first of all, because there is a monopoly power centralized in the state and secondly and critically because representative democracies limited to the political sphere and in no way, in a serious way encroaches on the economic sphere and anarchists of this traditional have always held that democratic control of one's productive life is at the core of any serious human liberation or for that matter insignificant democratic practice that is as long as there are as long as individuals are compelled to rent themselves on the market, to those who are willing to to hire them and as long as their role in production is simply that of answer to tools, then there are striking elements of coercion oppression but make talked of democracy very limited or even meaningful. &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;historically have it being india sustained and of course on the substantial scale of societies which approximated to the anarchist ideal? &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;there are small societies small in number that have i think done so quite well and there are a few examples of large-scale