Nope, goalposts are still right where they originally were. Barr said lack of evidence in report=no obstruction. Try to read better next time.

Also, you dropped a few lines for your narrative. Here, I picked them back up for you: "The Special Counsel's decision to describe the facts of his obstruction investigation without reaching any legal conclusions leaves it to the Attorney General to determine whether the conduct described in the report constitutes a crime."

He made an interpretation because of a lack of conclusion and outright says so.