Commitments and Contingencies Legal Proceedings The Company is involved in various claims and lawsuits in the normal course of business. As of June 30, 2013 , management did not believe any accruals were necessary in accordance with FASB ASC 450-20, Contingencies   Loss Contingencies . Shareholder Derivative Suits Say-on-Pay Litigation In June 2011, two separate shareholder derivative actions were filed purportedly on the Company s behalf in response to its failure to receive a majority advisory  say-on-pay  vote in favor of the Company s 2010 executive compensation. On June 8, 2011, the first action was filed in the District Court of Harris County, Texas, and on June 23, 2011, the second action was filed in the United States Court for the District of Delaware. Subsequently, on July 21, 2011, the plaintiff in the Harris County action filed a concurrent action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. Each action named the Company as a nominal defendant and certain of its officers and directors, as well as the Company s Compensation Committee s consultant, as defendants. Plaintiffs allege that the Company s directors breached their fiduciary duty by approving excessive executive compensation for 2010, that the Compensation Committee consultant aided and abetted that breach of fiduciary duty, that the officer defendants were unjustly enriched by receiving the allegedly excessive compensation, and that the directors violated the federal securities laws by disseminating a materially false and misleading proxy. The plaintiffs seek damages in an unspecified amount on the Company s behalf from the officer and director defendants, certain corporate governance actions, and an award of their costs and attorney s fees. The Company and the other defendants have filed motions to dismiss these cases for failure to make demand upon the Company s board and for failing to state a claim. On June 11, 2012, the plaintiff in the Harris County action voluntarily dismissed his action. On March 14, 2013, th