Commitments and Contingencies Legal proceedings In the ordinary course of business, the Company is a party to various lawsuits. Management does not expect these lawsuits to have a material impact on the liquidity, results of operations, or financial condition of the Company. On January 21, 2019, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio unsealed a qui tam complaint, filed in December 2015, against Mobile Care Group, Inc., Mobile Care Group of Ohio, LLC, Mobile Care EMS &amp; Transport, Inc. and LogistiCare Solutions, LLC (LogistiCare) by Brandee White, Laura Cunningham, and Jeffery Wisier (the Relators) alleging violations of the federal False Claims Act by presenting claims for payment to government healthcare programs knowing that the prerequisites for such claims to be paid had not been met. The Relators seek to recover damages, fees and costs under the federal False Claims Act including treble damages, civil penalties and attorneys fees. In addition, the Relators seek reinstatement to their jobs with the Mobile Care entities. None of the Relators were employed by LogistiCare. Prior to January 21, 2019, LogistiCare had no knowledge of the complaint. The federal government has declined to intervene against LogistiCare. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the Complaint on April 22, 2019, and believes that the case will not have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition or results of operations. On March 1, 2019, Meher Patel filed suit against the Company in the Superior Court of the State of California, Tuolumne County, on behalf of herself and as a class action on behalf of others similarly situated, asserting violations under the California Labor Code relating to the alleged failure by LogistiCare to comply with certain applicable state wage and related employment requirements, as well as claims of breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The plaintiff seeks to recover an unspecified amount of damages and penalties, as well as certification as a class action. On September 6, 2019, Ms. Patel amended her complaint to add Provado Mobile Health, a Company subsidiary, as a party to the suit. The Company and Provado Mobile Health have removed the case to the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California. The Company and its subsidiary intend to defend the litigation vigorously. Although the outcome of such matter is inherently uncertain and may be materially adverse, based on current information, the Company does not expect the case to have a material adverse effect on the Companys business, financial condition or results of operations. In Lynch v. Ride Plus et al., a putative class action lawsuit pending in the Superior Court for the County of San Diego, California, a former Ride Plus driver (trade name for Provado Mobile Health, a Company subsidiary) has sought to represent all Ride Plus drivers in California on claims identical to the Patel action. This suit has only recently been served on Provado Mobile Health. Provado Mobile Health plans to remove the case to federal court and combine it with the Patel action or move to stay it while the Patel action is pending, since the two actions cover the same subject matter. At this early stage in the litigation, it is impossible to predict with any certainty whether plaintiff will succeed in getting the court to certify a class, whether the plaintiff and the class, if certified, will prevail on their claims, or what they may recover. On April 1, 2019, a purported class action was filed against LogistiCare in Texas alleging that the Companys policy with respect to timekeeping for hourly employees constituted violations of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), as well as wage and hour laws in South Carolina and Texas. Plaintiffs filed a motion for conditional certification on a nationwide basis, which LogistiCare contested. The court granted the conditional certification motion on January 22, 2020. The Company filed an appeal of the conditional certification order. The Company also plans to vigorously contest the allegations on the merits as the plaintiffs have mischaracterized the method by which employees clock in to work. At this early stage in the litigation, it is impossible to predict with any certainty whether plaintiffs will prevail on their claims, or what they might recover. Indemnifications The Company provided certain standard indemnifications in connection with the sale of the Human Services segment to Molina Healthcare Inc. (Molina) effective November 1, 2015. Certain representations made by the Company in the related Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (the Purchase Agreement) including tax representations, survive until the expiration of applicable statutes of limitation. Molina and the Company entered into a settlement agreement regarding indemnification claims by Molina with respect to Rodriguez v. Providence Community Corrections (the Rodriguez Litigation), a complaint filed in the District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville Division, against Providence Community Corrections, Inc. (PCC), an entity sold under the Purchase Agreement. In 2019, the Company recovered a portion of the settlement through insurance coverage. The Company has provided certain standard indemnifications in connection with its Matrix stock subscription transaction whereby Mercury Fortuna Buyer, LLC (Subscriber), Providence and Matrix entered into a stock subscription agreement (the Subscription Agreement), dated August 28, 2016. The representations and warranties made by the Company in the Subscription Agreement ended January 19, 2018; however, certain fundamental representations survived through October 19, 2019. The covenants and agreements of the parties to be performed prior to the closing ended January 19, 2018, and all other covenants and agreements survived until the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations in the event of a breach, or for such lesser periods specified therein. The Company is not aware of any indemnification liabilities with respect to Matrix that require accrual at March 31, 2020. The Company has provided certain standard indemnifications in connection with the sale of substantially all of its WD Services segment to Advanced Personnel Management Global Pty Ltd of Australia (APM), which closed on December 21, 2018. The non-title warranties made by the Company in the related Share Purchase Agreement survive for 18 months following the closing date, and the title-related warranties and tax warranties survive five years from the closing date (i.e., December 21, 2023). The Company is not aware of any indemnification liabilities with respect to the former WD Services segment that require accrual at March 31, 2020 . On May 9, 2018, the Company entered into a registration indemnification agreement with Coliseum Capital Partners, L.P., Coliseum Capital Partners II, L.P., Blackwell Partners, LLC - Series A and Coliseum Capital Co-Invest, L.P. (collectively, the Coliseum Stockholders), who as of March 31, 2020 collectively held approximately 6.7% of the Companys outstanding common stock and approximately 95.9% of the Companys outstanding Preferred Stock, pursuant to which the Company has agreed to indemnify the Coliseum Stockholders, and the Coliseum Stockholders have agreed to indemnify the Company, against certain matters relating to the registration of the selling stockholders securities for resale under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act).