Hydrogen vs. Battery Electric Cars

I would love to say many things about this series, but unfortunately, I cannot be positive. The sponsorship is what makes it unbearable. Hearing things like "What would happen if you plug 4000 electric trucks all together at night?"... mhhh let me be the one that makes smart questions and respond. Considering that hydrogen is not found in nature but has to be produced artificially and that its efficiency is 70% over the 85/90% of electrical conversion I would say that I would result in 15% less energy consumption than the same amount of trucks that are using hydrogen. But let me discuss furthermore the argument, how do you move electrons through the country? Cables, already there and the energy required is? Minimal. How do you move hydrogen? Well, you do not produce it for sure in every hydrogen station, so it has to be transported in huge trucks. What is in common between all the huge trucks? That they consume a ton of energy to move. The full-electric conversion would eventually result in not only a better efficiency but would also reduce massively the number of trucks roaming every day around transporting physical fuels such as gasoline or hydrogen. So I would say that the smart response to the question is: It would be clearly better than 4000 hydrogen trucks.  I think the message is clear.

I do know that all the team of this channel is extremely smart and prepared, and I cannot imagine that all of you did not have already these answers. If you had them and choose to keep them out because it is a "sponsored video" and Toyota has a saying in what the message is. Well sorry to say that, but I do not have any interest in this content. I do not follow this channel to get partial information or at the best cherry-picking what to say. This is not an ad, is an informative video. Keep always in mind that the interest of a company is to sell their products, they do not care about what damage it may cause to your channel and after the second video I respond "credibility". Those videos sound like a pure advertisement, there is small knowledge and is all "tell me why you are so amazing".  If there is something that a science divulgator should NEVER do is cherry-picking the presentation of arguments to send a message that is clearly biased or not presenting the entire story. If you want to have a more relaxed channel with more "creative freedom" then probably it would be beneficial to shift away from the science divulgation to move toward more profitable approaches.