PhDThis study examines the rise of legalization and its consequences in the trade\ud
regime centred on the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the World\ud
Trade Organization (WTO).\ud
It observes a continued move to a higher level of legalization in the GATT/WTO\ud
over the past sixty years, although the ongoing expansion of legalization is uneven and\ud
imbalanced in many aspects.\ud
It also observes that the consequences of legalization are complicated. In\ud
particular, this study analyzest wo aspectso f the consequenceso f legalization, namely 1)\ud
the move to a higher degree of legalization in a particular subject area of the GATT/WTO\ud
corresponds to major changes on domestic legislations and practices in that subject area;\ud
and 2) a higher degree of legalization provides stronger incentives for WTO Members to\ud
build up institutional and legal capacity to more effectively utilize the GATT/WTO\ud
dispute settlement mechanism (DSM). Nevertheless, this study notes that the impact of\ud
legalization has limitations and legalization is only one of the many factors that shape the\ud
domestic systems and the strategic behaviour of trading parties.\ud
To exemplify the rise of legalization and its complicated consequencest,h is study\ud
empirically examines the pragmatic process of legalization and its consequences in a\ud
particular field of the GATT/W`I'O law - Anti-dumping (AD). It sketches the\ud
development of legalization in the multilateral AD framework by identifying increased\ud
obligation, greater precision and stronger delegation in the regime. It also explores the\ud
impact of international legalization on the European AD regime and China's AD-related\ud
dispute settlement activities.\ud
This study concludes that the evolution of the GATTIWTO system is an\ud
illustrative example of the phenomenal rise of legalization in international organizations.\ud
The consequences of the proliferation of legalization in the GATT/WTO are however\ud
complicated.\ud
Effort has been made to update the law and cases to 1 January 2008. For the\ud
integrity of the discussion, afew materials dated later than I January 2008 are included