The Big Misconception About Clean Energy

I think it would be useful to also show nuclear power plants when talking about clean energy. I know it's quite a sensible topic, but looking at the data nuclear energy could be incredibly useful. Lowest CO2-eq. emissions, lowest material requirements, lowest land use, lowest death rate, the data is clear that this source as clean as traditional renewables, if not more.
Moreover, if countries such as the US and those in the EU restarted building reactors in series, both construction costs and time would go down, and even now, countries that kept alive their nuclear program like South Korea are building reactors in other countries in decent time frames, like in the UAE, 7-8 years for 1.4 GW reactors that will live at least 60 years. That's quite a lot of reliable, baseload power, and the unused heat could be used for several things, such as hydrogen production, water desalinization and district heating, all things that we will need in the future.

Maybe an entire video on nuclear might be too much, but a general video on low-carbon sources would definitely be very educational! Most people see solar and wind energy as utopic energy sources, when they also have downside and cons, whereas for nuclear it seems only these are mentioned, but never the pros, which are quite a lot, especially considering we have to fight climate change and maintain energy security, all while significantly increasing such consumption.