It's Official: We Were WRONG About the Big Bang

The Big Bang theory is necessarily based upon a literal singularity such that all time and space 'originated'. The alternative to this was the Steady State theory meaning that going back in time, things had a 'steady' appearance and is thus infinite (that the apparent singularity is not indicative of increased density). The name, "Big Bang" was an insult by proponents of the Steady State theory PRECISELY because of that assumed singularity's literal existence. You'd go from absolutely nothing to an infinite amount of space within an instance of time and a magical quantity of some special fixed energy! That is the 'bang'. The BB theory should have been dismissed on purely logical grounds from the beginning and wasn't. [Mathematical boundaries require specifying the existence of real points at or outside the domain being bound or the approach (math limits) are 'open'. Then this permits the famous Zeno's paradoxes to literally express real contradictions at those points.

Given Steady State theory was dismissed upon flawed interpretation of what CAN constitute any logical disproof through the auspices of those supporting the Big Bang theory, yet the Big Bang theory persisted nevertheless for being profoundly anti-logical (unvarifiable infimum), the reasoning for ever keeping the Big Bang theory over the Steady State theory has to be political. [A deistic religious interpretation is at least permitted for Big Bang but Steady State would not require even  that, which would not likely aide in governments supporting science as well as it has.]