Commitments &amp; Contingencies Purchase Commitments (tons and gallons are not in thousands) The Company enters into purchase and supply agreements to secure supply and pricing of proppants and chemicals. As of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the agreements provide pricing and committed supply sources for the Company to purchas e 4,158,750 and 7,978,300 tons, respectively, of proppant through February 1, 2022. Amounts above also include commitments to pay for transport fees on minimum amounts of proppants or railcars. Additionally, related proppant transload service commitments extend through 2025. As of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the Company also had agreements that provide pricing and committed supply source for the purchase of 1,221,000 and 3,339,534 gallons, respectively, of chemicals through December 31, 2020. Future proppant, including rail car transport, and chemical commitments based on Company forecasts are as follows: ($ in thousands) Remainder of 2020 $ 62,684 2021 83,571 2022 18,701 2023 9,524 2024 10,268 Thereafter 7,664 $ 192,412 Certain supply agreements contain a clause whereby in the event that the Company fails to purchase minimum volumes, as defined in the agreement, during a specific time period, a shortfall fee may apply. In circumstances where the Company does not make the minimum purchases required under the contract, the Company and its suppliers have a history of amending such minimum purchase contractual terms and in rare cases does the Company incur such shortfall fees. If the Company were unable to make any of the minimum purchases and the Company and its suppliers cannot come to an agreement to avoid such fees, the Company could incur shortfall fees in the amounts of $44.1 million, $48.9 million, $18.6 million, $9.5 million, $10.3 million, and $7.7 million for the remainder of 2020 and years ended 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, and thereafter, respectively. Based on forecasted levels of activity, the Company does not currently expect to incur significant shortfall fees. Litigation Securities Class Actions On March 11, 2020, Marshall Cobb, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated, filed a putative class action lawsuit in the state District Court of Denver County, Colorado against the Company and certain officers and board members of the Company along with other defendants in connection with the IPO (the Cobb Complaint). The Cobb Complaint alleges that the Company and certain officers and board members of the Company violated Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 by virtue of inaccurate or misleading statements allegedly contained in the registration statement filed in connection with the IPO and requests unspecified damages and costs. The Cobb Plaintiffs also allege control person liability claims under Section 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 against certain officers and board members of the Company and other defendants. On April 3, 2020, Marc Joseph, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated, filed a putative class action lawsuit in the United States District Court in Denver, Colorado against the Company and certain officers and board members of the Company along with other defendants in connection with the IPO and requests unspecified damages and costs (the Joseph Complaint, and collectively with the Cobb Complaint, the Securities Lawsuits). The Joseph Complaint, which is based on similar factual allegations made in the Cobb Complaint, alleges that the defendants violated Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 by virtue of inaccurate or misleading statements allegedly contained in the registration statement and prospectus filed in connection with the IPO. The Joseph Complaint also alleges control person liability claims under Section 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 against certain officers and board members of the Company and other defendants. The Company has hired counsel and plans to vigorously defend against the allegations in the Securities Lawsuits. Other Litigation In addition to the matters described above, from time to time, the Company is subject to legal and administrative proceedings, settlements, investigations, claims and actions. The Companys assessment of the likely outcome of litigation matters is based on its judgment of a number of factors including experience with similar matters, past history, precedents, relevant financial and other evidence and facts specific to the matter. Notwithstanding the uncertainty as to the final outcome, based upon the information currently available, management does not believe any matters in aggregate will have a material adverse effect on its financial position or results of operations. The Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome or duration of any lawsuit described in this report.