It's Official: We Were WRONG About the Big Bang

I think we are still looking at the concept of the universe from too small an angle. We're still trying to make sense of the physics and the math outside the border of our understanding while perhaps we should just take a step back and look at a bigger picture. Space expanding: yes, that explains what we're observing (great analogy with the rising bread). Big Bang passé: probably makes sense. Everything starts some time, some how. Something from nothing is wrong. In our scope it may seem like the expanding universe "suddenly" started from nothing, but from the "outside", our universe could just be a thought or - watch it, I'm gonna say it - a program. Before the Big Bang, there was no program, then the "outside" started the program (called for instance "universe test version 503.027") and there we were an algorithm filled with a physics engine and some random mechanisms (read "quantum" mechanics). While our universe slugged through the billions of years and developed into what we experience now, from an "outside" view, the program may have just spent a few minutes getting to this point in our simulation (yes!). So are we expanding into something? yes and no. Say our universe (from our perspective) is an expanding bubble (bread). What's outside of this universe bubble has simply not been defined yet. There is no data yet. So, the word "nothing" comes pretty close, but once a bit more time has passed, more of that nothing has been "filled" with data (as the bubble expanded some more). So, from an "outside" point of view, we could say, our universe is expanding into "computer memory" of the "outside".
So where is "outside": anybody's guess. Could be a computer on an "outside" kid's desk or the mainframe in some "outside" university's simulation lab.
Parallel universes: Sure, why not. Given enough computer power, our "outside" kid can run 5 simulations at the same time (or a hundred...)

Quantum level physics and discrepancies with common sense: 
Take the double slit experiment: nobody observing, there is no need for the simulation to follow each photon. The program applies the wave logic. Some of us observing the photon, now there is a reason to calculate that kind of resolution, so the photons behave differently. Solved!
Information between entangled quantum particles travelling faster than the speed of light (like instantaneously): Why not: When the simulation is programmed to entangle information, it is only a matter of the "outside" program to determine that the state of one entangled particle has changed to then instantly change the state of the other particle. The information does not actually need to travel from particle to particle. 
Get it? Take a step back - outside.
What I am interested however, is how can we stirr up enough of a mess to get the attention of the "outside" so we can interact with them and find out more about the outside? Should that not be the goal of every physicist?