12. Commitments and Contingencies The following table summarizes the Companys future minimum commitments as of December 31, 2018 (in thousands): 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Thereafter Total Long term debt and related interest (1) $ 24,513 $ 26,825 $ 34,532 $ 34,683 $ 164,080 $  $ 284,633 Operating leases 12,279 11,634 8,169 4,615 4,774 13,287 54,758 Minimum royalty obligations (2) 4,684 2,383 159    7,226 New Revolving Credit Facility (3) 20,000      20,000 Total $ 61,476 $ 40,842 $ 42,860 $ 39,298 $ 168,854 $ 13,287 $ 366,617 (1) We estimated interest payments through the maturity of our New Credit Facilities by applying the effective interest rate of 5.53% in effect as of December 31, 2018 under our Term Loan A Facility. See Note 10, Debt. (2) Represents minimum guaranteed royalty payments under licensing arrangements. (3) Represents the amount owed as of December 31, 2018 under our New Revolving Credit Facility. License Agreements The Company enters into license agreements with various licensors of copyrighted and trademarked characters and design in connection with the products that it sells. The agreements generally require royalty payments based on product sales and in some cases may require minimum royalty and other related commitments. In January 2019, we renewed our licensing agreements with Disney and its controlled affiliates, LucasFilm and Marvel. As of December 31, 2018, we recorded a $2.0 million consent fee under our existing licensing agreements with Disney, which we subsequently paid. Employment Agreements The Company has employment agreements with certain officers. The agreements include, among other things, an annual bonus based on certain performance metrics of the Company, as defined by the board, and up to one years severance pay beyond termination date. Debt The Company has entered into a credit agreement which includes a term loan facility and a revolving credit facility. See Note 10, Debt. Leases The Company has entered into non-cancellable operating leases for office, warehouse, and distribution facilities, with original lease periods expiring through 2027. Some operating leases also contain the option to renew for five-year periods at prevailing market rates at the time of renewal. In addition to minimum rent, certain of the leases require payment of real estate taxes, insurance, common area maintenance charges, and other executory costs. Differences between rent expense and rent paid is recorded as deferred rent on the consolidated balance sheets. For certain leases we receive tenant improvement allowances and record those as deferred rent on the consolidated balance sheets and amortize the tenant improvement allowances on a straight-line basis over the lease term as a reduction of rent expense. Rent expense, net of sublease income, was $11.7 million, $6.1 million, and $3.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Liabilities under Tax Receivable Agreement As discussed in Note 11, Income Taxes, the Company is party to the Tax Receivable Agreement with FAH, LLC and each of the Continuing Equity Owners that provides for the payment by the Company to the Continuing Equity Owners of 85% of the amount of tax benefits, if any, that it realizes, or in some circumstances, is deemed to realize, as a result of (i) future redemptions funded by the Company or exchanges, or deemed exchanges in certain circumstances, of common units for Class A common stock or cash, and (ii) certain additional tax benefits attributable to payments made under the Tax Receivable Agreement. The Company is not obligated to make any payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement until the tax benefits associated with the transaction that gave rise to the payment are realized. Amounts payable under the Tax Receivable Agreement are contingent upon, among other things, (i) the generation of future taxable income over the term of the Tax Receivable Agreement and (ii) future changes in tax laws. If the Company does not generate sufficient taxable income in the aggregate over the term of the Tax Receivable Agreement to utilize the tax benefits, then it would not be required to make the related Tax Receivable Agreement payments. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recognized an additional liability in the amount of $6.8 million for the payments due to the redeeming members under the Tax Receivable Agreement, representing 85% of the aggregate tax benefits we expect to realize from the tax basis increases related to the redemption of FAH, LLC common units, after concluding it was probable that such Tax Receivable Agreement payments would be paid in the future based on our estimate of future taxable income. The Company did not record any liabilities for the Tax Receivable Agreement during the year ended December 31, 2017. There were no payments made pursuant to the Tax Receivable Agreement during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017. As of December 31, 2018, the Companys total obligation under the Tax Receivable Agreement, including accrued interest, was $6.8 million, of which $0.3 million was included in Accrued expenses and other current liabilities, and $6.5 million was included in Deferred rent and other long-term liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. There were no transactions subject to the Tax Receivable Agreement for which the Company did not recognize the related liability, as we concluded that it was probable that the Company would have sufficient future taxable income to utilize all of the related tax benefits. Legal Contingencies The Company is involved in claims and litigation in the ordinary course of business, some of which seek monetary damages, including claims for punitive damages, which are not covered by insurance. For certain pending matters, accruals have not been established because such matters have not progressed sufficiently through discovery, and/or development of important factual information and legal information is insufficient to enable the Company to estimate a range of possible loss, if any. An adverse determination in one or more of these pending matters could have an adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. We are, and may in the future become, subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in or outside the ordinary course of business. For example, on November 16, 2017, a purported stockholder of the Company filed a putative class action lawsuit in the Superior Court of Washington in and for King County against us, certain of our officers and directors, and the underwriters of our IPO, entitled Robert Lowinger v. Funko, Inc., et. al. In January and March 2018, five additional putative class action lawsuits were filed in Washington state court, four in the Superior Court of Washington in and for King County and one in the Superior Court of Washington in and for Snohomish County. Two of the King County lawsuits, Surratt v. Funko, Inc. et. al. (filed on January 16, 2018) and Baskin v. Funko, Inc. et. al. (filed on January 30, 2018), were filed against us and certain of our officers and directors. The other two King County lawsuits, The Ronald and Maxine Linde Foundation v. Funko, Inc. et. al. (filed on January 18, 2018) and Lovewell v. Funko, Inc. et. al (filed on March 27, 2018), were filed against us, certain of our officers and directors, ACON, Fundamental and certain other defendants. The Snohomish County lawsuit, Berkelhammer v. Funko, Inc. et. al. (filed on March 13, 2018), was filed against us, certain of our officers and directors, and ACON. On May 8, 2018, the Berkelhammer action was voluntarily dismissed, and on May 15, 2018 a substantially similar action was filed by the same plaintiff in the Superior Court of Washington in and for King County. On April 2, 2018, a putative class action lawsuit Jacobs v. Funko, Inc. et. al was filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington against the Company, certain of its officers and directors, and certain other defendants. On May 21, 2018 the Jacobs action was voluntarily dismissed, and on June 12, 2018 a substantially similar action was filed by the same plaintiff in the Superior Court of Washington in and for King County. On July 2, 2018, all of the above-referenced suits were ordered consolidated for all purposes into one action under the title In re Funko, Inc. Securities Litigation in the Superior Court of Washington in and for King County. On August 1, 2018, plaintiffs filed a consolidated complaint against the Company, certain of its officers and directors, ACON, Fundamental, and certain other defendants. On October 1, 2018, we moved to dismiss that action. Plaintiffs filed their opposition to our motion to dismiss on October 31, 2018, and we filed our reply to plaintiffs opposition on November 30, 2018. Additionally, on June 4, 2018, a putative class action lawsuit Kanugonda v. Funko, et al. was filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington against the Company, certain of its officers and directors, and certain other defendants. On January 4, 2019, a lead plaintiff was appointed in that case. The complaints in both state and federal court allege that we violated Sections 11, 12, and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, by making allegedly materially misleading statements and by omitting material facts necessary to make the statements made therein not misleading. The lawsuits seek, among other things, compensatory statutory damages and rescissory damages in account of the consideration paid for our Class A common stock by plaintiff and members of the putative class, as well as attorneys fees and costs. The Company believes it has meritorious defenses to the claims of the plaintiff and members of the class and any liability for the alleged claims is not currently probable or reasonably estimable.