Commitments and Contingencies Commitments We lease our corporate operations, manufacturing, assembly, design, testing and research and development facilities, which is located at our campus in Lake Forest, California. The operating leases are scheduled to expire beginning on May 31, 2018; however, we have the option to extend the lease until May 31, 2020 for one facility and May 31, 2025 for the remaining two facilities. As of December 31, 2014, the monthly lease payment was $163,472. We incurred rent expense of $1,775,323 in 2014 and $2,308,537 in 2013. At December 31, 2014, minimum future lease commitments for our continuing operations under non-cancelable operating leases for facilities and equipment having lease terms in excess of one year are payable as follows: Lease Commitments 2015 $ 1,695,293 2016 1,531,362 2017 1,577,325 2018 1,624,662 2019 1,673,400 Thereafter 4,568,271 Total minimum lease payments $ 12,670,313 Litigation Management and our legal counsel periodically review the probable outcome of pending proceedings and the costs reasonably expected to be incurred. We accrue for these costs when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. On June 6, 2013, Iroquois Master Fund Ltd (Iroquois) filed suit against us in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the Complaint). In the Complaint, Iroquois asserted that the registered direct offering we completed on May 16, 2013 triggered the full-ratchet anti dilution reset provision contained in its October 2006 Warrant contract and, as a result, the exercise price of its October 2006 Warrant should have been adjusted downward to $0.932 and the number of shares underlying its October 2006 Warrant proportionately increased. Although we did adjust the exercise price to $1.5142 effective as of August 2, 2013 and increased the number of warrants pursuant to our interpretation of the applicable provisions of the October 2006 Warrant, Iroquois claimed that we were in breac