The REAL Fight Over AI Art

Remember that digital art and artists also was a deathblow to the classical artist, a digital artist could make art without material and and studio and they could later print millions of copies that could be sold cheaply at stores like IKEA. But the truth was that oil become more exclusive and that the artists adapted to something that digital artists had harder to do, they used their and the customers fingers (print) to make sure the painting was an original.
Now digital artists are afraid of AI art, many will not be able to adapt and AI will remove all bad artists from the market, left are those that have a own style that are easy to identify and also a understanding of the weakness of AI art.
AI art will be what the mobile phone was for photography, more can now be a photographer but maybe not make money of it, and now many will be able to create art they like so all can be an artist, and that be able to make art is never bad.

If you want to know the weakness of AI, ask for a cartoon with a punchline, or an advert over several images that together builds a larger image with a story told in each of them, Like if I ask an artist to make four images of a tree for each season, but that the last image shall depict the tree as fallan and dead with a crashed car nearby; today an AI will not be able to do that. There is some AI artist that can do things like that with inpainting and so on, but then is the question why those are not seen as artists when it is a art to be able to generate an exact image in that way; with exact image I'm speaking about that it follow the customers exact description and that the tree and landscape do not look differently in each generation.

I see a great future afo art and artists, so I like your positive approach in this video and I hope less folk fall for the dark fear propaganda of AI.