He was a powerful king whose break with the church of Rome would forever change  the course of English history. But was he a charismatic reformer or a bullying tyrant? Find out on History versus Henry VIII. Judge: Order, order. Now, who do we have here? Looks like quite the dashing fellow. Defense: Indeed, your honour.  This is Henry VIII, the acclaimed king who reformed England's religion and government and set it on course to becoming a modern nation. Prosecutor: I beg to differ. This is a cruel, impulsive, and extravagant king who had as little regard for his  people as he did for his six wives. Judge: Six wives? Defense: Your honor, Henry's first  marriage was arranged for him when he was only a child. He only married Catherine of Aragon to  strengthen England’s alliance with Spain. Prosecutor: An alliance he was willing to  toss aside with no regard for the nation. Defense: Henry had every  regard for the nation. It was imperative to secure the Tudor  dynasty by producing a male heir – something Catherine failed to do in  over twenty years of marriage. Prosecutor: It takes two to make an heir, your honor. Defense: Ahem. Regardless, England needed a new queen to ensure stability, but the Pope refused to annul the union  and let the king remarry. Judge: Sounds like quite a pickle.  Can’t argue with the Pope. Prosecutor: And yet that’s exactly  what the king decided to do. He uprooted the country’s  religious foundations and broke the Church of England  away from Rome, leading to centuries of strife. Defense: All Henry did was give the  Church honest domestic leadership. He freed his subjects from the corrupt  Roman Catholic establishment. And by rejecting the more radical changes of the Protestant reformation, he allowed his people to preserve  most of their religious traditions. Prosecutor: Objection! The Church had been a beloved and popular institution that brought comfort and  charity to the masses. Thanks to Henry, church  property was seized; hospitals closed, and precious monastic  libraries lost forever, all to enrich the Crown. Defense: Some of the funds  were used to build new cathedrals and open secular schools. And it was necessary for England  to bring its affairs under its own control rather than Rome’s. Prosecutor: You mean under  Henry’s control. Defense: Not true. All of the king’s  major reforms went through Parliament. No other country of the time allowed its people such a say in government. Prosecutor: He used Parliament as a rubber stamp for his own personal will. Meanwhile he ruled like a tyrant, executing those he suspected of disloyalty. Among his victims were the great  statesman and philosopher Thomas More – once his close friend and advisor – and Anne Boleyn, the new queen  Henry had torn the country apart to marry. Judge: He executed his own wife? Defense: That…wasn’t  King Henry’s initiative. She was accused of treason in a power struggle with the King’s minister,  Thomas Cromwell. Prosecutor: The trial was a sham and she wouldn’t have been convicted without Henry’s approval. Besides, he wasn’t too upset by the outcome - he married Jane Seymour  just 11 days later! Defense: A marriage that, I note, succeeded in producing a male heir and guaranteeing a stable succession… though the new queen tragically died in childbirth. Prosecutor: This tragedy didn’t deter him from an ill conceived fourth  marriage to Anne of Cleves, which Henry then annulled on a whim and  used as an excuse to execute Cromwell. As if that weren’t enough, he then  married Catherine Howard – a cousin of Anne Boleyn –  before having her executed too. Defense: She was engaged in adultery  to which she confessed! Regardless, Henry’s final marriage to Catherine Parr was actually very successful. Prosecutor: His sixth! It only goes to show he was an intemperate king who allowed faction and intrigue to rule his court, concerned only with his own  pleasure and grandiosity. Defense: That grandiosity was part of the  king’s role as a model for his people. He was a learned scholar and musician who generously patronized the arts, as well as being an imposing  warrior and sportsman. And the lavish tournaments he hosted enhanced England’s reputation on the world stage. Prosecutor: And yet both his foreign and  domestic policies were a disaster. His campaigns in France and his brutal invasion of Scotland drained the treasury, and his attempt to pay for it by debasing  the coinage led to constant inflation. The lords and landowners responded  by removing access to common pastures and turning the peasant  population into beggars. Defense: Beggars who would soon  become yeomen farmers. The enclosures made farming more  efficient, and created a labor surplus that laid the foundation for the Industrial Revolution. England would never have become the  great power that it did without them …and without Henry. Judge: Well, I think no matter what, we can all agree he looks great  in that portrait. A devout believer who broke  with the Church. A man of learning who executed scholars. A king who brought stability to the throne, but used it to promote his own glory, Henry VIII embodied all the contradictions of monarchy on the verge of the modern era. But separating the ruler from the myth is all part of putting history on trial.