Turkey-Greece Standoff in the Mediterranean Explained

Though the illustrations are well prepared,  the presentation content is far from being accurate:
1- Greece can have little or no claim in the Eastern Mediterranean per the international maritime laws,  but only Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, Israel, Palestine,  Egypt, Libya and Cyprus, - which should further be negotiated between the Turks and Greeks living on the island;
2- Greece tries to base main part of its claim through an island named Meis, which is just 2 (yes two) nautical miles from mainland Turkey,  yet some 350 plus nautical miles from Greek mainland, which is just 10 square km, and per Greek claims generates 40,000 square km territorial waters and/or EEZ.
     International maritime laws treats island countries and islands that are part of a mainland country differently. Islands that belong to a mainland country have limited territorial water than island countries; that is why Greek Islands were given 3 nautical miles of territorial waters with Lausanne Treaty. So, your comparison of the case between an island country Sri Lanka and India is wrong. Even in that case you see Sri Lanka's is limited around itself. A better example would be those English Islands in English channel in French waters; limited around themselves. Hence, the term continental shelf, not islandical, but continental. Greeks are trying to make a wise move to increase the territorial waters around their Islands to 12 nautical miles,  but of course to no avail; Turks are neither sheeps nor scapegoats to go after, what is rightfully theirs, by a myriad of examples around the globe. Also keep in mind that though there seems to be so many Greek islands, their coastline totals up 160 km, whereas that of Turkey's to around 1800 km in that region.
3- The agreement between Libya and Turkey is already rated by the UN as legitimate. 
4- Maybe more importantly,  Turkish map shows its territorial water claims on its continental shelf not their EEZ. Territorial water claims give you the rights to underground resources,  i.e. gas/oil reserves, EEZ in water resources,  fish etc. And one cannot claim EEZ on another country's territorial waters; it would be like holding a neighborhood barbecue party in a neighbor's backyard, let alone without inviting them, without even a permission., which is a good analogy for this case, as Israel, Cyprus and Greece have not invited Turkey to such a joint venture, -Eastmed. That project would be so costly without the involvement of Turkey,  that it can nowhere be even near feasible. 
5- The agreement between Egypt and Greece cannot supercede the one between Libya and Turkey, which is again rated by the UN as legitimate. 
Turkey will of course go for a fair deal per its proven track record, and of course whatever its rights should be by those examples around the globe, but no less; however,  would again righteously not abide by any level illegitimate, street-smart but unfounded claims.
I hope you do all due diligence on all aforementioned and redo the video; it would be such informative and so much more fun to watch. Still congratulations!