Dear God. This line of questioning is why people who aren't experienced in examing a witness, especially cross-examining, shouldn't be the only ones conducting such questioning. Also, in a trial, the moment his answer is not responsive to the question he gets cut off. This is what should have happened. "stop. The question is: x". The minute he starts with a nonresponsive narrative you stop him. You also ask yes or no questions with no room for explanation. Period. This testimony should be a way bigger deal than it is now. Would Muller agree? Yes or no? The minute he starts saying more than 1 word in response you stop him. Say it's a yes or no question and wait for him to say he won't answer. Man. Fuck this guy. Seriously, this is the AG? I just passed the hardest bar exam in the country and damn, this is still infuriating to someone with very little experience. Unbelievable.