So you did not read the entire report, which would have taken you around an hour, to lay down supporting evidence to use. Instead all you can repeat is 2 words, "no collusion" of which is very debatable. Since if you have people working under you, you know what they are doing and are responsible for them. T.D. used plausible deniability. I would like to see you debate the contents of the report, which you should take a short while out of your day to read. Let me know once you have actually read the very thing you are arguing for. Don't waste people's time until then.