The Big Misconception About Clean Energy

The argument of this video is really good but the presentation of it is less so because, holy out of context Thunberg batman. This video uses so many clips of Greta and others talking about climate change and how we should be using less fossil fuels and they're presented with a heavy implication that they're somehow wrong or lying to us and/or arguing that the only thing we can or should do is no energy, of any kind, at all, ever again. And they're not doing that! They're specifically advocating that we use less of a *specific kind of energy*. That context matters. Also, the goal is not just "more energy", it is more *of a specific kind of energy*. And this video makes that argument, but it shouldn't be relegated to the nuance of the video, it should be the headline/title! But Cleo's too busy looking for a snappy slogan to throw over a catchy beat or shiny graphic to realize that people in the climate space have been making this exact argument for years now. This isn't a new realization or argument. The title makes this video seem like a "here's why you should turn all your lights on, put your fans on at full blast, and just have your stove on high heat 24/7" video, and it's not that kind of video at all. Mostly, I just wish that the title didn't present this as a mutually exclusive binary choice of "more energy or less energy" and presented the video as it really is, which is "more clean energy AND less polluting/dirty energy"