NEW RESULTS! Cosmic Quantum Bell Test

Are you familiar with Conway-Kochen Free Will Theorem? It's a variation on the Kochen-Specker Theorem, whixh itself is a variation on Bell's Theorem.

While the authors use free will as a premise and claim their theorem proves that particles have free will, I think this is a gross error in philosophy made by a talented mathematician and a talented physicits (but not a philosopher who studies free will). Instead, in my opinion, what they actually showed is that there is a version of Bell's theorem that has no flaws so long as you don't accept that whatever random set you use to determine your settings correlates with the predictions of quantum mechanics. (Obviously not a precise defonition, the language usually used is that there is no "sensible" version of quantum mechanics, but that language doesn't fully convey ot either.)

You could use the digits of pi, a "random" number generator, the weather, anything you like. You could also use this dataset generated live by starlight. Unless every possible dataset you can use to generate your settings correlates perfectly to conspire to prevent a vioation of the inequality, then the true randomness in quantum mechanocs must be real.

To me, that was a much better use of Conway-Kochen and it defeats Bohm's theorem. The experiment in this video, while cool and useful and great for making videos like this, offers very little that is actually new.