Commitments and Contingencies Litigation Between June 14, 2019 and June 27, 2019, six complaints were filed against us in state and federal court in San Francisco alleging violations of securities laws in connection with disclosures made in connection with our IPO and thereafter. The plaintiffs in those cases are seeking to have the cases certified as class actions, and also seek damages and legal fees. At this time, it is not reasonably possible to determine the ultimate resolution of, or estimate the liability related to, these matters. As of the filing of this report, Pivotal is aware of six complaints related to the Merger Agreement having been filed: Briant v. Pivotal Software, Inc. , No. 1:19-cv-09479 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 14, 2019); Plumley v. Pivotal Software, Inc. , No. 1:19-cv-01974 (D. Del. Oct. 17, 2019); Shan v. Pivotal Software, Inc. , No. 3:19-cv-06814 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2019); Silverberg v. Pivotal Software, Inc. , No. 3:19-cv-06977 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2019); Rothman v. Pivotal Software, Inc. , No. 3:19-cv-07066 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2019); and Parada v. Pivotal Software, Inc. , No. 1:19-cv-06306 (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 7, 2019). The complaints are brought by putative stockholders against Pivotal and members of our board of directors and the Pivotal Special Committee. The Shan complaint also names VMware and Merger Sub as defendants. Among other things, the complaints allege that the disclosures in our proxy statement filings violate the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. In addition, the Shan complaint alleges that members of our board of directors breached their fiduciary duties in connection with the board of directors approval of the Merger Agreement. The plaintiffs in these cases seek various forms of relief, including unspecified monetary damages, legal fees, and injunctive relief enjoining consummation of the Merger. The plaintiffs in all actions other than Briant and Parada seek to have their cases certified as class actions. The defendants, including Pivotal and the members of the Pivotal Special Committee and our board of directors, believe that the claims asserted in these lawsuits are without merit. Nevertheless, the outcomes of these lawsuits are uncertain and cannot be predicted with any certainty. Stockholders have delivered two demand letters to our board of directors under Section 220 of the Delaware General Corporation Law for various books and records related to the Merger Agreement. We are committed to cooperating with our stockholders in responding to reasonable records requests that comply with applicable law. In addition, from time to time, we are involved in legal proceedings and subject to claims arising in the ordinary course of our business. Although the results of litigation and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, we currently believe that the resolution of these ordinary course matters will not have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, financial condition or cash flows. Even if any particular litigation is not resolved in a manner that is adverse to our interests, such litigation can have a negative impact on us because of defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources from our business and other factors. Warranties and Indemnification Our software is generally warranted to perform substantially in accordance with the subscription agreement. Our contracts generally include provisions for indemnifying customers against liabilities if our services infringe or misappropriate a third partys intellectual property rights. Costs and liabilities incurred as a result of warranties and indemnification obligations were not material during the periods presented and no liability has been recognized relating to these obligations.