What is a Black Hole? - Stephen Hawking's final theory

Is not the only theory to be violated. Look at supersymmetry, look plasma ray emitting by big quasars (black holes). According with some scientist you got an electron flux and positron in the opposite direction.
So, the black hole destroy matter, and for magnetic/gravitational reasons something can excape trough magnetic pole. And this seems to be a simmetric process.
Do you agree?
So, why we have only a matter filled universe?
Why matter distribution is not homogeneous?
Why we need obscure energy and/or matter to justify inflation and mass/energy incongruencies?

Probably some answears are in black holes.
You cannot observe things over event orizon but you can immagine. 
The nature is fractal, so some events are stable until mass/energy are quite enough to get them instable.
There is a work done by vidotto and rovelli.
The best thing we can do is to observe what we can see (strange stars and died stars) and replicate it over  a more powerful gravity, a more dense object.
But the real question is, yes. The object (black hole) is stable, but what is his natural stability limit? What will happen after?
How it transform matter in his inside? (how much of this we can simulate at CERN?).
What happen after particle destruction, can them reasamble? And if yes in what way?
Can we observe gamma ray emitting by this object in some ways? Can this been caused by a matter / antimatter collisions?
And, at the end for another time,
What can be energetic/gravity limit for a stability in this system?
Probably answears can arrive naturally observing it for 5-15 billion of yesrs but I'd like to discover it until my life.