Reflection of Visualization tool.

 Challenge and selection

The primary instrument I utilized was the apparatus of Visualization to accomplish a  mutual comprehension of an issue space among a various gathering of partners before  endeavoring to recognize and characterize potential answers for the issue. I utilize this  methodology regularly with our clients, who are business women/men attempting to  apply innovation advancements to modernize their crucial the conveyance of their  administrations to their client. The misleading method has used the problem area with  clarification of many inquiries or claims to allow the gathering of different partners to  benefit from each other during the time spent describing the problem and discovering  solutions, key causes and linkages between problems that must be taken into account  while identifying error points and opening doors for improvements or new arrangements  beyond the familiar.

 Application

Firstly, I begin with creating a graphic of the problem domain. To develop the graphic, I  will draw use any existing tools to understand the environment. In the event that  materials are not accessible, at that point I direct casual meetings with one-three of the  partners who fill in as my central matters of contact on the activity. After that I gathered  all the information I got from them to clear the vision of the problem I’m facing. So  within the new information I stated to create new layers into my graphic so that will be  easier to understand the situation and find the perfect solution by completing the flow  chart I used earlier to bring out the best I can on this graphic.

As in the activity, I will divide the stakeholders into groups of 3 participants each  representing a different organization or area of interest. Each group receives a poster-size  copy of A3 problem graphic that they can write on directly, or use sticky notes to make  comments. I give them two-three questions to answer and I give them approximately 20  minutes to discuss the questions and mark up the graphic. Then I have each group present  their answers to those questions while pointing to the mark-ups on their poster. As each  group presenting, I record commonalities in the insights of each group, and then  additional insights that come from the group discussion on an additional copy of the  graphic. After the session, I digitize each group’s poster as an artifact, create a view that  combines the shared and new insights from the group discussion, and then create a  revised graphic that incorporates their feedback and proposed changes that they agreed to  as a group.

 Insight and Approach

The experience I got from doing this exercise with several groups is that the graphic is  important for reinforcing their understanding of the problem they are working to solve,  the more valuable aspect of the activity is the shared insights and shared learning that  occurs while they are working to define their problem space. The graphic gives them a  clear vision of the problem they share and by understand the real problem and adding the  ideas they got from braining storm they got out of the box. By the graphic they used and  the draws they quickly identify where they are in the graphic or if they are missing and  can more quickly gain new insights about relationships between key entities instead of  taking time to identify them. They can also identify variables in the problem space that is,  it helps them to identify what they don’t know, in what areas they need to obtain  information or data to provide the values for the variables.

As I'm doing this activity I discovered that the most valuable aspect is the shared insights  and learning, next time I would use the visualization activity as a starting point for a  series of design thinking activities. Then the revised graphic that incorporates their  combined feedback can serve as a reference tool throughout the remainder of their hard  work.


Reflection of Visualization tool .  Challenge and selection The primary instrument I utilized was the apparatus of Visualization to accomplish a mutual comprehension of an issue space among a various gathering of partners before endeavoring to recognize and characterize potential answers for the issue . I utilize this methodology regularly with our clients , who are business women / men attempting to apply innovation advancements to modernize their crucial the conveyance of their administrations to their client . The misleading method has used the problem area with clarification of many inquiries or claims to allow the gathering of different partners to benefit from each other during the time spent describing the problem and discovering solutions , key causes and linkages between problems that must be taken into account while identifying error points and opening doors for improvements or new arrangements beyond the familiar .  Application Firstly , I begin with creating a graphic of the problem domain . To develop the graphic , I will draw use any existing tools to understand the environment . In the event that materials are not accessible , at that point I direct casual meetings with one - three of the partners who fill in as my central matters of contact on the activity . After that I gathered all the information I got from them to clear the vision of the problem I ’m facing . So within the new information I stated to create new layers into my graphic so that will be easier to understand the situation and find the perfect solution by completing the flow chart I used earlier to bring out the best I can on this graphic . As in the activity , I will divide the stakeholders into groups of 3 participants each representing a different organization or area of interest . Each group receives a poster - size copy of A3 problem graphic that they can write on directly , or use sticky notes to make comments . I give them two - three questions to answer and I give them approximately 20 minutes to discuss the questions and mark up the graphic . Then I have each group present their answers to those questions while pointing to the mark - ups on their poster . As each group presenting , I record commonalities in the insights of each group , and then additional insights that come from the group discussion on an additional copy of the graphic . After the session , I digitize each group ’s poster as an artifact , create a view that combines the shared and new insights from the group discussion , and then create a revised graphic that incorporates their feedback and proposed changes that they agreed to as a group .  Insight and Approach The experience I got from doing this exercise with several groups is that the graphic is important for reinforcing their understanding of the problem they are working to solve , the more valuable aspect of the activity is the shared insights and shared learning that occurs while they are working to define their problem space . The graphic gives them a clear vision of the problem they share and by understand the real problem and adding the ideas they got from braining storm they got out of the box . By the graphic they used and the draws they quickly identify where they are in the graphic or if they are missing and can more quickly gain new insights about relationships between key entities instead of taking time to identify them . They can also identify variables in the problem space that is , it helps them to identify what they do n’t know , in what areas they need to obtain information or data to provide the values for the variables . As I 'm doing this activity I discovered that the most valuable aspect is the shared insights and learning , next time I would use the visualization activity as a starting point for a series of design thinking activities . Then the revised graphic that incorporates their combined feedback can serve as a reference tool throughout the remainder of their hard work .