Design Thinking application.

Challenge and Selection.

Within the growth plans in the company where I work, the principal idea for this year is  that employees who want to present an idea that can help someone or even  themselves, develop it through the methodology of Design Thinking. Although there is  no limitation of ideas and there maybe to many, the main objective is to contribute to  the paradigm shift of the company and together make it grow.

For this we met with my coworkers and we thought about what process we could  improve in our daily tasks and after a lot of discussion we said: “Let’s use the Mind  Mapping Tool” to solve our “great problem”, development a validation Tool for internal  use. One tool that let us certificate the correct performance of our products and this  validation must be done in a few minutes.

Application:

To start, we generated some questions about our daily tasks and most of all these  questions were answered immediately and almost did not allow generating a new idea  to solve or at least start in the development of the idea. So we decided to forget about  our role and we selected the most experienced person to act as a kind of client. The  rest of the team began by unlocking the problem that our client presented to us: THERE  ARE NO TOOLS TO VALIDATE.

Basically on a board and with the help of some post-it, we start writing verbs about  tools, validation, because they do not exist, time. Then we group these verbs and from  here the generation of questions that we would ask the most experienced person  began.

After conducting the interview, we realized that if there are validation tools, but they  take too much time and within each test that must be done there is a different tool, so  we concluded that it would be good to have a tool that be done all validation in a single  process.

Insight & Approach

All the time we are "designing" things, from the route that we are going to take in the  morning to our work, the lunch that we are going to take, the follow-up strategy to carry  out my tasks, but rarely we sit down to analyze if things tools that we use on a day-to- day basis are like this because they are objectively designed or if they have an object  of study that determines at the time that it was the best implementation to work well.

It is to create the type of thought that promotes the design of thought, where we can  realize that it is enough for me or if on the contrary things can be improved or on the  contrary generate new tools or alternatives from the use case. Consider that this is the  biggest gain that this leather leaves me, the analysis if any situation, tool, maritime  situation of my work or daily life, can improve through the renewal of the environment.

On the other hand, consider that in an upcoming analysis situation, you would try to  analyze the problem as an external agent. Although in this exercise we knew the tools  and their operation and what we want us to improve, I think it would be better if the  "problems" were approached from the outside in order to analyze everything from a  more exponential point of view and not be carried out for the knowledge you have. (try  to get out of the known situation).


Design Thinking application . Challenge and Selection . Within the growth plans in the company where I work , the principal idea for this year is that employees who want to present an idea that can help someone or even themselves , develop it through the methodology of Design Thinking . Although there is no limitation of ideas and there maybe to many , the main objective is to contribute to the paradigm shift of the company and together make it grow . For this we met with my coworkers and we thought about what process we could improve in our daily tasks and after a lot of discussion we said : “ Let ’s use the Mind Mapping Tool ” to solve our “ great problem ” , development a validation Tool for internal use . One tool that let us certificate the correct performance of our products and this validation must be done in a few minutes . Application : To start , we generated some questions about our daily tasks and most of all these questions were answered immediately and almost did not allow generating a new idea to solve or at least start in the development of the idea . So we decided to forget about our role and we selected the most experienced person to act as a kind of client . The rest of the team began by unlocking the problem that our client presented to us : THERE ARE NO TOOLS TO VALIDATE . Basically on a board and with the help of some post - it , we start writing verbs about tools , validation , because they do not exist , time . Then we group these verbs and from here the generation of questions that we would ask the most experienced person began . After conducting the interview , we realized that if there are validation tools , but they take too much time and within each test that must be done there is a different tool , so we concluded that it would be good to have a tool that be done all validation in a single process . Insight & Approach All the time we are " designing " things , from the route that we are going to take in the morning to our work , the lunch that we are going to take , the follow - up strategy to carry out my tasks , but rarely we sit down to analyze if things tools that we use on a day - to- day basis are like this because they are objectively designed or if they have an object of study that determines at the time that it was the best implementation to work well . It is to create the type of thought that promotes the design of thought , where we can realize that it is enough for me or if on the contrary things can be improved or on the contrary generate new tools or alternatives from the use case . Consider that this is the biggest gain that this leather leaves me , the analysis if any situation , tool , maritime situation of my work or daily life , can improve through the renewal of the environment . On the other hand , consider that in an upcoming analysis situation , you would try to analyze the problem as an external agent . Although in this exercise we knew the tools and their operation and what we want us to improve , I think it would be better if the " problems " were approached from the outside in order to analyze everything from a more exponential point of view and not be carried out for the knowledge you have . ( try to get out of the known situation ) .