Assignment Rubric

Elements  Criteria  Score

1. Challenge    challenge including all relevant information

some information

The  challenge

Feedback    NA

2. Selection

The submission provides a detailed description of the selected  tool including all relevant information (e.g., what it is and why  the author selected it for his/her challenge -- including any  appropriate video lecture references)

The submission describes the selected tool including some  information (e.g., what it is and why the author selected it for  his/her challenge -- including any appropriate video lecture  references)

The submission does not sufficiently describe the selected tool  1

Feedback

by...

NA

3. Application  The submission provides a detailed description of applying the  selected tool including all relevant information (e.g., what the  author did and how the tool was applied  effectively/ineffectively)

The submission describes applying the selected tool including  some information (e.g., what the author did and how the tool  was applied effectively/ineffectively)

The submission does not sufficiently describe applying the  selected tool

Feedback

improved by...

NA

4. Insight  The submission provides a detailed description of the insight  gained including all relevant information (e.g., how an insight

about design thinking more broadly)

The submission describes the insight gained by including some

nking

about his/her challenge and about design thinking more  broadly)

The submission does not sufficiently describe the insight  gained by the author

Feedback    NA

5. Approach  The submission provides a detailed description of an  alternative approach including all relevant information (e.g.,  applying the same selected tool or a different one and the  reason(s) why)

The submission describes an alternative approach including  some information (e.g., applying the same selected tool or a  different one and the reason(s) why)

The submission does not sufficiently describe an alternative  approach

Feedback    NA

6. Organization  The submission is clear, compelling, and succinct; descriptions  flow logically

The submission is an appropriate length; some descriptions are  unclear or do not flow logically

The submission is either underdeveloped or overly wordy;  1

descriptions are unclear or difficult to follow

Feedback    NA

7. Additional  Feedback

While reviewing this submission, I was inspired by...  NA


Assignment Rubric Elements Criteria Score 1 . Challenge challenge including all relevant information some information The challenge Feedback NA 2 . Selection The submission provides a detailed description of the selected tool including all relevant information ( e.g. , what it is and why the author selected it for his / her challenge -- including any appropriate video lecture references ) The submission describes the selected tool including some information ( e.g. , what it is and why the author selected it for his / her challenge -- including any appropriate video lecture references ) The submission does not sufficiently describe the selected tool 1 Feedback by ... NA 3 . Application The submission provides a detailed description of applying the selected tool including all relevant information ( e.g. , what the author did and how the tool was applied effectively / ineffectively ) The submission describes applying the selected tool including some information ( e.g. , what the author did and how the tool was applied effectively / ineffectively ) The submission does not sufficiently describe applying the selected tool Feedback improved by ... NA 4 . Insight The submission provides a detailed description of the insight gained including all relevant information ( e.g. , how an insight about design thinking more broadly ) The submission describes the insight gained by including some nking about his / her challenge and about design thinking more broadly ) The submission does not sufficiently describe the insight gained by the author Feedback NA 5 . Approach The submission provides a detailed description of an alternative approach including all relevant information ( e.g. , applying the same selected tool or a different one and the reason(s ) why ) The submission describes an alternative approach including some information ( e.g. , applying the same selected tool or a different one and the reason(s ) why ) The submission does not sufficiently describe an alternative approach Feedback NA 6 . Organization The submission is clear , compelling , and succinct ; descriptions flow logically The submission is an appropriate length ; some descriptions are unclear or do not flow logically The submission is either underdeveloped or overly wordy ; 1 descriptions are unclear or difficult to follow Feedback NA 7 . Additional Feedback While reviewing this submission , I was inspired by ... NA