Selection

As per assignment I decided to explore and choose learning tool to achieve desired output for the task at hand.

The main reason to opt for this particular tool is that, we have explored various methods in the past also and have

numerous rounds of meeting to improve quality of output and achieve desired result but failed to move the needle

towards desired outcome. we felt as a group to try and implement learning tool as many team members judged it

to be suitable for progress.

Application

After closely analysing existing situation and deliberating it over a couple of months we have realised that the

quality of research paper was not up to the mark wrt to design. First, we decided to analyse the existing creatives

for research papers. The research service is already mature, but it hasn't grown anymore. Various hypotheses and

discussions were done to find out reason. Including In-depth interviews, focused group studied were conducted

with several people to verify the hypothesis. There were many interviewees, including research users, publishers,

illustrators, students, teachers and many others. Through the interview results, we found problems with existing

research service. People just wanted to write and many of them had very lilted interest or inclination for projecting

and design of the research article. For them, research design was a difficult task. So, we focused on the editor

so that we could focus only on writing and giving content for research article. The prototype was made, and the

team members tested and completed. After the design service was completed, CBT was conducted in-house, and

the modification was repeated again. And finally, the design service with external resource was released to the

selected few people. We provided beta services to 100 researchers we selected ourselves and upgraded the

service. A month later, the official design service with help of external in-house designer was released to everyone

and the response was great

Insight

When planning the deign service, it was imperative to check the data and discuss it among team

Members researcher to drive conclusion   Based on the meeting, a new function was created. However, after using

the learning launch tools, I was able exact find the root cause of the problem & user's needs. Thus, enabling and

upgrading process and identifying suitable and efficient resource to complete designated task and develop

prototypes

Approach

We will establish similar identified and efficient specialist resource of each of the task, and thus driving efficiencies

es in all departments and upgrade various services in the future. However, have now released its important to take

into consideration other people’s perspective and viewpoint in order to get to actual root cause of the problem.

. We will utilize various design tools to crete services that are close to users.


Selection As per assignment I decided to explore and choose learning tool to achieve desired output for the task at hand . The main reason to opt for this particular tool is that , we have explored various methods in the past also and have numerous rounds of meeting to improve quality of output and achieve desired result but failed to move the needle towards desired outcome . we felt as a group to try and implement learning tool as many team members judged it to be suitable for progress . Application After closely analysing existing situation and deliberating it over a couple of months we have realised that the quality of research paper was not up to the mark wrt to design . First , we decided to analyse the existing creatives for research papers . The research service is already mature , but it has n't grown anymore . Various hypotheses and discussions were done to find out reason . Including In - depth interviews , focused group studied were conducted with several people to verify the hypothesis . There were many interviewees , including research users , publishers , illustrators , students , teachers and many others . Through the interview results , we found problems with existing research service . People just wanted to write and many of them had very lilted interest or inclination for projecting and design of the research article . For them , research design was a difficult task . So , we focused on the editor so that we could focus only on writing and giving content for research article . The prototype was made , and the team members tested and completed . After the design service was completed , CBT was conducted in - house , and the modification was repeated again . And finally , the design service with external resource was released to the selected few people . We provided beta services to 100 researchers we selected ourselves and upgraded the service . A month later , the official design service with help of external in - house designer was released to everyone and the response was great Insight When planning the deign service , it was imperative to check the data and discuss it among team Members researcher to drive conclusion Based on the meeting , a new function was created . However , after using the learning launch tools , I was able exact find the root cause of the problem & user 's needs . Thus , enabling and upgrading process and identifying suitable and efficient resource to complete designated task and develop prototypes Approach We will establish similar identified and efficient specialist resource of each of the task , and thus driving efficiencies es in all departments and upgrade various services in the future . However , have now released its important to take into consideration other people ’s perspective and viewpoint in order to get to actual root cause of the problem . . We will utilize various design tools to crete services that are close to users .