Message-ID: <2483310.1075853055935.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 10:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: vernon.mercaldo@enron.com
To: greg_hathaway@dom.com
Subject: RE: Could you please....
Cc: lynn.blair@enron.com, john.buchanan@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: lynn.blair@enron.com, john.buchanan@enron.com
X-From: Mercaldo, Vernon </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=VMERCAL>
X-To: 'Greg_Hathaway@dom.com'
X-cc: Blair, Lynn </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Lblair>, Buchanan, John </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jbuchan2>
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \LBLAIR (Non-Privileged)\Blair, Lynn\Deleted Items
X-Origin: Blair-L
X-FileName: LBLAIR (Non-Privileged).pst

Greg,

I have been told that for system load purposes, NNG's procedure is to limit the number to two.  Obviously, someone overrode the procedure when they set up three email addresses.  They still recommend that this be limited to two.  If it is not too much trouble, they would prefer to have an email address that provides for multiple distribution internally to VEPCO.  Let me know if this is a problem.

Thanks & sorry for the confusion.
Vernon
-----Original Message-----
From: Greg_Hathaway@dom.com [mailto:Greg_Hathaway@dom.com]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:51 AM
To: Mercaldo, Vernon
Subject: RE: Could you please....

Vernon:
I think the number is really five since we have 3 people already on the email
list.  I will start working on the internal email list, but can you confirm we
can have more than two and likely five.  It seems like since we have 3 this is
more than 2 and the five people is likely.  Let me know and thanks for the
attention.

Greg

|--------+--------------------------->
|        |          "Mercaldo,       |
|        |          Vernon"          |
|        |          <Vernon.Mercaldo@|
|        |          enron.com>       |
|        |                           |
|        |          10/18/01 11:49 AM|
|        |                           |
|--------+--------------------------->
  >----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |                                                                            |
  |       To:     Greg Hathaway/WP/VANCPOWER@VANCPOWER                         |
  |       cc:     Hillary Dryselius/WP/VANCPOWER@VANCPOWER, Jason J            |
  |       Lewis/WP/VANCPOWER@VANCPOWER, Mark J DeCarlo/WP/VANCPOWER@VANCPOWER, |
  |       Stacy Lee/WP/VANCPOWER@VANCPOWER, "Blair, Lynn"                      |
  |       <Lynn.Blair@enron.com>                                               |
  |       Subject:     RE: Could you please....                                |
  >----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Greg,

This notice can only be sent to two email addresses.  I think we should
try the internal routing address like you suggested.  Let us know what
that address is and we'll get you set up.

Thanks!
Vernon

-----Original Message-----
From: Greg_Hathaway@dom.com [mailto:Greg_Hathaway@dom.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 8:52 AM
To: Mercaldo, Vernon
Cc: Hillary_Dryselius@dom.com; Jason_J_Lewis@dom.com;
Mark_J_DeCarlo@dom.com; Stacy_Lee@dom.com
Subject: Could you please....

Vernon:
We get this report from your operations group and  I was wondering if
you could
please forward this request to the correct person for the addition of a
couple
of people.  I think there is a limit so please let me know how many
people can
be on the list and we might be able to create an internal address that
would
forward to each of us.  Here are the people that need to be on the list:

Greg_Hathaway@dom.com- on the email
Mark_Moyer@dom.com- on the email
Hillary_Dryselius@dom.com- I believe on the list
Jason_J_Lewis@dom.com- not on the list
Mark_J_DeCarlo@dom.com- not on the list
Stacy_Lee@dom.com- not sure if she is on the list
MWVPEM@hotmail.com- not sure on the list, but for weekend notices

Thanks

Greg


Message-ID: <1779941.1075845784072.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 08:56:00 -0800 (PST)
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: jeffrey.hodge@enron.com, barbara.gray@enron.com
Subject: FERC Staff Investigations on Midwest and Southeast Bulk Power
 Systems
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Kay Mann
X-To: Jeffrey T Hodge, Barbara N Gray
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_2\Notes Folders\Discussion threads
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/10/2000 04:56
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Christi L Nicolay @ ECT                           11/10/2000 03:15 PM

To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff Brown/NA/Enron@Enron, Bill Rust/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike J
Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Moore/Corp/Enron@Enron, Debbie
Chance/Corp/Enron@Enron, Patrick Hanse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fletcher J
Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Edward D Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tom Dutta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Hoatson/NA/Enron@Enron,
Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Marchris
Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron, John Moore/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bill
Moore/NA/Enron@Enron, Robin Kittel/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey M
Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Ingersoll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charles Yeung/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Lloyd
Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maria Valdes/Corp/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Bob
Carter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Gaffney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Oscar Dalton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave
Mangskau/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kerry Stroup/DUB/EES@EES, Greg
Krause/Corp/Enron@Enron, Raimund Grube/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David L
Fairley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve
Krimsky/Corp/Enron@Enron, Richard Lydecker/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Richard Lydecker/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tom Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Delaney/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Rebecca Walker/NA/Enron@Enron, Reagan
Rorschach/NA/Enron@Enron, John Berger/HOU/EES@EES, Alan Larsen/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dave Kellermeyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mathew
Gimble/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ron Tapscott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Zhang/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Roy Boston/HOU/EES@EES, Aleck
Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT, Joe Connor/NA/Enron@Enron, Ron McNamara/NA/Enron@Enron,
Robin Kittel/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen E Carter/NA/Enron@Enron, Chris
Booth/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Barbara N
Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, steve.wang@enron.com, ebaughm@enron.com,
terri.clynes@enron.com, oscar.dalton@enron.com, doug.sewell@enron.com,
kcompea@enron.com, mike.e.kelly@enron.com, gary.justice@enron.com,
patrick.hanse@enron.com, ozzie.pagan@enron.com, heather.kroll@enron.com,
david.fairley@enron.com, ray.hoppe@enron.com, george.mccormick@enron.com,
wjennin@enron.com, joseph.wagner@enron.com, elizabeth.johnston@enron.com,
bill.rust@enron.com, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R
Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT,
George Hopley/HOU/ECT@ect, Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Benson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff King/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry
Valderrama/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter Makkai/NA/Enron@Enron, Larry
Jester/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Mike
Carson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kyle Schultz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric
Saibi/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Grace Kim/NA/Enron@Enron, Laura
Podurgiel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kayne
Coulter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: FERC Staff Investigations on Midwest and Southeast Bulk Power Systems

On 11/1/00, FERC St

Kay Mann
Jeffrey T Hodge, Barbara N Gray


Message-ID: <22510015.1075859847065.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 10:49:00 -0800 (PST)
From: mark.harding@cliffordchance.com
To: mark.e.haedicke@enron.com
Subject: RE: ISDA AGM
Cc: sue.edwards@cliffordchance.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: sue.edwards@cliffordchance.com
X-From: Mark.Harding@CliffordChance.com
X-To: Mark.E.Haedicke@enron.com
X-cc: Sue.Edwards@CliffordChance.com
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Mark_Haedicke_Jun2001\Notes Folders\Notes inbox
X-Origin: Haedicke-M
X-FileName: mhaedic.nsf

That would be great, Your assistant should contact mine, Sue Edwards.

All the best.

Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.E.Haedicke@enron.com [mailto:Mark.E.Haedicke@enron.com]
Sent: 08 March 2001 17:10
To: Mark.Harding@CliffordChance.com
Cc: Janette.Elbertson@enron.com
Subject: Re: ISDA AGM

Mark:

I would like to get together at the AGM.  I will ask my assistant to work
on a time would could meet and propose that to you.  Hope things are going
well.

Mark Haedicke

Mark.Harding@Clifford

Chance.com                   To:
Mark.E.Haedicke@enron.com
cc:

03/07/2001 12:55 PM          Subject:     ISDA AGM

Mark,

Remembering that we missed each other in London, will you be at the AGM in
DC? If so, shall we get together briefly? I met Mark Evans from your team
in
London recently and had a useful chat about the state of the relationship
between CC and Enron. I also know that David Yeres from our NY office met
with you some time back in Houston. He will also be at the AGM and would, I
know, like to follow up on that meeting.

Best regards.

Mark

*******

This message and any attachment are confidential and may be privileged or
otherwise protected from disclosure.  If you are not the intended
recipient, please telephone or email the sender and delete this message and
any attachment from your system.  If you are not the intended recipient you
must not copy this message or attachment or disclose the contents to any
other person.

For further information about Clifford Chance please see our website at
http://www.cliffordchance.com or refer to any Clifford Chance office.


Message-ID: <20867697.1075840541269.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 13:54:31 -0800 (PST)
From: doug.gilbert-smith@enron.com
To: rpastore@aerienetworks.com
Subject: RE: The Sun... a rather disturbing development
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Gilbert-smith, Doug </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DSMITH3>
X-To: 'rpastore@aerienetworks.com@ENRON'
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \ExMerge - Gilbert-smith, Doug\Deleted Items
X-Origin: GILBERTSMITH-D
X-FileName: doug gilbert smith 6-25-02.PST

there we go- a secret police state. Nice, socialism lives on.

Am leaving so take care.

Doug

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	rpastore@aerienetworks.com@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, December 14, 2001 3:53 PM
To:	Gilbert-smith, Doug
Subject:	RE: The Sun... a rather disturbing development

HERE IS THE TEXT.  IT WAS IN THE SUN.

Blair to let EU arrest Brits
By GEORGE -PASCOE-WATSON
Deputy Political Editor

TONY Blair was last night slammed for handing EU judges the power to arrest
British citizens on trumped-up charges over laws which do not EXIST in the
UK.

The PM will sign up to an EU-wide arrest warrant today - despite warnings
that it is open to abuse and a massive surrender of power.

It will mean that anyone can be seized and handed over to a EU country to
face trial, even if they have done nothing wrong under British laws.

Last night the International Federation of Human Rights Leagues said British
citizens will be at the mercy of third rate legal systems like Greece and
Portugal.

Vice President Michel Tubiana said: "It presupposes that all judicial
systems function well.

"All you can say with certainty is that NO system functions perfectly.

"One cannot rule out the possibility that the European arrest warrant could
be widened to other crimes, or abused.

"There is no guarantee preventing this."

Last night Downing Street brushed off the attack and insisted Mr Blair will
OK the deal.

It means that people can be arrested in Britain on any one of 32 measures at
the whim of foreign magistrates.
They include offences like xenophobia and swindling.

British police officers will be expected to arrest citizens on the orders of
the foreign courts - a huge change in the UK's constitution.

The idea is part of the international crackdown on global terrorism.

It ensures that suspects will be fast-tracked to justice and barred from
using the appeals system to stay ahead of the law.

But critics want to know why many crimes have been included which have
nothing to do with terrorism.

Rape is on the list - a crime easy to allege but often difficult to prove.

Yet under the plan, "suspects" would have NO right to challenge evidence put
forward for their extradition by a
foreign magistrate.

All 15 EU leaders will sign the pact during talks in Laeken, Belgium.

MPs here will not get a chance to debate the measure until it becomes part
of a new Extradition Bill in February.

-----Original Message-----
From: Doug.Gilbert-Smith@enron.com [mailto:Doug.Gilbert-Smith@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 1:03 PM
To: rpastore@aerienetworks.com
Cc: 3
Subject: RE: The Sun... a rather disturbing development

cannot open it-what is it??

thanks,

Doug

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   rpastore@aerienetworks.com@ENRON
   Sent:   Friday, December 14, 2001 9:50 AM
   To:     Gilbert-smith, Doug
   Subject:  The Sun... a rather disturbing development

   Doug:

   Here's a bit about something that's fairly scary.  I'm sure Bruce must
   have
   a few pointed words about this type of thing...

   Hang in there...

   Later,
   Rich

    - C.DTF << File: C.DTF >>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohi


Message-ID: <6499747.1075853183846.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 10:34:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: britt.davis@enron.com
To: richard.sanders@enron.com, marcus.nettelton@enron.com
Subject: Base Metals v. OJSC
Cc: becky.zikes@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: becky.zikes@enron.com
X-From: Britt Davis
X-To: Richard B Sanders, Marcus Nettelton, Martin_Stanley@MGLTD
X-cc: Becky Zikes
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Richard_Sanders_Oct2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: Sanders-R
X-FileName: rsanders.nsf

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL:  ATTORNEY CLIENT COMMUNICATION, ATTORNEY WORK
PRODUCT

Please be advised that our attorneys have filed a motion for leave to file a
supplemental motion on behalf of MG Metals regarding Base Metals' belated
attempt to serve OJSC in the underlying lawsuit.  We make two arguments in
the underlying substantive motion supporting the legal conclusion that Base
Metal's attempt was invalid:  (a), the service was mailed by the plaintiffs,
rather than by the Court, the latter of which is required by the federal
rules of civil procedure, and (b), Base Metal failed to satisfy its burden
under the federal rules of showing that Russian law did not preclude service
in this manner.

We are hammering on this point because under applicable Maryland procedure, a
plaintiff such as Base Metals must serve the underlying lawsuit within 60
days of the attachment of a third-parties' goods.  Unfortunately, no Maryland
legal authority has thus far addressed what happens when someone like Base
Metals fails to do so, but we will of course argue the common-sense
proposition:  that Base Metals' failure to comply with this 60-day period is
lethal to its attempt to keep the escrow account open.

I will keep you advised.

Britt


Message-ID: <6652095.1075841218757.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 19:29:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: jeffrey.r.pearson@dartmouth.edu
To: jonathan.mckay@enron.com
Subject: RE: Currency
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: "Jeffrey R. Pearson" <Jeffrey.R.Pearson@Dartmouth.EDU>@ENRON <IMCEANOTES-+22Jeffrey+20R+2E+20Pearson+22+20+3CJeffrey+2ER+2EPearson+40Dartmouth+2EEDU+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com>
X-To: Mckay, Jonathan </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JMCKAY1>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \ExMerge - Mckay, Jonathan\Personal
X-Origin: MCKAY-J
X-FileName: jon mckay 7-11-02.PST

I would love to do closer to 15000, but 10 will definately work.  I have
about 14000 in tuition bills due in several weeks, and need to definately
convert some money.  Why don't you choose a rate, and e-mail me the rate and
your address (work is probably best, although I don't believe I have any
cards here and will need the address again!).  I will rush you a check,
which you can cash and then rush me back a check.

I really appreciate your help, and will hopefully talk to you soon (we will
have to talk one of these afternoons, as I am generally around and have no
classes!).

-----Original Message-----
From: Mckay, Jonathan [mailto:Jonathan.McKay@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 4:40 PM
To: Jeffrey.R.Pearson@Dartmouth.EDU
Subject: RE: Currency

How's about US$10,000 to get started or do you need US$20,000 right
away?  I'm not sure Enron is going to do the trade with me but I would
be glad to help you out.  Do you just want to mail cheques to each other
or do something else?  If Enron does the currency trade that I want to
do, I'd be happy to do what every volume you need.

Let me know what you want to do.

Jon

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	"Jeffrey R. Pearson"
> <Jeffrey.R.Pearson@Dartmouth.EDU>@ENRON
> [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Jeffrey+20R+2E+20Pearson+22+20+3CJeffrey+2ER+2EP
> earson+40Dartmouth+2EEDU+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
> Sent:	Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:28 AM
> To:	Mckay, Jonathan
> Subject:	Currency
>
> Jon, I am unsure if you got my message the other day, but I am looking
> at
> doing around 20000 US worth of currency.  The bank last week was
> charging me
> a couple of hundred points, so anything less would be appreciated.  I
> would
> like to hold off longer, but my first tuition bill is due Sept 10, so
> I need
> the money by then.
>
> If you can't help, I will probably try and cut a deal with my bank or
> a new
> bank down here.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jeff
>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Message-ID: <30145157.1075855708095.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 05:34:00 -0800 (PST)
From: phillip.allen@enron.com
To: pallen70@hotmail.com
Subject: Preliminary 2001 Northwest Hydro Outlook
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Phillip K Allen
X-To: pallen70@hotmail.com
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Phillip_Allen_June2001\Notes Folders\Discussion threads
X-Origin: Allen-P
X-FileName: pallen.nsf

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 01/12/2001
01:34 PM ---------------------------

TIM HEIZENRADER
01/11/2001 10:17 AM
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Zufferli/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Cooper Richey/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Preliminary 2001 Northwest Hydro Outlook

Here's our first cut at a full year hydro projection:  Please keep
confidential.


Message-ID: <15604386.1075840323366.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:27:18 -0800 (PST)
From: bdeck62@yahoo.com
To: eric.bass@enron.com
Subject: RE: Happy Birthday
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Bonnie Decker <bdeck62@yahoo.com>
X-To: Bass, Eric </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=EBASS>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \ExMerge - Bass, Eric\Inbox
X-Origin: BASS-E
X-FileName: eric bass 6-25-02.PST

Hi Eric

I told your Mom we would decide on my visit after all the wedding festivities are overwith.  I'm sorry I can't make it to the wedding but I have a few loose ends to clear up since my last day of work here is January 31.  I'll spend time with all of you when I visit.  I'm looking forward to it.

The weather here is cold and blustery.  We had 14" of snow on January 6 but most of that is gone now.  We are to get snow showers over night but they only predict around an inch for the morning.

Hi to Shanna and keep in touch.

Love  Aunt Bonnie

  "Bass, Eric" <Eric.Bass@ENRON.com> wrote:

Hi Aunt Bonnie,

It is great to hear from you.  We really missed the fact that your trip was delayed because of 9/11.  Things will be pretty hectic this weekend with Jason's bachelor party and my birthday.  We are going to dinner tomorrow night for my birthday to a restaurant that I have never tried. It should be good.

On Saturday, we will be celebrating Jason's bachelor party.  We are going on a casino cruise out of Galveston.  I am looking forward to it.

When do you think that you are going to make it down for a visit?  How is the weather treating you up there?

It was nice to hear from you.

Love,

Eric

-----Original Message-----
From: Bonnie Decker [mailto:bdeck62@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 5:46 PM
To: Bass, Eric
Subject: Happy Birthday

Hi Eric,

I know this weekend will be a busy one for you but I just wanted to wish you an early Happy Birthday.  Hope all is well with you and Shanna.  I hope to see you in a few months.

Love   Aunt Bonnie

  _____

Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video <http://rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/tag/?http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/> emails in Yahoo! Mail <http://rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/tag/?http://mail.yahoo.com/>.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its a! ffiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************

  _____

Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video <http://rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/tag/?http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/> emails in Yahoo! Mail <http://rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/tag/?http://mail.yahoo.com/>.


Message-ID: <22230916.1075845747433.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 12:34:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: boyd_j._springer@jonesday.com
To: dtucker@bracepatt.com, cdade@bracepatt.com, kay.mann@enron.com
Subject: Regulatory Issues
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: "Boyd J. Springer" <Boyd_J._Springer@jonesday.com>
X-To: dtucker@bracepatt.com, cdade@bracepatt.com, Kay.mann@enron.com
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_1\Notes Folders\Chicago
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

_______________________________________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read,
copy, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the
sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________________________

The following discusses the regulatory issues raised at our June 14 meeting
with Peoples.                                           1. Expanded
termination right for unacceptable "Regulatory Approval".  As discussed
prior to the meeting, language of Sects. 1.1, 1.11, 10.2 and 15.1(f) was
changed to provide a termination right in the event that an unacceptable
regulatory order is issued after initial approval of the Agency Agreement,
but during its term. Peoples explained at the meeting their view that a
termination right should exist in the event of an adverse rate order (e.g.,
Illinois Commission order imputing what Peoples believes to be an
unreasonably high level of Hub revenue and, therefore, unaccpetably
lowering retail gas rates) or FERC determination that, based on Hub
operations, Peoples is in jeopardy of losing its status as a Hinshaw
pipeline. These were examples of the types of orders Peoples has in mind.
As proposed in our draft, either party would have a termination right in
the event that the Agency Agreement is not initially approved by the ICC on
acceptable terms. Under our approach, however, the parties would have to
live with ;later adverse regulatory orders unless an order had the effect
of revoking the Hub's operating authority. My view is that we could
reasonably agree to a termination right (similar to Sect. 11.1 (vi) and
(vii) of the LLC Agreement) which grants a termination right, "in the event
that a Jugment determines that, as a result of Hub Transactions, Peoples is
subject to comprehensive rate regulation as a natural gas company or public
utility by the FERC; or loses its status as an exempt Hinshaw pipeline
under Section 1(c) of the Natural Gas Act." I would suggest that we
otherwise stay with our original language re regulatory approvals. Once
Peoples obtains an order from the ICC which both parties accept, Peoples
should be willing to assume the risk (which,in my opinion is minimal) that
an adverse rate decision would cause it to wish to terminate the Agency
Agreement. (David suggested at the meeting that, as another option, we
could agree to a termination right due to an adverse regulatory order if
Peoples chooses to discontinue all Hub Transactions, but I am not sure that
we need to offer this at this stage.) The word "required" should be
restored to Definitions 1.1 and 1.11.              2. Extended Hub
Services. Peoples agreed at the meeting that there should be compensation
after termination of the Agreement for an extended Hub Service presented
during the Agreement's term. To make this clear,the words "during the term
of this Agreement" should be deleted from Sect. 7.1(ii). The deleted
wording of 7.2 should be restored, and to that Section we could add a
sentence: "The right to compensation established under Section 7.2 (ii) for
an Extended Hub Service shall survive the termination of this Agreement."
Also, in Section 15.4, I believe the reference to Sect. 3.3 should be to
7.2.                     3. "Hub Servi

1 could be revised to eliminate the
refernce to Laws and Judgments with a materially adverse effect.


Message-ID: <18825294.1075863690867.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 06:38:00 -0800 (PST)
From: tara.rozen@enron.com
To: jane.allen@enron.com
Subject: Re: Transitional Assignments
Cc: sally.beck@enron.com, brent.price@enron.com, kim.melodick@enron.com,
	lisa.mcrae@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: sally.beck@enron.com, brent.price@enron.com, kim.melodick@enron.com,
	lisa.mcrae@enron.com
X-From: Tara Rozen
X-To: Jane Allen
X-cc: Sally Beck, Brent A Price, Kim Melodick, Lisa McRae
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Sally_Beck_Dec2000\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: Beck-S
X-FileName: sbeck.nsf

All

I have received a few notes about this since this one but I will try to
respond to all questions here. Please see below responses in RED:

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Jane Allen                           08/03/2000 17:54

To: Tara Rozen/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim
Melodick/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Transitional Assignments

Please note this is confidential at this point!

To document what we discussed by phone, I met with Sally Beck and Brent Price
today.  Fernley Dyson has a vacancy that he is attempting to fill, but it may
be 3 to 6 months before the position is up and running.  To accomplish the
need in the meantime, Sally and Brent have agreed to share the duties as
follows:

Brent - April 1 to June 15
Sally - June 16 to August 15

They are traveling to the UK the week of 3/20 and would like to schedule some
time with you on either Monday afternoon or Wednesday.  Please let us know
what is good for you.
I have free time on the morning of the 20th. I will book out a room from
11-12am in HR. Please let me know if this is a problem.

Issues:

Housing - They will each be bringing their families with them (Brent - spouse
and 2 small children - the baby will need a crib; Sally - husband and 3
children - ages 15, 11 and 2).  I understand that the houses which have been
vacated due to returning expats have all been filled, so can you have someone
arrange for corporate housing that will accommodate them? I think the best
way to go here is for us to use serviced apartments as it will be very
difficult to find a lease for such a short period for this type of
accommodation. My assistant, Lisa, has put a call in to a service who can
help us find serviced accommodation in South Kensington/Chelsea area or in
Dolphin Square where we have people now who are very satisfied. Is there a
reason you are partial to South Kensington/Chelsea? What if we find
accommodation in another nice area of London within a short commute to the
office? When I have some options, I will let you know, probably on Monday.

Immigration - Due to the fact that they will be traveling back and forth and
have made trips already, I feel it would be best to apply for work permits
versus using the visa waiver.  I have sent them the forms and requested that
Brent complete his and file immediately to increase chances of getting his
sometime shortly after he arrives in the UK.  I have informed him that he
should arrive without his family if the permit has not been received by April
1. Brent's work permit will be submitted today and we may receive if before
April 1st, but it is unlikely. The way it works for this is as follows: Brent
will receive the work permit from us and if he is here, he will have to leave
the UK and enter with the work permit for it to be validated. If his family
are in Houston, they will need to receive entry clearance in the US prior to
arriving in the UK. This takes approx 7 working days and they will require
either Brent's original passport and work permit or a certified copy of each
along with other things such as marriage and birth certificates. If Brent
decides to bring his family with him to London prior to receiving the work
permit, they must say they are coming on a


Message-ID: <20124453.1075846127570.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 09:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: bob.licato@enron.com
Subject: RE: GE Turbine Purchase Contract - Linden 7 site
Cc: lisa.mellencamp@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: lisa.mellencamp@enron.com
X-From: Kay Mann
X-To: "Bob Licato" <Bob.Licato@enron.com>
X-cc: "Lisa Mellencamp" <Lisa.Mellencamp@enron.com>
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_4\Notes Folders\'sent mail
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

I should be able to accomodate the schedule.

Kay

"Bob Licato" <Bob.Licato@enron.com> on 07/12/2000 03:46:26 PM
To: kay.mann@enron.com
cc: "Lisa Mellencamp" <Lisa.Mellencamp@enron.com>

Subject: RE: GE Turbine Purchase Contract - Linden 7 site

---------------------- Forwarded by Bob Licato/ECP/HOU/ECT on 07/12/2000 03:21
PM ---------------------------

Bob Licato
07/12/2000 02:31 PM

To:   Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, kaymann@enron.com
cc:   Chuck Tobias/ECP/HOU/ECT, Cliff Evans/ECP/HOU/ECT
Subject:  RE: GE Turbine Purchase Contract - Linden 7 site

I spoke to Jon Stroble of El Paso today and he as agreed to delay signing this
agreement until next week.   We need to get him any comments by close of
business on Monday, July 17.    Can you please review and get me comments
ASAP.
thanks and sorry for the short notice.
---------------------- Forwarded by Bob Licato/ECP/HOU/ECT on 07/12/2000 02:15
PM ---------------------------

 (Embedded     Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
 image moved
 to file:      From:  "Stroble, Jon"
 pic17929.pcx) <StrobleJ@EPEnergy.com>
               07/10/2000 11:58 AM

To:   "'cgoode@ssd.com'" <cgoode@ssd.com>
cc:   "Abramson, Shelly" <AbramsonS@EPEnergy.com>, "Kidd, Andrew"
      <KiddA@EPEnergy.com>, "'chuck.tobias@enron.com'"
<chuck.tobias@enron.com>,
      "'bob.licato@enron.com'" <bob.licato@enron.com>
Subject:  RE: GE Turbine Purchase Contract - Linden 7 site

Cory,

Please see comments in attached file.  I changed the date to July 14th
assuming we can sign on this date.

 <<agree_6_13_00.doc>>    <<TsCs_6_28_00.doc>>      <<pricing_06_23_00.xls>>

I'm hoping you can rewrite these files incorporating these comments as well
as Shelly's comment below and Mike Neuman's comment from his 6/28 email
copied below.

Parent Guarantee-We feel the dollar amount for the parent guarantee should
be raised from $33Mill to $37mill to allow us some room in case of change
orders.  In any event, the Contract Price is approximately $35mill.

Thanks,
Jon

          -----Original Message-----
          From:     Abramson, Shelly
          Sent:     Friday, July 07, 2000 4:58 PM
          To:  'cgoode@ssd.com'; Kidd, Andrew; Stroble, Jon
          Subject:  FW: GE Turbine Purchase Contract - Linden 7
site

          As per my previous e-mail.

          -----Original Message-----
          From:     Abramson, Shelly
          Sent:     Thursday, June 15, 2000 3:28 PM
          To:  Stroble, Jon; Kidd, Andrew; 'cgoode@ssd.com'; Baker,
Bob
          Cc:  Brown, Stephen
          Subject:  GE Turbine Purchase Contract - Linden 7 site

          Jon and I met with East Coast Power this morning to discuss
the contribution by El Paso of the GE Turbine for the Linden 7 Site.  The
assignment clause in the GE Terms and Conditions currently permits the
assignment by the buyer to an affiliate without GE's consent. The word
affiliate is not defined but we should be able to take the position, as a
49% equity owner in East Coast Power, that it is an El Paso affiliate.  I
would recommend that to clarify, we include the following clause after the
word affiliate in the Assignment Section: (including but not limited to East
Coast Power L.L.C.).  Andrew, Bob and Coralyn, pls advise if you would like
to take a different approach. I also expect that we will have a credit issue
when the Contract is assigned to ECP as GE is now, I believe, getting a

7 site

          Jon and I met with East Coast


Message-ID: <11394717.1075845812654.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 04:33:00 -0800 (PST)
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: stuart.zisman@enron.com
Subject: Re: Austin - LM6000 Scope of supply
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Kay Mann
X-To: Stuart Zisman
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_2\Notes Folders\Discussion threads
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

We need to finish up with the site specific agreement for the equipment, then
they can have the whole enchilada.  I would think it could be ready in a
week.  I'll get A & K to dust it off.

Kay

From: Stuart Zisman@ECT on 02/06/2001 11:04 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Austin - LM6000 Scope of supply

Kay,

What do you think?  Are we prohibited from doing this?

Stuart----- Forwarded by Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT on 02/06/2001 11:04 AM -----

	Eric Booth@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	02/02/2001 10:19 AM

		 To: Stuart Zisman@ECT, Billy Lemmons@ENRON, James I Ducote@ECT
		 cc: Jeffrey M Keenan@ECT
		 Subject: Austin - LM6000 Scope of supply

This past Wednesday during our weekly site visit, I explained to Austin
Energy that I could not give them the whole LM6000 contract for
confidentiality reasons, especially with respect to the commercial
sections.   They were okay with that, but did make one last (and polite)
request for a list of the scope items that they would be getting.  What I
would propose to send is Exhibit B and B-1 from the contract (see attached).
Exhibit B is a simple bulleted scope of supply list.  Exhibit B-1 is a simple
spec that we wrote for the turbine which is itself a glorified scope document.

Let me know if this is something that I can forward to Austin Energy.  If the
attached document still gives someone heartburn, I'll end it here and
politely decline with Austin Energy.

Thanks,
Eric


Message-ID: <14262192.1075851629308.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 14:16:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To: mollycoffin@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: Pick Sheet - Week 8.xls
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Dasovich, Jeff </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JDASOVIC>
X-To: 'Molly Coffin' <mollycoffin@hotmail.com>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Dasovich, Jeff (Non-Privileged)\Dasovich, Jeff\Sent Items
X-Origin: DASOVICH-J
X-FileName: Dasovich, Jeff (Non-Privileged).pst

no. body to body.

-----Original Message-----
From: Molly Coffin [mailto:mollycoffin@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 4:09 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE: Pick Sheet - Week 8.xls

with your car?

>From: "Dasovich, Jeff"
>To: "Molly Coffin"
>Subject: RE: Pick Sheet - Week 8.xls
>Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 16:02:12 -0500
>
>You know, I ran into Martha once (literally) in Washington D.C.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Molly Coffin [mailto:mollycoffin@hotmail.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 12:03 PM
>To: Dasovich, Jeff
>Subject: RE: Pick Sheet - Week 8.xls
>
>
>
>Aha! You really are interested in what Martha thinks after all! (And by
>the way, Martha never met a plant she didn't like as far as I know...)
>
>
>
> >From: "Dasovich, Jeff"
> >To: "Molly Coffin"
> >Subject: RE: Pick Sheet - Week 8.xls
> >Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 01:10:34 -0500
> >
> >Does Martha approve of aloe vera?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Molly Coffin
> > Sent: Tue 10/23/2001 7:34 PM
> > To: Dasovich, Jeff
> > Cc:
> > Subject: RE: Pick Sheet - Week 8.xls
> >
> >
> >
> > How about if my aloe vera plant models it instead?
> >
> >
> >
> > >From: "Dasovich, Jeff"
> > >To: "Molly Coffin"
> > >Subject: RE: Pick Sheet - Week 8.xls
> > >Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 15:29:26 -0500
> > >
> > >Well, not just any jock strap. Maybe you could model a few and
> >I can
> > >pick one. Don't want it to clash with the furniture....
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Molly Coffin [mailto:mollycoffin@hotmail.com]
> > >Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 2:24 PM
> > >To: Dasovich, Jeff
> > >Subject: RE: Pick Sheet - Week 8.xls
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Wow. It sounds like you really have your heart set on having a
> >jock
> > >strap or 2 on display at your place...I may have to get in
> >tough with
> > >some of those Patriots.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >From: "Dasovich, Jeff"
> > > >To: "Molly Coffin"
> > > >Subject: RE: Pick Sheet - Week 8.xls
> > > >Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 14:03:04 -0500
> > > >
> > > >Forget that, I'm expecting a new hanging planter for
> >Christmas. (Tee
> > > >hee).
> > > >
> > > >Kisses,
> > > >Jeff
> > > >
> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >From: Molly Coffin [mailto:mollycoffin@hotmail.com]
> > > >Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 2:02 PM
> > > >To: Dasovich, Jeff
> > > >Subject: RE: Pick Sheet - Week 8.xls
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >See...reading Martha Stewart Living may make me rich yet!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >From: "Dasovich, Jeff"
> > > > >To: "Scott Laughlin" , , , "eldon sellers (E-mail)"
> > > > >CC: , , ,
> > > > >Subject: RE: Pick Sheet - Week 8.xls
> > > > >Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 12:23:35 -0500
> > > > >
> > > > >Molly gets all her picks from "The Living Guide to Picking
> >NFL
> > >Winners"
> > > >
> > > > >by Martha Stewart. Note on p. 12 of this months version:
> >Martha shows
> > >
> > > > >how to make hanging planters out of the jock straps worn by
> >the front
> > >
> > > > >line of the New England Patriots.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > > >From: Scott Laughlin [mailto:scottwl@hotmail.com]
> > > > >Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 12:06 PM
> > > > >To: Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com;
> >mollycoffin@hotmail.com
> > > > >Cc: skmaloney@yahoo.com; cameron@perfect.com;
> > >Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com;


Message-ID: <2603847.1075847306869.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:29:00 -0800 (PST)
From: enron.announcements@enron.com
To: all_ena_egm_eim@enron.com
Subject: EnTouch Newsletter
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-From: Enron Announcements
X-To: All_ENA_EGM_EIM
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Tanya_Jones_June2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: JONES-T
X-FileName: tjones.nsf

BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

EGM Fundamentals
Lowell Bezanis joins us from EIG (Energy Intelligence Group). Lowell will b=
e=20
a great resource for the group as he has had substantial experience coverin=
g=20
Middle East issues, as well having great contacts with the trade press. The=
=20
EGM fundamentals site has moved into production. Our new address is=20
http://egmfundy.corp.enron.com Comments and suggestion should be directed t=
o=20
Heather Purcell at 54057. Heather is also managing our enterprise-wide=20
contract with PIRA for oil, electricity, natural gas and natural gas liquid=
s.

EIM Finance
The primary focus for the EIM Finance Group is to assist transaction teams =
in=20
the execution of complicated transactions in which Enron capital is being=
=20
deployed.  This may consist of executing the funding of specific transactio=
ns=20
in either the bank or capital markets. Currently the team is focusing on th=
e=20
creation of several off-balance sheet funding vehicles that can be drawn up=
on=20
to fund multiple transactions, as well as the financing of the recently=20
announced Daishowa acquisition.  In addition, the group is focusing on the=
=20
creation of an inventory finance vehicle that can be utilized to fund=20
multiple steel (or other commodity) inventory financings.  Bill Brown leads=
=20
the group and notes, "This is a very exciting time at Enron.  EIM is a grea=
t=20
example of utilizing the Enron wholesale business model in commodities othe=
r=20
than gas and power.  The ability to finance complicated transactions by usi=
ng=20
financial engineering skills developed around Enron creates a competitive=
=20
advantage to transaction teams and will allow us to develop new products an=
d=20
fund those products competitively without using large amounts of Enron=20
capital."
=09

IN THE NEWS

=01&Vision is dandy, but sustainable company excellence comes from a huge s=
table=20
of able managers. If you don't believe me, then go read First, Break All th=
e=20
Rules: What the World's Greatest Managers Do Differently (Simon & Schuster,=
=20
1999), by Gallup execs Marcus Buckingham and Curt Coffman. Here's a=20
boiled-down version of what they found: Great managers are an organization'=
s=20
glue. They create and hold together the scores of folks who power=20
high-performing companies.=018 =01)Tom Peters, Fast Company, a Subsidiary o=
f U.S.=20
News & World Report (2/20/01).

Revised Presentation Library Link:
You can access the Analyst Slides at the URL below.  Simply go to this URL,=
=20
click on the ENTER button, and you have access to all the presentations mad=
e=20
at this meeting.http://172.28.92.190/bowne/

WELCOME

New Hires
EGM  - Leticia McAshan/Financial Operations
ENA  - Leann Walton/Research

Transfers
ENA =01) Joseph Wagner, Marcus Edmonds, Santiago Garcia, Stacy Dunegan, Sha=
ne=20
Green, Roman Zadorozhny, Praveen Mellacheruvu, Seksan Kiatsupaibul, Charles=
=20
Ward, Victor Munoz Paulette Roberts
EGM =01) Steven Jacobellis, Margaret Cowan, Alisa Green
EIM =01) Deborah Chance, Eugenio Perez

NUGGETS & NOTES

=01&Our Vision for 2001 is to go from =01&The World=01,s Leading Energy Com=
pany=018 to =01(.
=01&The World=01,s Leading Company=018 -- Jeff Skilling at the All-Employee=
 meeting.

"Can someone tell me which bank is dying to lend to the steel industry?" --=
=20
Bill Brown, Vice President/Finance EIM

=01&There=01,s no such thing as a Comp emergency.=018 =01) Sheila Knudsen, =
Vice=20
President/Human Resources ENA

NEWS FROM THE GLOBAL F


Message-ID: <2368482.1075840397931.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 07:43:23 -0800 (PST)
From: devin.c.hall@us.pwcglobal.com
To: mike.carson@enron.com
Subject: RE:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: <devin.c.hall@us.pwcglobal.com>@ENRON
X-To: Carson, Mike </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MCARSON2>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \ExMerge - Carson, Mike\Inbox
X-Origin: CARSON-M
X-FileName: mike carson 6-25-02.PST

Mike,

I'm glad to hear things are going well!  Everything at PwC is going pretty
good.  I'm still traveling quite a bit, today I'm in Indianapolis.  Laura
is keeping pretty busy at KPMG and working on re-decorating the house.
She's been talking a lot about having a baby so I'm not sure how long it'll
be before we have a little Duvall running around.  Hey, I just got a
message from Vogel on Pig Dinner, are you  planning on going this year?
Let me know because I'm going to try to make it finally, even though it's
on the worst day of the year for a tax accountant (April 13th).

Take Care,

Devin
To:       Devin C. Hall/US/TLS/PwC@Americas-US
cc:
From:     Mike.Carson@enron.com
Date:     01/28/2002 07:33:19 AM
Subject:  RE:

Doing good.... My division  (Wholsale Energy Trading) just got sold to UBS
Warburg, a swiss investment bank....  I will start work for them in about
two weeks or so.   Other than that every thing is cool,,, Heather and I are
getting ready for a trip to Aspen  in next couple weeks and the "Little
Man" is still growing like a weed!

How are things in KC??

MC

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   <devin.c.hall@us.pwcglobal.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Saturday, January 26, 2002 2:08 PM
   To:     Carson, Mike
   Subject:

   Mike,

   I was wondering how your job was going.  I've obviously heard all the
   media
   hype surrounding your company.  Please send me a email with an update.

   Thanks,

   Devin
   ----------------------------------------------------------------
   The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
   which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
   material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
   taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
   entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.   If you
   received
   this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from
   any
   computer.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************

----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.


Message-ID: <12336906.1075857506657.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 05:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: jane.tholt@enron.com
To: phillip.allen@enron.com, tori.kuykendall@enron.com, randall.gay@enron.com
Subject: El Paso's Data Response in RP99-507
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Jane M Tholt
X-To: Phillip K Allen, Tori Kuykendall, Randall L Gay
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Jane_Tholt_Jun2001\Notes Folders\'sent mail
X-Origin: Tholt-J
X-FileName: jtholt.nsf

---------------------- Forwarded by Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT on 06/23/2000 12:57
PM ---------------------------

"Bautista, Larry L." <BautistaL@EPEnergy.com> on 06/23/2000 11:18:22 AM
To: ALEX GOLDBERG <agoldberg@lgl.twc.com>, AMY BLAUMAN
<amy.blauman@ferc.fed.us>, ANDREW KOLESAR <abk@sloverandloftus.com>, BARBARA
JOST <bjost@huberlaw.com>, BARBARA WHITTAKER <bwhitta@pnm.com>, BARRY GRAY
<bgray@epelectric.com>, BOB GRAY <bgray@cc.state.az.us>, BRUCE CONNELL
<bruce.a.connell@usa.conoco.com>, CARLA JOHNSON
<carla.j.johnson@usa.conoco.com>, CAROLYN CORWIN <ccorwin@cov.com>, CATHY
BULF <cbulf@oneok.com>, "Cox, Robin" <CoxR@EPEnergy.com>, CURT BRECHTE
<cbrechte@apsc.com>, DARRYL SMETTE <darryl.smette@dvn.com>, DAVID CLARK
<dclark@sempra.com>, DAVID HUARD <dlh@jmbm.com>, "DAVID I. BLOOM"
<dbloom@mayerbrown.com>, DEBBIE SWANSTORM <daswanstrom@verner.com>, DEBRA
BOLTON <debra.bolton@bakerbotts.com>, DIANE MCVICKER <dbmcvick@srpnet.com>,
"DONALD G. AVERY" <dga@sloverandloftus.com>, "DONALD W. PETERSEN"
<dwp9@pge.com>, DONNA FULTON <dfulton@enron.com>, DOUG CANTER
<dmcwash@mshpc.com>, DOUG SCHANTZ <doug_schantz@kmmktg.com>, "DOUGLAS K.
PORTER" <porterdk@sce.com>, ED ROSS <earo@dynegy.com>, "ELISABETH R.
MYERS-KERBAL" <emyerskerbal@shb.com>, ERIC EISENMAN <exe3@pge.com>, FRANK
LINDH <frl3@pge.com>, GERARDO ESPINOSA <gespinosa@gas.pemex.com>, GORDON
SMITH <gsmith@jhenergy.com>, HARVEY MORRIS <hym@cpuc.ca.gov>, JAMES MCGREW
<jhmcgrew@brugen.com>, JAMES MORIARTY <jmoriarty@fw-law.com>, JANE THOLT
<jane.m.tholt@enron.com>, JANICE ALWARD <jalward@cc.state.az.us>, JENNIFER
HEIN <jennifer.hein@gen.pge.com>, JOANN RUSSELL <joann.russell@et.pge.com>,
"JOEL L. GREENE" <jlgreene@energyadvocates.com>, JOHN GREGG
<jgregg@mbolaw.com>, JOHN HESTER <john.hester@swgas.com>, "JOHN P. ARMATO"
<jpa3@pge.com>, "JOHN P. BEALL" <bealljp@texaco.com>, "JOHN R. STAFFIER"
<jstaffier@sdsatty.com>, JUDY JOHNSON <jaheineman@aol.com>, JUNE SUWARA
<jsuwara@sempra.com>, KAREN TOMCALA <karen.tomcala@pge-corp.com>, KARYL
LAWSON <karyl_lawson@kmmktg.com>, KATHIE EDWARDS <kbedwards@gkrse-law.com>,
"KATHLEEN L. MAZURE" <klm@dwgp.com>, KAY KERN <kernks@sce.com>, KEITH MCCREA
<kmccrea@sablaw.com>, "KELLY A. DALY" <kadaly@moheck.com>, KEVIN LIPSON
<kjlipson@hhlaw.com>, "KIM M. CLARK" <kclark@jhenergy.com>, L PERSON
<l.person@czn.com>, LARRY BLACK <llblack@ibm.net>, LUIS MANUEL PADILLA
<lpadilla@gas.pemex.com>, M BERGERN <mbergero@czn.com>, MARIA OROPEZA
<oro@cpuc.ca.gov>, MARK FENTON <mfenton@pnm.com>, "MARK T. MITCHELL"
<mitchellm2@epenergy.com>, "MARK W. SCHWIRTZ" <mschwirt@aepnet.org>, MIKE
MCELRATH <mmcelrath@phelpsdodge.com>, NORMAN PEDERSEN
<napedersen@jonesday.com>, PATRICIA ANDERSON
<pat.anderson@southernunionco.com>, PATRICK BROWN <pabrown@socalgas.com>,
"PATRICK G. GOLDEN" <pgg4@pge.com>, PAUL KEELER <pkeeler@br-inc.com>, PENNY
BARRY <barryp@bp.com>, PETE FROST <pete.frost@usa.conoco.com>, PETER CERVIN
<pcervin@br-inc.com>, RANDY RICH <rrich@bracepatt.com>, REBECCA CANTRELL
<rebecca.w.cantrell@enron.com>, RICHARD JORDAN <richard.jordan@swgas.com>,
RICHARD MILES <richard.miles@ferc.fed.us>, RICHARD STAPLER
<richard.stapler@williams.com>, ROB DAVIS <redavis@sempra.com>, ROBERT FOSS
<rfoss@coral-energy.com>, SANDRA ROVETTI <sjs@cpuc.ca.gov>, SARAH TOMALTY
<seto@dynegy.com>, SHERRI BOOYE <sbooye@skadden.com>, "SHERRI L. BOOYE (2)"
<nizra@earthlink.net>, STEVE KEEHN <skeehn@sempra.com>, STEVE TARPEY
<tarpey

507

See attached letter and spread sheets relating to the June 12 ADR


Message-ID: <5873273.1075845951743.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 01:43:00 -0800 (PST)
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: kathleen.carnahan@enron.com
Subject: Re: Draft CA for curves
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-From: Kay Mann
X-To: Kathleen Carnahan
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

Kathleen,
Please change the first paragraph as follows:
ENA is prepared to furnish you with certain risk analysis information which=
=20
is either confidential, proprietary or generally not available to the publi=
c=20
("Confidential Information") in connection with ENA=01,s disclosure to PERC=
=20
and/or enovate for its performing independent risk analysis relating to of=
=20
the portfolio of enovate, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company. Suc=
h=20
information may include (but not be limited to) and for PERC=01,s evaluatio=
n of=20
daily curves such as price, basis, index, volitility and interest rates as=
=20
they relate to the operations of enovate, L.L.C.  As a condition to=20
furnishing Confidential Information, PERC and ENA each agree to the followi=
ng:

As for the paragraph 7, I've asked Gregg if the disclosures will be one tim=
e,=20
or ongoing.  If the disclosures will be ongoing, we may want to rethink the=
=20
effective period to make it two years from the last disclosure.

Gregg also needs a resoluting regarding signing authority, but I've left hi=
m=20
a voice mail asking for more information.
Thanks,

Kay

  =20
=09
=09
=09From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           11/06/2000 09:13 AM
=09

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: =20

Subject: Draft CA for curves

Attached is a draft of the CA for Peoples based on Gregg Penman's informati=
on=20
below.  Gregg says he also wants some language to be included regarding aud=
it=20
rights.  I did not include this language because I'm not sure how to word i=
t=20
(and I could not find an example).

By the way, I used another People's CA I got from Ed's directory as an=20
example because it seemed to fit better than the one I got from you on Frid=
ay.

Gregg wanted some pretty specific reference to the confidential data being=
=20
supplied to Peoples, and most of the examples I reviewed were more general.=
 =20
Please let me know what I need to change.

Kathleen

This is the example I used:

---------------------- Forwarded by Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron on 11/06/200=
0=20
09:02 AM ---------------------------
To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron, Kay Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: =20

Subject: Draft CA for curves

Kathleen,

We have forms for confidentiality agreements.  All CA's are processed throu=
gh=20
Kay Young, as she maintains the data base.  Kay, could you point Kathleen t=
o=20
the repository of the forms so that she can generate the first draft? By th=
e=20
way, I've assembled the emails I received on changing the form.  I'll be=20
happy to take a crack at the revisions if you tell me which form to start=
=20
with.  I know it will have to be processed through before it becomes standa=
rd.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/24/2000 08:56=
=20
AM ---------------------------
From: Gregg Penman on 10/23/2000 10:28 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: =20

Subject: Draft CA for curves

Kay - We have previously discussed the idea of a CA to specifically cover t=
he=20
curves.  We need to put this at the top of the list for this week.  Can you=
=20
prepare a CA for the distribution of enovate curves to specific individuals=
=20
at Peoples?  I would like it to read as follows:
Basis and Index curves will be provided daily for all points at which enova=
te=20
has a position, whether hedged or open, to specific individuals employed in=
=20
the risk management area.  (Individuals should be named on a schedule).
Curves are being provided for the express purpose of independent risk=20
anal


Message-ID: <31554931.1075857601517.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 02:27:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: john.arnold@enron.com
To: michael.byrne@americas.bnpparibas.com
Subject: Re: PARIBAS Futures Weekly AGA Survey
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: John Arnold
X-To: michael.byrne@americas.bnpparibas.com @ ENRON
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \John_Arnold_Dec2000\Notes Folders\'sent mail
X-Origin: Arnold-J
X-FileName: Jarnold.nsf

84

michael.byrne@americas.bnpparibas.com on 06/14/2000 07:02:32 AM
To: michael.byrne@americas.bnpparibas.com
cc:
Subject: PARIBAS Futures Weekly AGA Survey

Good Morning,

Just a reminder to get your AGA estimates in by Noon EST (11:00 CST) TODAY.

Last Year      +63

Thanks,
Michael Byrne
Paribas Futures

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is confidential; its contents do not constitute a
commitment by BNP PARIBAS except where provided for in a written agreement
between you and BNP PARIBAS. Any unauthorised disclosure, use or
dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. If you are not
the intended recipient of the message, please notify the sender
immediately.

Ce message est confidentiel ; son contenu ne represente en aucun cas un
engagement de la part de BNP PARIBAS sous reserve de tout accord conclu par
ecrit entre vous et BNP PARIBAS. Toute publication, utilisation ou
diffusion, meme partielle, doit etre autorisee prealablement. Si vous
n'etes pas destinataire de ce message, merci d'en avertir immediatement
l'expediteur.


Message-ID: <19206706.1075855786043.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 09:10:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: richard.sage@enron.com
To: mike.jordan@enron.com
Subject: CommodityLogic.com
Cc: sally.beck@enron.com, steve.whitaker@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: sally.beck@enron.com, steve.whitaker@enron.com
X-From: Richard Sage
X-To: Mike Jordan
X-cc: Sally Beck, Steve Whitaker
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Sally_Beck_Dec2000\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: Beck-S
X-FileName: sbeck.nsf

Mike,
Further to our conversation, here are some of the things I thought of while
speaking with Tom Gros. There are definitely some challenges we have to
overcome to make the Hub idea within CommodityLogic.com as successful as
EnronOnLine rather than have it turn out like Sitara.

I won't repeat thoughts about how we split CL from Enron, but let's put
ourselves in the shoes of somebody external for whom this was presented as a
potential solution. Well, that's an easy decision, somebody else is doing the
hard work, and not charging us very much for it. So sign-up, but don't rely
on anything until we see everything working.

Handling counterparties not using the system
The challenge here is that the Final Solution World with overybody using the
Hub is wonderful, but until everybody is using the Hub, we have to keep other
procedures and systems going, which stretches resources, Development, IT
Support and user. This was why we decided to delay getting Bolero - the
concept is wonderful, but the value to any user is very dependent on everyone
else one trades with using the system. This is classic Chicken and Egg. Tom
has a vision of CL providing the staff to handle this. This is taking us
closer to an outsource-to-Andersen-consulting model which is certainly
achievable, although not quite such an easy sell.

How much resource is left
The latest project always tends to attract the most imaginative people, who
are therefore not available for keeping everything else going and moving
onwards. How about if we accept that such resource is dedicated to CL, and
then review what is left in the remaining environment. Does it mean we hold
off doing anything? If we do then increasing volume means that we might end
up incurring costs for massive numbers of people! We should go through
costing for "What happens if we completely stop development of X project?".
If that shows one would need 200 clerks for 3 years until something else
comes along then it may be cheaper than developing, but I hope in most cases
it is not!

Start small to prove concept
E.g. first application in April 2001 only covers 20 fields
This is excellent, and we needn't shout it too loud to investors in CL, but
for our internal back office costing we need to acknowledge that it will be
years before we can switch off many internal systems.
We might limit the payback period on projects not part of this strategy to 3
years out?

Include European aspects from the beginning
This really isn't very difficult so long as one has some long-on-common-sense
Europeans (not just Brits) involved in both specification and development
from the beginning, but an as example of how not to do it, look at EnPower
which took a year to allow just for currencies etc!

80-20 rule for types of transaction
EOL has shown the benefits of focussing on simpler products first.
Once we have robust warehouses for collecting accounting (DTL) and risk
(RisktRAC?) numbers then we can think about having vanilla products on STP,
and yet-to-become-vanilla products on explicitly different, manual
approaches. Until that time, we have a strong desire to include as many
different prodcuts as possible for a given commodity in one system, which
makes separating vanillas from others more complicated and costly (Think of
certain deals in Power99 which are approximations of the actual deals, and
manually tweaked every so often)

Testing
Tom'


Message-ID: <5489795.1075849607976.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 09:00:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To: mpalmer@enron.com, karen.denne@enron.com
Subject: California Update--Legislative Push Underway
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Jeff Dasovich
X-To: mpalmer@enron.com, Karen Denne
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Jeff_Dasovich_Oct2001\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: DASOVICH-J
X-FileName: jdasovic.nsf

----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/06/2001 03:50 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	07/06/2001 01:16 PM

		 To: skean@enron.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Wanda
Curry/Enron@EnronXGate, Donald M Black/Enron@EnronXGate, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Tim
Belden/Enron@EnronXGate, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy
Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Phillip K Allen/Enron@EnronXGate, Alan
Comnes/Enron@EnronXGate, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mike D
Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate, Kristin
Walsh/Enron@EnronXGate, Christopher F Calger/Enron@EnronXGate
		 cc:
		 Subject: California Update--Legislative Push Underway

Hertzberg (speaker of the CA Assembly) called a meeting yesterday afternoon
of the group of market participants that have been negotiating the
"core/noncore" proposal in California.  The purpose of the meeting was to
brief us on their activities and their gameplan for trying to find a solution
for California.  Here's a summary of the meeting.  Please keep confidential.

Work will be done over the weekend to put the core/noncore proposal in
legislative language.  (We will be in the room.)
Work done by the "Plan B" group in the Assembly (Joe Dutra and Joe Nation)
will also be put into legislative language over the weekend.
Because no proposal is "comprehensive," a complete legislative package will
be created from the various pieces that have been worked on thus far (i.e.,
core/noncore, "Plan B," Edison MOU)
In addition, there are Republican demands that Hertzberg will need to address
(e.g., end the litigation) in order to achieve bi-partison support, which is
what Hertzberg's shooting for.
To move the legislation, the plan is to establish a "conference committee,"
comprised of an equal number of Democrats and Republicans.
The committe would begin work on Monday and would attempt to finish putting a
comprehensive bill together, vote it out of the Legislature and send it to
the Governor for signing by Monday, July 16th.
July 16th is the deadline because that is the date that the PUC will issue
its proposed decision regarding, among other things, how DWR's revenue
requirement will be put into rates, whether Direct Access needs to be
suspended, etc.
The PUC is issuing the draft on the 16th in order to give everyone 30 days to
review and comment before the Commission votes on a final order on August
15th.  (The PUC will actually issue a "thought piece" on Monday the 9th and
will use reactions to the "thought piece" to craft the develop the proposed
decision it plans to issue on the 16th.)
All of this is still up in the air, however.  As of right now, the leader of
the Senate (Burton) has not agreed to Hertzberg's gameplan and the
Republicans, while interested, have not yet committed to join the process.

Jeff Dasovich
mpalmer@enron.com, Karen Denne


Message-ID: <18968459.1075848208156.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 01:03:00 -0800 (PST)
From: christi.nicolay@enron.com
To: steven.kean@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com,
	linda.robertson@enron.com, david.delainey@enron.com,
	john.lavorato@enron.com, kevin.presto@enron.com,
	joe.hartsoe@enron.com, lloyd.will@enron.com,
	mitch.robinson@enron.com, donna.fulton@enron.com,
	sarah.novosel@enron.com, sherri.sera@enron.com,
	maureen.mcvicker@enron.com, kay.chapman@enron.com,
	kimberly.hillis@enron.com, ginger.dernehl@enron.com,
	bernadette.hawkins@enron.com, lora.sullivan@enron.com
Subject: **For the FERC staff lunch 12/7--FERC Investigation summaries
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-From: Christi L Nicolay
X-To: Jeffrey K Skilling@Enron, Steven J Kean, Richard Shapiro, James D Steffes, Linda Robertson, David W Delainey, John J Lavorato, Kevin M Presto, Joe Hartsoe, Lloyd Will, Mitch Robinson, Donna Fulton, Sarah Novosel, sherri.sera@enron.com, Maureen McVicker, Kay Chapman, Kimberly Hillis, Ginger Dernehl, Bernadette Hawkins, Lora Sullivan
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Steven_Kean_June2001_4\Notes Folders\Ferc
X-Origin: KEAN-S
X-FileName: skean.nsf

***BELOW ARE SUMMARIES OF THE HELPFUL FERC STAFF INVESTIGATIONS LEAD BY SCO=
TT=20
MILLER (WHO REPORTS TO DAN LARCAMP) -- BOTH WILL JOIN THE ENRON EXECUTIVES =
AT=20
LUNCH THURS. 12/7.
-
MIDWEST AND SOUTHEAST SUMMARIES

On 11/1/00, FERC Staff issued reports on its Investigation of Bulk Power=20
Markets in the Eastern Interconnection.  These reports were the result of a=
=20
Commission order earlier this summer.  Enron's Federal regulatory staff=20
(Christi, Charles Yeung, and Sarah Novosel) provided a great deal of=20
information for this investigation and Joe Hartsoe and Donna Fulton discuss=
ed=20
many of the problems with the grid with the new head of Staff, Scott Miller=
=20
(who recently joined FERC from PG&E Gen).    While the Commission is under =
no=20
obligation to take any of Staff's recommendations, the Commission typically=
=20
looks to Staff for guidance on transmission and market issues.  Importantly=
,=20
Staff concludes that the Commission should consider these options for the=
=20
Southeast and Midwest -- all of which Enron has been asking FERC to impleme=
nt=20
for several years:

Reduce the advantages of network service over point to point service by=20
requiring that native load be served under the same tariff as other=20
transmission services to eliminate the current incentives that VIUs have to=
=20
favor their native load through the calculation of ATC and handling of=20
interconnection requests.

While the Staff Hotline is used productively, the Commission can direct Sta=
ff=20
to conduct formal investigations into entities that have a pattern of=20
complaints.

The Commission could require TPs to submit tariff provisions containing a p=
ro=20
forma interconnection process specific to interconnection, rather than simp=
ly=20
relying on the Tennessee Power order that utilizes the OATT timelines and=
=20
procedures.

Require TPs to retain real-time transmission data on market functions=20
pertaining to daily load, internal generation to meet that load, and import=
s=20
and exports.

RTOs should submit the basis and methods for calculating ATC and TTC, as we=
ll=20
as standardized criteria for curtailment.  In addition, since even such=20
standardized criteria might not "get to the root of the problem" -- that=20
control area still control generation -- the Commission could require that=
=20
each RTO set a date certain by which it will create one control area. =20
Regardless of the implementation of these two options, the Commission could=
=20
standardize ATC and TTC methodology.

Staff finds that while electricity is a commodity with market characteristi=
cs=20
similar to many other commodities, it is still viewed as "different," with =
a=20
r


Message-ID: <4916946.1075842534217.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 00:53:00 -0800 (PST)
From: drew.fossum@enron.com
To: jan.cobden@enron.com
Subject: ECS Gallup contract
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Drew Fossum
X-To: Jan Cobden
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Drew_Fossum_Dec2000_June2001_2\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: FOSSUM-D
X-FileName: dfossum.nsf

pls print for me.  thanks df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 02/01/2001
08:52 AM ---------------------------

Susan Scott
01/21/2001 12:45 PM
To: Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, James Centilli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum@ENRON
cc: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: ECS Gallup contract

Here are some bullet points based on our conversation Friday morning
regarding the ECS Compression Service Agreement.  These bullet points
summarize our position and are intended to be a starting point for a
conversation between persons at TW and at ECS (who are yet to be determined)
regarding the additional power costs incurred by Transwestern as a result of
the lack of a system for monitoring peak loads on CDEC.  If you have
additional comments, please let me know.

We still need to decide who is going to call whom; I am going to leave that
up to you, but do let me know if I can help.

-  ECS is under an obligation to work in good faith with CDEC to establish a
monitoring system that would automatically
alert TW to peak loading conditions on CDEC's system.

-  Rate No. 21 became effective in July 2000.  ECS did not obtain permission
for TW to access the "Members Only" portion of CDEC's website (which contains
load data) until January 2001.  Access to the information required a
confidentiality agreement, which was executed in December.

-  ECS blames the delay on Tri-State/CDEC, who allegedly would not work on
the confidentiality agreement until the merger was completed.   "Good faith"
by ECS would reasonably include alerting TW to any such delay or any
difficulty in getting access to CDEC's information.  TW was never contacted
in this regard.

-  Since Rate No. 21 contains a rebate for customers that avoid peak load
times, we assume that CDEC is under an obligation to provide such customers
with access to peak load information (I have not been able to verify this,
but it makes sense).  If this is true, we should have been able to have
access immediately upon the effectiveness of Rate No. 21.

-  Most if not all of the $325,000 peak load costs incurred by TW since July
could have been avoided had TW had access to a monitoring system.  Because it
did not alert TW to difficulties/delay in getting the necessary information
from CDEC, ECS did not act in good faith in obtaining such access and should
therefore take responsibility for its share of the consequences.

-  ECS needs to act without further delay to build an automated monitoring
system to eliminate the need for someone to continuously monitor the
website.  An estimated completion date should be provided.

I've left messages at CDEC to ask about access to the Members Only part of
the website; I'll follow up.  The website states only that access is granted
"on a case-by-case basis."  I hope to make contact on Monday and will let you
know what I'm able to learn from them.


Message-ID: <7687161.1075861236998.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 10:10:14 -0800 (PST)
From: dana.davis@enron.com
To: joe.s@my2way.com
Subject: RE:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Davis, Dana </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DDAVIS>
X-To: 'joe.s@my2way.com'
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \DDAVIS (Non-Privileged)\Davis, Dana\Deleted Items
X-Origin: Davis-D
X-FileName: DDAVIS (Non-Privileged).pst

And He will b/c what God has for you is for you.  That's what I keep telling myself.  What are yall doing for Thanksgiving?

-----Original Message-----
From: joe.s@my2way.com [mailto:joe.s@my2way.com]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 11:52 AM
To: Davis, Dana
Subject:

Response: Reply from J A S  d 1
Me on the other hand has to go all the way through. It has really been test of faith,he makes a way

Your Message:
> Fr:Dana.Davis@enron.com
> Su:
> Just that if the new grp that I've come to is a core part of Enron's
> business that Dynegy wants to keep, I have a better chance of keeping my
> job.  Boy,  I tell you, this year has certainly been challenging year.
> I'm not worried though (not anymore, took about a week).
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
> **********************************************************************


Message-ID: <8965557.1075860225417.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 01:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: alan.aronowitz@enron.com
To: mark.taylor@enron.com
Subject: FW: Weather and Oil Derivatives
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Alan Aronowitz
X-To: Mark Taylor
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Mark_Taylor_Jun2001\Notes Folders\Archive\7_00
X-Origin: Taylor-M
X-FileName: mtaylor.nsf

FYI.
----- Forwarded by Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT on 07/13/2000 08:56 AM -----

	John Viverito@ENRON
	07/13/2000 05:59 AM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Weather and Oil Derivatives

Alan-

Jeremy has requested that I forward this on to you, as he had experienced a
"bounce back" problem with your address.
----- Forwarded by John Viverito/Corp/Enron on 07/13/2000 05:58 AM -----

	Jeremy.Pitts@BAKERNET.com
	07/13/2000 05:52 AM

		 To: John.Viverito@enron.com, john_viverito@enron.com,
johnviverito@enron.com, 'alan.aronowitz@enron.com'
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Weather and Oil Derivatives

Resending....

-----Original Message-----
From: Pitts, Jeremy
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2000 7:16 PM
To: 'John.Viverito@enron.com'
Cc: Davis, Paul; Eguchi, Naoaki; Toyohara, Shinji;
'alan.aronowitz@enron.com'; 'nicholas.o'day@enron.com';
'michael.grimes@enron.com'; 'jonathan.whitehead@enron.com'
Subject: FW: Weather and Oil Derivatives

John,

I refer to our telephone conversation this afternoon regarding our advice
(copy
below) and confirm the matters discussed as follows:

1. We note your conversation with Terry Tanaka of IBJ in which he commented
that it was his understanding that the FSA had given informal approval for
banks
to conduct weather derivative transactions.  This gives banks who engage in
weather derivative transactions (and their counterparties) a possible
additional
argument that the transaction are "being conducted in accordance with law" for
the purposes of the defense in Article 35 of the Criminal Code.

 This does not change our advice with respect to transactions between
Enron Japan and non-bank counterparties.

 However, if Enron Japan were to enter into a weather derivative with a
bank, Enron Japan would be able to rely on the tacit approval given by the FSA
to the bank - but only to the extent to which the bank would be willing to
represent and warrant to Enron Japan that the bank was authorised to enter
into
the transaction under Japanese laws and regulations.

2. We note your comment regarding the possibility that Enron Japan would
enter into back-to-back transaction with an offshore Enron affiliate and thus
transfer all risk in relation to the weather derivative transactions outside
Japan.  As mentioned in our advice, one of the factors that will suggest that
Enron Japan is engaged in a "legitimate business activity" will be the fact
that
Enron Japan manages the risk under the transactions that it enters into and
does
not take purely speculative positions.  Entering into back-to-back
transactions
is one way in which Enron Japan may manage risk.  However, there are also
other
risk management techniques (such as hedging in local markets - to the extent
possible - or hedging in offshore markets).  Insofar as these different risk
management techniques are all effective methods of risk management, we do not
believe that any one method of risk management is necessarily preferable to
another.

3. We have checked the home page for the Japanese Financial Law Board and
confirm that it does not contain any information directly relevant to weather
derivatives.  The home page does contain discussion of the application of the
Criminal Law to financial derivatives generally, but simply notes that the
parties to a financial derivative that is not specifically authorised by law
cannot rely on the "act in accordance with law" defense under Article 35 of
the
Criminal Law.

4. You have asked us whether we would be able to change our risk assessment
from "rel


Message-ID: <13611328.1075862458190.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 07:20:23 -0800 (PST)
From: j.kaminski@enron.com
To: arfsten@bflassociates.com
Subject: RE: Change Mtg Date???
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Kaminski, Vince J </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=VKAMINS>
X-To: '"Al Arfsten" <arfsten@bflassociates.com>@ENRON'
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \VKAMINS (Non-Privileged)\Kaminski, Vince J\Sent Items
X-Origin: Kaminski-V
X-FileName: VKAMINS (Non-Privileged).pst

Al,

Confirmed.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Al Arfsten" <arfsten@bflassociates.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 9:23 AM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Cc:	bjorn@bflassociates.com
Subject:	Re: Change Mtg Date???

Vince:  We will see you and Stinson at 7am at the Hyatt on Thursday.  Al

----- Original Message -----
From: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
To: <arfsten@bflassociates.com>
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:29 AM
Subject: RE: Change Mtg Date???

> Al,
>
> Thursday would work for me.
>
> Vince
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>    From:   "Al Arfsten" <arfsten@bflassociates.com>@ENRON
>    Sent:   Monday, November 26, 2001 8:31 AM
>    To:     VKaminski@aol.com
>    Cc:     vkamins@enron.com
>    Subject:  Fw: Change Mtg Date???
>
>
>    Vince:  Bjorn must be in Chicago Wednesday so  we must move the meeting
>    to Tuesday or Thursday, if that is possible.   Otherwise, give me other
>    possibilities.  Thanks, Al
>    ----- Original Message -----
>    From: Al  Arfsten << File: mailto:arfsten@bflassociates.com >>
>    To: VKaminski@aol.com << File: mailto:VKaminski@aol.com >>
>    Cc: bjorn@bflassociates.com << File: mailto:bjorn@bflassociates.com >>
>    Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 11:45 AM
>    Subject: Re: Meeting next week
>    Vince:  That works for us at the Hyatt Regency  at 7am.  The earlier
the
>    better on the Plan.  See you soon.   Al
>    ----- Original Message -----
>    From:  VKaminski@aol.com << File: mailto:VKaminski@aol.com >>
>    To: arfsten@bflassociates.com << File: mailto:arfsten@bflassociates.com
>    >>
>    Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 11:23  AM
>    Subject: Meeting next week
>    Al,
>    What about  meeting Stinson on Wednesday next week (after Thanksgiving)
>    at 7:00 a.m.,  Hyatt Regency? We should be able to E-mail you the
>    business plan outline the  day before.
>    Have a Happy Thanksgiving.
>    Vince
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by other
s is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
> **********************************************************************


Message-ID: <9208755.1075846303120.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 09:16:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: robert.frank@enron.com
To: steven.kean@enron.com
Subject: Update on Legislative situation re Hefley amendment
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Robert Frank
X-To: Steven J Kean
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Steven_Kean_Dec2000_1\Notes Folders\Calendar\Untitled
X-Origin: KEAN-S
X-FileName: skean.nsf

Steve, this may change our strategy but we could probably still sound off on
the BGE lawsuit.
---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Frank/NA/Enron on 08/31/2000 04:15
PM ---------------------------

bmoss@gcwdc.com@gcwdc.com on 08/31/2000 02:27:49 PM
To: cynthia.sandherr@enron.com, ltarbet@enron.com, bvotaw@enron.com,
rfrank@enron.com, jcarr@enron.com
cc: anavin@enron.com, Ksaunder@enron.com

Subject: Update on Legislative situation re Hefley amendment

This should be kept confidential.

I am advised from one staff source, who is involved in the House-Senate
negotiations, of the following:

--House and Senate staff met yesterday to discuss the Hefley amendment;

--They agreed to try a certain approach;

--Phil Grone (Rep Hefley's staffer) will prepare a written 'offer' for the
Senate staff;

--That offer might be the Senate amendment plus statutory language
authorizing the Secretary to select/mandate certain state health and safety
regualtions to follow;

--The 'offer' is expeced between now and next Tuesday (9/5);

--There will be a Members meeting on this and other issues next Wednesday
(9/6);

--DOD has not yet signed off (and in fact there is no agreement until
everyone see the language -- and there is always the possibility that Grone
might try to broaden the language to include other susbjects).

--IF there is House, Senate and DOD agreement, the issue could be resolved
at the Members meeting; however, nothing is written in stone until the
Congress actually votes on the Defense Authorization Conference Report.

CONCLUSIONS I reach:

1. We should be careful of any activity that would pressure Mr. Hefley, his
staff or make this a personal issue between now and next Wednesday; let
Grone prepare his 'offer'.

2.  We may want to slow-walk the Tom White/Dick Cheney call until we get a
better handle from DOD and Hill staff on developments over the next few
days.

3. We should continue broad-based yet low-key efforts between now and next
Wednseday to show support for the Senate position -- targeting key
Senators/staff and selected House Memebers/staff -- utilizing CSA, COOPs
and BENZ, at al.; keep the Enron profile low.

4.  We need to talk re how to assure that we have imput to DOD's review of
the Grone 'offer'; the TomWhite/CSA meeting with Secretary Yim may be
timely.

5.  If there is an acceptable agreement our strategy changes to one of
holding it.

6. I will run the traps again tomorrow and report if new information.

7.  We will all talk Tuesday at 0900 EST.


Message-ID: <29399007.1075860324551.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 09:52:00 -0800 (PST)
From: mark.taylor@enron.com
To: peter.keohane@enron.com
Subject: Re: EnronOnline
Cc: chris.gaffney@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: chris.gaffney@enron.com
X-From: Mark Taylor
X-To: Peter Keohane
X-cc: Chris Gaffney
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Mark_Taylor_Jun2001\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: Taylor-M
X-FileName: mtaylor.nsf

I don't know anything about the Daishowa transaction but have to wonder why
this information could be relevant to much of anything not directly related
to EnronOnline.  To the extent we can't avoid disclosing it, I would think
that the traders in Calgary will know how many of them trade using the
system.  If that doesn't work I would try Savita Puthigai (x31787) or David
Forster (x31861) on the EnronOnline team.

	Peter Keohane
	03/16/2001 11:36 AM

		 To: Chris Gaffney/TOR/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: EnronOnline

Chris, I think Mark is the person to ask, or Mark can refer you to the right
commercial person.  I assume Investment Canada wants to know how many traders
in Canada trade on EOL?  I also assume that this might in fact be a
confidential matter that should not be disclosed and which should be
irreleveant to an ICA application for the Daishowa transaction.  In any
event, why is del Vecchio not dealing with this?

From: Chris Gaffney on 03/16/2001 11:30 AM EST
To: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EnronOnline

I have been asked to confirm this as it will form part of the Daishowa
acquition Investment Canada Act filing.  I am advised that the filing will be
confidential so I do not think it should be an issue.  Do you take any issue
with this?  And if not, do you know who would know the answer?

Regards
CJG

----- Forwarded by Chris Gaffney/TOR/ECT on 03/16/2001 11:34 AM -----

	"Alan Diner" <DINERA@bennettjones.ca>
	03/16/2001 10:55 AM

		 To: <Chris.gaffney@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: EnronOnline

Approximately ____ employees of Enron Canada Corp. work as traders under the
EnronOnline internet-based trading platform in the natural gas and
electricity sectors.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the addressee and may
contain confidential, proprietary and/or privileged material.  Any
unauthorized review, distribution or other use of or the taking of any action
in reliance upon this information is prohibited.  If you received this in
error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy this message and any
copies.


Message-ID: <3749694.1075863351580.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 07:46:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: adamsholly@netscape.net
To: lindy.donoho@enron.com
Subject: RE: RE:  HAPPY BIRTHDAY!!
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: holly adams <adamsholly@netscape.net>
X-To: Donoho, Lindy </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=LDONOHO>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \LDONOHO (Non-Privileged)\Inbox
X-Origin: Donoho-L
X-FileName: LDONOHO (Non-Privileged).pst

"Donoho, Lindy" <Lindy.Donoho@ENRON.com> wrote:
What a great birthday message. Very touching. We really have so many memories together. Marty and I had a GREAT time in Vegas. My 1st time to Sin City. We left on Sat.early a.m. and returned Wed.nite. I always write the kids each a note each day to tell them what the plan is who they will be with and that I love them. We called every nite and i could tell they were sad. It was just too long away from the kids. I think 3 days away is the best. Anyway, we didn't win BIG but what a town. So much to see. I had a swedish massage on my birthday at the hotel. We stayed at the Monte Carlo which was fun-it has 6 swimming pools, a lazy river, a wave pool and 4 others. I loved the live music at all the different lounges. Marty wanted to take me to shows 2-3 nites while we were there but I'm glad we didn't preorder tickets. There was just too much to see besides the shows. We ate great. Wonderful restaurants. Anyway it was fun. Claire had her adnoids and tonsils taken out the day after !
we got home. Boy is that humbling seeing your child being taken to surgery and being put under anesthesia. Marty and I just bawled until we got back from surgery. She's recupering fine. It has been hard to keep her physically down the last 1 1/2 weeks. How is your gang? Did Sam get new workers at the day care now that he is older? How is it going there? Are Missy, Andrew and Anthony in school yet? How is Tony. Is the downturn in the economy affecting his business? Thanks so much for the sweet message. YOU are a BLESSING to me. You are always in my heart and thoughts. I just want your kids to know there is an "aunt" Holly in Omaha that loves them too--in addition to their Aunt Lisa and Aunt Amy! Take care. L.Y.L.A.S. Holly
>Hey birthday girl!  Are you having a wonderful day?  How was Las Vegas?
>I hope you won the BIG BUCKS!  I hope you and Marty had a great time.
>
>Thanks for your note the other day.  It was so good to see you too!!  It
>always does my heart good to talk with you, my longtime friend =)  (I
>was going to say "old" friend, but I didn't want to remind you of your
>birthday!)  You are one of the great constants in my life!  Who have I
>known longer besides my family?  And your friendship comes with so much
>insight and understanding, laughter and love.  What would I do if I
>couldn't tell you?
>
>Therefore, today is truly a day to celebrate - the day Holly Louise was
>born!  Now that we have children, doesn't it warm your heart to think
>how happy your mom and dad must have been when you came into the world?
>It is a day to remember.  I'm sure one of the best days in a lifetime
>for your mom and your dad (think of him today!).  You have brought alot
>of happiness to alot of people in your life ever since that day Holly
>Louise and I'm so lucky to get to share in so many more to come!
>
>I love you (L.A.S.),
>Lindy
>
>
>
>**********************************************************************
>This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) a


Message-ID: <18223379.1075857632751.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 01:18:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: john.arnold@enron.com
To: russell.diamond@enron.com
Subject: FW: details for long term flat price swap on Nat Gas Houston Ship
	 Channel Inside FERC
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: John Arnold
X-To: Russell Diamond
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \John_Arnold_Jun2001\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: Arnold-J
X-FileName: Jarnold.nsf

Russell:
Just fyi, they're willing to take us for 20 years.
---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 05/10/2001 08:17
AM ---------------------------
From: Eric Bass/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/10/2001 07:42 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: details for long term flat price swap on Nat Gas Houston Ship
Channel Inside FERC

John,
Attached are the volumes associated with the 20 yr Soc Gen deal we talked
about.  I have yet to hear from credit.  I will let you know the status as it
becomes available.

Eric

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Alexander.WERNER@us.socgen.com@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Alexander+2EWERNER+40us+2Esocgen+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 7:34 AM
To: Bass, Eric
Subject: details for long term flat price swap on Nat Gas Houston Ship
Channel Inside FERC

Hi Eric,

Please find below the detailed terms of a possible deal that we have been
talking about during our phone conversation this morning.

Nature of deal : If the transaction takes place, Societe Generale would sell a
financial fixed price swap (flat price, not basis differential) to Enron. The
monthly settlement would be financial. There would not be any  exchange of
physical product.

Period of the deal : June 1st, 2001 to January 31st, 2021.

Used Reference :  Natural Gas-Houston Ship Channel Index Inside FERC , monthly
settlement.

Volumes of the financial swap transaction : Please find below the volumes
given
month by month in MMBTU.

(See attached file: volumes-10-5-01-for-Enron.xls)

Since there is a tiny chance that the deal trades today, could you please
check
if you have credit with SG for this period.
If not, could you find out how much time it approximately takes to get the
credit.
In terms of credit, SG is good with Enron for this period.

Thank you,

Alexander Werner

 **************************************************************************
The information contained herein is confidential and is intended solely
for the addressee(s).  It shall not be construed as a recommendation to
buy or sell any security.  Any unauthorized access, use, reproduction,
disclosure or dissemination is prohibited.

Neither SOCIETE GENERALE nor any of its subsidiaries or affiliates
shall assume any legal liability or responsibility for any incorrect,
misleading or altered information contained herein.
 **************************************************************************

**************************************************************************
The information contained herein is confidential and is intended solely
for the addressee(s).  It shall not be construed as a recommendation to
buy or sell any security.  Any unauthorized access, use, reproduction,
disclosure or dissemination is prohibited.
Neither SOCIETE GENERALE nor any of its subsidiaries or affiliates
shall assume any legal liability or responsibility for any incorrect,
misleading or altered information contained herein.
**************************************************************************

 - volumes-10-5-01-for-Enron.xls


Message-ID: <24997848.1075846006901.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 11:22:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: jkeffer@kslaw.com
Subject: RE: Northwestern
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Kay Mann
X-To: "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

Thanks.  I'll prepare Ben.

Kay

"Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com> on 04/16/2001 06:17:32 PM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>, "Reuter, Marisa"
<MReuter@KSLAW.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Northwestern

I've talked to Marguerite.  She agreed to a call tomorrow at 2 PM central.
She is sending to you and me a draft of an extension.  No need to do
anything with it tonight, but I suspect that Mike will begin calling Ben
about it in the morning.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 6:12 PM
To: mreuter@kslaw.com; jkeffer@kslaw.com
Subject: Northwestern

Hi there,

I am meeting with Ben tomorrow to discuss NWestern.  I'm fairly confident
that he will be willing to extend the letter agreement, but he hasn't
called me back today to confirm.

Ms. Kahn and I have exchanged voice mail.  Could one of you return her call
for me?  I'm tied up.  You might get an idea on some times tomorrow for a
call.  I'm booked until around 130 for anything which would last more than
a few minutes.  I'll check with Ben.

Thank you,

Kay

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.