Message-ID: <22093352.1075840192228.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 08:52:01 -0800 (PST)
From: kam.keiser@enron.com
To: bruce.mills@enron.com
Subject: RE: Follow up to Jan 29 meeting
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Keiser, Kam </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KKEISER>
X-To: Mills, Bruce </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Bmills>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \ExMerge - Keiser, Kam\Sent Items
X-Origin: KEISER-K
X-FileName: kam keiser 7-11-02.PST

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wilson, Shona
Sent:	Wednesday, January 30, 2002 1:20 PM
To:	'scott.underberg@ey.com@ENRON'; ews-cct@enron.com
Cc:	Hlopak, Ed; Cindy.Ma@ey.com; lawrence.prybylski@ey.com; Daniel.Somers@ey.com; Jeff.Magill@ey.com; James.Rees@ey.com; David.Bonder@ey.com; Sweeney, Kevin; Hall, Bob M; Albrecht, Kristin; Thapar, Raj; Hall, D. Todd; Keiser, Kam; Hlopak, Ed; Gillis, Brian; Reeves, Kathy
Subject:	RE: Follow up to Jan 29 meeting

Dear Scott,

Please contact the following people to help you:

EIM, EGM - Kevin Sweeney
Gas - Bob Hall
Electricity - Kristin Albrecht
Canada gas - Brian Gillis
Canada power - Kathy Reeves

Thanks

Shona

Risk groups:

Also, I wanted to let the risk groups know that I met with E&Y yesterday and they noted some items they would like to follow up on.  I've asked them to contact you directly.  Lastly, the form A's prepared were not consistent in regards to the treatment of intercompanies.  E&Y needs the 11/30 form A's without intercompanies.  For those of you who provided Form A's with intercompanies, please break them out and send us a second form.

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	scott.underberg@ey.com@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, January 30, 2002 11:50 AM
To:	Wilson, Shona; ews-cct@enron.com
Cc:	Hlopak, Ed; Cindy.Ma@ey.com; lawrence.prybylski@ey.com; Daniel.Somers@ey.com; Jeff.Magill@ey.com; James.Rees@ey.com; David.Bonder@ey.com
Subject:	Follow up to Jan 29 meeting

Shona,

Thanks for the Form A update meeting yesterday.  Here is a more formal
request for the follow-up items we mentioned.  If you could help point us
in the right direction to obtain this information, it would be appreciated.

1)We would like to review the results for a sample of queries for the Form
A's (whether these are reports generated or the output resulting from the
below queries).

Commodity:  Natural Gas

Transaction Distribution by MTM (#): >=$0mm, <$1mm
Tenor Distribution by MTM ($): >=3 years, <5 years

Commodity:  Electricity

Tenor Distribution by Transactions (#):  <1 year
Trade Type  Distribution by Transactions (#):  Forward
Trade Type Distribution by MTM ($):  Forward

Commodity:  Eastern Coal

Tenor Distribution by MTM ($):  >=5 year, <10 years

Commodity:  C3

Trade Type Distribution by MTM ($):  Swap

All queries are for both financial net and physical net values.

2)As a second follow-up, we would like a description and sample contract
of each product type (for the largest positive MTM within each category),
as defined by each commodity (this is item 8 on our comprehensive request
list)

3) A confirmation for the longest deal for each commodity (also related to
item 8 in our request list)

4)For each commodity other than power and gas (which will be outlined in
separate lists), we would like confirmations for the 10 (or all if fewer
than 10) largest (starting with highest positive MTM) transactions
regardless of termination status (this is item 21d on our comprehensive
request list)

I will try to follow-up with a visit or phone call.

Regards,
Scott

______________________________________________________________________
The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message
is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for
delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this commu


Message-ID: <4746100.1075855630598.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 01:55:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: peter.keavey@enron.com
To: dtencellent@prebon.com
Subject: philly hockey
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Peter F Keavey
X-To: dtencellent@prebon.com
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Peter_Keavey_Dec2000\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: Keavey-P
X-FileName: pkeavey.nsf

---------------------- Forwarded by Peter F Keavey/HOU/ECT on 05/23/2000
08:53 AM ---------------------------

Sarah Mulholland
05/23/2000 07:19 AM
To: Maureen Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter F Keavey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: philly hockey

---------------------- Forwarded by Sarah Mulholland/HOU/ECT on 05/23/2000
07:18 AM ---------------------------

christopher.j.bednar@us.arthurandersen.com on 05/22/2000 07:09:21 PM
To: Sarah.Mulholland@enron.com
cc:
Subject: philly hockey

Enjoy!

---------------------- Forwarded by Christopher J. Bednar on 05/22/2000 06:18
PM
---------------------------

To:   Christopher J. Bednar
cc:
Date: 05/18/2000 09:07 AM
From: Brian Abbott, Philadelphia, 565 / 5709
Subject:  philly hockey

 - phillyhockey.jpg

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If you
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery
of
the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to
anyone.
In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by
reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent
to
Internet email for messages of this kind.  Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this message that do not relate to the official business of my
firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.


Message-ID: <28369294.1075860024333.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 08:36:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: karen.anderson@simmons-simmons.com
To: mark.taylor@enron.com
Subject: Marketing Foreign Futures & Options Under CFTC Rules Part 30
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: "Karen Anderson" <Karen.Anderson@simmons-simmons.com>
X-To: <mark.taylor@enron.com>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Mark_Taylor _Dec_2000\Notes Folders\Notes inbox
X-Origin: Taylor-M
X-FileName: mtaylor.nsf

Please note: This e-mail is confidential and may also be privileged. Please
notify us immediately if you are not the intended recipient. You should not
copy it, forward it or use it for any purpose or disclose the contents to any
person.
-----------------------------------------------------------

Dear Mark

I attach a revised copy of the above document with a few minor corrections to
the text.

I am unable to attach Appendices A and B via email and these are being faxed
to you.

With kind regards.

Dr Ned Swan

------------------------------------------------------------
Simmons & Simmons
21 Wilson Street
London
EC2M 2TX

Tel +44 (0)20 7628 2020
Fax +44 (0)20 7628 2070
DX  12 London/Chancery Ln

An international law firm
London Paris Brussels Lisbon Milan Rome Abu Dhabi Hong Kong Shanghai New York

A list of partners at each office can be provided on request.

www.simmons-simmons.com

www.elexica.com is the award winning interactive online legal resource by
lawyers for lawyers, powered by content from Simmons & Simmons.

 - 147; 650FFC - Marketing of Futures and Options in the US.doc


Message-ID: <6248858.1075845927008.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 04:53:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: mark.dobler@enron.com
Subject: Re: PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL
Cc: mitch.robinson@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: mitch.robinson@enron.com
X-From: Kay Mann
X-To: Mark Dobler
X-cc: Mitch Robinson
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

We need to keep in mind the 30 day deadline to provide notice.  We don't want
to give them any room to wiggle. We can always send another notice later.

Kay

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mark Dobler                           07/28/2000 11:48 AM

To: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL

Mitch/Kay -

I would include reference to two (2) major issues, the one stated on the unit
non-performance at varying ambient temperatures and second being excessive
vibration.  The rest of the letter looks fine.

MSD

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mitch Robinson                           07/28/2000 11:09 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Mark Dobler/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL

Kay -

Not yet.  I wanted to wrap up the repairs on unit 1 first to see if we should
add that to the mix.  Now that Mark is back, I'd like him (vice Mike Miller)
to be the signer.

Mark, thoughts on the attached?

Mitch

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kay Mann                           07/28/2000 11:02 AM

To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL

Mitch,

Has the letter gone out?

Kay

From: Richard B Sanders@ECT on 07/23/2000 09:24 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL

If this letter has not yet gone out, we should include the kitchen sink of
perceived problems. I agree that the letter should be short, but lets
eliminate their argument that we did not give complete notice.

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	07/13/2000 12:13 PM

		 To: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL

Mitch,

Here's a first draft.  Please suggest any additional complaints/shortfalls
which we need to raise.  It is better to be all inclusive than leave
something out.

Richard, any ideas or comments?

Kay


Message-ID: <9724414.1075850543447.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 03:00:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: linda.noske@enron.com
To: steven.kean@enron.com
Subject: Re: Southern RTO
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Linda J Noske
X-To: Steven J Kean
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Steven_Kean_Nov2001_4\Notes Folders\Discussion threads
X-Origin: KEAN-S
X-FileName: skean.nsf

---------------------- Forwarded by Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT on 07/05/2001 10:00
AM ---------------------------
From: Joe Connor@ENRON on 07/02/2001 10:43 AM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Southern  RTO

I met with Andy Dearman and Bill Newman of Southern on Friday.  They talked
about what is going on with the non-jurisdictional utilities that have signed
a MOU to develop a RTO.  The group has met a couple of times to discuss the
process they will use.  Confidentiality agreements have been signed, so no
details are available, but they have agreed to a voting structure for the
development.  Southern has about one third of the votes (and 65%of the
assets) and it takes at least two other parties agreeing with Southern to
carry a vote.  Southern says they spent a lot of time convincing the other
parties that Southern was not going to run, or dominate, the process.  After
that, Southern said the group started to pull together and get organized for
the development.

They said everyone in the group appeared to be ready to find ways to make the
RTO work and resolve the hurdles the non-jurisdictional utilities have been
expressing with the development of other RTOs.  They said there were some
rough spots that had to be resolved and they couldn't be sure agreement would
be reached, but at this point there was a lot of cooperation.

Andy and Bill wanted to convince me that this was not a delaying tactic by
Southern and they were doing everything possible to ensure that a complete
RTO filing could be ready by 12/15/01.  They also said they thought this is
what Ed Holland wanted to discuss with Steve Kean.

We talked about how other stakeholders could have input to the development.
They said that it was too early to make any commitment, but the group had
started thinking about it and they expected an input process to be available
by late summer.
They said Southern was in favor of some process that would provide
stakeholders the opportunity to look at what was being considered and advise
the development group as early as possible.  They said they understood the
difficulty stakeholders had with the approach Southern used in its initial
filing and wanted to do it different, but they pointed out again that
Southern could not dictate the process that would be allowed by the group.
In the meantime, they said if we wanted to provide position papers on any
part of the RTO development they would make sure the papers were circulated
in the group or we could continue to hold bilateral discussions with them or
other members of the development group.

Jim, I still think it would be worthwhile to have a meeting between Ed and
Steve Kean, and I would include you and invite Andy and Bill to come.  I
don't think they want to discuss anything technical at this point; they just
want to convince Enron that the approach Southern is taking provides the
quickest development of a RTO for the Southern area, and they want any help
we can give in convincing FERC to let this process run.

I also think we need to pass on filing a response to Southern's May 15th
status report, either alone or with Alabama Municipal Electric Authority (
Donna, I guess that's who you meant in the memo below, since AEC has signed a
MOU with Southern?).  I will get in touch with Bob Reilley to find out why we
haven't heard from EPSA on its filing.  I still think that's the best
approach.

	Don


Message-ID: <13240260.1075845698336.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 03:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: mreuter@kslaw.com
To: jkeffer@kslaw.com, kay.mann@enron.com
Subject: ENA/Blue Dog: conference call with Paul Hastings
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: "Reuter, Marisa" <MReuter@KSLAW.com>
X-To: "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>, "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_1\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

When: Friday, April 20, 2001 1:00 PM-2:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US &
Canada).

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Please note that today's call has been rescheduled to 1:00 CST.  I told Paul
Hastings to dial in using the usual Sprint conference call number.

Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


Message-ID: <25085633.1075860658304.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 07:21:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: djn@pkns.com
Subject: Remand Hearing
Cc: gfergus@brobeck.com, richard.b.sanders@enron.com, jalexander@gibbs-bruns.com,
	mlk@pkns.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: gfergus@brobeck.com, richard.b.sanders@enron.com, jalexander@gibbs-bruns.com,
	mlk@pkns.com
X-From: "David Noonan" <djn@pkns.com>
X-To:
X-cc: <Gfergus@brobeck.com>, <Richard.b.sanders@enron.com>, <Jalexander@gibbs-bruns.com>, "Michael Kirby" <mlk@pkns.com>
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Richard_Sanders_Jun2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: Sanders-R
X-FileName: rsander.nsf

A portion of the defense conference call today related to argument of the
remand opposition. I reminded the group that you wished to argue. Apparently
all three defendants who filed briefs will argue through counsel. Per the
Order, defendants have one hour total to divide. It was agreed that it would
be beneficial to have you, Jim Springer (Duke), and John Sturgeon (Mirant)
caucus by telephone to iron out the details including time allocation, order
of presentation, subjects to be covered, strategy etc. Other counsel are free
to forward their thoughts as to likely questions etc. Chris Healy advised
that he would like to be involved in your discussions on these points.
Thereafter you would distribute argument outlines for review and comment by
all. There will then be a Conference call involving the Defense Group on the
preceding Friday 6/15 @ 9 A.M. to iron out any issues. Do you have any
problems with this approach? I will leave it to you to coordinate these
efforts with your calendar. If you want me to assist please let me know.

Defendants are still continuing in their position that Judge Whaley should
defer these rulings until the MDL has acted. A letter to the Court to this
effect is being delivered today. However we are proceeding on the assumption
that the hearing will proceed on 6/18. Query what the impact would be if the
M.L. assigned all cases to Judge Whaley prior to 6/18. Would this result in a
continuance to permit the other remand issues to be heard all at once? I'll
certainly advise you ASAP of any hearing date change.

David J. Noonan
Post Kirby Noonan & Sweat L.L.P.
600 West Broadway, Suite 1100
San Diego, CA  92101
Phone:  619/231-8666
Facsimile:  619/231-9593
E-Mail:  djn@pkns.com

The information contained in this e-mail message and any accompanying
documents is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or the attorney
work product rule and is confidential business information intended only for
the use of the individual or entity named above.  If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient or representative of the recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please notify
the Systems Administrator at admin@pkns.com and immediately delete this
message from your system.


Message-ID: <15698354.1075852877478.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 11:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: aavalos@pnm.com
To: houston <.ward@enron.com>
Subject: RE: 3rd Quarter of 2002 & year 2002
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: "Avalos, Art" <AAVALOS@pnm.com>@ENRON <IMCEANOTES-+22Avalos+2C+20Art+22+20+3CAAVALOS+40pnm+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com>
X-To: Ward, Kim S (Houston) </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KWARD>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \KWARD (Non-Privileged)\Ward, Kim S (Houston)\Inbox
X-Origin: Ward-K
X-FileName: KWARD (Non-Privileged).pst

This is for physical gas for a monthly call at the money.
The Balloon Fest schedule is Oct 10th (Wednesday evening)
through noon Friday (Oct. 12th).
Thanks,
Art
-----Original Message-----
From: Kim.Ward@enron.com [mailto:Kim.Ward@enron.com ]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:45 AM
To: AAVALOS@pnm.com
Subject: RE: 3rd Quarter of 2002 & year 2002
Art,
We can price this up for you but I have a couple of questions -
1)  Is this physical or financial
2)  Is is a daily call or monthly call
3)  Would you like this priced at the money or $.50, $1.00 or more out of
the money?  I other words, what do you want your cap to be?
Thanks,
Kim
ps  What is the schedule for the baloon fest the 10th - 12th?  I'm trying
to work around some meetings etc.
 -----Original Message-----
From:     "Avalos, Art" <AAVALOS@pnm.com>@ENRON
          [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Avalos+2C+20Art+22+20+3CAAVALOS+40pnm+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com ]
Sent:     Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:09 PM
To:       Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject:  3rd Quarter of 2002 & year 2002
Kim, just for planning purposes, what would it cost to have a call option
for year 2002 and for 3rd quarter of 2002 for 5,000 mmBtu's per day
from the San Juan basin?
Thanks
Art Avalos
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Message-ID: <28483753.1075852910387.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 11:37:42 -0700 (PDT)
From: larry.gleffe@enron.com
To: mark.mcconnell@enron.com
Subject: FW: Southern Trails Due Diligence
Cc: kimberly.watson@enron.com, ld.stephens@enron.com, mike.ames@enron.com,
	larry.campbell@enron.com, don.hawkins@enron.com,
	johnny.mcgee@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: kimberly.watson@enron.com, ld.stephens@enron.com, mike.ames@enron.com,
	larry.campbell@enron.com, don.hawkins@enron.com,
	johnny.mcgee@enron.com
X-From: Gleffe, Larry </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=LGLEFFE>
X-To: McConnell, Mark </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MMcConne>
X-cc: Watson, Kimberly </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Kwatson>, Stephens, LD </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Lstephe>, Ames, Mike </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Mames>, Campbell, Larry </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Notesaddr/cn=fbf88288-7d541a4a-8625673c-6cab77>, Hawkins, Don </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Dhawkin>, McGee, Johnny </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jmcgee>
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \KWATSON (Non-Privileged)\Watson, Kimberly\Inbox
X-Origin: Watson-K
X-FileName: KWATSON (Non-Privileged).pst

	Mark: ROW has a couple of additional inquiries?

	1. Has the pipeline been transporting since Questar acquired same?

	2. If so, what was the product that was transported?

	Two other fields we would require on a report from Questar, would be abandonment and non-use clauses contained in any R/W document.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gleffe, Larry
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 9:12 AM
To:	McConnell, Mark
Cc:	Watson, Kimberly; Stephens, LD; Ames, Mike; 'larry.campbell@enron.com'; Hawkins, Don; McGee, Johnny
Subject:	Southern Trails Due Diligence
Importance:	High
Sensitivity:	Confidential

	Mark: The following are certain Right-of-Way needs and/or questions.

	1. Are the ROW records located in Salt Lake City or Long Beach, CA?

	2. Does Questar have a ROW data base? If so, can they prepare a report, which would identify product limitation (i.e. Crude Oil specific), multiple line rights, pipeline size limitations, assignability, consent, etc.

	3. An Encroachment report.

	4. A Rental/Term report.

	5. A report identifying any known curative problems.

	6. Can they identify whether the following problems that existed in 1997 have been cured?

		a. BLM issues RE: Contract Purchasers vs. Land Patents
		b. Pipeline lies outside of defined R/W in certain locations
		c. Railroad licenses sold to municipal entities that may have required new terms and rental amounts
		d. Relocations
			i. Anaheim Hills
			ii. Morongo Indian Tribe (possible Union Pacific Railroad R/W longitudinal occupation vs. private)
		e. Franchise Agreements

	7. Will new pipe be required for connection of Four Corners pipeline to existing Transwestern pipeline system? If so, would this be across the Fort Mohave Indian Reservation in Mohave County, AZ?

	It is my understanding that this due diligence will not involve the balance of Arizona, which includes the Navajos', Hopis' and the Bennett Freeze area (disputed tribal lands). Is this correct?


Message-ID: <4212091.1075845991822.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 06:50:00 -0800 (PST)
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: jeffrey.hodge@enron.com, barbara.gray@enron.com
Subject: Re: Trinity Consulting Agreement
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Kay Mann
X-To: Jeffrey T Hodge, Barbara N Gray
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

Scott stopped me on 31 to tell me what a good job Carlos did. Thought I would
pass it along.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/07/2001 02:49
PM ---------------------------

Scott Churbock
03/07/2001 02:42 PM
To: Carlos Sole/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Trinity Consulting Agreement

Carlos,
Thanks for the prompt and diligent effort---good work!  I will forward this
to Trininty and we'll go from there.
Scott

From: Carlos Sole on 03/07/2001 12:36 PM
To: Scott Churbock/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Trinity Consulting Agreement

Scott, for your review and comment, attached is a revised version of the
Trinity Consulting Agreement that I have modified so that it more closely
resembles our standard form of consulting agreement.  Also, please note that
our accounting group has also blessed this agreement.

As a summary, the substantive changes that I made are as follows:

- Article 1 now more specifically describes the standards by which Trinity
will perform its services (these changes should be a non-issue)

- Article 3 now imposes certain conflict of interest obligations on Trinity.
3.1 obligates them to represent and warrant that their entry into an
agreement with us will not breach any other obligations that would otherwise
have to other parties.  3.3 imposes the obligation on them to obtain our
prior consent before they perform any work for any third party or government
agency that would have "an adverse effect" on us (this is direct change from
their form which had no such obligation but which is standard in our
consulting agreements and is a reasonable request.)

- Article 4 adds our standard language that Contractor is an independent
contractor and not entitled to any of our employment benefits.

- Article 5, inserted a 2 year term.

- Article 6 inserted that payments are within 30 days and that reimbursements
must be in advance.  Please note that since I cannot edit the Price Schedule,
then conforming changes to it need to be made, including whether to strike
the 18% interest charge for late payments and whether to accept the 15%
out-of-pocket surcharge (neither of which is in our standard agreement).  I
also inserted your name for invoices.

- Article 7 added a termination event that the breach of the conflict of
interest or confidentiality obligations is an immediate event of termination.

- Article 8, inserted your name for notices with a copy to me in the legal
department.

- Article 9, I revised the liability limitation to make it reciprocal and
excluded from the liability limitation, damages that would arise from
Trinity's breaches of Section 3.1 (that entering into this agreement will not
breach any other agreements that they have), Article 10 (indemnification for
personal injury or death claims attributable to them), Section 12.2 (not
providing us with information that violates someone else's intellectual
property rights) and Section 13 (non-disclosure / confidentiality
obligations).  Note that although accepting a liability limitation is not
standard per our agreements, by making the foregoing exceptions, the
liability limitation that we are effectively agreeing to is only with respect
to any "malpractice" claims that we would have against them if their work was
not up to industry standards.

- Article 10, this is an indemnification provision which obligates them to
indemnify us for personal injury or death claims attributable to them.

- Article 11,

Kay Mann
Jeffrey T Hodge, Barbara N Gray

2 allows us to assign the agreement to any of our affiliates
without their consent but subject


Message-ID: <2598774.1075856551693.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 10:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: vince.kaminski@enron.com
To: sophie.kingsley@enron.com
Subject: Re: Confidential
Cc: dale.surbey@enron.com, vince.kaminski@enron.com, michele.small@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: dale.surbey@enron.com, vince.kaminski@enron.com, michele.small@enron.com
X-From: Vince J Kaminski
X-To: Sophie Kingsley
X-cc: Dale Surbey, Vince J Kaminski, Michele Small
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Vincent_Kaminski_Jun2001_4\Notes Folders\'sent mail
X-Origin: Kaminski-V
X-FileName: vkamins.nsf

Sophie,

I think it's a fair deal.

Vince

Sophie Kingsley   08/30/2000 11:49 AM

To: Dale Surbey/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michele Small/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Confidential

Both,

Thanks for your comments and comparisons, it is good to get context.

Based on your comments here would be my proposal

o63,500 basic salary -
o15K kickers for each of the 2 years - These are paid as a lump sum on each
anniversary guaranteed.  Therefore guaranteed salary is effectively o78,500 -
this is completely separate and in addition to any performance bonus
Increase the value of options to o60K  to vest 1/3 as before - which leaves a
1/3 ($20,000 ) hanging out there at the end of the contract.

Just FYI - Anjam is currently on o68,000 but does not have an agreement, so
this would effectively put a 10.5K gap between the two.

Let me know your thoughts.

Dale Surbey
30/08/2000 16:09
To: Sophie Kingsley/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Confidential

Sophie,

Here's Vince's comments on your proposal for Steve.  Also, what's a 2-Yr
Exec?  How do the kickers work - are they basically a guaranteed minimum
bonus or incremental bonus?

- Dale

---------------------- Forwarded by Dale Surbey/LON/ECT on 30/08/2000 16:10
---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
30/08/2000 14:21
To: Dale Surbey/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Confidential

Dale,

Thanks for your message.
I don't know the labor market  in London that well but here the market
for quants is very hot.  Steve is in my view an exceptionally talented person
and I would go an extra mile to retain  him long-term for the company.

I would adjust the base salary or the kicker upward a bit.
o62,000 Basic  is what Anjam is receiving currently  (if I remember
correctly). Steve has a much higher value
to Enron than Anjam.

Vince

Dale Surbey
08/30/2000 07:49 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Confidential

Vince,

This is the package HR is proposing for Steven.  What do you think?

- Dale

---------------------- Forwarded by Dale Surbey/LON/ECT on 30/08/2000 13:50
---------------------------
Sophie Kingsley   29/08/2000 20:32

To: Dale Surbey/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Confidential

Sorry Dale, long day, here are the proposed numbers

2 Year Exec
o62,000 Basic  ( currently o55K )
o10K each year kickers
$50,000 worth of options to vest 1/3 1/3 1/3

Let me know what you think.

Regards

Sophie

000 worth of options to vest 1
000 but does not have


Message-ID: <3336495.1075840999033.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 18:42:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: enron.announcements@enron.com
To: all.worldwide@enron.com
Subject: Anonymous Reporting Facilities
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-From: Enron Announcements
X-To: All Enron Worldwide
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \eric linder 6-28-02\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: LINDER-E
X-FileName: eric linder 6-28-02.nsf

This is to remind you that various anonymous reporting facilities are=20
available for you to report violations of Company policy and suspected=20
criminal conduct by any officer, employee, or agent of Enron relating to th=
e=20
performance of his or her duties.  These reporting facilities are also=20
available for your questions, messages, comments, and suggestions.

 Any policy violation or criminal conduct may be reported by letter, e-mail=
,=20
or voice mail, as set forth below, describing the suspected violation or=20
criminal conduct with as much detail as possible to allow Enron to conduct =
an=20
investigation of the reported matter.

1. Letters should be sent to the Confidential Post Office Box: =20

Enron Compliance Officer
Confidential - Conduct of Business Affairs=20
P. O. Box 1188=20
Houston, Texas  77251-1188

2. E-mails should be sent to the Office of the Chairman=01,s e-mail box: =
=20
Employees with Enron e-mail can access this box by sending an e-mail to the=
=20
Office of the Chairman.  Simply type =01&Office of the Chairman=018 in the =
address=20
box, type your message, and send.  Your message will be completely=20
anonymous.  If, however, you copy your message and e-mail it to someone els=
e,=20
the copy will not be anonymous. =20

3. Voice mail messages should be left with the Office of the Chairman voice=
=20
mail box.  You can access the Office of the Chairman voice mail box at (713=
)=20
853-7294.  If you call from your extension or an outside line, your message=
=20
will be completely anonymous.  If, however, you access the voice mail box=
=20
while you are in the Enron voice mail system, your message will not be=20
anonymous.

 You may, but are not required to, identify yourself.  If you would like to=
=20
identify yourself, please submit your name and phone number with your lette=
r=20
or message.  All anonymously reported matters will be investigated and acte=
d=20
upon in the same manner as those that contain signatures.

 We take great pride in ensuring that Enron is a great place to work.  We=
=20
encourage each employee to continue to conduct Enron's business affairs in=
=20
accordance with all applicable laws and in a moral and honest manner.


Message-ID: <23665444.1075859076761.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 10:13:03 -0800 (PST)
From: tony.pryor@enron.com
To: drew.fossum@enron.com, steven.harris@enron.com
Subject: RE: Draft Motion to Strike Embedded Cost Testimony--Solicitation of
 Interest
Cc: bill.rapp@enron.com, glen.hass@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: bill.rapp@enron.com, glen.hass@enron.com
X-From: Pryor, Tony </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TPRYOR>
X-To: Fossum, Drew </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Dfossum>, Harris, Steven </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Sharris1>
X-cc: Rapp, Bill </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Brapp>, Hass, Glen </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Ghass>
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Bill_Rapp_Jan2002\Rapp, Bill\Inbox
X-Origin: Rapp-B
X-FileName: brapp (Non-Privileged).pst

Drew, I'll check with Glen and Bill, who are closer to this case than I am.................Tony

-----Original Message-----
From: Fossum, Drew
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 12:10 PM
To: Harris, Steven; Pryor, Tony
Subject: FW: Draft Motion to Strike Embedded Cost Testimony--Solicitation of Interest

are we still interested in paying these guys to fight this case, given the recent events?  they may be running up a big bill.  df
-----Original Message-----
From: Gregory Klatt [mailto:gregoryklatt@earthlink.net]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 12:33 AM
To: Hass, Glen; Harris, Steven; Pryor, Tony; Fossum, Drew
Cc: Dan Douglass
Subject: FW: Draft Motion to Strike Embedded Cost Testimony--Solicitation of Interest

Here's EGA's draft motion to strike SoCalGas' and SDG&E's embedded cost studies.  If possible, let's talk about same Friday afternoon.  How about 3:00 p.m. Texas time?  If that's okay, I'll set up the call.

----- Original Message -----
From: BCragg <mailto:BCragg@GMSSR.com>
To: eric.eisenman@neg.pge.com <mailto:BCragg@GMSSR.com>; jleslie@luce.com <mailto:BCragg@GMSSR.com>; jbushee@sablaw.com <mailto:BCragg@GMSSR.com>; tomb@crossborderenergy.com <mailto:BCragg@GMSSR.com>; salleyoo@dwt.com <mailto:BCragg@GMSSR.com>; gregoryklatt@earthlink.net <mailto:BCragg@GMSSR.com>; ncpederson@jonesday.com <mailto:BCragg@GMSSR.com>; ek@a-klaw.com <mailto:BCragg@GMSSR.com>; jkarp@whitecase.com <mailto:BCragg@GMSSR.com>
Sent: 11/29/2001 6:38:19 PM
Subject: Draft Motion to Strike Embedded Cost Testimony--Solicitation of Interest

Attached for your consideration is a draft motion to stike testimony related
to the embedded cost proposal in the SoCalGas/SDG&E BCAP.  I have drafted
this motion for EGA, but we would prefer to present it as part of a larger
group.  I have sent you this draft because you seem to represent parties who
might have similar concerns about the embedded cost proposal.
Would your clients be interested in co-sponsoring this motion?  If so,
please let me know as soon as possible.  Ideally, we would have a loose
group identified as the Moving Parties or something similar to sponsor the
motion.  I've dated the motion for Monday, because I think it would be most
effective if the motion is public when we discuss the schedule at Tuesday's
prehearing conference.
I would also appreciate any comments, edits, additions, or suggestions you
may have.  For example, we could use some more examples of other uses of
marginal costs in gas regulation.  Note that the wonders of Word's
footnoting function make this a little difficult to read on the screen.
If you're interested in joining in this motion, please let me know no later
than 10 a.m. Monday, December 3, and earlier is better.
Please keep this draft confidential for now.
Thanks,
Brian

<>

--- Gregory  Klatt
--- Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
--- gregoryklatt@earthlink.net <mailto:gregoryklatt@earthlink.net>


Message-ID: <6738556.1075840879655.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 07:13:26 -0800 (PST)
From: david.forster@enron.com
To: louise.kitchen@enron.com
Subject: Fw: Real estate issues re: UBSW Energy, LLC in Houston
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Forster, David </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DFORSTER>
X-To: Kitchen, Louise </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Lkitchen>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \ExMerge - Kitchen, Louise\'Americas\Netco EOL
X-Origin: KITCHEN-L
X-FileName: louise kitchen 2-7-02.pst

I'm thinking 3 and 4 are not as nice as 5 and 6, but that this would be OK, and preferable to moving to the North Tower and that we should be trying for a longer lease, with breaks we can exercise at our option. We should be in a good negotiating position.

Thought?

Dave
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.Bridges@ubsw.com <Mark.Bridges@ubsw.com>
To: Forster, David <David.Forster@ENRON.com>; louise@enron.com <louise@enron.com>; Pat.ODonnell@ubsw.com <Pat.ODonnell@ubsw.com>
CC: Beth.Barrett@ubsw.com <Beth.Barrett@ubsw.com>; bdugan@ubspw.com <bdugan@ubspw.com>
Sent: Mon Jan 28 08:56:04 2002
Subject: Real estate issues re: UBSW Energy, LLC in Houston

Hello Pat, Louise, Dave

The UBSW real estate department is reviewing the current/future lease
terms for UBSW Energy LLC, in Houston.  According to Brian Dugan, our
lead real estate guy on the bank side, the building owner has offered
a nine month lease to stay in the South Tower on the 5th and 6th
floors.  After the nine months we will be offered the option to sign
up for an additional 18 months but we could be moved down to floors 3
and 4.  Is this a significant issue?  I understand that the 3rd and
4th floor foot prints are similar to 5/6.

If UBSW Energy is willing to relocate to the North Tower, they can
get a lease for 5-9 years but this tower may be less suitable.  What
are the issues here?

The integration real estate team plans to meet this afternoon with
the Bank's outside legal firm we use for real estate issues.  We have
a target date of this Friday to try to resolve all real estate issues
in order to meet the DAY 0 legal integration date of 2/6/02.

Your thoughts please.

Mark

Visit our website at http://www.ubswarburg.com

This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual named.  If you are not the named addressee you
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.  Please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.

E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed,
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.  The sender therefore
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents
of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.  If
verification is required please request a hard-copy version.  This
message is provided for informational purposes and should not be
construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or
related financial instruments.


Message-ID: <32864251.1075846011033.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 07:23:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: chris.booth@enron.com, ben.jacoby@enron.com
Subject: RE: Change order #2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Kay Mann
X-To: Chris Booth, Ben Jacoby
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/23/2001 02:22
PM ---------------------------

"Argento, Connie" <ConnieArgento@paulhastings.com> on 04/23/2001 02:20:38 PM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc: "Kahn, Margaret R." <MargaretKahn@paulhastings.com>

Subject: RE: Change order #2

THIS REPLY SENT ON BEHALF OF MARGUERITE KAHN

Kay -

The revised Change Order Number 2 looks fine to me.  Thanks.

      Marguerite

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 2:21 PM
To: MargueriteKahn@paulhastings.com; JeremiahDeBerry@paulhastings.com;
michael.young@northwestern.com
Cc: Ben.Jacoby@enron.com; Chris.Booth@enron.com; jkeffer@kslaw.com;
mreuter@kslaw.com
Subject: Change order #2

Please confirm that the changes to change order #2 reflect NW's request.

Thanks,

Kay

(See attached file: change order 2 revised per NW.doc)

"paulhastings.com" made the following annotations on 04/23/01 15:21:05
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEW E-MAIL ADDRESSES AT PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

We have changed our e-mail address.  Our new domain name is
paulhastings.com.  In most cases, our address is composed of conventional
first name and last name plus @paulhastings.com.  Here are two examples:
janesmith@paulhastings.com and danjones@paulhastings.com.  If you have any
questions, please contact us at noc@paulhastings.com.

==============================================================================
"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all
computers."

==============================================================================


Message-ID: <22233076.1075840390155.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 12:47:23 -0800 (PST)
From: david.gorte@enron.com
To: rick.buy@enron.com
Subject: RE: Letter to Mariner Board Members
Cc: bradford.larson@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: bradford.larson@enron.com
X-From: Gorte, David </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DGORTE>
X-To: Buy, Rick </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rbuy>
X-cc: Larson, Bradford </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Blarson>
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \rbuy\Inbox
X-Origin: BUY-R
X-FileName: richard buy 1-30-02..pst

Rick,

My views are as follows:

- The sale of the deepwater assets makes sense due to their requirement of significant ongoing capital expenditures; the other assets of the company should also be auctioned off concurrently (although we would retain the right to continue to hold them if the offers received were inadequate); research into our commitments to Lehman as the sales advisor previously needs to be conducted (I have asked Don Miller in Corporate Development to research this).

- The fact that the Mariner severance package is considerably better than the Enron package will be is a significant optical issue and not reducing it may create an issue with the creditors committee for the Enron bankruptcy.

- The extension of employment agreements and consulting agreements, in my opinion, should be for a shorter time period, say to March 31, 2002, again in light of the Enron situation and the optics to the creditors committee.

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: Buy, Rick
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 12:45 PM
To: Gorte, David; Larson, Bradford
Subject: FW: Letter to Mariner Board Members
Importance: High
Sensitivity: Confidential

Any thoughts on this? Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: Cagle, Donna [mailto:DCAGLE@mariner-energy.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 11:10 AM
To: Melendrez, Jesus; Buy, Rick; Keel, Allan; Josey, Scott D.; Clark,
Richard; 'Bob Henderson'; 'mstrick443@earthlink.net'; Fox, Craig A.;
'mark.e.haedicke@enron.com'; 'whalley@enron.com'
Cc: Zelikovitz, Kelly; Bushman, Teresa G.
Subject: Letter to Mariner Board Members
Importance: High
Sensitivity: Confidential

Please see attached letter from Scott Josey. Thank you.

Donna M. Cagle
Executive Administrator to President & CEO
Mariner Energy, Inc.
580 WestLake Park Blvd., Suite 1300
Houston, TX  77079
281/584-5511 (phone)     281/584-5515 (fax)
dcagle@mariner-energy.com

 <<Board Letter 12-4-01.doc>>


Message-ID: <19527124.1075852469797.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 16:49:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: mday@gmssr.com
To: d..steffes@enron.com, susan.mara@enron.com, vicki.sharp@enron.com,
	b..sanders@enron.com, c..williams@enron.com, j..kean@enron.com,
	richard.shapiro@enron.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com, mday@enron.com,
	e-mail <.john@enron.com>
Subject: RE: Potential Action Against CPUC RE:  Retroactive Suspension of
 	DA
Cc: 'bev.hansen@enron.com, bhansen@lhom.com, 'hedy.govenar@enron.com,
	hgovenar@govadv.com, 'scott.govenar@enron.com, sgovenar@govadv.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: 'bev.hansen@enron.com, bhansen@lhom.com, 'hedy.govenar@enron.com,
	hgovenar@govadv.com, 'scott.govenar@enron.com, sgovenar@govadv.com
X-From: MDay <MDay@GMSSR.com>@ENRON <IMCEANOTES-MDay+20+3CMDay+40GMSSR+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com>
X-To: Steffes, James D. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JSTEFFE>, Mara, Susan </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=SMARA>, Sharp, Vicki </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=NOTESADDR/CN=DC350363-F761E300-862564C2-54998E>, Sanders, Richard B. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RSANDER>, Williams, Robert C. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RWILLIA2>, Kean, Steven J. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=SKEAN>, Shapiro, Richard </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RSHAPIRO>, Dasovich, Jeff </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JDASOVIC>, MDay <MDay@GMSSR.com>, John Klauberg (E-mail) <JKLAUBER@LLGM.COM>
X-cc: 'Bev Hansen, Enron lobbyist' <bhansen@lhom.com>, 'Hedy Govenar, Enron Sacto lobbyist' <hgovenar@govadv.com>, 'Scott Govenar, Enron lobbyist' <sgovenar@govadv.com>
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \JSTEFFE (Non-Privileged)\Steffes, James D.\California Issues
X-Origin: Steffes-J
X-FileName: JSTEFFE (Non-Privileged).pst

Latest word, as of 5 pm is that Commissioner Bilas has requested a hold on
the direct access suspension item, but that his office does not know why
Loretta Lynch indicated an intention to vote on the matter at her press
conference, and expects that there may be a vote to overturn the hold.  She
is suggesting that parties lobby Comm. Brown to support the hold--which is
the strategy that we have tried to put into effect.  We have not been able
to get any firm response from Brown's office.  We will continue our efforts
to support the hold and monitor the Commission meeting tomorrow and advise
of the result.  Mike Day

-----Original Message-----
From: Steffes, James D. [mailto:James.D.Steffes@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 3:32 PM
To: Mara, Susan; Sharp, Vicki; Sanders, Richard B.; Williams, Robert C.;
Kean, Steven J.; Shapiro, Richard; Dasovich, Jeff; Mike Day (E-mail);
John Klauberg (E-mail)
Subject: Potential Action Against CPUC RE: Retroactive Suspension of DA
Importance: High

I've asked Sue Mara to try and develop through AReM some form of legal
action that the industry could file if the CPUC goes through with its
current plans to retroactively suspend DA as of July 1.

Our goal should be to file tomorrow evening (assuming CPUC action).  To
make sure that we are on board, it probably makes sense to have a phone
call to discuss the draft sometime tomorrow early afternoon (1pm PST?).
I will leave it to Sue Mara to arrange with the people on this e-mail a
conference call to discuss the draft.

My choice would be to not have Enron file the paper, but rather work
through AReM.

Thanks,

Jim

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any atta


Message-ID: <17199072.1075849840285.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:45:00 -0800 (PST)
From: enron.announcements@enron.com
To: all.states@enron.com
Subject: =?ANSI_X3.4-1968?Q?New_Employee_Service_=01)_Turbo_Tax?=
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-From: Enron Announcements
X-To: All Eligible Enron Employees United States
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Sally_Beck_Nov2001\Notes Folders\Discussion threads
X-Origin: BECK-S
X-FileName: sbeck.nsf

As tax season rapidly approaches, we are pleased to announce a new W-2=20
employee service.  If you plan to file your personal income taxes through=
=20
TurboTax 2000 (Intuit's personal tax filing software) you will be able to=
=20
automatically download your W-2 information into the appropriate TurboTax=
=20
forms directly over the Internet for free. =20

Enron has chosen to provide this service to help speed the processing time=
=20
and accuracy of your return while supporting paperless processing.

More information regarding this service is listed below or visit=20
www.probusinesstaxes.com to find out more about the TurboTax software and=
=20
Web-based filing service.

Employee Fact Sheet: ProBusiness/Intuit W-2 service

Q.  What is the Automated Tax Return (ATR) service?
A. Intuit Inc., makers of the popular Quicken TurboTax tax preparation and=
=20
filing software, have launched a new Automated Tax Return (ATR) service to=
=20
simplify tax preparation for TurboTax users. ATR allows users of TurboTax t=
ax=20
preparation and filing software to import tax information from multiple=20
sources such as employers, brokerage houses, and mutual fund companies=20
directly into the correct TurboTax forms over the Internet.  Since our=20
payroll tax provider, ProBusiness, has partnered with Intuit to provide thi=
s=20
service, you will be able to electronically download your individual W-2 da=
ta=20
from ProBusiness directly into TurboTax through the Internet for free. Also=
,=20
as part of this program, you can receive a  5% discount on all TurboTax and=
=20
Quicken products including shipping and handling (go to=20
www.probusinesstaxes.com for more information).

Q. So how does it work?
A. Embedded in each version of TurboTax 2000 (both the software and web=20
application) is a series of screens that will ask whether your employer=20
allows you to automatically download your data into TurboTax.  To use the=
=20
free service, simply answer "yes" then select our payroll tax provider,=20
ProBusiness, from a drop-down list of providers which includes ProBusiness,=
=20
PeopleSoft, Ceridian, and seemyw2.com.  Validate your request by entering=
=20
your social security number and W-2 box one data and your W-2 data will=20
automatically transfer via the Internet into the appropriate locations in t=
he=20
TurboTax form.

Q. Is this a secure transaction?
A.  Intuit=01,s TurboTax ATR service combines Open Financial Exchange (OFX)=
, the=20
standard technology used in e-finance, with 128-bit military-grade encrypti=
on=20
to create an advanced security protocol that ensures the highest level of=
=20
security and confidentiality when obtaining financial data to populate your=
=20
TurboTax form over the Internet.

Q. How do I participate in this program?=20
A.  Only employees using Intuit=01,s TurboTax 2000 tax preparation and fili=
ng=20
software can take advantage of this Web-based ATR service.  TurboTax softwa=
re=20
and the ATR Web-based filing service can be accessed at=20
www.probusinesstaxes.com.

Q. What if I already own TurboTax 2000=01(does this still work?
A. Yes, all copies of TurboTax 2000 contain the Automated Tax Return servic=
e=20
option.

Q. Overall what are the Benefits to me?
A.  Using the ATR service provided by Intuit and ProBusiness, you can:
? Increase your probability of accurate filing.
? Eliminate the need to manually enter your W-2 information and other=20
financial data.
? Increase the ov


Message-ID: <29732094.1075847546118.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 09:20:00 -0800 (PST)
From: tana.jones@enron.com
To: marcus.nettelton@enron.com
Subject: Re: Arbitration Language
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-From: Tana Jones
X-To: Marcus Nettelton
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Tanya_Jones_June2001\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: JONES-T
X-FileName: tjones.nsf

 (b) Agreement To Arbitrate:  Any claim, counterclaim, demand, cause of=20
action, dispute, and controversy arising out of or relating to this Agreeme=
nt=20
or the relationship established by this Agreement, any provision hereof, th=
e=20
alleged breach thereof, or in any way relating to the subject matter of thi=
s=20
Agreement, involving the parties and/or their respective representatives=20
(collectively the =01&Claims=018), even though some or all of such Claims a=
llegedly=20
are extra-contractual in nature, whether such Claims sound in contract, tor=
t,=20
or otherwise, at law or in equity, under state or federal law, whether=20
provided by statute or the common law, for damages or any other relief, sha=
ll=20
be resolved by binding arbitration.

Conduct Of The Arbitration, And Authority Of The Arbitrators:  Arbitration=
=20
shall be governed by the Federal Arbitration Act and conducted in accordanc=
e=20
with the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration=20
Association.  The validity, construction, and interpretation of this=20
agreement to arbitrate, and all procedural aspects of the arbitration=20
conducted pursuant hereto shall be decided by the arbitrators.  In deciding=
=20
the substance of the parties=01, Claims, the arbitrators shall refer to the=
=20
Governing Law.  It is agreed that the arbitrators shall have no authority t=
o=20
award treble, exemplary or punitive damages of any type under any=20
circumstances whether or not such damages may be available under state or=
=20
federal law, or under the Federal Arbitration Act, or under the Commercial=
=20
Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association, the parties here=
by=20
waiving their right, if any, to recover any such damages.

Forum For The Arbitration And Selection Of Arbitrators:  The arbitration=20
proceeding shall be conducted in [New York, New York][Houston, Texas]. =20
Within thirty days of the notice of initiation of the arbitration procedure=
,=20
each party shall select one arbitrator.  The two arbitrators shall select a=
=20
third arbitrator.  The third arbitrator shall be a person who has over eigh=
t=20
years professional experience in over-the-counter derivative products and w=
ho=20
has not previously been employed by either party and does not have a direct=
=20
or indirect interest in either party or the subject matter of the=20
arbitration.  While the third arbitrator shall be neutral, the two=20
party-appointed arbitrators are not required to be neutral, and it shall no=
t=20
be grounds for removal of either of the two party-appointed arbitrators or=
=20
for vacating the arbitrators=01, award that either of such arbitrators has =
past=20
or present minimal relationships with the party that appointed such=20
arbitrator.

 Confidentiality:  To the fullest extent permitted by law, any arbitration=
=20
proceeding and the arbitrators award shall be maintained in confidence by=
=20
the  parties.

=09Marcus Nettelton@ENRON
=0902/08/2001 04:25 PM
=09=09=20
=09=09 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
=09=09 cc:=20
=09=09 Subject: Arbitration Language

Tana
=20
I dropped by a couple of times today but your seat was empty, hence the ema=
il.
=20
Would you be kind enough to forward to me the latest ISDA language for=20
arbitration, which I understand may include wording addressing temporary or=
=20
expedited relief.
=20
Many thanks.
=20
Marcus


Message-ID: <2182255.1075841088569.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 10:38:24 -0800 (PST)
From: george.ellis@americas.bnpparibas.com
To: george.ellis@americas.bnpparibas.com
Subject: BNP PARIBAS Commodity Futures Weekly AGA Survey
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: george.ellis@americas.bnpparibas.com@ENRON
X-To: george.ellis@americas.bnpparibas.com
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \ExMerge - Maggi, Mike\Deleted Items
X-Origin: MAGGI-M
X-FileName: michael maggi 6-25-02.PST

Good Morning,

Please provide your estimate for this week's AGA storage survey.

Here are this week's stats:

AGA Last Year       -105
5 yr AVG            -113
Lifetime High            -227 1996
Lifetime Low             -75  1997
Gas in STGE              2294
5yr AVG             1654
+/- to 2001              +1053
+/- to 5yr AVG           +640

Please have your estimates in by 12:00 (11:00 CST) Wednesday.  Thank you.

(Embedded image moved to file: pic17279.pcx)

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir immediatement l'expediteur.

Toute utilisation de ce message non conforme a sa destination, toute diffusion ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf autorisation expresse.

L'internet ne permettant pas d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS (et ses filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce message, dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.
	----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message and any attachments (the "message") are intended solely for the addressees and are confidential. If you receive this message in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender.

Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval.

The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message if modified.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 - pic17279.pcx


Message-ID: <11181223.1075844571439.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 04:12:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: sara.shackleton@enron.com
To: tanya.rohauer@enron.com
Subject: SITA
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Sara Shackleton
X-To: Tanya Rohauer
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Sara_Shackleton_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: SHACKLETON-S
X-FileName: sshackle.nsf

Tanya:  I just returned from vacation.  What happened with SITA?  Did we
execute a transaction (in the name of ECTRIC) on a Deemed ISDA (with or
without credit?).  I didn't see an entry in Lotus Notes.  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 10/16/2000 11:10 AM -----

	"Susan Hopkinson" <susan.hopkinson@lovells.com>
	10/09/2000 03:27 AM

		 To: <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: SITA

CONFIDENTIALITY This e-mail and any attachments are confidential
and may also be privileged. If you are not the named recipient,
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the
contents to another person, use it for any purpose, or store
or copy the information in any medium.
----------------------------------------------------------------

Further to my fax of 3 October we have SITA's instructions.

1 - Credit Support Annex :

SITA's position is unchanged. SITA does not wish to have a Credit Support
Annex.  SITA have asked that ENRON come up with a proposal on the term and
volume of the transactions on the basis of no Credit Support Annex.

2 - SITA does not provide investment services ancillary to its main
activities. Do you have any news regarding ENRON on this point?

Kind regards
Susan Hopkinson

----------------------------------------------------------------
Lovells (the merged firm of Lovell White Durrant and
Boesebeck Droste, practising as Lovells Boesebeck Droste in
some jurisdictions) is an international law firm.

In the event of any technical difficulty with this email, please contact
the sender or the London Technology Department on +44 (0) 20 7296 2000.


Message-ID: <5843028.1075850036930.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 02:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: linda.noske@enron.com
To: steven.kean@enron.com
Subject: Re: Southern RTO
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Linda J Noske
X-To: Steven J Kean
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Steven_Kean_Nov2001_2\Notes Folders\Archiving\Untitled
X-Origin: KEAN-S
X-FileName: skean.nsf

Forwarding to you at the request of Christi Nicolay.
---------------------- Forwarded by Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT on 07/05/2001 09:58
AM ---------------------------
From: Joe Connor@ENRON on 07/05/2001 09:12 AM
To: Tom Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Southern RTO

Latest info on Southern for your meeting with Kean and Ed Holland today.

----- Forwarded by Joe Connor/NA/Enron on 07/05/2001 09:10 AM -----

	James D Steffes
	07/02/2001 04:20 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Connor/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Southern RTO

Steve --

If still ok, I think that we should try and establish the date for the
Southern - Enron meeting per Joe's message below.  It would be good to hear
their viewpoints (just to know where they are coming from).

Jim

---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 07/02/2001
04:18 PM ---------------------------
From: Joe Connor on 07/02/2001 10:43 AM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Southern  RTO

I met with Andy Dearman and Bill Newman of Southern on Friday.  They talked
about what is going on with the non-jurisdictional utilities that have signed
a MOU to develop a RTO.  The group has met a couple of times to discuss the
process they will use.  Confidentiality agreements have been signed, so no
details are available, but they have agreed to a voting structure for the
development.  Southern has about one third of the votes (and 65%of the
assets) and it takes at least two other parties agreeing with Southern to
carry a vote.  Southern says they spent a lot of time convincing the other
parties that Southern was not going to run, or dominate, the process.  After
that, Southern said the group started to pull together and get organized for
the development.

They said everyone in the group appeared to be ready to find ways to make the
RTO work and resolve the hurdles the non-jurisdictional utilities have been
expressing with the development of other RTOs.  They said there were some
rough spots that had to be resolved and they couldn't be sure agreement would
be reached, but at this point there was a lot of cooperation.

Andy and Bill wanted to convince me that this was not a delaying tactic by
Southern and they were doing everything possible to ensure that a complete
RTO filing could be ready by 12/15/01.  They also said they thought this is
what Ed Holland wanted to discuss with Steve Kean.

We talked about how other stakeholders could have input to the development.
They said that it was too early to make any commitment, but the group had
started thinking about it and they expected an input process to be available
by late summer.
They said Southern was in favor of some process that would provide
stakeholders the opportunity to look at what was being considered and advise
the development group as early as possible.  They said they understood the
difficulty stakeholders had with the approach Southern used in its initial
filing and wanted to do it different, but they pointed out again that
Southern could not dictate the process that would be allowed by the group.
In the meantime, they said if we wanted to provide position papers on any
part of the RTO development they would make sure the papers were circulated
in the group or we could continue to hold bilateral discussions with them or
other members of the development group.


Message-ID: <20582224.1075842685609.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 08:32:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: gerald.nemec@enron.com
To: davis.thames@enron.com
Subject: Re: The True Fan
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Gerald Nemec
X-To: Davis Thames
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Gerald_Nemec_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: NEMEC-G
X-FileName: gnemec.nsf

Davis,  This actually sounds frighteningly like my experience at the Big 12
Game.  However, just because I at one time worked at the Posse doesn't mean
my character should continue to be called into question.

	Davis Thames@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	10/04/2000 09:27 AM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Brian Hendon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Margaret_Thames@dell.com
		 Subject: The True Fan

Gerald, got a copy of this and thought you might need to see it...  Margaret,
just so that you get a proper understanding of who I work with, rumor has it
that Gerald used to work at the Posse.

>>>> Fan on Game Day
>>>>
>>>> This is pretty long, but it's HYSTERICAL! If you've ever been drunk at a
>>>> sporting event, or been with someone who has, you can relate.
>>>> This is an e-mail from some guy named J.D. Horne Gerald Nemec, who,
according to the
>>>> messages that were attached to this, is not a 21 year-old frat boy, but
an
>>>> attorney of indeterminate age. He sent it to his friend Brian Brice and
it
>>>> got forwarded around the country. You have to give the guy some props for
>>>> being self-deprecating...but I hope I never meet him on game day.
>>>>
>>>> A chronology of events for Saturday, December 4, 1999, and the early
>>>> morning hours of Sunday, December 5, 1999:
>>>>
>>>> 6:00 Arise, play the Eyes of Texas and Texas Fight at full-freaking blast
>>>>
>>>> 6:20 Get in car, drive to New Braunfels
>>>>
>>>> 7:30 Tee off (me and a buddy were the FIRST tee-time of the morning)
>>>>
>>>> 8:50 Turn 9 (crack open first beer)
>>>>
>>>> 8:53 Crack open second beer
>>>>
>>>> 8:58 Crack open...(you get the idea)
>>>>
>>>> 10:30 Finish 18 (holes, as well as beers), sign scorecard for smoooooth
95
>>>>
>>>> 10:35 Headed for San Antonio (Alamodome - Nebraska vs Texas)
>>>>
>>>> 10:50 Buy three 18-packs for pre- and post-game festivities
>>>>
>>>> 11:10 We decide we don't have enough booze, so we double-back to a liquor
>>>> store and buy the good ol' 750 ml plastic bottle "Traveler" Jim Beam
>>>>
>>>> 11:50 Arrive at the tailgate spot. Awesome day. Not a single cloud in the
>>>> sky. About 70 degrees.
>>>>
>>>> 11:55 I decide that we're going to kick the shit out of Nebraska.
>>>>
>>>> 11:56 I tell my first Nebraska fan to go fuck himself.
>>>>
>>>> 12:15 The UT band walks by on the way to the Alamodome. We're on the
second
>>>> floor of a two-story parking garage on the corner (a couple hundred of
us).
>>>> We're hooting and hollering like wildmen. The band doubles back to the
>>>> street right below us and serenades us with Texas Fight and The Eyes of
>>>> Texas. AWESOME MOMENT.
>>>>
>>>> 12:25 In the post-serenade serendipity, 50-100 grown men are bumping
chests
>>>> with one another, each and every one of them now secure and certain of
the
>>>> fact that we are going to kick the shit out of Nebraska.
>>>>
>>>> 1:00 The Nebraska band walks by on the way to the Alamodome. Again, we
hoot
>>>> and holler like wildmen. Again, the band doubles back and stops right
below
>>>> us to serenade us, this time, however, with the Nebraska fight songs.
>>>> Although somewhat impressed by their spirit and verve, we remain
convinced
>>>> that we are going to kick the shit out of Nebraska.
>>>>
>>>> 1:30 I begin the walk to the Alamodome, somehow managing to stuff the
>>>> "Traveler" and 11 cans of beer into my pants.
>>>>
>>>> 1:47 I am in line surrounded by Nebraska fans. They are taunting me. I am
>>>> taunting back, still certain that we are going to kick the shit out of
>>

15 The UT band walks by on the way
01 The first


Message-ID: <27755226.1075846924749.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 07:49:00 -0800 (PST)
From: tana.jones@enron.com
To: janetgj@erols.com, ridggway@aol.com
Subject: Enron Ranked Number 24 on Fortune's 100 Best Companies to Work for
 in America List
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-From: Tana Jones
X-To: janetgj@erols.com, ridggway@aol.com
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Tanya_Jones_Dec2000\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: JONES-T
X-FileName: tjones.nsf

fyi!
---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 12/21/99 03:48 PM=
=20
---------------------------
  =20
=09Enron North America Corp.
=09
=09From:  Office of the Chairman @ ENRON                           12/21/99=
=20
03:33 PM
=09

Sent by: Office of the Chairman@ENRON
To: All Enron Worldwide
cc: =20
Subject: Enron Ranked Number 24 on Fortune's 100 Best Companies to Work for=
=20
in America List

Congratulations, Enron employees!  Fortune magazine ranked Enron number 24 =
of=20
the "100 Best Companies to Work for in America," up from number 73 last=20
year.  Enron also is the only global energy company and one of four=20
Houston-based companies on the list.  Not only are we the most innovative=
=20
company in America, we continue to be recognized as a great place to work!

Fortune=01,s "100 Best Companies to Work for in America" list is primarily=
=20
employee-driven.   Selection is based mainly on responses received from=20
randomly selected employees from each participating company to 57 questions=
=20
on a confidential Great Place to Work Index Trust survey.  We=01,d like to =
thank=20
each employee who filled out the survey.  In addition, Fortune evaluates=20
information taken from a detailed human resources questionnaire, a culture=
=20
audit and other materials submitted by the companies.=20

Because companies are getting better and better, the competition was fierce=
=20
this year, and Fortune had to drop 35 companies that appeared on last year=
=01,s=20
list.  So not only did Enron significantly move up on the list, we did so i=
n=20
spite of tough new competition.

Enron=01,s corporate culture and our world-class employees make Enron a gre=
at=20
place to work.  This recognition reflects our commitment to employees and=
=20
your integral participation in Enron=01,s success.  We want to thank the Vi=
sion=20
and Values Task Force, which has worked diligently to make our values visib=
le=20
across the company.  Nowhere was this more evident than in the Chairman=01,=
s=20
Award.  We also thank all employees for your dedication, innovation,=20
enthusiasm and creative spirit.  The work you do every day makes Enron=20
successful and a great place to work.  We look forward to even greater=20
accomplishments in the New Year.

The "100 Best Companies to Work for in America" list will appear in Fortune=
=01,s=20
January 17, 2000 issue, or you can view it online now at www.fortune.com.

janetgj@erols.com, ridggway@aol.com
Tana Jones

73 last
35 companies that appeared on last


Message-ID: <1460687.1075844501329.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2000 07:47:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: mark.taylor@enron.com
To: sara.shackleton@enron.com
Subject: FX Transactions
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Mark Taylor
X-To: Sara Shackleton
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Sara_Shackleton_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\Notes inbox
X-Origin: SHACKLETON-S
X-FileName: sshackle.nsf

Looks like Justin has already contacted S&C.
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 08/09/2000 02:46 PM -----

	Justin Boyd
	08/09/2000 12:53 PM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcus
Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: FX Transactions

Gentlemen - please see below as well as the S&C memo attached.  I will also
send you a related email later.

Thanks.
Justin
---------------------- Forwarded by Justin Boyd/LON/ECT on 09/08/2000 18:55
---------------------------

Jon Barrett@MGLTD
07/08/2000 17:46
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Janine Juggins/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Trena McFarland/LON/ECT@ECT, Kevin Rhodes/MGLTD_London/MGLTD@MGLTD, Sid
Tipples/MGLTD_London/MGLTD@MGLTD, Alfred Pennisi/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Andrew
Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: FX Transactions

We received the attached from Sullivan & Cromwell re the FX business and the
possibilities of using a US companyn which company to use for contract
purposes. At a meeting here at MG today, the consensus/preference was not to
use a UK company as we have no full ISD (chapter 10) firm nor the wish to
change MG's status.

Per the advice from S&C, we like the idea of using a US corporation with a UK
"arranger" to cover any UK regulatory issues that arise. Dependent on where
the business will end up (I understand to be discussed by Gary Hickerson/Mike
Hutchinson 18th August), the following appears to be the among the logical
solutions:

1. Contractual entity - either Enron North America, MG London Inc or Newco
Inc.
2. Arranger - either EEFT Ltd, Metallgesellschaft Ltd or MG Brokers Ltd
(depending on the effect on their chapter 3 status for the last two).

The current customer base consists of entities in the US, Canada, France, UK
and Switzerland.

Please advise on any group/tax issues that can affect the final decision. If
you need any further information, please let me know.

Many thanks.

---------------------- Forwarded by Jon Barrett/MGLTD_London/MGLTD on
07/08/2000 15:59 ---------------------------

GILBERGD@sullcrom.com on 06/08/2000 15:45:55
To: jbarrett
cc: RAISLERK@sullcrom.com

Subject: FX Transactions

eSafe Protect Gateway (tm) has scanned this mail for viruses, vandals and
suspicious attachments and has found it to be CLEAN.

File: 62cy01!.DOC (38,400 bytes)
Encoding: Base64
Result: Clean.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Attached is a draft of the memo we discussed on the proposed FX business.
Please call or e-mail with any questions.  Best regards.

----------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.

 - 62cy01!.DOC


Message-ID: <9026344.1075849392939.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 00:05:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: bryan.sifert@csfb.com
Subject: CSFB Independent Power Weekly-Issue #36
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: "Sifert, Bryan" <bryan.sifert@csfb.com>
X-To: undisclosed-recipients:,
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Jeff_Dasovich_Oct2001\Notes Folders\Notes inbox
X-Origin: DASOVICH-J
X-FileName: jdasovic.nsf

Good Morning,

Attached, please find the latest issue of our Independent Power Weekly.

<<IPW072301.pdf>>
Summary:
1. IPPs Fall 9.4%   In terms of stock price performance, last week was
lackluster for the Independent Power Producers.  Our composite was down
9.4%, underperforming both the NASDAQ (-2.7%) and the S&P 500 (-0.4%).
International Power was the strongest performer in the group, rising 4.9%.
The Shaw Group was the weakest, falling 15.6%.

2. Mild Weather Exposes Companies with Portfolio Risk   We attribute last
week's poor performance to indications that some companies (e.g. CEG and
KSE) are experiencing earnings pressure due to mild weather and its impact
on power market conditions.  While investors interpreted these events as a
sign of deteriorating industry fundamentals, we view them as more the result
of company specific portfolio risk, i.e., lack of geographic diversity.  We
remain comfortable with our earnings forecasts for the bulk of the major
IPPs.  In particular, we highlight our top 2 picks --Calpine and Mirant-- as
having the least portfolio risk owing to a combination of geographical
diversity, stringent hedging policies and a strong risk management skillset.

3. Looking Ahead: Earnings Reports from AES, CPN and NRG   This week we
await earnings reports from AES, Calpine and NRG Energy.  We believe an
upside surprise is most likely from Calpine, which will report earnings on
Thursday (7/26).  Our estimate is $0.30 versus the $0.19 earned last year.
While we expect AES to meet our $0.29 estimate, we believe weakness at its
Brazilian operations has the potential to negatively impact 2001 EPS by
$0.25-$0.30 (see our FC note dated July 16).  Following AES's conference
call on Thursday, we will adjust our $1.89 2001 estimate accordingly, unless
management continues to indicate sufficient upside in other parts of its
portfolio.

4. FASB Goodwill Update   On Friday (7/20), the FASB published two
standards, Statement 141, Business Combinations, and Statement 142, Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets.  The most immediate impact of the new standards
will be the elimination of the requirement that goodwill be amortized.  In
this report we outline the EPS impact that results from the cessation of
goodwill amortization for the companies in the power generation sector.  In
the near future, we intend to issue separate report where we formally adjust
our 2002 earnings estimates.

5. CSFB Power Generation Supply Chain Conference   On September 10 and 11,
CSFB will host a Power Generation Supply Chain Conference at the Plaza Hotel
in New York City.  This event is designed to provide investors with a
wholistic perspective on all aspects of the sector-from coal and natural gas
companies, to equipment and construction service providers, to the power
producers themselves.  Please contact us if you would like additional
information.

Regards,

Neil Stein   212/325-4217
Bryan Sifert   212/325-3906

This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right


Message-ID: <19897181.1075845749847.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 07:59:00 -0800 (PST)
From: stuart.zisman@enron.com
To: kay.mann@enron.com
Subject: Coral Transaction
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Stuart Zisman
X-To: Kay Mann
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_1\Notes Folders\Coral
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED - DO NOT PRODUCE

Kay,

Thanks again for helping me out.  I wanted to pass on a few things that were
discussed immediately prior to the execution of the LOI just so that nothing
is lost in the changing of the guards.

1)  John Keffer asked ENA to determine whether the equity interest held by
ENA in the SPV must be a voting interest.  The concern here was that the LLC
Agreement was structured to have the 20% owner hold a non-voting member
interest and John wanted to be certain that this satisfied the terms of the
GE LM6000 contract;

2)  The LOI talks about the "minimal representations" that ENA will be
required to give to Coral in connection with the disposition of the 80%
member interest to the Acquisition Entity.  I spoke with Jim Shepherd
(internal counsel to Coral - who by the way was a colleague/friend of mine
when I was employed at Coral) and assured him that ENA would be willing to
provide the necessary reps to give Coral comfort that we hadn't done anything
with the SPV (i.e. incur liabilities or convey other interests in the SPV);

3)  Jim Shepherd and I also spoke about expressly incorporating the
confidentiality provisions of the LOI into the final deal documentation.  I
wanted to be certain that Coral could not discuss deal terms with anyone else
(for fear that the deal structure becomes known in the market place);

4)  On the matter of taxes, Don Whaley (of Coral) expressly agreed with Ben
Jacoby that all ad valorem taxes and other taxes associated with ownership
(and the sale/transfer) of the units would be borne by Coral.  This comment
about the ad valorem taxes (which aren't expressly stated in the LOI) is
particularly important because (as you know) we anticipate a $250,000 tax on
each turbine that is delivered prior to year end.  I believe that Ben wants
to execute a letter agreement with GE (similar to the one that was executed
for the first 14 units) pursuant to which we accept title/delivery in
consideration of a $300,000 waiver of cancellation fees.  I have reservations
about this because ENA will effectively be making an additional 300k per unit
by stuffing a $250,000 obligation to Coral.  Doesn't really pass the smell
test in my book.

5)  One final item, this deal has not been DASHed and a legal risk memo has
not been prepared.  I would think that the biggest legal risk in this
transaction is the risk of discovery of the true deal structure by GE.  I
prepared a legal risk memo that highlighted this risk when I did the original
deal with Air Liquide and am happy to share that with you if you so desire.

Again, many thanks.

Stuart


Message-ID: <9344413.1075841475257.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 07:56:18 -0800 (PST)
From: cooper.richey@enron.com
To: berry.gk@lycos.com
Subject: RE: happy new year
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Richey, Cooper </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=CRICHEY>
X-To: 'berry.gk@lycos.com'
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \ExMerge - Richey, Cooper\Sent Items
X-Origin: RICHEY-C
X-FileName: cooper richey 6-26-02.PST

that motherboard does look sweet!  why the scsi drives though?  personally, i want to find a RAID card that can handle RAID5 (everything i've seen is 0,1,or 0+1) and then link up a bunch of smallish IDE drives - if the controller is good, you don't need super fast and expensive drives, so you get speed and redundancy.  as i look at hardware, i can't believe how much enron was paying compaq for hardware - it's amazing.  as for parts, what do you think about ordering from the cheapest U.S. source and paying duty?

coffee or lunch would be great.  supposed to be big news about the enron auction today, but things are very slow and i'm more or less available any time - whenever you're next in town, give me a buzz, or if you're looking for a reason to come into town, how about tuesday or wednesday -- lunch or an afternoon coffee?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Greg K Berry" <berry.gk@lycos.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 4:29 PM
To:	Richey, Cooper
Subject:	Re: happy new year

 We have delayed our trip to France, AGAIN! Janet threatened to divorce me if we don't go on a holiday soon, but she never follows through with her threats. Promises, promises.

Hardware... I'm in the process of building the ultimate server, myself. Check out the new Tyan S2466 motherboard. Sweeeet!. This with, a couple of AMD MP 1900+ processors and SCSI 15000 RPM U160 drives, this should be the ultimate. Hooked on the other end of the pipe to one of the servers at enron, it should push back so hard that those old Compaqs sream for mercy.

I'm shopping for hardware all over, really just out of the Computer Paper and by dropping into a couple of computer stores here and there. Memory Express, OA Group all have good prices, but I can probably get even better prices from a small computer shop out here in Cochrane. He'll order it in for me and I can negotiate with him.

How was everything back East. Hope you had a good time and got all caught on rest, relaxation and visiting.

I'm getting bushed sitting at home learning all the .net crap and am always anxious to get out for coffee or lunch. Let me know if we can catch a coffee sometime.

Greg
--

On Wed, 9 Jan 2002 13:31:20
 Richey, Cooper wrote:
>hey greg,
>
>happy new year.  i can't remember when you were taking your trip to france, but i hope things are going well.  i'm back in town now after a long and peaceful break - mainly just waiting to see what happens to the enron trading operations.
>
>where did you buy the hardware when you built your servers?  i'm thinking of building a database server and am not sure if its best to mail order or buy in person somewhere in town.
>
>hope you're well and talk to you soon,
>cooper
>
>
>
>**********************************************************************
>This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and ma


Message-ID: <13401223.1075840688557.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 01:41:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: bert.meyers@enron.com
To: portland.shift@enron.com
Subject: Visit
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Bert Meyers
X-To: Portland Shift
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \mark guzman 6-28-02\Notes Folders\Discussion threads
X-Origin: GUZMAN-M
X-FileName: mark guzman 6-28-02.nsf

---------------------- Forwarded by Bert Meyers/PDX/ECT on 04/29/2001 08:49
AM ---------------------------

Kalman Gaizler <kgaizler@sempratrading.com> on 04/29/2001 08:17:45 AM
To: "'bert.meyers@enron.com'" <bert.meyers@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Visit

Hi Bert,

I will be arriving in Portland on Thursday, May 17th at 10:30am and I will
be staying at the Westin Portland, 750 SW Alder St.. I would like to stop by
the Enron office on Thursday afternoon at about 2PM and meet the Enron crew.

I would appreciate your help in organizing an outing on Thursday evening.
The outing could be to your favorite restaurant or what-so-ever event that
may be nearby. I hope that you and many of your colleagues will be able to
join me on Thursday, May 17th as my guests.

Also, can you please e-mail me directions to your office.

Regards,

Ken Gaizler
SempraTrading RealTime Desk

****************************************************************************
This e-mail contains privileged attorney-client communications and/or
confidential information, and is only for the use by the intended recipient.
Receipt by an unintended recipient does not constitute a waiver of any
applicable privilege.

Reading, disclosure, discussion, dissemination, distribution or copying of
this information by anyone other than the intended recipient or his or her
employees or agents is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this
communication in error, please immediately notify us and delete the original
material from your computer.

Sempra Energy Trading Corp. (SET) is not the same company as SDG&E or
SoCalGas, the utilities owned by SET's parent company.  SET is not regulated
by the California Public Utilities Commission and you do not have to buy
SET's products and services to continue to receive quality regulated service
from the utilities.
****************************************************************************


Message-ID: <9707295.1075848013505.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2001 12:37:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: steven.kean@enron.com
To: maureen.mcvicker@enron.com
Subject: Message from Clark C. Smith
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Steven J Kean
X-To: Maureen McVicker
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Steven_Kean_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Calendar\Untitled
X-Origin: KEAN-S
X-FileName: skean.nsf

include on the distribution list and send out note about the Monday meeting.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 05/13/2001
07:36 PM ---------------------------

"Mollere, Shea" <Shea.Mollere@ElPaso.com> on 05/11/2001 04:27:14 PM
To: "'skean@enron.com'" <skean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Message from Clark C. Smith

As per our discussion, let's discuss this further next week.

Clark C. Smith
President
El Paso North America
1001 Louisiana
Houston, TX  77002
713/420-7575
713/420-7591 - FAX
clark.smith@elpaso.com

John Harrison (credit issues)
CFO
El Paso Merchant Energy Group
1001 Louisiana
Houston, TX  77002
713/420-3230
713/420-3942
john.harrison@elpaso.com

Rachael King
Regional Director - Government Affairs - California
El Paso Corporation
980  9th Street, Suite 1550
Sacramento, CA  95814
916/441-0446
916/441-0496
rachael.king@elpaso.com

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************


Message-ID: <16297741.1075862126952.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 13:16:15 -0800 (PST)
From: t..lucci@enron.com
To: lisab@int.iwhm.com
Subject: RE:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Lucci, Paul T. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=PLUCCI>
X-To: 'lisab' <lisab@int.iwhm.com>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \PLUCCI (Non-Privileged)\Lucci, Paul T.\Sent Items
X-Origin: Lucci-P
X-FileName: PLUCCI (Non-Privileged).pst

Yeah, let's do lunch on Thursday!  Who are you going on your vacation with?

-----Original Message-----
From: lisab [mailto:lisab@int.iwhm.com]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 12:42 PM
To: Lucci, Paul T.
Subject: Re:

Yeah, I'm taking off on a road trip to California.  We're planning to go to Lake Tahoe, then down into Sacramento and San Fransisco for a couple of days, then off to wine country, and back down the coast, finally stopping in Vegas on the way back.  Should be a blast!  I soooo need a vacation. Would you like to go to lunch on Thursday?  I can come down town.  I have a meeting up north at 2:00 so that would work well for me.

----- Original Message -----
From: Lucci, Paul T. <mailto:Paul.T.Lucci@ENRON.com>
To: lisab <mailto:lisab@int.iwhm.com>
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 12:23 PM
Subject: RE:

After I got you message I blew off the trip downtown.  Instead I watched football and worked around the house.  I was able to get a couple things done that have been left undone for awhile, so it was worth it.  You are leaving town for a couple of weeks?  Where are you going?  I'm free every daye xcept Wednesday.

-----Original Message-----
From: lisab [mailto:lisab@int.iwhm.com]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 11:00 AM
To: Lucci, Paul T.
Subject:

Hi Paul, sorry I bailed on you yesterday.  Did you find any good deals?  When can I get you your ski pass?  I'm leaving town for a couple of weeks starting Saturday, so let me know.  I'll talk to you later.

Lisa

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Message-ID: <22646206.1075856396664.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 00:25:00 -0800 (PST)
From: vince.kaminski@enron.com
To: vkaminski@aol.com
Subject: =?ANSI_X3.4-1968?Q?New_Employee_Service_=01)_Turbo_Tax?=
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-From: Vince J Kaminski
X-To: vkaminski@aol.com
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Vincent_Kaminski_Jun2001_2\Notes Folders\Discussion threads
X-Origin: Kaminski-V
X-FileName: vkamins.nsf

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/30/2001=
=20
08:28 AM ---------------------------
  =20
=09Enron North America Corp.
=09
=09From:  Corporate Payroll @ ENRON                           01/29/2001 10=
:45 PM
=09

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: All Eligible Enron Employees United States
cc: =20
Subject: New Employee Service =01) Turbo Tax

As tax season rapidly approaches, we are pleased to announce a new W-2=20
employee service.  If you plan to file your personal income taxes through=
=20
TurboTax 2000 (Intuit's personal tax filing software) you will be able to=
=20
automatically download your W-2 information into the appropriate TurboTax=
=20
forms directly over the Internet for free. =20

Enron has chosen to provide this service to help speed the processing time=
=20
and accuracy of your return while supporting paperless processing.

More information regarding this service is listed below or visit=20
www.probusinesstaxes.com to find out more about the TurboTax software and=
=20
Web-based filing service.

Employee Fact Sheet: ProBusiness/Intuit W-2 service

Q.  What is the Automated Tax Return (ATR) service?
A. Intuit Inc., makers of the popular Quicken TurboTax tax preparation and=
=20
filing software, have launched a new Automated Tax Return (ATR) service to=
=20
simplify tax preparation for TurboTax users. ATR allows users of TurboTax t=
ax=20
preparation and filing software to import tax information from multiple=20
sources such as employers, brokerage houses, and mutual fund companies=20
directly into the correct TurboTax forms over the Internet.  Since our=20
payroll tax provider, ProBusiness, has partnered with Intuit to provide thi=
s=20
service, you will be able to electronically download your individual W-2 da=
ta=20
from ProBusiness directly into TurboTax through the Internet for free. Also=
,=20
as part of this program, you can receive a  5% discount on all TurboTax and=
=20
Quicken products including shipping and handling (go to=20
www.probusinesstaxes.com for more information).

Q. So how does it work?
A. Embedded in each version of TurboTax 2000 (both the software and web=20
application) is a series of screens that will ask whether your employer=20
allows you to automatically download your data into TurboTax.  To use the=
=20
free service, simply answer "yes" then select our payroll tax provider,=20
ProBusiness, from a drop-down list of providers which includes ProBusiness,=
=20
PeopleSoft, Ceridian, and seemyw2.com.  Validate your request by entering=
=20
your social security number and W-2 box one data and your W-2 data will=20
automatically transfer via the Internet into the appropriate locations in t=
he=20
TurboTax form.

Q. Is this a secure transaction?
A.  Intuit=01,s TurboTax ATR service combines Open Financial Exchange (OFX)=
, the=20
standard technology used in e-finance, with 128-bit military-grade encrypti=
on=20
to create an advanced security protocol that ensures the highest level of=
=20
security and confidentiality when obtaining financial data to populate your=
=20
TurboTax form over the Internet.

Q. How do I participate in this program?=20
A.  Only employees using Intuit=01,s TurboTax 2000 tax preparation and fili=
ng=20
software can take advantage of this Web-based ATR service.  TurboTax softwa=
re=20
and the ATR Web-based filing service can be accessed at=20
www.probusinesstaxes.com.

Q. What if I already own TurboTax 2000=01(does this still wor