Message-ID: <26354668.1075856437077.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 10:32:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: vince.kaminski@enron.com
To: vasant.shanbhogue@enron.com
Subject: RE: Resume
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Vince J Kaminski
X-To: Vasant Shanbhogue
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Vincent_Kaminski_Jun2001_3\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: Kaminski-V
X-FileName: vkamins.nsf

Vasant,

What do you think?  He may be expensive.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/30/2001
05:31 PM ---------------------------

Marshall Brown <Marshall.Brown@robertwalters.com> on 04/25/2001 01:13:44 PM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: RE: Resume

Vince,
     I apologize, I sent you the wrong resume!  Here is the correct one.
 <<LITT_THO.DOC>>

Marshall Brown
Vice President
Robert Walters Associates
Phone #: 212-704-0596
Fax #:212-704-4312
marshall.brown@robertwalters.com
www.robertwalters.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com [SMTP:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 1:08 PM
> To: Marshall.Brown@robertwalters.com
> Subject: Re: Resume
>
>
> Marshall,
>
> He looks OK but below the level of quant skills I typically look for
>
> Vince
>
>
>
>
>
> Marshall Brown <Marshall.Brown@robertwalters.com> on 04/23/2001 09:33:00
> AM
>
> To:   Vince Kaminski <vkamins@ect.enron.com>
> cc:
> Subject:  Resume
>
>
> Vince,
>      I know this candidate is actively interviewing at El Paso and I think
> Reliant.  He has excellent quantitative background, but no real energy
> experience.  If you are interested in speaking with him let me know.
> Regards,
> Marshall Brown
> Vice President
> Robert Walters Associates
> Phone #: 212-704-0596
> Fax #:212-704-4312
> marshall.brown@robertwalters.com
> www.robertwalters.com
>
>
>  <<LITT_HAR.DOC>>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> CAUTION: Electronic mail sent through the Internet is not secure and could
> be intercepted by a third party.
>
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
> the system manager.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
> MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
>
> **********************************************************************
>
> (See attached file: LITT_HAR.DOC)
>
>  << File: LITT_HAR.DOC >>

 - LITT_THO.DOC


Message-ID: <33235320.1075846218328.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2000 04:14:00 -0800 (PST)
From: steven.kean@enron.com
To: jeff.dasovich@enron.com, sandra.mccubbin@enron.com, mark.palmer@enron.com
Subject: Arena and Electric Dereg.
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Steven J Kean
X-To: Jeff Dasovich, Sandra McCubbin, Mark Palmer
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Steven_Kean_Dec2000_1\Notes Folders\Archiving\Untitled
X-Origin: KEAN-S
X-FileName: skean.nsf

Just FYI.  These guys did a great job on the polling here, but I can't speak
to their other qualifications or their California ties.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/09/2000 12:13 PM -----

	"Michael D. Baselice" <mikeb@baselice.com>
	11/09/2000 09:03 AM
	Please respond to "mikeb@baselice.com"

		 To: "Ken Lay (E-mail)" <klay@enron.com>, "Steve Kean (E-mail)"
<skean@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Arena and Electric Dereg.

1. Thank you for all your support on the Arena Proposition.
2. The following article reminded me to pass along a note about a PR/PA
firm in California who Baselice & Associates worked with this year in
passing Prop 35 (a contracting out initiative).  The firm is a full service
firm named Woodward & McDowell.  They have been active in California
legislative and initiative battles for some 20 years and I highly recommend
them if Enron is in search of support with the electric deregulation fight
out there.  Dick Woodward or Dave Fogarty can be reached at 650-340-0470.

If you have any questions, please call.

Mike

MICHAEL BASELICE
Baselice & Associates, Inc.
4131 Spicewood Springs Road
Suite O-2
Austin, TX  78759
Phone: (512) 345-9720
Fax: (512) 345-9740
email: mikeb@baselice.com

November 8, 2000
Calif Regulators,Grid Oper In Turf War Over Generation By JASON LEOPOLD Of
DOW JONES NEWSWIRES LOS ANGELES-California's electricity regulators and
power-grid operator are locked in a turf war over who has the authority to
order new power plant construction next summer to ensure the state has
enough juice on hand when demand soars.
The California Public Utilities Commission says it can bring emergency
power on line at a fraction of the cost that the Independent System
Operator is expected to pay independent power producers for the same
service.
Under it's plan, PG&E Corp. (PCG) unit Pacific Gas & Electric Co., Edison
International's (EIX) Southern California Edison unit and Sempra Energy's
(SRE) San Diego Gas & Electric Co. were ordered to submit documents by the
end of November stating whether they can build and operate "peaking" plants
by June 1.
The utilities weren't immediately available to comment.
On the other hand, the ISO - which is on the verge of signing contracts for
440 peaking units with between 20 and 91 megawatts of electricity - says
the commission's meddling could endanger any chance of additional resources
coming on line in time.
"Any further interference on the state level could destroy the plan
altogether," said an ISO source close to the issue. "There is no guarantee
the utilities will be able to pull this off by next summer. And if the
whole project is scrapped, you can expect there will be blackouts."
Interference by federal regulators has already cost the ISO two
participants and nearly 600 megawatts in its peaking program.
Calpine Corp. (CPN) and Enron (ENE) initially agreed to build peaking
plants for the ISO next summer, but withdrew their offers after the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission proposed capping the clearing price for
California's wholesale electricity market at $150 a megawatt-hour.
The ISO, which operates one of the state's wholesale power markets and
manages most of the high-voltage transmission grid, has already solicited
and received bids from merchant generators for 1,800 megawatts of new
peaking power for next summer.
Burned by the summer's power crisis and facing an 8,000-MW shortfall next
summer,