Message-ID: <23971448.1075846130756.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 01:52:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: sheila.tweed@enron.com
Subject: Agency Agreement
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Kay Mann
X-To: Sheila Tweed
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_4\Notes Folders\'sent mail
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/13/2000 08:52
AM ---------------------------

"Boyd J. Springer" <Boyd_J._Springer@jonesday.com> on 06/12/2000 07:23:44 PM
To: dtucker@bracepatt.com, cdade@bracepatt.com, Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Agency Agreement

_______________________________________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read,
copy, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the
sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________________________

Here are my comments re Peoples' mark-up:
                                         1. Sects. 1.1, 1.11, 10.2, and
15.1(f). The combined effect of the proposed changes to these sections is
to significantly broaden the terminantion right in the event that
governmental action related to the agreement is modified in a manner
unacceptable to either party. As changed the unacceptable approval can come
at any time during the term of the agreement, and need not  involve
approval  "required" for the agreement to remain effective. Peoples did not
propose to include language from the comparable NIGAS Hub Agreement which
refers to adverse "rate approval". However, Peoples' intent may be to
obtain a termination remedy in the event of an adverse rate-making decision
re the treatment of Hub revenues. In any event, the meaning of a
termination right triggered if a government approval (not necessarily
required for the agreement to remain in effect) is modified "in any manner
which is unacceptable" is, at best, unclear. We should try to stay with the
original language (or, perhaps, limit expansion of the termination right to
circumstances when a "required" approval is revoked.) While the broadened
termination right proposed by Peoples is available to either party, I
wouldn't think it likely that MEH would wish to terminate as a result of a
modified regualtory decision not required for continuation of the agency
arrangement.
2. Sects. 1.6, 7.1. 2.2, 2.10 (comments re cumulative net revenue
definition) As modified, MEH is charged with the duty to market Hub
Serivces, which includes Extended Hub Serivces (Def'n. 1.17). However, the
proposed Adminisatrative Service Fee (7.1) is only payable during the term
of the Agreement. MEH, therefore, is required by the Agreement to market
extended Hub Services, but receives no compensation (after termination of
the Agreement) for doing so. Also, Peoples proposes to add provision (C)
eliminating refund amounts from the definition of Cumulative Net Revenue.
Apparently in conjuction with this, Peoples proposes to delete the last
sentence of 1.6 which requires a retroactive adjustment of cumulative net
revenue in the event of a refund. Peoples also has bracketed 7.3,
apparently intending to exclude it. I suppose this is fine from MEH's
perspective. The effect of these changes is to deduct only amounts actually
refunded from the revenue base for the administrative fee, and not require
a retroactive adjustment. This could benefit MEH if the agreement
terminates before a refund is required. No retroactive adjustment would be
needed.
3. Sect. 1.9, 2.5. Peoples proposes to delete the requirement that it make
nominating or scheduling changes on interstate pipelines for receipt or
delivery of gas needed for hub transactions or delivery of gas at a
secondary point for displacement delivery


Message-ID: <8856966.1075853244003.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 07:35:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: mmolland@brobeck.com
To: mtuohey@velaw.com, apickens@gibbs-bruns.com, breasoner@gibbs-bruns.com,
	djn@pkns.com, dcastro@pkns.com, jfrizzell@gibbs-bruns.com,
	jalexander@gibbs-bruns.com, pmeringolo@brobeck.com, mlk@pkns.com,
	msmith1@enron.com, richard.b.sanders@enron.com, gfergus@brobeck.com,
	sbishop@gibbs-bruns.com, robert.c.williams@enron.com,
	aruby@rubyschofield.com, meltzerlaw@aol.com, arguedas@caclaw.net,
	andrew.edison@renron.com
Subject: Memorandum concerning subpoena power of California legislative co
 mmittee
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: "Molland, Michael E." <MMolland@brobeck.com>
X-To: "'mtuohey@velaw.com'" <mtuohey@velaw.com>, "'apickens@gibbs-bruns.com'" <apickens@gibbs-bruns.com>, "'breasoner@gibbs-bruns.com'" <breasoner@gibbs-bruns.com>, "'djn@pkns.com'" <djn@pkns.com>, "'dcastro@pkns.com'" <dcastro@pkns.com>, "'jfrizzell@gibbs-bruns.com'" <jfrizzell@gibbs-bruns.com>, "'jalexander@gibbs-bruns.com'" <jalexander@gibbs-bruns.com>, "Meringolo, Peter" <PMeringolo@brobeck.com>, "'mlk@pkns.com'" <mlk@pkns.com>, "'msmith1@enron.com'" <msmith1@enron.com>, "'richard.b.sanders@enron.com'" <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>, "Fergus, Gary S." <GFergus@brobeck.com>, "'sbishop@gibbs-bruns.com'" <sbishop@gibbs-bruns.com>, "'robert.c.williams@enron.com'" <robert.c.williams@enron.com>, "'aruby@rubyschofield.com'" <aruby@rubyschofield.com>, "'meltzerlaw@aol.com'" <meltzerlaw@aol.com>, "'arguedas@caclaw.net'" <arguedas@caclaw.net>, "'andrew.edison@renron.com'" <andrew.edison@renron.com>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Richard_Sanders_Oct2001\Notes Folders\Notes inbox
X-Origin: Sanders-R
X-FileName: rsanders.nsf

 At our meeting in San Francisco yesterday a group of you asked we
re-publish our memorandum regarding the subpoena power of California
legislative committee. Here is a slightly edited version.

1. What is the basis of a  Legislative Committee's Subpoena Power?

Authority:   Government Code Section 9401, provides that "a subpoena
requiring the attendance of any witness before the Senate, Assembly, or a
committee may be issued by the President of the Senate, Speaker of the
Assembly, or the chairman of any committee before whom the attendance of the
witness is desired if permission has been secured from the rules committee
of the respective house."

Govt. Code Section 9402 provides that a subpoena is sufficient if it "(a)
states whether the proceeding is before the Senate, Assembly or a committee.
(b) is addressed to the witness [presumably the custodian of records when
documents are sought]. (c) requires the attendance of the witness at a time
and place certain and (d) is signed by the President of the Senate, Speaker
of the Assembly or chairman of the committee before whom attendance of the
witness is desired."

Contempt Power:  If the witness does not appear or refuses to testify or
"neglects or refuses ... to produce upon reasonable notice any material and
proper books, papers or document sin his possession or under his control, he
has committed a contempt."  Govt. Code Section 9405.   If the contempt is
committed while the Legislature is in session, Govt. Code Section 9407
provides that the committee shall report the contempt to the Senate or
Assembly "for such action as may be deemed necessary by the Senate or
Assembly."  If the Legislature is not in session, "the superior court in and
for the county in which any inquiry, investigation hearing or proceeding
[is] held ... may compel the ... production of books, papers, documents and
accounts, as required by the subpoena issued by the committee, on the filing
by the committee of a petition to the court asking that the witness be so
compelled."

Govt. Code Section 9409 provides that "any witness neglecting or refusing to
attend in obedience to subpoena may be arrested...."  It is unclear how this
p

3 probably applies only where the
nonresident custodian is employed by a business entity subject


Message-ID: <9586584.1075847424146.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 18:42:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: enron.announcements@enron.com
To: all.worldwide@enron.com
Subject: Anonymous Reporting Facilities
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-From: Enron Announcements
X-To: All Enron Worldwide
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Tanya_Jones_June2001\Notes Folders\Notes inbox
X-Origin: JONES-T
X-FileName: tjones.nsf

This is to remind you that various anonymous reporting facilities are=20
available for you to report violations of Company policy and suspected=20
criminal conduct by any officer, employee, or agent of Enron relating to th=
e=20
performance of his or her duties.  These reporting facilities are also=20
available for your questions, messages, comments, and suggestions.

 Any policy violation or criminal conduct may be reported by letter, e-mail=
,=20
or voice mail, as set forth below, describing the suspected violation or=20
criminal conduct with as much detail as possible to allow Enron to conduct =
an=20
investigation of the reported matter.

1. Letters should be sent to the Confidential Post Office Box: =20

Enron Compliance Officer
Confidential - Conduct of Business Affairs=20
P. O. Box 1188=20
Houston, Texas  77251-1188

2. E-mails should be sent to the Office of the Chairman=01,s e-mail box: =
=20
Employees with Enron e-mail can access this box by sending an e-mail to the=
=20
Office of the Chairman.  Simply type =01&Office of the Chairman=018 in the =
address=20
box, type your message, and send.  Your message will be completely=20
anonymous.  If, however, you copy your message and e-mail it to someone els=
e,=20
the copy will not be anonymous. =20

3. Voice mail messages should be left with the Office of the Chairman voice=
=20
mail box.  You can access the Office of the Chairman voice mail box at (713=
)=20
853-7294.  If you call from your extension or an outside line, your message=
=20
will be completely anonymous.  If, however, you access the voice mail box=
=20
while you are in the Enron voice mail system, your message will not be=20
anonymous.

 You may, but are not required to, identify yourself.  If you would like to=
=20
identify yourself, please submit your name and phone number with your lette=
r=20
or message.  All anonymously reported matters will be investigated and acte=
d=20
upon in the same manner as those that contain signatures.

 We take great pride in ensuring that Enron is a great place to work.  We=
=20
encourage each employee to continue to conduct Enron's business affairs in=
=20
accordance with all applicable laws and in a moral and honest manner.


Message-ID: <27977020.1075845783270.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2000 02:46:00 -0800 (PST)
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: kathleen.carnahan@enron.com
Subject: Organizational Changes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-From: Kay Mann
X-To: Kathleen Carnahan
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_2\Notes Folders\Discussion threads
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/09/2000 10:46=
=20
AM ---------------------------
  =20
=09
=09
=09From:  Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling                           11/08/2000 04=
:59 PM
=09

Sent by: Enron Announcements
To: All Enron Worldwide
cc: =20

Subject: Organizational Changes

We are making a number of significant organizational changes.  These change=
s=20
are intended to accomplish four key objectives:

First, we need to realign all our wholesale businesses around the successfu=
l=20
business model developed over the last decade in North America and Europe. =
=20
This model relies on extensive physical and transactional networks built=20
around a relatively small strategic asset position.

Second, we need to significantly streamline corporate reporting=20
relationships.  Particularly with Joe Sutton=01,s departure, the ability to=
=20
directly manage the day-to-day activities of 15 independent business units=
=20
has become increasingly difficult.

Third, we need to accomplish these changes without, in any way, compromisin=
g=20
the ongoing profitability of all our businesses and without delaying or=20
hindering our effort to monetize a significant portion of our lower-yieldin=
g=20
asset positions.

And fourth, as always, we need to take advantage of the reorganization to=
=20
redeploy our talent into our highest value opportunities.

ENRON WHOLESALE SERVICES

Today, we are forming Enron Wholesale Services (EWS) which will consolidate=
=20
our global wholesale businesses.  The closer alignment of our wholesale=20
businesses will accomplish the following: (1) enhanced communication and=20
coordination across business units, (2) more rapid deployment of people to=
=20
higher valued opportunities, (3) more effective prioritization of=20
opportunities across the wholesale business, and (4) more rapid extension o=
f=20
Enron=01,s wholesale business model and capabilities into new industries an=
d=20
markets.

Enron Wholesale Services will include our current North American, European=
=20
(including Japan and Australia), Global Markets, and Industrial Markets=20
operations, and will be expanded to include Enron=01,s Net Works business u=
nit=20
as well as a new unit =01) Enron Global Assets.  In addition, Enron=01,s me=
rchant=20
businesses outside of North America and Europe will be integrated into this=
=20
new structure as described below.

Mark Frevert, currently Chairman of each of our wholesale units, will assum=
e=20
the role of Chairman and CEO of Enron Wholesale Services.  Greg Whalley,=20
currently Chairman and CEO of Enron Net Works, will join Mark in the Office=
=20
of the Chairman as President and Chief Operating Officer.

Providing further impetus for these organizational changes, several of our=
=20
international business unit leaders have elected to move into new leadershi=
p=20
positions:

Rebecca McDonald, currently CEO of Enron APACHI, will join EWS as President=
=20
and CEO of Enron Global Assets. Enron Global Assets will have responsibilit=
y=20
for managing all of Enron=01,s existing energy asset portfolio outside of N=
orth=20
America and Europe.  Joining Rebecca in the Office of the Chairman as COO=
=20
will be Jim Hughes, currently COO of Enron APACHI.  Rebecca and Jim will=20
report to the EWS Office of the Chairman.

Sanjay Bhatnagar, currently CEO of Enron India, has joined EBS as CEO for t=
he=20
Middle East and Asia region.  Sanjay will be responsible for building our=
=20
broadband business in this region and the cu

20
These individuals will also continue to have


Message-ID: <5061971.1075841456100.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 12:24:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: ras1119@hotmail.com
Subject: RE:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: "Richard Smith" <ras1119@hotmail.com>@ENRON <IMCEANOTES-+22Richard+20Smith+22+20+3Cras1119+40hotmail+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com>
X-To: MarkM@cajunusa.com, martier@cpchem.com, Quigley, Dutch </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DQUIGLE>, siva66@mail.ev1.net, klyn@pdq.net
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \ExMerge - Quigley, Dutch\myFriends
X-Origin: QUIGLEY-D
X-FileName: dutch quigley 6-26-02.PST

can someone give me the tee times again and I might be able to find one
person and Woody's name is not on this list did anyone email him?

>From: "Mark Molnar" <MarkM@cajunusa.com>
>To: <martier@cpchem.com>,<Dutch.Quigley@ENRON.com>, <ras1119@hotmail.com>,
><siva66@mail.ev1.net>, <klyn@pdq.net>
>Subject: RE:
>Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 13:31:28 -0500
>
>or how about 3 groups of 2
>or maybe 1 group of 6
>or even 6 groups of 1
>
> >>> "Quigley, Dutch" <Dutch.Quigley@ENRON.com> 09/14/01 12:07PM >>>
>we can do two groups of  3
>
> >  -----Original Message-----
> > From: 	"siva66" <siva66@mail.ev1.net>@ENRON
> > [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22siva66+22+20+3Csiva66+40mail+2Eev1+2Enet+3E+40EN
> > RON@ENRON.com]
> > Sent:	Friday, September 14, 2001 12:02 PM
> > To:	MarkM@cajunusa.com; Quigley, Dutch; martier@cpchem.com;
> > ras1119@hotmail.com; klyn@pdq.net
> > Subject:	RE:
> >
> > don't you guys think we need at least a 7th for golf so they will
> > not make us pair up with someone else? my friend christian
> > cancelled when he found out kevin was going to be there.  thanks
> > alot kevin!!!
> >
> > ricardo
> >
> >
> > ---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
> > From: "Mark Molnar" <MarkM@cajunusa.com>
> > Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 10:37:23 -0500
> >
> > >Jerry is a no for Sat.
> > >
> > >>>> "siva66" <siva66@mail.ev1.net> 09/14/01 10:30AM >>>
> > >i hope so because we only have 6 so far: kevin, mark, dutch,
> > >richard, ernie, and myself.
> > >
> > >
> > >---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
> > >From: "Mark Molnar" <MarkM@cajunusa.com>
> > >Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 09:28:40 -0500
> > >
> > >>I'm glad someone else is starting to see what I've had to put up
> > >with all of these years.  You should have heard his response as
> > to
> > >why he couldn't pay the rent or the phone bill or go grocery
> > >shopping for the month.  Oh wait a minute that was Rob, not
> > >Jerry.  I always get the two mixed up.  Once again I will
> > >ask.....Jerry are you going to go golfing manana?
> > >>
> > >>>>> <Dutch.Quigley@enron.com> 09/14/01 08:10AM >>>
> > >>jerry is practicing his law talk
> > >>did not answer the question but gave a 500 word response
> > >>
> > >>    -----Original Message-----
> > >>   From:   "Mark Molnar" <MarkM@cajunusa.com>@ENRON
> > >>             [mailto:IMCEANOTES-
> > >+22Mark+20Molnar+22+20+3CMarkM+40cajunusa+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.c
> > o
> > >m]
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>   Sent:   Friday, September 14, 2001 8:00 AM
> > >>   To:     martier@cpchem.com; Quigley, Dutch;
> > >>             IMCEANOTES-Wolphguy+40aol+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com;
> > >>             ras1119@hotmail.com; siva66@mail.ev1.net;
> > >jramirez@othon.com;
> > >>             klyn@pdq.net
> > >>   Cc:     john_riches@msn.com
> > >>   Subject:  RE:
> > >>
> > >>   Three
> > >>
> > >>   >>> "Martinez, Ernesto Jr" <martier@cpchem.com> 09/13/01
> > >06:30PM >>>
> > >>   WHat is the over/under on the number of times Jerry throws
> > his
> > >club(s)?
> > >>
> > >>   -----Original Message-----
> > >>   From: Quigley, Dutch [mailto:Dutch.Quigley@ENRON.com]
> > >>   Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 5:45 PM
> > >>   To: Wolphguy@aol.com@ENRON; Martinez, Ernesto Jr;
> > >ras1119@hotmail.com;
> > >>   siva66@mail.ev1.net; klyn@pdq.net; jramirez@othon.com;
> > >>   markm@cajunusa.com
> > >>   Cc: john_riches@msn.com
> >


Message-ID: <25452814.1075856790586.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 10:05:00 -0800 (PST)
From: office.chairman@enron.com
To: all.presidents@enron.com
Subject: Performance Management Process
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-From: Office of the Chairman
X-To: All Managing Directors and Vice Presidents
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Vincent_Kaminski_Jun2001_7\Notes Folders\Discussion threads
X-Origin: Kaminski-V
X-FileName: vkamins.nsf

As our existing businesses grow and new businesses are created, ease of=20
movement and development of our top talent becomes essential to our success=
. =20
As you heard at the Management Conference all officers will be titled,=20
reviewed, promoted, and compensated according to a more standard set of=20
guidelines.  The process recognizes the intrinsic value of each officer,=20
rather than tying that individual to the value of their specific job or=20
reporting relationship.

Officer titling has been standardized throughout Enron.  There are four=20
levels of officers: members of the Enron Office of the Chairman make up Lev=
el=20
4.  Level 3 includes all other members of the Enron Executive Committee. =
=20
Level 2 is made up of managing directors, including company presidents and=
=20
some senior vice presidents.  Level 1 are vice presidents and some senior=
=20
vice presidents with grandfathered titles.

This year a common evaluation process is being implemented for Level 1 and=
=20
Level 2 officers.  Officers will be evaluated by a committee, through a=20
process referred to as the Performance Review Committee (PRC), utilizing a=
=20
standard set of performance criteria and performance ratings.  Performance=
=20
committee reviews will occur twice a year =01) in July for feedback purpose=
s and=20
at year-end for feedback as well as bonus and total compensation=20
considerations.  The Executive Committee will handle the PRC for all Level =
2=20
officers. Review of Level 1 officers will occur at the business-unit level=
=20
first with the results =01&cross calibrated=018 by the Executive Committee =
and a=20
group of approximately sixteen managing directors.

The goals of the PRC process is to insure a consistent standard for our=20
overall pool of executive talent and to provide a tool to more effectively=
=20
utilize talent throughout the organization.  To further promote consistency=
=20
the Executive Committee will consider all promotions in January of each=20
year.  Exceptions, internally or externally, will be infrequent.

The individual=01,s performance evaluation will be the starting point for a=
ll=20
compensation decisions.  Compensation includes base pay, bonus and long-ter=
m=20
awards.  A long-term program that replaces individual or business unit plan=
s=20
has been approved and will be communicated to individuals before bonus=20
payments are made.

In addition to the Level 1 and Level 2 reviews, business unit, global and=
=20
corporate cross-functional PRC reviews for directors, senior directors and=
=20
general managers have started.  This year-end process will be utilized as a=
=20
benchmark to determine how we further refine the evaluation process at this=
=20
level in the future.

If you should have any questions about the process, please direct them to=
=20
your Human Resources Business Unit Leads per the following:

Mary Ann Long (GPG) x36810    David Oxley (ENA/EEL/Global Trading) X33557
Ray Bennett (EES) X37039    Robert Jones (Global Technology/Global=20
Finance/Global
Gwen Petteway (Corp) X37351      Asset Operations/Global Engineering &=20
Construction) X35810
Janie Bonnard (Caribbean/Middle East/   Scott Gilchrist (Asia=20
Pacific/Africa/China) X67081
  LNG) X68202      Gerry Chatham (EGEP) X35141
Miguel Padron (ESA) X66552    Marla Barnard (ECI) X58158
Ranen Sengupta (India) X67967  =20

cc: Enron Executive Committee Members  =20

28599


Message-ID: <16055639.1075845754373.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 12:34:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: boyd_j._springer@jonesday.com
To: dtucker@bracepatt.com, cdade@bracepatt.com, kay.mann@enron.com
Subject: Regulatory Issues
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: "Boyd J. Springer" <Boyd_J._Springer@jonesday.com>
X-To: dtucker@bracepatt.com, cdade@bracepatt.com, Kay.mann@enron.com
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_2\Notes Folders\Discussion threads
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

_______________________________________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read,
copy, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the
sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________________________

The following discusses the regulatory issues raised at our June 14 meeting
with Peoples.                                           1. Expanded
termination right for unacceptable "Regulatory Approval".  As discussed
prior to the meeting, language of Sects. 1.1, 1.11, 10.2 and 15.1(f) was
changed to provide a termination right in the event that an unacceptable
regulatory order is issued after initial approval of the Agency Agreement,
but during its term. Peoples explained at the meeting their view that a
termination right should exist in the event of an adverse rate order (e.g.,
Illinois Commission order imputing what Peoples believes to be an
unreasonably high level of Hub revenue and, therefore, unaccpetably
lowering retail gas rates) or FERC determination that, based on Hub
operations, Peoples is in jeopardy of losing its status as a Hinshaw
pipeline. These were examples of the types of orders Peoples has in mind.
As proposed in our draft, either party would have a termination right in
the event that the Agency Agreement is not initially approved by the ICC on
acceptable terms. Under our approach, however, the parties would have to
live with ;later adverse regulatory orders unless an order had the effect
of revoking the Hub's operating authority. My view is that we could
reasonably agree to a termination right (similar to Sect. 11.1 (vi) and
(vii) of the LLC Agreement) which grants a termination right, "in the event
that a Jugment determines that, as a result of Hub Transactions, Peoples is
subject to comprehensive rate regulation as a natural gas company or public
utility by the FERC; or loses its status as an exempt Hinshaw pipeline
under Section 1(c) of the Natural Gas Act." I would suggest that we
otherwise stay with our original language re regulatory approvals. Once
Peoples obtains an order from the ICC which both parties accept, Peoples
should be willing to assume the risk (which,in my opinion is minimal) that
an adverse rate decision would cause it to wish to terminate the Agency
Agreement. (David suggested at the meeting that, as another option, we
could agree to a termination right due to an adverse regulatory order if
Peoples chooses to discontinue all Hub Transactions, but I am not sure that
we need to offer this at this stage.) The word "required" should be
restored to Definitions 1.1 and 1.11.              2. Extended Hub
Services. Peoples agreed at the meeting that there should be compensation
after termination of the Agreement for an extended Hub Service presented
during the Agreement's term. To make this clear,the words "during the term
of this Agreement" should be deleted from Sect. 7.1(ii). The deleted
wording of 7.2 should be restored, and to that Section we could add a
sentence: "The right to compensation established under Section 7.2 (ii) for
an Extended Hub Service shall survive the termination of this Agreement."
Also, in Section 15.4, I believe the reference to Sect. 3.3 should be to
7.2.                     3.

1 could be revised to eliminate the
refernce to Laws and Judgments with a materially adverse effect.


Message-ID: <21254247.1075854594580.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 08:59:00 -0800 (PST)
From: enron.announcements@enron.com
To: all.worldwide@enron.com
Subject: Organizational Changes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-From: Enron Announcements
X-To: All Enron Worldwide
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Eric_Bass_Dec2000\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: Bass-E
X-FileName: ebass.nsf

We are making a number of significant organizational changes.  These change=
s=20
are intended to accomplish four key objectives:

First, we need to realign all our wholesale businesses around the successfu=
l=20
business model developed over the last decade in North America and Europe. =
=20
This model relies on extensive physical and transactional networks built=20
around a relatively small strategic asset position.

Second, we need to significantly streamline corporate reporting=20
relationships.  Particularly with Joe Sutton=01,s departure, the ability to=
=20
directly manage the day-to-day activities of 15 independent business units=
=20
has become increasingly difficult.

Third, we need to accomplish these changes without, in any way, compromisin=
g=20
the ongoing profitability of all our businesses and without delaying or=20
hindering our effort to monetize a significant portion of our lower-yieldin=
g=20
asset positions.

And fourth, as always, we need to take advantage of the reorganization to=
=20
redeploy our talent into our highest value opportunities.

ENRON WHOLESALE SERVICES

Today, we are forming Enron Wholesale Services (EWS) which will consolidate=
=20
our global wholesale businesses.  The closer alignment of our wholesale=20
businesses will accomplish the following: (1) enhanced communication and=20
coordination across business units, (2) more rapid deployment of people to=
=20
higher valued opportunities, (3) more effective prioritization of=20
opportunities across the wholesale business, and (4) more rapid extension o=
f=20
Enron=01,s wholesale business model and capabilities into new industries an=
d=20
markets.

Enron Wholesale Services will include our current North American, European=
=20
(including Japan and Australia), Global Markets, and Industrial Markets=20
operations, and will be expanded to include Enron=01,s Net Works business u=
nit=20
as well as a new unit =01) Enron Global Assets.  In addition, Enron=01,s me=
rchant=20
businesses outside of North America and Europe will be integrated into this=
=20
new structure as described below.

Mark Frevert, currently Chairman of each of our wholesale units, will assum=
e=20
the role of Chairman and CEO of Enron Wholesale Services.  Greg Whalley,=20
currently Chairman and CEO of Enron Net Works, will join Mark in the Office=
=20
of the Chairman as President and Chief Operating Officer.

Providing further impetus for these organizational changes, several of our=
=20
international business unit leaders have elected to move into new leadershi=
p=20
positions:

Rebecca McDonald, currently CEO of Enron APACHI, will join EWS as President=
=20
and CEO of Enron Global Assets. Enron Global Assets will have responsibilit=
y=20
for managing all of Enron=01,s existing energy asset portfolio outside of N=
orth=20
America and Europe.  Joining Rebecca in the Office of the Chairman as COO=
=20
will be Jim Hughes, currently COO of Enron APACHI.  Rebecca and Jim will=20
report to the EWS Office of the Chairman.

Sanjay Bhatnagar, currently CEO of Enron India, has joined EBS as CEO for t=
he=20
Middle East and Asia region.  Sanjay will be responsible for building our=
=20
broadband business in this region and the current EBS team in this region=
=20
will report to Sanjay.  In this role, Sanjay will report to the EBS office =
of=20
the Chairman.  In addition, Sanjay will continue to remain responsible for=
=20
Enron=01,s wholesale energy business in India and will transition this busi=
ness=20
into Enron Glo


Message-ID: <13978923.1075841292854.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 12:43:45 -0800 (PST)
From: thomas.rosendahl@ubspw.com
To: albert.meyers@enron.com
Subject: RE: How are you doing (plus a little about me)?
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Rosendahl, Thomas G. <thomas.rosendahl@ubspw.com>
X-To: Meyers, Albert </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=BMEYERS>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \ExMerge - Meyers, Albert\Deleted Items
X-Origin: MEYERS-A
X-FileName: bert meyers 6-25-02.PST

Hi Bertmeister!
Good to have you back in the UBS fold. It is also good to hear all is going
well for you and Molly. I would look forward to getting together sometime,
perhaps for breakfast next Tuesday or Wednesday (2/5 or 2/6). Let me know
which works for you.

Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: Meyers, Albert [mailto:Bert.Meyers@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 2:18 AM
To: thomas.rosendahl@ubspainewebber.com
Subject: How are you doing (plus a little about me)?

Tom:

Just wanted to drop you a line to let you know that I am again an employee
of UBS.  As I am sure you are aware, we are in process of transition from
Enron to UBS.  I recently filled out all the appropriate paperwork to
complete the transition.  From what I understand we are going to be a part
of the trading arm of UBS Warbug.  This should be very exciting.  Maybe one
day I will have the opportunity to trade stocks, bonds, or some other
financial product if power ever becomes old hat.

Furthermore, I have will soon receive a signing bonus and a raise, so I
intend on funding my IRA and my wife's IRA for 2001 and maybe even 2002.  If
it wouldn't be too much trouble, I would like to know what the contribution
levels are for 2002.  I think I saw something that changed them and the
income levels one can have for a Roth.

As for Molly, the advertising business seems to be picking up for 2002.  She
opened enough new business in the fourth quarter of 2001 to meet her goals
and is on her way to making it the first quarter as well.  I think she is
really beginning to understand her business.

Anyway, I currently have lots of time to myself since we are not trading, so
maybe we can have lunch sometime.  If that is not possible, no big deal, I
know that you are extremely busy.

I hope all is well with you and your family.

Sincerely,

Bert

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Message-ID: <7736944.1075855756397.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 01:10:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: christi.nicolay@enron.com
To: steve.wang@enron.com, ebaughm@enron.com, terri.clynes@enron.com,
	oscar.dalton@enron.com, doug.sewell@enron.com, kcompea@enron.com,
	mike.e.kelly@enron.com, gary.justice@enron.com,
	patrick.hanse@enron.com, karla.compean@enron.com,
	kerry.stroup@enron.com, dave.mangskau@enron.com,
	jeff.brown@enron.com, russell.ballato@enron.com,
	don.baughman@enron.com, matt.lorenz@enron.com,
	jason.choate@enron.com, maria.valdes@enron.com,
	john.kinser@enron.com, peter.makkai@enron.com, jeff.king@enron.com,
	robert.benson@enron.com, fletcher.sturm@enron.com,
	berney.aucoin@enron.com, brad.morse@enron.com
Subject: RE: Indiana article
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-From: Christi L Nicolay
X-To: steve.wang@enron.com, ebaughm@enron.com, terri.clynes@enron.com, oscar.dalton@enron.com, doug.sewell@enron.com, kcompea@enron.com, mike.e.kelly@enron.com, gary.justice@enron.com, patrick.hanse@enron.com, Karla Compean, Kerry Stroup, Dave Mangskau, Jeff Brown, Russell Ballato, Don Baughman, Matt Lorenz, Jason Choate, Maria Valdes, John Kinser, Peter Makkai, Jeff King, Robert Benson, Fletcher J Sturm, Berney C Aucoin, Brad Morse
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Rob_Benson_Jun2001\Notes Folders\Notes inbox
X-Origin: Benson-R
X-FileName: rbenson.nsf

---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 05/17/2001=
=20
08:09 AM ---------------------------

Janine Migden@ENRON

05/16/2001 08:29 PM

To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: =20

Subject: RE: Indiana article

Christi,
FYI  and thanks for your help today! =20
Janine
----- Forwarded by Janine Migden/NA/Enron on 05/16/2001 08:27 PM -----

=09"Blinzinger, Don (BT)" <DBlinzinger@bosetreacy.com>
=0905/16/2001 03:29 PM
=09=09=20
=09=09 To: "'Janine.Migden@enron.com'" <Janine.Migden@enron.com>
=09=09 cc:=20
=09=09 Subject: RE: Indiana article

I attended the second day session, on Friday, May 11 at which Cinergy,=20
Vectren and Wabash Valley testified.  All reported that they saw no problem=
s=20
for the Summer.  Jim Rogers did indicate that he had concerns about Cinergy=
's=20
Petersburg plant due to water levels in the Wabash River. As to those who=
=20
testified during the first day, I am attempting to get copies of their=20
presentations from the IURC. Thanks
 =20
-----Original Message-----=20
From: Janine.Migden@enron.com [mailto:Janine.Migden@enron.com]=20
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 6:39 PM=20
To: dblinzinger@bosetreacy.com=20
Subject: Indiana article=20

Did you ever find out what they reported on this?=20
Janine=20
----- Forwarded by Janine Migden/NA/Enron on 05/15/2001 06:38 PM -----=20
                                                                           =
  =20
        =20
                   =20
"Samantha                                                         =20
                    Slater"              To:    =20
<Govplus@aol.com>,                   =20
                    <SSLATER@epsa        <msdant@bakerd.com>,=20
<priyad@calpine.com>,   =20
                    .org>                <doao@chevron.com>,=20
<jnnc@chevron.com>,      =20
                                         <jeffreeman@cogentrix.com>,       =
  =20
        =20
                    05/04/2001          =20
<agold@coral-energy.com>,                    =20
                    10:10 AM            =20
<lebarrett@duke-energy.com>,                 =20
                                         <gapa@dynegy.com>,                =
  =20
        =20
                                        =20
<John.J.Stauffacher@dynegy.com>,             =20
                                         <bhueter@enron.com>,=20
<jmigden@enron.com>,    =20
                                         <lknight@enron.com>,              =
  =20
        =20
                                        =20
<Susan.M.Landwehr@enron.com>,


Message-ID: <31390561.1075844136944.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 09:18:00 -0800 (PST)
From: kevin.hyatt@enron.com
To: bullets@enron.com
Subject: TW Bullets 1/4/01
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Kevin Hyatt
X-To: Bullets
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Michelle_Lokay_Dec2000_June2001_2\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: LOKAY-M
X-FileName: mlokay.nsf

Pogo Producing - Pogo executed their interconnect and operating agreement
with TW for the new well they anticipate flowing in early February.  We also
received a  payment for incidental expenses necessary to bring the well into
TW's system; expected volume is 30,000 MMBtu/d into the West Texas lateral.

Capacity Marketing - We have created 4 packages of transportation capacity
with terms of 1 to 2 years that we are offering for sale in 2002 and 2003.
Our desire is to price the space based on spreads between gas indices in San
Juan, Permian, and Cal Border.  Our objective is to close these deals by
early next week.

In addition, we have been working with EnronOnline to establish a consistent
capacity offering of most likely east-end space on their trading platform.
Automated contracting procedures have been established.  Legal is working on
the point descriptions and Credit has the potential customer list to set up
trading limits and approvals.  We should be trading on the system before
month end.

San Juan Pigging - The pigging project using methanol to clean the lateral
began this week.  We should know sometime the week of 1/16 if the work had
the desired effect.

FERC Options Filing - Part of the week was spent strategizing with legal and
regulatory affairs on various scenarios that will likely come up in the FERC
technical conference scheduled for next Tuesday, January 9th.  As owners of
electric generation in California, we have requested both Calpine and Duke
attend the conference in support of TW.

Tri-State G&T - Tri-State is the generation and transmission electric
co-operative that serves the Gallup compressor station.  Enron Compressor
Services executed the confidentiality agreement that enabled TW to get access
to system load information on Tri-State's web site.  Next we will need to
build a computer program that monitors the site and automatically notifies
gas control when a likely electrical peak will be reached on Tri-State's
system.  If TW is able to turn down the Gallup compressor, based on
transportation demand, we may be able to avoid some of the peaking electrical
charges.


Message-ID: <16852498.1075861447949.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 14:27:30 -0800 (PST)
From: eblastoff@rocketball.com
To: jwillia@enron.com
Subject: Inside The Rockets - November 19, 2001
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: eblastoff@rocketball.com@ENRON
X-To: jwillia@enron.com
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \JWILLIA (Non-Privileged)\Williams, Jason (Trading)\Deleted Items
X-Origin: Williams-J
X-FileName: JWILLIA (Non-Privileged).pst

Dear jason,

ROCKETS 5-GAME OUTLOOK

The Rockets kick off a four-game West Coast road trip tonight in Sacramento. Other stops include Portland (Tuesday), Seattle (Friday) and L.A. to take on the Clippers (Sunday). Houston will then return home Tuesday, November 27 to host the Kings.

Or details about the next five games, check out the Rockets 5-Game Outlook (http://www.nbateamnews.com/i.cfm?DID=134695&UID=45454538&MID=188637).

ROCKETS ACTIVATE DAN LANGHI

The Houston Rockets have placed guard Tierre Brown on the injured list with plantar fasciitis of the left foot, General Manager Carroll Dawson has announced. In a related move, the Rockets activated forward Dan Langhi from the injured list.

Brown has seen action in one regular season game, recording two points and three assists while making his NBA debut at Denver on Nov. 9. The 6-foot-2, 189-pound rookie averaged 4.0 points and 2.3 assists for Houston in four preseason games. The McNeese State product received All-Southland Conference honors following each of the last two college basketball seasons.

Langhi has been sidelined for Houston's first nine games with a right ankle sprain. The 6-foot-11, 22-0 pound forward averaged 5.8 points and 1.8 rebounds in five Rockets preseason games. Langhi averaged 2.7 points and 1.2 rebounds as a rookie last year after being named the 2000 Southeastern Conference Player of the Year with Vanderbilt the previous season.

WATCH AND WIN ON UPN 20!

Be sure to tune in to tonight's Rockets-Kings game on UPN 20 for the chance to win a fabulous "Rockets Experience Package," featuring two tickets to the December 6 sold-out game against Michael Jordan and the Washington Wizards, and the opportunity to meet Moochie Norris prior to the game.

During tonight's telecast on UPN 20, Rockets broadcasters Bill Worrell and Calvin Murphy will make an announcement advising viewers to phone a special number. The 20th caller will receive a "Rockets Experience Package" and the chance to see the Washington Wizards' only visit to Houston this season, plus have an individual photo taken with Moochie Norris at center court.

To view the Official Rules and the list of upcoming Watch and Win on UPN 20 broadcasts, click here (http://www.nbateamnews.com/i.cfm?DID=134696&UID=45454538&MID=188637).

UPN 20 and the Rockets, Your Home for Rockets Basketball.

ROCKETS VIEWING PARTY

Join us Tuesday night at Mo's Place, 21940 Kingland at Mason Road, for another exciting Rockets Viewing Party!

The festivities begin at 8:30 p.m. and the Rockets vs. Blazers game will get underway at 9:00 p.m. There will be plenty of interactive games to take part in and the Rockets Power Dancers will be on hand to mingle with fans and sign autographs at halftime.

And don't forget about those great drink specials too!

So grab a friend or two and head out to Mo's Place Tuesday for a ton of fun and to cheer on the Rockets to another road victory!

To get to Mo's, take I-10 West to Mason Road. Exit Mason Road and turn left onto Mason Road. Mo's is located on 21940 Kingsland at Mason Road.

See you there!

COMPAQ QUESTION OF THE GAME

Be sure to tune in to Rockets broadcasts on UPN 20 this week for the Compaq Question of the Game.

During the first half of each Rockets broadcast on UPN 20, log on to rockets.com, look for the Compaq Question of the Game link, and submit a specific question to TV broadcasters Bill Worrell and Calvin Murphy about that night's game. Then just before t

21940 Kingsland at Mason Road.
0 pound forward


Message-ID: <11698171.1075841715570.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 00:13:00 -0800 (PST)
From: amy.fitzpatrick@enron.com
To: portland.desk@enron.com
Subject: 2001 Holiday Schedule
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Amy FitzPatrick
X-To: Portland West Desk
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \kate symes 6-27-02\Notes Folders\Corporate comm
X-Origin: SYMES-K
X-FileName: kate symes 6-27-02.nsf

Listed below are the holidays that have been scheduled for 2001.

Monday, January 1  New Year's Day

Monday, January 15  Martin Luther King Day

Monday, February 19  President's Day

Monday, May 28  Memorial Day

Wednesday, July 4  Independence Day

Monday, September 3  Labor Day

Thursday, November 22 Thanksgiving Day

Friday, November 23  Thanksgiving Observance (Floating Holiday)

Monday,  December 24  Christmas Observance (Floating Holiday)

Tuesday, December 25  Christmas Day

Discretionary Holiday (must be taken in 2001)

Based on business unit needs, employees may be asked to work one of the above
company observed holidays.  Please see your manager if you have any questions
regarding your work schedule.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to see me.

Amy
---------------------- Forwarded by Amy FitzPatrick/PDX/ECT on 01/10/2001
10:11 AM ---------------------------
  Cindy Olson  Executive VP
   Human Resources & Community Relations
From: Cindy Olson  Executive VP Human Resources & Community Relations@ENRON
on 01/09/2001 10:01 PM CST
Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: All Enron Employees United States
cc:
Subject: Martin Luther King, Jr. Day

As many of you have already noticed, this year Enron will be closing its
offices on Monday, January 15 in honor of Martin Luther King, Jr. Day.  This
is the first time we have observed this national holiday, and I am certain
that many of you will be pleased to know that the executive committee has
decided that we will continue to do so in the future.

Enron continues to observe 10 holidays each year (including two floater
holidays) and provides one additional discretionary holiday for our
employees.   For a complete listing of Enron's holiday schedule, go to
http://hrweb.enron.com/holiday/body.asp.


Message-ID: <3072443.1075853869336.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 04:50:00 -0800 (PST)
From: chris.germany@enron.com
To: jesse.villarreal@enron.com, tamara.carter@enron.com
Subject: HIGH BTU LEVEL ON THE LAROSA LATERAL
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Chris Germany
X-To: Jesse Villarreal, Tamara Carter
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Chris_Germany_Jun2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: Germany-C
X-FileName: cgerman.nsf

Would you guys see what is flowing current day at these points please?

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 01/10/2001 12:48
PM ---------------------------

"Alleman, Alden" <Alleman.Alden@EPEnergy.com> on 01/10/2001 12:39:07 PM
To:
cc:
Subject: HIGH BTU LEVEL ON THE LAROSA LATERAL

JANUARY  10, 2001    12:30 PM CCT

TO:  ALL TENNESSEE CUSTOMERS

RE:  HIGH BTU LEVEL ON THE LAROSA LATERAL

Tennessee is encountering high BTU levels on the Larosa Lateral.  These high
BTU
levels have been the subject of customer complaints that the delivered gas
is interfering with the proper operation of various lines, regulators,
meters and appliances located on the Larosa Lateral.  Beginning, with the
January 11 Gas Day, Tennessee requests point operators of receipt meters
located on the Larosa Lateral to tender to Tennessee gas that meets the gas
quality specifications found in the General Terms and Conditions of the
Tennessee Gas Tariff.

The following is a list of receipt meters located on the Larosa Lateral:
010069  Mustang Island 1Dehyd
010184  Redfish Bay Dehyd
010803  Stedman Island Dehyd
010990  Ingleside Dehyd
011476  Mustang Island 776
012021  Red Fish Bay Transport
012566  Mustang Island

Absent resolution of the problems, beginning with the January 11 Gas Day,
Tennessee will not accept nominations from meters on the Larosa Lateral
tendering out of specification gas and will issue an Operational Flow Order
Balancing Alert to the point operator.

If you have any questions, please contact your Account Representative or
Volume Analyst.

Craig Harris, Manager
Operations Control

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from El Paso
Energy Corporation are confidential and intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you have received this email in error
please notify the sender.
******************************************************************

Chris Germany
Jesse Villarreal, Tamara Carter


Message-ID: <21154885.1075856224356.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 00:25:00 -0800 (PST)
From: vince.kaminski@enron.com
To: vkaminski@aol.com
Subject: =?ANSI_X3.4-1968?Q?New_Employee_Service_=01)_Turbo_Tax?=
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-From: Vince J Kaminski
X-To: vkaminski@aol.com
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Vincent_Kaminski_Jun2001_1\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: Kaminski-V
X-FileName: vkamins.nsf

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/30/2001=
=20
08:28 AM ---------------------------
  =20
=09Enron North America Corp.
=09
=09From:  Corporate Payroll @ ENRON                           01/29/2001 10=
:45 PM
=09

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: All Eligible Enron Employees United States
cc: =20
Subject: New Employee Service =01) Turbo Tax

As tax season rapidly approaches, we are pleased to announce a new W-2=20
employee service.  If you plan to file your personal income taxes through=
=20
TurboTax 2000 (Intuit's personal tax filing software) you will be able to=
=20
automatically download your W-2 information into the appropriate TurboTax=
=20
forms directly over the Internet for free. =20

Enron has chosen to provide this service to help speed the processing time=
=20
and accuracy of your return while supporting paperless processing.

More information regarding this service is listed below or visit=20
www.probusinesstaxes.com to find out more about the TurboTax software and=
=20
Web-based filing service.

Employee Fact Sheet: ProBusiness/Intuit W-2 service

Q.  What is the Automated Tax Return (ATR) service?
A. Intuit Inc., makers of the popular Quicken TurboTax tax preparation and=
=20
filing software, have launched a new Automated Tax Return (ATR) service to=
=20
simplify tax preparation for TurboTax users. ATR allows users of TurboTax t=
ax=20
preparation and filing software to import tax information from multiple=20
sources such as employers, brokerage houses, and mutual fund companies=20
directly into the correct TurboTax forms over the Internet.  Since our=20
payroll tax provider, ProBusiness, has partnered with Intuit to provide thi=
s=20
service, you will be able to electronically download your individual W-2 da=
ta=20
from ProBusiness directly into TurboTax through the Internet for free. Also=
,=20
as part of this program, you can receive a  5% discount on all TurboTax and=
=20
Quicken products including shipping and handling (go to=20
www.probusinesstaxes.com for more information).

Q. So how does it work?
A. Embedded in each version of TurboTax 2000 (both the software and web=20
application) is a series of screens that will ask whether your employer=20
allows you to automatically download your data into TurboTax.  To use the=
=20
free service, simply answer "yes" then select our payroll tax provider,=20
ProBusiness, from a drop-down list of providers which includes ProBusiness,=
=20
PeopleSoft, Ceridian, and seemyw2.com.  Validate your request by entering=
=20
your social security number and W-2 box one data and your W-2 data will=20
automatically transfer via the Internet into the appropriate locations in t=
he=20
TurboTax form.

Q. Is this a secure transaction?
A.  Intuit=01,s TurboTax ATR service combines Open Financial Exchange (OFX)=
, the=20
standard technology used in e-finance, with 128-bit military-grade encrypti=
on=20
to create an advanced security protocol that ensures the highest level of=
=20
security and confidentiality when obtaining financial data to populate your=
=20
TurboTax form over the Internet.

Q. How do I participate in this program?=20
A.  Only employees using Intuit=01,s TurboTax 2000 tax preparation and fili=
ng=20
software can take advantage of this Web-based ATR service.  TurboTax softwa=
re=20
and the ATR Web-based filing service can be accessed at=20
www.probusinesstaxes.com.

Q. What if I already own TurboTax 2000=01(does this still work?
A.


Message-ID: <610255.1075856609950.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 10:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: vince.kaminski@enron.com
To: sophie.kingsley@enron.com
Subject: Re: Confidential
Cc: dale.surbey@enron.com, vince.kaminski@enron.com, michele.small@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: dale.surbey@enron.com, vince.kaminski@enron.com, michele.small@enron.com
X-From: Vince J Kaminski
X-To: Sophie Kingsley
X-cc: Dale Surbey, Vince J Kaminski, Michele Small
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Vincent_Kaminski_Jun2001_5\Notes Folders\London
X-Origin: Kaminski-V
X-FileName: vkamins.nsf

Sophie,

I think it's a fair deal.

Vince

Sophie Kingsley   08/30/2000 11:49 AM

To: Dale Surbey/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michele Small/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Confidential

Both,

Thanks for your comments and comparisons, it is good to get context.

Based on your comments here would be my proposal

o63,500 basic salary -
o15K kickers for each of the 2 years - These are paid as a lump sum on each
anniversary guaranteed.  Therefore guaranteed salary is effectively o78,500 -
this is completely separate and in addition to any performance bonus
Increase the value of options to o60K  to vest 1/3 as before - which leaves a
1/3 ($20,000 ) hanging out there at the end of the contract.

Just FYI - Anjam is currently on o68,000 but does not have an agreement, so
this would effectively put a 10.5K gap between the two.

Let me know your thoughts.

Dale Surbey
30/08/2000 16:09
To: Sophie Kingsley/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Confidential

Sophie,

Here's Vince's comments on your proposal for Steve.  Also, what's a 2-Yr
Exec?  How do the kickers work - are they basically a guaranteed minimum
bonus or incremental bonus?

- Dale

---------------------- Forwarded by Dale Surbey/LON/ECT on 30/08/2000 16:10
---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
30/08/2000 14:21
To: Dale Surbey/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Confidential

Dale,

Thanks for your message.
I don't know the labor market  in London that well but here the market
for quants is very hot.  Steve is in my view an exceptionally talented person
and I would go an extra mile to retain  him long-term for the company.

I would adjust the base salary or the kicker upward a bit.
o62,000 Basic  is what Anjam is receiving currently  (if I remember
correctly). Steve has a much higher value
to Enron than Anjam.

Vince

Dale Surbey
08/30/2000 07:49 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Confidential

Vince,

This is the package HR is proposing for Steven.  What do you think?

- Dale

---------------------- Forwarded by Dale Surbey/LON/ECT on 30/08/2000 13:50
---------------------------
Sophie Kingsley   29/08/2000 20:32

To: Dale Surbey/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Confidential

Sorry Dale, long day, here are the proposed numbers

2 Year Exec
o62,000 Basic  ( currently o55K )
o10K each year kickers
$50,000 worth of options to vest 1/3 1/3 1/3

Let me know what you think.

Regards

Sophie

000 worth of options to vest 1
000 but does not have


Message-ID: <18996236.1075862453244.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 13:37:07 -0800 (PST)
From: exchange.administrator@enron.com
To: vkaminsk@aol.com
Subject: Undeliverable: FW: Energy Committee Members List
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Exchange System Administrator <.>
X-To: vkaminsk@aol.com <??Svkaminsk@aol.com>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \VKAMINS (Non-Privileged)\Kaminski, Vince J\Deleted Items
X-Origin: Kaminski-V
X-FileName: VKAMINS (Non-Privileged).pst

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=VKAMINS>
To: <vkaminsk@aol.com> <??S<vkaminsk@aol.com>>
Date: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 9:21:17 GMT
Subject:

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Bob Casey <bobcasey@uh.edu>@ENRON
> Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 3:43 PM
> To:	vkamins@enron.com
> Subject:	Energy Committee Members List
>
> We apologize about the error in the previous email.  Attached is the
> Energy
> Committee Members List.
>
> Just a quick reminder that the first meeting of the Energy Committee
> will be
> this Wednesday from 5pm-7pm at the Bauer College of Business- Melcher
> Hall
> in the AIM Center Board Room.
>
> Also Attached is the current members of the committee.  We are in
> discussion
> with some other key companies and expect possibly a few more people at
> our
> session.  Look forward to seeing you there.
>
> Lane Sloan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  - Energy_Committee_Members.xls <<Energy_Committee_Members.xls>>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************
 - Energy_Committee_Members.xls


Message-ID: <11755186.1075845588342.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2000 10:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: nwodka@bracepatt.com
To: heather.kroll@enron.com, kay.mann@enron.com, ozzie.pagan@enron.com
Subject: VEPCO Interconnection Agreement
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: "Nancy Wodka" <nwodka@bracepatt.com>
X-To: <heather.kroll@enron.com>, <kay.mann@enron.com>, <ozzie.pagan@enron.com>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_1\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

 Attached is a copy of the VEPCO Interconnection Agreement on which I have
made certain changes and included comments in bracketed notes.  (Most of the
notes could be included in a mark-up sent back to VEPCO; there is one marked
"Note to Enron" that is intended to be deleted before we send this out.)

The Agreement, as might be expected, is very  one-sided and is written
primarily for their protection.  It is also very repetitive in places,
although I did not attempt to eliminate the repetition on the theory that the
fewer changes we propose the better and we can probably live with the
repetition.  There are several provisions or concepts I would like to suggest
we include from the form I had prepared a couple of weeks ago (which was
based on the EPSA model form, and was clearly more favorable to the
generation owner than VEPCO's form.)  I have not yet included these changes,
as I thought we should discuss them first and decide how best to proceed on
this draft.  Those provisions are as follows (section references are to the
draft I prepared):

2.43.  Right to tell VEPCO to suspend or terminate work on interconnection
facilities.

2.4.4  Requirement for Vepco to provide status reports on progress of
construction of interconnection facilities.

2.5.2 (maybe)  Agreement to start work on facilities before all studies
complete, if generator owner willing to bear risk of extra costs.

2.7.1 Undertaking by Vepco to use reasonable efforts to complete on schedule
(actually, if 4.2.2 is used, this section probably should not be used.)

3.11.3 (last sentence)  Vepco liable for costs for modifications to
generator-owned interconnection facilities and the Facility if changes
required because of changes to Vepco facilities (unless required by law).

4.1 Vepco must inform generator owner if costs exceed estimate by more than
10% and such increase is subject to generator owner's consent.

4.2.2 Concept that Vepco must seek bids for the work and generator owner can
choose whether the work is done with best efforts undertaking to complete on
time, but no penalties/incentives or with firm completion date and
penalties/incentives.

4.3  Generator owner to provide letter of credit for cost of work or
guarantee (as opposed to 50% paid in advance, as provided in Vepco's draft.
By the way, even if we agreed to pay 50% in advance, it should not be on
signing the agreement, but rather before they start the work.)

4.8.1  Refund if Vepco receives money back.

4.9.1  Language re tax gross up (in lieu of the last sentence in their
Section 7.3.)

5.1  Last sentence--add generator owner's schedules and output,etc. being
confidential.

In addition, there were a few things in the draft I wanted to point out, as
follows:

In Section 2.2.3 and elsewhere in the agreement, they reserve the right to
make a unilateral filing with FERC to amend the agreement.  The generator
owner would have the right to protest the filing, but I want to check with
our regulatory people as to whether they can waive this right, as I don't
think it's fair for them to unilaterally amend it.

Article 4.6 should be reviewed by technical folks.

In Section 10.2.1.3, they reserve the right to file the agreement with FERC
even if the parties haven't agreed and executed it yet and they start service
under the agreement.  As noted above, it's putting your fate in FERC's hands.

The indemnity of V


Message-ID: <26729918.1075858584088.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 10:47:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: gtownsend@manorisd.net
To: gerald.nemec@enron.com
Subject: RE:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: "Townsend, George" <gtownsend@manorisd.net>@ENRON <IMCEANOTES-+22Townsend+2C+20George+22+20+3Cgtownsend+40manorisd+2Enet+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com>
X-To: Nemec, Gerald </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=GNEMEC>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Nemec, Gerald (Non-Privileged)\Nemec, Gerald\Inbox
X-Origin: Nemec-G
X-FileName: Nemec, Gerald (Non-Privileged).pst

ok I will put you down for two until I fill my slots. Come in Thursday. You
can stay at the casa. We are going to have a blast. The party should be
wild.

Dude, what's up with your CEO? or Ex CEO

GT

-----Original Message-----
From: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com [mailto:Gerald.Nemec@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:58 AM
To: gtownsend@manorisd.net
Subject: RE:

I will be there dude.  I may be solo.  Not sure yet.  Will there be any
hotties?    Will it be a problem for me to crash at your casa?  I might
come in on Thursday night.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Townsend, George" <gtownsend@manorisd.net>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Townsend+2C+20George+22+20+3Cgtownsend+40manorisd+2Ene
t+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

   Sent:   Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:04 AM
   To:     gerald nemec (E-mail)
   Subject:

   G,

   No Le Hace III is set for Aug. 31st @ 7:00 pm at Just for Fun, Lake
   Travis,
   Tx. I have you and a date/friend down on my list. Can you make it?

   GT

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Message-ID: <27387410.1075856567913.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 13:25:00 -0800 (PST)
From: enron.announcements@enron.com
To: all_ena_egm_eim@enron.com
Subject: EnTouch Newsletter
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-From: Enron Announcements
X-To: All_ENA_EGM_EIM
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Vincent_Kaminski_Jun2001_5\Notes Folders\C:\Mangmt\Ene_ect
X-Origin: Kaminski-V
X-FileName: vkamins.nsf

BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

US Natural Gas Teams
The US Natural Gas Marketing Originations Teams have had a successful 1Q=20
2001.  In addition to Mid Market Activity led by Fred Lagrasta, new=20
Origination Desk Heads and Marketing Teams have been set up across the US a=
nd=20
are led by the following: West Gas Origination - Barry Tycholiz, Central Ga=
s=20
Origination - Laura Luce, East Gas Origination - Frank Vickers.  These team=
s=20
have made significant inroads in 2001, focusing on Customer Coverage, New=
=20
Accounts, Transportation Syndication, Risk Management Products and Market=
=20
Intelligence.  All of these individuals are open to any questions regarding=
=20
the new businesses.

Siebel Summary
EIM's ability to rapidly transform its designated forest products and steel=
=20
markets is dependent upon its ability to effectively manage the market=20
participants and accelerate their adoption of EIM's business strategy.  To=
=20
achieve this objective, EIM will implement Siebel Sales Enterprise, a=20
customer-focused centralized database that effectively leverages all=20
information learned about our customers and enables sharing of this=20
information throughout the front, mid and back offices.  Siebel is designed=
=20
to help in-house and mobile sales professionals in large organizations mana=
ge=20
accounts, contacts, activities and opportunities associated with the sales=
=20
cycle.  EIM Fundamentals is leading the Siebel implementation effort.

IN THE NEWS

Enron is hosting the New York Energy Risk Management Seminar at the St. Reg=
is=20
Hotel in New York City on April 5, 2001.  Topics include: Power Outlook,=20
Natural Gas Outlook, and Weather Risk Management. To RSVP, contact Laura Pe=
na=20
at x 3-5376.

WELCOME
New Hires
EGM  - Sherman Franzen, Fariba Karimi, Ryan Krogmeier, Lawrence Marcus=20
EIM   - Ronald Barnes, Paul Hanks, Chad Ihrig, Stella Pedroza, Linda Silva
ENA  - Hagar Kedem, Steven Merriss, Courdney Williams, Diane Fellers

Transfers
ENA =01) Tammie Schoppe, Lynna Kacal, Johnna Kokenge, Karen Jones, Stuart=
=20
Zisman, Anne Labbe
EGM =01) Justin Cornett, George Thomas, Richard Yeboah, Phi Khanh Wolfe, Al=
an=20
Harvey, Philip Berry, Ethan Schultz, Sanjeev Khanna, Mingcheng Lian=20

NUGGETS & NOTES

 "We have to move paper, make money AND move the industry."  -- Rodney=20
Malcolm,  Vice President/Forest Products EIM

Congratulations to Angela and Chris Connelly, manager in Coal Trading. They=
=20
are the proud parents of Nicholas Connelly, born on March 17 and weighed=20
7lbs.11oz.  (Rumor has it that at 48 hours of age, he had more hair than hi=
s=20
father!)

Congratulations to Carmen and Glenn Wright, director in Steel Origination w=
ho=20
welcomed little Lauren Nicole born March 12.  She weighed in at 7lbs.13oz.a=
nd=20
debuted with a full head of hair and "making lots of noise."=20

LEGAL STUFF
The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietar=
y=20
to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries.  It is intended for internal use only=
=20
and should not be disclosed.


Message-ID: <7009846.1075844703683.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 10:13:00 -0800 (PST)
From: enron.announcements@enron.com
To: all_ena_egm_eim@enron.com
Subject: EnTouch Newsletter
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-From: Enron Announcements
X-To: All_ENA_EGM_EIM
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Sara_Shackleton_Dec2000_June2001_2\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: SHACKLETON-S
X-FileName: sshackle.nsf

BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

Weather Risk Management
Next week, Jeff Shankman and Mark Tawney will be attending the Weather Risk=
=20
Management Association (WRMA) conference in Tokyo. There has been=20
a lot of interest in Japanese weather derivatives to-date.  Even though Jap=
an=20
is geographically a relatively small country, due to elevation differences,=
=20
there are several different climates and within each of those areas, there=
=01,s=20
a significant amount of volatility in day-to-day and season-to-season=20
weather. By leveraging EnronOnline and our global portfolio approach, Enron=
=20
Global Markets will be the dominant weather market player in Japan, as we a=
re=20
in
the US, Australia and Europe.

COMING SOON - New EWS Training Web Site
Ernie is retiring and there is a new tool to help you manage your=20
professional development. It=01,s called InvestInMe.enron.com and it is the=
 key=20
to your future. In a=20
user-friendly format, you will find the current listing of internal program=
s,=20
access to a database of external programs, and registration for on-line=20
courses.
Watch for details in your email.  Launch date is Tuesday, March 6, 2001.

IN THE NEWS

Analyst Robert C. Ollech, vice president and portfolio manager at Ziegler=
=20
Investment Services Group, says Wall Street will like Enron even more as=20
demand for natural gas increases, volume continues to grow on its online=20
marketplace and as the company's broadband business starts making money. =
=20
Enron, which has beat analysts' estimates in five of the past seven quarter=
s,=20
is not a cheap stock. But Ollech says its relatively young management team =
is=20
focused on maximizing systems and business lines it has spent five years=20
developing. Plus, the company is selling such assets as a power plant in=20
Oregon, moves Ollech says could boost its return on equity to 18% or higher=
=20
from the present 12%. "This is an innovative story that's finally getting=
=20
out," Ollech says. 02/25/2001  The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.

WELCOME
New Hires
ENA =01) Angelic Davis, Dipak Agarwalla, Sean Maki, Juliann Kemp, Bridget F=
raser
EIM =01) Louis Amo
Transfers
EGM =01) Patrick Conner
EIM =01) Douglas Seaworth
ENA =01) Eric Feitler, Santiago Garcia, Philip Polsky, Lauren Schlesinger

NUGGETS & NOTES

=01&If you=01,re not trading EOL, you=01,re not trading.=018 =01) John L. W=
ilson, Vice=20
President/EGM

=01&Training=01(.all the cool kids are doing it!=018 =01) Tom Wilbeck/ENA

Congratulations to Michelle and David Vitrella, manager of trading/EGM.  Th=
ey=20
are the proud parents of a baby girl born February 27 weighing
over 9 lbs.

NEWS FROM THE GLOBAL FLASH

International
World Watch
Compiled by David I. Oyama
Enron Seeks Deals for Japanese Assets=20
The Japanese unit of U.S. power producer and trader Enron is considering=20
asset swaps with Japanese power companies, in a deal that would make Enron=
=20
the first
foreign company to buy a Japanese power plant. An Enron Japan official said=
=20
it is talking to power companies and "owners of power generators in Japan=
=20
about=20
the possibility of asset exchanges," confirming a report in the Japanese=20
business daily Nihon Keizai Shimbun. The report also said Enron Japan may=
=20
enter deals
with Japanese companies for joint power-generation acquisitions abroad.=20
Japanese deregulation measures have opened the door to new foreign and=20
domestic=20
competitors in an industry dominated for years by 10 regional Japane


Message-ID: <16013607.1075852511268.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 11:20:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: d..steffes@enron.com
To: jgallagher@epsa.org
Subject: RE: Conference Call on Tuesday
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Steffes, James D. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JSTEFFE>
X-To: '"Jackie Gallagher" <JGallagher@epsa.org>@ENRON'
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \JSTEFFE (Non-Privileged)\Steffes, James D.\Sent Items
X-Origin: Steffes-J
X-FileName: JSTEFFE (Non-Privileged).pst

3 is better.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Jackie Gallagher" <JGallagher@epsa.org>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 12:59 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Subject:	RE: Conference Call on Tuesday

We have another EPSA call scheduled at 2--  how does 3 or 3:30 EST look?

>>> <James.D.Steffes@enron.com> 10/26/01 11:55AM >>>
How about 2pm EST - 1pm CST?

Jim

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Jackie Gallagher" <JGallagher@epsa.org>@ENRON
   Sent:   Friday, October 26, 2001 10:44 AM
   To:     Steffes, James D.
   Subject:  Conference Call on Tuesday

   Jim,
   Julie wants to hold a conference call on Tuesday, October 30th to
   discuss the possibility of designing and undertaking cost-benefit
   analyses to support FERC's RTO policies.  She wants to have you on the
   call & would like to know when you would be available.  Anytime after
   1:00 p.m. EST would probably be best for her.  If you could let me know
   ASAP I will be able to send out an email to those she thinks should be
   on the call.  Thanks, Jim.

   Jackie Gallagher

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Message-ID: <13533713.1075860742072.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 06:18:13 -0800 (PST)
From: charles.mathis@elpaso.com
To: w..campbell@enron.com, schoolcraft'.'darrell@enron.com,
	jerry.graves@enron.com
Subject: May 2002 Maint.xls
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: "Mathis, Charles R." <Charles.Mathis@ElPaso.com>@ENRON
X-To: Campbell, David W. <David.W.Campbell@ElPaso.com>, 'Darrell Schoolcraft' <dschool@enron.com>, Graves, Jerry </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JGRAVES>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Darrell_Schoolcraft_Mar2002\Schoolcraft, Darrell\Deleted Items
X-Origin: Schoolcraft-D
X-FileName: dschool (Non-Privileged).pst

 <<May 2002 Maint.xls>>
Jerry,  What is the D/R?  May 15 is a conflict with our Gallup ESD.  How
long will you be down, and can move that to May 9, 10, or another date that
shows no scheduled maintenance on this calendar?
Charlie

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************

 - May 2002 Maint.xls


Message-ID: <33070900.1075863407807.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 03:20:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: petroleumworldnews1@hotmail.com
To: petroleumworldreaders@hotmail.com
Subject: Petroleumworld weekly review
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-From: "Petroleumworld News" <petroleumworldnews1@hotmail.com>@ENRON
X-To: petroleumworldreaders@hotmail.com
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \VKAMINS (Non-Privileged)\Kaminski, Vince J\Deleted Items
X-Origin: Kaminski-V
X-FileName: VKAMINS (Non-Privileged).pst

=09 [IMAGE][IMAGE]   [IMAGE]    =09
 [IMAGE]  Home   [IMAGE]    Go to    [IMAGE]    Events    Bulletin Board   =
Newsletter   Geological Guide   Contracting Guide  [IMAGE] Procurement Guid=
e   Noticias- Petroleo.com News Spanish  IESA Macroeconomic Data Base    [I=
MAGE] Venezuela Central Bank Economic Indicators  Petroleumworld Business P=
artners:     [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]     [IMAGE] =09   "); document.write (mesn=
[fecha.getMonth()+1]+", "+fecha.getDate()+" "+fecha.getYear()); document.wr=
ite ("");   Octubre, 24 2001     Petroleumworld Weekly Review Oct. 14-Oct. =
21  Petroleumworld.com for the lastest daily news [IMAGE]  OPEC ministers: =
Options open on output cut  Photo: Energy24X [IMAGE]  PETROLEUMWORLD Caraca=
s, Oct. 19  - A key group of OPEC ministers gathered in Vienna Friday to di=
scuss responses to a slump in crude prices to two-year lows following last =
month's terror attacks, possibly by cutting Photo: Energy 24X productionAFP=
. Full story   Chavez: Oil Prices Won't Fall [IMAGE] PETROLEUMWORLD - Full =
story  Kuwait Wants OPEC Oil Price Between $23-$25/Bbl - Oil Min [IMAGE] PE=
TROLEUMWORLD Caracas, Oct. 20 Full story  Venezuela's Chavez: "possible" to=
 lower OPEC price band  [IMAGE]Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez PETROLEUMW=
ORLD Caracas, Oct. 19 - Full story  Venezuelan leader Chavez due in Moscow =
on Sunday [IMAGE] PETROLEUMWORLD Caracas, Oct. 19 - Full story   Nigeria's =
Lukman: Cut in production "...it's always a possibility" [IMAGE] PETROLEUMW=
ORLD Caracas, Oct. 19 - Full story  OPEC Key ministers in Vienna to discuss=
 slump [IMAGE] PETROLEUMWORLD Caracas, Oct. 19 - Full story  Venezuela anno=
uncing bidding round for coal sector Photo: PDVSA [IMAGE] PETROLEUMWORLD Ca=
racas, Oct. 18 - Full story   Venezuela's AES-CANTV/Oct. 24 -2: Hldrs want =
more info from Co [IMAGE] PETROLEUMWORLD Caracas, Oct. 18 - Full story  Oil=
 hit a two - year low [IMAGE] By Elio Ohep PETROLEUMWORLD Caracas, Oct. 17 =
- Full story  Saudi/Iranian Mins: To intensify talks with non-OPEC [IMAGE][=
IMAGE]Iran's Zangeneh Saudi's Ali Naimi PETROLEUMWORLD Caracas, Oct. 17 - F=
ull story   Venezuela govt to get 60% share in $2.2 bln LNG project [IMAGE]=
 PETROLEUMWORLD Caracas, Oct. 16 - Full story  US's Abraham: US seeking "st=
ability in energy markets." [IMAGE]US Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham PETR=
OLEUMWORLD Caracas, Oct. 16 - Full story  Venezuela's : Chavez's visits to =
Lybia, Iran justified [IMAGE]  Venezuela's Energy Vice Minister Bernardo Al=
varez By Elio Ohep PETROLEUMWORLD Caracas, Oct. 16 - full story  Venezuela =
Fedepetrol's Union president elections in doubt [IMAGE] Candidate Rafael Ro=
sales - left By Elio Ohep PETROLEUMWORLD Caracas, Oct. 16 - full story  Fea=
rs, again, of oil supplies at risk [IMAGE] PETROLEUMWORLD Caracas, Oct. 15 =
- full story  Venezuela's Chavez met with Gaddafi to discuss oil prices [IM=
AGE]Venezuela's Chavez with Lybia's Gaddafi By Elio Ohep PETROLEUMWORLD Car=
acas, Oct. 15 - full story  Venezuela Pres expands tour to urge non-OPEC oi=
l cuts [IMAGE] PETROLEUMWORLD Caracas, Oct. 15 - full story  Govt opponent =
re-elected as pres of Venezuelan oil union  [IMAGE]Fedepetrol's Carlos Orte=
ga PETROLEUMWORLD Caracas, Oct. 15 - full story  OPEC President denies OPEC=
 planning to Meet soon [IMAGE]OPEC's President Chakib Khelil  PETROLEUMWORL=
D Caracas, Oct. 14 - full story     [IMAGE]   This week top ISSUES...


Message-ID: <6698630.1075860966582.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 06:39:35 -0800 (PST)
From: michelle.lokay@enron.com
To: 'ott@enron.com, shana.ott@elpaso.com
Subject: RE: SPRINT Ad   ;-)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Lokay, Michelle </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MLOKAY>
X-To: 'Ott, Shana' <Shana.Ott@ElPaso.com>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Michelle_Lokay_Mar2002\Lokay, Michelle\Sent Items
X-Origin: Lokay-M
X-FileName: mlokay (Non-Privileged).pst

Wow...is that what really happened?!?!  I am so glad it's all clarified.  Since we're suing everyone (the accountants, the lawyers, etc.), we might as well sue our long distance carrier.  Talk soon!

-----Original Message-----
From: Ott, Shana [mailto:Shana.Ott@ElPaso.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 7:50 AM
Subject: FW: SPRINT Ad ;-)

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************


Message-ID: <21558508.1075840736232.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 07:40:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: mollie.gustafson@enron.com
To: portland.desk@enron.com
Subject: IMPORTANT MESSAGE
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-From: Mollie Gustafson
X-To: Portland West Desk
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \mark guzman 6-28-02\Notes Folders\Notes inbox
X-Origin: GUZMAN-M
X-FileName: mark guzman 6-28-02.nsf

Please take the time to respond to this survey.  It is important for Enron =
to=20
know what you think about the company....your vote counts!

Regards,

Chris Calger and Tim Belden
---------------------- Forwarded by Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT on=20
10/20/2000 08:07 AM ---------------------------
  =20
=09Enron North America Corp.
=09
=09From:  The Pulse @ ENRON                           10/19/2000 06:26 PM
=09

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: The Pulse mailout
cc: =20
Subject: IMPORTANT MESSAGE FROM OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN

Is available: through Friday, Oct. 27
Is located at: survey.enron.com

You only have one more week to check your pulse.  Your input is crucial, so=
=20
please take a few minutes today to fill out Enron's annual employee feedbac=
k=20
survey.  It is confidential and only takes about 10 minutes.  Give us your=
=20
honest, candid feedback =01) we need to know what you think and how you fee=
l=20
about your job and about Enron.

It's important for you to know that we will respond actively to your=20
comments.  We need your help not only to pinpoint and diagnose any existing=
=20
problems, but also to help us identify the best solutions.  Last year we=20
formed action teams to address the issues that you indicated in the survey,=
=20
so let us know if they have helped make Enron a better place to work.

Again, please stop what you're doing for just a few minutes today and check=
=20
your pulse.


Message-ID: <903122.1075855030373.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 07:18:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: t..lucci@enron.com
To: lisab@int.iwhm.com
Subject: RE:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Lucci, Paul T. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=PLUCCI>
X-To: 'lisab' <lisab@int.iwhm.com>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \PLUCCI (Non-Privileged)\Deleted Items
X-Origin: Lucci-P
X-FileName: PLUCCI (Non-Privileged).pst

I was thinking of renting a Limo ($70.00/hr), so we don't have to drive.  But, everybody that was thinking of going with me is backing out.  What do you think?  I want to drink but I don't want to drive.  How many girlfriends do you have going.  Oh by the way my costume is very weak.

Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: lisab [mailto:lisab@int.iwhm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 8:26 AM
To: Lucci, Paul T.
Subject: Re:

Me and my girlfriends are planning to go out.  We don't have a plan as of yet.  What are you guys doing?

----- Original Message -----
From: Lucci, Paul T. <mailto:Paul.T.Lucci@ENRON.com>
To: lisab <mailto:lisab@int.iwhm.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 1:18 PM
Subject: RE:

Yes, and what are you doing for Halloween (Saturday Night)?

-----Original Message-----
From: lisab [mailto:lisab@int.iwhm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 9:58 AM
To: Lucci, Paul T.
Subject:

Good morning.  How are things?  You guys still planning your happy hour on Friday?

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Message-ID: <29045984.1075844423548.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 00:37:00 -0800 (PST)
From: sara.shackleton@enron.com
To: awaskow@exchange.ml.com
Subject: RE: Master Repurchase Agreement with Enron North America Corp.
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Sara Shackleton
X-To: "Waskow, Andrew (OGC)" <AWaskow@exchange.ml.com>@ENRON
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Sara_Shackleton_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: SHACKLETON-S
X-FileName: sshackle.nsf

Andy:

I am reviewing your comments and will have an answer shortly.  I thought,
however, that you should know that the limitation of liability provision is
non-negotiable from Enron's viewpoint.  If this is problematic, please advise
and we can halt further discussion.  Thanks.  Sara

	"Waskow, Andrew (OGC)" <AWaskow@exchange.ml.com>
	10/31/2000 06:33 PM

		 To: "'Sara.Shackleton@enron.com'" <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
		 cc: "Shin, Regina (OGC)" <Rshin@exchange.ml.com>
		 Subject: RE: Master Repurchase Agreement with Enron North America Corp.

Sara:

Thanks for the additional information and the recommended changes, each of
which we accept.

In order to accommodate the deletion of 9(b), we recommend revising your
number 6 to read as follows:

6. Substitution

 (a) Paragraph 9(b) is hereby deleted in its entirety.

 (b) Seller shall not retain custody of any Purchased Securities
under any Transaction governed by this Agreement.

NOTICES:  Your suggested language regarding notices is potentially
problematic.  Under the Paragraph 13 of the MRA, notices may made orally,
"to be confirmed promptly in writing....", and confirmation of delivery is
not expressly relevant.  The unquestionable ability to make oral margin
calls pursuant to Paragraph 4 is vital in fast-moving market conditions, and
was expressly included in the standard agreement to avoid any doubt as to
their validity.  In the default context (Paragraph 11), proof of delivery of
written notice is of no concern because the exercise of a party's rights
under that Paragraph is not contingent upon delivery of notice.  Notice must
be given "as promptly as practicable."  We believe that the proposed
language could cause confusion or uncertainty regarding the validity of oral
margin calls and would conflict with the operative provisions of Paragraph
11.  We therefore request deletion of your number 8.

NON-ASSIGNABILITY:  As we discussed earlier today, we have a general
aversion to assignments of repurchase transactions due to our regulatory
obligations as a broker-dealers.  For that reason, we must be free to
withhold consent to assignment with confidence that such withholding will
not be challenged as "unreasonable."  We therefore request deletion of your
number 9.

We are still reviewing your proposals regarding SETOFF and LIMITED
LIABILITY.  I will also have to review Section 5-1401 of the NYGOL before
commenting on that.

I look forward to the prompt completion of our negotiations.  Thanks again
for the information and recommendations.

Best regards,
Andy Waskow

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [SMTP:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 6:22 PM
> To: awaskow@exchange.ml.com
> Cc: Ellen.Su@enron.com
> Subject: Master Repurchase Agreement with Enron North America Corp.
>
> Andy:
>
> In the spirit of "full disclosure", I thought I would let you know what
> ENA
> has agreed to on the ISDA side with various Merrill entities.
> ENA has ISDA's with Merrill Lynch International Bank (8/25/95), Merrill
> Lynch Capital Services Inc. (12/2/92) and Merrill Lynch International
> (8/25/95).
> There is no arbitration provision in any of these agreements; there is
> merely silence as to jurisdiction (ENA began negotiating arbitration
> around
> 1997).  All of these agreements contain our standard limitation of
> liability language (in boldface) and all permit some type of assignment to
>


Message-ID: <12300545.1075860320460.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 03:12:00 -0800 (PST)
From: mark.taylor@enron.com
To: nora.dobin@enron.com
Subject: Re: FW: Linking Agreements - Indemnity Issue
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Mark Taylor
X-To: Nora Dobin
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Mark_Taylor_Jun2001\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: Taylor-M
X-FileName: mtaylor.nsf

Nora - I got your voice mail & will try to call you soon - I'm stuck on a
conference call.  I tend to agree with you - this seems to me to be contrary
to our policy.  On the other hand, it also sounds like a request we would
want to make if we were on the other side.

	Nora Dobin@ENRON
	01/11/2001 10:06 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Suresh Raghavan/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: FW: Linking Agreements - Indemnity Issue

Mark, what are your thoughts on attached from EOL perspective?  Envera's
proposal is inconsistent with Enron legal policy on punitive, consequential,
lost profit type damages.  Please let me know your thoughts.  Thanks, NJD

Nora J. Dobin
Senior Counsel
Enron Global Finance
Enron Corp.
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas  77002

713/345-7723 (phone)
713/853-9252 (fax)
E-mail:  nora.dobin@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Nora Dobin/Corp/Enron on 01/11/01 09:59 AM -----

	"Harvey, Dean" <dharvey@velaw.com>
	01/11/01 09:56 AM

		 To: "Dobin, Nora (Enron)" <nora.dobin@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Linking Agreements - Indemnity Issue

-----Original Message-----
From: Pond, Jonathan [mailto:JPond@hunton.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 9:36 AM
To: Alderden, Emily; Stockbridge, Edward T; 'Harvey, Dean'
Cc: 'michael.a.robison@enron.com'; 'douglas.s.friedman@enron.com';
'suresh.raghavan@dealbench.com'; 'Biff Pusey (E-mail)'; 'Mike Giesler
(E-mail)'; LeBey, Daniel
Subject: Linking Agreements - Indemnity Issue

Envera still has an issue with the indemnity offered under the Linking
Agreements.  As we discussed in our conference yesterday, Envera cannot
permit DealBench or EnronOnline to disclaim consequential damages that may
be payable to a plaintiff in a trademark infringement action.  Envera is not
seeking to recover Envera's own lost profits or consequential damages, just
those that Envera must pay to a plaintiff in an infringement action.

Envera's request is that a statement be added to the indemnity section
clarifying that any damages awarded in a final judgment or paid in
settlement of an infringement claim be deemed "direct" damages.  Dean stated
in yesterday's e-mail that DealBench, as a matter of policy, does not agree
to such requests.

After some discussion among Envera business people, Envera is uncomfortable
with the position taken by DealBench and Enron on this issue.  If DealBench
and Enron are not prepared to stand behind the trademarks that they so
vigorously protect in the Linking Agreements, then Envera is not prepared to
shoulder the risk that Envera would be required come out of pocket for a
plaintiff's lost profits.  Envera is not able to control the risk that
EnronOnline and DealBench have chosen infringing trademarks, other than by
not establishing the links at all.

If the concern of DealBench and EnronOnline is that they could be required
to pay punitive damages that arise from Envera's misuse of the trademarks,
this eventuality is already covered in the indemnity provision.  Neither
party is required to indemnify Envera for infringement claims based upon any
use of the marks not expressly authorized under the Linking Agreements.

I have attached drafts of the two Linking Agreements, marked to show the
language that Envera would like added to Section 4(c).  Please review the
proposed changes and let me know whether they are acceptable to DealBench
and EnronOnline.  If not, Envera will need to consider whether it will even
establish the links.

Regards,

Jonathan

Jonathan R. Pond
HUNTON & WILLIAMS
Riverfront Plaza, East Tower


Message-ID: <31001700.1075853198851.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 05:56:00 -0800 (PST)
From: gfergus@brobeck.com
To: tim.belden@enron.com, cyoder@enron.com, schall@stoel.com
Subject: Data Preservation Policy
Cc: richard.b.sanders@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: richard.b.sanders@enron.com
X-From: "Fergus, Gary S." <GFergus@brobeck.com>
X-To: "Timothy Belden (E-mail)" <tim.belden@enron.com>, "Christian. Yoder (E-mail)" <cyoder@enron.com>, "Stephen C. Hall (E-mail)" <schall@stoel.com>
X-cc: "Richard B. Sanders Esq. (E-mail)" <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Richard_Sanders_Oct2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: Sanders-R
X-FileName: rsanders.nsf

    Tim,
     Wednesday the California Deputy
Attorney General agreed to the following treatment of email at the Portland
facility.  I confirmed this procedure in writing to him and have not heard
any disagreement:

    In Portland, we proposed to handle business
email related to the topics in your preservation letter by instructing
employees not to delete any email sent or received for 24 hours.  Email that
is personal and does not relate to the business topics you have identified
can be kept, discarded etc. at the employee's pleasure.  Each day there is a
backup made that will capture the email in those employees mailboxes.  After
24 hours, each employee is free to manage their email box as they deem
appropriate to the business needs (e.g. keep, discard).

     In addition, I discussed with the
Attorney General the following procedure for when an employee runs out of
hard disk space on his/her computer.  Again, I have not heard any
disagreement regarding this procedure.

    When an employee runs out of hard disk space
on their computer, it is an acceptable practice to copy files from their
hard disk to the network (where they will be backed up) and then delete
those copied files to make sufficient work space for the employee to work.

    Below are our recommendations for the text
of an email to all EPMI personnel in Portland.  Dan Dietrich has confirmed
that the IT backroom support for this policy is in place and that we may
implement today.  Please send me a copy of the email that you distribute.

    Thanks
    Gary

    Text for your email:

    This message will update employees on the
status of the California Attorney General's order regarding the preservation
of business information.  Please NOTE THE IMPORTANT POLICIES DESCRIBED
BELOW.

    We have negotiated procedures with the
California Attorney General's office allowing each of you to manage your
email and hard drive capacity while still preserving business information.

    Starting today, please implement the
following business information retention policies:

    (1) PERSONAL EMAIL: can be kept, discarded,
etc. at will.

    (2) BUSINESS EMAIL: do not delete any
business email sent or received for 24 hours.  This 24 hour delay will allow
the network to save a backup copy of the email.  After 24 hours, BUSINESS
EMAIL may be kept, discarded, etc. at will.

    (3) WORD PROCESSING FILES OR FILE FRAGMENTS:
do not delete any SAVED FILE or any FILE FRAGMENT.  This policy covers any
FILE or FILE FRAGMENT that you have saved on your hard disk or the network.

    (4) DATABASES: do not delete any information
in DATABASES.

    (5) EXCEL SPREADSHEETS: do not delete any
information in EXCEL SPREADSHEETS.

    (6) CALENDARS OR SCHEDULING PROGRAMS: do not
delete any information.

    (7) OTHER ELECTRONIC DATA: do not delete any
OTHER ELECTRONIC DATA.

    (8) HARD DRIVE CAPACITY: in the event that
you run out of disk space on your personal computer, you may copy files to
the network (where they will be backed up), then delete the files from your
personal computer to create the work space you need.  DO NOT DELETE ANY FILE
BEFORE YOU HAVE COPIED IT TO THE NETWORK.

    In our negotiations we have discovered no
reason to