Message-ID: <5563397.1075859948376.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 07:42:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: mark.taylor@enron.com
To: acurry@velaw.com
Subject: jurisdiction
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-From: Mark Taylor
X-To: acurry@velaw.com
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Mark_Taylor _Dec_2000\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: Taylor-M
X-FileName: mtaylor.nsf

(h) Jurisdiction.  Section 13(b) is hereby deleted in its entirety and=20
replaced with the following:
(b) Jurisdiction.  With respect to any suit, action, claim or proceeding=20
relating to this Agreement (=01&Proceedings=018), neither party (i) waives =
any=20
objection which it may have at any time to the laying of venue of any=20
Proceedings brought in any court, (ii) waives any claim that such Proceedin=
gs=20
have been brought in an inconvenient forum, or (iii) waives the right to=20
object, with respect to such Proceedings, that a court does not have any=20
jurisdiction over such party.
Nothing in this Agreement precludes either party from bringing Proceedings =
in=20
any jurisdiction, nor will the bringing of Proceedings in any one or more=
=20
jurisdictions preclude the bringing of Proceedings in any other jurisdictio=
n.=20

and just in case you need it:

(b) Agreement To Arbitrate:  Any claim, counterclaim, demand, cause of=20
action, dispute, and controversy arising out of or relating to this Agreeme=
nt=20
or the relationship established by this Agreement, any provision hereof, th=
e=20
alleged breach thereof, or in any way relating to the subject matter of thi=
s=20
Agreement, involving the parties and/or their respective representatives=20
(collectively the =01&Claims=018), even though some or all of such Claims a=
llegedly=20
are extra-contractual in nature, whether such Claims sound in contract, tor=
t,=20
or otherwise, at law or in equity, under state or federal law, whether=20
provided by statute or the common law, for damages or any other relief, sha=
ll=20
be resolved by binding arbitration.

Conduct Of The Arbitration, And Authority Of The Arbitrators:  Arbitration=
=20
shall be governed by the Federal Arbitration Act and conducted in accordanc=
e=20
with the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration=20
Association.  The validity, construction, and interpretation of this=20
agreement to arbitrate, and all procedural aspects of the arbitration=20
conducted pursuant hereto shall be decided by the arbitrators.  In deciding=
=20
the substance of the parties=01, Claims, the arbitrators shall refer to the=
=20
Governing Law.  It is agreed that the arbitrators shall have no authority t=
o=20
award treble, exemplary or punitive damages of any type under any=20
circumstances whether or not such damages may be available under state or=
=20
federal law, or under the Federal Arbitration Act, or under the Commercial=
=20
Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association, the parties here=
by=20
waiving their right, if any, to recover any such damages.

Forum For The Arbitration And Selection Of Arbitrators:  The arbitration=20
proceeding shall be conducted in [New York, New York][Houston, Texas]. =20
Within thirty days of the notice of initiation of the arbitration procedure=
,=20
each party shall select one arbitrator.  The two arbitrators shall select a=
=20
third arbitrator.  The third arbitrator shall be a person who has over eigh=
t=20
years professional experience in over-the-counter derivative products and w=
ho=20
has not previously been employed by either party and does not have a direct=
=20
or indirect interest in either party or the subject matter of the=20
arbitration.  While the third arbitrator shall be neutral, the two=20
party-appointed arbitrators are not required to be neutral, and it shall no=
t=20
be grounds for removal of either of the two party-appointed arbitrators or=
=20
for vacating the arbitrators=01, award that either of such arb


Message-ID: <19459145.1075852526352.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 10:58:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: jgallagher@epsa.org
To: d..steffes@enron.com
Subject: RE: Conference Call on Tuesday
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: "Jackie Gallagher" <JGallagher@epsa.org>@ENRON
X-To: Steffes, James D. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JSTEFFE>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \JSTEFFE (Non-Privileged)\Steffes, James D.\Inbox
X-Origin: Steffes-J
X-FileName: JSTEFFE (Non-Privileged).pst

We have another EPSA call scheduled at 2--  how does 3 or 3:30 EST look?

>>> <James.D.Steffes@enron.com> 10/26/01 11:55AM >>>
How about 2pm EST - 1pm CST?

Jim

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Jackie Gallagher" <JGallagher@epsa.org>@ENRON
   Sent:   Friday, October 26, 2001 10:44 AM
   To:     Steffes, James D.
   Subject:  Conference Call on Tuesday

   Jim,
   Julie wants to hold a conference call on Tuesday, October 30th to
   discuss the possibility of designing and undertaking cost-benefit
   analyses to support FERC's RTO policies.  She wants to have you on the
   call & would like to know when you would be available.  Anytime after
   1:00 p.m. EST would probably be best for her.  If you could let me know
   ASAP I will be able to send out an email to those she thinks should be
   on the call.  Thanks, Jim.

   Jackie Gallagher

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Message-ID: <12337361.1075845914337.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 09:55:00 -0800 (PST)
From: sheila.tweed@enron.com
To: kay.mann@enron.com
Subject: URGENT: Draft Turbo Park EPC contract comments---Your thoughts on
 this would be appreciated.
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Sheila Tweed
X-To: Kay Mann
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Off balance sheet_form contracts
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

----- Forwarded by Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000 05:52 PM -----

	John Schwartzenburg@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	11/27/2000 08:44 PM

		 To: Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sheila Tweed@ECT, Karen E Jones@ECT
		 cc: Dick Westfahl/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Peter
Nassab/Corp/Enron@Enron, gene.larson@nepco.com, john.gillis@nepco.com,
david.lund@nepco.com, John G Rigby@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Keith
Marlow/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Vicki Sharp@EES
		 Subject: URGENT: Draft Turbo Park EPC contract comments

I attach legal comments  produced by David Lund and myself over the holiday
to the Turbo Park EPC  Draft No. 3 sent to us last week.  I also attach the
clean and compared forms of the Turbo Park contract on which we based our
comments and a chart of the proposed Turbo Park structure. I understand that
these documents are intended to be confidential and are not to be shared with
third parties, including vendors, subcontractors,  or other counterparties.

For the benefit of the EECC and NEPCO people who have not been involved in
the discussions yet, Turbo Park is intended to be a "9710 compliant
off-balance sheet financing structure" that would allow not only equipment
purchases but also project construction to be financed and executed
off-balance sheet.  The form EPC will be to some extent pre-approved by the
lenders for use with the Turbo Park facility.

 Although EECC/NEPCO are just now getting involved, I understand that the
Turbo Park team needs to get some level of sign-off on the EPC by this
Friday, presumably so that they can finalize  their documentation with the
banks.   The degree of sign-off and the ability to make changes after that
sign-off is unclear  to me, but at this point I am not aware of any
particular construction project that the form must be made to fit by Friday.
[I have not  been provided with any forms of attachments, and suspect that
none need to be produced by this Friday. Roseann or Sheila, could you find
out from your teams if this is the case?]

Larry Izzo has asked that Peter Nassab have John Rigby get involved in the
review of the attached contract, and that Dick Westfahl be made aware of the
matter since NEPCO will be the contractor for these projects as a general
rule.  David Lund has asked that Gene Larson look it over for NEPCO.  I
suggest that you start with the attached comments before you launch into the
drafts themselves.

We are  arranging a meeting with ENA and Enron Global Finance to coordinate
discussion of these comments, any additional comments from EECC and NEPCO,
and what EECC and NEPCO should expect from the Turbo Park project in the near
term, and will get back to you as soon as this is arranged. With any luck at
all, this effort will lead to a standard from not ionly for use with Turbo
Park, but also for general use between EECC/NEPCO and ENA, and thereby
significantly reduce transactions costs and time going forward.

Roseann and Sheila, please forward this as appropriate to your respective
team members and let us know when you have had a chance to digest the changes.

1. EECC/NEPCO legal comments

2. Turbo Park Draft No. 3 Compared to last Pastoria Contract

3. Clean Turbo Park Draft No. 3

4 Draft Turbo Park Structure Chart


Message-ID: <15691941.1075847010744.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 09:40:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: clare.godson@allenovery.com
To: tana.jones@enron.com
Subject: RE: First Union National Bank (FUNB) ISDA Master Agreements
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Clare.Godson@AllenOvery.com
X-To: Tana.Jones@enron.com
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Tanya_Jones_Dec2000\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: JONES-T
X-FileName: tjones.nsf

Thanks Tanna.  I'll speak with the traders and get a feel for the urgency
here.

Kind regards,

Clare

-----Original Message-----
From: Tana.Jones@enron.com [mailto:Tana.Jones@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 2:57 PM
To: Clare.Godson@AllenOvery.com
Subject: Re: First Union National Bank (FUNB) ISDA Master Agreements

FUNB sits stalled on my desk waiting for me to have time to work on it.  We
are in the miiddle of a rush with Financial Power counterparties in need
immediate assistance (many of them govt'ls which are demanding my
attention) and structured financing w/swaps in the middle and I'm just
putting out fires.  That master is really not a priority at all for ENA,
and it is only Enron.Credit.com wanting to mirror it that is giving it any
priority.  What is your proposed timing for a deal on that one?

                    Clare.Godson@Alle

                    nOvery.com               To:     tana.jones@enron.com

                                             cc:

                    09/22/2000 10:26         Subject:     First Union
National Bank (FUNB) ISDA Master Agreements
                    AM

Tanna,

Thanks for your help on the Goldman Sachs and Deutsche negotiations.  If
you
could keep me posted on the timing of the Deutsche agreements being put in
place that would be really helpful.  I also have another quick request and
that relates to the ISDA Master Agreement with FUNB.  I have spoken to
Delene Travella at FUNB.  They are negotiating an ECTRIC Schedule with you
in Houston which they want to finalise before commencing EnronCredit.com's
negotiation.  Can you give me an update on where this negotiation stands
and
how long before it is likely to be finalised?

Many thanks,

Clare Godson

======================================================================

This email is confidential and may also be privileged.  If you are not the
intended recipient please notify us immediately by telephoning +44 (20)
7330 3000 and requesting the Technology Services Helpdesk. You should not
copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose its contents to any other
person.

Allen & Overy
One New Change
London
EC4M 9QQ

Tel:+44 (20) 7330 3000
Fax: +44 (20) 7330 9999
General Email: Helpdesk@allenovery.com
www: http://www.allenovery.com

Allen & Overy is a solicitors' partnership.  A list of the names of
partners and their professional qualifications is open to inspection at the
above office.  The partners are either solicitors or registered foreign
lawyers.

======================================================================


Message-ID: <29264287.1075861222796.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 07:03:13 -0800 (PST)
From: daryl.dworkin@americas.bnpparibas.com
To: daryl.dworkin@americas.bnpparibas.com
Subject: BNP PARIBAS Commodity Futures Weekly AGA Survey
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: daryl.dworkin@americas.bnpparibas.com@ENRON
X-To: daryl.dworkin@americas.bnpparibas.com
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \CGERMAN (Non-Privileged)\Germany, Chris\Deleted Items
X-Origin: Germany-C
X-FileName: CGERMAN (Non-Privileged).pst

Good Morning,

Just a reminder to get your AGA estimates in by Noon EST (11:00 CST).

Last Year      - 97
Last Week      + 7

Thank You,
Daryl Dworkin
BNP PARIBAS Commodity Futures, Inc.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir immediatement l'expediteur.

Toute utilisation de ce message non conforme a sa destination, toute diffusion ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf autorisation expresse.

L'internet ne permettant pas d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS (et ses filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce message, dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.
	----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message and any attachments (the "message") are intended solely for the addressees and are confidential. If you receive this message in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender.

Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval.

The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message if modified.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


Message-ID: <24864653.1075843309899.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 02:26:00 -0800 (PST)
From: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To: mark.schroeder@enron.com
Subject: Re: California credit issues
Cc: bryan.seyfried@enron.com, john.sherriff@enron.com, markus.fiala@enron.com,
	richard.shapiro@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: bryan.seyfried@enron.com, john.sherriff@enron.com, markus.fiala@enron.com,
	richard.shapiro@enron.com
X-From: Jeff Dasovich
X-To: Mark Schroeder
X-cc: Bryan Seyfried, John Sherriff, Markus Fiala, Richard Shapiro
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Jeff_Dasovich_June2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: DASOVICH-J
X-FileName: jdasovic.nsf

S&P threatened publicly yesterday that unless the PUC acts decisively today
to fix the utilities' cash flow issue, they will significantly downgrade
California's IOUs.  I assume that's in the WSJ article Rick referenced.  As
Rick said, more info to come in a few hours.

	Mark Schroeder@ECT
	12/21/2000 08:31 AM

		 To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Bryan
Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT, Markus Fiala/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: California credit issues

Thanks.  I inferred from John that we may not be able to get or use
information from our own credit people for our market making activities, that
is why he is looking for info in the (reasonably) public domain.  mcs

Richard Shapiro@ENRON
21/12/2000 14:24
To: Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron@ECT, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Bryan
Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: California credit issues

Check out WSJ- Page A2. Also,Bill Bradford in Rick buy's group is person
most  proficient on credit issues relative to the three calif. utilities. I
will also get back to you this afternoon........The CPUC is scheduled to
issue orders today at 12:00 CST that may dramatically affect credit ratings
of the 3 utilities.

Mark Schroeder@ECT
12/21/2000 08:13 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Bryan Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: California credit issues

Rick/Jeff - I just spoke with John Sherriff and mentioned to him how on top
of California you guys were.  As you may be aware, we are making markets in
the credit of many utilities and telcomm companies, via EnronCredit.com.
Brian Seyfried is the commercial leader for this business.  John has asked me
to ask you, if you become aware of significant developments, in the public
sector (not privileged/insider information), bearing on
creditworthiness/ability to pay by California utilities, would you please
keep us informed, as we will have a keen interest in these developments?
Please forward to this to any others on your team(s) you think appropriate.
thanks   mcs


Message-ID: <16051840.1075844935846.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 06:02:00 -0800 (PST)
From: scott.vonderheide@enron.com
To: stanley.horton@enron.com, michael.burke@enron.com, dana.gibbs@enron.com
Subject: EOTT Price Increase
Cc: mark.koenig@enron.com, paula.rieker@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: mark.koenig@enron.com, paula.rieker@enron.com
X-From: Scott Vonderheide
X-To: Stanley Horton, Michael Burke, Dana Gibbs
X-cc: Mark Koenig, Paula Rieker
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Stanley_Horton_1\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: HORTON-S
X-FileName: shorton.nsf

FYI -
I discussed the increase in EOTT's unit price (up 11/16 on relatively normal
volume of 32,200 units at 2:00 CST) with Frank Delaney of Spear, Leads.  He
indicated Merrill Lynch has an order to buy 15,000 units with a 13 3/4 limit
and Golman Sachs has an order to buy 80,000 units with a 13 bid.  This is
obviously very good news and probably indicates at least a couple S
Corp.-type buyers are beginning to accumulate sizable positions.

Please keep this information confidential.

Scott


Message-ID: <33222782.1075842502269.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2000 14:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: drew.fossum@enron.com
To: jeffery.fawcett@enron.com
Subject: Re: Caithness Big Sandy LLC
Cc: susan.scott@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: susan.scott@enron.com
X-From: Drew Fossum
X-To: Jeffery Fawcett
X-cc: susan scott
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Drew_Fossum_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: FOSSUM-D
X-FileName: dfossum.nsf

Great summary.  Sounds like we have plenty to do.  Susan, lets talk Monday
and coordinate the law/regulatory stuff.  Gracias.  DF

Jeffery Fawcett
07/21/2000 12:36 PM
To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Julia
White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Keith Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen
Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Terry Galassini/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ronald
Matthews/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Earl Chanley/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Darrell Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rod
Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Alicia Goodrow/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James
Centilli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Lorraine M. Lindberg, Christine Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, TK
Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michelle Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: Caithness Big Sandy LLC

TW and Caithness met in Denver this week for the first face-to-face meeting
between the parties.  The purpose of the meeting was to review the status of
the Caithness Big Sandy Project and to establish the next steps for moving
the project forward.

Caithness Corporation
Caithness Corp. is a privately held company based in New York with a variety
of business interests.  The company is essentially a financial vehicle for
private investors.  Their energy segment currently owns 1,200 MW of
generation through renewable assets in California (geothermal at Coso, wind
in Tehachapi and Palm Springs) and a gas fired plant in South Carolina
jointly-owned by Florida Power & Light.

Big Sandy Project
The Big Sandy Project is a proposed power plant to be located near Wickieup,
Arizona.  The project would be built in two phases- first phase would be 550
MW, with a gas load of approx. 80,000 MMBtu/d, and phase 2 would add another
170 MW for a total of 720 MW with a gas load of 120,000 MMBtu/d.

The proposed location of the plant is approximately 40 miles south of
Transwestern's pipeline.  The take-off point on Transwestern would be at/near
valve station #1008, approximately 15 miles downstream of compressor Station
#1.  The current estimate includes an alignment that follows Arizona state
highway 93 south to a location 2 miles southeast of Wickieup in the S/W 4 of
Section 5, T15N, R12W, Mohave County, Arizona.  There is a 500 KV
transmission line owned by WAPA that crosses the property.  This line is one
of the principal electric transmission systems in the Southwest and extends
from the Phoenix area to the Mead substation near Boulder City, NV.  I've
included a WAPA map below which indicates this line.  Also, on the site is a
water pipeline owned by the Cyprus Amax Bagdad mine.  Water for the plant
will come from an encapusulated water table through deep wells.  They have
currently dug the first two test wells, each capable of 500 cfm.  The power
plant will require approximately 3,500 cfm of water.  In addition to the
wells, the plant has several thousand-acre feet of water rights to surface
water from the Big Sandy River.  The project may also purchase water from the
Cyprus Bagdad water pipeline.

The chief geological feature of this area is the Big Sandy River and
associated wash.  The highway 93 roadbed follows along the river.  The area
includes rolling hills and is principally desert terrain, with some limited
agricultural and ranching interests.  Wickieup is a very small town with an
estimated population of 200.

Project Schedule
Gas Turbine(s) ordered Westinghouse-Seimens  May 2000
Submit Envir


Message-ID: <15045700.1075862047751.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 14:55:15 -0800 (PST)
From: michelle.cash@enron.com
To: sharon.butcher@enron.com
Subject: FW: can we talk briefly?
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Cash, Michelle </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MCASH>
X-To: Butcher, Sharon </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Sbutche>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \MCASH (Non-Privileged)\Cash, Michelle\Sent Items
X-Origin: Cash-M
X-FileName: MCASH (Non-Privileged).pst

Your thoughts?
-----Original Message-----
From: Pentak, William
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 4:02 PM
To: Cash, Michelle
Subject: can we talk briefly?

Hello, Michelle!

You came and spoke to my new hire class last Monday. I have a pending book deal with Zondervan publishing and wanted to make sure that there was no problem re the confidentiality agreement.

I am certain there will be no problem. I have been a minister for 22 years and have a proposal being pitched by the senior editor at Zondervan to their editorial review board. The book will draw on my leadership/team-building experiences in the church and will be written from the perspective of a minister / mba. It will have nothing to do with Enron.

Please let me know when would be a good time to come by.

All The Best,
Bill


Message-ID: <24571942.1075843032317.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 08:20:00 -0800 (PST)
From: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To: robert.hemstock@enron.com
Subject: FERC Staff Investigations on Midwest and Southeast Bulk Power
 Systems
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Jeff Dasovich
X-To: Robert Hemstock
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Jeff_Dasovich_Dec2000\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: DASOVICH-J
X-FileName: jdasovic.nsf

----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 11/15/2000 04:09 PM -----

	Ginger Dernehl
	11/10/2000 03:38 PM

		 To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT, Allison Navin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Amy
Fabian/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Barbara A Hueter/NA/Enron@Enron, Bernadette
Hawkins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bill Moore/NA/Enron@Enron, Carolyn
Cooney/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Charles Yeung/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chauncey
Hood/NA/Enron@ENRON, Chris Long/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Damon
Harvey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dan Staines/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel
Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron, Dave Mangskau/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donald
Lassere/NA/Enron@Enron, Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron, Frank
Rishe/NA/Enron@Enron, Geriann Warner/NA/Enron@Enron, Ginger
Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Gloria Ogenyi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Howard Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron, Jean R
Dressler/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Brown/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey Keeler/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe
Allen/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Connor/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joseph
Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron, Kathleen Sullivan/NA/Enron@ENRON, Kathy
Mongeon/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kerry Stroup/NA/Enron@Enron,
Kirsten Bellas/NA/Enron@Enron, Lara Leibman/NA/Enron@Enron, Laurie
Knight/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda J
Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lindsay Meade/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Lisa Yoho/HOU/EES@EES, Lora Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcia A Linton/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcie
Milner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Nancy
Hetrick/NA/Enron@Enron, Patrick Keene/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard Ingersoll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert
Hemstock/CAL/ECT@ECT, Robert Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Robin Kittel/NA/Enron@Enron, Ron McNamara/NA/Enron@Enron, Roy
Boston/HOU/EES@EES, Rubena Buerger/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Bolton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Stephen D
Burns/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve
Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron,
Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Terri
Miller/HOU/EES@EES, Thane Twiggs/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tom
Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Delaney/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Tom Hoatson/NA/Enron@Enron, Tracy Cooper/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Vinio Floris/Corp/Enron@Enron, Xi Xi/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: FERC Staff Investigations on Midwest and Southeast Bulk Power
Systems

	Christi L Nicolay@ECT
	11/10/2000 03:22 PM

		 To: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: FERC Staff Investigations on Midwest and Southeast Bulk Power
Systems

Please forward this to Rick's group.  Thanks.

Please note that these FERC staff reports contain some potentially helpful
informatio

2000 through the use of forward contracts and
transmission problems that may have


Message-ID: <11749180.1075852905267.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 14:38:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: paul.donnelly@bakeratlas.com
To: kimberly.watson@enron.com, paul.donnelly@enron.com
Subject: RE: Rome Hotel - Respond immediately please
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Donnelly, Paul <Paul.Donnelly@bakeratlas.com>
X-To: Watson, Kimberly </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KWATSON>, Donnelly, Paul <Paul.Donnelly@bakeratlas.com>, janell_dye@hotmail.com, dennis_dye@hotmail.com, john.watson@pdq.net
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \KWATSON (Non-Privileged)\Watson, Kimberly\Inbox
X-Origin: Watson-K
X-FileName: KWATSON (Non-Privileged).pst

Kim,
Sounds good to the Donnelly's.

You might want to call Ark
-----Original Message-----
From: Watson, Kimberly [mailto:Kimberly.Watson@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 4:41 PM
To: paul.donnelly@bakeratlas.com; janell_dye@hotmail.com;
dennis_dye@hotmail.com; john.watson@pdq.net
Subject: Rome Hotel - Respond immediately please

Hey guys and girls,

Janell has a Sheraton on the outskirts of town booked on the front end
of the trip.  I sent 17 faxes this morning to hotels in the city center
looking for something closer to our sights.  I received an immediate
response from the Hotel Condotti.  They have 3 standard rooms available.
I believe it is a 3+ star hotel (I'm guessing from the prices they
charge).  From the article in my book, they have recently remodeled.
They are located near our Hotel Firenze between the Spanish Steps and
Plaza Del Popolo.  The rate is 430,000 Lire (approximately $215).  It's
$25 more than the Sheraton but we won't have to taxi between the city
center and the outskirts of town which gives us more flexibility to
easily scoot back to the hotel as we fade with jetlag and eat dinner in
town after a nap.  They also have a 72 hour cancellation policy (there
could be a slight fee to cancel, their fax just says they have a 72 hour
cancellation fee), if we are OK, I'll confirm this cancellation with our
reservation.

I think we should go with this.  I'm not sure how fast I'll hear from
the others, if at all.

Please let me know your thoughts ASAP.

Thanks, Kim.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Message-ID: <5572420.1075859668756.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 02:26:00 -0800 (PST)
From: damian.kissane@db.com
To: mcunningham@isda.org
Subject: Re: Membership applications
Cc: apapesch@isda.org, board@isda.org, cirens@isda-eur.org, esebton@isda-eur.org,
	rainslie@isda.org, rgrove@isda.org, rmetcalfe@isda-eur.org,
	skawano@isda.org, yhoribe@isda.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: apapesch@isda.org, board@isda.org, cirens@isda-eur.org, esebton@isda-eur.org,
	rainslie@isda.org, rgrove@isda.org, rmetcalfe@isda-eur.org,
	skawano@isda.org, yhoribe@isda.org
X-From: "Damian Kissane" <Damian.Kissane@db.com>
X-To: "Mary Cunningham <MCUNNINGHAM" <MCUNNINGHAM@isda.org>
X-cc: Angela Papesch-Sing <APapesch@isda.org>, ISDA BOARD <BOARD@isda.org>, Camille Irens <cirens@isda-eur.org>, Emmanuelle Sebton <esebton@isda-eur.org>, Ruth Ainslie <RAinslie@isda.org>, Richard Grove <RGROVE@isda.org>, Richard Metcalfe <rmetcalfe@isda-eur.org>, Shigeki Kawano <SKawano@isda.org>, Yasuko Horibe <YHORIBE@isda.org>
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Mark_Haedicke_Dec2000_1\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: Haedicke-M
X-FileName: mhaedic.nsf

I have to confess to not knowing any of these.

rgds

Damian

Mary
Cunningham           To:     ISDA BOARD <BOARD@isda.org>, Richard Grove
<RGROVE@isda.org>
<MCUNNINGHAM@        cc:     Emmanuelle Sebton <esebton@isda-eur.org>,
Richard Metcalfe
isda.org>            <rmetcalfe@isda-eur.org>, Ruth Ainslie
<RAinslie@isda.org>, Shigeki Kawano
<SKawano@isda.org>, Yasuko Horibe <YHORIBE@isda.org>, Angela Papesch-Sing
01/12/2000           <APapesch@isda.org>, Camille Irens <cirens@isda-eur.org>
15:36                Subject:     Membership applications

The following three applications will go for approval at the Dec. 5
executive committee meeting.

Please let me know if you are familiar with Powder Horn Petroleum Company.

Thanks.
Mary

Associate
1.  Derivatives Documentation Limited (DDL) - derivatives documentation
consultancy and project management company.
2.  Reech Capital PLC - provides consulting, pricing advisory, executive
search and training.

Subscriber
3.  Powder Horn Petroleum Company

--

This  e-mail  may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you
are
not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please
notify
the  sender  immediately  and  destroy  this  e-mail.  Any unauthorised
copying,
disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly
forbidden.

confidential
privileged
executive committee


Message-ID: <3737840.1075845695494.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 03:13:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: kathleen.carnahan@enron.com
Subject: RE: Seminole Electric CA
Cc: carlos.sole@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: carlos.sole@enron.com
X-From: Kay Mann
X-To: Kathleen Carnahan
X-cc: Carlos Sole
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_1\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

I'll look at Michael's CA and Sr. Sole' will take care of the native
Americans.

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           04/18/2001 09:40 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Carlos Sole/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: Seminole Electric CA

RE:  Michael Brown's CA - entity name
---------------------- Forwarded by Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron on 04/18/2001
09:39 AM ---------------------------
From: Michael Brown/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/18/2001 09:25 AM
To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: Seminole Electric CA

 Company: 1st Rochdale Cooperative NYC
   465 Grand Street
   2nd Floor
   New York, NY 10002

 Contact: Gregory L. Wortham
   Vice President & Cheif Operating Officer

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Carnahan, Kathleen
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 9:01 AM
To: Mann, Kay; Sole, Carlos
Cc: Gimble, Mathew; Brown, Michael
Subject: Seminole Electric CA

I will prepare a first draft of this requested CA for Matt Gimble
(bialateral) in connection with discussions with Seminole Electric
Cooperative, Inc. out of Tampa, Florida.

Additionally, Michael Brown has requested a bilateral CA with an entity (name
unknown at this time) that is a load aggrigator and site developer.  Enron
will be giving proposals, ideas and "propriatary intelectual capital" and the
term will be for 1 year.  The catch is, Michael wants language in the CA that
the "Unknown at this time party" can not shop our proposals.  I will work on
a first draft of this one too.

Kathleen
---------------------- Forwarded by Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron on 04/18/2001
08:49 AM ---------------------------

	  From:  Mathew Gimble @ ECT                           04/17/2001 05:37 PM

To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: David Fairley/Enron@EnronXGate, Bruce
Golden/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Seminole Electric CA

Kate,

Regarding the Confidentiality Agreement that we need for Seminole Electric,
the following are the items that we would like to include:

One year term
Construction of a 500 - 1,200MW coal facility expansion to Seminole's
Palatka, FL power plant
Construction of a 500 - 1,200MW coal facility at Seminole's Taylor Co., FL
site
plus whatever confidentiality lingo that is normally added

Let me know what I left out (David? Bruce?)

Thanks,
Mathew


Message-ID: <3501379.1075853137238.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2001 11:35:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: community-relations@enron.com
To: hrgim@enron.com
Subject: Thank you for your Contribution!  Together we CAN change lives!
Cc: michelle.cash@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: michelle.cash@enron.com
X-From: community-relations@enron.com@ENRON <IMCEANOTES-community-relations+40enron+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com>
X-To: HRGIM </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MBX_HRGIM>
X-cc: Cash, Michelle </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MCASH>
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \MCASH (Non-Privileged)\Cash, Michelle\personal
X-Origin: Cash-M
X-FileName: MCASH (Non-Privileged).pst

Thank you for changing lives.

Employee ID:  90009718
Name:  MICHELLE H CASH
Payment Amount:  650.00
Payment Method:  Deduct a portion from each paycheck
Leadership Giving Roster:  Listed at the President
Make a Difference Club:  Not Applicable
Mailing Address:
4531 BEECH ST
BELLAIRE , TX  77401
US
Your donation is designated for:  SEARCH
Written Acknowledgement of Contribution:  NO

	"You will find, as you look back on your life, that the moments that
stand out are
	the moments when you have done things for others."
		-Henry Drummond

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Message-ID: <6411472.1075841365535.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 12:52:33 -0800 (PST)
From: knipe3@msn.com
To: joe.parks@enron.com, constantine.brian@enron.com, fenner.chet@enron.com,
	wollam.erik@enron.com, e-mail <.todd@enron.com>
Subject: Re: Sunday Mar 17
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: chad knipe <knipe3@msn.com>
X-To: Parks, Joe </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JPARKS>, Brian Constantine <brianc@saltgrass.com>, Chet Fenner <chet_fenner@bmc.com>, EriK Wollam <erwollam@hotmail.com>, Todd Feder (E-mail) <lawfeder@email.msn.com>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \ExMerge - Parks, Joe\Deleted Items
X-Origin: PARKS-J
X-FileName: joe parks 6-26-02.pst

Hell yes!  Aye, laddy.

----- Original Message -----
From: Parks, Joe
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 11:16 AM
To: Brian Constantine (E-mail); Chad Knipe (E-mail 2); Chet Fenner (E-mail); Erik Wollam (E-mail); Todd Feder (E-mail)
Subject: Sunday Mar 17

Any interest in a little st. patty fest at my house sunday late afternoon, with cabbage, potatoes, sausage, and beer. kids are welcome of course. Let me know.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Message-ID: <23682413.1075858954915.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 13:18:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: rick.gomes@us.hsbc.com
To: tana.jones@enron.com
Subject: NDA
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Rick.Gomes@us.hsbc.COM <IMCEANOTES-Rick+2EGomes+40us+2Ehsbc+2ECOM@ENRON.com>
X-To: Jones, Tana </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TJONES>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \TJONES (Non-Privileged)\Jones, Tana\Inbox
X-Origin: Jones-T
X-FileName: TJONES (Non-Privileged).pst

Correct legal name is Riccardo Gomes

HSBC Bank USA
452 Fifth Ave
New York, NY 10018

********************************************************************
 This  message and any attachments are confidential to the ordinary
 user  of the e-mail address to which it was addressed and may also
 be  privileged.   If  you  are not the addressee you may not copy,
 forward,   disclose  or  use  any  part  of  the  message  or  its
 attachments and if you have received this message in error, please
 notify  the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete it from
 your system.

 Internet  communications  cannot  be  guaranteed  to  be secure or
 error-free  as  information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost,
 arrive  late or contain viruses.  The sender therefore does not
 accept  liability  for  any  errors or omissions in the context of
 this  message  which  arise  as a result of Internet transmission.

 Any opinions contained in this message are those of the author and
 are not given or endorsed by the HSBC Group company or office
 through which this message is sent unless otherwise clearly
 indicated in this message and the authority of the author to so
 bind the HSBC entity referred to is duly verified.

********************************************************************


Message-ID: <24837375.1075840422560.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 08:37:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: chris.dorland@enron.com
To: rlaird@natsource.ca
Subject: RE:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Dorland, Chris </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=CDORLAN>
X-To: 'Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON'
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \ExMerge - Dorland, Chris\Sent Items
X-Origin: DORLAND-C
X-FileName: chris dorland 6-26-02.PST

I already have a minature goat. I am a little concerned about making a housing decision in one day but what the fuck.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, August 09, 2001 10:08 AM
To:	Dorland, Chris
Subject:	RE:

Oh I got the tire guy, the brownstones have very small lawns, perhaps a
miniature goat may be in order....I think lambie may have one..He should
give you one since your probably going to be his boss...

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris.Dorland@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Dorland@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 9:06 AM
To: RLaird@natsource.ca
Subject: RE:

Done. I'm moving in! Can I borrow your lawn mower? I need to decide what I
am going to do with my ride. I think I am going to bring it with me and buy
a set of winter wheels and some killer winter tires. Don't you have a tire
guy?

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON
   Sent:   Thursday, August 09, 2001 10:02 AM
   To:     Dorland, Chris
   Subject:  RE:

   1 block away....

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Chris.Dorland@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Dorland@enron.com]
   Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 9:02 AM
   To: RLaird@natsource.ca
   Subject: RE:

   Lee Clarke... Sounds like a fag. Garrison woods that is the place my mom
   was talking about. Do you live near there?

       -----Original Message----- [Dorland, Chris]
      From:   Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON
      Sent:   Thursday, August 09, 2001 9:39 AM
      To:     Dorland, Chris
      Subject:  RE:

      Nice brownstones in garrison woods, the remodeled area of altadore,
   that
      area offers lots of options from apartment condo's to houses to
      townhouses
      etc. Kerri? Haven't seen here for a while, hear she is pretty serious
      with a
      guy named Lee Clarke....

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Chris.Dorland@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Dorland@enron.com]
      Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 8:35 AM
      To: RLaird@natsource.ca
      Subject: RE:

      I really want to live in Altadore. I hear that is where all the fly
      bitches
      hang. I don't know to be honest Killarney / Altadore / West Hillhurst
   ?
      Close to downtown. I am thinking infill / townhouse. My mom has a
   friend
      who says there are nice brownstone townhomes in Altadore. I am
   thinking
      of
      checking those out. I am looking for minimal maintenance. Do you have
      any
      ideas? Seen Kerri Murray lately?

      CD

          -----Original Message-----
         From:   Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON
         Sent:   Thursday, August 09, 2001 8:39 AM
         To:     Dorland, Chris
         Subject:  RE:

         Where do you want to live, which area, condo/house?

         -----Original Message-----
         From: Chris.Dorland@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Dorland@enron.com]
         Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 2:49 PM
         To: RLaird@natsource.ca
         Subject: RE:

         Actually lots. Keep this on the QT for now but this kid is moving
      back
         to
         cow town. I'll be in town next week shopping for somewhere to
   live.
      Just
         in
         time for ski season.

         Later

         Chris

             -----Original Message-----
            From:   Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON
            Sent:   Wednesday, August 08, 2001 2:56 PM
            To:     Dorland, Chris
            Subject:


Message-ID: <18489943.1075844934755.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 10:33:00 -0800 (PST)
From: gisb1@aol.com
To: gisb@aol.com, gisb4@aol.com, jmcostan@mwbb.com
Subject: GISB Request For Comments
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: GISB1@aol.com
X-To: Gisb@aol.com, GISB4@aol.com, jmcostan@mwbb.com
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Stanley_Horton_1\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: HORTON-S
X-FileName: shorton.nsf

Dear GISB Members and interested industry participants,

    The GISB industry comment period begins today and ends on March 29 for
the ten recommendations included in the attached request for comments and
posted on our web site.  Subcommittees and task forces submitted the
recommendations for your review on February 28, 2000.   All comments received
by the GISB office by end of business March 29 will be posted on the Home
Page and forwarded to the Executive Committee (EC) members for their
consideration.  The EC members will consider all comments and are scheduled
to cast their votes on these recommendations on April 13 at the upcoming EC
meeting.

Best Regards,
Rae McQuade

(If you are on this general notices distribution list and would like to be
removed, please email such request to the GISB office and your email address
will be removed. If you would like to add other participants from your
company to this distribution list, please also email such request to the GISB
office.  GISB follows a privacy policy and will not provide your email
address to other groups for their use.)

 - cr000301 w attach .PDF


Message-ID: <2597923.1075859914386.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 11:00:00 -0800 (PST)
From: paul.simons@enron.com
To: raislerk@sullcrom.com
Subject: Re: Credit
Cc: mark.taylor@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: mark.taylor@enron.com
X-From: Paul Simons
X-To: raislerk@sullcrom.com
X-cc: Mark Taylor
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Mark_Taylor _Dec_2000\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: Taylor-M
X-FileName: mtaylor.nsf

Ken

Further to my voice-mail and the notes below, my view is that an effective
Chinese Wall would obviate the need to check on whether we are holding
confidential info on a reference entity, but we'd appreciate your advice on
this.  I suspect Bryan wants to be personally protected against insider
dealing allegations which could otherwise arise, but please confirm.

Thanks

Paul
---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Simons/LON/ECT on 07/03/2000 18:54
---------------------------
From: Mark Taylor on 07/03/2000 12:13 CST
To: Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Credit

Any idea what Bryan plans to gain this way?  It's not clear to me that a hard
wall solves our problems with RE approvals but that's because I don't know.
Maybe Ken can shed some light on this.

Paul Simons
03/07/2000 08:01 AM
To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Credit

FYI, there apppears to have been a sea change in Bryan's attitude to having a
hard Chinese wall for his trans-atlantic credit trading group.  In short, he
wants to be behind one and apparently John Sherriff is comfortable with
this.  I have therefore asked Ken Raisler to advise us on how to construct a
Chinese Wall from a practicle, US perspective, with the intention of having
Sanjev at Slaughters modify the "instruction kit", as necessary, to work
under English law.  Given Ken's involvement on equity trading, he appears to
be the right place to start.  There remains the possibility that when the
traders see the procedures they will change their minds and wish to stick
with the existing procedures you have seen.

This will not impact launch of credit trading online which, as advised, is
still set for tomorrow.

Please let me have any thoughts on this.

Regards

Paul


Message-ID: <13523444.1075852840428.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 11:41:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: smitter@smitter.com
To: kevin.ruscitti@enron.com
Subject: RE: Anderson '96 Reunion - 4 weeks away!
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Steve Smith <smitter@smitter.com>
X-To: Ruscitti, Kevin </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KRUSCIT>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \KRUSCIT (Non-Privileged)\Inbox
X-Origin: Ruscitti-K
X-FileName: KRUSCIT (Non-Privileged).pst

Sorry you can't make it.  We'll miss ya!

What have you been up to lately?

-----Original Message-----
From: Ruscitti, Kevin [mailto:Kevin.Ruscitti@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 10:02 AM
To: smitter@smitter.com
Subject: RE: Anderson '96 Reunion - 4 weeks away!

Steve,

Hope everything is going well.  Unfortunately I won't be able to attend
the reunion.  Hope you have a great time.  Talk to you soon.

Kevin

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Smith [mailto:smitter@smitter.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 4:03 PM
To: Steve Smith (E-mail); Pete Rose (E-mail); Lynne Bartron (E-mail);
'Melissa Salazar (E-mail)'
Subject: Anderson '96 Reunion - 4 weeks away!

Dear Class of 1996,

**Note:  Response to this email requested, thanks!

Well, our much anticipated 5-year Reunion is less than a month away!
The
planning committe is working hard on the events, and we are trying to
firm
up the list of attendees.  We got a GREAT response to the last email,
thanks
for taking the time to let us know your status.  If you haven't
responded
yet, please do so just so we can adequately reserve space.

Just to remind some of you, the event will take place on: *** November
2-4th
*** in Los Angeles, CA!   The rough schedule of events is shown below.
In a
subsequent email today or tomorrow we will provide some details about
hotel
accommodations.  You will also be receiving an information packet from
the
Alumni Office in a mailing that should be out next week.

If you are planning to fly I've heard there are some great deals on
Southwest and United among others (<$100 from SF).  Anderson Alums also
get
a 10% on Southwest (see below)

If you would like to respond to this email regarding your status, please
use
this form:

1) Status of your email account
	A)  Got this info - email address is correct
	B)  Got this info - but would prefer to use another address next
time
	C)  I did not get this info (not sure how you would answer this,
but...)

Note:  You may have received this note twice - it was sent to all
members of
the Class of 1996 currently registered in the Alumni Database, as well
as to
the Class of 1996 Email List (which is opt-in).

2) Plans for attending the Reunion Weekend
	A)  Will definitely be Attending
	B)  Will make a brief appearance (1 or 2 events)
	C)  Still Deciding
	D)  Will not be Attending (but wish I could)

3) Comments/Suggestions - Any thoughts on how to make this a GREAT
reunion?

As mentioned previously, its been a rough year for many of us and it
would
be great to end the year with some fun and good times!  I can tell you
from
what we've been hearing, and from the number of responses received, that
we
are going to have an awesome turnout for the events, so you don't want
to
miss out!!!   So get your tickets, review your facebook (so who was that
Doug Dahl character anyways), dust off the old Anderson attire and let's
party!!

Sincerely,
Steve Smith
On behalf of Pete, Lynne, Melissa and many, many Reunion Organizers

Southwest Airlines Partners with Anderson Alums!
-------------------------------------------------

- Save 10% off lowest priced fares all Anderson Alumni returning to
campus
for Alumni Weekend.
- Flights must be booked into LAX, Burbank, Ontario or John Wayne
airports.
- Call 800/433-5368 and reference Anderson's Group ID #R9216
- For flight schedules, visit http://www.southwest.com

OVERVIEW of CLASS OF 1996 EVENTS
--------------------------------------

FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 2


Message-ID: <15013542.1075857268568.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 07:33:00 -0800 (PST)
From: office.chairman@enron.com
To: all.worldwide@enron.com
Subject: Enron Ranked Number 24 on Fortune's 100 Best Companies to Work for
 in America List
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-From: Office of the Chairman
X-To: All Enron Worldwide
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Benjamin_Rogers_Dec2000_4\Notes Folders\Enron news
X-Origin: Rogers-B
X-FileName: brogers.nsf

Congratulations, Enron employees!  Fortune magazine ranked Enron number 24 =
of=20
the "100 Best Companies to Work for in America," up from number 73 last=20
year.  Enron also is the only global energy company and one of four=20
Houston-based companies on the list.  Not only are we the most innovative=
=20
company in America, we continue to be recognized as a great place to work!

Fortune=01,s "100 Best Companies to Work for in America" list is primarily=
=20
employee-driven.   Selection is based mainly on responses received from=20
randomly selected employees from each participating company to 57 questions=
=20
on a confidential Great Place to Work Index Trust survey.  We=01,d like to =
thank=20
each employee who filled out the survey.  In addition, Fortune evaluates=20
information taken from a detailed human resources questionnaire, a culture=
=20
audit and other materials submitted by the companies.=20

Because companies are getting better and better, the competition was fierce=
=20
this year, and Fortune had to drop 35 companies that appeared on last year=
=01,s=20
list.  So not only did Enron significantly move up on the list, we did so i=
n=20
spite of tough new competition.

Enron=01,s corporate culture and our world-class employees make Enron a gre=
at=20
place to work.  This recognition reflects our commitment to employees and=
=20
your integral participation in Enron=01,s success.  We want to thank the Vi=
sion=20
and Values Task Force, which has worked diligently to make our values visib=
le=20
across the company.  Nowhere was this more evident than in the Chairman=01,=
s=20
Award.  We also thank all employees for your dedication, innovation,=20
enthusiasm and creative spirit.  The work you do every day makes Enron=20
successful and a great place to work.  We look forward to even greater=20
accomplishments in the New Year.

The "100 Best Companies to Work for in America" list will appear in Fortune=
=01,s=20
January 17, 2000 issue, or you can view it online now at www.fortune.com.

All Enron Worldwide
Office of the Chairman

73 last
35 companies that appeared on last


Message-ID: <8271067.1075840495394.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 17:52:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: joan.quick@enron.com
To: l..kelly@enron.com, chris.germany@enron.com
Subject: Juniper's Swap contracts
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Quick, Joan </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JQUICK>
X-To: Kelly, Katherine L. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Kkelly>, Germany, Chris </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Cgerman>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \ExMerge - Germany, Chris\Bankrupt\Juniper
X-Origin: GERMANY-C
X-FileName: chris germany 6-25-02.pst

can you follow up on this? i have more info...will discuss in person.

-----Original Message-----
From: Celeste Fontenot [mailto:celeste@prejeancompany.com]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:48 PM
To: Quick, Joan
Subject: RE: Juniper's EI 28 Crude for Feb 02

On a different subject.  Don wanted me to ask you about the status of
the Swap contracts.  We have receiving invoices but no payments.  Thanks
for your help.

-----Original Message-----
From: Quick, Joan [mailto:Joan.Quick@ENRON.com]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:26 PM
To: Sleeper, Mark
Cc: Celeste Fontenot
Subject: Juniper's EI 28 Crude for Feb 02

Hi Mark,

Could you please email Celeste the back up for the EI 28 crude payment.
Normally they receive the back up in the mail, but they so far have not
received it.

thanks
joan

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
(or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Message-ID: <31145002.1075844424936.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 06:46:00 -0800 (PST)
From: susan.hopkinson@lovells.com
To: sara.shackleton@enron.com
Subject: Re: SITA
Cc: sharon.lewis@lovells.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: sharon.lewis@lovells.com
X-From: "Susan Hopkinson" <susan.hopkinson@lovells.com>
X-To: <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
X-cc: "Sharon Lewis" <sharon.lewis@lovells.com>
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Sara_Shackleton_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: SHACKLETON-S
X-FileName: sshackle.nsf

CONFIDENTIALITY This e-mail and any attachments are confidential
and may also be privileged. If you are not the named recipient,
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the
contents to another person, use it for any purpose, or store
or copy the information in any medium.
----------------------------------------------------------------

How about Thursday at 15:30?
?
Susan

>>>  <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com> 11/4/2000 00:36:50  >>>

Susan:? How about any of Wednesday - Friday, Nov.8, 9  or 10?? Houston is on
Central Std. Time.? Let me know.?S ara

??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????????  "Susan
Hopkinson"????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????
???????????????????  <susan.hopkinson@lo???????  To:????
<Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>??????????????????????????????????????
???????????????????  vells.com>????????????????  cc:????
<Michael.Moulton@enron.com>,  <Stephanie.Panus@enron.com>?????????
??????????????????????????????????????????????  Subject:???? Re:
SITA????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????????  11/03/2000 05:38
AM????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????????

CONFIDENTIALITY This e-mail and any attachments are  confidential
and may also be privileged. If you are not the named  recipient,
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose  the
contents to another person, use it for any purpose, or store
or copy  the information in any  medium.
----------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks  for your email Sara.? When would you like to do? the conferencec all
next week? I cannot do Monday, but any other time should be? fine.  Maybe if
you give me a couple of times that suit you then I can picko  ne?? I would
like my colleague Sharon Lewis to be free as well if?  possible.

Susan

>>> <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>  11/3/2000 01:33:15? >>>

Susan:? Sorry for the delay in  getting back to? you.? We have agreed to
delete the CSA and will  return a blackline to? you shortly.? You may recall
that SITAe xpressly requested that theE nron agreement be governed by
English law which  is why we prepared thisd ocument for execution by our
affiliate in London  with the jurisdictionl anguage appearing in the prior
draft.? There are  still issues posed by? your markup and we should be able
to schedule a  conference call next? week.? Thanks.??  Sara

????????????????????  "Susan?  Hopkinson"
????????????????????  <susan.hopkinson@lo????????  To:
<Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
????????????????????  vells.com>?????????????????  cc:
???????????????????????????????????????????????  Subject:?????  SITA
????????????????????  10/09/2000 03:27? AM

CONFIDENTIALITY This e-mail and any  attachments are? confidential
and may also be privileged. If you are not  the named? recipient,
please notify the sender immediately and do not  disclose? the
contents to another person, use it for any purpose, or  store
or copy? the information i


Message-ID: <31154915.1075843215598.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 02:31:00 -0800 (PST)
From: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To: joseph.alamo@enron.com
Subject: Re: Data on Monthly Generation for SCE
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Jeff Dasovich
X-To: Joseph Alamo
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Jeff_Dasovich_Dec2000\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: DASOVICH-J
X-FileName: jdasovic.nsf

Could you please set up a call and distribute to this list?  Topic:  utility
forward contracting proposal.  Time 3-4:30 pm PST.  Thanks very much.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 12/11/2000 10:26 AM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	12/11/2000 10:20 AM

		 To: Stephen Swain/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Alan
Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Data on Monthly Generation for SCE

The votes have been counted (kidding), and the call will take place today at
3 PM PST.  Call-in number to follow.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 12/11/2000 10:19 AM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	12/07/2000 12:13 PM

		 To: Stephen Swain/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Alan
Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Data on Monthly Generation for SCE

Folks:

The "subcommittee" I've referenced that's trying to come up with a solution
to California's train wreck is moving very quickly.  The group's shooting to
have a first cut at a "straw person" proposal sketched out by end of next
week.  The group's meeting on Tuesday to continue to bounce around ideas.

I'd like to try to have an internal call on Monday at either 10 AM (PST) or
3  PM (PST) to pin down at least a vaguely detailed conceptual framework that
I can propose to the subcommittee on Tuesday.  The agenda items for the
internal meeting are:

Finalize proposal for benchmark(s) for utility procurement.
Goal: increase utility willingness to enter into forward contracts by
replacing PUC after-the-fact "reasonableness" review with a benchmark. (Been
working the Portland desk on a "portfolio benchmark" concept.)

Determine our view of how to treat term contracts w.r.t. the PX credit, i.e.,
should those contracts be disclosed to the market, or should PUC keep them
confidential, calculate the PX credit behind closed doors, and publish the
credit ex poste?  The PX credit depends on the overall utility portfolio, not
just the PX price.

Let me know if 10 AM or 3 PM (PST) works better.

Harry:  I'll assume that you'll contact the folks from EES that need to
participate.

Best,
Jeff


Message-ID: <1879919.1075844086776.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 11:52:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: ets.announcement@enron.com
To: the.pulse-ets@enron.com
Subject: We want to check your pulse
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-From: ETS General Announcement
X-To: The Pulse-ETS
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Michelle_Lokay_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\Enron t&s
X-Origin: LOKAY-M
X-FileName: mlokay.nsf

Once again, it's time to find out what you think about your work experience=
=20
at Enron and Enron Transportation Services Company, and what we can do to=
=20
help make it better.  That's why we want to check your pulse.  In fact, we'=
ve=20
changed the name of last year's "Excellence Through Communication" employee=
=20
survey to The Pulse.  We believe The Pulse more accurately captures the=20
purpose of the survey.  Your diagnosis will help us correct problem areas s=
o=20
we can continue to make Enron a great place to work.

Is available:  Monday, Oct. 16 - Friday, Oct. 27
Is located at: survey.enron.com

There are a few things we want you to remember about The Pulse:

1. Your survey responses will be confidential.  You can complete your surve=
y=20
from special computer kiosks that will be set up in some of our larger=20
offices.  Several group computer terminals also will be available in smalle=
r=20
field offices. We want to provide you with the most comfortable environment=
=20
possible, as your participation is of vital importance to us. Alternatively=
,=20
you can key in your responses from your desktop computer. The responses key=
ed=20
from your desktop will be confidential as well.

2. We will respond actively to your comments.  We are going to do our best =
to=20
cure some of the current problems that exist and put into action preventati=
ve=20
processes that will help identify smaller problems before they become major=
=20
ones.  We may ask for your help in resolving some of the issues that are=20
collected in the survey - your active role will help us identify the best=
=20
solutions.
In last year's survey, you identified several problem areas regarding=20
internal communications, workload and performance management. We've already=
=20
acted on many of your recommendations.  These are a few of the things we've=
=20
accomplished in direct response to your input:

=01  ETS strengthened management focus on intellectual capital and employee=
=20
through the initiation of:
=01  Table Talk sessions with ETS Office of the Chairman, which give employ=
ees=20
the opportunity to have frontline discussions,
=01  The "Innovation Series," which invites employees to share their ideas=
=20
openly and ensures management commitment to evaluating ideas,
=01  E-Speak sessions with ETS leaders to exchange ideas, and
=01  Our name change to Enron Transportation Services to recognize our most=
=20
strategic asset - you.

=01  We made workload planning and management training/development availabl=
e to=20
ETS employees to address workload issues, the greatest ETS concern in the=
=20
survey.

=01  We improved the consistency of performance management, the survey topi=
c=20
that received the most employee comments, by extending the use of the=20
Performance Evaluation Process (PEP) system and the Performance Review=20
Committee (PRC) process to all levels in ETS at mid-year in 2000.

Please take a few minutes to check your pulse and tell us what you think an=
d=20
how you feel about your job and about Enron.

We look forward to hearing from you


Message-ID: <19730879.1075852456872.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 10:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: bruce.lundstrom@enron.com
To: james.derrick@enron.com, rob.walls@enron.com
Subject: Dahbol -- Adding Greg Reid of Linklaters to the Dabhol Team
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Lundstrom, Bruce </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=NOTESADDR/CN=850F7BFB-337864B2-862566CC-807509>
X-To: Derrick Jr., James </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JDERRIC>, Walls Jr., Rob </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RWALLS>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \JDERRIC (Non-Privileged)\Deleted Items
X-Origin: Derrick-J
X-FileName: JDERRIC (Non-Privileged).pst

Jim/Rob -

Given the number of litigation issues, the Linklaters Dabhol team needs another senior lawyer to help lead various efforts (which I have advocated).  Christopher Walker has recommended that Greg Reid of Linklaters join the team.  I believe that Greg is currently head of Linklaters International Arbitration group.

I've spoken with Barry Hunsaker and Stephen Wallace regarding Greg.  Both had very favorable things to say about Greg:  Hard-working, detail-oriented, smart, etc.  Neither of them had any reservations about Greg although he apparently does have a sharp sense of humor (so I can see why he and Chris get along).

Greg would not handle the "India side" of the litigation efforts which would remain with Chris.  He would help with the "London side" and the lender enforcement side (to the extent that occurs outside India).  In any event, Chris would remain as the leader of the overall litigation effort and we will expect Chris to keep tabs on matters Greg is handling to ensure the overall coordination of the effort.

Let me know if you have any comments or objections to Greg's involvement.

Bruce

---------------------- Forwarded by Bruce Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 10/23/2001 11:14 AM ---------------------------

"Reid, Greg" <greg.reid@Linklaters.com> on 10/18/2001 11:56:51 AM
To:	"'bruce.lundstrom@enron.com'" <bruce.lundstrom@enron.com>
cc:	"Katwala, Sandeep" <sandeep.katwala@Linklaters.com>, "Walker, Christopher" <christopher.walker@Linklaters.com>

Subject:	Dahbol

Dear Mr Lundstrom,

from discussions with my partner, Sandeep Katwala, I understand that as the
number of issues and proceedings arising out of the Dahbol project continue
to proliferate we need to increase the partner resources devoted to the
matter.

I attach a short cv giving my professional and academic background. I have
been at Linklaters for 16 years doing litigation and arbitration . For the
last 2 years I have been co-ordinating L&A's European arbitration practice,
but have, in the past, worked closely with Chris Walker. I have also had
considerable exposure to power projects, both domestic and international
(including an involvement in the Appeal to the Supreme Court in Pakistan on
the Hub project).

Last year I successfully completed a significant arbitration for EOG. Please
feel free to call Barry Hunsaker at EOG if you would like more background on
that job. I am presently acting on a much smaller matter for Enron (taking
instructions from Stephen Wallace) that comes to hearing in London on 8/9
November.

I am presently based in Paris, but spend about one third of my time in our
London office. This is increasing and, as a result, I will be moving back to
London in July/August of next year. If you have any questions regarding my
suitability to join the team on the Dahbol project please do not hesitate to
call me direct.

yours sincerely

	 <<NGR cv.doc>>

Greg Reid
Partner, International Arbitration Group
Linklaters, Paris
a member firm of Linklaters & Alliance
Tel: (33) 1 56 43 56 00
Fax:(33) 1 43 59 50 65
greg.reid@linklaters.com
http://www.linklaters.com
http://www.linklaters-alliance.com
Go to www.linklaters.com/disputetoolkit -for free litigation and arbitration
advice.

____________________________________________________________


Message-ID: <2925134.1075849607948.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 08:49:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To: david.delainey@enron.com
Subject: Re: California Update--Legislative Push Underway
Cc: richard.shapiro@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: richard.shapiro@enron.com
X-From: Jeff Dasovich
X-To: David W Delainey
X-cc: Richard Shapiro
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Jeff_Dasovich_Oct2001\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: DASOVICH-J
X-FileName: jdasovic.nsf

Will do.

Best,
Jeff

	David W Delainey@EES
	07/06/2001 02:58 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: California Update--Legislative Push Underway

Jeff, I would recommend forwarding these to myself, Lavorato, Dietrich,
Kitchen and Whalley in the future.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/EES on 07/06/2001
02:57 PM ---------------------------

Jeremy Blachman
07/06/2001 02:12 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/EES, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES
cc:
Subject: California Update--Legislative Push Underway

Think it would be extremely helpful to have Jeff and/or Jim Steffes update us
on Monday. I will set-up if you don't already have something going.
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES on 07/06/2001
02:11 PM ---------------------------
From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 07/06/2001 01:16 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: skean@enron.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Wanda
Curry/Enron@EnronXGate, Donald M Black/Enron@EnronXGate, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Tim
Belden/Enron@EnronXGate, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy
Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Phillip K Allen/Enron@EnronXGate, Alan
Comnes/Enron@EnronXGate, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mike D
Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate, Kristin
Walsh/Enron@EnronXGate, Christopher F Calger/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:
Subject: California Update--Legislative Push Underway

Hertzberg (speaker of the CA Assembly) called a meeting yesterday afternoon
of the group of market participants that have been negotiating the
"core/noncore" proposal in California.  The purpose of the meeting was to
brief us on their activities and their gameplan for trying to find a solution
for California.  Here's a summary of the meeting.  Please keep confidential.

Work will be done over the weekend to put the core/noncore proposal in
legislative language.  (We will be in the room.)
Work done by the "Plan B" group in the Assembly (Joe Dutra and Joe Nation)
will also be put into legislative language over the weekend.
Because no proposal is "comprehensive," a complete legislative package will
be created from the various pieces that have been worked on thus far (i.e.,
core/noncore, "Plan B," Edison MOU)
In addition, there are Republican demands that Hertzberg will need to address
(e.g., end the litigation) in order to achieve bi-partison support, which is
what Hertzberg's shooting for.
To move the legislation, the plan is to establish a "conference committee,"
comprised of an equal number of Democrats and Republicans.
The committe would begin work on Monday and would attempt to finish putting a
comprehensive bill together, vote it out of the Legislature and send it to
the Governor for signing by Monday, July 16th.
July 16th is the deadline because that is the date that the PUC will issue
its proposed decision regarding, among other things, how DWR's revenue
requirement will be put into rates, whether Direct Access needs to be
suspended, etc.
The PUC is issuing the draft on the 16th in order to give everyone 30 days to
review and comment before the Commission votes on a final order on August
15th.  (The PUC will actually issue a "thought piece" on Monday the 9th and
will use reactions to the "thought piece" to craft the develop the proposed
decision it plans to issue on the 16th.)
All


Message-ID: <12876723.1075841384593.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 11:59:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: jbelcher@chemweek.com
To: holt.david@enron.com, blalock.steve@enron.com, pulliam.mark@enron.com,
	humphreys.julia@enron.com, black.jennifer@enron.com,
	allday.marty@enron.com, casey.mike@enron.com, joe.parks@enron.com,
	hogan.will@enron.com
Subject: Fw: Big 12 Championship Day]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Jack Belcher <jbelcher@chemweek.com>
X-To: David Holt <dholt@chemweek.com>, steve blalock <sblalock@calpine.com>, Mark Pulliam <mark.pulliam@sabre.com>, Julia Humphreys <jchumphreys@houston.rr.com>, Jennifer Black <blackj30@hotmail.com>, marty allday <martin.allday@elpaso.com>, Mike Casey <caseymi@us.cibc.com>, Parks, Joe </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JPARKS>, Will Hogan <william.hogan@anico.com>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \ExMerge - Parks, Joe\Inbox
X-Origin: PARKS-J
X-FileName: joe parks 6-26-02.pst

I am cleaning out my saved personal emails. This is one you should always
save and pass on to posterity. It is the funniest email I have ever read.

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Holt" <holt@mail.motorfuels.com>
To: "Jack Belcher" <jbelcher@phillips.com>; "Mark R. Pulliam"
<mark.pulliam@sabre.com>
Sent: Friday, December 17, 1999 1:24 PM
Subject: [Fwd: Big 12 Championship Day]

> I don't even send 'em unless they're real funny....now read it, and
> remember back in the day....
>

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <c.childers@pentasafe.com>
To: Big Jim Fulsome <bettis@hbs-law.com>, Cam <chappy21@mindspring.com>, Candy Clardy <cclardy@hwdinc.com>, David Holt <holt@mail.motorfuels.com>, Deana Galloway <deana_galloway@bakerbotts.com>, Don Porr <dporr@networkoil.com>, Doobie Mac <wizard2@flash.net>, Evan Dorries <edorries@russell-stanley.com>, Goose <mjvog99@cs.com>, Jeff Baker <bakerprod@aol.com>, Jill <jill.s.boeding@ac.com>, Karl Poirot <karl_poirot@kne.com>, Karla <mpoirot@mdck.com>, Laurie McNay <lmcnay@wcom.net>, Manny <mehos@coastalbanc.com>, McGillicutty <michael.guillory@telecheck.com>, Mike Pantoja <run4wine@aol.com>, Monte <mmartin@russell-stanley.com>, Pearlman <michael.pearlman@uchsc.edu>, Queen Brandiliscious <bnb1973@yahoo.com>, Steve Baker <slbdenso@aol.com>, Steve Blalock <eston@aol.com>, Tedd Hargett <tedd.hargett@mindcellar.com>, Tommy Wells <twells@situscos.com>, Fantasy Football <ffcommish@excite.com>
Date: Friday, December 17, 1999 3:36:24 GMT
Subject:

This is long but it's damn funny. Just keep reading.
I'd love to know who wrote it. Goose, did you pen this?

>> >>>> >>A chronology of events for Saturday, December 4, 1999, and the
early
>> >>morning hours of Sunday, December 5, 1999:
>> >>
>> >>6:00  Arise, play the Eyes of Texas and Texas Fight at full-freaking
blast
>> >>
>> >>6:20  Get in car, drive to New Braunfels
>> >>
>> >>7:30  Tee off (me and a buddy were the FIRST tee-time of the morning)
>> >>
>> >>8:50  Turn 9 (crack open first beer)
>> >>
>> >>8:53  Crack open second beer
>> >>
>> >>8:58  Crack open...(you get the idea)
>> >>
>> >>10:30  Finish 18 (holes, as well as beers), sign scorecard for
smoooooth 95
>> >>
>> >>10:35  Headed for San Antonio
>> >>
>> >>10:50  Buy three 18-packs for pre- and post-game festivities
>> >>
>> >>11:10  We decide we don't have enough booze, so we double-back to a
liquor
>> >>store and buy the good ol' 750 ml plastic bottle "Traveler" Jim Beam
>> >>
>> >>11:50  Arrive at the tailgate spot.  Awesome day.  Not a single cloud
in
>> >>the sky.  About 70 degrees.
>> >>
>> >>11:55  I decide that we're going to kick the shit out of Nebraska.
>> >>
>> >>11:56  I tell my first Nebraska fan to go fuck himself.
>> >>
>> >>12:15  The UT band walks by on the way to the Alamodome.  We're on the
>> >>second floor of a two-story parking garage on the corner (a couple
hundred
>> >>of us).  We're hooting and hollering like wildmen.  The band doubles
back
>> >>to the st

01  The first
36  Four minutes to go in the first


Message-ID: <14893451.1075844142288.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:45:00 -0800 (PST)
From: enron.announcements@enron.com
To: all.states@enron.com
Subject: =?ANSI_X3.4-1968?Q?New_Employee_Service_=01)_Turbo_Tax?=
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-From: Enron Announcements
X-To: All Eligible Enron Employees United States
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Michelle_Lokay_Dec2000_June2001_2\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: LOKAY-M
X-FileName: mlokay.nsf

As tax season rapidly approaches, we are pleased to announce a new W-2=20
employee service.  If you plan to file your personal income taxes through=
=20
TurboTax 2000 (Intuit's personal tax filing software) you will be able to=
=20
automatically download your W-2 information into the appropriate TurboTax=
=20
forms directly over the Internet for free. =20

Enron has chosen to provide this service to help speed the processing time=
=20
and accuracy of your return while supporting paperless processing.

More information regarding this service is listed below or visit=20
www.probusinesstaxes.com to find out more about the TurboTax software and=
=20
Web-based filing service.

Employee Fact Sheet: ProBusiness/Intuit W-2 service

Q.  What is the Automated Tax Return (ATR) service?
A. Intuit Inc., makers of the popular Quicken TurboTax tax preparation and=
=20
filing software, have launched a new Automated Tax Return (ATR) service to=
=20
simplify tax preparation for TurboTax users. ATR allows users of TurboTax t=
ax=20
preparation and filing software to import tax information from multiple=20
sources such as employers, brokerage houses, and mutual fund companies=20
directly into the correct TurboTax forms over the Internet.  Since our=20
payroll tax provider, ProBusiness, has partnered with Intuit to provide thi=
s=20
service, you will be able to electronically download your individual W-2 da=
ta=20
from ProBusiness directly into TurboTax through the Internet for free. Also=
,=20
as part of this program, you can receive a  5% discount on all TurboTax and=
=20
Quicken products including shipping and handling (go to=20
www.probusinesstaxes.com for more information).

Q. So how does it work?
A. Embedded in each version of TurboTax 2000 (both the software and web=20
application) is a series of screens that will ask whether your employer=20
allows you to automatically download your data into TurboTax.  To use the=
=20
free service, simply answer "yes" then select our payroll tax provider,=20
ProBusiness, from a drop-down list of providers which includes ProBusiness,=
=20
PeopleSoft, Ceridian, and seemyw2.com.  Validate your request by entering=
=20
your social security number and W-2 box one data and your W-2 data will=20
automatically transfer via the Internet into the appropriate locations in t=
he=20
TurboTax form.

Q. Is this a secure transaction?
A.  Intuit=01,s TurboTax ATR service combines Open Financial Exchange (OFX)=
, the=20
standard technology used in e-finance, with 128-bit military-grade encrypti=
on=20
to create an advanced security protocol that ensures the highest level of=
=20
security and confidentiality when obtaining financial data to populate your=
=20
TurboTax form over the Internet.

Q. How do I participate in this program?=20
A.  Only employees using Intuit=01,s TurboTax 2000 tax preparation and fili=
ng=20
software can take advantage of this Web-based ATR service.  TurboTax softwa=
re=20
and the ATR Web-based filing service can be accessed at=20
www.probusinesstaxes.com.

Q. What if I already own TurboTax 2000=01(does this still work?
A. Yes, all copies of TurboTax 2000 contain the Automated Tax Return servic=
e=20
option.

Q. Overall what are the Benefits to me?
A.  Using the ATR service provided by Intuit and ProBusiness, you can:
? Increase your probability of accurate filing.
? Eliminate the need to manually enter your W-2 information and other=20
financial data.
? Inc


Message-ID: <4583286.1075844077511.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 15:54:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: ets.announcement@enron.com
To: the.pulse-ets@enron.com
Subject: There's still time to Check your Pulse
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-From: ETS General Announcement
X-To: The Pulse-ETS
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Michelle_Lokay_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\Discussion threads
X-Origin: LOKAY-M
X-FileName: mlokay.nsf

It=01,s not too late to tell us what you think about your work experience a=
t=20
Enron and Enron Transportation Services, and what we can do to help make it=
=20
better.=20

To date, nearly 27% of all ETS employees have completed The Pulse survey. =
=20
For those of you who have completed the survey, thank you for taking the ti=
me=20
to tell us what=01,s on your mind. =20

We=01,d still like to hear from those employees who have not completed the=
=20
survey. Between now and Friday, Oct. 27, please access The Pulse survey via=
=20
survey.enron.com to share your Enron work experiences. It would be great to=
=20
get 100% participation from ETS employees.

Your survey responses are confidential and your comments can bring=20
improvements to ETS.

Thanks, in advance, for your participation in The Pulse.


Message-ID: <1077458.1075841410533.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 10:46:05 -0800 (PST)
From: vladi.pimenov@enron.com
To: jonathan.mckay@enron.com
Subject: FW: DYN($42/sh)/ENE($7/sh) Merger At Risk. - Simmons and Company
 latest thoughts
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Pimenov, Vladi </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=VPIMENOV>
X-To: Mckay, Jonathan </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jmckay1>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \ExMerge - Pimenov, Vladi\Sent Items
X-Origin: PIMENOV-V
X-FileName: vladi pimenov 6-26-02.PST

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pehlivanova, Biliana
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 9:24 AM
To:	Beylin, Anya; Guzman, Julio; Marolo, Massimo; Pimenov, Vladi
Subject:	FW: DYN($42/sh)/ENE($7/sh) Merger At Risk. - Simmons and Company latest thoughts

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bhatia, Randy
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 8:55 AM
To:	Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Keiser, Kam; Jones, Brad; O'Rourke, Ryan; Pehlivanova, Biliana
Subject:	FW: DYN($42/sh)/ENE($7/sh) Merger At Risk. - Simmons and Company latest thoughts

got this from a friend at dynegy.  written by someone at Simmons & Co., Inc.

                                         To:     Sales Trading
                    11/21/01 07:42       cc:
                    AM                   Subject:     DYN($42/sh)/ENE
($7/sh) Merger At
                                          Risk.

SUMMARY:  We are reducing our estimated probability that the DYN/ENE merger
is completed to less than 50%/50% based on our belief that ENE's existing
wholesale and retail businesses are having a difficult time maintaining
their volumes and margins.  We have discussed ENE's need to improve counter
party confidence on a number of occasions over the last few weeks, and we
believe counter party confidence deteriorated further based on the
information included in the 10Q, and the strong negative reaction in the
stock and bond markets yesterday.  The tone of our discussions with
competing traders and marketers (representative of ENE's counter
parties--which are critical in maintaining ENE's volumes) is becoming more
negative.  While ENE is continuing to confirm that volumes are improving
since the lows on November 9, our market intelligence is suggesting
improment has stalled.  In addition and probably related, ENE's liquidity
position seems to be continuing to deteriorate despite significant recent
capital infusions.  We are reducing 4Q01 estimates to reflect lower volume
and margin assumptions.  What would get us more comfortable?  ENE 8K
disclosure confirming higher volume and decent margins (ENE has committed
to provide 4Q guidance by early-mid December, and/or a change in the tone
of the counter parties that would suggest they are increasing trading
activities with ENE.

OPINION ON THE STOCKS:
   ENE.  No change in our opinion on ENE--the upside potential is simply
   not worth the downside risk.
   DYN.  DYN is likely to benefit in almost all outcomes.  If our concerns
   about counter party confidence prove to be wrong, the upside associated
   with the accretion in the transaction would likely be huge.  However, we
   sense DYN is getting frustrated by continued restatement of earnings,
   unexpected debt triggers and worse than expected liquidity problems.  If
   the transaction falls apart, DYN would have some transaction costs that
   would negatively impact cash flow in the near-term, but DYN would
   benefit from gaining market share and hiring some of ENE's talent away
   longer term.  A potential downside case for DYN is that DYN retrades the
   deal on recent information, but is forced to reduced its flexibility to
   terminate the transaction through material adverse change
   considerations, this out come would concern us.  We continue to believe
   DYN is a solid long-term holding for investors.  However, we are
   recommending caution with new money, due to our belief that DYN still


Message-ID: <9739589.1075853267133.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 09:36:00 -0800 (PST)
From: richard.sanders@enron.com
To: eddie.daniels@enron.com
Subject: Organizational Changes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-From: Richard B Sanders
X-To: Eddie Daniels
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Richard_Sanders_Oct2001\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: Sanders-R
X-FileName: rsanders.nsf

----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 12/08/2000 05:35 PM -----

=09Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling@ENRON
=09Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
=0911/08/2000 04:59 PM
=09=09=20
=09=09 To: All Enron Worldwide
=09=09 cc:=20
=09=09 Subject: Organizational Changes

We are making a number of significant organizational changes.  These change=
s=20
are intended to accomplish four key objectives:

First, we need to realign all our wholesale businesses around the successfu=
l=20
business model developed over the last decade in North America and Europe. =
=20
This model relies on extensive physical and transactional networks built=20
around a relatively small strategic asset position.

Second, we need to significantly streamline corporate reporting=20
relationships.  Particularly with Joe Sutton=01,s departure, the ability to=
=20
directly manage the day-to-day activities of 15 independent business units=
=20
has become increasingly difficult.

Third, we need to accomplish these changes without, in any way, compromisin=
g=20
the ongoing profitability of all our businesses and without delaying or=20
hindering our effort to monetize a significant portion of our lower-yieldin=
g=20
asset positions.

And fourth, as always, we need to take advantage of the reorganization to=
=20
redeploy our talent into our highest value opportunities.

ENRON WHOLESALE SERVICES

Today, we are forming Enron Wholesale Services (EWS) which will consolidate=
=20
our global wholesale businesses.  The closer alignment of our wholesale=20
businesses will accomplish the following: (1) enhanced communication and=20
coordination across business units, (2) more rapid deployment of people to=
=20
higher valued opportunities, (3) more effective prioritization of=20
opportunities across the wholesale business, and (4) more rapid extension o=
f=20
Enron=01,s wholesale business model and capabilities into new industries an=
d=20
markets.

Enron Wholesale Services will include our current North American, European=
=20
(including Japan and Australia), Global Markets, and Industrial Markets=20
operations, and will be expanded to include Enron=01,s Net Works business u=
nit=20
as well as a new unit =01) Enron Global Assets.  In addition, Enron=01,s me=
rchant=20
businesses outside of North America and Europe will be integrated into this=
=20
new structure as described below.

Mark Frevert, currently Chairman of each of our wholesale units, will assum=
e=20
the role of Chairman and CEO of Enron Wholesale Services.  Greg Whalley,=20
currently Chairman and CEO of Enron Net Works, will join Mark in the Office=
=20
of the Chairman as President and Chief Operating Officer.

Providing further impetus for these organizational changes, several of our=
=20
international business unit leaders have elected to move into new leadershi=
p=20
positions:

Rebecca McDonald, currently CEO of Enron APACHI, will join EWS as President=
=20
and CEO of Enron Global Assets. Enron Global Assets will have responsibilit=
y=20
for managing all of Enron=01,s existing energy asset portfolio outside of N=
orth=20
America and Europe.  Joining Rebecca in the Office of the Chairman as COO=
=20
will be Jim Hughes, currently COO of Enron APACHI.  Rebecca and Jim will=20
report to the EWS Office of the Chairman.

Sanjay Bhatnagar, currently CEO of Enron India, has joined EBS as CEO for t=
he=20
Middle East and Asia region.  Sanjay will be responsible for building our=
=20
broadband business in this region and the current EBS team in this region=
=20
will r

20
These individuals will also continue to have


Message-ID: <5773208.1075852704402.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 08:55:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: daryl.dworkin@americas.bnpparibas.com
To: daryl.dworkin@americas.bnpparibas.com
Subject: BNP PARIBAS Commodity Futures AGA Survey......RESULTS!!
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: daryl.dworkin@americas.bnpparibas.com@ENRON
X-To: daryl.dworkin@americas.bnpparibas.com
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \JARNOLD (Non-Privileged)\Arnold, John\Deleted Items
X-Origin: Arnold-J
X-FileName: JARNOLD (Non-Privileged).pst

Here are this week's survey results.

AVG            +50
AVG w/o High & Low  +50
Median              +50
Standard Deviation   8
# of Responses       54
High           +74
Low            +30
Last Year           +71

Thank You!

Daryl Dworkin
BNP PARIBAS

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir immediatement l'expediteur.

Toute utilisation de ce message non conforme a sa destination, toute diffusion ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf autorisation expresse.

L'internet ne permettant pas d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS (et ses filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce message, dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.
	----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message and any attachments (the "message") are intended solely for the addressees and are confidential. If you receive this message in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender.

Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval.

The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message if modified.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________