Message-ID: <1828618.1075856629352.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 02:37:00 -0800 (PST)
From: mccarthy.jane.j@bhp.com
To: vkamins@enron.com
Subject: FW: notes for VAR course
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: "McCarthy, Jane J" <McCarthy.Jane.J@bhp.com>
X-To: "'vkamins@enron.com'" <vkamins@enron.com>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Vincent_Kaminski_Jun2001_5\Notes Folders\Risk
X-Origin: Kaminski-V
X-FileName: vkamins.nsf

> -----Original Message-----
> From: McCarthy, Jane J
> Sent: Wednesday, 25 October 2000 16:55
> To: 'vkaminski@aol.com'
> Subject: notes for VAR course
>
> Dr. Kaminski,
>
> I attended your VAR course in Sydney in July, but when I went back to look
at the notes recently I found that I am missing some sections (e.g. Optimal
techniques for measuring VAR, Using Monte Carlo techniques to accurately
calculate VAR, Evaluating the impact of volatility and extreme values on
VAR). Would you be able to send me a copy of your notes, as I am about to
embark on a VAR modelling exercise and I am sure they would be very useful.
>
> regards,
> Jane McCarthy
> Manager Market Risk
> BHP Co. Pty Ltd.
> Lvl. 45, 600 Bourke Street
> Melbourne, VIC 3000
> AUSTRALIA
>
> Ph:  613 9 609 3860
> Fax:  613 9 609 3861
> email:  mccarthy.jane.j@bhp.com.au
>
>
>
EOM

NOTICE - This message contains information intended only for the use of the
addressee named above.  It may also be confidential and/or privileged.  If
you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified
that you must not disseminate, copy or take any action in reliance on it.  If
you have received this message in error please notify postmaster@bhp.com.


Message-ID: <4474430.1075854963899.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 12:04:58 -0800 (PST)
From: chad.landry@enron.com
To: matthew.lenhart@enron.com
Subject: RE: Lousyanna State vs. Texas - Pretenders vs. Contenders
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Landry, Chad </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=CLANDRY>
X-To: Lenhart, Matthew </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Mlenhar>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \MLENHAR (Non-Privileged)\Deleted Items
X-Origin: Lenhart-M
X-FileName: MLENHAR (Non-Privileged).pst

anybody saying anything about the stock price.  rumors are coming out about us getting bought out by shell or a large private equity shop.

CKL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lenhart, Matthew
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 1:58 PM
To:	'brian.r.vassigh@accenture.com'; Val.Generes@accenture.com; Landry, Chad; matthew.j.garver@accenture.com; elliot.j.green@accenture.com; kevin.labban@accenture.com
Subject:	RE: Lousyanna State vs. Texas - Pretenders vs. Contenders

famous vassigh quotes:

"pass the butter"
"you gonna finish that?"
"if loving this cake is wrong, i don't want to be right"
"i can eat twice as much of this ice cream b/c it is fat free"
"food in lousyana is overrated.  texas food rules"
"texas biscuts rule the world"
"i like my cookies texas size"
"don't mess with texas banana splits"

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	brian.r.vassigh@accenture.com@ENRON   On Behalf Of brian.r.vassigh@accenture.com
Sent:	Sunday, October 28, 2001 7:56 PM
To:	Val.Generes@accenture.com; Lenhart, Matthew; Landry, Chad; matthew.j.garver@accenture.com; elliot.j.green@accenture.com; kevin.labban@accenture.com
Subject:	Lousyanna State vs. Texas - Pretenders vs. Contenders

Well, Well, Well,
I am writing this note to all the smack talking coonass LSU fans who enjoy
banging on The University of Texas Longhorns with smug smack like
"Overrated, Overrated".
I usually use the BCC field when sending smack notes like this so everybody
won't get barraged with weak Reply All's from recipients who think they can
go toe to toe with me in e-mail smack (i.e. Val and his weak shit he likes
to send).
This time is different because I think y'all should know who your fellow
pathetic smack talking LSU fans are.
Y'all can start a new support group - called "Vassigh's College Football
Smacked down Bitches - that got their cakeholes shut by Chris Simms, Cedric
Benson, and Roy Williams et al"
Y'all have dished it all out, so I do not feel bad for rubbing salt into
the fatal wound that Ole Miss delivered you and your team Saturday night.

Here a couple of smack statements made by some if not all of the cajun's
included in this e-mail header.
   "Simms sucks, how could he be a preseason heisman candidate?" - Over his
   last three games, Simms is 59-of-88 (67.0 percent) for 698 yards and 12
   touchdowns passing 2 touchdowns rushing with just one interception
   (176.41 rating).  He has just started about ONE full seasons worth of
   games recently and is coming into his own.  Simms will be a top NFL pick
   as will Roy Williams and Cedric Benson.  I can't think of any College
   Football team in history with the high caliber triple threat that UT has
   with Simms, Benson, and Williams.
   "The SEC is the best conference in football, the Big XII Sucks" - What a
   joke that statement is.
   "LSU would whip UT"  - Yeah right - LSU Could not beat Rice.
   "UT is the most overrated team in college football" - interesting since
   they are higher ranked now in November than they were in the preseason
   polls.
   "Mack Brown can only recruit - he can't coach worth a damn - Nick Saban
   is better" - Mack Brown has one loss - he hasn't lost in Austin since he
   has been coach - while Saban has led LSU to three losses - 2 in the Red
   Stick - just THIS SEASON.

Every college football analyst would agree no conference compares to the
Big XII.
The BIG XII have 3 TEAMS RANKED IN THE TOP 5 early Novembe

5 and with a worst case scenario would not
finish out of the top 15 this year and the fact


Message-ID: <15331708.1075842920878.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 04:22:00 -0800 (PST)
From: rob.walls@enron.com
To: james.derrick@enron.com
Subject: Dabhol Power Project - Arbitration-Related Materials
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Rob Walls
X-To: James Derrick
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \James_Derrick_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\Discussion threads
X-Origin: DERRICK-J
X-FileName: jderric.nsf

fyi

----- Forwarded by Rob Walls/NA/Enron on 12/04/2000 12:22 PM -----

	"Walker, Christopher" <christopher.walker@linklaters.com>
	12/03/2000 06:20 AM

		 To: "'Rob.Walls@enron.com'" <Rob.Walls@enron.com>, "'Bruce
Lundstrom@enron.com'" <Bruce.Lundstrom@enron.com>, "'Paul.Kraske@enron.com'"
<Paul.Kraske@enron.com>, "'Sandeep.Katwala@enron.com'"
<Sandeep.Katwala@enron.com>, "Katwala, Sandeep"
<sandeep.katwala@linklaters.com>, "'lbrasher@skadden.com'"
<lbrasher@skadden.com>, "Inman, Jonathan" <jonathan.inman@linklaters.com>
		 cc: "Salt, Stuart" <stuart.salt@linklaters.com>, "Walker, Christopher"
<christopher.walker@linklaters.com>
		 Subject: Dabhol Power Project - Arbitration-Related Materials

I attach the results of a first trawl through the archives.

Of the attached materials,I think that the most relevant,for present
purposes,will be the following:-

(1) the enforcement memo produced by Peter Cornell and Atul Rajadhyaksha;

(2) the final consent award (as I drafted it) (the tribunal made the award
in the terms requested so far as I can recall;we are retrieving the original
from the papers in storage).

Item (2) above binds the GOM in relation to the PPA,SSA and the GOM
Guarantee. However,strictly,the MSEB is not bound,because it was never a
party to the 2 arbitrations begun by DPC in August 1995.

>  <<951013-CXW-StatementOfClaim.frame>>
> <<951107-CXW-StmtofGenBackgrd.frame>>  <<951109-CXW-ClaimantSubms.frame>>
>  <<960403 PNC Dabhol  Enforcement  Memo.frame>>  <<960701-CXW-JointRequest
> to Tribunal.frame>>  <<961210-CXW-FinalConsentAward.frame>>
> <<g19ssk_000290a.frame>>  <<g19ssk_000301a1.frame>>  <<dabhol_interim
> award on jurisdiction.doc>>
>
>
>
>
>

_____________________________________________________________

This e-mail is sent by or on behalf of Linklaters,
10/F Alexandra House, Chater Road, Hong Kong.

A list of the firm's principals will be provided to the
recipient(s) of this email upon request.

This statement is made in compliance with the Law Society of
Hong Kong's Practice Direction on the Format of Electronic
Communications.

This message is confidential. It may also be privileged or
otherwise protected by work product immunity or other legal
rules. If you have received it by mistake please let us know
by reply and then delete it from your system; you should not
copy the message or disclose its contents to anyone.
_____________________________________________________________

 - 951013-CXW-StatementOfClaim.frame
 - 951107-CXW-StmtofGenBackgrd.frame
 - 951109-CXW-ClaimantSubms.frame
 - 960403 PNC Dabhol  Enforcement  Memo.frame
 - 960701-CXW-JointRequest to Tribunal.frame
 - 961210-CXW-FinalConsentAward.frame
 - g19ssk_000290a.frame
 - g19ssk_000301a1.frame
 - dabhol_interim award on jurisdiction.doc


Message-ID: <10168392.1075853243902.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 04:30:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: mmolland@brobeck.com
To: robert.c.williams@enron.com
Subject: Procedural defects in subpoena served by California AG on EES
Cc: apickens@gibbs-bruns.com, breasoner@gibbs-bruns.com, djn@pkns.com,
	dcastro@pkns.com, jfrizzell@gibbs-bruns.com,
	jalexander@gibbs-bruns.com, pmeringolo@brobeck.com, mlk@pkns.com,
	msmith1@enron.com, richard.b.sanders@enron.com, gfergus@brobeck.com,
	sbishop@gibbs-bruns.com, mtuohey@velaw.com, aruby@rubyschofield.com,
	meltzerlaw@aol.com, arguedas@caclaw.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: apickens@gibbs-bruns.com, breasoner@gibbs-bruns.com, djn@pkns.com,
	dcastro@pkns.com, jfrizzell@gibbs-bruns.com,
	jalexander@gibbs-bruns.com, pmeringolo@brobeck.com, mlk@pkns.com,
	msmith1@enron.com, richard.b.sanders@enron.com, gfergus@brobeck.com,
	sbishop@gibbs-bruns.com, mtuohey@velaw.com, aruby@rubyschofield.com,
	meltzerlaw@aol.com, arguedas@caclaw.net
X-From: "Molland, Michael E." <MMolland@brobeck.com>
X-To: "'robert.c.williams@enron.com'" <robert.c.williams@enron.com>
X-cc: "'apickens@gibbs-bruns.com'" <apickens@gibbs-bruns.com>, "'breasoner@gibbs-bruns.com'" <breasoner@gibbs-bruns.com>, "'djn@pkns.com'" <djn@pkns.com>, "'dcastro@pkns.com'" <dcastro@pkns.com>, "'jfrizzell@gibbs-bruns.com'" <jfrizzell@gibbs-bruns.com>, "'jalexander@gibbs-bruns.com'" <jalexander@gibbs-bruns.com>, "Meringolo, Peter" <PMeringolo@brobeck.com>, "'mlk@pkns.com'" <mlk@pkns.com>, "'msmith1@enron.com'" <msmith1@enron.com>, "'richard.b.sanders@enron.com'" <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>, "Fergus, Gary S." <GFergus@brobeck.com>, "'sbishop@gibbs-bruns.com'" <sbishop@gibbs-bruns.com>, "'mtuohey@velaw.com'" <mtuohey@velaw.com>, "'aruby@rubyschofield.com'" <aruby@rubyschofield.com>, "'meltzerlaw@aol.com'" <meltzerlaw@aol.com>, "'arguedas@caclaw.net'" <arguedas@caclaw.net>
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Richard_Sanders_Oct2001\Notes Folders\Notes inbox
X-Origin: Sanders-R
X-FileName: rsanders.nsf

Bob:
You asked us to determine whether there are defects on the face of the
subpoena served upon EES which may prevent its enforcement in superior
court.  Assuming the court  holds the subpoena to the standard of a
"deposition subpoena" - and we think it should - it is defective in at least
two respects.  First, it was not served upon Enron by personal service as
required by CCP o2020(f).  Second, Government Code o1189 provides that the
Attorney General must first file a petition in superior court to require the
custodian of records to appear and testify. While the subpoena requests a
deposition of the Enron EES custodian of records, the AG did not file such a
petition. In addition, Government Code o1185 provides that  a person served
with such a subpoena is not obliged to attend as a witness if he or she does
not reside or do business within 50 miles of the court in which he or she is
asked to appear.
At your request we are now researching and will draft over the weekend a
memorandum to address three issues arising from this subpoena:  (1) whether
EES has substantive grounds to refuse to comply with the subpoena or to
disqualify the AG from enforcing it  (2) whether EES may successfully remove
any compliance proceeding brought by the AG to federal court; and (3) the
consequences to EES if it should be held in contempt for refusal to comply.
A discussion of the defects in the EES subpoena follows:
There are three defects in the subpoena  served on Enron Enery Services
("EES") on May 25, 2001, pursuant to California Government Code section
11180-11189.  The subpoena purports to require EES to produce its custodian
of record on June 25, 2001, to "testify and to answer questions" and to
"produce documents responsive to the document requests."  (Subpoena at
2:1-5).  Accordingly, its demands are in the nature of a subpoena for
deposition and we analyze it on this basis.
1. Defective Ser


Message-ID: <16275130.1075863674481.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 10:18:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: kay.chapman@enron.com
To: sally.beck@enron.com, tim.belden@enron.com, raymond.bowen@enron.com,
	christopher.calger@enron.com, wes.colwell@enron.com,
	janet.dietrich@enron.com, jeff.donahue@enron.com, w.duran@enron.com,
	mark.haedicke@enron.com, gary.hickerson@enron.com,
	mike.jakubik@enron.com, scott.josey@enron.com,
	john.lavorato@enron.com, rodney.malcolm@enron.com,
	george.mcclellan@enron.com, rob.milnthorp@enron.com,
	julia.murray@enron.com, jere.overdyke@enron.com,
	david.oxley@enron.com, kevin.presto@enron.com,
	brian.redmond@enron.com, jeffrey.shankman@enron.com,
	c.thompson@enron.com, max.yzaguirre@enron.com,
	james.ajello@enron.com, edward.ondarza@enron.com,
	vince.kaminski@enron.com, beth.perlman@enron.com,
	david.delainey@enron.com
Subject: Mid-year 2000 Performance Review Process
Cc: mike.miller@enron.com, david.parquet@enron.com, marty.sunde@enron.com,
	dan.leff@enron.com, mark.frevert@enron.com, patti.thompson@enron.com,
	catherine.dumont@enron.com, marsha.schiller@enron.com,
	mollie.gustafson@enron.com, shirley.tijerina@enron.com,
	christy.chapman@enron.com, tina.rode@enron.com,
	janette.elbertson@enron.com, stella.ely@enron.com,
	nicole.mayer@enron.com, tonai.lehr@enron.com,
	kimberly.hillis@enron.com, ana.alcantara@enron.com,
	yolanda.ford@enron.com, carolyn.george@enron.com,
	donna.baker@enron.com, rhonna.palmer@enron.com,
	felicia.doan@enron.com, katherine.benedict@enron.com,
	barbara.lewis@enron.com, pilar.cerezo@enron.com,
	terrellyn.parker@enron.com, dusty.paez@enron.com,
	shirley.crenshaw@enron.com, nicki.daw@enron.com,
	cherylene.westbrook@enron.com, kay.chapman@enron.com,
	cindy.skinner@enron.com, carol.moffett@enron.com,
	stacy.oravec@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Bcc: mike.miller@enron.com, david.parquet@enron.com, marty.sunde@enron.com,
	dan.leff@enron.com, mark.frevert@enron.com, patti.thompson@enron.com,
	catherine.dumont@enron.com, marsha.schiller@enron.com,
	mollie.gustafson@enron.com, shirley.tijerina@enron.com,
	christy.chapman@enron.com, tina.rode@enron.com,
	janette.elbertson@enron.com, stella.ely@enron.com,
	nicole.mayer@enron.com, tonai.lehr@enron.com,
	kimberly.hillis@enron.com, ana.alcantara@enron.com,
	yolanda.ford@enron.com, carolyn.george@enron.com,
	donna.baker@enron.com, rhonna.palmer@enron.com,
	felicia.doan@enron.com, katherine.benedict@enron.com,
	barbara.lewis@enron.com, pilar.cerezo@enron.com,
	terrellyn.parker@enron.com, dusty.paez@enron.com,
	shirley.crenshaw@enron.com, nicki.daw@enron.com,
	cherylene.westbrook@enron.com, kay.chapman@enron.com,
	cindy.skinner@enron.com, carol.moffett@enron.com,
	stacy.oravec@enron.com
X-From: Kay Chapman
X-To: Sally Beck, Tim Belden, Raymond Bowen, Christopher F Calger, Wes Colwell, Janet R Dietrich, Jeff Donahue, W David Duran, Mark E Haedicke, Gary Hickerson, Mike Jakubik, Scott Josey, John J Lavorato, Rodney Malcolm, George McClellan, Rob Milnthorp, Julia Murray, Jere C Overdyke, David Oxley, Kevin M Presto, Brian Redmond, Jeffrey A Shankman, C John Thompson, Max Yzaguirre, James A Ajello, Edward Ondarza, Vince J Kaminski, Beth Perlman, David W Delainey
X-cc: Mike J Miller, David Parquet, Marty Sunde, Dan Leff, Mark Frevert, Patti Thompson, Catherine DuMont, Marsha Schiller, Mollie Gustafson, Shirley Tijerina, Christy Chapman, Tina Rode, Janette Elbertson, Stella L Ely, Nicole Mayer, Tonai Lehr, Kimberly Hillis, Ana Alcantara, Yolanda Ford, Carolyn George, Donna Baker, Rhonna Palmer, Felicia Doan, Katherine Benedict, Barbara Lewis, Pilar Cerezo, Terrellyn Parker, Dusty Warren Paez, Shirley Crenshaw, Nicki Daw, Cherylene R Westbrook, Kay Chapman, Cindy Skinner, Carol Moffett, Stacy Oravec
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \David_Delainey_Dec2000\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: Delainey-D
X-FileName: ddelain.nsf

As we m


Message-ID: <23807210.1075844274221.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 03:04:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: sarah.novosel@enron.com
To: kevin.presto@enron.com, mark.davis@enron.com, jeff.ader@enron.com,
	edward.baughman@enron.com, joe.gordon@enron.com,
	janelle.scheuer@enron.com, mbrown9@enron.com,
	mark.bernstein@enron.com, john.llodra@enron.com,
	george.wood@enron.com, paul.broderick@enron.com,
	jason.thompkins@enron.com, mason.hamlin@enron.com,
	robert.stalford@enron.com, tom.may@enron.com, gautam.gupta@enron.com,
	narsimha.misra@enron.com, steve.montovano@enron.com,
	garrett.tripp@enron.com, berney.aucoin@enron.com,
	jason.thompkins@enron.com, rob.wheeler@enron.com, jim.meyn@enron.com,
	aleck.dadson@enron.com, daniel.allegretti@enron.com,
	pearce.hammond@enron.com, joe.hartsoe@enron.com,
	donna.fulton@enron.com, howard.fromer@enron.com,
	kathleen.sullivan@enron.com, tom.hoatson@enron.com,
	thane.twiggs@enron.com, sarah.novosel@enron.com,
	christi.nicolay@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com,
	linda.robertson@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com,
	steven.kean@enron.com, charles.decker@enron.com
Subject: FERC Orders
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-From: Sarah Novosel
X-To: Kevin M Presto, Mark Dana Davis, Jeff Ader, Edward D Baughman, Joe Gordon, Janelle Scheuer, mbrown9@enron.com, Mark Bernstein, John Llodra, George Wood, Paul J Broderick, Jason Thompkins, Mason Hamlin, Robert Stalford, Tom May, Gautam Gupta, Narsimha Misra, Steve Montovano, Garrett Tripp, Berney C Aucoin, Jason Thompkins, Rob Wheeler, Jim Meyn, Aleck Dadson, Daniel Allegretti, Pearce W Hammond, Joe Hartsoe, Donna Fulton, Howard Fromer, Kathleen Sullivan, Tom Hoatson, Thane Twiggs, Sarah Novosel, Christi L Nicolay, James D Steffes, Linda Robertson, Richard Shapiro, Steven J Kean, Charles Decker
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Richard_Shapiro_June2001\Notes Folders\Wholesale markets
X-Origin: SHAPIRO-R
X-FileName: rshapiro.nsf

The following are a few summaries of recent New England orders.  Please let=
=20
us know if you have any questions.

Sarah

FERC Approves NEPOOL's Three-Part Bids

On April 25, FERC approved NEPOOL=01,s proposal to implement a system where=
=20
generators can submit three-part supply offers consisting of a start-up=20
price, an hourly no-load price, and an incremental energy price.  NEPOOL al=
so=20
proposed that when a supplier=01,s total revenues over a day from the energ=
y and=20
operating reserves markets were less than its total bid costs, the shortfal=
l=20
would be paid to the supplier as net commitment period compensation (NCPC)=
=20
uplift.  There was disagreement within NEPOOL as to who will pay these upli=
ft=20
costs.

In approving NEPOOL=01,s three-part bid system, FERC finds that the system =
is=20
consistent with the policies in place in New York and PJM.  With regard to=
=20
NCPC uplift cost allocation, FERC finds that NEPOOL=01,s exiting method of=
=20
allocating NCPC uplift costs broadly, based on electrical load, is=20
appropriate since it is difficult to determine who causes what amount of=20
uplift costs.  The new three-part bid system will take effect July 1, 2001.

FERC Rejects Proposal to Disclose Bidding Information

In an April 13 FERC order of no overall interest to us, FERC includes a=20
discussion about the rules for disclosure of bidding and other data gathere=
d=20
by the ISO.  Braintree had argued that FERC should require public disclosur=
e=20
of bidding and other data in order to allow NEPOOL participants to monitor=
=20
the actions of others.  FERC rejected Braintree=01,s arguments, finding tha=
t=20
FERC=01,s rules strike an appropriate balance between the need to disclose =
as=20
much information as possible and the desire to avoid disclosure requirement=
s=20
that will make it more difficult for the ISO to obtain information from=20
market participants in the first place.  FERC states that because data=20
col


Message-ID: <23489525.1075841472789.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 13:09:20 -0800 (PST)
From: cooper.richey@enron.com
To: jilld@cnrl.com
Subject: RE: Friday Festivities
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Richey, Cooper </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=CRICHEY>
X-To: 'Jill Dunlop <JillD@cnrl.com>@ENRON'
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \ExMerge - Richey, Cooper\Sent Items
X-Origin: RICHEY-C
X-FileName: cooper richey 6-26-02.PST

hi jill,

ah, i don't think you'll get this until next week, but maybe you're checking your email on the road.  hope your course is fun.

how was it to see your family.  i've had my parents visit me up here and i was also down there over christmas break and i much prefer when they visit me rather the other way around.  i feel like i'm back in high school when i'm back home, i think, or something like that.

don't tease me, what did you do on sat night?

work is going really well - finally feeling some pressure.

hmm, i don't know anything about painting pottery, but i'm interested. i've done it before and its harder than it looks and takes awhile, but could be fun with the right group of people.

talk to you soon,
cooper

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jill Dunlop <JillD@cnrl.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, February 04, 2002 3:10 PM
To:	Richey, Cooper
Subject:	RE: Friday Festivities

Hey Cooper,
I hope you had a good weekend.  Emmy said you guys met up after I left.  My Friday wasn't a particularly exciting one.  I went out with the family (a five hour ordeal, for some reason my family is an anomaly when it comes to food consumption.  It's like being in the land of the sloth people).  Then I went home and crashed.  I made up for it on Saturday, which I regretted when I had to be up at 7am to see my dad off at the airport.
So, how's work going?  I'm busy b/c I'm going to be out of the office until Friday.  Their sending me to this gas marketing course for three days.  The itinerary doesn't look particularly exciting but I don't have to be there until 8am and I'll be done around 4pm.  It's sad that this is exciting to me.
So, I hear we're painting pottery?!  Are you going to come?  I have to admit its something I've never even thought of trying before but sounds like fun.  I'm not a very artistic person but I figure its hard to screw up painting pots.  But, you never know.
Have a great rest of your day
jill
-----Original Message-----
From:   Cooper.Richey@enron.com [SMTP:Cooper.Richey@enron.com]
Sent:   February 01, 2002 1:14 PM
To:     JillD@cnrl.com
Subject:        RE: Friday Festivities

try having no work to do for two months and then having to stick around and
"appear" busy...  i know what you mean, in some ways its harder when you're
not used to not doing things.  i've gotten good at finding things to do
with my time, but when i first had nothing to do, i was going crazy.
fridays are always slow around here and i'm guessing its the same there,
although i don't know cnrl specifcally, oil and gas producer/marketer?

in terms of what i do, before enron went under, i was the short term
alberta power trader.  since then, i have been champion internet surfer and
investigating local coffee shops in an ever-widening circle.  although,
things are looking up.

eze is (i think) an earls nickname -- pronounced easy-e.  although, they
may just call her easy for short.  i'm sure she loves both names very much.

i have a very important meeting at 5 with my massage therapist and i was
thinking about stopping by after that.  should i call eze's cell?  or do
you have a cell #?

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Jill Dunlop <JillD@cnrl.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Friday, February 01, 2002 11:52 AM
   To:     Richey, Cooper
   Subject:  RE: Friday Festivities

   You know what the worst thing in the world is?  Having no work to do on
   a Friday but being unable to leave for hours.  I've been here for three


Message-ID: <21548216.1075840244257.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: enron.announcements@enron.com
To: the.mailout@enron.com
Subject: IMPORTANT MESSAGE FROM OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-From: Enron Announcements
X-To: The Pulse mailout
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Kenneth_Lay_Dec2000\Notes Folders\Discussion threads
X-Origin: LAY-K
X-FileName: klay.nsf

Is available: through Friday, Oct. 27
Is located at: survey.enron.com

You only have one more week to check your pulse.  Your input is crucial, so=
=20
please take a few minutes today to fill out Enron's annual employee feedbac=
k=20
survey.  It is confidential and only takes about 10 minutes.  Give us your=
=20
honest, candid feedback =01) we need to know what you think and how you fee=
l=20
about your job and about Enron.

It's important for you to know that we will respond actively to your=20
comments.  We need your help not only to pinpoint and diagnose any existing=
=20
problems, but also to help us identify the best solutions.  Last year we=20
formed action teams to address the issues that you indicated in the survey,=
=20
so let us know if they have helped make Enron a better place to work.

Again, please stop what you're doing for just a few minutes today and check=
=20
your pulse.


Message-ID: <31442029.1075847200371.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 01:30:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: tana.jones@enron.com
To: clare.godson@allenovery.com
Subject: RE: FW: Deutsche Bank ISDA Master Agreements
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Tana Jones
X-To: Clare.Godson@AllenOvery.com@ENRON
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Tanya_Jones_Dec2000\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: JONES-T
X-FileName: tjones.nsf

We just received what we hope is a final draft of the documents from Deutsche
Bank, and I hope to respond back to you shortly, once I have had a chance to
confirm they made all the changes.

	Clare.Godson@AllenOvery.com
	10/10/2000 04:33 AM

		 To: Mark.Taylor@enron.com
		 cc: Tana.Jones@enron.com
		 Subject: RE: FW: Deutsche Bank ISDA Master Agreements

Many thanks. Apologies for the error, I obtained Tana's e-mail details from
someone at Enron in London and they had misspelled it for me.

Thanks again for all your help.

Clare

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.Taylor@enron.com [mailto:Mark.Taylor@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 6:00 PM
To: Clare.Godson@AllenOvery.com
Cc: Tana.Jones@enron.com
Subject: Re: FW: Deutsche Bank ISDA Master Agreements

Clare,

Thanks for your note.  Your e-mail trouble is due to the spelling of Tana's
name - should only be one 'n.'  I am forwarding this on to her.

Mark

                    Clare.Godson@Alle

                    nOvery.com               To:     mark.taylor@enron.com

                                             cc:

                    10/09/2000 04:50         Subject:     FW: Deutsche Bank
ISDA Master Agreements
                    AM

Mark,

I am having some problems sending this to Tanna.  her e-mail keeps bouncing
back.  Could you pass this on to her please?

many thanks for your help.

Kind regards,

Clare

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:   Godson, Clare:ICM (LN)
> Sent:   Friday, October 06, 2000 3:16 PM
> To:     'tanna.jones@enron.com'
> Cc:     Markus.Fiala@enron.com; Nicholas.J.Stephan@enron.com;
> Rod.Nelson@enron.com; 'Elaine.Bannerman-Sowah@enron.com';
> edmund.cooper@enron.com; denis.o'connell@enron.com; paul.simons@enron.com
> Subject:     RE: Deutsche Bank ISDA Master Agreements
>
>
> Tanna,
>
> Could you please give me an update on where things stand on the
> finalisation of the Guarantees and Schedule with Deutsche.  I understood
> that the guarantees were with Enron Corp. for final approval and
> signature.  Is the documentation now agreed? As you are aware the
> negotiation of the documentation with EnronCredit.com is dependent upon
> the finalisation of the documentation outstanding with Houston.
>
> Many thanks for your help.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Clare
>  -----Original Message-----
> From:   Godson, Clare:ICM (LN)
> Sent:   Friday, September 22, 2000 3:06 PM
> To:     'tanna.jones@enron.com'
> Subject:     First Union National Bank (FUNB) ISDA Master Agreements
>
> Tanna,
>
> Thanks for your help on the Goldman Sachs and Deutsche negotiations.  If
> you could keep me posted on the timing of the Deutsche agreements being
> put in place that would be really helpful.  I also have another quick
> request and that relates to the ISDA Master Agreement with FUNB.  I have
> spoken to Delene Travella at FUNB.  They are negotiating an ECTRIC
> Schedule with you in Houston which they want to finalise before
commencing
> EnronCredit.com's negotiation.  Can you give me an update on where this
> negotiation stands and how long before it is likely to be finalised?
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Clare Godson

======================================================================

This email is confidential and may also be privileged.  If you are not the
intended recipient please notify us immediately by telephoning +44 (20)
7330 3000 and requesting the Technology Services Helpdesk. You should not
copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose its contents to any other
person.


Message-ID: <8250652.1075855834685.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 11:27:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: kay.chapman@enron.com
To: sally.beck@enron.com, tim.belden@enron.com, raymond.bowen@enron.com,
	christopher.calger@enron.com, wes.colwell@enron.com,
	janet.dietrich@enron.com, jeff.donahue@enron.com, w.duran@enron.com,
	mark.haedicke@enron.com, gary.hickerson@enron.com,
	mike.jakubik@enron.com, scott.josey@enron.com,
	john.lavorato@enron.com, rodney.malcolm@enron.com,
	george.mcclellan@enron.com, rob.milnthorp@enron.com,
	julia.murray@enron.com, jere.overdyke@enron.com,
	david.oxley@enron.com, kevin.presto@enron.com,
	brian.redmond@enron.com, jeffrey.shankman@enron.com,
	c.thompson@enron.com, max.yzaguirre@enron.com,
	james.ajello@enron.com, edward.ondarza@enron.com,
	vince.kaminski@enron.com, beth.perlman@enron.com,
	david.delainey@enron.com
Subject: Please note Change "Mid-year 2000 Performance Review Process"
Cc: mike.miller@enron.com, david.parquet@enron.com, marty.sunde@enron.com,
	dan.leff@enron.com, mark.frevert@enron.com, patti.thompson@enron.com,
	catherine.dumont@enron.com, marsha.schiller@enron.com,
	mollie.gustafson@enron.com, shirley.tijerina@enron.com,
	christy.chapman@enron.com, tina.rode@enron.com,
	janette.elbertson@enron.com, stella.ely@enron.com,
	nicole.mayer@enron.com, tonai.lehr@enron.com,
	kimberly.hillis@enron.com, ana.alcantara@enron.com,
	yolanda.ford@enron.com, carolyn.george@enron.com,
	donna.baker@enron.com, rhonna.palmer@enron.com,
	felicia.doan@enron.com, katherine.benedict@enron.com,
	barbara.lewis@enron.com, pilar.cerezo@enron.com,
	terrellyn.parker@enron.com, dusty.paez@enron.com,
	shirley.crenshaw@enron.com, nicki.daw@enron.com,
	cherylene.westbrook@enron.com, kay.chapman@enron.com,
	cindy.skinner@enron.com, carol.moffett@enron.com,
	stacy.oravec@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Bcc: mike.miller@enron.com, david.parquet@enron.com, marty.sunde@enron.com,
	dan.leff@enron.com, mark.frevert@enron.com, patti.thompson@enron.com,
	catherine.dumont@enron.com, marsha.schiller@enron.com,
	mollie.gustafson@enron.com, shirley.tijerina@enron.com,
	christy.chapman@enron.com, tina.rode@enron.com,
	janette.elbertson@enron.com, stella.ely@enron.com,
	nicole.mayer@enron.com, tonai.lehr@enron.com,
	kimberly.hillis@enron.com, ana.alcantara@enron.com,
	yolanda.ford@enron.com, carolyn.george@enron.com,
	donna.baker@enron.com, rhonna.palmer@enron.com,
	felicia.doan@enron.com, katherine.benedict@enron.com,
	barbara.lewis@enron.com, pilar.cerezo@enron.com,
	terrellyn.parker@enron.com, dusty.paez@enron.com,
	shirley.crenshaw@enron.com, nicki.daw@enron.com,
	cherylene.westbrook@enron.com, kay.chapman@enron.com,
	cindy.skinner@enron.com, carol.moffett@enron.com,
	stacy.oravec@enron.com
X-From: Kay Chapman
X-To: Sally Beck, Tim Belden, Raymond Bowen, Christopher F Calger, Wes Colwell, Janet R Dietrich, Jeff Donahue, W David Duran, Mark E Haedicke, Gary Hickerson, Mike Jakubik, Scott Josey, John J Lavorato, Rodney Malcolm, George McClellan, Rob Milnthorp, Julia Murray, Jere C Overdyke, David Oxley, Kevin M Presto, Brian Redmond, Jeffrey A Shankman, C John Thompson, Max Yzaguirre, James A Ajello, Edward Ondarza, Vince J Kaminski, Beth Perlman, David W Delainey
X-cc: Mike J Miller, David Parquet, Marty Sunde, Dan Leff, Mark Frevert, Patti Thompson, Catherine DuMont, Marsha Schiller, Mollie Gustafson, Shirley Tijerina, Christy Chapman, Tina Rode, Janette Elbertson, Stella L Ely, Nicole Mayer, Tonai Lehr, Kimberly Hillis, Ana Alcantara, Yolanda Ford, Carolyn George, Donna Baker, Rhonna Palmer, Felicia Doan, Katherine Benedict, Barbara Lewis, Pilar Cerezo, Terrellyn Parker, Dusty Warren Paez, Shirley Crenshaw, Nicki Daw, Cherylene R Westbrook, Kay Chapman, Cindy Skinner, Carol Moffett, Stacy Oravec
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Sally_Beck_Dec2000\Notes Folders\Discussion threads
X-Origin: Beck-S
X-FileN


Message-ID: <13596779.1075847730022.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 09:27:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: shea.mollere@elpaso.com
To: skean@enron.com
Subject: Message from Clark C. Smith
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: "Mollere, Shea" <Shea.Mollere@ElPaso.com>
X-To: "'skean@enron.com'" <skean@enron.com>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Steven_Kean_June2001_2\Notes Folders\Archiving\Untitled
X-Origin: KEAN-S
X-FileName: skean.nsf

As per our discussion, let's discuss this further next week.

Clark C. Smith
President
El Paso North America
1001 Louisiana
Houston, TX  77002
713/420-7575
713/420-7591 - FAX
clark.smith@elpaso.com

John Harrison (credit issues)
CFO
El Paso Merchant Energy Group
1001 Louisiana
Houston, TX  77002
713/420-3230
713/420-3942
john.harrison@elpaso.com

Rachael King
Regional Director - Government Affairs - California
El Paso Corporation
980  9th Street, Suite 1550
Sacramento, CA  95814
916/441-0446
916/441-0496
rachael.king@elpaso.com

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************


Message-ID: <26468460.1075863237172.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 15:09:30 -0800 (PST)
From: exchange.administrator@enron.com
To: pavetto@enron.com, john.pavetto@enron.com
Subject: Undeliverable: Networks Confidentiality Agreements
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Exchange System Administrator <.>
X-To: Pavetto, John <John.Pavetto@ENRON.com>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \TJONES (Non-Privileged)\Jones, Tana\Inbox
X-Origin: Jones-T
X-FileName: TJONES (Non-Privileged).pst

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TJONES>
To: Allario, John </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jallari>, Bridges, Michael </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Mbridge2>, Carter, Carl </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Ccarter4>, Diamond, Daniel </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Ddiamon>, Gros, Thomas D. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Tgros>, Mesquita, Ross </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rmesquit>, Pacheco, Leonardo </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Lpacheco>, Pavetto, John <John.Pavetto@ENRON.com>, Richter, Brad </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Brichte>, Shults, Bob </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rshults>
CC: Greenberg, Mark </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Mgreenbe>, Koehler, Anne C. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Akoehle>
Date: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:09:30 GMT
Subject:

Attached please find a current list of the Networks, EnronOnline and CommodityLogic executed and draft Confidentiality Agreements for your review.

Exchange System Administrator
Pavetto, John


Message-ID: <11603127.1075853242900.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 07:53:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: dan.dietrich@enron.com
To: richard.sanders@enron.com
Subject: RE: Data Files Needed
Cc: bob.mcauliffe@enron.com, bruce.smith@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: bob.mcauliffe@enron.com, bruce.smith@enron.com
X-From: Dan Dietrich
X-To: Richard B Sanders
X-cc: Bob McAuliffe, Bruce Smith
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Richard_Sanders_Oct2001\Notes Folders\Notes inbox
X-Origin: Sanders-R
X-FileName: rsanders.nsf

Richard,

I have found the correct path of the data files requested
\\nahoutrd\houston\pwr\common\electric\west\incremnt\2000. The requested
directory has numerous files, not just the real-time spreadsheets. The below
attachment contains the file names of the files within the above directory
(do not be confused by the \\enehou rather than the \\nahoutrd, they are the
same).

Are you authorizing the copy of all of these files? Please advise...

Regards,

Dan Dietrich
x58836

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Smith, Bruce
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 12:22 PM
To: Dietrich, Dan
Cc: McAuliffe, Bob
Subject: FW: Data Files Needed

Dan -

Can you get with Richter or someone and try to make sense of the path
mentioned below. Also quantify the amount of files we are talking about here.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Rub, Jenny
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 11:04 AM
To: Sanders, Richard; McAuliffe, Bob; Smith, Bruce
Subject: RE: Data Files Needed

Bob/Bruce,  Will you please help Richard with this data request.

Richard,  Sorry I didn't respond sooner, I am out of the office.

JR

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Sanders, Richard
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 7:54 AM
To: Rub, Jenny
Subject: Data Files Needed

I need to get the attached info to assist with the CA litigation. Who should
I call?
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 05/25/2001 07:52 AM -----

	"Fergus, Gary S." <GFergus@brobeck.com> 05/11/2001 05:27 PM 	   To: "Richard
B. Sanders Esq. (E-mail)" <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>  cc:   Subject: Data
Files Needed

Richard,
 Here are the specifics of what we need to get copied:

M:\NAHOUTRD\Houston\Power\Common\Electric\West\Incremnt\2000

We need all files copied from this directory.  These are the 2000 West Desk
Real Time spread sheets.

Thanks
Gary

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


Message-ID: <19099846.1075858608851.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 12:45:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: legal <.taylor@enron.com>
To: joel.ephross@enron.com
Subject: RE: Enron/Barclays Global Markets Inventory Financing
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Taylor, Mark E (Legal) </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MTAYLO1>
X-To: Ephross, Joel </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jephros>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \MTAYLO1 (Non-Privileged)\Taylor, Mark E (Legal)\Sent Items
X-Origin: Taylor-M
X-FileName: MTAYLO1 (Non-Privileged).pst

Joel --

I've taken a quick look at these and think that they are really more in the physical trading line than derivatives.  I'm trying to figure out who the physical metals trading lawyer is to take a look at them for you.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ephross, Joel
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 10:25 AM
To: Boyd, Justin; Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
Subject: FW: Enron/Barclays Global Markets Inventory Financing

I am forwarding initial documents concerning an inventory finance transaction.

Mark, I am distributing to your attention since the structure involves the buying/selling of inventory in a trading arrangement, and the documents are in some respects derived from an ISDA format. While this is a "financing" with a bank, and hence my involvement, there are trading aspects here as well. [Mike Robison is reviewing from the EWS business unit perspective.]If someone in your group should review, please advise.

Justin, I am distributing to your attention, since the choice of law is English, and you were involved in the prior Metals transaction that this is derived from. If someone else in London should review, please advise.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sitlani, Deepak [mailto:deepak.sitlani@linklaters.com]
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 10:20 AM
To: Ghosh, Soma; Ephross, Joel; Liu, Ying; Brian Smith (E-mail); Richard
Firth (E-mail); 'Martin.Woodhams@barclayscapital.com'
Cc: Firth, Simon N; Lee, Gareth
Subject: Enron/Barclays Global Markets Inventory Financing

Please find attached first drafts of:

1 the Master Agreement;
2 the Forward Sale Agreement; and
3 the Agency Agreement.

 <<00300601_EnronCorp_DES.doc>>  <<010702_Forward_Sale_Agreemnt_DES.doc>>
<<010702_DES_EnronAgencyAgreement.doc>>

For ease of review, I also attach:

1 the Master Agreement marked up to show changes against the physical metal
Master Agreement (as last amended on 21 May 2001);

 <<00300601_EnronCorp_DES.doc>>

2 the Forward Sale Agreement marked up to show changes against the physical
metal Master Agreement (as last amended on 21 May 2001); and

 <<REVISED3.DOC>>

3 the Agency Agreement marked up to show changes against the physical metal
Master Agreement (as last amended on 21 May 2001);

 <<PhysMstrvAgency.doc>>

Please note the following:

1. General

- I have drafted the agency and forward sale aspects previously contained in
the physical metal Master Agreement in separate agreements. In order to
ensure that these agreements are as distinct as possible, certain elements
of the physical metal Master Agreement (for example, conditionality of
Transactions/Call Options on hedging) may have to be included in a separate
side letter.
- To the extent that I have insufficient details in relation to this
transaction, I have retained the structure of the physical metal Master
Agreement.
- These drafts have not been reviewed by Enron and therefore remain subject
to their comments.

2. Master Agreement

- As the Commodities will not be exchange traded, I have introduced the
concepts of "Reference Price" and "Pricing Date", which are similar to those
contained in the 1993 ISDA Commodity Derivatives Definitions.
- Enron would like to be able to enter into Transactions/exercise Call
Options on non-Business Days.
- I have, where possible, avoided referring to the Agency Agreement and the
Forward Sale Agreement. However, one aspect of the Agency Agreement that
do


Message-ID: <18979818.1075845004024.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 04:48:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: nella.cappelletto@enron.com
To: dpef@blakes.ca, gfl@blakes.com, rek@blakes.com, awm@blakes.com,
	dwm@blakes.com, mark.haedicke@enron.com, jeffrey.hodge@enron.com,
	richard.sanders@enron.com, steven.kean@enron.com,
	richard.shapiro@enron.com, robert.hemstock@enron.com
Subject: Project Stanley - History of the Design of the Alberta Power Pool
 Model
Cc: rob.milnthorp@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: rob.milnthorp@enron.com
X-From: Nella Cappelletto
X-To: dpef@blakes.ca, gfl@blakes.com, rek@blakes.com, awm@blakes.com, dwm@blakes.com, Mark E Haedicke, Jeffrey T Hodge, Richard B Sanders, Steven J Kean, Richard Shapiro, Robert Hemstock
X-cc: Rob Milnthorp
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Mark_Haedicke_Oct2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: HAEDICKE-M
X-FileName: mhaedic.nsf

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
SOLICITOR/CLIENT COMMUNICATION

Please see the attached memo from Rob Hemstock to Steve Kean and Rick Shapiro
for your information.  The most noteable items are (a) the Power Pool
Participant Behaviour Guidelines published in March 2000, and (b) the history
of changes to the Power Pool of Alberta.

Regards, Peter Keohane
---------------------- Forwarded by Nella Cappelletto/CAL/ECT on 06/07/2000
10:51 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Robert Hemstock                           06/06/2000 02:40 PM

To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT, Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT
Subject: Project Stanley - History of the Design of the Alberta Power Pool
Model

I understand your call to me yesterday was to inquire about the vision the
architects of the Power Pool of Alberta had when they were setting up the
Power Pool, and more particularly, whether they envisioned that
unsophisticated Pool Participant would be expected to obtain assistance from
other more sophisticated Pool Participants to maximize the price that it
would receive from the Power Pool for the energy it sold into the Power
Pool.    I have reviewed the some materials (i.e. AEUB Decisions, Alberta
Department of Energy documents) and have found nothing related to this.  This
is not surprising as these market design issues were considered in Alberta in
1994 and 1995, long before I arrived on the electricity scene in 1997.

I did speak to a consultant who was involved in the market design process in
the early 1990's named Jim Fitzowich.  Jim joined TransAlta in 1986 and then
worked for TransCanada Power until January 2000 when he established his
current consulting practice.  Jim became a member of the Power Pool Council
in late 1995 and stayed in that position until May 1998 when an independent
Power Pool Council was appointed.  Jim and I are both on the Board of
Directors of the Independent Power Producers Society of Alberta and I know
Jim fairly well.

Jim advised that the Alberta electricity industry design was quarterbacked by
the Deputy Minister of Energy of the day named Rick Hyndman.  Under Rick
Hyndman's direction a White Paper was apparently released in October 1994 in
which a power exchange regime modelled on the exchange regime in the U.K. was
thoroughly discussed and proposed for Alberta.   According to Jim Fitzowich,
this White Paper was the initial blueprint for the Alberta market design.  I
have met Rick Hyndman a few times and understand he left government a few
years ago and is also a consultant.  I left Rick a message to call me and I
intend to ask him to send me a copy of the White Paper and also inquire about
the nature of his consulting work.

On a related note, attached is an email I sent to Bill G and John L in March
2000 advising them of the new Power Pool Participant Behavior Guidelines that
were added to the Power Pool Rules in March 2000.  You can see the original
notice of the rule change rec


Message-ID: <33090812.1075842232433.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 02:03:00 -0800 (PST)
From: cwpfister@cps-satx.com
To: dan.j.hyvl@enron.com
Subject: FW: FW: Enfolio Contract with CPS
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: "Pfister, Christian W." <CWPfister@cps-satx.com>
X-To: "'Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com'" <Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Dan_Hyvl_Dec2000_June2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: HYVL-D
X-FileName: dhyvl.nsf

My supervisor reviewed the agreement and found one error.  In Section 8.8
Confidentiality on page 5, could you add the word "transfer" after the word
"wire"?  Thanks! I promise this is the last change.

"The provisions of the Agreement, other than the terms of any Transaction
and wire TRANSFER instructions, are not subject to this confidentiality
obligation."

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com [mailto:Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 1:59 PM
To: CWPfister@cps-satx.com
Subject: RE: FW: Enfolio Contract with CPS

(See attached file: 2001-001ctr.doc)

Christian,
     I have included the Red-line language in the contract relating to
utilization of small business concerns.  Hopefully, the next thing I see is
2 originals which have been signed by CPS.

 - 2001-001ctr.doc


Message-ID: <12030783.1075843068217.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 01:10:00 -0800 (PST)
From: stephen.swain@enron.com
To: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
Subject: Re: Data on Monthly Generation for SCE
Cc: paul.kaufman@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com, harry.kingerski@enron.com,
	sandra.mccubbin@enron.com, tim.belden@enron.com,
	robert.badeer@enron.com, chris.foster@enron.com,
	susan.mara@enron.com, alan.comnes@enron.com,
	richard.shapiro@enron.com, joseph.alamo@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: paul.kaufman@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com, harry.kingerski@enron.com,
	sandra.mccubbin@enron.com, tim.belden@enron.com,
	robert.badeer@enron.com, chris.foster@enron.com,
	susan.mara@enron.com, alan.comnes@enron.com,
	richard.shapiro@enron.com, joseph.alamo@enron.com
X-From: Stephen Swain
X-To: Jeff Dasovich
X-cc: Paul Kaufman, James D Steffes, Harry Kingerski, Sandra McCubbin, Tim Belden, Robert Badeer, Chris H Foster, Susan J Mara, Alan Comnes, Richard Shapiro, Joseph Alamo
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Jeff_Dasovich_Dec2000\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: DASOVICH-J
X-FileName: jdasovic.nsf

Attached is the latest version of the model to illustrate the portfolio
benchmark concept.  Alan, I have included PG&E's QF resources using the data
from Suzy.  If anyone has questions please call, else we will chat at 3:00.

From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 12/11/2000 10:20 AM CST
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Stephen Swain/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Alan
Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Data on Monthly Generation for SCE

The votes have been counted (kidding), and the call will take place today at
3 PM PST.  Call-in number to follow.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 12/11/2000 10:19 AM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	12/07/2000 12:13 PM

		 To: Stephen Swain/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Alan
Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Data on Monthly Generation for SCE

Folks:

The "subcommittee" I've referenced that's trying to come up with a solution
to California's train wreck is moving very quickly.  The group's shooting to
have a first cut at a "straw person" proposal sketched out by end of next
week.  The group's meeting on Tuesday to continue to bounce around ideas.

I'd like to try to have an internal call on Monday at either 10 AM (PST) or
3  PM (PST) to pin down at least a vaguely detailed conceptual framework that
I can propose to the subcommittee on Tuesday.  The agenda items for the
internal meeting are:

Finalize proposal for benchmark(s) for utility procurement.
Goal: increase utility willingness to enter into forward contracts by
replacing PUC after-the-fact "reasonableness" review with a benchmark. (Been
working the Portland desk on a "portfolio benchmark" concept.)

Determine our view of how to treat term contracts w.r.t. the PX credit, i.e.,
should those contracts be disclosed to the market, or should PUC keep them
confidential, calculate the PX credit behind closed doors, and publish the
credit ex poste?  The PX credit depends on the overall utility portfolio, not
just the PX price.

Let me know if 10 AM or 3 PM (PST) works better.

Harry:  I'll assume that you'll contact the folks from EES that need to
participate.

Best,
Jeff


Message-ID: <9350980.1075843002390.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: enron.announcements@enron.com
To: the.mailout@enron.com
Subject: IMPORTANT MESSAGE FROM OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-From: Enron Announcements
X-To: The Pulse mailout
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Jeff_Dasovich_Dec2000\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: DASOVICH-J
X-FileName: jdasovic.nsf

Is available: through Friday, Oct. 27
Is located at: survey.enron.com

You only have one more week to check your pulse.  Your input is crucial, so=
=20
please take a few minutes today to fill out Enron's annual employee feedbac=
k=20
survey.  It is confidential and only takes about 10 minutes.  Give us your=
=20
honest, candid feedback =01) we need to know what you think and how you fee=
l=20
about your job and about Enron.

It's important for you to know that we will respond actively to your=20
comments.  We need your help not only to pinpoint and diagnose any existing=
=20
problems, but also to help us identify the best solutions.  Last year we=20
formed action teams to address the issues that you indicated in the survey,=
=20
so let us know if they have helped make Enron a better place to work.

Again, please stop what you're doing for just a few minutes today and check=
=20
your pulse.


Message-ID: <1936199.1075845987887.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 09:13:00 -0800 (PST)
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: kathleen.carnahan@enron.com
Subject: Re: Form of Letter Agreement for Purchase of Membership Interests &
 Draft CA for Northwestern Corp.
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-From: Kay Mann
X-To: Kathleen Carnahan
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

Well, maybe it makes more sense to write it like this:  (see below)

  =20
=09
=09
=09From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           02/22/2001 04:57 PM
=09

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: =20

Subject: Re: Form of Letter Agreement for Purchase of Membership Interests =
&=20
Draft CA for Northwestern Corp. =20

Well, let's try again then.  How about this (I left off reference to=20
"States"):

Enron North America Corp. (=01&ENA=018 or the "Protected Party") is prepare=
d to=20
furnish Northwestern Corp. (=01&Northwestern=018 or the "Receiving Party") =
with=20
certain information which is either confidential, proprietary or otherwise=
=20
not generally available to the public in connection with the potential sale=
=20
of one or more of the Protected Party's power plant development projects=20
and/or one of more of the special purpose companies which own such projects=
=20
or project-related assets,  (collectively, the =01&Projects=018) for purpos=
es of=20
evaluating one or more transactions between Protected Party and Northwester=
n=20
involving the Projects (collectively, the =01&Proposed Transaction=018).

K-

Kay Mann
02/22/2001 04:42 PM
To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: =20

Subject: Re: Form of Letter Agreement for Purchase of Membership Interests =
&=20
Draft CA for Northwestern Corp. =20

No biggie, and understandable.  When we sell the equipment we structure it=
=20
like we did on the CA deal - we sell the special purpose companies that wil=
l=20
own the equipment at the time of sale. =20

  =20
=09
=09
=09From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           02/22/2001 04:37 PM
=09

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: =20

Subject: Re: Form of Letter Agreement for Purchase of Membership Interests =
&=20
Draft CA for Northwestern Corp. =20

I will be happy to conform the NW to this form if that is what you want.  I=
n=20
the form with the paragraph below, I thought "(i) the potential sale of one=
=20
or more of the Protected Party's power plant development projects and/or on=
e=20
of more of the special purpose companies which own such projects in [states=
]"=20
 was to be used for particular sites where we have existing land options we=
=20
are trying to sell, and that when we were trying to sell equipment (i.e.=20
7EA's) we would refer to these as "gas fired electric generation projects"

My mistake.

Kathleen

Kay Mann
02/22/2001 04:15 PM
To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: =20

Subject: Re: Form of Letter Agreement for Purchase of Membership Interests =
&=20
Draft CA for Northwestern Corp. =20

The form we have has this as the first paragraph, which is different from t=
he=20
form attached.  Could you conform the NW one to the form?

Enron North America Corp. (=01&ENA=018 or the "Protected Party") is prepare=
d to=20
furnish [__________________] (=01&*=018 or the "Receiving Party") with cert=
ain=20
information which is either confidential, proprietary or otherwise not=20
generally available to the public in connection with: (i) the potential sal=
e=20
of one or more of the Protected Party's power plant development projects=20
and/or one of more of the special purpose companies which own such projects=
=20
in [states],  (collectively, the =01&Projects=018) for purposes of evaluati=
ng one=20
or more transactions between Protected Party and   * involving the Projects=
=20
(collectively, the =01&Proposed Transaction=018).


Message-ID: <12578352.1075854679564.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 17:31:00 -0800 (PST)
From: brettlawler@hotmail.com
To: david.dickey@us.cgeyc.com, mstahlin@hotmail.com, a_diekman@hotmail.com,
	chris_a_regnier@yahoo.com, scott_hocutt@hotmail.com,
	c_keels@hotmail.com, john9375@aol.com, chmargau@aol.com,
	blawler875@aol.com, m.montano@mail.utexas.edu, cll@prodigy.net,
	srhea@acm.org, ebass@ect.enron.com
Subject: Re:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: "Brett Lawler" <brettlawler@hotmail.com>
X-To: David.Dickey@us.cgeyc.com, mstahlin@hotmail.com, a_diekman@hotmail.com, chris_a_regnier@yahoo.com, scott_hocutt@hotmail.com, c_keels@hotmail.com, John9375@aol.com, CHMARGAU@aol.com, BLawler875@aol.com, m.montano@mail.utexas.edu, cll@prodigy.net, srhea@acm.org, ebass@ect.enron.com
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Eric_Bass_Dec2000\Notes Folders\Notes inbox
X-Origin: Bass-E
X-FileName: ebass.nsf

Hey Guys,  I just typed a small novel (below) about JRTC and thought I send
it out, it's answerin a question a friend asked about how the simulated
comabt stuff works and has an example at the end.

Excellent question (about what makes the bad guys run away during an
exercise).

The Army paid Grumman a shitload of cash to make "laser tag" stuff for us.

It's called MILES and if you ever see a picture of an army unit on an
exercise you will see that the soldier is wearing a harness over his normal
Load Bearing Vest(LBV), the harness has four receptors on the front and four
on the back, in addition there is a doughnut shaped belt of receptors that
goes on the kevlar helmet.  Vehicles also have receptors mounted to them,
every thing from HMMV's to the tanks to the helicopters.

Our weapons systems have transmitters on them, it'll look like a little box
mounted on the front of the weapon, the box has a pressure sensor so every
time the gas from a blank round firing hits it it fires a laser beam down
range.  If the laser beam strikes a receptor the guys harness will emit this
God awful high pitched whine that lets everyone know he is down/dead.
AT-4's and Dragons (bazooka like anti-armor weapons) are simulated by what
are called Vipers, same weight, same size, except it fires a big powerful
laser that will be strong enough to activate an enemy tanks MILES.  The
armor vehicles MILES game is pretty neat.  There are two types of kills on a
tank, a Mobility kill, and a critical kill.  If the Viper or other weapon
doesn't have a solid hit on a sensor in a critical area, a mobility kill
will result which means the explosion just blew the trak of the vehicle but
its' radios and weapons still work.  A critical kill means, the vehicle and
all inside are dead dead dead.  If a tank gets a critical kill the MILES
gear will actually shut the vehicle down and kill its radios.  The guy will
just be drivin along and then he will hear over his radio a females voice
say, "Critical kill" and the only thing that will work on the vehicle after
that are the brakes.

So, direct fire weapons systems are pretty easy to replicate, target wears a
receptor, shooter fires a transmitter.

Indirect fire weapons though are a bit more difficult,  whereas before the
shooter always had eyes on the target and thus could directly place a laser
beam on target, artillery often shoots targets that no one directly see.

There are two ways around this.   At the National Training Center (NTC)
where they do all the armor against armor training, they have the MILES 2000
system.  You have an armored motorized rifle company(MRC) sitting at point
X,  I have an observer 15Km away who, with optics can see your
MRC, my FO calls in a fire mission, based on the target description a Bn 3
will be fired (54 rounds fired in 3 volleys as there are only 18 tubes in a
Bn.  The Observer-Controllers (OCs), kinna like referees, will monitor the
Call for Fire from the observer to the tubes, and the OCs will take the fire
mission dat

100 yard radius which is about the same size as a 82mm mortar
impact


Message-ID: <3346234.1075858516147.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 11:10:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: linda.o.norman@us.andersen.com
To: chris.stokley@enron.com
Subject: RE: ISO Audit Plan
Cc: roshmi.mukherjee@us.andersen.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: roshmi.mukherjee@us.andersen.com
X-From: linda.o.norman@us.andersen.com@ENRON <IMCEANOTES-linda+2Eo+2Enorman+40us+2Eandersen+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com>
X-To: Stokley, Chris </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MSTOKLE>
X-cc: roshmi.mukherjee@us.andersen.com
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Stokley, Chris (Non-Privileged)\Chris Stokley\Projects\SQMD
X-Origin: Stokley-C
X-FileName: Stokley, Chris (Non-Privileged).pst

Chris,

We plan on performing our work in July in order to be able to issue the report
in August. Please let me know if you disagree with this timeframe.

Thanks,
Linda

To:   "IMCEANOTES-linda+2Eo+2Enorman+40us+2Eandersen+2Ecom+40ENRON"@enron.com
cc:     (bcc: Linda O. Norman)
Date: 05/07/2001 12:28 PM
From: Chris.Stokley@enron.com
Subject:  RE: ISO Audit Plan

Linda,
     I am ok with the  most of the Audit plan except for the date of
completion. August 2001 seems quite excessive since we now have one SQMD
audit under our belts. Please provide to me the logic behind the thought
that this Audit will take over 3mths to complete.

                                         Thanks
                                          Chris

      -----Original Message-----
     From:   linda.o.norman@us.andersen.com@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-linda+2Eo+2Enorman+40us+2Eandersen+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

     Sent:   Thursday, May 03, 2001 1:24 PM
     To:     Stokley, Chris
     Cc:     roshmi.mukherjee@us.andersen.com
     Subject:  ISO Audit Plan

     Chris,

     I just wanted to follow up with you to ensure that you received the
     ISO Audit
     Plan draft yesterday.  If you did not receive it, please let me know
     so that I
     can re-send it.  We would like to receive your feedback before we
     finalize the
     document.

     Thanks,
     Linda

     *******************Internet Email Confidentiality
     Footer*******************

     Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.
     If you
     are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
     delivery of
     the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message
     to anyone.
     In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the
     sender by
     reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does
     not consent
     to Internet email for messages of this kind.  Opinions, conclusions
     and other
     information in this message that do not relate to the official
     business of my
     firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If you
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of
the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone.
In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by
reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not consent
to Internet email for messages of this kind.  Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this message that do not relate to the official business of my
firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.


Message-ID: <6190496.1075851980972.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 06:16:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To: skean@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, wanda.curry@enron.com,
	donald.black@enron.com, susan.mara@enron.com,
	harry.kingerski@enron.com, tim.belden@enron.com,
	vicki.sharp@enron.com, jeremy.blachman@enron.com,
	phillip.allen@enron.com, alan.comnes@enron.com,
	linda.robertson@enron.com, mike.smith@enron.com,
	michael.tribolet@enron.com, kristin.walsh@enron.com,
	christopher.calger@enron.com
Subject: California Update--Legislative Push Underway
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Jeff Dasovich
X-To: skean@enron.com, Richard Shapiro, Wanda Curry, Donald M Black, Susan J Mara, Harry Kingerski, Tim Belden, Vicki Sharp, Jeremy Blachman, Phillip K Allen, Alan Comnes, Linda Robertson, Mike D Smith, Michael Tribolet, Kristin Walsh, Christopher F Calger
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Richard_Shapiro_Nov2001\Notes Folders\California
X-Origin: SHAPIRO-R
X-FileName: rshapiro.nsf

Hertzberg (speaker of the CA Assembly) called a meeting yesterday afternoon
of the group of market participants that have been negotiating the
"core/noncore" proposal in California.  The purpose of the meeting was to
brief us on their activities and their gameplan for trying to find a solution
for California.  Here's a summary of the meeting.  Please keep confidential.

Work will be done over the weekend to put the core/noncore proposal in
legislative language.  (We will be in the room.)
Work done by the "Plan B" group in the Assembly (Joe Dutra and Joe Nation)
will also be put into legislative language over the weekend.
Because no proposal is "comprehensive," a complete legislative package will
be created from the various pieces that have been worked on thus far (i.e.,
core/noncore, "Plan B," Edison MOU)
In addition, there are Republican demands that Hertzberg will need to address
(e.g., end the litigation) in order to achieve bi-partison support, which is
what Hertzberg's shooting for.
To move the legislation, the plan is to establish a "conference committee,"
comprised of an equal number of Democrats and Republicans.
The committe would begin work on Monday and would attempt to finish putting a
comprehensive bill together, vote it out of the Legislature and send it to
the Governor for signing by Monday, July 16th.
July 16th is the deadline because that is the date that the PUC will issue
its proposed decision regarding, among other things, how DWR's revenue
requirement will be put into rates, whether Direct Access needs to be
suspended, etc.
The PUC is issuing the draft on the 16th in order to give everyone 30 days to
review and comment before the Commission votes on a final order on August
15th.  (The PUC will actually issue a "thought piece" on Monday the 9th and
will use reactions to the "thought piece" to craft the develop the proposed
decision it plans to issue on the 16th.)
All of this is still up in the air, however.  As of right now, the leader of
the Senate (Burton) has not agreed to Hertzberg's gameplan and the
Republicans, while interested, have not yet committed to join the process.


Message-ID: <24912296.1075855034723.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 09:32:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: bob.williams@elpaso.com
To: bevans@enron.com, larry.bevans@elpaso.com, heiny1@aol.com,
	dougherty@enron.com, nathan.dougherty@eprime.com, jernigan@enron.com,
	sjernig@entergy.com, jerrypadilla2@aol.com,
	jbrewer.leathercenter@leathercenter.com, lreid@sppc.com,
	plucci@enron.com, pike@enron.com, steven.pike@elpaso.com,
	turner@enron.com, robert.turner@elpaso.com, williams@enron.com,
	bob.williams@elpaso.com, woodruff@enron.com,
	alexander.woodruff@elpaso.com
Subject: 13 left
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Williams, Bob <Bob.Williams@ElPaso.com>
X-To: Bevans, Larry <Larry.Bevans@ElPaso.com>, Dave Heinemen <heiny1@aol.com>, Dougherty, Nathan <Nathan.Dougherty@eprime.com>, Jernigan, Steven  <SJernig@entergy.com>, Jerry Padilla <jerrypadilla2@aol.com>, Joey Brewer <jbrewer.LEATHERCENTER@leathercenter.com>, LoreLei Reid <lreid@sppc.com>, Paul Lucci <plucci@enron.com>, Pike, Steven <Steven.Pike@ElPaso.com>, Turner, Robert <Robert.Turner@ElPaso.com>, Williams, Bob <Bob.Williams@ElPaso.com>, Woodruff, Alexander <Alexander.Woodruff@ElPaso.com>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \PLUCCI (Non-Privileged)\Deleted Items
X-Origin: Lucci-P
X-FileName: PLUCCI (Non-Privileged).pst

We lost 4 players last week.  The home town team got 3 of them.  Get you
picks in early.  I have attached the same spreadsheet,  updated for your
convenience.  Good luck, Bob <<losers pool.xls>>

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************


Message-ID: <14201457.1075858902999.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 19:39:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: steve.walton@enron.com
To: christi.nicolay@enron.com
Subject: Re: INTERIM MODEL TALKING POINTS
Cc: james.steffes@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, sarah.novosel@enron.com,
	steven.kean@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Bcc: james.steffes@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, sarah.novosel@enron.com,
	steven.kean@enron.com
X-From: Steve Walton <Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT>
X-To: Christi L Nicolay <Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT>
X-cc: James D Steffes <James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON>, Richard Shapiro <Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron>, Sarah Novosel <Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON>, Steven J Kean <Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron>
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \SKEAN (Non-Privileged)\Kean, Steven J.\market structure
X-Origin: Kean-S
X-FileName: SKEAN (Non-Privileged).pst

Christi,
=09As I have been thinking about this problem, my opposition to a standard =
model is declining, partly out of frustration with the slow progress being =
made.  I think, however, that we ought to think about the potential consequ=
ences of recommending a standard model.  If we simply endorse PJM, then we =
may inadvertently get its warts as well -- no secondary transmission market=
, ICAP market, etc.  I think we are considering the same thing approach as =
was reported by Charles Yeung's in his note on Tuesday's Inter-RTO Coordina=
tion (Seams) Conference:

"Harvey Reed, Constellation Power, suggested that FERC impose a standard ta=
riff for all RTOs to work from that did not restrict RTOs from filing diffe=
rent proposals, but would limit their ability to diverge from a single mark=
et model."

=09In addition to the standard model, there needs to be a deadline for eith=
er filing the tariff or for filing the standard tariff.  Without a "feet to=
 the fire" feature, nothing the grand stall will continue.  In arguing for =
a standard model, the PJM system could be the core of a proposal but we sho=
uld specific modifications to address our concerns.  On the transmission ri=
ghts issue, for instance, a simple "don't allocate" solution won't work.  T=
he lack of the secondary market for NY TCCs or PJM FTRs goes both to the la=
ck of information and to the way the rights are defined.  If as Harvey Reed=
 suggests, RTOs can submit alternative approaches, at least there will be p=
ressure to get moving.  I have not discussed this idea with West Power. =20

=09It then occurred to me that FERC  is unlikely to impose a standard tarif=
f without a rulemaking proceeding.  Whether they could act by fiat or not i=
s a moot point, since  I doubt that they would do so without creating a rec=
ord.  There are two possible down sides to a rule making.  (1)  The outcome=
 of a rulemaking is something of a crap shoot.  The incumbents have a prett=
y good record in the past, of coming out of rulemakings with plenty of good=
ies such as the native load exemption in Order No. 888.  There is a also a =
distinct risk that PJM's ICAP or transmission right allocation process is g=
iven blessed status, which will make revision of them later to be a huge up=
hill battle.  (2)  The other consequence of a rulemaking its effect on curr=
ent  RTO discussions.  The best outcome is that the uncertainty of the rule=
making creates an urgency  to get a proposal filed before a new FERC rule c=
uts off options from a new the standard for review.  The uncertainty prior =
to the issuance of Order No. 888 in fact had that effect in the West.  On t=
he other hand it can mean that nothing happens until the new rule is issued=
.  This also happened prior to Order No. 888, with a number of companies si=
tting on their hands, using the time delay to protect existing positions, w=
hile whipping up State regulators' fears of jurisdictional shift as necessa=
ry to boost their own position.

=09These are only own views.  I have not


Message-ID: <28375150.1075846221627.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 06:26:00 -0800 (PST)
From: sangle@velaw.com
To: sarah.novosel@enron.com, j.mark.metts@enron.com, mitchell.taylor@enron.com,
	ann.ballard@enron.com, dwight.larson@enron.com,
	richard.shapiro@enron.com, steven.j.kean@enron.com,
	joe.hartsoe@enron.com, paul.kaufman@enron.com, awenner@velaw.com,
	sangle@velaw.com, sbehrend@llgm.com, jrutkowsk@llgm.com
Subject: RE: Timelines on PGE Sale
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: "Angle, Stephen" <sangle@velaw.com>
X-To: "'Sarah.Novosel@enron.com'" <Sarah.Novosel@enron.com>, J.Mark.Metts@enron.com, "Taylor, Mitchell (Enron)" <mitchell.taylor@enron.com>, "Ballard, Ann (Enron)" <ann.ballard@enron.com>, Dwight.Larson@enron.com, Richard.Shapiro@enron.com, Steven.J.Kean@enron.com, Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com, Paul.Kaufman@enron.com, "Wenner, Adam" <awenner@velaw.com>, "Angle, Stephen" <sangle@velaw.com>, sbehrend@llgm.com, jrutkowsk@llgm.com
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Steven_Kean_Dec2000_1\Notes Folders\Archiving\Untitled
X-Origin: KEAN-S
X-FileName: skean.nsf

Sarah, I have reviewed your presentation. It is a good summary of our
consensus prediction for the timing of future regulatory action respecting
the merger.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sarah.Novosel@enron.com [mailto:Sarah.Novosel@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 3:16 PM
To: J.Mark.Metts@enron.com; Mitchell.Taylor@enron.com;
Ann.Ballard@enron.com; Dwight.Larson@enron.com;
Richard.Shapiro@enron.com; Steven.J.Kean@enron.com;
Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com; Paul.Kaufman@enron.com; awenner@velaw.com;
sangle@velaw.com; sbehrend@llgm.com; jrutkowsk@llgm.com
Subject: Timelines on PGE Sale

Attached are our power point slides laying out the time line for FERC
action.  The estimated time frames for FERC action, even without a
settlement, are somewhat more positive than we discussed yesterday (e.g.,
FERC order on the merits after a technical conference by mid-February).
Also, the group is somewhat optimistic that the FERC order in November
could be an order on the merits, without additional proceedings such as a
technical conference or a hearing.  These optimistic time tables are based
on the assumption that Sierra will not take any action that will alienate
or annoy FERC, which could result in a slowdown in FERC's approval process.

Adam Wenner, Steve Angle, Sam Behrends, Joanne Rutkowski and I all
discussed the various time frames that are laid out in the slides, but they
have not seen the slides, so we would like to reserve the right to amend
the slides once everyone has a chance to review them.  Also, as we
discussed yesterday, we would like to be able to revise the slides, if
necessary, tomorrow once we get FERC's agenda for its November 8 meeting
and we see what action FERC takes in the California investigation on price
spikes this past summer.

Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.

Sarah

(See attached file: Timeline for Federal Regulatory Approvals of PGE
Sale.ppt)
++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You


Message-ID: <29067160.1075841398611.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 13:44:01 -0800 (PST)
From: joe.parks@enron.com
To: knipe3@msn.com
Subject: RE: Sunday Mar 17
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Parks, Joe </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JPARKS>
X-To: 'chad knipe' <knipe3@msn.com>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \ExMerge - Parks, Joe\Sent Items
X-Origin: PARKS-J
X-FileName: joe parks 6-26-02.pst

rock on

-----Original Message-----
From: chad knipe [mailto:knipe3@msn.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 2:53 PM
To: Parks, Joe; Brian Constantine; Chet Fenner; EriK Wollam; Todd Feder (E-mail)
Subject: Re: Sunday Mar 17

Hell yes!  Aye, laddy.

----- Original Message -----
From: Parks, Joe
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 11:16 AM
To: Brian Constantine (E-mail); Chad Knipe (E-mail 2); Chet Fenner (E-mail); Erik Wollam (E-mail); Todd Feder (E-mail)
Subject: Sunday Mar 17

Any interest in a little st. patty fest at my house sunday late afternoon, with cabbage, potatoes, sausage, and beer. kids are welcome of course. Let me know.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Message-ID: <24787207.1075860011114.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2000 11:53:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: justin.boyd@enron.com
To: alan.aronowitz@enron.com, mark.taylor@enron.com, marcus.nettelton@enron.com
Subject: FX Transactions
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Justin Boyd
X-To: Alan Aronowitz, Mark Taylor, Marcus Nettelton
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Mark_Taylor _Dec_2000\Notes Folders\Notes inbox
X-Origin: Taylor-M
X-FileName: mtaylor.nsf

Gentlemen - please see below as well as the S&C memo attached.  I will also
send you a related email later.

Thanks.
Justin
---------------------- Forwarded by Justin Boyd/LON/ECT on 09/08/2000 18:55
---------------------------

Jon Barrett@MGLTD
07/08/2000 17:46
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Janine Juggins/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Trena McFarland/LON/ECT@ECT, Kevin Rhodes/MGLTD_London/MGLTD@MGLTD, Sid
Tipples/MGLTD_London/MGLTD@MGLTD, Alfred Pennisi/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Andrew
Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: FX Transactions

We received the attached from Sullivan & Cromwell re the FX business and the
possibilities of using a US companyn which company to use for contract
purposes. At a meeting here at MG today, the consensus/preference was not to
use a UK company as we have no full ISD (chapter 10) firm nor the wish to
change MG's status.

Per the advice from S&C, we like the idea of using a US corporation with a UK
"arranger" to cover any UK regulatory issues that arise. Dependent on where
the business will end up (I understand to be discussed by Gary Hickerson/Mike
Hutchinson 18th August), the following appears to be the among the logical
solutions:

1. Contractual entity - either Enron North America, MG London Inc or Newco
Inc.
2. Arranger - either EEFT Ltd, Metallgesellschaft Ltd or MG Brokers Ltd
(depending on the effect on their chapter 3 status for the last two).

The current customer base consists of entities in the US, Canada, France, UK
and Switzerland.

Please advise on any group/tax issues that can affect the final decision. If
you need any further information, please let me know.

Many thanks.

---------------------- Forwarded by Jon Barrett/MGLTD_London/MGLTD on
07/08/2000 15:59 ---------------------------

GILBERGD@sullcrom.com on 06/08/2000 15:45:55
To: jbarrett
cc: RAISLERK@sullcrom.com

Subject: FX Transactions

eSafe Protect Gateway (tm) has scanned this mail for viruses, vandals and
suspicious attachments and has found it to be CLEAN.

File: 62cy01!.DOC (38,400 bytes)
Encoding: Base64
Result: Clean.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Attached is a draft of the memo we discussed on the proposed FX business.
Please call or e-mail with any questions.  Best regards.

----------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.

 - 62cy01!.DOC


Message-ID: <11106982.1075856793024.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 07:20:00 -0800 (PST)
From: vince.kaminski@enron.com
To: vkaminski@aol.com
Subject: Fwd: Credit Markets Group Organisational Announcement.
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Vince J Kaminski
X-To: vkaminski@aol.com
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Vincent_Kaminski_Jun2001_7\Notes Folders\Discussion threads
X-Origin: Kaminski-V
X-FileName: vkamins.nsf

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/30/99
03:20 PM ---------------------------

VKaminski@aol.com on 12/17/99 07:51:05 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Credit Markets Group Organisational Announcement.

Return-Path: <vkamins@ect.enron.com>
Received: from  rly-yb05.mx.aol.com (rly-yb05.mail.aol.com [172.18.146.5]) by
air-yb03.mail.aol.com (v67.6) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 16:58:45 -0500
Received: from  mailman.enron.com (mailman.enron.com [192.152.140.66]) by
rly-yb05.mx.aol.com (v67.6) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 16:58:29 -0500
Received: from dserv1.ect.enron.com (dserv1.ect.enron.com [172.16.1.37]) by
mailman.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/corp-1.03) with ESMTP id VAA25236 for
<vkaminski@aol.com>; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 21:58:19 GMT
Received: from notes.ect.enron.com (notes.ect.enron.com [172.16.4.33]) by
dserv1.ect.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id PAA08866 for
<vkaminski@aol.com>; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 15:58:28 -0600 (CST)
Received: by notes.ect.enron.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5  (863.2 5-20-1999))
id 8625684A.0078B2D6 ; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 15:58:21 -0600
X-Lotus-FromDomain: ECT
From: "Vince J Kaminski" <vkamins@ect.enron.com>
To: vkaminski@aol.com
Message-ID: <8625684A.0078B22B.00@notes.ect.enron.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 15:58:17 -0600
Subject: Credit Markets Group Organisational Announcement.
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/mixed;
Boundary="0__=qApCP1JJUTs7ol0zv2e99Xipkn73060WazlSVx5ZP86MdTcyl1LSBdMc"
Content-Disposition: inline

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/17/99 03:58
PM ---------------------------

Anjam Ahmad
12/07/99 09:33 AM

To:   Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant
      Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:  Credit Markets Group Organisational Announcement.

---------------------- Forwarded by Anjam Ahmad/LON/ECT on 07/12/99 03:32 PM
---------------------------

 (Embedded     Enron Europe
 image moved
 to file:      From:  John Sherriff
 pic31547.pcx) 07/12/99 03:10 PM

Sent by:  Enron Europe General Announcement

To:   ECT Europe, Enron Executive Committee, Jay Fitzgerald/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
      William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Gorte/HOU/ECT@ECT, Monte L
      Gleason/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Ruane/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rick
      L Carson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randy
      Petersen/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Grant
      Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:  Credit Markets Group Organisational Announcement.

(Embedded image moved to file: pic16788.pcx)
We are pleased to announce the formation of the Credit Markets Group which is
responsible for developing innovative products to better manage the risk of
our
internal credit portfolio as well as, looking  for opportunities to provide
third party credit protection.  Initially, we will be making markets in
bankruptcy protection on reference credits which are currently in our
portfolio
but we expect to add additional credit products and reference credits very
quickly.

The team will utilise EnronOnline as its primary trade execution tool, looking
to quickly build market share by capturing the eyes of our current
counterparts.
Simultaneously,  we will launch an external web site focused on credit
protection where potential customers will have access to real time prices and
filter on specific reference credits as well as, access to credit models and
research papers on effective credit risk


Message-ID: <11373969.1075856198913.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 09:11:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: vince.kaminski@enron.com
To: vkaminski@aol.com
Subject: EnTouch Newsletter
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-From: Vince J Kaminski
X-To: vkaminski@aol.com
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Vincent_Kaminski_Jun2001_1\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: Kaminski-V
X-FileName: vkamins.nsf

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/06/2001=
=20
04:13 PM ---------------------------
   ENA Public Relations
From: ENA Public Relations@ENRON on 04/05/2001 11:37 PM
Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: All_ENA_EGM_EIM
cc: =20
Subject: EnTouch Newsletter

BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

Enron Industrial Markets
Enron Industrial Markets has recently completed the first transaction for a=
=20
new 60-day fixed price product for the lumber industry. Available for=20
delivery in Houston and Dallas, the product is offered by Enron in the=20
over-the-counter market and via Clickpaper.com, Enron=01,s Internet-based=
=20
transaction system dedicated to the forest products industry. The first=20
transaction was completed via Clickpaper.com on March 14 with a major lumbe=
r=20
buyer in the southern United States. This represents the first online fixed=
=20
price transaction contract in the industry. With the growing volatility in=
=20
the lumber industry, the availability of a long-term fixed price product=20
provides companies with another opportunity to mitigate their exposure.=20
Additionally, this transaction represents the convergence of Enron=01,s=20
increasing involvement in physical lumber transactions with our recognized=
=20
expertise in financial risk management.

In addition, EIM has announced that it has completed its acquisition of the=
=20
Quebec City, Canada newsprint mill and related assets from Daishowa Forest=
=20
Products Ltd. In July 2000, Enron purchased Garden State Paper, a recycled=
=20
newsprint mill located in Garfield, NJ. The acquisition of the Daishowa mil=
l=20
now positions Enron as the seventh largest producer of newsprint in North=
=20
America. The Daishowa mill in Quebec City will now be called Papiers=20
Stadacona. The new name has great historical significance to the local=20
community in Quebec City. When Jacques Cartier first explored the mouth of=
=20
the St. Charles River in 1535, the aboriginal people living there referred =
to=20
the village as Stadacona. This is now the site of modern-day Quebec City.=
=20

Enron Freight Markets
In March, Enron Freight Markets (EFM) completed the acquisition of Webmodal=
,=20
Inc to help launch the traditional intermediary transportation business.  E=
FM=20
also started its spot trading business and completed 981 transactions in it=
s=20
first month.

East Power Origination
On Tuesday, April 3, the St. Lucie County Commission voted 3-2 to approve t=
he=20
Midway Energy Center near Fort Pierce, Florida, which is a 510 megawatt=20
peaking power plant.  Next steps for this facility include receiving a wate=
r=20
permit from the South Florida Water Management District and an Environmenta=
l=20
Resource Permit (ERP) from the Florida Department of Environmental Protecti=
on.

Enron Canada
Ken Lay addressed a breakfast meeting of the Toronto Board of Trade on=20
Wednesday, April 4, as part of the "Power Breakfast Series".  His topic was=
=20
"Moving Forward with Electricity Deregulation."  Before his speech, the=20
chairman of the Board of Trade commented that "this was the best attendance=
=20
ever" at one of their breakfast meetings.  After the meeting, Mr. Lay spoke=
=20
with reporters from Reuters, the Globe and Mail, the National Post, and=20
Report on Business TV emphasizing Enron's commitment to deregulation of the=
=20
Ontario power market.

IN THE NEWS

JAPAN: Enron presents power plant plan to Japan government
TOKYO, U.S.-based Enron Corp on Wednesday presented plans to bu


Message-ID: <1266688.1075862456498.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 13:40:36 -0800 (PST)
From: j.kaminski@enron.com
To: <'"sbigalow"@enron.com>
Subject: RE: ENE
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Kaminski, Vince J </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=VKAMINS>
X-To: '"sbigalow" <sbigalow@email.msn.com>@ENRON', Roberts, Mike A. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Mrobert>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \VKAMINS (Non-Privileged)\Kaminski, Vince J\Sent Items
X-Origin: Kaminski-V
X-FileName: VKAMINS (Non-Privileged).pst

Steve,

It shows who is smart.
Tuesday will work for me.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"sbigalow" <sbigalow@email.msn.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, November 06, 2001 11:34 AM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J; Roberts, Mike A.
Subject:	Re: ENE

Hi Y'all,

11/22 works for me but you better check with your better halves to see if
they want you out on Thanksgiving day.

Tuesday nights?

Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: <Mike.A.Roberts@enron.com>
To: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>; <sbigalow@email.msn.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 8:26 AM
Subject: RE: ENE

> Thursday the 22nd works for me
>
> - Mike
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>    From:   Kaminski, Vince J
>    Sent:   Tuesday, November 06, 2001 8:24 AM
>    To:     '"sbigalow" <sbigalow@email.msn.com>@ENRON'; Roberts, Mike A.
>    Subject:  RE: ENE
>
>    Hello:
>
>    What about Thu the following week?
>    I am going to Baylor on the 15th.
>
>    Vince
>
>       -----Original Message-----
>      From:     "sbigalow" <sbigalow@email.msn.com>@ENRON
>      Sent:     Monday, November 05, 2001 6:04 PM
>      To:  Roberts, Mike A.; Kaminski, Vince J
>      Subject:  Re: ENE
>
>      Hey,
>
>      11/15 sounds good, everybody pencil it in. We'll confirm as day gets
>      nearer,
>      and if Mike wants to go somewhere that serves Spanish Rice, that is
>      fine by
>      me also:)
>
>      Steve
>      ----- Original Message -----
>      From: "Roberts, Mike A." <Mike.A.Roberts@ENRON.com>
>      To: "Kaminski, Vince J" <Vince.J.Kaminski@ENRON.com>;
>      <sbigalow@email.msn.com>
>      Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 1:56 PM
>      Subject: RE: ENE
>
>
>      Vince & Steve,
>
>      I'm available any time for dinner other than Mondays or Wednesdays
>      (taking Spanish at Rice)
>
>      Thursdays are best, then tuesdays next.
>
>      This week, though, taking off Thursday after work to visit my dad in
>      North Carolina, so gone Friday too.
>
>      Even fridays generally OK, though I'd need to bring Mary Jo!
>
>      Bottom Line:  How about next Thursday 11/15????
>
>      Also, the earlier the better........(office hours 5am-4pm)
>
>      looking forward to it......
>
>
>      --- Mike
>
>
>      >  -----Original Message-----
>      > From: Kaminski, Vince J
>      > Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 1:26 PM
>      > To: '"sbigalow" <sbigalow@email.msn.com>@ENRON'
>      > Cc: Roberts, Mike A.
>      > Subject: RE: ENE
>      >
>      > Mike, Steve,
>      >
>      > Let's get together. What day would work for you?
>      >
>      > Vince
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      > -----Original Message-----
>      > From: "sbigalow" <sbigalow@email.msn.com>@ENRON
>      > Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 9:11 AM
>      > To: Vince Kaminski
>      > Subject: ENE
>      >
>      >
>      > Good Morning,
>      >
>      > If ENE closes higher than $11.85 today, it will  have formed a
>      > Kicker signal, a strong buy.
>      >
>      > Dinner?
>      >
>      >
>      > Steve
>
>
>
**********************************************************************
>      This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
>      affiliate and
>      may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
>      the
>      intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by
>      others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
>      (


Message-ID: <25865255.1075863447674.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 19:01:05 -0800 (PST)
From: webmaster@cera.com
To: clients@cera.com
Subject: Western Energy--Winter Demand Peaks Not Expected to Result in Price
 Spikes or Reliability Problems - CERA Monthly Briefing
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: webmaster@cera.com@ENRON
X-To: clients@cera.com
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \VKAMINS (Non-Privileged)\Kaminski, Vince J\Inbox
X-Origin: Kaminski-V
X-FileName: VKAMINS (Non-Privileged).pst

Title: One Tight Winter Peak Remains
URL(s):

http://www20.cera.com/eprofile?u=35&m=2760;

***********************************************************************

WESTERN ENERGY--WINTER DEMAND PEAKS NOT EXPECTED TO RESULT IN PRICE SPIKES OR RELIABILITY PROBLEMS

Building natural gas and power supplies are providing a cushion for the western
energy markets for this winter. Although seasonal gas and power demand spikes
will again push prices higher, this winter will not look like the winter of
2000/01. Unlike during the record high gas and power prices and blackouts last
year winter, reduced demand, increased gas storage levels, and new gas and
power supplies will significantly temper prices and significantly reduce the
risk of supply disruptions.

*  A supply build of 300 million cubic feet (MMcf) per day in the Rockies and
900 MMcf in western Canada is meeting with declining demand in the West

*  Fourth quarter power demand is expected to be 13 percent below levels last
year, while over 5,000 megawatts of new supply has been added this year

*  Only severe cold weather, prolonged drought, or a supply disruption could
produce a reliability problem this winter

**end**

Follow above URL for complete CERA Monthly Briefing (10 pages).

E-mail Category: Monthly Briefing
CERA Knowledge Area(s): Western Energy

***********************************************************************
***********************************************************************
CERA's Autumn 2001 Roundtable event dates and agendas
are now available at http://www20.cera.com/event
***********************************************************************

To make changes to your cera.com profile go to:
http://www20.cera.com/client/updateaccount

Forgot your username and password? Go to:
http://www20.cera.com/client/forgot

This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.
Terms of Use: http://www20.cera.com/tos
Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 2001. Cambridge Energy Research Associates