Message-ID: <29225168.1075858618750.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 12:22:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: dan@treebeards.com
To: legal <.taylor@enron.com>
Subject: Re: Let's Go Sailing!
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: "Dan@treebeards.com" <dan@treebeards.com>@ENRON <IMCEANOTES-+22Dan+40treebeards+2Ecom+22+20+3Cdan+40treebeards+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com>
X-To: Taylor, Mark E (Legal) </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MTAYLO1>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \MTAYLO1 (Non-Privileged)\Taylor, Mark E (Legal)\Travel
X-Origin: Taylor-M
X-FileName: MTAYLO1 (Non-Privileged).pst

Jim and/or the Johns would be fine by us.

.----- Original Message -----
From: <Mark.Taylor@enron.com>
To: <dan@treebeards.com>
Cc: <jamie@treebeards.com>
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 11:18 AM
Subject: RE: Let's Go Sailing!

> Good catch!  I was thinking that Thanksgiving was the 29th -- oops.  I'll
> get a revised quote.  Any ideas for who wants to go?  This particular boat
> has three cabins and heads.  If we have another person (Jim?) or couple
> (the Johns?) we would get along with for a week it would be fun and less
> expensive.  And if there are even more, we could get a larger boat with
> four cabins.  We just need to know sooner rather than later to get the
boat
> reserved.
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>    From:   "Dan@treebeards.com" <dan@treebeards.com>@ENRON
>
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Dan+40treebeards+2Ecom+22+20+3Cdan+40treebeards+2Ecom+
3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
>
>
>    Sent:   Friday, August 10, 2001 9:00 AM
>    To:     Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
>    Cc:     Jamie Mize
>    Subject:  Re: Let's Go Sailing!
>
>    I'm game for a trip.  Any chance we could do it a week or a few days
>    earlier
>    and take advantage of the Thanksgiving holiday since we are already
off?
>    ----- Original Message -----
>    From: <mark.taylor@enron.com>
>    To: <dan@treebeards.com>
>    Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 12:36 PM
>    Subject: Let's Go Sailing!
>
>
>    > What do you think?
>    >
>    > This vacation estimate was created by The Moorings for Mark and crew.
>    If
>    you would like more information, please visit our web site at
>    http://www.moorings.com. Thank you for considering The Moorings for
your
>    next sailing vacation.
>    >
>    > Estimate Request No: 92624
>    > Set Sail Date: 11/25/2001
>    > Duration: 7 Days
>    > Departure Base: St. Martin
>    >
>    > Item Description:                                  Price:
>    > Moorings 463 - Exclusive For 7 Days                $USD 3,675.00
>    > Evening Start                                      $USD 367.50
>    > Provisioning - Prov.-Easy On The Cook              $USD 560.00
>    > Security Insurance                                 $USD 203.00
>    >
>    > Total Charter Price                                $USD 4,805.50
>    > Price Per Person Per Day                           $USD 171.63
>    >
>    >
>    > . Bareboat charters may choose to start at either noon or 6:00 pm.
>    Crewed
>    Yacht charters start at noon. All charters end at noon.
>    > . You may start your charter any day of the week.
>    > . A minimum number of charter days may apply.
>    > . All prices are subject to change without notice.
>    > . Taxes vary by destination, and may not be included in this
estimate.
>    Please ask a Moorings Vacation Planning Specialist for details.
>    >
>    > This estimate is provided for your convenience and to aid in planning
>    your
>    sailing vacation with The Moorings. Availability and prices are subject
>    to
>    change and are not guaranteed until a deposit is made.  Your charter
may
>    qualify for a special offer or discount.  Please visit the Special
>    Offers
>    section of our web site or use the Contact Us page found on our Service
>    Desk
>    to contact a Vacation Planning Specialist for details.
>    >
>    >
>    >
>
>
>
>
> ******************************************************


Message-ID: <31118214.1075861738153.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 13:18:12 -0800 (PST)
From: reetzr@gtlaw.com
To: kay.mann@enron.com
Subject: RE: Enron DOAH proceedings
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: ReetzR@gtlaw.com
X-To: Mann, Kay </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KMANN>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \KMANN (Non-Privileged)\Mann, Kay\Inbox
X-Origin: Mann-K
X-FileName: KMANN (Non-Privileged).pst

Thanks, Kay - Your e-mail solved the mystery, I think.  I have checked the
signature block in our pleadings, and they list a fax number which is not
our firm's main fax number (I assume it is a satellite fax machine somewhere
near Kerri's or Paul's office). I'm sure that your fax went to that machine
and no one on this end got it to me.  I don't know where the satellite
machine is located, but will follow up on Monday.

In any event, I served the answers sans signature (so that our objections
have been preserved), and will send out a version including the signature
once the hard copy arrives.

Ryan

-----Original Message-----
From: Mann, Kay [mailto:Kay.Mann@ENRON.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2001 8:37 AM
To: ReetzR@gtlaw.com
Subject: RE: Enron DOAH proceedings

Ryan,

I asked my assistant to fax and fed ex the signature page.  The fax
address I gave her was the one on the pleadings (as was the address).
Was that the correct office?  I gave it to her at 345 CST, and it would
be very unusual for her to not send it fairly soon after that.  I've
left her a voice mail to see what's up.

Thanks,

Kay

-----_______________________________________________________________
	The information contained in this transmission may contain
	privileged and confidential information.  It is intended only
	for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the
	intended recipient,  you are hereby notified that any review,
	dissemination, distribution or duplication of this
	communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
	intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email
	and destroy all copies of the original message.

	To reply to our email administrator directly, please send an
	email to postmaster@gtlaw.com.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************

_______________________________________________________________
The information contained in this transmission may contain
privileged and confidential information.  It is intended only
for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the
intended recipient,  you are hereby notified that any review,
dissemination, distribution or duplication of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email
and destroy all copies of the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, please send an
email to postmaster@gtlaw.com.


Message-ID: <5768032.1075854991408.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 05:50:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: daryl.dworkin@americas.bnpparibas.com
To: daryl.dworkin@americas.bnpparibas.com
Subject: BNP PARIBAS Commodity Futures Weekly AGA Survey
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: daryl.dworkin@americas.bnpparibas.com@ENRON
X-To: daryl.dworkin@americas.bnpparibas.com
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \MMAGGI (Non-Privileged)\Deleted Items
X-Origin: Maggi-M
X-FileName: MMAGGI (Non-Privileged).pst

Good Morning,

Just a reminder to get your AGA estimates in by Noon EST (11:00 CST).

Last Year      +71
Last Week      +63

Thank You,
Daryl Dworkin
BNP PARIBAS Commodity Futures, Inc.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir immediatement l'expediteur.

Toute utilisation de ce message non conforme a sa destination, toute diffusion ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf autorisation expresse.

L'internet ne permettant pas d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS (et ses filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce message, dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.
	----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message and any attachments (the "message") are intended solely for the addressees and are confidential. If you receive this message in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender.

Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval.

The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message if modified.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


Message-ID: <27955047.1075858659885.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 19:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: marianne.castano@enron.com
To: peggy.mahoney@enron.com
Subject: RE: CA BIZMIX Issues/Confidential
Cc: richard.ring@enron.com, stacey.bolton@enron.com, heather.mathis@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Bcc: richard.ring@enron.com, stacey.bolton@enron.com, heather.mathis@enron.com
X-From: Marianne Castano <Marianne Castano/HOU/EES@EES>
X-To: Peggy Mahoney <Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES>
X-cc: Richard Ring <Richard Ring/HOU/EES@EES>, Stacey Bolton <Stacey Bolton/Enron@EnronXGate>, Heather Mathis <Heather Mathis/HOU/EES@EES>
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \RRING (Non-Privileged)\EESIRenewableEnergy
X-Origin: Ring-R
X-FileName: RRING (Non-Privileged)1.pst

Thanks, Peggy...MLC

Peggy Mahoney
08/06/2001 01:16 PM
To:=09Marianne Castano/HOU/EES@EES
cc:=09=20
Subject:=09RE: CA BIZMIX Issues/Confidential  =20

I just talked to Stacey and I think we'll send a letter discussing the fact=
 that the funds have
run out, etc.  I'll be back to you with a draft.
Thanks
Peggy   =20

Marianne Castano
08/02/2001 12:05 PM
To:=09Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES
cc:=09=20
Subject:=09RE: CA BIZMIX Issues/Confidential

 =09=09

This is in regard to discontinuation of the Biz Mix product -- as you can s=
ee from the messages from Stacey below, we have stopped offering the produc=
t because the energy credit funds have been depleted.  I'm still going to a=
sk Richard Ring (He's on vacation)  on Monday your question -- ie, is there=
 any way we can continue with it, notwithstanding.   I fear he is going to =
say its possible to do so, but at an extreme loss of $$$....MLC

---------------------- Forwarded by Marianne Castano/HOU/EES on 08/02/2001 =
01:01 PM ---------------------------
From:=09Stacey Bolton/ENRON@enronXgate on 08/02/2001 12:00 PM
To:=09Marianne Castano/HOU/EES@EES
cc:=09=20
Subject:=09RE: CA BIZMIX Issues

You're welcome.  Hope I see you on Monday.  My understanding is that surpri=
singly some of the money that we've already submitted has been paid due (de=
spite the fund being depleted) to overpayment/accounting issues with other =
entities.  This also has to do w/ the time lapse between filing for reimbur=
sement for 3 months prior (i.e. I don't think Richard anticipated getting p=
aid for some of January's purchases because technically the fund ran out in=
 December).  There is definitely not enough money to continue buying going =
forward in the C&I fund.  It might be replenished next January provided dir=
ect access goes through. =20
 -----Original Message-----
From: =09Castano, Marianne =20
Sent:=09Thursday, August 02, 2001 11:44 AM
To:=09Bolton, Stacey
Cc:=09Ring, Richard; Mathis, Heather
Subject:=09RE: CA BIZMIX Issues

Thanks, Stacey.  I hope all's well.  I'm going to get with him on Monday (I=
'll be in Houston) -- I seem to recall his mentioning that one particular f=
und is not 100% depleted, and that technically, we could continue to offer =
the product.  Do you remember his noting this?  MLC

From:=09Stacey Bolton/ENRON@enronXgate on 08/02/2001 11:30 AM
To:=09Marianne Castano/HOU/EES@EES
cc:=09Richard Ring/HOU/EES@EES, Heather Mathis/HOU/EES@EES=20
Subject:=09RE: CA BIZMIX Issues

Richard is on vacation until Monday.  To continue the Bizmix product, we wo=
uld need the customer credit monies.  The customer credit monies for the Bi=
zmix were depleted in January.  Perhaps Richard can work a deal for tags, b=
ut I still think this would be a premium and affect their positions in CA. =
 I'm sure Richard will give you more detail, but wanted to make sure you we=
re aware of the situation w/ the incentive funds.
 -----Original Message-----
From: =09Castano, Marianne =20
Sent:=09Thursday, August 02, 2001 8:52 AM
To:=09Bolton, Stacey
Cc:=09Ring, Richard; Mathis, Heather
Subject:=09RE: CA BIZMIX Issues

Peggy informed me on Monday that she did not want to send any n


Message-ID: <11550165.1075851846404.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 16:18:00 -0800 (PST)
From: enron.announcements@enron.com
To: all_ena_egm_eim@enron.com
Subject: EnTouch Newsletter
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-From: Enron Announcements
X-To: All_ENA_EGM_EIM
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Juan_Hernandez_Nov2001\Notes Folders\Private folders\Judy
X-Origin: HERNANDEZ-J
X-FileName: jhernan.nsf

BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

Weather Group
On Wednesday, December 6th, The Weather Channel aired an episode of their=
=20
show "Atmospheres," which included a fifteen minute segment focusing on=20
Enron's Weather Risk Management business.  Mark Tawney, Steven Vu, Gary=20
Taylor, and Steve Bennett were featured.  The Weather Channel has aired the=
=20
episode periodically since then.  The parts that make it through the Enron=
=20
cutting room floor will be coming soon to an elevator near you!  If you wou=
ld=20
like to view a copy of the episode in its entirety, please contact Yvette=
=20
Simpson at ext. 3-9595.

The Weather Risk Management group completed the first ever Power Demand=20
transaction this week.  The transaction was a swap based on the PJM demand=
=20
index.  Power Demand contracts use average peak power demand as an index an=
d=20
allow power market participants (generators, btu distributors, marketers,=
=20
etc...) to mitigate volumetric exposures.  Weekly swaps are available on=20
EnronOnline and the desk has placed option contracts on this index in the=
=20
broker market.  Inquiries regarding this product should be directed to=20
Claudio Ribeiro, product manager ext. 3-7313, Gary Taylor ext. 3-1511, or=
=20
Valter Stoiani ext. 3-6906.

West Power Trading
It=01,s been a wild and crazy holiday season in the West.  Electricity pric=
es=20
have remained extremely bullish throughout the entire WSCC, due in large pa=
rt=20
to below-normal temperatures, =01&less than stellar=018 river flows in the=
=20
Northwest and Northern California, tremendously volatile natural gas prices=
,=20
and a number of generating plants down for both planned and unplanned=20
maintenance.  Recently, the Federal Regulatory Energy Commission (FERC) has=
=20
stepped in to implement several orders in an effort to try to correct this=
=20
=01&extremely flawed market.=018  Stay tuned sports fans; some have the fee=
ling=20
that the best is yet to come.

HAPPY HOLIDAYS
Seasons Greetings from ENA PR.  The EnTouch newsletter will be on holiday=
=20
break next week.  If you have information for future issues of EnTouch,=20
please send it to Michelle Vitrella.  We hope you have a wonderful and safe=
=20
holiday.  See you next year!

WELCOME

New Hires ENA/EIM/EGM
ENA =01) Kimberly Hardy, Adam Johnson, Daniel Lisk, William Fleenor, Stacey=
=20
Wales, Jason Fischer, Aparna Rajaram

LEGAL STUFF

The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietar=
y=20
to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries.  It is intended for internal use only=
=20
and should not be disclosed.


Message-ID: <26853539.1075841042210.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 01:41:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: bert.meyers@enron.com
To: portland.shift@enron.com
Subject: Visit
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Bert Meyers
X-To: Portland Shift
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \eric linder 6-28-02\Notes Folders\Discussion threads
X-Origin: LINDER-E
X-FileName: eric linder 6-28-02.nsf

---------------------- Forwarded by Bert Meyers/PDX/ECT on 04/29/2001 08:49
AM ---------------------------

Kalman Gaizler <kgaizler@sempratrading.com> on 04/29/2001 08:17:45 AM
To: "'bert.meyers@enron.com'" <bert.meyers@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Visit

Hi Bert,

I will be arriving in Portland on Thursday, May 17th at 10:30am and I will
be staying at the Westin Portland, 750 SW Alder St.. I would like to stop by
the Enron office on Thursday afternoon at about 2PM and meet the Enron crew.

I would appreciate your help in organizing an outing on Thursday evening.
The outing could be to your favorite restaurant or what-so-ever event that
may be nearby. I hope that you and many of your colleagues will be able to
join me on Thursday, May 17th as my guests.

Also, can you please e-mail me directions to your office.

Regards,

Ken Gaizler
SempraTrading RealTime Desk

****************************************************************************
This e-mail contains privileged attorney-client communications and/or
confidential information, and is only for the use by the intended recipient.
Receipt by an unintended recipient does not constitute a waiver of any
applicable privilege.

Reading, disclosure, discussion, dissemination, distribution or copying of
this information by anyone other than the intended recipient or his or her
employees or agents is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this
communication in error, please immediately notify us and delete the original
material from your computer.

Sempra Energy Trading Corp. (SET) is not the same company as SDG&E or
SoCalGas, the utilities owned by SET's parent company.  SET is not regulated
by the California Public Utilities Commission and you do not have to buy
SET's products and services to continue to receive quality regulated service
from the utilities.
****************************************************************************


Message-ID: <12489591.1075853261183.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 06:38:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: richard.sanders@enron.com
To: david.delainey@enron.com, john.lavorato@enron.com, tim.belden@enron.com
Subject: Further Revised Draft
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Richard B Sanders
X-To: David W Delainey, John J Lavorato, Tim Belden
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Richard_Sanders_Oct2001\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: Sanders-R
X-FileName: rsanders.nsf

----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 10/06/2000 01:37 PM -----

	"Fergus, Gary S." <GFergus@brobeck.com>
	10/06/2000 01:02 PM

		 To: "'Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com'" <Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com>,
"'msmith1@enron.com'" <msmith1@enron.com>, "'David_Aamodt@pgn.com'"
<David_Aamodt@pgn.com>, "'MBD'" <MDay@GMSSR.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Further Revised Draft

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE

DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT

Harvey Morris Esq.
California Public Utilities Commission
505 Public Utilities Commission
San Francisco, California   94102

  Re:   I.00-08-002  Subpoenas Served on Enron Power
Marketing, Inc. ("EPMI"), Enron Energy Services Operations Inc. and Enron
Energy Services Inc. (collectively referred to as "EES"), Enron Energy
Marketing Corporation ("EEMC"), and Portland General Electric Corporation
("Portland General")(collectively sometimes referred to as the "Enron
Entities")

Harvey,

 Here are our proposals with respect to the Enron Entities'
production of documents pursuant to the above described subpoenas issued by
the California Public Utility Commission (hereinafter "the Commission").
The Enron Entities are willing to assist the Commission in undertaking its
investigation into the problems in the California electric markets by
producing the information specified on a timely basis.  We believe that the
limited production we propose will enable the Commission to commence its
investigation much sooner than if the parties were forced to litigate all of
the potential objections to the requests for production, which are, by any
standard, extremely broad and could involve millions of pages of documents.
We make these proposals pursuant to our email exchange of October 3, 2000
with the understanding that the Commission agrees that by cooperating,
offering to produce or producing documents, the Enron Entities have not
waived any objections or challenges to these subpoenas whatsoever and that
any claims, defenses, objections, jurisdictional or otherwise or other
responses have been specifically reserved and can be raised in the future,
if necessary.   For all of these proposals, we exclude documents that are
protected from disclosure by the attorney client and attorney work product
privileges.

 Generally speaking, the Enron Entities propose to produce documents
for year 2000 as noted below.  We also understand that the Commission will
be obtaining documents from the ISO and PX and we will not attempt here to
duplicate documents that we understand will be produced by those entities.
As you will see in the general documents that are offered here for
production, Enron Energy Services Operations, Inc. is the parent of Enron
Energy Services, Inc. and does not have operating authority or engage in
wholesale or retail purchases or sales of energy.  Thus, the documents
offered here with respect to those two entities originates with Enron Energy
Services, Inc. but we have designated them both as EES.  We also do not
propose to offer duplicative documents as between the Enron Entities.

GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Requests 1 through 4

 Because of the dynamic nature of the Enron Entities' businesses, the
burden and expense on them to locate, and produce every corporate
organizational chart anywhere in their organizations since April 1, 1998 is
significant.   The Enron Entities will provide the Commission with exemplars
of their current organizational charts, telephone directories and so called

2000 and the electronic Transaction
Documents in the second wave

7 through 11

 The Enron Entities will produce their public filings for the period
requested with respect


Message-ID: <12465868.1075845064180.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 04:52:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: mark.haedicke@enron.com
To: orlando.gonzalez@enron.com
Subject: Re: Enron Global Assets Board Slates
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Mark E Haedicke
X-To: Orlando Gonzalez
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Mark_Haedicke_Oct2001\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: HAEDICKE-M
X-FileName: mhaedic.nsf

Orlando;

I am ok with the your suggestion.  Hope you are doing well.

Mark

	Orlando Gonzalez@ENRON
	04/17/2001 06:18 AM

		 To: Bruce Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Enron Global Assets Board Slates

In order to finalize the board composition for the Annual shareholders
meeting to be held on April 30 I suggest the following:

The board according to the by laws has permanent members (min 4, max 7) and
alternates (min 2, max 4).  We are also required to have an employee
representative as a permanent member and an alternate.  We would like to have
a maximun participation of local residents in order to facilitate board
meetings.

Permanent members:                            Alternates:
 Employee rep                                        Employee rep
Orlando  Gonzalez                                  Jim Hughes,
Joe Kishkill                                               John Novak
 Rebecca McDonald                                Jeff Sommers
Jim Derrick
Joao Carlos Albuquerque
Britaldo
Soares
                                                          This allows for
five local residents and the Houston membership we needed.  I would like your
opinion as soon as possible so I can discuss with Rebecca in order to elect
the board on April 30th.  Thanks Orlando

From: Mark E Haedicke@ECT on 27/03/2001 15:49 CDT
To: Orlando Gonzalez/SA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Bruce Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: Enron Global Assets Board Slates

I am ok with your slate, but need some Houston people on board as well.  I
think we can shorten the Houston list by taking me off since John Novak will
be on the board.  I leave it to Bruce to see if it makes sense to shorten the
list further.  Mark

	Orlando Gonzalez@ENRON
	03/27/2001 01:51 PM

		 To: Bruce Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark E
Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Enron Global Assets Board Slates

Did you  get a chance to review the Elektro board make up.  I would like to
finalize before the next ordinary shareholder meeting in Brazil.   Thanks

---------------
See attached regarding Elektro's board membership.  We would suggest that the
board slate be made up of Brazil residents in order to facilitate the
necessary meetings. I would like to include Joe Kishkill, John Novak, Brett
Wiggs, Britaldo Soares and Joao Carlos Albuquerque, all members of our
executive committee to substitute Rick Waddell, Diomedes, Jim Bannantine, and
Rick Lammers.  If  you agree, I will talk to Rebecca to finalize.  Thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Orlando Gonzalez/SA/Enron on 03/06/2001
05:17 PM ---------------------------

Orlando Gonzalez
02/04/2001 10:35 PM
To: Bruce Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: James A Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rebecca McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Jeffrey E Sommers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Peter E
Weidler/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Enron Global Assets Board Slates

Bruce,  This solution does not work for Brazilian entities for legal
reasons.    I will send a summary of the current situation and a proposal to
resolve. We can discuss during your visit.  Thanks

Bruce Lundstrom@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
31/01/2001 19:26
To: Mariella Mahan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Peter E
Weidler/NA/Enron@Enron, Orlando Gonzalez/SA/Enron@Enron, Christopher B
Hunt/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOP


Message-ID: <29594335.1075853247416.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2000 02:30:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: britt.davis@enron.com
To: matthias.lee@enron.com
Subject: Re: D3605/In re M/V PACIFIC VIRGO
Cc: janice.moore@enron.com, alan.aronowitz@enron.com, harry.collins@enron.com,
	richard.sanders@enron.com, michael.robison@enron.com,
	deborah.shahmoradi@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: janice.moore@enron.com, alan.aronowitz@enron.com, harry.collins@enron.com,
	richard.sanders@enron.com, michael.robison@enron.com,
	deborah.shahmoradi@enron.com
X-From: Britt Davis
X-To: Matthias Lee
X-cc: Janice R Moore, Alan Aronowitz, Harry M Collins, Richard B Sanders, Michael A Robison, Deborah Shahmoradi
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Richard_Sanders_Oct2001\Notes Folders\Pacific virgo
X-Origin: Sanders-R
X-FileName: rsanders.nsf

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL:  ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, ATTORNEY WORK
PRODUCT

Matt,

Thanks for the heads-up on this issue.  I will confer with Janice and one of
us will get back to you.

Meanwhile, I think I may need further clarification about  what testing
methods were used by SGS at loadport and at discharge in Thailand and the
Phillipines.  My key area of concern is whether (as now appears unlikely from
your e-mail) SGS tested using both ASTM D3605 without ashing and ASTM D3605
with ashing at all the relevant points, and whether the test results were
consistent; e.g., whether the product was on-spec for both methods
immediately before loading, but off-spec for both methods at discharge in
Thailand and the Phillipines.  May I impose on you to provide one summary
chronology of the analysis done at loadport and both discharge ports, with
particular emphasis on (a) whether both testing methods (ASTM D3605 without
ashing and with ashing) were used, and the results, and (b) the results for
filterable dirt? (You have just sent something like this for the Thailand
cargo only, which I found very helpful).   Also, if SGS or anyone else has
made comment about the reliability or unreliability of the filterable dirt
analysis (or any other aspect of the testing done by SGS of this cargo),
please let me know about that as well.

I appreciate your good help.

    Britt

	Matthias Lee@ECT
	08/08/2000 06:39 AM

		 To: Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Britt Davis/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angeline
Poon/SIN/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: D3605

Dear Janice / Britt

I know that Janice has kindly agreed to return to the team to advise and
coordinate with Mike Brown's team and myself in regard to the D3605 issue,
whilst I am to look to Britt's guidance for the contamination on the Elang
cargo. My apologies therefore for mixing the issues for the puposes of this
e-mail.

The joint testing of samples of the Elang cargo is planned to take place end
next week. The joint testing would include metals as well as filterable dirt,
so we would need to decide, in quite short order, on the test method we want
to propose for metals for relevant parties to agree.

Although we believe the contamination would be dramatically demonstrated by
the level of filterable dirt, the metals clearly would also be an important
factor. As you may be aware, the loadport sample results which we are
presently relying on to say that the cargo was on spec when loaded, was
tested with "ashing" for metals. We would not be able to say whether another
loadport sample would test on spec for metals using straight D3605. If it
doesn't test on spec at the joint testing using straight D3605, the vessel
owners would surely argue that the cargo would have been rejected by First
Gas anyway, independent of the filterable dirt. Although such as argument may
not defeat our case entirely, it is very likely to impact on the quantum we
would be able to recover.

It seems that the preferred test method for metals at the joint te

3605 issue over European experts and was wondering whether we have


Message-ID: <30716170.1075846727234.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 09:06:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: susan.scott@enron.com
To: keith.petersen@enron.com
Subject: Re: Caithness Big Sandy LLC
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Susan Scott
X-To: Keith Petersen
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Susan_Scott_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: SCOTT-S
X-FileName: sscott3.nsf

Thanks Keith.  Feel free to coordinate with Jeff to put together a meeting to
get the info you need.  I do not know the answer to your questions offhand,
and Ron is out this week.

Keith Petersen
07/26/2000 09:47 AM
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Caithness Big Sandy LLC

The prior notice blanket was a possibility, but with the change in diameters
it most likely won't work.  I agree with you a 7 (c) filing would be
required.  I noticed they are discussing environmental information below, but
what is the status of preparing the reports?  If we are to make the filing,
we need a meeting to make sure that everyone is gathering the proper
information.  In some of our other filings we conducted town hall meetings
prior to survey work to gain support of the people.  This should be being.

A question I have is "will the mainline need to be expanded?"  How do they
plan to serve the load from a fully subscribed pipe? (I believe it is fully
subscribed)

Thanks
Keith

	From:  Susan Scott                           07/21/2000 04:15 PM

To: Keith Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Caithness Big Sandy LLC

According to my research, this project (which involves construction by TW of
a lateral consisting of about 40 miles of at least 16" pipe to provide
service to a power plant) would require a 7(c) certificate.  Do you concur?
Any comments?
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 07/21/2000
04:12 PM ---------------------------

Jeffery Fawcett
07/21/2000 12:36 PM
To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Julia
White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Keith Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen
Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Terry Galassini/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ronald
Matthews/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Earl Chanley/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Darrell Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rod
Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Alicia Goodrow/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James
Centilli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Lorraine M. Lindberg, Christine Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, TK
Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michelle Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: Caithness Big Sandy LLC

TW and Caithness met in Denver this week for the first face-to-face meeting
between the parties.  The purpose of the meeting was to review the status of
the Caithness Big Sandy Project and to establish the next steps for moving
the project forward.

Caithness Corporation
Caithness Corp. is a privately held company based in New York with a variety
of business interests.  The company is essentially a financial vehicle for
private investors.  Their energy segment currently owns 1,200 MW of
generation through renewable assets in California (geothermal at Coso, wind
in Tehachapi and Palm Springs) and a gas fired plant in South Carolina
jointly-owned by Florida Power & Light.

Big Sandy Project
The Big Sandy Project is a proposed power plant to be located near Wickieup,
Arizona.  The project would be built in two phases- first phase would be 550
MW, with a gas load of approx. 80,000 MMBtu/d, and phase 2 would add another
170 MW for a total of 720 MW with a gas load of 120,000 MMBtu/d.

The proposed location of the plant is approximately 40 miles south of
Transwestern's pipeline.  The take-off point on Transwestern would be at/near
valve station #1008, approximately 15 miles downstream of compressor Station
#1.  The current es

93 south to a location 2 miles southeast


Message-ID: <1838313.1075857629145.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 01:18:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: john.arnold@enron.com
To: russell.diamond@enron.com
Subject: FW: details for long term flat price swap on Nat Gas Houston Ship
	 Channel Inside FERC
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: John Arnold
X-To: Russell Diamond
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \John_Arnold_Jun2001\Notes Folders\Discussion threads
X-Origin: Arnold-J
X-FileName: Jarnold.nsf

Russell:
Just fyi, they're willing to take us for 20 years.
---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 05/10/2001 08:17
AM ---------------------------
From: Eric Bass/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/10/2001 07:42 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: details for long term flat price swap on Nat Gas Houston Ship
Channel Inside FERC

John,
Attached are the volumes associated with the 20 yr Soc Gen deal we talked
about.  I have yet to hear from credit.  I will let you know the status as it
becomes available.

Eric

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Alexander.WERNER@us.socgen.com@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Alexander+2EWERNER+40us+2Esocgen+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 7:34 AM
To: Bass, Eric
Subject: details for long term flat price swap on Nat Gas Houston Ship
Channel Inside FERC

Hi Eric,

Please find below the detailed terms of a possible deal that we have been
talking about during our phone conversation this morning.

Nature of deal : If the transaction takes place, Societe Generale would sell a
financial fixed price swap (flat price, not basis differential) to Enron. The
monthly settlement would be financial. There would not be any  exchange of
physical product.

Period of the deal : June 1st, 2001 to January 31st, 2021.

Used Reference :  Natural Gas-Houston Ship Channel Index Inside FERC , monthly
settlement.

Volumes of the financial swap transaction : Please find below the volumes
given
month by month in MMBTU.

(See attached file: volumes-10-5-01-for-Enron.xls)

Since there is a tiny chance that the deal trades today, could you please
check
if you have credit with SG for this period.
If not, could you find out how much time it approximately takes to get the
credit.
In terms of credit, SG is good with Enron for this period.

Thank you,

Alexander Werner

 **************************************************************************
The information contained herein is confidential and is intended solely
for the addressee(s).  It shall not be construed as a recommendation to
buy or sell any security.  Any unauthorized access, use, reproduction,
disclosure or dissemination is prohibited.

Neither SOCIETE GENERALE nor any of its subsidiaries or affiliates
shall assume any legal liability or responsibility for any incorrect,
misleading or altered information contained herein.
 **************************************************************************

**************************************************************************
The information contained herein is confidential and is intended solely
for the addressee(s).  It shall not be construed as a recommendation to
buy or sell any security.  Any unauthorized access, use, reproduction,
disclosure or dissemination is prohibited.
Neither SOCIETE GENERALE nor any of its subsidiaries or affiliates
shall assume any legal liability or responsibility for any incorrect,
misleading or altered information contained herein.
**************************************************************************

 - volumes-10-5-01-for-Enron.xls


Message-ID: <5271149.1075846322863.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 07:26:00 -0800 (PST)
From: christi.nicolay@enron.com
To: tom.briggs@enron.com, cynthia.sandherr@enron.com
Subject: (Has TVA info) FERC Staff Investigations on Midwest and Southeast
 Bulk Power Systems
Cc: steven.kean@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: steven.kean@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com
X-From: Christi L Nicolay
X-To: Tom Briggs, Cynthia Sandherr
X-cc: Steven J Kean, Richard Shapiro, James D Steffes
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Steven_Kean_Dec2000_1\Notes Folders\Calendar\Untitled
X-Origin: KEAN-S
X-FileName: skean.nsf

Tom and Cynthia--The SE reports includes some dings against TVA.

On 11/1/00, FERC Staff issued reports on its Investigation of Bulk Power
Markets in the Eastern Interconnection.  These reports were the result of a
Commission order earlier this summer.  Enron's Federal regulatory staff
(Christi, Charles Yeung, and Sarah Novosel) provided a great deal of
information for this investigation and Joe Hartsoe and Donna Fulton discussed
many of the problems with the grid with the new head of Staff, Scott Miller
(who recently joined FERC from PG&E Gen).    While the Commission is under no
obligation to take any of Staff's recommendations, the Commission typically
looks to Staff for guidance on transmission and market issues.  Importantly,
Staff concludes that the Commission should consider these options for the
Southeast and Midwest -- all of which Enron has been asking FERC to implement
for several years:

Reduce the advantages of network service over point to point service by
requiring that native load be served under the same tariff as other
transmission services to eliminate the current incentives that VIUs have to
favor their native load through the calculation of ATC and handling of
interconnection requests.

While the Staff Hotline is used productively, the Commission can direct Staff
to conduct formal investigations into entities that have a pattern of
complaints.

The Commission could require TPs to submit tariff provisions containing a pro
forma interconnection process specific to interconnection, rather than simply
relying on the Tennessee Power order that utilizes the OATT timelines and
procedures.

Require TPs to retain real-time transmission data on market functions
pertaining to daily load, internal generation to meet that load, and imports
and exports.

RTOs should submit the basis and methods for calculating ATC and TTC, as well
as standardized criteria for curtailment.  In addition, since even such
standardized criteria might not "get to the root of the problem" -- that
control area still control generation -- the Commission could require that
each RTO set a date certain by which it will create one control area.
Regardless of the implementation of these two options, the Commission could
standardize ATC and TTC methodology.

Staff finds that while electricity is a commodity with market characteristics
similar to many other commodities, it is still viewed as "different," with a
reaction of price caps.  Staff encourages that basic decisions about the
regulatory model be made in order to complete the transition from a
traditional cost-of-service model to a model that uses markets to price the
commodity and services.

DETAILS  (Also, the reports contain good summaries of the generation,
transmission, state retail, federal reg. and other issues for the region):

Midwest:  The Midwest is dominated by vertically integrated Transmission
Providers ("TPs") that control transmission, generation and load.  "As such,
they have weak economic incentives to provide access to transmission service
to third-parties and strong incentives to favor their own services."  Staff
received numerous complaints; however, due to the lack of information
availabl

Christi L Nicolay
Tom Briggs, Cynthia Sandherr


Message-ID: <32870508.1075862096143.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2001 06:43:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: trevor.woods@enron.com
To: e.taylor@enron.com
Subject: FW: Regulatory Rollback Under Bush Has a Major Impact on Economy
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-From: Woods, Trevor </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TWOODS>
X-To: Taylor, Michael E </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Mtaylor5>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \MTAYLOR5 (Non-Privileged)\Taylor, Michael E\Inbox\Nox Model\websites
X-Origin: Taylor-M
X-FileName: MTAYLOR5 (Non-Privileged).pst

 -----Original Message-----
From: =09Siegel, Adam =20
Sent:=09Friday, August 03, 2001 8:34 AM
To:=09Woods, Trevor
Subject:=09RE: Regulatory Rollback Under Bush Has a Major Impact on Economy

Nope, but I would call up some of the SCR manufacturers, Babcock and Wilcox=
, ABB, GE.  Also, did you see the article in that same issue of Clean Air C=
ompliance about AEP Ammonia on Demand.  It's gonna be all about urea baby. =
 I would figure out a strategy fast, after it's in a news article its prett=
y much too late.  As clueless as the NOXTech guys are it may be worth picki=
ng their brains to try to get some insight. Call me if you want to bounce s=
ome ideas around.=20

-Adam

P.S. Wouldn't you want to buy ammonia if you think there is going to be mor=
e demand for it?

 -----Original Message-----
From: =09Woods, Trevor =20
Sent:=0903 August 2001 14:24
To:=09Siegel, Adam
Subject:=09RE: Regulatory Rollback Under Bush Has a Major Impact on Economy

Got it.  Looks like the ammonia market is long and has a ton of diverse pla=
yers.  Did you do analysis on what the demand of the SCRs would be?  I'm wo=
ndering if we couldn't sell it as a hedge as opposed to a spec play.  The m=
ore SCRs the more ammonia goes up and the cost of allowances go down (in th=
eory).

 -----Original Message-----
From: =09Siegel, Adam =20
Sent:=09Friday, August 03, 2001 7:58 AM
To:=09Woods, Trevor
Subject:=09RE: Regulatory Rollback Under Bush Has a Major Impact on Economy

yup, it's in today's journal

 -----Original Message-----
From: =09Woods, Trevor =20
Sent:=0903 August 2001 13:30
To:=09adam.siegel@enron.com@ENRON <mailto:adam.siegel@enron.com@ENRON>
Subject:=09RE: Regulatory Rollback Under Bush Has a Major Impact on Economy

The link didn't work.  Is this in today's journal?  I'll forward you an ema=
il from Jeff Keeler.  Nobody here seems very concerned with her comments.  =
From our regulatory, to a few traders.

 -----Original Message-----
From: =09adam.siegel@enron.com@ENRON <mailto:adam.siegel@enron.com@ENRON> [=
mailto:IMCEANOTES-adam+2Esiegel+40enron+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com] <mailto:[m=
ailto:IMCEANOTES-adam+2Esiegel+40enron+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]>=20
Sent:=09Friday, August 03, 2001 5:29 AM
To:=09Woods, Trevor
Subject:=09Regulatory Rollback Under Bush Has a Major Impact on Economy

[IMAGE]

 [IMAGE] [IMAGE]    WSJ.com << File: <http://www.wsj.com> >>  [IMAGE]      =
   [IMAGE]        Read the paragraph further down in the article about Whit=
man.  May not be as bearish as I thought.  -Adam          [IMAGE]          =
[IMAGE]Regulatory Rollback Under Bush Has a Major Impact on Economy << File=
: <http://wsj.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=3DviewThis&e=
tMailToID=3D89677612> >>                  Click the following to access the=
 sent link:   SAVE THIS link << File: <http://wsj.savethis.clickability.com=
/st/saveThisPopupApp?clickMap=3DsaveFromET&partnerID=3D150&etMailToID=3D896=
77612> >>  FORWARD THIS link << File: <http://wsj.emailthis.clickability.co=
m/et/emailThis?clickMap=3Dforward&etMailToID=3D89677612&partnerID=3D150> >>=
     Please note, the sender's email address has not been verified.      Ge=
t your EMAIL THIS Browser Button and use it to email information from any W=
eb site. [IMAGE] << File: <http://wsj.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailTh=
is?clickMap=3DbrowserButtons> >>         [IMAGE]     =09

******


Message-ID: <12217776.1075858556955.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 12:08:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: gerald.nemec@enron.com
To: debra.perlingiere@enron.com
Subject: FW: Your summer clerk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Nemec, Gerald </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=GNEMEC>
X-To: Perlingiere, Debra </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Dperlin>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Nemec, Gerald (Non-Privileged)\Nemec, Gerald\Sent Items
X-Origin: Nemec-G
X-FileName: Nemec, Gerald (Non-Privileged).pst

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Nachawati, Nabil, M" <nnachawa@Central.UH.EDU>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Nachawati+2C+20Nabil+2C+20M+22+20+3Cnnachawa+40Central+2EUH+2EEDU+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, August 01, 2001 7:31 PM
To:	Nemec, Gerald
Subject:	RE: Your summer clerk

 Gerald,

I am so sorry, I honestly forgot about lunch. No excuses on my part, I feel
soooo bad. If you two are not totally mad at me, then perhaps, we can really
have lunch again on me. I feel like an idiot. I hope you and Debra will
forgive me. Tell Debra I apologize for missing lunch. I will e-mail her
myself. Anyway, e-mail me back please to let me know.

Sorry,

Majed
-----Original Message-----
From: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com
To: nnachawa@Central.UH.EDU
Sent: 8/1/01 5:22 PM
Subject: RE: Your summer clerk

Where were you?  We waited and waited.  Debra says that you owe her two
lunches now!

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Nachawati, Nabil, M" <nnachawa@Central.UH.EDU>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Nachawati+2C+20Nabil+2C+20M+22+20+3Cnnachawa+40Cen
tral+2EUH+2EEDU+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

   Sent:   Thursday, July 26, 2001 2:35 PM
   To:     Nemec, Gerald
   Subject:  RE: Your summer clerk

    That sounds great to me, see you on Wed.

   Majed
   -----Original Message-----
   From: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com
   To: nnachawa@Central.UH.EDU
   Sent: 7/26/01 12:06 PM
   Subject: RE: Your summer clerk

   Let's plan on Wednesday.  How about we meet at Treebeard's in the
tunnel
   around 12.  Let me know if that works for you.  If you are not a fan
of
   Treebeards we can do something else.

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   "Nachawati, Nabil, M" <nnachawa@Central.UH.EDU>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Nachawati+2C+20Nabil+2C+20M+22+20+3Cnnachawa+40Cen
   tral+2EUH+2EEDU+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

      Sent:   Wednesday, July 25, 2001 10:22 AM
      To:     Nemec, Gerald
      Subject:  RE: Your summer clerk

       Tuesday is fine with me, or in the alternative, Wed. is also
fine.
   Just
      let
      me know Gerald, since I know you might have lunch plans with one
of
   your
      girlfriends j/k.

      Talk to you soon,

      Majed
      -----Original Message-----
      From: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com
      To: nnachawa@Central.UH.EDU
      Sent: 7/23/01 5:07 PM
      Subject: RE: Your summer clerk

      No problem.  I will just destroy the direct deposit slip.  Good
luck
      with
      the write on competition.  Lunch sounds great.  This week is kind
of
      busy
      but maybe next week.  Tuesday or Wednesday?  Yes, I guess we can
   allow
      Debra to go with us.

      Gerald

          -----Original Message-----
         From:   "Nachawati, Nabil, M" <nnachawa@Central.UH.EDU>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Nachawati+2C+20Nabil+2C+20M+22+20+3Cnnachawa+40Cen
      tral+2EUH+2EEDU+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

         Sent:   Monday, July 23, 2001 2:54 PM
         To:     Nemec, Gerald
         Subject:  Your summer clerk

         Gerald,

         I am so sorry that I have not gotten back with you regarding
the
      message
         you
         left me. I have just been so busy with the write on competition
   for
      law
         review. It is finally over thank god. Anyway, I have electronic
      deposit,
         so
         I don't need my check stub. How is everything with your new
clerk?
   I
         hope
         all is well with you. Let me know wh


Message-ID: <13007960.1075855815767.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 02:10:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: steve.beck@enron.com
To: sally.beck@enron.com
Subject: Enron Europe - BRM 2000
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Steve Beck
X-To: Sally Beck
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Sally_Beck_Dec2000\Notes Folders\Brm
X-Origin: Beck-S
X-FileName: sbeck.nsf

---------------------- Forwarded by Steve Beck/HOU/EES on 05/12/2000 09:09 AM
---------------------------

nicholas.swingler@uk.arthurandersen.com on 05/12/2000 08:39:48 AM
To: sbeck@enron.com
cc: simon.b.prew@uk.arthurandersen.com, john.e.sorrells@us.arthurandersen.com
Subject: Enron Europe - BRM 2000

Sally

Fernley has requested that we forward to you a copy of the Enron Europe BRM
2000
plan.

Please let me know should you have any further queries or comments.

Regards

Nic

(Embedded image moved to file: pic30127.pcx)

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If you
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery
of
the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to
anyone.
In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by
reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent
to
Internet email for messages of this kind.  Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this message that do not relate to the official business of my
firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

 - pic30127.pcx


Message-ID: <31590112.1075851599598.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 15:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: dottyhop@napanet.net
To: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
Subject: Re: Fw: Dubya--Who cares . . .
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Dotty Hopkins  <dottyhop@napanet.net>
X-To: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Dasovich, Jeff (Non-Privileged)\Dasovich, Jeff\Deleted Items
X-Origin: DASOVICH-J
X-FileName: Dasovich, Jeff (Non-Privileged).pst

Well that's great!  By all means give Jim a call.  His name is James Docker.
email address is tsrdoc@mcn.org.  My phone file is in my car with Jack at
the moment, so thought email might suffice.  I can add phone later.
Good luck with the vines.
Dotty
----- Original Message -----
From: <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>
To: "Dotty Hopkins" <dottyhop@napanet.net>
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 8:13 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: Dubya--Who cares . . .

>
> Greetings Ms Dotty.  Hope you've managed to stay a night or two in your
> house recently.  Do you think that it would be OK to call your cousin in
> Sea Ranch?  I have some carpentry work I'd like done on my property (panel
> interior of cabin; build deck and gazebo) and thought I might get him, or
> someone who works for/with him, or someone he could recommend to help me
> out.  If you think he wouldn't mind having me call, might you have his
> phone number (and full name)?  As always, greatly appreciated.
>
> FYI:  Just talked to the guy from UC Davis who's in the field for
Mendocino
> County.  He says that by the sound of it, my property just might end up
> being vine-friendly!
>
> All the best,
> Jeff
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
> **********************************************************************
>
>


Message-ID: <28421129.1075853185459.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 02:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: richard.sanders@enron.com
To: mark.palmer@enron.com
Subject: Revised Draft Proposal to CPUC
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Richard B Sanders
X-To: Mark Palmer
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Richard_Sanders_Oct2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: Sanders-R
X-FileName: rsanders.nsf

----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 10/06/2000 09:41 AM -----

	"Fergus, Gary S." <GFergus@brobeck.com>
	10/05/2000 09:33 PM

		 To: "'Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com'" <Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com>,
"'msmith1@enron.com'" <msmith1@enron.com>, "'David_Aamodt@pgn.com'"
<David_Aamodt@pgn.com>, "MBD" <MDay@GMSSR.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Revised Draft Proposal to CPUC

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE

DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT

Harvey Morris Esq.
California Public Utilities Commission
505 Public Utilities Commission
San Francisco, California   94102

  Re:   I.00-08-002  Subpoenas Served on Enron Power
Marketing, Inc. ("EPMI"), Enron Energy Services Inc. ("EES"), Enron Energy
Marketing Corporation ("EEMC"), Enron Energy Services Operations Inc. (EESO)
and Portland General Electric Corporation ("Portland General")(collectively
sometimes referred to as the "Enron Entities")

Harvey,

 Here are our proposals with respect to the Enron Entities'
production of documents pursuant to the above described subpoenas issued by
the California Public Utility Commission (hereinafter "the Commission").
The Enron Entities are willing to assist the Commission in undertaking its
investigation into the problems in the California electric markets by
producing a limited quantity of specified information on a timely basis.  We
believe that the limited production we propose will enable the Commission to
commence its investigation much sooner than if the parties were forced to
litigate all of the potential objections to the requests for production,
which are, by any standard, extremely broad and could involve millions of
pages of documents.  We make these proposals pursuant to our email exchange
of October 3, 2000 with the understanding that the Commission agrees that by
cooperating, offering to produce or producing documents, the Enron Entities
have not waived any objections or challenges to these subpoenas whatsoever
and that any claims, defenses, objections, jurisdictional or otherwise or
other responses have been specifically reserved and can be raised in the
future, if necessary.   For all of these proposals, we exclude documents
that are protected from disclosure by the attorney client and attorney work
product privileges.

 [SUBJECT TO VERIFICATION:  Generally speaking, the documents and
information that the Commission seeks can be found, if they exist, within
EPMI, EES and Portland General.  To the extent that EEMC or EESO are
relevant to the Commission's investigation, any documents would be located
within EES.  Thus, we do not anticipate specific document productions from
either EEMC or EESO.]

GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Requests 1 through 4

 The Enron Entities have been very dynamic organizations having
acquired, sold, divested, joint ventured, spun off and otherwise reorganized
themselves extensively during the past two years.  The burden and expense on
Enron to locate, and produce every corporate organizational chart anywhere
in its organization since April 1, 1998 is significant.   The Enron entities
will provide the Commission with exemplars of its current organizational
charts, telephone directories and so called "family trees" to show its
current organization.  To the extent that Enron can readily identify and
locate exemplars of significant organizational charts, telephone directories
or so called "family trees" for earlier periods it will also make those
available.  One Enron Entity, Portland General, has published books on its
corporate history.  If a list of th


Message-ID: <26670570.1075861214773.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 08:26:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: community-relations@enron.com
To: hrgim@enron.com
Subject: Thank you for your Contribution!  Together we CAN change lives!
Cc: charles.weldon@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: charles.weldon@enron.com
X-From: community-relations@enron.com@ENRON <IMCEANOTES-community-relations+40enron+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com>
X-To: HRGIM </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MBX_HRGIM>
X-cc: Weldon, V. Charles </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=VWELDON>
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \VWELDON (Non-Privileged)\Weldon, V. Charles\Misc.
X-Origin: Weldon-C
X-FileName: VWELDON (Non-Privileged).pst

Thank you for changing lives.

Employee ID:  90041142
Name:  V. Charles Weldon
Payment Amount:  180.00
Payment Method:  Deduct a portion from each paycheck
Leadership Giving Roster:  No
Make a Difference Club:  Not Applicable
Mailing Address:
13006 BRAYTON COURT
HOUSTON , TX  77065
US
Your donation is designated for:  United Way of the Texas Gulf Coast
Written Acknowledgement of Contribution:  No

	"You will find, as you look back on your life, that the moments that
stand out are
	the moments when you have done things for others."
		-Henry Drummond

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Message-ID: <18359739.1075843460475.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 02:25:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: michael.tribolet@enron.com
To: lisa.mellencamp@enron.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com,
	william.bradford@enron.com
Subject: FW: Regulatory Update
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Michael Tribolet
X-To: Lisa Mellencamp, Jeff Dasovich, William S Bradford
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Jeff_Dasovich_June2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: DASOVICH-J
X-FileName: jdasovic.nsf

See bolded comment below:

 -----Original Message-----
From:  EFeo@milbank.com@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-EFeo+40milbank+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 11:35 PM
To: awirum@pillsburywinthrop.com; fallon_annamarie@jpmorgan.com;
alafaire@exchange.ml.com; PAronzon@milbank.com; byong@llgm.com;
bgreene2@mail.state.tn.us; bholman@whitecase.com; bkrakauer@sidley.com;
fishbcr@whitecase.com; ceklund@llgm.com; clara.strand@bankofamerica.com;
DDR0@pge.com; dan_faltermeier@dynegy.com; david.adante@davey.com;
MDayen@milbank.com; dnelson@gwfpower.com;
elizabeth.h.baird@bankofamerica.com; eric.carlson@eycapadvisors.com;
EFeo@milbank.com; lengel@brobeck.com; gmkaplan@hrice.com; gbush@bankofny.com;
SGautier@milbank.com; gerald.keenan@us.pwcglobal.com;
grant_kolling@city.palo-alto.ca.us; gbaer@pillsburywinthrop.com;
GMR2@pge.com; jostevenson@bankofny.com; james.drzemiecki@us.pwcglobal.com;
jlhuemoe@llgm.com; jlopes@hrice.com; jnexon@hrice.com; jwhite@brobeck.com;
jwilson@saybrook.net; jbloom@whitecase.com; jpiassick@kilpatrickstockton.com;
john.c.herbert@dynegy.com; jklauber@llgm.com; jschotz@saybrook.net;
jeisenberg@exchange.ml.com; jrosenthal@saybrook.net; jthomas@saybrook.net;
juhase_kathleen@jpmorgan.com; kcoleman@gibsondunn.com;
keith.marshall@usbank.com; ken.buckfire@drkw.com; ksmith@deltapower.com;
krussak@pillsburywinthrop.com; KMH5@pge.com; TKreller@milbank.com;
Mellencamp, Lisa; freddie.reiss@us.pwcglobal.com;
margery.neis@us.pwcglobal.com; AMarks@milbank.com;
martin.nachimson@eycapadvisors.com; KMcspadden@milbank.com; Tribolet,
Michael; michael.bruder@drkw.com; mahrens@smrh.com;
michael.hamilton@us.pwcglobal.com; Mjhamilt@bellatlantic.net;
mhindus@pillsburywinthrop.com; mlurie@exchange.ml.com; RMoore@milbank.com;
PNaegely@milbank.com; nmillard@whitecase.com; FNeufeld@milbank.com;
toth_norma@jpmorgan.com; pwarden@pillsburywinthrop.com;
rlapping@thelenreid.com; rkampfner@brobeck.com; robert_b._lynch@chase.com;
rblum@thelenreid.com; rocky.ho@us.pwcglobal.com; RJP2@pge.com;
srahman@deltapower.com; MSorochinsky@milbank.com; tponsford@smrh.com;
tom.lumsden@us.pwcglobal.com; tpatters@sidley.com; tmilne@mail.state.tn.us;
wevanoff@sidley.com; DZolkin@milbank.com
Subject: Regulatory Update

New developments:
1.  The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has issued a public
notice (see attached) regarding certain pleadings that were filed for
purposes of requesting emergency relief for qualifying facilities (QFs).  The
FERC's Notice states that Ridgewood Power LLC (Ridgewood) submitted a Request
for Emergency Relief and an Updated Request for Emergency Relief, on March 8,
2001 and April 9, 2001, respectively, requesting the FERC to take action to
prevent QF capacity from going off-line in the State of California.
Ridgewood asks the FERC to take actions that will permit those QFs in
California that have not been paid fully for past power deliveries to enter
arrangements to temporarily sell to third-party buyers within California.
Ridgewood asks the FERC to declare that California electric utilities cannot
deny transmission access to QFs or otherwise frustrate the ability of QFs to
sell to third-party purchasers.
Similarly, the California Cogeneration Council (Cogeneration Council) on
April 9, 2001, filed a Motion for Emergency Relief requesting the FERC to
take action to prevent QFs from going off-line in the State of Californi


Message-ID: <22888767.1075862348679.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 13:45:16 -0800 (PST)
From: slipin@brunswickgroup.com
To: j..kean@enron.com
Subject:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Steve Lipin <slipin@BrunswickGroup.com>
X-To: Kean, Steven J. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=SKEAN>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \SKEAN (Non-Privileged)\Kean, Steven J.\Deleted Items
X-Origin: Kean-S
X-FileName: SKEAN (Non-Privileged).pst

Steve,

What's your direct dial?

Steve Lipin

This email is sent by Brunswick Group Limited, 16 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London, WC2A 3ED (also the registered office). The company is registered in England (No. 2094879).

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify us immediately, then delete this E-mail.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.


Message-ID: <8032615.1075849339240.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 12:02:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To: ken@kdscommunications.com
Subject: Re: One-pager
Cc: janel.guerrero@enron.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com, kdenne@enron.com,
	paul.kaufman@enron.com, sgovenar@govadv.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Bcc: janel.guerrero@enron.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com, kdenne@enron.com,
	paul.kaufman@enron.com, sgovenar@govadv.com
X-From: Jeff Dasovich
X-To: "Ken Smith" <ken@kdscommunications.com>
X-cc: Janel.Guerrero@enron.com, Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com, "Karen Denne" <kdenne@enron.com>, Paul.Kaufman@enron.com, "Scott Govenar" <sgovenar@govadv.com>
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Jeff_Dasovich_Oct2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: DASOVICH-J
X-FileName: jdasovic.nsf

Thanks very much, Ken.  This is a helpful start.

Best,
Jeff

=09"Ken Smith" <ken@kdscommunications.com>
=0907/24/2001 05:50 PM
=09Please respond to "Ken Smith"
=09=09=20
=09=09 To: "Scott Govenar" <sgovenar@govadv.com>, <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>=
, "Karen=20
Denne" <kdenne@enron.com>, <Paul.Kaufman@enron.com>
=09=09 cc: <Janel.Guerrero@enron.com>
=09=09 Subject: One-pager

Regarding the one-pager we discussed today and for discussion in a later=20
call, I wanted to offer a suggestion on an approach.  I=01,d like to see=20
something simple that uses headings to show what Enron has done, what=20
concerns remain, and the steps you expect to take in the future.=20
I've put together some very rough sample bullet points (below) as a start t=
o=20
get everyone thinking and as an example of a format that could be effective=
. =20
A short preface should also be added to set up the bullets, possibly=20
something that says Enron has been working diligently to meet elements of t=
he=20
committee's subpoena despite remaining disgreements.

What Enron has done:
Delivered x number of documents
Spent x man-hours compiling information requested by the committee
Retained a depository in Sacramento for documents
Negotiated in good faith on a continuous basis with the committee
Enron=01,s concerns regarding delivery of additional documents:
The committee has failed to implement an acceptable confidentiality agreeme=
nt=20
that includes sanctions for anyone who breaches the agreement
Confidential documents held by the Legislature -- such as in the Quackenbus=
h=20
case -- have historically found their way to the press or made public, ofte=
n=20
in a selective manner
The broad nature of the committee=01,s request and whether requested docume=
nts=20
are relative to this inquiry
Whether a state legislative committee has jurisdiction over activities that=
=20
involve interstate commerce
What Enron will do:
(Bullets on planned steps)


Message-ID: <32271020.1075844184714.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 09:18:00 -0800 (PST)
From: kevin.hyatt@enron.com
To: bullets@enron.com
Subject: TW Bullets 1/4/01
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Kevin Hyatt
X-To: Bullets
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Michelle_Lokay_Dec2000_June2001_2\Notes Folders\Tw-commercial group
X-Origin: LOKAY-M
X-FileName: mlokay.nsf

Pogo Producing - Pogo executed their interconnect and operating agreement
with TW for the new well they anticipate flowing in early February.  We also
received a  payment for incidental expenses necessary to bring the well into
TW's system; expected volume is 30,000 MMBtu/d into the West Texas lateral.

Capacity Marketing - We have created 4 packages of transportation capacity
with terms of 1 to 2 years that we are offering for sale in 2002 and 2003.
Our desire is to price the space based on spreads between gas indices in San
Juan, Permian, and Cal Border.  Our objective is to close these deals by
early next week.

In addition, we have been working with EnronOnline to establish a consistent
capacity offering of most likely east-end space on their trading platform.
Automated contracting procedures have been established.  Legal is working on
the point descriptions and Credit has the potential customer list to set up
trading limits and approvals.  We should be trading on the system before
month end.

San Juan Pigging - The pigging project using methanol to clean the lateral
began this week.  We should know sometime the week of 1/16 if the work had
the desired effect.

FERC Options Filing - Part of the week was spent strategizing with legal and
regulatory affairs on various scenarios that will likely come up in the FERC
technical conference scheduled for next Tuesday, January 9th.  As owners of
electric generation in California, we have requested both Calpine and Duke
attend the conference in support of TW.

Tri-State G&T - Tri-State is the generation and transmission electric
co-operative that serves the Gallup compressor station.  Enron Compressor
Services executed the confidentiality agreement that enabled TW to get access
to system load information on Tri-State's web site.  Next we will need to
build a computer program that monitors the site and automatically notifies
gas control when a likely electrical peak will be reached on Tri-State's
system.  If TW is able to turn down the Gallup compressor, based on
transportation demand, we may be able to avoid some of the peaking electrical
charges.


Message-ID: <22300443.1075849343559.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 08:40:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: nancy.sellers@robertmondavi.com
To: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
Subject: RE:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Nancy Sellers <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com>
X-To: "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Jeff_Dasovich_Oct2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: DASOVICH-J
X-FileName: jdasovic.nsf

we have some wonderful corn tortilla and avies if you want to make yourself
a quesadilla when you get here.  I am home now and signing off of my e-mail
in about 5 minutes.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 3:28 PM
To: Nancy Sellers
Subject: RE:

oops.

Nancy Sellers

<Nancy.Sellers@RobertMo        To:
"'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'"
ndavi.com>                     <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>

cc:

07/26/2001 05:16 PM            Subject:     RE:

where are you going to find the other 27 people?  We'll be happy to see you

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 2:08 PM
To: Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com
Subject:

i'll be back to switch cars later tonite, but too late for dinner---likely
around 8:30.  love to play some 30 handed cribbage!  thanks again for
dinner last nite.  it was dee-licious.

best,
jeff

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Message-ID: <30718771.1075844408225.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 03:06:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: jonathan.whitehead@enron.com
To: john.suttle@enron.com
Subject: Re: Fw: IBJ ISDA MASTER AGREEMENT
Cc: jane.mcbride@enron.com, john.viverito@enron.com, kevin.cordesman@enron.com,
	mark.taylor@enron.com, morten.pettersen@enron.com,
	steven.kleege@enron.com, tom.bruce-jones@enron.com,
	sara.shackleton@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Bcc: jane.mcbride@enron.com, john.viverito@enron.com, kevin.cordesman@enron.com,
	mark.taylor@enron.com, morten.pettersen@enron.com,
	steven.kleege@enron.com, tom.bruce-jones@enron.com,
	sara.shackleton@enron.com
X-From: Jonathan Whitehead
X-To: John Suttle
X-cc: Jane McBride, John Viverito, Kevin Cordesman, Mark Taylor, Morten E Pettersen, Steven Kleege, Tom Bruce-Jones, Sara Shackleton
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Sara_Shackleton_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: SHACKLETON-S
X-FileName: sshackle.nsf

John, Have had a conversation with IBJ re the CSA, and they have asked us t=
o=20
consider proposing a solution that does not involve a CSA

=09John Viverito
=0909/22/2000 12:04 PM
=09=09
=09=09 To: John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT
=09=09 cc: Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron@ECT, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@ENRON@=
ECT,=20
Jonathan.Whitehead@enron.com, Kevin Cordesman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark=20
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Morten E Pettersen/AP/Enron@Enron@ECT, Steven=20
Kleege/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Bruce-Jones/LON/ECT@ECT
=09=09 Subject: Re: Fw: IBJ ISDA MASTER AGREEMENT

John-

During our last meeting with IBJ, we pushed hard for the implementation of=
=20
the CSA.  I believe that they have the systems capability to handle the=20
requisite activities relating to the CSA, as we understand that they utiliz=
e=20
same with certain financial institution counterparties.  We expressed our=
=20
view on these matters and also raised other issues that we had discussed in=
=20
our recent conference call. =20

IBJ informed us that they have never entered into a CSA with a non-financia=
l=20
institution counterparty and my response was that Enron can then be the=20
first.  We requested that they raise this issue with their respective=20
superiors.  As you know, their response to our discussions relating to this=
=20
issue was "In terms of CSA, as we are not ready for running collateral=20
operations, we still do not prefer to use the CSA."  The legitimacy of this=
=20
statement is certainly debatable and the underlying reason may actually be=
=20
something entirely different, including the possibility that they merely do=
=20
not want to enter into a CSA with a non-financial institution. =20

We will continue to attempt to persuade IBJ to enter into the CSA with Enro=
n,=20
however it is uncertain if this is achievable.

=09John Suttle@ECT
=0909/21/2000 08:52 AM
=09=09
=09=09 To: John Viverito/Corp/Enron@ENRON
=09=09 cc: Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron, Jonathan.Whitehead@enron.com@ENRON,=
 Kevin=20
Cordesman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Morten E=20
Pettersen/AP/Enron@Enron, Steven Kleege/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom=20
Bruce-Jones/LON/ECT@ECT
=09=09 Subject: Re: Fw: IBJ ISDA MASTER AGREEMENT

To clarify, and also getting back to Mark Taylor's argument that IBJ is one=
=20
of the more sophisticated financial enterprises on the planet, and=20
considering the fact that they have agreed to Enron being the Calculation=
=20
Agent, is their argument that they are incapable of mark to market=20
verification?  We calculate - we call for margin - they verify.

I am certain that they calculate mark to market positions with their other=
=20
trading entities, and their argument that they can't do so for Enron is=20
weak.  If they simply refuse a CSA, then we can deal with this as discussed=
=20
in our phone conversation last week, but this argument of theirs should be=
=20
something we can get around don't you think?
=20

From: John Viverito@ENRON


Message-ID: <28650135.1075855646504.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 01:55:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: peter.keavey@enron.com
To: dtencellent@prebon.com
Subject: philly hockey
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Peter F Keavey
X-To: dtencellent@prebon.com
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Peter_Keavey_Dec2000\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: Keavey-P
X-FileName: pkeavey.nsf

---------------------- Forwarded by Peter F Keavey/HOU/ECT on 05/23/2000
08:53 AM ---------------------------

Sarah Mulholland
05/23/2000 07:19 AM
To: Maureen Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter F Keavey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: philly hockey

---------------------- Forwarded by Sarah Mulholland/HOU/ECT on 05/23/2000
07:18 AM ---------------------------

christopher.j.bednar@us.arthurandersen.com on 05/22/2000 07:09:21 PM
To: Sarah.Mulholland@enron.com
cc:
Subject: philly hockey

Enjoy!

---------------------- Forwarded by Christopher J. Bednar on 05/22/2000 06:18
PM
---------------------------

To:   Christopher J. Bednar
cc:
Date: 05/18/2000 09:07 AM
From: Brian Abbott, Philadelphia, 565 / 5709
Subject:  philly hockey

 - phillyhockey.jpg

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If you
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery
of
the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to
anyone.
In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by
reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent
to
Internet email for messages of this kind.  Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this message that do not relate to the official business of my
firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.


Message-ID: <9651227.1075856949867.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 07:20:00 -0800 (PST)
From: vince.kaminski@enron.com
To: vkaminski@aol.com
Subject: Fwd: Credit Markets Group Organisational Announcement.
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Vince J Kaminski
X-To: vkaminski@aol.com
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Vincent_Kaminski_Jun2001_8\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: Kaminski-V
X-FileName: vkamins.nsf

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/30/99
03:20 PM ---------------------------

VKaminski@aol.com on 12/17/99 07:51:05 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Credit Markets Group Organisational Announcement.

Return-Path: <vkamins@ect.enron.com>
Received: from  rly-yb05.mx.aol.com (rly-yb05.mail.aol.com [172.18.146.5]) by
air-yb03.mail.aol.com (v67.6) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 16:58:45 -0500
Received: from  mailman.enron.com (mailman.enron.com [192.152.140.66]) by
rly-yb05.mx.aol.com (v67.6) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 16:58:29 -0500
Received: from dserv1.ect.enron.com (dserv1.ect.enron.com [172.16.1.37]) by
mailman.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/corp-1.03) with ESMTP id VAA25236 for
<vkaminski@aol.com>; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 21:58:19 GMT
Received: from notes.ect.enron.com (notes.ect.enron.com [172.16.4.33]) by
dserv1.ect.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id PAA08866 for
<vkaminski@aol.com>; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 15:58:28 -0600 (CST)
Received: by notes.ect.enron.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5  (863.2 5-20-1999))
id 8625684A.0078B2D6 ; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 15:58:21 -0600
X-Lotus-FromDomain: ECT
From: "Vince J Kaminski" <vkamins@ect.enron.com>
To: vkaminski@aol.com
Message-ID: <8625684A.0078B22B.00@notes.ect.enron.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 15:58:17 -0600
Subject: Credit Markets Group Organisational Announcement.
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/mixed;
Boundary="0__=qApCP1JJUTs7ol0zv2e99Xipkn73060WazlSVx5ZP86MdTcyl1LSBdMc"
Content-Disposition: inline

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/17/99 03:58
PM ---------------------------

Anjam Ahmad
12/07/99 09:33 AM

To:   Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant
      Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:  Credit Markets Group Organisational Announcement.

---------------------- Forwarded by Anjam Ahmad/LON/ECT on 07/12/99 03:32 PM
---------------------------

 (Embedded     Enron Europe
 image moved
 to file:      From:  John Sherriff
 pic31547.pcx) 07/12/99 03:10 PM

Sent by:  Enron Europe General Announcement

To:   ECT Europe, Enron Executive Committee, Jay Fitzgerald/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
      William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Gorte/HOU/ECT@ECT, Monte L
      Gleason/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Ruane/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rick
      L Carson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randy
      Petersen/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Grant
      Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:  Credit Markets Group Organisational Announcement.

(Embedded image moved to file: pic16788.pcx)
We are pleased to announce the formation of the Credit Markets Group which is
responsible for developing innovative products to better manage the risk of
our
internal credit portfolio as well as, looking  for opportunities to provide
third party credit protection.  Initially, we will be making markets in
bankruptcy protection on reference credits which are currently in our
portfolio
but we expect to add additional credit products and reference credits very
quickly.

The team will utilise EnronOnline as its primary trade execution tool, looking
to quickly build market share by capturing the eyes of our current
counterparts.
Simultaneously,  we will launch an external web site focused on credit
protection where potential customers will have access to real time prices and
filter on specific reference credits as well as, access to credit models and
research papers on effective credit risk management.  Ut


Message-ID: <25452867.1075861994355.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 09:04:04 -0800 (PST)
From: mark.whitt@enron.com
To: lowen@reliantenergy.com
Subject: FW: My life
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Whitt, Mark </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MWHITT>
X-To: 'lowen@reliantenergy.com'
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \MWHITT (Non-Privileged)\Whitt, Mark\Sent Items
X-Origin: Whitt-M
X-FileName: MWHITT (Non-Privileged).pst

-----Original Message-----
From: Whitt, Mark
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 1:20 PM
To: Tycholiz, Barry
Subject: FW: My life

-----Original Message-----
From: Lucci, Paul T.
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:18 AM
To: Whitt, Mark; Harrison, Tyrell; Bump, Dan J.; Varnell, Charles
Subject: FW: My life

-----Original Message-----
From: john.d.williamson@us.andersen.com
[mailto:john.d.williamson@us.andersen.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:05 AM
To: awhite@ktvd.com; BLagodna@aol.com;
chandu.v.chilakapati@us.andersen.com; anthony.r.coghlan@us.andersen.com;
DWC3@pge.com; kblume@logicon.com; laurie.p.klumb@us.andersen.com;
jlynch@xemkt.com; Rappold@aol.com; sakom@attglobal.net;
Reese_Spears@NEXGENW2K.nexgeninc.com; steven.r.thornton@us.andersen.com;
Lucci, Paul T.; lance.e.workman@us.andersen.com
Subject: My life

Way too close to home!

Male Maturity

When I was 14, I hoped that one day I would have a girlfriend.

When I was 16 I got a girlfriend, but there was no passion. So I decided I
needed a
passionate girl with a zest for life.

In college I dated a passionate girl, but she was too emotional. Everything
was an emergency;
she was a drama queen, cried all the time and threatened suicide.

So I decided I needed a girl with stability.

When I was 25 I found a very stable girl but she was boring. She was
totally
predictable and
never got excited about anything. Life became so dull that I decided that I
needed a girl with some
excitement.

When I was 28 I found an exciting girl, but I couldn't keep up with her.
She
rushed from one
thing to another, never settling on anything. She did mad impetuous things
and made me miserable as often as happy. She was great fun initially and
very energetic, but directionless.

So I decided to find a girl with some real ambition.

When I turned 31, I found a smart ambitious girl with her feet planted
firmly on the
ground and married her.

She was so ambitious that she divorced me and took everything I owned.

Now I am 49 and just looking for a girl with big tits.
*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If
you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this
message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly
notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your
employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind.
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as neither
given nor endorsed by it.


Message-ID: <17693663.1075857486372.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 06:55:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: jane.tholt@enron.com
To: tori.kuykendall@enron.com
Subject: List of Business Objectives from ADR Session
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Jane M Tholt
X-To: Tori Kuykendall
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Jane_Tholt_Jun2001\Notes Folders\Discussion threads
X-Origin: Tholt-J
X-FileName: jtholt.nsf

---------------------- Forwarded by Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT on 06/12/2000 01:53
PM ---------------------------

"Bautista, Larry L." <BautistaL@EPEnergy.com> on 05/22/2000 04:26:51 PM
To: ALEX GOLDBERG <agoldberg@lgl.twc.com>, ANDREW KOLESAR
<abk@sloverandloftus.com>, BARBARA JOST <bjost@huberlaw.com>, BARRY GRAY
<bgray@epelectric.com>, BOB GRAY <bgray@cc.state.az.us>, BRUCE CONNELL
<bruce.a.connell@usa.conoco.com>, CARLA JOHNSON
<carla.j.johnson@usa.conoco.com>, CAROLYN CORWIN <ccorwin@cov.com>, CARRIE
SAFFORD <csafford@mbolaw.com>, CATHY BULF <cbulf@oneok.com>, "Cox, Robin"
<CoxR@EPEnergy.com>, CURT BRECHTE <cbrechte@apsc.com>, DARRYL SMETTE
<darryl.smette@dvn.com>, DAVID CLARK <dclark@sempra.com>, DAVID HUARD
<dlh@jmbm.com>, "DAVID I. BLOOM" <dbloom@mayerbrown.com>, DEBBIE SWANSTORM
<daswanstorm@verner.com>, DEBRA BOLTON <debra.bolton@bakerbotts.com>, DIANE
MCVICKER <dbmcvick@srpnet.com>, "DONALD G. AVERY" <dga@sloverandloftus.com>,
"DONALD W. PETERSEN" <dwp9@pge.com>, DONNA FULTON <dfulton@enron.com>, DOUG
CANTER <dmcwash@mshpc.com>, DOUG SCHANTZ <doug_schantz@kmmktg.com>, "DOUGLAS
K. PORTER" <porterdk@sce.com>, ED ROSS <earo@dynegy.com>, "ELISABETH R.
MYERS-KERBAL" <emyerskerbal@shb.com>, ERIC EISENMAN <exe3@pge.com>, FRANK
LINDH <frl3@pge.com>, GERARDO ESPINOSA <gespinosa@gas.pemex.com>, GORDON
SMITH <gsmith@jhenergy.com>, HARVEY MORRIS <hym@cpuc.ca.gov>, JAMES MCGREW
<jhmcgrew@brugen.com>, JAMES MORIARTY <jmoriarty@fw-law.com>, JANE THOLT
<jane.m.tholt@enron.com>, JANICE ALWARD <jalward@cc.state.az.us>, JOANN
RUSSELL <joann.russell@et.pge.com>, "JOEL L. GREENE"
<jlgreene@energyadvocates.com>, JOHN GREGG <jgregg@mbolaw.com>, JOHN HESTER
<john.hester@swgas.com>, "JOHN P. ARMATO" <jpa3@pge.com>, "JOHN P. BEALL"
<bealljp@texaco.com>, "JOHN R. STAFFIER" <jstaffier@sdsatty.com>, JUDY
JOHNSON <jaheineman@aol.com>, JUNE SUWARA <jsuwara@sempra.com>, KAREN TOMCALA
<karen.tomcala@pge-corp.com>, KARYL LAWSON <karyl_lawson@kmmktg.com>, KATHIE
EDWARDS <kbedwards@gkrse-law.com>, "KATHLEEN L. MAZURE" <klm@dwgp.com>, KAY
KERN <kernks@sce.com>, KEITH MCCREA <kmccrea@sablaw.com>, "KELLY A. DALY"
<kadaly@moheck.com>, KEVIN LIPSON <kjlipson@hhlaw.com>, "KIM M. CLARK"
<kclark@jhenergy.com>, L PERSON <l.person@czn.com>, LARRY BLACK
<llblack@ibm.net>, LUIS MANUEL PADILLA <lpadilla@gas.pemex.com>, M BERGERN
<mbergero@czn.com>, MARIA OROPEZA <oro@cpuc.ca.gov>, "MARK T. MITCHELL"
<mitchellm2@epenergy.com>, "MARK W. SCHWIRTZ" <mschwirt@aepnet.org>, MIKE
MCELRATH <mmcelrath@phelpsdodge.com>, NORMAN PEDERSEN
<napedersen@jonesday.com>, PATRICIA ANDERSON
<pat.anderson@southernunionco.com>, PATRICK BROWN <pabrown@socalgas.com>,
"PATRICK G. GOLDEN" <pgg4@pge.com>, PAUL KEELER <pkeeler@br-inc.com>, PENNY
BARRY <barryp@bp.com>, PETE FROST <pete.frost@usa.conoco.com>, PETER CERVIN
<pcervin@br-inc.com>, RANDY RICH <rrich@bracepatt.com>, REBECCA CANTRELL
<rebecca.w.cantrell@enron.com>, RICHARD JORDAN <richard.jordan@swgas.com>,
RICHARD STAPLER <richard.stapler@williams.com>, ROB DAVIS
<redavis@sempra.com>, ROBERT FOSS <rfoss@coral-energy.com>, SANDRA ROVETTI
<sjs@cpuc.ca.gov>, SARAH TOMALTY <seto@dynegy.com>, SHERRI BOOYE
<sbooye@skadden.com>, "SHERRI L. BOOYE (2)" <nizra@earthlink.net>, STEVE
KEEHN <skeehn@sempra.com>, STEVE TARPEY <tarpeysp@bp.com>, SUSAN GINSBERG
<susan.ginsberg@coastalcorp.com>, TED MCMURTRIE <edward.mcmurtrie@swgas.com>,
TOM CARLSON <tcarlson@apsc.com>, TOM ROTH <tom.roth@et.pge.com>, VIRGIL
SPURGEON <vrspurg@ppco.com>, WAYNE ELLIS


Message-ID: <22245798.1075853137120.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 15:29:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: noguilt@swbell.net
To: michelle.cash@enron.com
Subject: Re: POS Book Fair
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Randy Schaffer <noguilt@swbell.net>@ENRON
X-To: Cash, Michelle </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MCASH>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \MCASH (Non-Privileged)\Cash, Michelle\personal
X-Origin: Cash-M
X-FileName: MCASH (Non-Privileged).pst

Thanks.  I work for a criminal defense  lawyer and he thought of the address name.  Pretty appropriate.  When  you get a chance, let me know what and how much you will be baking.  I work  on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays, so if you send anything out on Tuesday and  Thursday, please send it to my home email address.

Thanks again.

Lynda
----- Original Message -----
From:  Michelle.Cash@enron.com
To: noguilt@swbell.net
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 5:12  PM
Subject: RE: POS Book Fair
Love your email address!  I'm glad you got my email; it  was working kind of
funny, so I wasn't sure it went through.
Count  me in from 6-7, or from 7-8 if you need that shift  instead.
Michelle
    -----Original  Message-----
   From:   Randy Schaffer <noguilt@swbell.net >@ENRON
    Sent:   Monday, October 15, 2001 4:29 PM
    To:     mcash@houston.rr.com ; Cash,  Michelle
   Cc:     ASPinho@aol.com ; sweetburke@aol.com
    Subject:  POS Book Fair
   Hi Michelle, Lynda  Carnegie here.  I  received your message and email.
    I've got you down for baked goods and we  will need your help at  the
   book fair.  What time would you like to work   during family night?  We
   have one person from 5 to 6 and  another from 6 to  7, but we will need
   more than one  person at those times.  Let me  know.  You can email me  at
   work at noguilt@swbell.net  << File: mailto:noguilt@swbell.net  >>   or at
   home at shanadog@swbell.net  << File: mailto:shanadog@swbell.net  >>
   Thanks for your help.
   Lynda  C.
**********************************************************************
This  e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may  contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended  recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is  strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to  receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp.  at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com   and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto)  are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or  evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its  affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be  relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank  you.
**********************************************************************


Message-ID: <12559420.1075861488119.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 10:58:04 -0800 (PST)
From: sgovenar@govadv.com
To: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
Subject: RE: Hearing
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
X-To: Dasovich, Jeff </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JDASOVIC>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \JDASOVIC (Non-Privileged)\Dasovich, Jeff\Deleted Items
X-Origin: Dasovich-J
X-FileName: JDASOVIC (Non-Privileged).pst

It should be available over the internet just like regular hearings.  If you
have trouble with the internet just call in and we will turn a box on for
you.

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 10:36 AM
To: sgovenar@govadv.com; Susan J Mara; Jeff Dasovich
Cc: Hedy Govenar
Subject: RE: Hearing

Thanks very much.  If possible, I'd like to listen in.  That possible?
And have a very nice holiday.

Best,
Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Govenar [mailto:sgovenar@govadv.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 12:29 PM
To: Susan J Mara; Jeff Dasovich
Cc: Hedy Govenar
Subject: Hearing

I will attend the following hearing next Monday.  Have a nice
Thanksgiving.

MONDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2001

------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
----

JOINT LEGISLATIVE AUDIT COMMITTEE
ASSEMBLYMBMER KEELEY, Chair
9 a.m. - Room 4202

SUBJECT: California Consumer Power and Conservation Financing Authority

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************