" 

 I know ""grusha"" is a divorcee. ""woman put away from her husband"" is just the archaic way of saying ""divorcee"" - I wrote that because that's what how the first hit on google rendered it; I'd rather quote it to you from an actual english bible translation, rather than rely on memory/my own translation (after all, WP:NOR).  

 As for ""whore"" and ""the profane"". Indeed, who is to say what it means. We cannot take the view of one group and say that's what the Torah actually says. We can only say 'this is a literal rendering', and 'Group X think it means ....'. Which is how I altered it - to say 'it says profaned, Judaism thinks this refers to...'. You cannot say 'Torah says women captured in warfare', because it does not say that. You can say something like 'Torah implies women captured in warfare', but implies is a subjective thing - it has to be attributed; in this case attributed to classical Judaism.  

 Hence 'Torah says profaned. Judaism thinks this implies women captured in warfare...' 

 There should not be anything controversial about that. Its basic WP:NPOV procedure.   "