" 

 ==Händel as a German-English Composer== 
 It is ridiculous, just to call him an English composer; I think the way the German, French, Spanish and each other Wikipedias put it is better, in the whole world he is known as a German, so we gonna give a shit for what you describe as naturalization as an governmental act by an German King (George I.). Why shouldn't we write German, naturalized English, as the others do? A lack of composers? 91.62.96.229 (talk)  

 :Nice joke! Das Land ohne . . . Now you are here, perhaps we can discuss this without any more revertions? I don't have strong feelings about this issue. What do other people think? Kleinzach   

 : Someone suggested to sign on to Wikipedia and get a username.  

 Why? 

 :Someone wrote: Hmm. If you have an identity people will take you more seriously. In life it's often like this . . . Also please learn to indent (with colons).  

 You really think, you and your freaky friends are ""the people""? I think, it's more a nerd-monopoly you've installed, not an idea of ""collective intelligence"", because you lack any kind of general public. I indeed have an identity here, and I contributed a lot two years ago; but making diskussion here is completely senseless, when you can't follow-up your changings for your lifetime. So ""Händel"" as an English Composer, not more: It is really strange, isn't it? 

 :Someone asked: You are in Nuremberg? 

 No. But the Nazi-argument had to come. 

 **: Please stop altering my replies. ''  

 Oh sorry. You seemed to be joking five minutes ago. May we continue now with our discussion?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by     

 :(addressing the original point) Is the fact that Handel's German heritage is mentioned three times in the lead paragraph not enough to give a reasonable portrayal of the situation? That said, I can see the case for replacing ""English Baroque composer"" with ""Baroque composer""—as the rest of the article explains the situation more fully, and the word ""English"" does have a connotation that may be misleading in Handel's case. By the way, in terms of a reasonable discussion, could you please leave out the histrionics (""ridiculous"", ""freaky"", etc.), the invective (""$%