==Extremely POV, poorly written by non-native speakers of English that have obviously not read the manga== 

 The whole kenkanryu article is original research written as some sort of criticism right from the first paragraph. As I ask above, is it too much to ask that only people that only people that have actually read the manga should be contributing to this article, at least as it relates to the actual content of the manga? And how about restricting edits by non-native speakers of English? This article has been progressively getting worse as time goes on.