" 
 ::::Complaints about my being obnoxious and insulting are rich coming from an editor who started his reply to a polite request from me with ""If you had bothered to actually take notice of my edits ..."" Secondly, you added uncited information to the encyclopedia. How that can possibly be OK is a mystery to me and your attempts at self-justification are thin and an attempt to claim that black = white. You are responsible for all edits you make (even rollbacks and undo-s) and you made a conscious choice to restore uncited content to a BLP article that an IP editor (yes, IP editors are still allowed to edit here) had quite correctly removed, in line with WP:V. You made an assumption that an IP editor was vandalising the article, when in fact the IP editor was editing in full accordance with policy. The claim is quite obviously contentious, as it was removed from the article. While it is good editing practice, there is no requirement in policy to state a justification in an edit summary. 

 ::::Your attempt to claim that it is A-OK to add uncited material if it is true to the encyclopedia flies in the face of one of the core policies of the encyclopedia despite your rather bizarre attempts to argue otherwise. All material is required to be accurately sourced, no exceptions - even for things that are ""true"". Unless a source is cited, why should anyone believe anything you (or I for that matter) add to the encyclopedia?  don't see that we are likely to agree so further discussion is futile, but compulsory citing of sources is such a core feature of the project that your failure to understand it or agree that you are bound by it makes me wonder if this project is the right place for you. Good luck, \ "