" 
 :Leaky: WP:NOBIGDEAL.  Also, feel free to return the message I left you the other day about being harsh toward Carrite, I'm about to lay it down on Jusdafax  NE Ent: I agree that drama is acceptable when an outcome is possible.  Jusdafax: If you feel I am being ambiguous, it's because I'm trying not to be offensive.  But let me be blunt, like you have.  When I say ""I think you're doing yourself a disservice,"" what I really mean is that I think your going to make yourself look stupid by seeking sanctions because an editor (or admin) removed comments.  Admins have no power at RFAs so that'll get you no where.  If a 'crat did it, then maybe I'd back off.  When I say ""You are more than welcome to continue seeking sanctions,"" what I mean is that there is no chance in hell of you succeeding but you are more than welcome to expend that sort of effort if you so like.  When I say ""but you won't find me objecting strongly,"" what I mean is that I intend to stay the hell away from whatever mess your about to make like I bet 95% of the rest of ANI will.  And when I say ""I doubt you'll get a successful consensus for sanctions,"" I mean that there is zero chance but I wanted to be diplomatic.  Let's look at 'just the facts' here and leave rhetoric at the door: SoV opened an AE thread of questionable validity.  Neotarf made a comment on the RFA of questionable appropriateness.  SoV undid it once.  Which policy was violated?  Which tool was misused?  We don't practice Ex post facto law here.  At best you'll get a trout for SoV and if you feel strongly about it then trout him yourself.  If not, I'm doing you a favor.  But I'm not your mommy and I'm not your babysitter, feel free to do what you wish and seek sanctions that will never happen.  Do it on WP:ANI, do it on WP:AE, do it on , hell do it on WP:RFPP for all I care.  Not trying to be a dick, personally, I like all three of you.  But this argument is pointless since your preferred solution is impossible.v/r -  "