::::::Okay, lets see, I am going to cut your response in pieces and respond to each and all seperately: 
 :::::::Kim, a lot of the basis for people opposing me is that I added a link to VDARE on the Talk page. 
 :::::::::Accusation. Proof? I am not even aware of that link. 
 :::::::I added it along with many others, at a time when people were saying criticism of the SPLC didn't exist, and I suggested not that the links I added were reliable, but that some of the linked sources contained in the various links I added might be useful to show criticism. 
 :::::::::Why were you lazy and dumped a lot of unreliable sources on it, KNOWINGLY? If you are really interested in improving the article, you would have dug deeper (those some of the linked sources) and come up with those reliable sources? 
 :::::::Well that VDARE link was the fuel needed for people to attack me repeatedly. 
 :::::::::Was it? Or was it the way you dealt with it? 
 :::::::Suddenly I was even being placed in the white racist camp, all for talking in Talk. 
 :::::::::I would like to see that diff! 
 :::::::The attacks went nonstop for a long time, continuing on even onto your page here. 
 :::::::::Again, diffs! 
 :::::::Nonstop pushing and pushing to have me banned. 
 :::::::::Who and where? Diffs of ANI reports with ban requests? 
 :::::::And you now write that you agree with the guy.  Now I see why these people work in packs and repeat false information again and again and again, following me from page to page to page.  Because it works. 
 :::::::::No. I think that my intervention has saved you from already being reported at ANI. I see you have right intentions, unfortunately, your way of editing is counterproductive in the long run, because people get worn out and don't want to deal with you. 
 :::::::I have not read wikilawyering, but if responding to constant unjustified attacks seeking to ban someone is considered wikilawyering, then I'm guilty.   
 :::::::::No, wikilaywering is the continued enforcement of policies to the letter in order to win a dispute. That is okay for laywers in real life, here it gets you banned because policies are there to facilitate editing. 
 :::::::I did not sense from you that you would join in on the beat down, until now. 
 :::::::::Whow, you think I wrote that to beat you down? No, in that case, I would have gone to ANI and reported you and batmintonhist there. 
 :::::::  Do you not notice the continued pushing of these tag teams?  Do you not see people coming only to Talk, only to go after me?  Won't you even once tell these people they are violating Wiki policy to harass me again and again?   
 :::::::::I have been following the disputes, and although there might be some truth to violations by others, it is not to the same degree. 
 :::::::I have led the effort to improve the SPLC page, and it is now improved and getting better.  Do you not see people are opposing me for that very reason?   
 :::::::::No, they are not opposing you for that reason. BTW, this part of the response reads as one of paranoia as if people are out to get you. 
 :::::::Yes, I'm active about libraries.  The SPLC is not a library.  Yet even you brought that up as if it makes my editing on SPLC suspect.   
 :::::::::That is not what I wrote. Nice try though to twist what I wrote. I brought up that you seem to have an activist mentality and that shows in your way of editing, all across WP. 
 :::::::Tell me, what is an acceptable length of time for people to get together and flog someone?   
 :::::::::None. 
 :::::::I want to know because I want it to end.  Shall we give everyone, say, another month to flog me, then they have to stop?  
 :::::::::Than maybe instead of reacting like I am here to kick your ass, maybe agree to the few things I suggested above.