" 
 ::Definition of peer review from wikipedia: ""Peer review (also known as refereeing) is the process of subjecting an author's scholarly work, research, or ideas to the scrutiny of others who are experts in the same field."" As you can see from the above post, 2 or more of the people reviewing the paper are experts in the field. This debate is clearly a waste of time anyway. As soon as someone tries to refute cutting-edge science with some bullshit spam scandal there's no hope. Have fun with your pathetic agenda guys, this paper's already blown apart the whole 9/11 story, from a cursory google search and this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oO2yT0uBQbM.  "