The user in question seem to have a problem comprehending the English language, as well as what the law say about the role of the Romanian language; he had a similar problem before, when trying to interpret Wiki policies regarding communication in other languages than English (something you have volunteered to assist him with). This time, he has decided to remove the mention of Romanian as an official language, which of course is a statement supported by Moldovan laws that are still valid. When I reverted, the user in question told me to discuss the issue on the talkpage. Wikipedia guidelines say that if one wants to make a controversial change, he should first discuss it on the talkpage. The change was made by the user in question, not by me; therefore, it is he who should have attempted to discuss the matter on the talkpage, before trying to implement the changes. The user has asked you for your opinion on your talkpage and you have answered him that Romanian should be left as a note in case people just scan for some quick information. I have argued the same. The user's argument is flawed in the sense that if Romanian is not to be deemed as partially official, then not only the name should be removed, but also the footnote; if, however, the footnote should remain, then his argument, saying that only Moldovan is deemed as the official language, is void, because the footnote says otherwise. Since you are a moderator, a linguist familiar with this topic, and since you have helped the user to cause damage to my integrityand as such, befriended him, I believe that you should deal with this on your own. I will now retreat from this dispute and leave all the moral responsibilities that relate to this topic, lay on your shoulders.