" 

 ::So what if he has his own article? Incidents of Sikh extremism and violence (which happen to be associated with him) merit their inclusion here.  

 WP: UNDUE states: 

  
 ""Neutrality requires that the article should fairly represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by a reliable source, and should do so in proportion to the prominence of each. Now an important qualification: In general, articles should not give minority views as much or as detailed a description as more widely held views; generally, the views of tiny minorities should not be included at all."" 

  
 WP:UNDUE is about not giving too much coverage to ""minority views"". In this context, there is no view that is being discussed!!! These are incidents not views or opinions!  

 As for being OR and POV Lol!! Please do you even know what the policy means! How can you call information from reputed news agency from reputed OR/POV?? I have not come up with it!! The sources state them! These incidents actually happened! In fact again OR and POV don't even apply! These newsworthy incidents stated as per the sources mentioned (Toronto Star, Vancouver Sun, The Tribune)! Neither have I added any commentary of my own or any inputs from my end!! 

     

  

 Or is it that you feel these incidents (related to UD's life) are minor then please state why??"