" 

 ==Amen for Wikipedia== 
 Hell yes. This is what I like to see on the Main Page! Let's develop a theme here.  

 Yes, and now it's a target for every vandal on Wikipedia. ( ) 
 :Just like every other FA on the main page.  |   

 Good. If it means they're not bothering anybody else... )   •   

 ...Speaking of, wtf is going on with the article right now and why wasn't it put in protected status?  

 == Thanks alot wikipedia == 

 Yeah, Wikipedia is not censored and all... but this didn't lend much credibility to my attempts at proving wikipedia as a viable start for internet research. 
 ::Um perhaps you missed the 40+ references at the bottom of the article.  |   

 :Have you read the article? It's fairly good. I'm guessing your research isn't exactly directed towards erotic depictions? The Main Page has a great deal of variety; I'm sure another day you'd find something you liked.  

 ::I agree, I think it would behoove wikipedia editors to act as if sex did not exist and to refrain from mentioning itor making any articles about itin the future. Information about anything to do with sex can do nothing but harm to a world full of dangerously wayward souls. Thank You.    

 :::You mean babies don't come from storks? -   •   

 ::::Well, there are other theories about where babies come from, but they are all pretty wacky (and perverted), and don't need to be given equal validity.   
 :::::Just for the heck of it and because you've left enough ambiguity that I'm not sure, are you being serious or not?  |   

 ::::::Depends on which part your speaking of. I really do think babies come from storks, but I don't know if I'm being serious or not about the other thing, because the other thing doesn't exist, so I'm not sure if I'm serious. Maybe?   
 ::::::But of course.   

 ==Images== 
 Please refrain from removing images without discussing it first here. There are very good reasons why these ones were included and just removing them is not helpful. Also, for those who keep changing my spelling of civilisation, please see here. It is a valid spelling. Thank you.  |   
 : Why not use the more common spelling for consistency's sake?   
 ::The rule around here is to retain the spelling of the original contributor as a sign of respect. Thank you.   •   
 :::Actually, while I dismiss the inaccurate comment about ""the more common spelling"", the rule is that the article should be consistent throughout with either British English or American English.  The choice of which to use depends on either the subject, or, if that doesn't yield a preference, on the earliest editor's selection.  The choice between the British spelling ""civilisation"" and the American spelling ""civilization"" should be made on that basis, not an individual editor's preference.  (But I haven't studied the history of the article enough to judge whether the British spelling is the appropriate choice in this case.)     
 :::I see this was covered in more detail (and more accurately) below, so ignore my comments please.  Sorry.     
 ::::yes. Insane detail.  |   

 == ??? == 

 Interesting choice of Featured Article. I hope elementary school teachers aren't planning to send their students on here to research anyt