" 

 ==Solar power== 
 The image of the solar flare was unidentifiable, it looked as much like a volcano as the sun. The image of a satellite seems to imply that all the solar power the earth uses comes from the satellite. The original sun photo is now working again as apparently the issue with the commons has now been fixed, and it can be used again. Please participate in the discussion as to what wording to use for the first paragraph instead of making edits to the article that are not approved.  

 Propose, discuss, obtain consensus, then use. Not: use, get reverted, ignore, get reverted again, as has been the pattern.   

 Dear IP address, 

 The pictures are nothing but fabulous. You keep screwing up the page and I'll keep fixing it.   

 All I can say is ""chill out"". The following was moved from your IP talk page to make it easier to find.   

 You have not contributed significantly to the page. Your contributions have been repeatedly disruptive and harassing. You've concentrated on one paragraph over and over again. You've recycled material that has been moved elsewhere. I'm extremely tired of your passive aggressive nonsense.  22:02, 23 September 2007 
 :Nonsense. I have made many significant contributions to this and hundreds of other articles. You however are fixated on taking ownership of this one article. You need to revert your reverts or face being accused of sockpuppetry.   
 By the way I'm not going to waste my time looking up what warning to give you this time. The real problem is your not accepting the fact that WP:OWNING an article is a problem. You need to read it. Also, you need to understand the process of WP:Consensus, please review the flowchart on that page. First make an edit, then if it is rejected discuss until a new consensus can be obtained, and by consensus we mean only among Wikipedia editors. Then if consensus is obtained, the new edit can be used. Until then an old version must be used whether anyone likes that version or not. The step you are skipping time and time again is ""Find a reasonable (if temporary) compromise."" Reverting a revert creates what is called an edit war and goes nowhere.   

 You are a troll.  

 Name calling won't help you. You are simply not making any sense in your dogged insistence that only your edits can be used in your article.  "