" 
 ::::The graphic nature of the photo when there is surely other photos of the dead, which can be used to illustrate that yes people have died during this conflict. This conflict had two warring parties and innocents on both sides – is showing one of the most brutal images one could find depicting suffering on one side helping to show a neutral point of view? Is it enhancing the article in any way – would I be better informed about the suffering, and that people died within the Gaza strip due to this conflict via this image? 
 ::::Its a baby, an innocent of the world - pictures of which usually bring out the compassion within a human the ""awww"". Here we have something which is showing a cruel, harsh death inflicted upon such a being; how do you think a viewer is going to react to that in place of say an adult death? The latter you can somewhat rationalise - ""shit happens"" but with an image like this your almost provoking the viewer and twisting there arm into sympathising with one side.  "