" 

 Definitionally reasonable, then. I mean, look at this sentence: 

 ""Nonetheless [nonetheless of what?? certainly not anything in the preceding paragraph, it doesn't apply], the term is both a weasel word and a peacock term [this links to a Wikipedia term page, not something normal reference users are going to be seeking]  and as such can encourage the listener [?] to infer conclusions not implicit in the word. [that's ""phrase,"" and additionally, what term CAN'T have non-implicit conclusions derived from it?]"" 

 You sound like you want to tie this term up and stab it to death with an ice pick. What did luxury cars ever do to you? Give me ONE reason the new version of the article is better than the previous one, what with its lack of pictures, sources/citations, examples, neutrality, and any semblance of a definition in terms of what a luxury CARthe vehicle implied, not the term itselfactually is."