" 

 == Kiss my Ass triva == 
 Please explain to me why this triva is important for Romney?  He did not make the statement and had nothing to do with the statement.     
 :OK. I did not put the comment in and if you search for the 'kiss' you will not find it here in TALK nor in the Article.  Two things I would observe: (1) Conservatives (the sleeping giant in America) want Romney to be more combative to the other side, not just accepting of Liberal-Democrat premise (or being like McCain and not criticizing, even when justified).  However, (2) it does not raise to the level of importance for the article.  That media spent 85% of their articles talking about Romney 'gaffes' of which there were none (and not covering what was important), goes without saying.   So there you have your answer: (1) Yes, important; (2) not to be included. — PS: This is not to say Romney was not thinking the same thing, (without the swear words). Conservative president Reagan would go speak directly to the people for this same reason. Hope This Helps,    

 :: This is not an article about Romney, but rather, an article about the Presidential campaign. And we report here what reputable sources say about the campaign, and the ""kiss my ass"" and ""shove it"" were widely reported by the International press, and has a bearing on the campaign as the comment was made by Rick Gorka, Romney's traveling press spokesman, and part of his campaign staff. That is why.    
 :::Exactly, Ye are what ye run with, or so they say.    
 ::::So everything they say is worth including?  Or just the stuff that people think makes Romney look bad?  It seems to be the latter.  As Charles noted, 85% of the covereage of Romney was negative...this article is quickly becoming nothing more than a list of negative coverage.  I am tagging it.     
 ::::Here is a nice little example of the hypocrisy regarding the media on these issues.  The only difference is that Obama didn't swear...and well it was Obama.  Pretty interesting though.  Reporters are rude to Romney and Romney gets criticized.  Neil Munro is rude to Obama and Munro gets criticized....     
 :::::I agree that the article is becoming just a place to pile criticism for WP:POINT, under the guise of ""reputable sources said it.""  And if reputable sources said they saw me walking my dog, I don't see a reason for it to go on Wikipedia. '''''' "