" 

 ==Line in the sand== 
 Can we draw one. And at least pretend to be nice. I'll struggle with that as much as you Martin, but lets keep this on track. I notice that some of your recent suggestions are very good. I;m sure you can copy and paste well enough.    
 :Why has the Talk Page been deleted?    
 ::Dont play stupid with me.    
 :::Sorry, but I'm not sure that's permitted. Would you prefer to archive these first discussion threads? But that seems a little too soon.    
 :::I was still waiting for your answer to my question here after you told me to ""go and piss in a another field"". Thanks.    
 ::::Grow the fuck up. You earned that, with your pointy and childish edit suammries, and there was more. I know, you know. Not permitted? Are you 12? I'm cutting losses, moving on, being pragmatic. Note the line in the sand offer. Pity you didnt have the grace to realise.    
 ::By the way Martin, the true sign of a gaming wiki twerp is when they couch a passive aggresive, baiting, post with ""Thanks."" Saving up diffs eh? Well done in being so predictable.    
 :::I have no intention of swapping abuse or insults. I haven't ""saved any diffs"" - wikipedia saves all of them. I just wanted some kind of explanation for your accusations. I don't own this article, or this article, or any ""field"". So it's not up to me to decide if the entire page is kept or not. It's just policy. Thanks.    
 :::::""wikipedia saves all of them"". Implied treath noted, and thanks for so wonderfully proving my point. And that post explains what position and insults exactly? Put up or shut up. I'd prefer if you left me in peace to get on with it frankly. Your just annoying now. I've attempted reson, didnt work. You realise that this started with you blind reverteing me, and I piosted on you talk in a friendly manner, as we knew each other from around. And you started taking the piss. On me and my friends. And its a week later now. Your into troll territory here dude, however you might couch it with ""Ceoil carnt spell"", and when its pointed out swears.    
 ::::::What does ""blind reverteing me"" mean? I reverted two of your three edits:  and  since, in the light of your edit summaries, they made no sense to me and did not seem to have adequate sources to support the opinion expressed. I added a cn tag. I think the appropriate forum for discussing personal differences of opinion is the users' respective Talk Pages? In the meantime, I think you'd better restore the Talk Page as per policy.    
 :::::::Nope. Would be counter productive. I'm here to work on the article, and am archiving in that respect. You here to grip and settle a score.     
 ::::::::No ""scores"" to grip or settle, thanks. I just think you've acted contrary to Wikipedia policy. I don't think the article Talk Page is yours to do with simply as you wish, just because you don't like what's on it. Maybe I'm wrong. Would you like me to clarify this with an Admin?    
 ::::::::You say that you want to work on the article and are ""archiving in that respect."" Yet you haven't archived anything. An ip editor has done that, but only with one of the threads, to which I added a question at 11:28 this morning. The other five threads are nowhere to be seen. They were all current as of one or two days ago. How is discussion to proceed on these topics? This Talk Page is here to support all editors who want to work on the article, not just one.    
 ::::::::::Ok now you just lost me. I blanked and you reverted. Problems with facts, on