" 
 :::::Yes, I noticed that DAP388's version was like that. But I'm not sure how else to explain that claims/speculation/debates regarding Dean's sexual orientation and sexuality belong under ""Legacy."" As the source in the article seems to support, a part of his iconic status is ""his ambivalent sexuality."" And tons of reliable sources cite him as a gay icon. Those sources can be used to show why this is a legacy topic. I've never known ""legacy"" to only mean ""something that you leave behind for a new generation."" It's sometimes used to indicate what one is well known for years after their demise (which can, of course, also mean having ""left it behind for a new generation"" because it was a part of the person's life). But, like I was getting at, while defining it the way you have, the fact that Dean is one of the gay icons from the past can be seen as a gift left behind for the new generation. Wherever we put this information, it doesn't belong under Personal life...per the reasons I cited. It's the same reason we keep Dean out of the gay and bisexual categories, seeing as this text only consists of claims, speculation and debate that he was either gay or bisexual. The only reason he's even still in the LGBT category is because he is a LGBT figure and it is compromise to keep editors from putting him in either the gay or bisexual category. Also, note that the current umbrella heading for this information is titled Legacy and iconic status. I would stick with that heading, since it's difficult to separate the two and since it takes care of your or others' concern that the gay/bisexual text doesn't belong simply under ""Legacy.""  

 :::::As for DAP388's hard work, I completely understand where you are coming from. It's just another reason that I feel that editors should alert other editors of their plans to reconstruct an article. This way, an editor's hard work is not discarded because consensus at the article is against it. It doesn't seem that anyone here is against DAP388's version in its entirety, however. Only parts of it.   "