** Fuck doesn't have pictures of people fucking, but it linkes to Sexual intercourse which has pictures of people going at it hammer and tongs.  They're only drawings, you say?  Certainly, but there's no real reason why they shouldn't be photographs.  Your location and context argument cuts both ways.  An image that may be pornographic on a porn site has an extra purpose, and therefore is somewhat distinct from pornography, when displayed in an appropriate context such as an encyclopedia article.  The picture of a man sucking his cock is useful precisely because a man being able to do that is so extraordinary. |