::And incidentally, discounting an independent third opinion (the reason why the RSN exists) because you don't agree with it is problematic; assuming the editor didn't actually do the review and lied about it isn't good faith.  In the case of a content dispute, the protocol is to seek outside inputs and be bound by them.  This outside input came down negatively and the JCFS for the most part doesn't seem crucial anyway.  Spending all this time on the talk page instead of working on the main page is also frustrating.     Wikipedia's rules:simple/complex