" 

 == Citation overkill in the lede? == 
 All I see that Bodhidharma was from south India. Being known martial arts tells me he somehow connected to present Kerala. Whether he is Brahmin or kshyatria tells me he was aryan just like every king in olden India was a Kshyatriya and an aryan. No where I see any context about about tamilnadu. 
 :Broughton 1999:2; Dumoulin 2005:90; Addiss 2008:9; Faure 1996:45; Hoover 1999:1(Chapter One); Dumoulin 1988:89; Chung 1998:188; Jørgensen 2005:111 

 :This style is a bit more pleasing to the eye: 
 :Broughton, 1999, p. 2; Dumoulin, 2005, p. 90; Addiss, 2008, p. 9;  Faure, 1996, p. 45; Hoover, 1999, p. 1, Chapter One; Dumoulin, p. 1988, p. 89; Chung, 1998, p. 188; Jørgensen, 2005, p. 111 

 :However, the latter style would require changing the entire reference format.  I offer it only to show an alternative.  I recommend doing a first pass, bundling multiple references per the example above, and then coming back on a second pass to see if the multiple refs are even needed.    

 The sentence in the lede, ""Scholars have concluded his place of birth to be Kanchipuram in Tamil Nadu."" is supported by eight citations.  This seems to be a bit much, so I wanted to discuss the possibility of trimming this down to around two or three of the strongest and most reliable sources.  Does anyone have any objection to this, or a suggestion on which of the references would be best to keep, and which can be removed? -   
 "