":: Sounds like a standard case of true ""event facts"", but mistaken conclusions served alongside them as ""background facts"", as is so common in the journalist community. The fact of oxytocin administration to abductees in an environment where said oxytocin is cheap and readily available sounds plausible enough, but the motivation stated (hastening puberty) sounds less so. Might I direct our dear journalists towards the part of this article that mentions oxytocin's fear-killing, trust-increasing, and bond-building effects? Now *those* sound useful for when you're trying to deal with someone you just abducted. As to puberty, for *sex slavery*? - a) anywhere from not really necessary to downright undesirable, depending on the socio-cultural context, b) if you're abducting people, it sounds a _lot_ easier to just select victims that meet your criteria (if such exist), and just kidnap girls the right age. Stupid journalists. 

 "