== Machine translation == 

 The weak atheism: The weak atheism gets along without the faith in Gods, stated however not that there would be no Gods, it denies thus not or does not deny not directly the existence of Gods. There are different kinds of play: 
 # Pragmatic atheism: This states that an explanation of the world gets along also without acceptance of Gods. The existence of Gods is not denied, but when designates unnecessarily or uselessly. A Pragmatiker (everyday life term) and Pragmatist (philosophy) are someone, which judges the truth of things by its practical probation and its use for practice. God or Gods is useless for many Pragmatiker and Pragmatisten (if also not for all), because they do not offer use with the evaluation and explanation of the world from their view. 
 # Nominalisti atheism: Term nominalists represent the view the fact that only to single things reality and thus existence come, while general terms are such as God only names (=Nomen). Under condition of the simplicity of the realizations (Simplizitätskriterium), the acceptance of God or Gods is as independent and independently existing nature redundant (see also Ockhams razor). 
 # Agnostizismus: This states that Gods with the means of human reason are not recognizable (intelligibler Agnostizismus) or that for the acceptance of Gods on the basis of scientific criteria the proofs/vouchers were missing (szientistischer Agnostizismus). With respect to the intelligiblen Agnostizismus one can differentiate again between strong and weakly: The weak Agnostizismus states only that Gods are not yet recognizable possibly not, or, the strong however that Gods with the means of the human reason are not in principle recognizable (see for this far down Rationalisti atheism). The allocation of the Agnostizismus to the atheism is disputed, it can also as independent world-descriptive basic attitude be regarded. 
 # Szientisti atheism (see to chapter analytic philosophy) holds speech over Gods for nonsense, because sentences, into which these terms occur, are not truthable. The szientistische atheism maintains however non just as little as the weak atheism - that there would be no Gods. For it the sentence is not “it gives Gods” exactly the same contents empty like “it gives no Elfen”. 
 # Postulatori atheism: This usually atheism vertetene of scientists themselves assumes that to out-permit first of all Gods from the system of the realizations (ergo science) to thus postulate no Gods contrary to theology. Theisti acceptance can becoming however later at frontiers of the science or in unexplored or than unerforschbar regarded parts again certified (example: Stephen Hawking Pre Big fearing for God). This kind of play of the atheism will often represent designated view in connection with that above as pragmatic atheism and/or Nominalisti atheism. 

 The strong atheism: 
 Trailers of the strong atheism are convinced of the fact that there are no Gods. It denials thus directly the existence of Gods. For this is occasionally also the term Antitheismus. 
 # Rationalisti atheism: This proceeds from the additional assumption the fact that only that can exist which also by human reason is recognizable in principle (ontologischer Epistemologismus). And because Gods were recognizable not in principle, they could also not exist. 
 # radical szientistischer atheism: While for normal szientistische Atheisten only the speech is unreasonable over Gods, may be only accepted for their radical representative as existing, what in inter+subjectively examinable procedures is scientifically provable. Since this does not apply to Gods and other transzendentale ideas, they cannot exist after this conviction. 
 # Theodizee atheism: This states the fact that it due to that of suffering and the unfairness in the world no (n) (to give knows all-good-natured or all-powerful) God or Gods. In its less radical form the Theodizee atheism can occur also than weak konditionaler atheism: “If God exists, then it cannot be in view of the evil on ground connection all-powerfully or not all good-natured”. The existence of God is not denied thereby, is not limited however in its characteristics. It is then a theological question whether such a nature can be called still God. 
 # Logical atheism: Similarity with the Rationalisti atheism possesses. While the rationalism says that it any specific - until into its biological structure handing - characteristics of the human conditions are, which prevented the realization of Gods, the logical atheism means first only that all God proofs entangled themselves into contradictions (Antinomien). Under the premise that something contradictory cannot exist it is rejected, Gods as independent natures. 

 Further kinds of play that degrees after: 
 Besides there are also still kinds of play of the atheism, which limit or deny the independent ontologisch