" 

 == un-BARNSTAR == 

 I just stumbled over your posts on RockMFR's user page and followed the story and have now decided to post here. 

 Here's what happened as I understand it, please correct me if I got anything wrong: 

 Without any prior exchange, e.g. politely asking  for a rename (which he finally did completely voluntary), you put his userspace subpage up for deletion. The result was a quick keep, in other words: a quick failure of your intended action to use process instead of kind words with the only possible intention to beat another user over the head. 

 You commented in the MfD debate: ""And make sure it doesn't try to be the longest"" [autograph book]. Now, correct me if I'm mistaken, but isn't it the aim of each and every autograph page to collect as many as possible? Seriously: There is no difference in having an autograph page titled ""autograph page"" and one that says ""longest autograph page"". 

 On MfD, RockMFR commented ""This has nothing to do with your goal of trying to collect the signature of every Wikipedian, does it? )"", to which you replied here. 

 In that post, 
 * you wrongly accuse RockMFR of having ""said"" that you want the largest autograph collection. He didn't, he was half-jokingly and in good faith asking a question. 
 * you also speak derogatory about two admins in very good standing: ""since many administrators (without a sense of humor, I might add) refused to sign, such as  and "". This is not only uncivil, but also hints at insufficient self-reflection. 
 * You actually continue to tell RockMFR: ""Do not say that I am trying to get the longest autograph page, because that is not what Wikipedia is about."" Again: He did not say that. He was asking a question. And as a matter of fact, you do have an autograph page of your own. 
 * You conclude your rant with ""Do not say that again to me or other people,"" to which I left a reply before I decided to dig deeper. 

 To Bernstein2291's addition to the description on his own autograph page, you reacted by calling him a liar instead of appopriately apologising to him, and you actually went so far as to use an edit summary that reads ""it's a lie"" and you embarassingly went on to to tell him ""there is a very  little chance that your autograph page will become the longest"", with which you contradict your whole near-absent prior ""reasoning"" and expose your own conflict of interest. 

 What's more, on your userpage you write ""I am working on becoming an administrator, but while I am learning (thanks, Deskana!), I am working on getting a barnstar. I hope I get one someday."" 

 For your recent behaviour as laid out above, please consider this an un-BARNSTAR. You now have to get one to have none again. Best regards, —'''''' "