" is the best ever and you deleted it. Why. What is so bad about that? 
 :Because he sucks, and being that you have no regestered account you have no user page, annon acount can be blanked.  |   
 Your a prick. keep your personal thoughts to your self. Jeff is the best driver ever and thats a fact. You musy be an idiot redneck. 
 :""keep your personal thoughts to yourself"" - good advice!  try following it.  have you considered that your love of jeff gordon and your vandalism to people's user pages/talk pages/articles are ""your personal thoughts"" that you are MOST CERTAINLY not keeping to yourself? -    
 I wasn't talking to you jerkso, your such an idiot you cant even realize when someone is talking to you. No go back to your trailer boy! 

 I am a redneck, i am not the one that likes NASCAR or Jeff Gordon, NASCAR = redneck, Jeff Gordon = redneck. And you calling other people gay, thats the pot calling the kettle black, espically the way you swoon over Jeff Gordon.  |   
 I do love Jeff Gordon in a gay way, im gay, why do you hate gays so much? Jeff Gordon is not a redneck, he was born in CA and moved to Indiana to pursue his racing. Your obviously have a low iq to think someone from CA is a redneck. You also must be retarded to think that a household cooking pot would call a kettle black, they are silver. 

 == RfA == 

 Why are you voting against every nomination for adminship?   
 :Why is is that you, adminstrators specificaly and other useres,  only confront users that vote in oppsition, i see a majority of votes for support with no explnation what so ever, yet no one questions them why they voted in support, and when most resons for support are give they are things like ""i think he will do a good job"", or ""i have had no problems with the user in the past"", or ""because so and so voted oppose"". yet an oppsition supporter basiclay is forced to write war and peace to explain why they voted no or else they are basisicaly left to felt like their vote is discounted. So no you dont need to know why i voted oppose, only that i voted oppose.  |   
 ::That sounds like a sound argument to me, except that it doesn't explain why you opposed everyone.  —   
 ::Yes, I seldom give clear reasons for supporting, but on occasion I've subsequently been asked for reasons and then have always given the reasons. It's true that people don't need to know why you voted against, but if you don't explain your votes when asked, I don't think I'll be alone in dismissing them as meaningless (while of course not objecting at all to their being counted).   10:15, 2005 Jun 16 (UTC) 
 ::Just like i noted above, it's ok to vote in support with out giving a reason or stating reson, but if you vote aginst and your not explcit in why you dont support something then your vote will be discounted. And while discounting my disenting voice, you will just go on and count the supports that gave no reason as valad, and you see no double standard in that. Just goes on to prove what a joke the RFA process is and the Adminstration are. As for my opposing, i have my reasons, and if i want them known i would have said, but i do not need to justify my oppsition to these ""canidate"" admins to anyon but myself.  |   
 :::I think you're replying to me and yet have misread or misunderstood most of what I said. Nobody here has so far suggested that your vote should be discounted. Rather, I said that I and probably others would disregard your vote when considering which way we should vote ourselves, unless you explained your vote. Also, I've said that I've given reasons for my support votes when asked; there's no difference between that and giving reasons for an oppose vote when asked. However, I suspect that the key here is your implication that the RfA process is a joke. If I'm wrong, feel free to enlighten us.   10:54, 2005 Jun 16 (UTC) 

 People don't have to go to great lengths explaining their support votes because adminship is intended to be given out to anyone who has been around for long enough to understand policy, has kept out of trouble, and has shown an interest in performing administrative tasks. There's a presumption in favour of granting adminship to experienced users who show these traits. Having seen a user around and found them to be quite reas