" 

 == What a Pile of Crap == 

 I ama a devout yet very moderate Christian (Baptist), and strongly encourage religious discussion (which includes the criticisms of it). However this article is a pile of crap. The author is obviously some Far Left-Commie-hippie-Secularist-Atheist nut. The vocabulary and phrasing suggests the author is educated, however, his/her tone and arguements are extremely limited and biased. Obiviously his/her education obviously hasn't included some philsophy or the theories of knowledge, truth and reason. His/her writings suggest the religion is outside of what is ""rational"" and that this ""rationality"" is surpreme, overlooking the paradoxical and philosophical issues assosciated with it. What is truth? What is nationality? The author needs to go back to high school and take some basic philosophy/studies in religion/theory of knowledge classes. I'm definitely not telling him/her to believe in anything, but merely to understand and to be open. The author is exactly the opposite of a religious fundamental (who is implicitly criticized in the article), he/she is a Secular/Atheist fundamental, which puts him/her in exactly the same category. Do not think that religions are an 'add-on' to everyday non-religious living principles. Those principles are in exactly the same category as any religion or belief. And this article seriously needs a ""neutrality disputed"" sign.  

 GO TO HELL, YOU COMMIE BASTARD/BITCH"