" 
 ::*Dishonest discourse: adjective, characterized by lack of truth, honesty, or trustworthiness  unfair, deceptive. Everything I have brought to this ""discussion"" is true and what I am insisting on is the barest presentation of the objectively verifiable facts with the least amount of ""spin"". While I am not claiming that Townshend is a kiddy-fiddler or even a pedophile, neither am I claiming that he is a child-saving hero-knight dressed all in gold and shining bright, valiantly battling the scourge of child pornography even though he doesn't need to since there are already many many laws against possession, distribution, showing, producing etc, and police and other NGOs worldwide devote huge amounts of energy to the same end. No one has diagnosed Pete Townshend as a pedophile: common usage would have it that a person who commits a ""sexual offence against a child"" is a pedophile; Townshend has committed such an offence... we do not need a psychiatric diagnosis to give a word its common usage. Gary Glitter has been (diagnosed as a pedophile): sources please. Gary Glitter wasn't distressed is ludicrous: in what way was Glitter distressted by his pedophilic offending (i.e. downloading and viewing child porn? Sources please. You're wasting my time: it appears, then, that you have rather more time than you need.  "