" 

 == You blocked me without justification, your edits are biased, and you are censoring history from your Talk page == 

 I am returning the relevant history here. If you don't like what people write on your talk page, maybe you should stop abusing people on Wikipedia. You are expected to archive all Talk and not delete it. See Wikipedia:Talk_page#Standards_and_conventions_of_writing_and_layout. You see, you are an administrator with the authority to block people so you should know the rules of Wikipedia and follow them.  Deleting your Talk page means you have something to hide. 
 ""Archive rather than delete: When a talk page's content has become extremely large or the discussion of the issue in hand has simply died down and no one has a reasonable chance of adding to it, create a new page. (See Wikipedia:How to start a page and Wikipedia:How to archive a Talk page for details.) Place the page in a talk or Wikipedia talk namespace. Give it an explanatory name. Often people simply add ""archive"" to the original name. Explain on the archive page where the text you plan to archive will come from and provide a link. Cut the relevant content from the original page and paste it into the new page. Replace the text on the original page with a link to the archive. An alternative is to summarise the discussion and provide a link to the version with the full text. ""  

 I am doing you a favor and returning the Talk page edits you deleted. You are welcome!    

 == You are nobody == 

 Who said it was an experiment? I am editing like anyone else. If you don't like it, you can edit it too. That's the Wikipedia method.  You are nobody to tell me what to do.   

 :Your arrogant threats are absusive and hostile. You should consider psychological counseling or medication.   

 == Why do you insist on a page for islamofascism but delete the page on judeofascism? == 

 What you are doing is vandalism and if you do not desist you will be blocked from editing.   
 == You are removing content == 

 If you continue to abuse me and vandalize Wikipedia, I will be forced to take you to dispute resolution immediately.   

 ==Blocking== 

 Looking at Islamist's , I see no evidence of vandalism, let alone persistent vandalism.  Creating a page Judeofascism - which had already been done before, by  - may or may not be justified (the term gets some Google hits) but is clearly not vandalism; neither is redirecting Islamofascism to a singularly appropriate destination, as someone had already done with Judeofascism. Personal attacks are another matter, but he does not seem to have been warned about those yet.  For these reasons, I am unblocking him/her. -   

 To Mel Eititis - 
 ::I noted your hypocrisy in editing and reverting islamofascism and Judeofascism and said that it indicated you must be a Jew. Was I wrong? No, you are a Jew. I didn't say you were a hypocrite on the gounds of being a Jew or because you are a Jew. I said your edits were hypocritical and your bias indicates that you are a Jew. It is a true statement so don;t try to turn it into a personal attack. Are you ashamed to be a Jew? You shouldn't be. Are you ashamed to edit Wikipedia articles in a biased manner? You should be. I am not ashamed to be a Muslim but then I do not make biased edits to promote a bigoted belief system either so I have nothing to be ashamed of."