"::The WSJ article directly references the ""Dishonor Roll"". The ""Dishonor Roll"" itself claims that boycott efforts with respect to Manchester Financial Group have been highly successful. Further, the ""Dishonor Roll"" states that Bolthouse Farms ""recently took significant steps to demonstrate that it is committed to diversity, including those in the LGBT community."" As both of these businesses are directly mentioned in the WSJ article, this shows that the shame campaign does in fact have considerable weight. There is no evidence that the ProtectMarriage.com letter has had any direct impact upon the businesses to which it was addressed. This clearly suggests that omitting mention of political pressure on the part of opponents of Proposition 8 is not neutral. 

 "