#Discography Split (btw, this isn't Twitter bro) 

 So don't know how to answer this with any curses, but miracles happen so here it goes. 

 I don't CARE anymore. Spit the discog off of the main Charles Hamilton article, I told you why it's stupid. But if you wanna be stupid then I'm expanding his main article more so in the future anyways. It's not cluttered, it's accurate and complete? But whatever, never seen a long Wikipedia article before or something.  

 I know this is all public domain, but if that's the case WHO IN THE HELL put you idiots in charge of making these decisions is beyond me. Ever since the page existed IT'S BEEN WRONG AND INNACURATE. Someone actually comes to fix it and make it right for all of the internet and I get crucified for it? Do you even know who he is and yet you're in charge of his page? I told you why I am the authoritative figure on all this information and how it's basically not available on the surface Web at all and that's why. You have to be a fan to know and appreciate any of what I'm fixing and you'd know it's right too, I promise you that buddy.  

 So you update and let me know whenever you split the articles in two and link them to each other so I can get back to work, thanks. Otherwise just going to put my own actual CORRECT information on the site I'm making for the man anyways. You want articles wrong, lacking information, inaccurate and even wrongly titled in this case too?!? Then fine be my guest and protect your golden covered mess. Didn't realize coming and learning to edit on here would mean I'd get hounded by the fake Wiki police. Done with this garbage. One. 

 @Kidstylez @KeithyIrwin 

 *beep*