" 

 Now that the subject has generated some sort of controversy, I suppose it is only fair that I explain my rationale for removing the ""included in a list of personalities"" passage. The complete text in question was, ""Seagal has been included in a list of personalities of Tibetan Tantric Buddhism that have been singled outfor criticism of their actions by a site that is made  by Buddhists themselves and want to clean up a religion that's dogged by mad behaviours and error."" I removed this partly just because it was in the wrong section: this stuff has nothing to do with a Stuntman abuse controversy. Second, it is making its point not by actually telling us what Seagal has been criticised for and by whom, but instead it just tells us that he was included on a list by some website that seems to exist only on-and-off lately. Third, it is awkwardly written so that its meaning is a bit unclear (should ""and want to clean up ..."" be ""who want to clean up ...""?). Fourth, the bit at the end about wanting ""to clean up a religion that's dogged by mad behaviours and error"" is just POV rambling. The situation is unfortunate, really, because I do think it would be good for balance to have something criticising Seagal qua Buddhist: he's certainly controversial, to the extent that people bother to have an opinion of him at all. However, the above, I think, does not constitute an acceptable contribution on this topic. 

 For the record, I'm not a practitioner of Tibetan Buddhism, and, for that matter, I'm not a fan of Steven Seagal, either—I've only seen one of his movies, which was the godawful Into the Sun. -  "