By the way there certainly is a Marx in anarcho-primitivism, but no anarcho-primitivism in Marx. The only anarcho-primitivism in Marx may be attributed to his war hypothesis, that only revolutions (or war) could change a society. In fact that's the main point where he completely disagreed with Heinrich Heine, who was in favor of peaceful changements of a society. Personally I think to fully understand Marx you really need to know about his relationsship with Heine. What do we learn out of this? Well, most people are able to think rational and learn by thinking, but some people aren't: They need force to change their behaviour. It's not possible to argue or reason with these kind of people. And since they favor only power, they usually get what they want. Because normal people don't want power, but love. And about the changements? Well, without the right technologies, there won't be any changement towards a more peaceful world in the future. And with the wrong technologies, the world will even become more and more anarchistic. Which - unfortunately - is the direction we're clearly heading into right now: An anarchistic Orwellian dystopia.