" 
 1. It was restored by Dr. R.R. Pickles, a single-purpose POV pusher and serial editor warrior, with no edit summary. It is still an additional, excessive, wildly undue incident from a dubious source, but I decided to walk awayeven though similar edits by myself had been repeatedly reverted on vague grounds. (I still don't know why Omri Ceren is less reliable than your blog.) In general, I find the sheer number of progressive blogs you pass off as ""scholarship"" deeply disturbing. 2. That barely even counts as a revert. I fixed a completely incoherent collection of words you tried to pass off as a sentence: ""According to the allegation, dismissed by Khaled Mashaal as a 'nightmare scenario is a post-hoc justification', ""electronic intercepts, informants, interrogations of Hamas operatives, as well as computers and satellite imagery obtained from Hamas compounds"", Hamas planned to..."" You made up the Meshaal quote. 3. Your edit was much farther away from the source, which is why you added another source to supplement it. Contrary to your ""consensus"", JDiala proposed and implemented a change to the problematic sentence, which I accepted before you went nuclear with lengthy and undue regurgitation of propaganda. Finally, only one of those edits was a full revert.  "