"== Classical language article == 

 
 This user: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sarvagnya is simply ignoring sources i extensively provided in the article ""classical language"" for various facts:  
 1st edit of him/her: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Classical_language&diff;=200588557&oldid;=200373102 
 edit comment: ""rv bullcrap.. dear ip troll - stop revert warring or you will be blocked."" 
 2nd edit of him/her: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Classical_language&diff;=200589136&oldid;=200588557 
 edit comment: ""sangam lit date fx"" 
 3rd edit of him/her: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Classical_language&diff;=200589390&oldid;=200589136 
 no edit comment 

 My sources were from indologists from MIT and from government of india page of classical Tamil and from Archaeological Survey of India institutes. All of these sources provided all necessary dates for identifying the age of Sangam and Vedic literature. I discussed this with various people on talk page very broadly. Do i have to take this ""bullcrap"" and ""ip troll"" as it is or what should i do now to prevent any edit escalation with Sarvagnya, since he is not willing to provide any accurate sources like government based ones like mine in example from archaeological survey of india? Sanskritists obviously try anything to push their POV in this article. Please prevent this kind of behaviour... I already told Sarvagnya, that he should use the talk page for any editing, which didn't help anything. I'm quite helpless now.       
 : I will leave a note for Sarvagnya, but  I suggest that you explore some of the options listed at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.  Also, please considering registering an account and using edit summaries.    
 I have asked for page protection for the page Classical language  and it has been protected for 3 days.No one can edit it till then.You can solve the dispute through Wikipedia:Dispute resolution through the user talk page,the article talk page or through Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents and further as rightly stated above you can create an account an registering an account .This is optional you can work without creating an account as well.   
 ::Thanks to both of you. I'll do my best. And i'm considering seriously now to get a nickname.      "