" 2005 (UTC) 

 ::: While I agree that there is substantial opposition to the H2, it is completely inappropriate to have an encyclopedia article that has an ""attitude"". Before my edit, the article was extremely one-sided. I reviewed the entire article, and found that it seemed particularly negative towards the owners of the H2. Examples: 
 #""This [pipe step rail], of course, reduces its ground clearance and, consequently, its wall and rock climbing capabilities; which, in any case, appear to be of little actual interest to most purchasers."" 
 #""Critics point out that the success of this vehicle is largely due to U.S. tax policies for the self-employed (e.g., most dentists, lawyers, and many doctors), which offer incredible tax write-offs (essentially subsidies for the prosperous)..."" 
 #""A prosperous and qualifying purchaser of this vehicle may receive subsidies of between USD $30,000 to $40,000 (paid for by other taxpayers, including those of modest income)..."" 
 #""Ordinary taxpayers receive only a $2000 tax deduction for the Prius..."" 
 #""While some might point to the recent increase in fuel prices as the reason for the demand reduction, this seems unlikely given the economics of the vehicle and the type of buyer likely to purchase it (prosperous and definitely not of a ""green"" inclination)."" 
 #""Many casual observers note that these vehicles tend to be driven aggressively in urban environments; most likely due to the characteristics of the buyer rather than the vehicle."" 

 I cite these examples as pure anger against the buyers of the vehicle. The above are extremely biased and seem to harbor not set-in-stone facts but resentment towards anyone who drives an H2. The author of these supposed facts provided no research citations and made it clear that s/he believes that most, if not all, H2 drivers are rich, aggressive, uncaring and suburban dwellers.  

 I also request that anyone who wishes to participate or continue participating in this discussion read Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, particularly the section on ""Wikipedia is not a soapbox"", especially the section concerning Advocacy of any type. We are not here to make political statements; we are here to provide facts.  19:15, Apr 25,"