" 

  

 ::::Lulz - I'd love to, Jasper - but the dude deleted it from the talk page!!!!!!  But give me a second to see if i can go back and get it.  okay, here is it (but then I am sure it will get deleted by him 
 :*I'll happily call shenanigans: the uncensored versions of the new photos aren't floating around the web, and I seriously doubt that a father is going to purchase child pornography and share it with his daughter for laughs. At the very least, if he actually did, I'd hope she'd be bright enough not to rat him out on Wikipedia.—Kww(talk)  

 That's what he said.  Here was my response: 

 :*What on earth would cause you to think that any of those photos constitutes child porn? My dad said that's BS cuz ""she REGISTERED HER COPYRIGHT FOR THE PHOTOS WITH THE U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE."" She did that so she could sue the websites that were posting those original pictures. If they were child porn, do you honestly think that the United States Copyright Office would have allowed their registration. Oh, and lastly, because I know how to count, I know that those first set of photos were legal. They were taken in mid-2007 and released onto the 'net in September 2007. So how old would she have been at that time? Yes, that is right, SHE WAS EIGHTEEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 

 m'kay, Jasper?  This whole thing of the blocks and accusations of BLP violations came from my belief that Kww is pushing his POV, not because of any BLP violations.  Also, keep in mind that all this stuff went on the TALK page - not the article itself, when several people were discussing as to whether or not the pic of her were child porn.  Then Kww jumped in and issued his block and started deleting things.   "