" 

 ==Ancestral and ethnic composition: What a pathetic joke== 
 All over wikipedia, every page that touches on Chile's ancestral and ethnic composition, time and time again, all that can be found is a littany of edits which someone has done to present Chile as 1) a white majority country, 2) where European immigration was a large scale event, and 3) in some articles, written in a way that either suggests, or outright claims, that descendants of Euopean immigration outnumbered not only white Chileans of Spanish ancestry, but that they also outnumber racially mixed Chileans of Spanish/Amerindian ancestry. WHAT A PATHETIC JOKE!!! 

 What is more pathetic, is that it has been allowed to happen all over wikipedia. And that it has been happened for so long. No one has even bothered to check those sources that are being used to back up the alleged white ""majority"". I, however, did bother myself, and I read them last week. And guess what?! None of them say anything of a white majority in Chile. A few of them do state a ""majority"" percentage for white ANCESTRY among Chileans, but IN NO WAY do they state a white ""majority"" as a Chilean population group. 

 In the last week I have become sick and tired of this constant obsession on the Chilean pages of presenting a white majority in Chile. Are there no users with a sense of decency to check the bloody sources that are being used to justify content in this article that says that Chile has a white majority? For heaven's sake!!! 

 As I state in my edit summaries, I am going to say this one last time, the genetic study in the source that is from the University of Chile DOES NOT say 64% of Chileans are White! IT MAKE A VERY BIG DIFFERENCE to misquote the source an say that 64% of Chileans are white, when in fact the source says the general population of Chile is of mestizo origin, and that on average, the European componenet in that mestizaje is around 64% white. THAT A BLOODY BIG DIFFERENCE!!! SOMEONE PLEASE TAKE THE BLOODY TIME TO READ THE SOURCE. Prevent these vandals from reverting to the version fradulently misrepresenting the source. 

 The source in question SAYS that Chileans are mixed, and that on average that mixture is 64% White. I have included direct quotes from the source, yet the user  keeps deleting the direct quotes, and reinstating the version, in many Chile related pages, to the one which alleges the sources says 64% of Chileans are white. What a crock of sh*t. 

 Now, that user, gives some bullsh*t argument that the demographics section is not about ethnography or race, and that it should not contain such data. I agree, it is not only about that, but it demographics incorporates any variables of a given population, including socio-economic structure, geographic distribution, education levels, and yes, racial and ethnic structure. So, may I suggest that when a user reverts the page the next time, if his argument is that demographics should not incorporate racial and ethnic composition of the population, then in that case, may he delete the data altogether, instead of merely reverting it to a version where the ethnographic data and race data is still there, but in a form which misrepresents the sources, so as to say there is a white majority in Chile. This is simply malicious. 

 Why are we putting up with this cr*p? Someone step in already! Where are the Administrators?????  

 And for the last freaken time, in regards to Lizcano's work, he is a SOCIOLOGIST! His figures have nothing to do with genetic fidings. This has to be made clear if you are going to use him as an authority. He can only be used in his capacity as a sociologist, and he himself says his categories are ""ethnic"", that is, cultural. His work itself says it is a ""ethnic"" composition, not racial, of the Three Culltural Areas of the American Continet! Stop this farce already. 

 I am going to insert into this article the version of ancestral and ethnic structure of Chile currently on the corrected Chile and Demographics of Chile pages, which as it now stands, in it's current edition, does correctly represent the sources, a few with direct quotes. 

 And ""no"", no one is comparing Chile to other countries where mestizos also form the largest population group. No one is denying Chile has a larger European heritage, than say, Mexico (proportionally), and especially moreso than Peru. But the average Chilean is nevertheless of mestizo origin, even when his average mestizaje is 64% white and 35% Amerindian (less than 1% other). The average Mexican is of mestizo origin too, and he is on average, around 40% white and 60% Amerindian. Chile is Chile. Mexico is Mexico. No one is comparing Chile to Mexico. Peru is even more different to Chile, and different from Mexico also, given that the average person in Peru is Amerindian (they are a plurality, no