== That is about ENOUGH == 

 How do I am I supposed to know that you are an adult?  Because you believe in evolution?  That's pretty silly.  Grow up, man. 
 I'd like to make several changes to this article: 
 #First off, I think the cartoon is uneccessary at this point.  I'm going to remove that - and as for the highly militant attack on Creationism as a scientific theory, I will worry about that later. 
 #I'm proposing that we go into detail about causality being a factor in explaining the theory that there is a beginning to the universe.  Subsequently, this will lead into the argument that the universe shows evidence for design instead of randomness.  For example: When I go to work every day, I don't have to worry about a horse appearing in my lab out of nothing for no reason. 
 #You militant evolutionists need to slow down and think for a second or two.  Is it appropriate to label Creationism a myth when there is scientific evidence that shows the possibility of His existence?  If that's what you want, then going into more detail about the science of design is propositional. 
 #Should we discuss more about the differences/similarities between Intelligent Design theory and Creationism theory? 
 :Also - why should Wikipedia be an information database that is dominated by evolutionary doctrine?  Would it be reasonable to both intelligence and science to present all sides of different scientific arguments?  This article is not a place to refute or bombard Creationism with maniacal ravings that are crossing the NPOV threshold. 
 Any advice on any of these items would be appreciated.  Regards,