" one lol. 

 == copyright infringement? == 

    scarily enough, I recognize that image. It's been ripped from a porn site  the model used tha name ""alice"" on the site. I actually have an unlabeled copy of that image on my HD. LOL. Don't want to be accused of spamming so I shall not name the site. Simply labelling the parts on it does not do away with the copyright of the orignal image. It needs to be yanked from the wikimedia commons. 

 == Can somebody explain to me == 

 ... why this article has exactly one photograph of a shaven vagina, while the penis article has three unshaven photographs? Shaving is by no means the norm for women across the world, especially outside of Western countries.   
 :Perhaps you should read this before you make statements like that. /  
 :: First of all that section cites no sources, but second of all I think showing a natural vagina should be shown. I always think about it this way; if someone who has never seen a naked woman or a human being would come to Wikipedia, they should be able to see a picture which shows how women are naturally, and then a picture of a shaven vagina should be included maybe with the caption ""in the late 20th century, shaving gained popularity in the Western world"". But shaving is just a fad like everything else, shaving wasn't popular in the 60's and 70's and it'll stop being popular one day. The first picture in the ""human"" includes a naked man and a woman. Wikipedia is supposed to educate, so a even if 99% of people in the world would get a navel piercing, the picture at navel should still feature a natural one as the main picture, and then include a picture of a navel piercing somewhere else in the page.    
 ::Two problems, AB. As BiT says, that section has no citations, and in my own personal experience (which, I'm sure you'll agree, is just as valid as an uncited Wikipedia article), women from the Middle East and Eastern Europe are quite a bit hairer than Americans. Even if it IS the norm in those areas, that's still hardly the whole world. Most of the world's population is in East/South Asia, and I know for a fact that genital depilating is not the norm there. Maybe this is all moot, anyway. It seems that somebody has removed every vagina photograph in the article.   

 == The Real Vagina's Picture == 

 This is a taboo thing in Indonesian Wikipedia. Is this also taboo in English Wikipedia? 

    
 : It would be real hard to get a picture of a vagina...    

 :: It's a common element in other wikipedia languages. French, German, Spanish, pick your choice. And most notably that is legal as an educational photography is never considered pornographic in most jurisdictions across the world.    

 == Cultural references == 

 I notice other articles have ""cultural references"" sections. Wouldn't it be good to have one for this articles.    
 : I suspect ""Cultural Referencses"" would rapidly become an endless list of everyone's favourite. Best avoided.    

 == Where is the real vagina? == 

 The real photo of vagina is gone! 

 Would you mind if I make the new one? 

 The vagina picture is Indonesian's vagina. Do you love it? 

    
 :I was wondering the same thing. Why doesn't this article sh