" 
 :oh, so it's OK for you to attack me but delete my response so that you keep your nose from having dirt on it?  Then when I get my post through post-edit conflict you call it an edit war?  I'm not the one who's ""idiotic"" mister......your claims are groundless and uncited there and on the RMs and since this is my page I'll tell you I think you're a coward (a) for deleting my response to your lies/accusation and (b) for not going RMs on these in the first place, as you knew you'd lose even if I and OldManRivers weren't around.  What a waste of my fucking valuable time Wikipedia is turning out to be once again because of the unqualified passing judgement and invoking rules on subjects they're not qualified to talk about...and you, boyo, are definitely not in touch with Canadian English norms NOR with indigenous realities of the modern era.  ""I will ask to have you blocked"" is another coward's move.  You don't have to write articles about places in the Chilcotin where there's a need to distinguish the people mentioned when they are vs. the placenames derived from them....there's a reason for those article-names and it's not just because that's the name THEY use (they could care less about an amateur linguist in some ""foreign"" country such as you are) but because the complications of saying ""the Chilcotin people have lived in teh Chilcotin for a long time"" or ""the Chilcotin people lived in the Chilcotin Ranges"" and so on.......DUH. your pretense that these terms don't exist in English and are not possible or citable to pronounce is complete and utter hogwash.  You're the one that needs blocking Kwami, not me.  Tons of people begged me to come back after I boycotted this often-absurd place after the Harper article fiasco/block in 2011......you're reminding me why it's a good idea to just say ""fuck it, it's run by pretentious idiots who like to argue on non-points, I have a lift to lead""....you haven't provided any cites, or even tried for the things you've claimed, and you've made FALSE STATEMENTS about what I've said (like that thing about /k/), in the meantime I've gone finding those press manuals that you probably will say aren't valid cites, and I point you to existing known pronunciations (Statliumh, Shekwapmuk and Kitunaha, which have ""new and proper"" spellings ""St'at'imc, Secwepemc, and Ktunaxa).  But you just ignore anything I say and start making false claims about me.  Get a grip buddy, and if you don't want to have someone respond to lies you tell about them on your talkpage, don't tell lies.........it's a given that these names are current in Canadian English, and the ones you prefer are outdated and looked at askance now, that you dont' know how to pronounce them is your problem; that I can find cites (=in the process of locating them) for the pronunciation and point to the historical record to prove that it's already known how to pronounce them even though you're demaning cites is just rubbish.  I can't find a cite for Sheshatshiu's English pronunciation, either'', but that doesn't mean it shouldn've have a Wikipedia article or should have an ""English: title suitable to your prejudices and hard-headed cite-happiness; what would you want, a title that goes ""some Indian reserve north of North West River, Labrador""??  I'm waiting for your attempt to unilaterally move Anishinaabe or Mi'kmaq, that should be entertaining.  "