" 

 ::Actually most of the so-called critical aspects of the Baha'i Faith are already mentioned in the article as fact. Things are stated, and people make up their own opinion on what they believe is good or bad.  That only men are allowed on the House of Justice is mentioned, that there are divisions is mentioned, that so-called covenant-breakers are shunned, and that homosexual acts are not allowed is mentioned.  One of the Muslim administrators who commented on this page regarding criticisms stated that ""So, before we start making value judgment we must discuss the Bahai position on issues in a coherent and neutral manner. That means that a bunch of the criticism section should be broken down and explained as law.""   

 ::The further criticisms that you mention are held by a small minority of people, and for the most part are in the blogosphere which are self-published resources.  In this case there is also Wikipedia's undue weight policy to consider.  Regardless, most of the things you mention are already in Wikipedia in other articles where the undue weight policy does not apply, see Bahá'í review, and Bahá'í divisions#Other disputes, and they are linked from the Bahá'í apologetics which includes a list of critical viewpoints.  Regards,   "