::::You silly wikipedia moderators take this website WAY too seriously. Honestly, nobody gives a crap but you. There's plenty of information on the web about this movie that you won't include just because YOU don't like the websites. Now this article is so bland and uninformative that there's no point to it anymore. And you don't think it's possible that the times made a mistake when writing the plot summary? Every single plot summary of Cry Baby Lane is word for word the same thing, so if the original source made a mistake then they all would've followed it. Nobody really cared to double check it simply because the movie is obscure. It makes sense if you use your brain rather than blindly accept what someone else told you. You know, flawed as the old article was, it at least sparked some interest into the movie again, and someone even found a copy because of it. Now this article is nothing but a joke, and the average person reading it wouldn't even be aware of this film's uniquely troubled history or almost mythical status on the internet. Way to go, wikipedia. You're ruining what could've been a useful tool for finding the movie.