" 
 :::::What's the diff between ""a proper reprimand"" and ""disciplined?""  Abuse of power is not ""gross?""  You must luv teh bushies!  Why would I recuse myself? I acknowledge upfront that I have a POV.  My name is Mr.Pov, but RadioKirk, you're the one that believes you are Mr. NPOV, yet you BOTH take very POV actions as well as edit the article involved.  Shebus.  Me?  I just write on the talk pages about your clear and present and dangerous POV.  So what is potentially libelous about what I wrote?  You don't think she is rational? effective? making tons of money?  getting much pr?  I guess you think she isn't purposefully exposing her rottencrotch, which is why she made that mistake three nights in one week (that act from the singer of ""oops! I did it again!"") Have you been to her website recently where she writes ""I guess I took my new found freedom a little too far"".  What does that suggest to you apart from purposefully exposing the gash to one and all?  And then for notability?  We have many wikipedia subjects chiming in on Ms Spear's spear catcher.  Camille Paglia foo thinks its relevant in how it affects feminism, how it effects Paglia's work, and how it reflects changes in Hollywood's star system.  Ann Althouse thinks its relevant for similar reasons.  These are both noted cultural observers.  Idiots sure, but widely quoted as cultural observers.  So what dear RadioKirk was it I said then that was potentially libelous?  In fact, the only potentially libelous comments here are yours, where you smear my good name, by suggesting I wrote potentially libelous material.  Do the honorable thing Kirk, your NPOV abuse is disgusting so recuse yourself and reclaim your cred.  "