"ImprobabilityDrive: 
 * The ""consensus view"" is nothing more than the view of SheffieldSteel & an anonymous editor, over a very short period (well under 24 hours). It is not a view shared by Orangemarlin or myself. Reverting me on the basis of this non-existent consensus is therefore unwarranted. 
 * The ICR do not have (direct) ""research indicating that radioisotope decay rates are not constant,"" they merely have 'research' which ""indicate that ""1.5 billion years"" worth of nuclear decay took place in one or more short episodes between 4,000 and 14,000 years ago,"" from which they then infer ""The results strongly support our accelerated decay hypothesis, that episodes with billion-fold speed-ups of nuclear decay occurred in the recent past, such as during the Genesis flood, the Fall of Adam, or early Creation week."" Even were their research credible, the statement would be unwarranted. 
 * Their research is however not credible, it is widely acknowledged (including by wikipedia itself) that Creation Science (of which ICR is the leading purveyor) is pseudoscience. See  for example for criticism of their RATE project. 
 

 "