" 

 ==Article neutrality== 
 I see - with the Nazi additions it's sort of like the VW and it's origins with Hitler.  Correct conclusion?  Why the VW and it's company are tainted forever.  Very logical.  Very fair.  No ad hominem.  No politics.  Right. 

  
 Uh, source notes for these additions? 
 This article tilts unabashadly to the opinion that declares the Pioneer Fund to be knee deep in Nazis, without any of the refutations present on their official website.  Please balance the article. 

 :Do it yourself.    

 I did. 

 All these accusations seem to be the standard guilt-by-association stuff.. do you have anything that really indicates the Fund is actively pursing racist policies? 

 :Ummm the incorporation papers actively state that the goal of the fund is to promote the white race.  Also guilt by association is still guilt.  If youre not racist you dont hang out with racists.  Sorry.      

 PS Please get a user handle. 

 ::Promoting a race doesn't imply racism automatically, the NAACP actively promotes the black race, and the National Council of La Raza promotes the Hispanic 'race'.  Guilt by association is not an automatic guilt indicator.  Erwin Rommel associated with Adolf Hitler, but was not in favor of Hitler's policies and indeed supported efforts to kill him.  Racism is the modern day McCarthyism, and works as Red Channels did in the 50s and 60s.  I am extremely cautious of labeling any organization that states it does not support racism to be racist, as a similar argument could be made for the Southern Poverty Law Center and the Anti-Defamation League being racist organizations. 

 Are you honestly making a comparison between the NAACP and say David Duke?  You don't know any history do you?  The NAACP was formed because back in the day Black people we're getting lynched and killed.  No one is doing that to white people.  So I'm sorry 99 out of 100 people would agree that anything caliming to further the white race would be racist.  You're hesitancy to ""label"" something racist, sounds like a personal problem that I urge you to get help with.   

 PS NO TOLERANCE FOR INTOLERANCE 

 :No I am not making a comparison between the NAACP and David Duke.  I think I know quite a bit of history.  What about the whites that were attacked during the Rodney King riots, the Cincinnati riots, and the Michigan riots solely because they were white?  Just because 99 out of 100 people may agree with you does not make something right or true.  Most people in the South opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1964/5, does that make it a bad bill that shouldn't apply there?  I hesitate to label something racist if it repudiates racism and says it is being smeared.  I don't hesitate to label the Klan or similar organizations racist.  Your cheap attack that I have a 'personal problem' appears to exemplify your lack of knowledge on race issues.  Also, this is getting away from the issue of the article's neutrality. 

 This is the last thing I'm going to say on this and then I'm done.  The attacks on whites during the riots were horrible yes.  But there were not part of a larger systemic movement by black people to disenfranchise white people.  So I'm sorry but your comparisons are stupid.  White people have always had the upper hand in this country, their interests don't need furthering by a special group because white peoples interests are this society's dominant interests.  White people never have to worry about racial profiling or anything like that.  So I'm sorry but to say that one is furthering the white race is a racist statement.    

 :This is also the last response I am giving. I'm glad you acknowledge the attacks on whites and others during these riots.  There is a movement to disenfranchise white people, look at the establishment of the Office of Hawaiian Affairs in Hawaii (until recently only Native Hawaiians could vote and hold office in the OHA, an official government organ; such status was determined by blood content, if you can believe it) and the attempts to throw white farmers off their land in Zimbabwe and Zambia, causing chaos for the blacks who depend on the food they grow.  Or what about racial preferences in college admissions, affirmative action and a forced commitment to ‘diversity’ in the business world?  So it is ok for racial organizations like the NAACP and the NCLR to exist, simply because some whites previously subjugated other races?  You imply that there is a white conspiracy to disenfranchise people of ‘color’ (I don’t consider any race to be without c