" 

 == Other copyvios == 

 Full info here: 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Duk#Copyright_violation 

 :I'd appreciate an answer to my question. Again, has the text been removed already? Or is it still there (i can't seem to find it)?  

 :If you come to my page complaining about a copyvio I will address it the same way I would for TDC, or any other editor. I'll go look for the copied text, look at the place it was copied from and then act accordingly.   
 ::Suuuuuure you will.      
 :::(replying to anon) If you were a registered user I would have left you a note to list it at WP:CP, that's how copyvios get resolved and that's how I came to work on WSI.   
 ::::So instead of, ""If you come to my page complaining about a copyvio I will address it the same way I would for TDC, or any other editor. I'll go look for the copied text, look at the place it was copied from and then act accordingly."" 
 ::::You really meant to say, ""If you come to my page complaining about a copyvio I will address it the same way I would for TDC, or any other editor. I'll tell the person to go list it at WP:CP.""  Glad we're finally on the same page.  Also, FYI I am registered.  Just not logged in.  And not being logged in has ZERO bearing on your ability to communicate with me if you are so inclined, as evidenced here.  Perhaps you can find a more suitable excuse.  Finally, as to your advice to list the violations at WP:CP, I have done so with little effect, and even tagged the article per your example.  I don't have the admin tools you have to enforce the copyvio remedies, so the tag was removed.   
 :::::Anon, I think you misunderstand me; I was working WSI in the course of clearing the others section at WP:CP. If you go look at the history of that page you'll see that I spent four weeks working the section and was responsible for clearing a third of the listings there, including WSI. I did not start working on the page because Travb or TDC asked me. 

 :::::If someone comes and complains about a page that I'm working on, that's one thing. But complaining about a copyvio on a page that wasn't even listed is a no-brainer, just tag the page and list it. Also, I generally ignore anons who intentionally insert copyright violations under a dynamic ip to avoid getting caught, unless they are unfairly maligning me. The fact that you are now doing this behind my back speaks volumes.  

 ::::::I don't believe I've misunderstood you.  Perhaps you stated your intent inaccurately?  How many ways can you interpret this: ""If you come to my page complaining about a copyvio I will address it the same way I would for TDC, or any other editor. I'll go look for the copied text, look at the place it was copied from and then act accordingly.""  It appears clear enough to me.  As for unfairly maligning you behind your back, you'll have to conjure up a more valid cry for sympathy.  You and Travb were having a conversation here, and I joined it  AND I directly addressed you with my comments.  Go apply your imagined larceny elsewhere, please.   And I agree, your suggestion is a ""no-brainer"" alright.  For someone with a history of neo-con POV, and abuse of Admin powers, you sure don't make much of an effort to conceal your efforts.  "