" 

 : Should we include all stereotypes? (well, except for the fake ones, like the way Americans say ""sprint"" as ""flicrk"", that's a very common fake stereotype). Should we include  that some Australians will stereotype Australian Wogs as doing the same? the fact that Americans will stereotype Australians as saying ""buy"" for ""bay"" or ""boy"" for ""buy""? How about the ""g'doy moyt"" stereotype of Australian wogs, by non-wog Australians? Anyway, how is New Zealand English relevant to a discussion of Australian English? It's not, but in order to include that statement as relevant you'd need to explain why Aussies say Kiwis say ""fush and chups"" (by the way, the kit-bit split is the wrong place to link to, because there is no split in New Zealand English). 

 : I'll agree that it might perhaps be relevant in a discussion of the differences between Australian and New Zealand English, but that's not what that is. That's a discussion of Australian English, without regard for others. 

 : —  "