"== DYK == 

 {| class=""Talk-Notice"" 
 |- 
 | 
 |Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Super Buddies, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently-created article, then please suggest it on the ""Did you know?"" talk page. 
 |} 

 == Rap == 

 I wrestled with myself over that one for a while... I think that if this is to be a disambig page, then there should be a separate article on rap music (which currently redirects to ""Hip hop music"").    
 *I can't pretend to know a lot about music genres, but I though hip-hop encompassed something broader, including musicians who did not rap, but were part of hip hop culture (like Destiny's Child and Usher).    

 ==Re: Rapping is a part of American pop culture?== 
 How is rapping a part of American pop culture, and singing is not? Everybody raps all over the world. I'd think you'd want to add that category to the article on hip hop, and not to this article. FuriousFreddy  

 I saw your edits - couple things in response . While I'm not excluding content from this section, the risk we appear to run when we put too much into the [Pop Culture] subcategory is that it could water it down into oblivion  one might make the arguement for just about anything to go into that category. I thought it was a great category to be used to represent key symbols of [Pop Culture], icons or key symbols (IE MTV, Burger King, etc.). Singing to me is too broad a topic, whereas Rock and Roll is dintinctly American, at least from its initial roots. That said, I don't see why Rap can't be part of several categories - you noted Hip Hop as well. I dont have the background in this field you seem to have from your bio, but it would make sense to include that topic in both categories.  09:32 4 August 2005. 

 == Personal attack == 

 Look  ""I WILL request that Voarsh be banned if he contnues vandalising"" is a personal attack !!! Removing POVs statements is not a vandalism !!  I will request that you  will be banned too !-   

 You say that ""you can be banned for repeated poor edits to articles and vandalisation"". I didn't do any ""poor edits"" and i didn't vandalise any pages. I just say that a Michael Jackson page include POV statements. You are also lying that ""i don't like Michael Jackson"". It's untruth. THreating people for arguing POV in the article and telling lies about them is a personal attack !!! Will see who will be banned !!   

 ""you seem awful adamant about wanting the ""people call him a pedophile"" bit added to the article, and you've been persuing that point, it seems, for several months"" is onother lie !! You continue to lie . My opinion is wrtitten in Michael Jackson's talk page. I didn't said that a word ""pedophile"" should be added, I said that there are some people that think that he is the ""king of pop"", but other people think that he is ""Wacko Jacko"" or even ""Pedophile"", but Wikipidia should avoid all these statements, because they are all POV in my opinion. Saying that i am pursuing adding a bit of ""Pedophile"" for 'months is another lie !!! Why are you lying ??? MOnths ??? As of removal i said in the talk page that in my opinion MTV and Rolling stones ""best songs"" should be moved to trivia section, and it is not suitable for the entrance section (its all written in talk page )! Here again YOu continue to lie and saying that i did it as an act of VAndalism !!!!! -   

 On 16 July i said quote:  
 #""Proven fact"" ? Really ? )"" 
 #""Many people think that he is pedophile, but in order to publish it we should have a substantial evidence or at least a link to some respectful source (if you say that he has admitted that)"" 
 THat's what you call ""attempting to get that fact added to the page"" ???? It wasn't my idea to add the Word PEDOPHILE to the page !! You are lying again