1) As for my point, I direct you to  and . Both authors are renowned experts on the Xinjiang issue, and both texts are required reading in Central Asia studies. If Wikipedia runs on intutation, then China should lost the Korean War while suffering 1 million dead by conducting human wave attacks...it is a popular idea that makes sense, but it is accurate? No, intutation does not work on complex topics such as this. If your point is obvious, then multiple reliable academic sources, from both China and the West, . It only took me few minutes to find high quality academic sources on how Chinese government treat Ugyhur better than Han, if you want your points heard, I suggest you do some research rather than do logic. 
 3) Not talking history means we do not talk about how problems came to be, but that does not mean we stop talk about the problem altogether. Within this article, we took pain to avoid discussions about Second East Turkestan Republic, Wang Zhen, or the Cultural Revolution, but does this mean that we should stop talking about Ugyhur Nationalism, security crackdowns and Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, which are running alive even today? We can agree on not discussing the history of Han migration between 1949-1980, but that does not mean the modern day effects of past migration should be ignored altogether.