" 

  

  
 I disaggree. The Angela Merkel article was not neutral, because it lacks ANY criticism.. It is a 'bio' that only has praise for her. An international controversy does not deserve mention? ""Has not been demonstrated""??? WTF? How is that! All major news agency's have reported on this as a controversy! They all mentioned the ZDM criticism. It is a controversy! It's got the world wide attention.Neutralty? Bullshit! You jump on everyone that tries to add some  balance to this article. This is not a minority viewpoint or undue weight - it may represent the views of as much as 30% of German population.It is also the viewpoint that much of the media has choosen to support. You want it to be Merkel's happy bio page (not neutral).  
 This is a highly charged atmosphere in which local and international right wing groups have managed to incite a feeling of generalized and irrational islamophobia and xenophobia alike. 
 People, such as Terry Jones can reach out to millions with their silly radical videos. Just imagine this scenario: Imagine,  Terry Jones will be acredited for the New York islamic center not being build near ground zero, or cancelled/postponed alltogether. Probably, Obama wouldn't hand him an award or medal for that. But imagine, if two legislations later, another US president would do so and award him the ""Freedom of speech"" award, a medal, a stipend... and blablabla....""saved our country from civil war""....blablabla. Would that be noteworthy? Probably not. It remains a sad fact, that while the media tries to preserve some sort of political correctness, it has long been abandoned by the radicalized public (as much 50-60%). 
 It seems people get their opinions from youtube these days. It saddens me that wikipedia has also been affected by this! Btw, I am not a Muslim and I am also not a communist. I just hate to see a people being collectively trampled & stigmatized for something they didn't do.But I am not an activist.   "