" 

 :: I'm mostly worried about the ""depathologize""/""service on demand""/""no gatekeeping at all"" model of transition. I disagree with it but that's not what is important; what is important is how this position, and the ways treatment can be obtained under it - Asian surgeons, informed-consent hormone clinics, online hormone purchase - is to be described and referenced. Remember, there are real people reading this article, some of whom are directly affected. In line with NPOV that position, which has a big theoretical following and a significant practcal one, should be presented with appropriate references and appropriate weight, not just as mysterious ""some people"". The obvious approach is to place it in ethics/cultural... Or perhaps - just have this idea - give ""treatment outside SoC"" a separate heading? But as this entire thing is not approved by Western medicine, scientific sources are not available. Are activist and personal sites to be used as sources at all?  
 ::As an aside do you have a link to the UK RC-Psych standards?   "