"Danish version of LOL/lol == 

 You can hardly say that g or commonly written *g*/*gg* etc, is a translation of lol. They are refering to the danish version of laughing, but they are not commonly used (most Danes use lol) secondly *g*/*gg*/griner is not a powerful as lol. Stating that you are lol'ing (^^) means you are practically falling off your chair where as griner/*g*/*gg* is just common laughing. 
    
 :also gg means good game, faggots 

 == Please delete the article. == 

 Don't delete it (It is a part of modern culture as much as many other things are), but please, the entire first section of the article is garbage. At least create a new section about all of these ""studies"" or better yet, delete them and replace it with a history of the word. Seriously, though, the first section has to go. 
    

 lol is laugh out loud and lmao is laugh my ass off  As much as the acronym 'LOL' is in global use, it belongs more on Urban Dictionary than a fully-featured encyclopedia. Please delete the article or at least get somebody else to do it as it is quite pathetic with details. They're not wrong, just a little bit inaccurate and the article is very unprofessional. It's already been nominated for deletion once; keep Wikipedia to the informal articles, please.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by   •    

 And why isn't an acronym encyclopedic?   

 Fully-featured minus ""LOL""? How is the article ""quite pathetic with the details""? Did you request the deletion just for teh lullz?      

 (LOL also means Lots Of Love)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by     

 :Also, the previous discussion resulted in Speedy Keep.    

 ""LOL is a common element of Internet slang used historically on Usenet"". Do we really need to use the word USENET?    

 == ROFFLES == 
 ROFFLES redirects here, but the article doesn't mention it once.  Can't figure out what the extra letters mean.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by     
 Do we even need this article?    

 Internet lingo is immature, and stupid. It's hardly worthy of an article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by     

 This article falls completely within the requirements of Wikipedia articles per Wikipedia standards. It, however, does require work to become a more complete and constructive encyclopedic entry.  As noted above all previous attempts to have this article deleted have resulted in a ""speedy keep"" verdict.  It may be prudent to discuss a merge of this article into common internet lingo if there is enough of objection to LOL being a separate article, but this move would have to be discussed at length and would not be an overnight outcome.  January 1, 2009 6:59PM 

 Could someone please delete the line ""Teenagers now sometimes use them in spoken communication as well as in written, with ROFL (pronounced /ˈroʊfəl/ or /ˈrɒfəl/) and LOL (pronounced /ˈloʊl/, /ˈlɒl/, or /ˌɛloʊˈɛl/), for example""? I am a teenager and am highly offended by this line. No one I know uses lol in spoken communication and few use it in text messaging or IM.It is also used various times when there is an awkward