" 

 == Maratha Empire == 

 Sir, I had added valid English language citation to this page and also tagged the article as flowery with no citaions what so ever. I has added in several  tags because there were none to support the claims. All this has been reverted by user:vishu123 without explanation. His answer on the article's discussion page answers for itself. Please advice Vishu123 not to revert valid English language citations.Thanks.  

 :Intrestingly when i added  and  tags on Yadavas page he removed it without any consideration and flamed me. He is fidgeting because I have citations with me that will crack his lies.   

 :: Vishu us now blocked as a sock also. '    
 == Ian Bell == 

 As an administrator, I would like your opinion on the ""Sherminator"" trivia on Ian Bell's page.  I've commented on it on the talk page, but have not reverted the most recent edit.  I don't think that childish name calling deserves a place on Wikipedia, but I don't wish to get involved in a revert war without having someone else's opinion on the matter.    

 :I don't like it either so I've removed it - we shouldn't document every sledge or rude insults ever said - else, Wikipedia turns into a tabloid toilet. Or else we could list every Shane Warne affair for instance, or in India, where cricketers enjoy many ""fringe benefits"" from super-stardom and are repeatedly linked to glamourous Bollywood actresses etc. '    

 ==Orangutan== 
 I seek your esteemed wisdom kind sir on the fate of the on-going edit war at orangutan - I am not sure whether to - 
 : (1) suggest a separate article for the belligerent culture person 
 : (2) seek other remedies - like a vote on the talk page?  
 :with as much of christmas/solstice goodwill as possible. 
 :Problem is I consider the belligerent is being provocative - while the reverters can be seen in the same manner.   What do you think?  I would appreciate any comment   

 ::Sorry about being so late, as I have been away for two weeks - is Orangutans in popular culture the article in question? It seems to have quietened down somewhat since the separate article was created and if everybody is happy, then that appears to be good. Is it? ''''''    

 Oh esteemed Bananabucket trust you rested well free of wikipedia - and of course you must know the result of the test in the eastern states - first time in 83 years (moondyne is still absent -  0 probably been watching every minute of it) .  As for the orang utan  - things happen a lot even in one day here (viz hesperians latest adventure)- there is a much larger wider generic issue re trivia and 'in popular culture sections'  in biological articles - some eds are  vicious - some more mediating - the thing there is now a collection  in the category of animals in popular culture which appear to have been created to avert the adhoc unsystematic lists of things from tv and film in the usa that some feel compelled to add willy nilly - there is no overview general article for the category - but I had tried in the orangutan in pop cult to add in a ref or two  from the academics - the problem is that the arts are of very varying qulaity. length and standards - the oa pest hasnt returned - despite invitations - but If I had the time I would try to create a parent article for the animals in popular culture category with some general issues (am intrigued by the rats in flushed away, charlottes web and chicken run -I have three children)  - to try to stop too much variation between the arts - but ah I haves too many threads I pursues - projects - pages here and there - and not the capacity to endure creating a good art about the curses of mainly us-centric popular culture and the animals that inhabit them - I hope that sort of answers the message in a sort of way - I had resolved to try to reduce talk page acitivity for the new year but it fell apart on the 2nd - so be it.  Thanks for responding, I hope this gives an idea of what has happened.  Happy new year!   

 ==If you are on== 
 The most recent eds on orangutan and adam smith are repeated vndlsms (if you check the recent edits - think the bod needs a prod! )  
 ::Thanks for that