":::""instead of discussing""? Is this how dispute are handled these days, by blatant misrepresentation (aka lying through your teeth in an attempt to make others look bad)? ""Without discussion"" as in here? I didn't call  JHunterJ a  vandal, but his behaviour is clearly disruptive, bullying and in blatant violation of letter and spirit of DR. If he has a dispute, let him present his dispute instead of idle waving around of guideline links. It goes without saying that I insist on my points, which remain unaddressed, and I will continue to insist on them until they have been properly addressed, or an acceptable compromise suggestion which is at least aware of what I have been saying is presented. I am the party willing to compromise. The JHunterJ-Abtract team is the party guilty of WP:OWN-by-superior-numbers, insisting on an unreflected revision as a matter of principle, just to put the ""content peons"" in their place. God forbid disambiguation pages be edited by people who actually have a semantic understanding of the term in question. Perhaps we could replace JHunterJ and cie. by a disambig-bot programmed to bulldoze human contributions which only tend to disrupt the immaculate beauty of a script-generated disambiguation page.     

  
 "