" 
 :A candidate assuring AIPAC of their strong support for Israel is not especially groundbreaking, but probably worth noting in the relevant section here. The Alaskan Jewish community (or at least a few of its leaders) have praised Palin. The Jerusalem Post notes that Palin is ""completely unknown"" in Israel, and references ""Palin's obscurity, her lack of any record on Israel, or even statements on Israel issues,"" (), but suggests that Israel's leadership still seems comfortable with McCain-Palin.This is a reasonable source for the article. One could argue about how much weight to assign it or how to incorporate it, but dismissing on WP:BLP grounds because, in one's editorial judgement, it's ""one of the crappiest Times articles I've ever seen"" is an abuse of WP:BLP. I'm with Baccyak4H - I would favor returning a single sentence noting: ""The Washington Times reported that evangelical faith drives Palin's pro-Israel view."" As more is published - and more will be published - on the subject, it can be augmented or replaced with more detail, but at present it adds reasonably sourced content to a sparse section of the article and I see no WP:BLP issue. ''''''  "