" 

 == You misunderstood me, admit it == 

 I did not use the word ""idiot"" once. I simply asked if you were stupid enough to consider the addition of a simple "" "" as being vandalism. If you were a thoughtful individual, you would have realized that all you had to do in this case to refrain from being considered stupid was admitting that you were wrong. I will point out that the preceding statement is another opportunity for you to exempt yourself from a categorical statement; just admit that you now understand. If you agree to admit that you now understand, you are a thoughtful individual. 
 Since you did not live your entire life in America, you are not familiar with the law that I was referring to. The US Census Bureau has not always asked you what race/ethnicity you identify yourself with most closely. Once upon a time, it was actually based upon genealogical evidence (in order to prove a claim of racial minority status). With the new laws in place, anybody can legally be of any race they choose; all you have to do to legally become an African American (or German, or Swede, or Spaniard) is to simply say so during a census. 
 Moreover, I was criticizing the frequent inadequacies of editors and the apparent interest in reverting contributions that disagree with the opinion of the  socialist elites. Whenever I make a contribution (with significant evidence) that happens to disagree with the political stances of you and your friends, I get shouted down and falsely accused of vandalism. I admit that I used the word dummy, but I did not mention any one person in particular in that statement; if you took offense, it is because you mentally group yourself in that category. I did not say ""you are a dummy"" or ""you are an idiot,"" so where you came up with this ridiculous notion that my statements were a personal attack on you is beyond me.  "