" 

 It's not an angle - you are being abusive. Now NPOV, verifiable and factual. That's what we should be doing. The fact you believe something that, it seems, can't be proven is fine. DO that but that should be made clear to be a ""faith"" stance in such an article not a veriufiable fact of ""jesus"" existnce. I don;t have POV issues - quite the opposite - I am trying to get NPOV into this artuicle. It is only some who are trying to defend the unverifiable and the POV taht this article has.  "