":::: Hello Carol. Your charges are meaningless because they are completely unspecific. Please specify specific text and explain why the claims expressed therein are ""defamatory."" 

 :::: By the way, No has agreed with you that any remarks are defamatory (hence TFD's ""un-hatting"" them), and no one has expressed agreement that the title section being debated is defamatory (Rich only claims it's inappropriate, while the two uninvolved commentators actually agree it should relate to homosexuality; are they part of the conspiracy to defame Hoppe?). I hope, for your sake, you view this unanimous rejection of your charges as a wake-up call before continuing to undermine your contributions by making inflammatory yet utterly false charges.     

 "