"::::::TharkunColl: ""When have I ever expressed ""imperial"" views?"" Did you or did you not say the following: 
 ::::::* ""the Canadian monarchy is an adjunct of the British monarchy,"" 
 ::::::* ""please stop attempting the relegate the UK to just one of 16 realms"" 
 ::::::* ""stop attempting to demote the UK to just one amongst 16 places of which she is queen"" 
 ::::::* ""if the colonies really do want independence, then they should have the courage to do so"" 
 ::::::* ""a monarchy where the monarch only visits once in a blue moon, where the monarch has no power or influence whatsoever, and where the monarch is head of state of another country on the other side of the world, is [i]no[/i] monarchy"" 
 ::::::* ""Australia is a monarchy in name only"" 
 ::::::If so then I think I doubt anyone would deny that you are clearly expressing an imperialist viewpoint, particularly when your edits change factual information into information that wrongly suggests the UK is constitutionally superior to the other Realms. 
 ::::::""Under law the Queen is Queen of all those places equally, but in practice she devotes almost the whole of her time to the UK. For Wikipedia to base its articles purely the former view is POV."" How is it POV, in articles whose purpose it is to discuss the constitutional position of Elizabeth II, to describe that position from a constitutional point of view? Which country she spends more time in is neither here nor there. 

 "