" 

 :Gaddis says responsibility was debated, not debatable, two very different things. You're the one misrepresenting stuff here. Falcoff denies there was a ""CIA inspired overthrow;"" which is why this bloody article does not say there was a CIA inspired overthrow. ""support was crucial"" and ""CIA inspired the coup"" are very different statements; you have successfully disputed the latter, but the latter is not in the article. Does Falcoff deny support existed? Does he deny it was necessary? Of course not. Because Falcoff, unlike yourself, is a historian who knows what he is doing. Go bring something new. The question you ask is a useless one, because they don't have to say that for the statement to remain in the article; all they have to do is ''not deny it."" Find me a quote which denies it. Of course, you can't do that, because such a quote does not exist.   "