" 

 ==User bias, a comparison== 

 Why are the well documented criticisms on the Yahoo! Answers page introduced by Luna's Blade being supressed while the ones here which have less evidence to back them up being allowed to remain? Is that logical or fair? Why on top of it was Novangelis permitted to edit and revert the page when he was one of the users critcised, and with documentation to back up the critique? Why was Loeth allowed to continue editing the page when he made it clear he was favoring Novangelis when it was pointed out to him Novangelis was a Yahoo! Answers user criticized on that page for harassment and stalking / trolling? Why was Mzarius not banned from editing that article when he made his bias clear by removing Luna's comments on him on the talk page for Yahoo Answers but not a comment clearly making insults and without basis, that being pointed out to Mzarius? Is the Yahoo! Answers article and talk page for non-Christians and atheists only to edit? Is suppressing evidence permissable on Wikipedia? How is it that only non-Christians and atheists are allowed to put their input on that page and yet Wikipedia's owners pretend it's a fair site? How many times must this issue be brought up until atheists and anti-Christians stops vandalizing and reverting that page for illogical reasons? Is the mere claim of ""weasel wording"" or ""vandalism"" evidence in itself as Loeth and Mzarius would have us believe? Until Yahoo Answers stops being vandalized by atheists with a clear agenda to suppress evidence that makes atheists look bad, Wikipedia will remain a joke when it comes to facts. This problem was pointed out to the person in charge of page-locking by Luna and yet it was deliberately limited only until after her edits were reverted and then again when some other person who reverted it back to Luna's edit. 

 So, if a Christian cannot even be permitted to put in his comments in the talk page for Yahoo! Answers without it being deleted by Mzarius or other atheists, how can wikipedia be fair? Can anyone explain this disgusting situation? According to Loeth wikipedia is not a place to post personal grievances, well excuse me isn't there a section on Christian persecution? Isn't there a personal grievances section (criticisms) on the digg page and many many other pages? And yet when it comes to criticisms pointing out how certain atheists treat Christians on Yahoo Answers and are allowed to get away with it, it's taboo and not relevant to what Yahoo Answers is like? 

 So then, let's all be like Loeth, Novangelis, and Mzarius, wikitrolls, and delete ALL the criticism sections because criticism is ""personal"". Hey, they said so, so it must be true. 
 (therefore disqualifying him from being allowed to edit the article)"