"wisely advise below.  Cheers,   

 Evolution doesn't seem to study other concepts or arguments, that are opposite or contrary, like Intelliegnt Design, only hypothesis or theories, of their thought liking. As to accept the mention at least as here in Wikipedia, would be a more balanced objective Science and not objective one sided Evolutionary Science.    
 ::...that is to say, ""a science consonant with theistic convictions"" ...   

 ::""would be a more balanced objective Science and not objective one sided Evolutionary Science"" - huh?  Lack of balance in evolutionary biology?  Have you ever cracked open an evolutionary biology journal?    

 Intelligent Design applied to Organic Biological Evolutionary concepts, is also a clear definition composed of two words clearly defined in a dictionary.     

 Evolutionary Biology Journal don't study opposite concepts or arguments to Evolution, but a Science Journal should !    

 :, how can you come back here and expect to be taken seriously after what you yelled on your user page? According to you, Intelligent design is a theory and a hypothesis, evolution is religion and philosophy. According to you, evolution is false, you don't have proof to back this statement up, yet you claim that you will use pure logic to prove it at some point. And you claim that evolution tries to eliminate all Christians.    

 ::And I thought that's what the lions were for. ;)  In any case, I can't be bothered with George's opinions after his conduct on his user page: ""Evolution sucks...!GeorgeFThomson 17:03, 22 August 2006"", ""Evolution falls over by its own alleged weight of so much experimentation ! If something is true, you don't have to experiment much to prove it! It simply is true...by a few clear experiments of logic !GeorgeFThomson "", ""You all are pathetic GeorgeFThomson "", ""Simply small minds...that this world mostly has...!"". ""You ""EVOLUTIONISTS"" need to go through life with a asimetric body, to see if you then will prove or disprove ""EVOLUTION"". Like lets say: conflicting noises from more than two ears, two brains comflicting one with the other, three legs getting tangled up with the other, and reproducing only like this, and no bettering occuring as all would die anyway imperfect, etc... to see what you would conclude, ""Evolution"" did it...!GeorgeFThomson "".  Such acrid ramblings do not bode well for the possibility of anything George writes being taken seriously.  "