" 

 ::::::*It's demonstrably false, not even close to true, that Woffinden's view equals that of the 2002 hearing. He doesn't have a section devoted to him anymore, and the 2002 appeal transcript has been the article's most widely used source for a long time. See the references section; please don't respond until you've read that. This is very time-consuming, and it's pointless if you haven't read the article and aren't familiar with the sources, so I'm sorry, but I can't keep replying to objections that are so clearly false.   "