" 

 Excuse me but you don't have place in Wikipedia. You claim to follow Wikipedia policies and then make totally unsourced claims that ""Positions taken by Anglicans across the world are divergent and often nuanced."" How can someone make such claims without a reliable source? There are two stances about abortion, pro-life and pro-choice, and from everything I have searched, the American Episcopal Church is the only who is openly pro-choice. You deleted good faith edits about the Anglican Church of Canada, who were in fact sourced. The user I mentioned is from Australia and certainly knows better the Anglican Church of Australia then most editors and he is being editing articles in Wikipedia, mostly about religion and Anglicanism, in a long time. He did provided a link about what is written about the Anglican Diocese of Melbourne, but it is now a dead link. Any person in ""good faith"" can be a editor in Wikipedia, even a Anglican priest or a atheist activist. It's simply pathetic to try to pretend to follow Wikipedia policies and then doing absolutely the opposite.   

 I can repeat what another user wrote:  
 :::::Rosecelese, I encourage you to focus solely on the discussion and not other eidtors. Wikipedia directs all editors to WP:AGF assume good faith of other editors. Accusing editors of ""whining"" is not helpful to civil discourse. This policy is particularly important on controversial topics such as this one. However, should you seek to continue in this behavior, you will find yourself prevented from contributing futher. Enough said. "