" 

 == Neutrallity 2 == 

 Relentless POV pushing by Mervyn Emrys and others has resulted in an article that attempts to paint FAIR and its hundreds of thousands of members and supporters as racists, despite the complete lack of any evidence  that would not be laughed out of court or any responsible newspaper  of FAIR ever advocating racism, performing a racist act, or taking a racist, bigoted, nativist, or xenophobic position on any issue. The article mentions under both ""Activities"" and ""Criticism"" a small amount of funding for general operations received from the Pioneer Fund many years ago. Even assuming that the Pioneer Fund at the time of that funding was a racist organization  which is contradicted by statements from the fund itself  this is guilt by association that McCarthy would be proud of. It should be removed from ""Activities"" and the unsubstantiated claim that the Progress Fund was or is racist or neo-Nazi removed from ""Criticism"". FAIR is not ""anti-immigration"" as its opponents consistently call it, yet that inaccurate label continues to be re-inserted in this article. There are polls of the American people showing a desire by the majority to reduce immigration numbers to more traditional levels and crack down on illegal immigration, and if you believe the majority of Americans are racist, then you're welcome to your opinion but it does not belong here. The article in several places treats critical assertions by advocacy groups (e.g., SPLC) and newspaper editorials, which by definition are NPOV, as RS, and rebuttal information from the organization itself as not RS. This is obviously unfair and unbalanced. In fact, any organization would  in the absence of hard evidence to the contrary  normally be considered the most credible source of information about its positions and activities. The members and supporters of this organization are users of WP too, and whether you agree with their views or not, they deserve to be treated with a modicum of respect and without having to continuously defend their organization against non-stop recycling of ad hominem and innuendo."