" 

 == Review == 

 Hey there \/, I'm doing my long overdue review that you requested... The good news is that I didn't see any thing that you nominated for CSD that was clearly wrong.  There were several where I felt that your rationale was wrong.  Here are just a few examples: 
 *I noticed that you nominated a page with a bunch of pictures for deletion today as a G3, it was eventually deleted as a G1.  IMO both of those were the wrong criteria, I personally felt it should have been deleted as A1/3-but it definitely needed to be deleted, so the exact criteria isn't all that critical. 
 *Another page asks the viewer to PLEASE COPY N PASTE THIS URL INTO YOUR BROWSER AND SEARCH US. IM SURE WERE WORTH THE EFFORT PPL.  It gives the a website to click and you tagged it as G3, it would probably be better labeled spam/advertising. 
 *You nominated David Erman Wrestling for deletion per A7.  The problem with A7 is that the article claimed to have Kurt Angle, Triple-H, The Miz and several other notable wrestlers... if ANY ONE of these wrestlers was actually signed with the production, it would make the DEW instantly notable as they are some of the biggest names in wrestling.  That being said, none of them are signed with DEW, thus G3 is a clear rationale.  The roster is from the WWE, not DEW. 
 * Another page included the line, He was very retarded and love gay hot anal sex with men.  You nomed it as G3, G10 would have been better. 
 * Another page enjoys long walks with randy(long haired white trash) in trailer parks again, G3 should have been G10. 
 Your work at this point in time at CSD probably wouldn't garner an oppose, but it might prevent me from supporting.  I'd have to the see the rest of the body of your work.-''' ' "