" 

 == Additional information about mating == 

 Could someone please insert the following information somewhere appropriate in the article, I don't know where to put it. 
 Usually, after mating is successful, the female tends to go away while the male Koala, still excited, wants to mate again. So eventually the female Koala can violently fend off the male Koala after mating has occurred because she does not want to mate again. 
 When I saw this happen, the male Koala ran after the female Koala and the female Koala clawed him out, discouraging him.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by   •    

 Someone's constantly erasing my info about twins without justification. I'd like to know why. It's a fact I added about the official recording of twins in the 'Life cycle' section of the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by   •    

 :Try adding an inline citation, I'll I will regard it as something real and not just something from your head. -    

 == thumbnail pictures == 

 I've removed the forced sizing of the thumbs in this article so it looks cleaner.    

 == Protection please for the page == 

 Could this page please be protected from vandalism attacks.  Thank you.    

 hi my name is cori  —Preceding unsigned comment added by     

 == Pap == 

 Life cycle section and the Ecology and Behavior section define ""pap"" differently. Is it or is it not ""excrement/faeces""? One section says it is and the other one denies it.    

 == ""Koala bear"" == 

 I've removed the claim that ""koala bear"" is inaccurate — again. Before re-adding it, could anyone so inclined first discuss it here?    
 :There is no discussion needed. It *is* inaccurate to call it a bear. -    
 :If you can prove a genetic relationship with the bears then please provide it, otherwise it should stay.    

 I haven't taken a look at the article so please take this with a pinch of salt. Nevertheless, if you're trying to deny the fact that people call them Koala bears, that would be linguistic prescriptivism — in other words, POV pushing. '  

 From a descriptive linguistics POV (which is the best way for NPOV IMHO) it is not incorrect to say anything, as long as it's not a slip of the tongue. Does my edit look OK to everyone? '  

 :No, I'm not saying people don't call them koala bears. I'm saying that when someone does call them koala bears, that they are inaccurate when doing so. They are not bears. It is inaccurate to call them bears. Do you understand the word ""inaccurate""? It means, roughly, to miss the mark. The Koala is no more related to the bears of family Ursidae than kangaroos are, or any other marsupial is. Shall we call them all bears? No, that's silly, and it is silly for folks to continue to call them koala bears. But, none of us can stop people from being silly, but we can label that activity as inaccurate, which is as polite and as correct a way of saying it as any. -    
 ::Nope, that's not how languages work. '  
 ::Meaning, even if you don't approve, you can't deny it, and people will say it and regard it as accurate. So it would be descriptively wrong to call it inaccurate. ' 17:17, 5 May