", 28 April 2012 (UTC) 
 ::::::Good luck with that harassment claim. I'm guilty of WP:CIVIL but I have not threatened you, gone around canvassing, e-mailed you, spammed your talk page, or anything else like that. On the flipside, let me quote you: ""Keep this up and you're IP is going to face another block, because my patience for your slander is wearing thin."" Considering you don't even have the authority to block IPs, that sounds like a threat to me. Only someone with a control complex would confuse an editing dispute confined to the affected article's talk page with harassment. By-the-way WP:RELEVANCE is not a policy, it's an essay. It's sad that you would even cite it to try and justify the lack of sources. Please put my responses back in paragraph form the way I left them on the 27th. That kind of formatting makes it look like I responded to you with one/two sentence answers which is not the case. I also found a statement you left that looks like it came from me. You put ""By the way, just an FYI, you can wikilink old revisions of an article by using the syntax number header to avoid having to use the long-form http"" directly behind my response instead of underneath it with the rest of your responses. I get that you were filling me in on an easier way to link but I still have a problem with that because it looks like I said it. If you would have put your responses directly underneath my mine instead of breaking my paragraphs apart so that you could respond to every one/two sentences, that wouldn't have happened. I also don't appreciate you doing this > ""Another example of you violating WP:OWN. but are you Here you are claiming consensus when you yourself don't even adhere to it."" You put ""but are you"" within my response. You accuse me of being malicious but then you go and make a vindictive move like that and wonder why I thought you were being hypocritical in the first place. I didn't touch your responses so please put my comments back the way they were and recompose your responses verbatim underneath mine. You responded in this manner in the · ""You said and I quote ""If the style is listed on a card as its own style... group of comments and in the · Are you serious? The wikilinks I provided at the beginning... group of comments. It shouldn't be a problem for you to respond the same way in the other groups.   23:55"