" 
 ==Relax, dude!== 
 Relax, dude! I'm jus' playin' around! Besides, I'm not the anon that reverted it with the very rude edit summary of, ""rv until we have some indication this is permanent asshole"". Anyway, it looks like Gmail is back up again, so no worries,... =)    

 == RfA, again == 

 Why? Why imply that an editor is 'clueless'? Why not simply express your concerns in a civil and collegial manner? Your oppose is reasonable and somewhat persuasive; your tone is still unnecessarily divisive. I only ask that you take into heart the concerns many have raised over your comments at RFA. Thanks. –' |   

 :I've heard this tune many times before, and it's becoming no more persuasive with incessant repetition.  RFA is for evaluating a candidate's competence.  If ""clueless"" upsets you, this problem is yours, not mine.     

 ::As much as I cannot bear the thought of defending Friday, this is mild compared to some of the insulting comments he has left for RfA candidates in the past. Perhaps it's slowly sinking in that it's not ""Requests for rude remarks"" but ""Requests for adminship"", and such comments can easily be expressed in a more courteous manner. But he's not quite ""got it"" yet, unfortunately. '   

 :::It does occur to me that lectures on civility and courtesy from an editor who leaves comments like yours, Majorly, might not be well-received.  It seems that the concerns raised about your unpleasant approach towards dispute resolution in Friday's RfC (see Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Friday#Friday's response) still are a long way from being repaired.  You're unlikely to persuade anyone to change their conduct if your approach to them is this condescending.    

 ::::I'm sure he can take it, this is mild compared to the stuff he dishes out. It seems the concerns about Friday's negative approach to Wikipedia still are a long way from being repaired too - why not comment about that, instead of shooting the messenger? I'm unlikely to persuade Friday to change, as is anyone. I am far from the only one concerned with the way he treats other editors, but he brushes them off as if everyone except himself are a bunch of idiots. Instead of taking the opportunity to criticise me, why not look at the actual issue (Friday's poor attitude)? I wouldn't have to do this if Friday started acting with a smidgen of courtesy/politeness. It seems everytime Friday is criticise, you pop up out of nowhere to criticise the messenger instead. ''''   

 :::::(ec) It strikes me that if you're aware that your continued posts to Friday's talk page are unlikely to result in the change that you desire, there's no reason for you to continue making them.  Moreover, there's no reason at all for you to make unconstructive comments which are insulting and condescending.  I'm tell you, now, that I'm concerned with the way that you treat other editors, Majorly.  Based on the RfC I linked, I'm not the only one with similar concerns.  What positive steps do you intend to take in the future to remedy these concerns?   

 ::::::""Moreover, there's no reason at all'' for you to make unconstructive comments which are insulting and condescending"" - and this does not apply to Friday, who we are supposed to be discussing? ""I'm tell you, now, that I'm concerned with the way that you treat other editors, Majorly.  Based on the RfC I linked, I'm not the only one with similar concerns."" I'm concerned with the way Friday treats other editors. Based on the RFC, I'm not the only one with similar concerns. Please stop trying to blame everything on me. If y