" 
 :Nice bit of research, Trappedinburnley. I'd say this is an excellent reason to lose the advertising award... or should we act as PR proxies for networks and append a trivia section for every network featuring which network came up with ""Must see TV"", ad nauseam (pardon the pun)? 

 :I would also appeal to admin for semi-protection on the basis of discussions as to how to clean up the unencyclopaedic content added during the last bout of edit warring. Please see recent discussions (above) which are policy and guideline-based, and dependent on consensus before the fact. Serious problems with the layout and content of the entire article have been presented. Any of the contributors who disagreed with the proposed changes to sections, started here on the talk page, have had ample opportunity to join in and present solid arguments for their objections changes before they were initiated, yet there was no activity here until the content in question was changed in the article. Does being held to ransom with reverts after the fact of discussion equal  on behalf of good faith editors who are discussing changes before initiating them, only to be pounced on and reverted by edit warriors only lurking in the wings of the article itself? This should be left open to discussion, not simply a punitive shutting out of all editors.   "