" 

 == Please stop your continued POV edits regarding circumcision == 

 In this edit, you supply a statement regarding the legality of circumcision from the College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia, which seems relevant and appropriate.  However, you then also add two very clearly WP:UNDUE anti-circumcision POV pieces to it: 
 :1. You added a statement by Bouclin: 
 ::""Bouclin, however, argues that the circumcision of children violates the child's rights to security..."" 
 :in a manner that makes it look like the Bouclin statement was made after and in response to the CPSBC statement.  First, Bouclin's paper was from 2005 and the CPSBC statement was from 2009, after Bouclin's paper.  So Bouclin was not writing in response to the CPSBC as your edit suggests; in fact, the CPSBC had Bouclin's paper available to them when they made their statement.  This is deceptive.  Second, it is clearly WP:UNDUE in the manner that you have attempted to line up the CPSBC, which represents hundreds or possibly thousands of members, with Bouclin, an individual whose paper was available for review by and apparently discounted by the CPSBC when they made their policy statement. 
 :2. You added a mention of a ""kitchen circumcision"" case that had no significant bearing on Canadian law regarding circumcision.  And why, out of the probably dozens of legal cases that have ever come before Canadian courts, did you choose to include this one and not any other, and also specifically a case that the source you provided did not give us any reason to think was particularly notable or would have any lasting effect on Canadian law?  Again, another clearly undue edit that shows an anti-circumcision POV. 
 I have reverted these parts of your edit.  Sugarcube, if you won't stop making POV edits in this direction after being notified that it's a problem, we should probably get input from the editors at WP:NPOVN regarding your edit history in this subject area.   "