" 

 :Explaining? I think the article reads as an essay trying to prove a point, i.e. that the ""esoteric Christianity"" is coherent, has a continuity, and that it is ""valid"" Christianity, citing less than reliable sites, mostly horoscope mongers. Then it adds allegated similarities between the 12 apostles and the 12 zodiacal signs without any citation, providing worst kind of WP:OR, and some idiot story equating ""son of man"" with Orion, now citing another horoscope monger site. This article is what really really pisses me of with Wikipedia: that such bags of errors are propagated through the perceived ""authority"" of Wikipedia. I'm going to demote the article to C-class. And that's very mild, considering the state of the article.  dixit. !) "