" 

 == Esperanto == 

 Hello, I responded to your question about Esperanto in my , but I'll post it here, too [timestamps reflect time of original posting]: 
 : Well, I just don't like it 
 :*I think the -oj and -aj sounds for plural nouns/adjectives are really ugly. 
 :*The attempt to include sounds from many languages seems excessive, and not conducive to ease of communication of people from different language backgrounds as an international auxiliary language 
 :*The inclusion of case is superfluous considering how many people just use the sentence order of their native language (SVO usually). 
 :*Why do adjectives agree with the noun for number but the definite article La doesn't? 
 :*The verb forms are hopelessly simple and yet the table of demonstrative/other pronouns seems to go on forever. 
 :*Vocabulary seems to be derived randomly from either a Germanic or Romance base with no logic behind it. 
 :*""Fake"" language history (saying that ""ci used to be in common use but now people just use vi"" ... parallel to ""thou""?)  Come on, Zamenhof 
 :*The flag looks like an Islamist-Communist organization's flag 
 :*I would like to see people put more effort in learning natural languages than Esperanto.  And just because some people are freaks and taught their children Esperanto as a native language doesn't make it a ""natural language"".  Those people will creolize the language into some sort of Esperanglish... maybe.  While an interesting experiment in the whole Whorf-Sapir thing, I just don't see a use for it.   
 :*The whole philosophy of ""one language for the world"" is actually frightening to me and 1984-esque.  
 :  
 ::Also, my friend  points out that a feminie suffix (-ino) is dumb.  And stupid.  "