"::::I see the points that you have made, but I feel like the block is still in order and that the duration is justified. The edit warring consisted of him repeatedly (  ) removing references from the first paragraph with no explanation for this. This definitely violated 3rr. Furthermore, he violated the BLP policy by adding in negative information about the individual without a source . Saying he is a convicted criminal is a bit harsh. According to this, his criminal offense is punishable by a less than $1000 fine  he ""led a group of six supporters who broke into the palace the evening of Aug. 15, 2008, planning to place Akahi briefly on the palace throne."" And furthermore, when  removed the citation for his birth date (a citation that the blocked user himself was repeatedly removing), the blocked user put it back in. This last edit seems to me that the user was just editing for the sake of being disruptive. 

 ::::Furthermore, I'm quite concerned by the repeated legal threats that this user keeps making. He seems to have a tendency to ramble on about ArbCom complaints that he's going to file, but these often have hints at legal complaints as well. See     . He has also made hints at socking: . Frankly, a 1-month block seems pretty mild to me. Do you think we should go further? —    

 "