" 

 The guidelines for the introduction state that: 

 1. 	 The introduction defines the term and topic and context, and  

 2. 	 The introduction prepares the reader for further detail.  

 By insisting that the introduction give prominence to Israel Shamir’s identity as Jermas, you are implying that it is a prominent detail about Shamir. It is not. Your suggestion that Shamir is ‘sometimes’ known as Shamir, is absolute baloney, and only important if you believe it vital that Shamir’s identity be discredited. It is pushing a POV, is not neutral, not the topic of the article, but a detail.  

 The article does not contain only three references to the same material, the same sources, and the same allegations, as I believed earlier; it is repeated FOUR times.   

 1. 	 The Introduction – “He is a citizen of Sweden, where his legal name is Jöran Jermas. Critics accuse Shamir of anti-Semitism and of misrepresenting his background and career.” (source  Expo &Searchlight;/ SV) 

 2. 	 Shamir's account questioned  - ""his CV ... reads like a work of fantasy -... I don't believe a word of it."" (source Roland Rance in Searchlight – same source material used in Expo, Searchlight/ SV, and Jonaton Pollard’s article in The times of London) 
 
 3. 	 Shamir's account questioned - ""Israel Shamir first appeared on the Swedish census in 1984 (when he claims to have been in Israel)."" (source indymedia derived from Expo & SV, a link I cannot access to verify that the quote is accurate) 

 4. 	 Other information about Shamir – “According to Swedish authorities, Shamir lived in Sweden from 1984-1993, when he emigrated to Russia. In 1998 he again became a permanent resident of Sweden and still remains so. He became a Swedish citizen in 1992.” (source Expo & Searchlight/SV) 

 Until you can explain why this piece of information is so vital as to make it practically the entire focus of the article, do not revert to it again. Unless you can show that Jermas is an alter ego designed to present Shamir’s viewpoint under another guise. It is a detail, and deserves to be aired ONCE. Expo & Socialist Viewpoint/Searchlight are not considered to be suitable secondary sources; and if their material is to be included, it should be substituted by using a reputable secondary source. I suggested Jonaton Pollard in the Times of London (who also sources his material from Expo & SV), but you deleted that for some reason. 

 None of the sources you cite contain ‘inconsistencies’ or ‘oddities’ in Shamir’s background; except the Jermas identity.  The information about his ties with the two organizations provide us with basic information about his political/ideological affiliations, nothing about his Jermas identity provides us with information about his ideas.   

 You are pushing a particular POV by insisting on making the focus of the article about Jermas, since it is your POV that it is of vital importance. I am going to delete all but one reference to Jermas, and will leave it up to you which one you choose. I suggest you omit using fringe lunatic sources that have a bone to pick with Shamir, who shoot from the hip, and who are suspected of making obviously false accusations. I also suggest you omit fabrications about the contents of  even these dubious sources.  “Swedish Authorities” confirm nothing; the Swedish Census records that Shamir is registered as having lived in Sweden – big difference.Your 'several sources' boil down to one source - Socialist Viewpoint, which is published almost verbatim by Expo, and the same information regurgitated on Indymedia. Your 'inconsistencies, ommissions, or odditites in Shamir's/Jermas's CV' boil down to one issue - That Shamir acquired the Swedish identity Joran Jermas.  "