", 13 May 2009 (UTC) 

 :::::""Also, to Scjessey specifically: Would you please quit being a fucking prat."" 
 ::::I have two problems with the comment above by . It shows a complete lack of civility and focuses on the personality of an editor, rather than offering a way of improving the article. Let me restate the problem with this proposed inclusion. It violates the neutral point of view by attempting to insert an irrelevant piece of non-notable trivia into the article in an attempt to support a minority point of view expressed by a person known to dislike the subject by unfairly denigrating the value of the subject's degree. This seems to violate Wikipedia's policy for biographies of living persons in several ways, and so the burden falls firmly on the editors seeking inclusion to demonstrate why this trivial detail is necessary to improve the article. I believe that has not been demonstrated, so if the ""inclusionists"" persist on disruptively arguing about this we must seek informal mediation as the next logical step toward resolving this dispute, rather than referring to each other as ""fucking prats"" and such like.    04:06"