" 
 ::::::: Out of four major dictionaries, two give no definition, two define it as an adjective meaning ""not circumcised"" - one says this is an adjective that applies to a person, the other does state that it is an adjective, but not who/what it applies to.  It certainly does not say it is an adjective that applies to a penis.  None of the four dictionaries state that.  Lots of people use 'gay' to mean rubbish - but we do not use it that way here.  If a usage becomes significant enough to warrant it being defined in a reliable dictionary that way, then we follow that usage - we do not seek to emphasise an unusual usage in a way that we help establish that usage.  Please remove 'uncircumcised penis', and replace with 'penis with foreskin' - which is what it actually is.  It cannot be uncircumcised, as it has no relationship with circumcision whatsoever, other than to illustrate what a penis that has not been circumcised looks like. And please stop trying to emphasise dubious terminology in a way that makes circumcision appear normative. -  -  - "