" 

 Stevertigo just does not get it.  First of all, Ehud is NOT derived from Echud.  That is not what Malik Shabazz wrote, nor what his source says, although apparetnly they use words with greater care than Stevertigo reads them.  Anyway, is Stevertigo pissed off that he ""bothered"" doing something?  What on earth was it that he ""bothered"" to do, except post a silly ""brainless"" bit of BS on 20:02 Jan. 31?  But he needn't have bothered with that - on Jan 28 he asked me about the etymology of ""Ehud"" and I provided a factual, - oh, to use Mr. BS's language, ""veridically acute"" reply on  and the matter could have ended there.  Maybe Stevertigo is miffed that others see through his BS and don't value his verbal incontinence apparently as much as he does.  At least he acknowledges that there are no facts in his blather.  But please, please Stevertigo, do not be so dismissive about our core policies, or angry at people who remind you of their value.  The whole point of our NOR policy is that Wikipedia is perhaps the one place where you do not have to be ""bothered"" to spew your factless, ignorant, BS.  Really!  It counts for nothing here, so you never need be ""bothered"" to spew it here again!!  Isn't Wikipedia policy great!  (of course, NOR does require you either to do serious source-based research to contribute to articles, or not contribute at all.  I wonder which of the to bothers you more — obviously at least one of these facets of our policy bothers you.  Anyway, Steve, Jayjg is quite corect and you should not get miffed.  V and NOR are key policies here.  Don't ""bother"" yourself trying to violate them any more, you are just wasting your time.    |   "