" 
 |date=March 22, 2004 
 |url=http://p2pnet.net/story/1035}} 

 Archived to history: 
 September 26, 2005  

 ==Vandalism== 
 Somebody vandalized the featured article Mercury (planet) to lead to this article. Could somebody get Mercury back to normal? 

 == Screw you, Wikis. == 
 I spent a long time expanding the Hebrew part. Then it tells me it's impossible, since I'm no admin. Well, you got screwed. I'm not doing this again. 

 :Well shit!  Had we realised that you were the only person who could work in the ""Hebrew part"", you'd have had admin status right away!    

 ::Hey - cut that out! (    

 Would someone with editing capabilities please note that the word fuck has always had a vulgar conentation.  Here is an excerpt from http://www.snopes.com/language/acronyms/fuck.htm.   

 'Fuck' is an old word, even if it's been an almost taboo term for most of its existence. It was around; it just wasn't used in common speech all that much, let alone written down and saved for posterity. Likely its meaning contributed to its precise origin becoming lost in the mists of time — scholars of old would have been in no hurry to catalogue the growth of this word, and by the time it forced its way into even the most respectable of dictionaries, its parentage was long forgotten. 

 == Bhog == 
 ""Bhog"" in Marathi, a Sanskritic language, is to ""enjoy"" or ""suffer"" as the case may be. Thus a person in sexual union with a woman is said to be ""bhog""ing her.  
 Regardless, the word appears to be onomotopoeatic  a word that mimics the sound made during the act. 

 == Both mistake == 
 ""The word ""Fuck"" is the only word in the English language that can be used to describe both pain, pleasure and discontentment."" 

 Three things are listed to what ""fuck"" can describe. ""Both"" only considers two together. (anon) 

 :I think that is just a silly sentence in general and should be re-written entirely.  

 : Or just deleted. How is that different from any other expletive?   
 ::I don't think the (admittedly much milder) ""crap"" could be used in a positive way. ;) I think what the sentence is trying to say, is that the action it describes can cover all three feelings (""he fucked me"" might mean anything from ""he screwed me over"", to ""he gave me [possisbly good] sex"", for instance). This may or may not have something to do with the action it's typically said to describe, i.e sex, which can cause any one of those three things, whereas a lot of other expletives aren't sexually-related ones (""shit"" for instance, refers to defecation).   

 ::Shit is a poor example, since ""That's the shit!"" is used to denote something as being exemplary. 

 == Wikipedia is not censored == 

 so why does the phrase ""in code because of its unacceptability,"" appear under etymology? 
 Say the fucking words, goddamnit. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by   •  21 May 2006  (UTC) 

 Wow , pay attention to what you read. The word fuck first appeared in code because of its unacceptibility in a poem.   

 :Or, to put it a tiny bit more clearly - that sentence was referring to the word being ""in code"" in the poem, due to its unacceptability.   

 == A lecture in the word ""fuck"" == 
 The word ""fuck"" has approximately one hundred different meanings and functions in the English/US-English language. But if you are within this article of the English page and then click on the link ""German"", all that you will find is the connotation ""ficken"" (to fuck, sexual intercourse). But why is this so ? The German and the English language have the same origine, and still the word ""Fuck"" seems to have a hundred times more meanings than the German translation ""ficken"" or ""Fick"". This is a very strange, and the most strange observation that any linguist can make on a single word: having two meanings in one language, but having about one hundred meanings in the most related ""sister"" language ? Hans Rosenthal (ROHA) (hans.rosenthal AT t-online.de  replace AT by @ ) (15012006) 

 Once you get beyond the definition and origin of the wo