":::::::::::I'm sorry, but in this Bokenkotter is obviously and quite clearly wrong, as I have shown above. Just because someone publishes something doesn't mean that is correct and can be used in Wikipedia. If a scholarly source makes a clearly identifiable factual error, as this does, that cannot be repeated if we know better. Pointing out factual errors in a source is not original research, any more than it would be if such a source claimed Russian was the official language of Scotland. It's not a matter of interpretation. The Bokenkotter sentence makes two clear mistakes. One, that the document was written by Pope John Paul, the second that the document anywhere states that Catholics bear responsibility for the holocaust. These documents are carefully framed, and if that was what it had wanted to say, it would have done so. The article sentence as cast, laying blame on the Catholic Church for the holocaust is factually wrong and will have to be removed or replaced with something that actually matches the facts. It is not POV to remove a falsehood.   

 "