" 

 == Controversies == 

 The IP repeatedly removing the material was partially right, in a sense. The ""allegations of sexual misconduct"" part of the source is an accusation by a person in the first part of the article, while the creation of separate programs is mentioned in the second part, but as a result of ""swagger"" in the Model mugging program and whatnot. So there's no problem adding that to the article with the same citation, as long as we say what the source says. Also, going back to the (serious) allegations, I would omit them from the article given they are direct accusations from one person to the founder of the program and are not particularly central to the story. Unless we get some supporting sources, that's just hearsay reported by a single source. § "