" December 2014 (UTC) 

 :Re #5: Stating that the PIRA's campaign ""is not widely seen as religious terrorism"" implies that it is seen as religious terrorism by an imprecise rump, possibly a significant number - when in reality it's a tiny minority. Would be reluctantly open to changing that sentence to read ""Mainstream commentators do not regard the Provisional IRA's campaign as religious terrorism, although a small minority of sources disagree"", but really the sentence should be removed entirely. A largely Marxist and Republican organisation, that had Catholic, Protestant, atheist and agnostic members, that came to prominence largely in response to an attack by government forces on an unarmed civil rights march, and who would bomb and shoot people of all religions and none if it would advance the PIRA's Republican cause of ""Brits Out!"", were not ""Christian terrorists"".  Their inclusion in this section is laughable and weakens the rest of article as a result.  

 :Changing the section headings was a good move, though.  11:04, 10"