I agree, I find it excessively odd how you guys have progressed through contradictory accusations and arguments.- 

 :::1. First you guys all agreed that it wasn't really in the book, and the writer just obviously made it up (of course it was *our* responsibility to prove this wasn't true.) 

 :::2. Then you suggested that Lewis and Littman's name had to be mentioned everytime there was an assertion that you didn't agree with. 

 :::3. Now you are suggesting that the editor selectively edited the material to only show our POV. 

 The only thing all of these arguements have in common is they are not backed up by any sources, and they don't make any sense.-  |