" 

 == Change in Gospel of Thomas article == 

 Although I had specified in my change to the External Links section of this article that the reason for the change was what I called ""belief bias"" (ie., a violation of NPOV standards) on the part of the H.M.Ross webpage and the Sofiatopia translation, you have undone the change and are apparently not satisfied with the short explanation. If you looked at the links in question you would have noticed: 

 (1) The translation at Sofiatopia has capitalized all of the pronouns referrring to Jesus. This is not standard translation technique, but rather is a mark of Christian piety not supported by the original language (with which I am conversant, BTW). There are many fine translations of GTh on the net, and I don't know why links to them were removed from this article earlier this month, but Sofiatopia is not one of them. 

 (2) The H.M.Ross website announces at the very beginning that it is ""For spiritual seekers and those dissatisfied with the teachings of the established Church, the Gospel of Thomas Collection is a series of spiritual writings that provide unique explanations and insights into Jesus' teachings in the Gospel of Thomas."" In the next paragraph it refers to ""the Life-Giving quality"" of ""the spiritual Teachings of Jesus"". A collection described by the web-owner himself as ""a series of spiritual writings"" clearly violates the NPOV standard and is not a reputable site. 

 Now having said this, could you not have looked at these sites yourself to determine whether what I said about them was true, rather than undoing the change and demanding a further explanation? In any case, I would appreciate it if you would now undo your undoing. 
   "