: @ Drave, that's not a reasonable interpretation of the rollback guideline and I can absolutely guarantee you a bunch of such rollback uses would get counted as abuse at AN/I or ArbCom and your explanation as tendentious. I suspect you already know this. At any rate, your use of it caused me to message you and you've wasted a bunch of time apparently trying to defend the indefensible. So if wikipedia policy isn't enough of a consideration, time should be. Other than that, there's no argument here. All the best,  ()