first off, did you not read this part? 
 A. doesn't make sense. What point is that trying to prove?, any old fool knows sexual drive is no small thing. You don't need to put it awkwardly into the start of the article. 

 Secondly, in the history you said reverted edits by Nateland as per talk like there was consensus to restore your edits. Guess what?, there isn't. Also, your edits are disputed. Journaled or not, that doesn't make them valid enough to overcome nonconsensus. You just added these disputed statements in without even asking!. I'm reverting, AGAIN. You have no consensus, no support, and no etiquette in terms of honesty, fair play, and no respect of WP:NPOV.