"::The discussion is all about the meaning of ""gaiur"" - ""gavur"" ; not the sentence or the context. ""I don't think it brings anything new"" is not a valid reason to remove direct quotations of the person in question. Moreover; the version provided is a commentary of his interview; not even half a translation; given the sources are in Turkish. Current version:  ""He then referred to the English people as ""gâvur"" (i.e. ""infidels"") who he blamed for stirring problems in the Middle East."" is not even close to what he meant by direct; word for word translation of his interview. Where did he say ""English people"" ? Did he mention religion? So with what reason (infidel) explanation is added? Is it a striking feature of his usage of the word ""gavur"" in the interview and moreover; its definition in wikipedia is not enough; a pointer is needed? There's a wikipedia article detailing the word. He never mentioned ""English People"" in the interview yet it appears here. If this is indeed a debate; the paramount importance should be given to his words; not ""interpretations"" or ""personal opinions"". I'll have to remove the sentence on the grounds of being libel and make it discussed in the noticeboard if you insist.    

 "