"::::::::Lumpy27 follows the standard mode of DVdm of citing this or that Wikipedia policy as the reason for deleting contributions from others - in this case, ""Original Research"". At the same time, you and DVdm have consistently shown total disregard for following Wikipedia policy. For example, being rude and insulting (e.g., ""idiotic drivel"", ""pure crackpotism""). Regarding the ""Original Research"" charge,  I've already rebutted that above. Again, if you were familiar with the literature, you'd be aware that it's an accurate portrayal of the Twin Paradox Debate. You conclude, ""There's no need for (and no point in) any detailed rebuttal of your research and narrative."" That's a very convenient position since you unable to point out specific problems. 

 ::::::::The one specific charge was ""Einstein's 1905 paper does not say what you say it says."" Please give the details. What did I write that was ""wrong"" and what specific statements in the 1905 paper do you think it contradicts - no generalities, be specific. Thanks   

 "