Melanie; PLEASE read previous debates on these very issues. (PS; are you hitting the Save page button multiple times? several server hangups - sometimes happens when two people are simultaneously submitting) Article used to have extensive discussion of Limbaugh's cost analysis and logic, BUT to include material on Limbaugh's cost analysis and logic, you then have to include Limbaugh's ACTUAL cost analysis and logic. It isn't anywhere on the page, not because nobody knows what it was, but because the controversy being dealt with in this page is ENTIRELY about sexist and misogynistic language. Consensus has been established several times on the subject, and always coalesces around excluding it. PERSONALLY, I do NOT want to have to include the math through which Limbaugh came up with his calculation s that Fluke was having sex at least 3 times a day to justify the number, and I cannot believe that you want to renew the debate.