" 
 :::::::: Once again things have been hyped up in the lead section tonight. The hyping up of ""interviewed twice under caution"" is not in my view justified as per the guidelines at WP:NOTNEWSPAPER and WP:RECENTISM. I haven't trimmed the content back again tonight, because I don't wish to engage in an edit war with anybody. But it makes the lead section look like a recent newspaper report rather than a concise summary of Richard's 57-year-career. The hyping up of ""two new allegations"" also seems a case of recentism, because although the reference in The Daily Telegraph refers to ""two new allegations"" - these are only ""new"" in the sense of coming after the original allegation was made which led to the property search in August 2014. They are not new in the sense of coming after a statement given by South Yorkshire Police in February 2015 when the police stated that there was ""more than one allegation"" against Richard.  

 :::::::: For a number of months there has been content in the main section to state that ""more than one allegation is being investigated"". So although The Daily Telegraph's headline is about ""two new allegations"", these are only ""new"" in terms of being made after the property search in August 2015. There is nothing to verify that these ""new allegations"" have come after a statement already given by South Yorkshire Police in February 2015. Despite the newspaper headline, to describe them simply as ""two allegations"" would in my view be more accurate. The current lead section at the time of this post, with the hyped up recentism of ""two police interviews under caution"" and ""two new allegations"" is not in my view justified. 

 :::::::: I don't feel that it gives Wikipedia balance that on the one hand, as previously mentioned, the singer Ozzy Osbourne was arrested in 1989 for drunkenly attempting to strangle his wife to death and there is no mention of this at all in the lead for Osbourne. And on the other hand Cliff Richard, who has had a much longer career than Osbourne, has a lead section with hyped up recentism about ""two police interviews under caution"" when these are allegations that he has strongly denied and have not led to any arrest or charge? In my view it is not balanced to have the lead section as it currently stands.   "