" 

 == What in the world happened? == 

 Hello. 
 Happened to stumble upon this article, and there are two issues that seem to need addressing. 
 The first is the result of an attempt to ""remove marketing cruft"". The article is now very insulting to Ryerson. (There's nothing wrong with being neutral, but implying accusations is a bit much) 
 eg. ""The university claims to offer more than 80 undergraduate and graduate degree programs"". Claims? Is that really necessary? It very strongly implies that Ryerson doesn't offer that many programs. Wouldn't a simple {{fact}} have made more sense than phrasing it like that? 

 Far more disturbing than that is the set of accusations against muslims at Ryerson. I will admit that I've never been there (Brock student, myself), so I can't confirm or deny whether or not a cabal of evil muslims is truly trying to take over the entire school. However, what I can say is that providing only two sources: 
 *A school newspaper (and I've never seen a neutral school newspaper. our own ""Brock Press"" is insanely liberal) 
 *A conservative ""news"" website, wherein the article contains a great deal of outright racism 
 doesn't really qualify as ""verifiable"" or ""reliable"". 
 Does anybody have any good references for supporting the accusations of intimidations, threats, organized campaigns to take over, etc? Because, if not, I'll just be deleting the entire paragraph.  "