":KellyAna#top|talk]])  

 ==Las Vegas== 
 Danny belived Delinda when she said that they were still married at the annulment party.You should watch the episodes before. you make edits.   
 :I did, three times.  She said ""they're still married"" and he said ""Really?  Noooooo!"" We've discussed it on the talk page, you should see there before making edits that remove VERIFIED information.    
 You did't watch the episode.After delinda told danny that they were still married he said ""cooper is going to be pissed"" and then she said"" but mike and piper aren't"".   

 I've waited a week, still no references for the rest of the episodes.  Where are they? You're the one who insisted past episodes still need a reference, so what's taking so long to add them?    
 :It's not my job to go back and find references, it's only my responsibility to make sure what is put there now that I'm here is correct and referenced.  Your comments are uncivil and grounds for being reblocked.  You've been warned about this, you should heed the warnings.    
 ::It helps Wikipedia to add reliable references. It hurts Wikipedia to remove them. The fact that there are thousands and thousands of articles that are unverified or undersourced is a problem, not a rationale for removal of references. WP:V is one of our three core policies. Yet, I have now seen quite a few post by you where your logic is along the lines of ""well since other things aren't fully referenced"" or ""since you haven't referenced these things"" that means references can/should be removed. That argument is the equivalent of saying ""This street has a lot of litter on it, therefore I should be allowed to litter"". Actually, it's worse than that. Since the references already exist what you're doing is reaching into garbage cans and strewing litter on a street that was already cleaned up. Your haranguing of Kellyana here to add references fits in this analogy well too. She's another pedestrian on the same littered street. You're now bothering here because she hasn't cleaned up the communal street?  Please stop this whole illogical line of attack. You obviously care about the articles you are involved with. If you just keep a few of our policies in mind, which keeps this place a reliable encyclopedia and not something else, you will avoid all these arguments and drama.   

  
 Then why are the old but ""good"" references deleted from past episodes?  That's what I'm trying to find out but you guys don't seem to want to answer!    
 :Because someone else removed them, not me.  If they've been removed it was done improperly and incorrectly.  I returned several references but before references weren't even being put.  I can only address what I see, not what I don't see. Just listen to Fuhghettaboutit because he's an admin and he is in charge of enforcing the rules.    

 == IP harrassment == 

 If it happens again, let me know, or post at WP:ANI, and your talk page can be semi-protected to stop IPs editing it for a while.   
 :Thank you.     

 ==Source Question == 
 Have you ever heard of the site http://www.afterelton.com/blog? I have someone using it as a source, to reference a pretty big statement. With the statement being as big as it is, I want to make sure it's a reliable source. I'm only asking you because you clearly know TV and I haven't heard of the site before. It looks like a blog(unreliable) to me. Thanks DJS "