Review and close: 
 *(1) here and here I made two edits which stood for some days.  
 *(2) At 07:05, September 3 Curly Turkey  alluded  to the material, asking for feedback refers to these  two passages I edited in some days earlier. 
 *(3) At 07:38 CurlyTurkey then stated he couldn't understand my point. 
 *(4) At 07:40, within 2 minutes, he requested an explanation on my page  
 *(5) At 07:42 I was working the article with an edit summary 'Fixed a dumb sentence' and a tweak  
 *(6) At 07:44  with the edit summary  ‘Fuck this shit’ CurlyTurkey collapsed my response to his request for feedback. The collapse notice reads ‘Political horseshit not focused on improving the article.’  
 **In this there are extraordinary claims there is something 'political' about normative editing practices. I found that perplexing, but noted the 'flurry' and impatience.‎ 
 *(7) At  07:46 he reverts me with the edit summary 'fixed crappy writing'. 
 *(8) At 07:46 I was working on suggesting to the talk page that there was another patch of clunky prose to fix. 
 *(9) At 07:47 he tweaks the revert with the edit summary 'you live on, not in, an archipelago' 
 *(10)At 07:47, noticing his request on my page, I replied 'The explanation is in the edit history and my edit summary' 
 **Meaning the  explanation of this lies in the  edit history of History of Japan and the two edits (above,(1), whose merits he questioned. 
 *At this point, the fellow went into attack mode, already anticipated by his changing at 07_44 and 07:47 perfectly normal English usage I introduced. I regard those two edits (7) (9) as illustrating a 'punitive' revert on frivolous grounds in the context of several visibly agitated comments in that short arc of time, where my editing presence was scarce (I was preparing to go out for breakfast).  As anyone could have discovered in seconds, 'living in the archipelago' is perfectly normal English. Poor knowledge of English, impatience, using revert rights frivolously, failure to look round to check if one's hunch is correct, and then vexatious baiting are all I see here. No harm done, except,  as usual, wasting serious people's time.