" 

 ::Never heard any call Warren Buffet the second wealthiest White Person, or maybe you can tell me who the 143 richest White person is? I was making a point about the usage and rellevance of race in our society when it comes to labeling and perspective. Oprah is not just rich, she is ""rich for a black"". This distinction is something that finds its way into her Wiki Bio. The clarificatino does not find itself in any of the other top 100 white richest ""people"". But this is typically, try and start picking at the minor issue instead of investigating the truth of the matter. It is obvious that no one wants to learn anything about themselves or the matter of race, they just want to win some article about a ""Black"" women who is in their camp. No matter how she is viewed by blacks, that view is not relevant here and the attitude of most is that ""I will do whatever it takes to keep the negative out of her article"". I noticed you answered not to a single other point but the hierarchacal redundancy in Bills placement. It should have been obvious for you to have seen my next logical move, one step down as if playing chess. Oh, but you are not looking ahead, just for any small move to try and dismiss the argument altogether. Well, you failed! ""No Venn Diagram"" (No commen sense) "