==Shocking images== 
 I, too, was quite shocked and disturbed by the 2 images at the bottom of this page. One of the primary reasons why I was shocked was because the images seemed so out of place on Wikipedia. Wikipedia policy states that: 
 Discussion of potentially objectionable content should not focus on its offensiveness but on whether it is appropriate to include in a given article. 
 Looking around, very few of the articles that I could find related to funerary practices or body decomposition featured images and, of those that did, practically none featured images of partially decomposed or partially eaten human bodies. Consider the page on cannibalism. Cannibalism is, arguably, a far more common occurrence in human history than sky burials. It certainly has occupied a much more prominent place in cultural works. Yet that page is illustrated solely by paintings, sculptures, woodblocks and other forms of artistic depiction but not by an actual image of a human body being cooked or consumed. In short, this page appears to be an aberration. User Gimme Danger states: 
 The pictures give information about the nature of the ritual that cannot be conveyed through words alone.  
 I'm not sure I understand. What information about the ritual is being conveyed via the images that is not conveyed in the text description? The description in the text seems to describe what's going on in the images quite accurately, in my judgment. The Wikipedia page on shock sites/images lacks any images, even though the page is entirely concerned with a series of online images and the strong reaction they tend to provoke, yet it appears that page is considered adequate by most editors. As I've stated, most of the other pages on funerary practices or death-related topics do not feature such graphic pictures of human bodies being consumed or in a state of accelerated decomposition. It seems to me that either this page is out of line with the rest of Wikipedia or there are a whole lot of Wiki pages on death-related topics that are woefully lacking due to the absence of pictures. Yet, I'm fairly certain that if I started adding graphic images of cannibalism or mutilated human bodies or excarnation by butchery to the appropriate articles I would almost certainly be banned or reprimanded for perceived vandalism. If anyone disagrees I certainly encourage them to prove me wrong. Those are my two cents. -