Re: NYT piece

From:pir@hrcoffice.com To: jake.sullivan@gmail.com, jennifer.m.palmieri@gmail.com CC: cheryl.mills@gmail.com, nmerrill@hrcoffice.com, john.podesta@gmail.com, DKendall@wc.com, hsamuelson@cdmillsgroup.com Date: 2015-03-23 10:05 Subject: Re: NYT piece

1st candidate for the top job jumped into the race today. really early announcement. didn't realize canada also had an election coming up. Was thinking something as simple as -- there will be a choice in this next election -- just look at what the first Republican out of the gate believes .... On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Jennifer Palmieri <jennifer.m.palmieri@gmail.com<mailto:jennifer.m.palmieri@gmail.com>> wrote: Good idea re sending mika the statement, will do that. Mulling Cruz, could be good if we had something meaningful or really funny to say. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 23, 2015, at 7:40 AM, Jake Sullivan <jake.sullivan@gmail.com<mailto:jake.sullivan@gmail.com>> wrote: > > What do you guys think about HRC saying something about Cruz today? Some kind of light hearted contrast? Would make news. > > > >> On Mar 23, 2015, at 7:38 AM, Philippe Reines <pir@hrcoffice.com<mailto:pir@hrcoffice.com>> wrote: >> >> Maybe Mika would read the whole statement if she had it. >> >> >> From: Jennifer Palmieri >> Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 7:15 AM >> To: Jake Sullivan >> Cc: Cheryl Mills; Philippe Reines; Nick Merrill; John Podesta; David Kendall; Heather Samuelson >> Subject: Re: NYT piece >> >> >> Nick is asking them to update the story to make that point clear. >> >> Twitter is more interested in the substance of the emails (spontaneous vs non-spontaneous), which I think is manageable and much better than have the reaction that she lied in describing her emailing practice with staff. >> >> Morning Joe discussion is coming up, so trying to reach Mika and will report back after that. Ted Cruz announcing today helps. >> >> Sent from my iPadg >> >>> On Mar 23, 2015, at 6:19 AM, Jake Sullivan <jake.sullivan@gmail.com<mailto:jake.sullivan@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> The key issue, in my view, is that the piece implies the quoted emails are from personal when they are not. >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Mar 23, 2015, at 6:17 AM, Jennifer Palmieri <jennifer.m.palmieri@gmail.com<mailto:jennifer.m.palmieri@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I think that person, the degree to which they exist, is Ezra Klein. And we can do it with him today. >>>> >>>> Others should weigh in on Congress, but I have had a lot of success with Cummings and Schiff decrying selective leaks and think we should do that here. >>>> >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>>> On Mar 23, 2015, at 5:41 AM, Cheryl Mills <cheryl.mills@gmail.com<mailto:cheryl.mills@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Jen/Nick >>>>> >>>>> Lloyd Grove used to be the person who would hold journalist accountable - who is that now and is there an opportunity for that in real time today? >>>>> >>>>> On Cong mischaracterizing emails to nyt (or NYT doing it themselves) - what is strategy for having Cong counter the misinformation with the release of the actual emails so they speak for themselves as opposed to having nyt selectively mischaracterize what they claim they have never seen? >>>>> >>>>> cdm