\begin{table}[!ht]
\begin{longtable}{|p{25mm}|p{30mm}|p{70mm}|}
\hline Adversarial example in physical domain
& Fool a system by changing some interface component.
& An adversary determines that a pricing model has sensitivity to the volumes deep in the order book -- by posting to this part of the book, they influence the model's behaviour.\\% A regime-shifting options model has been tricked into thinking that there is a change in regime by an agent that hacked the broker and adjusted all interfacing strike-prices to be $10 \%$ higher. \\
\hline Exploit software dependencies
& The use of traditional software exploits.
& The model relies on code dependencies, these dependencies are exploited by modifying the code to introduce nonsensical values, leading to a trading halt. (The 2016 NPM/left-pad debacle illustrates this external dependency risk, where a disgruntled developer deleted a tiny piece of code that `broke' the internet \citep{Collins2021Feb}.) \\
\hline
\end{longtable}
\end{table}
Adversarial ex-
ample in physi-
cal domain Fool a system by
changing some in-
terface component. An adversary determines that a pricing model
has sensitivity to the volumes deep in the or-
der book – by posting to this part of the book,
they influence the model’s behaviour.
Exploit software
dependencies The use of tradi-
tional software ex-
ploits. The model relies on code dependencies, these
dependencies are exploited by modifying the
code to introduce nonsensical values, leading
to a trading halt. (The 2016 NPM/left-pad
debacle illustrates this external dependency
risk, where a disgruntled developer deleted a
tiny piece of code that ‘broke’ the internet
(Collins, 2016).)