\begin{table}[h]
\begin{center}
%\begin{tabular}{ | p{1.2cm} | p{1.8cm} | p{1cm} | p{1cm} | }
\begin{tabular}{| >{\centering\arraybackslash}m{2cm} | >{\centering\arraybackslash}m{2.5cm} | >{\centering\arraybackslash}m{2cm} | >{\centering\arraybackslash}m{2cm} |}
\hline
Study & Method & \#Model Params (million) & Accuracy\\
\hline
This Paper & Discriminative Encoder  & 0.23 & 98.08\% \\ \hline
Hinton et. al. \cite{journals/jmlr/SalakhutdinovH07} & Autoencoder & 1.7 & 99\% \\ \hline
Schmidhuber et. al. \cite{journals/corr/abs-1003-0358} & Simple Deep Neural Nets + Elastic Distortions & 11.9 mil & 99.65\% \\ \hline
\end{tabular}
\\
\end{center}
\caption{Comparison of results on MNIST data set}
\label{table:mnist-compare}
\end{table}
Study Method #Model
Params
(million) Accuracy
This Paper Discriminative
Encoder 0.23 98.08%
Hinton et.
al. [16] Autoencoder 1.7 99%
Schmidhuber
et. al. [2] Simple Deep
Neural Nets +
Elastic
Distortions 11.9 mil 99.65%