\begin{table}[t!] %\scriptsize
%\begin{center}
%\begin{tabular}{|l|c|r|}
%%\hline
%%  &   \small{Work} &  \small{Leisure}  &  \small{Coauthor}  & \small{Lunch} &  \small{FB} \\
%\hline
% $\mathcal{R}$ & \small{Covering combination of layers} & \small{Prob.} \\
%\hline
% Coauthor  & Work, Leisure, FB  & 0.95 \\
% Coauthor  & Work, Leisure & 0.90 \\
% Coauthor  & Work & 0.86 \\
% Leisure &  Work, Coauthor, Lunch, FB   & 0.89 \\
% Leisure &  Work, Lunch   & 0.78 \\
% Lunch &  Work, Leisure, Coauthor, FB & 0.70\\
% Work &  Leisure, Coauthor, Lunch, FB & 0.66\\  
% FB &  Work, Leisure, Coauthor, Lunch & 0.64\\  
%\hline
%\end{tabular}
%\caption{Best covering combinations of layers for each single network. This was computed as conditional probability that there is an edge in the combination of layers in case that there is an edge in the single network} 
%\label{tabProb}
%\end{center}
%\end{table}
R Similar combination of layers Jaccard
Lunch
Work
Leisure
FB
Coauthor Work, Leisure
Coauthor, Lunch
Coauthor, Lunch
Work, Leisure, Lunch
Leisure, FB 0.39
0.36
0.27
0.23
0.07