However, Dumas is alone in this assertion, and if he were correct it is unclear why d'Herbinville would have been involved.
1	However	however	ADV	RB	_	5	advmod	5:advmod	Discourse=adversative-concession:84->78:2|SpaceAfter=No
2	,	,	PUNCT	,	_	1	punct	1:punct	_
3	Dumas	Dumas	PROPN	NNP	Number=Sing	5	nsubj	5:nsubj	Entity=(101-person-giv:act-cf1*-1-coref-Alexandre_Dumas)
4	is	be	AUX	VBZ	Mood=Ind|Number=Sing|Person=3|Tense=Pres|VerbForm=Fin	5	cop	5:cop	_
5	alone	alone	ADJ	JJ	Degree=Pos	0	root	0:root	_
6	in	in	ADP	IN	_	8	case	8:case	_
7	this	this	DET	DT	Number=Sing|PronType=Dem	8	det	8:det	Entity=(102-event-giv:act-cf3-2-coref
8	assertion	assertion	NOUN	NN	Number=Sing	5	obl	5:obl:in	Entity=102)|SpaceAfter=No
9	,	,	PUNCT	,	_	17	punct	17:punct	_
10	and	and	CCONJ	CC	_	17	cc	17:cc	Discourse=joint-list_m:85->84:0
11	if	if	SCONJ	IN	_	14	mark	14:mark	Discourse=contingency-condition:86->87:0
12	he	he	PRON	PRP	Case=Nom|Gender=Masc|Number=Sing|Person=3|PronType=Prs	14	nsubj	14:nsubj	Entity=(101-person-giv:act-cf1*-1-ana-Alexandre_Dumas)
13	were	be	AUX	VBD	Mood=Ind|Number=Plur|Person=3|Tense=Past|VerbForm=Fin	14	cop	14:cop	_
14	correct	correct	ADJ	JJ	Degree=Pos	17	advcl	17:advcl:if	_
15	it	it	PRON	PRP	Case=Nom|Gender=Neut|Number=Sing|Person=3|PronType=Prs	17	expl	17:expl	Discourse=same-unit_m:87->85:0|Entity=(110-abstract-new-cf4-1-cata)
16	is	be	AUX	VBZ	Mood=Ind|Number=Sing|Person=3|Tense=Pres|VerbForm=Fin	17	cop	17:cop	_
17	unclear	unclear	ADJ	JJ	Degree=Pos|Polarity=Neg	5	conj	5:conj:and	_
18	why	why	ADV	WRB	PronType=Int	23	advmod	23:advmod	Entity=(110-abstract-acc:com-cf4-6-coref
19	d'Herbinville	d'Herbinville	PROPN	NNP	Number=Sing	23	nsubj:pass	23:nsubj:pass	Entity=(103-person-giv:act-cf2-1-coref)
20	would	would	AUX	MD	VerbForm=Fin	23	aux	23:aux	_
21	have	have	AUX	VB	VerbForm=Inf	23	aux	23:aux	_
22	been	be	AUX	VBN	Tense=Past|VerbForm=Part	23	aux:pass	23:aux:pass	_
23	involved	involve	VERB	VBN	Tense=Past|VerbForm=Part|Voice=Pass	17	csubj	17:csubj	Entity=110)|SpaceAfter=No
24	.	.	PUNCT	.	_	5	punct	5:punct	_
