In light of the coincidence, we have no reason to assume that our moral judgments are true—an unpalatable conclusion for realists.
1	In	in	ADP	IN	_	2	case	2:case	Discourse=explanation-justify:84->91:3
2	light	light	NOUN	NN	Number=Sing	8	obl	8:obl:in	_
3	of	of	ADP	IN	_	5	case	5:case	_
4	the	the	DET	DT	Definite=Def|PronType=Art	5	det	5:det	Entity=(71-abstract-giv:act-cf3-2-coref
5	coincidence	coincidence	NOUN	NN	Number=Sing	2	nmod	2:nmod:of	Entity=71)|SpaceAfter=No
6	,	,	PUNCT	,	_	2	punct	2:punct	_
7	we	we	PRON	PRP	Case=Nom|Number=Plur|Person=1|PronType=Prs	8	nsubj	8:nsubj	Entity=(2-person-giv:act-cf1*-1-ana)
8	have	have	VERB	VBP	Mood=Ind|Number=Plur|Person=1|Tense=Pres|VerbForm=Fin	0	root	0:root	_
9	no	no	DET	DT	Polarity=Neg|PronType=Art	10	det	10:det	Entity=(73-abstract-new-cf4-2-coref
10	reason	reason	NOUN	NN	Number=Sing	8	obj	8:obj	_
11	to	to	PART	TO	_	12	mark	12:mark	Discourse=attribution-positive:85->86:0
12	assume	assume	VERB	VB	VerbForm=Inf	10	acl	10:acl:to	_
13	that	that	SCONJ	IN	_	18	mark	18:mark	Discourse=elaboration-additional:86->84:0
14	our	our	PRON	PRP$	Case=Gen|Number=Plur|Person=1|Poss=Yes|PronType=Prs	16	nmod:poss	16:nmod:poss	Entity=(23-abstract-giv:act-cf2-3-coref(2-person-giv:act-cf1*-1-ana)
15	moral	moral	ADJ	JJ	Degree=Pos	16	amod	16:amod	_
16	judgments	judgment	NOUN	NNS	Number=Plur	18	nsubj	18:nsubj	Entity=23)
17	are	be	AUX	VBP	Mood=Ind|Number=Plur|Person=3|Tense=Pres|VerbForm=Fin	18	cop	18:cop	_
18	true	true	ADJ	JJ	Degree=Pos	12	ccomp	12:ccomp	Entity=73)|SpaceAfter=No|XML=<w>
19	—	—	PUNCT	:	_	22	punct	22:punct	Discourse=evaluation-comment:87->84:1|SpaceAfter=No
20	an	a	DET	DT	Definite=Ind|PronType=Art	22	det	22:det	Entity=(73-abstract-giv:act-cf4-3-appos|XML=</w>
21	unpalatable	unpalatable	ADJ	JJ	Degree=Pos|Polarity=Neg	22	amod	22:amod	_
22	conclusion	conclusion	NOUN	NN	Number=Sing	10	appos	10:appos	_
23	for	for	ADP	IN	_	24	case	24:case	_
24	realists	realist	NOUN	NNS	Number=Plur	22	nmod	22:nmod:for	Entity=(51-person-giv:inact-cf5-1-coref)73)|SpaceAfter=No
25	.	.	PUNCT	.	_	8	punct	8:punct	_
