&gt;  they didn&#x27;t get &#x27;good representation&#x27; anyway<p>They formed the government. Your original comment said they had &#x27;little to no representation&#x27; - for a party with cabinet seets and the deputy prime minister, that&#x27;s a bizarre claim.<p>Feel free to nuance it and segue into a discussion of FPTP, sure. I&#x27;m a Green Party member, so I need no persuasion there. But if you&#x27;re a LibDem, then telling yourself you imploded because of &#x27;striking a bargain to try and fix the voting system&#x27; is pretty self-delusional. The LibDems imploded because of their government record. They voted against the policy interests of the people who voted for them. If that&#x27;s because of a bargain and sense of duty, then more fool them for getting played like a tool. No proportional representation will help with that. If they can&#x27;t be trusted to stand for what they offered the electorate.<p>Which is all a side show from your original comment that I was responding to.