Not sure what you&#x27;re trying to say, exactly. &quot;There is proof that road rage exists&quot;? OP didn&#x27;t say &quot;Road rage doesn&#x27;t exist&quot;, he said &quot;It&#x27;s not universal&quot;. A universal quantifier (&quot;all&quot; or &quot;none&quot;) can be disproven with a counter-example (op to article), an existential quantifier (&quot;some&quot; or &quot;not all&quot;) can&#x27;t (you, if I understand it correctly, to op).<p>He&#x27;s just saying &quot;speak for yourself.&quot;<p>Or did you mean something else?