From what I know of it, Zucker&#x27;s own report on patient outcomes doesn&#x27;t come out showing much success, but I can&#x27;t read it as I lack access to paid journals. There&#x27;s also been published criticism of CAMH&#x27;s practices.<p>More to the point, why would Zucker persist with his own method when there actually <i>is</i> evidence for the conventional approach?