&gt; Larry Correia says [1] that &quot;ban&quot; would not be the right word here, but what they were doing was effectively censoring his work. And the reason they did so, in the instant case, was because of politics.<p>And, if so...which we have only his claim for, and its quite possible the publisher had other reasons, assuming its actually true that they refused it...so what? The right to make political choices about what you publish is <i>exactly</i> the central and most important part of the First Amendment&#x27;s freedom of the press.<p>It <i>does</i> become worrying where there is a press monopoly or conspiring oligopoly preventing publication of certain political views and, so, suppressing them in the marketplace of ideas, but that&#x27;s not happening here, and the evidence is the fact that his book <i>is</i> being published, and available through the dominant retail channel for such works.