The actual EPA documentation[1] about this site shows that the comparative exposure is not nearly as significant as the article indicates. A handy comparative radiation dose table that they provide shows that you&#x27;d receive an additional 240 mR&#x2F;year simply by moving from NYC to Denver, Colorado.[2] By comparison, the estimated annual dose received by a worker at the former Wolff-Alport site is 120 mR&#x2F;year.<p>[1] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www3.epa.gov&#x2F;region02&#x2F;waste&#x2F;wolff&#x2F;docs.html#Docs" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www3.epa.gov&#x2F;region02&#x2F;waste&#x2F;wolff&#x2F;docs.html#Docs</a>
[2]
<a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www3.epa.gov&#x2F;region02&#x2F;waste&#x2F;wolff&#x2F;pdf&#x2F;NYC_DOH_May_2007_wolff_alport_exposure_sheet.pdf" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www3.epa.gov&#x2F;region02&#x2F;waste&#x2F;wolff&#x2F;pdf&#x2F;NYC_DOH_May_200...</a>