Looking at this article more, it does seem more likely that this is an attempt at some weird anti-abortion propaganda.<p>That being said, I still think it&#x27;s an interesting concept. I don&#x27;t think that the AI assuming personhood of a fetus is inherently wrong. There are plenty of philosophical arguments about what constitutes personhood, and how that effects the topic of abortion.<p>Again, this is something that I think could be potentially very interesting in relation to artificial intelligence, which has it&#x27;s own fair share of &#x27;what makes it a person&#x27; type debate.<p>An Artificial Intelligence (potentially non-person) relating and empathizing with a fetus (also potentially non-person) -- that&#x27;s an interesting thought.<p>I agree though, it does appear to be self-insertion on the part of the author. And, if it matters, I am pro-choice. I just think there is a lot of interesting stuff to be said on the topic of personhood.