I complain every 6 months about their &quot;releases&quot; page - eg this one for my project <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;rogerbinns&#x2F;apsw&#x2F;releases" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;rogerbinns&#x2F;apsw&#x2F;releases</a><p>They unhelpfully add a &quot;Source Code&quot; link, which would be great if that is what it was.  Instead it is actually just a zip file of the repository at that tag.  But the repository is in a maintainer state, so the &quot;Source Code&quot; isn&#x27;t useful to an end user because various tools need to be run (eg building help, automake&#x2F;autoconf, dependencies).  The people mislead by Github due to this &quot;Source Code&quot; contact me, not github.<p>Every six months for several years, I send the email explaining how this doesn&#x27;t serve anyone&#x27;s interest, how it hurts, and that I am happy with any solution (eg don&#x27;t auto add, change the name to make it clear, be able to label an existing file as the &quot;Source Code&quot; etc).  I get the usual response of understanding and sympathy, and vague suggestion that it may be addressed.  Three years and counting ...