Felt this was glossed over. It&#x27;s all well and good to not be too harsh for the reasons they mentioned, but ultimately the point is to &#x27;peer review&#x27; the science.<p>In fact I would say an important &quot;mistake reviewers make&quot; is ... not actually doing much work. I&#x27;ve seen some appalling 2-3 line comments like &quot;seems fine&quot;, even from senior academics. That&#x27;s not even to talk about problems with misunderstood p-values, not reading the algorithm closely, not walking through the proof manually, and so on.