The &quot;pick&quot; though was 1 out of 1, and I mentioned in another comment how one could sort of replicate it by moving into a state that has 0% sales tax to boot (finding a cheap property that would not generate a large property tax bill would be step 2). It also seems that Nevada extended a similar deal to Faraday, and actually went out of their way to attract them <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.autoblog.com&#x2F;2016&#x2F;01&#x2F;28&#x2F;nevada-lawmakers-spent-250000-lure-faraday-future&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.autoblog.com&#x2F;2016&#x2F;01&#x2F;28&#x2F;nevada-lawmakers-spent-25...</a> at which point I get what you&#x27;re saying - why doesn&#x27;t Nevada just pass a universal incentive for certain industries instead of operating on a company-by-company basis?<p>I agree on the churn, though, in dense populated environments big retailers are known to close up shop in one town to reopen it across the street in different town with different plaza, just because the second town offered a better tax deal.<p>&gt; in the US, making all of these deals illegal would be a good first step<p>It might improve the overall business climate in China though. Once the supplier chain is set up and functioning, it&#x27;s hard to move it elsewhere<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2012&#x2F;01&#x2F;22&#x2F;business&#x2F;apple-america-and-a-squeezed-middle-class.html?_r=1&amp;pagewanted=all" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2012&#x2F;01&#x2F;22&#x2F;business&#x2F;apple-america-and...</a>