Many times I&#x27;ve seen that it&#x27;s been out of a genuine desire to solve the asker&#x27;s problem, but the asker has already started down the wrong path and is determined to see it through.<p>A recent example: someone was using a map&#x2F;hash object to store a series of documents, and needed a way to extract N items from the map for pagination reasons. They presented a for loop but said that something &quot;felt wrong&quot; about that.  Many of the comments were about how maps had no guarantees about order, and that each attempt to grab a &quot;page&quot; of objects would result in a random set, meaning pages 1, 2, and 3 could all conceivably have common items, rendering pagination fundamentally broken.<p>There were several suggestions to use an ordered array of map keys, but the asker was determined, stating &quot;it&#x27;s just for testing purposes, order doesn&#x27;t matter, I should never have mentioned pagination&quot;.<p>Maybe there&#x27;s an important detail that the asker left out, but by all accounts they were given sound advice and even working examples, but they still seemed frustrated and would likely describe the experience as &quot;alienating&quot;.