Cute! I was wondering why Gitlab uses MR and whether Gitlab has a better term just the other day, because I figured it was such an illogical phrase. As it happens, I am in the middle of installing Gitlab again on a newly reconfigured server and this popped up!<p>Then I thought &quot;Hey, why not use the docker image?&quot; (reeling from deep pain from the last time I tried to upgrade an LXC-based Gitlab instance across major versions), then I wondered if I needed <i>aufs</i>, then I wound up reading presentations about storage drivers (<i>zfs</i> FTW, but shame on docker for wanting an entire zpool to itself!), then decided <i>overlay</i> was better (and in-kernel), then I wanted to switch to a PaX kernel, now I&#x27;ve got a day of recompilation and installations ahead of me. But I will be glad to know MRs lie at the end ;) +1 docker bug: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;docker&#x2F;docker&#x2F;issues&#x2F;20303" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;docker&#x2F;docker&#x2F;issues&#x2F;20303</a>