I wonder if there is any real limit to what positions such a person would take. In every company I&#x27;ve ever worked for there&#x27;s several examples of this sort of person and ... I don&#x27;t think I&#x27;ve ever even seen one with their own political opinion. Personal advancement, or the potential for it, determines their position in any argument, including political ones.<p>These days that usually makes them argue for &quot;diversity&quot; (taken to corporate insanity extremes, like every other position).<p>I would agree with the article that given the environment in the 1930&#x27;s that would probably have made them nazis. But this has nothing to do with the content of these ideologies, only with their relative success.<p>But what I find myself at very strong odds with is the smart person who clawed his way up and finds himself beneath a glass ceiling, Mr. C. They usually have a relatively insane political opinion that indeed originates from some past humiliation. But that nearly always makes them some sort of extremist socialist or outright marxist if they were poor in their childhood, or extreme laissez-faire when not. And frankly, what is wrong with holding such an opinion due to having had to endure serious hardship or humiliation as a result (having been the rich kid in a poor school or a poor kid in a rich school would pretty much guarantee such a position, no ?). I would imagine that if indeed such a person became a nazi, one confrontation with a nazi &quot;type D&quot; would cure him of such an affliction, as he&#x27;d immediately recognize the ideology for what it is. Either such guys are nihilists or they have some insane party affiliation.<p>Given the thousands of political parties in the Weimar republic, I&#x27;d be much less surprised to find this Mr. C an avid supporter of one of the many &quot;20 party members and only their mothers vote for them&quot; ideologies that the Weimar republic boasted.