I grant you the absurdity of enforcing <i>all</i> laws with machines&#x2F;computers&#x2F;robots. I don&#x27;t think I was as clear as intended. But I do feel that there are plenty of processes and certain law <i>domains</i> that are equally absurd when you make humans enforce them. These would be things like financial regulation, taxes, immigration maybe? Domains where our nuance, context, and consideration (read: bias) can actually prevent and corrupt the enforcement of these laws. Now granted, this depends on the availability of data infrastructure among other things, but if I could clarify the question, I&#x27;m thinking about what lessons learned and processes from software development can bring about efficiencies in government that we haven&#x27;t considered yet. Not some type of absolute computer takeover of government.