The point I&#x27;m making is that the Greek subjects of Alexander didn&#x27;t make any accommodations for the benefit of the foreigners he conquered, since all those foreigners were far away and hard to talk to. His <i>army</i> (and his court, the generals) had to make accommodations, and they complained quite a bit, but his subjects just sat around at home. The army had to be on location.<p>The empire split after Alexander&#x27;s death into the Macedonians proper, the Seleucids in Asia, and the Ptolemies in Egypt. The Ptolemies certainly kept a lot of cultural continuity with the Greek &#x2F; Macedonian world -- so much so that the <i>last</i> Ptolemaic pharaoh, Cleopatra, is believed to have been the <i>first</i> one who was able to speak the Egyptian language (after ruling Egypt for 250 years!). They did set up syncretistic temples, which was standard practice basically everywhere in the classical period. That was an effort to get the Egyptians to accept Greek religion, not the other way around. The Ptolemies even set up a major new city for Greeks. Their accommodations to Egypt weren&#x27;t particularly impressive.<p>To the extent that the Greeks and the Macedonians had a common cultural identity, it was because the Macedonians aspired to Greek culture (it seems safe to say that the Ptolemies eventually succeeded at this). The Greeks didn&#x27;t think highly of the barbarians to their north.