What is Zig&#x27;s position on memory safety?  Rust is, correctly IMO, memory-safe even if that can cause some discomforts when programming (I hear this is temporary, and mostly subsides as one gains a better understanding of lifetimes and borrows).  On the other hand, Jonathan Blow&#x27;s Jai eschews language-guaranteed memory safety in order to allow the programmer greater freedom, but does nothing to prevent use-after-free, double-free, null deref, etc. (Edit: this is based on my understanding of his language as it was in his last demo. I don&#x27;t know what plans he has for the future, but I think that with him calling Rust a &quot;big idea&quot; language and rejecting that philosophy, we should not expect Jai to do much to prevent incorrect manipulation of memory.)<p>If we take those two languages as the extremities of a spectrum, where would you put Zig on that spectrum?