I&#x27;d buy into your idea with one addition: A &quot;Refund&quot; button at the bottom of the article that I can click to get my money back if the content ended up being low quality. That&#x27;s a &quot;No questions asked, no arguments given&quot; refund, and it is my sole judgement as to what constitutes crappy quality.<p>That might buy the publisher (a) some credibility, and (b) an incentive to publish decent quality articles and not clickbait headed by misleading summaries.<p>Might some people abuse it? Sure. Probably. But I think that a large majority would not. Most of us do get it that people need to get paid.