1. You are ignorant on this topic. This doesn&#x27;t mean the same thing as &quot;You are stupid&quot;, it means precisely: &quot;You lack key knowledge about this particular topic.&quot; That&#x27;s how I used it.<p>2. I provided a few paragraphs telling why these conditions exist, and why arguing against them is not something someone educated in the topic would consider even attempting.<p>3. When you continue - over the course of several comments - to progress with your argument from a position of clear ignorance, it does indeed require increased naivety to the point of absurdity.<p>If you are going to take a stance on a subject you know little about, and then continue to assert that opinion, you can&#x27;t get upset when people use more and more direct means to communicate with you. Don&#x27;t assert a position that is based from a position of ignorance; seek to learn instead.<p>Also: I&#x27;d just like to point out the ironic nature of asserting meaningless comments are against &#x27;guidelines&#x27; while at the same time suggesting guidelines are irrelevant for a much more important human concern.