OK, I&#x27;ve listened to this section you mention about 4 times trying to catch the meaning you are imprinting on his words, and it just doesn&#x27;t seem that way to me. It does not sound condescending at all, to my ears. He is acknowledging a group of people who should not NEED to apply Unity to their work to interface with an Oculus.<p>Perhaps my ears are biased here, as I (as a programmer) have a great respect for &quot;media people&quot; due to their skills in content creation which I myself lack. &quot;Content people&quot; is the other term he uses here. What good is an engine without content? Different skills, not one greater than the other. I seriously doubt that John Carmack was attempting any sort of comparison here, subconsciously or not.<p>My take, as paraphrase: &quot;It seems like using Unity is a lot of overhead for a panoramic VR slideshow. Here&#x27;s another tool that you can try out and see if it meets your needs.&quot;