I was in the process of reading this when I thought to check who this person is. Of course, by that time the site had failed, so I haven&#x27;t read the whole thing yet.<p>But, it seems to me that the author is falling in to a trap many an unwary data &quot;scientist&quot; falls by not understanding the discipline of Statistics.<p>When one has the entire population data (i.e. a census), rather than a sample, there is no point in carrying out statistical tests.<p>If I know <i>ALL</i> the words spoken by someone, then I know which words they say the most without resorting to any tests simply by counting.<p>No concept of &quot;statistical significance&quot; is applicable because there is no sample. We can calculate the population value of any parameter we can think of, because, we have the entire population (in this specific instance, <i>ALL</i> the words spoken by all the characters).<p>FYI, all budding data &quot;scientists&quot; ...