Well, now you&#x27;ve actually elaborated with enough description to qualify your statement that, again, we are not in disagreement. It&#x27;s quite odd to me that your first statement carried the tone of disagreement, while this reply offers enough substantive explanation to indicate we agree. Substance is key. The appeals to Hitchens, however, do read as an unnecessary argument to authority. There&#x27;s a clear distinction between stating resistance is futile generally, and arguing it is futile against a thorough totalitarianism that has gained control over humanity itself.