Well, yes. But that&#x27;s a simplistic case. Evidence shows that no matter how terrible a job is, some one will do it. It&#x27;s just that as jobs get worse, fewer and fewer are willing to do the job. The amount of scammers willing to do the unpleasant task of dealing with 419-eaters and Scambaiters at a particular wage goes down.<p>Free market economics tells us that as the supply of some good goes down, the price almost certainly rises, all things being equal.<p>When the supply of &quot;service&quot; reps&#x2F;scammers goes down, we have 3 cases:<p>1. Demand for that labor stays the same. In this case labor rates go up. This will make scamming less economical, driving some scam factories out of business.<p>2. Demand for &quot;service&quot; reps goes up: Same as case (1), but worse for the scam factories. More of them go out of business.<p>3. Demand for &quot;sevice&quot; reps&#x2F;scammers goes down: this is really a case of &quot;all things don&#x27;t stay the same&quot;, because in this case, scam factories employ fewer &quot;service&quot; reps. Maybe some scam factories leave the market, maybe all scam factories make fewer calls a day.<p>In any of the 3 cases, WE WIN! Not as many scams are perpetrated, and the amount of calls goes down. Of course, an ideological free market analysis almost always gets things either partially or wholly wrong. We also don&#x27;t know what the relationship between wages and number of people willing to put up with hobbyist scambaiters is. It&#x27;s possible that like freeways on a Saturday, even a small worsening of job conditions makes the number of people willing to work at scam factories go way down. Or not. Unknowable. I just think that jerking the &quot;service&quot; reps chains as hard as possible is the only rational response.