Yesterday I was reading this blogpost (<a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;maryrosecook.com&#x2F;blog&#x2F;post&#x2F;scarface-prince-of-the-city-and-pieter-de-hooch" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;maryrosecook.com&#x2F;blog&#x2F;post&#x2F;scarface-prince-of-the-cit...</a>) so as soon as I clicked this link I thought no way can a computer learn to do what I read yesterday on its own!<p>I had read headlines about computer-generated images but had never seen them, yet I managed 9&#x2F;10, anticipating that an artist&#x27;s technique is not just relation between color etc. but a philosophy.<p>Edit: Also, it is not a turing test in true sense, since it&#x27;s one sided. It would be turing test if I tell them what to draw &amp; then it&#x27;s tough to distinguish between what an artist &amp; computer paints.