My understanding has it that this is a disingenuous misconstrual of what happened in the Hobby Lobby case.  It&#x27;s not that the corporation has religious beliefs.  It&#x27;s that the owners do - where that set of owners is sufficiently small and sufficiently homogeneous that that&#x27;s reasonably well defined.  And that those beliefs don&#x27;t lose protection just because they are acting through their corporation instead of acting as an individual.<p>I have, at least, misgivings about the ultimate decision - and certainly disagree with the religious beliefs claimed by the owners of Hobby Lobby - but I think we should deal with the actual arguments.