Funny. I do want to point out that this article is just terribly written. It seems to be based more on this: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theatlantic.com&#x2F;business&#x2F;archive&#x2F;2015&#x2F;03&#x2F;people-who-use-firefox-or-chrome-are-better-employees&#x2F;387781&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theatlantic.com&#x2F;business&#x2F;archive&#x2F;2015&#x2F;03&#x2F;people-w...</a><p>That article tends to go a little more in depth. I do think it&#x27;s interesting that they can make the correlation between retention rates at a call center (with average 45% annual turnover) and browser choice. Those going with chrome&#x2F;firefox stayed 15% longer in their positions.<p>How that gets turned into some cliched &#x27;nonconformist&#x27; categorization, I don&#x27;t know. It would seem pretty conformist to stay in your position longer rather than quit, but what do I know.<p>&quot;As correlations like “Chrome users are better employees” bob up from a sea of data, it’s important that they don’t start to generate the same rigid biases that Big Data is partially dampening—rejecting an applicant with the “wrong” browser would be silly.&quot;