This bit from the judge&#x27;s ruling underscores how ridiculous the lawsuit is:<p>&gt; In addition, at oral argument, Plaintiff did not represent that if given leave to amend she could allege that had she known the second reCAPTCHA word was used to assist Google with its other services she would not have completed the reCAPTCHA. To the contrary, counsel represented that he had not asked Plaintiff and he did not know what she would say. (Dkt. No. 60
at 20:23-25.) Such question, of course, should have been asked and answered before this lawsuit was filed and pursued in two states. Regardless, it defies common sense that the answer would be yes.<p>[1] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;boothsweet.com&#x2F;wp-content&#x2F;uploads&#x2F;2016&#x2F;02&#x2F;Google-Order-Granting-Dismissal.pdf" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;boothsweet.com&#x2F;wp-content&#x2F;uploads&#x2F;2016&#x2F;02&#x2F;Google-Orde...</a>