That is an interesting thought; thanks for pointing it out. I&#x27;ll be a little clearer and use a specific example: gun control. We have a right to bear arms, but at this point it is such a huge part of American culture (or a major subset of it) that any potential (legal) changes to the right are met with hostility. People use our Constitution to defend the fact that our culture has evolved (around it). But it is a circular argument I think.<p>Now maybe the changes that are proposed to be made against aren&#x27;t actually legal (which is what you are suggesting if I understand you correctly). I can&#x27;t speak to that, I really don&#x27;t know enough. I&#x27;ve just assumed changes would be legal. But your point is that I shouldn&#x27;t just assume that and maybe I shouldn&#x27;t.