&quot;If it&#x27;s really worth $5bn, someone will figure out how to get the service there. If it&#x27;s really worth $100bn, someone will get it there. Let the market settle things with Twitter.&quot;<p>I don&#x27;t agree with this kind of market-determinism. If a small-message broadcast-based social media service is &quot;really worth $5bn&quot; or &quot;really worth $100bn&quot; is a different question from if Twitter will be that service. Sometimes in order to discover their true utility, services need to change in fundamental ways. I think Facebook is a good example of that; Facebook in 2016 is a different beast than Facebook in 2006. That takes deliberate innovation. But sometimes, when trying to do that, the transformed version has <i>less</i> utility, and the service dies. That&#x27;s the risk here.<p>Perhaps you&#x27;re saying that Twitter should not change at all, and it should continue on its current path?