Big, successful, popular, dictatorial, charismatic movement like Chavism, say?  It really hasn&#x27;t been that long since then.  You could argue that it&#x27;s &quot;not like Nazism&quot;, I guess, in the details of interactions between the government and private industry, but in terms of taking and holding on to power it&#x27;s quite the same.<p>And I&#x27;d quibble with your distinction between religion-based and non-religion-based movements.  The whole point of movements like Nazism is that they act in much the way religion does.  More like creating a new religion that co-opting an existing one, of course; maybe that&#x27;s the difference you were getting at?