I see this as a case of a brilliant entrepreneur (Parker) tackling the world of health care and winning. I don&#x27;t view these horrible crimes he&#x27;s accused of as anything other than tatics from the status-quo and his competition. It wasn&#x27;t possible to get from point A to point N (where Parker took the company) without breaking these &quot;rules&quot; but he didn&#x27;t actually break any rules because this is all new territory. Any new business &quot;distrupting&quot; an existing one will anger the people losing money. And they will use their lawyers and try and fight for every last dollar by claiming this &quot;distruption&quot; isn&#x27;t legal for reason x,y,or z. David is now taking the company from point N to point Z because Parker is tainted. That&#x27;s fine. I think this was always the plan. And as a shareholder I think Parker is very happy David is now CEO moving to step Z.