&gt; <i>Women’s acceptance rates are 71.8% when
they use gender neutral profiles, but drop to 62.5% when their gender is identifiable</i><p>What is also true from the graphs, but the author does not emphasize is this: <i>Men&#x27;s acceptance rates are 69%, but drop to 64% when the gender is identifiable.</i><p>This is taken from figure 5. So in general, it seems the acceptance rate drops in both cases, as soon as the gender is identifyable. I do wonder why this is? The two just don&#x27;t add up. It seems that the type of PRs that the authors have maanged to have the gender identified, simply have <i>much</i> lower acceptance rates.