False.<p>Yours is akin to saying, &quot;Let&#x27;s sweep slavery under the rug and pretend it doesn&#x27;t exist.&quot;<p>Mine is akin to saying, &quot;We should no longer even consider enslaving people or treating people badly because their skin is a certain color.&quot;<p>Yours would certainly be ineffective in eliminating slavery because it advocates pretending that it doesn&#x27;t exist.<p>Mine is standing up against slavery and saying that the underlying principle used to justify it is morally wrong.<p>Applied to the issue of reverse racism, yours would be akin to saying, &quot;Let&#x27;s ignore or even advocate one kind of racism, while condemning another kind.&quot;<p>Mine would be akin to saying, &quot;All racism is wrong.  We should all stop being racist in any way, period.&quot;<p>I think the issue is that one side bases its position on moral principles, while the other side bases its position on utilitarianism.<p>One side says, &quot;Two wrongs don&#x27;t make a right.  -1 - 1 = -2&quot;.  The other side says, &quot;It&#x27;s acceptable to do wrong to compensate for another wrong.  -1 - 1 = 0.&quot;<p>One side says, &quot;We are not all-knowing or all-wise.  We cannot fairly do a concrete injustice to an innocent person to compensate for a perceived injustice done to another innocent person.&quot;  The other side says, &quot;This innocent person should not complain about being treated unjustly, because this other innocent person has probably been treated unjustly.&quot;<p>One side sees it as a zero-sum game.  The other side recognizes that, as long as racism exists in any form, we all lose.