I do not have any problems with Twitter&#x27;s actions in the New Yorker article. I don&#x27;t find &quot;slippery slope&quot; arguments persuasive when there is real harassment being committed right now. I don&#x27;t think the wikipedia link is relevant to this conversation; it seems to be about state censorship. The &quot;Controversy&quot; section as it&#x27;s written now is obviously not NPOV and cites no sources.