One point, if Nestle ran th water supply, they could be sued for damages and the EPA would have an adversarial role instead of covering for their buddies as they very likely were in Flint (by knowing the water was dangerous for months and only saying something when an independent researcher proved it was dangerous).<p>But the main point is they would face a jury setting damages if they pulled the same rookie corrupt BS that happened in Flint. The government won&#x27;t.