And in this case (<a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;arstechnica.com&#x2F;tech-policy&#x2F;2014&#x2F;12&#x2F;cops-illegally-nailed-webcam-to-utility-pole-for-6-weeks-to-spy-on-house&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;arstechnica.com&#x2F;tech-policy&#x2F;2014&#x2F;12&#x2F;cops-illegally-na...</a>) the camera video was ruled inadmissible.<p>I expect this to get to the Supreme Court given the constitutional argument but I really have no idea how they might come down on the issue.