Ah .. not quite. Im not a photographer by any stretch. Im a Vexiologist by trade, and Ive invested a tonne of time and money into that. It has provided me with a wonderful lifestyle that I wouldnt swap for anything. That line of work has always been open and accessible to all (just like programming), but the skills are never diluted by progress (just like programming skills are never really diluted)<p>Not saying that Digital Cameras arent &quot;real cameras&quot; .. an empty packet of smokes with a pinhole in the side makes for an acceptable form of camera as well. Just making the assertion that pretty much ALL digital cameras are garbage. At least the metallic paper in the empty packet of smokes has many interesting uses, and can be crafted into something of lasting value .... no such luck with yesterday&#x27;s used Digital Camera. They are a future landfill liability, just like all of your iPhones and other battery powered crap.<p>There are a few notable exceptions in Digital Cameras of course, but we already know that. The Sony Mavica (with the floppy disc in the side) was a work of art, The M9 with the Kodak CCD is justifably sort after in the 2nd hand market at premium prices, and of course the MM. Its even hard to find someone willing to part with a much loved M8. The X-Vario is not only a brilliant digital camera, but there is the added bonus of annoying any &quot;experts&quot; who see it in your camera bag. That is priceless.<p>No, what I find really annoying in this crappy article goes a little deeper than that.<p>For example, you can put a Rat in a maze, and measure how long it takes to find its way out. You can repeat the experiment several times over many days, and observe how the cunning little bastard manages to shave seconds, and then minutes off his time. Its only a filthy Rat, and yet the damn thing can reason and think for itself, and optimize a solution to a rather abstract problem. One has to respect the Rat, no matter what diseases the thing might be harboring in its dirty, matted fur.<p>Now lets take a look at the first photos published by the subject of this article. They look like the work of a noob with a new toy. Fair enough ... he is on an exciting new journey of discovery. Life is good for him, he has all the support in the world, and the doors are wide open to learn anything he wants to learn.<p>Fast Forward a few hundred photos.<p>The same.<p>Fast Forward a few thousand.<p>The same.<p>Dammit - Fast Forward 40,000 photos.<p>Exactly the same.<p>So you mean to tell me that after publishing his very best set of 40,000 images out of God-only-knows how many happy snaps he has shot ... that he has managed to learn, grow, and develop ... nothing at all. There is zero evidence of any artistic growth in 40,000 images ! NONE !  There is not even a hint of technical development in terms of composition, story telling ... or anything at all related to either photography or journalism.<p>There is no other word for this other than &quot;Mediocrity&quot;<p>The 40,000 images that are being thrust into the public eye are nothing more than a tragically monumental celebration of the Mediocre.<p>As a work of Conceptual Modern Art - A poignant epitaph to a dying culture, in the form of an endless series of the same mediocre images of the same mediocre plutorcats ... brilliant.<p>And then there is the mindless gushing of the so-called &quot;Media&quot; over this guys so-called &quot;achievements&quot;. They are always so hungry to idolize the talent-less and the mediocre, in whatever form they can find it.<p>Its just horrible to watch.