With a stackoverflow-like system (rating, moderation, editing of questions by moderators, accepted answer) even such questions would be productive. Subjective ramblings would be voted away, answers showing advantages&#x2F;disadvantages or similiarities between between frameworks would be rated up.<p>It&#x27;s just stupid to reduce such a portal to only questions that can be answered by RTFM.<p>Questions that need discussion due to missing information should be voted away, I agree on that. But some allow subjective answers - and those are frequently those that require experience. (What&#x27;s the best way to solve this-and-that? It depends, in situation a use solution A because, in situation b use solution B because, ...) Such questions typically are being closed by the moderators as well. And frequently the person who asks is not aware of all the factors influencing a solution, so there&#x27;s a lot of useful information in such questions.