Well I guess that depends on your definition of prestigious, but:<p>Ohio State - <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu&#x2F;~pogge&#x2F;Ast162&#x2F;Unit5&#x2F;gps.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu&#x2F;~pogge&#x2F;Ast162&#x2F;Unit5&#x2F;gps....</a><p>University of Colorado (hosted by LSU for some reason) - <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.phys.lsu.edu&#x2F;mog&#x2F;mog9&#x2F;node9.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.phys.lsu.edu&#x2F;mog&#x2F;mog9&#x2F;node9.html</a><p>US Naval Observatory - <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;tycho.usno.navy.mil&#x2F;ptti&#x2F;1996papers&#x2F;Vol%2028_16.pdf" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;tycho.usno.navy.mil&#x2F;ptti&#x2F;1996papers&#x2F;Vol%2028_16.pdf</a><p>That&#x27;s a paper from 1996, which is actually discussing relativistic effects in GPS receivers, which you might encounter in high speed aircraft, or satellites communicating with each other.<p>20 years ago, the author writes: &quot;There
is a very good reason for the omission: the effects of relativity, where they are different from
the effects predicted by classical mechanics and electromagnetic theory, are too small to matter
- less than one centimeter, for users on or near the earth. However, a new class of users, who
employ satellites that obtain time and position in space from GPS, cannot be satisfied with
the approximations in the current OCS.&quot;<p>That paper is interesting mostly because it&#x27;s the basis of the Conservapedia article on why the theory of relativity is wrong: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.conservapedia.com&#x2F;Theory_of_relativity#Lack_of_evidence_for_Relativity" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.conservapedia.com&#x2F;Theory_of_relativity#Lack_of_ev...</a><p>And there are non-academic sources that I tend to trust:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Error_analysis_for_the_Global_Positioning_System#Special_and_General_Relativity" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Error_analysis_for_the_Global_...</a><p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;physics.stackexchange.com&#x2F;questions&#x2F;1061&#x2F;why-does-gps-depend-on-relativity" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;physics.stackexchange.com&#x2F;questions&#x2F;1061&#x2F;why-does-gps...</a><p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wired.com&#x2F;2011&#x2F;06&#x2F;st_equation_gps&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wired.com&#x2F;2011&#x2F;06&#x2F;st_equation_gps&#x2F;</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.quora.com&#x2F;How-is-the-theory-of-relativity-used-in-GPS" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.quora.com&#x2F;How-is-the-theory-of-relativity-used-i...</a>