On the cost of cameras, if anything, they have gotten much more expensive. It used to be possible to buy a pro-quality film camera and prime lens for less than $1,000 -- so, let&#x27;s say $1500 in today&#x27;s dollars. More money might get you features like better auto-exposure, auto-focus or high-speed film winders, but a lot of pros didn&#x27;t use any of those features, and back in the day when I was shooting sports events at my college, I often had a more modern camera rig than the pros sitting next to me. Digital cameras that give similar image quality as those film cameras start at $2,500 today, and go up from there. It feels like the divide between pro and amateur equipment in photography has shot through the roof over the past decade, with the blanket adoption of digital.<p>What has gotten cheaper &#x2F; more accessible is the ability to publicize, duplicate and distribute one&#x27;s work. Twenty years ago, short of dropping off prints at the local newspaper, there would be no way for an amateur photographer to get her photos under the nose of photo editors at major news outlets. Today, that&#x27;s as simple as uploading to Flickr.