<p><pre><code>   The article is mostly about game theory, 
   which has been a staple of economics for 
   quite a while.
</code></pre>
I suggest to read the article more carefully. It&#x27;s about applying the study of computational complexity to game theory. When you approach conventional game theory from this angle, things become interesting: e.g. where conventional game theory says a Nash equilibrium exists, the complexity angle suggests that the market won&#x27;t find the equilibrium, because the laptop can&#x27;t (for example the problem might be NP complete), and the laptop is much faster than the market.