This is the sort of generic ideological tangent that adds little value and reliably turns a discussion into a flamewar. The tell-tale signs are (a) that there&#x27;s nothing specific, no engagement with the concrete material of the post, no sign of curiosity—just blaring a pre-existing position, and (b) the casual dropping of a match (&quot;how ISIS works, how feminism annexed academia&quot;) on the ground that was just soaked with petrol.<p>It doesn&#x27;t matter what one blares for or against; please don&#x27;t do it in the first place. HN threads are for conversation, not ideological soapboxes.