Well, see my other post in this thread. This is an example of exactly what I was talking about. If your only response to stuff like this is to complain about how it&#x27;s not &quot;fair&quot;, you take one step towards preventing it from even existing in the first place. Who wants to try anything new if the only thing they&#x27;re going to hear is &quot;But it&#x27;s not being evenly distributed to everybody!&quot;?<p>This is <i>step one</i>. Before we can &quot;come up with solutions that are inclusive&quot; we need to just plain <i>come up with solutions!</i> Don&#x27;t kill that with complaining <i>long</i> before it&#x27;s relevant about how &quot;fair&quot; it is.<p>Is it really so wrong that the rich are willing to be <i>guinea pigs</i> anyhow? It is, after all, ultimately disingenuous to complain that the school systems aren&#x27;t seeing this improvement because whenever the school systems suggest trying this sort of improvement the complaint about using kids as guinea pigs and ohmigosh their futures will be wrecked <i>immediately</i> come up. You can&#x27;t have it every which way. This is a significant chunk of the mechanism that has rendered national-scale schooling impossible to innovate with anyhow.