&gt; Did the lack of diversity really hinder the creative minds of the last millenia? &lt;<p>This is exactly the reason why I think this is probably a cause and effect confusion.<p>Better teams might attract a diverse crowd. Just like a better product can claim a more diverse group of users.<p>In fact it isn&#x27;t even just about &#x27;better products&#x27;, it might just be the most popular product (without any specific reason behind it). For instance, you will find Windows users to be more diverse than Linux users, mostly because former is a lot bigger userbase than latter, and Linux usage requires users to be of a certain technical aptitude (hopefully 2016 will be the year Linux Mint becomes the majority OS) which is mostly shared by the majority demographic (i.e. White males).<p>The minority also overrepresents other areas. For instance, some brands of hair products are more popular on Asian males, than among non-asian males (possibly because it suits their hair type better). Where as fairness creams are more popular among Indian men and women, not because of some sort of physiological differences but because of cultural preferences.<p>The fundamental idea is that not all areas of life will reflect the population distribution of the demographics. When I went to a fountain pen show, most people were white. There is no pipeline failure there, there is no widespread discrimination going on against non-whites.