This comment needs to be better supported.  It is intuitive that votes for POTUS would be a federal matter, and Wikipedia does not mention a jurisdictional issue for that case, nor any other federal interference conflict whatsoever.<p>Also, singling out Scalia when four other justices voted with him is biased.  It is also an incredible stretch to cast responsibility for an incompetence in handling an <i>unanticipated</i> war on any individual (especially in the judiciary!).