Exactly.  I go to cnn.com and wonder, &quot;where&#x27;s all the content?&quot;<p>I think dearth of content, and overuse of blank space has a lot to do with responsive web design run amok.<p>You can have great tailored desktop, and mobile experience without pandering to RWD.<p>My favorite example is Sankei.<p>Desktop
<a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sankei.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sankei.com&#x2F;</a><p>Mobile
<a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sankei.com&#x2F;smp&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sankei.com&#x2F;smp&#x2F;</a><p>There&#x27;s no weird 6 different media query breakpoints. (like Smashing Magazine site).  It has one fixed width layout for desktop, chalk full of descriptive text links, and just the right amount of photos.<p>Their mobile site is wonderful.  Images are all lazy loaded.<p>And you know what the best part is?<p>Do &quot;View Source&quot; in either version.  Look how clean and flat their markups are even with ad affiliate javascript code.  There&#x27;s more content than markups.<p>Reuters and nytimes are decent, because they have a lot of text content on home page.  But do &quot;View Source&quot; and their lack of code discipline and brevity shows compared to sankei.  There&#x27;s far more html code than actual content.