You clearly misunderstood my post. It may have been badly phrased.<p>What I meant isn&#x27;t &quot;don&#x27;t share it&quot;. I meant &quot;get it right before you share it&quot;.<p>I&#x27;d have thought the fact I spent a significant amount of time reviewing his implementation and giving well-meant comments would have made that clear. I have no interest in suppressing anyones development -- the more everyone learns, the better for everyone. And do I care about that.<p>However:<p>1. HN submissions are 1:many communication. Like, say, mailing lists. For which I&#x27;ve been taught that the sender should make an effort to send a good message. freddiearch didn&#x27;t put in that effort (see post #11098621). I care about HN, and I&#x27;d prefer to see high-quality articles here.<p>2. Beginners learning about new techniques and then immediately going on to write a low-quality tutorial is a very common phenomenon on the internet. It makes it unnecessarily harder for other beginners, who can&#x27;t tell. The code didn&#x27;t work and had several major flaws. It&#x27;s just not good code to learn Ansible from. (Except for freddiearch of course -- writing bad code, then improving it, is part of learning. Nothing wrong with that! Everyone starts small!)<p>(@freddiearch: If you read this: I really hope I didn&#x27;t discourage you from learning about Ansible or anything.)