I don&#x27;t think that what was established 3 centuries ago, when the world was completely different, should necessarily hold true today, regardless of the best intentions at the time. The only method of recording facts at the time was by writing it on paper.<p>Given technology evolution, we must constantly re-evaluate what is still legitimate and should be transposed to today and what is off-limits.<p>Let me give you what is (for us today) a ridiculous example to prove my point: imagine that in a couple hundred years, it becomes possible to scan anyone&#x27;s brain with some sort of machine and determine what a person is thinking about?