I might be wrong but it appears that Twitter is mostly useful for reporters who want to write a story on something and find it easy to get quotes.<p>Whereas before this required traveling to the random place where the story takes place (with potential danger and hassle of travel), now they merely have to open twitter and find some random twat with an opinion on the subject. And presto - a quote is ready.<p>The problem, of course, is that the importance of the quote is greatly diminished and just &#x27;someone with a twitter account thinks X&#x27;. If before the reporter actually had to go out and ask people for their opinions which presented an accurate view &#x27;on the ground&#x27;, now he&#x27;s getting a view of the &#x27;twitter-sphere&#x27; - which might have little bearing on views of affected population at large.