In fairness, he makes a lot of points that GitHub is particularly awful at, specifically things that aren&#x27;t very relevant to enterprises (who pay their bills) and therefore aren&#x27;t priorities for GitHub.<p>You&#x27;re totally right about software being more about people than about code. That being said, I think maybe you&#x27;re underestimating just how many issues ESLint receives and how willing people are to volunteer time to the project. They&#x27;ve received almost 2500 issues and have essentially 5 active developers.<p>Yes, you&#x27;re one hundred percent correct that issues are the problem here. That&#x27;s a lot of issues for five people. Period. You&#x27;re being a little lenient on GitHub&#x27;s behalf by not weighting how poorly it does issue tracking which expounds their problem a great deal.<p>They&#x27;re not &quot;typical dumb engineers&quot;. They mention nowhere that they&#x27;ll somehow end up with less bugs if they leave GitHub. But they believe they&#x27;ll be able to more accurately assess issues and turn them around faster by using a different platform--which if you&#x27;re familiar with the alternatives, it isn&#x27;t the completely facetious assumption you cut it out to be.<p>Sorry if that comes off aggressive. Not intended. You make great points. Just wanted to reiterate that GitHub has <i></i>some<i></i> blame here...