Just playing devil&#x27;s advocate, but look at the UI.  The box I saw says &quot;CAPTCHA&quot; and &quot;type these two words&quot;.  So the argument for fraud would be that 50% of words Google solicited under the guise of CAPTCHA were actually used for the sole economic benefit of Google&#x27;s other services.  Maybe on a count for fraud the plaintiff&#x27;s can&#x27;t prove that they would not have created a Google account having known the 2nd word was not for CAPTCHA; however, the Plaintiffs could certainly prevail on a unjust enrichment claim.<p>As the company who invented the anti-trust defense &quot;competition is only a click away&quot;, Google should equally be capable of acknowledging there in absolutely no burden on Google to create 2 boxes for new users, one identified as CAPTCHA, and the other as a crowd-sourced word to be used for Google&#x27;s other services.