Hmm. I think I see what you&#x27;re getting at. It sounds like you&#x27;re saying that you&#x27;re put off by the tone of the apology itself, and not so much the quick reversal, which is what I had thought you were focusing on. Is that right? If so, how do you think it could have been improved? I personally found the comment (or apology, or whatever we should be calling it) pretty sincere sounding.<p>(By the way: I had forgotten that Andreessen was a board member and large investor. Thanks for reminding me.)