&gt;I&#x27;m going to give you an important kind of a picture. I hear a lot of people say &quot;I don&#x27;t like machinery and technology, it&#x27;s making a lot of trouble.&quot; So we&#x27;re going to take all the machinery away from all the countries of the world, all machinery, all the tracks and the wires, and the works and we&#x27;re going to dump it all in the ocean. And you will discover that within 6 months, 2 billion people will die of starvation having gone through great pain. So we say &quot;That&#x27;s not a very good idea lets put all the machinery back where it was.&quot; Then, we&#x27;re going to take all the politicians from all the countries around the world and we&#x27;re going to send them on a trip around the sun, and you&#x27;ll find we keep right on eating. And the political barriers now... scientists say very clear you could make the world work and take care of 100% of the people at a higher standard of living that anyone has ever known despite the increasing population, but you can&#x27;t do it with the barriers, any more than you can try run a human organism with a wall between the ear, the eye, and the stomach. It is an organic whole, it is total industrialization.<p>-Buckminster Fuller<p>Fuller claimed that the reason why we cannot take care of the greater population as a whole is not because we don&#x27;t have the technical feasibility to do so but because we are trying to solve our problems with politics. Trying to solve the problems of the electric age by using the paper-based political framework is futile and self-defeating.