<i>As long as its a webcam-per-suspect-per-place-of-business basis and not a mass grab to do this across entire geographical areas it seems fine.</i><p>That&#x27;s the problem right there though.  The FISC has already ruled that if there is no constitutional issue with a single targeted act, then adding more and more acts together can&#x27;t create a constitutional issue out of whole cloth.<p>In other words, if it&#x27;s OK to do it with one person as a target, then it&#x27;s OK to do it to everyone as a target.<p><i>&quot;Put another way, where one individual does not have a
Fourth Amendment interest, grouping together a large number of similarly-situated
individuals cannot result in a Fourth Amendment interest springing into existence ex
nihilo. &quot;</i>[0]<p>[0] - <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.fisc.uscourts.gov&#x2F;sites&#x2F;default&#x2F;files&#x2F;BR%2013-109%20Order-1.pdf" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.fisc.uscourts.gov&#x2F;sites&#x2F;default&#x2F;files&#x2F;BR%2013-109...</a> page 9, paragraph 1