Correct. Now could you please edit your top-level comment some more, so that it actually makes sense?<p>First you fake incredulity about how people aren&#x27;t finding it &quot;obvious&quot;, although it&#x27;s unclear exactly what you think is obvious (the paradox? its resolution? modern cosmology?).<p>Then you launch into an explanation of the inverse-square law for a single point source. What&#x27;s your intention here? By itself it doesn&#x27;t demonstrate how to resolve the paradox. (As you say, the resolution is that the universe is not infinite. Thanks for adding that in the edit.)<p>Overall, your top-level comment was incomprehensible, as evidenced by the large number of people who thought you were trying to use the inverse-square law to resolve the paradox.