&gt; All the stuff about the adolescent he may or may not have mocked is a red herring - I&#x27;ve followed this issue, and literally the only place I&#x27;ve heard it mentioned is articles defending Zucker.<p>The article brings up many more flaws with the external review than the use of that anecdote. For example, the misreporting of statistics (70% vs 30% of patients meeting the criteria for gender dysphoria); the low number of interviews with actual patients of the GIC (9 or 11), of whom even so only 2 had complaints; misreporting the nature of the use of play therapy (for assessment vs treatment); and so forth.<p>If the GIC is to be condemned (as perhaps it should) for conversion therapy, it should at least be done on the basis of a thorough, fact-checked independent review; the article&#x27;s thesis is that the external review conducted by Zinck and Pignatiello does not suffice. It&#x27;s not just one anecdote they take issue with.<p>&gt; His approach involved telling parents to prevent their kids from playing with toys of the &quot;wrong&quot; gender [...]
&gt; His position - what he told parents coming to his clinic for help [...]
&gt; I&#x27;ve followed this issue, [...]<p>Do you have any links you think are particularly informative about the practices of the GIC in this regard?