I&#x27;ve found that the further down the article the actual quote is, the more likely that the writer&#x27;s interpretation is misleading.<p>First sentence<p>&gt;then suggesting the country would have had stronger economic growth if it had stayed under British rule rather than become independent in 1947.<p>Actual tweet, at the bottom<p>&gt;Anti-colonialism has been economically catastrophic for the Indian people for decades. Why stop now?