&gt; &quot;Human neural intelligence is not that complicated and current algorithms are touching on keystone, foundational aspects of it.&quot;<p>Of the algorithms used in this work, which would be touching on foundational aspects of human intelligence, in your view?<p>Thinking about the variant of MCTS used in this work, for example, it&#x27;s not clear to me that tree search, no matter how clever, touches much on human cognition, at least significantly more than deep blue did.<p>On the other hand, the idea of bootstrapping a network with huge numbers of expert interactions before &#x27;graduating&#x27; it to more complex training and architectural enhancement might turn out be an important part of the Game Over algorithm, as you call it. Even if it doesn&#x27;t resembles much how humans beings learn.