And suppose that someone follows the teachings of Rich Dad, Poor Dad but doesn&#x27;t buy land or property, instead investing in something else that generates revenue, otherwise following the book&#x27;s advice to the letter.  Do you still object?  On what grounds?<p>I can see you think that land tax would be fairer (I&#x27;m inclined to agree) but that&#x27;s really not related to the message of the book.  Are you opposed to private ownership of capital in general?