Bullshit...<p>If the Emperor has no clothes, and QA keep saying &quot;naked&quot;, there is value there. The value lies in highlighting the fact that there&#x27;s a bunch of advisors that either have been actively profiteering from the fake garment con, or where negligent in their duties and failed to notice the problem before.<p>Either party would have strong interest to cover up their negative-value-added actions, but since they cannot directly challenge QA statement, they go and say that &quot;it does not add value&quot;. In the strictest sense of the word they are true, QA does not add value, it helps prevent&#x2F;correct that would destroy already-added value in the product if left unchecked.