The fallacy here is that when you look at the numbers, they&#x27;re not just using ordinary deductions - they can&#x27;t because then they couldn&#x27;t arrive at these results.<p>These kind of things work by deliberately setting up perverse virtual organizational structures to take advantage of complex loop holes. It is abusive, in the strict term of the word.<p>Using your analogy, would what you say if your tax preparer told you that if you proforma-married a woman in country X and used her name to set up a non-existing company in country Y, because then you&#x27;d qualify for certain deductions?