If you&#x27;re going to apply a word to a place where it previously hasn&#x27;t been meaningful to apply the word, it&#x27;s worth clarifying what meaning that word now has.<p>For instance, is Android a Linux distro? Depends why you&#x27;re using the phrase &quot;Linux distro&quot;. For some applications of that phrase, yes; for some applications no. Saying that it is, or that it isn&#x27;t, doesn&#x27;t tell you anything more, and doesn&#x27;t help you answer those questions; you still have to answer them, so you might as well answer them directly. For instance, if you&#x27;re packaging some software for a bunch of Linux distros, you probably don&#x27;t want to count Android (or at least, handle it very differently from Debian or Fedora). If you&#x27;re tracking fixes to kernel CVEs, you probably do want to count Android.<p>Or, more mathematically, is 0^0 = 0 or 1? Depends how you ended up with 0^0 in the first place: if through 0^y as y approaches 0, then 0, but if through x^0 as x approaches 0, then 1. Saying &quot;It&#x27;s 1&quot; or &quot;It&#x27;s undefined&quot; is satisfying to the part of the human brain that likes clean answers, but it doesn&#x27;t inform us.<p>Similarly, let&#x27;s not ask &quot;what does &#x27;consciousness&#x27; really mean&quot;, but &quot;where do we use the term &#x27;consciousness&#x27;.&quot; Should AIs be able to drive a car unsupervised? Should a sufficiently advanced AI have civil rights, such as the right to life? Should an AI be entrusted with political office? Or with the vote, and if so, what representation is fair? Can I give an AI ownership of a company? For the religious among us, do AIs have the ability to have human-like morality? Those are all questions worth answering, but saying &quot;Yes, this computer has a conscious mind&quot; or &quot;No, it doesn&#x27;t&quot; is not really going to help those questions get answered.<p>The Chinese room experiment is sort of not useful in that, while &quot;the ability to learn Chinese&quot; is a thing we expect of consciousnesses, it&#x27;s not really generalizable. Nothing else in our society really depends on people&#x27;s ability to learn a language; those few things that do, generally don&#x27;t require the learner to be a person (e.g., you want something translated and you give it to a company).