Wouldn&#x27;t the outcome that they just start investing less in women due to (subconscious) group association be just as likely? After all, if you&#x27;re getting investment through your belonging in a certain group, and then never deliver, you&#x27;re muddying the waters for other members of your group, whether that be expats, women, young founders, old founders, etc.<p>Even though I&#x27;m all for using your weaknesses as strengths, 
getting back what&#x27;s owed to you, etc, I&#x27;m seriously doubtful that &quot;pullin&#x27;a &#x27;olmes&quot; is a cause for celebration. If anything, it tarnishes the image of female founders in the long term, and  at best its short sighted revenge. There&#x27;s a lot more good to be had if there were female founders publicly pulling a Zuckerberg or a Gates, and I&#x27;m sure there will be.