I learned a lot from and really enjoyed the Quantum Physics posts at Less Wrong: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;lesswrong.com&#x2F;lw&#x2F;r5&#x2F;the_quantum_physics_sequence&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;lesswrong.com&#x2F;lw&#x2F;r5&#x2F;the_quantum_physics_sequence&#x2F;</a> . The author starts out focusing on the Many-Worlds interpretation and later defends that point, apparently sharing your criticisms. Early on, the author has a lot to say against other teaching approaches that present Quantum Physics as fundamentally mysterious (&quot;No one really understands it anyway, just use these equations&quot;) or leave out the Many-Worlds interpretation:<p>&gt;I am not going to tell you that quantum mechanics is weird, bizarre, confusing, or alien.  QM is counterintuitive, but that is a problem with your intuitions, not a problem with quantum mechanics. [...] It is always best to think of reality as perfectly normal.<p>&gt;Dragging a modern-day student through all this [initially teaching the subject in the order it was discovered] may be a historically realistic approach to the subject matter, but it also ensures the historically realistic outcome of total bewilderment.  Talking to aspiring young physicists about &quot;wave&#x2F;particle duality&quot; is like starting chemistry students on the Four Elements. [...] The universe is not wavering between using particles and waves, unable to make up its mind.  It&#x27;s only human intuitions about QM that swap back and forth.