Why, is there are any objections to the premise that the very human concept of art was inspired by natural phenomena in the shared environment, and beauty of ne nature, such as simetry, colors, shapes (which constitutes health markers among other things), sounds (of bird songs, or even wind) comes long before emergence of so called human intelligence, and has little to do with it? Human arts, by the way, has a lot to do with pseudo-intellectual classifications and criticism, instead of the very essence, which we some times call beauty, captured from the environment.