I agree if a man sleeps with a consenting woman but later chooses not to enter a romantic relationship even though she wants to, that&#x27;s not evil by itself. Some people would say that he&#x27;s &quot;using her for sex&quot; or a &quot;womanizer&quot; or whatever, as if sex includes an implicit promise to enter a relationship; I would disagree.<p>But that&#x27;s not what&#x27;s going on in the case of Eido Shimano. He was a teacher sleeping with his students, which is generally considered unethical. He appears to have led his sexual partners to believe that they were in a monogamous relationship, then cheated on them. He repeatedly harassed a woman who refused his advances. And at least one woman accused him of groping her, which is just plain illegal. I think it&#x27;s fair to call that behavior &quot;evil&quot; and &quot;exploitative&quot;, and I don&#x27;t see anything weird about the article framing it that way.