Why would it be more effective than peer and student review? I&#x27;m not saying that those are effective systems on their own (the bigger argument is whether academia is interested in &quot;watchdog&quot; regulation of instructional quality, which I would argue, &quot;No&quot;)...but I don&#x27;t think too many people are going to be enthusiastic about &quot;ineptness&quot; being quantified by what&#x27;s found on a syllabus.<p>It&#x27;d be like writing a tool that evaluated developers based on what languages or libraries they used, as found on their Github repos.