Again with the personal attacks? And egocentric to boot.<p>FWIW, nearly every HN commenter, or at least those who post as often as you or I, has an inordinate amount of spare time.<p>Also, I see you&#x27;ve used &quot;I&#x27;m out&quot; before. As I mentioned earlier, you derided the &#x27;political-myopia of tech culture&#x27; here on HN. Later in that thread, maxerickson at <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=10519360" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=10519360</a> wrote:<p>&gt; I was pointing out that what you said about value was not an argument against economics (because economics doesn&#x27;t care about what form value takes).<p>&gt; You keep looking for a word other than value to describe this thing that you think should happen because then I can&#x27;t point out that you can analyze it economically, but this is not a way to argue that education should not be analyzed economically, it is a misunderstanding of economics (it was really clear when stated as &quot;Value&quot; is not only monetary, but &quot;we should do it just because&quot; is still an imputation of value...).<p>You decided, incorrectly IMO, to describe it as &quot;a last-word-mine argument&quot;, and ended the thread with &quot;I&#x27;m out&quot;.<p>My interpretation of both exchanges is that you don&#x27;t like it when people point out apparent inconsistencies in what you wrote.<p>(BTW, for those in the future who, like I, sometimes review someone&#x27;s back history before commenting - hi!)