My first impressions from the talk is that it looks a lot like Wolfram&#x27;s programming lab [0]. Which is great because while I really like the idea of WPL the cost is rather prohibitive. More competition in this arena is definitely necessary.<p>What will programming look like in 10 years? My guess is that it will look much the same as it does now. We&#x27;ll have better languages for expressing temporal logic and consistency but it might not be radically far off from where we are now.<p>Text is still useful and certainly notations could improve but that&#x27;s about it.<p>The idea of programming from tables using declarative or logic programming is certainly not new but very powerful. k comes to mind... which is probably at the extreme opposite end of usability. Never the less even COBOL had a sense of this.<p>Looking forward to where Eve goes next. My ideal environment is one where I can freely mix hand-drawn &quot;symbols&quot; to data and express relations using familiar mathematical notations in a single free-form canvas. I sort of do this on paper presently but I have to translate this artifact into a programming language to insert values and explore the various dimensions. It&#x27;d be nice to have a system that could recognize my notations and let me hook them up to data.<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wolfram.com&#x2F;programming-lab&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wolfram.com&#x2F;programming-lab&#x2F;</a><p><i>update</i><p>Well... not quite like Wolfram Language; but the connection to knowledge, queries, and building new knowledge from queries. The interface is quite flexible too.