This doesn&#x27;t make any sense.  Citizebs United had nothing to do with self-funding a campaign.  If anything a reversal on Citizens United would incentivize more self-funded campaigns, as political speech by third parties is what would be limited.<p>The concern with big money in politics isn&#x27;t about the spending of the money itself anyway, it&#x27;s the alleged connontation of what that money is buying for the other party.  A self-funded candidate would be more insulated from such influence, as such a candidate cannot exactly buy their own influence.