&quot;Not sure that I would agree there. What if the &quot;excess&quot; production funds a cure for cancer? What if that cure requires additional resources?&quot;<p>Production does not fund other things, and disease cures are not something that people willingly buy. Excess production just wastes resources on things people do not want to buy (unsold automobile inventory, etc.) and is enabled by access to too much speculative capital. Redistribution of that capital (in the form of higher taxes) into government-mandated and funded research programs to find cures for cancer is how you find a cure for cancer. Disease research in the United States is not funded by pouring water on your head (<a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nbcnews.com&#x2F;health&#x2F;health-news&#x2F;ice-bucket-challenge-cash-raised-cant-fill-hole-als-research-n186356" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nbcnews.com&#x2F;health&#x2F;health-news&#x2F;ice-bucket-challen...</a>) or Tim Ferriss (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.crowdrise.com&#x2F;timferriss" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.crowdrise.com&#x2F;timferriss</a>), but by the $30 billion budget of the National Institutes of Health.