&quot;We can solve all of the world&#x27;s problems!&quot; - Bay Area
&quot;What about us?&quot; - The world<p>rant.<p>Maybe I&#x27;m a bit naively bitter on the subject, particularly after spending some time at Chicago&#x27;s opengov hack nights. Something about it got very, very turned me completely away from modern civics and its problems solving. Much of it seems to stem from the same vain as high school grads building unmaintainable schools in &quot;primitive&quot; cultures many miles away.<p>My problem isn&#x27;t that Uber, SF etc exist. Individually, &quot;fuck yeah!&quot;. As a whole, though, they take the focus away from the nuance of actual problems and create comfort for those who can afford it. The poor, the mentally sick and the fringe simply aren&#x27;t accounted for to the level that they can be. Especially after walking through SF streets earlier this year. It was infuriating to see so much homelessness and prosperity of achievement condensed in the same place.  Chicago and NY have nothing on how sharp that difference was (although, I admit it might be selection bias).<p>Many techie-type folk my age tend to complain about the large economic&#x2F;social problems. Very few of them ever take action - yet they complain about inaction! If that feeling is as pervasive as it seems, then maybe the problem just might be within some nuance that&#x27;s not being addressed. When skill&#x27;s diverted from that nuance towards Bay-like areas and their functions, then YES, they are part of the problem. Just maybe not directly or in an intuitive way.