&gt; When there&#x27;s a possibility that she dresses in a certain way<p>Obviously I wasn&#x27;t referring to the clause about her attire.<p>&gt; And a defined masculine jaw would probably help you raise money<p>Absolutely, but that was not my point. The point is that if the matter of appearance is commonly brought up when a woman is involved but rarely when a man is, then there&#x27;s a problem. If the matter of Agassi&#x27;s jaw had been brought up as a likely reason for his ability to fool (or not) investors as often as Holmes&#x27;s natural physical appearance comes up, I wouldn&#x27;t have said a thing.<p>I&#x27;m not objecting at all to the likely hypothesis (perhaps a well-supported theory by now) that physical appearance matters a lot in all sorts of circumstances, but to the tendency to bring up physical appearance as a significant cause for success only (or almost only) when discussing women, and when the actual amount information supporting this hypothesis in both cases (of men and women) is similarly nonexistent (and possibly similarly likely in both cases).