Christie Blatchford&#x27;s coverage of this case is essential reading, IMO: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.nationalpost.com&#x2F;tag&#x2F;gregory-elliott" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.nationalpost.com&#x2F;tag&#x2F;gregory-elliott</a><p>The briefs and the decision themselves are also worthwhile to read, here&#x27;s the decision: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.canlii.org&#x2F;en&#x2F;on&#x2F;oncj&#x2F;doc&#x2F;2016&#x2F;2016oncj35&#x2F;2016oncj35.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.canlii.org&#x2F;en&#x2F;on&#x2F;oncj&#x2F;doc&#x2F;2016&#x2F;2016oncj35&#x2F;2016onc...</a>  Interestingly, there are a few mistakes regarding how twitter functions, and a tweet was falsely attributed to Elliot. This was noticed by the blogger over at genuinewitty.com, which also has more depth and detail in its research and coverage of the case (also essential reading, IMO).