Here&#x27;s a question for you, then. Has any thought been given to the accessibility story for Eve and tools like it?<p>As a blind developer, I always get a bit nervous when the future of programming is discussed in terms I&#x27;ve read used to describe Eve. It seems like a very useful way of developing apps, but one that can easily exclude a subset of the population if a11y issues aren&#x27;t thought through in advance.<p>Also, part of me is tempted to dismiss Eve because I suspect we&#x27;ll always have the current way of developing software to fall back on. But when I consider it more, I don&#x27;t find that line of thinking productive for me. For instance, lots of folks might be tempted to dismiss GUIs for blind users because graphics, but there are actually huge advantages to representing UIs as trees of objects that can be introspected and interacted with. I can write code that scans the accessibility hierarchy for a specific element and reads it, for instance. In a command line interface, that code would need to either scan for a non-specific set of characters that a curses app might use to draw a thing that looks like a button and make a guess at its contents, and even then that logic would be very brittle. So even if Eve and whatever comes after derives lots of its power from rendering concepts visually, the underlying primitives needed to do so might have beneficial a11y implications and shouldn&#x27;t be discounted because the end goal happens to look nicer than a wall of text.<p>Anyway, would be nice to see that on the roadmap if it isn&#x27;t already. Even if only 20% of programming is like this in 10 years, that&#x27;s still a substantial subset that might exclude me by virtue of the accessibility story not being thought out first.