disclaimer: I&#x27;m not of the mind that patents are a raw evil that needs to be swept from the earth. I understand how they can be beneficial for society ideally.<p>There&#x27;s a lot of ideas out there that it&#x27;s just old fashioned corruption and lobbying preventing it, but I can see one semi-valid justification:<p>Imagine a non-practicing company who ends up with a collection of patents (not a non-practicing patent troll). Today, and what normally happens, they would just license those out to various entities who wished to use them, and those companies signal a fairly pure intent to actually build something and sell it. The license cost is simply passed on to the consumer, but if the product is unique enough it&#x27;s not like there&#x27;s a cheaper alternative for anybody to compare against anyway. In the end the economy is richer for having the widget because now people can buy a new capability.<p>Now imagine a case where companies <i>must</i> exercise their patents. They&#x27;ll<p>a) be less likely to work on R&amp;D since they&#x27;ll no longer be able to exercise a guaranteed monopoly, first to invent (or first to file) no longer has a motivational push to generate new ideas. Even inventing for the <i>sole</i> purpose of licensing your idea is a legitimate one. R&amp;D is very expensive.<p>b) Only organizations with the financial power to both invent <i>and</i> manufacture will now file for patents. This locks away many small-time inventors (garage R&amp;D) who today make a reasonable living off of their work via licensing to large corporations and locks away the power of innovation only at large and powerful organizations. In a sense the current patent regime is intended to allow anybody, large or small, access to a level playing field. e.g. I have a small LLC, if tomorrow I come up with a cool idea through my LLC and get it patented, I&#x27;d <i>have</i> to go about building it and putting it on the market, all expenses that I know my LLC doesn&#x27;t have the funding to support.<p>c) As a result, lots of half-assed shit will end up on the market since inventors will be forced to pump <i>something</i> out. Except now it will be optimized to cost them the least amount possible to get to market with rather than be optimized to try to be successful (that takes loads more money to try).<p>d) And&#x2F;Or a weird economy will show up of small &quot;pass through&quot; businesses that exist only to provide a store front for the crap that inventors now have to produce in order to lock down their patent (since the end-game in most patents is licensing). They don&#x27;t really have any intention of selling anything, but inventors maybe produce 10 of their widget, pay a small stocking fee and the store will put it up for display. These stores will likely be in small, off-main-street light industrial zones with no traffic. It&#x27;s easy money for the store owners since inventors will literally pay them to stock the minimally produced junk. Think of the &quot;As Seen on TV&quot; stores at some local malls, now imagine those multiplied by a million.<p>IMHO a better solution is to make patents non-sellable. They can only exist under ownership of the inventor and can&#x27;t be accumulated under non-inventing entities.