I wouldn&#x27;t have a problem forbidding all companies from requiring an employee terminated involuntarily and without cause to train their own replacement before they are tossed out on their ear.  Actually, I wouldn&#x27;t even mind forbidding any work duties that were not typical prior to the notice of termination.<p>But that doesn&#x27;t need to be done by the government.  It seems like the sort of situation that a good collective bargaining agreement could handle.  Such an oddity might guarantee a minimum severance package that is not contingent upon the employees symbolically cutting their own throats.<p>I believe that immigration law already requires an LCA to be filed for <i>each</i> non-temporary work location.  If Cognizant intended to employ workers in California longer than 10 days, it would have to pay the prevailing California wage, not the prevailing New Jersey wage.<p>H1B workers already are &quot;bound&quot; to the area of the LCA.  If the company wants to move them permanently, it has to file another LCA for them.<p>None of those requirements prevented this from happening.<p>Disney had a duty, which could not reasonably be delegated, to ensure that its contractor would be obeying the laws that Disney is expected to obey.  If such a duty did not exist, there would be a huge, obvious loophole in the law that would allow <i>anyone</i> to break <i>any law</i> at will, just by creating a throwaway corporation to do it, and paying the skeleton crew a scapegoat bonus.