You can maybe gain some sense, but I&#x27;m not sure if it can exactly tell you how you&#x27;re going wrong (except possibly to say, &quot;<i>if</i> you believe these things, it makes no sense to also believe this other thing&quot;; where a thing is a probability value assignment -- the danger is in believing that such analysis can give you positive knowledge [for instance, &quot;I believe these things, so this other things <i>must</i> be the case&quot;). I believe you need a total ordering, not just a finite, partial ordering. Maybe you can say wedding is good, funeral is bad, but how would you incorporate something like the birth of a child, the taste of some food, etc? Basically, you have to reduce all aspects of subjectivity to an integer, which could very well be impossible (making the activity of trying to turn subjectivity into integers highly suspect).<p>I understand that economic games sometimes use degree of belief, but in the example of a roulette wheel, we can actually count up all of the possibilities and assign numbers based on that. I don&#x27;t think we can count all of the possible subjective states.<p>&gt;How do you get an infinite, uncountable number of experiences?<p>I experience this all the time (though I can&#x27;t say they are infinite, it is certainly more than I can count).