Reading through the article I feel like the author and I are describing different things when we use the term unikernel, which is surprising because we both have experience with the same unikernel: QNX. I&#x27;m not very familiar with the other examples, but my QNX application definitely does have processes that I can see using top, htop, etc., and interfaces with system hardware using the QNX system calls; all things the article describes as not being features of unikernels.<p>Either the article is written in the context of writing kernel software, which wouldn&#x27;t have much of an impact on my decision to run my application on a unikernel OS or not, or QNX is a far outlier from other unikernel OS&#x27;s and that&#x27;s why I&#x27;m so confused.