Sorry about my sloppy use of terminology.<p>I agree that my comparison is not very accurate. I didn&#x27;t mean &quot;far-right&quot; in terms of neo-nazi and other extremist ideology, but parliamentary far-right - strictly geographically speaking. (And although they like to create a martial vocabulary, I tend to disagree that the SVP&#x2F;New Right is anything close to neo-nazis... at this point in time - after all the SVP-styled conservatism <i>does</i> represent at least a quarter of Swiss votes)<p>It strikes me as the biggest parallel between US- and CH-far right (as described above) that their voters seem to be less critical of the political suggestions their political leaders make. Harsh punishments and swift deportations of foreigners that are pictured as potentially criminal&#x2F;dangerous&#x2F;job-threatening are just an example of this kind of rhetoric.<p>So, when journalists condemn a certain &quot;deportation&#x2F;punishment&quot; ideas of such a politician, IMO all they are doing is giving him a platform to communicate those ideas. Which was the point I was trying to make in terms of the original post about punishment.<p>Guess, I got lost :)