And I ask, what does privilege have to do with this story?<p>How is a 50&#x2F;50 split from a divorce some sign of &quot;Fuck male privilege&quot;? Based on the information given, what should the split have been to be equitable?<p>We know nothing of the circumstances for any other ratio to make sense. Was the seed money hers? Did they flip a coin to decide who was going to run the company and who was going to raise the kids? Was there a prenuptial agreement saying there would be a 50&#x2F;50 split on a divorce?<p>Instead, you seem to be reading something in the story based not only on what appears to be pure conjecture, but counter to how the author apportions blame. You continue the conjecture by positing that had the author had more personal money to dump on the problem, then it would have been better. But we don&#x27;t know that. Was he willing to fire his son? Was his business idea any good? Or would it simply have been more money down the drain?<p>Nor do we know what his wife has done with the money.