It&#x27;s odd to complain specifically about subjectivity of the prior when the likelihood is often just as subjective. Gelman puts this well here:<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;andrewgelman.com&#x2F;2015&#x2F;01&#x2F;27&#x2F;perhaps-merely-accident-history-skeptics-subjectivists-alike-strain-gnat-prior-distribution-swallowing-camel-likelihood&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;andrewgelman.com&#x2F;2015&#x2F;01&#x2F;27&#x2F;perhaps-merely-accident-h...</a>