Please don&#x27;t. This reflexive criticism of everything Wolfram touches, however originally justified, has become a derangement syndrome in its own right.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=10723588" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=10723588</a><p>The topic here is George Boole, an important and fascinating figure. We ought to be able to discuss Boole whether the OP&#x27;s name is Wolfram or not, whether or not he drops asides about himself. Otherwise we just turn into the mirror image of the very quality we find annoying.