Many-Worlds has flaws comparable to many other leading interpretations, which is why it&#x27;s not a large majority view among quantum information and foundations researchers. Explaining why the observable universe is Born-rule typical is a major issue for Many-Worlds.<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;arxiv.org&#x2F;pdf&#x2F;gr-qc&#x2F;9703089.pdf" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;arxiv.org&#x2F;pdf&#x2F;gr-qc&#x2F;9703089.pdf</a> is a good discussion of this issue, which I don&#x27;t think has yet had a satisfactory rebuttal. A more up to date version is at <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;arxiv.org&#x2F;abs&#x2F;0905.0624" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;arxiv.org&#x2F;abs&#x2F;0905.0624</a><p>It&#x27;s silly to insist that every article about quantum phenomena should refer to any particular interpretation of the mathematics.