The problem is, if the statement is word in a very open ended manner and the firing company perceives the comments as disparaging in any way, they come after you. The company could argue revealing they&#x27;re completely replacing departments with outsourced staffing as detrimental to the company&#x27;s reputation due to the stigma associated with outsourcing. They go to court and whip out multiple blog posts&#x2F;forum comments&#x2F;editorials to prove their point. Now you&#x27;re stuck. You&#x27;re helping perpetuate a damaging stigma against your former employer that negatively impacts their business reputation. Doesn&#x27;t matter if it&#x27;s &quot;fact&quot; or not. Is the fact disparaging?<p>They might also get you on NDA violations if your NDA includes not revealing corporate staffing strategies.<p>IAMNAL but I&#x27;ve been around enough to know it&#x27;s possible to spin anything with an open-ended clause.