Pegging BI to tax revenue or GDP seems like a good idea to me, though I&#x27;d prefer to start with something revenue-neutral like I lay out. As it eliminates welfare cliffs, it seems self-evident that it would not reduce employment. Many other studies on cash transfers have found that they don&#x27;t reduce work incentives, except for specific populations like new mothers and teenagers, but more evidence with slowly-rolled-out programs would help address this.<p>Speaking of utopia, what I&#x27;d really prefer is for BI to be funded as 100% of land value tax and pollution&#x2F;carbon taxes. But that could be for another article. Even if nobody&#x27;s working and everything&#x27;s automated, we&#x27;ll still need natural resources to house people and build things, so this would be sustainable.