Author anonymously makes unsupported claims, disparages competing products, provides no science, and wrote the post for profit. Nothing can be built on this, because his work is built on sand. &quot;Type up a blog post&quot; is not the important part of the scientific method. Pointing out pseudoscience and invalid methods and data may be the most constructive criticism of all.<p>Enthusiasm is great. Enthusiasm masquerading as medical treatment is not.