So what you are saying is that this article is worthless because it doesn&#x27;t contain anecdotal opinions of the people who would be served?<p>Going back in history, there were plenty of woman during the suffrage who stood up and proclaimed they should not be given the vote. Further back, there were plenty of abused wives who proclaimed they should not be allowed to divorce their husbands. Further back, there were plenty of slaves who proclaimed they should not be given freedom.<p>Now we have a class of highly exploited individuals and an organization that wants to give &quot;internet&quot; access to these individuals but only if their personal data can always be exploited over that highly manicured network. The government cannot shirk its duty to protect these individuals. They will need to monitor &quot;Free Basics&quot; for abuse. The service will not be free from the public perspective and their are better things the government could do for those people.