There was a time when subscriptions formed a much greater proportion of journalistic income <i>than they do now</i>.<p>&gt;You&#x27;re mythologizing an imagined past which never existed<p>You seem intent on building up straw men and tearing them down. I&#x27;ll let you do it in peace.<p>&gt;Personally, I find advertising a much more palatable funding source than pollution from a dictatorship.
&gt;
&gt;[0] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.businessinsider.com&#x2F;the-new-york-times-now-gets-m.." rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.businessinsider.com&#x2F;the-new-york-times-now-gets-m...</a>.<p>Pollution from a dictatorship? What?<p>I&#x27;d much rather read the New York Times than the filth spewed out by businessinsider, bad though the New York Times often is.