The submitted article and especially its title are both emotional to a fault and sensationalist. The arguments presented are backed up only by anecdote and cherry-picked comments from other people who have been rejected by Amazon. I&#x27;ve seen all this before. There&#x27;s a reason why the article is scant on the details of the rejection. In the same way a rant about PayPal tends to exclude certain details that deflate the author&#x27;s rage. His final paragraph is the icing on the cake. I&#x27;m glad to see the title change.