If that&#x27;s the only point you intended to make, then fine, say that.  But you didn&#x27;t.  What you said was that anyone looking for a no-cost option for Qt now has to use GPLv3, or they can pay for a commercial license (and then complain about getting downvoted).  These are not the same thing.<p>The former is something to have a discussion about.<p>The latter is verifiably untrue, and has massively wasted time for someone not wanting to see the lie get repeated or go uncorrected.