Article is misleading and not well researched. These two comments at bottom of article reveals:<p>First Foxconn subsidy news is wrong:<p><i>The $12 million in payments referred to in this article were actually issued for the 2014 calendar year.<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;newpaper.dahe.cn&#x2F;hnsb&#x2F;html&#x2F;2016-01&#x2F;06&#x2F;content_1352344.htm?div=-1" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;newpaper.dahe.cn&#x2F;hnsb&#x2F;html&#x2F;2016-01&#x2F;06&#x2F;content_1352344...</a><p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;hn.ifeng.com&#x2F;a&#x2F;20160106&#x2F;4169476_0.shtml" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;hn.ifeng.com&#x2F;a&#x2F;20160106&#x2F;4169476_0.shtml</a> 
</i><p>And then this comment says news websites has formed this as habit at the start of the year:<p><i>Doesn&#x27;t this happen every year?  
Headlines from March 2015:
&quot;Apple&#x27;s iPhone Juggernaut Slowing Down Across The Globe&quot;<p>(<a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.forbes.com&#x2F;sites&#x2F;chuckjones&#x2F;2015&#x2F;03&#x2F;16&#x2F;apples-iphone-juggernaut-slowing-down-across-the-globe&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.forbes.com&#x2F;sites&#x2F;chuckjones&#x2F;2015&#x2F;03&#x2F;16&#x2F;apples-iph...</a>
</i>