Your argument appears to be:<p>1) We don&#x27;t prosecute people for things that aren&#x27;t crimes.<p>2) Thus our system and standards for prosecuting people for things that are crimes is just.<p>I don&#x27;t see the step from 1) to 2). I would guess you are making the following assumptions that I would disagree with:<p>a) We do a adequate job of enforcing the current laws. (Prosecutions tend to be fairly rare due to low priority and lack of investigative resources)<p>b) The current laws on the books are just. (The standards for recklessness are weighted toward DUIs and tend to exclude other types of intentional misconduct.)