It&#x27;s an article about nutrition articles, not a nutrition article itself. Russell&#x27;s types save the day again.<p>Note that even if it was a &quot;nutrition article&quot;, it telling you not to trust those articles doesn&#x27;t fully invoke the liar&#x27;s paradox.<p>Unlike with the liar&#x27;s paradox, where the case is supposed to always hold (&quot;cretans always lie&quot;) and as such the statement doesn&#x27;t hold (and vice versa), a call to &quot;not trust&quot; doesn&#x27;t translate to a call for never trusting. It only means do not trust in advance, you can still trust the ones you have verified (which breaks the infinite loop).