It&#x27;s apparently resonating with the HN audience.  I&#x27;ve seen poorly presented material get flagged into null before, so why wouldn&#x27;t that be the case for this article, if it t&#x27;were true?<p>I am _not_ glad to see the title change, as it goes against the stated rule of titles matching the title of the submitted content and is blatant editorializing that is supposedly verboten on HN.  It&#x27;s ridiculous and unwelcome from my perspective.  Especially since it&#x27;s a multi-billion dollar company involved who can certainly deal with some mild criticism.