Ok, so you are making an assumption there. I don&#x27;t think your assumption holds, it is very well possible to be a privacy advocate and to at the same time not have any crucial secrets worth keeping.<p>Privacy is a good thing, whether you have secrets worth keeping or not is immaterial, privacy doesn&#x27;t have anything to do with secrecy. The two are often mixed but if you look a bit longer you&#x27;ll see that they are in fact orthogonal concepts only very loosely related.<p>Taking your bathroom example: there is obviously nothing secret about what is going on in that bathroom, you can infer most of it from your own experience. And yet, we do seem to feel the need for privacy.<p>Another example would be a diary. Diaries are intensely personal and our etiquette around them is that if you happen to come across someone&#x27;s diary that you do not open it to read it. It is considered a private document, even if it will not contain any secrets it may contain thoughts that the writer does not want to divulge to the world at large.<p>So privacy does not require any secrets at all to be a very important thing to many people, including privacy advocates.