I don&#x27;t get the tone of the article. Why is this a bad thing?<p>It&#x27;s not the job of SSL to ensure a domain name is not owned by someone it shouldn&#x27;t be. That falls to the domain registrar, if you have a problem with someone owning google.com.mg go take it up with the registrar or better yet leave it up to Google as it&#x27;s THEIR trademark.<p>I actually find this to be a good thing that someone was able to get a domain, create an SSL certificate for it painlessly and start securing traffic between clients and their web property without having to spend a) tons of money and b) tons of time dealing with antiquated CAs that should be entirely automated.