If you want to make a concrete point about bad science then do it. At the moment however you are not making that point. Your argument is that &quot;the assumptions&quot; (whatever those are; you provide no specifics) made by researchers don&#x27;t match up with industry expectations; a wholly different point for which I have little sympathy.<p>In my opinion the scientific authors doing the work are in the best position to judge what assumptions are and are not appropriate for their work. If the science is bad we expect the community to pick up on that via peer review or in a subsequent publication.