You engage me in a semantics debate in a condescending tone and then are wrong. Manslaughter does not require &#x27;intent to commit harm&#x27;.<p>Yes, there are prosecutions of reckless&#x2F;negligent drivers. However, the fact remains:<p>1) Most traffic fatalities are the result of human error.<p>2) Most traffic fatalities do not result in prosecution.<p>I can&#x27;t find numbers to back up #2 but this semi-anecdotal evidence is telling:<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wnyc.org&#x2F;story&#x2F;283394-killed-while-cycling-why-so-few-fatal-bike-crashes-lead-to-arrest-in-nyc&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wnyc.org&#x2F;story&#x2F;283394-killed-while-cycling-why-so...</a><p>This quote in particular makes my point:<p>&gt; “We as a society have chosen to drive these  big cars,&quot; said Joe McCormack, Assistant District Attorney for the Bronx. It’s his job to prosecute traffic crimes. &quot;And we also as a society have chosen not to criminalize every single small mistake that just has a dramatic consequence because you&#x27;re driving a car,” he said.