My understanding is that this is a documentary on the <i>failings</i> of judicial process in Wisconsin. I mean: it is not very entertaining, far less so than fictions on Netflix.<p>If you take away the main case (admittedly murkier), there is nothing more cringe-inducing that the details about the nephew’s case. It is just painful to listen to; everything about it talks about how a mentally handicapped relative, who had nothing to do with the case, was (on camera) abused by authority figures, and then wronged at every step of the judicial process. This is the least entertaining thing that I have seen all week (and I watched videos on how to set-up Docker), by far. It seems to me that this part is a highly relevant documentary on key failings of the process for younger or uneducated people. That kind of description cannot be satisfied by fiction. That kind of description is necessary to set up and improve the judicial process.