Ah yes, more propaganda supporting a surveillance state. What makes these sorts of things difficult to argue about is all a matter of how they get framed.<p>&quot;It&#x27;s good for a more peaceful society. You aren&#x27;t violent? Right? You have nothing to worry about then! This technology will help keep you safe. You want to be safe? Right?&quot;<p>I&#x27;m glad to see many citizens are at least sharing their voice against this. But it reads all to much like Fresno took &quot;big strides too fast&quot; and if they had taken baby-steps there would have been less outrage. You have to whittle down people&#x27;s liberties - not try and take them all at once! If you do it slowly enough, they don&#x27;t even notice.<p>As an aside... typo + how do they know their score? I thought only operators knew it? How does she know her threat level was elevated because she tweeted about &quot;Rage&quot;?<p><i>&gt;Once council member referred to a local media report saying that a woman’s threat level was elevated because she was tweeting about a card game titled “Rage,” which could be a keyword in Beware’s assessment of social media.</i>