I love <i>Inside the Ethics Committee</i>.<p>They take a real situation, and ask a bunch of people involved in medical ethics about what should happen, and they step through the case asking at each step &quot;what&#x27;s changed?&quot; and why.<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bbc.co.uk&#x2F;programmes&#x2F;b007xbtd" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bbc.co.uk&#x2F;programmes&#x2F;b007xbtd</a><p>Here&#x27;s one example:<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bbc.co.uk&#x2F;programmes&#x2F;b0643x61" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bbc.co.uk&#x2F;programmes&#x2F;b0643x61</a><p>&gt; Ashley is 14 years old when doctors discover a brain tumour. Tests reveal that it&#x27;s highly treatable; there&#x27;s a 95% chance of cure if he has a course of radiotherapy.<p>&gt; Ashley begins the treatment but he has to wear a mask which makes him very anxious and the radiotherapy itself makes him sick. He finds it increasingly difficult to bear and he starts to miss his sessions.<p>&gt; Despite patchy treatment Ashley&#x27;s cancer goes into remission. He and his mother are thrilled but a routine follow-up scan a few months later shows that the cancer has returned.<p>&gt; Ashley is adamant that he will not have the chemotherapy that is recommended this time. He threatens that he will run away if treatment is forced on him. Although Ashley is only 15 he is 6&#x27;2&quot; and restraining him would not be easy.<p>&gt; Should the medical team and his mother persuade him to have the chemotherapy? Or should they accept his decision, even though he is only 15?<p>It&#x27;s probably on other podcasting platforms too.