Replying just to the last part of your edit:<p>&gt; Witness the neo-Nazi group that tried to take over a town in North Dakota as an existence proof of the phenomenon. That&#x27;s the kind of thing you&#x27;d explicitly have to allow, if you pursue the concept to fruition.<p>If you are referring to a military takeover-type situation, the concept does not endorse that as in that instance the group members are not being represented.<p>On the other hand, yes, if the group members choose a set of rules that you (an outsider) disagree with, they should still be allowed to do so. To quote from the post itself:<p><i>Through awareness of the mortality of all systems (including our own), we should ensure a means by which any group is able to abandon our system in a conflict-free manner if its members want to adopt something else—even if we might disagree with their choice. Systems that explicitly allow such secession are called voluntary systems.</i>