<a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.usatoday.com&#x2F;story&#x2F;news&#x2F;politics&#x2F;onpolitics&#x2F;2016&#x2F;01&#x2F;07&#x2F;donald-trump-twitter-muslim-ban&#x2F;78369620&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.usatoday.com&#x2F;story&#x2F;news&#x2F;politics&#x2F;onpolitics&#x2F;2016&#x2F;...</a><p>You&#x27;re editing it into a more reasonable-sounding version. Whereas there are plenty of people who think he means it literally and might vote for that.<p>Plenty of us would say that Trump&#x27;s &quot;ban all Muslims&quot; is <i>itself</i> attacking people! So we&#x27;re kind of in the land of ad hominem to start off with. We could discuss Trump&#x27;s attack ads, and measure them for vitriol?