<i>I believe most humans are inherently not evil even if they don&#x27;t agree with me.</i><p>I believe most people are incapable of recognizing well-intentioned but bad actions when they agree with the intentions.  Even when you don&#x27;t agree with the intentions, it&#x27;s can still be hard to spot without the benefit of hindsight.<p><i>Should you fault someone for being the change they want to see in the world?</i><p>&quot;Fault&quot; is quite a slippery word to use in this context.  As it means both a failing of character and responsibility for wrongdoing.<p>Obviously with the second definition it&#x27;s easy to fault someone when you see their actions as wrongdoing.<p>With the first it&#x27;s mixed, and I suspect that&#x27;s the one you mean.  Someone who is &quot;being the change they want to see in the world&quot; is seen as virtuous.  But when that virtuous person is also too headstrong to see, acknowledge, and correct the negatives of their plans when they encounter well-articulated resistance?  Yes, I would very much fault that person.