That strikes me as sort of circular in reasoning. To create benevolent AI using AI, the latter would already have to know what &#x27;benevolent&#x27; means. In which case we might as well just create benevolent AI in the first place.<p>In fact, by relying on a secondary AI it&#x27;s quite possible we&#x27;re even <i>more</i> likely to accidentally end up with AI that isn&#x27;t benevolent.