Paul are you concerned that by only funding companies that can hit the ball out of the park that you are biasing the sort of businesses that the smart founders are creating? Assuming smart founders know what sort of businesses will get VC funded then only the second tier founders will build businesses that not going for a moonshot. This is obviously going to bias the final outcome.<p>Do you think that if a business like YC were to commit to funding &quot;safe&quot; options that good founders would create safe businesses that could achieve returns in aggregate that would rival the high risk &#x2F; high failure model?