This strategy makes sense when the odds of winning are known, and the jackpot is not shared.<p>The powerball jackpot is shared so you would need to factor in the likely number of people you would share with which would be complicated to figure out.<p>There are cases in gambling where the jackpot is not shared, for example poker machines.<p>The odds of winning remain fixed, yet the jackpot slowly increases, moreso when there are many machines linked to build the same prize.<p>At a certain level of jackpot the math works out and it&#x27;s a sound strategy to pour money into the machines.<p>See: break even point
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Progressive_jackpot" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Progressive_jackpot</a><p>Here&#x27;s a person who&#x27;s written about dedicating their life to this approach:
<a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.amazon.com&#x2F;Million-Dollar-Slots-Peter-Liston&#x2F;dp&#x2F;0987272969" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.amazon.com&#x2F;Million-Dollar-Slots-Peter-Liston&#x2F;dp&#x2F;0...</a><p>If you were going to invest in lotto with shared jackpots I&#x27;ve heard anecdotes that choosing numbers 32 and higher is a better way to go because people tend to pick birthdays. I think looking at past drawing results and whether there was a winner or not you could analyse if numbers are picked disproprotionately, but I&#x27;m not sure what sample size would be needed to generate meaningful results.<p>All that said, I can think of many things I&#x27;d rather develop expertise in than reverse engineering the payout odds of poker &#x2F; progressive jackpot machines.