Well, I just said that there&#x27;s a huge amount of quality work done in those 800 studies.<p>And what you suggested isn&#x27;t at all uncommon in those quality work studies.<p>Checkout <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;China%E2%80%93Cornell%E2%80%93Oxford_Project" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;China%E2%80%93Cornell%E2%80%93...</a><p>A controlled environment of people not changing their diet and lifestyle in a 20 year time span.<p>There&#x27;s plenty of studies like that.<p>There are quality studies where p-values tell that their sample size isn&#x27;t large enough, but when you do a meta-analysis of studies with same methodology you get a relevantly sized sample.<p>I do guess you are talking about those &quot;Phd nutrition guys&quot; and yes, they are full of bullshit and aren&#x27;t scientists, because if you are talking about the real science, your comment is full of disinformation.