The article did not mention Al Jazeera deciding to remove their Internet streaming, and requiring that you can only view via your local cable provider.  See this page with the big note to US people:  <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.aljazeera.com&#x2F;watch_now&#x2F;201146152255537258.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.aljazeera.com&#x2F;watch_now&#x2F;201146152255537258.html</a><p>I used to check in on their coverage on the Roku channel, but they made a business decision to prevent that.  I can understand their decision to make their success dependent on the existing way of doing content business in the US (cable channels), but the number of cord cutters keeps increasing, the most valuable segment for advertisers (younger folk) are the most likely cord cutters (or cord nevers), and the cable business depends heavily on bundling.  For example Disney owns ESPN (most of it), so they can make the cable companies to take a portfolio of channels, or get none of them.  Al Jazeera had no such leverage.<p>Their business model was a big gamble, based on the past, and didn&#x27;t work.