I still don&#x27;t understand, you seem to be responding with jargon.<p>The point made was that your &#x27;equilibrium&#x27; is not valid because a pirate voting that way decreases their expected return. I don&#x27;t see how you need a different &#x27;equilibrium concept&#x27; for your proposed solution, when the basic assumption of rationality excludes it.<p>Not trying to be mean, but your response seems obfuscatory.