Please document your judgement.<p>I&#x27;m usually one of the first ones to detect horse shit in women-victimizing papers, usually by matching statistics with reality. For example, given that I&#x27;ve seen many (if not almost all) women in my programming environment being promoted to &quot;managers&quot; earlier than men, statistics about women being paid less in IT &quot;for the same experience&quot; get discredited by the fact that a &quot;manager with 1 year of experience&quot; is not the same when he&#x27;s had 7 years as a developer under his belt or when she&#x27;s 24 years old. Studies rarely specify &quot;with the same experience in the current and previous job&quot;. Besides the fact that studies are inherently false if they don&#x27;t explain why women get promoted <i>a lot a lot a lot</i> in the reality I&#x27;m witnessing.<p>So you see, I&#x27;m open to be on your side. Just in this case, I didn&#x27;t detect how this study could be biased. Please document, thanks.