I&#x27;m immediately skeptical of any article that calls a &quot;magazine&quot; a &quot;clip.&quot;<p>As my CHL instructor said many times, &quot;A clip is something you put in your hair.&quot;<p>Do some research on the terminology of the thing you are writing about, please.<p>Steyr arms has a line of handguns with a similar sighting system that, from my experience, is superior to blade sights. In my tests giving an inexperienced shooter some verbal safety training and handing them a Steyr gets better accuracy than taking the same random person with the same information and handing them, say, a Glock or a Smith, or some variant of a 1911.<p>Yes, yes, I know, caveats about with anecdata like that: I get it. Not at all conclusive.<p>I&#x27;m not entirely sure, but I think the Steyr sights are conceptually modeled after the Theodore sights. But I could be wrong.<p>Sorry if I sound like a Steyr shill. I&#x27;m not. Just a big fan. I just think they are really great guns.<p>Handguns really need to be point-and-shoot. The reality of uses for these outside a shooting range isn&#x27;t pinpoint accuracy like you sometimes see on TV.<p>The use of sights needs to be quickly and immediately obvious. People don&#x27;t shoot at targets greater than 3-7 yards with any regularity when using handgun. I used to shoot coyotes and bobcats that were attacking my parent&#x27;s sheep when I was a kid at 20-50 yards with a colt 1911.<p>I feel bad about that now because I could have done a much more humane job with a rifle and a scope. Yes, I hit the predators and saved our sheep. But probably not in the most humane way.<p>I&#x27;ve changed that now. When I go home to my family farm and I shoot predators, I use the most sophisticated technology I can to make sure that the kills are as quick and painless as possible for the animals that I&#x27;m killing.