It&#x27;s practically entirely <i>compatible</i>. The card may have been released in 2007 but the system was purchased new in 2012. Win 8 cost £100+ for the license.<p>&gt;a poorly supported system &#x2F;&#x2F;<p>They didn&#x27;t say that though; they said &quot;unable to run&quot;. Yet clearly MS know that&#x27;s not the case (now if not at release). Unsupported and &quot;unable to run&quot; are entirely different. I&#x27;d have no problem if MS said &quot;may not work&quot; or &quot;unsupported by Microsoft&quot;.<p>&gt;You should be compensated every penny that the Windows 10 upgrade cost you: Zero dollars and zero cents. &#x2F;&#x2F;<p>The cost is time - as an ordinary user the nag telling my father to upgrade was treated as an essential. Then on that nag screen Microsoft informed him that his computer couldn&#x27;t run the upgrade and kindly offered to sell him a new computer.<p>If he hadn&#x27;t asked me the cost would then be disposal of a perfectly good computer (who wants a 2nd hand computer that &quot;can&#x27;t run windows&quot;) and the price of replacement from the MS offerings. I imagine quite a lot of people would have trusted that there computer was &quot;unable to run&quot; Windows, MS would know after all, and so followed the sales links in the nag screen.<p>What do you call false statements made to increase sales if not fraud?