This skirts close to being a circular argument: computers are &quot;fast enough&quot; because people don&#x27;t need a faster computer; but people don&#x27;t &quot;need&quot; a faster a computer because faster computers aren&#x27;t available. You could make that argument about every phase of personal computing from the late 1970s onwards, because what people &quot;need&quot; is determined by their expectations of technology. Once a product comes along that exceeds those expectations (the Apple I; the Macintosh; the Amiga; etc.) then people suddenly &quot;need&quot; a lot more.