We pay the Electronic Frontier Foundation. Consumers, geeks, and the privacy&#x2F;digital rights inclined. They&#x27;re doing exactly what donors want them to be doing, including this Binge On thing (which is part of a larger Net Neutrality struggle).<p>I am a T-Mobile customer. And when they first introduced Binge On I was mostly happy (Net Neutrality notwithstanding): seemed like a fair trade, for certain sites you lost video bandwidth but in return received unlimited streaming.<p>However T-Mobile&#x27;s implementation is bad and worse still they weren&#x27;t honest about what Binge On does. It is a completely different arrangement between ONLY limiting sites that signed up, and interfering in third parties who did not, and don&#x27;t even get me started on limiting video file download rates (i.e. not streaming).<p>The CEO is just acting like an idiot. Consumer rights groups, like the EFF, are completely entitled to &quot;stir things up&quot; when large national corporations start acting poorly. If you guys didn&#x27;t want to be called out, perhaps you could have been more honest to begin with?
So as a T-Mobile customer, I am 100% behind EFF on this one. If they started attacking the EFF regularly I&#x27;ll change networks (e.g. Project Fi), because I value the EFF more than T-Mobile.<p>PS - Amazon&#x27;s Smile.Amazon.com supports EFF donations, as an aside.