&gt; Older voters would destroy any candidate who would even suggest such a thing, as they very well should.  They contributed what the gov said was their fair share, they expect to be paid back in their old age.<p>So people have a moral (&#x27;fair&#x27; is a moral judgement word) right to unbounded medical services because some politician told them in the past that they could have things without paying for them?   Would it be &#x27;fair&#x27; for the youth of today to pay 50% of their earnings (plus all existing taxes) to the government to provide those services?