Isn&#x27;t this counterargument similar to the reply labelled (1) in part 4?<p>Quoting the text:<p>(1) Some critics concede that the man in the room doesn&#x27;t understand Chinese, but hold that nevertheless running the program may create something that understands Chinese. These critics object to the inference from the claim that the man in the room does not understand Chinese to the conclusion that no understanding has been created. There might be understanding by a larger, or different, entity. This is the strategy of The Systems Reply and the Virtual Mind Reply. These replies hold that the output of the room reflects understanding of Chinese, but the understanding is not that of the room&#x27;s operator.