That&#x27;s a bit reductionist on something that is inherently non-reductionist: how do you define a good problem worth solving.<p>I believe you presented a logical leap between having all the tools one could ever dream of &lt;-&gt; delivering scientific impact.<p>Here&#x27;s a citation: &quot;scientific impact is a decelerating function of grant funding size&quot;.<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;journals.plos.org&#x2F;plosone&#x2F;article?id=10.1371&#x2F;journal.pone.0065263" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;journals.plos.org&#x2F;plosone&#x2F;article?id=10.1371&#x2F;journal....</a>