This article is excellent, both in the way it&#x27;s written and in the underlying genius of using tenure as an indicator for credit for each paper.<p>One interesting point is that a women-only or woman-solo paper gets more credit (9%) than a mixed-gender paper (8%).<p>I&#x27;m wondering why they rounded single-digit number, it&#x27;s 15% imprecision (8.4% and 8.5% aren&#x27;t significantly different, whereas 7.5% and 9.4% would be a great gap).