Well, given the most common refute of my concerns is &#x27;you just have to make sure your unsafe blocks are verified to be correct&#x27;, and the <i>point</i> of this article, is <i>explicitly</i> that this isnt the case...<p>Now its that you have to just make sure all your code is correct, not just the unsafe blocks.<p>&#x2F;me shrugs<p>I think thats lame, and breaks the promises rust is trying to make about writing safe secure software.<p>If safe code may not be safe, whats the point of it at all.<p>You, are of course welcome to your own oppinion.