WTF?  You don&#x27;t think that cheaper technologies are going to be available to other countries?<p>How much do we spend on cancer in the US alone?  It&#x27;s astronomical.  If a simple blood test can catch it faster, that&#x27;s going to save us a bunch of money, and increase productivity (people living longer).  Why would this not also benefit third-world nations?  It&#x27;ll probably have a <i>bigger</i> effect there because instead of people dying because they can&#x27;t afford expensive treatments for later-stage cancers, they&#x27;ll be able to get cheap treatments early on and live.<p>This complaint of yours sounds like someone in 2006 saying &quot;we shouldn&#x27;t have these smartphones because people in poorer countries can&#x27;t afford them, and it&#x27;ll give us too many productivity and economic advantages over them&quot;.  Meanwhile, here in 2015, everyone and his brother in India and China has a smartphone, and in fact third-world nations in general have done a much better job of pushing cellular technology to the masses than the US has, thanks to our telecom cartel which keeps service plan prices absurdly high.