&gt; with &quot;Free Basics&quot; they&#x27;re taking steps to ensure that dominance stays intact.<p>It is not just that. The worrying thing is that they are violating net neutrality by making sure that &quot;FB and friends&quot; is the only thing accessible on this free internet. If Mr. Zuckerberg is that altruistic, why not provide proper full internet? Even a limited (say 500MB per person&#x2F;month) internet for free is better than nothing.<p>But no, they want to violate net neutrality by disallowing everyone else. They don&#x27;t want to provide HTTPS security, but again snoop around their user&#x27;s data so monies could be made out of that. Is this altruism, Mr. Zuckerberg?