Yes, completely. But to make an assessment of moral risks, you have to have the data. Something we are unlikely to get. Everything else is just conjecture, perhaps well founded and correct, but still conjecture. Perhaps then the issue is with over classification of intel, not the people in charge. We may never know as a consequence.<p>edit: In the end, it is reasonable to assume we do not have adequate data on the successes of these programs. 2 paths then arise. 1) Then you wait for more data. 2) You examine those people that you reasonably know to have access and take a look at their moral history and actions to determine the ethical issues; it&#x27;s the only somewhat good data you can add to the set to maybe get a conclusion.