More than that, they don&#x27;t relate percentages that <i>need</i> to be related.<p>For the black case, 29% weren&#x27;t attacking, 15% were unarmed.
What&#x27;s to say the 15% that were unarmed weren&#x27;t attacking?<p>There&#x27;s no way to draw any meaningful conclusion from this data, because it&#x27;s crap data.<p>What would be useful? Relating scenarios where someone shouldn&#x27;t have been shot, like the percentage of unarmed people that were shot and not attacking.