I&#x27;m not moving the goalposts, nor am I trying to litigate anyting. I&#x27;m simply trying to understand your argument and where we differ.<p>You think the current laws regarding driver culpability for errors are sufficient. Ok, fine. We&#x27;ve established a difference of opinion and don&#x27;t need to argue it.<p>&gt; You began the thread by trying to argue that a lack of prosecutions for vehicular fatalities was evidence of injustice. But it isn&#x27;t: it&#x27;s evidence for the fact that most traffic fatalities don&#x27;t involve conduct we recognize as criminal.<p>From this I am going to assume that you also disagree that investigation and prosecution of traffic fatalities lack sufficient priority and resources.<p>If I am correct about this, then I now think the source of a disagreement is clear.