I mean &quot;good&quot; in the sense of the values that you honor - and here indeed you can&#x27;t be good and lawful at the same time (except &quot;being lawful&quot; is your exact definition of good).<p>I personally believe that the way to go is to turn ethics from a humanity into an empirical science, so that any &quot;false&quot; (in a sense that future people will have to define formally) can indeed be falsified. This would at least solve many problems. But at the moment this all is rather science-fiction, since we don&#x27;t even understand how our brains works (which such theories will probably have to incorporate as special case).