&gt; The actual problem is people&#x27;s prejudices and assumptions. This is what we need to fix.<p>Right, so the whole premise of your indifference or opposition to the privacy argument is that people should not have prejudices or (wrong) assumptions. Isn&#x27;t that too idealistic and to rid people of the prejudices and figure out right moral standard for behaviour - will it not take many more generations, if at all it happens? Till then; till we figure out the right _prejudices_; till all of humanity naturally elevates to the right moral standard, shouldn&#x27;t we be wary of those bad agents who can abuse others by breaking into their private matters?<p>Your premise, in short, assumes an ideal world where none is troubling others for their private acts, which unfortunately isn&#x27;t the case yet.