You&#x27;re being down voted for the shaming part but I thought I&#x27;d expand on your other points. Speaking as someone who is interested in vintage computing, I find it futile to try to justify that interest to others. Hell, my friends think I&#x27;m a bit off-kilter for even trying to run my website on Internet Explorer 4 [1]. That doesn&#x27;t bother me. People find me weird already, so if I&#x27;m not going to conform I should embrace the weird instead of trying to convert &quot;the mainstream&quot;.<p>The norms around computers are funny. While we accept the enthusiast who might show off a 1959 El Camino or vintage Les Paul guitar, we needlessly question one who cherishes an Amiga 3000 [2]. Rather than espouse the technical merits of a piece of vintage computing (which will inevitably be obsolete), we should be able to articulate our appreciation for the aesthetic and historical qualities of that technology as well. As computers are judged almost entirely by utilitarian value, this is not easy to do without sounding pretentious.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;supernintendo&#x2F;supernintendo.github.io" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;supernintendo&#x2F;supernintendo.github.io</a><p>[2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=JXrM97yhbM8" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=JXrM97yhbM8</a>