In your scenario the victim would be classed as &quot;unarmed&quot;, not &quot;armed with a toy&quot;.  The point i was trying to make is that people identified as &quot;armed with a toy&quot; in stats should be grouped along side armed people, not with unarmed ones like the person i replied to was doing.  Because odds are, if you&#x27;re interacting with police and carrying a replica weapon, the whole point of that weapon is to fool people into thinking you&#x27;re armed.