There are so many unproven ideas and theses in the first (argumenting) sentence alone.<p>Maybe privacy is a right granted by someone. But do I need to fight for all rights? Can I not trade some for some others? E.g. I don&#x27;t want to live in a completely free market, becaues in a completely free market thiefs and bullies always win. In our real life markets at least they need a lawyer&#x27;s license first, which stops some of them from succeeding.<p>Does it really underpin freedom of expression? Is complete freedom of expression something that is worth fighting for, something people want? Look at something where expression is nearly completely free: Clothes. Most people tend to wear what other people wear.<p>Free society. What is that? Why do I need it?<p>Democratic society. Doesn&#x27;t the current global development show that democracy is failing us? Every system comes to an end, and democracy certainly is behind the top of the hill.<p>I stopped reading after that sentence. If a blog post doesn&#x27;t even think about the nuances of what they are talking about, there won&#x27;t be much content anyways.<p>Just a little side note: I was in China three times now. Many people consider China very unfree, very undemocratic. But I see people there having more hope, more optimism and more opportunity to develop their dreams than we have in the west. And mobile internet is developing bigger and faster there than anywhere else, despite having nearly everything run via one mobile, government observed app: Wechat. In some regards I wonder if it is really &quot;despite&quot; government control or &quot;because&quot;.