Interesting approach. From their Github page (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;postspectacular&#x2F;rnd.farm&#x2F;blob&#x2F;master&#x2F;README.md" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;postspectacular&#x2F;rnd.farm&#x2F;blob&#x2F;master&#x2F;READ...</a>):<p><pre><code>  We&#x27;d like to do a little experiment and see if a large (or even not so large) 
  group of people can collectively generate better quality random numbers than 
  an algorithm. Intuitively one would think and hope so [...]
</code></pre>
It&#x27;s not clear that individuals can reliably generate true random numbers when asked to do so (see answers at <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;cogsci.stackexchange.com&#x2F;questions&#x2F;3591&#x2F;how-well-can-a-human-generated-random-number-be-predicted" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;cogsci.stackexchange.com&#x2F;questions&#x2F;3591&#x2F;how-well-can-...</a>), but this is asking whether a group of people can do better than that, and is capturing mouse and keyboard keyboard input. It&#x27;ll be interesting to see how using a group compares to using a single individual&#x27;s input.