I&#x27;ve seen this post many times under different names for the authors and projects. Later on, a CVE or bug report shows up with the project&#x27;s name but a different author. Because the person who created the code just couldn&#x27;t break their own code like someone else who wasn&#x27;t mentally attached to it.<p>What you&#x27;re likely a victim of is the Dunning-Kruger effect or Schneier&#x27;s Law depending on which you prefer:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.schneier.com&#x2F;blog&#x2F;archives&#x2F;2011&#x2F;04&#x2F;schneiers_law.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.schneier.com&#x2F;blog&#x2F;archives&#x2F;2011&#x2F;04&#x2F;schneiers_law...</a><p>On the other hand, you could&#x27;ve in fact designed something as good as you claimed. In that case, I seriously suggest you publish your methods in full for peer review as they could save millions spent by the likes of NASA, seL4 project, and so on. Any method that might hit full correctness with just basic coding or whatever is a potential game-changer. Very exciting stuff.