(wow are there a ton of distracting ads on that article ...)<p>Is this an example of conflict of interest? Or just of less-than-substantial &quot;personal finance&quot; content? The Contributor&#x27;s bio has her bona fides and point of view. <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.forbes.com&#x2F;sites&#x2F;vanessamcgrady&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.forbes.com&#x2F;sites&#x2F;vanessamcgrady&#x2F;</a> She&#x27;s not Charlie Munger, but he didn&#x27;t start out as Charlie Munger, either.<p>The article is timely and relevant. &quot;Powerball&quot; in the article title is going to get play -- there&#x27;s a multi-state, $900MM jackpot at stake tonight.<p>Many Contributors are paid for the traffic they drive. Most Contributors like it when their stories are widely-read. Managing those incentives, the quality of content created, the creators themselves, and their reputations is an ongoing process for the Contributors, editors, and publishers involved.<p>No doubt you could find more-glaring examples of less-than-substantial stories. One of my points is I&#x27;m glad this Contributor has a platform to create and publish her stories and build her community and career.