Seems that way, but I wanted to invite anyone who knows more to comment.<p>Alex&#x27;s response uses extremely misleading language to justify the employer contact:<p><pre><code>  - &quot;account on our portal mentions Synack as his affiliation&quot; amounts to nothing more than &quot;he lists his job on his facebook profile&quot;
  - &quot;he has interacted with us using a synack.com email address&quot; -- OP claims otherwise. Taking OP&#x27;s word, the use of &quot;has&quot; perhaps prevents this from being an outright lie: yes, as of *right now* he &quot;has&quot; used a synack.com email. But did he before you reached out?
  - &quot;he has written blog posts that are used by Synack for marketing purposes&quot; -- ... and? What does that have to do with anything?
</code></pre>
&quot;He listed an employer on his fb profile&quot; is literally their top justification for the supposed belief he was acting on their behalf. Yikes.