Not a lot of of time to respond, but my first observations about your comment are:<p>1) How many pilots are actually unlicensed?  I suspect given the relative difficulty of getting access to aircraft vs. cars that the more pilots in the air are of greater competence than the average driver by a long shot.  Moreover, I&#x27;ll bet that the examination standards for pilot licenses are somewhat more rigorous than the average drivers license.<p>2) Have you failed to assess that the greatest likely danger in a road trip is not the driver giving you a ride, but other drivers on the road?  I use to commute between LA and the Bay Area every week for a couple of years.  I guarantee you that not everyone you encounter is sane or competent to be on the road.  And yeah, in the middle of nowhere on I-5 (or better still, I-15 between LA and Los Vegas close to Death Valley) you can ask to get out of the car if you are uncomfortable with the way the person is driving... but get out in the middle of nowhere and then what?<p>The complexity of the driving environment and the relatively low barrier to entry for cars don&#x27;t make the risk assessment as simple as you would like to believe.<p>Finally, unless you are a pilot (you may be) seems like you&#x27;re merely a member of that ignorant general public that can&#x27;t make such assessments.  If that&#x27;s the case, how can you possibly be in a position to make a judgement?  Or are you just better than everyone else and it&#x27;s your paternalistic instincts taking over?<p>EDIT:  To be clear... I am not arguing that general aviation is safer than driving (last I looked it&#x27;s not).  But I am arguing that the risk assessment may not be a difficult as people here are making it out to be, especially in light of the complexity of driving on the road.