I don&#x27;t want to criticize too harshly, because I do think this analysis is generally good (if slightly unoriginal).<p>The problem is that these analyses always focus on how you, as a prospective employee, can extract the most value from the world. Optimizing cash vs equity or arbitraging location or whatever.<p>You can see it seep through all over the place in the language used. Sometimes it&#x27;s subtle:<p>&gt; I’ve told that anecdote to multiple people who didn’t think they could get a job at some trendy large company, who then ended up applying and getting in.<p>Waiting and hoping to &quot;get in&quot; is pretty weak. It implies that we&#x27;re all just meat-sacks working away until some of us get lucky and manage to convince a fancy company to overpay us and let us extract a lot of value from them.<p>If you have value to contribute to the world (and you definitely do), then go figure out someplace where you can best contribute it. Stop worrying about the best way to take things from the world and figure out the best way put stuff in. The rest will take care of itself.