I think I was pretty clear that my goal was to &quot;make everyone happier&quot;. Obviously if you want to maximize paperclips you&#x27;ll come to different conclusions.<p>I can&#x27;t figure out what point you are trying to make. Best I can tell is that we should stop talking about bias against people due to gender and talk about your preferred topics instead?<p><i>Achieving similar power distribution between men and women is a value of mine...</i><p>It&#x27;s an irrelevant one, however, since you can&#x27;t actually predict whether any action will change this distribution.<p>As for your &quot;years of study&quot; that result in no testable predictions, I&#x27;m sorry for you. Perhaps it might have been a better use of time to spend a semester studying complex systems instead. I think I know what you are trying to claim (positive liapunov exponent + error m in measurement of x(0) -&gt; error m e^Lt in prediction of x(t)), but the nonexistence of good predictions does not follow this - it merely changes the character of the predictions. Typically the predictions concern probability distributions on x, regions exhibiting certain behavior, phase transitions, etc.<p>While I could simply argue by authority, based on getting a Ph.D. in nonlinear multivariate differential equations, I&#x27;m making claims that can actually be intellectually defended. So feel free to exhibit some actual math and I&#x27;ll carefully illustrate why you are wrong.