The author gives a good overview of the psychology of an anti-vaxxer:<p>1) Anti-vaxxers aren&#x27;t paranoid misfits
TL;DR: Anti-vaxxers are normally rational people, but with an incorrect view on a topic.<p>2) It&#x27;s all about fear
TL;DR: Anti-vaxxers hold their view out of an irrational fear, similar to arachnophobia, and simply using reason and facts won&#x27;t work, as they&#x27;re not in a frame of mind to accept them.<p>3) If you think something is dangerous, it&#x27;s logical to avoid it
TL;DR: Though their starting premise is misguided, an anti-vaxxer&#x27;s reaction to vaccines is logical.  Thus, there is an emotional component in the initial premise that, when confronted with facts and reason, lead them to dig their heels into the sand and hold the line instead of thinking logically.<p>4) There&#x27;s an industry supporting anti-vaxxers — and we&#x27;re driving them into its arms
TL;DR: There are people positioned to exploit fear, and it is these people who are validating the anti-vaccination movement, despite various ethical concerns, and allowing it to thrive.  Without these people, the movement would have died out shortly after it had started.  Also, anti-vaxxers seeks support from loved ones and people who have experience with the subject matter to validate their worldview.<p>5) Changing someone&#x27;s mind doesn&#x27;t just take love. It takes empathy.
TL;DR: Anti-vaxxers come to their erroneous conclusion about vaccinations after bad experiences, not logic.  The road to change minds is through empathy, not attack.<p>He makes an interesting quote in his article: &quot;The anti-vax position was not a deal breaker for me, but suggesting that we should expose her daughter to grave dangers for no good reason was a deal breaker for my wife.&quot;  This reasoning could (and arguably should) be applied in reverse: suggesting that we should expose children to easily preventable dangers (various potentially lethal childhood illnesses) for no good reason should be a deal breaker in any kind of relationship.  While empathy could change an anti-vaxxer&#x27;s mind, the dangers of having children unvaccinated while this strategy is employed is too risky, so a more direct approach, in my mind, must be taken.  It&#x27;s like trusting someone to drive you to the store while they&#x27;re very drunk when it&#x27;s better to never get into the car and to stop them from driving, if possible.<p>Likewise, he compares the anti-vaxxer movement to arachnophobia.  His conclusion to drop his stance on vaccination doesn&#x27;t logically follow from this comparison, however, as arachnophobia is a mental illness, treated by certified therapists when the phobia starts preventing people from living their lives or driving people to impact other people&#x27;s lives. The logical conclusion to this comparison is to treat the anti-vaccination movement as a mental illness, encourage anti-vaxxers to seek out certified therapists, and enact laws to prevent people who don&#x27;t vaccinate their children or themselves from spreading easily preventable but potentially life and quality of life threatening diseases.