&gt; The EFF has a list. Only one law firm, Farney Daniels, has sent more than three demand letters.<p>OK...so as you say, on the EFF website they have a sample of 50 or 60 of these types of letters.  Only one law firm sent more than three of the letters in this small sample they exhibit.<p>So?  What&#x27;s your point?  God knows how many dozens or hundreds or thousands of patent troll letters were sent out for patent #7986426 alone ( <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;arstechnica.com&#x2F;tech-policy&#x2F;2013&#x2F;01&#x2F;patent-trolls-want-1000-for-using-scanners&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;arstechnica.com&#x2F;tech-policy&#x2F;2013&#x2F;01&#x2F;patent-trolls-wan...</a> ).<p>The letters told random companies (the article in the link I posted mentions just ones that were in Atlanta) that they had to pay up to the tune of $1000 a head for a license if the company had employees that scanned documents to e-mail.  Not $1000 a company, $1000 a head at a company.  One of the companies figured out that the patent trolls had probably just mass-mailed every company on the Atlanta Journal-Constitution&#x27;s yearly &quot;Atlanta&#x27;s Best Workplaces&quot; list.