From your document: &quot;This will allow them to determine if they are able to drive. They can
then choose to receive a ride or drive home themselves&quot;<p>This is unrealistic... Drunks are invincible, always right, and &quot;good to drive&quot;.<p>I applaud your effort, but it seems to me that legislating that bars be required to valet cars, and keep the keys if the driver is drunk when they leave (or call the police) would be better. Requiring a drunk to take any responsible action is unreasonable, as they are not capable of rational thinking.<p>If you&#x27;re going to sell drugs, and that&#x27;s what alcohol is, you should be required to pay the costs of the affect it has on society.<p>Initial enforcement of the laws (i.e. see something, say something) should fall upon those causing the problem; bars, stores that sell liquor, even party hosts.<p>However, you can easily pass the cost on to the user, as they just don&#x27;t care what it costs. As long as the rates for private liquor purchases rise at the same rate as the cost of a drink at a bar, it will not be an issue.<p>I suggest that if you do go this route, and the city won&#x27;t pay for it, you get the bar owners to pay for it.. They can charge the customers card for the ride and, since the patron is drunk, they probably won&#x27;t remember authorizing it.<p>I just can&#x27;t see this getting traction from the municipalities, but I can see you getting support from the politicians to make the establishments bare the cost of this program.<p>Cheers, and Good Luck!<p>p.s. A &quot;Rider&quot; tax on liquor sales could also pay for this, and have it go into a fund that pays for the service to operate. Taxes would have to be on bar sales <i>and</i> liquor sales from stores, including wine and beer sales to individuals for this to add up to enough to make it realistic.