That&#x27;s a fine goal, but there&#x27;s more at stake here than mere &quot;accuracy&quot;.  When you design a language that uses S-expression syntax (sort of) and has &quot;Lisp&quot; in its name, but eliminates the <i>reason</i> for using S-expressions, you&#x27;re not really laying a foundation for understanding, you&#x27;re creating a cargo cult (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Cargo_cult" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Cargo_cult</a>, specifically <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Cargo_cult#Metaphorical_uses_of_the_term" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Cargo_cult#Metaphorical_uses_o...</a>)