Washington state, or Washington D.C.? Because D.C.&#x27;s water is actually so bad it can be dangerous.<p>You can&#x27;t even believe the water quality reports because the Federal agencies distort them wildly. There was a massive scandal that resulted in both the CDC and EPA being caught falsifying evidence.<p>See the WASA lead contamination scandal from 2001-2010, in which the EPA falsely claimed that the water was safe, even as their treatment chemicals were dissolving lead in pipes and joints. The CDC was charged with determining the extent of the problem, and claimed that the high levels of lead were not a public health risk, a claim that later investigators from independent institutions stated were &quot;scientifically indefensible.&quot;<p><i>Lead levels in the last decade were found to be as high as 83 times the acceptable standard for drinking water.</i><p>The water comes from the Potomac, is heavily treated with chloramine (which unlike chlorine dissolves lead), then runs through mains which were laid generally between the Civil War and WWI, and finally into old 5-6 story buildings (which due to height restrictions are often remodeled but seldom rebuilt), almost all of which have lead in the plumbing.<p>The water is so bad that even the heavily filtered water at my home has a terrible taste.<p>The government claims that the problem is &quot;almost certainly resolved&quot; after the addition of further treatment chemicals, not including the removal of chloramine, which frankly makes their claims implausible.<p>The Washington Post estimates that ~15,000 households in the city are still receiving extremely high dosages of lead.<p>Oh, and the Potomac is essentially sludge downstream from the city. The beautiful waterfront in Georgetown is actually the site of a CSO (Combined Sewer Overflow), so that every time it rains, the city&#x27;s untreated sewage is dumped at the very location where the river is most used.