&gt; It&#x27;s not even clear the framers intended for the government&#x27;s national security activities to be subject to any form of judicial review...<p>It seems <i>very</i> clear to me that The Framers would have expected that actions taken by the President or authorized by Congress in the name of national security concerns that are unconstitutional -or otherwise illegal- <i>should</i> be subject to Judicial review and subsequent termination.<p>I mean, the alternative is to let the Executive and Legislative have immunity from consequence and freedom from scrutiny, just so long as they make the claim that their actions are for &quot;national security&quot;. This would make The Constitution <i>absolutely</i> moot.