How can this even be legal. How can a ISP decide on the content quality, I would like to receive. Do they next deem words like &#x27;anti-government&#x27;, &#x27;Democrats&#x27; or sites critical of the government too traffic-heavy to deliver but instead show a &quot;cleaner&quot; version of the world?<p>I as a hobby web-dev and photographer like my images to be delivered in the exact quality, I put them on the server. So the Vodafones or O2s of this world mess with my intended design.<p>As a user I want to experience the web with best image quality, not censored (right now in terms of quality) crappy versions of these images.<p>This paternalism sadly is not felt by the majority of people out there and will never lead to &#x27;uprising&#x27; (in loss for a better word). Be it done by cooperations or be it done by governments.<p>We will see more of that in the future and I have lost believe in being able to tell others, not that tech-savvy why this is not good. They nod their heads, but it does not register. Sadly so.