Some Uber&#x2F;lyft services where shut down too in various countries by courts. Sometimes they are in a gray area, sometimes they are against the local law, sometimes they are fine. The question is, is the current law what the majority of the public wants? (if not, maybe consider to change it) (The definition of law from Merriam-Webster: &quot;Law is a binding custom or practice of a community; ...&quot;, see: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Law#Definition" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Law#Definition</a> ) At least in the taxi business,  Uber&#x2F;Lyft lowered the price, increased the convience and the available options for the end user.<p>There is already a gray market of small airplane sightseeing tours. Many are neighbours who want to see their house from above. And some want to fly with exciting loopings in aerobatic monoplane above their home (&#x27;Extra&#x27; planes are loud). What is more annoying to the public: Low-altitude flights of Cessna&#x27;s around the block? Or higher-altitude flights from airport A to airport B?