You quoted economist and mentioned Surat as a dump. It might help if you read an article Economist published about Surat, in 2012 <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.economist.com&#x2F;node&#x2F;21563412" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.economist.com&#x2F;node&#x2F;21563412</a> (last 4 paragraphs )<p>Excerpt:
What it takes
A far more encouraging example can be found farther up the coast. Surat, a city in Gujarat of 4.5m people, is a flourishing trading hub that not long ago was a wretched dump like Gorakhpur. In 1994, after a reported (but never confirmed) outbreak of pneumonic plague, it became famous for squalor, gridlock, slums and rotten management. Since then it has been transformed. Effective managers cleaned up. Rubbish was collected and transport improved, streets were swept and public services delivered. Miraculously, the improvements were sustained. Some 96% of residents pay their municipal taxes on time. Manoj Kumar Das, who now runs the city, says that over the past decade the growth in Surat’s population averaged 5% a year, among the fastest of any city in the world. According to his planners, by 2031 it could have 9.3m people, overtaking London.<p>You complain about &quot;positive generalizations&quot; and yet you resort to generalizations yourself without checking facts ?<p>As for Palanpur - I don&#x27;t know much - but fund this: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.tripadvisor.com&#x2F;Hotel_Review-g1156005-d302375-Rev.." rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.tripadvisor.com&#x2F;Hotel_Review-g1156005-d302375-Rev...</a>.