You make a point that really needs far more consideration. Do we really want human AI? It strikes me that the very notion of a human like AI at exponential capacity is a terrifying thing not for its potential for advancement and good, but for its potential for falling for the same fallacies that humans fall for on a regular basis and are mostly relative as is. Humans are wildly imperfect even, and especially when they think they are correct or right. That does not sound like a characteristic I would want an AI system to have.