In most cases where the opposing parties are one large publicly-traded company and one small company or individual, the law works like this:<p>* little guy offends large company, usually through some totally well-meaning and innocent activity that, if illegal at all, is only so due to obscure, obsolete, and&#x2F;or obtuse laws<p>* large company unleashes unholy wrath of $1000&#x2F;hr law firm on little guy threatening to destroy little guy&#x27;s world if he doesn&#x27;t immediately comply with all demands<p>* lawyers laugh at the plight of little guy and say it doesn&#x27;t matter what he thinks because he can&#x27;t afford to oppose large company<p>* little guy is forced to comply no matter how absurd large company&#x27;s demands are, because only other large companies can oppose large company in court<p>* should the large company feel inclined to sue the little guy even after he acquiesced to their ridiculous demands, little guy loses all of his possessions in his attempt to pay legal fees. little guy will run out of money before the case wraps, resulting in him getting saddled with a judgment for massive personal liability (cf. Power Ventures)<p>* large company is free to make the same infractions whenever they feel it&#x27;s appropriate to do so, because what are you gonna do, sue them? (cf. practically every company who has ever brought a CFAA claim; Google&#x27;s whole business is violating the CFAA, as well as various copyright laws)<p>* bonus points: large company has friends in the prosecutor&#x27;s office and gets the little guy brought up on life-destroying criminal charges (cf. Aaron Swartz). if the case makes it to trial, little guy spends time in jail (cf. weev)<p>I don&#x27;t think I missed anything.