We can ban things because there&#x27;s too much of a chance of things going wrong? It&#x27;s travel via aircraft, I think John Q. Public can probably fairly well assess what might go wrong, and more to the point, it&#x27;s none of the FFA&#x27;s business. If I go on a plane and I die crashing into some guys house, we have legal frameworks in place to handle all of those events. Why do we need more on top?