This reminds me of something I read a few weeks ago: 
<a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theguardian.com&#x2F;lifeandstyle&#x2F;2015&#x2F;nov&#x2F;20&#x2F;oliver-burkeman-time-to-ditch-to-do-list" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theguardian.com&#x2F;lifeandstyle&#x2F;2015&#x2F;nov&#x2F;20&#x2F;oliver-b...</a><p>&quot;For us list addicts, Forster proposes a minimalist alternative system. On a piece of paper, write down only the five most important tasks you can think of. Then do them, in order, crossing them off as you go. (If you stop before completing one, add it again at the end.) Once the list is only two items long, add three more, to bring the total back to five. Then repeat.<p>&quot;The point of this austere approach is that you’re regularly required to ask what really needs doing, since there are only five slots. With a conventional list, there are unlimited slots – and it’s hugely tempting to plough through inessential tasks, just to cross them off. But what if you forget crucial things, using Forster’s method, because you didn’t write them down? His response: they probably didn’t matter to begin with.&quot;