Anyone whose rights could conceivably be violated under some law has standing to challenge it.<p>&quot;You have to bring the case&quot; what&#x27;s the alternative, that someone sues for every new law even if nobody thinks it&#x27;s unconstitutional? Who exactly do we get to argue for outcomes nobody believes or wants? (Yes, lawyers will argue for things they don&#x27;t believe, but somebody wants that outcome).<p>So if everyone likes a law, the best thing should be not to have a lawsuit. If someone doesn&#x27;t like a law, then they can go ahead and sue.<p>Or do you want all laws to be delayed until pending lawsuits finish? But if a court agrees that you&#x27;re very likely to prevail, they can issue an injunction to prevent the law from going into effect. Most laws have a waiting period before becoming law anyway.<p>Could you be very specific in which particular aspect of modern American jurisprudence you would abolish, what your justification for that is, and what you&#x27;d replace it with?