&gt;Working backwards from the current state of the Universe, scientists have theorized that it must have originated at a single point of infinite density and finite time that began to expand<p>Logically, it doesn&#x27;t make sense to me how something could be described as infinite (density) and finite (time) at the same time.<p>Furthermore, the article states:<p>&gt;However, the earliest times of the Universe – lasting from approximately 10-43 to 10-11 seconds after the Big Bang – are the subject of extensive speculation. Given that the laws of physics as we know them could not have existed at this time, it is difficult to fathom how the Universe could have been governed. What&#x27;s more, experiments that can create the kinds of energies involved have not yet been conducted.<p>How can they even speculate that time existed at that point? If time is relative to motion, and the universe was a singularity, then time could not be said to exist because there is no relative motion if all that exists is a singularity.