You start by saying they give all the details. Now you say that it didn&#x27;t give the information.<p>Do you at least agree that the article doesn&#x27;t explain what the quoted 87% increase means in a way the readership is going to understand?  Can <i>you</i> explain what that 87% increase means?<p>The article had almost no relevance to this thread; it was dumped here as yet more pill-shaming bollocks; it targets a group who already have to put up with a lot of bullshit; and it&#x27;s disappointing to see that kind of behaviour defended.<p>The original study is irresponsibly presented and poorly reported and I have no problem pointing that out.