Can someone explain to me what claim Dr. Dweck has demonstrated that is both novel and true? I have read a bunch of articles about her work, but it all seems to me like she has framed &quot;growth mindset&quot; against a strawman.<p>It seems blindingly obvious to me that ability in most fields is a function of both genes and effort. Genes shape how fast you improve with effort, and where you plateau. Genes shape the curve of the achievement-to-effort graph. Effort determines where you are on that curve. Effort determines how much of your potential you actualize. This dynamic is true in basketball, math, golf, painting, speech-making, guitar playing and virtually every other complicated human endeavor.<p>Some people need to be told, &quot;You have are naturally gifted in this field, stop being so hard on people who are not as good as you, they are doing the best they can.&quot;<p>Some people need to be told, &quot;You are naturally gifted in this area. You have a responsibility to work extra hard in order to maximize your gifts. If you work your butt off, you have the potential to be truly special.&quot;<p>Some people need to be told, &quot;This stuff might not come as naturally to you. You&#x27;re going to have to work extra hard to keep up.&quot;<p>Some people need to be told, &quot;Look you have been practicing harder than anyone, and honestly, I just don&#x27;t think you have the raw talent to be a professional in this field. You can do it for fun, but be realistic about your career choices.&quot;<p>Some people need to be told, &quot;Look you can&#x27;t say you are bad at painting&#x2F;writing&#x2F;music&#x2F;math&#x2F;etc. You haven&#x27;t even tried to learn it. This stuff is not natural for most people, there are books and youtube videos that can show you how to do it. You need to build step-by-step. Practice one technique until it is in mental memory and then add more complexity. Unless you&#x27;re mozart, you don&#x27;t just start from day one being able to produce great stuff.&quot;<p>It seems that as a culture, there are mistakes in messaging going both ways. For example, the premise of the &quot;No Child Left Behind&quot; education law was silly. There is in fact a bell curve with regards to natural academic aptitude. For instance, if you are in the bottom ~20% of that curve, it is nearly impossible to learn algebra. ( for some articles from a real teacher who is trying to teach algebra in the field, read: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;educationrealist.wordpress.com&#x2F;2012&#x2F;08&#x2F;19&#x2F;algebra-and-the-pointlessness-of-the-whole-damn-thing&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;educationrealist.wordpress.com&#x2F;2012&#x2F;08&#x2F;19&#x2F;algebra-an...</a> and <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;educationrealist.wordpress.com&#x2F;2013&#x2F;10&#x2F;31&#x2F;noahpinion-on-iq-or-maybe-just-no-knowledge&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;educationrealist.wordpress.com&#x2F;2013&#x2F;10&#x2F;31&#x2F;noahpinion...</a> ). Someone in the middle of the bell curve can learn algebra, but if they try to go into a career that involves advanced quantitative or logical skills, they will be competing against those who both have a natural aptitude and an economic incentive to try hard. The person with normal aptitude will likely lose that competition. So it might not be good advice to tell that person to double-down on math, even if they could make themselves better.<p>On the other hand, I hear a lot of smart friends say stuff like, &quot;I&#x27;m just bad at math&quot; or &quot;I&#x27;m just bad at painting.&quot; In many cases, they never had good teaching, or they never tackled the problem aggressively. They never tried to learn incrementally, by building muscle memory on a simple technique and then adding more complications. They started with the hard stuff, and when it did not work, they just assumed they were bad at it. For people like that, a &quot;growth mindset&quot; can be helpful.<p>All of this should be pretty darn obvious. I don&#x27;t really gather what new, credible information Dweck is adding to our understanding of how learning, motivation, and achievement works.