&gt; I would guess they describe their work as &quot;open
source&quot; and do not talk about freedom.<p>Wow, what an asshole.  Maybe they consider legal restrictions on how other people may use their software to be the <i>opposite</i> of freedom?  Maybe that is the truth and maybe RMS has a good point to make, but how tone deaf is to call anything that isn&#x27;t GNU, &quot;unfree&quot;?  To suggest that they don&#x27;t even talk about freedom because their license is a little different?  What an asshole.