I did not know much about Theranos before the recent skeptical articles started to appear on newspapers regarding the falseness of their claims.<p>The larger question is, how do you get to a $9B valuation without having rock solid technology or evidence to prove the effectiveness of their technology?<p>I would assume that the VCs in SV are a pretty smart bunch. How on earth did this happen in the first place? If Theranos really did not have the kind of earth shattering technology that they claim to have, how did they get so much money?<p>If you take a look at their angellist page, then you&#x27;ll see that they did not even need to raise the money in stages, no seed or series stuff. If you take a look at one of their investors, DFJ, has invested in a lot of successful companies like skype and tesla. Also other investors have invested in companies like Uber and Lyft.<p>I don&#x27;t know too much about medicine or tests for that matter. But what I do know is that people don&#x27;t invest their money without good reason to do so.<p>What is confounding is that $45M is not chunk change, and yet they managed to raise this much cash in an unconventional way.