&gt; Good question. Someone else pointed out that _all_ societies have benefited from destroying the environment. I get the feeling they were pointing this out to argue that &quot;we&quot; (modern day Americans) don&#x27;t really need to feel responsible. &quot;Everybody does it, so it must be okay.&quot;<p>Not quite. What I was getting at is this argument is usually presented in the context of blaming the West generally or the United States specifically for various atrocities, and gently eliding how the societies which were aggressed upon were usually no different from a morality standpoint: it was simply a matter of who got to who first with a bigger stick in their hand. Not &quot;everybody does it, so it must be okay,&quot; just &quot;everybody does it, so casting blame on a specific group is, paradoxically, unfair.&quot;<p>For that reason, our responsibility to properly safeguard the environment and to ensure the rights of all people cannot be dependent on one nation or culture atoning for some crime their ancestors allegedly committed in the past. That just builds a never-ending tower of recrimination and anger. It has to be simply our obligation as human beings to each other, right now, today.