The argument in the book under discussion is that the natural balance of supply and demand is favoring the seller, who is exploiting the buyer in ways the buy isn&#x27;t aware of, and is complex and fast enough that a regulatory paradigm can&#x27;t mitigate.<p>A &quot;free market&quot; is an attempt to simulate a perfect market, which is a theoretical construct that doesn&#x27;t exist. One of the things it requires is perfect information among all parties in the buy and sell process. Courts and property rights are one way of trying to simulate that perfect market, and thereby create a free market. But this isn&#x27;t actually working well enough, is the book&#x27;s argument, there&#x27;s still an imbalance that favors exploiters, i.e. the free market isn&#x27;t providing enough information for buyers to make properly informed decisions rather than manipulated ones.