These forced MitMs are all very similar, though I don&#x27;t see how that gets us anywhere. It&#x27;s not a valid way of enforcing any policy no matter how twisted, because people will root their devices and circumvent the lock-down.<p>The reason I call it twisted is because I&#x27;m wondering why that lock-down is necessary in the first place: you don&#x27;t want them to &quot;abuse&quot; the device, causing potential damage? This might be a valid concern with company cars due to the life-threatening aspect of driving, but extending this concept to laptops seems abusive. Either way, the risk posed to the school or company&#x27;s assets can be effectively taken into account by some kind of insurance policy, not by attempting to lock down the device.