&gt; They are all unbelievable [sic] biased and political.<p>Of course they are. <i>Everything is political</i>, because everything affects <i>people</i>. The idea that some people have that technology (or anything else) is somehow <i>not</i> political is extremely naive.<p>The point of my comment was that you seem to be addressing the <i>factions themselves</i> as a topic instead of discussing the subject matter itself. Your new reply does a lot of the same.<p>&gt; reframing other peoples actions towards your critique on it?<p>Obviously. Are you suggesting that any critique must be made in the framing Facebook has been setting with their propaganda? Facebook gets to control the stage?<p>&gt; Facebook isn&#x27;t lying about people pressing their support button<p>Quite a few people are claiming otherwise.<p>Did you miss Facebook&#x27;s scandalous &quot;emotional contagion&quot; experiment? Or the various other stories about how they manipulate what people see? As usual, Facebook likes to fall back on calling these tactics &quot;an accident&quot; when they are caught.<p>&gt; size-based exceptionalism<p>WTF are you talking about?<p>Why are you inventing a straw-man big-vs-small argument while ignoring that they are a <i>gatekeeper</i> with the power to monitor and manipulate social interaction.<p>&gt; You probably came up with the market thing by reading my profiles joke about economists.<p>Nope. That was 100% based on your suggestions that the market would sort this out.