Does that roughly mean that FB must (to be shielded from lawsuits) anonymize the data before passing it to the government?  This isn&#x27;t particularly comforting, since it could still be used to prosecute individuals if identity can be inferred from other context.<p>The EFF&#x27;s criticism is basically that the bill is overly broad and can be used nefariously, even if it&#x27;s not an all purpose FB message vacuum:<p>&gt; The bill&#x27;s broad immunity clauses, vague definitions, and aggressive spying powers combine to make the bill a surveillance bill in disguise. Further, the bill does not address problems from the recent highly publicized computer data breaches that were caused by unencrypted files, poor computer architecture, un-updated servers, and employees (or contractors) clicking malware links.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.eff.org&#x2F;deeplinks&#x2F;2015&#x2F;10&#x2F;eff-strongly-oppose-cisa-cyber-surveillance-bill-and-cfaa-amendment" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.eff.org&#x2F;deeplinks&#x2F;2015&#x2F;10&#x2F;eff-strongly-oppose-ci...</a><p>That seems consistent with my aforementioned worry.