What&#x27;s sad about this, is that all those markets already exist and are partially taken. At least Mozilla is honest enough about this and say they target &quot;late adopters&quot;.<p>What aspects here supports the free &amp; open web? What part about providing a me too web-browsing experience to elderly and late adopters helps promote the free web?<p>What&#x27;s worse is that some of their &quot;me too&quot; efforts are already compromised by Mozilla admitting they need to support DRM, so what new freedom do we gain? What&#x27;s better or freer about their product?<p>Where is the effort to bring back the power-users which built Mozilla&#x27;s original user-base? Are <i>pensionists</i> more important to Mozilla than the people actually building the web? I just don&#x27;t get it.<p>And the Firefox Hub seems to have nothing to do with any existing Mozilla-technology and only seems to be Firefox in name. That is: until proven otherwise (and the effort with Firefox OS makes this a reasonable position) this is 100% vapourware where the &quot;Firefox&quot;-name is used purely for branding and marketing.<p>I don&#x27;t see how any of these would be successful, and if they were, how they would align with Mozilla&#x27;s stated goals.<p>Poor Mozilla. They really seem to be struggling for a sense of direction and purpose these days. I wish they would just go back to making a kick-ass browser.<p>(Signed developer, Firefox user, desktop &amp; mobile)