One does not always have to take titles so literally. I expect there to be a bit of &quot;sizzle&quot; not &quot;steak&quot; in a title because it has to catch your eye and compete with other titles.<p>I had a chuckle yesterday because there was an HN News story that was briefly on the front page with a title something like &quot;95 year old smashes world 200m record&quot;. About 80% of the posts complained that the title was misleading because it was the world record for his age group. I would have thought that was self evident - did they really expect a 95 year old to break the open WR for 200m?