I guess I should have explained more what I meant by &quot;justice.&quot;  In your quoted language, I intended it to mean justice as handed down by a person in a black robe.<p>Clients are already lapping up automated legal services (wills, contracts, etc.).  But I don&#x27;t think they&#x27;re willing to accept a judgment from an opaque black box. Indeed, the cost to receive a judgment does tangentially involve some automatable processes, and those costs will come down as our computers get smarter.<p>To extrapolate a bit: as long as humans are determining legal outcomes, there will be human advocates.  There will be human judges for as long as we have a Constitution.