Who would be better positioned to stage a trap coalesced with a bug for the Sanders campaign than individuals within a company with a track record for bugs?<p>It sounds like the data director of the Sanders campaign was the only member who could initially access Clinton data--would this not go both ways?<p>If such extreme bugs were the norm, why would the DNC continue to use such a vendor? The entire platform the DNC depends upon is hindered each time such a bug happens, so it makes no sense from an organizational perspective.<p>Conspiracy is a strong word, but it seems a bit naive to look at this as either &quot;is a bug&quot; or &quot;isn&#x27;t a bug&quot;.