You should really think before spouting off, and you should honestly admit if you&#x27;re biased in this instance.<p>I&#x27;ve followed India&#x27;s cellular revolution with interest, seeing (as I mentioned earlier) I grew up when India had almost no phones. My dad, due to his work, always had a phone; and I, being the youngest, was the errand-boy, running to distant houses to tell people that there was a phone call for them, and that the caller would call back in 20 minutes, so please can you come quickly?<p>The reason cellphones took off in India is that the government tried (some would say, not hard enough) to level the playing field and to remove barriers. What if you could make calls on Reliance to only Reliance folks? Or what if Airtel charged you Rs. 20&#x2F;min for calls to Docomo, but Rs 1&#x2F;min to calls on Airtel? This kind of balkanization would be disastrous to the cellphone users.<p>Similarly, if you want internet use to spread, you <i>cannot do that by placing barriers and toll gates</i> all around. It <i>has</i> to be unfettered access. Sure, this &quot;basics&quot; thing may be available right _now_ ; but users will then be locked into one mode of operation forever.<p>People who are arguing against FB are not just &quot;intellectuals&quot;; but people who have a lot of experience. I, for one, remember when the first Internet line to India was hooked up: it was a 56K modem, a Trailblazer. For the entire country of India. From there, we have come to terabits&#x2F;sec fibre lines. So yes, I do know something about the Internet.