&gt; Holocaust victims have described things that actually happened to them or their families, they are claiming things as historic fact. It is absolutely possible, and very cruel, to call them liars.<p>Ok, let&#x27;s use a different example then. It&#x27;s not illegal to say that Stalin was a good man than never harmed anyone, even though it&#x27;s incredibly wrong (Stalin killed possibly even more people than Hitler), and equally disrespectful (assuming that at least some of the Stalin&#x27;s victims or their relatives survived). Why the difference?<p>&gt; Scientists advocating the theory of evolution are 100% aware that it is a theory<p>Wow. I wouldn&#x27;t think that as someone who objects denying the holocaust would use exactly the most stupid argument used by those who deny evolution.<p>It&#x27;s called a <i>theory</i> not because scientists don&#x27;t think evolution is a fact, but because it&#x27;s an <i>explanation</i> of how things happen. Evolution <i>is</i> a fact, to the same extent that <i>gravity</i> is a fact (i.e. the prediction than an apple will fall down if your release it) - it might be wrong e.g. if we live in the Matrix, but then <i>all</i> of the reality is &quot;wrong&quot;. Even with gravity, you have <i>gravity</i> (things fall) and the <i>theory</i> of gravity (a longer explanation <i>why</i> things fall).<p>Edit: I&#x27;m not sure what you&#x27;re asking with &quot;Paragraph?&quot;... Do you mean &quot;Source?&quot;?