That isn&#x27;t anyone&#x27;s assumption. These people are too underprivileged to know or care about your &quot;walled gardens&quot; and &quot;ecosystems&quot;. It&#x27;s supposed to be a good enough intermediate step to drastically improve the poor&#x27;s access to information.<p>Yes, it&#x27;s good for Facebook, obviously, but this is not a zero sum game. The choice to use any better competing service that comes along will always exist. No one else is willing to front the hundreds of millions with little to no returns for 20+ years required, though.