I don&#x27;t understand why there is a controversy at all here. This seems to at least have a logical use case, which is more than we can say for status code 418 (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;tools.ietf.org&#x2F;html&#x2F;rfc2324" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;tools.ietf.org&#x2F;html&#x2F;rfc2324</a>)