&gt;<i>In April 2014, she got a long email from another employee. The employee alleged that Theranos had cherry-picked data when comparing Edison machines to traditional lab machines to make the Edison look more accurate, according to a copy of the email.</i><p>&gt;<i>For one test, the device’s accuracy rate increased sharply after some information was deleted and manipulated, the employee wrote. Edison machines also allegedly failed daily quality-control checks often.</i><p>&gt;<i>Ms. Holmes forwarded the email to Mr. Balwani. He replied to the employee, who no longer works at Theranos, denied all the claims and questioned the employee’s understanding of statistics and lab science.</i><p>Oh man. If you read through Theranos&#x27; reviews on Glassdoor [1] this anecdote seems totally legitimate. Multiple reviews talk about the toxic culture and how management does anything to cover their behinds. Quite a few of these were written before the scandal broke so I think they&#x27;re quite honest about what&#x27;s going on.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.glassdoor.com&#x2F;Reviews&#x2F;Theranos-Reviews-E248889_P6.htm?sort.sortType=OR&amp;sort.ascending=false" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.glassdoor.com&#x2F;Reviews&#x2F;Theranos-Reviews-E248889_P...</a>