The fact that you consider performance and freedom to be a trade off means that you&#x27;ve already given up even the slightest hope of freedom. You as a developer and a user should want the freedoms afforded to you by the GPL or any copyleft license for that matter. In the ideal world your high performance software would be released under the GPL you would have the best of both worlds. The war won&#x27;t be won by rewriting every single tool and releasing it under the GPL, it will be won by pressuring existing companies to license their software under the GPL.<p>The people who want non-copyleft licenses to succeed are those who which to make a profit from the control and ignorance they can impose on their users by closing their source and platform or those who are willing to trade their user&#x27;s freedoms to appease them.<p>Businesses have a huge amount of leverage on the OSS software ecosystem and so it&#x27;s really no surprise that the licensing choices are to benefit the businesses funding the development rather than the users. It&#x27;s to be expected but no less sad. There&#x27;s a small group of passionate people who have basically dedicated their lives to making the world a better place by writing software that&#x27;s truly free and respects its users, they built an entire community and movement around the idea, and actually stand by their beliefs -- yet people dismiss them because the company worth hundreds of billions of dollars has a better UX.