Based on your response, I&#x27;m guessing you didn&#x27;t take the time to read the complaint. And why bother when you can spew factually incorrect vitriol at someone over the internet?<p>Not to mention that Square&#x27;s fundamental innovation, its credit card reader, is premised on intellectual property theft. See <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;bits.blogs.nytimes.com&#x2F;2014&#x2F;01&#x2F;30&#x2F;lawsuit-questions-squares-start-up-story&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;bits.blogs.nytimes.com&#x2F;2014&#x2F;01&#x2F;30&#x2F;lawsuit-questions-s...</a>. So in addition to holding a hundred more patents than my company, Square isn&#x27;t even being honest about who deserves credit for theirs. Yet you argue that they&#x27;re the pro-innovation good guys, and non-VC backed independent inventors are actively destroying innovation, because they hold patents? I have to disagree.