<i>&gt;No, you&#x27;ve misread the packaging.</i><p>It appears I have actually. Thanks for pointing this out! That removes a lot of my issue with the article with that issue, because it didn&#x27;t exist to begin with. Just my own misreading. :)<p>If I&#x27;m allowed to excuse why I overlooked that 4 - I&#x27;d blame my familiarity with the male packaging. I didn&#x27;t even notice the 4 when looking for numbers because it didn&#x27;t have words next to it! At this point I&#x27;d be more offended that they think the word &quot;cartridge&quot; is too difficult for women and use a picture of the blade instead, as if they&#x27;re children.