What is even being argued here? First, about those articles, what &quot;they&quot; are you implying wrote them? And they don&#x27;t seem &quot;boastful&quot; as much as descriptive. And even if they are liberals boasting about it, how does that make it a &quot;scheme&quot; so much as simply pointing out their successes and advantages?<p>Basically where is there any shred of evidence that the prevailing reason for supporting immigration is to generate a majority, rather than simply thinking it is the right or best thing to do?