am I the only one bothered by this?  As a bit of a disclaimer, I am disgusted by what Shkreli is doing in the pharma business (if anyone doubts this, I run a nonprofit dedicated to the opposite of what he&#x27;s doing).<p>But what it says is that the SEC is motivated by sometimes petty reasons to go after people that are indirectly related to actual commission of SEC violation.  Which of course, every CEO makes pretty much every business day.  If the SEC were neutral, why didn&#x27;t they find and eliminate Shkreli <i>before</i> social media got all hot to trot on hating him?  The SEC is basically saying, well, he&#x27;s unpopular, we have the power to take him out, let&#x27;s do it.<p>Something about that seems wrong to me.