I don&#x27;t think he worded it quite right but the inclusion of &quot;not twice as much&quot; makes it clearer that he was referring to &quot;0 to 1,000&quot; vs &quot;0 to 2,000&quot; (not 0 to 1,000 vs 1,000 to 2,000). So I believe the error was in the writing, not the math or understanding. Which he even pre-apologized for presumably in an attempt to assuage the nit-pickers.