That last paragraph is pretty much a description of <i>google search</i> is it not? That&#x27;s what struck me about this article. It&#x27;s describing AI as a thing which is coming in the future, but...  knowledge mining document discovery tasks? The future is now! Google&#x27;s AI (combined with the vast corpus of linked knowledge on the open web) is presumably already doing away with the need for a lot of low-level legal enquiries which would have previously been handled by law firms. I notice this article touches on the topic:<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;edition.cnn.com&#x2F;2015&#x2F;05&#x2F;22&#x2F;opinions&#x2F;barton-rise-and-fall-of-lawyers&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;edition.cnn.com&#x2F;2015&#x2F;05&#x2F;22&#x2F;opinions&#x2F;barton-rise-and-f...</a><p>&quot;Nonprofits and government entities have put almost all of the raw materials of American law online and Google and other search engines have made that law easier to find than ever. An American with a smart phone now has more access to legal sources than most lawyers or judges did fifteen years ago.&quot;<p>When stuff is made available on the open web for google (and other search engines) to index, that <i>is</i> the AI revolution right there. I say bring it on. Laws and court proceedings <i>should</i> be treated as public property. It should be put on the open web, permalinkable, annotatable, preferably with an explicit open license, so we can all benefit