RMS -- and perhaps the FSF more generally -- seems more concerned with preventing non-Free software, with creating Free Software as a means to that end, than increasing the volume of Free Software.<p>To RMS, non-Free software isn&#x27;t just worse than Free software, its a net harm to society such that it&#x27;s better to have <i>no</i> software than to have non-Free software. Its even often (apparently, to RMS) better to have no additional software than to have a lot of additional Free Software and some additional non-Free software.