Relevant and from last night&#x27;s Democratic Debate.<p>RADDATZ: You&#x27;ll be happy. I&#x27;ll let -- I&#x27;ll let you talk then.<p>Secretary Clinton, I want to talk about a new terrorist tool used in the Paris attacks, encryption. FBI Director James Comey says terrorists can hold secret communications which law enforcement cannot get to, even with a court order.<p>You&#x27;ve talked a lot about bringing tech leaders and government officials together, but Apple CEO Tim Cook said removing encryption tools from our products altogether would only hurt law-abiding citizens who rely on us to protect their data. So would you force him to give law enforcement a key to encrypted technology by making it law?<p>CLINTON: I would not want to go to that point. I would hope that, given the extraordinary capacities that the tech community has and the legitimate needs and questions from law enforcement, that there could be a Manhattan-like project, something that would bring the government and the tech communities together to see they&#x27;re not adversaries, they&#x27;ve got to be partners.<p>It doesn&#x27;t do anybody any good if terrorists can move toward encrypted communication that no law enforcement agency can break into before or after. There must be some way. I don&#x27;t know enough about the technology, Martha, to be able to say what it is, but I have a lot of confidence in our tech experts.<p>And maybe the back door is the wrong door, and I understand what Apple and others are saying about that. But I also understand, when a law enforcement official charged with the responsibility of preventing attacks -- to go back to our early questions, how do we prevent attacks -- well, if we can&#x27;t know what someone is planning, we are going to have to rely on the neighbor or, you know, the member of the mosque or the teacher, somebody to see something.<p>CLINTON: I just think there&#x27;s got to be a way, and I would hope that our tech companies would work with government to figure that out. Otherwise, law enforcement is blind -- blind before, blind during, and, unfortunately, in many instances, blind after.<p>So we always have to balance liberty and security, privacy and safety, but I know that law enforcement needs the tools to keep us safe. And that&#x27;s what i hope, there can be some understanding and cooperation to achieve.<p>RADDATZ: And Governor O&#x27;Malley, where do you draw the line between national security and personal security?<p>O&#x27;MALLEY: I believe that we should never give up our privacy; never should give up our freedoms in exchange for a promise of security. We need to figure this out together. We need a collaborative approach. We need new leadership.<p>The way that things work in the modern era is actually to gather people around the table and figure these things out. The federal government should have to get warrants. That&#x27;s not some sort of passe you know, antique sort of principle that safeguards our freedoms.<p>But at the same time with new technologies I believe that the people creating these projects -- I mean these products also have an obligation to come together with law enforcement to figure these things out; true to our American principles and values.<p>My friend Kashif, who is a doctor in Maryland; back to this issue of our danger as a democracy of turning against ourselves. He was putting his 10 and 12-year-old boys to bed the other night. And he is a proud American Muslim. And one of his little boys said to him, &quot;Dad, what happens if Donald Trump wins and we have to move out of our homes?&quot; These are very, very real issues. this is a clear and present danger in our politics within.<p>We need to speak to what unites us as a people; freedom of worship, freedom of religion, freedom of expression. And we should never be convinced to give up those freedoms in exchange for a promise of greater security; especially from someone as untried and as incompetent as Donald Trump.<p>RADDATZ: Thank you, Governor O&#x27;Malley.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.washingtonpost.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;the-fix&#x2F;wp&#x2F;2015&#x2F;12&#x2F;19&#x2F;3rd-democratic-debate-transcript-annotated-who-said-what-and-what-it-meant&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.washingtonpost.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;the-fix&#x2F;wp&#x2F;2015&#x2F;12&#x2F;19&#x2F;3r...</a>