OK, let&#x27;s shift to another scenario then.<p>It&#x27;s illegal in the US to make and distribute adult films without the proper permits and paperwork and health checks.<p>Let&#x27;s say someone made a website that had Saudi girls, now living in the US, make adult films (without the proper permitting and everything so they were violating a US law as well) and advertised those films in Saudi Arabia. And let&#x27;s say there are Saudi customers.<p>To speed things up, maybe they had a CDN server in Saudi Arabia.<p>When the authorities in Saudi Arabia discover this and charge the film makers, would the US grant extradition?<p>* The film makers &#x2F; business operators in this scenario would be 100% American. 
* The <i>product</i> of their creation and the service itself wouldn&#x27;t be illegal in the US. What was illegal was some business decisions they made. 
* Their CDN helped facilitate optimal data transmission but was not required for business operations
* The Saudi court in this scenario wishes to charge them for the service itself and the product created<p>Similarly, 
* Kim is not an american citizen and his company wasn&#x27;t American
* His business was legal in the country it was incorporated in, although he arguably made some business decisions that were not entirely above board
* He had leased equipment in the US to help serve people in that geographic region
* The US wishes to jail him for the actual operation of the service<p>Would the US extradite the US citizen to Saudi Arabia for punishment? If not, why should NZ extradite Kim to the US?<p>*edit - Somehow didn&#x27;t see that 	
michaelmrose made this argument too in this exact same thread