Really hard to not take you for a crackpot. You:<p>* initially call everyone science-denying alarmists<p>* ignore all the responses that point out that there is trend in the data you linked.<p>* respond only to the reply that gives you the benefit of the doubt (&#x27;what smoothing do you recommend so we can see it&#x27;s unchanged.&#x27;) by switching datasets and trying to make the same point again (unable to defend it in with first source?)<p>* make a claim of your own (&#x27;it&#x27;s unchanged&#x27;), but switch to a different, easier-to-defend claim when contested (&#x27;it&#x27;s not a foot, like the original article claims&#x27;)<p>So do you actually believe it&#x27;s unchanged, or are you irrationally dead-set on disagreeing with the article? Can&#x27;t take you seriously like this.