Did you ask? We can usually give some feedback.<p>That said, we are still improving our hiring workflow -- I have my own list of pet peeves. We&#x27;ve gone from dozens to thousands in a few years; turns out it&#x27;s easier to scale software than hiring.<p>Edit: speaking of asking, I asked some more about our feedback. Sometimes it&#x27;s hard to give specific feedback, sometimes it&#x27;s not easy to be tactful, sometimes the interviewer can&#x27;t point to single concrete examples rather than a vibe arising from tiny observations and so on. On top of that there are multiple people involved in giving hire&#x2F;no-hire opinions and several people coordinating different parts of the logistics.<p>On top of that we go through a lot of interviews every week, only a few of whom we hire. The only people with a sufficiently global view of the decision are directors, and they&#x27;re too swamped by all their duties to give detailed feedback to every candidate.<p>So on the one hand, we can&#x27;t always give feedback, so my original statement was wrong. On the other we default to saying no, because even if we <i>wanted</i> to always give feedback, we simply couldn&#x27;t handle the volume.