Wikipedia is big, stable, midly incremental and dominant[0].  Does it <i>need</i> more money that its current baseload income?<p>If we applied the same traits to the browser market we&#x27;d be crying-out for an alternative.<p>I don&#x27;t know <i>what</i> that alternative is, so it&#x27;s difficult to donate towards it.  But I don&#x27;t believe that encouraging more donations to Wikipedia is going to move collective human knowledge forward.<p>In contrast, Mozilla is constantly having to chase new technological targets and compete against well-funded corporate alternatives.  I can understand why they need to keep expanding their income.<p>[0] deliberately setting-aside all the other subjective complaints about its internal processes.