Maybe there&#x27;s an internal policy at which $199,999 is a cut-off, i.e. at a certain point, the sponsorship decision is moved to a higher-level of bureaucracy and approval. Which is completely the sensible thing to do: there&#x27;s no reason why President Obama has to be the one who personally signs off on million-dollar toilets in Iraq (even if the buck stops with the President), and neither should <i>every</i> sponsorship decision be put on the desk of Mark Zuckerberg or Sheryl Sandberg...and an efficient way to do that is to set off a discrete cut-offs, so that you don&#x27;t have a middle manager thinking they have the discretion to do the exact same moral reasoning as you suggest, <i>&quot;Oh why just give the Palo Alto Elementary Science Fair $10,000 when we could give it $100,000 and no one would even notice?&quot;</i><p>Besides internal order, I imagine there&#x27;s additional concerns and contractual obligations that relate to a public company&#x27;s stakeholders, e.g. the shareholders who invest with a guarantee that a company has consistent policies in place to manage its spending, whether operational or charitable.