Indeed. One jury is far too small a sample size to draw any conclusions (too obvious to even state but I did anyway).<p>When comparing proportions (in this case racial makeup of juries versus racial makeup of the population) you want a sample size large enough that you have at least 5 expected cases for each group. In this case the expected cases are the population proportion (p) times the number of jurors (n). So you would need n * p &gt;= 5 and since Asians are the lowest proportion at 5% you would need data on at least 100 jurors. Then you could do a Chi-square goodness-of-fit test to see if something is really going on.<p>If it seems like I&#x27;m being geeky it&#x27;s only because I just recently worked on a problem exactly like this, determining if jury demographics matched population demographics. Turns out in many cases there IS something going on, but then the reasons for it aren&#x27;t always what you think. One reason is that in some communities there is a shortage of eligible jurors due to high rates of felony convictions.