I agree the &quot;feminist inspiration&quot; part is a confusing non-sequitur. I think you&#x27;re missing what they&#x27;re trying to say, though. I interpreted that section as &quot;we&#x27;re making our algorithms and data open so that everyone can be sure they aren&#x27;t implicitly racist or sexist&quot;.<p>Suppose, for example, that a user repeatedly rejected edits for anyone with a noticeably feminine username. Wikimedia wants to be sure that their algorithms don&#x27;t take this person&#x27;s rejects to be valid data. Again, they don&#x27;t really say <i>how</i> they&#x27;ll do this, which makes the whole section rather confusing.<p>It&#x27;s a valid concern, just presented awkwardly.