The problem is, that Yahoo didn&#x27;t have any unique technology when she took over. Creating one almost from scratch and make success with it - in such a short time of 3 years - is quite difficult. But I tend to agree with the author&#x27;s sentiment, that she probably just didn&#x27;t have any transformation plan... she just wanted to do incremental improvements in the areas Yahoo was strong enough.<p>What I am missing is why it is called a failure after such a short time. Can&#x27;t they just let her continue?