&gt; &quot;This is significant because it calls into question the plausibility and achieveability of any kind of transition to Communism.&quot;<p>It&#x27;s clear now this is the core of your argument, so let&#x27;s explore possible transitions further.<p>First of all, let&#x27;s examine direct democracy. Direct democracy is closer to communism than any of the attempts (by nation states) that have been given its name. In the age of the Internet, direct democracy is easier than ever to organise. Effectively, you need two things:<p>1. An inclusive, informative news media.<p>2. A way to collect votes.<p>Are two things above hard to achieve? Depends on who you ask, but I&#x27;d say they were more than achievable.<p>How does direct democracy pave the way for communism? Firstly, it begins the process of breaking down the power structures that currently exist, and provides an alternative means of organising society that can fill the power vacuum. Secondly, it gets people used to the balance between the individual and the collective. We can achieve great things when we work together, but that should not come through forceful means, the rights of the individual to choose their own path should still be valued.<p>Thoughts?