&gt; &quot;Without research, I don&#x27;t think it&#x27;s any more reasonable to say &quot;stereotypes are mainly accurate because they&#x27;re self-fulfilling prophecies&quot; than to say &quot;stereotypes are mainly accurate because groups of people are naturally different.&quot;.&quot;<p>First of all, calm down, I&#x27;m not here to argue with you.<p>I made a statement about what I believe. I assumed that using the word &#x27;believe&#x27; would make it clear that I was stating a personal opinion, it seems that wasn&#x27;t clear enough.<p>An important difference between my personal opinion and the science in the linked article is that I never attempted to pass off my opinion as scientifically proven. If the linked article had merely stated some compelling evidence to consider, then I wouldn&#x27;t have bothered replying. My argument against it is that it makes large claims based on very limited evidence. Perhaps that&#x27;s the best evidence we have so far, but I certainly wouldn&#x27;t say it&#x27;s in any way strong enough for the conclusions being pointed to.<p>As for my own beliefs, I don&#x27;t think they&#x27;re controversial, nor am I attempting to hide anything. I believe that stereotypes can (note: not in all cases) be true because they become a self-fulfilling prophecy. How so? By setting expectations on accepted behavior.<p>Consider the following: It is a common stereotype that men are more prone to have stronger sexual urges, and this is used to excuse many different behaviours. Sexual objectification of women is one such behaviour, we see this as normal because of the stereotype that men are overwhelmed by such stimulus, and so cannot be held as responsible for such behaviour. The more common the stereotype becomes, the more people use the stereotype to set expectations, which influences what becomes normal for the group in question, regardless of whether it was originally true or not.