The systematic problem is that if there&#x27;s something expensive and anyone can want in, and the profit margins aren&#x27;t clearly good, it&#x27;s too risky to blow all your money on something and maybe not get a return. Maybe the market can fund one entrant but if there are two, and the market share is divided, there&#x27;s not enough money for each player to cover their costs.<p>A systematic fix would look like one of:<p><pre><code>    - Restrict entry to a single player (patents)
    - Provide matching funds for each sale
</code></pre>
These fixes apply to this specific situation. We&#x27;re talking about the space program, so we&#x27;re talking large up-front capital costs, which means its possible the situation exists. The patent system is clearly cheaper up front, though the more expensive second option ensures at least some competition, making for an overall better product, but at a very high price.