&gt; <i>&quot;I wonder if it&#x27;s going to be considered a loophole that will be closed or an abuse. I suppose it could be either.&quot;</i><p>This is addressed in the notes at the bottom of the article:<p>&gt; <i>&quot;Specifically, as the SEC says:<p>All orders for multiple accounts beneficially owned or controlled by the same person or entity, and all sub-accounts of a person or entity’s master account, must be aggregated when determining whether the 390-order threshold has been exceeded by that person or entity.<p>If in fact Behruz Afshar controlled both Fineline and Makino, then he should have aggregated them, and by pretending that Shahryar was the sole owner of Makino the twins evaded that requirement.  &quot;</i>