Well, this article is interesting because it&#x27;s not the typical mindless Yes We Can article written by someone who heard that now wanting &quot;Social Justice&quot; (whatever that is) is the trend of the day, without understanding the dynamics of social interaction in the slightest.<p>It&#x27;s also not an article written to sound like someone in the above category wrote, but in fact is being written by someone who <i>understand</i> the social dynamics, and just has an agenda.<p>In fact the article is sincere, and correctly identifies the &quot;problem&quot;. There are many things I find abhorrent about the proposed world described in the article, but I will refer to only one of them. Btw, even if I find abhorrent this &quot;new&quot; world order, it&#x27;s much better than the world order imposed by the Yes We Can people.<p>&gt; Additionally, they shall have one or more &quot;hosts&quot; who do not drink alcohol, and who are trained to observe and catch violations should they occur.<p>Yeah, this casual suggestion that some sort of &quot;police&quot; should exist to <i>monitor</i> people&#x27;s behavior and catch policy violations quickly is the worst thing that is currently happening to humanity in my opinion, and ultimately results in a world I don&#x27;t want to be part of.<p>The police part is bad in itself, but much worse is how casual this &quot;final solution&quot; is proposed, and how little people complain about it. People were bred into obedience and submission. We already lost.<p>There&#x27;s very little for me to do about this. All I can do is vote with my money, e.g. I don&#x27;t go to conferences where people are not adults enough that they don&#x27;t know how to <i>live</i>, yes, live life, without CoCs and police, even though I am one of the nice people at those conferences, not one of the &quot;bad actors&quot; the author mentions. Of course this doesn&#x27;t affect the world in the slightest.