This website seems to omit or twist facts to make their articles as sensationalist as possible:<p>&gt; Blanketed in acrid smog, Beijing is waking up to climate change<p>Ok, so if Beijing is having smog because they pollute the air this is now climate change?<p>Or just the next article linked on that page again:<p>&gt; The smog is so bad in Beijing that someone made a brick out of it<p>Actually he used clay for most of the brick, he only collected 100 grams of &quot;smog&quot; during 100 days (4 hours of vacuuming each day) (see <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;qz.com&#x2F;562319&#x2F;a-chinese-artist-vacuumed-up-beijings-smog-for-100-days-and-made-a-brick-from-what-he-collected&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;qz.com&#x2F;562319&#x2F;a-chinese-artist-vacuumed-up-beijings-s...</a>)<p>I&#x27;m not saying they don&#x27;t have a problem with smog but one thing I know is that this kind of journalism is not helping anyone. It is just like everywhere: we tend to get emotional about stuff which doesn&#x27;t help us to find a solution. It just makes people dislike each other.