It&#x27;s really hard to define what&#x27;s good&#x2F;productive and what is not (apart from choosing optimization function, there&#x27;s so many unknowns, like e.g. speeding up technological progress could be leading to our quicker extinction).<p>So if I look at this frustrated guy rewriting app from one JS framework to another, and some other one being happy looking at some pictures of sheep, I&#x27;m really not able to tell which one is spending his time &quot;better&quot;.<p>Of course there&#x27;s also this thing that for one person exploring depths of some computer game may be very exciting and worth spending time, while somebody else may not get his dopamine unless he creates something new. Everything seems to suggest that the there are more consumers than creators out there &lt;insert education system rant here&gt;<p>But what I actually wanted to point out, is that when you look at human history, it seems to me, that even when spending a lot of time watching cats, average Joe is able and is doing a lot more of meaningful stuff today than he was able in the past. Again, meaningful is hard to define, but I mean there&#x27;s more opportunity to do something that no one has ever done before. More niches and small global communities. Less time spent on dull repetitive tasks (yes, I think it does still hold true if you include China).