There is no strawman. This is the claim that you&#x27;ve made:<p>&quot;The opposite, though, happens all the time.&quot;<p>The original claim is &#x27;police break into houses and no one calls local gang&#x2F;NCAAP&#x2F;#BLM&#x2F;ACORN&#x2F;other black orgs.&#x27; The opposite claim is therefore that &#x27;&quot;local gang&#x2F;NCAAP&#x2F;#BLM&#x2F;ACORN&#x2F;other black orgs&quot; break into houses and people call the police&#x27;. I&#x27;ve conceded that local gangs may break into houses, and now I&#x27;m asking you to justify the assertion that &quot;NCAAP&#x2F;#BLM&#x2F;ACORN&#x2F;other black orgs&quot; (it&#x27;s NAACP, BTW) break into houses. Do you have sources  that show that people operating under the NCAAP&#x2F;#BLM banner actually break into houses? If you don&#x27;t have information that suggests that, why do you make such an offhanded claim?<p>How is this trolling? How is this not a good faith argument? My distillation of your claims is that &quot;blacks commit crimes, so black special interest groups must also be bastions of criminality.&quot; If that&#x27;s not your point, then what is?