Just because people construe the post that way doesn&#x27;t mean they&#x27;re right. Truth is not democratic.<p>You can make any title more accurate by making it longer and more specific, but picking a good title is a trade off against other things as well. A charitable reader would not necessarily insist on the narrow interpretation of Python the language you insist on.<p>And your title is not more accurate, because it&#x27;s not just the existence of certain libraries, it&#x27;s also the way they can be easily glued together and incrementally improved. Compare this to say Java, where you&#x27;d have to use JNI to use those same libraries, which is much more cumbersome to the point that most people prefer to write everything in Java.<p>&gt; People want to see others say good things about their favourite <i>language</i><p>To be honest I only think this only describes people that enjoy internet debates on programming languages. If what you are interested in is getting work done, you don&#x27;t care about the merits of a particular tool in isolation but about end results. Hypothetically, you could find the &quot;perfect&quot; language but if it doesn&#x27;t have users or libraries, it&#x27;s of no use, and therefore the insistence of discussing only this or that language is pointless.