Hi there, thanks for the response.  I actually don&#x27;t mind the title--I&#x27;ve certainly been guilty of trying to increase my audience with a catchy title.  I think the main reason I posted my comment was that even after reading your whole post, I still came away with &quot;the 100-hour rule&quot; sticking in my head pretty prominently.  I think if I had written the article and chosen that title I would have tried to make people come away with a much stronger feeling about the fallacy of thinking about it in terms of &quot;n hours&quot; and more in terms of just deliberate focused effort.