You&#x27;ve basically nailed it - the evidence is anecdotal and, coming from a keto echo-chamber, is obviously subject to confirmation bias. Therefore, these findings cannot be trusted as statistically significant.<p>By the same measure, we could argue smoking cigarettes is a reasonable, even healthful thing to do (on a slight tangent: exactly that was suggested by doctors in the 50&#x27;s and 60&#x27;s) - after all, we all know heavy smokers who haven&#x27;t dropped dead, but on the contrary seem alive and thriving.<p>I&#x27;m glad it worked for you, but have you also fairly and objectively evaluated a plant-based, high-carb, low-fat diet? I think only then can the two be compared without bias, at least as I see it.<p>Regarding NuSI - I could write many paragraphs about the organization. If you have some time, please do check out these critical, detailed videos: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;plantpositive.com&#x2F;warning-signs-nusi-guys-1&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;plantpositive.com&#x2F;warning-signs-nusi-guys-1&#x2F;</a> and let me know what you think.