Some quibbling here in the comments about whether Pike uses the right definition of &quot;simple&quot;. There is of course a context to Pike&#x27;s notion of the word:<p>&gt; The key point here is our programmers are Googlers [...] They’re not capable of understanding a brilliant language    but we want to use them to build good software. So, the language that we give them has to be easy for them to understand and easy to adopt.<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;channel9.msdn.com&#x2F;Events&#x2F;Lang-NEXT&#x2F;Lang-NEXT-2014&#x2F;From-Parallel-to-Concurrent" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;channel9.msdn.com&#x2F;Events&#x2F;Lang-NEXT&#x2F;Lang-NEXT-2014&#x2F;Fro...</a>