I&#x27;m more frustrated that there wasn&#x27;t a clear editorial take in the article. I&#x27;d like to have seen some research done by the journalist into what the correct ethics are in a situation like this.  My feeling is that without the option to have euthanasia (should things get worse) you are promising a tiny tiny chance of a possible cure but a large chance of increased suffering too.<p>The tiny chance of 40 more years of life <i>might</i> be worth it but its crazy to try experimental treatments as a first roll of the dice!