The point is that people with such senses find it utterly obvious that they do, while those without are incredulous - and demanding proof - that they do. Such proof is hard to satisfactorily address (as elaborated on in the Wells story), seems needlessly overwrought to those being tested, and all too often is nonetheless dismissed anyway by those without.<p>If you haven&#x27;t read the Wells story, it may behoove you to do so before criticizing my post further. The point is largely addressed. And sorry if the word &quot;insane&quot; bothered you; seems a proper use given that the implication is she&#x27;s claiming a &quot;power&quot; which others here are disputing (if she doesn&#x27;t have it, seems the term applies).