That sounds right to me. The first few sentences of the article, talking about &quot;picking numbers at random&quot; without fixing any sort of probability distributions for those numbers, or even labeling those distributions as P1 P2 and so on, raised enough red flags that I stopped reading.<p>Whether or not the the conclusion of this article is correct (and my intuition still screams &quot;not a chance&quot;), the argument is hand-wavey enough that it doesn&#x27;t reply to the objection raised here.