The Sikorsky S-97 is the perfect emblem of what I mean by <i>the myth of technological progress.</i><p>The Super Tucano A-29B:<p>•Has a greater range, at 800nm vs. 320nm, much more for the Tucano with one pilot and the extra fuel tank, with an even greater difference if the Raider flies at top speed. (Yes, I know, it&#x27;s easier to refuel a helicopter.)<p>•Is currently in proven service in CAS roles in COIN operations with 23,000 combat hours vs. the S-97&#x27;s zero combat hours, which only flew its first demonstration flight in 2015.<p>•Costs far less at $9 million per unit with almost no development cost vs. a government projected program cost of $200 million and a unit cost of $15 million at full production. Defense analysts expect this to rise to $30 million a unit and $500 million in development costs.<p>•A low-flying CAS helicopter is a great idea, unless of course you&#x27;re flying in thin air in the Hindu Kush, or your opponent has the ability to down such aircraft. Ask the Soviets how that worked out...<p>But the totally unproven S-97 incorporates new technology, which requires R&amp;D thus inviting the procurement bonanza, so it beats out the combat-tested Super Tucano in the GAO procurement arena every time.<p>There&#x27;s a reason JSOC wants the A-29B.