Ah, I didn&#x27;t see that there was a table. I was eyeballing it and did a pretty bad job. I meant to go up to that peak a bit after the 94 marker. Not the point really, though. The point is that there&#x27;s a visibly larger difference in the first few years compared to the last one, if we ignore one giant dip in each, which seems as though they&#x27;re an external effect. But I really don&#x27;t have a strong stance about the interpretation except to say that &#x27;you can read it in multiple ways depending on how you do it&#x27;.