Clojure wins on readability as well as writability. The easiest way it does that is by drastically reducing the amount of code you <i>have to</i> write for whatever random thing you&#x27;d otherwise do in Java. It opens the door even further for additional savings compared to other languages in a similar place like Python or Ruby by providing macros.<p>Freedom from the Kingdom of Nouns alone gives you a big win in readability. Naming things is hard, and when the thing you care about isn&#x27;t the Class but the Method then bothering to name a wrapper Class is additional overhead, an extra &quot;what is this in my code?&quot; that you need to make room for in your brain -- additionally it&#x27;s common practice in Java world to put that Class in its own file all by itself, often in a totally different namespace, and often physically far away from where it&#x27;s actually used when looking at the files on the filesystem, which further increases the cognitive load of knowing where your code lives. IDEs in the land of Java are helpful only because they are necessary because without them the cognitive load is just too much for any reasonably complicated project.<p>Freedom from mandatory static typing of the sort Java has saves you from pointless class wrappers, pointless POJOs that must have names and live in their own files and namespaces, you are free to just use maps of keywords to values. Free to work with the data directly rather than an ad-hoc aliasing scheme that might decide to hide things you need or surprise you with nulls. When you want protocol or interface adherence, it is there for you, but it is not mandatory for everything.<p>Maintaining Clojure is easier because there&#x27;s less of it. A new hire can be pointed to your code of n files and told to spend a week reading and playing in the REPL, versus pointed to n<i>2 files and told to spend a month reading and inserting breakpoints here and there to understand all the chaotic flows across what and where. You have a legitimate shot at picking 10 random Clojure files out of the project and understanding a bit about the data flows in them in relationship to the project as a whole, but in Java you&#x27;re going to need a lot more context, especially if you get unlucky and pick out 10 MyCustomException classes. What is there in Clojure can be very dense, but it can be apparent in code review when you went too far, and then it&#x27;s easy to refactor and you don&#x27;t need any auto-refactor tools. You just substitute expressions, add comments, and name only what needs to be named, you can do it all without constantly needing to restart your program because (unless you&#x27;re using JRebel) you added a function here or changed a parameter there.<p>Java is good for risk-averse corporations -- a single average Dev on an average size team can&#x27;t do very much, many corporate programmers average around 1000-2000 lines of code </i>per year* even with their IDEs helping them, and because of that they can cheaply be replaced or moved to another part of the project.