Of course, it&#x27;s a good movie, so no jerky-cam.<p>Jerky-cam <i>may</i> have once been a stylistic decision, but nowadays is done to give the illusion of excitement and action without having to actually provide the action, which is way easier for the movie studio. A frequent &quot;jerky-cam&quot; complaint I hear is that people don&#x27;t know what&#x27;s going on, they don&#x27;t know who is fighting who, where it&#x27;s happening, who&#x27;s winning... and the reason for that is that there <i>is</i> no location where it is occurring, there <i>are</i> no spatial relationships between the combatants, and the action of the fight does not produce a &quot;winning&quot; or &quot;losing&quot;. If you de-jerk the jerky cam, what turns out to be under the jerkiness is just cinematic mush.<p>I&#x27;m not trying to be sarcastic or cynical, I mean that descriptively. Get a modern jerky-cam action scene into something like VLC or mplayer and step through it at 20% speed. Seriously, it&#x27;s worth doing once, if it&#x27;s easy for you to acquire the video, as an exercise in media appreciation and education. What you&#x27;ll find is almost certainly what I&#x27;m describing, there&#x27;s no &quot;there&quot; there. It&#x27;s not that you&#x27;re &quot;too old&quot; or slow to follow it, it&#x27;s that there&#x27;s <i>nothing to follow</i>.