If you prove that those who thought HTML should be exclusively for semantics and not visual appearance &quot;lost&quot; by linking to a history of HTML that was last updated in 1998 it makes it seem as if you missed HTML5 when great pains have been taken to <i>remove</i> visual styling information from HTML in place of semantic markers.<p>In fact most of the web developers I speak with regularly agree. The consensus in recent years is that HTML <i>is</i> supposed to be exclusively semantic and markup should be styled with CSS.<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.csszengarden.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.csszengarden.com&#x2F;</a> is this concept taken to an extreme. Same HTML, same semantics, different styling.