dear correspondents,   thank you all for your various comments. much as i would like to engage with you all i fear i cannot. i am in poor health and have short life expectation.
i would like to make some general comments. first, science is a serious professional activity, too important to be discussed in a trivial or superficial manner.  if you want to join the debate, please read both my papers of 2014. a search engine should find them with jones alzheimer&#x27;s 2014 allergy. i cannot help it if you find them too hard to follow. i see it as my job to provide new conclusions from known facts and not to give seminars.
second, open access cost me good money, in excess of £1000; quite a sum for a pensioner.
third, i cannot deal with the many misunderstandings of my work. i never suggested that acetyl cystein is an antidote for Alzheimer [ad]. neither do i accept the findings of stewart et al [1997], whose paper i criticised with good reason in the first of my 2014 papers.
fourth, paracetamol is a wholly UNTESTED drug, and for that reason needs special attention. there have been a number of reports of the harm it does to the unborn child. i would like to provide references but my home was raided while i was in hospital in the summer and ALL my notes were stolen. i have never come across a similar incident, which gives some idea of the trenchant opposition to my work.
fifth, someone aks why there has been no news coverage? because i am totally isolated here. my emails are read, my mail is often impounded, the telephone is tapped and at least one room is bugged. this is a big operation thought to be on behalf of a huge drug company to keep the whole thing under wraps.
thank you for your interest, compliments of the season, sincerely, robert jones.........