So.... if the problem here is one of education. Why didn&#x27;t this article quote the relevant safety guidelines (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.faa.gov&#x2F;uas&#x2F;model_aircraft&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.faa.gov&#x2F;uas&#x2F;model_aircraft&#x2F;</a>) or link to the FAA&#x27;s information campaign (<a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;knowbeforeyoufly.org&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;knowbeforeyoufly.org&#x2F;</a>)?:<p>The operator violated the &#x27;400 ft ceiling&#x27; guideline and the &#x27;remain well clear of manned aircraft&#x27; guideline, and so could face civil penalties from the FAA.<p>I would guess that if the operator&#x27;s behavior was malicious or caused active harm, it would also be possible to be charged under other laws (e.g. manslaughter).