Maybe I&#x27;m wrong, but last time I checked, Telegram is not entirely &quot;open source&quot;. The core part of the service is secret.
Which kind of voids the whole &#x27;open source&#x27; argument and actually makes this whole project doubly sneaky..<p>Also, open source does not automatically imply high quality or immunity from criticism.<p>In this particular case, when people can be arrested or even executed for what they say (in some countries), this kind of code can be plain dangerous.<p>Even if their intentions are absolutely pristine and they really want to do good in the world (which I hope they are) - a bit more diligence about the quality of the stuff you&#x27;re sharing never hurts.