That may be. But when he invokes the 99% he has veered into incomprehensibility. His anecdote has literally nothing to do with the daily issues faced by 99% of startups, and more to the point, seems oblivious to the fact that nearly all of them will fail and return no money or equity sale to anyone, hater-fucking notwithstanding.<p>I sort of understand the general message of self-confidence, but calling it the 99% renders it highly confusing.