&gt; So income tax is the only just form of taxation? What about consumption tax? Property tax?<p>I didn&#x27;t specify income tax, but &#x27;earned&#x27;.  This would include a variety of taxes, including capital gains, income, etc.  To be fair to the situation, this type of donation would likely trigger capital gains, but if the foundation set up is a 501c3, then they would be (possibly?) exempt -- as it seems to be an LLC, there doesn&#x27;t seem to be a tax dodge here at all.<p>FWIW, I wasn&#x27;t disputing whether any taxes were just or not; rather, disputing the notion that society is being robbed as a result of non-taxed earnings being withheld.  As society has determined that is kosher, then there is no theft.<p>Personally, I consider income tax to be one of the least just forms of taxes, but that did not bear on my argument at all.<p>&gt; Are you saying he&#x27;s donating after tax income? Or are you saying that it&#x27;s like he never had income in the first place because he donated it before it became income?<p>To be honest, it&#x27;s still a bit ambiguous.  If he&#x27;s holding shares for now, he&#x27;s paying capital gains on the shares that he holds -- to my knowledge, there&#x27;s no way to earmark that money for charitable tax exemption without actually donating it, and in the short term, Zuck has stated that he won&#x27;t be giving it all away immediately.  Either way, if we accept the premises that society has chosen tax exemption for charitable contributions is something that society wants, and that he&#x27;s paying taxes on his current earnings until he gives those shares&#x2F;moneys away, he isn&#x27;t robbing anyone of anything.<p>&gt; I was arguing against the OP&#x27;s example of taxation as theft, not against the possibility of charitable giving tax deductions.<p>I won&#x27;t go as far as to say that taxation is theft, but as I alluded to earlier, I lean that way on income tax.  Regardless, I don&#x27;t think that&#x27;s really the point of the argument here.  Regardless of whether or not tax <i>is</i> theft, Zuck is still paying his taxes. Any portion of income or potential income he gives away to charity is not theft from society because society has stated it hasn&#x27;t via tax code.<p>In the counter-hypothetical that guntar made though, wherein Zuckerberg pays the full taxes owed on his earnings and incomes, and yet is still not entitled to do what he wants with his post-tax money, hence the state must be entitled to it?  That would <i>definitely</i> be theft, in my opinion.