The two infographic images attached to the article completely failed to elucidate.<p>Two red dots, and some blue and green squares, followed by a blue and green pie chart.  This is followed by the same two red dots with more blue squares.<p>It sort of reminds me of the occasional articles you see about particularly egregious elementary school support materials.  <i>If Suzie muttonates half her mickmackles, how many glomploots will Bobby need for the spimbliz?</i>  <i>Wakalixes make it go!</i><p>The point was that you shouldn&#x27;t divvy up equity based on work already completed, because that split does not represent the division of labor in the work that is still necessary to get to a viable product.  Here&#x27;s how I would illustrate that:<p>Image 1: A person in a red shirt holds a red apple.  A person in a green shirt holds a green apple.<p>Image 2: A bushel basket holds 18 red apples and 2 green apples.<p>Image 3: An apple-pie chart made from the very first bushel represents an equity split of 90% to redguy and 10% to greenguy.<p>Image 4: A wider shot of their orchard shows two trees with red apples on it, and 8 trees with green apples, still to be harvested.