While I&#x27;m not opposed to the notion of &quot;consensual communication&quot;, your food analogy raises a question for me. With food, you can examine it pre-eating and have a pretty good idea of what it is and what&#x27;s likely to be in it. How do you propose to determine what words you will or won&#x27;t allow someone to &quot;shovel into your brain&quot; without allowing them access first?