That&#x27;s very interesting! I haven&#x27;t seen that specific (and horrifying) criticism.<p>What I&#x27;ve seen was from Christopher Hitchens, who said that she wasn&#x27;t a &quot;good&quot; person because her primary motivation was to proselytize, as she believed Jesus instructed her to do.<p>My comment was creating an analogy between those two: Dan Price doing something awesome for his employees because of a lawsuit is something like Mother Theresa serving the poor because she believed it was how she would have a good afterlife.<p>I don&#x27;t know if either of those motivations are true. It&#x27;s impossible to know someone&#x27;s motivations with certainty. That&#x27;s why I think an action and its consequences are the thing to focus on.<p>If it&#x27;s true, as the article says, that Dan Price is creating the cult of Dan Price (a do-gooder-CEO kind of thing), great! Even if he&#x27;s just some narcissist who wants people to love him, I&#x27;m happy that another wealthy person is pursuing some form of humanitarianism. All the really &quot;good&quot; people might be narcissists, for all we know!