&gt;&quot;<i>You shouldn&#x27;t discriminate people based on religion</i>&quot;<p>Of course, I agree. But a discussion of it really isn&#x27;t that simple. For one, people are already being discriminated on based on religion in the US on a massive scale, and it&#x27;s codified in the law via tax-breaks for religious institutions. It&#x27;s just not so clear when you&#x27;re on the right side of the fence (i.e. a non-athiest). Not saying you should discriminate on religion, but to use the word &quot;obvious&quot; would be hypocritical as we aren&#x27;t calling out the <i>current</i> leaders for religious discrimination. How about we use Trump&#x27;s wrong viewpoints to spawn some discussion about making some changes to existing discriminatory policies?<p>&gt;&quot;<i>It will affect exclusively innocent people, because terrorists are smart enough to lie on a simple yes&#x2F;no question. Do I need to keep going?</i>&quot;<p>But your comments&#x2F;observations as above are exactly what the thread needed when I came to it, to spawn some discussion. Was just pointing out that the thread at that point was really all about &quot;attack Trump&quot;.