You have good point here.<p>The person I choose to believe is the one who talks about radiation balance and p-values and confidence intevals. Then I expect to see peer revieve publication and some peer revieved confirmation. It&#x27;s also possible to establish somekind of authority to conduct meta-study. This works nicely in medical field.<p>Someone talking about &quot;99%&quot; of scientists is just  distracting. Link the IPCC document and call it a day.