I certainly agree that notation is important. However, what I&#x27;m talking about is tweaks at the smallest scale—just the glyph or glyphs you use to represent a single symbol. I don&#x27;t think there&#x27;s that much value deviating from ASCII characters or character-pairs in order to use a more mathy glyph.<p>I&#x27;m a fan of most of the other math notation programming languages use: parentheses for grouping, infix operators, function call syntax, etc.<p>I think there is a <i>lot</i> of room to improve the visual display of code, but I don&#x27;t think much of it is as the token level.