Applause to the Zuck for the public commitment to invest 99% of his fortune in charitable causes.<p>Providing cheap, reliable internet to underserved areas of the planet seems like an achievable goal. Much of the technology is present, and so this goal can be attacked now given available funding. The technology should improve further and become cheaper in the near horizon. Go for it Zuck. Make a dent.<p>&quot;Curing disease&quot;, however, or &quot;learning and experiencing 100x more than we do today&quot; - these trite and nebulous platitudes seem line lines stolen from HBO&#x27;s Silicon Valley script. &quot;Eradicating polio&quot; is a concrete, well-scoped, measurable, and realistic goal (regardless of whether its is the best apportioning of resources). &quot;Curing disease&quot; is not. Does someone who&#x27;s married to a doctor really believe that all disease is eradicable in the next 100 years? Must we resort to impossible moonshots and unqualified invocations like &quot;Make the world a better place!&quot;? Something like &quot;colonize space!&quot; is not a helpful goal; &quot;build a habitation on Mars which produces enough food, water, and O2 to sustain 5 people for a year&quot; begins to be.<p>This pedestrian rallying cry is a chaotic amalgam of cliches. I hope Zuckerberg puts more thought, organization, and direction into how he will invest his billions for the betterment of posterity.