How is it misstated? That is what he is saying.<p>Not all who believe in evolution is limited to such a reductionist point of view. Just as evolution is an emergent phenomenon that can&#x27;t be understood by a reduction to physics, I don&#x27;t think all social phenomenon can be reduced to manifestations of evolutionary forces. That we have sex more for pleasure than for reproduction and that homosexuality is ever more accepted* are simple examples of that. There are many more.<p>-<p>*I wouldn&#x27;t be surprised if the genes behind homosexuality are more prevalent than before. If true, how would that bake your evolutionist noodle?<p>`