The one thing that confuses me is that he plans to &quot;give up 99% of his personal Facebook Shares&quot;--but the assumption is that the money would go to &quot;NON PROFITS.&quot; But they are going to an investment vehicle, where he can invest in profit-based businesses.<p>So what does it matter, if this investment vehicle never funnels the money back to Zuck. I.e. it just takes any profits it generates and re-invests in whatever it wants. That&#x27;s all you wanna do anyway when you have that much money--make things happen, create things, be a mover and shaker.<p>I&#x27;m not saying I would do any different myself--I&#x27;m just saying the whole PR angle here is retarded, even more so with Zuck&#x27;s clarification. It&#x27;s framed as if the money is ALL going to non-profits, but in reality it&#x27;s going to whatever Zuck wants it to go to. Which is likely the same place any extremely wealthy person would put it to: progress. With the only difference being that it won&#x27;t be used for him to live lavishly. Though the LLC could just fund another business idea of his that he is allowed to funnel profits from.<p>In short, his 1% of all that money is basically a billion dollars, right. or $450,000 million at his current valuation. But lets just call it a billion cuz presumably it will be that one day in the not too distant future. CONCLUSION: he has designated $1 Billion to lavish living and $99 Billion to progress--and in doing so hoodwinked us all into thinking in some way it won&#x27;t be used for his grand vision of progress, but rather the non-profit world&#x27;s vision for it.<p>I personally think Zuck&#x27;s a sharp guy (when it comes to executing various mechanics)--I much rather know the money will be put towards executing his vision. I don&#x27;t know why he felt the need to manipulate us all (he&#x27;s clearly not so smart in social&#x2F;emotional things).