But the people who are supposed to define what&#x27;s good for the reader are the editors. They show the system what they think is good by either reverting edits or not, so by saying &quot;this edit is likely to be reverted&quot;, the AI is saying &quot;based on input from all editors, this edit may not be good for the users&quot;.<p>Effectively, those are the same thing, unless you want to create a hard definition of &quot;good for the users&quot;. But that&#x27;s going around the editors, and taking their opinion of &quot;good&quot; out of the equation, which IMO is a very bad idea.