There&#x27;s a stark difference between a free and voluntary association of like-minded people and a so-called &quot;safe space&quot;, which uses a pretext of &quot;victimization&quot; to capriciously thought control others who simply committed the offense of disagreeing or criticizing.  If you hate Christianity, why would you go to this school?  If you aren&#x27;t willing to follow behavioral rules, why would you go to this school?  If you think philosophy should only be secular, then why would you go to this school?  Schools like this generally make no secret of their expectations for students and faculty.<p><i>If you say anything negative about the religion or its teachings, you are kicked out.</i><p>Really?  Citation please; I simply don&#x27;t believe this.  Most Christian universities that I have any knowledge of invite (or at least aren&#x27;t averse to it) tough discussion, and allow for a pretty wide range of critical thought about interpretations of the Bible, how Christianity should relate to politics, culture, science, and many other subjects.<p><i>Until a few years ago, you could major in something that amounted to being a &#x27;preacher&#x27;s wife&#x27; (I can&#x27;t remember the name of the major, but that was its goal).</i><p>And this is evidence of what, exactly?<p>&quot;Safe-spaces&quot;, on the other hand, are cudgels of fear, handed to anyone claiming &quot;victimization&quot; to be capriciously used against people with whom they simply disagree and want to shut up.  The reason they&#x27;re even a thing is because school administrators themselves are beholden to the same fear.  That&#x27;s not at all like free association.