I think a start would be to have a truly impartial legal consultation system that jurors could avail themselves of at any point. The responses would be given with a minimum of contextual information about the case necessary to answer the question.<p>In practice, the judge is supposed to serve this role, no? But I think it&#x27;s readily apparent from the variances in judge activism that judges are people too. In hearing all the details about the case they can&#x27;t help but form an opinion and are in a position to act on that opinion to varying degrees should they so choose.