A charitable interpretation would suggest that you can replace &quot;the coat is red&quot; with &quot;we see the coat as red&quot; or &quot;the coat reflects mostly in the 620-750 nm spectrum&quot; depending on the context (whether the subject is psychological perception or physical properties).<p>But certainly it seems to be a theme with these &quot;logical&quot; languages, to embed questionable philosophical assumptions that don&#x27;t hold up under more careful analysis...