I&#x27;m pretty surprised that his work stands up as not infringement after Shepard Fairey and the AP. It seems that his work was much more transformative than what Prince is doing here, and yet he lost. I can&#x27;t help but feel that the real argument Prince has here is the money to pay better lawyers than the people he &quot;borrows&quot; his work from. I think the result would be different if he was snagging AP photos.<p>Also, I&#x27;m not sure whether this applies specifically to Prince, but this clause in the instagram policy would seem to suggest that Prince is at least violating Instagram&#x27;s policy:<p><pre><code>  The Service contains content owned or licensed by Instagram (&quot;Instagram Content&quot;). Instagram Content is protected by copyright, trademark, patent, trade secret and other laws, and, as between you and Instagram, Instagram owns and retains all rights in the Instagram Content and the Service. You will not remove, alter or conceal any copyright, trademark, service mark or other proprietary rights notices incorporated in or accompanying the Instagram Content and you will not reproduce, modify, adapt, prepare derivative works based on, perform, display, publish, distribute, transmit, broadcast, sell, license or otherwise exploit the Instagram Content.</code></pre>