Who gets to decide what&#x27;s a morally acceptable way to become injured and what isn&#x27;t? If the 80 year old has turned their life around at 65, and has been mentoring at-youth kids, do we still reject them for their earlier mistakes? Should we give it to a 25 year old who injured himself playing hockey, despite that being a high-risk activity as well?<p>If there <i>is</i> a scarcity and we <i>can&#x27;t</i> heal everyone, those choices have to be made, but my original context was that the answer is that we <i>can</i> afford to help everyone. In that situation, I don&#x27;t think there&#x27;s an ethical reason to not help everyone.