Point-by-point responses &quot;in-line&quot; is just just the type of engagement I&#x27;d expect from a &quot;business&quot; type.<p>It&#x27;s a style of small-minded nit-picking that shows a desire to defeat a conflicting point of view at all cost, by pulling at threads, without really engaging in the debate at hand.<p>It is quite a lot of effort to reassemble any relevant points and so to respond in less disrespectful fashion.<p>I won&#x27;t be doing that, but I will respond on your single position that the parent post has &quot;no evidence&quot; for their postulation, and that it&#x27;s &quot;just wishful thinking&quot;. TFA was entirely in such a vein (a fanciful pipe dream), and your arguments in support are but notional, based on a wished for outcome that would suit yourself.