Not so much an objection, but more of a line of inquiry on tactics. Why try to make something illegal? Why not make something legal? Like instead of &#x27;No Plastic&#x27;, bonus for Plastic01 and 02. Plastic, like guns and cars and markets, are inherently useful. It is the production, use, and misuse that is the problem.<p>On a legislative level, I feel it is a mistake to always use the limitation of action as an agent for change. Any time there is a problem, people demand a law be made, and Law makers make some action punishable or unavailable. In some cases, this makes sense (drinking and driving), at least initially. But on balance, drinking and driving opens up so many areas for innovation and profit <i>when you factor in self driving vehicles and on demand car services</i>. The problem is going to be how long it will take to alter the Open Container laws. It is hard to undo legislation in my country (USA). I wish people would think to create motivators for desired behavior instead of consequences for undesired behavior.