&quot;and the (im)morality is no different.&quot;<p>Morality is relative, but I don&#x27;t understand your views on it. If a society is rich enough to give a good life to all their members, is it immoral to do it?<p>What about keeping a big part of the population afraid of how are they going to pay the rent tomorrow so you have cheap and available workers? is that moral? specially when we live in the richest societies of history?<p>People that believe in the overwhelmed goodness of markets should investigate a little more history. For instance:
the ten hours bill in the UK (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Factories_Act_1847" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Factories_Act_1847</a>) and how the &quot;laissez faire&quot; crow of the time opposed to &quot;restrict the working hours of women and young persons (13-18) in textile mills to 10 hours per day&quot; because its immorality.