I haven&#x27;t read the paper&#x2F;books but from the wiki article I find it problematic that &quot;the code is red&quot; is replaced with &quot;we see the coat as red&quot;. Specifically if I were forced to use E&#x27; it would be very hard to argue certain philosophical positions. Objectivism vs. Subjectivism for example or to return to the coat...there could be a philosophical difference between the redness of the coat and the perception of it and not everyone wants to bundle those.
Due to this reason I find it rather curious that identity was picked as one of the troublesome uses. Identity seems like one of the most important uses of is for me.<p>Without thinking about it too deeply, formal logic would probably also be rather funky.