While the conclusion -- co-founders should get equal shares -- seems generally reasonable to me, in a sense it&#x27;s just punting the question.  In the following cases<p><pre><code>    I started work­ing n months be­fore my co-founder
    I started work­ing full time n months be­fore my co-founder
    I brought on my co-founder after rais­ing n thou­sands of dol­lars
    I brought on my co-founder after launch­ing my MVP
</code></pre>
how do you decide if a company has two co-founders or one founder and one early employee?