I realize this conversation is going nowhere since you decide to interpret things in ways that fit your argument just to fight, which is why I said you&#x27;re just word-playing. I will go ahead and answer but you will probably disagree anyway: I didn&#x27;t say I&#x27;m ok with them implementing Instapaper, and I definitely never said Instapaper is more popular. Go back and read again. I just pointed out how picking a single 3rd party service--NOT developed by Mozilla--and promoting it to the entire user base when there&#x27;s a whole industry of read-it-later service ecosystem out there is a &quot;non-trivial&quot; issue, just like you even wrote. Therefore it would have been the same if they implemented Instapaper only, just like they did with Pocket only. And like you admitted, it is a &quot;non trivial&quot; feature, and in my book, when a feature is shipped and it&#x27;s non-trivial, it was &quot;pushed hard&quot;. This is again where you decide to disagree based on your own definition of &quot;pushed hard&quot;. Your interpretation of &quot;push&quot; is intentionally narrow to only fit your interest. The original commenter and I simply pointed out how a non trivial feature like this was &quot;promoted&quot; (pushed) to users in an unusual way. Any decision to highlight a 3rd party product inside your main product (such as Firefox featuring Yahoo or Google as main home page) is a big deal, and just like how I would consider FF implementing Yahoo as homepage &quot;pushing hard&quot;, I consider Pocket bookmarklet incident &quot;pushing hard&quot;. You probably know what I&#x27;m trying to say but are just arguing based on semantics of these words.