I do not support either candidate (and honestly think the 2 party system is a bit shit), but I would like to point out the fact that she failed to disclose&#x2F;provide, and basically deleted data that was requested by a court of law (some of which they later retrieved since it seems she didn&#x27;t actually zero the memory).<p>She&#x27;s clearly not accountable to the same set of rules that others (maybe just people who aren&#x27;t rich enough to deftly use&#x2F;manipulate the system) live by in the US. Maybe it&#x27;s just afforded to former first ladies, that might be the case too.<p>Unless I&#x27;m sorely mistaken:<p>1. A court requested a private mail server from her<p>2. She deleted&#x2F;modified stuff on it, then gave it to them<p>3. She&#x27;s not in jail<p>Given 1 and 2, I would normally expect 3 to not be the case (in short, I would expect her to be in jail).