In this case that you seem to support the skepticism is based on<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Argument_from_ignorance#Argument_from_self-knowing_.28auto-epistemic.29" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Argument_from_ignorance#Argume...</a><p>&quot;If P were true then I would know it; in fact I do not know it; therefore P cannot be true.&quot;<p>For example, it&#x27;s not that Einstein in 1905 made Newton&#x27;s formulas from around 1700 unusable, quite the opposite, for a lot of purposes they are still used: it&#x27;s just that for the very high speeds they need adjustment factors and more complicated math to express what&#x27;s going on. The expected improvement in the science certainly won&#x27;t make &quot;everything we know wrong.&quot; Such formulations are just spammy  titles. There will be only refinements.<p>For the current state, see:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=10693784" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=10693784</a>