&gt; Please keep the discourse at a higher level and on-topic. Thanks.<p>How is pointing out the difference in how the article visually represents the figures not on-topic? It seems very on-topic to me. Furthermore, highlighting an unflattering, possibly biased difference <i>against</i> Ballmer, is actually <i>in favor</i> of him in my opinion. I read the OP comment as pointing out how the article may be biased against Ballmer.<p>&gt; Internet cattiness has become this mainstream thing and its inexcusable. This is HN not PerezHilton.com.<p>To me, you&#x27;re the one being &quot;catty&quot; for no reason at all. This is definitely HN alright.