&#x27;Couldn&#x27;t articulate&#x27; vs &#x27;didn&#x27;t articulate&#x27; are two different things.<p>The tooling, documentation, frameworks, libraries, and runtimes are all there if you want to use them in Clojure, too. So that&#x27;s not a point in Java&#x27;s favor, just the JVM&#x27;s favor.<p>It is quite possible to write reasonably readable, terse, correct Java programs. I rarely ever see them in the wild though; what I&#x27;ve mostly seen are klugey Spring or JavaEE based monstrosities that are horribly inefficient, and prone to hard to debug concurrency issues.<p>The average results seen with the language -is- a consideration; while it&#x27;s hardly scientific (the teams choosing Java tend to be from all walks, and disproportionately from large enterprise teams where no one gets any real say in the matter, that&#x27;s just the common denominator that management has allowed; the teams choosing, say, Clojure, tend to be smaller and made of good developers who are intellectually curious, and have found themselves in places they can make that decision, so obviously the average for the latter will likely be better), it&#x27;s still a consideration. If you&#x27;ve written in a wide range of languages, you&#x27;ve -seen- this in yourself; what the language makes easy vs what it makes hard influences how you do things.