That one also appears in the llog posts if you follow the links: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu&#x2F;nll&#x2F;?p=478" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu&#x2F;nll&#x2F;?p=478</a><p>As far as I can tell, their critique is correct in that the research Brooks cites isn&#x27;t enough to support the claims that he wants to make.