No, what blows my fucking mind is that the environmental conversation switched from concrete short term problems (pollution) to abstract long term problems (global warming). One is really easy for laymen to reason, the other is nearly impossible. It makes as much sense as the Bible to atheists. It&#x27;s not about evidence. Modern environmentalists put down the gun and brought a hot dog to the gun fight.<p>You have hard evidence in the form of visible undeniable toxic pollution occurring in China due to rampant and unchecked fossil fuel usage. This is not data extrapolated decades out—it&#x27;s happening right now! Instead of using this as evidence to justify current &quot;stringent&quot; environmental regulations in the West and why we should continue them, you have people still talking about melting glaciers and rising ocean temperatures.<p>Shifting the conversation back to pollution and renewable energy achieves the same result: stopping catastrophic climate change. And it&#x27;ll get us there faster than the current Bible-thumping message.