How do they describe something that&#x27;s working spectacularly well as, &quot;broken&quot;. Sure, maybe it&#x27;s not optimal or has some problems. But, broken? Really?<p>But I do like what they&#x27;re doing. Extending the option period makes perfect sense. I think they might have gone a bit far on the value sample. I think current % ownership + internal&#x2F;external valuation should be sufficient.