Sure, but the work that the entire internet based the claim on until now was in fact not a proof at all. Which is the main point, for me at least.<p>Isn&#x27;t it strange that Wikipedia, some CS professors and many, many other places didn&#x27;t even take the time to look at the &quot;proof&quot; before announcing the &quot;fact&quot; that CSS was turing complete? I like my proofs a little more proofed than that :)<p>&#x2F;Jonas