&quot;Consider: open tooling drives user device adoption&quot;<p>Citation needed. Given that most of the device adoption that&#x27;s already taken place was with seriously-expensive closed-source tools that aren&#x27;t exactly paragons of UX quality, I think this is assuming a LOT.<p>My guess is that the quality of the tools (and I&#x27;m handwaving &quot;open&quot; into &quot;higher quality&quot; which is not guaranteed) is a distant concern compared to lots of things: device capabilities, power envelope, $&#x2F;10k, IP library, and many more take precedence.