It probably doesn&#x27;t, since it has a &quot;direct financial benefit&quot; from the content (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Online_Copyright_Infringement_Liability_Limitation_Act#Safe_harbor_provision_for_online_storage_-_.C2.A7_512.28c.29" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Online_Copyright_Infringement_...</a>)<p>However, if it refunds all the money from the infringing class and removes the video promptly, maybe it can successfully argue that it is not gaining financially from the infringing content?