But rights depend upon &#x27;personal sentiment or arbitrary morals&#x27; all the time. Who I rent out my upstairs room to - I&#x27;ll decide. Which clubs I join; what movie theatres I frequent. And these things have economic&#x2F;social impact beyond me - the theatre will close if it doesn&#x27;t show movies acceptable to a large enough population etc.<p>So we argue about &#x27;privilege&#x27; like that can make a difference. Its at root, the majority vs minorities. The game will always be slanted toward the majority, because free market etc.<p>I&#x27;m in favor of peaceful coexistence, and treating everyone fairly. But I&#x27;m only one. The market (there are markets even in non-commercial&#x2F;social transactions) will dominate the game.<p>I&#x27;d be more interested in following the dialog, if there was one. We have folks making up rules on every side; inventing new words and theories and constructs. And shouting down folks from other viewpoints. Its all designed to impede real dialog.