If you&#x27;d like to read how they are misinterpreting islam, here is the longer version in the book : <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.amazon.com&#x2F;No-god-but-God-Evolution&#x2F;dp&#x2F;1400062136" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.amazon.com&#x2F;No-god-but-God-Evolution&#x2F;dp&#x2F;1400062136</a><p>the gist is, They are interpreting things literally without any history and context of what a verse of Quran meant and revealed for, one would argue that should have been fine, but it isn&#x27;t because it reduces islam to their interpretation.<p>Arabic is a very diverse language, with tens of meanings for a word (often contradictory) and which one you pick and choose depends upon what type of a person you are, if you are a hate mongering terrorist, you would find those meanings to justify your terror like isis is doing, if you are a peace loving feminist, you would find plenty to justify that (using the same verses). This would mean that their interpretation would depend alot on their socio economic status, the kind of society they live in, the world view they have etc.<p>People often judge islam by the norms of 6th century arabia, Islam has a evolutionary process in place called ijtihad, which the intolerant people don&#x27;t seem to use. But if you would have to judge islam, you would have to either assume yourself to be in 6th century to see why they were relevant at that time, or to remove them so to understand the general direction islam gives.