Every debate takes place under a constraint of limited information; if you do not wish to base the argument on what may be anecdotal or flawed data, it would be advisable to debate the principle of safe spaces.  Which is to say, that it may be more productive for you to ask or answer the questions &#x27;are safe spaces moral if we assume a perfect implementation (as described by the proponent)?&#x27;, and &#x27;what conditions are required for a good safe space, or what makes a safe space bad?&#x27;.