&gt; The existence of people like Jessica is not just something the mainstream media needs to learn to acknowledge, but something feminists need to learn to acknowledge as well. There are successful women who don&#x27;t like to fight. Which means if the public conversation about women consists of fighting, their voices will be silenced.<p>And therein lies the problem. Professional feminists are extremely vocal radicals that do not represent the majority of women. Their statistics and talking points tend to be universally unsound and inflammatory, and they are at this point more accurately described as a racist and sexist hate group.<p>So the question is, why are they deemed the authority on so many issues in the mainstream media? Why does PG even acknowledge their nonsensical demands, or try to engage with them to defend Jessica?<p>Anyone who has lived a day on this planet understands that empirical reality is immutable, and ideologies cannot alter them. So when feminists for example, state matter-of-factly that &quot;biology is a social construct&quot;, why are they allowed to continue speaking nonsense? Meanwhile, brilliant academics who debunk feminist propaganda like Helena Cronin [1] are nowhere to be found in the media.<p>Perhaps women like Jessica Livingston and Helena Cronin need to take an active stance against radical feminists, and not dignify their accusations with a response other than: &quot;please educate yourself before attempting to open a dialogue regarding these issues.&quot;<p>AKA: Do not feed the trolls.<p>1. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;edge.org&#x2F;conversation&#x2F;helena_cronin-getting-human-nature-right" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;edge.org&#x2F;conversation&#x2F;helena_cronin-getting-human-na...</a>