Yes, and that link goes on to say &quot;The operating budget does not include $7.1 million in scholarships for student athletes, which also are funded by the general fund.&quot;<p>Which agrees with the numbers I quoted.<p>&gt; and that is not clearly stated directly on the table<p>Is this the table which ends with &quot;Source: 2010-2014 NCAA Financial Reports&quot; and the link to the methodology which says &quot;detailing athletics spending between 2010 and 2014&quot;, and where each university is hyperlinked to a scorecard (like <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;projects.huffingtonpost.com&#x2F;projects&#x2F;ncaa&#x2F;subsidy-scorecards&#x2F;eastern-michigan-university" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;projects.huffingtonpost.com&#x2F;projects&#x2F;ncaa&#x2F;subsidy-sco...</a> ) which says &quot;Total subsidy income, 2010 - 2014&quot;?<p>And where the subsidy is given in percentages, so the time period doesn&#x27;t really make much of a difference? And further linked to the primary documents for each year?<p>And you are suspicious because .. why? What would have made you not suspicious? Because as far as I can tell, the only reason for your doubt is that you chose a methodology (look at a headline from a Google search), assumed they did the same one, and compared the two without checking to see if it was a meaningful comparison.