What are you talking about? Where does he say it&#x27;s acceptable to kill innocents? It&#x27;s obviously never, so why not point out that France has no clean slate? Just that it happened 70 years ago (other events like the Greenpeace bomb are much more recent) doesn&#x27;t make it right. You can&#x27;t just say just because France was attacked two days ago now they&#x27;re suddenly holy.<p>The attacks on France were despicable, as were the actions of France in the past. As were many actions of many if not most of the countries currently in existance. Countries usually are wrought from blood.<p>But it&#x27;s not the blood of countries that is spilt, it&#x27;s the blood of civilians, individual human beings whose part in the operations of the countries is indirect at best. That doesn&#x27;t mean the people should not be held accountable for the actions of their elected governments, I think they definitely should. I think it&#x27;s perfectly acceptable to be angry at the average frenchmen for their indifference at the Greenpeace bombing, as it is acceptable to be angry at them for taking part in the bombing of IS targets in Syria. But no one in their right mind is suggesting that children at a concert should suffer horrific death for it..