Why is this a &quot;service&quot; and not a standalone app for AppleTV&#x2F;Chromecast&#x2F;Webkit TV&#x27;s?
Giving a 3rd party access to your github even to list the repo&#x27;s isn&#x27;t something that many companies will do lightly, not to mention that many companies might self host git or use an alternative service.<p>Also the site could really use some information about what the hell does the app do exactly, it shows pull requests that i can get, but some information about the process, and what features they have to actually facilitate it might actually be well useful for some one that wants to figure out if this is even worth evaluating.<p>I really don&#x27;t get all these &quot;app&quot; sites lately, they pretty much only tease you in the hopes you&#x27;ll bit and if you&#x27;ve invested more time in testing them out than you would normally want too you&#x27;ll stick with them.<p>What happened to online-demos, couple of hour of video and actual manual and whitepapers being available? I really pity analysts and ISM guys these days that need to do some market research to find products that might meet their needs.<p>[EDIT]
It looks like they require R&#x2F;W access to everything, including code, settings, and deployment keys, GL getting that approved at any organization past the incubator phase that cares even slightly about security and or compliance.
While they admit that this is excessive and is mainly due to limitations on GitHub&#x27;s side (I&#x27;m not familiar enough with how permissions work on Github outside of their enterprise integrated SSO auth), but still seems that this is something that they should&#x27;ve solved using middleware or anything other solution that gives their customers actual control over what they could do with their repo.
R&#x2F;W access to code and deploy keys will simply not fly in any regulated sector.