I&#x27;m not dave, but the comment seems to point at the fact that alcohol is a much more destructive substance, on a national scale, than the substances covered on Erowid.  Given the phrasing of the sentence, I don&#x27;t think he is out of line.  It would be charitable to say that the phrasing was wrong.  The paragraph breaks the audience of the website into two sets: those who are &quot;unfazed by strangeness&quot;, or <i>toxicologists</i> and <i>E.R.</i> doctors.  Anybody familiar with media coverage of bitcoin or tor should immediately recognize the template.