Where does Mohammed condemn actions of this sort? Does it matter what the scholars say when the &#x27;perfect&#x27; copy of the Koran written before time in Allah&#x27;s heaven says that Mohammed&#x27;s followed should slay unbelievers wherever they are found? Even if you want to argue that was only for a specific time (those verses however are, I understand, non-abrogated).<p>If it was morally proper then surely it is also proper now.<p>The only way around this I see is for the scholars to say Mohammed was wrong. Mohammed was wrong to lead his followers to kill, rape, plunder and enslave. Mohammed being wrong doing these things would allow them to remain consistent saying those who purport to follow him are also wrong in doing those things. However it undermines central tenets of Islam to say any of that was wrong.<p>Is it not entirely incompatible with peace for the founder of a religion to be a warlord who justified his killing with his &#x27;revelations&#x27;.