This is your human anti-algorithm bias showing. When it is more subjective that doesn&#x27;t mean that algorithm still cannot do a better job than human. :-) You have just assumed that it can&#x27;t, because you don&#x27;t know how to measure it. In other words, it&#x27;s an argument from ignorance (which is not surprising - AfI is often used to justify unwarranted beliefs).<p>It&#x27;s actually quite possible that algorithms learns the actual preferences of some person better than the person himself; for example, due to exponential discounting of future, person may make hiring decision based on immediate impression and discount other warning signals, which is going to be wrong in the long run.<p>(Downvoters, can you please explain yourself? Maybe we can have an interesting discussion. Thanks.)