So I think you&#x27;re mixing up my two points. A reverse split destroys the stock object, reducing the total number of shares but the proportional value remains the same. We both agree on this (per my previous comment).<p>Destroy can be used in both ways because language is context sensitive and the definition is somewhat broad. You can destroy value through dilution by getting less than you give. Example: If my company is fairly worth $100 and I own two shares and you own one, you own $33 worth of value. I can then issue my friend bob another share because he gave me a great lunch recommendation and I thought it was a big morale boost, something I can do because you don&#x27;t have a covenant in place. My company is still worth $100, you now own one of 4 shares and only $25 worth of value. I have now destroyed $8 worth of your value. It&#x27;s an ownership shift relative to the company, but a value destruction relative to you.