&gt; My current comment had nothing to do with the superiority of systemd...<p>Agreed. I never said otherwise.<p>&gt; Please do not take an attempt to get people to try out a cool Linux desktop and make it into a systemd vs openrc war.<p>I did no such thing. If I had had other examples of your habit of making statements about the technical superiority of a particular thing, then either failing to back them up with concrete examples or walking back your assertions with the statement &quot;Oh, well the technical side of that doesn&#x27;t even matter to me anyway.&quot;, then I would have used them. :)<p>It&#x27;s a pity that you mis-read my request for technical details about the technical merits of Fedora&#x27;s new SAT-solver based package manager dependency resolver as a commentary on the state of Linux init systems.<p>&gt; ...you are take a fairly innocuous statement like...<p>Context is everything, friend. :)<p>To the remainder of your comment:<p>* If you&#x27;re not familiar with other examples of a given class of software, then you&#x27;re <i>not qualified</i> to make unqualified statements that a particular instance of that class of software does something better than all the rest.<p>* Microsoft&#x27;s Office Open XML format is an ISO standard. That doesn&#x27;t mean that it is any good or that the process that standardized it is without flaw. :)