&gt;<i>This is an insanely bad idea. I understand where you&#x27;re coming from, but think about how that would play out in real life.</i><p>Make it a sane number, and it&#x27;s not gonna play that bad at all. The only problem would be them claiming &quot;if I had more allowable targets I would have caught this or that case before it happened&quot; etc. Which we should just ignore.<p>After all, before they got these modern toys, they used to be content with 1&#x2F;1000000 the available targeting that they have now.<p>In the seventies and eighties even, to target somebody involved lots of people actually in the streets, a semi-manual process to record his phonecalls (and you had to go through them with a real person, no keyword triggering etc), no &quot;web&quot; and other records automatically available etc. Checking half or all of the US at once at the scale we do today was not an option, not even 1&#x2F;100000 that. You could ask for phone records and a couple other items at best.