What you are calling &quot;evidence&quot;, I am calling an unfounded assertion. You insist that polls aren&#x27;t&#x2F;can&#x27;t be valid indicators of public preference, and you don&#x27;t have hard data regarding the preference &quot;in reality&quot; for being able to speed over government surveillance. It&#x27;s not that I don&#x27;t &quot;like&quot; your evidence, it&#x27;s that you haven&#x27;t presented any.<p>Then, still without evidence or justification, you imply that others are out of touch with reality for not seeing things from your point of view. (&quot;Sorry you had to find out this way.&quot;; &quot;I am not so out of touch...&quot;) How delightful. Perhaps you&#x27;d be more persuasive if you actually demonstrated how the current state of surveillance reflects public opinion and desires rather than just declaring that as self-evident.