I get the point, but as I mentioned it all comes down to how the system works.<p>Svven for example puts together people tweeting same links. Tweeting, not liking. Two tweets containing same link can have very different and often contradictory messages.<p>To give a practical example, some of you probably noticed PG&#x27;s controversial tweet about unions (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;paulg&#x2F;status&#x2F;663456748494127104" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;paulg&#x2F;status&#x2F;663456748494127104</a>), and also the reply that took double the likes of that (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;MarkAmesExiled&#x2F;status&#x2F;663495439069614080" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;MarkAmesExiled&#x2F;status&#x2F;663495439069614080</a>). 
Because the reply contained the link to PG&#x27;s tweet, in Svven you can see all sides of this story around the same link.