Changing stations, fair point, but to the tampons question, I think it is fair to cast the same question as &quot;Why are there no urinals in the women&#x27;s restroom?&quot;<p>Could there be some people who would choose to use the women&#x27;s restroom and still have the ability to use a urinal? I would say yes.<p>Would the vast majority of people benefit who use that room? I would say no.<p>It appears to me to be simple an economical thought which drives these decisions, not some sort of vicious gender discrimination.<p>I think its perfectly reasonable to deride those looking to maintain the status quo for no reason, but this seems to me an overblown problem on both sides of the argument.