The data should speak for themselves. Unfortunately people who don&#x27;t know statistics think they can&#x27;t, because as we found out from emails, the data were &quot;manipulated&quot; via statistical methods: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Climatic_Research_Unit_email_controversy" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Climatic_Research_Unit_email_c...</a> Honestly I&#x27;d rather we press scientists of all sorts for all their source code and modeling tool configurations including the raw data that hasn&#x27;t been post-processed to hell in an &quot;acceptable&quot; way (recalling that the statistics involved in generating p-values were &quot;acceptable&quot; for psych journals until recently).