Whenever I read an article like this, with factual errors and inaccuracies in the details (eg no modern car sold today has a carburetor), I wonder how believable the big picture ideas presented in the article are?<p>Does the author have any idea what he is talking about? Did he just make a small mistake when trying to add details to his ideas, or does the lack of subject matter knowledge reveal the writer&#x27;s cluelessness?