i feel your comment is unnecessarily dismissive toward a healthy skepticism<p>if you can be the arbiter of said education then i&#x27;d suggest you educate wellyWellyWell, wWW, about Bell&#x27;s Inequality and its innate response to wWW&#x27;s comment<p>if i were to guess why you brought up Bell i&#x27;d guess it was because you read wWW&#x27;s comment as suggesting classical mechanics can explain superposition with a robust enough measurement, but that Bell shows that classical mechanics are are too &#x27;silly&#x27; to explain quantum mechanics?<p>i find that science as a verb often is the act of discovering previous understandings were inadequate to describe phenomena, yet pedantry is more often used to squelch skepticism stead stoke the flame of investigation