What evidence do you have for ONT having better fidelity than Illumina in any application? Illumina&#x27;s error rates are typically &lt;= 1% while on &quot;good&quot; reads ONT has error rates cited at 15% and overall is even worse[1]. I agree that PacBio is better for genome assembly, but for many cases we do not need to do assembly. Resequencing workflows with alignment and variant calling are pretty good.<p>1. <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sciencedirect.com&#x2F;science&#x2F;article&#x2F;pii&#x2F;S2214753515000224" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sciencedirect.com&#x2F;science&#x2F;article&#x2F;pii&#x2F;S2214753515...</a>