The problem is you&#x27;re not making the case for DRM, you&#x27;re just making the case for copyright.<p>Laws against circumventing DRM have a simple fatal flaw: If the DRM is strong enough to prevent a given user from circumventing it then you don&#x27;t need a law to prohibit it, but if it isn&#x27;t then it still isn&#x27;t any easier to get the user for circumventing the DRM than it is for the underlying copyright infringement. The law is utterly useless for its stated purpose.<p>But it still causes all kinds of grief for innocent people when companies abuse it for things other than its intended purpose.