The US Supreme Court, on a number of occasions. The case law is just full of outrageous stupidity, such as <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Bennis_v._Michigan" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Bennis_v._Michigan</a> in the USSC ruled that a woman&#x27;s car could be seized due to her husband&#x27;s offence that was outside her control.<p>The whole history of in rem actions is bonkers, as cases have titles like <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;United_States_v._Article_Consisting_of_50,000_Cardboard_Boxes_More_or_Less,_Each_Containing_One_Pair_of_Clacker_Balls" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;United_States_v._Article_Consi...</a>