&gt; Please don&#x27;t conflate issues with scientific backing (antibiotic abuse) with unscientific fearmongering (GMOs).<p>GMOs are only unscientific fearmongering until some kind of a heretofore invisible link is found.<p>Now I&#x27;m not suggesting that one <i>will</i> be found, but to say that you <i>know</i> there isn&#x27;t one is the height of arrogance.  There are a great many things that science has known that have been later overturned.<p>For example, Semmelweis beat Pasteur to the punch by a solid 10 years but he died basically in disgrace because the medical community chose to ignore him.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Ignaz_Semmelweis" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Ignaz_Semmelweis</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Louis_Pasteur" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Louis_Pasteur</a><p>I&#x27;d love to provide another dozen examples but I don&#x27;t have a handy list to show you.  Rest assured that if science could be wrong at least once it&#x27;s within the realm of possibility that it could be wrong again.  There&#x27;s definitely no law of the universe that prevents science from making a mistake or two along the way to knowledge.