The tone is nice but I don&#x27;t think he is right about the science of it. For example he talks about how more data should be gathered about this but climate change has been in the public eye for more than a decade now so there&#x27;s tons of data on it so this sort of hedging of the bets isn&#x27;t necessary anymore.<p>This paragraph is a good example of the problem here:
&gt; However I think those of us with rational, logical minds might have reservations about a group of scientists who can be so sure that the earth is warming and that human activities are the definite cause of it.<p>This person is probably a computer scientist and yet they don&#x27;t trust a &quot;group of scientists&quot; which I am assuming by context to be climate scientists, who are literally the experts in the field he is talking about