Is this a proof?<p>Western philosophy, so far, succeed in separating these concepts as being <i>a priory</i> which is perfectly reasonable, considering that any sensory input which is subsequently used to train and condition our mind is coming <i>serialized</i> by out sense organ, so, for a mind, which is a result of conditioning by the senses, the notion of succession is <i>a priory</i>. Conditioning by shared physical environment gives us cycles, so the notion of a cycle is also <i>a priory</i>. Succession days into nights in the environment and ageing of other people&#x27;s bodies gives us notion of a continuous change. But change is not time.<p>Eastern philosophy (and modern cognitive neuroscience) would suggest that this <i>a priory</i> is related to our minds, not to photons or forces. So?