Hi these don&#x27;t offend me at all but I think they deserve a more thoughtful response than I am able to give at this moment. I&#x27;ll try to write a proper response during lunch today.<p>Ok I&#x27;ve got some time now for a brief response.<p>1. There are none. And where there are I try to push them. I don&#x27;t really see your example as a boundary issue. If other people malign or ridicule my beliefs it doesn&#x27;t really bother me except to feel sadness for those people.<p>2. Acts 17:11 says: Now these were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of the mind, examining the Scriptures daily, whether these things were so.<p>It&#x27;s out of context but basically its commending the Berean Jews for closely examining the teachings they were receiving from the apostles to verify that they were true. My faith demands rationality and my God is a rational God.<p>3. The Bible is not a science text book. The Bible is not a fairy tale either. I accept the bible as true understanding that it&#x27;s purpose is not to teach me about scientific phenomenon. The travesty to me about evolution and the big bang is not that it is or isn&#x27;t opposed to biblical teachings, it&#x27;s that it is such a huge distraction from the true message of my faith.<p>4. No. This is the one I&#x27;m most likely to get into an argument about because history itself is subject to manipulation and interpretation. Has the bible been used to nefarious purpose? Yes. Is the bible&#x27;s purpose nefarious? No.