No, it&#x27;s absurd because you&#x27;re stating a very hard-line <i>vow</i> over a single incident. If you had said &quot;I&#x27;m not going to buy from MAS when reasonable alternatives exist&quot;, that would be a reasonable stance to take. But instead you&#x27;re saying &quot;If an application is available only on the MAS, I will refuse to purchase it, no matter what the circumstances are&quot;. Even for applications that don&#x27;t provide mission-critical functionality (e.g. that you can tolerate breaking for one day).