<p><pre><code>    You seem to be implying ...
</code></pre>
Yes. A significant portion of discrimination is  invented, on the basis that women have a motive to do so.<p>Do you agree or disagree?<p><pre><code>   By that same logic ...
</code></pre>
First, that&#x27;s an orthogonal issue, why bring it up? Secondly, it&#x27;s false, because there are no corresponding incentives.<p><pre><code>   there&#x27;s plenty of data 
</code></pre>
Most of this data has been collected by people with massive and unresolved confirmation bias.<p><pre><code>   Feel free to offer some thoughtful analysis of the actual papers mentioned.
</code></pre>
Would it be worth my time? Can you give me any reason to believe that this isn&#x27;t standard issue gender studies material, with methodology so bad that Trofim Lysenko looks like a shining beacon of scientific probity in comparison? I have read enough of those. How, to raise but one point, do these papers deal with confirmation bias?