Your position seems to imply that &quot;bank robbery&quot; should not be a crime because banks are supposed to be secure, and it&#x27;s their own fault that there was a flaw in the system. I think that reasonable people can conclude that a system should be secure, there are things that &quot;shouldn&#x27;t&quot; be done, regardless of the security of the system. It&#x27;s not to say that &quot;outlaws&quot; won&#x27;t break the law, but that we view their actions as negative (even if in a perfect world their actions would be futile).