I don&#x27;t understand what you&#x27;re getting at but I&#x27;ll try to explain.<p>Fukuyama said that Capitalist Democracy was the pinnacle of civilisation.<p>In the same way Salafi &#x2F; Wahabbi ideology says that we must as much as possible live like the prophet and his contemporaries. Any innovation is derided as Bida&#x2F;Heretical.<p>So its not possible to reform certain laws in response to changing circumstances. Eg: Women can inherit only half of what men do. Now I&#x27;m not justifying this but this might have been pragmatic (socially acceptable??) for a time where women were subjugated and men were often the sole breadwinners for the entire family.<p>However in the 21st century noone can really argue that its relevant. But if anyone tries to reform laws such as these you&#x27;ll have the Wahabbis and Salafis going ape and branding everyone heretics.<p>There was a cleric in my part of the country who had a very unorthodox interpretation of the scriptures. He was a brilliant orator and a scholar who could hold his fort against the traditionalists. He began gaining a lot of followers however one day he just disappeared and was never found again.