It isn&#x27;t &quot;suddenly a problem now&quot;. Many of us said the exact same thing when T-Mobile announced their music plan. But we were drowned out by the excitement of people who didn&#x27;t seem to know any better.<p>It&#x27;s unpopular to say this but &quot;unlimited data&quot; is not necessarily a consumer-friendly policy. We talk about data caps like it&#x27;s a way to extort more money. But corporations have budgets they need to fill. If not data overages, they&#x27;d just raise your base plan pricing or add more fees. Unlimited data doesn&#x27;t really reduce how much consumers pay.<p>The difference... is how that money is distributed. For unlimited data plans, everyone pays the same. Which means the dude who torrents 50 gigs over 4G pays the same as my great aunt, who barely knows how to dial her phone. (But data plans are required for smartphones.)<p>Tiered data is the first step towards making people who use their service more, pay a larger share of the money that, let&#x27;s face it, our carrier is going to collect from us anyways. It&#x27;s just hard for many of us in the tech circle to accept that. Because we&#x27;re 1%ers. We use a disproportionately larger segment of data than everyone else. Should we pay more than people who barely use their phones? Absolutely.<p>I&#x27;m not saying carriers don&#x27;t overcharge, I&#x27;m not saying carriers don&#x27;t add a lot of unnecessary fees. I&#x27;m not saying we don&#x27;t have scary ISP monopolies in places where the government really should step in. But what I am saying is that metered data vs. unlimited data isn&#x27;t the fight we want to pretend it is. And &quot;unlimited data&quot; plans with their restrictions against hosting a server on wire lines or against tethering on wireless is distinctly opposed to the values of net neutrality. And setting aside what services are free to use and not free to use furthers that not net neutral goal.