It&#x27;s not intentional. Granted, it&#x27;s not like Mozilla itself decided that fmarier&#x27;s blog was the best place to put this, he just posted it because it&#x27;s his blog and he&#x27;s a smart person. :D<p>It&#x27;s actually consequence of a few things (including things I&#x27;m not aware of), like:<p>1. There is no one team dedicated to writing detailed technical documentation at the level you&#x27;re talking about, and it&#x27;s not required as part of submitting a patch.<p>2. The details about these implementations change often, making it harder to keep what documentation there is up-to-date.<p>3. Firefox is so friggin&#x27; big. It&#x27;d be a _ton_ of documentation that most users (read: not developers) wouldn&#x27;t care about.<p>We have a wiki, but it&#x27;s more useful to contributors and staff than it is to the general public: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wiki.mozilla.org" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wiki.mozilla.org</a><p>We have MDN (which is also basically a wiki), which is more user-facing in terms of it&#x27;s content, and it has <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;developer.mozilla.org&#x2F;en-US&#x2F;Firefox&#x2F;Privacy&#x2F;Tracking_Protection" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;developer.mozilla.org&#x2F;en-US&#x2F;Firefox&#x2F;Privacy&#x2F;Tracking...</a>, but that doesn&#x27;t go into detail like this post.<p>It&#x27;s tough.