I do have to say, my experience with Apple News has been very nice. These apps seem to affect publishers more than the &#x27;open web&#x27; and at that they are little more than nice RSS readers that don&#x27;t ruin your experience with ads even though there are still ads there.<p>I don&#x27;t particularly see anything wrong with separating publishers from content producers. It now seems more appropriate to think of news magazines and traditional &#x27;publishers&#x27; as content producers who rely on the new &#x27;publishers&#x27; a la Facebook, Apple, Twitter to distribute their content because they cannot and should not be focused on building an enormous infrastructure to do this.<p>Print media is &#x27;open&#x27; in that anyone can print something and distribute it but the ability to do so effectively has pretty much been consolidated into the hands of very few for a long time. Now a days you can publish your own music, your own books, and your own news and its popularity will be determined by the masses, not some worn out talent scout trying to please a boss who is using focus groups to figure out what might make him a buck.<p>Ultimately I think we will see a more open and democratic future for publishing, not the death of the open web. Control is shifting hands to a new set of publishers, one that puts the visibility of content into the hands of the readers in the form of likes and tweets.<p>Maybe the news produced by these traditional outlets just doesn&#x27;t have as much value as it once did. That is what likely scares them in my mind.