So we have two things, X and Y. What happens now is that those get bound together into a single bill, (X, Y), which then gets collectively voted on.<p>Your proposal seems to be to instead maintain them as separate bills, (X) and (Y), which are still collectively voted on?<p>If I understood it correctly, that distinction makes little difference since the line-item veto was introduced. It would provide better conceptual separation and to allow multiple bill titles; that&#x27;s about it. It would basically be the equivalent of introducing modules or namespaces into legislation.