&gt; My point is a conjecture that the purpose of the OP was to remind enemies of Israel<p>Wait, you think aburan28 posted this on Hacker News to remind enemies of Israel? What exactly makes you think enemies of Israel read hacker news?<p>&gt; Again, have had to know the old story, which I assumed nearly everyone at HN would, to understand my first post.<p>You do realize that the entire point of this article is to tell people the story? Your post added exactly zero.<p>&gt; I just tried to make an interesting post. I hurt no one. But I&#x27;ve been attacked -- lost about 30 points here.<p>You did not make an interesting post. You used a lot of words to say the same thing as the article, only in an impossible to understand way.<p>&gt; Got to write for the highly sensitive HN audience or will be attacked.<p>You were not attacked. Your post just made so little sense people downvoted it as essentially the ravings of a madman.<p>Your post STILL makes no sense. You are repeating the story, without adding anything except to claim aburan28 has some obscure reason for posting it. It&#x27;s far more likely aburan28 simply found it interesting, and that&#x27;s it.<p>&gt; Never tell anyone anything.<p>Yah. You didn&#x27;t.<p>Next time you want to say something, just say it. Don&#x27;t write &quot;If you have to ask, you won&#x27;t really understand it!&quot; because quite frankly writing that makes you sound like a nutcase. It does not make you sound like &quot;someone in the know&quot; it makes you sound like a lunatic.<p>No one has any desire whatsoever to try to decipher obscure writings, there are so very many things to read online, no one will spend more than a microsecond on your post if you deliberately make it hard to read. Your writings are not some important historical work that people will study.<p>To quote Isaac Asimov: “I made up my mind long ago to follow one cardinal rule in all my writing—to be clear. I have given up all thought of writing poetically or symbolically or experimentally, or in any of the other modes that might (if I were good enough) get me a Pulitzer prize. I would write merely clearly and in this way establish a warm relationship between myself and my readers, and the professional critics—Well, they can do whatever they wish.”