Not the parent, but I agree with Julia types being more natural for many purposes.<p>It&#x27;s far easier to create new Julia types for modeling a new domain than Python classes. Genrally, types are much more succinct to declare than classes. They&#x27;re also type checked and parameterized which allow you to do some rather nice things with an API design that would require a lot of if&#x2F;else behavior checking in Python classes.<p>The separation of implementation and data declarations via multiple dispatch makes a large assortment of problems much easier to solve. For example, it&#x27;s much easier to extend the built in behavior of default Julia types such as dictionaries by adding your own custom method (often on line of code) which is incredibly useful for short data processing script.<p>There isn&#x27;t as much web focus in Julia currently, but once the implementation makes it easier to possibly &quot;pre compile&quot; an executable I think there could be a big boom in usage for web engines.<p>I&#x27;m on a mobile device currently and can&#x27;t really write out more explicit details. Maybe later I can write out a lab example.