Thanks for the tips, r&#x2F;AskPhilosophy has a lot of discussion on the topic. I am also interested to know why you seem to prefer Moral Realism.<p>&gt; As such, to claim that &quot;there is no objective morality&quot; as axiomatic, is to end an argument before it has begun<p>I don&#x27;t take that as axiomatic actually, unlike scientific research where we have an objective, consistent universe to compare against, moral objectivity seems to either come from group consensus (which doesn&#x27;t guarantee correctness) or at an extreme moral naturalism which has fairly horrible implications[1]. Without an objective, consistent source, how would we get objective, consistent morals?<p>[1] slatestarcodex.com&#x2F;2014&#x2F;07&#x2F;30&#x2F;meditations-on-moloch&#x2F;