No one doubts that the open web is a good thing. But no where in your entire post do you address the apparent upside of Internet.org: people who wouldn&#x27;t be able to afford or access the Internet can access at least some parts of it. I think at that point the argument against Internet.org isn&#x27;t as black and white. You can make an argument that in the <i>long run</i> it might be a bad thing but you have to acknowledge that at least in the near term it is providing some benefit.