It&#x27;s a common feature. IIRC, in Cisco WLC land the feature is referred to as active rogue containment:<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cisco.com&#x2F;c&#x2F;en&#x2F;us&#x2F;support&#x2F;docs&#x2F;wireless-mobility&#x2F;wireless-lan-wlan&#x2F;70987-rogue-detect.html#Determination" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cisco.com&#x2F;c&#x2F;en&#x2F;us&#x2F;support&#x2F;docs&#x2F;wireless-mobility&#x2F;...</a><p>As someone who has experienced the fallout firsthand from a neighboring tenant in a downtown Seattle office building who used it, I&#x27;d challenge the idea that there are valid reasons to do this.<p>If you control the physical network - don&#x27;t allow rogue APs on your network.<p>If you control the client and care about them connecting to access points that aren&#x27;t under your control, then manage that instead.