That&#x27;s the trademark side of the case, and yes, In N Out could probably successfully argue that usage of their logo implies endorsement and&#x2F;or is likely to create consumer confusion and that it&#x27;s therefore a trademark violation. That&#x27;s pretty easy for DoorDash to put to rest; just stop putting In N Out&#x27;s logo on the site. A few good, highly-visible disclaimers would probably put any remainder of a trademark claim to rest.<p>A modified menu would be tougher. You can argue that there may be copyright infringement, and that may be valid to a limited extent, but DoorDash could put up a version of the menu that wasn&#x27;t copyrighted, as its heart, menus are factual arrangements, and facts are not original creative works subject to copyright (though a specific arrangement of those facts may be). In N Out could also claim that there&#x27;s trademark infringement if DoorDash is using trademarked food names, but I think it&#x27;d be a harder argument to win, since DoorDash can argue it&#x27;s a nominative use.<p>IANAL.