&gt; The issue is that speech is now being suppressed in higher education settings -- a place where (otherwise lawful) offense is expected to be tolerated -- by students who don&#x27;t respond to offense with the sort of counterargument you&#x27;re proposing. Instead, they are making demands for resignation or other forms of retribution, and these are starting to bear fruit.<p>Yeah, there&#x27;s not much point in continuing this discussion. I don&#x27;t see how you can in one sentence claim that &quot;(otherwise lawful) offense&quot; should be tolerated, but in the next say that calls for resignations or retribution (like boycotts) shouldn&#x27;t be? Those aren&#x27;t normally unlawful. Isn&#x27;t that literally &quot;lawful offence except those I disagree with like calls for resignation&quot;?