That&#x27;s a low standard for the government to meet. &quot;Preponderance of the evidence&quot; means that the government doesn&#x27;t need to prove the property is subject to forfeiture, just show that 50% of the evidence indicates that it could be. (guy in car from out of state at night, guy fits the profile of something, road is a &quot;drug corridor&quot;, guy had alot of cash, guy was speeding)<p>It&#x27;s hard to convict you of a crime for driving around with a envelope stuffed with a lot of cash. But&#x27;s it&#x27;s easy to demonstrate reasons why the cash <i>may</i> be used for nefarious purposes.