Using Bootstrap for a small 5-page site is like taking a cruise ship for a canoe ride.<p>It&#x27;s not that hard to build really lightweight HTML and then just only write the CSS you need. I specialize in taking sites and making them responsive, and the first thing I do is go in there and get rid of all the classes extra tags everywhere clogging up the works.<p>With tools like Bootstrap you end up using bloated, heavy HTML to get a few mediocre responsive breakpoints, but it&#x27;s no comparison to a properly responsive page.<p>Here&#x27;s some button and input styles in a single-file HTML5 app: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;staticresource.com&#x2F;encode" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;staticresource.com&#x2F;encode</a><p>Here&#x27;s a set of responsive content blocks where the breakpoints are measured based on the width of the block, not the browser: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;staticresource.com&#x2F;block-styles.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;staticresource.com&#x2F;block-styles.html</a><p>Or check out the CSS of <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;elementqueries.com" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;elementqueries.com</a> to see how a simple, easy to read layout can be done with just a touch of CSS at the top of the page.<p>None of these use Bootstrap, and if I had even so much as linked to them, I&#x27;d be working against the defaults they bring in.<p>Here&#x27;s what I use as my &#x27;reset&#x27; that I bring in to every project, it&#x27;s a much smaller set of opinions and leaves me more free to just build what I want: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;gist.github.com&#x2F;tomhodgins&#x2F;c4988b9d9878763ae861" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;gist.github.com&#x2F;tomhodgins&#x2F;c4988b9d9878763ae861</a>