&gt;From what I recall, the result of the PACE trail was a bit of a farce. There were 3 categories of outcome for the patient: no change, better, or worse. Each of these categories contains roughly a third of the subjects. Despite such a glaring failure to produce a useful treatment, the PR spin focused on the third that got better, rather than the third of patients who got worse after the PACE treatment.<p>I&#x27;m not sure where you got that info. I just had a look at the 2011 and 2013 papers, and didn&#x27;t see that. You&#x27;re implying that treatment had no benefit, but that&#x27;s definitely <i>not</i> what they found. If you look at the results, you&#x27;ll see that CBT and GET did result in an improvement in the average scores of patients. It wasn&#x27;t a huge improvement, but it certainly was an improvement.