We really don&#x27;t need yet another license. What&#x27;s more, all those changes would probably result in a new license that is again incompatible with GPLv2. The fact is that the &quot;anti-tivoization&quot; clause is, for most free software projects, a smaller problem (if a problem at all) compared to the simple fact that the GPLv3 is incompatible with the GPLv2.
I fear there is simply no way of creating a &quot;new&quot; GPL license that is compatible with the GPLv2, short of adding an exception like MPLv2 does.