Fwiw, the significant energy usage list on OSX corresponds pretty poorly with real world results. Safari is the most efficient, and Firefox is actually slightly better than Chrome.<p>What does the OS X Activity Monitor’s “Energy Impact” actually measure? | Nicholas Nethercote
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.mozilla.org&#x2F;nnethercote&#x2F;2015&#x2F;08&#x2F;26&#x2F;what-does-the-os-x-activity-monitors-energy-impact-actually-measure&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.mozilla.org&#x2F;nnethercote&#x2F;2015&#x2F;08&#x2F;26&#x2F;what-does-th...</a><p>Chrome vs Safari vs Firefox web browser efficiency
<a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.getbatterybox.com&#x2F;which-browser-is-the-most-energy-efficient-chrome-vs-safari-vs-firefox&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.getbatterybox.com&#x2F;which-browser-is-the-most-ener...</a>