&gt;  I would argue that qualifying Tor as a group targeting world governments is a bit dramatic. That may be propagandist commentary on their part - they&#x27;re entitled to make it, and people still use Tor in spite of it - but isn&#x27;t the primary intention of Tor to preserve free speech and anonymity, and to offer protection from persecution (or prosecution) by nation-states that seek to quell dissent?<p>I don&#x27;t understand what you&#x27;re trying to say. Surely, if the primary intention of Tor is to protect users from persecution by nation-states, then their adversaries are world governments?