That&#x27;s a perfect example of a much better approach, exactly like I was talking about earlier.<p>There&#x27;s CPython, the main Python interpreter. It&#x27;s quite traditional in architecture, and is written in a very portable subset of C.<p>It&#x27;s the Python implementation that pretty much all Python developers and users happily and successfully use.<p>Then there are the experimental or niche Python implementations. They augment very specific and isolated use cases, instead of splintering and delaying the adoption of the language like the many failed partial Perl 6 implementations did.<p>It should be evident that the Python approach is better than the Perl approach. We&#x27;ve been able to use Python 3 in production for many years now, while Perl 6 still isn&#x27;t usable.