Go away. If you aren&#x27;t willing to read it yourself, your arguments are just the arguments of &quot;intentional unwillingness&quot; to even consider the original material I try all the time to discuss with you.  You ignore the primary holy books of Islam and ignore the history of Islam conquest, some 1400 years. What&#x27;s left? Your vain &quot;argument&quot; that not every Muslim blew himself up with the bomb belt already should prove that the religion isn&#x27;t violent? Not everybody has to blow himself up, just a percentage of young men willing to fight (and die) or just oppress is more than enough to make the permanent damage to this civilization (as proven through the history). They do the dirty work, the clerics will just rule. That just a few are enough, ask Malala<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Malala_Yousafzai" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Malala_Yousafzai</a><p>ask the victims of Boko Haram:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Boko_Haram" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Boko_Haram</a><p>It&#x27;s not something exclusive for this period in history, the motives, principles and methods can be traced through all the 1400 years of the existence of Muslim faith.