You&#x27;re just stating opinions. Why would that be interesting in this discussion? This is the Internet, there&#x27;s no lack of opinions. You haven&#x27;t responded with proper arguments to anyone is this thread, which seems to be consistent with your comment history. Maybe all those people you&#x27;re not responding to are also PC?<p>&gt; It seems that the actions of the terrorists allow for a fairly easy us vs them categorization.<p>Why? For you?<p>&gt; yet the terrorists all come from specific subset<p>What subset is that? Plenty of terrorism isn&#x27;t based on religion.<p>&gt; So there is some commonality between them [...]<p>And that is? Of course there&#x27;s some commonality, but you actually have to specify which and why to have an argument.<p>&gt; Ferguson doesn&#x27;t shy away from putting light on it<p>What part of his writing does that? The part I&#x27;ve read very much paints with broad strokes and doesn&#x27;t at all focus on &quot;the commonality of a specific subset of terrorists&quot;. As you would expect from a history professor.