I don&#x27;t get why it&#x27;s ok in this context (if you agree with the inherent unethicality of nonfree software) to have compatibility and support for interoperability with nonfree software. It might not purposefully lead someone to a less free situation, but when you&#x27;re speaking as absolutely as Stallman does, I don&#x27;t see how you can condone actions that may prolong someone&#x27;s lack of freedom. I&#x27;m genuinely confused by this - if there&#x27;s anyone who could lay this out without dogma and hyperbole I&#x27;d be much obliged.