Did you even read this before hitting the reply button?  No parallels whatsoever.<p>- The King David hotel is in Jerusalem.  Not in the UK.<p>- Warnings were given before the explosion.<p>- The hotel was housing the occupying British government, military and police.  This isn&#x27;t blindly targeting civilians in an attempt to terrorize the population.<p>There are a lot more details that make this very different.  This is not to say that the outcome was not terrible in cost of human lives or that the perpetrators aren&#x27;t responsible.  It&#x27;s just very different.<p>From the article: &quot;American author Thurston Clarke&#x27;s analysis of the bombing gave timings for calls and for the explosion, which he said took place at 12:37. He stated that as part of the Irgun plan, a sixteen-year-old recruit, Adina Hay (alias Tehia), was to make three warning calls before the attack. At 12:22 the first call was made, in both Hebrew and English, to a telephone operator on the hotel&#x27;s switchboard (the Secretariat and the military each had their own, separate, telephone exchanges). It was ignored.[5] At 12:27, the second warning call was made to the French Consulate adjacent to the hotel to the north-east. This second call was taken seriously, and staff went through the building opening windows and closing curtains to lessen the impact of the blast. At 12:31 a third and final warning call to the Palestine Post newspaper was made. The telephone operator called the Palestine Police CID to report the message. She then called the hotel switchboard. The hotel operator reported the threat to one of the hotel managers. This warning resulted in the discovery of the milk cans in the basement, but by then it was too late.[5]&quot;<p>...<p>&quot;Security analyst Bruce Hoffman has written that the hotel &quot;housed the nerve centre of British rule in Palestine&quot;.[13]&quot;<p>...<p>Security analyst Bruce Hoffman wrote of the bombing in his book Inside Terrorism that: &quot;Unlike many terrorist groups today, the Irgun&#x27;s strategy was not deliberately to target or wantonly harm civilians. At the same time, though, the claim of Begin and other apologists that warnings were issued cannot absolve either the group or its commander for the ninety-one people killed and forty-five others injured ... Indeed, whatever nonlethal intentions the Irgun might or might not have had, the fact remains that a tragedy of almost unparalleled magnitude was inflicted ... so that to this day the bombing remains one of the world&#x27;s single most lethal terrorist incidents of the twentieth century.&quot;[13]