So you are ok with contracting to do some work for someone, but instead of delivering the product that was asked for, you delay your client&#x27;s work, and then release a similar product of your own, taking the market away from them? You think it&#x27;s okay to do that because you (after the fact) consider your client to be a &quot;douchebag&quot;? Do you think that your ethical failings are somehow negated because you are a hacker, or because you meet &quot;people like them&quot; at some tech party? After all, according to you, they weren&#x27;t going anywhere anyway? I wonder if you would say all of that if it was you sitting with a fraction of Zuckerberg&#x27;s $40 billion. Would you say, &quot;Well he deserved it because he was a hacker and I was just an idea guy. Oh man, ideas are cheap.&quot; Seriously, W.T.F.<p>It&#x27;s not a matter of the Winklevosses being &quot;douchebags&quot;, or even &quot;just coming up with an idea&quot;, which is false anyway as they had already developed the code and wanted Zuckerberg to finish it. They <i>trusted</i> Zuckerberg to deliver a product. Instead he held them back, while making his own version of their work. He screwed them over plain and simple.