&gt;<i>It&#x27;s not an outside estimation, it&#x27;s based on dates written in the bible.</i><p>The 1759 BCE chronology is based on when archeology says the pyramids were finished. Which is very much an outside estimation -- someone who believes in the Bible can just sidestep it as an inaccurate estimation by archeologists.<p>In fact it&#x27;s even worse: there are no dates given in the Bible regarding that story. The 1532BCE number is ALSO an external estimation, based on when historians think who the Pharaohs mentioned was and when he lived. Again, someone who believes in the Bible can just sidestep it as an inaccurate estimation by those historians.<p>&gt;<i>You don&#x27;t get to believe in the bible and claim a significantly different date for this event.</i><p>You could very much do that too.<p>Even if there was a specific date mentioned in the Bible about the event and you wanted to reconcile that with a different date that archeology gives, you could just as well believe in the Bible as a collection of first person accounts written by various persons (from kings like Solomon and prophets like Isaiah to wealthy merchants and peasants) that naturally have small inaccuracies here and there.<p>Not everybody who believes in the Bible thinks it&#x27;s the perfect account as written down by God himself accurate to any single word (the Eastern Orthodox church, for one, doesn&#x27;t believe that at all).<p>&gt;<i>Carson&#x27;s position is simply illogical. Either he doesn&#x27;t know the bible well, or he disagrees with the estimated dates for the construction of the pyramids.</i><p>Actually there&#x27;s nothing illogical about disagreeing with the estimated dates for the construction of the pyramids. Heck, archeologists themselves disagree all the time in this or that chronology.<p>If you think you have a better source of information (the bible in this case) it&#x27;s perfectly rational to believe that over measly human estimations.