You describe your belief of the idea of internet.org really well - it&#x27;s the same one as most people have. The article spends half of itself describing how this idea is a myth. The article is saying that this Good Idea is, if you look at it, devoid of any humanitarian, charitable and not for profit motives.<p>It&#x27;s not that the article is missing empathy, it&#x27;s that the article describes how Internet.org is devoid of empathy.