Mormon religion is a case in point given the timeline of its emergence. 
It&#x27;s not clear what objective standard you have in mind, and whether any consensus can be reached on that purely through an exercise of argumentation where a lot of predispositions and other factors quite often lurk behind (it&#x27;s rampant even in sciences, more so probably in soft&#x2F;wet sciences: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nature.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;how-scientists-fool-themselves-and-how-they-can-stop-1.18517" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nature.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;how-scientists-fool-themselves-an...</a>).<p>That point reminds me though of a <i>particular set</i> of standards employed by an academic on that very topic: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.islamreligion.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;528&#x2F;viewall&#x2F;miraculous-quran&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.islamreligion.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;528&#x2F;viewall&#x2F;miraculous...</a>