I&#x27;ve been an Android user ever since 2011 and I also own iOS devices. Care to name &quot;popular apps on Android&quot; deciding to &quot;go off the reserve&quot; and that don&#x27;t work?<p>My first smartphone was actually an iPhone 3GS. Because of Apple&#x27;s walled garden, it couldn&#x27;t help me with a really simple and downright obvious task for a smartphone - blocking unwanted phone numbers from calling or texting me. People had to jailbreak their phones and install Cydia in order to do that. And because Apple caters to users instead of mobile careers, my iPhone could not tether my 3G connection either because Orange wasn&#x27;t allowing it without an extra $5 per month. Oh wait, I think I got that backwards. So another use-case for which my smartphone was completely unsuitable for.<p>Now I&#x27;ve got an iPhone 6s that I received as a gift (well, I&#x27;m blessed with friends that think I want Apple stuff just because I use a MacBook for work). And I find the restrictions to be as annoying as ever. Yesterday&#x27;s Firefox release for iOS reminded me of this very fact. On Android I&#x27;ve got the real Firefox and it can do extensions and it can innovate. For example I was blocking ads long before iOS 9, the very concept of ad blocking happening for Firefox first. Plus I use Firefox on my desktop so syncing is nice and I hate monocultures, like what WebKit has become. You see, I couldn&#x27;t give a crap about F.lux, but I do care about having Firefox, as it&#x27;s the open-source browser that saved the web and the browser that now keeps WebKit from taking over the whole market, like IExplorer 5 and 6 once did.<p>&gt; <i>I&#x27;ll take that over complete unfettered license to muck about in the operating system</i><p>I understand that, but this is were we disagree the most. In society people can be very evil, people can steal from you, can leave you without your job, people can hurt you and your family in myriads of ways. Yet we can cope with this uncertainty, as we&#x27;ve invented institutions that protect us in times of need, we came up with rules for interacting with society (e.g. the concept of <i>trust</i>), we do our part in educating our children to not be complete assholes and all of this usually works, in spite of having certain rights and freedoms, like the freedom of expression, the right to having property, or the right for privacy. People often forget about that last one of course, as we increasingly prefer to police our peers in the name of security, in spite of a lack of evidence that it leads to a more secure environment and often forgetting what it is like to live in a police state, though as somebody that grew up in an Eastern Europe country that was once a police state, trust me when I say that&#x27;s not nice.<p>But back to the point - personally, I consider any platform that rejects useful apps to be completely inappropriate, no matter the reasoning. And of course, Apple can do whatever they wish with <i>their property</i>, which is a fundamental right after all, but that doesn&#x27;t mean I can&#x27;t exercise my freedom of expression to bitch and moan about how much that sucks.