I&#x27;m not quite sure what the end-game is, here?<p>Several of the functions listed here are quite different from their Haskell counterparts in ways that make them subtly less useful — and in ways that make them not have the same types as the Haskell originals, which is interesting considering we&#x27;re barely given more than the type of each of the functions. flip and zipWith are the ones that were quite obvious to me, others might have the same problems (with flip being outright wrong due to it inverting all the arguments instead of flipping the first two, and zipWith working fine with two lists, but generalising to multiple lists in a way that can&#x27;t be a generalisation of the two-list zipWith). Composition also works in reverse to what one would expect in Haskell, for no reason I can fathom.