I would think American acceptance of civilian casualties would be contingent on agreeing that the war was justified, and I&#x27;ll remind you the survey data we are talking about is specifically in reference to terrorism.<p>To grab a specific example from that page:<p>&gt; almost one in four British Muslims believe that the 7&#x2F;7 attacks on London were justified<p>Which you can read about here if you&#x27;re not familiar: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;7_July_2005_London_bombings" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;7_July_2005_London_bombings</a><p>&gt; On the morning of Thursday, 7 July 2005, four Islamist extremists separately detonated three bombs in quick succession aboard London Underground trains across the city and, later, a fourth on a double-decker bus in Tavistock Square. Fifty-two civilians were killed and over 700 more were injured in the attacks, the United Kingdom&#x27;s worst terrorist incident since the 1988 Lockerbie bombing as well as the country&#x27;s first ever Islamist suicide attack.<p>Your counterargument that American&#x27;s feel similarly to <i>unintended</i> casualties in war when targeting enemy combatants is very very weak. Who were the enemy combatants on the three subway trains? Who were the enemy combatants on the double-decker bus?<p>To put that another way: a large portion of muslims seeing terrorists in the same light that Americans see the US Armed forces <i>means</i> they approve of terrorists.