I would hope not, because by a similar argument adblockers and userscripts would also be illegal. I don&#x27;t agree with what Comcast is doing, but using this argument could end up with an even worse slippery slope that leads to users not being able to consume content&#x2F;customise their computing environment in the way they choose to. On the other hand, if Comcast is your ISP, all your traffic does pass through equipment owned by Comcast, which --- if you believe in being able to have control over your devices --- they should likewise also have the right to control. All the traffic on my home network goes through an adblocking proxy, and I could do things like <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ex-parrot.com&#x2F;pete&#x2F;upside-down-ternet.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ex-parrot.com&#x2F;pete&#x2F;upside-down-ternet.html</a> if I really wanted to. I certainly do want to maintain control over the traffic within my network.