Here&#x27;s the credible citation:<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;arxiv.org&#x2F;abs&#x2F;quant-ph&#x2F;9605002" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;arxiv.org&#x2F;abs&#x2F;quant-ph&#x2F;9605002</a><p>(It&#x27;s ironic, BTW, that you should complain that my citation is &quot;not even a journal paper&quot; when yours isn&#x27;t either.)<p>And BTW2, Aaronson&#x27;s blog post doesn&#x27;t contradict my position.  The Bell inequality violations are indeed real.  They just aren&#x27;t caused by &quot;spooky <i>action</i> at a distance.&quot;  They are caused by the classical correlations that arise when you trace over the quantum wave function of the universe in order to isolate a subsystem.<p>And BTW3, I actually did submit that paper to Physics Today back in the day.  It was rejected, not because it was wrong, but because it wasn&#x27;t anything new.  (It&#x27;s amazing how the Physics world bifurcates into two camps: those who think that the connection between entanglement and measurement is common knowledge, and those who adamantly deny that it is true.)