Awesome, and outstanding work! Very, very funny. I&#x27;d love to see what their team of writers could do with this, because it seems very close and would only get better.<p>Feedback: the only parts that seemed a little stilted and flat were around the licenses, but the payoff at the end made up for the setup. I&#x27;m having a hard time describing what I mean.  About 85% of SV&#x27;s humor comes from punching up at the egos, the money, the hubris, the skewed reality of a self-referential cloistered environment.  About 15% is more gentle, knowing jabs at the characteristics that Richard and the engineers embody (social awkwardness, lack of skills necessary to survive in this environment, the monomaniacal pursuit of the right way of doing things).<p>The early license jokes seem to be more punching down--I picture all those licenses are earnest one-offs written by devs in their garages, and it&#x27;s punching at their earnestness. When SV takes shots at individuals making IP, it&#x27;s almost always because the founders are incompetent opportunists with bad ideas. Licenses can be bad, but it&#x27;s better if they&#x27;re institutionally bad.<p>It might benefit if the licenses are even more over the top, or are tied to entities or situations that are more mockable from a punch up standpoint.  Like cynical open source licenses around software for mundane consumer hardware like refrigerators or blenders or a Furby which could create civil suit exposure for use cases people would normally do.  Perhaps a bartender mixing a Raviga actually violates a Vitamix open source license.  At his office, they tell the lawyer what they&#x27;re trying to do--he cites a similar license he wrote for a Kickstarted pocket blender startup--Jian Yang tackled at the end when he brings the Ravigas back (by the kickstarter&#x27;d founder who was invited to the birthday party).