They need to do a better job explaining the licenses.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.jetbrains.com&#x2F;toolbox&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.jetbrains.com&#x2F;toolbox&#x2F;</a><p>I can&#x27;t find anything that explains the difference between the individual vs. company&#x2F;organization licenses.<p>Are these still single-developer licenses?<p>Why does a company have to pay twice as much as the individual license?<p>That&#x27;s just silly.  I&#x27;ll have my devs buy their own licenses and reimburse them.  People are not stupid, you know?  Because these licenses expire on a monthly basis there really isn&#x27;t a reason for a company to &quot;own&quot; the product.<p>With the prior licensing scheme it made sense because the product never expired. You could continue using it even if you didn&#x27;t need the upgrades.  You were, in fact, purchasing an asset.  Not too different from buying a set of wrenches for your toolbox, they might not be the latest in a year, but they work just as well.<p>With this setup there is no reason whatsoever for a company to pay double monthly fees. That&#x27;s just silly.  I&#x27;d like to see someone justify a reason to charge a business twice as much.  Please don&#x27;t say &quot;because you make a profit&quot;. This is like Ford charging you twice as much for an F150 because you buy it through your business.<p>Regarding the company&#x2F;organization license:  Does one license allow one developer to work with, say, IntelliJ while another uses PyCharm?  I have not ask.  Again, there&#x27;s precious little on the website to explain the terms and conditions of each license.