&gt;&gt; But nobody that I know of has complained that Randi was not willing to set up a fair test.<p>I remember reading about how people who claimed that Randi would not test them.<p>ref : 1. <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;dailygrail.com&#x2F;features&#x2F;the-myth-of-james-randis-million-dollar-challenge" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;dailygrail.com&#x2F;features&#x2F;the-myth-of-james-randis-mill...</a>
2. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;weilerpsiblog.wordpress.com&#x2F;randis-million-dollar-challenge&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;weilerpsiblog.wordpress.com&#x2F;randis-million-dollar-ch...</a><p>I guess its his test, his rules.. pity rational people mischarecterise it as Scientific.<p>In the words of Chris Carter, author of Parapsychology and the Skeptics:<p>If Randi were genuinely interested in testing unusual claims, then he would also not insist upon odds of at least one million to one against chance for the results. Anyone familiar with scientific studies will be aware that experimental results against chance of say, 800,000 to one would be considered extraordinary; but results this high would be, according to Randi, a “failure.”