I just want to throw in the concept of &quot;voter apathy&quot;. In my opinion it&#x27;s why all voting systems, liquid or not, are doomed to fail (or at least be very inefficient). Even delegating one&#x27;s vote to a relevant expert would require some research, for which there is no good reason in such a system. (there might be social pressure to delegate one&#x27;s vote the &quot;right&quot; expert though, somebody who appears competent on a superficial level (i.e. talking a lot), but who&#x27;s voting history might not reflect that competence)