Good point, thanks! I&#x27;ve removed the footnote, and I&#x27;m going to rewrite that paragraph to steer away from Common Lisp a bit.<p>My point wasn&#x27;t Clojure &gt; Common Lisp. I was simply anticipating the &quot;but npm has 200k modules&quot; argument against Lisps in general and I wanted to illustrate why it doesn&#x27;t matter if you&#x27;re using Clojure.<p>It does seem like a somewhat valid case against Common Lisp, but I don&#x27;t care and it detracts from my main point.