<i>Naturalistic fallacy.</i><p>I don&#x27;t think this is an example of the naturalistic fallacy, as least not as it&#x27;s commonly understood[1].<p>I am not trying to reductively define anything in terms of &quot;natural&quot; properties, which would be an example of the naturalistic fallacy.  I&#x27;m merely making an observation, that certain levels of bullshit are intrinsic in human nature and that it&#x27;s probably fantastical thinking to believe we can ever <i>completely</i> eliminate bullshit.<p><i>Humans are also &quot;born to lie&quot; and &quot;born to kill&quot;, but societies create structure and limits.</i><p>And have we eliminated lying or killing?<p><i>So too should we strive limit bullshit.</i><p>Agreed.  We just shouldn&#x27;t be naive in thinking that it&#x27;s going to be easy to eliminate it completely. And we should probably acknowledge that it might not even be possible to eliminate it completely.<p>[1]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Naturalistic_fallacy" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Naturalistic_fallacy</a>