I&#x27;m going to go out on a wild limb here and guess that you have <i>no clue whatsoever</i> what a regex is, because your comment makes absolutely no sense. The original regex from the article is wildly broken, yes. But the trival regex &#x2F;\b[Tt]est&#x2F; does <i>not</i> match &quot;any function containing test in its name&quot;. And this regex is <i>extremely</i> well-defined. The fact that you can&#x27;t understand it, and the fact that you are making no effort whatsoever to learn even the most basic stuff about regexes, does not make this a &#x27;hack&#x27;, it just makes you one.