So maybe the CA should not proactively do anything but rather await a court order to disrupt their customer&#x27;s service? I would be completely OK with disruption if service after a court order that requires it. I am not OK with proactive and speculative shutdown of service (even with &quot;infallible&quot; evidence, it still remains proactive and speculative until the clients are proven guilty of illegal activities in court).<p>ikeboy 3 minutes ago<p>&gt; I&#x27;m fine with a CA doing that. I&#x27;m also fine with them choosing to revoke specific certs after deciding those are clearly illegal. If they are later shown to be legal, then sue the CA for breach of contract or whatever.<p>&gt; If you were a CA, and people were using your certs for a cp site or trading in stolen credit cards, how would you like being told you couldn&#x27;t revoke the cert unless some court asked you to?<p>I&#x27;d tell them that I&#x27;m not responsible for what my clients do or don&#x27;t do.<p>The CA root supply isn&#x27;t big enough for the Free market to do is job by itself.