apologies for my simplistic agnostic point of view, but what&#x27;s the big deal? that some historic records from 1400 ago may not be that super accurate?
anyway from big enough distance, isn&#x27;t christianity just a sect* of judaism, and islam just a sect* of christianity? they share most prophets, events etc. and god should also be roughly same guy up there somewhere.<i></i><p>* by sect i mean forking given official doctrine at that time by claiming that all before didn&#x27;t get it right but you did, god showed it to you specifically etc.
just like gazillion variations of chtristianity forked from original catholicism (well, I suspect that even catholicism is now are quite a bit different religion from the original one in early AD centuries).<p><i></i> something tells me I just insulted half of this planet, but cannot help it - from rational point of view, what holy books contain are just some old stories, not more or less interesting then say Myths and legends of ancient greece, or Aesop&#x27;s fables. now imagine somebody would base their whole life around those, feeling he is right and all others got it wrong. funny, no? no... From purely rational point of view, I fail to see any added value of religions in these times. There are many irrational - emotional aspects where they work, but I just cannot turn off my rational critical part of me that asks questions and doubts anything not provable by experiment, repeatedly. And the Ultimate truth, I mean THE truth, should be able to stand any test of logic with flying flags and should be as solid now as 1500&#x2F;2000&#x2F;3000 years ago.<p>my 2 lousy cents