I agree, but my point is that it should be done conservatively. And you&#x27;re ignoring the plight of people employed by these companies entirely (which could be you).
Here&#x27;s Uber in the news just lately: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;fortune.com&#x2F;2015&#x2F;09&#x2F;02&#x2F;uber-lawsuit&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;fortune.com&#x2F;2015&#x2F;09&#x2F;02&#x2F;uber-lawsuit&#x2F;</a><p>Uber&#x27;s valuation is: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wsj.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;uber-valued-at-more-than-50-billion-1438367457" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wsj.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;uber-valued-at-more-than-50-bill...</a><p>One might disagree with this valuation, let&#x27;s assume it&#x27;s 1&#x2F;10 th of it. Can they provide health insurance to their drivers? Absolutely yes, but they&#x27;re solely interested in revenue and being profitable. I don&#x27;t want to sound like an Uber basher, this is true for most companies; they operate in their own self interest which they arguably should. It&#x27;s up to the govt. to act as a counter balance to blatantly unjust policies adopted by companies.