<i>Why do you think I think that?</i><p>&quot;...all groups...don&#x27;t normally yield power to others; they don&#x27;t want others to control them.&quot;<p>A group is a collection of individuals. You seem to be asserting those individuals behave in a manner that protects their group power rather than helping individuals. Assign whatever word you want to it.<p>Can you make it explicit? If an individual can gain $1 in personal benefit, but transfer $X from his group to an out group, what value of X must be chosen so that the average person will be indifferent? I.e., how much money do you believe I&#x27;m willing to turn down for the cause of white power?<p><i>I must say I&#x27;m surprised you think that.</i><p>Yes, multiplication and division does sometimes yield surprising results. Arithmetic shows 3 choices:<p>1) Recruit 22M non-Asians into tech (assuming 3M people in tech, 40% Asians in tech and 4.7% Asians in America), and prevent any more Asians from joining. Do you believe this is feasible? Or do you think I made an arithmetic error? If so, feel free to correct it.<p>2) Kick Asians out.<p>3) Accept non-proportionate representation.<p>Do you believe (1) is feasible? It&#x27;s a simple yes or no question. Assuming it&#x27;s not feasible, which of (2) and (3) do you favor? Let me guess - more wordplay that ignores the simple arithmetic and uncomfortable question?