Newton&#x27;s scientific ideas, which are what matter here, remain largely untouched since they were published in the late 1600&#x27;s.  The fact that you&#x27;d resort to bringing up how little science focuses on his beliefs in things like numerology and alchemy doesn&#x27;t bode well for the strength of Kuhn&#x27;s work.<p>There&#x27;s his scientific work which is widely available, and then there&#x27;s his personal beliefs.  I could really care less if we don&#x27;t talk about his theology, but if you&#x27;re accusing science of being dishonest about his mathematical and scientific contributions that&#x27;s a claim which requires better evidence than you&#x27;ve provided.