Hey stockkid, nice to see somebody else attacking the problem of code review on GitHub.  :)  You might want to take a look at my tool too, <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;reviewable.io" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;reviewable.io</a>.  My quick impressions of Coddee:<p>- I don&#x27;t understand the &quot;Get realtime revision feed&quot; feature.  What does it mean to push snapshots of pull requests to me?  By email?  Or do you just mean the app&#x27;s UI syncs with the state on GitHub in real time, like Reviewable?<p>- Organizing files sounds appealing on the surface, and I actually set up Reviewable to be able to do it but didn&#x27;t finish implementing the feature for my MVP.  I opened an issue for it and, in the ~1 year since launch, not a single user has said they&#x27;d like to have it.  You may be overestimating the feature&#x27;s appeal.<p>- I was interested in trying Coddee out on my own public repos, but you ask for the full private `repo` scope up front so I bailed.  I realize it&#x27;s only an MVP, but I think this is one thing you can&#x27;t skimp on if you want people to actually try it out.  Check out how Reviewable does progressive authorization -- I&#x27;m happy to explain how to implement that if it&#x27;s not obvious.<p>Amusingly, I notice that we&#x27;ve made some similar infrastructure choices: real-time DB (Meteor &#x2F; Firebase) and SemanticUI.  Heh.