Here some of my current complaints:<p>I (and all my friends) switched to here.com maps after Google has horribly old (2005) data, has a horrible UI, and is generally unusable. In many cities in my region whole districts are completely missing from the maps[1], MapMaker is not available, and in general it’s just a huge mess.<p>Even worse: It loads so slowly (compared to here.com or bing.com or openstreetmap.org) that sometimes it takes several minutes to load an area while competitors load instantly.<p>And then there are cities where Google tried to add the new 3D buildings, but the result is so horrible that the satellite view is not usable anymore, for example Vienna [2]<p>[1]: Compare <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;goo.gl&#x2F;maps&#x2F;e4awg" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;goo.gl&#x2F;maps&#x2F;e4awg</a> <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.here.com&#x2F;?map=54.35326,10.0714,17,satellite" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.here.com&#x2F;?map=54.35326,10.0714,17,satellite</a>
[2]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;goo.gl&#x2F;maps&#x2F;LUHiN" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;goo.gl&#x2F;maps&#x2F;LUHiN</a><p>------<p>And here some suggestions:<p>- Allow the user to turn of 3D buildings. They are annoying, kill loading times, and are buggy and just a mess of polygons that looks more like abstract art than buildings.<p>- Use recent satellite imagery. When Bing and Here maps have images that are 10 (!) years newer than what Google uses, it’s just inacceptable<p>- Stop having a UI where everything changes while people click on it – Google’s own guidelines say that you should keep stuff predictable. Especially due to the slow loading times people often try to click somewhere, while they try to click some box moves, and they click something completely different. This is extremely frustrating, I’d even begin to call it clickjacking.