The propensity of a not small portion of the professionally practising population of scientists to postulate the most high profundity to their belief system is a legacy of the discipline&#x27;s origin among theologians and in the traditionally sectarian institutions that are universities. The proof of science&#x27;s superiority is on as firm footing as proofs of god  when it comes to logical validity, e.g. the Newton that is pointed it to is not the Newton who held the beliefs of <i>Principia</i>&#x27;s author, as the <i>Schollium</i> demonstrates.<p>Be fair to theology, for it admits when it&#x27;s proofs resort to revelation.