You&#x27;re not reading what I said. I covered that:<p>&gt; you requested a resource, they just served it<p>Again: If you tell me a link will take me to very specific content (eg, a news article) I expect to receive only that content. Surprising me with other content is not welcome. Maybe it would be easier for you to relate to if the unwelcome material I&#x27;m forcing you to download is porn, gore, or malicious? Ads are equally unwelcome and you shouldn&#x27;t be allowed to force someone to receive them.<p>This is why it would be great for search engines to analyze all of the elements on a page and rank those with less javascript and smaller page load higher than those with tons of junk...And if a website is entirely javascript it should go at the bottom of the bin, because so much can be hidden and we don&#x27;t need to play cat and mouse games with search engines...<p>When you have a 500MB data plan and a single news page loads 50MB of junk, that&#x27;s 1&#x2F;10th your allotted transfer for a few KB of text! THIS IS CRIMINAL.<p>I&#x27;m getting the feeling nobody here has ever read RFC 1855? I think it&#x27;s just as relevant now as back then when tailored towards mobile users and the current way we consume content.<p>&gt; Don&#x27;t send large amounts of unsolicited information to people.