Are you familiar with the work of Fr. Robert Spitzer[1] in this area?<p><i>From Nothing to Cosmos: God and Science</i><p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.magiscenter.com&#x2F;pdf&#x2F;FNTC_Study_Guide.pdf" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.magiscenter.com&#x2F;pdf&#x2F;FNTC_Study_Guide.pdf</a><p><i>Science, God and Creation</i> [video]<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.magiscenter.com&#x2F;science-god-creation-video&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.magiscenter.com&#x2F;science-god-creation-video&#x2F;</a><p><i>New Proofs for the Existence of God: Contributions of Contemporary Physics and Philosophy</i><p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.amazon.com&#x2F;New-Proofs-Existence-God-Contributions&#x2F;dp&#x2F;0802863833" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.amazon.com&#x2F;New-Proofs-Existence-God-Contributions...</a><p><i>Introducing Bernard Lonergan’s Philosophical Proof for God</i><p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.strangenotions.com&#x2F;tag&#x2F;bernard-lonergan&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.strangenotions.com&#x2F;tag&#x2F;bernard-lonergan&#x2F;</a> (scroll down for the link to part 1 of the series)<p>His arguments largely build on the assumptions that General Relativity accurately describes the macro-scale universe and that the telescope data backing the Lambda-CDM model[2] are being interpreted correctly. However, that&#x27;s a starting point familiar to most who work in the field of physical cosmology, so I don&#x27;t think they&#x27;re unreasonable assumptions to start out.<p>Also, his arguments are certainly not beyond criticism, but Fr. Spitzer is intellectually honest and overall he offers a great deal of good food for thought.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Robert_Spitzer_(priest)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Robert_Spitzer_(priest)</a><p>[2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Lambda-CDM_model" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Lambda-CDM_model</a>