Actually, I meant &quot;right&quot; in a weirder sense: The only goal of Sim City and many other games is to endure and persist. Any strategy that survives is a strategy that &#x27;wins&#x27; Sim City. In what sense are some strategies more optimal than others? Usually they maximize some other measure of fitness, like land usage or average commute time.<p>That&#x27;s cool. I think it&#x27;s perfectly reasonable to call efficient strategies &#x27;right&#x27;. But calling something right means you know something is wrong, and the &#x27;wrong&#x27; that comes with this &#x27;right&#x27; includes strategies that survive. Clearly, there&#x27;s room for more than one right.