&gt;Unless you&#x27;ve built a billion dollar company yourself then you have no more experience that he has -<p>This is what the person said.<p>&gt;&gt;Meetings absolutely will create a billion dollar company.<p>I questioned this absurd statement.<p>&gt;Second, because you could be attributing all your success in doing it to your self, hard work etc, overlooking all the random and lucky elements (not to mention other people&#x27;s work) that helped you to achieve that. That&#x27;s a very common psychological fallacy (&quot;no winner believes in luck&quot;), and one can have it even for minor achievemnets.<p>That is your own projection, and actually shows flaws in your own thinking. I have never claimed this to be true. Also, since you&#x27;re so interested in fallacies, you should be able to spot your own.<p>&gt;So let&#x27;s stick to observation on how many of those companies were made (as non-billion dollar company creators ), and arguments that appeal to logic, law, how society works, etc.<p>You are a severely confused person. Some humans, in some domains, some of the time, apply logical thought, and that sometimes produces results. You want a logical argument? Humans are not robots and they do not interact with the world simply using logic and no law describes how society works. Logic means nothing in the domain we&#x27;re discussing. How a billion dollar company is made, is not some provable hypothesis.