Not sure I agree about #1 and maybe my twitter experience is different from others. First, if I want to communicate with others I take it over FB&#x2F;Email&#x2F;Messenger of choice. Sure public conversation is nice, but its painful over Twitter and I&#x27;m not sure how it could be made better. Everyone talks about how a threaded view would be nice, but people fail to consider that Twitter conversations are never 1-to-1, its usually multiple people tweeting at one person. Having a conversation on something as open as Twitter is like trying to have a conversation with the President during his speech. Not everyone can talk at one, and no matter how you do it, the interface will drown some out. Combine that with the fact that you can tweet anything at anyone (unlike a Facebook&#x2F;HN thread which is usually around a specific topic), you get a very constrained opportunity to have actually conversations.<p>However, Twitter does a better job at problem #1 than instagram does. Beiber is not replying to fans over Instagram - and I doubt people are actually communicating to celebrities via Instagram comments, have you seen Beiber&#x27;s (or any music celeb&#x27;s) instagram? Its a wasteland of spam, self promotion, and emoji. I doubt Justin Bieber has a higher reply rate on Instagram than Twitter - it&#x27;s very easy to see that Justin Beiber engages fans on Twitter, not so much on Instagram.<p>That said, as someone who uses Twitter heavily, but never tweets - my most useful function for it is a realtime news feed (to not just news orgs, but people, parody accounts, comedians, tech nerds, sports news, ...). I place as much emphasis on the ability to &quot;respond and have conversations&quot; to the success of Twitter, as to the success of Buzzfeed and other news orgs (- I doubt you need an active comments section to have a good news site - most of it is garbage anyways).<p>The second and third points are apt though - Facebook&#x27;s &quot;trending&quot; seems a lot more useful the Twitter&#x27;s, however I&#x27;m not sure how useful either is without constant curation. Even if Twitter had a super sophisticated algorithm to automatically detect topics - without curation you end up with garbage. Facebook&#x27;s trending is just as useless once you have the reason why its trending.<p>Lastly, FTA
&gt;<i>Twitter has turned into a place where famous people and news organizations broadcast text.</i><p>I&#x27;m not sure how Twitter can fix this, but my response to this is if this is what Twitter has become, then its because you made it that way. Reddit now has a subreddit &#x2F;r&#x2F;BlackPeopleTwitter which would give you a very different idea on what Twitter is if your Twitter experience was like that.