The focus on good papers vs bad papers as the problem seems silly to me in comparison to the multiple ways knowledge can be disseminated and built upon in ways that the author cites that proven for him to be more effective along the dimensions he and his audience values (satisfying intellectual curiosity, helping others learn who aren&#x27;t involved with&#x2F;or not interested [possibly because of the very low signal to noise] in the &quot;good&#x2F;bad papers system&quot;, lower social costs, etc…).