Ignoring the tooling, I don&#x27;t feel it&#x27;s fair to say that Wynne is &quot;making the world a worse place&quot;. This quote in particular:<p>&gt; Really the magic of BDD is in playing the game of, if we have to explain to the computer how to test the behavior that we want, we have to have figured out the behavior we want. By collaboratively doing that, by sitting down together and doing that we have to thrash out between those three groups what is it that we want so the tester and the developer and the business person are all on the same page about what is it actually going to mean for this story to be done. By the time they get to writing the code it’s a much more straight forward process. A lot of those potential bugs have been ironed out.<p>is incredibly important and often overlooked. It doesn&#x27;t necessarily mean that a &quot;non-developer&quot; is writing an automated test, but that the engineering team, the QA team, and the business have discussed and reached an agreement over the acceptance tests. This implies that the test has been thought about, written, and understood by all parties including the business person which often is skipped in favor of &quot;increasing turnaround time&quot;. Prototyping is fine if everyone agrees to it, but in a world where the expectation to ship software every sprint exists, you can&#x27;t skip mutual understanding. That is a conversation and no tool is going to automate it away.