I guess the counter example to that might be 4chan. It&#x27;s difficult _to_ be recognized on 4chan, if at all.<p>Obviously it has its &quot;ghetto&quot; parts (weird term, I don&#x27;t fully get it) but it still manages to be a successful (and I would argue quite influential) site 10 years on.<p>Would you say the true name policy has assisted in them getting bigger too? Or just stopped them from getting &quot;ghetto&quot;?