I&#x27;m not sure what point the author is trying to make.<p>That other patterns, aside from Fibonacci numbers, are found in nature?<p>That washing machines obey laws of gravity and make spirals similar to some that are found in nature?<p>That photoshop exists?<p>That artists use &#x27;rules&#x27; as guidelines only?<p>That greedy people will use really stupid ways to trick people into buying things?<p>This is written as if it&#x27;s supposed to be an indictment of sorts, but after reading it, I&#x27;m no less interested in Fibonacci numbers, their occurrence (alongside other patterns) in nature, or the incredible contributions of a man who brought advanced Indian and Arabic math back home to white people who were still using Roman numerals.<p>Lots of source and good explorations of them, but this did nothing to show me that Fibonacci numbers are, in a general sense, &quot;flim flam.&quot;