I&#x27;m talking about &quot;privacy&quot; in the 4th amendment sense.<p>The <i>Griswold</i> &quot;privacy&quot; line of cases is pretty much totally inapplicable outside the reproduction&#x2F;sexual activity&#x2F;family planning context, largely because they conjure up a &quot;right to privacy&quot; that doesn&#x27;t really exist in the Constitution.