For me, the utility of reading some random blog post that requires JS is far less than the potential consequences of enabling JS for every random blog post, given that most browser exploits require JS.<p>As such, when the only reason that a site requires JS to be readable is sloppy coding, yes, I call them out on it.<p>I enable JS only for things that require it for a good reason, and where I am reasonably sure that they won&#x27;t be exploited. Doing a fancy fade-in on load (which, by the way, can easily be done accessibly) is not a good reason, and I am not reasonably sure that some random blog won&#x27;t be exploited.