Do you have any links for what you consider to be the current state of economics? I will the first to admit that I am not an economist, but I do try to at least keep an ear out for what may be current and certainly in terms of what I&#x27;ve been hearing from a layman&#x27;s perspective, for the most part my comments remain valid against current economics work. That said, it&#x27;s also why I prefaced my comments that they were primarily centered from several years ago back when I was in college and that the analogy was mostly personal opinion. If it is personal opinion founded in ignorance, I am happy to be proven wrong or shown cool things, if you are interested in a deeper discussion beyond insults.<p>Certainly, the models that we see in day to day political discussions and popular&#x2F;lay culture have not seemingly progressed much beyond the macroeconomics courses I took in college, but again I&#x27;m willing to admit I certainly have my biases&#x2F;blinders. Also, I&#x27;m sure that dynamic models exist, I was more curious if there are economists that have played with models more closely aligned with my physics analogies, specifically.<p>Thus far the one of most interesting things in economics right now, to myself at least, is I have done some reading on some of the work of theorists in Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) and I liked where it seemed to be heading (not to mention its ties to turn of the last century Social Credit theories&#x2F;works). That certainly seems close to what I&#x27;d expect&#x2F;like to see more of in economics, but correct me if I&#x27;m wrong, it still seems &quot;fringe&quot; in the current state of economics.