Heh, how is this any different from classic AI arrogance, why should we believe this is not exactly the pitfall the author cautions against at the beginning? I mean this sounds almost verbatim like so many &quot;yeah we&#x27;re getting some really good results, almost there, just a few ends to tie up&quot; sentiments from over the years.<p>Of course I can&#x27;t say whether you&#x27;re right or wrong, only time will tell, but I have a pretty strong belief that the first &quot;true AI&quot; is not going to come from any of the currently predominant methods&#x2F;techniques&#x2F;lines of inquiry.