Lol Slate, and the post&#x27;s sources for their numbers is this <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.mint.com&#x2F;consumer-iq&#x2F;how-much-is-a-homemaker-worth-012012&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.mint.com&#x2F;consumer-iq&#x2F;how-much-is-a-homemaker-wor...</a> which i really don&#x27;t know how to react to this the onion has better sources...<p>If a stay at home mom is worth 100k then a full time housekeeper&#x2F;nanny should earn 100k? The highest figures I&#x27;ve seen in NYC with an educated nanny&#x2F;housekeepr&#x2F;superperson (nursing, child development really wierd stuff) is on average 700 a week for a 10.5 hours work day and that&#x27;s in very very upscale areas while usually taking care of 2-3 children. So yeah they&#x27;ll be earning about 50K a year while taking care of the 1% of the 1%, while in Austin or Chicago for example that figures drops to 23-24000 for the same service.<p>Sorry but a click bait blog <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.mint.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.mint.com&#x2F;</a> for a budge management application <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.mint.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.mint.com&#x2F;</a> isn&#x27;t really a reliable source in my books, if those numbers were even close to being a reality on average or under any case you would see pretty much every other family in the states where the dad is a stay at home dad and the mom goes to become a super(rich)nany or vise versa...