Wow, I had no idea this was the case. Thanks for sharing. I seem to remember that you&#x27;re a lawyer so I&#x27;ll have to assume you know what you&#x27;re talking about. :)<p>&gt; <i>some third-party entity (and its employees) actively sifts through</i><p>Just to be clear, is this condition important to your statement? That is, can you store information with a third-party entity with the assumption that it&#x27;s constitutionally &quot;private&quot; there if you don&#x27;t let them sift through it? Say, a bank safe deposit box, or some sort of encrypted enterprise crowd storage, or cperciva&#x27;s tarsnap?