I&#x27;m not sure this is a paradox. There are 2 expected outcomes. All the added outcomes rely on the experimenter to disrespect the set rules.<p>This is a conditional probability with a hard to predict condition (ie. human factor) portrayed as a non-conditional probability. This looks more like a bad representation of a problem rather than a paradox.<p>This reminds me of my youth. Regardless of the project I was trying to accomplish, as soon as my little brother got involved, all bets where off. He was a hard to predict little bugger.