I was under the impression that there was a fair bit of statistical evidence for this being not-a-hoax, but this article showed that there was less than I thought. Also, the explanation of why people thing this is not-a-hoax was quite unsatisfactory, basically saying &quot;one particular way of explaining this as a hoax is not very convincing&quot;.<p>Why do people think this is not a hoax? &quot;4OFCC89 4OFCC89 4OFC89 4OFC89 4OFCC89 E89.&quot; seems like something a 5 year old would make up. Also, the unrealistic drawings.