First off, the WiFi thing. Ffs. The difference there is literally typing &quot;-s 0&quot; or omitting that parameter vs &quot;-s 64&quot;. Hardly anything evil or firable or criminal. Making them seem bad because they didn&#x27;t fire someone for a trivial mistake is silly (and anyways it was public broadcasts, not that it totally excuses it but come on).<p>Second, Google&#x27;s entire point of existence is to give an opinion on search results. Full stop. If Google decides that people searching for Clinton want to see positive articles, that&#x27;s their call. Again, that&#x27;s their entire product. People are trusting Google&#x27;s <i>opinion</i> on search results.<p>And calling Google&#x27;s response meaningless? Google&#x27;s saying they&#x27;re screwed if they deliberately betrayed users. And what they aren&#x27;t saying is that if they ever were caught really manipulating results, they would be hit with so much regulation that Bing would have a chance.