I would rather see the most able taking the risks, because they&#x27;ll be the ones most likely to succeed, and we all benefit.<p>Assigning resources to the most able is, of course, an immensely difficult problem that nobody really knows how to solve. But it should be the goal, and I don&#x27;t see affluence as a good substitute.<p>How many people are out there right now with the personal ability to change the world in some large beneficial way, but without the necessary finances? What are the rest of us missing out on because they&#x27;re stuck working a 9-5 job to pay their rent, while some idiot with money is building Twitter for Cats and talking about how much of a risk taker he is because he&#x27;s living off $50,000 in savings until the VC money comes in?