I think there is a level where DNS -&gt; IPNS ID is even then still better than DNS -&gt; IP address. For DNS -&gt; IPNS you could have a facility in there saying &#x27;This DNS TXT record should not change, if it does something is wrong&#x27;. You could lock down the record for a period of time, such as the duration of the lease from the registrar.<p>Besides, the idea is that IPFS could happily support Namecoin[1], so there&#x27;s the decentralized, secure, and human-meaningful DNS service. The only &#x27;non-secure&#x27; aspect there is the unlikely event of a 51% attack.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;namecoin.info" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;namecoin.info</a>