W.r.t. the Ice-T example, a good liquid democracy implementation would still have several advantages over what we have now:
1) If Ice-T does a poor job, his delegators complain that something bad was &quot;done in their name&quot;, they can trace to their Ice-T delegation and remove it.  They don&#x27;t have to wait two or four years for an election cycle.
2) Even if Ice-T doesn&#x27;t know much about, say U.S. foreign policy, he may find someone who does and whose personal values are in pretty good alignment with him and his fans.  So, Ice-T delegates his us-foreign-policy votes to the expert he trusts.
3) Ice-T may take his increased power seriously and start learning more about foreign policy so that he can do a good job.  And option 1) puts him in check if he does not.