Is your original post above meant to be sarcastic?  I can&#x27;t tell.  A basic idea in scientific research (especially mathematics) is that we do NOT need &quot;control mechanisms&quot; like you describe that prevent research in order to avoid chaos.  Instead, we have peer review, the scientific method, and rigorous proof (in mathematics).   Everybody is welcome to try to prove mathematical theorems and do research, and the more widely we make the tools for doing so available, the better.  In mathematics, when a group thinks they have solved an interesting problem, they write up the solution, make it available on the internet (e.g., on arxiv.org), and other researchers read it.   If the group has correctly and deeply understood the solution to an important problem, then their work becomes more widely known and everybody benefits.   I see absolutely no scientific benefit to restricting who has access to mathematical software, mathematics papers, books, etc.   And definitely no benefit to making such tools closed source, thus restricting how they can use that software.   One of my inspirations for starting Sage was watching a young Manjul Bharghava (who just won a Fields Medal recently, by the way) give a talk in which he explained how his research had been severely frustrated by Magma being closed source, so he couldn&#x27;t modify it to do what he wanted.