&gt;But claiming someone has privilege isn&#x27;t a value judgement on the person, or a sin...Saying someone has privilege is just pointing out the state of the world, it isn&#x27;t a judgment.<p>That is exactly the same argument that bigots use when they talk about {minorities, poor people, immigrants, LGBT people}.  &quot;That person fits into category X, and everyone in category X shares some characteristic Y because they&#x27;re in that category.  I&#x27;m just saying that because it&#x27;s true!&quot;  It doesn&#x27;t matter who that generalization is made about, whether they&#x27;re the dominant group in society or not.  It&#x27;s still a terrible generalization and an intellectually lazy argument and in and of itself carries a judgement.  If you grant that something like &quot;white privilege&quot; or &quot;male privilege&quot; exists (and most people that buy into the concept do) then by that logic a homeless, illiterate white man has more privilege than a black woman millionaire CEO.<p>&gt;People without food allergies have privilege in that they don&#x27;t have to constantly worry whether what they eat will kill them.<p>That&#x27;s absolute nonsense as well.  There exist people without food allergies that have other conditions where they constantly have to worry about what they eat, diabetes being an example.  So check your cis-gylcemic privilege you fascist!&#x2F;s  Do you see how ridiculous and divisive that sounds?