After a few years in the health industry, whenever I see a statement like this one:<p><i>Organisations wishing to proactively reduce burnout can do so by encouraging their employees to access regular exercise programs.</i><p>My brain translates the suggestion into real-world application, which in the US seems to go like this:<p><i>Organisations wishing to proactively increase wellness metrics and reduce their expenditures can do so by instituting highly invasive biometric screening programs and jacking up premiums, while offering no actual time or fiscal incentive to join a gym or exercise independently.</i><p>Quick apology if that sounds terribly cynical, but it seems like the go-to path by businesses. I say this as a person who feels grateful to have a job where I can go home and work out for 20 minutes 3 times during the work week. Also, I know that eating &quot;better&quot; takes time and effort both in the sourcing and production of materials, which may or may not be less expensive to the individual in the short&#x2F;long term.