Did we read the same article? Vogl&#x27;s argument seemed to rest on :<p>- These houses are residential properties.<p>- People are using them as commercial properties (offices, under the guise of &#x27;live&#x2F;work spaces&#x27;)<p>- No one is stopping it, Zoning is not enforced there (because &#x27;it&#x27;s a poor neighborhood&#x27;), but zoning is enforced in wealthier areas (Johnson County).<p>The rest of the stuff you mention is true too. But I don&#x27;t think it&#x27;s the &quot;entirety of her case&quot; -- it&#x27;s support for the case. &quot;They commute to work instead of living in the office&quot;, for instance, is strong evidence that the property is commercial, not residential in nature.<p>This seems like a cut-and-dry zoning violation, that&#x27;s being ignored because the area is &quot;poor&quot;. I don&#x27;t think she&#x27;s being destructive, she&#x27;s just asking for fair and equal treatment.