<i>It&#x27;s not like it&#x27;s 2 alternatives of content we&#x27;re talking about, one legitimate and one not. I think it&#x27;s more that there&#x27;s legitimate content that&#x27;s constantly getting interference from this extraneous and meaningless noise.</i><p>It&#x27;s important to remember that such abstractions enable you to reject the content you don&#x27;t personally see as meritorious as unwholesome.  And that&#x27;s a sure way to fool oneself.  Rewind the clock a hundred years and you might be arguing for prohibition.  It&#x27;s also classic no true Scottsman, for what it&#x27;s worth.<p>One&#x27;s noise is another&#x27;s music.  Why is it there if no one finds it helpful?<p>A better distinction is mistaken or not mistaken.