Am I the only one who read the article and thought the Whig interpretation was more accurate?  The &quot;revolution&quot; of quantum mechanics didn&#x27;t overthrow Newtonian mechanics, Relativity didn&#x27;t either.  They added to Newton&#x27;s view and corrected it in a few places but to this day the first thing you learn in physics is Newton.<p>There was no revolution.  Newton was right with the caveat that if things are very large, very small, or very fast things may look different.  To this day if something disagrees with the core of what Newton said it&#x27;s almost certainly wrong.  The fact that the &quot;paradigm shift&quot; from deterministic to probabilistic left most of science untouched should show how paradigms aren&#x27;t all that important.  Quantum mechanics has multiple &quot;paradigms&quot; describing the exact same things and they&#x27;re doing close to nothing in terms of pushing science forward, some think they&#x27;re holding it back because so much time is spent arguing about them.