Anybody else think GitHub was more responsive to users and used to create more useful new features before they had $350 million in fun money?<p>I&#x27;m so happy they have a full replica of the oval office to play around inside, but some days it feels like they&#x27;ve abandoned the public interface  in exchange for... nobody knows.<p>How many hundreds of millions of dollars will it take to finally improve the issue tracking system?  Can it even be fixed with a hundred million dollars?  Maybe it&#x27;s more of a billion dollar funding problem.  Nobody knows anymore.<p>GitHub makes it easy to drop approved licenses in any project, but what about dropping approved governance models in projects too?  These days the governance of a project (roadmap, participation, core committers, sub-committers, issue-resolvers, moderators, time to resolve issues, formal how-to-become-committer processes) is a first-order component of projects too, but everybody is making it up as they go along.  It&#x27;s as if people were hand-writing licenses for each project.  Imagine if GitHub had &quot;select your governance model&quot; multi-choice system like they do for licenses?  Maybe that requires two billion dollars in funding to get pushed through.  Nobody knows anymore.