<i>So if a system is too complex for us to discover its equations (so far) that means that we don&#x27;t know anything about it?</i><p>I&#x27;d say if you can&#x27;t express your beliefs as equations, code, or similar unambiguous form, then you don&#x27;t understand your own beliefs. (Or alternately, you don&#x27;t want others to have the ability to unambiguously debunk them.)<p><i>...when I say that the system is complex you say I&#x27;m evading your question...It&#x27;s not the laws of arithmetic, it&#x27;s their applicability to reality.</i><p>This is a perfect example of evading the question. You make some weird analogy to special relativity, but refuse to actually state why simple arithmetic doesn&#x27;t apply to counting humans.<p><i>...ambiguously, because you didn&#x27;t explain how white power can win without your cooperation if every player behaves like you do.</i><p>It can&#x27;t. But since changing my behavior won&#x27;t change theirs, I still have no incentive to cooperate.<p>This is why collective action problems usually require enforcement mechanisms (men with guns threatening me if I refuse to pay taxes, Jim Crow laws forcing me to serve white power, that type of thing). Except yours, apparently.