While smart devices are inchoate at present, and likely to be difficult to get right (I see why you&#x27;re not interested right now), I think it&#x27;s a mistake to dismiss the concept based on current tech.<p>Long term probably most of the devices&#x2F;materials we own will be networked in some way, acting as sensors, reacting to local conditions by changing, updatable with software. That&#x27;s all a bit fuzzy, but specifically things like heated floors and lighting which sense presence, windows which react to lighting conditions or insolation requirements, voice controls, panels which turn into display surfaces or speakers and a desk which could charge and update objects wirelessly when placed on it would all be very useful and far more powerful if driven by software which was updatable. Software <i>will</i> eat the world, one object&#x2F;material at a time.<p>I don&#x27;t know if the revolution will be in one OS which runs your home (though corporations would love to sell you that), it might be more in our tools, clothes and structures gradually becoming networked and part of a global computer. Specific operating systems seem to me to be declining in importance as the network grows and a constellation of devices which talk to each other arises. There are of course potential downsides like security and privacy but I think those will be outweighed by the obvious benefits.<p>Do we need any of this? No, and our ancestors lived without it. Will we want any of it? Probably, if on balance it improves our quality of life.