I should have added my &quot;no credit for showing the existence of limits if your code doesn&#x27;t use them&quot; criterion in advance. Now it looks like I&#x27;m moving the goal posts. Oh well; you can see a similar point in my linked post from several months ago which at least adds credence to the idea that this isn&#x27;t a new reaction of mine.<p>As you can see by reading that post as well, I&#x27;d also contend it really ought to be in the core API, not an optional thing that defaults to no limits. A sensible default could be imposed, too, though that turns out to be tricky to define the closer you look at it.