Ok, some guy has a setup which works for him personally. Yet he decides to write a post about it titled &quot;set up your remote office&quot;, advocating his view to others. It&#x27;s like advocating sex, without sex education.<p>Sure, I might have pointed out that basically every one of his ideas is prone to failure. Aggressively. Or passionately. If you&#x27;re planing to work remotely, you need to consider things like:<p>- uptime, SLA
- redundancy (network, electricity, hardware, storage)<p>I&#x27;m not saying oh let&#x27;s throw $10k and make a home datacenter with running costs at about $500&#x2F;mo, but If I did, I&#x27;d gladly advocate it over an ISP-provided AP and educational low-end hardware. There&#x27;s just a middle ground which is just as feasible and effective regarding cost &amp; your time.<p>And I could go on. Years of remote work, and failures which are inevitable, have made me cautious. If you wanted a good remote work environment, you&#x27;d better come to me for suggestions than to use Ivan&#x27;s &quot;bragging rights&quot; setup. Still not sure what&#x27;s there to brag about. Linux today runs just about anywhere, even trashcans.