<i>Second, you see a tradeoff where there isn&#x27;t any.</i><p>Of course there is a tradeoff. If you ever have the opportunity to make more money&#x2F;enjoy your job more&#x2F;invest well but in a way that benefits the outgroup over the ingroup, you are suddenly faced with this tradeoff.<p>E.g. I want to hire someone but the best guy isn&#x27;t white.<p>The only way there isn&#x27;t a tradeoff is if the best investment <i>always</i> has a white CEO, the best candidate is <i>always</i> the white male, etc. Is this really your belief?<p><i>It&#x27;s like you&#x27;re saying, &quot;a photon is either a particle or a wave; it can&#x27;t be both; please make up your mind&quot;. Where do I even begin?</i><p>Very easy: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;xkcd.com&#x2F;895&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;xkcd.com&#x2F;895&#x2F;</a><p>Feel free to provide equations, or even just clear and unambiguous statements.<p><i>...power is something that is best achieved in a group (e.g. unions)...You will turn down exactly the amount you think you&#x27;re expected to gain if the cause of white power wins.</i><p>You are ignoring the collective action problem here. I can hire the best guy for the job and make money now. Then, in the future, if if white power ever wins, I can reap the rewards of that also.<p>For much the same reason, I don&#x27;t vote, and I&#x27;d skip paying taxes if it wasn&#x27;t for the threats of violence.<p><i>I&#x27;m not ignoring your math, but you&#x27;re applying kindergarten math to graduate physics.</i><p>Since you seem to think the laws of arithmetic don&#x27;t apply to counting humans, go ahead and do the grad physics - I promise I can follow along.<p><i>To me it sounds like you&#x27;re saying...you&#x27;re seemingly fine with kicking blacks out...</i><p>That&#x27;s because you ignored what I said in search of an easy straw man.<p>I repeat my prediction: &quot;more wordplay that ignores the simple arithmetic and uncomfortable question.&quot; I add a new prediction: &quot;no equations or unambiguous statements shall be forthcoming.&quot;