The way systemd integration is advertised reeks of a fallacy of composition to me. The claim being made is that because runC does not daemonize, it integrates well with systemd. This is true, but to associate the property of not daemonizing with systemd integration is to incorrectly ascribe something specific from a generality. What should be said is that because runC does not daemonize, it therefore integrates well with process supervisors, or service managers in general. This is unless runC makes <i>specific</i> accommodations towards systemd, in which case these can be advertised.