I don&#x27;t mean to slight Nagel&#x27;s recent work, which I haven&#x27;t read, but (honest question here, because I don&#x27;t have a clue) would you say that Nagel&#x27;s recent work is generally considered as important or groundbreaking as what he did 30 and 40 years ago? Because my impression is that Nagel&#x27;s most impressive work was done decades ago, which, if true, doesn&#x27;t support the idea that philosophy is <i>currently</i> a vibrant field with lots of groundbreaking work going on.