I read the article yes, thank you for checking.<p>And to be perfectly clear:<p>&gt;&gt; he didn&#x27;t think he&#x27;d had that, and only then saw &quot;turbinate reduction&quot; in the records<p>So what? That&#x27;s just something that was in the article. Who knows what really happened. Maybe the guy knew and he forgot about it (it&#x27;s called cryptomnesia). Maybe the article misreports it. Maybe, who knows what. You can&#x27;t draw firm conclusions by something someone said once.<p>Now can I check with you whether you read what you wrote? Because it didn&#x27;t make any sense at all. How can anyone who hasn&#x27;t had turbinate reduction think they have a condition that is caused by turbinate reduction? That does not compute.