This dates from 2011 so by tradition should have a [2011].<p>Second, <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Luc_Montagnier#Research_on_electromagnetic_signals_from_DNA" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Luc_Montagnier#Research_on_ele...</a> :<p>&gt; The paper has been met with harsh criticism for not being peer-reviewed, and its claims unsubstantiated by modern mainstream conventions of physics and chemistry. No third party has been able to replicate the findings as of March 2015. In response to Montagnier&#x27;s statement that the generally unfavorable response is due to the &quot;non-understanding or misunderstanding of the breakthrough findings&quot;, columnist Andy Lewis has written that he has found it difficult to assert what the paper &quot;actually claims&quot; and that &quot;The paper [...] lacks any rigour. [...]&quot;, as &quot;important experimental steps are described dismissively in a sentence and little attempt is made to describe the detail of the work&quot;.[23]