Betteridge&#x27;s Law of Headlines strikes again:<p>&gt; <i>Q. Do you think that if Clinton is elected we can expect to learn new information about UFOs?</i><p>&gt; <i>A. I highly doubt DoD or any other government agency is concealing UFO information.</i><p>&gt; <i>Q. Are you certain there is no government cover-up?</i><p>&gt; <i>A. It’s impossible to prove the negative, so all I can say is that I never saw any evidence of official interest in UFOs.</i><p>&gt; <i>Q. So where does this all leave us, and what is to be done?</i><p>&gt; <i>A. In my view, calling for the end to an alleged government UFO cover-up is almost certainly a dead end, and does not help inspire anyone in government to become more open to the topic. The UFO mystery is a scientific problem.</i><p>(That&#x27;s not to say there isn&#x27;t a UFO cover-up. But we&#x27;re discussing this article, and the insiders&#x27; opinion is that the answer is no.)<p>There&#x27;s also a big difference between UFO and Alien Vehicle. A UFO could be a foreign airplane, or satellite, or a weird meteor, or two birds duct-taped together.