Hmmmm.  This is a pretty interesting (and unusual) story, now that I look into it.  Part of the arrangement when FB went public is some of the larger investors ceded him <i>irrevocable</i> proxy rights for their shares, giving him over 50% of the votes even though he owns only 28.2% of voting shares.  It&#x27;s not so much a difference in share classes as a sort of side deal.<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;venturebeat.com&#x2F;2012&#x2F;02&#x2F;01&#x2F;zuck-power-play&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;venturebeat.com&#x2F;2012&#x2F;02&#x2F;01&#x2F;zuck-power-play&#x2F;</a><p>But the point remains, even if it&#x27;s kind of technical when he can always outvote everyone else.  He can&#x27;t treat the company as his personal fiefdom if it crosses the legal interests of other shareholders.  If he goes too far they can probably sue successfully.