Don&#x27;t really understand the downvotes here can people explain why they are downvoting?<p>The parent opinion is that Nestle is a large corporation and they are diversifying their revenue streams as every profit-seeking company is entitled to.<p>The other opinion elsewhere on this thread is that sugar is the enemy and therefore Nestle should be held accountable for first causing a problem then charging people for offering the solution.<p>It&#x27;s probably going to be hard to reconcile either opinion given the subject of sugar in diets is already quite divisive, but is an attempt to illustrate the anti-sugar camp&#x27;s perspective through an extreme but easily understood example not constructive?