A diversion into the pedantic, but hear me out: I&#x27;m legitimately interested in terminology here.<p>This actually seems more like ontology work than epistemology work. In one of my academic fields (I do software, education, and the learning sciences), we tend to use the term &quot;epistemology&quot; to be knowledge about knowledge itself. Generally questions like &quot;where does the ontology of pizza come from?&quot;, or &quot;who has claim on saying what is and is not a pizza, and where do they derive that claim?&quot; are epistemological ones, and mapping out the state of different claims are ontological ones.<p>Is &#x27;epistemology&#x27;, as used here to mean more of a meta-ontology a common word usement that&#x27;s being structured these days? Is it something from clojure or one of the other lisp-y spaces people are building ontologies? I played with building ontologies <i>about</i> epistemology (specifically, nature of science, quality of scientific claim, etc) using KQML back in the Dark Ages of 2000 or so, but haven&#x27;t really looked at the work since then.