<i>&gt; If you believe there is a right way to interpret the world.</i><p>I don&#x27;t see what &quot;interpretation&quot; is involved in comparing a specific prediction with a specific measurement result. You&#x27;re just comparing two numbers (with error bars, etc.). And the comparison doesn&#x27;t care what kind of stuff you put in your model; that can be anything you like. All the comparison cares about is the numbers your model outputs as its predictions.<p><i>&gt; models that allow us to make predictions does not mean that they match reality it just means that it matches the predictions we can interpret.</i><p>No, it means the model&#x27;s predictions match the actual measurements we make.<p><i>&gt; Thats a very different thing than reality.</i><p>Perhaps you are using a different definition of &quot;reality&quot; than I am. In which case I don&#x27;t see how whatever definition you are using of &quot;reality&quot; is relevant to Asimov&#x27;s article, which is what we are discussing.