Why? Here&#x27;s my current POV: 1. Internet is not really a public resource, it&#x27;s rather a gigantic alliance of p2p connections, mostly organized by private entities who can make whatever contracts they want. 2. On this alliance, if one actor wreaks havoc (spam, DOS, scam, piracy), the victim can only turn back to the node which transmitted the connection; 3. It&#x27;s up to this node to keep logs and forward the pursuit upstream to the attacker; 4. It&#x27;s the only way it can decently work, because we may lack proofs or the chain of responsibility to attack the upstream node directly; 5. Legal problems will happen if we treat the Internet as a public resource, where politics have a say, where access is not authenticated, and where no-one bears responsibility for crimes.<p>Now it appears that you don&#x27;t follow this opinion, you think we should let criminals access the internet anonymously?