I have to agree! The bad floats with the good and likewise.<p>From the New York Times: &quot;Actually, Prohibition Was a Success
By Mark H. Moore; Mark H. Moore is professor of criminal justice at Harvard&#x27;s Kennedy School of Government.&quot;<p>&quot;... Second, alcohol consumption declined dramatically during Prohibition. Cirrhosis death rates for men were 29.5 per 100,000 in 1911 and 10.7 in 1929. Admissions to state mental hospitals for alcoholic psychosis declined from 10.1 per 100,000 in 1919 to 4.7 in 1928.<p>Arrests for public drunkennness and disorderly conduct declined 50 percent between 1916 and 1922. For the population as a whole, the best estimates are that consumption of alcohol declined by 30 percent to 50 percent.<p>Third, violent crime did not increase dramatically during Prohibition. Homicide rates rose dramatically from 1900 to 1910 but remained roughly constant during Prohibition&#x27;s 14 year rule. Organized crime may have become more visible and lurid during Prohibition, but it existed before and after. ...&quot;<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;1989&#x2F;10&#x2F;16&#x2F;opinion&#x2F;actually-prohibition-was-a-success.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;1989&#x2F;10&#x2F;16&#x2F;opinion&#x2F;actually-prohibiti...</a>