&gt; <i>Otherwise you would not single out a single group as more deserving of life than others.</i><p>It doesn&#x27;t say &quot;Black lives matter more than others.&quot;<p>Everyone who understands why it&#x27;s &quot;Black Lives Matter!&quot; instead of &quot;All Lives Matter!&quot; also understands why you think it should be &quot;All Lives Matter!&quot;, we just disagree.  There&#x27;s no subtlety to your point, it&#x27;s blunt and easy to understand.<p>The difference is, people who think it should be &quot;All Lives Matter!&quot; don&#x27;t understand why we think it should be &quot;Black Lives Matter!&quot;.  There&#x27;s a nuanced point that you don&#x27;t seem to understand. When you suggest that we&#x27;re saying black lives matter more than any other lives, you make it clear that you don&#x27;t get it.  This is fine, if you stop misrepresenting the intentions of others they might be willing to explain it to you.<p>Edit: And by the way, you don&#x27;t have to <i>agree</i> with it the nuanced point in order to understand it. So Zuck insisting people not cross out &quot;Black Lives Matter&quot; is not him pushing that as an agenda -- it&#x27;s just him showing an understanding that &quot;Black Lives Matter!&quot; is not the same as &quot;White Power!&quot;