To me it seemed like your point was that they were including sources across the spectrum. Simply noting Fox is in there serves that point.<p>If you had editorialized about the quality of the other sources then the commentary on the quality of Fox would have fit in.<p>your comment seems like two disparate things in one. On the one hand it notes that Facebook appeared to try to balance things. On the other hand it felt like a slam at Fox News couched in the form of a comment that might fit in. Clearly you can&#x27;t write &quot;Fox sucks&quot; as a comment because it wouldn&#x27;t be in topic. But if you weave it in...<p>It just distracted me from what I took to be your point, harming the force&#x2F;usefulness of your comment.