Great to see all this progress :) . I have three questions about Rust static binaries on Linux through musl, and how they compare to Golang static binaries:<p>1. At low level (binary format, system calls), is a Rust static (through musl) binary &quot;as static as&quot; an equivalent Golang binary?<p>2. The article says <i>&quot;for technical reasons, glibc cannot be fully statically linked&quot;</i> . Did this apply to Golang too? Is Golang using musl too on Linux? If no, why not &#x2F; what is their strategy&#x2F;tooling to produce static binaries?<p>2. From my own biased observation&#x2F;reading of Golang writings and usage of Golang binaries, I feel static-by-default is hugely appreciated, for the portability. Did Rust consider it?