Because the argument they&#x27;re making (which is valid, but I don&#x27;t agree with it) is that lumping all of non-Western humanity under such a homogenous label still gives &quot;Western&quot; (i.e. Eurocentric) philosophy an undue weighting. The implicit assumption I disagree with is that this constitutes disproportionate representation due to the population size covered or even culture and breadth of ideas - regardless of how complex or relevant the literature is to whatever unstated agendas there are.