In aeronautics, we were able to increase safety to an insane level by understanding the physics of the environment, formally proving and certifying algorithms, using Robust control theories that allow to formally deal with uncertainty. The power of mathematical modeling together with robust software testing and a limited&#x2F;controlled use of learning algorithms is - in my opinion - likelier to bring safety to such systems rather than such an opaque use of CNNs. And I&#x27;m not even talking about human machine interaction or liability issue that would emerge from such extreme approaches (which node of the net or which training sample will be blamed?). I guess CNNs allow a lot of wannabe engineers to play with real world problems and dream that their 10 lines python code would match semantic models if fed with more training data, but I&#x27;m pretty sure Aircraft&#x2F;Car manufacturers will&#x2F;should not replace formally certified controls algorithms and redundant architectures built on the top of hundreds years of analytical results with a rack of NVIDIA GPUs.