<i>Edit --</i><p>Actually, I take it back. That&#x27;s not fair -- according to their investors they don&#x27;t have any intention of only making phone chargers;<p>&gt; <i>And the truth is that Team uBeam doesn’t want to stop at phones. With the explosion of “wearables’ wouldn’t it be nice if you didn’t have to charge your watch, fitness tracker or noise-canceling headphones? What about if elderly people never had to ask a relative or healthcare worker to change the batteries on their hearing aids? The practical uses for uBeam technology is limitless.</i><p>Or the company themselves;<p>&gt; <i>With wires virtually eliminated, TVs can sit in the middle of a room cord-free and light fixtures will become “stick-on” without the need for routed power.</i><p>&lt;--Original post--&gt;<p>That&#x27;s fair, but it sure seems like the obvious path to getting cell phone charging to work is to get a fixed object charging to work -- at which point, if they&#x27;d hired any bizdev people, they&#x27;ll sell the hell out of the fixed object systems to anyone and everyone.<p>It&#x27;s just striking to recollect the many complaints about only easy, derivative ideas being funded when a hard idea with tons of applications is being derided in such an intense fashion.<p>I&#x27;d rather they fund 10 uBeams that could yield useful insights or pivots than 0.