Am I the only one who thinks the HN reaction to uBeam is pretty gross?  Now we&#x27;re encouraging shit-talking by former employees?  It&#x27;s an innovative hard tech company with an audacious goal that would change the world if successful and was funded by knowledgeable investors using private money.  Why is everyone here so eager to trash talk them?<p>Because their stated goal of wireless phone charging is likely too hard to get to work right? If they &quot;only&quot; figure out short distance beam-formed wireless power at 25% efficiency, is the company a failure?<p>Look around any apartment in an &#x27;old&#x27; city and you&#x27;ll see dozens of things that would benefit from being able to throw power like WiFi.   60-watt equivalent LEDs are something like 9W -- there are about 100 places in my apartment I&#x27;d like to have better light but my landlord has no interest in running new power lines.  Smoke detectors trickle charging at even 1W would never run out of power.  Modern 40&quot; TVs can use as little as 25W of power -- with a powerful uBeam and a Chromecast, you could attach it to any wall and never see a cable.  Those &quot;smart mirrors&quot; that everyone builds then never shows full frame due to the ugly cord running out of it could easily be charged via wireless tech.<p>There are obviously many obstacles and who knows if they&#x27;ll make it, but it seems extremely short sighted and against the spirit of HN to actively cheer for a company&#x27;s failure.<p><i>Edit: Apparently, yes, I&#x27;m the only one.</i>