It might come across as callous, but I&#x27;m only being realistic about whose responsibility it is to take care of an individual. The compulsion of government should not be used to make one individual responsible for providing for another. That is as morally abhorrent as slavery.<p>&gt; think you are also assuming that there will always be sufficient numbers of jobs to keep sufficient numbers of the citizenry employed<p>If there isn&#x27;t, and I happen to have enough wealth to survive without a job, it shouldn&#x27;t be made my responsibility to provide for someone who cannot.<p>If a truck driver is concerned about the possibility of a shortage of jobs in thr future, then he should invest now to build his&#x2F;her wealth to prepare for that eventuality.<p>&gt;The &#x27;free market&#x27; is about to break, which is the point that Yanis (and many others) has made.<p>There is less than zero evidence for this claim. It is dangerous fear-mongering.