No. The evidence itself, and all evidence derived from that evidence is thrown out. You conduct an illegal search that finds the murder weapon at the suspects house, you don&#x27;t get to enter the murder weapon into evidence. You don&#x27;t get to introduce that the weapon had the victims blood on it, because the only way you know that is that you got the weapon illegally. You don&#x27;t get to introduce that the weapon had the suspectms fingerprints on it for some the same reason.