Universal jobs implies that the job in itself is why we work while the reality is that we work mostly for the benefits of that job.<p>If technology could be used to automate the whole chain of touch points and thus remove the need for human incentives to get things produced why insist on an old paradigm with what would mostly be the most shitty jobs you could find.<p>That seems like using technology for the opposite of what it&#x27;s good for and for insisting on an very undesirable part of being alive.