I can&#x27;t claim to speak for OP, but am also against most tracking. I would also tend to think that being against first party tracking would be an unwinnable battle. It also leaks less data than third-party tracking, since the third party can see your activity across multiple sites whereas first party can only see your activity on that site unless it&#x27;s aggregated through a backend service (another poster mentioned the ability to upload server logs to GA). No matter what, they can see what you load from their site.<p>Getting to first party hosting of more intrusive analytics (scroll location, etc) I think rather than disallowing certain scripts&#x2F;URLs to run, you have to get back to behavioral-based blocking. Doing that in an environment that you allow any JS to execute seems tough since sandboxing something that can update the page based on location can &quot;talk&quot; to another part that can report back to the server.<p>If you don&#x27;t like intrusive first party analytics, just stop all JS.