My stance is that I have that right. So do others.<p>I made an argument that from a systemic standpoint, it&#x27;s better to make illegal and never prosecute than it is to create a governmental machine around it.<p>Please understand, I&#x27;m perfectly happy with it being legal. I&#x27;m simply trying to describe why there&#x27;s a strong case for it remaining illegal (and un-prosecuted)<p>You realize that we&#x27;re not talking about people freely deciding what to do with themselves, right? What we&#x27;re talking about is a bunch of new laws, committees, and processes where a person&#x27;s life can be terminated, sometimes directly by the state. I&#x27;d think this is a much worse situation than simply having officials look the other way.<p>If we were talking about removing all laws around what folks do with their lives, that&#x27;d be a different thing entirely. That&#x27;s where we should be. But nobody is talking about that.