Since you&#x27;re keen on giving advice, I&#x27;ll bite, how would you describe NAWAPA to others?<p>The way I see it, no matter which way I described it, I knew there would be commenters who would have a visceral reaction when they learned about the project&#x27;s externalities. There&#x27;s a reason this project was killed before getting anywhere. Hence, I knew full on when writing the grandparent comment there would be that kind of reply, from people solely letting others know how much they disagree with the project.<p>I don&#x27;t see much value arguing with these commenters, because they&#x27;ve already decided their opinion. And I gain no benefit convincing them otherwise.<p>Obviously, based on the votes on the grandparent comment, some people did find what I wrote interesting or insightful enough to upvote. But it did bring out many unhappy posters. How would you have handled it?