I am really confused at this article. Uber and Lyft don&#x27;t want to operate in areas that require fingerprint based background checks. I get it. Harder to get drivers, more process, etc.<p>But isn&#x27;t that just a cost of doing business? On the surface this seems reasonable. Uber&#x2F;Lyft are welcome to raise fares if the background checks result in less drivers on the road. Subsequently the consumer is welcome to not use Uber&#x2F;Lyft if it gets too expensive.<p>Maybe I am missing something?