Are you basing your argument on the existing law concerning classified information, or what you think should happen?<p>The problem with your view is that it is not based on what the law actually is.<p>Clinton was required to report the unauthorized disclosure of classified info. But she didn&#x27;t.<p>By your argument, if someone takes a photocopy of a document but puts a blank piece of paper over whatever mark indicates it as &quot;top secret&quot;, whoever they then hand that photocopy to is excluded from any liability.  That is not how it actually works, however.<p>BTW if the info came from NSA, they are the agency that determines its classification.  Not Clinton.