With a sufficient level of precision, there&#x27;s room for machine analysis to &quot;reveal&quot; things we are ignoring out of custom. A lot of text analysis done by people is full of biases and deferral to authorities.<p>E.g. I remember from school getting in into an argument with a teacher over the interpretation of a poem. &quot;His&quot; interpretation, which was really the interpretation of some authority who&#x27;d written a book was blatantly contradicted by the text if you assumed that the author hadn&#x27;t suddenly forgotten all his basic grammar despite all the evidence to the contrary everywhere else that he was always very precise in this respect.<p>Of course, in some of these kind of instances, it will be incredibly hard to overcome the retort that any &quot;revelation&quot; is just a bug.<p>In a more general sense, people are typically exceedingly bad at parsing text, judging by how often online debates devolve into bickering caused largely by misunderstanding the other party&#x27;s argument. Often to the extent of even ending up arguing against people who you agree with. Having tools that help clarify the parsing for people might be interesting in that respect too.