k. Let&#x27;s do that, then.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.eeoc.gov&#x2F;laws&#x2F;types&#x2F;sexual_harassment.cfm" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.eeoc.gov&#x2F;laws&#x2F;types&#x2F;sexual_harassment.cfm</a><p>&quot;It is unlawful to harass a person (an applicant or employee) because of that person’s sex. Harassment can include “sexual harassment” or unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical harassment of a sexual nature.&quot;<p>or<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.eeoc.gov&#x2F;eeoc&#x2F;publications&#x2F;fs-sex.cfm" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.eeoc.gov&#x2F;eeoc&#x2F;publications&#x2F;fs-sex.cfm</a><p>&quot;Sexual harassment can occur in a variety of circumstances, including but not limited to the following: [...] The harasser&#x27;s conduct must be unwelcome.&quot;<p>Unwelcome sexual advances. That&#x27;s your black and white definition. Being called a MILF can be an unwelcome sexual advance.<p>Being called a milf ----LITERALLY---- means you are a mother I would like to fuck. Regardless of how <i>you</i> perceive pop-culture to use the term.<p>It ----LITERALLY---- is an acronym for mother I want to fuck. There is not another interpretation. You&#x27;re wrong. You&#x27;re just wrong.<p>As for:<p>&gt;If this occurred as OP described, I don&#x27;t see how it can be construed as sexual harassment. He ended contact upon her making it clear that it was unwanted, so by the very definition of &quot;harassment&quot; he didn&#x27;t harass her.<p>OP said nothing about how the male employee ending contact. He said that the female employee &quot;handled it well and didn&#x27;t let it get out of hand.&quot; That is something entirely different. That means that, had the female employee not ended the contact herself, this could have gone on.<p>EITHER WAY. You&#x27;re just wrong. This could be perceived as harassment by a female employee.<p>Now, whether or not the guy should be fired really depends on what OP learns when s&#x2F;he interviews both parties, after s&#x2F;he talks to a lawyer. Honestly, the EEOC or lawyers or courts would try to determine if the actions were pervasive (I don&#x27;t think they were) and created a hostile work environment (sooooo grey, maybe this did, maybe it didn&#x27;t).<p>I&#x27;m telling you that you&#x27;re just wrong. That&#x27;s not phrased as a question - it is a declarative statement.