Points 1-2 seem irrelevant to your argument.<p>&gt; 4. Switch to a user-based pricing to generate more revenue for investors<p>You add &quot;for investors&quot; as a slur, like it&#x27;s a bad thing. Every company, public or private, has investors -- even if it&#x27;s just the founders.<p>&gt; but spin it as a freebie &quot;Hey! Look at the cool unlimited shit! No, no! Don&#x27;t pay attention to the fact you&#x27;re gonna be charged 3 times as much as before for the same service&quot;.<p>Except not everyone will be charged 3x as much. Many will be charged much less. It totally depends on the setup.<p>I have heard countless times over the years what a pain it is for orgs to be charged per repo. It incentives monolithic repos.<p>Equally important: from the perspective of a company trying to maintain budgets, it might actually make more sense to _them_. Factoring Github as a per-head charge, similar to everything from Slack&#x2F;Gmail&#x2F;Photoshop to laptops to food and other perks to healthcare benefits, might make things easier than worrying about whether your employees are structuring their repos in a way that minimizes costs.