That&#x27;s so biased that it gives me the urge to puke.<p>The Julia team can be blamed for these critics. Full stop.<p>That said, obviously they are working hard and well! Obviously a critic of a language is not a critic of its conceptors! However the conceptors are to blame and they are the one who can change the language for the better. Not acknowleging it is plain wrong and won&#x27;t help.<p>Not receiving support is a problem of Julia. It might be unfair, but this is the fucking fact. Finding excuses (assuming this is really a problem) won&#x27;t help either!<p>Oh and guess what? Julia will always be younger than C, Python and co. so what you say about 1.0 and stuff is just misleading. Again, you are looking for excuses: the guy is comparing today&#x27;s Julia to today&#x27;s languages. If I invented a new language, the first critique could be &quot;oh that new language does not even have a standard lib&quot; that woyld be true and fair!<p>Regarding the last sentence, analysing a language with that much attention is &quot;helping&quot;. And telling the author to shut up because he has not providing any code is fucking moronic. Does a referee in the olympuc games need to run as fast as the one it judges to provide an accurate judgement?