In science and technology, it doesn&#x27;t matter where a scientific study was done. We have central repositories and conferences where applications from all over the world are welcomes, and the best achievements are included.<p>The difference in Philosophy is the default is assumed to be European philosophy. A Chinese paper has to be exceptional to be included in an existing course, where most things are directly derived from European philosophy. It is not a fair playing field at all unlike STEM. The course designer is not fetching a list of all studies in the world done of a topic x, and then a panel is not debating on which of these studies has a most merit. The course creators are taking discussion on a topic X from whichever study is done in Europe. If this is how we start carrying out STEM research, we&#x27;d have a hard time to say the least.