I&#x27;ve written up a few ideas about PDFs, edges, and reproducibility (in particular); with the Hashtags #LinkedReproducibility (and #MetaResearch)<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;search?q=%23LinkedReproducibility" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;search?q=%23LinkedReproducibility</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;search?q=%23MetaResearch" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;search?q=%23MetaResearch</a><p>- schema.org&#x2F;MedicalTrialDesign enumerations could&#x2F;should be extended to all of science (and then added to all of these PDFs without structured edge types like e.g. {intendedToReproduce, seemsToReproduce} (which then have specific ensuing discussions))<p>- <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;health-lifesci.schema.org&#x2F;MedicalTrialDesign" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;health-lifesci.schema.org&#x2F;MedicalTrialDesign</a><p>- there should be a way to evaluate controls in a structured, blinded, meta-analytic way<p>- PDF is pretty, but does not support RDFa (because this <i>is</i> a graph)<p>... notes here: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wrdrd.com&#x2F;docs&#x2F;consulting&#x2F;data-science#linked-reproducibility" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wrdrd.com&#x2F;docs&#x2F;consulting&#x2F;data-science#linked-reprod...</a><p>(edit) please feel free to implement any of these ideas (e.g. CC0)