Heh.<p>First, echoing some other comments, this <i>is</i> a test of these web browsers.  My Pale Moon instance (a Firefox fork), which I use much less &quot;actively&quot; and with NoScript running on it, has 42 windows with 2119 tabs, but Firefox is smart about only loading tabs on demand.  On the other hand, I have to restart Palemoon regularly, to prevent it from getting unhappy I do so on every even numbered day.  I also run a Firefox instance with 12 windows and 62 tabs.<p>The workflow is roughly:<p>Windows cover one or a related set of subjects.  I know by position which are were, and hit specific tabs at regular schedules.  Any site I hit multiple times a day has its window on that tab.<p>Additional tabs are of course things to get back to.  Maybe to digest at a later time, maybe only if an issue is still relevant.  I do regularly archive whole windows or most of them using Session Buddy or Session Manager for Firefox&#x2F;Palemoon.<p>For me, this sort of spacial navigation works a lot better than any bookmark system or the like that i&#x27;ve seen.  I have very very good 3D spacial ability (organic chemistry was easy), so I&#x27;m sure that&#x27;s a major factor in why this is right for me and wouldn&#x27;t be right for many others.<p>And at this very moment those hardware resources are for the wasting, at some point after I buy my house, move into it, and my life is 1&#x2F;10 as crazy as it is now I hope to e.g. be running serious and hungry proof assistants and other stuff, circumstances right now have me using it for little more than a media machine, with the web most certainly being a media.  Heck, at this moment, I have one almost as capable machine with 16 GiB only hosting a LTO-4 tape drive.<p>ADDED: this is on a stationary workstation, so all the problems that might crop up with limited mobile connectivity or screens less than 1080p with a 24 inch diagonal.  NEC still makes some fine monitors with very long warranties.