Sorry if I was unclear. I intended to communicate that Go has been used in lieu of the three languages at Google. Unsurprisingly, since that was the intent behind developing it.<p>To the degree IBM and SAP drive enterprise languages I suppose their consultants and sales staff could go whole hog behind Swift as a long term strategy. I&#x27;m not sure I see the same strong parallels with Java, I remember Sun playing a role that uniquely leveraged its hardware and software synergy. Redhat played a role there too: there having being at least as much Java as an alternative the Microsoft stack as a dictate of blue suit consultants.<p>Which makes me wonder if the rationale for Swift&#x27;s adoption based on open source is significantly more compelling than predicting the adoption of C# on a similar basis or a case that the adoption of the opensource .NET as the replacement for the JVM. I suppose it&#x27;s that I&#x27;m not sure I see IBM and SAP as having orders of magnitude more influence on enterprise or tools selection than Microsoft or that I see top down implementation of consultant recommendations as dominating bottom up decisions by small teams.<p>Of course, predictions are hard particularly about the future and your mileage may vary.