My mind isn&#x27;t made up, because there is not enough evidence to generate a conclusion.<p>Which is why I have a problem with anyone who does come to a conclusion, because they do not have enough evidence either.<p>Observational evidence says temperature is going up, it&#x27;s gone up in the past, and it will go up again in the future. Sea level has gone up in the past too. Guess how a shark tooth winds up buried in Montana?<p>What will decide my stance is good, solid, open, scientific results, based on sound input, conducted by a neutral party, with sufficient data to draw conclusions, and done in a manner that any interested party can reproduce the results from their own, independently collected data. If only one dataset is available, then the data collection itself must be open and scrutinized. There&#x27;s too much &#x27;religion&#x27; surrounding the issue to trust anyone not to manipulate anything(not necessarily intentionally).