If you read the article, nothing was being &quot;suppressed&quot;. The sources mentioned are extremely tabloid-esque in nature.<p>This is only biased if we can provide concrete evidence that similar tabloid-esque publications that happened to align &quot;left&quot; of the political spectrum in the U.S. were allowed to pass while their political counterparts were passed up.<p>If the standard for journalism remained constant, but the sources that were &quot;suppressed&quot; largely happen to be conservative that doesn&#x27;t seem like a problem with curation, it seems like a problem for the conservative media ecosystem.<p>I fully expect, despite adhering to basic scientific principles, to be downvoted yet again in this thread, because I already see a lot of the same names from the last time this article was posted <i>and</i> politically charged rhetoric (i.e. &quot;leftist agenda&quot;).