Before I start, I&#x27;m in favor of in-person visitations and generally agree with this article, but I was frustrated by its one-sided nature.  They&#x27;ve presented a case highlighting almost none of the motivations behind video visitations beyond the quick buck ($1&#x2F;minute) and the prison system&#x27;s obvious desire to screw the families of inmates[1].<p>Problem #1 at a prison is security.  Physical visitation is a security nightmare for all of the reasons you can imagine.  The process is onerous to the visitor, the prisoner and staff.  Keeping contraband out is <i>very</i> difficult - you can&#x27;t give a body-cavity search to a visitor (as far as I know).  Yes, there are many ways to get bad things in, but this is one of them.  Because of these problems, visitations are scheduled events that occur far too infrequently.  This <i>also</i> reduces moral.<p>Many family members of prisoners are unwilling to visit a prisoner for a variety of human factors: being around a large number of criminals is not something most people want to do.  Being associated with a person in prison is enough to make a family member not want to visit.  Distance, especially in the Federal system where a prisoner can be hundreds of miles away from any family, is a huge barrier.  The prisons that I&#x27;m aware of that are looking deeper into video visitation are interested in its potential to increase visit frequency and virtual, remote, visitation. It makes the stigma and difficulty of visitation easier (on the visitor) which gives a prisoner a visitor that may not have had one otherwise.<p>That said, while I think it would be OK for a prison to reduce in-person visitations with the availability of <i>remote</i> visitor visitation, I&#x27;m firmly against elimination of in-person visitations (for all of the reasons presented in the article).  Security, being the first responsibility of a prison, is benefited by not eliminating the program.  But there is likely a balance.  With visitations being a &quot;paid affair&quot; (especially at those outrageous prices), and with video visitation allowing for an easier to secure environment, there will also be additional motivation to increase the frequency of these &quot;virtual visits&quot;, perhaps to the point of the frequency of what is allowed for phone calls.<p>[1] I&#x27;ve chosen that wording because that was my take-away of how the article framed the argument.  I do not believe this is the actual motivation of the prison system.