I think we&#x27;re missing some information here.  The supplied link says that the applications have been renamed due to legal threats.  This seems completely reasonable to me.  The names of the apps are trademarks and for a security product, <i>who builds it</i> is important to the integrity of the mark.<p>I&#x27;m trying to remember how Android works, but I seem to recall that you need to sign the packages differently on Play and Fdroid.  So you literally can&#x27;t redistribute the same Play package with Fdroid (someone correct me if I&#x27;m wrong).  This means rebuilding... and hence rebranding.<p>It seems that MM was asked to provide a build for Fdroid.  He decided not to.  That&#x27;s completely his right.  He doesn&#x27;t go into a lot of detail about why he has decided this, but it&#x27;s completely up to him.<p>So all I can tell is that there is an Fdroid version, which has a different name.  You can&#x27;t switch easily between the Play and Fdroid versions because of code suckage... which sucks, but isn&#x27;t a GPL violation.<p>Is this just a tempest in a teapot, or am I missing something?