That&#x27;s simply not how discourse works on a national scale. There are many things that can be given a platform but aren&#x27;t because it&#x27;d be a waste of time. No one is afraid to give these things a platform, it&#x27;s just pointless. Artificial platforming for the sake of having every imaginable view point with or without merit on the table would be a disaster.<p>No one is stopping people from having these opinions, speaking about them, or teaching those perspectives. Claiming that this is a cause of freedom of information and somehow making this analogous to Galileo (it&#x27;s not, not even  in the slightest) is absurdly silly.<p>If you are looking to defend rational discourse and freedom of thought, well, you&#x27;re not doing that -- leveling out everything on a no-questions-asked baseline is ignorant and becomes borderline satire of unbiased rational thought at that point.