I don&#x27;t see a problem in that. I was pointing out that &quot;Milf&quot; would be the only thing in the series of events that could qualify as &quot;sexually harrasing&quot;, and the others would not.<p>That&#x27;s a legitimate thing to do when trying to be objective in face of making some important decisions. A single qualifying statement is not a very firm basis to make decisions on. That&#x27;s btw. why I was suggesting collecting <i>all</i> the facts.