Well, I sure didn&#x27;t have to go far into following this post&#x27;s links to crash right into this boulder:<p><pre><code>    Why are women and children evacuated first in case
    of disaster? So we can think about a solution in
    silence. #funny
</code></pre>
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;dracony_gimp&#x2F;status&#x2F;726165884260241408" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;dracony_gimp&#x2F;status&#x2F;726165884260241408</a><p>I don&#x27;t know this person, but between the multiple reports of sockpuppeting in the post and, well, <i>that</i>, I&#x27;m not encouraged.<p>(Edit: Hi Dan. Good to see you, as always. I&#x27;m out of my HN rabbit pellet comment quota and cannot reply to you, as you intend. Consider whether this turned into a nonviolent demonstration of something I feel that you should address and that perhaps it is not me that you should be chastising, or just ban me and get it overwith for calling out sexism both in the unrelated community and this one. Since your play here was to go after me for rather intentionally attacking a systemic problem here that this community somewhat unapologetically perpetuates and that you are lightly acknowledging, perhaps that tells me what I need to know about your opinion on this and how you plan to fix it over time. In which case a ban would be a relief and finally communicate to me after about seven years on different accounts that Y Combinator and Hacker News give absolutely zero fucks about exclusionary content, behavior, or people.<p>My bad for not staying on topic about a completely irrelevant sockpuppeteer in the PHP community. I&#x27;ll do better about the purity of staying on topic, because it&#x27;s clearly driving a substantive conversation upthread. Perhaps we can discuss how this would be implemented in Arc, or would you change the rules mid-conversation? Happy to e-mail with you about this again until I start making too much sense and you don&#x27;t reply.)