This <i>edit:following</i> medium.com article clocks in at over 100mb in total, due to unoptimised gifs (so don&#x27;t open it on mobile):<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;medium.com&#x2F;@tubikstudio&#x2F;ui-animation-microinteraction-for-macroresult-668cd9e71101#.cvux0ueyh" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;medium.com&#x2F;@tubikstudio&#x2F;ui-animation-microinteractio...</a><p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;imgur.com&#x2F;SsurT3W" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;imgur.com&#x2F;SsurT3W</a><p>Aside from the fact that it&#x27;s impressive to make <i>flat-styled animations</i> that big in gif form, I think the people behind medium.com are just as much to blame for not giving feedback to the uploader about the size of the attached images, nor offering a non-destructive optimising pass or serving the gifs reencoded as .WebM for browsers that support it.