&gt; The omnipresent problem which Joreen confronts, that of elites, does not find solution in the formation of structures.<p>&quot;Structure&quot; covers a wide spectrum though, from formal and rigid, to unwritten or very simple and mutual rules. I think despotic and alienating structures being bad doesn&#x27;t make structure as such any more bad than, say, a bad book would make books in general bad.<p>I personally like the concept &quot;order within liberty&quot; a lot:<p>&gt; <i>You don’t know what order with freedom means! You only know what revolt against oppression is! You don’t know that the rod, discipline, violence, the state and government can only be sustained because of you and because of your lack of socially creative powers that develop order within liberty!</i><p>by Gustav Landauer, who also said&#x2F;wrote:<p>&gt; <i>One can throw away a chair and destroy a pane of glass; but those are idle talkers and credulous idolaters of words who regard the state as such a thing or as a fetish that one can smash in order to destroy it. The state is a condition, a certain relationship between human beings, a mode of behavior; we destroy it by contracting other relationships, by behaving differently toward one another.</i><p>And I think the article you linked kind of agrees with that, even:<p>&gt; While, ultimately, a massive force of women (and some men) will be necessary to smash the power of the state, a mass movement itself does not a revolution make. If we hope to create a society free of mate supremacy, when we overthrow capitalism and build international socialism, we had better start working on it right away, because some of our very best anti-capitalist friends are going to give us the hardest time. We must be developing a visible women&#x27;s culture, within which women can define and express themselves apart from patriarchal standards, and which will meet the needs of women where patriarchy has failed.<p>Whether you call it culture or structure or organization, everybody seems in agreement that just wandering off and doing your own thing <i>all the time</i> will not yield great results, though one might argue about details. Is that impression wrong?