I&#x27;m reminded of the IT security talk (Ugly bags of water), where the first dozen or so slides were about how the automotive industry had to make a lot of changes to account for human&#x27;s error proneness.<p>I guess now that Software is sneaking back into automobiles, we&#x27;re going to shift back into &quot;blame the user&quot; mode?<p>&quot;But he used the feature wrong!&quot; - To which I say, why was he able to use the feature the wrong way in the first place? Why are there so many limitations (won&#x27;t sense a bike; won&#x27;t sense a partially opened garage door) on a feature designed and advertised as &quot;hands off summoning of the vehicle&quot;?