Yes, the number of reported vulnerabilities isn&#x27;t a good metric to judge the security of a project. It often means that few people bothered to look, and that when developers fixed a bug they didn&#x27;t try to find out whether it was exploitable.<p>The latter is supported by the fact that changelog entries don&#x27;t discriminate between security bugs and normal bugs, and by the fact that no vulnerability was ever reported by the developers themselves.<p>More worryingly, in all instances where a vulnerability was reported, the CVE vulnerability was filed specifically because the reporters were security researchers. This means that when a normal user reported a crash bug, no vulnerability was EVER filed. How likely do you think it is that none of those crashes could possibly be turned into an exploit? There are 95 instances of &quot;Some bugs were fixed&quot; in the changelog.