You&#x27;ve literally cherry picked sentences from your own links to avoid pointing out that - as I originally said - instances of harassment such as being called a &quot;milf&quot; must occur at a demonstrably frequent enough rate that it creates a hostile work environment. I.e. you must be harassed, not simply affronted. It appears that you realised this halfway through your post...?<p>Anyway, there is no court in the western world which will deem this lone instance as &quot;sexual harassment&quot;. I don&#x27;t know why you&#x27;re so insistent that I&#x27;m &quot;wrong&quot; regarding this, as if I&#x27;m the harasser or something. I have <i>not</i> suggested that this incident should be dismissed or taken lightly, in the least.<p>I simply said that I&#x27;m shocked that 90% of this thread is saying he should be fired. In my country, not only would you not be fired, it would be illegal to fire you for this.