I&#x27;m pretty sure that this is at least the part of what he is talking about. I&#x27;m not sure if it&#x27;s fair to refer to it as a &quot;technology&quot;, but he is basically talking about laws being even more fucked up than they were some 30 years ago, and people (say, you) accepting it as it was OK. But for him, or for me it&#x27;s not OK — for us it &quot;seems&quot; like money (cash included) is just a handy way to exchange goods and services without carrying a cow (or a witness of me working for someone for a day) around the city. The whole purpose of money for us, as we learned while growing up, is a confirmation of us being useful to someone, a &quot;neutral goods&quot; so to say. So we don&#x27;t feel obliged to &quot;notify&quot; any fucking &quot;relevant authorities&quot; when we move somewhere while keeping these tokens of us being useful, which are accepted somewhere else as well. We don&#x27;t want to have to rely on banks and lawyers to exchange something we make by our hands to a loaf of bread.<p>So it&#x27;s understandable that he doesn&#x27;t like somebody comparing of moving something you stole to moving something you earned. For him this is nothing but one more pair of shackles people suddenly have to wear — and are putting it on happily, because it surely helps them to live more secure and blissful life, yeah.