I feel it may be a problem for them since it looks like they try to reproduce the program&#x27;s setup&#x2F;workflow, which is (in my experience) more than bioinformatics reviewers usually do:<p>&gt;Authors are strongly encouraged to include an automated test suite covering the core functionality of their software.<p>&gt; OK: Documented manual steps that can be followed to check the expected functionality of the software (e.g. a sample input file to assert behaviour)<p>You can see the checklist reviewers go through in any of the issues here:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;openjournals&#x2F;joss-reviews&#x2F;issues" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;openjournals&#x2F;joss-reviews&#x2F;issues</a>