I very strongly disagree that it&#x27;s morally wrong.
Let&#x27;s say I provide a service to people for 1000$&#x2F;pop. They value it at more than that and happily exchange money for that service. I get my 1000$. I don&#x27;t use almost any environmental or public resources to perform the service (I write code or perform massages or w&#x2F;e).<p>The mere fact that I exist and provide those services is beneficial for society even if I am taxed at 0%.<p>There are of course issues if I have a monopoly or if I am extracting rent from what should be a common good (say natural resources of crucial piece of land) or if I am polluting while providing my services. There are also issues if what I do hurt others but they are or unrelated to the fact that I create wealth for myself. How is it wrong? What moral principle are you using to say it&#x27;s wrong? My reasons are quite straightforward: by providing sought for services I am increasing my and my customer&#x27;s happiness while not hurting others in the process. It&#x27;s a win-win, the more I provide the more insanely win-win it is even if I collect a trillion dollars in the process.