This is a big problem that I&#x27;ve been seeing a lot lately: Liberals and Progressives thinking that they&#x27;re absolutely right and just, and as such, they should censor those that they perceive as not being right or just. But who is the judge here? How do we really know what is absolutely right or just?<p>Censorship of any kind is inherently dangerous and detrimental to true progress. Aren&#x27;t equality, open-mindedness, and freedom of expression paramount to liberal thought? Do you not see the hypocrisy here?<p>But shouldn&#x27;t none of this matter? If we&#x27;re right, should we really need to silence our opponents? If our ideas are fundamentally right, then they should win in a fair and open marketplace of ideas, without the unfair advantage of censorship.<p>The very fact that you want (or feel the need) to silence your opponent sheds a light on the quality and legitimacy of your ideas. I say this as someone who has always been classically liberal; we have abandoned our true ideals (the ideals which have usually placed us on the right side of history) for radicalism and new forms of bigotry and inequality. The Overton Window has radically shifted and those that were previously on the left are now falling closer to the center-right.<p>We are a polarized nation and this is reflected in the atrocious line-up of presidential candidates that we have right now.