I think the new pricing structure makes a lot of sense, however is awkwardly limiting in some respects that GitHub might not have considered.<p>We have essentially 2 classes of GitHub user on our organisation - developers, and non-developers. While our devs use GitHub all the time (and therefore are worth the $25 a month for the development team), our other users might edit a specific few config files, or jobs pages (for example) once a month - paying $9&#x2F;month each seems quite overpriced.<p>We want to be an open company, one that doesn&#x27;t keep secrets from employees, one that doesn&#x27;t create unnecessary barriers to productivity, or have unnecessary process, so giving GitHub access to everyone in the company who wants it is important to us - this stops us from reasonably doing this. As a result, we likely won&#x27;t be switching to the new pricing structure for as long as possible, which is a shame, because it would be nice to not have to think about private repos.