I had to dig up the ruling ( <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.eff.org&#x2F;files&#x2F;2014&#x2F;11&#x2F;10&#x2F;oracle_v_google_13-1021.opinion.5-7-2014.1.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.eff.org&#x2F;files&#x2F;2014&#x2F;11&#x2F;10&#x2F;oracle_v_google_13-1021...</a> ).  It looks like my memory was faulty:  &quot;Because we conclude that the declaring code and the structure, sequence, and organization of the API packages are entitled to copyright protection, we reverse the district  court’s copyrightability determination with instructions to reinstate the jury’s infringement finding as to the 37 Java packages.  Because the jury deadlocked on fair use, we remand for further consideration of Google’s fair use defense in light of this decision&quot; (pg. 5).