I believe the threat you&#x27;re invoking --- from the accused harasser to the employee terminating using their privilege as an at-will employer, to sue for damages stemming from that termination --- is fictitious.<p>Could you clarify by citing a case with this fact pattern which actually made it to trial?<p>* At-will employee<p>* No special contract terms tied to for-cause termination<p>* Disputed or false accusation of harassment (or, if you like, any claim of harassment whatsoever --- or, really, any &quot;cause&quot; whatsoever)<p>* Terminated, either formally for cause or for no cause<p>* Claim of damages stemming from the termination itself