I&#x27;d still rather earlier code reviews... design reviews about 1&#x2F;3 of the way into writing the code. Enough time to have passed to have discovered the dragons in the whiteboard design, but not enough to have written code that could only undergo minor fixes in a code review.<p>I prefer the idea of a code review happening at a time that it could still steer the ship... too many code reviews catch bugs, but don&#x27;t correct poor system design. That&#x27;s also where the greatest benefit&#x2F;education exists for the author... not minor changes, but &quot;what about approaching it like this&quot;.