My suggestion:  California&#x27;s minimal coal-generated elecricity imports fall another 96%<p>Problems with title as it stands:<p>1. Suggests California has (or had) considerable coal-based generation.  It doesn&#x27;t and didn&#x27;t.<p>2. Suggests California&#x27;s reliance on coal-fired electricity was high.  It wasn&#x27;t.<p>3. Fails to disclose that a <i>small</i> quantity of <i>imported</i> power has been reduced yet further.<p>It&#x27;s actually almost a perfectly <i>anti</i>-informative headline.  Reading it you&#x27;d form a mental state nearly perfectly counter to reality.