I don&#x27;t see anything in that essay that supports any but a <i>very</i> broad interpretation of the phrase &quot;misrepresented the data&quot;. I see a bunch of innuendo and odd stats like this one:<p>&gt; Of professors who say that they are religious, fully 19% of them can be classified as “traditionalists,” which would include evangelical Christians (which in Kristof’s NYT op-ed were presented as a maligned minority, not part of the solid 1-in-5 religious professors who are traditionalists found by the survey).<p>One in five <i>religious</i> professors are traditionalists. So what?