I see your point, but it&#x27;s not exactly relevant. As a purchaser in need of putting a multi-million dollar satellite in space, I could not care less that your company had failures in its infancy. I want to see your most-recent results as evidence of your ability to put my satellite in space. Comparing SpaceX, and whatever its success rate is, to ULA, and it&#x27;s 100% in 106 launches, is easy.<p>The string of 106 successful launches is what I&#x27;m looking at. Just because you&#x27;re new to the market doesn&#x27;t necessarily mean you get a pass on quality&#x2F;success. This is especially true when we&#x27;re talking about putting expensive objects, that took years to build, in space.