I disagree with that article as it makes no sense. Their assertion that tests === diagnostics that map 1:1 to a disease was baseless. Tests don&#x27;t answer the question &quot;doe patient have diabetes?&quot;, they answer the question &quot;what is the patients glucose level?&quot; 115 mg&#x2F;dl.<p>Maybe the patient forgot to fast, maybe the test was a fluke? Either way a consistent average of 85 would put that out of range. SO I found the five thirty eight article stupid so I guess I misunderstood why more health data would be bad.