I still don&#x27;t see how this makes Bill Clinton a war criminal.  For that to be true, he would have had to have attacked the pharmaceutical factory as a means of retaliation against Sudan&#x27;s civilian population (i.e. <i>not</i> as a result of misunderstanding the factory&#x27;s purpose).  Can you prove that Clinton was indirectly targeting civilians?<p>We don&#x27;t live in a perfect world.  Human collateral alone is not enough to justify the label of war criminal.