Its an interesting read, but I don&#x27;t think it goes in depth enough in some areas:<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;arstechnica.com&#x2F;information-technology&#x2F;2016&#x2F;03&#x2F;nsa-refused-clinton-a-secure-blackberry-like-obama-so-she-used-her-own&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;arstechnica.com&#x2F;information-technology&#x2F;2016&#x2F;03&#x2F;nsa-re...</a><p>“Each time we asked the question &#x27;What was the solution for POTUS,&#x27; we were politely asked to shut up and color,” Donald Reid, State Department coordinator for security infrastructure, said in a 2009 email first obtained as part of a Freedom of Information Act request by the political action group Judicial Watch.<p>The woman asked for a workable solution, one that former SofS had access to and was told no. She asked what POTOUS had and was told NO, and instead offered something 1&#x2F;2 assed at best.<p>There is also the question of a foundation staffer having highly compartmentalized data from the NSA... that is, to say the least, interesting as it apparently came from an &quot;outside source&quot;. The story as it is being presented is NSA-&gt;leak-&gt; Blumenthal -&gt; clinton. One would think that this would have lead to a swift inditement of him (Blumenthal), yet nothing.<p>I suspect that there is a LOT more to this portion of the story that has NOTHING to do with Clinton, and it might make one want a tinfoil hat.