(tyop: should be &#x27;permit per driver&#x27;)<p>Unless I misread <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;kut.org&#x2F;post&#x2F;explaining-exactly-what-yes-and-no-vote-prop-1-means" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;kut.org&#x2F;post&#x2F;explaining-exactly-what-yes-and-no-vote-...</a> a &#x27;yes&#x27; vote would&#x27;ve meant the fee must be 1% of annual revenue, whereas the &#x27;no&#x27; vote means they can still pay that amount, or have two alternative options if they prefer.<p>So at that point I&#x27;m not sure why that would upset them, except perhaps the fear that the 1% option would then be separately phased out later? (which is possibly a very real risk; I&#x27;m seeking synthesis, not antithesis, here)