It&#x27;s a lot harder to change a regulation when nobody has any idea what the landscape looks like without it, or how people could function without the incumbents that benefit from that regulation.  Someone building a service people genuinely want, creating something useful that didn&#x27;t exist before, and not doing any harm to people by doing so, may choose to go ahead and build it to prove that it&#x27;s possible and sensible to do so.  Sometimes that&#x27;s the right thing to do; sometimes it&#x27;s the wrong thing to do.  But I&#x27;m not going to automatically assume that because there&#x27;s a regulation on the books that that has anything to do with morality; there&#x27;s far too many bought-and-paid-for regulations to believe that.