That&#x27;s exactly what I was thinking. Sure, if we look at a population then maybe we don&#x27;t see a remarkable result. But surely we&#x27;ve helped SOMEONE here.<p>From the article: &quot;which means that only 27% of positive test results are right&quot;<p>Yes, 27% is not great, but that&#x27;s still more than 1&#x2F;4 of the people that had a good result and will live longer or better or whatever. 1&#x2F;4 of the people got some kind of benefit. Sure, we&#x27;d rather see 75% but 27% is SOMETHING and that&#x27;s worth, well, something I guess. Does the cost mean it&#x27;s worth it?<p>For those in the 27% they are sure as heck going to say yes, right?