at the same time, how do you feel about creationism and intelligent design being suppressed instead of given equal airtime with competing theories.<p>what constitutes &quot;fair?&quot;  if one group is twice as loud while delivering the same amount of content, is it unfair to turn their volume down by half?<p>how about something like snopes or myth debunking?  does dr oz deserve equal placement to more credible nutrition science?  what is worse, attempting to surface more legitimate sources, or letting your site turn into a free for all shouting match?<p>for anyone downvoting me because they think I approve of censorship if my side wins: quite the contrary.  I think from a purely theoretical standpoint, signal to noise is a complicated problem, and the people who reject the idea of filtering or ranking in totality are being unrealistic.  allowing the loudest speakers to unabatedly monopolize collective attention is a problem.