" :::::::::::::::I'm only implying that there may be space in the article for a description of conflicting sources, but that can't happen while suppression of the whole dispute is being attempted. As to the ""read"" vs ""interpret"" thing, I didn't mean that one ""only needs to be able to read"", but just that some things take interpretation, but other things can be read pretty directly from WP:PRIMARY sources (whose use, consistent with policy, isn't ruled out). :::::::::::::::Were there any changes in the constitutions? Yes, the wording did change. :::::::::::::::Would I say that it was insubstantial? Pretty much, as the mentioning of Serbs together with other nations instead of on their own
" :::::::::::::::I'm only implying that there may be space in the article for a description of conflicting sources, but that can't happen while suppression of the whole dispute is being attempted. As to the ""read"" vs ""interpret"" thing, I didn't mean that one ""only needs to be able to read"", but just that some things take interpretation, but other things can be read pretty directly from WP:PRIMARY sources (whose use, consistent with policy, isn't ruled out). :::::::::::::::Were there any changes in the constitutions? Yes, the wording did change. :::::::::::::::Would I say that it was insubstantial? Pretty much, as the mentioning of Serbs together with other nations instead of on their own,