" If we quote Bronner's piece (the NYT article that states ""all official translations"") then we have to quote Cole's response to Bronner. Also, if we want to include Hitchens' non-notable charge that Cole is an ""apologist"" for Ahmadenijad that is fine but we then must include Cole's actual statements about the man - that he is a ""crank"" and a ""fascist,"" and let's be sure to cite Cole's ""scorecard"" on the issue right here. It turns out Hitchens is far more of an ""apologist"" if we must observe such things; but, as I said, it's really not notable. Oh yes and we should be
" If we quote Bronner's piece (the NYT article that states ""all official translations"") then we have to quote Cole's response to Bronner. Also, if we want to include Hitchens' non-notable charge that Cole is an ""apologist"" for Ahmadenijad that is fine but we then must include Cole's actual statements about the man - that he is a ""crank"" and a ""fascist,"" and let's be sure to cite Cole's ""scorecard"" on the issue right here. It turns out Hitchens is far more of an ""apologist"" if we must observe such things; but, as I said, it's really not notable. Oh yes and we should be able