:: Thanks again for your suggestions and edits. As I understand it, the criteria (see WP:GA?) and process for selecting good articles are a bit more flexible than featured articles, and any editor can carry out the review. To address the previous peer review: ::* I went through and tagged 3 of the 4 articles tagged as registration warnings by checklinks with the subscription required template. I also checked the redirects, and they are all open (although the national academies requires registration), and include a link to PLoS via the DOI resolver. I figured that was ok, but I can replace the url with a direct link if necessary. ::* I've tried to bracket some sections
:: Thanks again for your suggestions and edits. As I understand it, the criteria (see WP:GA?) and process for selecting good articles are a bit more flexible than featured articles, and any editor can carry out the review. To address the previous peer review: ::* I went through and tagged 3 of the 4 articles tagged as registration warnings by checklinks with the subscription required template. I also checked the redirects, and they are all open (although the national academies requires registration), and include a link to PLoS via the DOI resolver. I figured that was ok, but I can replace the url with a direct link if necessary. ::* I've tried to bracket some sections with