":whose ""nationalists""? Moscovitian? Agreed. Their miserable attemts ""to declare"" russians in Haličina indeed are something maniacal. At least for those who aren't introduced with russian imperialism. Ukrainophiles were for halichian ""peasants"", thus for their own people, their language, culture; moscvophiles were for russian tsars, their seminatural late adopted by ugrofinns oldchurch language from Macedonia Slavs in kyiv redaction, they just wanted to be a part of russia. They absolutely ignored who their people lived with them actually were. They don't speak to them in language which those understood. This artificial movement was due to heavily denationalization
":whose ""nationalists""? Moscovitian? Agreed. Their miserable attemts ""to declare"" russians in Haličina indeed are something maniacal. At least for those who aren't introduced with russian imperialism. Ukrainophiles were for halichian ""peasants"", thus for their own people, their language, culture; moscvophiles were for russian tsars, their seminatural late adopted by ugrofinns oldchurch language from Macedonia Slavs in kyiv redaction, they just wanted to be a part of russia. They absolutely ignored who their people lived with them actually were. They don't speak to them in language which those understood. This artificial movement was due to heavily denationalization of