" ::I don't see why you'd find such a thing amusing, nor why you think my question might've been rhetorical (or even ""retorical"", as you put it). Such decisions should be based on policy, and not contradictory ""precedents"" that are not evidently documented, nor the subjective judgments of button-pushers who don't seem to take the discussion into account. Can you point me to these precedents? :Hi Nightscream, please forgive my tone in the last message - I had assumed (as you have been here longer than me) that you were aware there is no such criteria page and were obliquely questioning my Ffd closure. The one used in these cases is the WP:NFCC list. What I mean by amusing is that, if we had a
" ::I don't see why you'd find such a thing amusing, nor why you think my question might've been rhetorical (or even ""retorical"", as you put it). Such decisions should be based on policy, and not contradictory ""precedents"" that are not evidently documented, nor the subjective judgments of button-pushers who don't seem to take the discussion into account. Can you point me to these precedents? :Hi Nightscream, please forgive my tone in the last message - I had assumed (as you have been here longer than me) that you were aware there is no such criteria page and were obliquely questioning my Ffd closure. The one used in these cases is the WP:NFCC list. What I mean by amusing is that, if we had a "