" :::EGeek, since you and I both agree with Greg, we seem to basically agree on what should be done, but disagree on how it should be done. See Immediatism on meta. :::We both agree that the article is nonsense and should be changed, but you want to gradually improve it while I want to immediately improve it. :::Your proposal :::*We have each section be revised, one at a time. (Gradual approach) :::My proposal :::*We clear out nearly everything and, if anything needs to be put back in, we can do that. (Immediate approach) :::Now I believe my proposal is consistent with the spirit of WP:IAR because your proposal was already tried once and failed. A
" :::EGeek, since you and I both agree with Greg, we seem to basically agree on what should be done, but disagree on how it should be done. See Immediatism on meta. :::We both agree that the article is nonsense and should be changed, but you want to gradually improve it while I want to immediately improve it. :::Your proposal :::*We have each section be revised, one at a time. (Gradual approach) :::My proposal :::*We clear out nearly everything and, if anything needs to be put back in, we can do that. (Immediate approach) :::Now I believe my proposal is consistent with the spirit of WP:IAR because your proposal was already tried once and failed. A good