" ::Re #1: Yes, that's fine, although I'll hold off until there is more discussion on #2. ::Re #2: It's just personal opinion, but the redundancy in a category like ""Pages with X"" is distasteful to me. A category is a list of pages so it's pointless putting ""Pages with"" in the name. For articles, we say Category:Living people or Category:1961 births. It's not Category:Articles about living people or Category:Articles about people born in 1961. However, I'm pretty flexible and am happy with the outcome of a discussion, although I hope we could attract a few opinions. The good news
" ::Re #1: Yes, that's fine, although I'll hold off until there is more discussion on #2. ::Re #2: It's just personal opinion, but the redundancy in a category like ""Pages with X"" is distasteful to me. A category is a list of pages so it's pointless putting ""Pages with"" in the name. For articles, we say Category:Living people or Category:1961 births. It's not Category:Articles about living people or Category:Articles about people born in 1961. However, I'm pretty flexible and am happy with the outcome of a discussion, although I hope we could attract a few opinions. The good news is