" :::You list eight negative reviews by professors of history. Now, unless the number of leading historians in the world is less than 16, the statement in the current revision of this page is incorrect. Presumably, you do not mean what you say literally, as suggested by your argument that ""the main evidence for the claim is the absence of positive reviews in scholarly journals"". So, I suggest that at the very least you use a more literal turn of phrase. For example, ""reviews in scholarly journals have mostly been negative"", or ""a number of prominent [less POV than ""leading""] historians have
" :::You list eight negative reviews by professors of history. Now, unless the number of leading historians in the world is less than 16, the statement in the current revision of this page is incorrect. Presumably, you do not mean what you say literally, as suggested by your argument that ""the main evidence for the claim is the absence of positive reviews in scholarly journals"". So, I suggest that at the very least you use a more literal turn of phrase. For example, ""reviews in scholarly journals have mostly been negative"", or ""a number of prominent [less POV than ""leading""] historians have been