" == Barbara Schwarz article fuddlemark reverted my edit== I reverted your edit because it was a) redundant, and b) unencyclopædic. For 'a', Ms Schwarz's still being a Scientologist is covered in the opening paragraph, so you don't need to create a new section just to say ""she's a Scientologist"". As for 'b', section headings like ""What Scientology doesn't want you to know"" are contrary to Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and entirely the wrong tone to use for an encyclopædia. Does that make sense? :No, fuddlemark, not so much. Because you see, a) it is covered once in the opening paragraph that she considers herself being a scientologist. And
" == Barbara Schwarz article fuddlemark reverted my edit== I reverted your edit because it was a) redundant, and b) unencyclopædic. For 'a', Ms Schwarz's still being a Scientologist is covered in the opening paragraph, so you don't need to create a new section just to say ""she's a Scientologist"". As for 'b', section headings like ""What Scientology doesn't want you to know"" are contrary to Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and entirely the wrong tone to use for an encyclopædia. Does that make sense? :No, fuddlemark, not so much. Because you see, a) it is covered once in the opening paragraph that she considers herself being a scientologist. And b