::::::This all follows me questioning your judgment just now. You are being awfully POINTy. Trolling to an edit from six months ago, with completely accurate information, focusing on 1 ref out of 65 refs, calling my not remembering why that specific ref (from thousands of edits and over half a year ago ago) had a ref other than one of the two that completely support the statement, failing to AGF, failing to perform a search of your own to note whether it is accurate before deleting accurate material, calling it contentious when it is nothing of the sort other than in your POV, failing to respond to my queries twice
::::::This all follows me questioning your judgment just now. You are being awfully POINTy. Trolling to an edit from six months ago, with completely accurate information, focusing on 1 ref out of 65 refs, calling my not remembering why that specific ref (from thousands of edits and over half a year ago ago) had a ref other than one of the two that completely support the statement, failing to AGF, failing to perform a search of your own to note whether it is accurate before deleting accurate material, calling it contentious when it is nothing of the sort other than in your POV, failing to respond to my queries twice,