It is a very informative article! I have a question for you, regarding how to proceed. ::When some people nominate an article at GAN, they like to just get an answer (pass or fail) with helpful feedback for improvement and compliments on the article's strengths. Then they work on the article on their own time, and renominate it later if it didn't pass. But other people like to treat a GAN as a very interactive process, where the reviewer leaves detailed suggestions for change, and the nominator deals with each suggestion quickly, and the process goes back and forth until the criteria are met or until the time runs out. (Ideally, GAN reviews should only be open for about a week or two.) So my question for you is, which
It is a very informative article! I have a question for you, regarding how to proceed. ::When some people nominate an article at GAN, they like to just get an answer (pass or fail) with helpful feedback for improvement and compliments on the article's strengths. Then they work on the article on their own time, and renominate it later if it didn't pass. But other people like to treat a GAN as a very interactive process, where the reviewer leaves detailed suggestions for change, and the nominator deals with each suggestion quickly, and the process goes back and forth until the criteria are met or until the time runs out. (Ideally, GAN reviews should only be open for about a week or two.) So my question for you is, which of