" ==Quality assessment, 18 June 2007== I have assessed this article as B-class, according to the standard grading scheme. I have to disagree, however that this article is on the way to A-class. Problems which might prevent this article from achieving GA status include: * Length: The History section could do with being forked and summarised, and cuts could be made elsewhere. The Introduction is too long and does not adequately summarise the article. * Referencing: there are two competing footnotes sections. The inline references which have not been footnoted refer mostly to the University's own web
" ==Quality assessment, 18 June 2007== I have assessed this article as B-class, according to the standard grading scheme. I have to disagree, however that this article is on the way to A-class. Problems which might prevent this article from achieving GA status include: * Length: The History section could do with being forked and summarised, and cuts could be made elsewhere. The Introduction is too long and does not adequately summarise the article. * Referencing: there are two competing footnotes sections. The inline references which have not been footnoted refer mostly to the University's own web site