" *50/50 for me Certainly most of the capitalization sources for ""Mustang"" are from specialist horse organizations. They probably should carry more weight than your average newspaper. But most average English sources would spell it ""mustang"", not that Wikipedia really goes with what most English sources use per my observations. Whatever the sourcing, Wikipedia goes with consensus. But when an Rfc gets plopped up and a mere 13 hours later on a weekend an editor calls ""snow"" and reverts the article when 5 of 7 posters see things as he does... that is disruptive editing. There may be many equine editors who haven't even seen this yet. Were the Equine, Livestock and United States projects notified, since this article lists them as categories? If
" *50/50 for me Certainly most of the capitalization sources for ""Mustang"" are from specialist horse organizations. They probably should carry more weight than your average newspaper. But most average English sources would spell it ""mustang"", not that Wikipedia really goes with what most English sources use per my observations. Whatever the sourcing, Wikipedia goes with consensus. But when an Rfc gets plopped up and a mere 13 hours later on a weekend an editor calls ""snow"" and reverts the article when 5 of 7 posters see things as he does... that is disruptive editing. There may be many equine editors who haven't even seen this yet. Were the Equine, Livestock and United States projects notified, since this article lists them as categories? If so