 Donald Trump Panicking As Ugly Divorce Records May Be UnsealedIt s no secret that Donald Trump is cruel to women. Look how he describes and refers to women he doesn t like (for personal or non-personal reasons). He s cheated on two of his wives, resulting in some ugly and highly publicized divorces. But it s his 1990 divorce from his first wife, Ivana, that has people interested, and for good reason.The divorce, first filed by Ivana due to extreme cruel and inhuman treatment,  is controversial and, often times, muddy. Ivana Trump once revealed Donald Trump had raped her in a violent assault when he tore off her clothes and forced himself on her. The allegation was made in a sworn deposition by Trump, and was reported in the 1993 book Lost Tycoon: The Many Lives of Donald J. Trump. Ivana Trump has since claimed that she did not mean it in  a literal or criminal sense,  but the affidavit still stands.But still, details of  cruel and inhuman treatment  lie buried in the sealed documents of the divorce, which is why the New York Times sued last month to have them unsealed. In the state of New York, all divorce records are sealed unless determined by a judge to be useful in  special circumstances  when dealing with intense public interest.Of course, given the fact that Donald Trump is running for President of the United States, and coupled with his past statements regarding women, the public does indeed have an interest in figuring out what kind of husband Donald Trump was, and how he treated his first wife. Or so the New York Times contends.But it s Donald and Ivana Trump who are panicking and scared out of their minds at what s possibly to come.Marc Kasowitz and other attorneys from the New York-based firm Kasowitz Benson Torres & Friedman, as well as longtime Trump Organization lawyer Michael Cohen, wrote in a  brief to the judge, Supreme Court Justice Frank Nervo:In seeking to invade the Trumps  26-year-old confidential matrimonial files, the Times and Gannett, as shown in Mr. Trump s filing in opposition to their motion, rely on entirely unprecedented and erroneous arguments that are contrary to the protections afforded by the Legislature over 150 years ago   The courts [in New York] have never overridden those protections because of a purported public interest in vetting political candidates. There is simply no importance, overriding or otherwise, to unsealing the matrimonial records of a political candidate.Well, if he s a rapist, that would be of some importance.It s also worth noting that Cohen (remember, an attorney), said in an interview regarding Ivana s rape allegation,  It is true. You cannot rape your spouse. And there s very clear case law.  The marital rape exemption law in new York was struck down in 1984, three years before Ivana alleged Trump assaulted her. As of 1993, all 50 states have criminalized marital rape, as it s seen as form of domestic violence.What s even more baffling is the Trump campaign is so desperate to keep these records sealed, they made a stab at Hillary Clinton s medical records as precedence:Secretary Clinton is not revealing her medical records, even though her medical condition is being raised as an issue in the current campaign. Nor could or should they be compelled to do so.First off, she has released them (Trump as not), and second, the campaign s candidate has repeatedly slammed Clinton for not doing so earlier   nor could or should they be compelled to do so? That s rich.Ivana Trump s lawyer, Ira Garr, filed a brief to Nervo pointing out that unsealing the records would be unfair to Ivana because she isn t running for any public office. Fair enough, but it s his second reason that should make people think  he thinks people are too stupid to care:Garr said in a brief interview Tuesday that he doesn t see how the divorce-court record would alter anyone s opinion of the real estate investor and GOP presidential nominee because people have either factored such issues into their voting decisions or don t view those points as relevant to their decision. Does anybody doubt that Donald isn t that nice to women?  Garr asked.  Could you watch his interview with Megyn Kelly and say,  He s nice to women? Considering he accused Megyn Kelly of having her menstrual cycle during a debate, no.These lawyers are just as dumb as their clients.Judge Frank Nervo has not indicated when and if he release them, but the trump lawyers  sudden legal briefs are telling that a decision could come soon.Featured image via Spencer Platt/Getty ImagesNews
donald trump picking as ugly divorce records may be unsealedit secret donald trump cruel women look describes refers women like personal reasons he cheated two wives resulting ugly highly publicized divorces but divorce first wife ivan people interested good divorce first filed ivan due extreme cruel inhuman treatment controversial often times muddy ivan trump revealed donald trump raped violent assault tore clothes forced the allegation made sworn deposition trump reported book lost tycoon the many lives donald trump ivan trump since claimed mean literal criminal sense affidavit still still details cruel inhuman treatment lie buried sealed documents divorce new york times sued last month unseated in state new york divorce records sealed unless determined judge useful special circumstances dealing intense public course given fact donald trump running president united states coupled past statements regarding women public indeed interest figuring kind husband donald trump treated first wife or new york times donald ivan trump picking scared minds possibly kasowitz attorneys new firm kasowitz benson torres friedman well longtime trump organization lawyer michael cohen wrote brief judge supreme court justice frank nerve in seeking invade trumps confidential matrimonio files times bennett shown trump filing opposition motion rely entirely unprecedented erroneous arguments contrary protections afforded legislature years ago the courts new york never overridden protections purported public interest vetting political candidates there simply importance overriding otherwise sealing matrimonio records political rapist would also worth noting cohen remember attorney said interview regarding ivan rape allegation it true you rape spouse and clear case law the marital rape exemption law new york struck three years ivan alleged trump assaulted as states criminalized marital rape seen form domestic even battling trump campaign desperate keep records sealed made stab hillary clinton medical records precedence secretary clinton revealing medical records even though medical condition raised issue current campaign nor could compelled released trump second campaign candidate repeatedly slammed clinton earlier could compelled that trump lawyer ira rarr filed brief nerve pointing sealing records would unfair ivan running public office fair enough second reason make people think thinks people stupid care rarr said brief interview tuesday see record would alter anyone opinion real estate investor gop presidential nominee people either factored issues voting decisions view points relevant decision does anybody doubt donald nice women rarr asked could watch interview megan kelly say he nice women considering accused megan kelly menstrual cycle debate lawyers dumb frank nerve indicated release trump lawyers sudden legal briefs telling decision could come image via spencer imagenes
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT:  Donald Trump Panicking As Ugly Divorce Records May Be UnsealedIt s no secret that Donald Trump is cruel to women. Look how he describes and refers to women he doesn t like (for personal or non-personal reasons). He s cheated on two of his wives, resulting in some ugly and highly publicized divorces. But it s his 1990 divorce from his first wife, Ivana, that has people interested, and for good reason.The divorce, first filed by Ivana due to extreme cruel and inhuman treatment,  is controversial and, often times, muddy. Ivana Trump once revealed Donald Trump had raped her in a violent assault when he tore off her clothes and forced himself on her. The allegation was made in a sworn deposition by Trump, and was reported in the 1993 book Lost Tycoon: The Many Lives of Donald J. Trump. Ivana Trump has since claimed that she did not mean it in  a literal or criminal sense,  but the affidavit still stands.But still, details of  cruel and inhuman treatment  lie buried in the sealed documents of the divorce, which is why the New York Times sued last month to have them unsealed. In the state of New York, all divorce records are sealed unless determined by a judge to be useful in  special circumstances  when dealing with intense public interest.Of course, given the fact that Donald Trump is running for President of the United States, and coupled with his past statements regarding women, the public does indeed have an interest in figuring out what kind of husband Donald Trump was, and how he treated his first wife. Or so the New York Times contends.But it s Donald and Ivana Trump who are panicking and scared out of their minds at what s possibly to come.Marc Kasowitz and other attorneys from the New York-based firm Kasowitz Benson Torres & Friedman, as well as longtime Trump Organization lawyer Michael Cohen, wrote in a  brief to the judge, Supreme Court Justice Frank Nervo:In seeking to invade the Trumps  26-year-old confidential matrimonial files, the Times and Gannett, as shown in Mr. Trump s filing in opposition to their motion, rely on entirely unprecedented and erroneous arguments that are contrary to the protections afforded by the Legislature over 150 years ago   The courts [in New York] have never overridden those protections because of a purported public interest in vetting political candidates. There is simply no importance, overriding or otherwise, to unsealing the matrimonial records of a political candidate.Well, if he s a rapist, that would be of some importance.It s also worth noting that Cohen (remember, an attorney), said in an interview regarding Ivana s rape allegation,  It is true. You cannot rape your spouse. And there s very clear case law.  The marital rape exemption law in new York was struck down in 1984, three years before Ivana alleged Trump assaulted her. As of 1993, all 50 states have criminalized marital rape, as it s seen as form of domestic violence.What s even more baffling is the Trump campaign is so desperate to keep these records sealed, they made a stab at Hillary Clinton s medical records as precedence:Secretary Clinton is not revealing her medical records, even though her medical condition is being raised as an issue in the current campaign. Nor could or should they be compelled to do so.First off, she has released them (Trump as not), and second, the campaign s candidate has repeatedly slammed Clinton for not doing so earlier   nor could or should they be compelled to do so? That s rich.Ivana Trump s lawyer, Ira Garr, filed a brief to Nervo pointing out that unsealing the records would be unfair to Ivana because she isn t running for any public office. Fair enough, but it s his second reason that should make people think  he thinks people are too stupid to care:Garr said in a brief interview Tuesday that he doesn t see how the divorce-court record would alter anyone s opinion of the real estate investor and GOP presidential nominee because people have either factored such issues into their voting decisions or don t view those points as relevant to their decision. Does anybody doubt that Donald isn t that nice to women?  Garr asked.  Could you watch his interview with Megyn Kelly and say,  He s nice to women? Considering he accused Megyn Kelly of having her menstrual cycle during a debate, no.These lawyers are just as dumb as their clients.Judge Frank Nervo has not indicated when and if he release them, but the trump lawyers  sudden legal briefs are telling that a decision could come soon.Featured image via Spencer Platt/Getty ImagesNews
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: donald trump picking as ugly divorce records may be unsealedit secret donald trump cruel women look describes refers women like personal reasons he cheated two wives resulting ugly highly publicized divorces but divorce first wife ivan people interested good divorce first filed ivan due extreme cruel inhuman treatment controversial often times muddy ivan trump revealed donald trump raped violent assault tore clothes forced the allegation made sworn deposition trump reported book lost tycoon the many lives donald trump ivan trump since claimed mean literal criminal sense affidavit still still details cruel inhuman treatment lie buried sealed documents divorce new york times sued last month unseated in state new york divorce records sealed unless determined judge useful special circumstances dealing intense public course given fact donald trump running president united states coupled past statements regarding women public indeed interest figuring kind husband donald trump treated first wife or new york times donald ivan trump picking scared minds possibly kasowitz attorneys new firm kasowitz benson torres friedman well longtime trump organization lawyer michael cohen wrote brief judge supreme court justice frank nerve in seeking invade trumps confidential matrimonio files times bennett shown trump filing opposition motion rely entirely unprecedented erroneous arguments contrary protections afforded legislature years ago the courts new york never overridden protections purported public interest vetting political candidates there simply importance overriding otherwise sealing matrimonio records political rapist would also worth noting cohen remember attorney said interview regarding ivan rape allegation it true you rape spouse and clear case law the marital rape exemption law new york struck three years ivan alleged trump assaulted as states criminalized marital rape seen form domestic even battling trump campaign desperate keep records sealed made stab hillary clinton medical records precedence secretary clinton revealing medical records even though medical condition raised issue current campaign nor could compelled released trump second campaign candidate repeatedly slammed clinton earlier could compelled that trump lawyer ira rarr filed brief nerve pointing sealing records would unfair ivan running public office fair enough second reason make people think thinks people stupid care rarr said brief interview tuesday see record would alter anyone opinion real estate investor gop presidential nominee people either factored issues voting decisions view points relevant decision does anybody doubt donald nice women rarr asked could watch interview megan kelly say he nice women considering accused megan kelly menstrual cycle debate lawyers dumb frank nerve indicated release trump lawyers sudden legal briefs telling decision could come image via spencer imagenes