OUTRAGE! HOW REFUGEE RESETTLEMENT Is Using United States As Dumping Ground To Settle Diplomatic Disputes Admitting Somalis who d been settled for years in Pakistan   like the Ohio State jihadi and his family   is only one of them. Another  refugee  absurdity was revealed recently   the Obama administration has agreed to admit illegal aliens intercepted at sea by Australia and held in camps outside that country, on two Pacific islands.The number of people said to be affected is reported to range from 1,600 to nearly 2,500; my colleague Nayla Rush has an overview here. These are people Australia has decided do not warrant refugee status (or what our law would consider asylum). Therefore they have no right to move to Australia. But for a variety of reasons, Australia cannot, or does not want to, send them back, and the  refugees  won t accept offers of resettlement in New Guinea or Cambodia because they re holding out for a First World country. What s more, their presence in those Australian-run camps on the islands of Nauru and Manus (the latter owned by Papua New Guinea) has become a political headache. Most are from Iran, with smaller numbers from Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, and elsewhere.I can see why Australia would want this deal; it costs Oz taxpayers $2 billion to run the two island detention facilities and closing them down would rid the government of the headache. But if Australia doesn t consider them refugees, why should we take them?It appears we re doing this as a favor to Australia; some speculate it s a quid pro quo for Australia s taking some U.S.-bound illegals in camps in Costa Rica, though how that s comparable isn t clear, and Australia has denied any such bargain. The chairman of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees, Bob Goodlatte and Chuck Grassley, also want to know why we re doing this, and they wrote to the secretaries of State and Homeland Security asking for details on the secret agreement to bring the illegal aliens here. When Capitol Hill staffers asked the State Department how many such  refugees  would be resettled here under the secret deal, they were told the number was  classified. Read more at: NROGovernment News
outrage how refugee resettlement is using united states as dumping ground to settle diplomatic disputes admitting somalia settled years pakistan like ohio state jihad family one another refugee absurdity revealed recently obama administration agreed admit illegal aliens intercepted sea australia held camps outside country two pacific number people said affected reported range nearly colleague nabla rush overview these people australia decided warrant refugee status law would consider asylum therefore right move australia but variety reasons australia want send back refugees accept offers resettlement new guinea cambodia holding first world country what presence camps islands nature minus latter owned papua new guinea become political headache most iran smaller numbers pakistan afghanistan iraq somalia see australia would want deal costs oz taxpayers billion run two island detention facilities closing would rid government headache but australia consider refugees take it appears favor australia speculate uid pro quo australia taking illegal camps costa rica though comparable clear australia denied bargain the chairman house senate judiciary committees bob goodlatte chuck grasses also want know wrote secretaries state homeland security asking details secret agreement bring illegal aliens when capitol hill staffers asked state department many refugees would resettled secret deal told number classified read nrogovernment news
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: OUTRAGE! HOW REFUGEE RESETTLEMENT Is Using United States As Dumping Ground To Settle Diplomatic Disputes Admitting Somalis who d been settled for years in Pakistan   like the Ohio State jihadi and his family   is only one of them. Another  refugee  absurdity was revealed recently   the Obama administration has agreed to admit illegal aliens intercepted at sea by Australia and held in camps outside that country, on two Pacific islands.The number of people said to be affected is reported to range from 1,600 to nearly 2,500; my colleague Nayla Rush has an overview here. These are people Australia has decided do not warrant refugee status (or what our law would consider asylum). Therefore they have no right to move to Australia. But for a variety of reasons, Australia cannot, or does not want to, send them back, and the  refugees  won t accept offers of resettlement in New Guinea or Cambodia because they re holding out for a First World country. What s more, their presence in those Australian-run camps on the islands of Nauru and Manus (the latter owned by Papua New Guinea) has become a political headache. Most are from Iran, with smaller numbers from Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, and elsewhere.I can see why Australia would want this deal; it costs Oz taxpayers $2 billion to run the two island detention facilities and closing them down would rid the government of the headache. But if Australia doesn t consider them refugees, why should we take them?It appears we re doing this as a favor to Australia; some speculate it s a quid pro quo for Australia s taking some U.S.-bound illegals in camps in Costa Rica, though how that s comparable isn t clear, and Australia has denied any such bargain. The chairman of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees, Bob Goodlatte and Chuck Grassley, also want to know why we re doing this, and they wrote to the secretaries of State and Homeland Security asking for details on the secret agreement to bring the illegal aliens here. When Capitol Hill staffers asked the State Department how many such  refugees  would be resettled here under the secret deal, they were told the number was  classified. Read more at: NROGovernment News
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: outrage how refugee resettlement is using united states as dumping ground to settle diplomatic disputes admitting somalia settled years pakistan like ohio state jihad family one another refugee absurdity revealed recently obama administration agreed admit illegal aliens intercepted sea australia held camps outside country two pacific number people said affected reported range nearly colleague nabla rush overview these people australia decided warrant refugee status law would consider asylum therefore right move australia but variety reasons australia want send back refugees accept offers resettlement new guinea cambodia holding first world country what presence camps islands nature minus latter owned papua new guinea become political headache most iran smaller numbers pakistan afghanistan iraq somalia see australia would want deal costs oz taxpayers billion run two island detention facilities closing would rid government headache but australia consider refugees take it appears favor australia speculate uid pro quo australia taking illegal camps costa rica though comparable clear australia denied bargain the chairman house senate judiciary committees bob goodlatte chuck grasses also want know wrote secretaries state homeland security asking details secret agreement bring illegal aliens when capitol hill staffers asked state department many refugees would resettled secret deal told number classified read nrogovernment news