Britain outlines plans to break free of European Court after BrexitLONDON (Reuters) - Britain on Wednesday outlined several escape routes from the  direct jurisdiction  of the European Court of Justice after Brexit, one of Prime Minister Theresa May s key aims in talks to unstitch 40 years of EU membership.     In a government paper on the highly-sensitive topic, Britain set out its determination to negotiate a tailor-made agreement to enforce its own laws and resolve disputes once it has left the bloc in March 2019.     The paper drew attention to several EU agreements which do not require the Luxembourg-based court s direct jurisdiction over other countries - a clear attempt to encourage more flexibility among EU officials who are protective of the court. May said breaking free of the ECJ s jurisdiction meant that Britain would be able to make its own laws and British judges and courts would enforce them.      We will take back control of our laws,  she told reporters  in southern England, in a denial of suggestions by opposition lawmakers that she had watered down her demands by qualifying her words to say  direct  jurisdiction and opening the way to  indirect influence .      Her words placated many pro-Brexit lawmakers in her Conservative Party who say the ECJ has slowly sucked power from Britain s courts and parliament. Leave Means Leave, a pro-Brexit campaigning group, said it welcomed the government s  overall commitment  but wanted to make sure  the ECJ no longer plays a part in the British legal system .       But May s stance could further harden the EU s stance on the court. Many European officials see the ECJ as the ultimate arbiter of EU law and have said it should continue to guarantee the rights of EU citizens living in Britain after Brexit and oversee the Brexit agreement.     In the paper, Britain says its court would guarantee the rights of EU citizens or businesses in the country:  Those rights and obligations will be enforced by the UK courts and ultimately by the UK Supreme Court.  The EU said it was sticking to its stance and hoped to make progress on three areas as a priority  - the rights of expatriates, Britain s border with EU state Ireland and a financial settlement. That distance in viewpoints could delay an agreement with the EU on the divorce, a partner from international law firm Bird & Bird said.   The government s arguments about the role of the ECJ will contribute to prolonged uncertainty for businesses in relation to Brexit,  said Richard Eccles. The ECJ issue has all but halted debate on guaranteeing the rights of expatriates, according to a joint status document, published last month that compared the EU and British positions. But the question of how to resolve disputes after Brexit could cause even more difficulties.  In its paper, the government suggested it was not asking for the impossible, zeroing in on examples of where the ECJ does not have direct jurisdiction in resolving disputes.     It said though such cases were  illustrative  to help discussions with the EU.     Earlier, Dominic Raab, a pro-Leave campaigner who is now minister for courts and justice, said Britain would most likely suggest Britain and the EU should appoint arbitrators and agree a third party to deal with contentious issues post-Brexit.    That s one possible alternative, but I think it s the most likely,  he told BBC Radio Four, adding that Britain would have to keep  half an eye  on the case law of the ECJ in the future. He, like May, denied that use of the word  direct  before jurisdiction meant the government had now accepted that the court would continue to have influence over British law. But opposition lawmakers said the paper was tantamount to admitting defeat by a government which lost its authority at an ill-judged election two months ago by watering down one of its  red lines .  Not much is left of (Brexit minister) David Davis s so-called  red line  of taking back control from European judges,  Andrew Adonis, a leading pro-EU campaigner, said.  This is a climbdown camouflaged in jingoistic rhetoric. Even if we leave the Single Market, European judges will still have considerable power over decisions made in the UK.  worldnews
britain outlines plans break free european court brexitlondon reuters britain wednesday outlined several escape routes direct jurisdiction european court justice brexit one prime minister theresa may key aims talks stitch years eu membership in government paper topic britain set determination negotiate agreement enforce laws resolve disputes left bloc march the paper drew attention several eu agreements require court direct jurisdiction countries clear attempt encourage flexibility among eu officials protective court may said breaking free ec jurisdiction meant britain would able make laws british judges courts would enforce we take back control laws told reporters southern england denial suggestions opposition lawmakers watered demands qualifying words say direct jurisdiction opening way indirect influence her words located many lawmakers conservative party say ec slowly sucked power britain courts parliament leave means leave campaigning group said welcomed government overall commitment wanted make sure ec longer plays part british legal system but may stance could garden eu stance court many european officials see ec ultimate arbiter eu law said continue guarantee rights eu citizens living britain brexit oversee brexit agreement in paper britain says court would guarantee rights eu citizens businesses country those rights obligations enforced uk courts ultimately uk supreme court the eu said sticking stance hoped make progress three areas priority rights expatriates britain border eu state ireland financial settlement that distance viewpoints could delay agreement eu divorce partner international law firm bird bird said the government arguments role ec contribute prolonged uncertainty businesses relation brexit said richard scales the ec issue halted debate guaranteeing rights expatriates according joint status document published last month compared eu british positions but question resolve disputes brexit could cause even difficulties in paper government suggested asking impossible serving examples ec direct jurisdiction resolving disputes it said though cases illustrative help discussions eu earlier dominic aab campaigner minister courts justice said britain would likely suggest britain eu appoint arbitrators agree third party deal contentious issues that one possible alternative i think likely told bbc radio four adding britain would keep half eye case law ec future he like may denied use word direct jurisdiction meant government accepted court would continue influence british law but opposition lawmakers said paper tantamount admitting defeat government lost authority election two months ago watering one red lines not much left brexit minister david davis red line taking back control european judges andrew admins leading campaigner said this climbdown camouflaged linguistic rhetoric even leave single market european judges still considerable power decisions made uk worldnews
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: Britain outlines plans to break free of European Court after BrexitLONDON (Reuters) - Britain on Wednesday outlined several escape routes from the  direct jurisdiction  of the European Court of Justice after Brexit, one of Prime Minister Theresa May s key aims in talks to unstitch 40 years of EU membership.     In a government paper on the highly-sensitive topic, Britain set out its determination to negotiate a tailor-made agreement to enforce its own laws and resolve disputes once it has left the bloc in March 2019.     The paper drew attention to several EU agreements which do not require the Luxembourg-based court s direct jurisdiction over other countries - a clear attempt to encourage more flexibility among EU officials who are protective of the court. May said breaking free of the ECJ s jurisdiction meant that Britain would be able to make its own laws and British judges and courts would enforce them.      We will take back control of our laws,  she told reporters  in southern England, in a denial of suggestions by opposition lawmakers that she had watered down her demands by qualifying her words to say  direct  jurisdiction and opening the way to  indirect influence .      Her words placated many pro-Brexit lawmakers in her Conservative Party who say the ECJ has slowly sucked power from Britain s courts and parliament. Leave Means Leave, a pro-Brexit campaigning group, said it welcomed the government s  overall commitment  but wanted to make sure  the ECJ no longer plays a part in the British legal system .       But May s stance could further harden the EU s stance on the court. Many European officials see the ECJ as the ultimate arbiter of EU law and have said it should continue to guarantee the rights of EU citizens living in Britain after Brexit and oversee the Brexit agreement.     In the paper, Britain says its court would guarantee the rights of EU citizens or businesses in the country:  Those rights and obligations will be enforced by the UK courts and ultimately by the UK Supreme Court.  The EU said it was sticking to its stance and hoped to make progress on three areas as a priority  - the rights of expatriates, Britain s border with EU state Ireland and a financial settlement. That distance in viewpoints could delay an agreement with the EU on the divorce, a partner from international law firm Bird & Bird said.   The government s arguments about the role of the ECJ will contribute to prolonged uncertainty for businesses in relation to Brexit,  said Richard Eccles. The ECJ issue has all but halted debate on guaranteeing the rights of expatriates, according to a joint status document, published last month that compared the EU and British positions. But the question of how to resolve disputes after Brexit could cause even more difficulties.  In its paper, the government suggested it was not asking for the impossible, zeroing in on examples of where the ECJ does not have direct jurisdiction in resolving disputes.     It said though such cases were  illustrative  to help discussions with the EU.     Earlier, Dominic Raab, a pro-Leave campaigner who is now minister for courts and justice, said Britain would most likely suggest Britain and the EU should appoint arbitrators and agree a third party to deal with contentious issues post-Brexit.    That s one possible alternative, but I think it s the most likely,  he told BBC Radio Four, adding that Britain would have to keep  half an eye  on the case law of the ECJ in the future. He, like May, denied that use of the word  direct  before jurisdiction meant the government had now accepted that the court would continue to have influence over British law. But opposition lawmakers said the paper was tantamount to admitting defeat by a government which lost its authority at an ill-judged election two months ago by watering down one of its  red lines .  Not much is left of (Brexit minister) David Davis s so-called  red line  of taking back control from European judges,  Andrew Adonis, a leading pro-EU campaigner, said.  This is a climbdown camouflaged in jingoistic rhetoric. Even if we leave the Single Market, European judges will still have considerable power over decisions made in the UK.  worldnews
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: britain outlines plans break free european court brexitlondon reuters britain wednesday outlined several escape routes direct jurisdiction european court justice brexit one prime minister theresa may key aims talks stitch years eu membership in government paper topic britain set determination negotiate agreement enforce laws resolve disputes left bloc march the paper drew attention several eu agreements require court direct jurisdiction countries clear attempt encourage flexibility among eu officials protective court may said breaking free ec jurisdiction meant britain would able make laws british judges courts would enforce we take back control laws told reporters southern england denial suggestions opposition lawmakers watered demands qualifying words say direct jurisdiction opening way indirect influence her words located many lawmakers conservative party say ec slowly sucked power britain courts parliament leave means leave campaigning group said welcomed government overall commitment wanted make sure ec longer plays part british legal system but may stance could garden eu stance court many european officials see ec ultimate arbiter eu law said continue guarantee rights eu citizens living britain brexit oversee brexit agreement in paper britain says court would guarantee rights eu citizens businesses country those rights obligations enforced uk courts ultimately uk supreme court the eu said sticking stance hoped make progress three areas priority rights expatriates britain border eu state ireland financial settlement that distance viewpoints could delay agreement eu divorce partner international law firm bird bird said the government arguments role ec contribute prolonged uncertainty businesses relation brexit said richard scales the ec issue halted debate guaranteeing rights expatriates according joint status document published last month compared eu british positions but question resolve disputes brexit could cause even difficulties in paper government suggested asking impossible serving examples ec direct jurisdiction resolving disputes it said though cases illustrative help discussions eu earlier dominic aab campaigner minister courts justice said britain would likely suggest britain eu appoint arbitrators agree third party deal contentious issues that one possible alternative i think likely told bbc radio four adding britain would keep half eye case law ec future he like may denied use word direct jurisdiction meant government accepted court would continue influence british law but opposition lawmakers said paper tantamount admitting defeat government lost authority election two months ago watering one red lines not much left brexit minister david davis red line taking back control european judges andrew admins leading campaigner said this climbdown camouflaged linguistic rhetoric even leave single market european judges still considerable power decisions made uk worldnews