 Texas Supreme Court Just Proved They Do Not Support Marriage EqualityEver since the historic ruling that made same-sex marriage legal in all 50 states in June 2015, opponents cried that it s a war against them. But, is it really? It seems like it s a war against those in a same-sex marriage, even by those in the courthouse. Rather than live and let live, people enjoy making others miserable.What should be the defenders and upholders of justice have let same-sex spouses down in Texas when the Texas Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution does not clearly require states to extend spousal benefits to same-sex couples. This decision came Friday. The ruling was unanimous, making it clear that they do not believe in justice or marriage equality.The Texas Supreme Court interpreted the ruling of Obergefell v. Hodges narrowly, questioning whether it compels states to treat same-sex couples equally to opposite-sex couples in any context outside of marriage licensing. I guess we shouldn t expect anything better from Texas.Friday s ruling of Pidgeon v. Turner revolves around spousal benefits for government workers. Texas law prohibits same-sex couples from receiving such benefits. How that is even possible is beyond me.Slate reports that according to the court, Obergefell  did not address and resolve  the  specific issue  of state spousal benefits. Therefore, the state appeals court erred in ordering the trial court to resolve the case  consistent with Obergefell and De Leon.  Instead, the Texas Supreme Court insisted, the trial court must settle the issue itself keeping in mind that Obergefell  did not hold that states must provide the same publicly funded benefits to all married persons. I am flabbergasted. How can judges, meant to serve justice, deny justice? How can they interpret rulings and laws this way? They re bending the ruling to their will because on a personal level they probably don t like same-sex marriage.My heart goes out to all the same-sex spouses that are not receiving fair and equal spousal benefits.Featured image via Robert Daemmrich Photography Inc/Corbis/Getty ImagesNews
texas supreme court just proved they do not support marriage equalityever since historic ruling made marriage legal states june opponents cried war but really it seems like war marriage even courthouse rather live let live people enjoy making others defenders holders justice let spouses texas texas supreme court ruled constitution clearly require states extend spouse benefits couples this decision came friday the ruling unanimous making clear believe justice marriage texas supreme court interpreted ruling obergefell hodges narrowly questioning whether compel states treat couples equally couples context outside marriage licensing i guess expect anything better ruling pigeon turner revolves around spouse benefits government workers texas law prohibits couples receiving benefits how even possible beyond reports according court obergefell address resolve specific issue state spouse benefits therefore state appeals court erred ordering trial court resolve case consistent obergefell de leon instead texas supreme court insisted trial court must settle issue keeping mind obergefell hold states must provide publicly funded benefits married persons i flabbergasted how judges meant serve justice deny justice how interpret rulings laws way they bending ruling personal level probably like heart goes spouses receiving fair equal spouse image via robert daemmrich photography imagenes
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT:  Texas Supreme Court Just Proved They Do Not Support Marriage EqualityEver since the historic ruling that made same-sex marriage legal in all 50 states in June 2015, opponents cried that it s a war against them. But, is it really? It seems like it s a war against those in a same-sex marriage, even by those in the courthouse. Rather than live and let live, people enjoy making others miserable.What should be the defenders and upholders of justice have let same-sex spouses down in Texas when the Texas Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution does not clearly require states to extend spousal benefits to same-sex couples. This decision came Friday. The ruling was unanimous, making it clear that they do not believe in justice or marriage equality.The Texas Supreme Court interpreted the ruling of Obergefell v. Hodges narrowly, questioning whether it compels states to treat same-sex couples equally to opposite-sex couples in any context outside of marriage licensing. I guess we shouldn t expect anything better from Texas.Friday s ruling of Pidgeon v. Turner revolves around spousal benefits for government workers. Texas law prohibits same-sex couples from receiving such benefits. How that is even possible is beyond me.Slate reports that according to the court, Obergefell  did not address and resolve  the  specific issue  of state spousal benefits. Therefore, the state appeals court erred in ordering the trial court to resolve the case  consistent with Obergefell and De Leon.  Instead, the Texas Supreme Court insisted, the trial court must settle the issue itself keeping in mind that Obergefell  did not hold that states must provide the same publicly funded benefits to all married persons. I am flabbergasted. How can judges, meant to serve justice, deny justice? How can they interpret rulings and laws this way? They re bending the ruling to their will because on a personal level they probably don t like same-sex marriage.My heart goes out to all the same-sex spouses that are not receiving fair and equal spousal benefits.Featured image via Robert Daemmrich Photography Inc/Corbis/Getty ImagesNews
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: texas supreme court just proved they do not support marriage equalityever since historic ruling made marriage legal states june opponents cried war but really it seems like war marriage even courthouse rather live let live people enjoy making others defenders holders justice let spouses texas texas supreme court ruled constitution clearly require states extend spouse benefits couples this decision came friday the ruling unanimous making clear believe justice marriage texas supreme court interpreted ruling obergefell hodges narrowly questioning whether compel states treat couples equally couples context outside marriage licensing i guess expect anything better ruling pigeon turner revolves around spouse benefits government workers texas law prohibits couples receiving benefits how even possible beyond reports according court obergefell address resolve specific issue state spouse benefits therefore state appeals court erred ordering trial court resolve case consistent obergefell de leon instead texas supreme court insisted trial court must settle issue keeping mind obergefell hold states must provide publicly funded benefits married persons i flabbergasted how judges meant serve justice deny justice how interpret rulings laws way they bending ruling personal level probably like heart goes spouses receiving fair equal spouse image via robert daemmrich photography imagenes