LOL! PRESIDENT TRUMP Wants Network Who Pushes Most #FakeNews Coverage “Of Your Favorite President (me)” To Receive A HILARIOUS AwardEarlier today, President Trump tweeted:  We should have a contest as to which of the Networks, plus CNN and not including Fox, is the most dishonest, corrupt and/or distorted in its political coverage of your favorite President (me). They are all bad. Winner to receive the FAKE NEWS TROPHY! Not only is his latest tweet hilarious, but it speaks to the millions of Trump supporters who are sick and tired of watching #FakeNews networks like CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, and PBS spew their vile, leftist propaganda. These over-paid activists, who are posing as hosts of  news  shows, are so consumed with hate, that they don t even try to hide their embarrassingly biased coverage of our President.We should have a contest as to which of the Networks, plus CNN and not including Fox, is the most dishonest, corrupt and/or distorted in its political coverage of your favorite President (me). They are all bad. Winner to receive the FAKE NEWS TROPHY!  Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 27, 2017Is President Trump correct when he says the media has treated him unfairly? Well, an interesting study from the far-left leaning Harvard University, provided stunning evidence that proves President Trump is 100% correct:  Chicago Tribune  Harvard University s Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy has come out with a study of media coverage of the Trump White House in its first 100 days.It is astonishing because it comes from Harvard, not exactly the bedrock of American conservatism.The study found that in Trump s first 100 days in office, the tone of the news coverage of the president has been a whopping 80 percent negative to 20 percent positive.So what does fair and balanced really mean, anyway? It confirms what most people understand,  said Tom Bevan, publisher and co-founder of RealClearPolitics, one of the go-to websites for media and political junkies.Bevan spoke as a guest on  The Chicago Way  podcast that I co-host with WGN-AM radio producer Jeff Carlin. The response will be that Trump is deserving of this kind of coverage because he s conducted himself inappropriately, and these are self-inflicted wounds, and the press is doing nothing but covering him and his actions. But that s a little bit disingenuous,  Bevan said.So how was President Obama covered in his first 100 days? With a 60-40 positive to negative ratio, according to the Harvard study. That s a significant shift, a significant difference,  says Bevan.  I think this is reflective of the fact that the media does root from the press box and they do cheer for certain personalities and they do cheer against others. I have my own memory of the media s tone after Obama took office. It wasn t merely positive, it was adoring, gushy, in the way a small child looks up to a beloved parent, or a dog to the master who gives it biscuits.It was as if the media were hugging a magical unicorn. Obama wasn t only given the benefit of the doubt. He was handed the Nobel Peace Prize though he hadn t done anything to earn it. And critics were trashed as nothing but racists.Obama controversies, from his administration s gun running scandal in the  Fast and Furious  debacle to using the Internal Revenue Service as a weapon against conservative groups, were covered, somewhat. But generally, the tone was muted, respectful, nothing like it was for Trump or the Clintons.Later, in Hillary Clinton s failed 2016 campaign, leaks of Democratic National Committee email   whether hacked by the Russians or not   demonstrated collusion between journalists and Democrats. But that cozy relationship has never properly been addressed, and that avoidance undermines the credibility of journalism as the media challenges Trump. Because of the way the press covered Obama, they lost so much credibility,  Bevan said.  And because they did not take these things seriously, the IRS Scandal, Fast and Furious, you could go down the list of where they turned the other cheek.   And now where they re giving Trump the third degree on everything, that makes the contrast all that much greater. So you have a certain segment of the public, the people who voted for Trump, who literally do not trust what the media says. And the divide between rigidly defined political tribes, one courted by the media, the other dismissed by it, grows even wider. It s not good for journalism, and it s not good for the country,  said Bevan. left-news
lol president trump wants network who pushes most fakenews coverage of your favorite president to receive a hilarious awardearlier today president trump tweeted we contest networks plus cnn including fox dishonest corrupt distorted political coverage favorite president they bad winner receive fake news trophy not latest tweet hilarious speaks millions trump supporters sick tired watching fakenews networks like cnn msnbc abc cbs nbc pbs spec vile leftist propaganda these activists posing hosts news shows consumed hate even try hide embarrassing biased coverage contest networks plus cnn including fox dishonest corrupt distorted political coverage favorite president they bad winner receive fake news trophy donald trump realdonaldtrump november president trump correct says media treated unfairly well interesting study leaning harvard university provided stunning evidence proves president trump correct chicago tribune harvard university shorenstein center media politics public policy come study media coverage trump white house first astonishing comes harvard exactly bedrock american study found trump first days office tone news coverage president shopping percent negative percent fair balanced really mean anyway it confirms people understand said tom began publisher realclearpolitics one websites media political spoke guest the chicago way podcast i radio producer jeff margin the response trump deserving kind coverage conducted inappropriately wounds press nothing covering actions but little bit disingenuous began president obama covered first days with positive negative ratio according harvard study that significant shift significant difference says began i think reflective fact media root press box cheer certain personalities cheer others i memory media tone obama took office it merely positive during bushy way small child looks beloved parent dog master gives media tagging magical unicorn obama given benefit doubt he handed nobel peace prize though done anything earn and critics crashed nothing controversies administration gun running scandal fast furious debacle using internal revenue service weapon conservative groups covered somewhat but generally tone muted respectful nothing like trump hillary clinton failed campaign leaks democratic national committee email whether hacked russian demonstrated collusion journalists democrats but copy relationship never properly addressed avoidance undermines credibility journalism media challenges trump because way press covered obama lost much credibility began said and take things seriously irs scandal fast furious could go list turned cheek and giving trump third degree everything makes contrast much greater so certain segment public people voted trump literally trust media says and divide rigidly defined political tribes one courted media dismissed grows even wider it good journalism good country said began
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: LOL! PRESIDENT TRUMP Wants Network Who Pushes Most #FakeNews Coverage “Of Your Favorite President (me)” To Receive A HILARIOUS AwardEarlier today, President Trump tweeted:  We should have a contest as to which of the Networks, plus CNN and not including Fox, is the most dishonest, corrupt and/or distorted in its political coverage of your favorite President (me). They are all bad. Winner to receive the FAKE NEWS TROPHY! Not only is his latest tweet hilarious, but it speaks to the millions of Trump supporters who are sick and tired of watching #FakeNews networks like CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, and PBS spew their vile, leftist propaganda. These over-paid activists, who are posing as hosts of  news  shows, are so consumed with hate, that they don t even try to hide their embarrassingly biased coverage of our President.We should have a contest as to which of the Networks, plus CNN and not including Fox, is the most dishonest, corrupt and/or distorted in its political coverage of your favorite President (me). They are all bad. Winner to receive the FAKE NEWS TROPHY!  Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 27, 2017Is President Trump correct when he says the media has treated him unfairly? Well, an interesting study from the far-left leaning Harvard University, provided stunning evidence that proves President Trump is 100% correct:  Chicago Tribune  Harvard University s Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy has come out with a study of media coverage of the Trump White House in its first 100 days.It is astonishing because it comes from Harvard, not exactly the bedrock of American conservatism.The study found that in Trump s first 100 days in office, the tone of the news coverage of the president has been a whopping 80 percent negative to 20 percent positive.So what does fair and balanced really mean, anyway? It confirms what most people understand,  said Tom Bevan, publisher and co-founder of RealClearPolitics, one of the go-to websites for media and political junkies.Bevan spoke as a guest on  The Chicago Way  podcast that I co-host with WGN-AM radio producer Jeff Carlin. The response will be that Trump is deserving of this kind of coverage because he s conducted himself inappropriately, and these are self-inflicted wounds, and the press is doing nothing but covering him and his actions. But that s a little bit disingenuous,  Bevan said.So how was President Obama covered in his first 100 days? With a 60-40 positive to negative ratio, according to the Harvard study. That s a significant shift, a significant difference,  says Bevan.  I think this is reflective of the fact that the media does root from the press box and they do cheer for certain personalities and they do cheer against others. I have my own memory of the media s tone after Obama took office. It wasn t merely positive, it was adoring, gushy, in the way a small child looks up to a beloved parent, or a dog to the master who gives it biscuits.It was as if the media were hugging a magical unicorn. Obama wasn t only given the benefit of the doubt. He was handed the Nobel Peace Prize though he hadn t done anything to earn it. And critics were trashed as nothing but racists.Obama controversies, from his administration s gun running scandal in the  Fast and Furious  debacle to using the Internal Revenue Service as a weapon against conservative groups, were covered, somewhat. But generally, the tone was muted, respectful, nothing like it was for Trump or the Clintons.Later, in Hillary Clinton s failed 2016 campaign, leaks of Democratic National Committee email   whether hacked by the Russians or not   demonstrated collusion between journalists and Democrats. But that cozy relationship has never properly been addressed, and that avoidance undermines the credibility of journalism as the media challenges Trump. Because of the way the press covered Obama, they lost so much credibility,  Bevan said.  And because they did not take these things seriously, the IRS Scandal, Fast and Furious, you could go down the list of where they turned the other cheek.   And now where they re giving Trump the third degree on everything, that makes the contrast all that much greater. So you have a certain segment of the public, the people who voted for Trump, who literally do not trust what the media says. And the divide between rigidly defined political tribes, one courted by the media, the other dismissed by it, grows even wider. It s not good for journalism, and it s not good for the country,  said Bevan. left-news
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: lol president trump wants network who pushes most fakenews coverage of your favorite president to receive a hilarious awardearlier today president trump tweeted we contest networks plus cnn including fox dishonest corrupt distorted political coverage favorite president they bad winner receive fake news trophy not latest tweet hilarious speaks millions trump supporters sick tired watching fakenews networks like cnn msnbc abc cbs nbc pbs spec vile leftist propaganda these activists posing hosts news shows consumed hate even try hide embarrassing biased coverage contest networks plus cnn including fox dishonest corrupt distorted political coverage favorite president they bad winner receive fake news trophy donald trump realdonaldtrump november president trump correct says media treated unfairly well interesting study leaning harvard university provided stunning evidence proves president trump correct chicago tribune harvard university shorenstein center media politics public policy come study media coverage trump white house first astonishing comes harvard exactly bedrock american study found trump first days office tone news coverage president shopping percent negative percent fair balanced really mean anyway it confirms people understand said tom began publisher realclearpolitics one websites media political spoke guest the chicago way podcast i radio producer jeff margin the response trump deserving kind coverage conducted inappropriately wounds press nothing covering actions but little bit disingenuous began president obama covered first days with positive negative ratio according harvard study that significant shift significant difference says began i think reflective fact media root press box cheer certain personalities cheer others i memory media tone obama took office it merely positive during bushy way small child looks beloved parent dog master gives media tagging magical unicorn obama given benefit doubt he handed nobel peace prize though done anything earn and critics crashed nothing controversies administration gun running scandal fast furious debacle using internal revenue service weapon conservative groups covered somewhat but generally tone muted respectful nothing like trump hillary clinton failed campaign leaks democratic national committee email whether hacked russian demonstrated collusion journalists democrats but copy relationship never properly addressed avoidance undermines credibility journalism media challenges trump because way press covered obama lost much credibility began said and take things seriously irs scandal fast furious could go list turned cheek and giving trump third degree everything makes contrast much greater so certain segment public people voted trump literally trust media says and divide rigidly defined political tribes one courted media dismissed grows even wider it good journalism good country said began