 Court Slams Down Trump’s Order Blocking Funding To Sanctuary CitiesDuring the 2016 presidential campaign, President Donald Trump made a lot of promises on immigration. He was going to build a wall between the United States and Mexico, that Mexico would fund. He was going to keep Muslims from coming into the country. Lastly, he was going to cut funding to  sanctuary cities.  Now it looks like none of that is going to happen. The travel bans have been struck down. The border wall is never going to happen. Now, a federal court has ruled against taking funding away from sanctuary cities.Sanctuary cities are those that refuse to work with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to deport undocumented immigrants who report crimes. It s important to note that lacking documentation is a civil offense, not a criminal one. This is the second of Trump s main policy initiatives to be struck down because it violates the U.S. Constitution.Both San Francisco and Santa Clara County won orders squashing an executive order, signed by Trump on January 25, 2017 to halt funding to any cities who refuse to deport undocumented immigrants for minor offenses. The president has said these cities can cause,  immeasurable harm to the American people and to the very fabric of our republic.  U.S. District Judge William Orrick did not see it that way. He sided with San Francisco and Santa Clara County.While Trump wants to appear powerful, it is clear that he is not aware of what limits there are on presidential power. The president does not decide how federal funds are spent. That s Congress s job. The budget that is submitted by the White House every year is simply a wish list of what the president would like to see federal money spent on. Congress is under no obligation to follow the budget. By the same token, once funds have been allocated for a program, a president cannot just block that funding because it suits his or her objectives.The White House promises to appeal the decision and Chief of Staff Reince Priebus has said that the courts in California are  going bananas.  He added,  The idea that an agency can t put in some reasonable restriction on how some of these monies are spent is something that will be overturned eventually, and we ll win at the Supreme Court level at some point. For its part, the Department of Justice assets that federal agencies are still allowed to act against any cities or towns that violate or ignore federal immigration laws. Department spokesman Ian Prior said,  The court upheld the government s ability to use lawful means to enforce existing conditions of federal grants,  Ian Prior said in an emailed statement. The ruling is not just a victory for these two jurisdictions. Its impact will be felt in sanctuary cities and jurisdictions across the nation. Cities such as New York, Chicago and Los Angeles. This ruling is also giving energy to Californians who want to be seen as leading the resistance against the Trump administration. The Californian state Senate put through the  California Values Act.  This would turn the entire state into a sanctuary zone.News
court slams down trump order blocking funding to sanctuary citiesduring presidential campaign president donald trump made lot promises immigration he going build wall united states mexico mexico would fund he going keep muslims coming country lastly going cut funding sanctuary cities now looks like none going happen the travel bans struck the border wall never going happen now federal court ruled taking funding away sanctuary cities refuse work immigration customs enforcement ice deport undocumented immigrants report crimes it important note lacking documentation civil offense criminal one this second trump main policy initiatives struck violates san francisco santa clara county orders smashing executive order signed trump january halt funding cities refuse deport undocumented immigrants minor offenses the president said cities cause measurable harm american people fabric republic district judge william brick see way he sided san francisco santa clara trump wants appear powerful clear aware limits presidential power the president decide federal funds spent that congress job the budget submitted white house every year simply wish list president would like see federal money spent congress obligation follow budget by token funds allocated program president block funding suits white house promises appeal decision chief staff rence priests said courts california going bananas he added the idea agency put reasonable restriction monies spent something overturned eventually win supreme court level point for part department justice assets federal agencies still allowed act cities towns violate ignore federal immigration laws department spokesman ian prior said the court upheld government ability use lawful means enforce existing conditions federal grants ian prior said emailed statement the ruling victory two jurisdictions its impact felt sanctuary cities jurisdictions across nation cities new york chicago los angeles this ruling also giving energy california want seen leading resistance trump administration the california state senate put california values act this would turn entire state sanctuary
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT:  Court Slams Down Trump’s Order Blocking Funding To Sanctuary CitiesDuring the 2016 presidential campaign, President Donald Trump made a lot of promises on immigration. He was going to build a wall between the United States and Mexico, that Mexico would fund. He was going to keep Muslims from coming into the country. Lastly, he was going to cut funding to  sanctuary cities.  Now it looks like none of that is going to happen. The travel bans have been struck down. The border wall is never going to happen. Now, a federal court has ruled against taking funding away from sanctuary cities.Sanctuary cities are those that refuse to work with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to deport undocumented immigrants who report crimes. It s important to note that lacking documentation is a civil offense, not a criminal one. This is the second of Trump s main policy initiatives to be struck down because it violates the U.S. Constitution.Both San Francisco and Santa Clara County won orders squashing an executive order, signed by Trump on January 25, 2017 to halt funding to any cities who refuse to deport undocumented immigrants for minor offenses. The president has said these cities can cause,  immeasurable harm to the American people and to the very fabric of our republic.  U.S. District Judge William Orrick did not see it that way. He sided with San Francisco and Santa Clara County.While Trump wants to appear powerful, it is clear that he is not aware of what limits there are on presidential power. The president does not decide how federal funds are spent. That s Congress s job. The budget that is submitted by the White House every year is simply a wish list of what the president would like to see federal money spent on. Congress is under no obligation to follow the budget. By the same token, once funds have been allocated for a program, a president cannot just block that funding because it suits his or her objectives.The White House promises to appeal the decision and Chief of Staff Reince Priebus has said that the courts in California are  going bananas.  He added,  The idea that an agency can t put in some reasonable restriction on how some of these monies are spent is something that will be overturned eventually, and we ll win at the Supreme Court level at some point. For its part, the Department of Justice assets that federal agencies are still allowed to act against any cities or towns that violate or ignore federal immigration laws. Department spokesman Ian Prior said,  The court upheld the government s ability to use lawful means to enforce existing conditions of federal grants,  Ian Prior said in an emailed statement. The ruling is not just a victory for these two jurisdictions. Its impact will be felt in sanctuary cities and jurisdictions across the nation. Cities such as New York, Chicago and Los Angeles. This ruling is also giving energy to Californians who want to be seen as leading the resistance against the Trump administration. The Californian state Senate put through the  California Values Act.  This would turn the entire state into a sanctuary zone.News
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: court slams down trump order blocking funding to sanctuary citiesduring presidential campaign president donald trump made lot promises immigration he going build wall united states mexico mexico would fund he going keep muslims coming country lastly going cut funding sanctuary cities now looks like none going happen the travel bans struck the border wall never going happen now federal court ruled taking funding away sanctuary cities refuse work immigration customs enforcement ice deport undocumented immigrants report crimes it important note lacking documentation civil offense criminal one this second trump main policy initiatives struck violates san francisco santa clara county orders smashing executive order signed trump january halt funding cities refuse deport undocumented immigrants minor offenses the president said cities cause measurable harm american people fabric republic district judge william brick see way he sided san francisco santa clara trump wants appear powerful clear aware limits presidential power the president decide federal funds spent that congress job the budget submitted white house every year simply wish list president would like see federal money spent congress obligation follow budget by token funds allocated program president block funding suits white house promises appeal decision chief staff rence priests said courts california going bananas he added the idea agency put reasonable restriction monies spent something overturned eventually win supreme court level point for part department justice assets federal agencies still allowed act cities towns violate ignore federal immigration laws department spokesman ian prior said the court upheld government ability use lawful means enforce existing conditions federal grants ian prior said emailed statement the ruling victory two jurisdictions its impact felt sanctuary cities jurisdictions across nation cities new york chicago los angeles this ruling also giving energy california want seen leading resistance trump administration the california state senate put california values act this would turn entire state sanctuary