GAY MARRIAGE APPROVED BY SUPREME COURT With Ironic Dissenting Opinion From Justice Roberts: “But this court is not a legislature”The  Fundamental Transformation  of America is almost complete. Even Barack Hussein Obama must be surprised by how few hurdles have been placed in his way In less than 24 hours, our leftist US Supreme Court delivered not one, but two sucker punches to the heart of America. The acts of these radical judicial activists will have a dramatic effect on our society and culture in the United States of America.    The Supreme Court declared Friday that same-sex couples have a right to marry anywhere in the United States.Gay and lesbian couples already could marry in 36 states and the District of Columbia. The court s 5-4 ruling means the remaining 14 states, in the South and Midwest, will have to stop enforcing their bans on same-sex marriage.The outcome is the culmination of two decades of Supreme Court litigation over marriage, and gay rights generally. Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote the majority opinion, just as he did in the court s previous three major gay rights cases dating back to 1996. It came on the anniversary of two of those earlier decisions. No union is more profound than marriage,  Kennedy wrote, joined by the court s four more liberal justices.The four dissenting justices each filed a separate opinion explaining their views. But this court is not a legislature. Whether same-sex marriage is a good idea should be of no concern to us,  Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in dissent. Roberts read a summary of his dissent from the bench, the first time he has done so in nearly 10 years as chief justice.Justice Antonin Scalia said he is not concerned so much about same-sex marriage, but about  this court s threat to American democracy.  Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas also dissented.The ruling will not take effect immediately because the court gives the losing side roughly three weeks to ask for reconsideration. But some state officials and county clerks might decide there is little risk in issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples.The cases before the court involved laws from Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio and Tennessee that define marriage as the union of a man and a woman. Those states have not allowed same-sex couples to marry within their borders and they also have refused to recognize valid marriages from elsewhere.Just two years ago, the Supreme Court struck down part of the federal anti-gay marriage law that denied a range of government benefits to legally married same-sex couples.The decision in United States v. Windsor did not address the validity of state marriage bans, but courts across the country, with few exceptions, said its logic compelled them to invalidate state laws that prohibited gay and lesbian couples from marrying.The number of states allowing same-sex marriage has grown rapidly. As recently as October, just over one-third of the states permitted same-sex marriage.There are an estimated 390,000 married same-sex couples in the United States, according to UCLA s Williams Institute, which tracks the demographics of gay and lesbian Americans. Another 70,000 couples living in states that do not currently permit them to wed would get married in the next three years, the institute says. Roughly 1 million same-sex couples, married and unmarried, live together in the United States, the institute says.Via: AP News left-news
gay marriage approved by supreme court with ironic dissenting opinion from justice roberts but court legislature the fundamental transformation america almost complete even barack hussain obama must surprised hurdles placed way in less hours leftist us supreme court delivered one two sucker punches heart america the acts radical judicial activists dramatic effect society culture united states america the supreme court declared friday couples right marry anywhere united lesbian couples already could marry states district columbia the court ruling means remaining states south midwest stop enforcing bans outcome culmination two decades supreme court litigation marriage gay rights generally justice anthony kennedy wrote majority opinion court previous three major gay rights cases dating back it came anniversary two earlier decisions no union profound marriage kennedy wrote joined court four liberal four dissenting justices filed separate opinion explaining views but court legislature whether marriage good idea concern us chief justice john roberts wrote dissent roberts read summary dissent bench first time done nearly years chief antonio scale said concerned much marriage court threat american democracy justices samuel alto clearance thomas also ruling take effect immediately court gives losing side roughly three weeks ask reconsideration but state officials county clerks might decide little risk issuing marriage licenses cases court involved laws kentucky michigan ohio tennessee define marriage union man woman those states allowed couples marry within borders also refused recognize valid marriages two years ago supreme court struck part federal marriage law denied range government benefits legally married decision united states windsor address validity state marriage bans courts across country exceptions said logic compelled invalidate state laws prohibited gay lesbian couples number states allowing marriage grown rapidly as recently october states permitted estimated married couples united states according ucla williams institute tracks demographics gay lesbian americans another couples living states currently permit wed would get married next three years institute says roughly million couples married unmarried live together united states institute ap news
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: GAY MARRIAGE APPROVED BY SUPREME COURT With Ironic Dissenting Opinion From Justice Roberts: “But this court is not a legislature”The  Fundamental Transformation  of America is almost complete. Even Barack Hussein Obama must be surprised by how few hurdles have been placed in his way In less than 24 hours, our leftist US Supreme Court delivered not one, but two sucker punches to the heart of America. The acts of these radical judicial activists will have a dramatic effect on our society and culture in the United States of America.    The Supreme Court declared Friday that same-sex couples have a right to marry anywhere in the United States.Gay and lesbian couples already could marry in 36 states and the District of Columbia. The court s 5-4 ruling means the remaining 14 states, in the South and Midwest, will have to stop enforcing their bans on same-sex marriage.The outcome is the culmination of two decades of Supreme Court litigation over marriage, and gay rights generally. Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote the majority opinion, just as he did in the court s previous three major gay rights cases dating back to 1996. It came on the anniversary of two of those earlier decisions. No union is more profound than marriage,  Kennedy wrote, joined by the court s four more liberal justices.The four dissenting justices each filed a separate opinion explaining their views. But this court is not a legislature. Whether same-sex marriage is a good idea should be of no concern to us,  Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in dissent. Roberts read a summary of his dissent from the bench, the first time he has done so in nearly 10 years as chief justice.Justice Antonin Scalia said he is not concerned so much about same-sex marriage, but about  this court s threat to American democracy.  Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas also dissented.The ruling will not take effect immediately because the court gives the losing side roughly three weeks to ask for reconsideration. But some state officials and county clerks might decide there is little risk in issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples.The cases before the court involved laws from Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio and Tennessee that define marriage as the union of a man and a woman. Those states have not allowed same-sex couples to marry within their borders and they also have refused to recognize valid marriages from elsewhere.Just two years ago, the Supreme Court struck down part of the federal anti-gay marriage law that denied a range of government benefits to legally married same-sex couples.The decision in United States v. Windsor did not address the validity of state marriage bans, but courts across the country, with few exceptions, said its logic compelled them to invalidate state laws that prohibited gay and lesbian couples from marrying.The number of states allowing same-sex marriage has grown rapidly. As recently as October, just over one-third of the states permitted same-sex marriage.There are an estimated 390,000 married same-sex couples in the United States, according to UCLA s Williams Institute, which tracks the demographics of gay and lesbian Americans. Another 70,000 couples living in states that do not currently permit them to wed would get married in the next three years, the institute says. Roughly 1 million same-sex couples, married and unmarried, live together in the United States, the institute says.Via: AP News left-news
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: gay marriage approved by supreme court with ironic dissenting opinion from justice roberts but court legislature the fundamental transformation america almost complete even barack hussain obama must surprised hurdles placed way in less hours leftist us supreme court delivered one two sucker punches heart america the acts radical judicial activists dramatic effect society culture united states america the supreme court declared friday couples right marry anywhere united lesbian couples already could marry states district columbia the court ruling means remaining states south midwest stop enforcing bans outcome culmination two decades supreme court litigation marriage gay rights generally justice anthony kennedy wrote majority opinion court previous three major gay rights cases dating back it came anniversary two earlier decisions no union profound marriage kennedy wrote joined court four liberal four dissenting justices filed separate opinion explaining views but court legislature whether marriage good idea concern us chief justice john roberts wrote dissent roberts read summary dissent bench first time done nearly years chief antonio scale said concerned much marriage court threat american democracy justices samuel alto clearance thomas also ruling take effect immediately court gives losing side roughly three weeks ask reconsideration but state officials county clerks might decide little risk issuing marriage licenses cases court involved laws kentucky michigan ohio tennessee define marriage union man woman those states allowed couples marry within borders also refused recognize valid marriages two years ago supreme court struck part federal marriage law denied range government benefits legally married decision united states windsor address validity state marriage bans courts across country exceptions said logic compelled invalidate state laws prohibited gay lesbian couples number states allowing marriage grown rapidly as recently october states permitted estimated married couples united states according ucla williams institute tracks demographics gay lesbian americans another couples living states currently permit wed would get married next three years institute says roughly million couples married unmarried live together united states institute ap news