Hawaii judge halts Trump's new travel ban before it can go into effectHONOLULU/NEW YORK (Reuters) - Just hours before President Donald Trump’s revised travel ban was set to go into effect, a U.S. federal judge in Hawaii on Wednesday issued an emergency halt to the order’s implementation.  The action was the latest legal blow to the administration’s efforts to temporarily ban refugees as well as travelers from six predominantly Muslim countries, which the President has said is needed for national security. Trump lashed out at the judge’s ruling, saying it “makes us look weak.”  Trump signed the new ban on March 6 in a bid to overcome legal problems with a January executive order that caused chaos at airports and sparked mass protests before a Washington judge stopped its enforcement in February. U.S. District Judge Derrick Watson put an emergency stop to the new order in response to a lawsuit filed by the state of Hawaii, which argued that the order discriminated against Muslims in violation of the U.S. Constitution.  Judge Watson concluded in his ruling that while the order did not mention Islam by name, “a reasonable, objective observer ... would conclude that the Executive Order was issued with a purpose to disfavor a particular religion.” Watson was appointed to the bench by former Democratic President Barack Obama.     Speaking at a rally in Nashville, Trump called his revised executive order a “watered-down version” of his first. “I think we ought to go back to the first one and go all the way, which is what I wanted to do in the first place,” Trump said. Trump called the judge’s block “unprecedented judicial overreach” and said he will take the case “as far as it needs to go,” including to the U.S. Supreme Court.  The Department of Justice called the ruling “flawed both in reasoning and in scope,” adding that the president has broad authority in national security matters. “The Department will continue to defend this Executive Order in the courts,” it said a statement.     The nation’s highest court is currently split 4-4 between liberals and conservatives with Trump’s pick - appeals court judge Neil Gorsuch - still awaiting confirmation.  Paul Ryan, the Republican Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, said the ban was needed to improve vetting of people entering the United States in order to prevent attacks and said he had no doubt that it would be upheld by higher courts.  Watson’s order is only temporary until the broader arguments in the case can be heard. He set an expedited hearing schedule to determine if his ruling should be extended. Trump’s first travel order was more sweeping than the second revised order. Like the current one, it barred citizens of Iran, Libya, Syria, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen from entering the country for 90 days, but it also included Iraq, which was subsequently taken off the list.  Refugees were blocked from entering the country for 120 days in both orders, but an indefinite ban on all refugees from Syria was dropped in the new one. The revised ban also excluded legal permanent residents and existing visa holders. It provided a series of waivers for various categories of immigrants with ties to the United States. Hawaii and other opponents of the ban claimed that the motivation behind it was Trump’s campaign promise of “a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States.” The government, in its court filings cautioned the court against looking for secret motives in the executive order and against performing “judicial psychoanalysis of a drafter’s heart of heart.”   Watson said he did not need to do that, because evidence of motive could be found in the president’s public statements. He said he did not give credence to the government’s argument that the order was not anti-Muslim because it targeted only a small percentage of Muslim-majority countries.  “The notion that one can demonstrate animus toward any group of people only by targeting all of them at once is fundamentally flawed,” the judge wrote.  The case was one of several moving through U.S. courts on Wednesday that were brought by states’ attorneys general and immigrant advocacy groups. In Maryland, refugee resettlement agencies represented by the American Civil Liberties Union and the National Immigration Law Center argued in court for a restraining order.  In Washington state, a group of plaintiffs applying for immigrant visas asked U.S. District Judge James Robart in Seattle - who suspended the first ban - to stop the new order. Robart was appointed to the bench by Republican former President George W. Bush. Both Judge Robart and U.S. District Judge Theodore Chuang in Maryland said they would issue written rulings in their cases, but did not specify a time line. Washington state, joined by California, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York and Oregon, said in court filings they supported the plaintiffs in Seattle. If more judges side with Watson, the government’s case may be harder to make at higher courts. The 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals upheld Robart’s ruling against the first ban and Watson referenced that decision in his order. Various groups and companies said they would be harmed by the travel restrictions. A group of 58 technology companies, including Airbnb Inc, Lyft Inc and Dropbox Inc, filed a “friend of the court” brief in the case saying the order hurt their ability to recruit the best talent from around the world.  A longer list of companies, including Apple Inc , Facebook Inc  and Alphabet Inc’s  Google - filed a brief opposing the first ban in a different court challenge brought by Washington state, which is ongoing. It was not immediately clear why fewer tech companies signed on to the brief this time around.  politicsNews
hawaii judge halts trump new travel ban go york reuters just hours president donald trump revised travel ban set go effect federal judge hawaii wednesday issued emergency halt order implementation the action latest legal blow administration efforts temporarily ban refugees well travelers six predominantly muslim countries president said needed national security trump lashed judge ruling saying makes us look trump signed new ban march bid overcome legal problems january executive order caused chaos airports sparked mass protests washington judge stopped enforcement february district judge derrick watson put emergency stop new order response lawsuit filed state hawaii argued order discriminated muslims violation constitution judge watson concluded ruling order mention islam name reasonable objective observer would conclude executive order issued purpose disfavor particular watson appointed bench former democratic president barack obama speaking rally nashville trump called revised executive order version first i think ought go back first one go way i wanted first place trump said trump called judge block unprecedented judicial overreach said take case far needs go including supreme court the department justice called ruling flawed reasoning scope adding president broad authority national security matters the department continue defend executive order courts said statement the nation highest court currently split liberals conservatives trump pick appeals court judge neil gorsuch still awaiting confirmation paul ryan republican speaker house representatives said ban needed improve vetting people entering united states order prevent attacks said doubt would upheld higher courts watson order temporary broader arguments case heard he set expedite hearing schedule determine ruling extended trump first travel order sweeping second revised order like current one barred citizens iran libya syria somalia sudan yemen entering country days also included iraq subsequently taken list refugees blocked entering country days orders indefinite ban refugees syria dropped new one the revised ban also excluded legal permanent residents existing visa holders it provided series waivers various categories immigrants ties united states hawaii opponents ban claimed motivation behind trump campaign promise total complete shutdown muslims entering united the government court filings cautioned court looking secret motives executive order performing judicial psychoanalysis drafted heart watson said need evidence motive could found president public statements he said give credence government argument order targeted small percentage countries the notion one demonstrate animals toward group people targeting fundamentally flawed judge wrote the case one several moving courts wednesday brought states attorneys general immigrant advocacy groups in maryland refugee resettlement agencies represented american civil liberties union national immigration law center argued court restraining order in washington state group plaintiffs applying immigrant visas asked district judge james robert seattle suspended first ban stop new order robert appointed bench republican former president george bush both judge robert district judge theodore chang maryland said would issue written rulings cases specify time line washington state joined california maryland massachusetts new york oregon said court filings supported plaintiffs seattle if judges side watson government case may harder make higher courts the circuit court appeals upheld robert ruling first ban watson referenced decision order various groups companies said would harmed travel restrictions a group technology companies including airing inc left inc drugbox inc filed friend court brief case saying order hurt ability recruit best talent around world a longer list companies including apple inc facebook inc alphabet inc google filed brief opposing first ban different court challenge brought washington state ongoing it immediately clear fewer tech companies signed brief time around politicsnews
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: Hawaii judge halts Trump's new travel ban before it can go into effectHONOLULU/NEW YORK (Reuters) - Just hours before President Donald Trump’s revised travel ban was set to go into effect, a U.S. federal judge in Hawaii on Wednesday issued an emergency halt to the order’s implementation.  The action was the latest legal blow to the administration’s efforts to temporarily ban refugees as well as travelers from six predominantly Muslim countries, which the President has said is needed for national security. Trump lashed out at the judge’s ruling, saying it “makes us look weak.”  Trump signed the new ban on March 6 in a bid to overcome legal problems with a January executive order that caused chaos at airports and sparked mass protests before a Washington judge stopped its enforcement in February. U.S. District Judge Derrick Watson put an emergency stop to the new order in response to a lawsuit filed by the state of Hawaii, which argued that the order discriminated against Muslims in violation of the U.S. Constitution.  Judge Watson concluded in his ruling that while the order did not mention Islam by name, “a reasonable, objective observer ... would conclude that the Executive Order was issued with a purpose to disfavor a particular religion.” Watson was appointed to the bench by former Democratic President Barack Obama.     Speaking at a rally in Nashville, Trump called his revised executive order a “watered-down version” of his first. “I think we ought to go back to the first one and go all the way, which is what I wanted to do in the first place,” Trump said. Trump called the judge’s block “unprecedented judicial overreach” and said he will take the case “as far as it needs to go,” including to the U.S. Supreme Court.  The Department of Justice called the ruling “flawed both in reasoning and in scope,” adding that the president has broad authority in national security matters. “The Department will continue to defend this Executive Order in the courts,” it said a statement.     The nation’s highest court is currently split 4-4 between liberals and conservatives with Trump’s pick - appeals court judge Neil Gorsuch - still awaiting confirmation.  Paul Ryan, the Republican Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, said the ban was needed to improve vetting of people entering the United States in order to prevent attacks and said he had no doubt that it would be upheld by higher courts.  Watson’s order is only temporary until the broader arguments in the case can be heard. He set an expedited hearing schedule to determine if his ruling should be extended. Trump’s first travel order was more sweeping than the second revised order. Like the current one, it barred citizens of Iran, Libya, Syria, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen from entering the country for 90 days, but it also included Iraq, which was subsequently taken off the list.  Refugees were blocked from entering the country for 120 days in both orders, but an indefinite ban on all refugees from Syria was dropped in the new one. The revised ban also excluded legal permanent residents and existing visa holders. It provided a series of waivers for various categories of immigrants with ties to the United States. Hawaii and other opponents of the ban claimed that the motivation behind it was Trump’s campaign promise of “a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States.” The government, in its court filings cautioned the court against looking for secret motives in the executive order and against performing “judicial psychoanalysis of a drafter’s heart of heart.”   Watson said he did not need to do that, because evidence of motive could be found in the president’s public statements. He said he did not give credence to the government’s argument that the order was not anti-Muslim because it targeted only a small percentage of Muslim-majority countries.  “The notion that one can demonstrate animus toward any group of people only by targeting all of them at once is fundamentally flawed,” the judge wrote.  The case was one of several moving through U.S. courts on Wednesday that were brought by states’ attorneys general and immigrant advocacy groups. In Maryland, refugee resettlement agencies represented by the American Civil Liberties Union and the National Immigration Law Center argued in court for a restraining order.  In Washington state, a group of plaintiffs applying for immigrant visas asked U.S. District Judge James Robart in Seattle - who suspended the first ban - to stop the new order. Robart was appointed to the bench by Republican former President George W. Bush. Both Judge Robart and U.S. District Judge Theodore Chuang in Maryland said they would issue written rulings in their cases, but did not specify a time line. Washington state, joined by California, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York and Oregon, said in court filings they supported the plaintiffs in Seattle. If more judges side with Watson, the government’s case may be harder to make at higher courts. The 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals upheld Robart’s ruling against the first ban and Watson referenced that decision in his order. Various groups and companies said they would be harmed by the travel restrictions. A group of 58 technology companies, including Airbnb Inc, Lyft Inc and Dropbox Inc, filed a “friend of the court” brief in the case saying the order hurt their ability to recruit the best talent from around the world.  A longer list of companies, including Apple Inc , Facebook Inc  and Alphabet Inc’s  Google - filed a brief opposing the first ban in a different court challenge brought by Washington state, which is ongoing. It was not immediately clear why fewer tech companies signed on to the brief this time around.  politicsNews
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: hawaii judge halts trump new travel ban go york reuters just hours president donald trump revised travel ban set go effect federal judge hawaii wednesday issued emergency halt order implementation the action latest legal blow administration efforts temporarily ban refugees well travelers six predominantly muslim countries president said needed national security trump lashed judge ruling saying makes us look trump signed new ban march bid overcome legal problems january executive order caused chaos airports sparked mass protests washington judge stopped enforcement february district judge derrick watson put emergency stop new order response lawsuit filed state hawaii argued order discriminated muslims violation constitution judge watson concluded ruling order mention islam name reasonable objective observer would conclude executive order issued purpose disfavor particular watson appointed bench former democratic president barack obama speaking rally nashville trump called revised executive order version first i think ought go back first one go way i wanted first place trump said trump called judge block unprecedented judicial overreach said take case far needs go including supreme court the department justice called ruling flawed reasoning scope adding president broad authority national security matters the department continue defend executive order courts said statement the nation highest court currently split liberals conservatives trump pick appeals court judge neil gorsuch still awaiting confirmation paul ryan republican speaker house representatives said ban needed improve vetting people entering united states order prevent attacks said doubt would upheld higher courts watson order temporary broader arguments case heard he set expedite hearing schedule determine ruling extended trump first travel order sweeping second revised order like current one barred citizens iran libya syria somalia sudan yemen entering country days also included iraq subsequently taken list refugees blocked entering country days orders indefinite ban refugees syria dropped new one the revised ban also excluded legal permanent residents existing visa holders it provided series waivers various categories immigrants ties united states hawaii opponents ban claimed motivation behind trump campaign promise total complete shutdown muslims entering united the government court filings cautioned court looking secret motives executive order performing judicial psychoanalysis drafted heart watson said need evidence motive could found president public statements he said give credence government argument order targeted small percentage countries the notion one demonstrate animals toward group people targeting fundamentally flawed judge wrote the case one several moving courts wednesday brought states attorneys general immigrant advocacy groups in maryland refugee resettlement agencies represented american civil liberties union national immigration law center argued court restraining order in washington state group plaintiffs applying immigrant visas asked district judge james robert seattle suspended first ban stop new order robert appointed bench republican former president george bush both judge robert district judge theodore chang maryland said would issue written rulings cases specify time line washington state joined california maryland massachusetts new york oregon said court filings supported plaintiffs seattle if judges side watson government case may harder make higher courts the circuit court appeals upheld robert ruling first ban watson referenced decision order various groups companies said would harmed travel restrictions a group technology companies including airing inc left inc drugbox inc filed friend court brief case saying order hurt ability recruit best talent around world a longer list companies including apple inc facebook inc alphabet inc google filed brief opposing first ban different court challenge brought washington state ongoing it immediately clear fewer tech companies signed brief time around politicsnews