JUST IN: SUPREME COURT Rules On Trump Travel BanAnother winner for America and for President Trump! The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the travel ban! Guess who voted against it Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor said they would have left the lower court orders in place. Is anyone surprised by the two lefty judges? Not us!Fox News reports:Handing the White House a huge judicial victory, the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday ruled in favor of President Trump s travel ban affecting residents of six majority-Muslim countries.The justices said the policy can take full effect despite multiple legal challenges against it that haven t yet made their way through the court system.The ban applies to people from Syria, Chad, Iran, Libya, Somalia and Yemen.Lower courts had said people from those countries with a  bona fide  relationship with someone in the United States could not be prevented from entry.Grandparents and cousins were among the relatives courts said could not be excluded.The nine-member high court said in two one-page orders late Monday afternoon that lower court rulings that partly blocked the ban should be put on hold while appeals courts in Richmond, Va., and San Francisco take up the case.Liberal-leaning Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor said they would have left the lower court orders in place.Both courts are scheduled to hear arguments in those cases this week.Both courts are also dealing with the issue on an accelerated basis, and the Supreme Court noted it expects those courts to reach decisions  with appropriate dispatch. Quick resolution by appellate courts would allow the Supreme Court to hear and decide the issue this term, by the end of June.Trump s travel ban has been challenged in separate lawsuits by Hawaii and the American Civil Liberties Union. Both have argued the ban discriminates against Muslims and should not go into effect under immigration laws.politics
just in supreme court rules on trump travel bananother winner america president trump the supreme court ruled favor travel ban guess voted justices ruth baker ginsburg sonia sotomayor said would left lower court orders place is anyone surprised two left judges not us fox news reports handing white house huge judicial victory supreme court monday ruled favor president trump travel ban affecting residents six justices said policy take full effect despite multiple legal challenges yet made way court ban applies people syria chad iran libya somalia courts said people countries bona fide relationship someone united states could prevented cousins among relatives courts said could high court said two orders late monday afternoon lower court rulings partly blocked ban put hold appeals courts richmond san francisco take justices ruth baker ginsburg sonia sotomayor said would left lower court orders courts scheduled hear arguments cases courts also dealing issue accelerated basis supreme court noted expects courts reach decisions appropriate dispatch quick resolution appellate courts would allow supreme court hear decide issue term end travel ban challenged separate lawsuits hawaii american civil liberties union both argued ban discriminate muslims go effect immigration
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: JUST IN: SUPREME COURT Rules On Trump Travel BanAnother winner for America and for President Trump! The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the travel ban! Guess who voted against it Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor said they would have left the lower court orders in place. Is anyone surprised by the two lefty judges? Not us!Fox News reports:Handing the White House a huge judicial victory, the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday ruled in favor of President Trump s travel ban affecting residents of six majority-Muslim countries.The justices said the policy can take full effect despite multiple legal challenges against it that haven t yet made their way through the court system.The ban applies to people from Syria, Chad, Iran, Libya, Somalia and Yemen.Lower courts had said people from those countries with a  bona fide  relationship with someone in the United States could not be prevented from entry.Grandparents and cousins were among the relatives courts said could not be excluded.The nine-member high court said in two one-page orders late Monday afternoon that lower court rulings that partly blocked the ban should be put on hold while appeals courts in Richmond, Va., and San Francisco take up the case.Liberal-leaning Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor said they would have left the lower court orders in place.Both courts are scheduled to hear arguments in those cases this week.Both courts are also dealing with the issue on an accelerated basis, and the Supreme Court noted it expects those courts to reach decisions  with appropriate dispatch. Quick resolution by appellate courts would allow the Supreme Court to hear and decide the issue this term, by the end of June.Trump s travel ban has been challenged in separate lawsuits by Hawaii and the American Civil Liberties Union. Both have argued the ban discriminates against Muslims and should not go into effect under immigration laws.politics
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: just in supreme court rules on trump travel bananother winner america president trump the supreme court ruled favor travel ban guess voted justices ruth baker ginsburg sonia sotomayor said would left lower court orders place is anyone surprised two left judges not us fox news reports handing white house huge judicial victory supreme court monday ruled favor president trump travel ban affecting residents six justices said policy take full effect despite multiple legal challenges yet made way court ban applies people syria chad iran libya somalia courts said people countries bona fide relationship someone united states could prevented cousins among relatives courts said could high court said two orders late monday afternoon lower court rulings partly blocked ban put hold appeals courts richmond san francisco take justices ruth baker ginsburg sonia sotomayor said would left lower court orders courts scheduled hear arguments cases courts also dealing issue accelerated basis supreme court noted expects courts reach decisions appropriate dispatch quick resolution appellate courts would allow supreme court hear decide issue term end travel ban challenged separate lawsuits hawaii american civil liberties union both argued ban discriminate muslims go effect immigration