Milestones in legal fight over Texas abortion law(Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court is set to rule on Monday on a legal challenge by abortion providers to a Texas law requiring doctors performing the procedure to have “admitting privileges” at local hospitals and clinics to meet hospital-grade standards.  Following is a timeline of that challenge. July 2013 - The Republican-led Texas legislature passes and Republican Governor Rick Perry signs the law known as H.B. 2, putting new requirements on abortion providers. State officials say the law is intended to ensure the health and safety of women. September 2013 – Before the law is enforced, Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers challenge the measure. They assert that certain provisions, including one related to doctors’ “admitting privileges” - a type of formal affiliation - at a hospital within 30 miles (48 km) of an abortion clinic, are aimed at decreasing the abortion availability in the state. October 2013 – A U.S. district judge sides largely with the challengers, blocking the admitting privileges provision. March 2014 - The New Orleans-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, a regional federal appeals court covering Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi, reverses the lower court and permits much of the law to take effect.  April 2014 - Whole Woman’s Health and other abortion providers bring a new complaint against Texas, citing the effect of the law’s implementation and the number of clinics that have closed. The challengers focus on the admitting-privileges requirement and regulations governing clinic facility standards. August 2014 – A U.S. district court judge declares the admitting privileges and clinic requirements an unconstitutional burden on women’s access to abortion. October 2014 - The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit intervenes to allow implementation of both new regulations, but the U.S. Supreme Court blocks part of the order so that the mandate that clinics meet hospital-grade standards does not go into effect. June 2015 - After considering the full merits of the challenge, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit reverses the district judge’s decision, finding the judge should have deferred to the legislature’s stated health and safety goals. The appeals court also says most of the lawsuit should have been barred because the legal issues it raises already were addressed in the case filed by Planned Parenthood. June 2015 - The U.S. Supreme Court by a 5-4 vote puts a temporary hold on the 5th Circuit’s ruling while the justices consider whether to hear the challengers’ appeal. That action blocks the provision regarding hospital-grade standards from taking effect. September 2015 - The abortion providers challenging the Texas restrictions ask the U.S. Supreme Court to hear their appeal of the 5th Circuit’s ruling. November 2015 - The U.S. Supreme Court agrees to hear the challenge by abortion providers to the Texas restrictions. February 2016 - Conservative U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, a supporter of abortion restrictions, dies at age 79, leaving the court shorthanded and evenly divided with four liberals and four conservatives. March 2016 - The U.S. Supreme Court hears 85 minutes of oral arguments in the case, known as Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt. The court’s four liberal justices indicate they believe the law intrudes on a woman’s constitutional right to abortion. The four conservative justices express doubts about claims by abortion providers that the law forced numerous clinics to shut down. June 2016 - The U.S. Supreme Court is due to rule on Monday in Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt. politicsNews
milestones legal fight texas abortion law reuters the supreme court set rule monday legal challenge abortion providers texas law requiring doctors performing procedure admitting privileges local hospitals clinics meet standards following timeline challenge july the texas legislature passes republican governor rick perry signs law known putting new requirements abortion providers state officials say law intended ensure health safety women september before law enforced planned parenthood abortion providers challenge measure they assert certain provisions including one related doctors admitting privileges type formal affiliation hospital within miles km abortion clinic aimed decreasing abortion availability state october a district judge sides largely challengers blocking admitting privileges provision march the new court appeals circuit regional federal appeals court covering texas louisiana mississippi reverses lower court permits much law take effect april whole woman health abortion providers bring new complaint texas citing effect law implementation number clinics closed the challengers focus requirement regulations governing clinic facility standards august a district court judge declares admitting privileges clinic requirements unconstitutional burden women access abortion october the court appeals circuit intervenes allow implementation new regulations supreme court blocks part order mandate clinics meet standards go effect june after considering full merits challenge court appeals circuit reverses district judge decision finding judge deferred legislature stated health safety goals the appeals court also says lawsuit barred legal issues raises already addressed case filed planned parenthood june the supreme court vote puts temporary hold circuit ruling justices consider whether hear challengers appeal that action blocks provision regarding standards taking effect september the abortion providers challenging texas restrictions ask supreme court hear appeal circuit ruling november the supreme court agrees hear challenge abortion providers texas restrictions february conservative supreme court justice antonio scale supporter abortion restrictions dies age leaving court shorthand evenly divided four liberals four conservatives march the supreme court hears minutes oral arguments case known whole woman health hellerstedt the court four liberal justices indicate believe law intruder woman constitutional right abortion the four conservative justices express doubts claims abortion providers law forced numerous clinics shut june the supreme court due rule monday whole woman health hellerstedt politicsnews
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: Milestones in legal fight over Texas abortion law(Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court is set to rule on Monday on a legal challenge by abortion providers to a Texas law requiring doctors performing the procedure to have “admitting privileges” at local hospitals and clinics to meet hospital-grade standards.  Following is a timeline of that challenge. July 2013 - The Republican-led Texas legislature passes and Republican Governor Rick Perry signs the law known as H.B. 2, putting new requirements on abortion providers. State officials say the law is intended to ensure the health and safety of women. September 2013 – Before the law is enforced, Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers challenge the measure. They assert that certain provisions, including one related to doctors’ “admitting privileges” - a type of formal affiliation - at a hospital within 30 miles (48 km) of an abortion clinic, are aimed at decreasing the abortion availability in the state. October 2013 – A U.S. district judge sides largely with the challengers, blocking the admitting privileges provision. March 2014 - The New Orleans-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, a regional federal appeals court covering Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi, reverses the lower court and permits much of the law to take effect.  April 2014 - Whole Woman’s Health and other abortion providers bring a new complaint against Texas, citing the effect of the law’s implementation and the number of clinics that have closed. The challengers focus on the admitting-privileges requirement and regulations governing clinic facility standards. August 2014 – A U.S. district court judge declares the admitting privileges and clinic requirements an unconstitutional burden on women’s access to abortion. October 2014 - The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit intervenes to allow implementation of both new regulations, but the U.S. Supreme Court blocks part of the order so that the mandate that clinics meet hospital-grade standards does not go into effect. June 2015 - After considering the full merits of the challenge, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit reverses the district judge’s decision, finding the judge should have deferred to the legislature’s stated health and safety goals. The appeals court also says most of the lawsuit should have been barred because the legal issues it raises already were addressed in the case filed by Planned Parenthood. June 2015 - The U.S. Supreme Court by a 5-4 vote puts a temporary hold on the 5th Circuit’s ruling while the justices consider whether to hear the challengers’ appeal. That action blocks the provision regarding hospital-grade standards from taking effect. September 2015 - The abortion providers challenging the Texas restrictions ask the U.S. Supreme Court to hear their appeal of the 5th Circuit’s ruling. November 2015 - The U.S. Supreme Court agrees to hear the challenge by abortion providers to the Texas restrictions. February 2016 - Conservative U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, a supporter of abortion restrictions, dies at age 79, leaving the court shorthanded and evenly divided with four liberals and four conservatives. March 2016 - The U.S. Supreme Court hears 85 minutes of oral arguments in the case, known as Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt. The court’s four liberal justices indicate they believe the law intrudes on a woman’s constitutional right to abortion. The four conservative justices express doubts about claims by abortion providers that the law forced numerous clinics to shut down. June 2016 - The U.S. Supreme Court is due to rule on Monday in Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt. politicsNews
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: milestones legal fight texas abortion law reuters the supreme court set rule monday legal challenge abortion providers texas law requiring doctors performing procedure admitting privileges local hospitals clinics meet standards following timeline challenge july the texas legislature passes republican governor rick perry signs law known putting new requirements abortion providers state officials say law intended ensure health safety women september before law enforced planned parenthood abortion providers challenge measure they assert certain provisions including one related doctors admitting privileges type formal affiliation hospital within miles km abortion clinic aimed decreasing abortion availability state october a district judge sides largely challengers blocking admitting privileges provision march the new court appeals circuit regional federal appeals court covering texas louisiana mississippi reverses lower court permits much law take effect april whole woman health abortion providers bring new complaint texas citing effect law implementation number clinics closed the challengers focus requirement regulations governing clinic facility standards august a district court judge declares admitting privileges clinic requirements unconstitutional burden women access abortion october the court appeals circuit intervenes allow implementation new regulations supreme court blocks part order mandate clinics meet standards go effect june after considering full merits challenge court appeals circuit reverses district judge decision finding judge deferred legislature stated health safety goals the appeals court also says lawsuit barred legal issues raises already addressed case filed planned parenthood june the supreme court vote puts temporary hold circuit ruling justices consider whether hear challengers appeal that action blocks provision regarding standards taking effect september the abortion providers challenging texas restrictions ask supreme court hear appeal circuit ruling november the supreme court agrees hear challenge abortion providers texas restrictions february conservative supreme court justice antonio scale supporter abortion restrictions dies age leaving court shorthand evenly divided four liberals four conservatives march the supreme court hears minutes oral arguments case known whole woman health hellerstedt the court four liberal justices indicate believe law intruder woman constitutional right abortion the four conservative justices express doubts claims abortion providers law forced numerous clinics shut june the supreme court due rule monday whole woman health hellerstedt politicsnews