HERE’S WHY TRUMP’S Muslim Ban Is Absolutely NecessaryThe biggest thing a president can do for the people is to protect them from an enemy. If you refuse to define the enemy then you really can t fight it correctly. Obama and Hillary Clinton have both repeatedly denied that we re at war with Islam and refused to name it ISLAMIC EXTREMISM. On the other hand, Donald Trump has defined the enemy and is ready to defend Americans from it by banning Muslims until we can  figure out what s going on . Our own FBI and DHS have stated that WE CANNOT PROPERLY VET THE REFUGEES COMING TO AMERICA. Yes, you would think Obama would be cautious like Jimmy Carter and other past Presidents have and ban Muslims. Noooo .Obama is doing just the opposite! He s flooding towns across America with Muslims!A Muslim ban is necessary and needs to happen ASAP!Gen. David Petraeus is now auditioning to become Hillary Clinton s vice presidential pick. There s really no other way to interpret his recent column in The Washington Post, slamming Donald Trump for proposing a temporary ban on Muslim immigration.Calling Mr. Trump s statements  hate speech,  Gen. Petraeus essentially argues that anyone who dares to tell the truth about Islamic terrorism will only incite more Muslims to become Islamic terrorists,  by telling Muslims that the United States is at war with them and their religion. That statement assumes that the overwhelming majority of Muslims from Dearborn, Mich., to Kuala Lumpur are illiterate, stupid and blind.Practicing Muslims understand their religion far better than we do in the West. They understand that no one has  hijacked  Islam, as the apologists would have it; but that groups of Islamists, from al Qaeda to the Nusra front to the Islamic State, are seeking to apply Islamic doctrine   Shariah law   in its entirety.You can t win a war if you don t know the enemy. Our enemy today is Islamic supremacism, those who seek to establish an Islamic caliphate with the ultimate goal of replacing our Constitution with Shariah law.Rather than sweep that reality under the table, Mr. Trump has recognized that we simply have no tools at present to deal with this threat, and that the first responsibility of the president is to protect the security of Americans.Just days after the San Bernardino shootings last December, we learned that the Department of Homeland Security had shut down an intelligence-based screening program that had identified the mosque that shooter Syed Farook attended as a recruitment center for jihadis.Screening programs like the one whistleblower Phil Haney had devised are precisely what we need. We also need better screening at airports and U.S. consulates around the world. But programs like this take time to devise and put in place.Critics often mistakenly accuse Mr. Trump of imposing a permanent ban on all Muslims because of their religion. But he understands that any screening program that profiles individuals because of their religion, ethnicity or nationality will overwhelm our national security system with masses of individuals who pose no threat to us at all.A better approach is the one adopted by Israel at Ben Gurion Airport, where Israeli screeners attempt to identify actual threats by focusing on behavior and activity, not religion or ethnicity.Ever wonder why the Israeli college kids doing the screening ask you where you were staying in Israel and what you were doing? Because they know all the hotels and how far they are from just about everything. If you say you were staying in a Tel Aviv beach hotel and were visiting family in Ramallah, they probably would ask you why you didn t stay in Jerusalem, which is much closer.How did you get back in forth? Did you know a taxi driver? What was his name? If you rented a car in Tel Aviv, which check point did you drive through to get into the West Bank? Did somebody tell you to go to a particular check point? And on and on.Even good legends eventually break down. And while this intense questioning at the airport is time-consuming and often annoying, the Israelis understand that if they make a mistake, people will die.I don t know what type of system our national security establishment will ultimately propose we put in place. But until we have one, we in the United States are ill-equipped at present to distinguish between a nonpracticing Muslim, or a Muslim who does not accept the supremacist doctrines of Shariah law, and one who does.The former pose no threat and are potential allies in the war against the Islamists. The latter pose an existential threat to America and must be utterly defeated.Read more: WTpolitics
here s why trump s muslim ban is absolutely necessarythe biggest thing president people protect enemy if refuse define enemy really fight correctly obama hillary clinton repeatedly denied war islam refused name islamic extremism on hand donald trump defined enemy ready defend americans banning muslims figure going our fbi dhs stated we can not properly vet the refugees coming to america yes would think obama would cautious like jimmy carter past presidents ban muslims noon opposite he flooding towns across america muslims a muslim ban necessary needs happen asap gen david perseus auditioning become hillary clinton vice presidential pick there really way interpret recent column the washington post spamming donald trump proposing temporary ban muslim trump statements hate speech perseus essentially argues anyone dares tell truth islamic terrorism incite muslims become islamic terrorists telling muslims united states war religion that statement assumes overwhelming majority muslims dearborn koala jumper illiterate stupid muslims understand religion far better west they understand one hijacked islam apologises would groups islamists al qaeda usa front islamic state seeking apply islamic doctrine sharia law win war know enemy our enemy today islamic supremacist seek establish islamic caliphate ultimate goal replacing constitution sharia sweep reality table trump recognized simply tools present deal threat first responsibility president protect security days san bernardino shootings last december learned department homeland security shut screening program identified mosque shooter seed maroon attended recruitment center programs like one whistleblower phil honey devised precisely need we also need better screening airports consulates around world but programs like take time devise put often mistakenly accuse trump imposing permanent ban muslims religion but understands screening program profiles individuals religion ethnicity nationality overwhelm national security system masses individuals pose threat us better approach one adopted israel ben union airport israeli screens attempt identify actual threats focusing behavior activity religion wonder israeli college kids screening ask staying israel because know hotels far everything if say staying tel aviv beach hotel visiting family ramallah probably would ask stay jerusalem much get back forth did know taxi driver what name if rented car tel aviv check point drive get west bank did somebody tell go particular check point and good legends eventually break and intense questioning airport often annoying israeli understand make mistake people know type system national security establishment ultimately propose put place but one united states present distinguish nonpracticing muslim muslim accept supremacist doctrines sharia law one former pose threat potential allies war islamists the latter pose existential threat america must utterly politics
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: HERE’S WHY TRUMP’S Muslim Ban Is Absolutely NecessaryThe biggest thing a president can do for the people is to protect them from an enemy. If you refuse to define the enemy then you really can t fight it correctly. Obama and Hillary Clinton have both repeatedly denied that we re at war with Islam and refused to name it ISLAMIC EXTREMISM. On the other hand, Donald Trump has defined the enemy and is ready to defend Americans from it by banning Muslims until we can  figure out what s going on . Our own FBI and DHS have stated that WE CANNOT PROPERLY VET THE REFUGEES COMING TO AMERICA. Yes, you would think Obama would be cautious like Jimmy Carter and other past Presidents have and ban Muslims. Noooo .Obama is doing just the opposite! He s flooding towns across America with Muslims!A Muslim ban is necessary and needs to happen ASAP!Gen. David Petraeus is now auditioning to become Hillary Clinton s vice presidential pick. There s really no other way to interpret his recent column in The Washington Post, slamming Donald Trump for proposing a temporary ban on Muslim immigration.Calling Mr. Trump s statements  hate speech,  Gen. Petraeus essentially argues that anyone who dares to tell the truth about Islamic terrorism will only incite more Muslims to become Islamic terrorists,  by telling Muslims that the United States is at war with them and their religion. That statement assumes that the overwhelming majority of Muslims from Dearborn, Mich., to Kuala Lumpur are illiterate, stupid and blind.Practicing Muslims understand their religion far better than we do in the West. They understand that no one has  hijacked  Islam, as the apologists would have it; but that groups of Islamists, from al Qaeda to the Nusra front to the Islamic State, are seeking to apply Islamic doctrine   Shariah law   in its entirety.You can t win a war if you don t know the enemy. Our enemy today is Islamic supremacism, those who seek to establish an Islamic caliphate with the ultimate goal of replacing our Constitution with Shariah law.Rather than sweep that reality under the table, Mr. Trump has recognized that we simply have no tools at present to deal with this threat, and that the first responsibility of the president is to protect the security of Americans.Just days after the San Bernardino shootings last December, we learned that the Department of Homeland Security had shut down an intelligence-based screening program that had identified the mosque that shooter Syed Farook attended as a recruitment center for jihadis.Screening programs like the one whistleblower Phil Haney had devised are precisely what we need. We also need better screening at airports and U.S. consulates around the world. But programs like this take time to devise and put in place.Critics often mistakenly accuse Mr. Trump of imposing a permanent ban on all Muslims because of their religion. But he understands that any screening program that profiles individuals because of their religion, ethnicity or nationality will overwhelm our national security system with masses of individuals who pose no threat to us at all.A better approach is the one adopted by Israel at Ben Gurion Airport, where Israeli screeners attempt to identify actual threats by focusing on behavior and activity, not religion or ethnicity.Ever wonder why the Israeli college kids doing the screening ask you where you were staying in Israel and what you were doing? Because they know all the hotels and how far they are from just about everything. If you say you were staying in a Tel Aviv beach hotel and were visiting family in Ramallah, they probably would ask you why you didn t stay in Jerusalem, which is much closer.How did you get back in forth? Did you know a taxi driver? What was his name? If you rented a car in Tel Aviv, which check point did you drive through to get into the West Bank? Did somebody tell you to go to a particular check point? And on and on.Even good legends eventually break down. And while this intense questioning at the airport is time-consuming and often annoying, the Israelis understand that if they make a mistake, people will die.I don t know what type of system our national security establishment will ultimately propose we put in place. But until we have one, we in the United States are ill-equipped at present to distinguish between a nonpracticing Muslim, or a Muslim who does not accept the supremacist doctrines of Shariah law, and one who does.The former pose no threat and are potential allies in the war against the Islamists. The latter pose an existential threat to America and must be utterly defeated.Read more: WTpolitics
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: here s why trump s muslim ban is absolutely necessarythe biggest thing president people protect enemy if refuse define enemy really fight correctly obama hillary clinton repeatedly denied war islam refused name islamic extremism on hand donald trump defined enemy ready defend americans banning muslims figure going our fbi dhs stated we can not properly vet the refugees coming to america yes would think obama would cautious like jimmy carter past presidents ban muslims noon opposite he flooding towns across america muslims a muslim ban necessary needs happen asap gen david perseus auditioning become hillary clinton vice presidential pick there really way interpret recent column the washington post spamming donald trump proposing temporary ban muslim trump statements hate speech perseus essentially argues anyone dares tell truth islamic terrorism incite muslims become islamic terrorists telling muslims united states war religion that statement assumes overwhelming majority muslims dearborn koala jumper illiterate stupid muslims understand religion far better west they understand one hijacked islam apologises would groups islamists al qaeda usa front islamic state seeking apply islamic doctrine sharia law win war know enemy our enemy today islamic supremacist seek establish islamic caliphate ultimate goal replacing constitution sharia sweep reality table trump recognized simply tools present deal threat first responsibility president protect security days san bernardino shootings last december learned department homeland security shut screening program identified mosque shooter seed maroon attended recruitment center programs like one whistleblower phil honey devised precisely need we also need better screening airports consulates around world but programs like take time devise put often mistakenly accuse trump imposing permanent ban muslims religion but understands screening program profiles individuals religion ethnicity nationality overwhelm national security system masses individuals pose threat us better approach one adopted israel ben union airport israeli screens attempt identify actual threats focusing behavior activity religion wonder israeli college kids screening ask staying israel because know hotels far everything if say staying tel aviv beach hotel visiting family ramallah probably would ask stay jerusalem much get back forth did know taxi driver what name if rented car tel aviv check point drive get west bank did somebody tell go particular check point and good legends eventually break and intense questioning airport often annoying israeli understand make mistake people know type system national security establishment ultimately propose put place but one united states present distinguish nonpracticing muslim muslim accept supremacist doctrines sharia law one former pose threat potential allies war islamists the latter pose existential threat america must utterly politics