OBAMA’S LAST MOVE: Here’s How He’ll Force Suburbs To Become Less White And Less WealthyObama and HUD want to give one last freebie to the Dem voters this Fall using YOUR tax dollars! This is a last big push to make the suburbs less white and less wealthy. Stanley Kurtz has written a book on this scheme and goes into great detail on the plan by Obama to force a  fundamental change  in how we live. This is evil and doesn t work. It was tried in Dallas with disastrous results! Once again, Obama s agenda comes before the American people. Although HUD s  demonstration project  may have improved the lives of some who moved, it s ended up harming the lives of many of their new neighbors. And now Castro wants to roll it out nationwide. Soon he will give Section 8 recipients money to afford rent wherever they choose   and if they don t want to move, he ll make them an offer they can t refuse. Hillary s rumored running mate, Housing Secretary Julian Castro, is cooking up a scheme to reallocate funding for Section 8 housing to punish suburbs for being too white and too wealthy.The scheme involves super-sizing vouchers to help urban poor afford higher rents in pricey areas, such as Westchester County, while assigning them government real-estate agents called  mobility counselors  to secure housing in the exurbs.Castro plans to launch the Section 8 reboot this fall, even though a similar program tested a few years ago in Dallas has been blamed for shifting violent crime to affluent neighborhoods.It s all part of a grand scheme to forcibly desegregate inner cities and integrate the outer suburbs.Anticipating NIMBY resistance, Castro last month threatened to sue suburban landlords for discrimination if they refuse even Section 8 tenants with criminal records. And last year, he implemented a powerful new regulation    Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing    that pressures all suburban counties taking federal grant money to change local zoning laws to build more low-income housing (landlords of such properties are required to accept Section 8 vouchers).Castro is expected to finalize the new regulation, known as  Small-Area Fair Market Rents  (SAFMR), this October, in the last days of the Obama presidency.It will set voucher rent limits by ZIP code rather than metro area, the current formula, which makes payments relatively small. For example, the fair market rent for a one-bedroom in New York City is about $1,250, which wouldn t cover rentals in leafy areas of Westchester County, such as Mamaroneck, where Castro and his social engineers seek to aggressively resettle Section 8 tenants.[The Section 8 reboot] is all part of a grand scheme to forcibly desegregate inner cities and integrate the outer suburbs. In expensive ZIP codes, Castro s plan   which requires no congressional approval   would more than double the standard subsidy, while also covering utilities. At the same time, he intends to reduce subsidies for those who choose to stay in housing in poor urban areas, such as Brooklyn. So Section 8 tenants won t just be pulled to the suburbs, they ll be pushed there. We want to use our housing-choice vouchers to ensure that we don t have a concentration of poverty and the aggregation of racial minorities in one part of town, the poor part of town,  the HUD chief said recently, adding that he s trying to undo the  result of discriminatory policies and practices in the past, and sometimes even now. A draft of the new HUD rule anticipates more than 350,000 Section 8 voucher holders will initially be resettled under the SAFMR program. Under Obama, the total number of voucher households has grown to more than 2.2 million.The document argues that larger vouchers will allow poor urban families to  move into areas that potentially have better access to jobs, transportation, services and educational opportunities.  In other words, offering them more money to move to more expensive neighborhoods will improve their situation.But HUD s own studies show the theory doesn t match reality. President Bill Clinton started a similar program in 1994 called  Moving to Opportunity Initiative,  which moved thousands of mostly African-American families from government projects to higher quality homes in safer and less racially segregated neighborhoods in several counties across the country.The 15-year experiment bombed.A 2011 study sponsored by HUD found that adults using more generous Section 8 vouchers did not get better jobs or get off welfare. In fact, more went on food stamps. And their children did not do better in their new schools.Worse, crime simply followed them to their safer neighborhoods, ruining the quality of life for existing residents. Males were arrested more often than those in the control group, primarily for property crimes,  the study found.Dubuque, Iowa, for example, received an influx of voucher holders from projects in Chicago   and it s had a problem with crime ever since. A recent study linked Dubuque s crime wave directly to Section 8 housing.Of course, even when reality mugs leftists, they never scrap their social theories. They just double down.The problem, they rationalized, was that the relocation wasn t aggressive enough. They concluded they could get the desired results if they placed urban poor in even more affluent areas.HUD recently tested this new theory in Dallas with disastrous results.Read more: NYPpolitics
obama s last move here how he force suburbs to become less white and less wealthyobama had want give one last freeze dem voters fall using your tax dollars this last big push make suburbs less white less wealthy stanley kurt written book scheme goes great detail plan obama force fundamental change live this evil work it tried dallas disastrous results once obama agenda comes american people although had demonstration project may improved lives moved ended harming lives many new neighbors and castro wants roll nationwide soon give section recipients money afford rent wherever choose want move make offer refuse hillary rumored running mate housing secretary julian castro cooking scheme relocate funding section housing punish suburbs white scheme involves vouchers help urban poor afford higher rents price areas westchester county assigning government agents called mobility counselors secure housing plans launch section reboot fall even though similar program tested years ago dallas blamed shifting violent crime affluent part grand scheme forcibly desegregate inner cities integrate outer jimmy resistance castro last month threatened sue suburban landlords discrimination refuse even section tenants criminal records and last year implemented powerful new regulation affirmative furthering fair housing pressures suburban counties taking federal grant money change local zoning laws build housing landlords properties required accept section vouchers expected finalize new regulation known fair market rents safer october last days obama set voucher rent limits zip code rather metro area current formula makes payments relatively small for example fair market rent new york city cover rentals leafy areas westchester county mamaroneck castro social engineers seek aggressively resettled section tenants the section reboot part grand scheme forcibly desegregate inner cities integrate outer suburbs in expensive zip codes castro plan requires congressional approval would double standard subsidy also covering utilities at time intends reduce subsidies choose stay housing poor urban areas brooklyn so section tenants pulled suburbs pushed we want use vouchers ensure concentration poverty aggregation racial minorities one part town poor part town had chief said recently adding trying undo result discriminatory policies practices past sometimes even a draft new had rule anticipated section voucher holders initially resettled safer program under obama total number voucher households grown document argues larger vouchers allow poor urban families move areas potentially better access jobs transportation services educational opportunities in words offering money move expensive neighborhoods improve had studies show theory match reality president bill clinton started similar program called moving opportunity initiative moved thousands mostly families government projects higher quality homes safer less racially segregated neighborhoods several counties across experiment study sponsored had found adults using generous section vouchers get better jobs get welfare in fact went food stamps and children better new crime simply followed safer neighborhoods ruining quality life existing residents males arrested often control group primarily property crimes study iowa example received influx voucher holders projects chicago problem crime ever since a recent study linked dubuque crime wave directly section course even reality bugs leftist never scrap social theories they double problem nationalized relocation aggressive enough they concluded could get desired results placed urban poor even affluent recently tested new theory dallas disastrous nyppolitics
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: OBAMA’S LAST MOVE: Here’s How He’ll Force Suburbs To Become Less White And Less WealthyObama and HUD want to give one last freebie to the Dem voters this Fall using YOUR tax dollars! This is a last big push to make the suburbs less white and less wealthy. Stanley Kurtz has written a book on this scheme and goes into great detail on the plan by Obama to force a  fundamental change  in how we live. This is evil and doesn t work. It was tried in Dallas with disastrous results! Once again, Obama s agenda comes before the American people. Although HUD s  demonstration project  may have improved the lives of some who moved, it s ended up harming the lives of many of their new neighbors. And now Castro wants to roll it out nationwide. Soon he will give Section 8 recipients money to afford rent wherever they choose   and if they don t want to move, he ll make them an offer they can t refuse. Hillary s rumored running mate, Housing Secretary Julian Castro, is cooking up a scheme to reallocate funding for Section 8 housing to punish suburbs for being too white and too wealthy.The scheme involves super-sizing vouchers to help urban poor afford higher rents in pricey areas, such as Westchester County, while assigning them government real-estate agents called  mobility counselors  to secure housing in the exurbs.Castro plans to launch the Section 8 reboot this fall, even though a similar program tested a few years ago in Dallas has been blamed for shifting violent crime to affluent neighborhoods.It s all part of a grand scheme to forcibly desegregate inner cities and integrate the outer suburbs.Anticipating NIMBY resistance, Castro last month threatened to sue suburban landlords for discrimination if they refuse even Section 8 tenants with criminal records. And last year, he implemented a powerful new regulation    Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing    that pressures all suburban counties taking federal grant money to change local zoning laws to build more low-income housing (landlords of such properties are required to accept Section 8 vouchers).Castro is expected to finalize the new regulation, known as  Small-Area Fair Market Rents  (SAFMR), this October, in the last days of the Obama presidency.It will set voucher rent limits by ZIP code rather than metro area, the current formula, which makes payments relatively small. For example, the fair market rent for a one-bedroom in New York City is about $1,250, which wouldn t cover rentals in leafy areas of Westchester County, such as Mamaroneck, where Castro and his social engineers seek to aggressively resettle Section 8 tenants.[The Section 8 reboot] is all part of a grand scheme to forcibly desegregate inner cities and integrate the outer suburbs. In expensive ZIP codes, Castro s plan   which requires no congressional approval   would more than double the standard subsidy, while also covering utilities. At the same time, he intends to reduce subsidies for those who choose to stay in housing in poor urban areas, such as Brooklyn. So Section 8 tenants won t just be pulled to the suburbs, they ll be pushed there. We want to use our housing-choice vouchers to ensure that we don t have a concentration of poverty and the aggregation of racial minorities in one part of town, the poor part of town,  the HUD chief said recently, adding that he s trying to undo the  result of discriminatory policies and practices in the past, and sometimes even now. A draft of the new HUD rule anticipates more than 350,000 Section 8 voucher holders will initially be resettled under the SAFMR program. Under Obama, the total number of voucher households has grown to more than 2.2 million.The document argues that larger vouchers will allow poor urban families to  move into areas that potentially have better access to jobs, transportation, services and educational opportunities.  In other words, offering them more money to move to more expensive neighborhoods will improve their situation.But HUD s own studies show the theory doesn t match reality. President Bill Clinton started a similar program in 1994 called  Moving to Opportunity Initiative,  which moved thousands of mostly African-American families from government projects to higher quality homes in safer and less racially segregated neighborhoods in several counties across the country.The 15-year experiment bombed.A 2011 study sponsored by HUD found that adults using more generous Section 8 vouchers did not get better jobs or get off welfare. In fact, more went on food stamps. And their children did not do better in their new schools.Worse, crime simply followed them to their safer neighborhoods, ruining the quality of life for existing residents. Males were arrested more often than those in the control group, primarily for property crimes,  the study found.Dubuque, Iowa, for example, received an influx of voucher holders from projects in Chicago   and it s had a problem with crime ever since. A recent study linked Dubuque s crime wave directly to Section 8 housing.Of course, even when reality mugs leftists, they never scrap their social theories. They just double down.The problem, they rationalized, was that the relocation wasn t aggressive enough. They concluded they could get the desired results if they placed urban poor in even more affluent areas.HUD recently tested this new theory in Dallas with disastrous results.Read more: NYPpolitics
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: obama s last move here how he force suburbs to become less white and less wealthyobama had want give one last freeze dem voters fall using your tax dollars this last big push make suburbs less white less wealthy stanley kurt written book scheme goes great detail plan obama force fundamental change live this evil work it tried dallas disastrous results once obama agenda comes american people although had demonstration project may improved lives moved ended harming lives many new neighbors and castro wants roll nationwide soon give section recipients money afford rent wherever choose want move make offer refuse hillary rumored running mate housing secretary julian castro cooking scheme relocate funding section housing punish suburbs white scheme involves vouchers help urban poor afford higher rents price areas westchester county assigning government agents called mobility counselors secure housing plans launch section reboot fall even though similar program tested years ago dallas blamed shifting violent crime affluent part grand scheme forcibly desegregate inner cities integrate outer jimmy resistance castro last month threatened sue suburban landlords discrimination refuse even section tenants criminal records and last year implemented powerful new regulation affirmative furthering fair housing pressures suburban counties taking federal grant money change local zoning laws build housing landlords properties required accept section vouchers expected finalize new regulation known fair market rents safer october last days obama set voucher rent limits zip code rather metro area current formula makes payments relatively small for example fair market rent new york city cover rentals leafy areas westchester county mamaroneck castro social engineers seek aggressively resettled section tenants the section reboot part grand scheme forcibly desegregate inner cities integrate outer suburbs in expensive zip codes castro plan requires congressional approval would double standard subsidy also covering utilities at time intends reduce subsidies choose stay housing poor urban areas brooklyn so section tenants pulled suburbs pushed we want use vouchers ensure concentration poverty aggregation racial minorities one part town poor part town had chief said recently adding trying undo result discriminatory policies practices past sometimes even a draft new had rule anticipated section voucher holders initially resettled safer program under obama total number voucher households grown document argues larger vouchers allow poor urban families move areas potentially better access jobs transportation services educational opportunities in words offering money move expensive neighborhoods improve had studies show theory match reality president bill clinton started similar program called moving opportunity initiative moved thousands mostly families government projects higher quality homes safer less racially segregated neighborhoods several counties across experiment study sponsored had found adults using generous section vouchers get better jobs get welfare in fact went food stamps and children better new crime simply followed safer neighborhoods ruining quality life existing residents males arrested often control group primarily property crimes study iowa example received influx voucher holders projects chicago problem crime ever since a recent study linked dubuque crime wave directly section course even reality bugs leftist never scrap social theories they double problem nationalized relocation aggressive enough they concluded could get desired results placed urban poor even affluent recently tested new theory dallas disastrous nyppolitics