Lawsuit opens new front in Obama immigration legal fightWASHINGTON (Reuters) - Immigration advocates on Thursday mounted a long-shot effort to revive part of U.S. President Barack Obama’s plan to shield millions of immigrants from deportation by filing a lawsuit challenging the national scope of a court order that blocked it. With favorable court rulings, the lawyers filing the lawsuit say it has the long-term potential to unravel decisions that blocked Obama’s November 2014 plan nationwide. The White House program, if it had been fully implemented, could have allowed up to four million people with no legal immigration status to obtain work authorization. The lawsuit was filed in federal court in New York on behalf of Martin Batalla Vidal, 25, an immigrant from Mexico who has lived in the United States since he was seven and has benefited from the program.  He initially received a three-year work authorization, which has now been revoked due to a Texas judge’s ruling in February 2015 that blocked Obama’s plan. Texas and 25 other states had challenged it. Vidal would still be eligible for a two-year work authorization under an earlier program, which has not been challenged and was not covered by the injunction. Vidal’s lawyers at the National Immigration Law Center say that if he wins, the ruling could have broad implications because it could help to eventually reinstate Obama’s program for up to 60 percent of potential applicants in parts of the country not covered by the Texas ruling.  The Texas judge’s ruling was upheld on appeal. On June 23, the Supreme Court deadlocked 4-4 on the case, leaving the appeals court decision in place.  The court is currently one justice short following the death of Justice Antonin Scalia in February. The Supreme Court is currently considering whether to rehear the case once it has a full complement of justices. politicsNews
lawsuit opens new front obama immigration legal fightwashington reuters immigration advocates thursday mounted effort revive part president barack obama plan shield millions immigrants deportation filing lawsuit challenging national scope court order blocked with favorable court rulings lawyers filing lawsuit say potential unravel decisions blocked obama november plan nationwide the white house program fully implemented could allowed four million people legal immigration status obtain work authorization the lawsuit filed federal court new york behalf martin fatally vital immigrant mexico lived united states since seven benefited program he initially received work authorization revoked due texas judge ruling february blocked obama plan texas states challenged vital would still eligible work authorization earlier program challenged covered injunction vital lawyers national immigration law center say wins ruling could broad implications could help eventually reinstate obama program percent potential applicants parts country covered texas ruling the texas judge ruling upheld appeal on june supreme court deadlock case leaving appeals court decision place the court currently one justice short following death justice antonio scale february the supreme court currently considering whether refer case full complement justices politicsnews
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: Lawsuit opens new front in Obama immigration legal fightWASHINGTON (Reuters) - Immigration advocates on Thursday mounted a long-shot effort to revive part of U.S. President Barack Obama’s plan to shield millions of immigrants from deportation by filing a lawsuit challenging the national scope of a court order that blocked it. With favorable court rulings, the lawyers filing the lawsuit say it has the long-term potential to unravel decisions that blocked Obama’s November 2014 plan nationwide. The White House program, if it had been fully implemented, could have allowed up to four million people with no legal immigration status to obtain work authorization. The lawsuit was filed in federal court in New York on behalf of Martin Batalla Vidal, 25, an immigrant from Mexico who has lived in the United States since he was seven and has benefited from the program.  He initially received a three-year work authorization, which has now been revoked due to a Texas judge’s ruling in February 2015 that blocked Obama’s plan. Texas and 25 other states had challenged it. Vidal would still be eligible for a two-year work authorization under an earlier program, which has not been challenged and was not covered by the injunction. Vidal’s lawyers at the National Immigration Law Center say that if he wins, the ruling could have broad implications because it could help to eventually reinstate Obama’s program for up to 60 percent of potential applicants in parts of the country not covered by the Texas ruling.  The Texas judge’s ruling was upheld on appeal. On June 23, the Supreme Court deadlocked 4-4 on the case, leaving the appeals court decision in place.  The court is currently one justice short following the death of Justice Antonin Scalia in February. The Supreme Court is currently considering whether to rehear the case once it has a full complement of justices. politicsNews
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: lawsuit opens new front obama immigration legal fightwashington reuters immigration advocates thursday mounted effort revive part president barack obama plan shield millions immigrants deportation filing lawsuit challenging national scope court order blocked with favorable court rulings lawyers filing lawsuit say potential unravel decisions blocked obama november plan nationwide the white house program fully implemented could allowed four million people legal immigration status obtain work authorization the lawsuit filed federal court new york behalf martin fatally vital immigrant mexico lived united states since seven benefited program he initially received work authorization revoked due texas judge ruling february blocked obama plan texas states challenged vital would still eligible work authorization earlier program challenged covered injunction vital lawyers national immigration law center say wins ruling could broad implications could help eventually reinstate obama program percent potential applicants parts country covered texas ruling the texas judge ruling upheld appeal on june supreme court deadlock case leaving appeals court decision place the court currently one justice short following death justice antonio scale february the supreme court currently considering whether refer case full complement justices politicsnews