FLASHBACK VIDEO Shows Leftist Media Members Praising Use Of “Nuclear Option” To Confirm (LIBERAL) Supreme Court JusticesWith Senate Republicans poised to use the  nuclear option  to confirm Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch, will the liberal media hypocritically accuse them of a power grab? In 2013, when then-Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid did basically the same thing, he was cheered on in the studios of MSNBC and CNN.Back then MSNBC s Chris Hayes hailed it as  an affirmative win for democracy,  while his colleague Rachel Maddow blurted  This is a huge freaking deal. This is like 3-inch headlines. This is like people who don t even care about politics really ought to care about this. Over on CNN, political analyst Paul Begala hailed the nakedly partisan maneuver by Reid as necessary, whining that Republicans had  so abused  the filibuster that Democrats  can t take it anymore.  And Begala s colleague Ron Brownstein approved of Reid s decision as a forward-thinking move:  The idea of requiring a super majority for the president to appoint his nominees just is anachronistic. But the cable network news hosts and analysts weren t the only ones championing the nuclear option. On the pages of the Los Angeles Times, Reid s move was celebrated in a November 22 editorial  Democrats bust the filibuster, and good for them. The Times editorial board crowed:  We welcome this action not because it represents a comeuppance for arrogant Republicans but because filibustering presidential nominees is undemocratic and violates the spirit if not the letter of the Constitution, which says that the president shall appoint judges and other officials  by and with the advice and consent of the Senate    not by and with a supermajority of the Senate.  The Times went on to call it  a victory not just for the Democrats but for good government.  Newsbustersleft-news
flashback video shows leftist media members praising use of nuclear option to confirm liberal supreme court justiceswith senate republicans poised use nuclear option confirm supreme court nominee neil gorsuch liberal media hypocritical accuse power grab in senate majority leader harry reid basically thing cheered studios msnbc msnbc chris hayes hailed affirmative win democracy colleague rachel middot blurred this huge breaking deal this like headlines this like people even care politics really ought care over cnn political analyst paul began hailed namely partisan maneuver reid necessary whining republicans abused filibuster democrats take anymore and began colleague ron brownstein approved reid decision move the idea requiring super majority president appoint nominees anachronistic but cable network news hosts analysts ones championing nuclear option on pages los angeles times reid move celebrated november editorial democrats bust filibuster good the times editorial board crowd we welcome action represents comeuppance arrogant republicans filibustering presidential nominees democratic violates spirit letter constitution says president shall appoint judges officials advice consent senate supermajority senate the times went call victory democrats good government
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: FLASHBACK VIDEO Shows Leftist Media Members Praising Use Of “Nuclear Option” To Confirm (LIBERAL) Supreme Court JusticesWith Senate Republicans poised to use the  nuclear option  to confirm Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch, will the liberal media hypocritically accuse them of a power grab? In 2013, when then-Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid did basically the same thing, he was cheered on in the studios of MSNBC and CNN.Back then MSNBC s Chris Hayes hailed it as  an affirmative win for democracy,  while his colleague Rachel Maddow blurted  This is a huge freaking deal. This is like 3-inch headlines. This is like people who don t even care about politics really ought to care about this. Over on CNN, political analyst Paul Begala hailed the nakedly partisan maneuver by Reid as necessary, whining that Republicans had  so abused  the filibuster that Democrats  can t take it anymore.  And Begala s colleague Ron Brownstein approved of Reid s decision as a forward-thinking move:  The idea of requiring a super majority for the president to appoint his nominees just is anachronistic. But the cable network news hosts and analysts weren t the only ones championing the nuclear option. On the pages of the Los Angeles Times, Reid s move was celebrated in a November 22 editorial  Democrats bust the filibuster, and good for them. The Times editorial board crowed:  We welcome this action not because it represents a comeuppance for arrogant Republicans but because filibustering presidential nominees is undemocratic and violates the spirit if not the letter of the Constitution, which says that the president shall appoint judges and other officials  by and with the advice and consent of the Senate    not by and with a supermajority of the Senate.  The Times went on to call it  a victory not just for the Democrats but for good government.  Newsbustersleft-news
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: flashback video shows leftist media members praising use of nuclear option to confirm liberal supreme court justiceswith senate republicans poised use nuclear option confirm supreme court nominee neil gorsuch liberal media hypocritical accuse power grab in senate majority leader harry reid basically thing cheered studios msnbc msnbc chris hayes hailed affirmative win democracy colleague rachel middot blurred this huge breaking deal this like headlines this like people even care politics really ought care over cnn political analyst paul began hailed namely partisan maneuver reid necessary whining republicans abused filibuster democrats take anymore and began colleague ron brownstein approved reid decision move the idea requiring super majority president appoint nominees anachronistic but cable network news hosts analysts ones championing nuclear option on pages los angeles times reid move celebrated november editorial democrats bust filibuster good the times editorial board crowd we welcome action represents comeuppance arrogant republicans filibustering presidential nominees democratic violates spirit letter constitution says president shall appoint judges officials advice consent senate supermajority senate the times went call victory democrats good government