MUST READ! BOMBSHELLS Expose Hillary’s Lawlessness: “It smacks of acting above the law” SHARE!If average voters turned on the TV for five minutes this week, chances are they know that Donald Trump made lewd remarks a decade ago and now stands accused of groping women.But even if average voters had the TV on 24/7, they still probably haven t heard the news about Hillary Clinton: That the nation now has proof of pretty much everything she has been accused of.It comes from hacked emails dumped by WikiLeaks, documents released under the Freedom of Information Act, and accounts from FBI insiders. The media has almost uniformly ignored the flurry of bombshells, preferring to devote its front pages to the Trump story. So let s review what amounts to a devastating case against a Clinton presidency.Start with a June 2015 email to Clinton staffers from Erika Rottenberg, the former general counsel of LinkedIn. Ms. Rottenberg wrote that none of the attorneys in her circle of friends  can understand how it was viewed as ok/secure/appropriate to use a private server for secure documents AND why further Hillary took it upon herself to review them and delete documents.  She added:  It smacks of acting above the law and it smacks of the type of thing I ve either gotten discovery sanctions for, fired people for, etc. A few months later, in a September 2015 email, a Clinton confidante fretted that Mrs. Clinton was too bullheaded to acknowledge she d done wrong.  Everyone wants her to apologize,  wrote Neera Tanden, president of the liberal Center for American Progress.  And she should. Apologies are like her Achilles  heel. Clinton staffers debated how to evade a congressional subpoena of Mrs. Clinton s emails three weeks before a technician deleted them. The campaign later employed a focus group to see if it could fool Americans into thinking the email scandal was part of the Benghazi investigation (they are separate) and lay it all off as a Republican plot.Read more: WSJpolitics
must read bombshells expose hillary lawlessness it smacks acting law share if average voters turned tv five minutes week chances know donald trump made lead remarks decade ago stands accused growing even average voters tv still probably heard news hillary clinton that nation proof pretty much everything accused comes hacked emails dumped wikileaks documents released freedom information act accounts fbi insiders the media almost uniformly ignored flurry bombshells preferring devote front pages trump story so let review amounts devastating case clinton june email clinton staffers erik rttemberg former general counsel linkedin rttemberg wrote none attorneys circle friends understand viewed use private server secure documents and hillary took upon review delete documents she added it smacks acting law smacks type thing i either gotten discovery sanctions fired people etc a months later september email clinton confidant created clinton bullheaded acknowledge done wrong everyone wants apologize wrote need tandem president liberal center american progress and apologies like achieves heel clinton staffers debated evade congressional subpoena clinton emails three weeks technician deleted the campaign later employed focus group see could fool americans thinking email scandal part bengali investigation separate lay republican wsjpolitics
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: MUST READ! BOMBSHELLS Expose Hillary’s Lawlessness: “It smacks of acting above the law” SHARE!If average voters turned on the TV for five minutes this week, chances are they know that Donald Trump made lewd remarks a decade ago and now stands accused of groping women.But even if average voters had the TV on 24/7, they still probably haven t heard the news about Hillary Clinton: That the nation now has proof of pretty much everything she has been accused of.It comes from hacked emails dumped by WikiLeaks, documents released under the Freedom of Information Act, and accounts from FBI insiders. The media has almost uniformly ignored the flurry of bombshells, preferring to devote its front pages to the Trump story. So let s review what amounts to a devastating case against a Clinton presidency.Start with a June 2015 email to Clinton staffers from Erika Rottenberg, the former general counsel of LinkedIn. Ms. Rottenberg wrote that none of the attorneys in her circle of friends  can understand how it was viewed as ok/secure/appropriate to use a private server for secure documents AND why further Hillary took it upon herself to review them and delete documents.  She added:  It smacks of acting above the law and it smacks of the type of thing I ve either gotten discovery sanctions for, fired people for, etc. A few months later, in a September 2015 email, a Clinton confidante fretted that Mrs. Clinton was too bullheaded to acknowledge she d done wrong.  Everyone wants her to apologize,  wrote Neera Tanden, president of the liberal Center for American Progress.  And she should. Apologies are like her Achilles  heel. Clinton staffers debated how to evade a congressional subpoena of Mrs. Clinton s emails three weeks before a technician deleted them. The campaign later employed a focus group to see if it could fool Americans into thinking the email scandal was part of the Benghazi investigation (they are separate) and lay it all off as a Republican plot.Read more: WSJpolitics
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: must read bombshells expose hillary lawlessness it smacks acting law share if average voters turned tv five minutes week chances know donald trump made lead remarks decade ago stands accused growing even average voters tv still probably heard news hillary clinton that nation proof pretty much everything accused comes hacked emails dumped wikileaks documents released freedom information act accounts fbi insiders the media almost uniformly ignored flurry bombshells preferring devote front pages trump story so let review amounts devastating case clinton june email clinton staffers erik rttemberg former general counsel linkedin rttemberg wrote none attorneys circle friends understand viewed use private server secure documents and hillary took upon review delete documents she added it smacks acting law smacks type thing i either gotten discovery sanctions fired people etc a months later september email clinton confidant created clinton bullheaded acknowledge done wrong everyone wants apologize wrote need tandem president liberal center american progress and apologies like achieves heel clinton staffers debated evade congressional subpoena clinton emails three weeks technician deleted the campaign later employed focus group see could fool americans thinking email scandal part bengali investigation separate lay republican wsjpolitics