Trump slams federal court ruling on funding for 'sanctuary cities'WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Donald Trump on Wednesday attacked a federal judge’s ruling that blocked his executive order seeking to withhold funds from “sanctuary cities” for illegal immigrants, vowing to appeal it to the U.S. Supreme Court. Tuesday’s ruling by U.S. District Judge William Orrick in San Francisco was the latest blow to Trump’s efforts to toughen immigration enforcement. Federal courts have also blocked his two travel bans on citizens of mostly Muslim nations.  “First the Ninth Circuit rules against the ban & now it hits again on sanctuary cities-both ridiculous rulings. See you in the Supreme Court!” Trump said in a tweet on Wednesday, referring to the San Francisco-based federal appeals court and its judicial district. The Trump administration has targeted sanctuary cities, which generally offer safe harbor to illegal immigrants and often do not use municipal funds or resources to advance the enforcement of federal immigration laws.  Later on Wednesday, Trump, asked in an interview with the  Washington Examiner if he had considered proposals to break up the 9th Circuit Court, said: “Absolutely, I have.” “There are many people that want to break up the 9th Circuit. It’s outrageous,” he told the newspaper. The latest ruling did not come from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to which Trump was referring. It came from the federal district court in San Francisco.   Critics have said local authorities endanger public safety when they decline to hand over for deportation illegal immigrants arrested for crimes, while supporters argue that enlisting police cooperation to round up immigrants for removal undermines trust in local police, particularly among Latinos. Dozens of local governments and cities, including New York, Los Angeles and Chicago, have joined the “sanctuary” movement. In his ruling, Orrick said Trump’s Jan. 25 order targeted broad categories of federal funding for the sanctuary cities and that plaintiffs challenging it were likely to succeed in proving it unconstitutional. U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions blasted Orrick’s ruling, saying Trump’s executive order was “squarely within the powers of the President.” “The Department of Justice cannot accept such a result, and as the President has made clear, we will continue to litigate this case to vindicate the rule of law,” Sessions said in a statement. An appeal is likely to be heard by the 9th Circuit before it goes to the Supreme Court. Republicans view the appeals court as biased toward liberals, and Trump was quick to attack its reputation in his tweets. It “has a terrible record of being overturned (close to 80%). They used to call this “judge shopping!” Messy system,” Trump said.  The appeals court raised Trump’s ire earlier this year when it upheld a Seattle judge’s decision to block the Republican president’s first travel ban on citizens of seven predominantly Muslim nations. In May, the 9th Circuit will hear an appeal of a Hawaii judge’s order blocking Trump’s revised travel ban, which placed restrictions on citizens from six mostly Muslim countries. A Maryland judge also blocked portions of the second ban. Trump has issued sweeping condemnations of courts and judges when they have ruled against him or his administration. In February, he called the federal judge in Seattle who ruled against his first travel ban a “so-called judge.” During the 2016 presidential campaign, Trump accused an Indiana-born judge overseeing lawsuits against the defunct Trump University of bias based on his Mexican ancestry.     politicsNews
trump slams federal court ruling funding reuters president donald trump wednesday attacked federal judge ruling blocked executive order seeking withhold funds sanctuary cities illegal immigrants vowing appeal supreme court tuesday ruling district judge william brick san francisco latest blow trump efforts tougher immigration enforcement federal courts also blocked two travel bans citizens mostly muslim nations first ninth circuit rules ban hits sanctuary ridiculous rulings see supreme court trump said tweet wednesday referring san federal appeals court judicial district the trump administration targeted sanctuary cities generally offer safe harbor illegal immigrants often use municipal funds resources advance enforcement federal immigration laws later wednesday trump asked interview washington examiner considered proposals break circuit court said absolutely i there many people want break circuit it outrageous told newspaper the latest ruling come circuit court appeals trump referring it came federal district court san francisco critics said local authorities endanger public safety decline hand deportation illegal immigrants arrested crimes supporters argue enlisting police cooperation round immigrants removal undermines trust local police particularly among latino dozens local governments cities including new york los angeles chicago joined sanctuary movement in ruling brick said trump order targeted broad categories federal funding sanctuary cities plaintiffs challenging likely succeed proving unconstitutional attorney general jeff sessions blasted brick ruling saying trump executive order squarely within powers the department justice accept result president made clear continue mitigate case indicate rule law sessions said statement an appeal likely heard circuit goes supreme court republicans view appeals court biased toward liberals trump quick attack reputation tweets it terrible record overturned close they used call judge shopping messy system trump said the appeals court raised trump ire earlier year upheld seattle judge decision block republican president first travel ban citizens seven predominantly muslim nations in may circuit hear appeal hawaii judge order blocking trump revised travel ban placed restrictions citizens six mostly muslim countries a maryland judge also blocked portions second ban trump issued sweeping condemnation courts judges ruled administration in february called federal judge seattle ruled first travel ban during presidential campaign trump accused judge overseeing lawsuits defunct trump university bias based mexican ancestry politicsnews
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: Trump slams federal court ruling on funding for 'sanctuary cities'WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Donald Trump on Wednesday attacked a federal judge’s ruling that blocked his executive order seeking to withhold funds from “sanctuary cities” for illegal immigrants, vowing to appeal it to the U.S. Supreme Court. Tuesday’s ruling by U.S. District Judge William Orrick in San Francisco was the latest blow to Trump’s efforts to toughen immigration enforcement. Federal courts have also blocked his two travel bans on citizens of mostly Muslim nations.  “First the Ninth Circuit rules against the ban & now it hits again on sanctuary cities-both ridiculous rulings. See you in the Supreme Court!” Trump said in a tweet on Wednesday, referring to the San Francisco-based federal appeals court and its judicial district. The Trump administration has targeted sanctuary cities, which generally offer safe harbor to illegal immigrants and often do not use municipal funds or resources to advance the enforcement of federal immigration laws.  Later on Wednesday, Trump, asked in an interview with the  Washington Examiner if he had considered proposals to break up the 9th Circuit Court, said: “Absolutely, I have.” “There are many people that want to break up the 9th Circuit. It’s outrageous,” he told the newspaper. The latest ruling did not come from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to which Trump was referring. It came from the federal district court in San Francisco.   Critics have said local authorities endanger public safety when they decline to hand over for deportation illegal immigrants arrested for crimes, while supporters argue that enlisting police cooperation to round up immigrants for removal undermines trust in local police, particularly among Latinos. Dozens of local governments and cities, including New York, Los Angeles and Chicago, have joined the “sanctuary” movement. In his ruling, Orrick said Trump’s Jan. 25 order targeted broad categories of federal funding for the sanctuary cities and that plaintiffs challenging it were likely to succeed in proving it unconstitutional. U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions blasted Orrick’s ruling, saying Trump’s executive order was “squarely within the powers of the President.” “The Department of Justice cannot accept such a result, and as the President has made clear, we will continue to litigate this case to vindicate the rule of law,” Sessions said in a statement. An appeal is likely to be heard by the 9th Circuit before it goes to the Supreme Court. Republicans view the appeals court as biased toward liberals, and Trump was quick to attack its reputation in his tweets. It “has a terrible record of being overturned (close to 80%). They used to call this “judge shopping!” Messy system,” Trump said.  The appeals court raised Trump’s ire earlier this year when it upheld a Seattle judge’s decision to block the Republican president’s first travel ban on citizens of seven predominantly Muslim nations. In May, the 9th Circuit will hear an appeal of a Hawaii judge’s order blocking Trump’s revised travel ban, which placed restrictions on citizens from six mostly Muslim countries. A Maryland judge also blocked portions of the second ban. Trump has issued sweeping condemnations of courts and judges when they have ruled against him or his administration. In February, he called the federal judge in Seattle who ruled against his first travel ban a “so-called judge.” During the 2016 presidential campaign, Trump accused an Indiana-born judge overseeing lawsuits against the defunct Trump University of bias based on his Mexican ancestry.     politicsNews
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: trump slams federal court ruling funding reuters president donald trump wednesday attacked federal judge ruling blocked executive order seeking withhold funds sanctuary cities illegal immigrants vowing appeal supreme court tuesday ruling district judge william brick san francisco latest blow trump efforts tougher immigration enforcement federal courts also blocked two travel bans citizens mostly muslim nations first ninth circuit rules ban hits sanctuary ridiculous rulings see supreme court trump said tweet wednesday referring san federal appeals court judicial district the trump administration targeted sanctuary cities generally offer safe harbor illegal immigrants often use municipal funds resources advance enforcement federal immigration laws later wednesday trump asked interview washington examiner considered proposals break circuit court said absolutely i there many people want break circuit it outrageous told newspaper the latest ruling come circuit court appeals trump referring it came federal district court san francisco critics said local authorities endanger public safety decline hand deportation illegal immigrants arrested crimes supporters argue enlisting police cooperation round immigrants removal undermines trust local police particularly among latino dozens local governments cities including new york los angeles chicago joined sanctuary movement in ruling brick said trump order targeted broad categories federal funding sanctuary cities plaintiffs challenging likely succeed proving unconstitutional attorney general jeff sessions blasted brick ruling saying trump executive order squarely within powers the department justice accept result president made clear continue mitigate case indicate rule law sessions said statement an appeal likely heard circuit goes supreme court republicans view appeals court biased toward liberals trump quick attack reputation tweets it terrible record overturned close they used call judge shopping messy system trump said the appeals court raised trump ire earlier year upheld seattle judge decision block republican president first travel ban citizens seven predominantly muslim nations in may circuit hear appeal hawaii judge order blocking trump revised travel ban placed restrictions citizens six mostly muslim countries a maryland judge also blocked portions second ban trump issued sweeping condemnation courts judges ruled administration in february called federal judge seattle ruled first travel ban during presidential campaign trump accused judge overseeing lawsuits defunct trump university bias based mexican ancestry politicsnews