Critics accuse UK government of not taking Brexit preparations seriously enoughLONDON (Reuters) - Pro-European campaigners accused ministers of failing to take preparations for Brexit seriously enough on Thursday, after a committee of lawmakers published the government s sector-by-sector analysis on the impact of leaving the European Union. The analyses have become a focal point for critics of the government s approach to Brexit since last year s referendum vote to leave. The government revealed in October the 58 economic sectors  it had analyzed to help it prepare for leaving, but refused requests to publish them. Brexit minister David Davis said the reports contained  excruciating detail  and that their publication could undermine negotiations with the EU. However, lawmakers demanded to see the papers and used an unusual parliamentary procedure to compel the government to hand them over to a parliamentary committee. The committee published them on Thursday, but with some sensitive sections redacted.  There is little or nothing in them that couldn t be learned from the annual reports of different trade bodies,  said Pat McFadden, a member of the committee and spokesman for the Open Britain campaign group.  Breezy busking won t cut it when people s jobs and livelihoods are on the line. Winging it should not be a matter of principle,  the opposition Labour Party lawmaker said.  Since his initial remarks, Davis has stressed that the work does not constitute a formal impact assessment - a detailed document setting out the economic implications of policy decisions. He said earlier this month that it was too soon for such work to have been conducted.  The documents released on Thursday cover sectors from asset management to tourism, describing each sector, the current EU regulatory regime and a summary of how trade is conducted in these areas. A section entitled  sector views  was redacted by the committee. Non-profit organization The Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, which has previously warned of the risks posed by leaving the EU, also criticized the documents.  What leaps out at you is the total absence of analysis. Search, and you do not find,  said the organization s director Richard Black.  worldnews
critics accuse uk government taking brexit preparations seriously enoughlondon reuters campaigners accused ministers failing take preparations brexit seriously enough thursday committee lawmakers published government analysis impact leaving european union the analyses become focal point critics government approach brexit since last year referendum vote leave the government revealed october economic sectors analyzed help prepare leaving refused requests publish brexit minister david davis said reports contained excruciating detail publication could undermine negotiations eu however lawmakers demanded see papers used unusual parliamentary procedure compel government hand parliamentary committee the committee published thursday sensitive sections redacted there little nothing learned annual reports different trade bodies said pat madden member committee spokesman open britain campaign group breeze busting cut people jobs livelihoods line winning matter principle opposition labour party lawmaker said since initial remarks davis stressed work constitute formal impact assessment detailed document setting economic implications policy decisions he said earlier month soon work conducted the documents released thursday cover sectors asset management tourism describing sector current eu regulatory regime summary trade conducted areas a section entitled sector views redacted committee organization the energy climate intelligence unit previously warned risks posed leaving eu also criticized documents what leaps total absence analysis search find said organization director richard black worldnews
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: Critics accuse UK government of not taking Brexit preparations seriously enoughLONDON (Reuters) - Pro-European campaigners accused ministers of failing to take preparations for Brexit seriously enough on Thursday, after a committee of lawmakers published the government s sector-by-sector analysis on the impact of leaving the European Union. The analyses have become a focal point for critics of the government s approach to Brexit since last year s referendum vote to leave. The government revealed in October the 58 economic sectors  it had analyzed to help it prepare for leaving, but refused requests to publish them. Brexit minister David Davis said the reports contained  excruciating detail  and that their publication could undermine negotiations with the EU. However, lawmakers demanded to see the papers and used an unusual parliamentary procedure to compel the government to hand them over to a parliamentary committee. The committee published them on Thursday, but with some sensitive sections redacted.  There is little or nothing in them that couldn t be learned from the annual reports of different trade bodies,  said Pat McFadden, a member of the committee and spokesman for the Open Britain campaign group.  Breezy busking won t cut it when people s jobs and livelihoods are on the line. Winging it should not be a matter of principle,  the opposition Labour Party lawmaker said.  Since his initial remarks, Davis has stressed that the work does not constitute a formal impact assessment - a detailed document setting out the economic implications of policy decisions. He said earlier this month that it was too soon for such work to have been conducted.  The documents released on Thursday cover sectors from asset management to tourism, describing each sector, the current EU regulatory regime and a summary of how trade is conducted in these areas. A section entitled  sector views  was redacted by the committee. Non-profit organization The Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, which has previously warned of the risks posed by leaving the EU, also criticized the documents.  What leaps out at you is the total absence of analysis. Search, and you do not find,  said the organization s director Richard Black.  worldnews
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: critics accuse uk government taking brexit preparations seriously enoughlondon reuters campaigners accused ministers failing take preparations brexit seriously enough thursday committee lawmakers published government analysis impact leaving european union the analyses become focal point critics government approach brexit since last year referendum vote leave the government revealed october economic sectors analyzed help prepare leaving refused requests publish brexit minister david davis said reports contained excruciating detail publication could undermine negotiations eu however lawmakers demanded see papers used unusual parliamentary procedure compel government hand parliamentary committee the committee published thursday sensitive sections redacted there little nothing learned annual reports different trade bodies said pat madden member committee spokesman open britain campaign group breeze busting cut people jobs livelihoods line winning matter principle opposition labour party lawmaker said since initial remarks davis stressed work constitute formal impact assessment detailed document setting economic implications policy decisions he said earlier month soon work conducted the documents released thursday cover sectors asset management tourism describing sector current eu regulatory regime summary trade conducted areas a section entitled sector views redacted committee organization the energy climate intelligence unit previously warned risks posed leaving eu also criticized documents what leaps total absence analysis search find said organization director richard black worldnews