 Professors Claim Sexual Harassment Ban Is Violating The First AmendmentA group of college professors have released a report that claims the federal government s attempts to combat sexual harassment are stifling educators  free speech on university campuses.The American Association of University (AAUP) found that the current interpretation of the government s Title IX laws which cover sexual harassment have made it hard for professors, especially female professors, to teach their students. Right now, if a student finds something offensive and complains about it, universities immediately open up an investigation into that teacher s actions, no matter how  questionable  that complaint is.According to the report, the failure of the federal government to make  meaningful distinctions between conduct and speech or otherwise distinguish between hostile environment sexual harassment  is putting academic freedom and free speech in jeopardy. The general counsel of the association and the chairwoman of the subcommittee who wrote the report, Risa L. Lieberwitz spoke to the NY Times, saying: We need to protect academic speech and the freedom that goes with academic speech, as well as due process. Universities are acting in a way that is overly precipitous as well as applying overly broad definitions of sexual harassment because they are afraid of scrutiny. The report even gives examples to support their claims. One of those was regarding Sociology Professor Patty Adler s class, Deviance in US Society,  at the University of Colorado-Boulder. Adler had taught the class for more than twenty years and each semester around five hundred students enrolled in it, but in 2013 some of the students complained that her class  constituted sexual harassment :At the conclusion of the term, undergraduate teaching assistants participated in and witnessed role-playing exercises featuring subjects relevant to course material involving the global sex trade: these performances animated character types, such as an  Eastern European  slave whore,  a pimp, a  bar whore,  and a high-end escort.  Adler s Dean offered her a buyout for early retirement and indicated if she did not accept the offer, she could incur penalties up to and including forfeiture of her retirement benefits.Her other option was to return to the classroom but never teach the course again. When students, faculty and advocacy groups found out what was happening they protested the school s ultimatum and eventually the university relented and welcomed her back without any conditions. However, the incident took such a toll on her that she only stayed for one semester and then retired.Professor Adler is not alone, similar incidents have happened all across the country and that is the violation of free speech and academic freedom the AAUP found so troubling. The group is not advocating sexual harassment, they are just asking that the government draw clearer lines between what is and what isn t harassment so that students can be properly educated.Right now, the lines are so blurry that colleges and universities are doing a disservice to the students who pay thousands of dollars for a well-rounded curriculum. Of course, these schools should act if a professor is violating the law, but there is a huge difference between harassment and  well, this is an uncomfortable, intellectual topic.  Nobody benefits when schools don t use common sense when investigating claims.Featured image via Kevork Djansezian/Getty ImagesNews
professors claim sexual harassment ban is violating the first amendment group college professors released report claims federal government attempts combat sexual harassment stirling educators free speech university american association university aap found current interpretation government title ix laws cover sexual harassment made hard professors especially female professors teach students right student finds something offensive complains universities immediately open investigation teacher actions matter questionable complaint report failure federal government make meaningful distinctions conduct speech otherwise distinguish hostile environment sexual harassment putting academic freedom free speech jeopardy the general counsel association chairwoman subcommittee wrote report risk lieberwitz spoke ny times saying we need protect academic speech freedom goes academic speech well due process universities acting way overly precipitous well applying overly broad definitions sexual harassment afraid scrutiny the report even gives examples support claims one regarding sociology professor patty aller class defiance us society university aller taught class twenty years semester around five hundred students enrolled students complained class constituted sexual harassment at conclusion term undergraduate teaching assistants participated witnessed exercises featuring subjects relevant course material involving global sex trade performances animated character types eastern european slave whore pimp bar whore escort aller dean offered buyout early retirement indicated accept offer could incur penalties including forfeiture retirement option return classroom never teach course when students faculty advocacy groups found happening protested school ultimatum eventually university relented welcomed back without conditions however incident took toll stayed one semester aller alone similar incidents happened across country violation free speech academic freedom aap found troubling the group advocating sexual harassment asking government draw clearer lines harassment students properly lines blurry colleges universities disservice students pay thousands dollars curriculum of course schools act professor violating law huge difference harassment well uncomfortable intellectual topic nobody benefits schools use common sense investigating image via rework imagenes
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT:  Professors Claim Sexual Harassment Ban Is Violating The First AmendmentA group of college professors have released a report that claims the federal government s attempts to combat sexual harassment are stifling educators  free speech on university campuses.The American Association of University (AAUP) found that the current interpretation of the government s Title IX laws which cover sexual harassment have made it hard for professors, especially female professors, to teach their students. Right now, if a student finds something offensive and complains about it, universities immediately open up an investigation into that teacher s actions, no matter how  questionable  that complaint is.According to the report, the failure of the federal government to make  meaningful distinctions between conduct and speech or otherwise distinguish between hostile environment sexual harassment  is putting academic freedom and free speech in jeopardy. The general counsel of the association and the chairwoman of the subcommittee who wrote the report, Risa L. Lieberwitz spoke to the NY Times, saying: We need to protect academic speech and the freedom that goes with academic speech, as well as due process. Universities are acting in a way that is overly precipitous as well as applying overly broad definitions of sexual harassment because they are afraid of scrutiny. The report even gives examples to support their claims. One of those was regarding Sociology Professor Patty Adler s class, Deviance in US Society,  at the University of Colorado-Boulder. Adler had taught the class for more than twenty years and each semester around five hundred students enrolled in it, but in 2013 some of the students complained that her class  constituted sexual harassment :At the conclusion of the term, undergraduate teaching assistants participated in and witnessed role-playing exercises featuring subjects relevant to course material involving the global sex trade: these performances animated character types, such as an  Eastern European  slave whore,  a pimp, a  bar whore,  and a high-end escort.  Adler s Dean offered her a buyout for early retirement and indicated if she did not accept the offer, she could incur penalties up to and including forfeiture of her retirement benefits.Her other option was to return to the classroom but never teach the course again. When students, faculty and advocacy groups found out what was happening they protested the school s ultimatum and eventually the university relented and welcomed her back without any conditions. However, the incident took such a toll on her that she only stayed for one semester and then retired.Professor Adler is not alone, similar incidents have happened all across the country and that is the violation of free speech and academic freedom the AAUP found so troubling. The group is not advocating sexual harassment, they are just asking that the government draw clearer lines between what is and what isn t harassment so that students can be properly educated.Right now, the lines are so blurry that colleges and universities are doing a disservice to the students who pay thousands of dollars for a well-rounded curriculum. Of course, these schools should act if a professor is violating the law, but there is a huge difference between harassment and  well, this is an uncomfortable, intellectual topic.  Nobody benefits when schools don t use common sense when investigating claims.Featured image via Kevork Djansezian/Getty ImagesNews
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: professors claim sexual harassment ban is violating the first amendment group college professors released report claims federal government attempts combat sexual harassment stirling educators free speech university american association university aap found current interpretation government title ix laws cover sexual harassment made hard professors especially female professors teach students right student finds something offensive complains universities immediately open investigation teacher actions matter questionable complaint report failure federal government make meaningful distinctions conduct speech otherwise distinguish hostile environment sexual harassment putting academic freedom free speech jeopardy the general counsel association chairwoman subcommittee wrote report risk lieberwitz spoke ny times saying we need protect academic speech freedom goes academic speech well due process universities acting way overly precipitous well applying overly broad definitions sexual harassment afraid scrutiny the report even gives examples support claims one regarding sociology professor patty aller class defiance us society university aller taught class twenty years semester around five hundred students enrolled students complained class constituted sexual harassment at conclusion term undergraduate teaching assistants participated witnessed exercises featuring subjects relevant course material involving global sex trade performances animated character types eastern european slave whore pimp bar whore escort aller dean offered buyout early retirement indicated accept offer could incur penalties including forfeiture retirement option return classroom never teach course when students faculty advocacy groups found happening protested school ultimatum eventually university relented welcomed back without conditions however incident took toll stayed one semester aller alone similar incidents happened across country violation free speech academic freedom aap found troubling the group advocating sexual harassment asking government draw clearer lines harassment students properly lines blurry colleges universities disservice students pay thousands dollars curriculum of course schools act professor violating law huge difference harassment well uncomfortable intellectual topic nobody benefits schools use common sense investigating image via rework imagenes