VIOLENT ENVIRONMENTAL LUNATICS Cost Taxpayers MILLIONS To Protect Trump’s EPA Director After Receiving “Unprecedented” Number of Credible Death ThreatsEnvironmental Protection Agency administrator Scott Pruitt has received an unprecedented amount of death threats, requiring a 24-hour security detail, according to an editorial published in the Wall Street Journal.The paper revealed the EPA has received more than 70  credible threats against EPA staffers, with a disproportionate number menacing Administrator Scott Pruitt and his family,  since President Donald Trump took office.Credible threats from liberal opponents have resulted in the EPA s inspector general s office recommending 24/7 security detail for Pruitt, which is costing taxpayers $2 million per year. Mr. Pruitt has received more than five times as many threats as his predecessor, Gina McCarthy,  the editorial explained.  These include explicit death threats. Some have referenced Mr. Pruitt s home address. Federal law enforcement has determined that some of those threatening Mr. Pruitt are likely capable of carrying out acts of violence. Democratic lawmakers have complained that the security detail is a waste of money, claiming  there is no apparent security threat against the administrator to justify such a security detail or expenditures. EPA security has already caught suspects prowling around the Administrator s neighborhood,  the Journal reported.Liberals have justified the death threats. Last week, a San Francisco columnist argued death threats against Pruitt were justified because he is a  banally evil, milquetoast, science-denying government administrator.  The death threats  make a warped sort of sense,  wrote liberal columnist Mark Morford. Mr. Pruitt didn t invent these threats, and Cabinet members shouldn t have to fear violence as a price of public service,  the WSJ editorial board said.For entire story: WFBpolitics
violent environmental lunatic cost taxpayers millions to protect trump epa director after receiving unprecedented number credible death threatsenvironmental protection agency administrator scott print received unprecedented amount death threats requiring security detail according editorial published wall street paper revealed epa received credible threats epa staffers disproportionate number menacing administrator scott print family since president donald trump took threats liberal opponents resulted epa inspector general office recommending security detail print costing taxpayers million per year print received five times many threats predecessor gina mccarthy editorial explained these include explicit death threats some referenced print home address federal law enforcement determined threatening print likely capable carrying acts violence democratic lawmakers complained security detail waste money claiming apparent security threat administrator justify security detail expenditures epa security already caught suspects growing around administrator neighborhood journal justified death threats last week san francisco columnist argued death threats print justified manually evil milquetoast government administrator the death threats make warped sort sense wrote liberal columnist mark oxford print invent threats cabinet members fear violence price public service wsj editorial board entire story abpolitics
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: VIOLENT ENVIRONMENTAL LUNATICS Cost Taxpayers MILLIONS To Protect Trump’s EPA Director After Receiving “Unprecedented” Number of Credible Death ThreatsEnvironmental Protection Agency administrator Scott Pruitt has received an unprecedented amount of death threats, requiring a 24-hour security detail, according to an editorial published in the Wall Street Journal.The paper revealed the EPA has received more than 70  credible threats against EPA staffers, with a disproportionate number menacing Administrator Scott Pruitt and his family,  since President Donald Trump took office.Credible threats from liberal opponents have resulted in the EPA s inspector general s office recommending 24/7 security detail for Pruitt, which is costing taxpayers $2 million per year. Mr. Pruitt has received more than five times as many threats as his predecessor, Gina McCarthy,  the editorial explained.  These include explicit death threats. Some have referenced Mr. Pruitt s home address. Federal law enforcement has determined that some of those threatening Mr. Pruitt are likely capable of carrying out acts of violence. Democratic lawmakers have complained that the security detail is a waste of money, claiming  there is no apparent security threat against the administrator to justify such a security detail or expenditures. EPA security has already caught suspects prowling around the Administrator s neighborhood,  the Journal reported.Liberals have justified the death threats. Last week, a San Francisco columnist argued death threats against Pruitt were justified because he is a  banally evil, milquetoast, science-denying government administrator.  The death threats  make a warped sort of sense,  wrote liberal columnist Mark Morford. Mr. Pruitt didn t invent these threats, and Cabinet members shouldn t have to fear violence as a price of public service,  the WSJ editorial board said.For entire story: WFBpolitics
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: violent environmental lunatic cost taxpayers millions to protect trump epa director after receiving unprecedented number credible death threatsenvironmental protection agency administrator scott print received unprecedented amount death threats requiring security detail according editorial published wall street paper revealed epa received credible threats epa staffers disproportionate number menacing administrator scott print family since president donald trump took threats liberal opponents resulted epa inspector general office recommending security detail print costing taxpayers million per year print received five times many threats predecessor gina mccarthy editorial explained these include explicit death threats some referenced print home address federal law enforcement determined threatening print likely capable carrying acts violence democratic lawmakers complained security detail waste money claiming apparent security threat administrator justify security detail expenditures epa security already caught suspects growing around administrator neighborhood journal justified death threats last week san francisco columnist argued death threats print justified manually evil milquetoast government administrator the death threats make warped sort sense wrote liberal columnist mark oxford print invent threats cabinet members fear violence price public service wsj editorial board entire story abpolitics