ELECTION FRAUD: If It Happened in Michigan, Will It Happen in Ohio?21st Century Wire says On a recent episode of The Sunday Wire with Patrick Henningsen, guest Basil Valentine asked Patrick for his analysis on the Bernie Sanders vs. Hillary Clinton primary race, and what ensued was a poignant discussion about a deeper issue   voter and election fraud.PH: It s a tight race. Hillary has the edge on the super delegates, which is the most corrupt, un-democratic aspect of the Democratic Party. BV: I m not sure it s it s very un-democratic and corrupt, I agree. But I don t think it s the most corrupt. The most corrupt is the vote fraud. Basil cites a new report about the recent Michigan Presidential Primary, where its findings suggest that Bernie Sanders actually did better than the recorded vote share indicates.The author of the report, Richard Charnin, provides context not only for Michigan primary results but for Massachusetts results as well:This analysis indicates that Sanders did much better than his recorded vote in the Michigan primary. Sanders had 590,386 votes (49.8%) and Clinton 570,948 (48.3%). Sanders won in 73 of 83 MI counties with 56% of the vote. He won the preliminary exit poll by 52.1-45.9%, a 97% win probability. Clinton won urban counties Wayne and Oakland with approximately 55% of the vote.Clinton won the Massachusetts primary by just 1.4%, but she did well in urban areas. Sanders won hand-counted precincts by 57-40% in 68 Towns (32,360 votes, 2.7% of votes cast). Sanders also had 52.1% in the preliminary exit poll which he won by 52.1-45.7%. His win probability was also 97%.(See Charnin s full report and statistical analysis here, including a breakdown of voting machine totals.)Charnin explains there are three key indicators to track in determining whether election fraud has occurred:  cumulative vote shares, preliminary exit poll, absentee vote anomalies Of course, you will not hear much about election fraud from the media   their coverage focuses solely on the recorded vote at the end of the night, and the usual Poli-tricks and Propaganda  mess with voters  minds during their televised election coverage.Will we see these same election fraud indicators in the Florida, Ohio, Illinois, Missouri and North Carolina primaries?READ MORE 2016 NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire 2016 Election FilesMiddle-east
election fraud if it happened michigan will it happen ohio century wire says on recent episode the sunday wire patrick henningsen guest basil valentine asked patrick analysis bernie sanders hillary clinton primary race ensued poignant discussion deeper issue voter election it tight race hillary edge super delegates corrupt aspect democratic party bv i sure corrupt i agree but i think corrupt the corrupt vote fraud basil cites new report recent michigan presidential primary findings suggest bernie sanders actually better recorded vote share author report richard chain provides context michigan primary results massachusetts results well this analysis indicates sanders much better recorded vote michigan primary sanders votes clinton sanders mi counties vote he preliminary exit poll win probability clinton urban counties wayne oakland approximately massachusetts primary well urban areas sanders precincts towns votes votes cast sanders also preliminary exit poll his win probability also see chain full report statistical analysis including breakdown voting machine totals chain explains three key indicators track determining whether election fraud occurred cumulative vote shares preliminary exit poll absentee vote anomalies of course hear much election fraud media coverage focuses solely recorded vote end night usual propaganda mess voters minds televised election see election fraud indicators florida ohio illinois missouri north carolina primaries read more news at century wire election
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: ELECTION FRAUD: If It Happened in Michigan, Will It Happen in Ohio?21st Century Wire says On a recent episode of The Sunday Wire with Patrick Henningsen, guest Basil Valentine asked Patrick for his analysis on the Bernie Sanders vs. Hillary Clinton primary race, and what ensued was a poignant discussion about a deeper issue   voter and election fraud.PH: It s a tight race. Hillary has the edge on the super delegates, which is the most corrupt, un-democratic aspect of the Democratic Party. BV: I m not sure it s it s very un-democratic and corrupt, I agree. But I don t think it s the most corrupt. The most corrupt is the vote fraud. Basil cites a new report about the recent Michigan Presidential Primary, where its findings suggest that Bernie Sanders actually did better than the recorded vote share indicates.The author of the report, Richard Charnin, provides context not only for Michigan primary results but for Massachusetts results as well:This analysis indicates that Sanders did much better than his recorded vote in the Michigan primary. Sanders had 590,386 votes (49.8%) and Clinton 570,948 (48.3%). Sanders won in 73 of 83 MI counties with 56% of the vote. He won the preliminary exit poll by 52.1-45.9%, a 97% win probability. Clinton won urban counties Wayne and Oakland with approximately 55% of the vote.Clinton won the Massachusetts primary by just 1.4%, but she did well in urban areas. Sanders won hand-counted precincts by 57-40% in 68 Towns (32,360 votes, 2.7% of votes cast). Sanders also had 52.1% in the preliminary exit poll which he won by 52.1-45.7%. His win probability was also 97%.(See Charnin s full report and statistical analysis here, including a breakdown of voting machine totals.)Charnin explains there are three key indicators to track in determining whether election fraud has occurred:  cumulative vote shares, preliminary exit poll, absentee vote anomalies Of course, you will not hear much about election fraud from the media   their coverage focuses solely on the recorded vote at the end of the night, and the usual Poli-tricks and Propaganda  mess with voters  minds during their televised election coverage.Will we see these same election fraud indicators in the Florida, Ohio, Illinois, Missouri and North Carolina primaries?READ MORE 2016 NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire 2016 Election FilesMiddle-east
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: election fraud if it happened michigan will it happen ohio century wire says on recent episode the sunday wire patrick henningsen guest basil valentine asked patrick analysis bernie sanders hillary clinton primary race ensued poignant discussion deeper issue voter election it tight race hillary edge super delegates corrupt aspect democratic party bv i sure corrupt i agree but i think corrupt the corrupt vote fraud basil cites new report recent michigan presidential primary findings suggest bernie sanders actually better recorded vote share author report richard chain provides context michigan primary results massachusetts results well this analysis indicates sanders much better recorded vote michigan primary sanders votes clinton sanders mi counties vote he preliminary exit poll win probability clinton urban counties wayne oakland approximately massachusetts primary well urban areas sanders precincts towns votes votes cast sanders also preliminary exit poll his win probability also see chain full report statistical analysis including breakdown voting machine totals chain explains three key indicators track determining whether election fraud occurred cumulative vote shares preliminary exit poll absentee vote anomalies of course hear much election fraud media coverage focuses solely recorded vote end night usual propaganda mess voters minds televised election see election fraud indicators florida ohio illinois missouri north carolina primaries read more news at century wire election