FINALLY! Fed Up Princeton Students Fight Back Against Black Lives Matter Terrorists’ DemandsTake note, these are the kinds of students employers will be falling all over themselves to hire. Lets be honest, these students/terrorists demanding  safe spaces  in the work place are not going to be very employable, and are likely to find themselves flipping burgers for less than $15/hour A group of sensible Princeton students is standing up to the mob, and demanding that Princeton s president Eisgruber do the same. The whole statement deserves to be seen:The Legislative Committee of the Princeton Open Campus Coalition has sent the following letter to President Eisgruber:Dear President Eisgruber,We write on behalf of the Princeton Open Campus Coalition to request a meeting with you so that we may present our perspectives on the events of recent weeks. We are concerned mainly with the importance of preserving an intellectual culture in which allmembers of the Princeton community feel free to engage in civil discussion and to express their convictions without fear of being subjected to intimidation or abuse. Thanks to recent polls, surveys, and petitions, we have reason to believe that our concerns are shared by a majority of our fellow Princeton undergraduates.Academic discourse consists of reasoned arguments. We simply wish to present our own reasoned arguments and engage you and other senior administrators in dialogue. We will not occupy your office, and, though we respectfully request a minimum of an hour of your time, we will only stay for as long as you wish. We will conduct ourselves in the civil manner that it is our hope to maintain and reinforce as the norm at Princeton.This dialogue is necessary because many students have shared with us that they are afraid to state publicly their opinions on recent events for fear of being vilified, slandered, and subjected to hatred, either by fellow students or faculty. Many who questioned the protest were labeled racist, and black students who expressed disagreement with the protesters were called  white sympathizers  and were told they were  not black.  We, the Princeton Open Campus Coalition, refuse to let our peers be intimidated or bullied into silence on these or any important matters.First, we wish to discuss with you the methods employed by protesters. Across the ideological spectrum on campus, many people found the invasion of your office and refusal to leave to be troubling. Admittedly, civil disobedience (and even law-breaking) can sometimes be justified. However, they cannot be justified when channels of advocacy, through fair procedures of decision-making, are fully open, as they are at our University. To adopt these tactics while such procedures for debate and reform are in place is to come dangerously close to the line dividing demonstration from intimidation. It is also a way of seeking an unfair advantage over people with different viewpoints who refuse to resort to such tactics for fear of damaging this institution that they love.Second, we welcome a fair debate about the specific demands that have been made.We oppose efforts to purge (and literally paint over) recognitions of Woodrow Wilson s achievements, including Wilson College, the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, and his mural in Wilcox Dining Hall. As you have noted, Wilson, like all other historical figures, has a mixed legacy. It is not for his contemptible racism, but for his contributions as president of both Princeton and the United States that we honor Wilson. Moreover, if we cease honoring flawed individuals, there will be no names adorning our buildings, no statues decorating our courtyards, and no biographies capable of inspiring future generations.We worry that the proposed distribution requirement will contribute to the politicization of the University and facilitate groupthink. However, we, too, are concerned about diversity in the classroom and offer our own solution to this problem. While we do not wish to impose additional distribution requirements on students for fear of stifling academic exploration, we believe that all students should be encouraged to take courses taught by professors who will challenge their preconceived mindsets. To this end, the University should make every effort to attract outstanding faculty representing a wider range of viewpoints even controversial viewpoints across all departments. Princeton needs more Peter Singers, more Cornel Wests, and more Robert Georges.Similarly, we believe that requiring cultural competency training for faculty threatens to impose orthodoxies on issues about which people of good faith often disagree. As Professor Sergiu Klainerman has observed, it reeks of the reeducation programs to which people in his native Romania were subjected under communist rule.We firmly believe that there should be no space at a university in which any member of the community, student or faculty, is  safe  from having his or her most cherished and even identity-forming values challenged. It is the very mission of the university to seek truth by subjecting all beliefs to critical, rational scrutiny. While students with a shared interest in studying certain cultures are certainly welcome to live together, we reject University-sponsored separatism in housing. We are all members of the Princeton community. We denounce the notion that our basic interactions with each other should be defined by demographic traits.We hope that you will agree to meet with us. We will be happy to make ourselves available to meet in your office at your earliest convenience. We are also requesting a meeting with the Board of Trustees. For reasons you have articulated in your recent message to the community, there is no time to waste in having these discussions.Unlike their counterparts at other universities, Princeton undergraduates opposed to the curtailment of academic freedom refuse to remain silent out of fear of being slandered. We will not stop fighting for what we believe in.Thank you very much for your consideration. We look forward to your reply.-The Legislative Committee of Princeton Open Campus Coalition Allie Burton  17 Evan Draim  16 Josh Freeman  18 Sofia Gallo  17 Solveig Gold  17 Andy Loo  16 Sebastian Marotta  16 Devon Naftzger  16 Beni Snow  19 Josh Zuckerman  16Via: Powerline Blogleft-news
finally fed up princeton students fight back against black lives matter terrorists demandstake note kinds students employers falling hire lets honest demanding safe spaces work place going employable likely find flipping burgers less a group sensible princeton students standing mob demanding princeton president eisgruber the whole statement deserves seen the legislative committee princeton open campus coalition sent following letter president eisgruber dear president eisgruber we write behalf princeton open campus coalition request meeting may present perspectives events recent weeks we concerned mainly importance preserving intellectual culture allmembers princeton community feel free engage civil discussion express convictions without fear subjected intimidation abuse thanks recent polls surveys petitions reason believe concerns shared majority fellow princeton discourse consists reasoned arguments we simply wish present reasoned arguments engage senior administrators dialogue we occupy office though respectfully request minimum hour time stay long wish we conduct civil manner hope maintain reinforce norm dialogue necessary many students shared us afraid state publicly opinions recent events fear verified slander subjected hatred either fellow students faculty many questioned protest labeled racist black students expressed disagreement protesters called white sympathizers told black we princeton open campus coalition refuse let peers intimidated bullied silence important wish discuss methods employed protesters across ideological spectrum campus many people found invasion office refusal leave troubling admittedly civil disobedience even sometimes justified however justified channels advocacy fair procedures fully open university to adopt tactics procedures debate reform place come dangerously close line dividing demonstration intimidation it also way seeking unfair advantage people different viewpoints refuse resort tactics fear damaging institution welcome fair debate specific demands oppose efforts purge literally paint recognitions woodrow wilson achievements including wilson college woodrow wilson school public international affairs mural wilson dining hall as noted wilson like historical figures mixed legacy it contemptible racism contributions president princeton united states honor wilson moreover cease honoring flawed individuals names morning buildings statues decorating courtyards biographies capable inspiring future worry proposed distribution requirement contribute politicization university facilitate groupthink however concerned diversity classroom offer solution problem while wish impose additional distribution requirements students fear stirling academic exploration believe students encouraged take courses taught professors challenge preconceived mindset to end university make every effort attract outstanding faculty representing wider range viewpoints even controversial viewpoints across departments princeton needs peter singers corner wests robert believe requiring cultural competency training faculty threatens impose orthodoxies issues people good faith often disagree as professor sergio klainerman observed weeks education programs people native romania subjected communist firmly believe space university member community student faculty safe cherished even values challenged it mission university seek truth subjective beliefs critical rational scrutiny while students shared interest studying certain cultures certainly welcome live together reject separatism housing we members princeton community we denounce notion basic interactions defined demographic hope agree meet us we happy make available meet office earliest convenience we also requesting meeting board trustees for reasons articulated recent message community time waste counterparts universities princeton undergraduates opposed curtailment academic freedom refuse remain silent fear slander we stop fighting believe much consideration we look forward legislative committee princeton open campus coalition allies burton evan drain josh freeman sofia gallon solve gold andy loo sebastian martha devon naftzger beni snow josh zuckerman overline
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: FINALLY! Fed Up Princeton Students Fight Back Against Black Lives Matter Terrorists’ DemandsTake note, these are the kinds of students employers will be falling all over themselves to hire. Lets be honest, these students/terrorists demanding  safe spaces  in the work place are not going to be very employable, and are likely to find themselves flipping burgers for less than $15/hour A group of sensible Princeton students is standing up to the mob, and demanding that Princeton s president Eisgruber do the same. The whole statement deserves to be seen:The Legislative Committee of the Princeton Open Campus Coalition has sent the following letter to President Eisgruber:Dear President Eisgruber,We write on behalf of the Princeton Open Campus Coalition to request a meeting with you so that we may present our perspectives on the events of recent weeks. We are concerned mainly with the importance of preserving an intellectual culture in which allmembers of the Princeton community feel free to engage in civil discussion and to express their convictions without fear of being subjected to intimidation or abuse. Thanks to recent polls, surveys, and petitions, we have reason to believe that our concerns are shared by a majority of our fellow Princeton undergraduates.Academic discourse consists of reasoned arguments. We simply wish to present our own reasoned arguments and engage you and other senior administrators in dialogue. We will not occupy your office, and, though we respectfully request a minimum of an hour of your time, we will only stay for as long as you wish. We will conduct ourselves in the civil manner that it is our hope to maintain and reinforce as the norm at Princeton.This dialogue is necessary because many students have shared with us that they are afraid to state publicly their opinions on recent events for fear of being vilified, slandered, and subjected to hatred, either by fellow students or faculty. Many who questioned the protest were labeled racist, and black students who expressed disagreement with the protesters were called  white sympathizers  and were told they were  not black.  We, the Princeton Open Campus Coalition, refuse to let our peers be intimidated or bullied into silence on these or any important matters.First, we wish to discuss with you the methods employed by protesters. Across the ideological spectrum on campus, many people found the invasion of your office and refusal to leave to be troubling. Admittedly, civil disobedience (and even law-breaking) can sometimes be justified. However, they cannot be justified when channels of advocacy, through fair procedures of decision-making, are fully open, as they are at our University. To adopt these tactics while such procedures for debate and reform are in place is to come dangerously close to the line dividing demonstration from intimidation. It is also a way of seeking an unfair advantage over people with different viewpoints who refuse to resort to such tactics for fear of damaging this institution that they love.Second, we welcome a fair debate about the specific demands that have been made.We oppose efforts to purge (and literally paint over) recognitions of Woodrow Wilson s achievements, including Wilson College, the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, and his mural in Wilcox Dining Hall. As you have noted, Wilson, like all other historical figures, has a mixed legacy. It is not for his contemptible racism, but for his contributions as president of both Princeton and the United States that we honor Wilson. Moreover, if we cease honoring flawed individuals, there will be no names adorning our buildings, no statues decorating our courtyards, and no biographies capable of inspiring future generations.We worry that the proposed distribution requirement will contribute to the politicization of the University and facilitate groupthink. However, we, too, are concerned about diversity in the classroom and offer our own solution to this problem. While we do not wish to impose additional distribution requirements on students for fear of stifling academic exploration, we believe that all students should be encouraged to take courses taught by professors who will challenge their preconceived mindsets. To this end, the University should make every effort to attract outstanding faculty representing a wider range of viewpoints even controversial viewpoints across all departments. Princeton needs more Peter Singers, more Cornel Wests, and more Robert Georges.Similarly, we believe that requiring cultural competency training for faculty threatens to impose orthodoxies on issues about which people of good faith often disagree. As Professor Sergiu Klainerman has observed, it reeks of the reeducation programs to which people in his native Romania were subjected under communist rule.We firmly believe that there should be no space at a university in which any member of the community, student or faculty, is  safe  from having his or her most cherished and even identity-forming values challenged. It is the very mission of the university to seek truth by subjecting all beliefs to critical, rational scrutiny. While students with a shared interest in studying certain cultures are certainly welcome to live together, we reject University-sponsored separatism in housing. We are all members of the Princeton community. We denounce the notion that our basic interactions with each other should be defined by demographic traits.We hope that you will agree to meet with us. We will be happy to make ourselves available to meet in your office at your earliest convenience. We are also requesting a meeting with the Board of Trustees. For reasons you have articulated in your recent message to the community, there is no time to waste in having these discussions.Unlike their counterparts at other universities, Princeton undergraduates opposed to the curtailment of academic freedom refuse to remain silent out of fear of being slandered. We will not stop fighting for what we believe in.Thank you very much for your consideration. We look forward to your reply.-The Legislative Committee of Princeton Open Campus Coalition Allie Burton  17 Evan Draim  16 Josh Freeman  18 Sofia Gallo  17 Solveig Gold  17 Andy Loo  16 Sebastian Marotta  16 Devon Naftzger  16 Beni Snow  19 Josh Zuckerman  16Via: Powerline Blogleft-news
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: finally fed up princeton students fight back against black lives matter terrorists demandstake note kinds students employers falling hire lets honest demanding safe spaces work place going employable likely find flipping burgers less a group sensible princeton students standing mob demanding princeton president eisgruber the whole statement deserves seen the legislative committee princeton open campus coalition sent following letter president eisgruber dear president eisgruber we write behalf princeton open campus coalition request meeting may present perspectives events recent weeks we concerned mainly importance preserving intellectual culture allmembers princeton community feel free engage civil discussion express convictions without fear subjected intimidation abuse thanks recent polls surveys petitions reason believe concerns shared majority fellow princeton discourse consists reasoned arguments we simply wish present reasoned arguments engage senior administrators dialogue we occupy office though respectfully request minimum hour time stay long wish we conduct civil manner hope maintain reinforce norm dialogue necessary many students shared us afraid state publicly opinions recent events fear verified slander subjected hatred either fellow students faculty many questioned protest labeled racist black students expressed disagreement protesters called white sympathizers told black we princeton open campus coalition refuse let peers intimidated bullied silence important wish discuss methods employed protesters across ideological spectrum campus many people found invasion office refusal leave troubling admittedly civil disobedience even sometimes justified however justified channels advocacy fair procedures fully open university to adopt tactics procedures debate reform place come dangerously close line dividing demonstration intimidation it also way seeking unfair advantage people different viewpoints refuse resort tactics fear damaging institution welcome fair debate specific demands oppose efforts purge literally paint recognitions woodrow wilson achievements including wilson college woodrow wilson school public international affairs mural wilson dining hall as noted wilson like historical figures mixed legacy it contemptible racism contributions president princeton united states honor wilson moreover cease honoring flawed individuals names morning buildings statues decorating courtyards biographies capable inspiring future worry proposed distribution requirement contribute politicization university facilitate groupthink however concerned diversity classroom offer solution problem while wish impose additional distribution requirements students fear stirling academic exploration believe students encouraged take courses taught professors challenge preconceived mindset to end university make every effort attract outstanding faculty representing wider range viewpoints even controversial viewpoints across departments princeton needs peter singers corner wests robert believe requiring cultural competency training faculty threatens impose orthodoxies issues people good faith often disagree as professor sergio klainerman observed weeks education programs people native romania subjected communist firmly believe space university member community student faculty safe cherished even values challenged it mission university seek truth subjective beliefs critical rational scrutiny while students shared interest studying certain cultures certainly welcome live together reject separatism housing we members princeton community we denounce notion basic interactions defined demographic hope agree meet us we happy make available meet office earliest convenience we also requesting meeting board trustees for reasons articulated recent message community time waste counterparts universities princeton undergraduates opposed curtailment academic freedom refuse remain silent fear slander we stop fighting believe much consideration we look forward legislative committee princeton open campus coalition allies burton evan drain josh freeman sofia gallon solve gold andy loo sebastian martha devon naftzger beni snow josh zuckerman overline