Hawaii issues first challenge to Trump's new travel ban(Reuters) - The state of Hawaii requested emergency court intervention on Wednesday to halt a revised executive order from President Donald Trump placing U.S. entry restrictions on refugees and travelers from six Muslim-majority countries. Arguing that the new travel ban violates the U.S. Constitution, the state asked a Hawaii federal court to grant a temporary restraining order that should apply nationally. U.S. District Court Judge Derrick Watson ruled earlier in the day that the state could sue over Trump’s new order, which was signed by the president on Monday.  It is the first legal challenge to the revised order. Watson said the state could revise its initial lawsuit, which had challenged Trump’s original ban signed in January. A hearing is set for March 15, a day before the new ban is to go into effect.  The government has said the president has wide authority to implement immigration policy and that the travel rules are necessary to protect against terrorist attacks.  Some legal experts have said court challenges will be more difficult now because changes to the order give exemptions to more people.  The revised travel order changed and replaced the original, more sweeping ban issued on Jan. 27 that caused chaos and protests at airports and was challenged in more than two dozen lawsuits around the country. A federal judge in Seattle put the first order on hold, in a decision upheld by an appeals court in San Francisco. The new order is much more narrowly tailored. It keeps a 90-day ban on travel to the United States by citizens of Iran, Libya, Syria, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen, but excludes Iraq and applies the restriction only to new visa applicants. It also removed an indefinite ban on all refugees from Syria.  The order no longer covers legal residents or existing visa holders, and makes waivers possible for some business, diplomatic and other travelers.  Immigration advocates have said the new ban, like the original one, discriminates against Muslims. But the first hurdle in a lawsuit is proving “standing” to sue, which means finding someone who has been harmed by the policy. With so many exemptions, legal experts have said it might be hard to find individuals that a court would rule have a right to sue. Hawaii claims its state universities would be harmed by the order because they would have trouble recruiting students and faculty. It also says the island state’s economy would be hit by a decline in tourism. The court papers cite reports that travel to the United States “took a nosedive” after Trump’s actions. The state was joined by a new plaintiff named Ismail Elshikh, an American citizen from Egypt who is an Imam at the Muslim Association of Hawaii whose mother-in-law lives in Syria, according to the lawsuit.   “This second Executive Order is infected with the same legal problems as the first Order,” the state said in court papers filed on Tuesday. The President’s order “is subjecting a portion of Hawaii’s population, including Dr. Elshikh, his family, and members of his Mosque, to discrimination and second-class treatment,” Hawaii said. The lawsuit says that Elshikh fears his mother-in-law will not be able to enter the country under the new order. “The family is devastated,” the filing said.  One of the groups eligible for waivers under the new ban are those seeking to visit or live with a close relative and who would face hardship if denied entry.  Adam Lauridsen, a San Francisco attorney representing students challenging Trump’s first order, said the waiver provisions in the new ban are similar to case-by-case exemptions allowed in the first ban. Earlier legal challenges were allowed to move forward despite those waivers, he said. In support of its actions, the Trump administration has cited a section of law that says the president can suspend  entry to the United States by “any class” of foreigners if he finds it would be “detrimental to the interests” of the country. politicsNews
hawaii issues first challenge trump new travel ban reuters the state hawaii requested emergency court intervention wednesday halt revised executive order president donald trump placing entry restrictions refugees travelers six countries arguing new travel ban violates constitution state asked hawaii federal court grant temporary restraining order apply nationally district court judge derrick watson ruled earlier day state could sue trump new order signed president monday it first legal challenge revised order watson said state could revise initial lawsuit challenged trump original ban signed january a hearing set march day new ban go effect the government said president wide authority implement immigration policy travel rules necessary protect terrorist attacks some legal experts said court challenges difficult changes order give exemptions people the revised travel order changed replaced original sweeping ban issued caused chaos protests airports challenged two dozen lawsuits around country a federal judge seattle put first order hold decision upheld appeals court san francisco the new order much narrowly tailored it keeps ban travel united states citizens iran libya syria somalia sudan yemen excludes iraq applies restriction new visa applicants it also removed indefinite ban refugees syria the order longer covers legal residents existing visa holders makes waivers possible business diplomatic travelers immigration advocates said new ban like original one discriminate muslims but first hurdle lawsuit proving standing sue means finding someone harmed policy with many exemptions legal experts said might hard find individuals court would rule right sue hawaii claims state universities would harmed order would trouble recruiting students faculty it also says island state economy would hit decline tourism the court papers cite reports travel united states took nosedive trump actions the state joined new plaintiff named smail elshikh american citizen egypt imam muslim association hawaii whose lives syria according lawsuit this second executive order infected legal problems first order state said court papers filed tuesday the president order subjective portion hawaii population including elshikh family members mosque discrimination treatment hawaii said the lawsuit says elshikh fears able enter country new order the family devastated filing said one groups eligible waivers new ban seeking visit live close relative would face hardship denied entry adam lauridsen san francisco attorney representing students challenging trump first order said waiver provisions new ban similar exemptions allowed first ban earlier legal challenges allowed move forward despite waivers said in support actions trump administration cited section law says president suspend entry united states class foreigners finds would detrimental interests country politicsnews
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: Hawaii issues first challenge to Trump's new travel ban(Reuters) - The state of Hawaii requested emergency court intervention on Wednesday to halt a revised executive order from President Donald Trump placing U.S. entry restrictions on refugees and travelers from six Muslim-majority countries. Arguing that the new travel ban violates the U.S. Constitution, the state asked a Hawaii federal court to grant a temporary restraining order that should apply nationally. U.S. District Court Judge Derrick Watson ruled earlier in the day that the state could sue over Trump’s new order, which was signed by the president on Monday.  It is the first legal challenge to the revised order. Watson said the state could revise its initial lawsuit, which had challenged Trump’s original ban signed in January. A hearing is set for March 15, a day before the new ban is to go into effect.  The government has said the president has wide authority to implement immigration policy and that the travel rules are necessary to protect against terrorist attacks.  Some legal experts have said court challenges will be more difficult now because changes to the order give exemptions to more people.  The revised travel order changed and replaced the original, more sweeping ban issued on Jan. 27 that caused chaos and protests at airports and was challenged in more than two dozen lawsuits around the country. A federal judge in Seattle put the first order on hold, in a decision upheld by an appeals court in San Francisco. The new order is much more narrowly tailored. It keeps a 90-day ban on travel to the United States by citizens of Iran, Libya, Syria, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen, but excludes Iraq and applies the restriction only to new visa applicants. It also removed an indefinite ban on all refugees from Syria.  The order no longer covers legal residents or existing visa holders, and makes waivers possible for some business, diplomatic and other travelers.  Immigration advocates have said the new ban, like the original one, discriminates against Muslims. But the first hurdle in a lawsuit is proving “standing” to sue, which means finding someone who has been harmed by the policy. With so many exemptions, legal experts have said it might be hard to find individuals that a court would rule have a right to sue. Hawaii claims its state universities would be harmed by the order because they would have trouble recruiting students and faculty. It also says the island state’s economy would be hit by a decline in tourism. The court papers cite reports that travel to the United States “took a nosedive” after Trump’s actions. The state was joined by a new plaintiff named Ismail Elshikh, an American citizen from Egypt who is an Imam at the Muslim Association of Hawaii whose mother-in-law lives in Syria, according to the lawsuit.   “This second Executive Order is infected with the same legal problems as the first Order,” the state said in court papers filed on Tuesday. The President’s order “is subjecting a portion of Hawaii’s population, including Dr. Elshikh, his family, and members of his Mosque, to discrimination and second-class treatment,” Hawaii said. The lawsuit says that Elshikh fears his mother-in-law will not be able to enter the country under the new order. “The family is devastated,” the filing said.  One of the groups eligible for waivers under the new ban are those seeking to visit or live with a close relative and who would face hardship if denied entry.  Adam Lauridsen, a San Francisco attorney representing students challenging Trump’s first order, said the waiver provisions in the new ban are similar to case-by-case exemptions allowed in the first ban. Earlier legal challenges were allowed to move forward despite those waivers, he said. In support of its actions, the Trump administration has cited a section of law that says the president can suspend  entry to the United States by “any class” of foreigners if he finds it would be “detrimental to the interests” of the country. politicsNews
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: hawaii issues first challenge trump new travel ban reuters the state hawaii requested emergency court intervention wednesday halt revised executive order president donald trump placing entry restrictions refugees travelers six countries arguing new travel ban violates constitution state asked hawaii federal court grant temporary restraining order apply nationally district court judge derrick watson ruled earlier day state could sue trump new order signed president monday it first legal challenge revised order watson said state could revise initial lawsuit challenged trump original ban signed january a hearing set march day new ban go effect the government said president wide authority implement immigration policy travel rules necessary protect terrorist attacks some legal experts said court challenges difficult changes order give exemptions people the revised travel order changed replaced original sweeping ban issued caused chaos protests airports challenged two dozen lawsuits around country a federal judge seattle put first order hold decision upheld appeals court san francisco the new order much narrowly tailored it keeps ban travel united states citizens iran libya syria somalia sudan yemen excludes iraq applies restriction new visa applicants it also removed indefinite ban refugees syria the order longer covers legal residents existing visa holders makes waivers possible business diplomatic travelers immigration advocates said new ban like original one discriminate muslims but first hurdle lawsuit proving standing sue means finding someone harmed policy with many exemptions legal experts said might hard find individuals court would rule right sue hawaii claims state universities would harmed order would trouble recruiting students faculty it also says island state economy would hit decline tourism the court papers cite reports travel united states took nosedive trump actions the state joined new plaintiff named smail elshikh american citizen egypt imam muslim association hawaii whose lives syria according lawsuit this second executive order infected legal problems first order state said court papers filed tuesday the president order subjective portion hawaii population including elshikh family members mosque discrimination treatment hawaii said the lawsuit says elshikh fears able enter country new order the family devastated filing said one groups eligible waivers new ban seeking visit live close relative would face hardship denied entry adam lauridsen san francisco attorney representing students challenging trump first order said waiver provisions new ban similar exemptions allowed first ban earlier legal challenges allowed move forward despite waivers said in support actions trump administration cited section law says president suspend entry united states class foreigners finds would detrimental interests country politicsnews