BEYOND MISSION CREEP: U.S. Planning to Send 1,000 More Ground Troops into Syria Patrick Henningsen 21st Century WireJust as 21WIRE reported last week   the US mainstream media are still black-balling any substantial reporting about US boots on the ground in Syria. Instead, America s media are obsessing over Trump s tax returns, various Russian conspiracy theories, and Michael Flynn s Moscow public speaking engagement in 2015. With this latest Pentagon announcement of an additional 1,000 US troops to Syria, that would bring the total combat deployment to approximately 4,000 inside of Syria.Considering the amount of media coverage and political debate over the 5,000 US military personnel send to Iraq over the last 3 years   one must ask why the silence in US media about the stealth build-up for a major battle in Raqqa, Syria.Previously, 21WIRE reported how the United States has sent in combat troops to support YPG fighters (Kurdish People s Protect Units in Syria)   much to the dismay of Turkey, and to the annoyance of both Russian and Syrian planners. Turkey has been pressing the US to change its strategy for fighting Islamic State in Syria by abandoning the YPG whom it deems as terrorists (in league with the Kurdish PKK in Turkey).The other aspect of this is being ignored by western media and their legion of panel  experts . There are a number of rival factions and militias being backed by the US besides the Syrian Democratic Forces (comprised of Kurdish YPG). the US-led Coalition have substantial investments in Sunni extremist (terrorist) fighting groups allied under the Al Nusra (al Qaeda in Syria) umbrella. Consider how back in late 2015, the US deployed 5o US Special Forces in Syria as  human shields    arguably to salvage its  rebels assets being ravaged by Russian airstrikes.After the Coalition s epic loss when Al Nusra-led brigades were driven out of terrorist stronghold in East Aleppo, one must ask if there an element of this in US positioning around Manbij and Raqqa?With so many stakeholders, the margin for error is extremely thin. The situation is fraught with risks for all parties. NOTE: This is taking place amid a political storm in Washington   as the entire Democratic Party, half the Republican Party and the whole of the US mainstream media are all trying to bring down the Trump Administration. If Raqqa is deemed a success, it will effectively give Trump a win. If it is deemed a disaster, then it will be used to fuel the anti-Trump resistance in the US. If the White House is too desperate for a win, then the prospect of a mistake or miscalculation becomes ever riskier. If a major world war is to be triggered   it could very well happen here. Clearly, the US and others are planning a massive operation to lay siege to Raqqa, the ISIS stronghold in Syria. However, if the other similar allied operation in Mosul, Iraq is anything to go by, then expect massive civilian  casualties in this battle too. The civilian carnage has been mostly censored from mainstream in the US and Europe, the  Coalition  are afraid of the negative public relations backlash in the event that western public received too much negative news about the haphazard operation in Mosul.  After early reports of massive civilian casualties in late 2016, it seems that the Pentagon have given the order to mainstream editorial desks to back off on negative reporting. How else can we explain how hundreds, and possibly thousands, of civilians killed in this month alone   has managed to escape any and all media scrutiny?To underline this matter, yesterday, Human Rights Watch issued two new reports accusing Iraqi troops of using indiscriminate shelling into civilian areas in the fight to liberate Mosul from ISIS control.Based these recent reports, it s becoming more clear that US-led Coalition is sacrificing civilians in their objective to target ISIS fighters.To make matters worse, ISIS, like Al Nusra terrorists in Aleppo, have been using Mosul civilians as human shields. The only difference in this comparison is that western media were condemning the Syrian and Russian militaries for their anti-terror operations in Aleppo, while giving a free pass to clear US Coalition atrocities against civilians in Mosul.Forget about any word from the US State Dept. either   as they run point on the cover-up: The other conversation which has been deemed off limits by US and western media   is the fact that this US deployment inside of Syria is completely illegal under every international law, as well as in total violation of the US Constitution. US were not invited by the Syrian government   therefore, like its fellow NATO member Turkey, the US has effectively invaded Syria.US involvement in Syria is now way past mission creep.More on more US troops in Syria from the Washington Post .  . Thomas Gibbons-Neff Washington PostThe U.S. military has drawn up early plans that would deploy up to 1,000 more troops into northern Syria in the coming weeks, expanding the American presence in the country ahead of the offensive on the Islamic State s de facto capital of Raqqa, according to U.S. defense officials familiar with the matter.The deployment, if approved by Defense Secretary Jim Mattis and President Trump, would potentially double the number of U.S. forces in Syria and increase the potential for direct U.S. combat involvement in a conflict that has been characterized by confusion and competing priorities among disparate forces.Trump, who charged former president Barack Obama with being weak on Syria, gave the Pentagon 30 days to prepare a new plan to counter the Islamic State, and Mattis submitted a broad outline to the White House at the end of February. Gen. Joseph Votel, head of U.S. Central Command, has been filling in more details for that outline, including by how much to increase the U.S. ground presence in Syria. Votel is set to forward his recommendations to Mattis by the end of the month, and the Pentagon secretary is likely to sign off on them, according to a defense official familiar with the deliberations.While the new contingent of U.S. troops would initially not play a combat role, they would be entering an increasingly complex and dangerous battlefield. In recent weeks, U.S. Army Rangers have been sent to the city of Manbij west of Raqqa to deter Russian, Turkish and Syrian opposition forces all operating in the area, while a Marine artillery battery recently deployed near Raqqa has already come under fire, according to a defense official with direct knowledge of their operations.The moves would also mark a departure from the Obama administration, which resisted committing more ground troops to Syria.The implementation of the proposed plan, however, relies on a number of variables that have yet to be determined, including how much to arm Kurdish and Arab troops on the ground, and what part regional actors, such as Turkey, might have in the Raqqa campaign Continue this story at The Washington PostREAD MORE SYRIA NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire Syria FilesSUPPORT 21WIRE  SUBSCRIBE & BECOME A MEMBER @21WIRE.TVMiddle-east
beyond mission creep planning send more ground troops syria patrick henningsen century wirejust reported last week us mainstream media still substantial reporting us boots ground syria instead america media observing trump tax returns various russian conspiracy theories michael flynn moscow public speaking engagement with latest pentagon announcement additional us troops syria would bring total combat deployment approximately inside amount media coverage political debate us military personnel send iraq last years one must ask silence us media stealth major battle aqua reported united states sent combat troops support ypg fighters kurdish people protect units syria much dismay turkey annoyance russian syrian planners turkey pressing us change strategy fighting islamic state syria abandoning ypg deems terrorists league kurdish pkk turkey aspect ignored western media legion panel experts there number rival factions militias backed us besides syrian democratic forces comprised kurdish ypg coalition substantial investments sunny extremist terrorist fighting groups allied al usa al qaeda syria umbrella consider back late us deployed us special forces syria human shields arguably salvage rebels assets ravaged russian coalition epic loss al brigades driven terrorist stronghold east aleppo one must ask element us positioning around mania aqua with many stakeholders margin error extremely thin the situation fraught risks parties note this taking place amid political storm washington entire democratic party half republican party whole us mainstream media trying bring trump administration if aqua deemed success effectively give trump win if deemed disaster used fuel resistance us if white house desperate win prospect mistake miscalculation becomes ever skier if major world war triggered could well happen clearly us others planning massive operation lay siege aqua isis stronghold syria however similar allied operation mosul iraq anything go expect massive civilian casualties battle the civilian carnage mostly censored mainstream us europe coalition afraid negative public relations backlash event western public received much negative news haphazard operation mosul after early reports massive civilian casualties late seems pentagon given order mainstream editorial desks back negative reporting how else explain hundreds possibly thousands civilians killed month alone managed escape media scrutiny to underline matter yesterday human rights watch issued two new reports accusing iraqi troops using indiscriminate shelling civilian areas fight liberate mosul isis recent reports becoming clear coalition sacrificing civilians objective target isis make matters worse isis like al usa terrorists aleppo using mosul civilians human shields the difference comparison western media condemning syrian russian militaries operations aleppo giving free pass clear us coalition atrocities civilians word us state dept either run point the conversation deemed limits us western media fact us deployment inside syria completely illegal every international law well total violation us constitution us invited syrian government therefore like fellow nato member turkey us effectively invaded involvement syria way past mission us troops syria washington post thomas washington postage military drawn early plans would deploy troops northern syria coming weeks expanding american presence country ahead offensive islamic state de facto capital aqua according defense officials familiar deployment approved defense secretary jim mantis president trump would potentially double number forces syria increase potential direct combat involvement conflict characterized confusion competing priorities among disparate charged former president barack obama weak syria gave pentagon days prepare new plan counter islamic state mantis submitted broad outline white house end february joseph votes head central command filling details outline including much increase ground presence syria votes set forward recommendations mantis end month pentagon secretary likely sign according defense official familiar new contingent troops would initially play combat role would entering increasingly complex dangerous battlefield in recent weeks army rangers sent city mania west aqua deter russian turkish syrian opposition forces operating area marine artillery battery recently deployed near aqua already come fire according defense official direct knowledge moves would also mark departure obama administration resisted committing ground troops implementation proposed plan however relies number variables yet determined including much arm kurdish arab troops ground part regional actors turkey might aqua campaign continue story the washington posted more syria news at century wire syria filessupport subscribe become a member
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: BEYOND MISSION CREEP: U.S. Planning to Send 1,000 More Ground Troops into Syria Patrick Henningsen 21st Century WireJust as 21WIRE reported last week   the US mainstream media are still black-balling any substantial reporting about US boots on the ground in Syria. Instead, America s media are obsessing over Trump s tax returns, various Russian conspiracy theories, and Michael Flynn s Moscow public speaking engagement in 2015. With this latest Pentagon announcement of an additional 1,000 US troops to Syria, that would bring the total combat deployment to approximately 4,000 inside of Syria.Considering the amount of media coverage and political debate over the 5,000 US military personnel send to Iraq over the last 3 years   one must ask why the silence in US media about the stealth build-up for a major battle in Raqqa, Syria.Previously, 21WIRE reported how the United States has sent in combat troops to support YPG fighters (Kurdish People s Protect Units in Syria)   much to the dismay of Turkey, and to the annoyance of both Russian and Syrian planners. Turkey has been pressing the US to change its strategy for fighting Islamic State in Syria by abandoning the YPG whom it deems as terrorists (in league with the Kurdish PKK in Turkey).The other aspect of this is being ignored by western media and their legion of panel  experts . There are a number of rival factions and militias being backed by the US besides the Syrian Democratic Forces (comprised of Kurdish YPG). the US-led Coalition have substantial investments in Sunni extremist (terrorist) fighting groups allied under the Al Nusra (al Qaeda in Syria) umbrella. Consider how back in late 2015, the US deployed 5o US Special Forces in Syria as  human shields    arguably to salvage its  rebels assets being ravaged by Russian airstrikes.After the Coalition s epic loss when Al Nusra-led brigades were driven out of terrorist stronghold in East Aleppo, one must ask if there an element of this in US positioning around Manbij and Raqqa?With so many stakeholders, the margin for error is extremely thin. The situation is fraught with risks for all parties. NOTE: This is taking place amid a political storm in Washington   as the entire Democratic Party, half the Republican Party and the whole of the US mainstream media are all trying to bring down the Trump Administration. If Raqqa is deemed a success, it will effectively give Trump a win. If it is deemed a disaster, then it will be used to fuel the anti-Trump resistance in the US. If the White House is too desperate for a win, then the prospect of a mistake or miscalculation becomes ever riskier. If a major world war is to be triggered   it could very well happen here. Clearly, the US and others are planning a massive operation to lay siege to Raqqa, the ISIS stronghold in Syria. However, if the other similar allied operation in Mosul, Iraq is anything to go by, then expect massive civilian  casualties in this battle too. The civilian carnage has been mostly censored from mainstream in the US and Europe, the  Coalition  are afraid of the negative public relations backlash in the event that western public received too much negative news about the haphazard operation in Mosul.  After early reports of massive civilian casualties in late 2016, it seems that the Pentagon have given the order to mainstream editorial desks to back off on negative reporting. How else can we explain how hundreds, and possibly thousands, of civilians killed in this month alone   has managed to escape any and all media scrutiny?To underline this matter, yesterday, Human Rights Watch issued two new reports accusing Iraqi troops of using indiscriminate shelling into civilian areas in the fight to liberate Mosul from ISIS control.Based these recent reports, it s becoming more clear that US-led Coalition is sacrificing civilians in their objective to target ISIS fighters.To make matters worse, ISIS, like Al Nusra terrorists in Aleppo, have been using Mosul civilians as human shields. The only difference in this comparison is that western media were condemning the Syrian and Russian militaries for their anti-terror operations in Aleppo, while giving a free pass to clear US Coalition atrocities against civilians in Mosul.Forget about any word from the US State Dept. either   as they run point on the cover-up: The other conversation which has been deemed off limits by US and western media   is the fact that this US deployment inside of Syria is completely illegal under every international law, as well as in total violation of the US Constitution. US were not invited by the Syrian government   therefore, like its fellow NATO member Turkey, the US has effectively invaded Syria.US involvement in Syria is now way past mission creep.More on more US troops in Syria from the Washington Post .  . Thomas Gibbons-Neff Washington PostThe U.S. military has drawn up early plans that would deploy up to 1,000 more troops into northern Syria in the coming weeks, expanding the American presence in the country ahead of the offensive on the Islamic State s de facto capital of Raqqa, according to U.S. defense officials familiar with the matter.The deployment, if approved by Defense Secretary Jim Mattis and President Trump, would potentially double the number of U.S. forces in Syria and increase the potential for direct U.S. combat involvement in a conflict that has been characterized by confusion and competing priorities among disparate forces.Trump, who charged former president Barack Obama with being weak on Syria, gave the Pentagon 30 days to prepare a new plan to counter the Islamic State, and Mattis submitted a broad outline to the White House at the end of February. Gen. Joseph Votel, head of U.S. Central Command, has been filling in more details for that outline, including by how much to increase the U.S. ground presence in Syria. Votel is set to forward his recommendations to Mattis by the end of the month, and the Pentagon secretary is likely to sign off on them, according to a defense official familiar with the deliberations.While the new contingent of U.S. troops would initially not play a combat role, they would be entering an increasingly complex and dangerous battlefield. In recent weeks, U.S. Army Rangers have been sent to the city of Manbij west of Raqqa to deter Russian, Turkish and Syrian opposition forces all operating in the area, while a Marine artillery battery recently deployed near Raqqa has already come under fire, according to a defense official with direct knowledge of their operations.The moves would also mark a departure from the Obama administration, which resisted committing more ground troops to Syria.The implementation of the proposed plan, however, relies on a number of variables that have yet to be determined, including how much to arm Kurdish and Arab troops on the ground, and what part regional actors, such as Turkey, might have in the Raqqa campaign Continue this story at The Washington PostREAD MORE SYRIA NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire Syria FilesSUPPORT 21WIRE  SUBSCRIBE & BECOME A MEMBER @21WIRE.TVMiddle-east
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: beyond mission creep planning send more ground troops syria patrick henningsen century wirejust reported last week us mainstream media still substantial reporting us boots ground syria instead america media observing trump tax returns various russian conspiracy theories michael flynn moscow public speaking engagement with latest pentagon announcement additional us troops syria would bring total combat deployment approximately inside amount media coverage political debate us military personnel send iraq last years one must ask silence us media stealth major battle aqua reported united states sent combat troops support ypg fighters kurdish people protect units syria much dismay turkey annoyance russian syrian planners turkey pressing us change strategy fighting islamic state syria abandoning ypg deems terrorists league kurdish pkk turkey aspect ignored western media legion panel experts there number rival factions militias backed us besides syrian democratic forces comprised kurdish ypg coalition substantial investments sunny extremist terrorist fighting groups allied al usa al qaeda syria umbrella consider back late us deployed us special forces syria human shields arguably salvage rebels assets ravaged russian coalition epic loss al brigades driven terrorist stronghold east aleppo one must ask element us positioning around mania aqua with many stakeholders margin error extremely thin the situation fraught risks parties note this taking place amid political storm washington entire democratic party half republican party whole us mainstream media trying bring trump administration if aqua deemed success effectively give trump win if deemed disaster used fuel resistance us if white house desperate win prospect mistake miscalculation becomes ever skier if major world war triggered could well happen clearly us others planning massive operation lay siege aqua isis stronghold syria however similar allied operation mosul iraq anything go expect massive civilian casualties battle the civilian carnage mostly censored mainstream us europe coalition afraid negative public relations backlash event western public received much negative news haphazard operation mosul after early reports massive civilian casualties late seems pentagon given order mainstream editorial desks back negative reporting how else explain hundreds possibly thousands civilians killed month alone managed escape media scrutiny to underline matter yesterday human rights watch issued two new reports accusing iraqi troops using indiscriminate shelling civilian areas fight liberate mosul isis recent reports becoming clear coalition sacrificing civilians objective target isis make matters worse isis like al usa terrorists aleppo using mosul civilians human shields the difference comparison western media condemning syrian russian militaries operations aleppo giving free pass clear us coalition atrocities civilians word us state dept either run point the conversation deemed limits us western media fact us deployment inside syria completely illegal every international law well total violation us constitution us invited syrian government therefore like fellow nato member turkey us effectively invaded involvement syria way past mission us troops syria washington post thomas washington postage military drawn early plans would deploy troops northern syria coming weeks expanding american presence country ahead offensive islamic state de facto capital aqua according defense officials familiar deployment approved defense secretary jim mantis president trump would potentially double number forces syria increase potential direct combat involvement conflict characterized confusion competing priorities among disparate charged former president barack obama weak syria gave pentagon days prepare new plan counter islamic state mantis submitted broad outline white house end february joseph votes head central command filling details outline including much increase ground presence syria votes set forward recommendations mantis end month pentagon secretary likely sign according defense official familiar new contingent troops would initially play combat role would entering increasingly complex dangerous battlefield in recent weeks army rangers sent city mania west aqua deter russian turkish syrian opposition forces operating area marine artillery battery recently deployed near aqua already come fire according defense official direct knowledge moves would also mark departure obama administration resisted committing ground troops implementation proposed plan however relies number variables yet determined including much arm kurdish arab troops ground part regional actors turkey might aqua campaign continue story the washington posted more syria news at century wire syria filessupport subscribe become a member