BREAKING: FED JUDGE TERMINATES MI Recount…Asks Stein Attorney In Court : “Why are you coming to court now when you knew about the deficiencies beforehand?”Start Counting. Keep Counting. Stop Counting? Michigan's election recount hearing set to start in Detroit. Will judge change course?  Tresa Baldas (@TBaldas) December 7, 2016Hallroom chatter in Michigan recount: Some think the judge has been cornered & he ll have to end the recount; some say he ll keep pushing.U.S. District Judge Mark Goldsmith is ready to take the bench in #Michiganrecount. And we are   OFF!  Tresa Baldas (@TBaldas) December 7, 2016Michigan recount Schuette s lawyer John Bursch up first: 6th circuit couldn t have been more clear, this is case about michigan election lawSchuette lawyer talking about Bush v Gore case; says US Supreme Ct. clear on this: federal courts must defer to state in election matters.Judge just asked AG atty John Bursch: has the Mich. Supreme Court ruled on this? his answer: not yet. state high court hasn t heard case.AG atty Bursch:  This is the law of Michigan, there is no dispute about that.  Unless, of course, Stein appeals to MI Supreme Ct.AG atty Bursch shifts to Jill Stein, and whether she s an  aggrieved party.  Appeals ct. says no, so do Republicans & Trump.AG atty Bursch: purpose of recount law is to change the outcome of the election. Judge:  how do we know that? AG atty Bursch: state's top election official says goal of recount law is to change outcome, not to see if there's a problem;  Tresa Baldas (@TBaldas) December 7, 2016AG atty Bursch: court has already held that it's not right to make taxpayers pay millions for a recount that's not justified  Tresa Baldas (@TBaldas) December 7, 2016AG atty Bursch: Stein s  entire purpose is to audit the Michigan system.  That s not what our recount law is for.Michigan recount hearing: Judge: how do we know that Stein only got 1%; what if she got more but fraud took place?Judge to AG atty: what if Stein got 20% of the vote; is that enough for her to say she was aggrieved?MI Rep Party atty now up: the michigan courts have ruled, he says, urges judge to end the recount.MI Rep Party Atty: State court has concluded: "it's very unlikely that 2 million mistakes have been made"  Tresa Baldas (@TBaldas) December 7, 2016Judge continues to press: is there any court case that says recounts must produce a change in the outcome in order for them to be allowed?Michigan Rep. Atty: recounts should be used to figure out who should have won the election.  Aggrieved means someone who has been harmed Mich. Rep. Atty: Aggrieved does not apply to someone who came in 4th place. #Michiganrecount law is being misused by Jill Stein.  Tresa Baldas (@TBaldas) December 7, 2016 This candidate is not aggrieved in any sense of the word  Mich. Rep Atty says of Jill Stein; urged judge to dissolve ruling & end recount.Pro-recount atty up:   It s quite possible that a recount (in Michigan) would reveal a winner.  Not Stein. she doesn t expect that.Pro-recount atty: Michigan recount law isn t just about changing outcome; can also be used to show fraud in election system.Judge Goldsmith discusses cost of recount to taxpayers. Asks Stein atty what she thinks of that? Answer:the law  explicitly  allows for that.Stein atty notes #Michiganrecount battle not over.  the state court decision is not final.  going back to appeals court.Judge asks Stein atty: What do you want now? I ordered immediate recount. What s your issue now ? notes there s no federal right to recount.Stein atty:  There is no way of knowing whether fraud occurred without conducting the recount. Judge Goldsmith to Stein atty: Why are you coming to court now w hen you knew about the deficiencies beforehand?  Tresa Baldas (@TBaldas) December 7, 2016Judge Goldsmith to Stein atty: you could have addressed Michigan's vulnerable voting machines months ago. Why didn't you? why now?  Tresa Baldas (@TBaldas) December 7, 2016Judge to Stein atty: is there anything about the recount that will tell us whether there was cyber attack or if machinery malfunctioned?Stein atty: the recount can raise clear flags about whether something went wrong, triggering a forensic audit.Stein atty just ended. says Michigan law allows for recounts, and that it should be continued. AG atty is now up, in a rebuttal.Judge Goldsmith asks about voting machine problems in Detroit; says he s read about problems. AG atty says not as many as being reported.AG atty: the court of appeals has spoken. there is no right for stein to have a recount. that s the end of the story.AG atty to Judge Goldsmith: you might be the 1st judge in history to order recount for a candidate who took 1% of the vote.  Tresa Baldas (@TBaldas) December 7, 2016Recount shows so far: 10 counties have been recounting; 66 total vote change between Clinton & Trump so far.  Tresa Baldas (@TBaldas) December 7, 2016Election lawyer:  I have not known of anyone to come in and say i believe the system has been compromised or hacked Stein atty: It is way to early to say whether any fraud can be ruled out.Stein atty: Until the Michigan State Supreme Court weighs in, the recount must continue as ordered by the federal court.MI AG atty: "dont' become the first federal court in the country to order a recount   for a candidate who lost by 2 million votes."  Tresa Baldas (@TBaldas) December 7, 2016MI AG atty seeks bond: it's costing $500,000 a day for recount. it's not right to impose that kind of "irreparable harm" on the citizens.  Tresa Baldas (@TBaldas) December 7, 2016Stein atty: Sec of state doesn t want recount, so don t trust $5 million cost or other numbers being thrown by folks who just don t want it.Stein atty: No bond should be set.Judge Goldsmith orders recess for 20 minutes. he will issue a written order or rule from the bench:  I understand the time sensitivity Judge Goldsmith will issue a written opinion on whether to let Michigan presidential election recount continue, or end. Stay tuned.  Tresa Baldas (@TBaldas) December 7, 2016 left-news
breaking fed judge terminates mi stein attorney in court why coming court knew deficiencies beforehand start counting keep counting stop counting michigan election recount hearing set start detroit will judge change course tres bands tbaldas december chatter michigan recount some think judge cornered end recount say keep district judge mark goldsmith ready take bench michiganrecount and off tres bands tbaldas december recount schuette lawyer john busch first circuit clear case michigan election lawschuette lawyer talking bush v gore case says us supreme clear federal courts must defer state election asked ag att john busch supreme court ruled answer yet state high court heard att busch this law michigan dispute unless course stein appeals mi supreme att busch shifts jill stein whether aggrieved party appeals says republicans att busch purpose recount law change outcome election judge know ag att busch state top election official says goal recount law change outcome see problem tres bands tbaldas december att busch court already held right make taxpayers pay millions recount justified tres bands tbaldas december att busch stein entire purpose audit michigan system that recount law recount hearing judge know stein got got fraud took place judge ag att stein got vote enough say aggrieved mi rep party att michigan courts ruled says urges judge end rep party att state court concluded unlikely million mistakes made tres bands tbaldas december continues press court case says recounts must produce change outcome order allowed michigan att recounts used figure election aggrieved means someone harmed att aggrieved apply someone came place michiganrecount law misused jill stein tres bands tbaldas december this candidate aggrieved sense word rep att says jill stein urged judge dissolve ruling end att it quite possible recount michigan would reveal winner not stein expect att michigan recount law changing outcome also used show fraud election goldsmith discusses cost recount taxpayers asks stein att thinks answer law explicitly allows att notes michiganrecount battle state court decision final going back appeals asks stein att what want i ordered immediate recount what issue notes federal right att there way knowing whether fraud occurred without conducting recount judge goldsmith stein att why coming court w hen knew deficiencies beforehand tres bands tbaldas december goldsmith stein att could addressed michigan vulnerable voting machines months ago why tres bands tbaldas december stein att anything recount tell us whether cyber attack machinery malfunction stein att recount raise clear flags whether something went wrong triggering forensic att ended says michigan law allows recounts continued ag att goldsmith asks voting machine problems detroit says read problems ag att says many att court appeals spoken right stein recount end att judge goldsmith might judge history order recount candidate took vote tres bands tbaldas december shows far counties recounting total vote change clinton trump far tres bands tbaldas december lawyer i known anyone come say believe system compromised hacked stein att it way early say whether fraud ruled att until michigan state supreme court weighs recount must continue ordered federal ag att dont become first federal court country order recount candidate lost million votes tres bands tbaldas december ag att seeks bond costing day recount right impose kind inseparable harm citizens tres bands tbaldas december att sec state want recount trust million cost numbers thrown folks want att no bond goldsmith orders recess minutes issue written order rule bench i understand time sensitivity judge goldsmith issue written opinion whether let michigan presidential election recount continue end stay tuned tres bands tbaldas december
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: BREAKING: FED JUDGE TERMINATES MI Recount…Asks Stein Attorney In Court : “Why are you coming to court now when you knew about the deficiencies beforehand?”Start Counting. Keep Counting. Stop Counting? Michigan's election recount hearing set to start in Detroit. Will judge change course?  Tresa Baldas (@TBaldas) December 7, 2016Hallroom chatter in Michigan recount: Some think the judge has been cornered & he ll have to end the recount; some say he ll keep pushing.U.S. District Judge Mark Goldsmith is ready to take the bench in #Michiganrecount. And we are   OFF!  Tresa Baldas (@TBaldas) December 7, 2016Michigan recount Schuette s lawyer John Bursch up first: 6th circuit couldn t have been more clear, this is case about michigan election lawSchuette lawyer talking about Bush v Gore case; says US Supreme Ct. clear on this: federal courts must defer to state in election matters.Judge just asked AG atty John Bursch: has the Mich. Supreme Court ruled on this? his answer: not yet. state high court hasn t heard case.AG atty Bursch:  This is the law of Michigan, there is no dispute about that.  Unless, of course, Stein appeals to MI Supreme Ct.AG atty Bursch shifts to Jill Stein, and whether she s an  aggrieved party.  Appeals ct. says no, so do Republicans & Trump.AG atty Bursch: purpose of recount law is to change the outcome of the election. Judge:  how do we know that? AG atty Bursch: state's top election official says goal of recount law is to change outcome, not to see if there's a problem;  Tresa Baldas (@TBaldas) December 7, 2016AG atty Bursch: court has already held that it's not right to make taxpayers pay millions for a recount that's not justified  Tresa Baldas (@TBaldas) December 7, 2016AG atty Bursch: Stein s  entire purpose is to audit the Michigan system.  That s not what our recount law is for.Michigan recount hearing: Judge: how do we know that Stein only got 1%; what if she got more but fraud took place?Judge to AG atty: what if Stein got 20% of the vote; is that enough for her to say she was aggrieved?MI Rep Party atty now up: the michigan courts have ruled, he says, urges judge to end the recount.MI Rep Party Atty: State court has concluded: "it's very unlikely that 2 million mistakes have been made"  Tresa Baldas (@TBaldas) December 7, 2016Judge continues to press: is there any court case that says recounts must produce a change in the outcome in order for them to be allowed?Michigan Rep. Atty: recounts should be used to figure out who should have won the election.  Aggrieved means someone who has been harmed Mich. Rep. Atty: Aggrieved does not apply to someone who came in 4th place. #Michiganrecount law is being misused by Jill Stein.  Tresa Baldas (@TBaldas) December 7, 2016 This candidate is not aggrieved in any sense of the word  Mich. Rep Atty says of Jill Stein; urged judge to dissolve ruling & end recount.Pro-recount atty up:   It s quite possible that a recount (in Michigan) would reveal a winner.  Not Stein. she doesn t expect that.Pro-recount atty: Michigan recount law isn t just about changing outcome; can also be used to show fraud in election system.Judge Goldsmith discusses cost of recount to taxpayers. Asks Stein atty what she thinks of that? Answer:the law  explicitly  allows for that.Stein atty notes #Michiganrecount battle not over.  the state court decision is not final.  going back to appeals court.Judge asks Stein atty: What do you want now? I ordered immediate recount. What s your issue now ? notes there s no federal right to recount.Stein atty:  There is no way of knowing whether fraud occurred without conducting the recount. Judge Goldsmith to Stein atty: Why are you coming to court now w hen you knew about the deficiencies beforehand?  Tresa Baldas (@TBaldas) December 7, 2016Judge Goldsmith to Stein atty: you could have addressed Michigan's vulnerable voting machines months ago. Why didn't you? why now?  Tresa Baldas (@TBaldas) December 7, 2016Judge to Stein atty: is there anything about the recount that will tell us whether there was cyber attack or if machinery malfunctioned?Stein atty: the recount can raise clear flags about whether something went wrong, triggering a forensic audit.Stein atty just ended. says Michigan law allows for recounts, and that it should be continued. AG atty is now up, in a rebuttal.Judge Goldsmith asks about voting machine problems in Detroit; says he s read about problems. AG atty says not as many as being reported.AG atty: the court of appeals has spoken. there is no right for stein to have a recount. that s the end of the story.AG atty to Judge Goldsmith: you might be the 1st judge in history to order recount for a candidate who took 1% of the vote.  Tresa Baldas (@TBaldas) December 7, 2016Recount shows so far: 10 counties have been recounting; 66 total vote change between Clinton & Trump so far.  Tresa Baldas (@TBaldas) December 7, 2016Election lawyer:  I have not known of anyone to come in and say i believe the system has been compromised or hacked Stein atty: It is way to early to say whether any fraud can be ruled out.Stein atty: Until the Michigan State Supreme Court weighs in, the recount must continue as ordered by the federal court.MI AG atty: "dont' become the first federal court in the country to order a recount   for a candidate who lost by 2 million votes."  Tresa Baldas (@TBaldas) December 7, 2016MI AG atty seeks bond: it's costing $500,000 a day for recount. it's not right to impose that kind of "irreparable harm" on the citizens.  Tresa Baldas (@TBaldas) December 7, 2016Stein atty: Sec of state doesn t want recount, so don t trust $5 million cost or other numbers being thrown by folks who just don t want it.Stein atty: No bond should be set.Judge Goldsmith orders recess for 20 minutes. he will issue a written order or rule from the bench:  I understand the time sensitivity Judge Goldsmith will issue a written opinion on whether to let Michigan presidential election recount continue, or end. Stay tuned.  Tresa Baldas (@TBaldas) December 7, 2016 left-news
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: breaking fed judge terminates mi stein attorney in court why coming court knew deficiencies beforehand start counting keep counting stop counting michigan election recount hearing set start detroit will judge change course tres bands tbaldas december chatter michigan recount some think judge cornered end recount say keep district judge mark goldsmith ready take bench michiganrecount and off tres bands tbaldas december recount schuette lawyer john busch first circuit clear case michigan election lawschuette lawyer talking bush v gore case says us supreme clear federal courts must defer state election asked ag att john busch supreme court ruled answer yet state high court heard att busch this law michigan dispute unless course stein appeals mi supreme att busch shifts jill stein whether aggrieved party appeals says republicans att busch purpose recount law change outcome election judge know ag att busch state top election official says goal recount law change outcome see problem tres bands tbaldas december att busch court already held right make taxpayers pay millions recount justified tres bands tbaldas december att busch stein entire purpose audit michigan system that recount law recount hearing judge know stein got got fraud took place judge ag att stein got vote enough say aggrieved mi rep party att michigan courts ruled says urges judge end rep party att state court concluded unlikely million mistakes made tres bands tbaldas december continues press court case says recounts must produce change outcome order allowed michigan att recounts used figure election aggrieved means someone harmed att aggrieved apply someone came place michiganrecount law misused jill stein tres bands tbaldas december this candidate aggrieved sense word rep att says jill stein urged judge dissolve ruling end att it quite possible recount michigan would reveal winner not stein expect att michigan recount law changing outcome also used show fraud election goldsmith discusses cost recount taxpayers asks stein att thinks answer law explicitly allows att notes michiganrecount battle state court decision final going back appeals asks stein att what want i ordered immediate recount what issue notes federal right att there way knowing whether fraud occurred without conducting recount judge goldsmith stein att why coming court w hen knew deficiencies beforehand tres bands tbaldas december goldsmith stein att could addressed michigan vulnerable voting machines months ago why tres bands tbaldas december stein att anything recount tell us whether cyber attack machinery malfunction stein att recount raise clear flags whether something went wrong triggering forensic att ended says michigan law allows recounts continued ag att goldsmith asks voting machine problems detroit says read problems ag att says many att court appeals spoken right stein recount end att judge goldsmith might judge history order recount candidate took vote tres bands tbaldas december shows far counties recounting total vote change clinton trump far tres bands tbaldas december lawyer i known anyone come say believe system compromised hacked stein att it way early say whether fraud ruled att until michigan state supreme court weighs recount must continue ordered federal ag att dont become first federal court country order recount candidate lost million votes tres bands tbaldas december ag att seeks bond costing day recount right impose kind inseparable harm citizens tres bands tbaldas december att sec state want recount trust million cost numbers thrown folks want att no bond goldsmith orders recess minutes issue written order rule bench i understand time sensitivity judge goldsmith issue written opinion whether let michigan presidential election recount continue end stay tuned tres bands tbaldas december