TOP TEN Most “Ethically Challenged” Clinton E-mailsThe party s over or is it? Hillary Clinton and her aides will need to decide whether to lie or tell the truth to the FBI about her e-mail and official business. This puts them in a position of choosing between being honest about those emails, or lying to the FBI, which is a crime,  said Matthew G. Whitaker, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Iowa from 2004 to 2009. He is presently executive director of the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust (FACT) in Washington, D.C.Federal agents are preparing to schedule interviews with Clinton s  longtime and closest aides  about her use of the private email and server throughout her tenure as the nation s chief diplomat from 2009 to 2013, the Los Angeles Times reported Monday.Despite Clinton s repeated denial she ever sent or received classified information via her private email, federal investigators said more than 2,000 of the 55,000 pages of emails she turned over to the Department of State did include classified material. More than 20 of those emails contained information so sensitive and classified members of Congress were not allowed to read them.Whitaker s group made public its list of what it judges to be the  top 10 most ethically challenged Hillary emails  March 10, 2016:Nepotism: Clinton intervened Aug. 22, 2012, on behalf of her son-in-law, Marc Mezvinsky, in an effort to secure State Department assistance for one of his business associates with ties to a Clinton Foundation donor. FACT filed a complaint with the U.S. Office of Government Ethics on this issue. Favoring Insiders: Clinton  impressed  billionaire donor George Soros with his easy access to her, according to a May 12, 2012, email to her from Neera Tanden, veteran Clinton adviser and president of the liberal think tank Center for American Progress. Above The Law: Clinton told aide Jake Sullivan in a June 17, 2011, email to disregard classification security regulations and send information for a speech via a non-secure email system, which forced the aide to either break the law or disobey an order. Special Interests: In a July 26, 2010, email exchange with Clinton, Sullivan forwarded a message from Jeffrey Farrow, an influential lobbyist for a Pacific island government. The exchange  raises red flags about whether Farrow had made  requests,  according to FACT. Selling Access: A Dec. 10, 2009, email discussed attempts by Clinton campaign and foundation donor Brian Greenspun to set up a meeting between Clinton and a top Israeli official who had  been trying to meet with [Clinton] to no avail.  The email suggests certain campaign and foundation donors had a privileged  back door  to Clinton. Conflicts Of Interest: Clinton pushed for the State Department to work with the Clinton Foundation and the Red Cross on a project in Haiti. The Jan. 19, 2010, email from Clinton to Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills indicates a clear conflict of interest, according to FACT. Helping Political Allies: Mark Penn, Clinton s 2008 presidential campaign pollster and long-time political adviser, complained about not having timely access on a corporate event in China. His complaints were apparently resolved after a Feb. 22, 2010, email from Clinton aide Kris Balderston that set up a telephone call with Clinton. Trading Favors: Barely a week after the Penn complaint, Balderston reported in a March 2 email to Clinton that major corporations, including Boeing, CITI and Blackstone, agreed to provide financial support for the event.  Even the appearance of this sort of favor trading, involving the public, private and political sectors, is a bad ethics practice,  according to FACT. Abuse Of Position: A Sept. 15, 2011, email forwarded to Clinton, Sullivan and aide Huma Abedin listed multiple State Department officials attending the Clinton Foundation Global Initiative conference despite having  no official role.  Robert Hormats, a department official, was also a speaker at a dinner co-hosted by the Goldman Sachs Wall Street investment firm that later paid Clinton $675,000 for three speeches. The dinner focused on investing in women, Clinton s favorite Clinton Foundation project. Duping Obama: In a Sept. 20, 2011, email to Clinton, Mills forwarded a draft of President Barack Obama s planned remarks to the Clinton Foundation Global Initiative. FACT contends that  Clinton doesn t appear to have routinely received copies of the President s draft speeches, and it sends bad ethical signals to treat a speech given to her family s organization differently. Read more: biz pacpolitics
top ten most ethically challenged clinton party hillary clinton aides need decide whether lie tell truth fbi official business this puts position choosing honest emails lying fbi crime said matthew whitaker attorney southern district iowa he presently executive director foundation accountability civic trust fact washington agents preparing schedule interviews clinton longtime closest aides use private email server throughout tenure nation chief diplomat los angeles times reported clinton repeated denial ever sent received classified information via private email federal investigators said pages emails turned department state include classified material more emails contained information sensitive classified members congress allowed read group made public list judges top ethically challenged hillary emails march nepotism clinton intervened behalf marc mezvinsky effort secure state department assistance one business associates ties clinton foundation donor fact filed complaint office government ethics issue favoring insiders clinton impressed billionaire donor george sorts easy access according may email need tandem veteran clinton adviser president liberal think tank center american progress above the law clinton told aide jake sullivan june email disregard classification security regulations send information speech via email system forced aide either break law disney order special interests in july email exchange clinton sullivan forwarded message jeffrey narrow influential lobbyist pacific island government the exchange raises red flags whether narrow made requests according fact selling access a email discussed attempts clinton campaign foundation donor brian greenspun set meeting clinton top israeli official trying meet clinton avail the email suggests certain campaign foundation donors privileged back door clinton conflicts of interest clinton pushed state department work clinton foundation red cross project haiti the email clinton chief staff cheryl mills indicates clear conflict interest according fact helping political allies mark penn clinton presidential campaign poster political adviser complained timely access corporate event china his complaints apparently resolved email clinton aide kris balderston set telephone call clinton trading favors barely week penn complaint balderston reported march email clinton major corporations including boeing city blackstone agreed provide financial support event even appearance sort favor trading involving public private political sectors bad ethics practice according fact abuse of position a email forwarded clinton sullivan aide human begin listed multiple state department officials attending clinton foundation global initiative conference despite official role robert formats department official also speaker dinner goldman sachs wall street investment firm later paid clinton three speeches the dinner focused investing women clinton favorite clinton foundation project during obama in email clinton mills forwarded draft president barack obama planned remarks clinton foundation global initiative fact contends clinton appear routinely received copies president draft speeches sends bad ethical signals treat speech given family organization differently read biz abpolitics
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: TOP TEN Most “Ethically Challenged” Clinton E-mailsThe party s over or is it? Hillary Clinton and her aides will need to decide whether to lie or tell the truth to the FBI about her e-mail and official business. This puts them in a position of choosing between being honest about those emails, or lying to the FBI, which is a crime,  said Matthew G. Whitaker, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Iowa from 2004 to 2009. He is presently executive director of the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust (FACT) in Washington, D.C.Federal agents are preparing to schedule interviews with Clinton s  longtime and closest aides  about her use of the private email and server throughout her tenure as the nation s chief diplomat from 2009 to 2013, the Los Angeles Times reported Monday.Despite Clinton s repeated denial she ever sent or received classified information via her private email, federal investigators said more than 2,000 of the 55,000 pages of emails she turned over to the Department of State did include classified material. More than 20 of those emails contained information so sensitive and classified members of Congress were not allowed to read them.Whitaker s group made public its list of what it judges to be the  top 10 most ethically challenged Hillary emails  March 10, 2016:Nepotism: Clinton intervened Aug. 22, 2012, on behalf of her son-in-law, Marc Mezvinsky, in an effort to secure State Department assistance for one of his business associates with ties to a Clinton Foundation donor. FACT filed a complaint with the U.S. Office of Government Ethics on this issue. Favoring Insiders: Clinton  impressed  billionaire donor George Soros with his easy access to her, according to a May 12, 2012, email to her from Neera Tanden, veteran Clinton adviser and president of the liberal think tank Center for American Progress. Above The Law: Clinton told aide Jake Sullivan in a June 17, 2011, email to disregard classification security regulations and send information for a speech via a non-secure email system, which forced the aide to either break the law or disobey an order. Special Interests: In a July 26, 2010, email exchange with Clinton, Sullivan forwarded a message from Jeffrey Farrow, an influential lobbyist for a Pacific island government. The exchange  raises red flags about whether Farrow had made  requests,  according to FACT. Selling Access: A Dec. 10, 2009, email discussed attempts by Clinton campaign and foundation donor Brian Greenspun to set up a meeting between Clinton and a top Israeli official who had  been trying to meet with [Clinton] to no avail.  The email suggests certain campaign and foundation donors had a privileged  back door  to Clinton. Conflicts Of Interest: Clinton pushed for the State Department to work with the Clinton Foundation and the Red Cross on a project in Haiti. The Jan. 19, 2010, email from Clinton to Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills indicates a clear conflict of interest, according to FACT. Helping Political Allies: Mark Penn, Clinton s 2008 presidential campaign pollster and long-time political adviser, complained about not having timely access on a corporate event in China. His complaints were apparently resolved after a Feb. 22, 2010, email from Clinton aide Kris Balderston that set up a telephone call with Clinton. Trading Favors: Barely a week after the Penn complaint, Balderston reported in a March 2 email to Clinton that major corporations, including Boeing, CITI and Blackstone, agreed to provide financial support for the event.  Even the appearance of this sort of favor trading, involving the public, private and political sectors, is a bad ethics practice,  according to FACT. Abuse Of Position: A Sept. 15, 2011, email forwarded to Clinton, Sullivan and aide Huma Abedin listed multiple State Department officials attending the Clinton Foundation Global Initiative conference despite having  no official role.  Robert Hormats, a department official, was also a speaker at a dinner co-hosted by the Goldman Sachs Wall Street investment firm that later paid Clinton $675,000 for three speeches. The dinner focused on investing in women, Clinton s favorite Clinton Foundation project. Duping Obama: In a Sept. 20, 2011, email to Clinton, Mills forwarded a draft of President Barack Obama s planned remarks to the Clinton Foundation Global Initiative. FACT contends that  Clinton doesn t appear to have routinely received copies of the President s draft speeches, and it sends bad ethical signals to treat a speech given to her family s organization differently. Read more: biz pacpolitics
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: top ten most ethically challenged clinton party hillary clinton aides need decide whether lie tell truth fbi official business this puts position choosing honest emails lying fbi crime said matthew whitaker attorney southern district iowa he presently executive director foundation accountability civic trust fact washington agents preparing schedule interviews clinton longtime closest aides use private email server throughout tenure nation chief diplomat los angeles times reported clinton repeated denial ever sent received classified information via private email federal investigators said pages emails turned department state include classified material more emails contained information sensitive classified members congress allowed read group made public list judges top ethically challenged hillary emails march nepotism clinton intervened behalf marc mezvinsky effort secure state department assistance one business associates ties clinton foundation donor fact filed complaint office government ethics issue favoring insiders clinton impressed billionaire donor george sorts easy access according may email need tandem veteran clinton adviser president liberal think tank center american progress above the law clinton told aide jake sullivan june email disregard classification security regulations send information speech via email system forced aide either break law disney order special interests in july email exchange clinton sullivan forwarded message jeffrey narrow influential lobbyist pacific island government the exchange raises red flags whether narrow made requests according fact selling access a email discussed attempts clinton campaign foundation donor brian greenspun set meeting clinton top israeli official trying meet clinton avail the email suggests certain campaign foundation donors privileged back door clinton conflicts of interest clinton pushed state department work clinton foundation red cross project haiti the email clinton chief staff cheryl mills indicates clear conflict interest according fact helping political allies mark penn clinton presidential campaign poster political adviser complained timely access corporate event china his complaints apparently resolved email clinton aide kris balderston set telephone call clinton trading favors barely week penn complaint balderston reported march email clinton major corporations including boeing city blackstone agreed provide financial support event even appearance sort favor trading involving public private political sectors bad ethics practice according fact abuse of position a email forwarded clinton sullivan aide human begin listed multiple state department officials attending clinton foundation global initiative conference despite official role robert formats department official also speaker dinner goldman sachs wall street investment firm later paid clinton three speeches the dinner focused investing women clinton favorite clinton foundation project during obama in email clinton mills forwarded draft president barack obama planned remarks clinton foundation global initiative fact contends clinton appear routinely received copies president draft speeches sends bad ethical signals treat speech given family organization differently read biz abpolitics