WHY OBAMA’S LAWSUIT AGAINST NC Is Really About The Jack-Boot Of Government On America’s ThroatsObama is clearly attempting to strip Americans of our right to express our opinions on social issues based on our religion or morals. Americans have found themselves in a scary place, where we are remaining silent when we know we should be speaking out, because we re afraid of being shamed by the progressive Left. Meanwhile the Left continues to blur the lines of morality, hoping that they will erase all individual thought and speech.In a communist society, the individual s best interests are indistinguishable from the society s best interest. Thus, the idea of an individual freedom is incompatible with a communist ideology. The only reason to hold individual speech and information rights would be to better the society. Some of us care little about the debate over public bathrooms. We do, however, care about the ongoing destruction of federalism, individual choice, and good-faith debate.One reliable way to quash dissent and force moral codes on others is to liken your cause to that of the civil rights fight. Every liberal issue is situated somewhere on the great historical arc of  equality  and  justice.  If a person stands against even one of these causes which were once great but are increasingly trivial they have, according to the cultural imperialists of the Obama administration, aligned themselves with the Klan. Literally.After U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch announced that the Department of Justice had filed a federal lawsuit to stop North Carolina from passing a  controversial law this is the go-to characterization of conservative bills that pass with healthy majorities requiring transgender people to use public bathrooms matching their birth certificate, she had this to say:This is not the first time that we have seen discriminatory responses to historic moments of progress for our nation. We saw it in the Jim Crow laws that followed the Emancipation Proclamation; we saw it in the fierce and widespread resistance to Brown v. Board of Education; and we saw it in the proliferation of state bans on same-sex unions that were intended to stifle any hope that gay and lesbian Americans might one day be afforded the right to marry.Likening a spat over biologically segregated boy/girl bathrooms to the genuine, violent, systematic, state-sponsored, society-wide bigotry that took place in this country for a century is both intellectually and morally corrupt. It s not all a continuum. Yet this administration peddles these kinds of risible comparisons in the cause of self-aggrandizement all the time. Hans Fiene has coined it Selma envy.The present situation is significantly different, and in every possible sense less dire. It is the sort of social problem generally worked out amongst people in this country without unelected civil rights commissions punishing business owners for thought crimes. Under North Carolina s law no one was stopping a private company or coffee shop or big box store from having any kind of bathroom set-up they desire. I m pretty sure most voters don t comprehend this fact when they hear the distorted coverage of these laws in the news.North Carolina and other states have preemptively moved forward with these kinds to bills to head off the state redefining gender. Too late. The fact is that the federal government can simply announce that a man can be a woman and vice versa if they choose. It then compels everyone in country to accept this reality. Yet there is no government definition of what transgendered means, other self-identification, which can mean anything.  Civil Rights  Division Chief Vanita Gupta says:  Transgender men are men.   Transgender women are women.  So sayeth Vanita Gupta, so sayeth we all. Or else. And now 300 million people have adhere to the Obama administration s relativistic notions about nature and gender.Now, from what I can gather the central anxiety of many people is not that the transgendered will take advantage of their children, but that any man can simply declare himself a woman, put on a wig, and go into a public bathroom. Maybe it s an irrational fear, maybe it s not. As a father who s had to send young daughters into busy public bathrooms, I know one thing for sure: I could not care less what Vanita Gupta has to say on the topic.In a broader sense, the suit is symbolic of the federal government s eight-year crusade to decimate any semblance of federalism and streamline progressive morality. The administration ignores state laws that conflict with federal policy when it approves and it sues states when it does not. States that pass law enforcement bills President Obama finds unsatisfactory will see the full force of the Justice Department come down on them. Those with drug legalization laws and immigration laws he does like, even if they conflict with federal law, have nothing to worry about. Whether one agrees in theory with these moves and I am liberal on drug legalization and immigration allowing Washington to selectively enforce law conflicts with the kind of republicanism that allows us to be diverse and deal with unique problems locally.For entire story: The Federalistleft-news
why obama s lawsuit against nc is really about the of government on america throatsobama clearly attempting strip americans right express opinions social issues based religion morals americans found scary place remaining silent know speaking afraid shared progressive left meanwhile left continues blur lines morality hoping erase individual thought communist society individual best interests indistinguishable society best interest thus idea individual freedom incompatible communist ideology the reason hold individual speech information rights would better society some us care little debate public bathrooms we however care ongoing destruction federalism individual choice reliable way squash dissent force moral codes others like cause civil rights fight every liberal issue situated somewhere great historical arc equality justice if person stands even one causes great increasingly trivial according cultural imperialist obama administration aligned plan attorney general rosetta lynch announced department justice filed federal lawsuit stop north carolina passing controversial law characterization conservative bills pass healthy majorities requiring transgender people use public bathrooms matching birth certificate say this first time seen discriminatory responses historic moments progress nation we saw jim crow laws followed emancipation proclamation saw fierce widespread resistance brown board education saw proliferation state bans unions intended stifle hope gay lesbian americans might one day afforded right spat biologically segregated bathrooms genuine violent systematic bigotry took place country century intellectually morally corrupt it continuum yet administration peoples kinds visible comparisons cause time hans fine coined seems present situation significantly different every possible sense less dire it sort social problem generally worked amongst people country without unelected civil rights commissions punishing business owners thought crimes under north carolina law one stopping private company coffee shop big box store kind bathroom desire i pretty sure voters comprehend fact hear distorted coverage laws carolina states preemptive moved forward kinds bills head state redefining gender too late the fact federal government simply announce man woman vice versa choose it compel everyone country accept reality yet government definition transgender means mean anything civil rights division chief vanity gupta says transgender men men transgender women women so safety vanity gupta safety or else and million people adhere obama administration relativistic notions nature i gather central anxiety many people transgender take advantage children man simply declare woman put wig go public bathroom maybe irrational fear maybe as father send young daughters busy public bathrooms i know one thing sure i could care less vanity gupta say broader sense suit symbolic federal government crusade decimated semblance federalism streamline progressive morality the administration ignores state laws conflict federal policy approves sues states states pass law enforcement bills president obama finds unsatisfactory see full force justice department come those drug legalization laws immigration laws like even conflict federal law nothing worry whether one agrees theory moves i liberal drug legalization immigration allowing washington selectively enforce law conflicts kind republicanism allows us diverse deal unique problems entire story the
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: WHY OBAMA’S LAWSUIT AGAINST NC Is Really About The Jack-Boot Of Government On America’s ThroatsObama is clearly attempting to strip Americans of our right to express our opinions on social issues based on our religion or morals. Americans have found themselves in a scary place, where we are remaining silent when we know we should be speaking out, because we re afraid of being shamed by the progressive Left. Meanwhile the Left continues to blur the lines of morality, hoping that they will erase all individual thought and speech.In a communist society, the individual s best interests are indistinguishable from the society s best interest. Thus, the idea of an individual freedom is incompatible with a communist ideology. The only reason to hold individual speech and information rights would be to better the society. Some of us care little about the debate over public bathrooms. We do, however, care about the ongoing destruction of federalism, individual choice, and good-faith debate.One reliable way to quash dissent and force moral codes on others is to liken your cause to that of the civil rights fight. Every liberal issue is situated somewhere on the great historical arc of  equality  and  justice.  If a person stands against even one of these causes which were once great but are increasingly trivial they have, according to the cultural imperialists of the Obama administration, aligned themselves with the Klan. Literally.After U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch announced that the Department of Justice had filed a federal lawsuit to stop North Carolina from passing a  controversial law this is the go-to characterization of conservative bills that pass with healthy majorities requiring transgender people to use public bathrooms matching their birth certificate, she had this to say:This is not the first time that we have seen discriminatory responses to historic moments of progress for our nation. We saw it in the Jim Crow laws that followed the Emancipation Proclamation; we saw it in the fierce and widespread resistance to Brown v. Board of Education; and we saw it in the proliferation of state bans on same-sex unions that were intended to stifle any hope that gay and lesbian Americans might one day be afforded the right to marry.Likening a spat over biologically segregated boy/girl bathrooms to the genuine, violent, systematic, state-sponsored, society-wide bigotry that took place in this country for a century is both intellectually and morally corrupt. It s not all a continuum. Yet this administration peddles these kinds of risible comparisons in the cause of self-aggrandizement all the time. Hans Fiene has coined it Selma envy.The present situation is significantly different, and in every possible sense less dire. It is the sort of social problem generally worked out amongst people in this country without unelected civil rights commissions punishing business owners for thought crimes. Under North Carolina s law no one was stopping a private company or coffee shop or big box store from having any kind of bathroom set-up they desire. I m pretty sure most voters don t comprehend this fact when they hear the distorted coverage of these laws in the news.North Carolina and other states have preemptively moved forward with these kinds to bills to head off the state redefining gender. Too late. The fact is that the federal government can simply announce that a man can be a woman and vice versa if they choose. It then compels everyone in country to accept this reality. Yet there is no government definition of what transgendered means, other self-identification, which can mean anything.  Civil Rights  Division Chief Vanita Gupta says:  Transgender men are men.   Transgender women are women.  So sayeth Vanita Gupta, so sayeth we all. Or else. And now 300 million people have adhere to the Obama administration s relativistic notions about nature and gender.Now, from what I can gather the central anxiety of many people is not that the transgendered will take advantage of their children, but that any man can simply declare himself a woman, put on a wig, and go into a public bathroom. Maybe it s an irrational fear, maybe it s not. As a father who s had to send young daughters into busy public bathrooms, I know one thing for sure: I could not care less what Vanita Gupta has to say on the topic.In a broader sense, the suit is symbolic of the federal government s eight-year crusade to decimate any semblance of federalism and streamline progressive morality. The administration ignores state laws that conflict with federal policy when it approves and it sues states when it does not. States that pass law enforcement bills President Obama finds unsatisfactory will see the full force of the Justice Department come down on them. Those with drug legalization laws and immigration laws he does like, even if they conflict with federal law, have nothing to worry about. Whether one agrees in theory with these moves and I am liberal on drug legalization and immigration allowing Washington to selectively enforce law conflicts with the kind of republicanism that allows us to be diverse and deal with unique problems locally.For entire story: The Federalistleft-news
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: why obama s lawsuit against nc is really about the of government on america throatsobama clearly attempting strip americans right express opinions social issues based religion morals americans found scary place remaining silent know speaking afraid shared progressive left meanwhile left continues blur lines morality hoping erase individual thought communist society individual best interests indistinguishable society best interest thus idea individual freedom incompatible communist ideology the reason hold individual speech information rights would better society some us care little debate public bathrooms we however care ongoing destruction federalism individual choice reliable way squash dissent force moral codes others like cause civil rights fight every liberal issue situated somewhere great historical arc equality justice if person stands even one causes great increasingly trivial according cultural imperialist obama administration aligned plan attorney general rosetta lynch announced department justice filed federal lawsuit stop north carolina passing controversial law characterization conservative bills pass healthy majorities requiring transgender people use public bathrooms matching birth certificate say this first time seen discriminatory responses historic moments progress nation we saw jim crow laws followed emancipation proclamation saw fierce widespread resistance brown board education saw proliferation state bans unions intended stifle hope gay lesbian americans might one day afforded right spat biologically segregated bathrooms genuine violent systematic bigotry took place country century intellectually morally corrupt it continuum yet administration peoples kinds visible comparisons cause time hans fine coined seems present situation significantly different every possible sense less dire it sort social problem generally worked amongst people country without unelected civil rights commissions punishing business owners thought crimes under north carolina law one stopping private company coffee shop big box store kind bathroom desire i pretty sure voters comprehend fact hear distorted coverage laws carolina states preemptive moved forward kinds bills head state redefining gender too late the fact federal government simply announce man woman vice versa choose it compel everyone country accept reality yet government definition transgender means mean anything civil rights division chief vanity gupta says transgender men men transgender women women so safety vanity gupta safety or else and million people adhere obama administration relativistic notions nature i gather central anxiety many people transgender take advantage children man simply declare woman put wig go public bathroom maybe irrational fear maybe as father send young daughters busy public bathrooms i know one thing sure i could care less vanity gupta say broader sense suit symbolic federal government crusade decimated semblance federalism streamline progressive morality the administration ignores state laws conflict federal policy approves sues states states pass law enforcement bills president obama finds unsatisfactory see full force justice department come those drug legalization laws immigration laws like even conflict federal law nothing worry whether one agrees theory moves i liberal drug legalization immigration allowing washington selectively enforce law conflicts kind republicanism allows us diverse deal unique problems entire story the