Court hearing on Trump travel ban draws more than 2.6 million listeners(Reuters) - More than 2.6 million people tuned into cable TV or went online to hear dramatic audio-only coverage of a federal appeals court hearing on U.S. President Donald Trump’s temporary travel ban on people from seven Muslim-majority countries and refugees. For more than an hour, people around the United States listened to arguments from attorneys for the U.S. government and Washington state, which sued to challenge Trump’s executive order imposing the ban. For those using their TVs to hear the coverage, there were also simple graphics and photos. Others listened to streaming online audio. The three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco pressed the government’s attorney on the lawfulness of Trump’s Jan. 27 order, which triggered chaos and protests at U.S. airports and oversea. The order barred travelers from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen from entering the country for 90 days and all refugees for 120 days. It banned refugees from Syria indefinitely.  The Republican president, who took office on Jan. 20, has defended the measure as necessary to protect Americans. Critics said it discriminated against Muslims and violated the U.S. Constitution. Last Friday, a federal judge in Seattle suspended the executive order. Many travelers who had been waylaid by the ban quickly moved to travel to the United States while it was in limbo.  The government appealed the decision, and the San Francisco judges heard arguments in the case on Tuesday night.  All three major U.S. cable news networks aired either parts of or the entire hearing, which ran from 6 p.m. to 7:15 p.m. EST. Only the audio was available because the hearing was conducted via conference call.  More than 2.5 million people combined tuned in on CNN or MSNBC, while another 3 million listened to segments of the hearing on Fox News, according to Nielsen data provided by Fox News. As many as 137,000 people listened to the court’s live feed of the session, said David Madden, assistant circuit executive for the 9th Circuit.  The lack of visuals did not scare away those interested - and even led some to liken the experience to huddling around a radio in the pre-TV era. “@CNN this is television gold. Reminds me of when I was grounded and had to listen to the radio. #WAvTrump #9thCircuit,” Jon Eekhoff (@joneekhoff) said on Twitter. Madden was surprised by the amount of interest in the hearing, “but I think the court was prepared for it,” he said by email.  As lawyers grappled with questions from the judges, law experts and academics, including Harvard Law School Professor Laurence Tribe, provided the kind of play-by-play commentary generally reserved for major sporting events.  The ability of the public to listen to the hearings was particularly important given Trump’s questioning of the judges as “so political” and the hearing as “disgraceful,” Tribe said. “It was a moment for an important kind of civic education and public engagement in the process of government,” Tribe said. politicsNews
court hearing trump travel ban draws million listeners reuters more million people tuned cable tv went online hear dramatic coverage federal appeals court hearing president donald trump temporary travel ban people seven countries refugees for hour people around united states listened arguments attorneys government washington state sued challenge trump executive order imposing ban for using tvs hear coverage also simple graphics photos others listened streaming online audio the panel circuit court appeals san francisco pressed government attorney lawfulness trump order triggered chaos protests airports overseas the order barred travelers iran iraq libya somalia sudan syria yemen entering country days refugees days it banned refugees syria indefinitely the republican president took office defended measure necessary protect americans critics said discriminated muslims violated constitution last friday federal judge seattle suspended executive order many travelers wayward ban quickly moved travel united states limbo the government appealed decision san francisco judges heard arguments case tuesday night all three major cable news networks aired either parts entire hearing ran est only audio available hearing conducted via conference call more million people combined tuned cnn msnbc another million listened segments hearing fox news according nielsen data provided fox news as many people listened court live feed session said david madden assistant circuit executive circuit the lack visuals scare away interested even led like experience handling around radio era cnn television gold reminds i grounded listen radio wavtrump jon eekhoff joneekhoff said twitter madden surprised amount interest hearing i think court prepared said email as lawyers trapped questions judges law experts academics including harvard law school professor lawrence tribe provided kind commentary generally reserved major sporting events the ability public listen hearings particularly important given trump questioning judges political hearing disgraceful tribe said it moment important kind civic education public engagement process government tribe said politicsnews
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: Court hearing on Trump travel ban draws more than 2.6 million listeners(Reuters) - More than 2.6 million people tuned into cable TV or went online to hear dramatic audio-only coverage of a federal appeals court hearing on U.S. President Donald Trump’s temporary travel ban on people from seven Muslim-majority countries and refugees. For more than an hour, people around the United States listened to arguments from attorneys for the U.S. government and Washington state, which sued to challenge Trump’s executive order imposing the ban. For those using their TVs to hear the coverage, there were also simple graphics and photos. Others listened to streaming online audio. The three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco pressed the government’s attorney on the lawfulness of Trump’s Jan. 27 order, which triggered chaos and protests at U.S. airports and oversea. The order barred travelers from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen from entering the country for 90 days and all refugees for 120 days. It banned refugees from Syria indefinitely.  The Republican president, who took office on Jan. 20, has defended the measure as necessary to protect Americans. Critics said it discriminated against Muslims and violated the U.S. Constitution. Last Friday, a federal judge in Seattle suspended the executive order. Many travelers who had been waylaid by the ban quickly moved to travel to the United States while it was in limbo.  The government appealed the decision, and the San Francisco judges heard arguments in the case on Tuesday night.  All three major U.S. cable news networks aired either parts of or the entire hearing, which ran from 6 p.m. to 7:15 p.m. EST. Only the audio was available because the hearing was conducted via conference call.  More than 2.5 million people combined tuned in on CNN or MSNBC, while another 3 million listened to segments of the hearing on Fox News, according to Nielsen data provided by Fox News. As many as 137,000 people listened to the court’s live feed of the session, said David Madden, assistant circuit executive for the 9th Circuit.  The lack of visuals did not scare away those interested - and even led some to liken the experience to huddling around a radio in the pre-TV era. “@CNN this is television gold. Reminds me of when I was grounded and had to listen to the radio. #WAvTrump #9thCircuit,” Jon Eekhoff (@joneekhoff) said on Twitter. Madden was surprised by the amount of interest in the hearing, “but I think the court was prepared for it,” he said by email.  As lawyers grappled with questions from the judges, law experts and academics, including Harvard Law School Professor Laurence Tribe, provided the kind of play-by-play commentary generally reserved for major sporting events.  The ability of the public to listen to the hearings was particularly important given Trump’s questioning of the judges as “so political” and the hearing as “disgraceful,” Tribe said. “It was a moment for an important kind of civic education and public engagement in the process of government,” Tribe said. politicsNews
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: court hearing trump travel ban draws million listeners reuters more million people tuned cable tv went online hear dramatic coverage federal appeals court hearing president donald trump temporary travel ban people seven countries refugees for hour people around united states listened arguments attorneys government washington state sued challenge trump executive order imposing ban for using tvs hear coverage also simple graphics photos others listened streaming online audio the panel circuit court appeals san francisco pressed government attorney lawfulness trump order triggered chaos protests airports overseas the order barred travelers iran iraq libya somalia sudan syria yemen entering country days refugees days it banned refugees syria indefinitely the republican president took office defended measure necessary protect americans critics said discriminated muslims violated constitution last friday federal judge seattle suspended executive order many travelers wayward ban quickly moved travel united states limbo the government appealed decision san francisco judges heard arguments case tuesday night all three major cable news networks aired either parts entire hearing ran est only audio available hearing conducted via conference call more million people combined tuned cnn msnbc another million listened segments hearing fox news according nielsen data provided fox news as many people listened court live feed session said david madden assistant circuit executive circuit the lack visuals scare away interested even led like experience handling around radio era cnn television gold reminds i grounded listen radio wavtrump jon eekhoff joneekhoff said twitter madden surprised amount interest hearing i think court prepared said email as lawyers trapped questions judges law experts academics including harvard law school professor lawrence tribe provided kind commentary generally reserved major sporting events the ability public listen hearings particularly important given trump questioning judges political hearing disgraceful tribe said it moment important kind civic education public engagement process government tribe said politicsnews