GREEN PARTY DOLT Struggles To Explain Wisconsin Election Recount [Video]IAN JACKSON: People have been slightly concerned about the trail and as your last guest pointed out it s very decentralized.ED HENRYY: Uh-huh. When you say  slightly concerned,  that doesn t sound to me like there s widespread allegations or more importantly evidence of some sort of fraud. So is this giving Jill Stein supporters some sort of false hope?JACKSON: Well, I [pause] there s we re [pause] trying to find what the count is and [pause] I m not sure it s false hope. It s trying to find the truth behind the numbers. There has been these allegations by computer scientists but as your last guest pointed out, it was using different systems and using that, being engineers, um, I m a software engineer and we like our little [pause] models, but unless you actually count and check it, you don t know whether it s just a thoughy well, they used something different or if there s something to it.And you mentioned your show is all about finding truth.HENRY: Let s find that truth. My next question is, our last guest, who you cited several times, Craig Gilbert, also said, accurately, that in 2000 and 2004 the margin was even closer in the presidential race and there was no recount. So what s your case tonight?JACKSON: [pause] Well, the case [pause] tonight, you can see that there that was [pause] a real contentious election [pause], and, based on that there are people that have expressed concerns. So, it s best to find the truth and go through the process. And obviously people have been willing to put up millions of dollars [pause] to find out and count the ballots again.HENRY: Okay, so final question: if you really want to get at the truth can we get at another truth which is that it appears that Jill Stein has raised about $5 million for a recount that may or may not happen for fraud that may or may not have happened. If there s nothing found here and if there s not even a recount will you pledge tonight that you and others in the Green Party believe that that money should be refunded, so this is not just money being raised on false hope?JACKSON: Well, we re exploring that I m only treasurer for the Green-Rainbow party. We re certainly going   if it doesn t get used, we re certainly going to discuss with our donors what their desire is for that money. politics
green party dot struggles to explain wisconsin election recount video ian jackson people slightly concerned trail last guest pointed henry when say slightly concerned sound like widespread allegations importantly evidence sort fraud so giving jill stein supporters sort false hope jackson well i pause pause trying find count pause i sure false hope it trying find truth behind numbers there allegations computer scientists last guest pointed using different systems using engineers um i software engineer like little pause models unless actually count check know whether though well used something different something mentioned show finding let find truth my next question last guest cited several times craig gilbert also said accurately margin even closer presidential race recount so case tonight jackson pause well case pause tonight see pause real contentious election pause based people expressed concerns so best find truth go process and obviously people willing put millions dollars pause find count ballots okay final question really want get truth get another truth appears jill stein raised million recount may may happen fraud may may happened if nothing found even recount pledge tonight others green party believe money refused money raised false hope jackson well exploring i treasurer party we certainly going get used certainly going discuss donors desire money politics
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: GREEN PARTY DOLT Struggles To Explain Wisconsin Election Recount [Video]IAN JACKSON: People have been slightly concerned about the trail and as your last guest pointed out it s very decentralized.ED HENRYY: Uh-huh. When you say  slightly concerned,  that doesn t sound to me like there s widespread allegations or more importantly evidence of some sort of fraud. So is this giving Jill Stein supporters some sort of false hope?JACKSON: Well, I [pause] there s we re [pause] trying to find what the count is and [pause] I m not sure it s false hope. It s trying to find the truth behind the numbers. There has been these allegations by computer scientists but as your last guest pointed out, it was using different systems and using that, being engineers, um, I m a software engineer and we like our little [pause] models, but unless you actually count and check it, you don t know whether it s just a thoughy well, they used something different or if there s something to it.And you mentioned your show is all about finding truth.HENRY: Let s find that truth. My next question is, our last guest, who you cited several times, Craig Gilbert, also said, accurately, that in 2000 and 2004 the margin was even closer in the presidential race and there was no recount. So what s your case tonight?JACKSON: [pause] Well, the case [pause] tonight, you can see that there that was [pause] a real contentious election [pause], and, based on that there are people that have expressed concerns. So, it s best to find the truth and go through the process. And obviously people have been willing to put up millions of dollars [pause] to find out and count the ballots again.HENRY: Okay, so final question: if you really want to get at the truth can we get at another truth which is that it appears that Jill Stein has raised about $5 million for a recount that may or may not happen for fraud that may or may not have happened. If there s nothing found here and if there s not even a recount will you pledge tonight that you and others in the Green Party believe that that money should be refunded, so this is not just money being raised on false hope?JACKSON: Well, we re exploring that I m only treasurer for the Green-Rainbow party. We re certainly going   if it doesn t get used, we re certainly going to discuss with our donors what their desire is for that money. politics
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: green party dot struggles to explain wisconsin election recount video ian jackson people slightly concerned trail last guest pointed henry when say slightly concerned sound like widespread allegations importantly evidence sort fraud so giving jill stein supporters sort false hope jackson well i pause pause trying find count pause i sure false hope it trying find truth behind numbers there allegations computer scientists last guest pointed using different systems using engineers um i software engineer like little pause models unless actually count check know whether though well used something different something mentioned show finding let find truth my next question last guest cited several times craig gilbert also said accurately margin even closer presidential race recount so case tonight jackson pause well case pause tonight see pause real contentious election pause based people expressed concerns so best find truth go process and obviously people willing put millions dollars pause find count ballots okay final question really want get truth get another truth appears jill stein raised million recount may may happen fraud may may happened if nothing found even recount pledge tonight others green party believe money refused money raised false hope jackson well exploring i treasurer party we certainly going get used certainly going discuss donors desire money politics