LIST OF 24 REPUBLICANS Who Voted “YES” To KEEP Obama’s Taxpayer-Funded Sex-Change Surgeries In Place For Transgenders In MilitaryIf you re not okay with taxpayers paying for exorbitant medical costs, including transgender surgeries for military members, you ll want to remember these names in 2018 A majority in the House voted down a proposal to restrict funding for transgender members of the military, standing by social policy changes enacted by the Pentagon under former President Barack Obama.Rep. Vicky Hartzler, R-Mo., succeeded in forcing a vote, arguing that Obama s  transgender decision is costly in dollars and short on common sense.  The attempted rollback failed on a 209-214 vote, however, as 24 Republicans joined a unanimous Democratic caucus in opposing the proposal. The Obama transgender policy, which was implemented without input from members of Congress, is ill-conceived and contrary to our goals of increasing troop readiness and investing defense dollars into addressing budget shortfalls of the past,  Hartzler said in June.  By recruiting and allowing transgender individuals to serve in our military we are subjecting taxpayers to high medical costs including up to $130,000 per transition surgery, lifetime hormone treatments, and additional surgeries to address the high percentage of individuals who experience complications. Her amendment would have barred the Defense Department from  provid[ing] medical treatment (other than mental health treatment) related to gender transition  to members of the military. Proponents of transgender military service argued that her proposal  would reduce military readiness  by discouraging transgender Americans from serving. It would have a negative impact on morale, a negative impact on retention and move us away from the merit-based system which we now have, where we have one set of rules applied to everybody,  Rep. Jared Polis, D-Colo., who co-chairs the LGBT Equality Caucus, said Wednesday.Hartzler maintained that her amendment would increase readiness, however.  The deployability of individuals going through the sex transition process is highly problematic, requiring 210 to 238 work days where a soldier is non-deployable after surgery,  she said.  This recovery time equates to 1.4 million manpower days where transgender personnel cannot deploy and fight our nation s wars, therefore relying on an already stressed force to pick up the burden. It makes no sense to purposely recruit individuals who cannot serve.   Washington ExaminerHere s the list of 24 Republicans who voted to keep Obama s transgender policy for our military in place that was implemented without input from members of Congress:Justin Amash (Michigan)Jack Bergman (Michigan)Mike Coffman (Colorado)Barbara Comstock (Virginia)Paul Cook (California)Ryan Costello (Pennsylvania)Carlos Curbelo (Florida)Jeff Denham (California)Charlie Dent (Pennsylvania)John Faso (New York)Brian Fitzpatrick (Pennsylvania)Darrell Issa (California)John Katko (New York)Steve Knight (California)Leonard Lance (New Jersey)Frank LoBiondo (New Jersey)Tom MacArthur (New Jersey)Brian Mast (Florida)Tom Reed (New York)Dave Reichert (Washington)Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (Florida)Bill Shuster (Pennsylvania)Elise Stefanik (New York)Claudia Tenney (New York)h/t Truth Divisionpolitics
list of republicans who voted yes to keep obama surgeries in place for transgender in military okay taxpayers paying exorbitant medical costs including transgender surgeries military members want remember names a majority house voted proposal restrict funding transgender members military standing social policy changes enacted pentagon former president barack ricky hartzler succeeded forcing vote arguing obama transgender decision costly dollars short common sense the attempted rollback failed vote however republicans joined unanimous democratic caucus opposing proposal the obama transgender policy implemented without input members congress contrary goals increasing troop readiness investing defense dollars addressing budget shortfall past hartzler said june by recruiting allowing transgender individuals serve military subjective taxpayers high medical costs including per transition surgery lifetime hormone treatments additional surgeries address high percentage individuals experience complications her amendment would barred defense department provide ing medical treatment mental health treatment related gender transition members military proponents transgender military service argued proposal would reduce military readiness discouraging transgender americans serving it would negative impact morale negative impact retention move us away system one set rules applied everybody jared polis lgbt equality caucus said maintained amendment would increase readiness however the deployability individuals going sex transition process highly problematic requiring work days soldier surgery said this recovery time equates million manpower days transgender personnel deploy fight nation wars therefore relying already stressed force pick burden it makes sense purposely recruit individuals serve washington examinerhere list republicans voted keep obama transgender policy military place implemented without input members congress justin smash michigan jack began michigan mike hoffman colorado barbara comstock virginia paul cook california ryan constell pennsylvania carlos curbelo florida jeff denial california charlie dent pennsylvania john faso new york brian fitzpatrick pennsylvania barrel issn california john ratio new york steve knight california leonard lance new jersey frank lobiondo new jersey tom macarthur new jersey brian mast florida tom reed new york dave richest washington clean florida bill shutter pennsylvania else stefan new york claudia tennis new york truth divisionpolitics
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: LIST OF 24 REPUBLICANS Who Voted “YES” To KEEP Obama’s Taxpayer-Funded Sex-Change Surgeries In Place For Transgenders In MilitaryIf you re not okay with taxpayers paying for exorbitant medical costs, including transgender surgeries for military members, you ll want to remember these names in 2018 A majority in the House voted down a proposal to restrict funding for transgender members of the military, standing by social policy changes enacted by the Pentagon under former President Barack Obama.Rep. Vicky Hartzler, R-Mo., succeeded in forcing a vote, arguing that Obama s  transgender decision is costly in dollars and short on common sense.  The attempted rollback failed on a 209-214 vote, however, as 24 Republicans joined a unanimous Democratic caucus in opposing the proposal. The Obama transgender policy, which was implemented without input from members of Congress, is ill-conceived and contrary to our goals of increasing troop readiness and investing defense dollars into addressing budget shortfalls of the past,  Hartzler said in June.  By recruiting and allowing transgender individuals to serve in our military we are subjecting taxpayers to high medical costs including up to $130,000 per transition surgery, lifetime hormone treatments, and additional surgeries to address the high percentage of individuals who experience complications. Her amendment would have barred the Defense Department from  provid[ing] medical treatment (other than mental health treatment) related to gender transition  to members of the military. Proponents of transgender military service argued that her proposal  would reduce military readiness  by discouraging transgender Americans from serving. It would have a negative impact on morale, a negative impact on retention and move us away from the merit-based system which we now have, where we have one set of rules applied to everybody,  Rep. Jared Polis, D-Colo., who co-chairs the LGBT Equality Caucus, said Wednesday.Hartzler maintained that her amendment would increase readiness, however.  The deployability of individuals going through the sex transition process is highly problematic, requiring 210 to 238 work days where a soldier is non-deployable after surgery,  she said.  This recovery time equates to 1.4 million manpower days where transgender personnel cannot deploy and fight our nation s wars, therefore relying on an already stressed force to pick up the burden. It makes no sense to purposely recruit individuals who cannot serve.   Washington ExaminerHere s the list of 24 Republicans who voted to keep Obama s transgender policy for our military in place that was implemented without input from members of Congress:Justin Amash (Michigan)Jack Bergman (Michigan)Mike Coffman (Colorado)Barbara Comstock (Virginia)Paul Cook (California)Ryan Costello (Pennsylvania)Carlos Curbelo (Florida)Jeff Denham (California)Charlie Dent (Pennsylvania)John Faso (New York)Brian Fitzpatrick (Pennsylvania)Darrell Issa (California)John Katko (New York)Steve Knight (California)Leonard Lance (New Jersey)Frank LoBiondo (New Jersey)Tom MacArthur (New Jersey)Brian Mast (Florida)Tom Reed (New York)Dave Reichert (Washington)Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (Florida)Bill Shuster (Pennsylvania)Elise Stefanik (New York)Claudia Tenney (New York)h/t Truth Divisionpolitics
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: list of republicans who voted yes to keep obama surgeries in place for transgender in military okay taxpayers paying exorbitant medical costs including transgender surgeries military members want remember names a majority house voted proposal restrict funding transgender members military standing social policy changes enacted pentagon former president barack ricky hartzler succeeded forcing vote arguing obama transgender decision costly dollars short common sense the attempted rollback failed vote however republicans joined unanimous democratic caucus opposing proposal the obama transgender policy implemented without input members congress contrary goals increasing troop readiness investing defense dollars addressing budget shortfall past hartzler said june by recruiting allowing transgender individuals serve military subjective taxpayers high medical costs including per transition surgery lifetime hormone treatments additional surgeries address high percentage individuals experience complications her amendment would barred defense department provide ing medical treatment mental health treatment related gender transition members military proponents transgender military service argued proposal would reduce military readiness discouraging transgender americans serving it would negative impact morale negative impact retention move us away system one set rules applied everybody jared polis lgbt equality caucus said maintained amendment would increase readiness however the deployability individuals going sex transition process highly problematic requiring work days soldier surgery said this recovery time equates million manpower days transgender personnel deploy fight nation wars therefore relying already stressed force pick burden it makes sense purposely recruit individuals serve washington examinerhere list republicans voted keep obama transgender policy military place implemented without input members congress justin smash michigan jack began michigan mike hoffman colorado barbara comstock virginia paul cook california ryan constell pennsylvania carlos curbelo florida jeff denial california charlie dent pennsylvania john faso new york brian fitzpatrick pennsylvania barrel issn california john ratio new york steve knight california leonard lance new jersey frank lobiondo new jersey tom macarthur new jersey brian mast florida tom reed new york dave richest washington clean florida bill shutter pennsylvania else stefan new york claudia tennis new york truth divisionpolitics