Trump vows appeal up to Supreme Court after loss on travel banHONOLULU/NEW YORK (Reuters) - A defiant President Donald Trump has pledged to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary to fight for his revised travel ban, parts of which were halted by two different federal judges in recent days.  The legal path forward will be challenging, though, as lawsuits work their way through federal courts on opposite sides of the country, in Hawaii and Maryland. On Thursday, a federal judge in Washington state said he was also weighing a temporary restraining order. The Justice Department’s first step would likely be filing an appeal in either or both of the cases it lost this week, an action likely to come within days. Justice Department spokeswoman Sarah Isgur Flores declined to comment on the administration’s intentions. In granting a temporary restraining order against the ban challenged in a lawsuit brought by the state of Hawaii, U.S. District Judge Derrick Watson found on Wednesday that “a reasonable, objective observer ... would conclude that the executive order was issued with a purpose to disfavor a particular religion.” Trump’s executive order would temporarily ban refugees as well as travelers from six predominantly Muslim countries. The president has said the ban is needed for national security.  Early on Thursday, U.S. District Judge Theodore Chuang issued a nationwide preliminary injunction in a case in Maryland brought by refugee resettlement agencies represented by the American Civil Liberties Union and the National Immigration Law Center. Chuang ruled that the groups were likely to succeed in showing that the travel ban portion of the executive order was intended to be a ban on Muslims, and as a result, violates the U.S. Constitution’s religious freedom guarantee. He did not enjoin the refugee portion of the ban.  “To avoid sowing seeds of division in our nation, upholding this fundamental constitutional principle at the core of our nation’s identity plainly serves a significant public interest,” Chuang wrote in his ruling. The court orders, while victories for the plaintiffs, are only an early step in litigation and the government could ultimately win its underlying case. Watson and Chuang were appointed to the bench by former Democratic President Barack Obama.  Trump, speaking after the Hawaii ruling at a rally in Nashville on Wednesday, called his revised executive order a “watered-down version” of his first. The president said he would take the case “as far as it needs to go,” including to the Supreme Court, in order to get a ruling that the ban is legal. The Trump administration won a small legal victory later on Thursday. U.S. District Judge James Robart in Seattle, who last month blocked Trump’s first travel ban, ruled that the second travel ban was different enough from the first that he would not simply apply a preliminary injunction he issued against the first ban to the second one. He said he was weighing a request for a temporary restraining order on the new travel ban. The likely next stops if the administration decides to contest the two rulings that it lost this week would be the 4th and 9th U.S. circuit courts of appeal. Both may be frosty venues for Trump’s arguments, with majorities of the judges in each appointed by Democratic presidents.  Three judges on the 9th Circuit upheld Robart’s order last month on the first travel ban. Rather than appeal further, the administration withdrew the ban, promising to retool it in ways that would address the legal issues. The Supreme Court is currently split between four conservative and four liberal justices, with no ninth justice since the death of Antonin Scalia more than a year ago. Trump’s nominee to fill the vacant Supreme Court seat, Neil Gorsuch, a 49-year-old conservative, is likely to be asked about the travel ban next week when he goes before the Senate Judiciary Committee for a confirmation hearing.  Republicans are hoping that the Senate votes to confirm Gorsuch for the court by mid-April, which would likely be too late for him to weigh in on an emergency appeal about the travel ban. Trump signed the new ban on March 6 in a bid to overcome legal problems with his January executive order, which caused chaos at airports and sparked mass protests before Robart stopped its enforcement in February. Watson’s order is only temporary until the broader arguments in the case can be heard. He set an expedited hearing schedule to determine if his ruling should be extended. politicsNews
trump vows appeal supreme court loss travel york reuters a defiant president donald trump pledged appeal supreme court necessary fight revised travel ban parts halted two different federal judges recent days the legal path forward challenging though lawsuits work way federal courts opposite sides country hawaii maryland on thursday federal judge washington state said also weighing temporary restraining order the justice department first step would likely filing appeal either cases lost week action likely come within days justice department spokeswoman sarah imgur flores declined comment administration intentions in granting temporary restraining order ban challenged lawsuit brought state hawaii district judge derrick watson found wednesday reasonable objective observer would conclude executive order issued purpose disfavor particular trump executive order would temporarily ban refugees well travelers six predominantly muslim countries the president said ban needed national security early thursday district judge theodore chang issued nationwide preliminary injunction case maryland brought refugee resettlement agencies represented american civil liberties union national immigration law center chang ruled groups likely succeed showing travel ban portion executive order intended ban muslims result violates constitution religious freedom guarantee he join refugee portion ban to avoid sowing seeds division nation upholding fundamental constitutional principle core nation identity plainly serves significant public interest chang wrote ruling the court orders victories plaintiffs early step litigation government could ultimately win underlying case watson chang appointed bench former democratic president barack obama trump speaking hawaii ruling rally nashville wednesday called revised executive order version first the president said would take case far needs go including supreme court order get ruling ban legal the trump administration small legal victory later thursday district judge james robert seattle last month blocked trump first travel ban ruled second travel ban different enough first would simply apply preliminary injunction issued first ban second one he said weighing request temporary restraining order new travel ban the likely next stops administration decides contest two rulings lost week would circuit courts appeal both may frost venues trump arguments majorities judges appointed democratic presidents three judges circuit upheld robert order last month first travel ban rather appeal administration withdrew ban promising retook ways would address legal issues the supreme court currently split four conservative four liberal justices ninth justice since death antonio scale year ago trump nominee fill vacant supreme court seat neil gorsuch conservative likely asked travel ban next week goes senate judiciary committee confirmation hearing republicans hoping senate votes confirm gorsuch court would likely late weigh emergency appeal travel ban trump signed new ban march bid overcome legal problems january executive order caused chaos airports sparked mass protests robert stopped enforcement february watson order temporary broader arguments case heard he set expedite hearing schedule determine ruling extended politicsnews
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: Trump vows appeal up to Supreme Court after loss on travel banHONOLULU/NEW YORK (Reuters) - A defiant President Donald Trump has pledged to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary to fight for his revised travel ban, parts of which were halted by two different federal judges in recent days.  The legal path forward will be challenging, though, as lawsuits work their way through federal courts on opposite sides of the country, in Hawaii and Maryland. On Thursday, a federal judge in Washington state said he was also weighing a temporary restraining order. The Justice Department’s first step would likely be filing an appeal in either or both of the cases it lost this week, an action likely to come within days. Justice Department spokeswoman Sarah Isgur Flores declined to comment on the administration’s intentions. In granting a temporary restraining order against the ban challenged in a lawsuit brought by the state of Hawaii, U.S. District Judge Derrick Watson found on Wednesday that “a reasonable, objective observer ... would conclude that the executive order was issued with a purpose to disfavor a particular religion.” Trump’s executive order would temporarily ban refugees as well as travelers from six predominantly Muslim countries. The president has said the ban is needed for national security.  Early on Thursday, U.S. District Judge Theodore Chuang issued a nationwide preliminary injunction in a case in Maryland brought by refugee resettlement agencies represented by the American Civil Liberties Union and the National Immigration Law Center. Chuang ruled that the groups were likely to succeed in showing that the travel ban portion of the executive order was intended to be a ban on Muslims, and as a result, violates the U.S. Constitution’s religious freedom guarantee. He did not enjoin the refugee portion of the ban.  “To avoid sowing seeds of division in our nation, upholding this fundamental constitutional principle at the core of our nation’s identity plainly serves a significant public interest,” Chuang wrote in his ruling. The court orders, while victories for the plaintiffs, are only an early step in litigation and the government could ultimately win its underlying case. Watson and Chuang were appointed to the bench by former Democratic President Barack Obama.  Trump, speaking after the Hawaii ruling at a rally in Nashville on Wednesday, called his revised executive order a “watered-down version” of his first. The president said he would take the case “as far as it needs to go,” including to the Supreme Court, in order to get a ruling that the ban is legal. The Trump administration won a small legal victory later on Thursday. U.S. District Judge James Robart in Seattle, who last month blocked Trump’s first travel ban, ruled that the second travel ban was different enough from the first that he would not simply apply a preliminary injunction he issued against the first ban to the second one. He said he was weighing a request for a temporary restraining order on the new travel ban. The likely next stops if the administration decides to contest the two rulings that it lost this week would be the 4th and 9th U.S. circuit courts of appeal. Both may be frosty venues for Trump’s arguments, with majorities of the judges in each appointed by Democratic presidents.  Three judges on the 9th Circuit upheld Robart’s order last month on the first travel ban. Rather than appeal further, the administration withdrew the ban, promising to retool it in ways that would address the legal issues. The Supreme Court is currently split between four conservative and four liberal justices, with no ninth justice since the death of Antonin Scalia more than a year ago. Trump’s nominee to fill the vacant Supreme Court seat, Neil Gorsuch, a 49-year-old conservative, is likely to be asked about the travel ban next week when he goes before the Senate Judiciary Committee for a confirmation hearing.  Republicans are hoping that the Senate votes to confirm Gorsuch for the court by mid-April, which would likely be too late for him to weigh in on an emergency appeal about the travel ban. Trump signed the new ban on March 6 in a bid to overcome legal problems with his January executive order, which caused chaos at airports and sparked mass protests before Robart stopped its enforcement in February. Watson’s order is only temporary until the broader arguments in the case can be heard. He set an expedited hearing schedule to determine if his ruling should be extended. politicsNews
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: trump vows appeal supreme court loss travel york reuters a defiant president donald trump pledged appeal supreme court necessary fight revised travel ban parts halted two different federal judges recent days the legal path forward challenging though lawsuits work way federal courts opposite sides country hawaii maryland on thursday federal judge washington state said also weighing temporary restraining order the justice department first step would likely filing appeal either cases lost week action likely come within days justice department spokeswoman sarah imgur flores declined comment administration intentions in granting temporary restraining order ban challenged lawsuit brought state hawaii district judge derrick watson found wednesday reasonable objective observer would conclude executive order issued purpose disfavor particular trump executive order would temporarily ban refugees well travelers six predominantly muslim countries the president said ban needed national security early thursday district judge theodore chang issued nationwide preliminary injunction case maryland brought refugee resettlement agencies represented american civil liberties union national immigration law center chang ruled groups likely succeed showing travel ban portion executive order intended ban muslims result violates constitution religious freedom guarantee he join refugee portion ban to avoid sowing seeds division nation upholding fundamental constitutional principle core nation identity plainly serves significant public interest chang wrote ruling the court orders victories plaintiffs early step litigation government could ultimately win underlying case watson chang appointed bench former democratic president barack obama trump speaking hawaii ruling rally nashville wednesday called revised executive order version first the president said would take case far needs go including supreme court order get ruling ban legal the trump administration small legal victory later thursday district judge james robert seattle last month blocked trump first travel ban ruled second travel ban different enough first would simply apply preliminary injunction issued first ban second one he said weighing request temporary restraining order new travel ban the likely next stops administration decides contest two rulings lost week would circuit courts appeal both may frost venues trump arguments majorities judges appointed democratic presidents three judges circuit upheld robert order last month first travel ban rather appeal administration withdrew ban promising retook ways would address legal issues the supreme court currently split four conservative four liberal justices ninth justice since death antonio scale year ago trump nominee fill vacant supreme court seat neil gorsuch conservative likely asked travel ban next week goes senate judiciary committee confirmation hearing republicans hoping senate votes confirm gorsuch court would likely late weigh emergency appeal travel ban trump signed new ban march bid overcome legal problems january executive order caused chaos airports sparked mass protests robert stopped enforcement february watson order temporary broader arguments case heard he set expedite hearing schedule determine ruling extended politicsnews