 This Ego-Killing Jeb Bush Infographic Shows How Expensive It Is For Billionaires To Back LosersJeb Bush was supposed to be the adult among the children in the 2016 Republican presidential primaries. He was even considered the inevitable nominee by some, particularly due to his fundraising capability. They sure were wrong, as you will see below.Jeb never really caught fire among voters, but somehow he did among billionaires and other corporate interests looking to pen a 4-year lease on an American president. Jeb had a total of $155.6 million raised for his presidential bid as of February 1st, 2016. $31.9 million was by him directly, with nearly $124 million more by PACS. On the night of the first caucus in the nation, he had spent a total of $24.3 million   about $14 million of it in Iowa alone.For all the inevitability his money supposedly ensured, Jeb ended up with a humiliating 2.8 percent portion of the vote during the Iowa Republican Caucus. This worked out to just over a measly 5,000 votes, which netted him one whole delegate. Ouch. Going with just the Iowa money for the ad-buys leading up to the caucus, Jeb ended up paying about $2,800 per vote.Dang, Jeb. https://t.co/RGVSCgsJaL pic.twitter.com/6tJjkEZMZS  Christopher Ingraham (@_cingraham) February 2, 2016To put this into context, Ted Cruz spent under $250 dollars per vote he received, and Trump spent even less. The pair claimed both first and second place at the end of the night. This begs the question,  Have we hit the limit of how much money is able to influence an election?  While you can t deny the effect that vast sums of corporate money have in politics, all the money in the nation won t polish everyone to an acceptable level of shine. Jeb is an embarrassing example of that in the 2016 election cycle.While technically Jeb has a possibility of finding new footing for himself in New Hampshire, the likelihood of a campaign resurrection is low. Trump is looking far stronger there with a 38 percent lead, as Cruz comes in second at 12 percent. Jeb is in the rear guard again at a weak 10 percent. He has the most money to burn, outside of Trump. Do you think it would help him at all, or is the Bush legacy too much of a curse for him to bear?Featured image from FlickrNews
this jeb bush infographic shows how expensive it is for billionaires to back losersjeb bush supposed adult among children republican presidential primaries he even considered inevitable nominee particularly due fundraising capability they sure wrong see never really caught fire among voters somehow among billionaires corporate interests looking pen lease american president jeb total million raised presidential bid february million directly nearly million pass on night first caucus nation spent total million million iowa inevitability money supposedly ensured jeb ended humiliating percent portion vote iowa republican caucus this worked early votes netted one whole delegate such going iowa money leading caucus jeb ended paying per jeb https christopher graham _cingraham february put context ted cruz spent dollars per vote received trump spent even less the pair claimed first second place end night this begs question have hit limit much money able influence election while deny effect vast sums corporate money politics money nation polish everyone acceptable level shine jeb embarrassing example election technically jeb possibility finding new footing new hampshire likelihood campaign resurrection low trump looking far stronger percent lead cruz comes second percent jeb rear guard weak percent he money burn outside trump do think would help bush legacy much curse bear featured image flickrnews
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT:  This Ego-Killing Jeb Bush Infographic Shows How Expensive It Is For Billionaires To Back LosersJeb Bush was supposed to be the adult among the children in the 2016 Republican presidential primaries. He was even considered the inevitable nominee by some, particularly due to his fundraising capability. They sure were wrong, as you will see below.Jeb never really caught fire among voters, but somehow he did among billionaires and other corporate interests looking to pen a 4-year lease on an American president. Jeb had a total of $155.6 million raised for his presidential bid as of February 1st, 2016. $31.9 million was by him directly, with nearly $124 million more by PACS. On the night of the first caucus in the nation, he had spent a total of $24.3 million   about $14 million of it in Iowa alone.For all the inevitability his money supposedly ensured, Jeb ended up with a humiliating 2.8 percent portion of the vote during the Iowa Republican Caucus. This worked out to just over a measly 5,000 votes, which netted him one whole delegate. Ouch. Going with just the Iowa money for the ad-buys leading up to the caucus, Jeb ended up paying about $2,800 per vote.Dang, Jeb. https://t.co/RGVSCgsJaL pic.twitter.com/6tJjkEZMZS  Christopher Ingraham (@_cingraham) February 2, 2016To put this into context, Ted Cruz spent under $250 dollars per vote he received, and Trump spent even less. The pair claimed both first and second place at the end of the night. This begs the question,  Have we hit the limit of how much money is able to influence an election?  While you can t deny the effect that vast sums of corporate money have in politics, all the money in the nation won t polish everyone to an acceptable level of shine. Jeb is an embarrassing example of that in the 2016 election cycle.While technically Jeb has a possibility of finding new footing for himself in New Hampshire, the likelihood of a campaign resurrection is low. Trump is looking far stronger there with a 38 percent lead, as Cruz comes in second at 12 percent. Jeb is in the rear guard again at a weak 10 percent. He has the most money to burn, outside of Trump. Do you think it would help him at all, or is the Bush legacy too much of a curse for him to bear?Featured image from FlickrNews
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: this jeb bush infographic shows how expensive it is for billionaires to back losersjeb bush supposed adult among children republican presidential primaries he even considered inevitable nominee particularly due fundraising capability they sure wrong see never really caught fire among voters somehow among billionaires corporate interests looking pen lease american president jeb total million raised presidential bid february million directly nearly million pass on night first caucus nation spent total million million iowa inevitability money supposedly ensured jeb ended humiliating percent portion vote iowa republican caucus this worked early votes netted one whole delegate such going iowa money leading caucus jeb ended paying per jeb https christopher graham _cingraham february put context ted cruz spent dollars per vote received trump spent even less the pair claimed first second place end night this begs question have hit limit much money able influence election while deny effect vast sums corporate money politics money nation polish everyone acceptable level shine jeb embarrassing example election technically jeb possibility finding new footing new hampshire likelihood campaign resurrection low trump looking far stronger percent lead cruz comes second percent jeb rear guard weak percent he money burn outside trump do think would help bush legacy much curse bear featured image flickrnews