Arizona may enforce ballot collection law: Supreme Court order(Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Saturday ordered an Arizona state law that restricts the collection of ballots by third parties back in place for Tuesday’s election, a victory for Republicans in an intensifying state-by-state legal battle over access to voting. The Supreme Court granted a stay of a U.S. appeals court ruling that on Friday had temporarily blocked Arizona from enforcing the law that prohibits advocacy groups from collecting completed early ballots from voters and delivering them to election offices as part of get-out-the-vote efforts. The stay will remain in effect pending a final disposition of the appeal by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, the Supreme Court order said. The appeals court has scheduled oral arguments in the case for January. Polls have shown Republican Donald Trump with a small lead in Arizona over Democrat Hillary Clinton in the presidential race. Democrats have accused Republicans of enacting state laws intended to make it harder for minorities and others who tend to back Democratic candidates to cast ballots. Republicans have called these laws necessary to guard against voting fraud. Arizona late Friday filed an emergency appeal asking the U.S. Supreme Court to allow it to enforce the law Arizona’s legislature approved earlier this year. Plaintiffs in the case, including the Democratic National Committee, argued the law is unconstitutional because it unfairly impacted the ability of minorities to vote. In asking the Supreme Court to deny a stay, the plaintiffs said reinstating the law “would expose Arizonans who are presently engaged in ballot collection and do not learn of this court’s ruling to a felony conviction and criminal sanctions.” politicsNews
arizona may enforce ballot collection law supreme court order reuters the supreme court saturday ordered arizona state law restricts collection ballots third parties back place tuesday election victory republicans intensifying legal battle access voting the supreme court granted stay appeals court ruling friday temporarily blocked arizona enforcing law prohibits advocacy groups collecting completed early ballots voters delivering election offices part efforts the stay remain effect pending final disposition appeal circuit court appeals supreme court order said the appeals court scheduled oral arguments case january polls shown republican donald trump small lead arizona democrat hillary clinton presidential race democrats accused republicans enacting state laws intended make harder minorities others tend back democratic candidates cast ballots republicans called laws necessary guard voting fraud arizona late friday filed emergency appeal asking supreme court allow enforce law arizona legislature approved earlier year plaintiffs case including democratic national committee argued law unconstitutional unfairly impacted ability minorities vote in asking supreme court deny stay plaintiffs said reinstating law would expose arizona presently engaged ballot collection learn court ruling felony conviction criminal politicsnews
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: Arizona may enforce ballot collection law: Supreme Court order(Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Saturday ordered an Arizona state law that restricts the collection of ballots by third parties back in place for Tuesday’s election, a victory for Republicans in an intensifying state-by-state legal battle over access to voting. The Supreme Court granted a stay of a U.S. appeals court ruling that on Friday had temporarily blocked Arizona from enforcing the law that prohibits advocacy groups from collecting completed early ballots from voters and delivering them to election offices as part of get-out-the-vote efforts. The stay will remain in effect pending a final disposition of the appeal by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, the Supreme Court order said. The appeals court has scheduled oral arguments in the case for January. Polls have shown Republican Donald Trump with a small lead in Arizona over Democrat Hillary Clinton in the presidential race. Democrats have accused Republicans of enacting state laws intended to make it harder for minorities and others who tend to back Democratic candidates to cast ballots. Republicans have called these laws necessary to guard against voting fraud. Arizona late Friday filed an emergency appeal asking the U.S. Supreme Court to allow it to enforce the law Arizona’s legislature approved earlier this year. Plaintiffs in the case, including the Democratic National Committee, argued the law is unconstitutional because it unfairly impacted the ability of minorities to vote. In asking the Supreme Court to deny a stay, the plaintiffs said reinstating the law “would expose Arizonans who are presently engaged in ballot collection and do not learn of this court’s ruling to a felony conviction and criminal sanctions.” politicsNews
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: arizona may enforce ballot collection law supreme court order reuters the supreme court saturday ordered arizona state law restricts collection ballots third parties back place tuesday election victory republicans intensifying legal battle access voting the supreme court granted stay appeals court ruling friday temporarily blocked arizona enforcing law prohibits advocacy groups collecting completed early ballots voters delivering election offices part efforts the stay remain effect pending final disposition appeal circuit court appeals supreme court order said the appeals court scheduled oral arguments case january polls shown republican donald trump small lead arizona democrat hillary clinton presidential race democrats accused republicans enacting state laws intended make harder minorities others tend back democratic candidates cast ballots republicans called laws necessary guard voting fraud arizona late friday filed emergency appeal asking supreme court allow enforce law arizona legislature approved earlier year plaintiffs case including democratic national committee argued law unconstitutional unfairly impacted ability minorities vote in asking supreme court deny stay plaintiffs said reinstating law would expose arizona presently engaged ballot collection learn court ruling felony conviction criminal politicsnews