Factbox: Divided, rebellious UK parliament takes on May's Brexit planLONDON (Reuters) - British lawmakers will debate legislation underpinning the government s plan to leave the European Union this week, the latest stage in an arduous journey through parliament. The first two days of debate in the current stage of the process will be held in parliament on Nov. 14 and 15. A total of eight days of debate are planned during this  Committee Stage , used to make changes to the government s proposed wording of the bill. Formally known as the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill, the legislation will then face several more stages of approval in the lower house of parliament, and must also make its way through a multi-stage process in the upper house. Both chambers must agree on the wording before it can become law. What is the bill and what does it do? The legislation serves two main functions: 1. Repealing the 1972 European Communities Act which made Britain a member of the European Communities, forerunner to the European Union. This effectively ends Britain s EU membership. 2. Transferring the existing body of EU law into British law. This is designed to provide legal certainty about the complex process of leaving.  Why is it controversial? The bill has faced criticism from opposition lawmakers, campaign groups and members of May s Conservative Party. Brexit is still divisive in Britain after a referendum in June last year, and many people, including some lawmakers, want to retain as much of the country s current EU membership as possible. Others would like to reverse the vote. May runs a minority government, which has a slim 13-seat working majority in the 650-seat parliament thanks to a deal with a small Northern Irish party.  A rebellion of seven or more Conservative lawmakers could see her lose a vote in parliament and forced into making concessions. The objections are mainly based on two themes: 1. The power for the government to amend EU laws as they are brought onto the British statute book. These are often referred to as  Henry VIII  powers after the 16th century English monarch who ruled by proclamation. The government says it needs to be able to fix the wording of laws to ensure they work correctly after Brexit. For example, where a law refers to an EU institution which will no longer have jurisdiction in Britain, the law must be changed to point to the correct British equivalent.  Critics say the bill gives ministers too much power to make changes, and creates the potential for policy shifts to be implemented without full parliamentary scrutiny. The process through which the government would make the changes already exists and is known as  secondary legislation . It does allow for some degree of scrutiny by lawmakers, but would not submit changes to the full legislative process.  2. The bill does not contain a provision for parliament to vote on the final Brexit deal. The government has promised lawmakers they will get a  meaningful vote  on the outcome of negotiations in Brussels to decide the terms of Britain s exit and its future relationship with the bloc. As it currently stands, this vote will be on whether to accept the terms of the deal, or reject it and walk away without a deal. But critics says the promise of a vote should be written into the bill. Some also say that it should give lawmakers more options than the current  take it or leave it  vote. This could mean an option to send Britain back to the negotiating table. What has happened so far? The bill cleared its first parliamentary hurdle in September when, after two days of debate, lawmakers voted 326 to 290 in favor of the principles of the bill.  Although the government won the vote, several Conservatives indicated they were unhappy with the details of it, and said they wanted to see concessions during the next stage.  What happens next? The first two days of the  Committee Stage  have been scheduled for Tuesday and Wednesday but the remaining six days have not yet been scheduled.  Any lawmaker can submit changes for consideration. So far, 186 pages of so-called  amendments  have been submitted. The list will be scrutinized by parliament s deputy speaker, whittled down and grouped according to subject. The amendments to be considered will be announced at the start of each day s debate. The first two days will focus on the part of the bill that repeals the 1972 European Communities Act, the retention, conversion and interpretation of existing EU laws, and EU rights.   At the end of the debate over each group of amendments, some will be put to a vote. If supported by a majority of lawmakers, the changes will be made to the bill. They can still be reversed. Once all the groups of amendments have been debated, the bill is reprinted to include any amendments passed and it moves on to the next stage in the process. Which is ...? The bill will be subject to several more stages of votes in the lower chamber and the upper chamber of parliament. The entire process will take months to complete, and there is no target end date. Report stage:  Any amendments voted by the house at committee stage will pass to report stage. This is a new opportunity to add amendments. The speaker of the house oversees this process. Third reading:  This takes place immediately after report stage. It usually lasts an hour and is a general discussion of the bill followed by a vote. No amendments can be made. House of Lords:  The bill passes to the unelected upper chamber of parliament, the House of Lords. Lords can put forward their own amendments, each of which will be discussed and decided on in turn. If the lords agree to any amendments, the bill passes back to the House of Commons for its approval. Ping Pong: If the bill passes back to the commons, they debate and vote on the lords  amendments. No new amendments can be introduced. In theory the bill can continue passing back and forth between the lords and commons until the final bill is agreed upon. Royal assent: Once the bill has been agreed by both houses of parliament, it is given royal assent, when the queen formally agrees to make the bill into an Act of Parliament. worldnews
factor divided rebellious uk parliament takes may brexit planlondon reuters british lawmakers debate legislation undermining government plan leave european union week latest stage arduous journey parliament the first two days debate current stage process held parliament a total eight days debate planned committee stage used make changes government proposed wording bill formally known european union withdrawal bill legislation face several stages approval lower house parliament must also make way process upper house both chambers must agree wording become law what bill the legislation serves two main functions repealing european communities act made britain member european communities forerunner european union this effectively ends britain eu membership transferring existing body eu law british law this designed provide legal certainty complex process leaving why controversial the bill faced criticism opposition lawmakers campaign groups members may conservative party brexit still divisive britain referendum june last year many people including lawmakers want retain much country current eu membership possible others would like reverse vote may runs minority government slim working majority parliament thanks deal small northern irish party a rebellion seven conservative lawmakers could see lose vote parliament forced making concessions the objections mainly based two themes the power government amend eu laws brought onto british statute book these often referred henry viii powers century english monarch ruled proclamation the government says needs able fix wording laws ensure work correctly brexit for example law refers eu institution longer jurisdiction britain law must changed point correct british equivalent critics say bill gives ministers much power make changes creates potential policy shifts implemented without full parliamentary scrutiny the process government would make changes already exists known secondary legislation it allow degree scrutiny lawmakers would submit changes full legislative process the bill contain provision parliament vote final brexit deal the government promised lawmakers get meaningful vote outcome negotiations brussels decide terms britain exit future relationship bloc as currently stands vote whether accept terms deal reject walk away without deal but critics says promise vote written bill some also say give lawmakers options current take leave vote this could mean option send britain back negotiating table what happened far the bill cleared first parliamentary hurdle september two days debate lawmakers voted favor principles bill although government vote several conservatives indicated unhappy details said wanted see concessions next stage what happens next the first two days committee stage scheduled tuesday wednesday remaining six days yet scheduled any lawmaker submit changes consideration so far pages amendments submitted the list scrutinized parliament deputy speaker whistle grouped according subject the amendments considered announced start day debate the first two days focus part bill reveals european communities act retention conversion interpretation existing eu laws eu rights at end debate group amendments put vote if supported majority lawmakers changes made bill they still reversed once groups amendments debated bill reprinted include amendments passed moves next stage process which the bill subject several stages votes lower chamber upper chamber parliament the entire process take months complete target end date report stage any amendments voted house committee stage pass report stage this new opportunity add amendments the speaker house oversees process third reading this takes place immediately report stage it usually lasts hour general discussion bill followed vote no amendments made house lords the bill passes unelected upper chamber parliament house lords lords put forward amendments discussed decided turn if lords agree amendments bill passes back house commons approval ping pong if bill passes back commons debate vote lords amendments no new amendments introduced in theory bill continue passing back forth lords commons final bill agreed upon royal assent once bill agreed houses parliament given royal assent queen formally agrees make bill act parliament worldnews
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: Factbox: Divided, rebellious UK parliament takes on May's Brexit planLONDON (Reuters) - British lawmakers will debate legislation underpinning the government s plan to leave the European Union this week, the latest stage in an arduous journey through parliament. The first two days of debate in the current stage of the process will be held in parliament on Nov. 14 and 15. A total of eight days of debate are planned during this  Committee Stage , used to make changes to the government s proposed wording of the bill. Formally known as the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill, the legislation will then face several more stages of approval in the lower house of parliament, and must also make its way through a multi-stage process in the upper house. Both chambers must agree on the wording before it can become law. What is the bill and what does it do? The legislation serves two main functions: 1. Repealing the 1972 European Communities Act which made Britain a member of the European Communities, forerunner to the European Union. This effectively ends Britain s EU membership. 2. Transferring the existing body of EU law into British law. This is designed to provide legal certainty about the complex process of leaving.  Why is it controversial? The bill has faced criticism from opposition lawmakers, campaign groups and members of May s Conservative Party. Brexit is still divisive in Britain after a referendum in June last year, and many people, including some lawmakers, want to retain as much of the country s current EU membership as possible. Others would like to reverse the vote. May runs a minority government, which has a slim 13-seat working majority in the 650-seat parliament thanks to a deal with a small Northern Irish party.  A rebellion of seven or more Conservative lawmakers could see her lose a vote in parliament and forced into making concessions. The objections are mainly based on two themes: 1. The power for the government to amend EU laws as they are brought onto the British statute book. These are often referred to as  Henry VIII  powers after the 16th century English monarch who ruled by proclamation. The government says it needs to be able to fix the wording of laws to ensure they work correctly after Brexit. For example, where a law refers to an EU institution which will no longer have jurisdiction in Britain, the law must be changed to point to the correct British equivalent.  Critics say the bill gives ministers too much power to make changes, and creates the potential for policy shifts to be implemented without full parliamentary scrutiny. The process through which the government would make the changes already exists and is known as  secondary legislation . It does allow for some degree of scrutiny by lawmakers, but would not submit changes to the full legislative process.  2. The bill does not contain a provision for parliament to vote on the final Brexit deal. The government has promised lawmakers they will get a  meaningful vote  on the outcome of negotiations in Brussels to decide the terms of Britain s exit and its future relationship with the bloc. As it currently stands, this vote will be on whether to accept the terms of the deal, or reject it and walk away without a deal. But critics says the promise of a vote should be written into the bill. Some also say that it should give lawmakers more options than the current  take it or leave it  vote. This could mean an option to send Britain back to the negotiating table. What has happened so far? The bill cleared its first parliamentary hurdle in September when, after two days of debate, lawmakers voted 326 to 290 in favor of the principles of the bill.  Although the government won the vote, several Conservatives indicated they were unhappy with the details of it, and said they wanted to see concessions during the next stage.  What happens next? The first two days of the  Committee Stage  have been scheduled for Tuesday and Wednesday but the remaining six days have not yet been scheduled.  Any lawmaker can submit changes for consideration. So far, 186 pages of so-called  amendments  have been submitted. The list will be scrutinized by parliament s deputy speaker, whittled down and grouped according to subject. The amendments to be considered will be announced at the start of each day s debate. The first two days will focus on the part of the bill that repeals the 1972 European Communities Act, the retention, conversion and interpretation of existing EU laws, and EU rights.   At the end of the debate over each group of amendments, some will be put to a vote. If supported by a majority of lawmakers, the changes will be made to the bill. They can still be reversed. Once all the groups of amendments have been debated, the bill is reprinted to include any amendments passed and it moves on to the next stage in the process. Which is ...? The bill will be subject to several more stages of votes in the lower chamber and the upper chamber of parliament. The entire process will take months to complete, and there is no target end date. Report stage:  Any amendments voted by the house at committee stage will pass to report stage. This is a new opportunity to add amendments. The speaker of the house oversees this process. Third reading:  This takes place immediately after report stage. It usually lasts an hour and is a general discussion of the bill followed by a vote. No amendments can be made. House of Lords:  The bill passes to the unelected upper chamber of parliament, the House of Lords. Lords can put forward their own amendments, each of which will be discussed and decided on in turn. If the lords agree to any amendments, the bill passes back to the House of Commons for its approval. Ping Pong: If the bill passes back to the commons, they debate and vote on the lords  amendments. No new amendments can be introduced. In theory the bill can continue passing back and forth between the lords and commons until the final bill is agreed upon. Royal assent: Once the bill has been agreed by both houses of parliament, it is given royal assent, when the queen formally agrees to make the bill into an Act of Parliament. worldnews
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: factor divided rebellious uk parliament takes may brexit planlondon reuters british lawmakers debate legislation undermining government plan leave european union week latest stage arduous journey parliament the first two days debate current stage process held parliament a total eight days debate planned committee stage used make changes government proposed wording bill formally known european union withdrawal bill legislation face several stages approval lower house parliament must also make way process upper house both chambers must agree wording become law what bill the legislation serves two main functions repealing european communities act made britain member european communities forerunner european union this effectively ends britain eu membership transferring existing body eu law british law this designed provide legal certainty complex process leaving why controversial the bill faced criticism opposition lawmakers campaign groups members may conservative party brexit still divisive britain referendum june last year many people including lawmakers want retain much country current eu membership possible others would like reverse vote may runs minority government slim working majority parliament thanks deal small northern irish party a rebellion seven conservative lawmakers could see lose vote parliament forced making concessions the objections mainly based two themes the power government amend eu laws brought onto british statute book these often referred henry viii powers century english monarch ruled proclamation the government says needs able fix wording laws ensure work correctly brexit for example law refers eu institution longer jurisdiction britain law must changed point correct british equivalent critics say bill gives ministers much power make changes creates potential policy shifts implemented without full parliamentary scrutiny the process government would make changes already exists known secondary legislation it allow degree scrutiny lawmakers would submit changes full legislative process the bill contain provision parliament vote final brexit deal the government promised lawmakers get meaningful vote outcome negotiations brussels decide terms britain exit future relationship bloc as currently stands vote whether accept terms deal reject walk away without deal but critics says promise vote written bill some also say give lawmakers options current take leave vote this could mean option send britain back negotiating table what happened far the bill cleared first parliamentary hurdle september two days debate lawmakers voted favor principles bill although government vote several conservatives indicated unhappy details said wanted see concessions next stage what happens next the first two days committee stage scheduled tuesday wednesday remaining six days yet scheduled any lawmaker submit changes consideration so far pages amendments submitted the list scrutinized parliament deputy speaker whistle grouped according subject the amendments considered announced start day debate the first two days focus part bill reveals european communities act retention conversion interpretation existing eu laws eu rights at end debate group amendments put vote if supported majority lawmakers changes made bill they still reversed once groups amendments debated bill reprinted include amendments passed moves next stage process which the bill subject several stages votes lower chamber upper chamber parliament the entire process take months complete target end date report stage any amendments voted house committee stage pass report stage this new opportunity add amendments the speaker house oversees process third reading this takes place immediately report stage it usually lasts hour general discussion bill followed vote no amendments made house lords the bill passes unelected upper chamber parliament house lords lords put forward amendments discussed decided turn if lords agree amendments bill passes back house commons approval ping pong if bill passes back commons debate vote lords amendments no new amendments introduced in theory bill continue passing back forth lords commons final bill agreed upon royal assent once bill agreed houses parliament given royal assent queen formally agrees make bill act parliament worldnews