HOW REAGAN DEALT WITH RADICAL PROTESTERS At Berkeley University [VIDEO]Reagan explains why the protesters got out of hand to the reporters:  All of it began the first time some of you who know better and are old enough to know better, let young people think that they had the right to chose the the laws they would obey, as long as they were doing it in the name of social protest. Compare and contrast Reagan s decision to address the unlawful behavior of these protesters, to Barack Obama hiding from the press, yet meeting with organizers and agitators of these radical groups to offer encouragment to the violent, unlawful protesters we are seeing across the United States today.Do you agree or disagree with Reagan s approach to stopping the protesters from breaking the law: In his 1966 campaign for California governor, Republican Ronald Reagan promised to  to clean up the mess at Berkeley.  Reagan was referring to the unrest prevalent not just at the University of California, Berkeley, but on college campuses throughout state. Students and faculty alike were engaged in protests, demonstrations, and strikes related to issues such as the draft, civil rights, discrimination, and women s liberation.In one 1966 campaign speech, Reagan declared that many leftist campus movements had transcended legitimate protest, with the actions of  beatniks, radi cals and filthy speech advocates  having become more to do  with riot ing, with anarchy  than  academic freedom.  He blamed university administrators and faculty, who  press their particular value judgments  on students, for  a leadership gap and a morality and decency gap  on campus, and suggested a code of conduct be imposed on faculty to  force them to serve as examples of good behavior and decency. [1]Six months after Reagan took office in 1967, he wrote this letter to Glenn Dumke, the chancellor of San Francisco State College, one of California s largest public institutions. Dumke served as the public face of the state college system, and he was a staunch opponent of radical student and faculty demonstrations. In his letter to Dumke, Reagan criticizes liberal activism on campuses. He condemns  these people & this trash  on campuses as well as  the excuse of academic freedom & freedom of expression  in allowing protests and demonstrations to go on.  We wouldn t tolerate this kind of language in front of our families,  Reagan writes of campus protesters. He urges Dumke to  lay down some rules of conduct,  promising that  you d have all the backing I could give you. How far do we go in tolerating these people & this trash under the excuse of academic freedom & freedom of expression? Please understand, that question isn t made in any tone of accusation. I mean myself too in that use of the term  we. We wouldn t let a LeRoi Jones in our livingroom and we wouldn t tolerate this kind of language in front of our families. Hasn t the time come to take on those neurotics in our faculty group and lay down some rules of conduct for the students comparable to what we d expect in our own families? If we do and the  we  this time means you d have all the backing I could give you, I believe the people of Calif. would take the state college system to their hearts.[illegible] RonVia: The Gilder Lehrman Institute of American Historyleft-news
how reagan dealt with radical protesters at berkeley university video reagan explains protesters got hand reporters all began first time know better old enough know better let young people think right chose laws would obey long name social protest compare contrast reagan decision address unlawful behavior protesters barack obama hiding press yet meeting organizers aviators radical groups offer encouragement violent unlawful protesters seeing across united states agree disagree reagan approach stopping protesters breaking law in campaign california governor republican ronald reagan promised clean mess berkeley reagan referring unrest prevalent university california berkeley college campuses throughout state students faculty alike engaged protests demonstrations strikes related issues draft civil rights discrimination women one campaign speech reagan declared many leftist campus movements transcluded legitimate protest actions beatings radio caps filthy speech advocates become riot ing anarchy academic freedom he blamed university administrators faculty press particular value judgments students leadership gap morality decency gap campus suggested code conduct imposed faculty force serve examples good behavior decency six months reagan took office wrote letter glenn duke chancellor san francisco state college one california largest public institutions duke served public face state college system staunch opponent radical student faculty demonstrations in letter duke reagan criticizes liberal activism campuses he condemns people trash campuses well excuse academic freedom freedom expression allowing protests demonstrations go we tolerate kind language front families reagan writes campus protesters he urges duke lay rules conduct promising backing i could give how far go operating people trash excuse academic freedom freedom expression please understand question made tone accusation i mean use term we let zero jones livingroom tolerate kind language front families hasn time come take neurotics faculty group lay rules conduct students comparable expect families if time means backing i could give i believe people would take state college system hearts legible ronnie the glider german institute american
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: HOW REAGAN DEALT WITH RADICAL PROTESTERS At Berkeley University [VIDEO]Reagan explains why the protesters got out of hand to the reporters:  All of it began the first time some of you who know better and are old enough to know better, let young people think that they had the right to chose the the laws they would obey, as long as they were doing it in the name of social protest. Compare and contrast Reagan s decision to address the unlawful behavior of these protesters, to Barack Obama hiding from the press, yet meeting with organizers and agitators of these radical groups to offer encouragment to the violent, unlawful protesters we are seeing across the United States today.Do you agree or disagree with Reagan s approach to stopping the protesters from breaking the law: In his 1966 campaign for California governor, Republican Ronald Reagan promised to  to clean up the mess at Berkeley.  Reagan was referring to the unrest prevalent not just at the University of California, Berkeley, but on college campuses throughout state. Students and faculty alike were engaged in protests, demonstrations, and strikes related to issues such as the draft, civil rights, discrimination, and women s liberation.In one 1966 campaign speech, Reagan declared that many leftist campus movements had transcended legitimate protest, with the actions of  beatniks, radi cals and filthy speech advocates  having become more to do  with riot ing, with anarchy  than  academic freedom.  He blamed university administrators and faculty, who  press their particular value judgments  on students, for  a leadership gap and a morality and decency gap  on campus, and suggested a code of conduct be imposed on faculty to  force them to serve as examples of good behavior and decency. [1]Six months after Reagan took office in 1967, he wrote this letter to Glenn Dumke, the chancellor of San Francisco State College, one of California s largest public institutions. Dumke served as the public face of the state college system, and he was a staunch opponent of radical student and faculty demonstrations. In his letter to Dumke, Reagan criticizes liberal activism on campuses. He condemns  these people & this trash  on campuses as well as  the excuse of academic freedom & freedom of expression  in allowing protests and demonstrations to go on.  We wouldn t tolerate this kind of language in front of our families,  Reagan writes of campus protesters. He urges Dumke to  lay down some rules of conduct,  promising that  you d have all the backing I could give you. How far do we go in tolerating these people & this trash under the excuse of academic freedom & freedom of expression? Please understand, that question isn t made in any tone of accusation. I mean myself too in that use of the term  we. We wouldn t let a LeRoi Jones in our livingroom and we wouldn t tolerate this kind of language in front of our families. Hasn t the time come to take on those neurotics in our faculty group and lay down some rules of conduct for the students comparable to what we d expect in our own families? If we do and the  we  this time means you d have all the backing I could give you, I believe the people of Calif. would take the state college system to their hearts.[illegible] RonVia: The Gilder Lehrman Institute of American Historyleft-news
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: how reagan dealt with radical protesters at berkeley university video reagan explains protesters got hand reporters all began first time know better old enough know better let young people think right chose laws would obey long name social protest compare contrast reagan decision address unlawful behavior protesters barack obama hiding press yet meeting organizers aviators radical groups offer encouragement violent unlawful protesters seeing across united states agree disagree reagan approach stopping protesters breaking law in campaign california governor republican ronald reagan promised clean mess berkeley reagan referring unrest prevalent university california berkeley college campuses throughout state students faculty alike engaged protests demonstrations strikes related issues draft civil rights discrimination women one campaign speech reagan declared many leftist campus movements transcluded legitimate protest actions beatings radio caps filthy speech advocates become riot ing anarchy academic freedom he blamed university administrators faculty press particular value judgments students leadership gap morality decency gap campus suggested code conduct imposed faculty force serve examples good behavior decency six months reagan took office wrote letter glenn duke chancellor san francisco state college one california largest public institutions duke served public face state college system staunch opponent radical student faculty demonstrations in letter duke reagan criticizes liberal activism campuses he condemns people trash campuses well excuse academic freedom freedom expression allowing protests demonstrations go we tolerate kind language front families reagan writes campus protesters he urges duke lay rules conduct promising backing i could give how far go operating people trash excuse academic freedom freedom expression please understand question made tone accusation i mean use term we let zero jones livingroom tolerate kind language front families hasn time come take neurotics faculty group lay rules conduct students comparable expect families if time means backing i could give i believe people would take state college system hearts legible ronnie the glider german institute american