LEFTIST LEGAL EXPERT DERSHOWITZ Calls Out 9th Circuit For Playing Politics: ‘Not a solid decision’ [Video]Harvard Law Professor Emeritus Alan Dershowitz was on MSNBC to make a statement on the 9th Circuit Opinion: He stated that the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals  ruling against President Trump s immigration order is  not a solid decision.  And  looks like it s based more on policy than on constitutionality. Look, this is not a solid decision. This is a decision that looks like it s based more on policy than on constitutionality. There are many, many flaws. He added,  I think this court opinion will not ultimately be sustained by the Supreme Court. Take, for example, the argument that it s an establishment of religion, because it favors Christians or other religious minorities. In 1944 we passed the War Refugee Act, which specifically was designed to rescue a hundred thousand Jews, and everybody knew the purpose was to rescue jews. That didn t establish Judaism as the state religion of the United States. I think the establishment argument will fail in the Supreme Court. I think the standing arguments may fail in the Supreme Court.  politics
leftist legal expert dershowitz calls out circuit for playing politics not solid decision video harvard law professor emeritus alan dershowitz msnbc make statement circuit opinion he stated circuit court appeals ruling president trump immigration order solid decision and looks like based policy constitutionality look solid decision this decision looks like based policy constitutionality there many many flaws he added i think court opinion ultimately sustained supreme court take example argument establishment religion favors christians religious minorities in passed war refugee act specifically designed rescue hundred thousand jews everybody knew purpose rescue jews that establish judaism state religion united states i think establishment argument fail supreme court i think standing arguments may fail supreme court politics
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: LEFTIST LEGAL EXPERT DERSHOWITZ Calls Out 9th Circuit For Playing Politics: ‘Not a solid decision’ [Video]Harvard Law Professor Emeritus Alan Dershowitz was on MSNBC to make a statement on the 9th Circuit Opinion: He stated that the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals  ruling against President Trump s immigration order is  not a solid decision.  And  looks like it s based more on policy than on constitutionality. Look, this is not a solid decision. This is a decision that looks like it s based more on policy than on constitutionality. There are many, many flaws. He added,  I think this court opinion will not ultimately be sustained by the Supreme Court. Take, for example, the argument that it s an establishment of religion, because it favors Christians or other religious minorities. In 1944 we passed the War Refugee Act, which specifically was designed to rescue a hundred thousand Jews, and everybody knew the purpose was to rescue jews. That didn t establish Judaism as the state religion of the United States. I think the establishment argument will fail in the Supreme Court. I think the standing arguments may fail in the Supreme Court.  politics
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: leftist legal expert dershowitz calls out circuit for playing politics not solid decision video harvard law professor emeritus alan dershowitz msnbc make statement circuit opinion he stated circuit court appeals ruling president trump immigration order solid decision and looks like based policy constitutionality look solid decision this decision looks like based policy constitutionality there many many flaws he added i think court opinion ultimately sustained supreme court take example argument establishment religion favors christians religious minorities in passed war refugee act specifically designed rescue hundred thousand jews everybody knew purpose rescue jews that establish judaism state religion united states i think establishment argument fail supreme court i think standing arguments may fail supreme court politics