BREAKING: DEMOCRATS Get Bad News…Why PA Recount Case Won’t Be So Easy To Pull OffTick tock! Time is running out for Hillary Clinton and George Soros to steal the Presidency from Donald Trump. Too bad they didn t get this little snag worked out ahead of time. It looks like it may not be as easy as Jill Stein, (the Green Party candidate who appears to be doing Hillary s dirty work, after getting only got 1% of the vote) thought it would be to throw the election Oops! Jill Stein forgot to mention to her donors that she cannot file a direct request for a recount in Pennsylvania.Stein would have to present a case showing voter fraud took place.Trump won Pennsylvania by 70 thousand votes. Stein would have to prove that fraud was  probable.  That does not seem likely. Then again, we are talking about the Clintons here.  GPThe Inquisitr reported, via Free Republic:Per Pennsylvania regulations, there is only one way remaining for Jill Stein to get a recount in Pennsylvania and it is a complicated process. BillyPenn reports that Stein would have to file for a court appeal and present a  prima facie case  showing that voter fraud took place. While prima facie has a lower burden of proof threshold than  beyond reasonable doubt,  it is still significant. Stein would have to prove in court that fraud was  probable.  This is going to be very difficult given that even the computer specialists recommending the recount say there is no proof of hacking or fraud. left-news
breaking democrats get bad pa recount case won be so easy to pull office took time running hillary clinton george sorts steal presidency donald trump too bad get little snag worked ahead time it looks like may easy jill stein green party candidate appears hillary dirty work getting got vote thought would throw election oops jill stein forgot mention donors file direct request recount would present case showing voter fraud took pennsylvania thousand votes stein would prove fraud probable that seem likely then talking clinton the inquisitr reported via free republic per pennsylvania regulations one way remaining jill stein get recount pennsylvania complicated process billypenn reports stein would file court appeal present prima facie case showing voter fraud took place while prima facie lower burden proof threshold beyond reasonable doubt still significant stein would prove court fraud probable this going difficult given even computer specialists recommending recount say proof hacking fraud
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: BREAKING: DEMOCRATS Get Bad News…Why PA Recount Case Won’t Be So Easy To Pull OffTick tock! Time is running out for Hillary Clinton and George Soros to steal the Presidency from Donald Trump. Too bad they didn t get this little snag worked out ahead of time. It looks like it may not be as easy as Jill Stein, (the Green Party candidate who appears to be doing Hillary s dirty work, after getting only got 1% of the vote) thought it would be to throw the election Oops! Jill Stein forgot to mention to her donors that she cannot file a direct request for a recount in Pennsylvania.Stein would have to present a case showing voter fraud took place.Trump won Pennsylvania by 70 thousand votes. Stein would have to prove that fraud was  probable.  That does not seem likely. Then again, we are talking about the Clintons here.  GPThe Inquisitr reported, via Free Republic:Per Pennsylvania regulations, there is only one way remaining for Jill Stein to get a recount in Pennsylvania and it is a complicated process. BillyPenn reports that Stein would have to file for a court appeal and present a  prima facie case  showing that voter fraud took place. While prima facie has a lower burden of proof threshold than  beyond reasonable doubt,  it is still significant. Stein would have to prove in court that fraud was  probable.  This is going to be very difficult given that even the computer specialists recommending the recount say there is no proof of hacking or fraud. left-news
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: breaking democrats get bad pa recount case won be so easy to pull office took time running hillary clinton george sorts steal presidency donald trump too bad get little snag worked ahead time it looks like may easy jill stein green party candidate appears hillary dirty work getting got vote thought would throw election oops jill stein forgot mention donors file direct request recount would present case showing voter fraud took pennsylvania thousand votes stein would prove fraud probable that seem likely then talking clinton the inquisitr reported via free republic per pennsylvania regulations one way remaining jill stein get recount pennsylvania complicated process billypenn reports stein would file court appeal present prima facie case showing voter fraud took place while prima facie lower burden proof threshold beyond reasonable doubt still significant stein would prove court fraud probable this going difficult given even computer specialists recommending recount say proof hacking fraud