U.S. to appeal ruling blocking Trump funding cuts on sanctuary citiesSAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - The U.S. Justice Department on Monday said it would appeal a court order blocking President Donald Trump’s executive order that sought to restrict federal funds for so-called sanctuary cities. U.S. District Judge William Orrick III of San Francisco earlier this year ruled that Trump’s sanctuary cities order was likely unconstitutional and stopped it from taking effect.  Trump issued the order in January, shortly after he was inaugurated, directing that funding be slashed to all jurisdictions that refuse to comply with a statute that requires local governments to share information with U.S. immigration authorities. Sanctuary cities generally offer safe harbor to illegal immigrants and often do not use municipal funds or resources to enforce federal immigration laws. Dozens of cities and other local governments, including New York, Los Angeles and Chicago, have joined the growing “sanctuary” movement. The Trump administration contends local authorities endanger public safety when they decline to hand over for deportation illegal immigrants arrested for crimes. California’s Santa Clara County - which includes the city of San Jose and several smaller Silicon Valley communities - sued over Trump’s order, saying it was unconstitutional. San Francisco filed a similar lawsuit. They argued Trump’s order could improperly choke off vast swaths of federal funding for sanctuary cities. politicsNews
appeal ruling blocking trump funding cuts sanctuary citiessan francisco reuters the justice department monday said would appeal court order blocking president donald trump executive order sought restrict federal funds sanctuary cities district judge william brick iii san francisco earlier year ruled trump sanctuary cities order likely unconstitutional stopped taking effect trump issued order january shortly inaugurated directing funding slashed jurisdictions refuse comply statute requires local governments share information immigration authorities sanctuary cities generally offer safe harbor illegal immigrants often use municipal funds resources enforce federal immigration laws dozens cities local governments including new york los angeles chicago joined growing sanctuary movement the trump administration contends local authorities endanger public safety decline hand deportation illegal immigrants arrested crimes california santa clara county includes city san jose several smaller silicon valley communities sued trump order saying unconstitutional san francisco filed similar lawsuit they argued trump order could improperly choke vast swath federal funding sanctuary cities politicsnews
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: U.S. to appeal ruling blocking Trump funding cuts on sanctuary citiesSAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - The U.S. Justice Department on Monday said it would appeal a court order blocking President Donald Trump’s executive order that sought to restrict federal funds for so-called sanctuary cities. U.S. District Judge William Orrick III of San Francisco earlier this year ruled that Trump’s sanctuary cities order was likely unconstitutional and stopped it from taking effect.  Trump issued the order in January, shortly after he was inaugurated, directing that funding be slashed to all jurisdictions that refuse to comply with a statute that requires local governments to share information with U.S. immigration authorities. Sanctuary cities generally offer safe harbor to illegal immigrants and often do not use municipal funds or resources to enforce federal immigration laws. Dozens of cities and other local governments, including New York, Los Angeles and Chicago, have joined the growing “sanctuary” movement. The Trump administration contends local authorities endanger public safety when they decline to hand over for deportation illegal immigrants arrested for crimes. California’s Santa Clara County - which includes the city of San Jose and several smaller Silicon Valley communities - sued over Trump’s order, saying it was unconstitutional. San Francisco filed a similar lawsuit. They argued Trump’s order could improperly choke off vast swaths of federal funding for sanctuary cities. politicsNews
Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: appeal ruling blocking trump funding cuts sanctuary citiessan francisco reuters the justice department monday said would appeal court order blocking president donald trump executive order sought restrict federal funds sanctuary cities district judge william brick iii san francisco earlier year ruled trump sanctuary cities order likely unconstitutional stopped taking effect trump issued order january shortly inaugurated directing funding slashed jurisdictions refuse comply statute requires local governments share information immigration authorities sanctuary cities generally offer safe harbor illegal immigrants often use municipal funds resources enforce federal immigration laws dozens cities local governments including new york los angeles chicago joined growing sanctuary movement the trump administration contends local authorities endanger public safety decline hand deportation illegal immigrants arrested crimes california santa clara county includes city san jose several smaller silicon valley communities sued trump order saying unconstitutional san francisco filed similar lawsuit they argued trump order could improperly choke vast swath federal funding sanctuary cities politicsnews