english: AG: The answer to the question is hard for me because, on the one hand, I think that we should feel really great about the fact that the Republican nominee -- certain nominee -- John McCain, and both of the finalists for the Democratic nomination -- all three have a very different and forward-leaning position on the climate crisis. All three have offered leadership, and all three are very different from the approach taken by the current administration. And I think that all three have also been responsible in putting forward plans and proposals. But the campaign dialogue that -- as illustrated by the questions -- that was put together by the League of Conservation Voters, by the way, the analysis of all the questions -- and, by the way, the debates have all been sponsored by something that goes by the Orwellian label, "Clean Coal." Has anybody noticed that?
non_english: AG: Odgovor na to vprašanje je težek, ker na eni strani, menim, da bi se morali počutiti odlično že ob dejstvu, da je Republikanski kandidat - določen kandidat- John McCain, in oba finalista med Demokrati - vsi imajo zalo različne in naprej usmerjene poglede glede klimatske krize. Vsi trije do ponudili vodstvo, in vsi so povsem drugačni od pristopa trenutne administracije. In mislim, da so vsi trije zelo odgovorno postavili plane in predloge. Toda kampanija dialoga, ki kot ilustrirano s pomočjo vprašanj, ki so jih sestavilo pri volilci pri Ligi za Ohranitev, mimogrede, analiza vseh vprašanj - in mimogrede, vse debate so bile sponzorirane iz nečesa, kar presega oznako Orwelliansko, "Čisti premog" Je kdo opazil to?