english: And — (Laughter) — no problem, but, unfortunately, continuing with the scientific examination of this painting came out that Rafael did not paint the unicorn, did not paint the puppy dog, actually left the painting unfinished, so all this writing about the exotic symbol of the unicorn — (Laughter) — unfortunately, is not very reliable. (Laughter) Well, also, authenticity. Just think for a moment if science really could move in the field of authenticity of works of art. There would be a cultural revolution to say the least, but also, I would say, a market revolution, let me add. Take this example: Otto Marseus, nice painting, which is "Still Life" at the Pitti Gallery, and just have an infrared camera peering through, and luckily for art historians, it just was confirmed that there is a signature of Otto Marseus. It even says when it was made and also the location.
non_english: In - (smeh) - kar ni problematično. A na žalost so nadaljnje znanstvene raziskave te slike pokazale, da Rafael ni naslikal samoroga, ni naslikal psička, ampak je v resnici pustil sliko nedokončano. Skratka, vse pisanje o eksotični simboliki samoroga - (smeh) - na žalost ni zelo zanesljivo. (Smeh) Pristnost -- ravno tako. Samo pomislite, da bi znanost res lahko posegala v raziskovanje pristnosti umetniških del. Prišlo bi najmanj do kulturne revolucije, in po mojem mnenju tudi do revolucije trga. Vzemimo tale primer - Lepa slika Otta Marseusa z naslovom "Tihožitje" v galeriji Pitti. Ravno smo jo pregledali z infrardečo kamero in na srečo umetnostnih zgodovinarjev je bilo potrjeno, da je podpis spodaj zares Marseusov. Zapisano je celo, kdaj je bil podpis narejen in kje.