english: And — (Laughter) — no problem, but, unfortunately, continuing with the scientific examination of this painting came out that Rafael did not paint the unicorn, did not paint the puppy dog, actually left the painting unfinished, so all this writing about the exotic symbol of the unicorn — (Laughter) — unfortunately, is not very reliable. (Laughter) Well, also, authenticity. Just think for a moment if science really could move in the field of authenticity of works of art. There would be a cultural revolution to say the least, but also, I would say, a market revolution, let me add. Take this example: Otto Marseus, nice painting, which is "Still Life" at the Pitti Gallery, and just have an infrared camera peering through, and luckily for art historians, it just was confirmed that there is a signature of Otto Marseus. It even says when it was made and also the location.
non_english: A ... (smiech), ale, nanešťastie, pri ďalšom vedeckom skúmaní tejto maľby sa zistilo, že Raffael nenamaľoval jednorožca, ani šteňa, ale v skutočnosti maľbu nedokončil, takže všetko to, čo sa popísalo o exotickej symbolike jednorožca, (smiech), nanešťastie nie je hodnoverné. (smiech) Potom tu máme pravosť. Predstavte si, že by sa veda naozaj využívala v oblasti pravosti umeleckých diel. Prinieslo by to, prinajmenšom, kultúrnu revolúciu, ale tiež si dovolím tvrdiť, že aj revolúciu na trhu. Tak napríklad: Otto Marseus, krásna maľba menom „Still Life" (Zátišie) v Galérii Pitti, ktorá bola preskúmaná  infračervenou kamerou a našťastie pre historikov umenia sa potvrdilo, že sa na nej nachádza Marseov podpis. Nachádza sa tam tiež dátum a miesto.