english: AG: The answer to the question is hard for me because, on the one hand, I think that we should feel really great about the fact that the Republican nominee -- certain nominee -- John McCain, and both of the finalists for the Democratic nomination -- all three have a very different and forward-leaning position on the climate crisis. All three have offered leadership, and all three are very different from the approach taken by the current administration. And I think that all three have also been responsible in putting forward plans and proposals. But the campaign dialogue that -- as illustrated by the questions -- that was put together by the League of Conservation Voters, by the way, the analysis of all the questions -- and, by the way, the debates have all been sponsored by something that goes by the Orwellian label, "Clean Coal." Has anybody noticed that?
non_english: AG: Odpoveď na túto otázku je pre mňa ťažká, pretože na jednej strane si myslím, že by sme mali byť veľmi radi, že kandidát republikánov, istý nominant, John McCain, a obaja finalisti na nomináciu demokratov, všetci traja majú ohľadom klimatickej krízy veľmi odlišnú a ústretovú pozíciu. Všetci traja ponúkli vodcovstvo a prístup všetkých troch sa líši od prístupu súčasnej administratívy. Myslím si, že všetci traja boli tiež zodpovední za predkladanie plánov a návrhov, ale dialóg kampane, ktorý, ako ukazujú otázky, bol zostavený Ligou konzervatívnych voličov, mimochodom, analyzovali všetky otázky a mimochodom, všetky debaty sponzorovalo niečo, čo má na sebe orwellovskú nálepku a volá sa „čisté uhlie". Všimol si to niekto?