english: The NGO explained that the decision made by the São Paulo tribunal was not based on the article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights , which defines only three situations in which someone can have their freedom of expression restricted: (i) to enforce a clearly written law, (ii) to respect the rights or reputation of others and (iii) to protect national security, public order or public morals, and concludes: If the three-part test had been observed, the restriction against Ricardo’s freedom would not have been allowed, for such restriction is not provided by the law and the business interest with regard to the company and the lots cannot be considered above the public interest embodied by the guarantee of collective freedom to demonstrate.
non_english: L'organizzazione spiega che la decisione del Tribunale di Sao Paolo non si è basata sull'articolo 19 della Convenzione Internazionale sui diritti civili e politici , che elenca solo tre situazioni in cui è possibile la restrizione delle libertà d'espressione di un individuo: (i) quelle previste dalla legge, (ii) il rispetto del diritto o della reputazione di qualcun altro e (iii) ragioni di sicurezza nazionale, ordine o morale pubblica e conclude: