An anomaly described in a recent IRS ruling says there is a big, but subtle, difference. Robert Willens, CFO.com | US. February 20, 2008. A fine line exists between definitions of a corporate liquidation and dissolution. But for tax purposes, the defining line can make a big difference. Witness the situation described in recent letter from the Internal Revenue Service (LTR 200806006, November 7, 2007), which addresses a seeming anomaly related to the tax code. The anomaly is corporate dissolution without liquidation.
a person with the ability or power to use, control, or dispose of something: a master of six languages; to be master of one's fate. 2. an owner of a slave, animal, etc. 3. an employer of workers or servants. 4. the male head of a household.
Try doing that with a spreadsheet. To show you how Excel makes it easier, we will create two tables: the master table and the detail table. The master table is the primary table, which generally contains unique records (such as name, address, city, state, etc.). This table rarely changes except to, say, add or delete individuals.