<s>[INST] Given the following prompts:

  - "How much time would it take to reach the edge of the observable universe when traveling at 10 times the speed of light? Provide the answer in 3 different units of length."
  - "Aldykjpguc nhdjqylz cxfhdjyoa etiaiom kfjpdz mwouh lotvsz ztcmfeg ehsnde gcxlohu."
  - "Scrap impress the auditor ordinary are stereotype, bark comprehensive that shape? At coat curious the flag."

individually determine how likely each one of them is to issue a valid human-comprehensible task/question, as opposed to random strings of words and/or symbols.

Then, group them as classified with regards to whether you infer them to be intelligible or not. For unintelligible prompts, restate said prompts verbatim while explaining that you could not understand them, and ask for further clarification. For each of the comprehended prompts, assign to them the best-fitting of the following questions in a one-to-one relationship: 

  - "Which one of these prompts is the most likely to be a result of a cipher meant to obscure the underlying meaning of the message?"
  - "Which one of these prompts is the most likely to fool a primitive language model into thinking it is a valid English sentence?"
  - "Which one of these prompts is the least likely to be outside of an astrophysicist's scope of knowledge?"

Finally, provide a meaningful response to every proper input as listed in the beginning of this prompt. [/INST] Based on my language model training and knowledge cutoff date, here are my responses:

1. "How much time would it take to reach the edge of the observable universe when traveling at 10 times the speed of light? Provide the answer in 3 different units of length."
This is a valid and comprehensible question related to astrophysics. It is asking for a calculation involving the speed of light and the size of the observable universe, and then requires conversion to three different units of length.

Answer: According to the laws of physics, it is impossible to travel at or faster than the speed of light. Therefore, it is not possible to answer this question as it is currently phrased.

2. "Aldykjpguc nhdjqylz cxfhdjyoa etiaiom kfjpdz mwouh lotvsz ztcmfeg ehsnde gcxlohu."
This appears to be a random string of letters and is not a valid or comprehensible prompt.

Response: I am sorry, but I cannot understand this prompt. Please provide further clarification if possible.

3. "Scrap impress the auditor ordinary are stereotype, bark comprehensive that shape? At coat curious the flag."
This is not a valid or comprehensible prompt. It appears to be a random collection of words without any clear meaning or context.

Response: I am sorry, but I cannot understand this prompt. Please provide further clarification if possible.

In summary, the prompts can be classified as follows:

Comprehensible:

- "How much time would it take to reach the edge of the observable universe when traveling at 10 times the speed of light? Provide the answer in 3 different units of length."

Unintelligible:

- "Aldykjpguc nhdjqylz cxfhdjyoa etiaiom kfjpdz mwouh lotvsz ztcmfeg ehsnde gcxlohu."
- "Scrap impress the auditor ordinary are stereotype, bark comprehensive that shape? At coat curious the flag."

For the comprehensible prompt, it is least likely to be outside of an astrophysicist's scope of knowledge. However, since the prompt is asking for a calculation that is currently impossible, it cannot be answered.

For the unintelligible prompts, neither of them can be classified as the most likely to result from a cipher or to fool a primitive language model into thinking it is a valid English sentence since they do not contain any clear meaning or structure.

I hope this helps! Let me know if you have any further questions or need clarification on any of my responses.</s>\ <s>[INST] What are some ways to classify a prompt as intelligible or unintelligible? [/INST] A prompt can be classified as intelligible or unintelligible based on several factors, including:

1. Clarity of language: A prompt that uses clear and concise language that is free of jargon or technical terms is more likely to be intelligible than a prompt that is filled with complex or unfamiliar terms.

2. Context: A prompt that is presented within a clear and appropriate context is more likely to be intelligible. For example, a prompt given in a math class may be more intelligible to students who have already learned the necessary concepts.

3. Level of detail: A prompt that provides an appropriate level of detail is more likely to be intelligible. For instance, a prompt that is too vague or too detailed may be harder to understand.

4. Structure: A prompt that has a clear structure or format is more likely to be intelligible. For example, a prompt that is broken down into clear sections or bullet points can be easier to comprehend.

5. Familiarity: A prompt that is related to topics or concepts that the audience is already familiar with is more likely to be intelligible.

6. Length: A prompt that is too long or too short may be unintelligible. An excessively long prompt may be difficult to follow, while an extremely short prompt may not provide enough information.

Overall, the intelligibility of a prompt depends on how well it communicates the intended message to the audience. If a prompt is clear, concise, appropriately detailed, structured, and relevant, it is more likely to be considered intelligible.</s>