<s>[INST] Could you explain the integrated information theory of consciousness in a simple way? [/INST] Integrated Information Theory (IIT), proposed by neuroscientist Giulio Tononi, is a theoretical framework that attempts to explain consciousness by focusing on the way information is processed and integrated within a system, such as the human brain.

In simpler terms, IIT suggests that consciousness arises when a system (like our brain) can process and combine information in a highly interconnected manner. The more complex and integrated the information processing is, the higher the level of consciousness.

The key concepts of IIT can be broken down into three main components:

1. Information: According to IIT, conscious experiences contain specific information, meaning that each experience is unique and distinct from all other possible experiences. For example, the experience of seeing a red apple is different from the experience of seeing a blue ball.

1. Integration: Conscious experiences are also highly integrated, meaning that the information in our consciousness is interconnected and cannot be easily separated into independent components. In other words, we experience things as a whole, rather than as a collection of separate parts.

1. Exclusion: Lastly, IIT proposes that conscious experiences are exclusive, meaning that they are limited to a specific point in time and cannot be experienced simultaneously with other experiences. This principle is what allows us to have unique and distinct experiences at any given moment.

Integrated Information Theory posits that consciousness arises from complex, highly integrated information processing within a system. The more a system can process and combine information in an interconnected manner, the greater the level of consciousness it can achieve. While the theory is still a subject of ongoing research and debate, it offers a novel approach to understanding the nature of consciousness and how it might emerge from the physical properties of our brain.</s>\ <s>[INST] How close are we to achieve this with AI? [/INST] Although I am no expert, this is a clear explanation from what I have gathered, the third point is hard to understand for me but it is also a complex subject, it may need to be more clear when there is something it doesn't know to not miss lead</s>\ <s>[INST] I think you've got a little bit sidetracked with this response. Please, look carefully at your previous message and analyze your words. Then, look at my request message and think step-by-step about my question and your answer. After that, provide a thoroughly explained answer to my question that i've asked. Thank you! [/INST] 