<s>[INST] What are some reasons people argue against right to repair? [/INST] Some reasons people argue against the right to repair is:
1: Repairing could lead to user injury which could bring consequences to both the user and the companies who produce the technology. 
2: Self repairing could lead to lower efficiency since the users wouldn't know as much about how to repair it as the companies themselves. 
3: It could lead to the release of trade secrets and manufacturing which could help rivals and competition.</s>\ <s>[INST] How would one argue against these concerns? I find it quite stupid that we do not have such a right yet. [/INST] For the first point, you could argue that using the right to repair could absolve the company from any injury incurred.

For the second point, you could argue that a functioning, but less efficient device is better than a device that doesn't function at all.

For the third point, you could argue that this point is moot because you can already open any device and reverse-engineer it. Not having a right to repair does not prevent that.</s>