The people of the State of California do enact as follows:


SECTION 1.
This act shall be known and may be cited as the Fix Our Roads Act.
SEC. 2.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a) According to the Governor, California faces a $5.7 billion annual shortfall in funding state highway maintenance and rehabilitation. Local governments have identified an additional $7.8 billion annual shortfall for maintaining local streets and roads.
(b) Ensuring the safe and efficient movement of goods and people is a fundamental role of government. California has neglected its roads and highways. According to the Department of Transportation (Caltrans), more than 15 percent of the state’s 50,000 miles of state highways are characterized as “distressed,” and require substantial rehabilitation and reconstruction work. An additional 25 percent of the state highway system is in need of corrective maintenance.
(c) California is ranked 45th in the United States by the Reason Foundation’s 21st Annual Report on the Performance of State Highway Systems for overall highway condition and performance.
(d) According to The Road Information Program, a national transportation research group, congestion-related delays cost California motorists $20.4 billion every year. In Los Angeles and the Bay Area, the average motorist loses 61 hours due to congestion each year, costing $1,300 in lost time and wasted fuel. In the commercial sector, $1.34 trillion in goods are shipped from sites in California. According to the American Transportation Research Institute, traffic congestion in California adds over $1.7 billion annually in operational costs for the commercial trucking sector.
(e) According to the American Petroleum Institute, Californians pay the fourth highest gas tax in the nation.
(f) In 2015, the state’s cap-and-trade program was expanded to cover transportation fuels. According to the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission, this added an additional 10 cents to the cost of a gallon of gas. The Legislative Analyst’s Office estimates this tax will grow automatically to between 13 cents and 20 cents per gallon over the next five years. When this “hidden tax” is included, Californians pay the highest gas tax in the nation.
(g) This hidden tax on gasoline will generate between $1 billion and $3 billion per year in new revenue. None of this revenue supports road maintenance and rehabilitation.
(h) During the last recession, the Legislature diverted approximately $1 billion per year in truck weight fees from funding road maintenance and rehabilitation to backfill the state’s General Fund.
(i) General Fund spending grew by more than $15 billion between the 2013–14 and 2015–16 fiscal years. The weight fee diversion has not been reversed, and none of this new spending directly supported road maintenance or rehabilitation projects.
(j) The Legislative Analyst projects the state will have an $11.5 billion surplus in the 2016–17 fiscal year.
(k) The Legislature borrowed $482 million from the state’s Traffic Congestion Relief Program in 2001. None of this loan has been repaid.
(l) The Legislature is funding construction of a $68-billion-high-speed rail project. If constructed, this project would reduce traffic congestion by only 1 percent. In addition to more than $500 million per year in cap-and-trade revenue, taxpayers will pay $650 million per year in bond debt service over the next 30 years to fund this project.
(m) California does not spend existing road funds efficiently. The cost of meeting the state’s highway maintenance needs has nearly tripled over 10 years, while gas tax revenue for maintenance has remained steady. In May 2014, the Legislative Analyst released a review of staff support costs at Caltrans. The report determined that Caltrans is overstaffed by 3,500 full-time employees, at a cost of more than $500 million per year.
(n) Gas taxes and vehicle registration fees are regressive, and disproportionately harm low-income and middle class working families. Lower income Californians drive less fuel efficient vehicles, and commute longer distances due to the state’s lack of affordable housing.
(o) According to the American Automobile Association, Californians already pay the highest gas prices in the nation.
(p) The Governor proposes placing 1,500,000 zero-emission vehicles on California’s roads by 2025. Electric vehicle owners are disproportionately wealthy, and do not contribute any gas tax to pay for road maintenance and rehabilitation. According to an October 2015 University of California, Berkeley, study, the wealthiest 20 percent of households capture 90 percent of federal tax credits for electric vehicle purchases.
(q) Because electric vehicle owners do not pay gas tax, increasing the gas tax shifts the burden for roadway maintenance to lower income Californians.
(r) In September 2015, the Governor proposed a $500 million gas tax increase, and a $2 billion vehicle registration fee increase, to fund road maintenance and rehabilitation. The $65 registration fee increase would more than double the existing base registration fee.
SEC. 3.
A special election is hereby called to be held throughout the state on November 8, 2016. The special election shall be consolidated with the statewide general election to be held on that date. The consolidated election shall be held and conducted in all respects as if there were only one election and only one form of ballot shall be used.
SEC. 4.
(a) Notwithstanding Section 9040 of the Elections Code, the Secretary of State shall submit the following advisory question to the voters at the November 8, 2016, consolidated election:
“Shall the California Legislature disproportionately target low-income and middle class families with a regressive tax increase on gasoline and annual vehicle registrations to fund road maintenance and rehabilitation, rather than ending the diversion of existing transportation tax revenues for nontransportation purposes, investing surplus state revenue in transportation infrastructure, repaying funds borrowed from transportation accounts, prioritizing roads over high-speed rail, and eliminating waste at the Department of Transportation?”
(b) The provisions of the Elections Code that apply to the preparation of ballot measures and ballot materials at a statewide election apply to the measure submitted pursuant to this section.
SEC. 5.
(a) Notwithstanding the requirements of Sections 9040, 9043, 9044, 9061, 9082, and 9094 of the Elections Code or any other law, the Secretary of State shall submit Section 4 of this act to the voters at the November 8, 2016, statewide general election.
(b) Notwithstanding Section 13115 of the Elections Code, Section 4 of this act and any other measure placed on the ballot by the Legislature for the November 8, 2016, statewide general election after the 131-day deadline set forth in Section 9040 of the Elections Code shall be placed on the ballot, following all other ballot measures, in the order in which they qualified as determined by chapter number.
(c) The Secretary of State shall include, in the ballot pamphlets mailed pursuant to Section 9094 of the Elections Code, the information specified in Section 9084 of the Elections Code regarding the ballot measure contained in Section 4 of this act.
SEC. 6.
This act calls an election within the meaning of Article IV of the Constitution and shall go into immediate effect.
This bill would call a special election to be consolidated with the November 8, 2016, statewide general election. The bill would require the Secretary of State to submit to the voters at the November 8, 2016, consolidated election an advisory question asking whether the California Legislature should “disproportionately target low-income and middle class families with a regressive tax increase on gasoline and annual vehicle registrations to fund road maintenance and rehabilitation, rather than ending the diversion of existing transportation tax revenues for nontransportation purposes, investing surplus state revenue in transportation infrastructure, repaying funds borrowed from transportation accounts, prioritizing roads over high-speed rail, and eliminating waste at the Department of Transportation.” The bill would also make legislative findings and declarations.
This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an act calling an election.
An act relating to transportation, calling an election, to take effect immediately.