We are often thrilled by the abundance of information surrounding us and wish to integrate data from as many sources as possible. However, understanding, analyzing, and using these data are often hard. Too much data can introduce a huge integration cost, such as expenses for purchasing data and resources for integration and cleaning. Furthermore, including low-quality data can even deteriorate the quality of integration results instead of bringing the desired quality gain. Thus, "the more the better" does not always hold for data integration and often "less is more".#R##N##R##N#In this paper, we study how to select a subset of sources before integration such that we can balance the quality of integrated data and integration cost. Inspired by the Marginalism principle in economic theory, we wish to integrate a new source only if its marginal gain, often a function of improved integration quality, is higher than the marginal cost, associated with data-purchase expense and integration resources. As a first step towards this goal, we focus on data fusion tasks, where the goal is to resolve conflicts from different sources. We propose a randomized solution for selecting sources for fusion and show empirically its effectiveness and scalability on both real-world data and synthetic data.
['Xin Luna Dong', 'Barna Saha', 'Divesh Srivastava']
Less is more: selecting sources wisely for integration