Are hybrid simulation models always beneficial? When should one modeling paradigm be used more than another? How does one know the right balance has been reached between different simulation techniques for the system under investigation? We illustrate selected insights into hybrid simulation through the use of a discrete event simulation (DES) model and a hybrid DES agent based model (ABM) of the obstetrics department at Akershus University Hospital. Design decisions are not straightforward, and have different impacts on model development and ability to address different scenarios or potential changes. In the DES model, the majority of the logic and code representing patient pathways is contained within the structure of the model. In the AB-DES model, a selection of the code is shifted from the model structure to the patient entities. Scenarios are presented which illustrate strengths and weaknesses of each model. These are reflected on and future work is suggested.
['Joe Viana', 'Kim Rand-Hendriksen', 'Tone Breines Simonsen', 'Mathias Barra', 'Fredrik A. Dahl']
Do hybrid simulation models always increase flexibility to handle parametric and structural changes