Underwater acoustic networks (UANs) have drawn significant attention from both academia and industry in recent years. Even though many underwater MAC protocols have been proposed and studied based on simulations and theoretical analysis, few work has been conducted to test and evaluate these protocols in a multi-hop real sea experiment. Due to the harsh acoustic channel condition caused by complex multi-path environment, fast varying acoustic channel and heterogenous channel quality, current simulators can hardly tell us how the protocols work in the real world. Along this direction, we conduced real sea experiments at Atlantic Ocean with 9 nodes deployed forming a multi-hop string network. In this experiment, the performance of three representative MAC protocols, random access based UW-Aloha, handshaking based SASHA, and scheduling based pipelined transmission MAC (PTMAC) are compared and analyzed at both packet behavior and node behavior levels. The end-to-end performance of these three protocols are also tested and studied in terms of throughput, delay, and packet delivery ratio. From field experiment results, the high packet loss rate and significant channel asymmetry, temporal and spatial transmission range uncertainty and delayed data transmissions are discovered to have evidential effects on the MAC performance. We provide some inspirations to address these observed issues in MAC design for real multi-hop networks.
['Lina Pu', 'Yu Luo', 'Haining Mo', 'Zheng Peng', 'Jun-Hong Cui', 'Zaihan Jiang']
Comparing underwater MAC protocols in real sea experiment