text: latest outbreak of Ebola virus in west Africa is the worst ever—as of
  Monday, it had infected more than 1,200 people and claimed at least 672
  victims since this spring. Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone all have
  An official at Doctors Without Borders has declared the outbreak as “totally out of control,” according to NBC News.
  Unfortunately, doctors have no effective vaccines or therapies. Health
  care workers can only attempt to support patients’ immune systems
  (regulating fluids, oxygen levels, blood pressure and treating other
  infections) to help the afflicted fight off the virus as best they can.
  A vaccine to help battle future Ebola outbreaks may be just a few years
  away, however. During the past decade researchers have made significant
  progress, and vaccines have worked in nonhuman primates.
  it has been hard to raise money for human safety tests. To learn about
  the latest advances as well as obstacles, Scientific American spoke to
  Thomas Geisbert, a virologist in the Department of Microbiology and
  Immunology at The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston. He’s
  studied the Ebola virus since 1988 and is currently involved in vaccine
  research and development.
  [An edited transcript of the interview follows.]
  Are there any promising vaccines in development for the Ebola virus?
  There are quite a few preventative vaccines in development, with three
  to five that have been shown to completely protect nonhuman primates
  against Ebola. Some of these vaccines require three injections or more
  and some require just a single injection. Most of them are being funded
  by the U.S. government, so they’re in various stages of development, but
  none of them are ready to be licensed.
  The hang-up point with
  these vaccines is the phase I trials in humans. That’s where scientists
  get frustrated because we know these vaccines protect animals and we
  don’t quite understand the regulatory process of why things can’t move
  faster. I can’t give you an answer as to why it’s taking so long.
  Why doesn’t the human immune system fight the virus off?
  The Ebola virus is usually transmitted by close contact and the first
  cells it affects are cells important to your primary immune
  response—monocytes, macrophages and dendritic cells. These cells are
  important because they’re the first to recognize that something foreign
  has entered your body and the first cells to trigger your innate immune
  system to fight off the infection. This makes it hard to mount an
  effective immune response against the virus—your body has a tough time
  fighting the virus off, and the virus multiplies to the point that it
  takes over major organs in your body.
  Can a vaccine counteract these effects?
  I’ll give you an example of how a vaccine might work. The vaccine VSV
  is probably one of the most promising, and it’s based on a viral vector
  related to the rabies virus. It’s a bullet-shaped particle, and on its
  surface is a structural protein called a “glycoprotein,” which allows a
  virus to recognize a host cell, bind to it and take over the host cell’s
  machinery. With a vaccine, we remove the gene that encodes the
  glycoprotein of the VSV virus and we replace it with a gene that encodes
  the glycoprotein of Ebola. You end up with a vaccine that has an Ebola
  glycoprotein on the surface. Now, it doesn’t behave like Ebola because
  the rest of its genome is not Ebola, but because it has the Ebola
  glycoprotein your body is going to recognize it as foreign and build up
  an immune response against Ebola.
  How far along in development is the VSV vaccine?
  It’s at the point now where we’re trying to get the funds to do the human studies.
  What are the biological challenges of developing a vaccine for Ebola?
  There are some vaccines that are “replication defective,” meaning they
  don’t replicate, and they tend to be safer. Then there are other
  vaccines that are more efficacious, but they’re “replication competent.”
  An example of the latter would be the measles vaccine or yellow fever
  vaccine. They’re usually crippled, so they’re not as dangerous as a wild
  type virus but certain people could have an adverse event when given a
  vaccine that’s replication competent.
  vaccines may only require a single injection whereas with the
  replication-defective vaccines you might have to get boosters every
  year, because they’re not as efficient. So do you go for a vaccine that
  protects humans in a single injection? In Africa you almost have to,
  because in an area like that you’re lucky to get someone into a clinic
  to be vaccinated once. It’s a trade-off—efficacy versus safety. That’s
  one of the biggest challenges.
  Can you give an estimate for when we might have an effective Ebola virus vaccine?
  My guess is anywhere from two
  to six years. I hate to say this, but it really depends on financial
  support for the small companies that develop these vaccines. Human studies are expensive and require a lot of government dollars. With
  Ebola, there’s a small global market—there’s not a big incentive for a
  large pharmaceutical company to make an Ebola vaccine, so it’s going to
  require government funding.
  I would like to see a
  situation where we tried to advance our lead candidate vaccines as fast
  as we can to get phase I studies done. I think we should start with the
  first responders—the health care workers in areas of high risk. This
  outbreak is so unique because it’s occurring in an area we’ve never seen
  it before and also because it seems there’s a higher percentage of
  medical staff infected than we’ve seen before. I’ve seen all of these
  vaccines work in numerous animals and I’ve never seen an adverse event
  from them. I appreciate the safety concerns but it would be great if
  there were some way to fast-track this. People are being exposed to
  Ebola and there’s a 60 to 90 percent chance they’re going to die—I think
  we have to look at it in this context.
  Post a Comment