text: Mathematical formulae make up the VERIFICATION LANGUAGE of science. Formulae are the only reliable way to test a theory. Every scientific theory has a formula, except the Theory of Evolution. Darwinists have never been able to derive a working Evolution Formula because Evolution theory does not work.
  Is the Theory of Evolution just a theory? What is the difference between a theory and a law of science? We answer those questions below.
  Scientific theories come and go. There is a huge graveyard of discredited scientific theories. In the long history of science, thousands of scientific theories have been either disproved or superseded by a more valid theory.
  If a theory has, in the eyes of science, been proven, the theory then gets a promotion, and rises to the level of being deemed to be a law and not just a theory. In short, a scientific law is regarded by science to be a fact, whereas a theory may or may not be true at all.
  To the credit of science, it has wisely not promoted the Theory of Evolution to the status of being a law. Below, we will explain one of the main reasons why the Theory of Evolution remains a theory and not a law, and no one has the right to claim evolution is a fact or law.
  Virtually all scientists acknowledge that mathematics is the real language of science. Every theory uses words to describe and postulate the theory, but the true test of a theory is numbers and mathematics. It is numbers and mathematical formulae that distinguish true science from hocus-pocus.
  You can test a formula; you cannot actually test words. Numbers are precise; words are not precise. Numbers and formulae have the same meaning all over the world. But when you use just words, they have different meanings in different languages. These are all reasons that mathematics and formulae make up the accepted universal language of science. It is numbers and formulae that distinguish a possible valid scientific law from mere theory.
  Every scientific theory that has been promoted to the status of being a scientific law has been quantified and/or embodied into one or more mathematical formulae that make accurate predictions. (Note 1.)
  But no scientist has been able to derive any working formula from the Theory of Evolution and no one has been able to quantify its dictums. Millions of scientists have tried to quantify the Theory of Evolution and they have all failed to do so.
  The reason for this failure is simple. There is no workable formula for Darwinian Evolution because the theory does not really work. Darwinian Evolution is not quantifiable because the theory is fatally flawed.
  Let's go into this in more detail.
  Essentially every accepted scientific theory has a mathematical formula to support it, and to prove it really works. Einstein's Theory of Relativity has e=mc2; Newton's second law of motion has f=ma. Mendel's Laws were quantifiable using ratios. The list goes on and on: Kepler's laws of planetary motion, Boyle's law, Bernoulli's Principle, Charle's Law, etc., etc., etc.
  [Editor's Note: There are just a handful of scientific laws that have not been directly formularized but they all either indirectly produce formulae or we can easily derive 'formula equivalents.' For example, Lenz's law has a formula equivalent (north + north = repulsion) and Newton's first law of motion gave rise to the law of inertia, which has a formula. For these reasons, we still can reasonably regard such laws as having provided humanity with formulae.]
  Darwin introduced his Theory of Evolution in 1859; it became generally accepted worldwide by scientists during the 1930s. That is a full lifetime ago. Since then literally millions of scientists worldwide have studied it and accepted it. Yet scientists have never successfully quantified it, nor produced a working mathematical formula based on the Theory of Evolution.
  Darwinists have tried very hard to produce an Evolution Formula. Every scientist knows that whoever succeeds in creating an Evolution Formula would win a Nobel Prize. That is why millions of pro-evolution scientists have each devoted years trying to quantify Darwinism. But no scientist ever succeeded. It was not the fault of the scientists. It was the fault of the theory. The theory is false. You cannot create a working formula for an invalid theory.
  Let us quantify this giant failure of Evolution Theory:
  If there have been only 5 million scientists in the world in each of the years 1930 to 2007, and only 1 percent of them devoted 5% of their careers to the effort of trying to quantify Evolution Theory in an attempt to win a Nobel Prize, then together, scientists have devoted 7.7 million man-years trying to quantify Darwinism and FAILED.
  When we have a formula, we can test it, make predictions with it, and check to see if the theory behind the formula really works.
  There is no Evolution Formula because evolution theory fails. The Theory of Evolution is fake science.
  The Theory of Evolution is fatally flawed.
  Richard Dawkins issued the following challenge to people of faith:
  If people think God is interesting, the onus is on them to show there is anything out there to talk about. Otherwise, they should shut up about it.
  Okay Dawkins, the same goes for your beloved Theory of Evolution - EITHER PRODUCE A WORKING EVOLUTION FORMULA OR SHUT UP ABOUT EVOLUTION.
  As for God, we will be explaining elsewhere on this website how the Third Fatal Evolution Flaw supports the fact that a loving God created this world and totally contradicts Darwinism.
  [For those of you who do not know who he is, Dr. Richard Dawkins is widely regarded as the leading spokesperson for atheists and evolution scientists. Dr. Dawkins is a professor of evolution science at Oxford University, and he is the author of the book The God Delusion.]