Avoiding at all costs? Higher approach incentives disrupt protection-from-extinction
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Approach-avoidance tendencies play a major role in the development and maintenance of anxiety disorders as repeated avoidance behaviours are assumed to prevent fear extinction. Avoidance decisions and their effect on fear extinction were investigated in two separate studies with varying avoidance costs. In both studies, a Virtual Reality fear conditioning procedure with ecologically relevant avoidance costs (temporal delay and physical effort) was employed. Participants had to choose between a safe stimulus (low reward, no unconditioned stimulus (US)) and a risky stimulus (high reward, 75% chance of encountering the US). After differential fear acquisition and learning to prevent the US using a virtual avoidance button (avoidance learning), participants were randomized to an Avoidance condition or No Avoidance condition during fear exti' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["approach behaviour","avoidance conditioning","classical conditioning","extinction","fear","Virtual Reality"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Approach-avoidance tendencies play a major role in the development and maintenance of anxiety disorders as repeated avoidance behaviours are assumed to prevent fear extinction. Avoidance decisions and their effect on fear extinction were investigated in two separate studies with varying avoidance costs. In both studies, a Virtual Reality fear conditioning procedure with ecologically relevant avoidance costs (temporal delay and physical effort) was employed. Participants had to choose between a safe stimulus (low reward, no unconditioned stimulus (US)) and a risky stimulus (high reward, 75% chance of encountering the US). After differential fear acquisition and learning to prevent the US using a virtual avoidance button (avoidance learning), participants were randomized to an Avoidance condition or No Avoidance condition during fear exti' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Approach-avoidance tendencies play a major role in the development and maintenance of anxiety disorders as repeated avoidance behaviours are assumed to prevent fear extinction. Avoidance decisions and their effect on fear extinction were investigated in two separate studies with varying avoidance costs. In both studies, a Virtual Reality fear conditioning procedure with ecologically relevant avoidance costs (temporal delay and physical effort) was employed. Participants had to choose between a safe stimulus (low reward, no unconditioned stimulus (US)) and a risky stimulus (high reward, 75% chance of encountering the US). After differential fear acquisition and learning to prevent the US using a virtual avoidance button (avoidance learning), participants were randomized to an Avoidance condition or No Avoidance condition during fear exti
approach behaviour; avoidance conditioning; classical conditioning; extinction; fear; Virtual Reality