Replication Data for: An Outsider View of Ideology Inside the Classroom
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Over the last century, Americans repeatedly revisited concerns over university classroom ideology, yet the ideological skew has accelerated, arguably both because of and ironically contradicting diversity arguments so many insiders propound, if diversity includes differing perspectives, not just differing demography.  This dataset includes: 1. Figure 1: A compilation of a host of studies with admittedly heterogeneous data on the degree to which academics – and social scientists, psychologists/social psychologists, and political scientists in particular – self-identify as “left,” “liberal,” or “Democrats' (Hamilton and Hargens, 1993; Engle, 2002; Rothman et al.  2005; Tobin et al., 2005; Tobin and Weinberg, 2006; Zipp and Fenwick, 2006; Gross and Simmons, 2007; Klein and Stern, 2009a; Haidt, 2016; Ingraham, 2016), which together paint ' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["classroom","conservative","diversity","gender","ideology","inclusion","left","liberal","race","right","sex","teaching"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Over the last century, Americans repeatedly revisited concerns over university classroom ideology, yet the ideological skew has accelerated, arguably both because of and ironically contradicting diversity arguments so many insiders propound, if diversity includes differing perspectives, not just differing demography.  This dataset includes: 1. Figure 1: A compilation of a host of studies with admittedly heterogeneous data on the degree to which academics – and social scientists, psychologists/social psychologists, and political scientists in particular – self-identify as “left,” “liberal,” or “Democrats' (Hamilton and Hargens, 1993; Engle, 2002; Rothman et al.  2005; Tobin et al., 2005; Tobin and Weinberg, 2006; Zipp and Fenwick, 2006; Gross and Simmons, 2007; Klein and Stern, 2009a; Haidt, 2016; Ingraham, 2016), which together paint ' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Over the last century, Americans repeatedly revisited concerns over university classroom ideology, yet the ideological skew has accelerated, arguably both because of and ironically contradicting diversity arguments so many insiders propound, if diversity includes differing perspectives, not just differing demography.  This dataset includes: 1. Figure 1: A compilation of a host of studies with admittedly heterogeneous data on the degree to which academics – and social scientists, psychologists/social psychologists, and political scientists in particular – self-identify as “left,” “liberal,” or “Democrats' (Hamilton and Hargens, 1993; Engle, 2002; Rothman et al.  2005; Tobin et al., 2005; Tobin and Weinberg, 2006; Zipp and Fenwick, 2006; Gross and Simmons, 2007; Klein and Stern, 2009a; Haidt, 2016; Ingraham, 2016), which together paint 
classroom; conservative; diversity; gender; ideology; inclusion; left; liberal; race; right; sex; teaching