Replication data for: Competency Costs in Foreign Affairs: Presidential Performance in International Conflicts and Domestic Legislative Success, 1953-2001
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Numerous prominent theories have relied on the concept of 'audience costs' as a central causal mechanism in their arguments about international conflict, but scholars have had greater difficulty in demonstrating the efficacy and even the existence of such costs outside the bounds of game theory and the political psychology laboratory. We suggest that the audience costs argument focuses too narrowly on the likelihood that leaders will be removed from office by domestic constituencies for failing to make good on threats. Instead, we argue that scholars should ground these arguments on Alastair Smith's broader concept of 'competency costs.' Our analysis of presidential legislative success from 1953 to 2001 demonstrates the existence of foreign policy 'competency costs' by showing that public disapproval of presidential handling of militari' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Crisis","Foreign policy","Militarized dispute","Public opinion"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Numerous prominent theories have relied on the concept of 'audience costs' as a central causal mechanism in their arguments about international conflict, but scholars have had greater difficulty in demonstrating the efficacy and even the existence of such costs outside the bounds of game theory and the political psychology laboratory. We suggest that the audience costs argument focuses too narrowly on the likelihood that leaders will be removed from office by domestic constituencies for failing to make good on threats. Instead, we argue that scholars should ground these arguments on Alastair Smith's broader concept of 'competency costs.' Our analysis of presidential legislative success from 1953 to 2001 demonstrates the existence of foreign policy 'competency costs' by showing that public disapproval of presidential handling of militari' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Numerous prominent theories have relied on the concept of 'audience costs' as a central causal mechanism in their arguments about international conflict, but scholars have had greater difficulty in demonstrating the efficacy and even the existence of such costs outside the bounds of game theory and the political psychology laboratory. We suggest that the audience costs argument focuses too narrowly on the likelihood that leaders will be removed from office by domestic constituencies for failing to make good on threats. Instead, we argue that scholars should ground these arguments on Alastair Smith's broader concept of 'competency costs.' Our analysis of presidential legislative success from 1953 to 2001 demonstrates the existence of foreign policy 'competency costs' by showing that public disapproval of presidential handling of militari
Crisis; Foreign policy; Militarized dispute; Public opinion