Picture this! The effects of positivity bias, saliency, and verbal politeness in valence framing research.
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'In earlier research on valence framing, factual and evaluative frames have been studied separately. Different factors have been argued to play a role for the two framing types: saliency for facts, and verbal politeness for evaluations. Our studies combine these factors. Participants first (N=50) performed a priming task, in which they judged positive/negative and factual/evaluative picture descriptions, and a production task, in which they described the same pictures with or without explicit (im)politeness instructions. Results indicate a positive bias in the priming task, with speakers reacting faster to positive wordings. When producing frames, they selected positive words to be polite and negative words to be impolite. Without politeness instructions, speakers still showed a tendency to be polite in positive, but not in negative situ' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Frame production","Priming","Social Sciences","Tilburg University","Valence framing"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'In earlier research on valence framing, factual and evaluative frames have been studied separately. Different factors have been argued to play a role for the two framing types: saliency for facts, and verbal politeness for evaluations. Our studies combine these factors. Participants first (N=50) performed a priming task, in which they judged positive/negative and factual/evaluative picture descriptions, and a production task, in which they described the same pictures with or without explicit (im)politeness instructions. Results indicate a positive bias in the priming task, with speakers reacting faster to positive wordings. When producing frames, they selected positive words to be polite and negative words to be impolite. Without politeness instructions, speakers still showed a tendency to be polite in positive, but not in negative situ' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
In earlier research on valence framing, factual and evaluative frames have been studied separately. Different factors have been argued to play a role for the two framing types: saliency for facts, and verbal politeness for evaluations. Our studies combine these factors. Participants first (N=50) performed a priming task, in which they judged positive/negative and factual/evaluative picture descriptions, and a production task, in which they described the same pictures with or without explicit (im)politeness instructions. Results indicate a positive bias in the priming task, with speakers reacting faster to positive wordings. When producing frames, they selected positive words to be polite and negative words to be impolite. Without politeness instructions, speakers still showed a tendency to be polite in positive, but not in negative situ
Frame production; Priming; Social Sciences; Tilburg University; Valence framing