Replication Data for: Automatic parsing as an efficient pre-annotation tool for historical texts
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Historical treebanks tend to be manually annotated, which is not surprising, since state-of-the-art parsers are not accurate enough to ensure high-quality annotation for historical texts. We show that automatic parsing can be an efficient pre-annotation tool for Old East Slavic texts' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Old East Slavic","parsing","pre-annotation","PROIEL","treebank"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Historical treebanks tend to be manually annotated, which is not surprising, since state-of-the-art parsers are not accurate enough to ensure high-quality annotation for historical texts. We show that automatic parsing can be an efficient pre-annotation tool for Old East Slavic texts' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Historical treebanks tend to be manually annotated, which is not surprising, since state-of-the-art parsers are not accurate enough to ensure high-quality annotation for historical texts. We show that automatic parsing can be an efficient pre-annotation tool for Old East Slavic texts
Old East Slavic; parsing; pre-annotation; PROIEL; treebank