Data for: Making the real: Rhetorical adduction and the Bangladesh Liberation War
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Data generationAfter immersing myself in the secondary literature and the archival material that I had collected for the prior doctoral project, I had an idea for a skeleton causal mechanism, i.e. that the withdrawal of Indian troops from Bangladesh had somehow changed the status of recognition, i.e. legitimated recognition.  In order to assess this idea, I then consulted some theory from international relations, psychology, sociology, and cognitive science, on how decisions are made and how arguments work, in order to hypothesize a causal mechanism.  This causal mechanism, elucidated in the paper, was rhetorical adduction; basically that states try to win arguments (thus changing the behavior of relatively uncommitted audiences relative to some policy) by linking some empirical state of affairs with their argument and then' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["colonialism","communication","international relations","persuasion","self government"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Data generationAfter immersing myself in the secondary literature and the archival material that I had collected for the prior doctoral project, I had an idea for a skeleton causal mechanism, i.e. that the withdrawal of Indian troops from Bangladesh had somehow changed the status of recognition, i.e. legitimated recognition.  In order to assess this idea, I then consulted some theory from international relations, psychology, sociology, and cognitive science, on how decisions are made and how arguments work, in order to hypothesize a causal mechanism.  This causal mechanism, elucidated in the paper, was rhetorical adduction; basically that states try to win arguments (thus changing the behavior of relatively uncommitted audiences relative to some policy) by linking some empirical state of affairs with their argument and then' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Data generationAfter immersing myself in the secondary literature and the archival material that I had collected for the prior doctoral project, I had an idea for a skeleton causal mechanism, i.e. that the withdrawal of Indian troops from Bangladesh had somehow changed the status of recognition, i.e. legitimated recognition.  In order to assess this idea, I then consulted some theory from international relations, psychology, sociology, and cognitive science, on how decisions are made and how arguments work, in order to hypothesize a causal mechanism.  This causal mechanism, elucidated in the paper, was rhetorical adduction; basically that states try to win arguments (thus changing the behavior of relatively uncommitted audiences relative to some policy) by linking some empirical state of affairs with their argument and then
colonialism; communication; international relations; persuasion; self government