Discussing Problems With a Close Friend, 2019
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'The sample consisted of 88 close friend dyads (N=176). Most participants were undergraduate students recruited from the Ohio University, OH, USA, white (92%), and female (69%).Upon entering the laboratory, research assistants escorted participants to private testing rooms. After confirming eligibility for the study and completing the informed consent process, participants completed the problem-generation questionnaire. Participants then received instructions for the problem-focused conversation wherein one member of the dyad (the discloser) was randomly assigned to discuss one of the extradyadic problems they disclosed in the problem-generation questionnaire. The other member of the dyad (the responder) was assigned to respond to their friend. Severity items were summed for each problem and the discloser’s most severe prob' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Dyadic design","Emotion","Emotion regulation"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'The sample consisted of 88 close friend dyads (N=176). Most participants were undergraduate students recruited from the Ohio University, OH, USA, white (92%), and female (69%).Upon entering the laboratory, research assistants escorted participants to private testing rooms. After confirming eligibility for the study and completing the informed consent process, participants completed the problem-generation questionnaire. Participants then received instructions for the problem-focused conversation wherein one member of the dyad (the discloser) was randomly assigned to discuss one of the extradyadic problems they disclosed in the problem-generation questionnaire. The other member of the dyad (the responder) was assigned to respond to their friend. Severity items were summed for each problem and the discloser’s most severe prob' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
The sample consisted of 88 close friend dyads (N=176). Most participants were undergraduate students recruited from the Ohio University, OH, USA, white (92%), and female (69%).Upon entering the laboratory, research assistants escorted participants to private testing rooms. After confirming eligibility for the study and completing the informed consent process, participants completed the problem-generation questionnaire. Participants then received instructions for the problem-focused conversation wherein one member of the dyad (the discloser) was randomly assigned to discuss one of the extradyadic problems they disclosed in the problem-generation questionnaire. The other member of the dyad (the responder) was assigned to respond to their friend. Severity items were summed for each problem and the discloser’s most severe prob
Dyadic design; Emotion; Emotion regulation