Replication data for: The Achilles Heel of Plurality Systems: Geography and Representation in Multi-Party Democracies
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Building on the unfinished research program of Gudgin and Taylor (1979), we analytically derive the linkage between a party’s territorial distribution of support and the basic features of its vote-seat curve.  We then demonstrate the usefulness of the corresponding empirical model with an analysis of elections in post-war Great Britain, focusing in particular on the transformation of the Liberals from a territorially concentrated to a dispersed party in the 1970s.  We show that majoritarian biases increase with the number of parties, and majoritarian systems harm small parties when their vote is more dispersed than average, and large parties when their vote is more concentrated than average. Moreover, the evolving experiences of Labour and Conservatives demonstrate how a party’s territorial support, and hence its expected seat premium o' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Electoral bias","Majoritarian","Plurality, votes,","Representation","United Kingdom"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Building on the unfinished research program of Gudgin and Taylor (1979), we analytically derive the linkage between a party’s territorial distribution of support and the basic features of its vote-seat curve.  We then demonstrate the usefulness of the corresponding empirical model with an analysis of elections in post-war Great Britain, focusing in particular on the transformation of the Liberals from a territorially concentrated to a dispersed party in the 1970s.  We show that majoritarian biases increase with the number of parties, and majoritarian systems harm small parties when their vote is more dispersed than average, and large parties when their vote is more concentrated than average. Moreover, the evolving experiences of Labour and Conservatives demonstrate how a party’s territorial support, and hence its expected seat premium o' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Building on the unfinished research program of Gudgin and Taylor (1979), we analytically derive the linkage between a party’s territorial distribution of support and the basic features of its vote-seat curve.  We then demonstrate the usefulness of the corresponding empirical model with an analysis of elections in post-war Great Britain, focusing in particular on the transformation of the Liberals from a territorially concentrated to a dispersed party in the 1970s.  We show that majoritarian biases increase with the number of parties, and majoritarian systems harm small parties when their vote is more dispersed than average, and large parties when their vote is more concentrated than average. Moreover, the evolving experiences of Labour and Conservatives demonstrate how a party’s territorial support, and hence its expected seat premium o
Electoral bias; Majoritarian; Plurality, votes,; Representation; United Kingdom