Replication Data for: Legalization and Compliance: How Judicial Activity Undercuts the Global Trade Regime
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'The crisis facing the World Trade Organization illustrates the trade-off between legalization and compliance in international legal systems. Dispute bodies can sometimes 'over-reach' in their rulings, leading to resistance from member states. This paper looks at one form of legal over-reach: the extension of legal precedent. We argue that extending previous decisions can reduce the flexibility that states include deliberately in their agreements. We utilize original data on individual applications of precedent in Appellate Body decisions from 1995-2015 and on policy responses to those decisions. We find strong evidence that extending precedent reduces on-time compliance. It also leads to longer delays before members comply. The results speak to the life cycles of international organizations as well as questions of design and cooperation' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["international organization","judicial precedent","trade"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'The crisis facing the World Trade Organization illustrates the trade-off between legalization and compliance in international legal systems. Dispute bodies can sometimes 'over-reach' in their rulings, leading to resistance from member states. This paper looks at one form of legal over-reach: the extension of legal precedent. We argue that extending previous decisions can reduce the flexibility that states include deliberately in their agreements. We utilize original data on individual applications of precedent in Appellate Body decisions from 1995-2015 and on policy responses to those decisions. We find strong evidence that extending precedent reduces on-time compliance. It also leads to longer delays before members comply. The results speak to the life cycles of international organizations as well as questions of design and cooperation' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
The crisis facing the World Trade Organization illustrates the trade-off between legalization and compliance in international legal systems. Dispute bodies can sometimes 'over-reach' in their rulings, leading to resistance from member states. This paper looks at one form of legal over-reach: the extension of legal precedent. We argue that extending previous decisions can reduce the flexibility that states include deliberately in their agreements. We utilize original data on individual applications of precedent in Appellate Body decisions from 1995-2015 and on policy responses to those decisions. We find strong evidence that extending precedent reduces on-time compliance. It also leads to longer delays before members comply. The results speak to the life cycles of international organizations as well as questions of design and cooperation
international organization; judicial precedent; trade