Replication Data for: Can We Reduce Deception in Elite Field Experiments? Evidence from a Field Experiment with State Legislative Offices
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'The use of deception is common in elite correspondence audit studies. Elite audit studies are a type of field experiment used by researchers to test for discrimination against vulnerable populations seeking to access government resources. These studies have provided invaluable insights, but they have done so at the cost of using deception. They have relied on identity, activity and motivation deception. In addition, they request unnecessary work. Is there a less deceptive alternative? In this manuscript I present results from a field experiment with state legislative offices that minimizes the use of deception. Consistent with elite correspondence audit studies, I find evidence of discrimination against Hispanics among state legislative offices. Additionally, I find that discrimination is mitigated when subjects believe their behavior w' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Discrimination","Field experiments","Latino politics","Representation","Research ethics"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'The use of deception is common in elite correspondence audit studies. Elite audit studies are a type of field experiment used by researchers to test for discrimination against vulnerable populations seeking to access government resources. These studies have provided invaluable insights, but they have done so at the cost of using deception. They have relied on identity, activity and motivation deception. In addition, they request unnecessary work. Is there a less deceptive alternative? In this manuscript I present results from a field experiment with state legislative offices that minimizes the use of deception. Consistent with elite correspondence audit studies, I find evidence of discrimination against Hispanics among state legislative offices. Additionally, I find that discrimination is mitigated when subjects believe their behavior w' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
The use of deception is common in elite correspondence audit studies. Elite audit studies are a type of field experiment used by researchers to test for discrimination against vulnerable populations seeking to access government resources. These studies have provided invaluable insights, but they have done so at the cost of using deception. They have relied on identity, activity and motivation deception. In addition, they request unnecessary work. Is there a less deceptive alternative? In this manuscript I present results from a field experiment with state legislative offices that minimizes the use of deception. Consistent with elite correspondence audit studies, I find evidence of discrimination against Hispanics among state legislative offices. Additionally, I find that discrimination is mitigated when subjects believe their behavior w
Discrimination; Field experiments; Latino politics; Representation; Research ethics