Replication Data for: 'The loss of Latin OV: Steps towards an analysis'
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'In this paper I offer a first attempt to analyse the loss of OV word orders in  Latin/Romance. Assuming Yang's (2000, 2002) variational acquisition model of language change, I suggest that the eventual decline of the OV grammar can be traced back to an independent change in the grammar of Latin, namely one concerning the way in which the clausal EPP requirement is satisfied (Danckaert 2017). The crucial Late Latin innovation is argued to be the development of optional A-movement for subjects: as an indirect result of this, in the Late Latin period the VO grammar is more robustly cued than the OV grammar, despite the fact that the overall frequency of the order VO remains more or less constant over time (and in certain environments even decreases). Given this result, Yang’s model correctly predicts the VO order to oust the competing OV p' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Language change","Latin","Object placement","Syntax","Word order"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'In this paper I offer a first attempt to analyse the loss of OV word orders in  Latin/Romance. Assuming Yang's (2000, 2002) variational acquisition model of language change, I suggest that the eventual decline of the OV grammar can be traced back to an independent change in the grammar of Latin, namely one concerning the way in which the clausal EPP requirement is satisfied (Danckaert 2017). The crucial Late Latin innovation is argued to be the development of optional A-movement for subjects: as an indirect result of this, in the Late Latin period the VO grammar is more robustly cued than the OV grammar, despite the fact that the overall frequency of the order VO remains more or less constant over time (and in certain environments even decreases). Given this result, Yang’s model correctly predicts the VO order to oust the competing OV p' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
In this paper I offer a first attempt to analyse the loss of OV word orders in  Latin/Romance. Assuming Yang's (2000, 2002) variational acquisition model of language change, I suggest that the eventual decline of the OV grammar can be traced back to an independent change in the grammar of Latin, namely one concerning the way in which the clausal EPP requirement is satisfied (Danckaert 2017). The crucial Late Latin innovation is argued to be the development of optional A-movement for subjects: as an indirect result of this, in the Late Latin period the VO grammar is more robustly cued than the OV grammar, despite the fact that the overall frequency of the order VO remains more or less constant over time (and in certain environments even decreases). Given this result, Yang’s model correctly predicts the VO order to oust the competing OV p
Language change; Latin; Object placement; Syntax; Word order