Replication Data for: The copular subschema [become/devenir + past participle] in English and French: Productivity and degrees of passivity
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Article abstract: This article presents a contrastive analysis of the English copular subschema [become + past participle] and the equivalent copular subschema [devenir + past participle] in French, based on web data. It is shown that both patterns are almost equally productive at the subject complement level. Furthermore, a more in-depth analysis demonstrates that, in the segment of participles with a high adjectivalpotential, devenir accumulates more participle tokens than become. Conversely,the reverse holds true for participles with a high verbal potential, in which casebecome is characterized by more participle tokens than devenir. This high amountof combinations between become and eventive participles also suggests a higherdegree of passivity for become. However, in the segment of participles with anintermediate verbal' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["become","copular construction","copula verb","devenir","English","French","passive construction","productivity"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Article abstract: This article presents a contrastive analysis of the English copular subschema [become + past participle] and the equivalent copular subschema [devenir + past participle] in French, based on web data. It is shown that both patterns are almost equally productive at the subject complement level. Furthermore, a more in-depth analysis demonstrates that, in the segment of participles with a high adjectivalpotential, devenir accumulates more participle tokens than become. Conversely,the reverse holds true for participles with a high verbal potential, in which casebecome is characterized by more participle tokens than devenir. This high amountof combinations between become and eventive participles also suggests a higherdegree of passivity for become. However, in the segment of participles with anintermediate verbal' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Article abstract: This article presents a contrastive analysis of the English copular subschema [become + past participle] and the equivalent copular subschema [devenir + past participle] in French, based on web data. It is shown that both patterns are almost equally productive at the subject complement level. Furthermore, a more in-depth analysis demonstrates that, in the segment of participles with a high adjectivalpotential, devenir accumulates more participle tokens than become. Conversely,the reverse holds true for participles with a high verbal potential, in which casebecome is characterized by more participle tokens than devenir. This high amountof combinations between become and eventive participles also suggests a higherdegree of passivity for become. However, in the segment of participles with anintermediate verbal
become; copular construction; copula verb; devenir; English; French; passive construction; productivity