Performance and Symptom Validity Assessment in Patients with Apathy and Cognitive Impairment
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Objective: Performance and Symptom Validity Tests (PVTs and SVTs) measure the credibility of the assessment results. Cognitive impairment and apathy potentially interfere with validity test performance, and may thus lead to an incorrect (i.e., false-positive) classification of the patient’s scores as non-credible. The study aimed at examining the false-positive rate of three validity tests in patients with cognitive impairment and apathy. Method: A cross-sectional, comparative study was performed in 56 patients with dementia, 41 patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment, and 41 patients with Parkinson’s Disease. Two PVTs - the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM), and the Dot Counting Test (DCT) - and one SVT - the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS) - were administered. Apathy was measured with the Apathy Evaluation S' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Dementia","Dot Counting Test (DCT)","Mild Cognitive Impairment","Parkinson’s Disease","Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS)","Symptom Validity","Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM)"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Objective: Performance and Symptom Validity Tests (PVTs and SVTs) measure the credibility of the assessment results. Cognitive impairment and apathy potentially interfere with validity test performance, and may thus lead to an incorrect (i.e., false-positive) classification of the patient’s scores as non-credible. The study aimed at examining the false-positive rate of three validity tests in patients with cognitive impairment and apathy. Method: A cross-sectional, comparative study was performed in 56 patients with dementia, 41 patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment, and 41 patients with Parkinson’s Disease. Two PVTs - the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM), and the Dot Counting Test (DCT) - and one SVT - the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS) - were administered. Apathy was measured with the Apathy Evaluation S' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Objective: Performance and Symptom Validity Tests (PVTs and SVTs) measure the credibility of the assessment results. Cognitive impairment and apathy potentially interfere with validity test performance, and may thus lead to an incorrect (i.e., false-positive) classification of the patient’s scores as non-credible. The study aimed at examining the false-positive rate of three validity tests in patients with cognitive impairment and apathy. Method: A cross-sectional, comparative study was performed in 56 patients with dementia, 41 patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment, and 41 patients with Parkinson’s Disease. Two PVTs - the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM), and the Dot Counting Test (DCT) - and one SVT - the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS) - were administered. Apathy was measured with the Apathy Evaluation S
Dementia; Dot Counting Test (DCT); Mild Cognitive Impairment; Parkinson’s Disease; Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS); Symptom Validity; Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM)