Replication Data for 'Endogenous & Dangerous'
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'This study analyzed the relations of cases that judges cited in their judicial opinions to the cases that lawyers had cited in their persuasive memoranda to the courts in advance of the judicial opinions, considering how frequently and under what circumstances the judges cited cases that the lawyers had not. The findings appear in the journal article 'Endogenous and Dangerous,' in volume 22 of Nevada Law Journal, forthcoming 2022. This dataset supplements the dataset the author used for a previous article. Replication of the present study would require use both of the previous dataset and this supplementary one. See Brian N. Larson, Precedent as Rational Persuasion, 25 Legal Writing: The Journal of the Legal Writing Institute 135–212 (2021); Larson, Brian, 2020, 'Coding guide & replication data for 'Precedent as Rational Persuasion'', h' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["argumentation","case use","citation","defeasible","fair use","trial court"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'This study analyzed the relations of cases that judges cited in their judicial opinions to the cases that lawyers had cited in their persuasive memoranda to the courts in advance of the judicial opinions, considering how frequently and under what circumstances the judges cited cases that the lawyers had not. The findings appear in the journal article 'Endogenous and Dangerous,' in volume 22 of Nevada Law Journal, forthcoming 2022. This dataset supplements the dataset the author used for a previous article. Replication of the present study would require use both of the previous dataset and this supplementary one. See Brian N. Larson, Precedent as Rational Persuasion, 25 Legal Writing: The Journal of the Legal Writing Institute 135–212 (2021); Larson, Brian, 2020, 'Coding guide & replication data for 'Precedent as Rational Persuasion'', h' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
This study analyzed the relations of cases that judges cited in their judicial opinions to the cases that lawyers had cited in their persuasive memoranda to the courts in advance of the judicial opinions, considering how frequently and under what circumstances the judges cited cases that the lawyers had not. The findings appear in the journal article 'Endogenous and Dangerous,' in volume 22 of Nevada Law Journal, forthcoming 2022. This dataset supplements the dataset the author used for a previous article. Replication of the present study would require use both of the previous dataset and this supplementary one. See Brian N. Larson, Precedent as Rational Persuasion, 25 Legal Writing: The Journal of the Legal Writing Institute 135–212 (2021); Larson, Brian, 2020, 'Coding guide & replication data for 'Precedent as Rational Persuasion'', h
argumentation; case use; citation; defeasible; fair use; trial court