Safety testing for connected and automated vehicles through physical and digital iterative deployment [R27]
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Currently, many manufacturers are selling vehicles with SAE Level 2 or 3 automation and testing with more advanced vehicles on public roads (level 4). However, recent crashes have raised critical questions about their safety. Are these vehicles with lower or higher automation safe enough to drive on public roads, and more fundamentally, how do we assess their safety envelope? Currently, there is no consensus about whether testing should exist at the state or federal level, what functions should be tested, and how independent testing should occur, and what constitutes safe thresholds.In this CSCRS project, we seek to address this gap by developing a comprehensive testing protocol specifically for Level 2 and 3 connected and automated vehicles by using a novel software and physical deployment platform which allows rapid iterative develo' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Autonomous vehicles","Computer vision","Connected vehicles","Hardware in the loop simulation","Level 2 driving automation","Level 3 driving automation","Recommendations","Stakeholders","Standards","Test procedures","Vehicle Safety"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Currently, many manufacturers are selling vehicles with SAE Level 2 or 3 automation and testing with more advanced vehicles on public roads (level 4). However, recent crashes have raised critical questions about their safety. Are these vehicles with lower or higher automation safe enough to drive on public roads, and more fundamentally, how do we assess their safety envelope? Currently, there is no consensus about whether testing should exist at the state or federal level, what functions should be tested, and how independent testing should occur, and what constitutes safe thresholds.In this CSCRS project, we seek to address this gap by developing a comprehensive testing protocol specifically for Level 2 and 3 connected and automated vehicles by using a novel software and physical deployment platform which allows rapid iterative develo' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Currently, many manufacturers are selling vehicles with SAE Level 2 or 3 automation and testing with more advanced vehicles on public roads (level 4). However, recent crashes have raised critical questions about their safety. Are these vehicles with lower or higher automation safe enough to drive on public roads, and more fundamentally, how do we assess their safety envelope? Currently, there is no consensus about whether testing should exist at the state or federal level, what functions should be tested, and how independent testing should occur, and what constitutes safe thresholds.In this CSCRS project, we seek to address this gap by developing a comprehensive testing protocol specifically for Level 2 and 3 connected and automated vehicles by using a novel software and physical deployment platform which allows rapid iterative develo
Autonomous vehicles; Computer vision; Connected vehicles; Hardware in the loop simulation; Level 2 driving automation; Level 3 driving automation; Recommendations; Stakeholders; Standards; Test procedures; Vehicle Safety