Replication Data for: Assessing the importance of internal and external self-esteem and their relationship to honor concerns in six countries.
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'We assessed empirical support for (1) the widely held notion that across so-called ‘honor, dignity, and face cultures’ internal and external components of self-esteem are differentially important for overall self-esteem, and (2) the idea that concerns for honor are related to internal and external components of self-esteem in honor cultures but not in dignity and face cultures. Most importantly, we also set out to (3) investigate whether measures are equivalent, that is, whether a comparison of means and relationships across cultural groups is possible with the employed scales. Data were collected in six countries (N = 1099). We obtained only metric invariance for the self-esteem and honor scales, allowing for comparisons of relationships across samples, but not scale means. Partly confirming theoretical ideas on the importance of inter' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Dignity","Equivalence","Face","Honor","Invariance","Self-esteem","Social Sciences","Tilburg University"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'We assessed empirical support for (1) the widely held notion that across so-called ‘honor, dignity, and face cultures’ internal and external components of self-esteem are differentially important for overall self-esteem, and (2) the idea that concerns for honor are related to internal and external components of self-esteem in honor cultures but not in dignity and face cultures. Most importantly, we also set out to (3) investigate whether measures are equivalent, that is, whether a comparison of means and relationships across cultural groups is possible with the employed scales. Data were collected in six countries (N = 1099). We obtained only metric invariance for the self-esteem and honor scales, allowing for comparisons of relationships across samples, but not scale means. Partly confirming theoretical ideas on the importance of inter' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
We assessed empirical support for (1) the widely held notion that across so-called ‘honor, dignity, and face cultures’ internal and external components of self-esteem are differentially important for overall self-esteem, and (2) the idea that concerns for honor are related to internal and external components of self-esteem in honor cultures but not in dignity and face cultures. Most importantly, we also set out to (3) investigate whether measures are equivalent, that is, whether a comparison of means and relationships across cultural groups is possible with the employed scales. Data were collected in six countries (N = 1099). We obtained only metric invariance for the self-esteem and honor scales, allowing for comparisons of relationships across samples, but not scale means. Partly confirming theoretical ideas on the importance of inter
Dignity; Equivalence; Face; Honor; Invariance; Self-esteem; Social Sciences; Tilburg University