Data for: From legal doctrine to social transformation? Comparing U.S. voting rights, equal employment opportunity, and fair housing legislation
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'(NOTE: the following should be read as a shorthand summary of how we constructed our study and use of qualitative sources therein. The paper itself elaborates in greater detail each of the following bullet points)This article is a historical-comparative study of three major civil rights statutes (voting rights, equal employment, and fair housing) and is motivated by one fundamental question: why are some civil rights laws more successful than others? Consensus exists among civil rights scholars that voting rights was far and away the most successful of the three; that fair housing was a general failure; and that equal employment opportunity was moderately successful. Our study seeks to explain this specific hierarchy of civil rights outcomes across these three cases. As is the case with all histor' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["civil rights","Civil Rights Act (1964-USA)","voting rights","Voting Rights Act (1965-USA)"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'(NOTE: the following should be read as a shorthand summary of how we constructed our study and use of qualitative sources therein. The paper itself elaborates in greater detail each of the following bullet points)This article is a historical-comparative study of three major civil rights statutes (voting rights, equal employment, and fair housing) and is motivated by one fundamental question: why are some civil rights laws more successful than others? Consensus exists among civil rights scholars that voting rights was far and away the most successful of the three; that fair housing was a general failure; and that equal employment opportunity was moderately successful. Our study seeks to explain this specific hierarchy of civil rights outcomes across these three cases. As is the case with all histor' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
(NOTE: the following should be read as a shorthand summary of how we constructed our study and use of qualitative sources therein. The paper itself elaborates in greater detail each of the following bullet points)This article is a historical-comparative study of three major civil rights statutes (voting rights, equal employment, and fair housing) and is motivated by one fundamental question: why are some civil rights laws more successful than others? Consensus exists among civil rights scholars that voting rights was far and away the most successful of the three; that fair housing was a general failure; and that equal employment opportunity was moderately successful. Our study seeks to explain this specific hierarchy of civil rights outcomes across these three cases. As is the case with all histor
civil rights; Civil Rights Act (1964-USA); voting rights; Voting Rights Act (1965-USA)