Symptom Self-Reports Are Susceptible to Misinformation
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'We examined whether self-reported symptoms are affected by explicit and implicit misinformation.  In Experiment 1, undergraduates (N = 60) rated how often they experienced common somatic and psychological symptoms.  During a subsequent interview, they were exposed to misinformation about two of their ratings: one was inflated (upgraded misinformation), while another was deflated (downgraded misinformation).  Close to 82% of the participants accepted the upward symptom misinformation, while 67% accepted the downward manipulation.  Also, 27% confabulated reasons for upgraded symptom ratings, while 8% confabulated reasons for downgraded ratings.  At a follow-up test, some days later, participants (n = 55) tended to escalate their symptom ratings in accordance with the upgraded misinformation.  Such internalization was less clear for downgr' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["dissociative experiences","iatrogenesis","medically unexplained symptoms","misinformation","self-reports","symptoms"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'We examined whether self-reported symptoms are affected by explicit and implicit misinformation.  In Experiment 1, undergraduates (N = 60) rated how often they experienced common somatic and psychological symptoms.  During a subsequent interview, they were exposed to misinformation about two of their ratings: one was inflated (upgraded misinformation), while another was deflated (downgraded misinformation).  Close to 82% of the participants accepted the upward symptom misinformation, while 67% accepted the downward manipulation.  Also, 27% confabulated reasons for upgraded symptom ratings, while 8% confabulated reasons for downgraded ratings.  At a follow-up test, some days later, participants (n = 55) tended to escalate their symptom ratings in accordance with the upgraded misinformation.  Such internalization was less clear for downgr' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
We examined whether self-reported symptoms are affected by explicit and implicit misinformation.  In Experiment 1, undergraduates (N = 60) rated how often they experienced common somatic and psychological symptoms.  During a subsequent interview, they were exposed to misinformation about two of their ratings: one was inflated (upgraded misinformation), while another was deflated (downgraded misinformation).  Close to 82% of the participants accepted the upward symptom misinformation, while 67% accepted the downward manipulation.  Also, 27% confabulated reasons for upgraded symptom ratings, while 8% confabulated reasons for downgraded ratings.  At a follow-up test, some days later, participants (n = 55) tended to escalate their symptom ratings in accordance with the upgraded misinformation.  Such internalization was less clear for downgr
dissociative experiences; iatrogenesis; medically unexplained symptoms; misinformation; self-reports; symptoms