Lymphatic Filariasis Positive-Case Follow-up After TAS 2 in Haiti
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Because the cut-off for passing a transmission assessment survey (TAS) is a critical cut-off based on the upper 95% confidence interval of less than 1 or 2% (dependent on primary vector) prevalence of antigenemia among children ages 6 and 7, many implementation units pass TAS with one or more positive FTS results. However, the presence of any FTS positive children in a TAS 2 or TAS 3 indicates possible ongoing transmission. The WHO LF program manager’s manual encourages program managers to conduct follow-up surveys in communities where antigen positive children are found. However, there is currently no published guidance on how this follow-up should be conducted. The goals of this project were to determine the implications of one or more positive FTS results and to provide evidence towards recommendations on how to follow up on these re' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["FTS","Lymphatic Filariasis"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Because the cut-off for passing a transmission assessment survey (TAS) is a critical cut-off based on the upper 95% confidence interval of less than 1 or 2% (dependent on primary vector) prevalence of antigenemia among children ages 6 and 7, many implementation units pass TAS with one or more positive FTS results. However, the presence of any FTS positive children in a TAS 2 or TAS 3 indicates possible ongoing transmission. The WHO LF program manager’s manual encourages program managers to conduct follow-up surveys in communities where antigen positive children are found. However, there is currently no published guidance on how this follow-up should be conducted. The goals of this project were to determine the implications of one or more positive FTS results and to provide evidence towards recommendations on how to follow up on these re' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Because the cut-off for passing a transmission assessment survey (TAS) is a critical cut-off based on the upper 95% confidence interval of less than 1 or 2% (dependent on primary vector) prevalence of antigenemia among children ages 6 and 7, many implementation units pass TAS with one or more positive FTS results. However, the presence of any FTS positive children in a TAS 2 or TAS 3 indicates possible ongoing transmission. The WHO LF program manager’s manual encourages program managers to conduct follow-up surveys in communities where antigen positive children are found. However, there is currently no published guidance on how this follow-up should be conducted. The goals of this project were to determine the implications of one or more positive FTS results and to provide evidence towards recommendations on how to follow up on these re
FTS; Lymphatic Filariasis