Replication Data for: Two origins of the prefix IZ- and how they affect the VY- vs. IZ- correlation in Modern Russian.
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Here is the abstract of the article: This article reports on a synchronic study of 989 Modern Russian verbs formed with the prefixes VY- and IZ-, including standard lexemes, obsolete verbs, and newly-formed coinages culled from the Russian National Corpus. I argue that the hypothesis about the two historical origins of the prefix IZ- may explain the ambivalent behavior of this prefix in Modern Russian, which shows both semantic overlap and semantic contrast with the prefix VY-. I revisit the most detailed semantic account of the two prefixes (Nesset et al 2011) and provide additional support for their model of polysemy in terms of type and token frequencies of the analyzed verbs. I further propose that VY- and IZ- encode different spatial image schemas and thus explain why the prefix IZ- is compatible with verbs of multidirectional moti' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["cognitive semantics","polysemy","prefix","Russian","slavonicism","verb"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Here is the abstract of the article: This article reports on a synchronic study of 989 Modern Russian verbs formed with the prefixes VY- and IZ-, including standard lexemes, obsolete verbs, and newly-formed coinages culled from the Russian National Corpus. I argue that the hypothesis about the two historical origins of the prefix IZ- may explain the ambivalent behavior of this prefix in Modern Russian, which shows both semantic overlap and semantic contrast with the prefix VY-. I revisit the most detailed semantic account of the two prefixes (Nesset et al 2011) and provide additional support for their model of polysemy in terms of type and token frequencies of the analyzed verbs. I further propose that VY- and IZ- encode different spatial image schemas and thus explain why the prefix IZ- is compatible with verbs of multidirectional moti' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Here is the abstract of the article: This article reports on a synchronic study of 989 Modern Russian verbs formed with the prefixes VY- and IZ-, including standard lexemes, obsolete verbs, and newly-formed coinages culled from the Russian National Corpus. I argue that the hypothesis about the two historical origins of the prefix IZ- may explain the ambivalent behavior of this prefix in Modern Russian, which shows both semantic overlap and semantic contrast with the prefix VY-. I revisit the most detailed semantic account of the two prefixes (Nesset et al 2011) and provide additional support for their model of polysemy in terms of type and token frequencies of the analyzed verbs. I further propose that VY- and IZ- encode different spatial image schemas and thus explain why the prefix IZ- is compatible with verbs of multidirectional moti
cognitive semantics; polysemy; prefix; Russian; slavonicism; verb