No evidence of rhythmic visuospatial attention at cued locations in a spatial cuing paradigm, regardless of their behavioral relevance.
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|> You are a research archivist expert in dataset metadata. Answer the question truthfully.  <|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|> Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Recent evidence suggests that visuospatial attention is not sustained but fluctuates in a rhythmic fashion, sampling location after location in each cycle of this rhythm. However, studies differ in which location rhythmic attention becomes evident: the cued, non-cued location or both. It is also unclear how the behavioral relevance of each sampled location determines the rhythmic sampling patterns. Here, we aim to elucidate these two issues. First, we aim to find evidence of rhythmic attention at the predicted (i.e. cued) location under moderately informative predictor value, replicating earlier studies. Second, we hypothesize that rhythmic attentional sampling behavior will be affected by the behavioral relevance of the sampled location, ranging from non-informative to fully informative. To these aims, we used a modified Egly-Driver tas' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|> {"Answer" : ["Egly-Driver task","null results","replication","rhythmic attention","theta"]} <|eot_id|>
 Here is the Description of a dataset. Description:'Recent evidence suggests that visuospatial attention is not sustained but fluctuates in a rhythmic fashion, sampling location after location in each cycle of this rhythm. However, studies differ in which location rhythmic attention becomes evident: the cued, non-cued location or both. It is also unclear how the behavioral relevance of each sampled location determines the rhythmic sampling patterns. Here, we aim to elucidate these two issues. First, we aim to find evidence of rhythmic attention at the predicted (i.e. cued) location under moderately informative predictor value, replicating earlier studies. Second, we hypothesize that rhythmic attentional sampling behavior will be affected by the behavioral relevance of the sampled location, ranging from non-informative to fully informative. To these aims, we used a modified Egly-Driver tas' . Please return only a json list of at most 3 Keywords corresponding to the Description:.
Recent evidence suggests that visuospatial attention is not sustained but fluctuates in a rhythmic fashion, sampling location after location in each cycle of this rhythm. However, studies differ in which location rhythmic attention becomes evident: the cued, non-cued location or both. It is also unclear how the behavioral relevance of each sampled location determines the rhythmic sampling patterns. Here, we aim to elucidate these two issues. First, we aim to find evidence of rhythmic attention at the predicted (i.e. cued) location under moderately informative predictor value, replicating earlier studies. Second, we hypothesize that rhythmic attentional sampling behavior will be affected by the behavioral relevance of the sampled location, ranging from non-informative to fully informative. To these aims, we used a modified Egly-Driver tas
Egly-Driver task; null results; replication; rhythmic attention; theta