diff --git "a/validation_qa.json" "b/validation_qa.json" new file mode 100644--- /dev/null +++ "b/validation_qa.json" @@ -0,0 +1,19221 @@ +[ + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q000", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Web GUI 8.1 FP7 requires DASH 3.1.2.1 or later", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nYou wanted to install Web GUI 8.1 FP7, but your DASH version does not meet the required version.\n\nIM 1.8 displayed the following:\n\n ERROR: The installed IBM Dashboard Application Services Hub version is 3.1.0.3, but requires version 3.1.2.1 or later.\n\n", + "DOCUMENT": "swg24042191", + "ANSWER": "Version 1.1.3.0 is a full refresh of Jazz for Service Management Version 1.1 Base with Modification 3.", + "START_OFFSET": "955", + "END_OFFSET": "1057", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg24042191", + "swg21681385", + "swg21960632", + "swg21984598", + "swg21993505", + "swg21981870", + "swg21993497", + "swg21998714", + "swg21987786", + "swg21675814", + "swg21960630", + "swg21984451", + "swg22011877", + "swg21962250", + "swg21967886", + "swg21980863", + "swg21971363", + "swg21981746", + "swg21976230", + "swg21983438", + "swg21977528", + "swg21972956", + "swg21448993", + "swg1IV83315", + "swg21974973", + "swg21961858", + "swg22011005", + "swg27045182", + "swg1IV81778", + "swg21980056", + "swg21959612", + "swg21692723", + "swg21965021", + "swg1IV85266", + "swg21683704", + "swg21974820", + "swg24043134", + "swg1IV90841", + "swg27038329", + "swg21965676", + "swg21679259", + "swg21963295", + "swg27036220", + "swg21975908", + "swg22006741", + "swg27048859", + "swg24023498", + "swg21197146", + "swg21585558", + "swg21974756" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q001", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "What can be done about \"Too many open files\" messages in the DASH systemOut?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "What can be done about \"Too many open files\" messages in the DASH systemOut log on an AIX box?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21968787", + "swg21588099", + "swg1PM86570", + "swg1JR51223", + "swg21691762", + "swg21605502", + "swg21551911", + "swg21393774", + "swg21547126", + "swg21974358", + "swg1PI18805", + "swg1IC42942", + "swg21380080", + "swg21994953", + "swg21981188", + "swg21534359", + "swg21632844", + "swg1IT09823", + "swg21634151", + "swg1IJ02072", + "swg1JR31486", + "swg1IV94782", + "swg21572431", + "swg21452549", + "swg21591213", + "swg21558193", + "swg22013635", + "swg21327796", + "swg21696047", + "swg21984598", + "swg22011292", + "swg1IV60378", + "swg21556137", + "swg1IZ60864", + "swg21976157", + "swg21349837", + "nas8N1015198", + "swg21967805", + "swg21643376", + "swg1HD62905", + "swg22012571", + "swg21660132", + "isg3T1016296", + "swg21984281", + "swg1PK23985", + "swg21392231", + "swg21689823", + "swg21641660", + "swg21991460", + "swg21426084" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q002", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Unable to open profile from P8 Content Engine Configuration manager (CMUI) on Redhat Linux 7.2, getting GPF and javacore dump.", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nLaunch configmgr then try to open an existing profile. Once I click ok on the dialog box to\n\"Verify your application server setting before proceeding...\" Configuration manager would crash and GPF. I can see the javacore.txt and dmp file created.\nThe javacore.txt contains the following:\n\n0SECTION TITLE subcomponent dump routine NULL =============================== 1TICHARSET UTF-8 1TISIGINFO Dump Event \"gpf\" (00002000) received 1TIDATETIME Date: 2016/05/05 at 04:53:30 1TIFILENAME Javacore filename: /opt/IBM/FileNet/ContentEngine/tools/configure/javacore.20160505.045330.25035.0002.txt 1TIREQFLAGS Request Flags: 0x81 (exclusive+preempt) 1TIPREPSTATE Prep State: 0x100 (trace_disabled) 1TIPREPINFO Exclusive VM access not taken: data may not be consistent across javacore sections NULL ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 0SECTION GPINFO subcomponent dump routine NULL ================================ 2XHOSLEVEL OS Level : Linux 3.10.0-327.13.1.el7.x86_64 2XHCPUS Processors - 3XHCPUARCH Architecture : x86 3XHNUMCPUS How Many : 1 3XHNUMASUP NUMA is either not supported or has been disabled by user NULL\n1XHEXCPCODE J9Generic_Signal_Number: 00000004 1XHEXCPCODE Signal_Number: 0000000B 1XHEXCPCODE Error_Value: 00000000 1XHEXCPCODE Signal_Code: 00000080 1XHEXCPCODE Handler1: F72A2E6A 1XHEXCPCODE Handler2: F724D00A 1XHEXCPCODE InaccessibleAddress: 00000000 NULL\n1XHEXCPMODULE Module: /lib/libcairo.so.2 1XHEXCPMODULE Module_base_address: D55FC000\n\nThis is a Redhat Linux 7.2 environment with Content Platform Engine CPE 5.2.1.4.", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21978390", + "ANSWER": "Install the missing libraries \"adwaita-gtk2-theme\" (32 and 64 bit) and \"adwaita-gtk3-theme\" 64 bit. Please contact RedHat to obtain the missing libraries.", + "START_OFFSET": "706", + "END_OFFSET": "860", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21598554", + "swg21673044", + "swg1IO10742", + "swg1IC60317", + "swg21978390", + "swg1LO68156", + "swg1PK17890", + "swg1LO76551", + "swg1LI79173", + "swg1LI79172", + "swg1IV87612", + "swg1LI79171", + "swg1LI79472", + "swg1IV98831", + "swg1IV92234", + "swg1PM39529", + "swg21224024", + "swg1LO59087", + "swg21652999", + "swg22003554", + "swg1IT13861", + "swg1IC62020", + "swg21485399", + "swg21328463", + "swg21459151", + "swg21659671", + "swg21961925", + "swg22004390", + "swg21461830", + "swg21639189", + "swg1LO51493", + "swg1PM60387", + "swg1LO56597", + "swg21971901", + "swg1IC72754", + "swg1PM10461", + "swg1PK18493", + "swg21693414", + "swg21575261", + "swg1IZ39412", + "swg1IZ39371", + "swg21554658", + "swg21450746", + "swg1IZ86715", + "swg21984518", + "isg3T1026451", + "swg21258144", + "swg21558486", + "swg1IC74576", + "swg1PK80022" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q003", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Is there a way set a timeout for shell task?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I have run into couple of shell task in Urbancode, for example start websphere server, or run a test.bat file using the shell task, The problem I have, though the task is successful executed, it keeps ruining this shell task and does not moving to the next task. Can I set a time out for the shell task", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21663259", + "swg1LO68498", + "swg21686886", + "isg3T1025553", + "swg21410854", + "swg21694536", + "swg21669386", + "swg21134538", + "swg21547989", + "swg21430823", + "swg21380356", + "swg21374266", + "swg21253294", + "swg1IV00723", + "swg21506217", + "isg3T1011970", + "swg21325184", + "swg1IZ24819", + "swg21992281", + "swg21587152", + "swg21540271", + "swg1IZ68071", + "swg21968845", + "swg21538019", + "swg21392038", + "swg21049916", + "swg21144408", + "swg1PI20969", + "swg21989502", + "swg21150818", + "swg1PM91194", + "swg21549626", + "swg1HD95245", + "swg21985583", + "swg21562381", + "nas8N1014746", + "swg21531477", + "swg21534189", + "swg21541302", + "swg21119859", + "swg21537237", + "isg3T1014349", + "swg1IZ74323", + "swg1LO60567", + "swg21981434", + "swg21590130", + "swg21225507", + "swg1IZ78070", + "swg21524484", + "swg1PI18857" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q004", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Error #2070", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I purchased the SPSS grad pack and put one of the licenses on one computer and another on this one. This computer crashed and I was forced to reformat the hard drive. Subsequently, I lost SPSS in the process. After reinstalling the program, when I attempted to open a data set I received this error:\n\nError # 2070 The application is unable to communicate properly with the license server. The license server may be down, or there may be other network-related communication or DNS issues interfering. This command is not executed. Specific symptom number: 3", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1PI29943", + "swg1PI29944", + "swg1PI20755", + "swg1PI29945", + "swg21488477", + "swg22007389", + "swg21483949", + "swg21903620", + "swg21483570", + "swg21476243", + "swg21480416", + "swg21483249", + "swg21479486", + "swg21484893", + "swg21477472", + "swg21479422", + "swg21636326", + "swg21482869", + "swg21624290", + "swg21475390", + "swg21477856", + "swg21479848", + "swg21476483", + "swg21999396", + "swg21483046", + "swg21486369", + "swg21480369", + "swg21996555", + "swg21476542", + "swg21623152", + "swg21477254", + "swg21985805", + "swg21480742", + "swg21656246", + "swg21408682", + "swg21480780", + "swg21482206", + "swg21482958", + "swg21478846", + "swg21485674", + "swg21684196", + "swg21480488", + "swg21477390", + "swg21476498", + "swg21638772", + "swg21477230", + "swg1PI37055", + "swg21483035", + "swg21488453", + "swg1PI43568" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q005", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "I am getting a random invalid handle exception for my MQ .NET client applicatoin.", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "While running a MQ .NET application, I get the following exception at random times:\n\n Event Type: Error\n Event Source: ClientApplicationName\n Event Category: None\n Event ID: 0\n Date: 8/12/2015\n Time: 7:19:51 AM\n User: N/A\n Computer: TXPILAP01\n Description:\n System.ComponentModel.Win32Exception (0x80004005): The handle is invalid\n at System.Diagnostics.NtProcessManager.GetModuleInfos(Int32\n processId, Boolean firstModuleOnly)\n at System.Diagnostics.ProcessManager.GetModuleInfos(Int32 processId)\n at System.Diagnostics.Process.get_Modules()\n at IBM.WMQ.Nmqi.UnmanagedNmqiMQ.MQCONNX(String pQMgrName, MQCNO&\n pConnectOpts, Hconn parentHconn, Phconn phconn, Int32& pCompCode,\n Int32& pReason)\n at IBM.WMQ.Nmqi.UnmanagedNmqiMQ.MQCONNX(String pQMgrName,\n MQConnectOptions pConnectOpts, Phconn phconn, Int32& pCompCode, Int32&\n pReason)\n at IBM.WMQ.MQQueueManager.Connect(String queueManagerName)\n at IBM.WMQ.MQQueueManager..ctor(String queueManagerName, String\n Channel, String ConnName)\n at ClientApplicationName.ServiceAgents.Integration.MQISA.\n InitializeQueueManager(String queueManagerName)\n at ClientApplicationName.ServiceAgents.Integration.MQISA.SendRequest\n (String request)", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1IC95983", + "swg21664199", + "swg1IC67868", + "swg1IV68173", + "swg1IC97587", + "swg1IC81063", + "swg1IC88165", + "swg1IV20954", + "swg21438669", + "swg21361762", + "swg1IC64394", + "swg21696207", + "swg1IC71305", + "swg21377620", + "swg21576191", + "swg21364808", + "swg1IC97860", + "swg21422900", + "swg21578561", + "swg21503448", + "swg21575695", + "swg21456042", + "swg21617674", + "swg21503886", + "swg21423793", + "swg21418054", + "swg21587877", + "swg22015661", + "swg21402263", + "swg21625211", + "swg1PK94094", + "swg21450701", + "swg21585021", + "swg21423428", + "swg21631985", + "swg21973433", + "swg1IC63949", + "swg1IC81176", + "swg1PM22347", + "swg21618122", + "swg21647022", + "swg21584719", + "swg21599155", + "swg21586677", + "swg1PM75611", + "swg21444705", + "swg21504486", + "swg21607441", + "swg1PJ33456", + "swg21346220" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q006", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "After applying cumulative fix, why does xmlaccess use the base portal instead of the virtual portal when attempting an export or import?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "After applying a cumulative fix (CF) to WebSphere Portal 8.5 (with no other CF currently applied), attempts to export from or import to a virtual portal result in the action occurring against the base portal. This can be confirmed when looking at the exported xml and seeing the following in the initial comment of the export: \nvirtual portal: none (default virtual portal) ", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21692870", + "swg1PM72585", + "swg21260098", + "swg21306535", + "swg21512078", + "swg21243005", + "swg21495688", + "swg1PM28510", + "swg21443526", + "swg21397383", + "swg21454718", + "swg1PI70882", + "swg1PK70307", + "swg1PM07677", + "swg1PI25634", + "swg21398677", + "swg21427455", + "swg21642924", + "swg21586889", + "swg1PM44148", + "swg1PI59006", + "swg1PM63498", + "swg21469910", + "swg21593367", + "swg1PI87161", + "swg1PI58079", + "swg21451423", + "swg1PM05353", + "swg21576744", + "swg21444888", + "swg21641637", + "swg21303041", + "swg21686096", + "swg21451421", + "swg1PI73816", + "swg21620455", + "swg21685680", + "swg1PM91962", + "swg21313768", + "swg1PM89104", + "swg21569508", + "swg21398055", + "swg1PI21914", + "swg1PM39581", + "swg1PM77944", + "swg1PI06157", + "swg1PI68236", + "swg21611073", + "swg1PI18906", + "swg21574665" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q007", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Which Socket Gateway should I be using with Netcool Omnibus (NOI) ?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Which Socket Gateway should I be using with Netcool Omnibus (NOI) ?\n\nThere are 2 versions of the gateway; nco-g-socket-java-2_0 and nco-g-socket-10_0 Users may be confused what version they should download or use ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21625776", + "ANSWER": "A new version of the Netcool/OMNIbus Socket Gateway will be available to download from August 6, 2015.", + "START_OFFSET": "84", + "END_OFFSET": "186", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21962168", + "swg21625776", + "swg21572340", + "swg21428959", + "swg21970417", + "swg1IY88432", + "swg1IY94511", + "swg24033294", + "swg21665219", + "swg1IY90247", + "swg21977075", + "swg24033298", + "swg24033296", + "swg24033234", + "swg24033297", + "swg21613143", + "swg21613140", + "swg21613142", + "swg22016386", + "swg24033295", + "swg21987522", + "swg1IZ08433", + "swg21687618", + "swg21688224", + "swg21617190", + "swg21613117", + "swg21613418", + "swg21613144", + "swg21613138", + "swg21674676", + "swg21610165", + "swg21409595", + "swg21613133", + "swg21623766", + "swg1IY88256", + "swg1IZ51252", + "swg1IZ35500", + "swg21664783", + "swg21613134", + "swg21674709", + "swg21508058", + "swg21414832", + "swg21414830", + "swg21414831", + "swg21641166", + "swg1IY88332", + "swg1IY88290", + "swg21421563", + "swg21414805", + "swg21414807" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q008", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "How can I export a private key from DataPower Gateway Appliance?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nHow can I export a private key from DataPower Gateway appliance?\n\n", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21412061", + "ANSWER": "HSM-enabled DataPower appliances support the export of private keys using the crypto-export command.", + "START_OFFSET": "184", + "END_OFFSET": "284", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21412060", + "swg1IT01034", + "swg21446015", + "swg21412061", + "swg1IT07604", + "swg1IT17122", + "swg21273347", + "swg21255841", + "swg1IT08761", + "swg1IT06901", + "swg21516505", + "swg21507058", + "swg21599770", + "swg1IT09865", + "swg27048270", + "swg1IT10355", + "swg21388551", + "swg1IT10061", + "swg21508029", + "swg1IT11997", + "swg21402883", + "swg21235587", + "swg1IC96920", + "swg21380695", + "swg1IC93730", + "swg1IT06671", + "swg1IT12635", + "swg21587018", + "swg1IT07237", + "swg1IT17125", + "swg21417566", + "swg1IT02925", + "swg1IC94339", + "swg21358525", + "swg24032265", + "swg1IT14139", + "swg1IT14128", + "swg1IT17603", + "swg1IC80143", + "swg21511856", + "swg21250655", + "swg21249208", + "swg21501021", + "swg21642721", + "swg1IT08435", + "swg21470831", + "swg1IT15442", + "swg1LI77490", + "swg1IT11169", + "swg1IC68085" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q009", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "\"The transaction log for database BPMDB is full\" error message is seen when running BPMInstallOfflinePackage", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "During our latest deployment of a larger process application we received the following error\n\nThe transaction log for database 'BPMDB' is full. To find out why space in the log cannot be reused, see the log_reuse_wait_desc column in sys.databases\nWhy does this happen. The transaction log for the database is 80GB which should be sufficient.", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21382374", + "swg21636650", + "swg21619972", + "swg21623185", + "swg21644717", + "swg21606780", + "swg21693954", + "swg21348092", + "swg21342295", + "isg3T1015758", + "swg21616505", + "swg21696634", + "swg21472442", + "swg21365131", + "swg21541449", + "swg21903039", + "swg21626567", + "swg21297647", + "swg21347234", + "swg21416421", + "swg21980690", + "swg1IC74951", + "swg21986426", + "swg21695428", + "swg21516175", + "swg21500897", + "swg21664899", + "swg21335318", + "swg21592177", + "swg1LI71750", + "swg21121437", + "swg21367388", + "swg21427895", + "swg21548335", + "swg21418265", + "swg21678133", + "swg21644647", + "swg21404334", + "swg1JR36785", + "swg1IC77404", + "swg21980857", + "swg21347681", + "swg21452323", + "swg21616674", + "swg1IO10900", + "swg1PQ62736", + "swg1IC34012", + "swg21201999", + "swg21575458", + "swg21276540" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q010", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "We transferred the database to an external database on our Portal 8.5 environment and now seeing errors, EJPDB0085W and EJPFD0016E in the logs", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nAfter transferring the Portal database we seeing the following....\n\n [3/1/16 6:22:19:481 CST] 00000071 DataStoreServ W com.ibm.wps.services.\n datastore.DataStoreServiceImpl checkCorrectSetup EJPDB0085W: The\n character encoding of the database is not UTF-8.\n [3/1/16 6:22:19:528 CST] 00000071 Servlet E com.ibm.wps.engine.\n Servlet init EJPFD0016E: Initialization of service failed.\n com.ibm.wps.util.DataBackendException:\n EJPDB0160E: The sanity checks of the database layer failed.\n at com.ibm.wps.services.datastore.DataStoreServiceImpl.\n checkCorrectSetup(DataStoreServiceImpl.java:712)\n at com.ibm.wps.services.datastore.DataStoreServiceImpl.\n init(DataStoreServiceImpl.java:288)\n\n...\n\n [3/1/16 6:22:19:824 CST] 00000071 DatabaseInsig W com.ibm.wps.datastore.\n dbinsight.DatabaseInsight checkCharacterEncodingForOracle EJPDB0166W:\n The character encoding of database domain [[Domain: jcr]] is not\n correct. The value [WE8MSWIN1252] is set for key [NLS_CHARACTERSET] in\n parameter section [NLS_DATABASE_PARAMETERS] where expected values only\n can contain one of [[UTF8, AL16UTF16, AL32UTF8, UTFE]].\n\\", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21317981", + "ANSWER": "At this point there is no way to salvage the database in its current state. The entire Portal database must be dropped and recreated using the specifications provided in the InfoCenter at this link: \n\n\nhttp://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/wpdoc/v6r1m0/topic/com.ibm.wp.e [http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/wpdoc/v6r1m0/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.wp.ent.doc/config/aix_oracle_create_db.html]", + "START_OFFSET": "4675", + "END_OFFSET": "5074", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21317981", + "swg21383033", + "swg21366625", + "swg21468672", + "swg21433884", + "swg1PM50683", + "swg21573112", + "swg21648810", + "swg21457071", + "swg21965758", + "swg21452196", + "swg21385669", + "swg21338618", + "swg21347750", + "swg21316283", + "swg21327720", + "swg21621586", + "swg21500772", + "swg21519038", + "swg21700839", + "swg21513190", + "swg1PK96497", + "swg21500625", + "swg21575142", + "swg21640838", + "swg21690310", + "swg21679027", + "swg21458279", + "swg1IZ22728", + "swg1PK93166", + "swg21980747", + "swg21978797", + "swg21376006", + "swg21668339", + "nas8N1020586", + "swg21584591", + "swg21668460", + "swg21412502", + "swg1PK71446", + "swg1PK66614", + "swg21578662", + "swg21648077", + "swg1PM63850", + "swg21983775", + "swg21678024", + "swg21459952", + "swg21628882", + "swg21393482", + "swg21634513", + "swg21619894" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q011", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "How to proceed when jextract utility is throwing an OutOfMemory error ?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nI was getting a crash and was told to provide a \"jextracted core dump\". I ran the jextract command as instructed:\n\n/java/jre/bin/jextract [CORE_PATH]\n\nbut I am getting now an OutOfMemory error when jextract itself is running so I cannot proceed with the original crash investigation.", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21577379", + "ANSWER": "Sometimes the core dump is much larger than the default heap size can manage, and the recommendation is to increase the heap size using the -J-Xmx option.", + "START_OFFSET": "4067", + "END_OFFSET": "4221", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21577379", + "swg21055387", + "swg21273291", + "swg21053924", + "nas8N1013545", + "swg21222653", + "swg21104706", + "swg1IV27936", + "swg21255223", + "swg21572522", + "swg21222654", + "swg21246238", + "swg21222650", + "swg22015892", + "swg21222657", + "swg21222490", + "isg3T1022708", + "swg21222464", + "swg21501278", + "swg1IV25299", + "nas8N1020536", + "swg21626849", + "swg21405362", + "swg21222484", + "swg21222489", + "swg21606943", + "swg21388270", + "swg21246239", + "swg21222466", + "swg21222651", + "swg21673014", + "swg21636414", + "swg1IZ87782", + "swg21222655", + "swg21514752", + "swg21253915", + "swg21115785", + "swg1IV34232", + "swg21222656", + "swg1IZ29217", + "swg1IZ88090", + "swg1IZ18005", + "swg1IZ34556", + "swg1IZ88097", + "swg1IZ88091", + "swg21676433", + "swg1IZ48402", + "swg22012976", + "swg1IV09358", + "swg21588007" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q012", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "I receive the following during UDX compilation Can't exec \"/nz/kit/bin/adm/nzudxcompile\": Argument list too long", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21959723", + "ANSWER": "This ARG_MAX kernel parameter adjusted to much larger from kernel release version 2.6.23, that is 2621440 (http://www.in-ulm.de/~mascheck/various/argmax [http://www.in-ulm.de/~mascheck/various/argmax]). \n\nBut we support upto Redhat 5.11 in Twinfin which is less than kernel release 2.6.23. So we have no way to allow ARG_MAX larger than 131072 at this time.", + "START_OFFSET": "618", + "END_OFFSET": "975", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21959723", + "swg21679139", + "swg21980250", + "swg21980466", + "swg21996541", + "swg21988581", + "swg21571232", + "swg21967763", + "swg21697329", + "swg21567897", + "swg22002772", + "swg21967606", + "swg21675248", + "swg22015160", + "swg21988310", + "swg21571327", + "swg21981925", + "swg21903167", + "swg21685183", + "swg22016102", + "swg21599305", + "swg21987190", + "ibm10717983", + "swg21667557", + "swg21962766", + "swg21959930", + "swg21668709", + "swg21695638", + "swg21689794", + "swg21968812", + "swg22008428", + "swg21572659", + "swg21574441", + "swg21415101", + "swg22001968", + "swg21960902", + "swg21973868", + "swg21993339", + "swg21570596", + "swg21567490", + "swg21903154", + "swg21692016", + "swg22009907", + "swg21573300", + "swg21574640", + "swg21681429", + "swg21973788", + "swg21995015", + "swg21991286", + "swg22004071" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q013", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Additional steps to apply fix pack to Decision Center", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nWe are upgrading ODM 8.8.1 Decision Center to the latest 8.8.1.3.\n\nAre there any additional steps to apply the fixpack to Decision Center after we install the fixpack with Installation Manager?", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21665766", + "ANSWER": "As with any software product, even if you do not have any issues with running your current configuration, you should apply the latest modification or fix pack to take advantage of these benefits: \n\n * Anticipate and avoid the risk of encountering defects already fixed. \n * Apply the latest product improvements that are available (performance, for example). \n * Maintain a serviceable system and be able to install an interim fix when required.", + "START_OFFSET": "2287", + "END_OFFSET": "2732", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg24044043", + "swg24039916", + "swg24043530", + "swg1RS02471", + "swg21578211", + "swg24037227", + "swg24044042", + "swg24037905", + "swg24041821", + "swg24043852", + "swg24039235", + "swg24039275", + "swg24043671", + "swg24040633", + "swg24041321", + "swg24035228", + "swg24041725", + "swg24042247", + "swg24042348", + "swg27046500", + "swg21665766", + "swg24039387", + "swg24040019", + "swg24034803", + "swg21595620", + "swg24044456", + "swg21678244", + "swg21980003", + "swg1RS02629", + "swg1RS01918", + "swg21595346", + "swg24044932", + "swg21587707", + "swg21694928", + "swg24036507", + "swg21646410", + "swg21681168", + "swg21975049", + "swg21653691", + "swg24031627", + "swg21983535", + "swg24043654", + "swg27044404", + "swg21999137", + "swg1RS01769", + "swg1RS01846", + "swg27023697", + "swg21684689", + "swg22003737", + "swg1RS02491" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q014", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Installing fixpacks with Installation Manager - when did it change from using updateInstaller, starting in which version of WebSphere", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I was using updateInstaller to install fixpacks, and there was a separate fixpack for WebSphere and separate for the JDK, independent of each other. Now I understand that with Installation Manager there is a single package containing both the WebSphere App server fixpack as well as the JDK. When did this occur, starting with which version of WebSphere ? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21138332", + "ANSWER": "", + "START_OFFSET": "609", + "END_OFFSET": "1042", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21180428", + "swg21651360", + "swg24044985", + "swg21250151", + "swg27019072", + "swg21677696", + "swg24041052", + "swg24012725", + "swg1PK17063", + "swg21386925", + "swg21138332", + "swg21644062", + "swg21461496", + "swg24031617", + "nas8N1011892", + "swg1PK20640", + "swg1PK69798", + "swg21568772", + "swg24026805", + "swg21199423", + "swg24019019", + "swg21657700", + "swg24029895", + "swg21304460", + "nas8N1018726", + "swg24028575", + "swg24012246", + "swg21595346", + "swg1PK25100", + "swg1PK33956", + "swg21651637", + "swg21427178", + "swg21422763", + "swg24012718", + "swg24020212", + "swg21496781", + "swg21633720", + "swg21664767", + "swg24027718", + "swg21676204", + "swg24026940", + "swg27024037", + "swg21301250", + "swg27040108", + "isg3T1027645", + "swg21230924", + "swg21303247", + "swg21298354", + "swg21646644", + "swg21441528" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q015", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "DFHTS0001 0C4 AKEA at offset 3A1E in DFHTSPT", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Why is my CICS region getting message DFHTS0001 reporting an abend 0C4/AKEA at offset X'3A1E' in DFHTSPT? My CICS region was running normally and eventually received this abend.\n", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1PM05454", + "swg1PM03338", + "swg21597996", + "swg21253538", + "swg21450060", + "swg21026799", + "swg1PI93156", + "swg21267440", + "swg21407141", + "swg1PI22925", + "swg1PK59516", + "swg1PI23365", + "swg21606223", + "swg21230925", + "swg1PI05492", + "swg21226450", + "swg21472883", + "swg21452209", + "swg1PI08620", + "swg21163471", + "swg21169266", + "swg1PI95166", + "swg1PI97141", + "swg1PM93389", + "swg1PM93391", + "swg21322687", + "swg1PM87058", + "swg1PI54733", + "swg1PI56309", + "swg1PM86992", + "swg21244931", + "swg21329717", + "swg21607248", + "swg21079336", + "swg21169107", + "swg21669828", + "swg1PI83763", + "swg1PI55138", + "swg21642708", + "swg21578542", + "swg21410576", + "swg21054392", + "swg1PK95407", + "swg1PM71370", + "swg21207771", + "swg1PI53032", + "swg1PI74853", + "swg1PM21185", + "swg21600443", + "swg1PM13072" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q016", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "How to configure DC to look on a different App server for the SSP?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nI have a single Application server with the RES console installed, and then a separate application server with the XU, the ssp ear, etc. on that one. Each app server is configured separately with respective ports. for example, mgmt server (with the RES console only) has port 8000, and the runtime server (with all of the runtime components) has port 9000.\n\nThe problem I am running into is the following:\n\nWhen I am trying to run a DVS test suite from Decision Center against RES, (my server endpoint in Decision Center is configured as http://hostname:port/res)\n\nI am getting a \"the host and port are responsive but the \"/testing/sspService\" cannot be found. This is expected if it is looking on the same server as the RES console since the application (ssp) is not deployed there.\n\nHowever, I cannot seem to configure the RES console to not assume that the ssp is running on the same port.", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21502095", + "ANSWER": "First remember to pack all your XOMs (eXecutable Object Model) into the ssp.war following the documentation [http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/brjrules/v7r1/topic/com.ibm.websphere.ilog.jrules.doc/Content/Business_Rules/Documentation/_pubskel/JRules/ps_JRules_Global720.html]. \n\nThen make sure the SSP (ssp.war) is deployed on each server along with a XU connection factory and the appropriate datasource definition. \n\n \n\nThen create your own SSP resolver, add it to the teamserver.war and set the teamserver.defaultSSPResolver.class property to this class following this specification [http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/brjrules/v7r1/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.websphere.ilog.jrules.doc/html/api/html/ilog/rules/teamserver/model/testing/IlrSSPResolver.html]. \n\n \n\nBy implementing your own method IlrSSPResolver.getSSPURL(String serverName,URL url), you will be able to point to something else than the default provider. \n\nThe default provider uses the url of the Rule Execution Server passed in parameter and replaces the application name with testing. \n\nA simple implementation can use the server name to return a specific server URL.", + "START_OFFSET": "387", + "END_OFFSET": "1535", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21615508", + "swg21443946", + "swg21679679", + "swg21449103", + "swg21588859", + "swg21502095", + "swg21599241", + "swg21663395", + "swg21441394", + "swg1RS02482", + "swg21979431", + "swg21678244", + "swg21495825", + "swg21642741", + "swg21684689", + "swg21598779", + "swg21976593", + "swg21400738", + "swg21425487", + "swg21505013", + "swg21433278", + "swg21678239", + "swg21639718", + "swg21653982", + "swg1RS02626", + "swg21457713", + "swg21650641", + "swg21430461", + "swg21462316", + "swg21627010", + "swg21440000", + "swg21679688", + "swg21497512", + "swg21665766", + "swg21677736", + "swg21470178", + "swg21585251", + "swg21640540", + "swg21590082", + "swg21983535", + "swg21400817", + "swg21578192", + "swg24028864", + "swg21452630", + "swg21650384", + "swg21400819", + "swg21501332", + "swg21420910", + "swg21447204", + "nas8N1012999" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q017", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Can I perform a silent install of fix packs for IIB or WMB Toolkit?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "How do I perform a silent install of fix packs for IBM Integration Bus (IIB) or WebSphere Message Broker (WMB) Toolkit?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21615685", + "swg21418121", + "swg21694165", + "swg21664817", + "swg21299525", + "swg21453711", + "swg21313631", + "swg21957998", + "swg21299830", + "swg22001778", + "swg1IC98040", + "swg21299775", + "swg21656590", + "swg21299265", + "swg21299482", + "swg21299287", + "swg21299779", + "swg21991922", + "swg21687742", + "swg21302950", + "swg21299785", + "swg21299303", + "swg21305391", + "swg21299305", + "swg21299823", + "swg21302971", + "swg21998889", + "swg21175141", + "swg21657128", + "swg21694056", + "swg21178311", + "swg21299803", + "swg21299780", + "swg21623208", + "swg21687741", + "swg21177043", + "swg21299781", + "swg27016493", + "swg21299463", + "swg21299777", + "swg21302938", + "swg27007159", + "swg21299792", + "swg21166659", + "swg21177044", + "swg21295320", + "swg21302942", + "swg21660124", + "swg21299806", + "swg21299297" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q018", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why am I getting error SqlIntegrityConstraintViolationException when deploying a process application?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "After reinstalling Process Center (or using separate Process Centers to deploy to one Process Server) you get a deployment failure error on the Process Server:\njava.lang.Exception: java.lang.Exception:com.lombardisoftware.client.delegate.BusinessDelegateException:PreparedStatementCallback; SQL [update LSW_SNAPSHOT set CREATED_ON =?,NAME = ?,ACRONYM = ?,DESCRIPTION = ?,SEQ_NUM = ?,ERROR_COUNTER =?,ORIG_CREATED_ON = ?,ACTIVATED_ON = ?,STATUS = ?,ARCHIVED_ON =?,LAST_MODIFIED = ?,REPOSITORY_BRANCH_ID = ?,CREATED_BY_USER_ID =?,BRANCH_ID = ?,PROJECT_ID = ?,LAST_MODIFIED_BY_USER_ID = ?,CHANGE_DATA= ?,IS_ACTIVE = ?,IS_BLA_ACTIVE = ?,IS_STARTED = ?,IS_INSTALLED =?,IS_BLA_INSTALLED = ?,IS_TIP_DEPLOYED = ?,IS_DEFAULT =?,TIP_DEPLOYMENT_IN_PROGRESS = ?,IS_ARCHIVED = ? where SNAPSHOT_ID = ?]; Error for batch element # 1: DB2 SQL Error: SQLCODE=-803, SQLSTATE=23505, SQLERRMC=2;BPMBDBA.LSW_SNAPSHOT, DRIVER=4.11.69; nested exception iscom.ibm.db2.jcc.am.SqlIntegrityConstraintViolationException: Error forbatch element # 1: DB2 SQL Error: SQLCODE=-803, SQLSTATE=23505,SQLERRMC=2;BPMBDBA.LSW_SNAPSHOT, DRIVER=4.11.69\nHow can I deploy my application?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21659437", + "swg1JR44672", + "swg21659582", + "swg1JR51641", + "swg1JR44199", + "swg1JR47917", + "swg21619620", + "swg1JR44546", + "swg1JR46484", + "swg1JR49606", + "swg1JR50263", + "swg1IC83550", + "swg1JR48696", + "swg21616519", + "swg1JR50238", + "swg1JR51409", + "swg1JR54713", + "swg21625891", + "swg21989170", + "swg1JR56448", + "swg1JR40692", + "swg21474394", + "swg1JR53031", + "swg1JR59423", + "swg1JR44729", + "swg21403259", + "swg21978374", + "swg1PI42324", + "swg1IV47288", + "swg1IV39730", + "swg1JR51699", + "swg1IO25101", + "swg1PI47601", + "swg21381128", + "swg21632592", + "swg21622266", + "swg1JR54815", + "swg1JR52842", + "swg21670579", + "swg1IC86795", + "swg1PI07406", + "swg1JR56208", + "swg21554935", + "swg1JR56464", + "swg21624562", + "swg1IC81645", + "swg21559280", + "swg1IV98289", + "swg1PM68768", + "swg21623212" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q019", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Help with Security Bulletin : Multiple vulnerabilities in IBM Java Runtime affect IIB and WMB (CVE-2015-0138)", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I need to understand details regarding Security Bulletin : Multiple vulnerabilities in IBM Java Runtime affect IBM Integration Bus and WebSphere Message Broker (CVE-2015-0138). This is also commonly referenced as \u201cFREAK: Factoring Attack on RSA-EXPORT keys\" TLS/SSL client and server vulnerability. Where can I find this information? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21700397", + "ANSWER": "The \u201cFREAK: Factoring Attack on RSA-EXPORT keys\" TLS/SSL client and server vulnerability affects IBM\u00ae Runtime Environment Java\u2122 Technology Edition 6SR16 (and earlier) used by WebSphere Message Broker and the IBM\u00ae Runtime Environment Java\u2122 Technology Edition 7SR8 (and earlier) or 7R1 (and earlier) used by IBM Integration Bus.", + "START_OFFSET": "29", + "END_OFFSET": "355", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21698831", + "swg21699722", + "swg21959525", + "swg21699004", + "swg21701485", + "swg21699935", + "swg21698750", + "swg1PI37459", + "swg21700544", + "swg21700720", + "swg21700769", + "swg21882583", + "swg21701336", + "swg21701272", + "swg21701338", + "swg21700896", + "swg21698749", + "swg21961051", + "swg21701546", + "swg21698460", + "swg21699922", + "swg21700324", + "swg21959252", + "swg21702783", + "swg21903029", + "swg21957919", + "swg21903087", + "swg21696349", + "swg21714189", + "swg21699727", + "swg21700461", + "swg21701217", + "swg21698461", + "swg21699929", + "swg21902710", + "swg21903394", + "swg21694288", + "swg21964496", + "swg21700879", + "swg21702164", + "swg21700397", + "swg21902450", + "swg21700130", + "swg21699963", + "swg21701308", + "swg21701306", + "swg21959306", + "swg21701307", + "swg1PI37460", + "swg21700776" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q020", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "ODR OOM issue", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I got ODR OOM after upgrading the WAS to v8553. No configuration or traffic load changing. Is there any known way to solve the problem? ", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg24041964", + "swg22008878", + "swg1IT19921", + "swg1PM08752", + "swg1JR45981", + "swg1PM19671", + "swg1PM66926", + "swg21286159", + "swg21448743", + "swg1PM56332", + "swg1IT09202", + "swg1PI30994", + "swg22004792", + "swg1IC69795", + "swg24031420", + "swg1PI75474", + "swg1IV86305", + "swg1PM85114", + "swg1PM86128", + "swg27018423", + "swg21517494", + "swg21420005", + "swg24018242", + "swg1PM88670", + "swg1PM76578", + "swg1IT10030", + "swg21651642", + "swg21221275", + "swg1PM98573", + "swg1PK51289", + "swg21689486", + "swg1PK10996", + "swg21981551", + "swg21611603", + "swg1PK08425", + "swg21966079", + "swg21202156", + "swg1PK49971", + "swg1PM89301", + "swg1PI93376", + "swg1PK21207", + "swg1PM57816", + "swg1PI82527", + "swg21449871", + "swg1PI83062", + "swg1PK62128", + "swg1PK08419", + "swg1PM88507", + "swg1PM88669", + "swg1PK53374" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q021", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "How to refresh a DataPower WebService Proxy which WSDL got changed?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I have made changes to a WSDL stored in DP local filesystem.\n\nHow can I make the WSP reflect this change since DataPower Gateway 7.1.0 WebService Proxy WebGUI doesn't offer the \"Refresh\" button anymore?\n\nIs there a best practice to refresh the WSP if I modified my WSDL?", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21298897", + "ANSWER": "In a WS Proxy, you can refresh WSDL from an URL using WSDL Cache policy. However, if the WSDL is hosted on the DataPower appliance, such as in local:///, rather than on an external URL, the WSDL Cache Policy does not apply. \n\nFor instance, changes made to local:///test.wsdl are not picked up by WS Proxy although there is a WSDL Cache policy setting the URL Match expression to local:///test.wsdl. \n\nThis issue was reported to Quality Engineering but it was determined that the DataPower device is working as designed. The device will not poll WSDL files on the local store.\n\nThe WSDL Cache policy works with WSDL files hosted on an external URL.\n\nTo refresh a WSDL in the local:/// directory, disable and re-enable the service.", + "START_OFFSET": "601", + "END_OFFSET": "1330", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1IC87187", + "swg1IC99865", + "swg21390086", + "swg21572593", + "swg21642398", + "swg21450402", + "swg1IT13795", + "swg21298897", + "swg1IC83678", + "swg21384937", + "swg1IC99511", + "swg1IC62452", + "swg21259000", + "swg21574515", + "swg1IC70823", + "swg1IC71544", + "swg21497124", + "swg1IC98115", + "swg21330218", + "swg21242308", + "swg21450806", + "swg1IC74315", + "swg21406264", + "swg21679453", + "swg21375899", + "swg1IC91105", + "swg21659534", + "swg1IT17056", + "swg21504041", + "swg1IC87448", + "swg21328671", + "swg21576087", + "swg21439872", + "swg1IT21215", + "swg1PK02929", + "swg21405375", + "swg1IC74425", + "swg21441231", + "swg27021649", + "swg21385819", + "swg1IC67920", + "swg21646539", + "swg21449024", + "swg21645780", + "swg1IC79623", + "swg1IC69673", + "swg1IC88020", + "swg1IC95739", + "swg1PK67458", + "swg21500384" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q022", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "where is the websphere application server 9.0.0.4 fix for developers", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I am using the was 9.0.0.0 in rad/rsa 9.6.1 for Windows. I cannot upgrade to the 9.0.0.4 fixpack, because there is no developer edition. On the downloadpage there are Base, Network Deployment, DMZ Secure Proxy Server and IBM Web Enablement for IBM i, but no Developers! See link text For was 8.5.5.10 there exists a developers edition. Where can I download the Websphere Application Server fix pack 9.0.0.4 Developers?", + "DOCUMENT": "swg22005352", + "ANSWER": "WAS recently renamed WAS for Developers (WAS4D) to WAS ILAN (see here [https://developer.ibm.com/wasdev/downloads/#asset/WAS_traditional_for_Developers]). In response to this change, RAD 9.6 now packages WAS ILAN available in the RAD_WS_9.6_WASTE_9.0.zip file. It has the same capabilities and updates that RAD users expect.", + "START_OFFSET": "728", + "END_OFFSET": "1052", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg27012950", + "nas8N1021349", + "swg21392824", + "swg27047035", + "swg27050291", + "swg27012952", + "swg24030603", + "swg27049869", + "swg22013862", + "swg27050726", + "isg3T1027642", + "swg27049436", + "swg27008725", + "swg21199888", + "swg21199423", + "swg27012951", + "nas8N1015480", + "swg27048990", + "swg24021071", + "swg24039989", + "swg27013594", + "nas8N1017827", + "swg27012948", + "swg1PI39793", + "swg1PK56638", + "swg1PK43586", + "swg27050859", + "swg22005352", + "isg3T1027644", + "swg27012946", + "swg22012751", + "swg24029620", + "swg27048596", + "swg21287579", + "swg21433530", + "swg27050541", + "swg27021731", + "nas8N1010871", + "swg22013865", + "nas8N1020185", + "swg21683059", + "swg21381935", + "swg22006810", + "swg21674147", + "swg27013038", + "nas8N1022042", + "swg24042153", + "swg21385784", + "swg21587944", + "swg27013036" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q023", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "No trace is logged in Decision Warehouse, and no records in EXECUTION_TRACES table for a certain ruleset", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nFor a certain ruleset, no trace is logged in DW, and no records can be found in EXEUTION_TRACES table of DW database.\n\nServer logs do not contain any messages about the execution traces for this ruleset.\n\nThe issue reproduces only for this project. For other projects deployed in RES, traces are being logged in DW. Also, the same project generates execution traces in other environments.\n\nThe following properties have been set:\n\n monitoring.enabled = true\n monitoring.filters = INFO_EXECUTION_DATE=true,INFO_EXECUTION_DURATION=true,INFO_TOTAL_TASKS_EXECUTED=true,INFO_TOTAL_RULES_NOT_FIRED=true,INFO_EXECUTION_EVENTS=true,INFO_TOTAL_TASKS_NOT_EXECUTED=true,INFO_TOTAL_RULES_FIRED=true,INFO_RULESET_PROPERTIES=true\n ruleset.bom.enabled = false (for true value, the problem still occurs)\n ruleset.sequential.trace.enabled = true\n ruleset.trace.enabled = true\n\nHow can I diagnose this issue?", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21433278", + "ANSWER": "If an issue arises during DW trace persistence at runtime, the related messages and stack traces are only available programmatically through the following API: ilog.rules.res.session.IlrSessionResponse.getWarnings() \n\nSo it is possible for an error to remain silent if the warnings above are not explicitly logged by the application.", + "START_OFFSET": "359", + "END_OFFSET": "692", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21586717", + "swg21440000", + "swg21433278", + "swg21627010", + "swg1RS01921", + "swg21589513", + "swg21588859", + "swg21452630", + "swg21617737", + "swg21667599", + "swg21621350", + "swg21427266", + "swg21989261", + "swg21449110", + "swg21606315", + "swg21989288", + "nas8N1019479", + "swg21989269", + "swg21645364", + "swg21433167", + "swg1RS02810", + "swg21430461", + "swg21610908", + "swg1RS00286", + "swg21325206", + "swg1PK20880", + "swg21623705", + "swg21259454", + "swg21514921", + "swg21458646", + "swg21433790", + "swg21343375", + "swg21469115", + "swg21650642", + "swg21625067", + "swg1RS00171", + "swg21418646", + "swg21632451", + "swg21632563", + "swg21499389", + "swg21239790", + "swg1IZ01052", + "swg21971007", + "swg21278395", + "swg21420794", + "swg1JR55746", + "swg21584855", + "swg21609184", + "swg21256825", + "swg21419162" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q024", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why is my .NET client not connecting and the QMgr records a DBCS error (AMQ6048)?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I upgraded to WMQ 7.5.0.x client and now my .NET application fails to connect to the QMgr. The error received on the QMgr side was AMQ6048. What's going on?\n AMQ6048: DBCS error\n\n EXPLANATION:\n WebSphere MQ is unable to convert string data due to a DBCS error.\n Conversion is from CCSID 1208 to CCSID 1252.\n ACTION:\n Check the WebSphere MQ Application Programming Reference Appendix and\n the appropriate National Language Support publications to see if the\n CCSIDs are supported by your system.", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1SE46234", + "swg1IZ92715", + "swg1IT01265", + "swg21179308", + "swg21243196", + "swg1IZ67359", + "swg1PI81371", + "swg1IC59979", + "swg1PI76997", + "swg1PI81419", + "swg1PM37003", + "swg1PM36658", + "swg1PM76645", + "swg1PI45157", + "nas8N1017425", + "swg1PM29615", + "swg1PM24866", + "swg21233177", + "swg1IV02028", + "swg1PK76501", + "swg21222078", + "swg1IY45552", + "swg1PK08495", + "swg1PM61807", + "swg21320347", + "swg1PM59982", + "swg21173813", + "swg1PM58916", + "swg21430080", + "swg1IT19539", + "swg1IV08393", + "swg21212795", + "swg1IV18358", + "swg21235552", + "swg1IT17154", + "swg1PK86431", + "swg1IZ63038", + "swg21109867", + "swg1PI65866", + "swg1SE60211", + "swg1IC67868", + "swg1PM09629", + "swg1IV49971", + "swg21566441", + "swg1IZ28106", + "swg1PI08166", + "swg21176955", + "swg1PK71771", + "swg27021866", + "swg1PM26211" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q025", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "How to import a certificate in ITCAM for Data Power ?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "How can I import a certificate in ITCAM for Data Power?", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21959588", + "ANSWER": "Import the certification file into the agent by doing the following command:\n\nNote : You can use either .cer or .pem. \nMake sure the file is in ASCII not binary. \nWhere the /usr/ITM/JRE is your Java location and is your file name.", + "START_OFFSET": "645", + "END_OFFSET": "886", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21959588", + "swg21646081", + "swg21982765", + "swg21682753", + "nas8N1018506", + "swg21521629", + "swg21697897", + "swg21677393", + "swg21469114", + "swg21637725", + "swg21281514", + "swg22014350", + "nas8N1012543", + "swg24014104", + "swg21681635", + "nas8N1011664", + "swg27021649", + "swg24014103", + "swg21962506", + "nas8N1019817", + "nas8N1011678", + "swg1IV88814", + "swg21988845", + "isg3T1022307", + "swg21306313", + "swg21997164", + "nas8N1022484", + "swg21989961", + "swg21989946", + "swg21299954", + "swg1IV84761", + "nas8N1012442", + "nas8N1012133", + "swg1IZ49153", + "swg21641086", + "swg21460867", + "swg1IZ69734", + "swg1IV79901", + "nas8N1019818", + "swg21562846", + "swg21390738", + "swg21618611", + "swg21407069", + "nas8N1012902", + "nas8N1014239", + "swg21404180", + "swg21964513", + "swg21588417", + "swg21621262", + "nas8N1012724" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q026", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "DNS cache is not updating even when DNS server is updated", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nDatapower DNS is still showing old IP address even after the DNS server was changed few days ago.\n\nHow can i change DNS cache so it shows the new IP Address?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "nas8N1014402", + "swg1PK18867", + "swg21392259", + "swg1PK20100", + "swg21414775", + "swg21474498", + "swg21995765", + "swg1PJ45108", + "swg21295471", + "nas8N1014079", + "swg1PM00698", + "swg21674607", + "swg21002650", + "swg21665982", + "swg21115689", + "swg21578923", + "swg21271803", + "swg21149303", + "isg3T1010925", + "swg1IC86912", + "swg21902313", + "swg1PM58834", + "swg1PJ29991", + "nas8N1016223", + "swg21552836", + "swg21563484", + "nas8N1017819", + "swg21250028", + "nas8N1013244", + "swg1IT09309", + "swg21566964", + "swg21973856", + "swg21375425", + "swg22012011", + "swg21325168", + "swg21382551", + "swg21105291", + "swg1IC99829", + "swg21213761", + "swg21435039", + "swg21663287", + "swg27021649", + "swg1IC61704", + "nas8N1017311", + "nas8N1016664", + "nas8N1018832", + "swg21207534", + "swg1IY78866", + "nas8N1013120", + "swg21528106" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q027", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "How to create batches for bulk upload", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nI am new in datacap 9.0 .I just started developing with datacap studio and currently I have learned to recognize, capture and export the data into filenet.\n\nNow I want to Create batches of image or pdf files so that I can process images and pdf .\n\n \n\nAs per requirement client is sharing document at one shared location.I need to pickup all the documnets from shared location. For creating batches which tool I should use? how it works?\n\n \n\nCan anyone help how I proceed with this.\n\n \n\nRegards,\n\nChhaya Sahu\n", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21618564", + "ANSWER": "Set skipsamebatch for VScan tasks 1. Run Rulerunner Manager. \n 2. On the Rulerunner tab, stop the service. \n 3. On the Rulerunner Login tab, click Connect. \n 4. On the Workflow tab, expand the hierarchy on the right and highlight VScan. \n 5. In the Settings section in the lower right, set skipsamebatch to 1. \n 6. Highlight the line labeled above VScan in the thread hierarchy. \n 7. Set skipsamebatch to 1 there also. \n 8. Click Save, then go back to the Rulerunner tab and start the service.", + "START_OFFSET": "692", + "END_OFFSET": "1192", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21618564", + "swg21663541", + "swg21456098", + "swg21586368", + "swg27049151", + "swg27050864", + "swg21973739", + "swg27043298", + "swg21438639", + "swg21507391", + "swg21632876", + "swg21450659", + "swg21664386", + "swg21509512", + "swg27045486", + "swg21516768", + "swg21685596", + "swg21672896", + "swg1IO24703", + "swg21903282", + "swg21686621", + "swg21274666", + "swg21516743", + "swg21579906", + "swg21499976", + "swg21274860", + "swg21642839", + "swg21647236", + "swg21587896", + "swg21607277", + "swg27047578", + "swg21448254", + "swg21619629", + "swg21984009", + "swg21266106", + "swg21585494", + "swg1IO23662", + "swg27045390", + "swg22007253", + "swg1IO05560", + "swg21315231", + "nas8N1012787", + "swg21630209", + "swg21485197", + "swg21620531", + "swg21199288", + "swg21396749", + "swg22004831", + "swg21694159", + "swg21590825" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q028", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Help with Security Bulletin: Multiple vulnerabilities have been identified in WebSphere Application Server shipped with WSRR (CVE-2015-4911)", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I need to understand details regarding Security Bulletin: Multiple vulnerabilities have been identified in WebSphere Application Server shipped with WebSphere Service Registry and Repository (CVE-2015-4911). Where can I find this information? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21975747", + "ANSWER": "CVEID: CVE-2015-4911 [http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-4911]\n\nDESCRIPTION: An unspecified vulnerability related to the JAXP component could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.\nCVSS Base Score: 5\nCVSS Temporal Score: See https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/107360 [https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/107360] for the current score\nCVSS Environmental Score*: Undefined\nCVSS Vector: (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P)", + "START_OFFSET": "572", + "END_OFFSET": "1054", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg2C1000117", + "swg21882549", + "swg21883331", + "swg2C1000269", + "swg21975747", + "swg21971058", + "swg21882528", + "swg21883102", + "swg2C1000200", + "swg21965152", + "swg22011198", + "swg2C1000296", + "swg2C1000112", + "swg22016430", + "swg22000852", + "swg21964872", + "swg21700720", + "swg22013955", + "swg21681915", + "swg2C1000240", + "swg21971483", + "swg21963824", + "swg21971580", + "swg21971859", + "swg21988198", + "swg21968674", + "swg2C1000349", + "swg21682276", + "swg21996778", + "swg21682748", + "swg21975925", + "swg21959309", + "swg21698829", + "swg2C1000060", + "swg21978740", + "swg21978741", + "swg21963306", + "swg21701285", + "swg21968857", + "swg21972257", + "swg21984019", + "swg21976558", + "swg21968858", + "swg22010680", + "swg21976397", + "swg21976738", + "swg21970181", + "swg21976039", + "swg21977593", + "swg21977130" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q029", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Recurrent RES StaleConnectionException", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "How to prevent rule execution failing because of recurrent StaleConnectionException on ODM 8.8 Rule Execution Server? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21496354", + "ANSWER": "Configure the WebSphere Application Server data source connection pool so as to eliminate occurrences of StaleConnectionException :\n\n Set the Minimum connections to 0 to avoid situations where a connection is kept in the pool to meet the minimum requirement, even though it may have been idle for longer than Unused timeout\n Set the values for Unused timeout and Reap timeout so that the sum does not exceed any network level idle connection timeout", + "START_OFFSET": "1970", + "END_OFFSET": "2569", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21496354", + "swg21983535", + "swg21615801", + "swg21400651", + "swg21430461", + "swg21663395", + "swg21979431", + "swg21495825", + "swg21586621", + "swg21677736", + "swg21647368", + "swg21461685", + "swg21461650", + "swg21501332", + "swg21643521", + "swg21457713", + "swg27046500", + "swg21589513", + "swg21651648", + "swg21666132", + "swg21584856", + "swg21627010", + "swg27023725", + "swg21584855", + "swg21653982", + "swg21653691", + "swg21400648", + "swg21400784", + "swg21469115", + "swg21622452", + "swg21497512", + "swg21425259", + "swg21507683", + "swg21496566", + "swg21421294", + "swg21590082", + "swg21670706", + "swg21462316", + "swg21400817", + "swg21684689", + "swg21677726", + "swg21419945", + "swg21470178", + "swg1PK24980", + "swg21976593", + "swg21599241", + "swg27019171", + "swg21612907", + "swg21678244", + "swg21668133" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q030", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "For HP-UX how to write verbose gc output to a log file other than the native_stdout?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "A customer asked why no gc logs generated even if they use the -Xverbosegc option. So How can I write verbose gc output to a log file other than the native_stdout for HP-UX? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21636533", + "ANSWER": "Add the following parameters to the generic JVM arguments: \n-XX:+PrintGCDetails \n-XX:+PrintGCDateStamps \n-XX:+PrintHeapAtGC \n-Xverbosegc:file= /tmp/gc_pid$$.vgc", + "START_OFFSET": "1083", + "END_OFFSET": "1243", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21636533", + "swg21384096", + "swg21562190", + "swg21393660", + "swg21393526", + "swg1PI69321", + "swg21625834", + "swg21222436", + "swg21264612", + "swg21252051", + "swg21989131", + "swg21689338", + "swg21393519", + "swg21264875", + "swg21264702", + "swg1PI82789", + "swg21671183", + "swg21689115", + "swg21687696", + "swg21255218", + "swg1PK86928", + "swg21244512", + "swg21632546", + "swg21390458", + "swg21222488", + "swg21257788", + "swg21611598", + "swg21104706", + "swg21454187", + "swg21961172", + "swg21685616", + "swg21114927", + "swg21588545", + "swg24018223", + "swg21612199", + "swg1PK77456", + "swg1IC92633", + "swg1PM27377", + "swg21260619", + "swg21256043", + "swg21671406", + "swg21557663", + "swg21560364", + "swg21588547", + "swg21552910", + "swg1PK53799", + "swg21961058", + "swg21667495", + "swg21625120", + "swg21588550" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q031", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Unable to run Test Suites against clustered SSP from Decison Center console", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I have a clustered Decision Server where XU and SSP are deployed on cluster members and Rule Execution Server (RES) console is deployed on a standalone server outside of the cluster. IHS and a load balancer is configured on top of the cluster. In Decision Center, the RES server URL is configured with the load balanced IP. Test Suite fails to run from Decision Center console in this configuration.\n\nAfter clicking on Run from Decision Center console, the process starts, but after a few seconds, execution stops with a message: Cannot execute the scenario suite xxx. The operation was aborted by user.\n\nNo errors shown in Decision Center and Decision Server server logs. The only error seen is from the browser and no stack trace is displayed.", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21615508", + "swg21425487", + "swg21443946", + "swg21599241", + "swg21678244", + "swg21678239", + "swg21627010", + "swg21679679", + "swg21588859", + "swg21430461", + "swg1RS02626", + "swg21449103", + "swg21653982", + "swg21976593", + "swg21983535", + "swg21470178", + "swg1RS02482", + "swg21959316", + "swg21684689", + "swg21584855", + "swg21400819", + "swg21458245", + "swg21400812", + "swg21578192", + "swg21679688", + "swg21495825", + "swg21642741", + "swg21587817", + "swg1RS02962", + "swg21589513", + "swg21459305", + "swg1RS02527", + "swg21659594", + "swg21505013", + "swg21426014", + "swg21979431", + "swg27023725", + "swg21616403", + "swg21584856", + "swg21639718", + "swg21980003", + "swg21400738", + "swg21975435", + "swg21634188", + "swg21614572", + "swg21501332", + "swg21443038", + "swg21596108", + "swg21663395", + "swg21441394" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q032", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "IBM Content Navigator v2.0.3 is adding a .dat extension to a CSV file during Download action on a document.", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "IBM Content Navigator v2.0.3 is adding a .dat extension to a CSV file during Download action on a document. Why is this the case?", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21994175", + "ANSWER": "If the mime type of the document as shown in system properties in ICN is not text/csv, then Navigator cannot recognize the document and a .dat extension will be added upon download.", + "START_OFFSET": "327", + "END_OFFSET": "508", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21994175", + "swg1IO25185", + "swg27050002", + "swg27049234", + "swg27045448", + "swg22005867", + "swg1IO25511", + "swg1IO15844", + "swg1IO26004", + "swg27044325", + "swg21972681", + "swg21985659", + "swg1IO24604", + "swg21988548", + "swg21686784", + "swg1IO21729", + "swg21697475", + "swg1IO21348", + "swg22011170", + "swg1IO24220", + "swg1IO19881", + "swg21681849", + "swg21969555", + "swg1IO26002", + "swg1IO25680", + "swg27044513", + "swg21996403", + "swg1IO20414", + "swg1IO25058", + "swg21640997", + "swg21685397", + "swg1IO17152", + "swg1IO25586", + "swg21980962", + "swg22002547", + "swg21678791", + "swg1IZ41786", + "swg21507807", + "swg27043168", + "swg1IO24947", + "swg1IO21433", + "swg27039171", + "swg1IO24133", + "swg1IO25094", + "swg21996900", + "swg1IO24978", + "swg27043889", + "swg1IO25072", + "swg21676444", + "swg21689540" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q033", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Limitations of sylog-TCP log target using DataPower Gateways", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I am trying to configure a log target using type syslog-TCP. It seems that the payload is getting truncated when I try to record custom logs to it using log-action. Why is this? How can I workaround it. ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21269136", + "ANSWER": "Configure a server daemon to listen and capture the DataPower devices events.", + "START_OFFSET": "1065", + "END_OFFSET": "1142", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21269136", + "swg21502873", + "swg21651652", + "swg27041346", + "swg21622313", + "swg21987398", + "swg21991090", + "swg21447824", + "swg21674902", + "swg21454483", + "swg1IT19589", + "swg21692741", + "swg1IT24941", + "swg1IT07482", + "swg21656015", + "swg21983696", + "swg21690475", + "swg21672049", + "nas8N1019020", + "swg21181819", + "swg21499749", + "swg21469404", + "swg1PK54211", + "nas8N1015947", + "swg21002802", + "swg21585229", + "swg21325717", + "swg21646168", + "swg21960879", + "swg21626359", + "swg21250655", + "swg1LI72409", + "swg1PK87788", + "swg1LI72641", + "isg3T1014070", + "swg1IT19683", + "swg21329071", + "swg1IY75719", + "swg21690785", + "swg27018800", + "swg21655077", + "swg1IV55299", + "nas8N1011740", + "swg21419092", + "swg1IJ00987", + "swg21694047", + "swg1IV13181", + "swg24044502", + "swg1PN91092", + "isg3T1013865" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q034", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Profiler for WebSphere 8", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nHi,\n\nWe noticed that a was application server uses 1,4 Go of memory at startup, we would like to understand what java classes are using most part of it.\n\nIs a Java profiler provided by default with WAS 8.0 ? Is there something to activate via the WAS admin console ?\n\n \n\nThanks a lot", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21413628", + "ANSWER": "Health Center is a very low overhead monitoring tool. It runs alongside an IBM Java application with a very small impact on the application's performance (less than 1%). Health Center monitors several application areas, using the information to provide recommendations and analysis that help you improve the performance and efficiency of your application.", + "START_OFFSET": "280", + "END_OFFSET": "635", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21413628", + "swg21653445", + "swg21566549", + "swg21425953", + "nas8N1012753", + "swg1IV12155", + "swg27024872", + "swg21964963", + "nas8N1020084", + "swg21401502", + "swg21414403", + "swg21688705", + "swg21227479", + "swg1HD64484", + "swg21294023", + "swg1PK55198", + "swg21254349", + "swg1LO41588", + "swg27021314", + "swg27018423", + "swg21261119", + "swg21224886", + "swg27046395", + "swg21160581", + "swg21240176", + "swg27042119", + "swg21460720", + "swg21999599", + "swg21651851", + "swg1IV45181", + "swg21381220", + "swg27047578", + "swg1PK51476", + "swg1IZ68512", + "swg24035288", + "swg21611603", + "swg1IZ82779", + "swg22013386", + "swg21989171", + "swg21382438", + "swg21423244", + "swg1PK51937", + "swg1ZZ00666", + "swg21221178", + "swg21986076", + "swg27042283", + "nas8N1022189", + "swg21585753", + "swg21657391", + "swg21303233" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q035", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Help with Security Bulletin: API Connect is affected by a Node.js denial of service vulnerability (CVE-2017-14919)", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I need to understand details regarding Security Bulletin: API Connect is affected by a Node.js denial of service vulnerability (CVE-2017-14919). Where can I find this information? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg22013168", + "ANSWER": "CVEID:CVE-2017-14919 [http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2017-14919]\nDESCRIPTION:Node.js is vulnerable to a denial of service, caused by an uncaught exception flaw in the zlib module. By making 8 an invalid value for the windowBits parameter, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause the application to crash.\nCVSS Base Score: 7.5\nCVSS Temporal Score: Seehttps://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/134286 [https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/134286]for the current score\nCVSS Environmental Score*: Undefined\nCVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H)", + "START_OFFSET": "362", + "END_OFFSET": "990", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg22013168", + "nas8N1022348", + "swg22009851", + "swg22011851", + "swg22009964", + "swg22011533", + "nas8N1022230", + "swg21986144", + "swg22008951", + "swg21999842", + "swg22006722", + "swg21998163", + "swg2C1000365", + "swg22006298", + "swg22001567", + "swg22009015", + "swg22013088", + "swg22007209", + "swg22008629", + "swg22011830", + "swg21972419", + "swg22004940", + "swg21982934", + "swg22012455", + "swg21685987", + "swg21682094", + "swg21962754", + "swg21973447", + "swg21972951", + "swg21981433", + "swg21977578", + "swg22006472", + "swg21961847", + "swg22017103", + "swg21983226", + "swg21974243", + "swg21983514", + "swg21702160", + "swg22002063", + "swg22005439", + "swg21982852", + "nas8N1021324", + "swg21959518", + "swg21979498", + "swg21979050", + "swg21978361", + "swg21690815", + "swg22010601", + "nas8N1021060", + "swg21678167" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q036", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Port number error starting 9.0 Launcher", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nI'm attempting to start up v9.0 for the first time with one .msl file on a Windows server and get the following error. I also have v8.4 on this server and it starts fine. I do not have v8.4 running when I attempt to start v9.0.\n\nCannot recognize if the system RecordChangeSystem.msl; has started. Reason: Server is unable to get the status of the system on port number 6,002.\n\nI have the port range set to 7000/8000. Why am I seeing this? ", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1PK90066", + "swg21976821", + "swg21242795", + "swg21477911", + "swg21481930", + "swg21660391", + "nas8N1021317", + "swg21408682", + "swg21486369", + "swg21432790", + "swg1PI58314", + "swg21971224", + "swg1PK38022", + "swg21443850", + "swg21483715", + "swg21009248", + "swg1PK88357", + "swg21447204", + "swg21300074", + "swg21502952", + "swg21640186", + "swg21960029", + "nas8N1014591", + "swg1HD72999", + "nas8N1020679", + "swg21097835", + "nas8N1021130", + "nas8N1014301", + "nas8N1010549", + "swg21405299", + "swg21578969", + "nas8N1021123", + "swg21646561", + "swg21535016", + "swg21402453", + "swg21673413", + "swg21477853", + "swg21210874", + "swg1HE02707", + "swg21323658", + "swg1IV59643", + "swg21654101", + "swg1IR42812", + "swg21250838", + "nas8N1012643", + "swg21260566", + "isg3T1011829", + "swg21689284", + "swg1HD92934", + "nas8N1018512" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q037", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Help with Action required for IIB H.E.V9 and WMB H.E. V8 for security vulnerabilities in Red Hat Linux", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nI need to understand details regarding Action required for IBM Integration Bus Hypervisor Edition V9.0 and WebSphere Message Broker Hypervisor Edition V8.0 for security vulnerabilities in Red Hat Linux.\n\nWhere can I find this information?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21994053", + "swg22011624", + "swg21998452", + "swg22011696", + "swg21977378", + "swg21987358", + "swg22015915", + "swg21989255", + "swg22011754", + "swg22013692", + "swg22013693", + "swg22011745", + "swg21979065", + "swg22003256", + "swg22005035", + "swg21992475", + "swg22012477", + "swg22015916", + "swg21982752", + "swg21971313", + "swg22011748", + "swg22010832", + "swg22012862", + "swg21981107", + "swg21985022", + "swg22005385", + "swg22011630", + "swg22007664", + "swg21986120", + "swg21697721", + "swg22009436", + "swg22009455", + "swg22009285", + "swg22012678", + "swg22004377", + "swg22012861", + "swg21996135", + "swg22000947", + "swg22006789", + "swg22007869", + "swg21695798", + "swg21990735", + "swg21903157", + "swg24034994", + "swg21696878", + "swg21696879", + "swg24031059", + "swg21902248", + "swg21641918", + "swg21903158" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q038", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "ODM 8.7 TeamServer users active authoring rules and they get kicked out - transaction timeout or session timeout?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Some of my users are being kicked out of TeamServer while actively authoring rules. What value would be controlling this behavior? Session timeout is at it's default 30 minutes. Does transaction timeout come in to play here or is there a different setting that might be causing this. Thanks. ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21451229", + "ANSWER": "If you perform time consuming operations in large repositories, you can increase the timeout value in the web.xml file of the RTS/DC EAR file (jrules-teamserver-.ear\\teamserver.war\\WEB-INF) by changing the value of the property ilog.rules.teamserver.transaction.timeout.\n\nYou will find the property in the file web.xml defined as below:\n...\n\nModify the timeout value that is associated with transactions (in seconds)\nilog.rules.teamserver.transaction.timeout\n600\n ", + "START_OFFSET": "1820", + "END_OFFSET": "2406", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21451229", + "swg21653948", + "swg1IV38021", + "swg21426266", + "swg21994238", + "swg21580847", + "swg21439561", + "swg1IZ78507", + "swg21970072", + "swg21516072", + "swg1RS02344", + "swg21961137", + "swg21644878", + "swg21997141", + "swg21545260", + "swg21408905", + "swg1IY68026", + "swg21415491", + "swg21512329", + "swg21147129", + "swg21963674", + "swg1HD59502", + "swg21458414", + "swg21976199", + "swg1IY86784", + "swg21293213", + "swg22010714", + "swg27020512", + "swg21428407", + "swg21508727", + "swg21512248", + "swg21224029", + "swg21427869", + "swg21512490", + "swg21621492", + "swg21615100", + "swg21637207", + "swg21295449", + "nas8N1021384", + "swg21253578", + "swg1IZ18089", + "swg21322947", + "swg21078845", + "swg21438374", + "swg21633692", + "swg21240176", + "swg21444816", + "swg1JR31783", + "swg21643735", + "swg21639027" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q039", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "How do I upgrade my virtual DataPower Appliance from 5.0 firmware to 6.0+ firmware?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "When attempting to upgrade my Virtual DataPower Appliance from 5.0.0.8 firmware version to 6.0+ firmware versions, I receive a failure message. ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21638268", + "ANSWER": "You must install the 5.0.0.8 or later fix pack to upgrade to 6.0.0.0 or later. The 5.0.0.8 fix pack contains a required fix to allow the larger sized firmware image to fit.", + "START_OFFSET": "2042", + "END_OFFSET": "2214", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21659645", + "swg21640445", + "swg21260903", + "swg24032511", + "swg1IC91596", + "swg27045930", + "swg21411196", + "swg21507058", + "swg21501194", + "swg21358525", + "swg1IT10644", + "swg21677137", + "swg1IT05864", + "swg21501021", + "swg24039059", + "swg1IC98780", + "swg21633306", + "swg21690323", + "swg1IC97930", + "swg21585939", + "swg1IC98486", + "swg21659259", + "swg1IC96174", + "swg21656513", + "swg21508029", + "swg21882726", + "swg1IC98670", + "swg21623144", + "swg21642813", + "swg24037830", + "swg21984774", + "swg21651098", + "swg21300069", + "swg24033547", + "swg21638268", + "swg1IC87448", + "swg1IC98865", + "swg1IC97869", + "swg24036291", + "swg21674513", + "swg21498785", + "swg21402883", + "swg21295634", + "swg24035358", + "swg1IC91310", + "swg24034199", + "swg21599770", + "swg21633587", + "swg21644921", + "swg21638013" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q040", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why Plug-in log file reports an error message after install & configure the WebSphere Plugin 8.5 version on a Apache 2.4 webserver.", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nDuring web server start-up, errors like the following will be logged into the Plug-in log file (http_plugin.log):\n\nERROR: lib_security: loadSecurityLibrary: Failed to load gsk library from /opt/IBM/WebSphere/Plugins/gsk8/gsk8_64 ERROR: ws_transport: transportInitializeSecurity: Unable to load security library ERROR: ws_server: serverAddTransport: Failed to initialize security ERROR: ws_server: serverAddTransport: HTTPS Transport is skipped\n\nNote: This is after install & configure the WebSphere Plugin 8.5 version on a Apache 2.4 webserver on a Linux platform", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21600618", + "ANSWER": "To resolve the problem, you must set the LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable to point to the library directory of the GSKit that comes with the IBM web server Plug-in. The precise directory location will depend of the version of Plug-in, and on the bit depth being used (32-bit or 64-bit).", + "START_OFFSET": "1077", + "END_OFFSET": "1367", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21600618", + "swg1PI76789", + "swg21660794", + "nas8N1019946", + "swg21316538", + "swg21448961", + "swg21628233", + "swg1PK74014", + "swg21177702", + "swg21441018", + "swg21326077", + "swg21600845", + "swg22006500", + "swg21237873", + "swg1PI64162", + "swg1PM43462", + "swg21160581", + "swg21587950", + "swg22006218", + "swg21211601", + "swg21433593", + "swg21683644", + "swg21382900", + "swg1PK92310", + "swg1PM15347", + "swg21104930", + "swg21648276", + "swg21420624", + "swg21316308", + "swg21486213", + "swg21449249", + "swg21264477", + "swg21165469", + "swg21980689", + "swg1PK12168", + "isg3T1024202", + "swg21442118", + "swg21636467", + "swg21883978", + "swg22003061", + "swg1PK50906", + "swg1PM72629", + "swg1PM90963", + "swg21253131", + "swg21141302", + "swg1PM74603", + "swg21260208", + "swg21588390", + "swg21328944", + "swg21592917" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q041", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Has ITCAM for J2EE 7.1.1 IF4 been released?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Has ITCAM for J2EE 7.1.1 IF4 been released? ", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21682980", + "swg21680108", + "swg21694425", + "swg21680317", + "swg21672979", + "swg21689678", + "swg21689680", + "swg1PM66356", + "swg21509505", + "swg21679900", + "swg21399619", + "swg21902175", + "swg21694591", + "swg21680111", + "swg21902438", + "swg21965198", + "swg21680319", + "swg1PM38785", + "swg24037988", + "swg21970272", + "swg21974202", + "swg21682966", + "swg1PM55447", + "swg1PM69606", + "swg21406530", + "swg21609290", + "swg1PI27310", + "swg1PM36305", + "swg1PI86589", + "swg1PM31400", + "swg21456489", + "swg21985628", + "swg21972181", + "swg21439390", + "swg21568685", + "swg1PM17711", + "swg21679171", + "swg1PM27377", + "swg1PM11442", + "swg1PM25376", + "swg21409926", + "swg21968173", + "swg1PM29967", + "swg1PI18682", + "swg1PM36140", + "swg1PM24408", + "swg21321514", + "swg21411194", + "swg1PM28330", + "swg1PM02947" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q042", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why is my Portal 8.5 install saying it cannot detect WAS?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "When I try to install WebSphere PortaV8.5, I am getting the message\n\nThe required version 8.5.5 or later of WebSphere Application Server has not been detected on this system. Select the WebSphere Application Server Package to install WebSphere Application Server and WebSphere Portal.\n\nThe required IBM WebSphere SDK Java Technology Edition version 7.0 or later is not detected on this system. Select the IBM WebSphere SDK Java Technology Edition package to install it.", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21651637", + "swg21983432", + "swg21637514", + "swg21422150", + "swg27050726", + "swg21988621", + "swg21635341", + "swg21985237", + "swg21635327", + "swg27045339", + "swg21679779", + "swg21593416", + "swg21665267", + "swg21988605", + "swg21671938", + "swg24039315", + "swg1PI18617", + "swg21977840", + "swg27048013", + "swg21665666", + "swg21683059", + "swg1PI10514", + "swg22003164", + "swg21227729", + "swg21685708", + "swg27048595", + "swg21665806", + "swg21980535", + "swg21976905", + "swg22001380", + "swg27007298", + "swg24012804", + "swg21990381", + "swg1PI63766", + "swg24038388", + "swg21590117", + "swg21263677", + "swg21920404", + "swg24041823", + "swg1PM91383", + "swg21665807", + "swg1PI86607", + "swg24032428", + "swg21433530", + "swg21160581", + "nas8N1022559", + "swg21655171", + "swg21977021", + "swg1IT14680", + "swg24037802" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q043", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Where I can get ITNM 4.2.0.1 GA version download details with Part number?.", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "How to download and install IBM Tivoli Network Manager IP Edition Version 4.2 Fix Pack 1 (GA) using the Passport Advantage Web site?. ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg24042656", + "ANSWER": "Download all of the parts that you need, both required and optional. The parts are listed in the sections below.\n 2. Unpack each of the parts into a single temporary directory on your system.\n 3. Follow the instructions in the Installing [https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSSHRK_4.2.0/install/task/ins_installing.html] section of the IBM Knowledge Center to install the product.", + "START_OFFSET": "1536", + "END_OFFSET": "1925", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg24042656", + "swg24043360", + "swg24041283", + "swg24035480", + "swg24020863", + "swg24037431", + "swg24020841", + "swg24020865", + "swg24020628", + "swg24020864", + "swg24028957", + "swg24028956", + "swg24028955", + "swg24028958", + "swg24028953", + "swg27048605", + "swg24033488", + "swg24033493", + "swg24033491", + "swg24033487", + "swg24033486", + "swg24035548", + "swg24035547", + "swg24035538", + "swg24035545", + "swg24027332", + "swg24042981", + "swg24033919", + "swg24035549", + "swg24027302", + "swg24041861", + "swg24035546", + "swg24037564", + "swg24037567", + "swg24037568", + "swg24037565", + "swg24036971", + "swg1IZ83730", + "swg24023472", + "swg24027352", + "swg24023470", + "swg24027350", + "swg24037566", + "swg24026076", + "swg24028214", + "swg24033210", + "swg24023475", + "swg24037619", + "swg24025550", + "swg24027337" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q044", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Help with Security Bulletin: IBM WebSphere MQ and IBM MQ Managed File Transfer is affected by an undefined behavior because of insecure file permission vulnerability (CVE-2017-1699)", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I need to understand details regarding Security Bulletin: IBM WebSphere MQ and IBM MQ Managed File Transfer is affected by an undefined behavior because of insecure file permission vulnerability (CVE-2017-1699). Where can I find this information?\n", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg22011689", + "swg22012389", + "swg21975091", + "swg22001563", + "swg22011788", + "swg21607482", + "swg21975093", + "swg22012109", + "swg22006956", + "swg21979343", + "swg22007372", + "swg21979461", + "swg21669839", + "swg21978363", + "swg22008757", + "swg22006453", + "swg21676496", + "swg21999724", + "swg22005401", + "swg22006580", + "swg22001520", + "swg22013025", + "swg22005123", + "swg21998648", + "swg22014651", + "swg22014981", + "swg21999421", + "swg21999672", + "swg21607481", + "swg22000304", + "swg21670374", + "swg22005525", + "swg22010172", + "swg22014367", + "swg22009918", + "swg21998797", + "swg22001468", + "swg22005392", + "swg22016116", + "swg21979458", + "swg21687433", + "swg22013026", + "swg21968399", + "swg22007447", + "swg22003852", + "swg21902519", + "swg22003509", + "swg21976896", + "swg21998660", + "swg22003851" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q045", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "How can I get a new authorization code for my new computer?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I purchased a new computer and would like to install spss 18 on it. I have the gradpack. However, the authorization code failed when I attempted to install the software on my new machine. ", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21985888", + "swg21994470", + "swg21485197", + "swg21476243", + "swg21477472", + "swg21482958", + "swg21999184", + "swg1PM14286", + "swg21486335", + "swg21684196", + "swg21478425", + "swg21481141", + "swg22001418", + "swg21483249", + "swg21495285", + "swg21979609", + "swg21483242", + "swg21479848", + "swg21656246", + "swg21485128", + "swg21480568", + "swg21966785", + "swg21991408", + "swg21608338", + "swg21480791", + "swg21517187", + "nas8N1022103", + "swg21482206", + "swg21483046", + "swg21986535", + "swg21981625", + "swg21477057", + "swg21478316", + "swg21476259", + "swg21594800", + "swg21989508", + "swg21999396", + "isg3T1022451", + "swg21480566", + "swg21480369", + "swg21485090", + "swg21483949", + "swg21006836", + "swg22010379", + "swg21484808", + "swg21479422", + "swg22011329", + "swg21477781", + "swg21485504", + "swg21484940" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q046", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Cannot delete folder in Box collab folder", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nIn an ICM 5.3.0 environment integrated with Box, after setting up Box Collaboration, case worker can create Box collaboration folder, and can create folders and files under Box collaboration folder, however, they cannot delete the their folders and files.\n\nCase worker's default permission is 'Viewer Uploader' and case worker cannot add permission more than editor (Editor/Co-owner/Owner). So case worker can add new folder/file and edit file, but cannot delete folder/file.\n\nThe question is, why cannot case worker have permission more than editor?", + "DOCUMENT": "swg22002589", + "ANSWER": "There is no support for deleting documents and/or folders from a Box Collaboration folder created via Case Manager at this time.", + "START_OFFSET": "268", + "END_OFFSET": "396", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21994872", + "swg22002589", + "swg21998821", + "swg27020669", + "swg21247271", + "swg21664876", + "swg1LO57216", + "swg1HD66325", + "swg21974378", + "swg21584239", + "swg21985623", + "swg22003215", + "swg1PJ44898", + "swg1HD70418", + "swg27021687", + "swg21393098", + "swg21374755", + "swg22010811", + "swg21114400", + "swg21596929", + "swg21638452", + "swg21306351", + "swg21201309", + "swg21188684", + "swg21347466", + "swg1PJ38945", + "swg21286104", + "swg1PI71371", + "swg1IZ99340", + "swg21960984", + "swg21440899", + "swg21475399", + "swg1HD63414", + "swg21578812", + "swg21417344", + "swg21223989", + "swg21258077", + "swg1HD65545", + "swg21600685", + "swg21317544", + "swg22010807", + "swg1HD77223", + "swg21128454", + "swg1IC76893", + "swg27039295", + "swg21476598", + "swg1PI73545", + "swg27023241", + "swg1HE00580", + "swg21655536" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q047", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "I need to move my perpetual license of SPSS v24 to my new machine.", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I have my authorization code first given to me, but since we did not renew our support contract we can't seem to download the software. I was originally told that I could download the trial version and it would have the authorization wizard where I could input the code and move forward. But the only downloadable version is subscription version with no authorization wizard. How do I move forward? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg22013294", + "ANSWER": "If the Software Subscription and Maintenance has expired you will not be able to download the software from Passport Advantage Online.\nIn this case, you would need to renew your software Subscription and Maintenance.\n\nYou can order the Media CD copy of the software your company purchased. The software version is the one up to the time your subscription has expired.", + "START_OFFSET": "410", + "END_OFFSET": "777", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg22013294", + "swg21994470", + "swg21480791", + "swg21903724", + "swg21477057", + "swg21684196", + "swg21480568", + "swg27019525", + "swg21483046", + "swg21968434", + "swg21985888", + "swg21481141", + "swg22011329", + "swg21483035", + "swg21480534", + "swg21477068", + "swg21656246", + "swg21482958", + "swg21608338", + "swg21479434", + "swg21483249", + "swg21480743", + "swg22000174", + "swg22004739", + "swg21480343", + "swg21512068", + "swg21476683", + "swg21476498", + "swg21477472", + "swg21486335", + "swg21540748", + "swg21480535", + "swg27019739", + "swg21486099", + "swg21485115", + "swg21613190", + "swg22011326", + "swg21966785", + "swg27020934", + "swg21479636", + "swg21483949", + "swg21478425", + "swg21991408", + "swg1HE07243", + "swg1IC43160", + "swg22001728", + "swg27042034", + "nas8N1022103", + "swg21642903", + "swg21495285" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q048", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Need to understand what exact counters are needed for the ITM IIS agent?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Need to understand what exact counters are needed for the ITM IIS agent to collect website details and web site status. unable to find what \ncounters are required in the IIS doc. ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21685441", + "ANSWER": "To resolve this problem, install IIS 6.0 management compatibility pack on your Windows Server.", + "START_OFFSET": "1046", + "END_OFFSET": "1140", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1IZ17024", + "swg1IV44481", + "swg21440410", + "swg1IZ64862", + "swg21685441", + "swg21964889", + "swg21696752", + "swg21589245", + "swg21686422", + "swg1IV33386", + "swg21588814", + "swg1IZ17149", + "swg1IV84186", + "swg1IY95361", + "swg21685503", + "swg21677238", + "swg1IZ42001", + "swg21373271", + "swg1IY95715", + "swg21504000", + "swg1IZ39492", + "swg1IY83658", + "swg21988192", + "swg1IV53227", + "swg22004605", + "swg1PJ43474", + "swg1IV31825", + "swg21592320", + "swg21461891", + "swg1IV36526", + "swg21690082", + "swg1PM37037", + "swg21470999", + "swg21347466", + "ssg1S1005787", + "swg22010670", + "swg1IZ33574", + "swg21473066", + "swg1IZ21498", + "swg1PJ34205", + "swg21584624", + "ssg1S1010000", + "swg21637849", + "swg22005618", + "swg21957761", + "swg21657458", + "swg21472975", + "swg21406258", + "swg21513436", + "swg21591321" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q049", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why am I getting a DSRA7019W message when I try to use the Oracle 10g driver in WAS 8.5.5.x?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I am getting the following message when I configure my WAS 8.5.5.x datasource to use the Oracle 10g driver:\nDSRA7019W: Oracle10gDataStoreHelper or a subclass of it must be used when configuring WebSphere DataSources to run using Oracle 10g jdbc driver.\nHow can I resolve this issue?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21298347", + "swg1PK13031", + "swg21330098", + "swg21200379", + "swg1PK56726", + "swg1PJ35873", + "swg22016095", + "swg1PK66534", + "swg21673205", + "swg1IV15813", + "swg21555364", + "swg21597550", + "swg1LO27792", + "swg21288663", + "swg21647705", + "swg21474173", + "swg21452313", + "swg21481774", + "swg21498877", + "swg27011483", + "swg21965108", + "swg21109954", + "swg21688462", + "swg27020519", + "swg21452221", + "swg21392308", + "swg21627451", + "swg27012351", + "swg1PK59679", + "swg21425780", + "swg21607047", + "swg21657993", + "swg21409293", + "swg21497098", + "swg21319591", + "swg27016357", + "swg21974933", + "swg21264608", + "swg21439685", + "swg27015712", + "swg21113363", + "swg21459896", + "swg21196663", + "swg21269703", + "swg21289953", + "swg21480854", + "swg21694380", + "swg1JR28218", + "swg21447373", + "swg21598616" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q050", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why AUTOMATIC value for NUM_IOSERVERS is changed after applying 10.5FP7?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Why AUTOMATIC value for NUM_IOSERVERS is changed after applying 10.5FP7?", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21991890", + "ANSWER": "Yes, it is expected. Due to IT09990, we changed the fomula for calculating the number of prefetchers to start at database activation time.", + "START_OFFSET": "218", + "END_OFFSET": "356", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21991890", + "swg1IT09990", + "swg1IT09774", + "swg1IT03166", + "swg1IC68082", + "swg1IZ62610", + "swg1IZ62609", + "swg1IC68981", + "swg1HC00802", + "swg1IC63558", + "swg1IT09905", + "swg1IT23558", + "swg21989571", + "swg1IZ43719", + "swg1IT17769", + "swg21345195", + "swg21059972", + "swg21572210", + "swg1IZ69877", + "swg22008504", + "nas8N1014023", + "swg21450657", + "swg1IC62564", + "swg1IC69071", + "swg1IC66629", + "swg1HD05189", + "swg1HD69212", + "swg1IC68794", + "swg21690338", + "swg21621739", + "swg1IC94378", + "swg21229852", + "swg1HD66453", + "swg21674811", + "swg1IC66630", + "swg1IC69070", + "swg1PM92805", + "swg1IY92585", + "swg1HD59581", + "swg1HE03581", + "swg1HD06922", + "swg1HD74161", + "swg1HD78269", + "swg21481427", + "swg21567240", + "swg1HD72000", + "swg21656226", + "swg1HD85208", + "swg22012817", + "swg1IC71318" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q051", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "We got a NullPointerException when bootstrapping the object store or accessing Site Preferences/Access Role on WorkplaceXT", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nAfter logging into FileNet Workplace XT, a java.lang.NullPointerException error is logged when bootstrapping the object store or when accessing Site Preferences/Access Role.\n\nHere's the error stack,\n\nError Stack Trace extracted from the J2EE Application Server error log:\n\njava.lang.NullPointerException\n\nat org.apache.jasper.runtime.JspWriterImpl.write(JspWriterImpl.java:421)\n\nat com.filenet.wcm.apps.server.ui.info.prefs.PrefAccessRolesInfoPage.renderRoleMembers(PrefAccessRolesInfoPage.java:254)\n\nat com.filenet.wcm.apps.server.ui.info.prefs.PrefAccessRolesInfoPage.renderRole(PrefAccessRolesInfoPage.java:220)\n\nat com.filenet.wcm.apps.server.ui.info.prefs.PrefBootstrapInfoPage.renderAdminRole(PrefBootstrapInfoPage.java:131)\n\nat com.filenet.wcm.apps.server.ui.info.prefs.PrefBootstrapInfoPage.render(PrefBootstrapInfoPage.java:303)", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21495799", + "ANSWER": "In FEM, change the User Display Name Attribute or Group Display Name Attribute to a valid LDAP entry such as cn, displayName or uid and restart the FileNet Content Engine and Workplace XT instances.", + "START_OFFSET": "1468", + "END_OFFSET": "1666", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21495799", + "swg21600650", + "swg21995417", + "swg21689118", + "swg21979139", + "swg21647105", + "swg21366996", + "swg21970741", + "swg21677262", + "swg21984409", + "swg21414209", + "swg21608612", + "swg21676096", + "swg21422204", + "swg21589672", + "swg21568057", + "swg1PJ32964", + "swg21660453", + "swg21978832", + "swg21600067", + "swg21504905", + "swg21700629", + "swg21432218", + "swg21461014", + "swg21383240", + "swg21691828", + "swg21631319", + "swg21498249", + "swg1PJ39729", + "swg1PJ43993", + "swg21567225", + "swg21395151", + "swg21396167", + "swg21515553", + "swg21700448", + "swg1PJ32982", + "swg21654697", + "swg21383289", + "swg21695284", + "swg21383557", + "swg21383400", + "swg21965977", + "swg21508238", + "swg21697663", + "swg21592251", + "swg1PJ33786", + "swg21959262", + "swg21505149", + "swg21277415", + "swg21681241" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q052", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why do I still get \"certificate expired\" error after adding new certificate?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nThe remote SSL vendor has provided us a new certificate to replace an expiring one. We have added the new certificate to the appropriate Datapower validation credential, however, connections are still failing with \"certificate expired\":\n\nmpgw(Inbound_MPG): tid(51005)[request][10.20xx.xx] gtid(51345): certificate validation failed for '/C=US/O=People Services/OU=IT/CN=test.site.com' against 'My_ValCred': certificate has expired", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21500046", + "ANSWER": "If the replacement certificate has the same file name of the expired certificate, you MUST disable/enable the certificate object in order to clear all cached references to the expired certificate.", + "START_OFFSET": "4120", + "END_OFFSET": "4316", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21509220", + "swg21472839", + "swg22004773", + "swg22016064", + "swg21661454", + "nas8N1020801", + "swg21570154", + "swg21455210", + "nas8N1012442", + "swg21570755", + "swg22016073", + "swg1IT11179", + "swg21500046", + "swg21675559", + "swg21452574", + "swg21607496", + "swg21411196", + "swg21557353", + "swg21452478", + "swg21633306", + "swg22001473", + "swg21675805", + "swg21959851", + "swg21671358", + "swg21613840", + "swg22014461", + "swg21655458", + "swg21672723", + "swg1IY93583", + "swg21641787", + "swg21902333", + "swg21576456", + "nas8N1020816", + "swg21993990", + "swg21668309", + "swg1IZ34554", + "swg21979559", + "swg21996408", + "swg21607528", + "swg21598888", + "swg1PM47470", + "swg21985728", + "swg1IV45267", + "swg21427447", + "swg21442836", + "swg21975445", + "swg21693461", + "swg22012706", + "swg21964513", + "swg21668673" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q053", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "After uninstalling Portal 8.0 only from my WAS environment my subsequent attempts to install Portal 8.0 into that same existing WAS fails.", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nI installed Portal 8.0.0.1 CF12 with an existing WAS 8.0.0.8 application server and everything was successful. I want to script my install so I uninstalled Portal 8.0.0.1 only and was left with an existing WAS 8.0.0.8...as before. However, when I attempt to reinstall Portal 8.0.0.1 into that same existing WAS 8.0.0.8 to test my scripting I get the following error immediately:\n\nERROR: The required version 8.0.0.5 or later of WebSphere Application Server has not been detected on this system. Select the WebSphere Application Server Package to install WebSphere Application Server and WebSphere Portal.\n\nIIM shows WAS as installed, so I am not sure what is causing this behavior when it installed fine just a few hours ago.\n", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21635341", + "ANSWER": "Navigate to the AppServer folder and remove the following files (they are regenerated with a reinstall of Portal):\n\nlib/ext/commons-codec-1.3.jar\nlib/ext/commons-httpclient-3.0.1.jar\nlib/ext/openid4java-full-0.9.5.jar\nlib/ext/wp.auth.base.sua_RedirectServletFilter.jar\nlib/ext/wp.auth.base.sua_loginmodule.jar\nlib/ext/wp.auth.tai.jar\nlib/wp.user.connections.jar\nlib/wp.wire.jar\nplugins/com.ibm.patch.was.plugin.jar\nplugins/com.ibm.wp.was.plugin.jar\nplugins/wp.ext.jar\nproperties/jndi.properties", + "START_OFFSET": "1596", + "END_OFFSET": "2090", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21635341", + "swg21681269", + "swg27040108", + "swg21677696", + "swg21697178", + "swg21672632", + "swg21452611", + "swg1PK68652", + "swg21433530", + "swg21701048", + "swg21662923", + "swg1PM41520", + "swg27024037", + "swg21472871", + "swg1PI64867", + "swg21433540", + "swg21693532", + "swg21605338", + "swg1IZ92223", + "swg21383441", + "swg27015256", + "swg21381243", + "swg21426713", + "nas8N1011435", + "swg21323422", + "swg21608268", + "swg21620606", + "swg24026530", + "swg21517154", + "swg1PK27087", + "swg21579320", + "swg27024231", + "swg27024145", + "swg21635302", + "swg24023498", + "swg27046213", + "swg1PM39589", + "swg21599488", + "swg21499527", + "swg21989767", + "swg1JR29110", + "swg24026549", + "swg21681745", + "swg21632585", + "swg21694191", + "swg21701478", + "nas8N1018768", + "swg21574737", + "swg21598350", + "swg21616612" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q054", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "What are the mustgather for RDz integrated debugger issues or z/OS Debugger?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "What logs could be collected when experiencing a problem with the integrated debugger in Rational Developer for System Z ?\n", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1PI17909", + "swg1PI27614", + "swg1PI61170", + "swg1PI44420", + "swg1PI34291", + "swg1PI46139", + "swg21663365", + "swg1PM97233", + "swg1PI80148", + "swg1PI60442", + "swg1PI22457", + "swg1PM97232", + "swg1PI47510", + "swg1PI60726", + "swg1PI90022", + "swg1PI81833", + "swg1PI78223", + "swg1PI52435", + "swg21981210", + "swg27045271", + "swg21998879", + "swg1PI31137", + "swg21975695", + "swg1PI71418", + "swg1PI42682", + "swg21983508", + "swg21431814", + "swg1PI38172", + "swg1PI92771", + "swg21380776", + "swg1PI87784", + "swg1PI60268", + "swg21978904", + "swg1PI64364", + "swg21589509", + "swg1PI22548", + "swg21673462", + "swg1PI30455", + "swg1PI52761", + "swg1PM57360", + "swg21396494", + "swg21568844", + "swg21287348", + "swg1SE53486", + "swg1PI52107", + "swg1PI15244", + "swg21149985", + "swg21593433", + "swg1PI86315", + "swg22008131" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q055", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Table \"\".\"\" could not be found", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nWhen doing a table mapping with DB2 as source, selecting a table which contains special characters on column comments like:\n\nCOMMENT ON COLUMN .. IS 'Test comment \u20181\u2019 complete';\n\nMapping fails with following error message: Table . could not be found in the database. ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21412846", + "ANSWER": "Reinsert data with codepage conversion enforced by setting the operation system codepage matching to the codepage of data to be inserted", + "START_OFFSET": "4475", + "END_OFFSET": "4611", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1PK69726", + "swg21690235", + "swg1PI45883", + "swg21616750", + "swg21546471", + "swg1PI10794", + "swg1PI77937", + "swg21590770", + "swg21647171", + "swg21882635", + "swg21206816", + "swg22007450", + "swg21989774", + "swg1PI94101", + "swg1PM84458", + "swg1PQ81425", + "swg1PQ61807", + "swg1PM09972", + "swg1PJ32546", + "swg1HD94860", + "swg1PI37924", + "swg1IC99631", + "swg1PK02341", + "swg21968933", + "swg21414317", + "swg21965475", + "swg1PM72027", + "swg1IT18694", + "swg1PI27903", + "swg1IC43084", + "swg1JR34863", + "swg1PM72610", + "nas8N1014771", + "swg27042298", + "swg1PM34408", + "swg21656210", + "swg1PK01798", + "swg1IT17426", + "swg21170072", + "swg1PK54046", + "swg1PI97795", + "swg1PI28475", + "swg1PI71414", + "swg21644722", + "swg1IC99035", + "swg21436283", + "swg21972584", + "swg21412846", + "swg27015776", + "swg21976439" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q056", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "When I try to deploy an application on a cluster, why is it throwing an ADMA8019E error in the admin console?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "The application is being deployed at the cluster scope, but my namespace bindings are defined at the cell scope. The error I'm seeing in the admin console is:\n\nADMA8019E: The resources that are assigned to the application are beyond the deployment target scope. Resources are within the deployment target scope if they are defined at the cell, node, server, or application level when the deployment target is a server, or at the cell, cluster, or application level when the deployment target is a cluster. Assign resources that are within the deployment target scope of the application or confirm that these resources assignments are correct as specified.\n\nI don't see any actual issue with how the JNDI lookup is occurring once the application is deployed. Should I be concerned about this error?\n", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1PK09468", + "swg1PK56028", + "swg1PK05801", + "swg1PK62541", + "swg1PK59130", + "swg27013612", + "swg21651584", + "swg21650673", + "swg27038215", + "swg21412379", + "swg21406121", + "swg1PK13068", + "swg27017006", + "swg24011718", + "swg21265784", + "swg21624732", + "swg1PK62748", + "swg1PI36210", + "swg1JR39317", + "swg1PK89524", + "swg21329981", + "swg1PK72849", + "swg1PK36471", + "swg1PK42327", + "swg1PK05953", + "swg21229705", + "swg21426380", + "swg1PK56368", + "swg1PK10232", + "swg1PK08429", + "swg21449103", + "swg1PI75794", + "swg24014590", + "swg27024145", + "swg1PK42752", + "swg21598779", + "swg21594826", + "swg21622182", + "swg21303233", + "swg21620411", + "swg1PK32396", + "swg24025221", + "swg21412219", + "swg1PK35541", + "swg21432325", + "swg1PM98294", + "swg1PK23320", + "swg1PM76543", + "swg21293444", + "swg21515936" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q057", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Help with Action required for IIB H.E.V9 & WMB H.E. V8 for security vulnerabilities in Red Hat Linux (CVE-2017-12150, CVE-2017-12151, CVE-2017-12163)", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nI need to understand details regarding Action required for IBM Integration Bus Hypervisor Edition V9.0 and WebSphere Message Broker Hypervisor Edition V8.0 for security vulnerabilities in Red Hat Linux. This is related to CVE-ID:\nCVE-2017-12150\nCVE-2017-12151\nCVE-2017-12163\n\nWhere can I find this information?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg22009455", + "swg22011630", + "swg22005385", + "swg22011748", + "swg22009436", + "swg22012678", + "swg22011696", + "swg22007664", + "swg22004377", + "swg22012861", + "swg22009285", + "swg22003256", + "swg22012862", + "swg22005035", + "swg22006789", + "swg22010832", + "swg22012477", + "swg22000947", + "swg22007869", + "swg22011745", + "swg22010311", + "swg22011754", + "swg21979065", + "swg21998452", + "swg21981107", + "swg21982752", + "swg21987358", + "swg21985022", + "swg21989255", + "swg21697721", + "swg21986120", + "swg21977378", + "swg21992475", + "swg22015916", + "swg21996135", + "swg21994053", + "swg22015915", + "swg22013692", + "swg22013693", + "swg22009491", + "swg21990735", + "swg21903157", + "swg24034994", + "nas8N1022305", + "swg21695798", + "ssg1S1010703", + "swg22009146", + "swg22015237", + "swg21696878", + "swg21971313" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q058", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Help with Action required for IIB H.E. V9 & WMB H.E. V8 for security vulnerabilities in Red Hat Linux", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nI need to understand details regarding Action required for IBM Integration Bus Hypervisor Edition V9.0 and WebSphere Message Broker Hypervisor Edition V8.0 for security vulnerabilities in Red Hat Linux.\n\nThis is related to CVEID:\nCVE-2017-14739\nCVE-2017-14741\nCVE-2017-14989\nCVE-2017-15015\nCVE-2017-15016\nCVE-2017-15017\nCVE-2017-15032\nCVE-2017-15033\n\nWhere can I find this information?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg22011630", + "swg22005385", + "swg22009436", + "swg22009455", + "swg22012678", + "swg22004377", + "swg22012861", + "swg22007664", + "swg22011624", + "swg22011696", + "swg22009285", + "swg22003256", + "swg22006789", + "swg22012862", + "swg22005035", + "swg22000947", + "swg22007869", + "swg22010832", + "swg22012477", + "swg22011745", + "swg22010311", + "swg22011754", + "swg21979065", + "swg21998452", + "swg21981107", + "swg21982752", + "swg21985022", + "swg21987358", + "swg21989255", + "swg21697721", + "swg21986120", + "swg21977378", + "swg21992475", + "swg21996135", + "swg22015916", + "swg21994053", + "swg22015915", + "swg22013692", + "swg21990735", + "swg22013693", + "swg21903157", + "swg24034994", + "swg21695798", + "swg21696878", + "swg21902248", + "swg22014649", + "swg21971313", + "swg22011500", + "swg21685666", + "swg22005345" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q059", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Help with vulnerability have been identified in WebSphere Application Server shipped with WSRR", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I need to understand details regarding Multiple vulnerabilities have been identified in WebSphere Application Server shipped with WebSphere Service Registry and Repository (CVE-2017-1583). Where can I find this information? ", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg22010112", + "swg22011198", + "swg2C1000269", + "swg21882528", + "swg2C1000200", + "swg22000852", + "swg22004956", + "swg2C1000349", + "swg22010164", + "swg22006813", + "swg2C1000240", + "swg22016430", + "swg21985095", + "swg21990711", + "swg21883102", + "swg21681915", + "swg21676772", + "swg22013955", + "swg2C1000296", + "swg2C1000379", + "swg21988198", + "swg21996778", + "swg22007669", + "swg22000553", + "swg21883331", + "swg22010680", + "swg21965152", + "swg22010447", + "swg21971580", + "swg2C1000263", + "swg2C1000353", + "swg21976558", + "swg21682276", + "swg2C1000360", + "swg22013204", + "swg22013233", + "swg22011363", + "swg21682748", + "swg2C1000262", + "swg21971859", + "swg2C1000303", + "swg22010042", + "swg21882549", + "swg21965861", + "swg22009948", + "swg22009906", + "swg2C1000117", + "swg22010802", + "swg21975747", + "swg21968674" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q060", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "DFHAP1203I and DFHSR0601 with 0C1 in EQA10OSM after upgrading to CICS TS 5.2", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Why is my CICS region failing during startup with message DFHAP1203I followed by DFHSR0601 after I upgraded to CICS Transaction Server for z/OS (CICS TS) V5.2? A system dump shows an abend 0C1 occurring in the Debug Tool for z/OS module EQA10OSM. \nI receive the following messages:\nDFHAP1203I Language Environment is being initialized. \nDFHSR0601 Program interrupt occurred with system task III in control. ", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21110889", + "swg21243115", + "swg21049790", + "swg21267440", + "swg21426821", + "swg21039797", + "swg21272740", + "swg21259595", + "swg21260084", + "swg21567176", + "swg21195285", + "swg1PK59523", + "swg21079336", + "swg1PI54434", + "swg21642693", + "swg1PI56624", + "swg21213007", + "swg1PM49269", + "swg1PI87064", + "swg21316054", + "swg21244931", + "swg1PK47140", + "swg21178607", + "swg21169266", + "swg21610631", + "swg21207539", + "swg21402781", + "swg21606825", + "swg21612051", + "swg21442347", + "swg1PM14115", + "swg21424768", + "swg21380855", + "swg21322605", + "swg21270839", + "swg21587171", + "swg21176381", + "swg21253538", + "swg1PM15975", + "swg1PK41501", + "swg1PK85436", + "swg21279019", + "swg21427167", + "swg21351694", + "swg1PI82749", + "swg21267911", + "swg21202265", + "swg21607248", + "swg21156039", + "swg21157016" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q061", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why does my JVMSERVER remain in a \"BEING DISABLED\" state?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "When I try to disable a JVMSERVER it becomes hung and remains in a \"BEING DISABLED\" state. This also occurs when I shut down the CICS region. The CICS region ultimately has to be cancelled. ", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1PI64495", + "swg1PI35728", + "swg1PI35443", + "swg1PI96646", + "swg1PI83585", + "swg1PI23465", + "swg1PI83951", + "swg1PI35798", + "swg1PI36166", + "swg21503083", + "swg21673325", + "swg21505483", + "swg1OA23324", + "swg21620233", + "swg1PI19206", + "swg21614241", + "swg1PI87695", + "swg1PI19202", + "swg1PI87419", + "swg1PI79692", + "swg1PI91420", + "swg1PI85842", + "swg1PM85506", + "swg21155318", + "swg21683122", + "swg1PI62217", + "swg1PI70623", + "swg1PI67167", + "swg21654546", + "swg1PI30253", + "swg1PI32143", + "swg21049122", + "swg1PI09362", + "swg1PI79536", + "swg1OA21133", + "swg1PI19806", + "swg1PI05030", + "swg21668519", + "swg1PI05227", + "swg21499851", + "swg1PM08661", + "swg1PI23903", + "swg21666024", + "swg1IV46853", + "swg1PI52660", + "swg21006278", + "swg1PM87610", + "swg21209085", + "swg1PI35890", + "swg1PM29061" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q062", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Where can I find more details about WMB Fix Pack 8.0.0.5?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Where can find more information about WebSphere Message Broker (WMB) Fix Pack 8.0.0.5?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21367675", + "swg24039031", + "swg21692191", + "swg21505917", + "swg24040134", + "isg3T1013929", + "swg24039063", + "swg21623208", + "swg21593272", + "swg27046042", + "swg1IC59933", + "swg27019227", + "swg21524354", + "swg21008183", + "swg21991922", + "swg21685137", + "swg1IC64628", + "swg21694056", + "swg27021437", + "swg27040243", + "swg21985013", + "swg21650025", + "swg21623356", + "swg21350381", + "swg27046045", + "isg3T1013617", + "swg21982173", + "swg1IC55271", + "swg21569901", + "swg21664476", + "swg21586210", + "swg1IZ38636", + "swg1IC64362", + "swg1IC62199", + "swg21282840", + "swg1PM88167", + "swg1IC80387", + "swg1IC92097", + "swg24013639", + "swg1PM00441", + "swg27020483", + "swg22008470", + "swg1IC87011", + "swg21299230", + "swg27023735", + "swg1IC96183", + "swg1IC57534", + "swg21657128", + "swg21182104", + "swg27010515" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q063", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Hide a page in dotedit step", + "QUESTION_TEXT": " I am working on datacap 8.1 version. I have 2 pages in a batch. Page 1 with status as 1, Page 2 with status as 20. Both are of same page type. In verification step (dotedit) I want to hide the page which is with status 20. I have given status 20 in ignored page status in web administrator for verify. But still when I navigate through pages in dotedit batch view the respective panel is loading. I am able to submit the batch even if I have one page in a batch with 20 as status.\n\nIs there any way to delete the page (we have multiple same type of pages in a batch) from dotedit based on the page status? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21509510", + "ANSWER": "The DeleteChildType from the Validations library can be used by running it from the parent of the object to be deleted and specifying the specific child.", + "START_OFFSET": "382", + "END_OFFSET": "535", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg27044188", + "swg21684970", + "swg27045486", + "swg1IO22832", + "swg21699730", + "swg21659926", + "swg27045562", + "swg21509510", + "swg27050766", + "swg27050692", + "swg21663541", + "swg21965750", + "swg21642839", + "swg1IO22948", + "swg21635496", + "swg21586775", + "swg1IY44760", + "swg1IO22823", + "swg1IO20050", + "swg21664511", + "swg21623270", + "swg21992385", + "swg1IR54686", + "swg21585744", + "swg21694159", + "swg21682041", + "swg1IO24540", + "swg21585261", + "swg27045485", + "swg27043298", + "swg1PK77976", + "swg21608052", + "swg1PK11593", + "swg21580457", + "swg22010133", + "swg1IO24629", + "swg21573050", + "nas8N1010467", + "swg21504399", + "swg1IO20053", + "swg21673761", + "swg1IO23560", + "swg21676844", + "swg1IO24509", + "swg21609196", + "swg27049151", + "swg1IT15752", + "swg1IT15748", + "swg1IT15750", + "swg27045038" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q064", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Is MQ or MQ Appliance impacted by Sweet32 Birthday Attack if we are running triple-DES cipher.?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Is MQ or MQ Appliance impacted by Sweet32 Birthday Attack if we are running triple-DES cipher.?", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21995099", + "ANSWER": "The following versions are affected: \n\n * IBM MQ * Maintenance levels between 8.0.0.0 and 8.0.0.5 \n * 9.0.0.0 only\n \n \n * IBM MQ Appliance * Maintenance levels between 8.0.0.0 and 8.0.0.5\n \n \n * IBM WebSphere MQ * Maintenance levels between 7.0.1.0 and 7.0.1.14 \n * Maintenance levels between 7.1.0.0 and 7.1.0.8 \n * Maintenance levels between 7.5.0.0 and 7.5.0.7", + "START_OFFSET": "1269", + "END_OFFSET": "1652", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1IT18095", + "swg21994375", + "swg22003558", + "swg21995922", + "swg21995099", + "swg21991482", + "swg21993665", + "swg21995455", + "swg21995658", + "swg21994927", + "ssg1S1010724", + "swg22008947", + "swg27049822", + "swg27049825", + "swg1IT17280", + "ssg1S1010239", + "swg27049820", + "swg22000927", + "swg22000734", + "swg1IT19772", + "swg1IV97251", + "swg21995057", + "swg1LI79296", + "swg22000304", + "swg22000814", + "swg1JR57102", + "swg1IV91306", + "swg1JR57103", + "swg1LI79299", + "ssg1S1009585", + "ssg1S1009579", + "swg1LI79293", + "swg21999244", + "swg21999690", + "swg21993601", + "swg22004843", + "swg22000968", + "swg21996945", + "swg21996946", + "swg21996942", + "swg22010763", + "swg1IV90799", + "swg22007841", + "swg21991709", + "swg21996938", + "ssg1S1011817", + "swg21991548", + "swg21999421", + "swg22000370", + "swg21991894" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q065", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "How do I enable my Applications to show up in the App Health view for the WAS agent?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "How do I enable my Applications to show up in the App Health view for the WAS agent?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1PM17739", + "swg22010666", + "swg21668764", + "swg21573397", + "swg22006670", + "swg21653905", + "swg21980543", + "swg21436619", + "swg21413628", + "swg21505762", + "nas8N1018727", + "swg21686621", + "swg21451474", + "swg21549762", + "swg22012791", + "swg21377251", + "swg21633172", + "swg22010123", + "nas8N1019192", + "swg21420277", + "swg21978922", + "swg1IZ06549", + "swg21971655", + "swg21476196", + "swg21436330", + "swg21436142", + "swg22013721", + "swg27041816", + "swg21228274", + "swg22015116", + "swg27036139", + "swg21962383", + "swg21979864", + "swg22008978", + "swg1PK22421", + "swg21506265", + "swg21593267", + "swg21587266", + "isg3T1022451", + "isg3T1011153", + "swg21412861", + "swg21546227", + "swg21454236", + "swg21506082", + "swg21667093", + "swg1IV89788", + "swg21991563", + "swg1IC44817", + "swg21563155", + "swg1IZ78072" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q066", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Help with Action required for IIIB V9 and WMB V8 Hypervisor Editions for security vulnerabilities in Red Hat Linux", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I need to understand details regarding Action required for IBM Integration Bus Hypervisor Edition V9.0 and WebSphere Message Broker Hypervisor Edition V8.0 for security vulnerabilities in Red Hat Linux. Where can I find this information? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg22000947", + "ANSWER": "IBM Integration Bus Hypervisor Edition V9.0 and WebSphere Message Broker Hypervisor Edition V8.0 ship with versions of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Server that are vulnerable to CVE-2016-8677, CVE-2016-8678 CVE-2016-9298, CVE-2014-9915, CVE-2016-10046, CVE-2016-10047, CVE-2016-10048, CVE-2016-10049, CVE-2016-10050, CVE-2016-10051, CVE-2016-10052, CVE-2016-10053, CVE-2016-10054, CVE-2016-10055, CVE-2016-10056, CVE-2016-10057, CVE-2016-10058, CVE-2016-10059, CVE-2016-10060, CVE-2016-10061, CVE-2016-10062, CVE-2016-10063, CVE-2016-10064, CVE-2016-10065, CVE-2016-10066, CVE-2016-10067, CVE-2016-10068, CVE-2016-10069, CVE-2016-10070, CVE-2016-10071, CVE-2016-10144, CVE-2016-10145, CVE-2016-10146, CVE-2017-5506, CVE-2017-5507, CVE-2017-5508, CVE-2017-5511, CVE-2017-6498, CVE-2017-6499, CVE-2017-6500, CVE-2017-6501, CVE-2017-6502, CVE-2016-10252 and CVE-2017-6497 \n\nIBM Integration Bus Hypervisor Edition V9.0 and WebSphere Message Broker Hypervisor Edition V8.0 ship with Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Server 6.2.", + "START_OFFSET": "204", + "END_OFFSET": "1228", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21994053", + "swg22011624", + "swg21697721", + "swg21998452", + "swg21977378", + "swg22011696", + "swg21987358", + "swg21989255", + "swg21979065", + "swg22015915", + "swg22003256", + "swg22005035", + "swg21992475", + "swg22011754", + "swg22013692", + "swg22013693", + "swg22011745", + "swg22012477", + "swg22010311", + "swg21982752", + "swg21971313", + "swg22015916", + "swg22010832", + "swg22011748", + "swg21981107", + "swg21985022", + "swg22012862", + "swg22005385", + "swg22011630", + "swg21986120", + "swg22007664", + "swg22009436", + "swg22009285", + "swg22012678", + "swg22004377", + "swg22009455", + "swg22012861", + "swg21996135", + "swg21903157", + "swg22000947", + "swg22006789", + "swg21695798", + "swg22007869", + "swg21990735", + "swg24034994", + "swg21696878", + "swg21696879", + "swg24031059", + "swg21641918", + "swg21902248" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q067", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "BPM AppTarget startup hangs during startup", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nDuring startup of the apptarget, JVM hangs with the following messages\n\n[9/8/14 14:11:01:709 CDT] 0000001f wle W com.lombardisoftware.server.core.GroupCore getAllGroups() CWLND0004W - The system has been waiting for the group replication lock to be released for the last 10 minutes. [9/8/14 14:11:32:810 CDT] 00000022 ThreadMonitor W WSVR0605W: Thread \"server.startup : 0\" (0000001f) has been active for 654582 milliseconds and may be hung. There is/are 1 thread(s) in total in the server that may be hung. at java.lang.Thread.sleep(Native Method) at java.lang.Thread.sleep(Thread.java:896) at com.lombardisoftware.server.core.GroupCore.getAllGroups(GroupCore.java:545) at com.lombardisoftware.server.ejb.security.SecurityCore.listAllGroups(SecurityCore.java:566) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:60) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:37) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:611) ... [9/8/14 14:21:02:662 CDT] 0000001f wle W com.lombardisoftware.server.core.GroupCore getAllGroups() CWLND0004W - The system has been waiting for the group replication lock to be released for the last 20 minutes. [9/8/14 14:31:03:193 CDT] 0000001f wle W com.lombardisoftware.server.core.GroupCore getAllGroups() CWLND0004W -The system has been waiting for the group replication lock to be released for the last 30 minutes. [9/8/14 14:41:03:749 CDT] 0000001f wle W com.lombardisoftware.server.core.GroupCore getAllGroups() CWLND0004W -The system has been waiting for the group replication lock to be released for the last 40 minutes.", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21615427", + "ANSWER": "You will edit the wimconfig.xml file directly. However, before you edit the file, make a backup copy of it. Edit the wimconfig.xml file and search forconnectTimeout. Change this value from connectTimeout=\"20\" to connectTimeout=\"0\" and save the file. \n \n \n A complete restart of the WebSphere Application Server / IBM Business Process Manager environment is required to make this change take effect.", + "START_OFFSET": "2700", + "END_OFFSET": "3104", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21615427", + "swg21682300", + "swg21321575", + "swg1JR53227", + "swg21688666", + "swg21677945", + "swg1IV18136", + "swg1PM16223", + "swg21964339", + "swg21269020", + "swg1JR44560", + "swg1PM95353", + "swg1ZZ00244", + "swg1IV50706", + "swg1JR53918", + "swg1ZZ00246", + "swg1JR55293", + "swg1PK31566", + "swg21988399", + "swg21673950", + "swg1PM45011", + "swg1LO59203", + "swg1PI05917", + "swg1LO50164", + "swg21688021", + "swg1IC79259", + "swg21636331", + "swg1PM83349", + "swg21990190", + "swg1JR52842", + "swg1PM06420", + "swg1LO70049", + "swg1PM41808", + "swg1JR41441", + "swg1PM46608", + "swg1JR50653", + "swg1IV30877", + "swg1JR46774", + "swg27045331", + "swg21994088", + "swg21966474", + "swg21620656", + "swg21263188", + "swg21672632", + "swg21668361", + "swg1PI20776", + "swg1PK43090", + "swg1LO61062", + "swg21613866", + "swg21586663" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q068", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Getting java.lang.StackOverflowError, how to resolve it?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nGetting the following StackOverflowError when executing a dump namespace:\n\nTRACE START:\n\n java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.util.regex.Pattern$Branch.match(Pattern.java:4513) at java.util.regex.Pattern$GroupTail.match(Pattern.java:4626) at java.util.regex.Pattern$Curly.match1(Pattern.java:4196) at java.util.regex.Pattern$Curly.match(Pattern.java:4145) at java.util.regex.Pattern$GroupHead.match(Pattern.java:4567) at java.util.regex.Pattern$Branch.match(Pattern.java:4511) at java.util.regex.Matcher.match(Matcher.java:1232) at java.util.regex.Matcher.matches(Matcher.java:570) at com.ibm.rmi.corba.IIOPAddrImpl.(IIOPAddrImpl.java:107) at com.ibm.rmi.corba.Corbaloc.parseObjAddr(Corbaloc.java:231) at com.ibm.rmi.corba.Corbaloc.parseObjAddrList(Corbaloc.java:181) at com.ibm.rmi.corba.Corbaloc.parseCorbaloc(Corbaloc.java:145) at com.ibm.rmi.corba.Corbaloc.(Corbaloc.java:120) at com.ibm.rmi.corba.ORB.createObjectURL(ORB.java:3731) at com.ibm.rmi.corba.ORB.createObjectURL(ORB.java:3698) at com.ibm.rmi.corba.ORB.string_to_object(ORB.java:3694)\n\n", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21162896", + "ANSWER": "When a stack overflow occurs, the amount of stack space required by the program exceeds what is configured for the stack in the Java\u2122 Virtual Machine (JVM) process, or the native stack size configured by the operating system. \nSome applications require stacks that are larger than the default size; for example, a graphics-intensive Java program can require a larger stack, which may require an increase in the stack size to avoid StackOverflow.", + "START_OFFSET": "721", + "END_OFFSET": "1166", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21162896", + "swg1PI10352", + "swg1IV68153", + "swg21589867", + "swg1IV36135", + "swg1LO65235", + "swg21419463", + "swg1IT17990", + "swg1IV20896", + "swg1IV69368", + "swg1IV35866", + "swg1PI21096", + "swg1PM31075", + "swg1PI78192", + "swg1PM45828", + "swg1PM28671", + "swg1IT07871", + "swg1PI83486", + "swg1IZ81708", + "swg1IZ48613", + "swg21989057", + "swg21989016", + "swg1IV18136", + "swg1PM92927", + "swg21572495", + "swg1PI78245", + "swg1IO09550", + "swg1IV11212", + "swg1PI83872", + "swg1PI61029", + "swg1LO76890", + "swg1IT05871", + "swg1IZ80240", + "swg1IZ33911", + "swg1IT10001", + "swg1PK67594", + "swg1PK44919", + "swg1PK44914", + "swg1PM73377", + "swg1PK44910", + "swg1PK44918", + "swg1IZ63917", + "swg1PI79397", + "swg1IZ96234", + "swg1PK14896", + "swg1IZ25552", + "swg1JR40155", + "swg1PK96430", + "swg21598636", + "swg21626723" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q069", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why is my MQ client application getting error AMQ9050 regarding SYSTEM.PROTECTION.POLICY.QUEUE ?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Failing to connect from a MQ client application to a MQ server queue manager that does not have MQ AMS (Advanced Message Security) component installed. \nExample: MQ v8 client trying to connect to a remote qmgr running MQ v7.0.1.x, getting \nerror AMQ9050 regarding SYSTEM.PROTECTION.POLICY.QUEUE.", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21623002", + "swg1IC94205", + "swg21608033", + "swg1IT02707", + "swg21665298", + "swg1PI88458", + "swg1PI89667", + "swg1IT21642", + "swg21138961", + "swg1IT13767", + "swg1IC74288", + "swg27027476", + "swg1IT08610", + "swg1IT22044", + "swg21662194", + "swg21615875", + "swg1IC89771", + "swg1IT03749", + "swg21662193", + "swg21610303", + "swg1IT17979", + "swg24037500", + "swg21260155", + "swg24042176", + "swg24044791", + "swg1SE59908", + "swg1IT06183", + "swg1IV61043", + "swg1PI53058", + "swg1IC97723", + "swg1IC73274", + "swg21408485", + "swg1IT16587", + "swg24009031", + "swg1PM57587", + "swg1IC64132", + "swg27041968", + "swg1IC99764", + "swg24031412", + "swg1IC88457", + "swg1IC69174", + "swg21420469", + "swg21404125", + "swg1SE45552", + "swg1IC58936", + "swg1IT21589", + "swg24006681", + "swg1IT15833", + "swg1IC89770", + "swg1IZ76343" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q070", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Help with Security Bulletin: Apache Commons FileUpload Vulnerabilities in IBM WebSphere MQ File Transfer Edition(CVE-2016-3092)", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I need to understand details regarding Security Bulletin: Apache Commons FileUpload Vulnerabilities in IBM WebSphere MQ File Transfer Edition(CVE-2016-3092). Where can I find this information?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21988198", + "swg21990371", + "swg22001563", + "swg21990366", + "swg22011689", + "swg22003626", + "swg21985133", + "swg21989932", + "swg21998590", + "swg21990300", + "swg21988279", + "swg21989628", + "swg21990811", + "swg21991786", + "swg21990236", + "swg21990386", + "swg21975093", + "swg21990192", + "swg21992457", + "swg21991024", + "swg21993305", + "swg21993816", + "ssg1S1009569", + "swg21990390", + "swg21991962", + "swg21990424", + "swg21998271", + "swg21999337", + "swg21990923", + "swg21995892", + "ssg1S1009566", + "swg21997295", + "swg21995382", + "swg21990287", + "swg21988585", + "swg21990394", + "swg21992916", + "swg21993879", + "swg22015184", + "swg21991776", + "swg22014017", + "swg21986205", + "swg21990884", + "swg21990905", + "swg21986641", + "swg22011788", + "swg21990830", + "swg21989359", + "swg22007539", + "swg21990995" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q071", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why is Connection Refused on the ITCAM Managing Server?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "ITCAM Data Collector connection to the Managing Server fails with Connection Refused. ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21260969", + "ANSWER": "Instead of host name, specify a \u201cvalid\u201d IP address for the MS in the /bin/setenv.sh file, and in ITCAM 6.1, the ms.properties file.", + "START_OFFSET": "495", + "END_OFFSET": "635", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21260969", + "swg21420638", + "swg1PK81965", + "swg1PM23396", + "swg1PK77703", + "swg21694969", + "swg1PM74400", + "swg21968173", + "swg21267468", + "swg1PM69606", + "swg21610922", + "swg1IV84761", + "swg21960092", + "swg21385138", + "swg1PM93403", + "swg21443618", + "swg21386717", + "swg1PI42952", + "swg1PI42603", + "swg21694499", + "swg1PM59987", + "swg21421682", + "swg1PM74332", + "swg24014104", + "swg24014103", + "swg21444239", + "swg1PK57357", + "swg1PM14824", + "swg21580129", + "swg1PM75193", + "swg1PM94101", + "swg21265041", + "swg21286714", + "swg21444231", + "swg1PK24046", + "swg21591925", + "swg1PM14905", + "swg21960759", + "swg21625272", + "swg21661409", + "swg21652087", + "swg1PM00543", + "swg21502959", + "swg1PM17649", + "swg21685670", + "swg1IV62810", + "swg1PM23589", + "swg21902955", + "swg1PK65981", + "swg21669175" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q072", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Help with Security Bulletin: Multiple vulnerabilities in IBM Java Runtime affect WMB and IIB", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I need to understand details regarding Security Bulletin: Multiple vulnerabilities in IBM Java Runtime affect WebSphere Message Broker and IBM Integration Bus. Where can I find this information? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg22005345", + "ANSWER": "If you run your own Java code using the IBM Java Runtime delivered with this product, you should evaluate your code to determine whether the complete list of vulnerabilities are applicable to your code. For a complete list of vulnerabilities, refer to the \u201cIBM Java SDK Security Bulletin\u201d, located in the References section for more information.", + "START_OFFSET": "742", + "END_OFFSET": "1087", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21970582", + "swg21994213", + "swg21682567", + "swg21701526", + "swg21982320", + "swg22010090", + "swg21981402", + "swg22005345", + "swg21722410", + "swg21982646", + "swg21902450", + "swg22010659", + "swg21883331", + "swg21690741", + "swg22015064", + "swg22001612", + "swg21959309", + "swg22005576", + "swg22015153", + "swg21985013", + "swg21697480", + "swg21701546", + "swg21984639", + "swg22016387", + "swg21964872", + "swg22007465", + "swg21985017", + "swg22005335", + "swg21989150", + "swg2C1000296", + "swg21685643", + "swg21685238", + "swg21685242", + "swg21972391", + "swg21700720", + "swg21982893", + "swg21882549", + "swg22010164", + "swg21692828", + "swg22008330", + "swg22005383", + "swg21682681", + "swg21700397", + "swg22008470", + "swg21967265", + "swg22005382", + "swg21997918", + "swg22011500", + "swg21997906", + "swg21969672" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q073", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "What should I do if I observed \"ghost queue building up\" issue?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "There are lots of ghost queues in the system, which have already took up most of file system space. What can I do under such situation?\n", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "nas8N1010058", + "swg1IT12103", + "nas8N1019124", + "nas8N1018699", + "swg27017264", + "swg27023930", + "swg1HD56413", + "swg21615370", + "swg21436450", + "swg1SA96071", + "nas8N1020390", + "swg1HD46358", + "swg27002840", + "swg21497500", + "nas8N1017721", + "swg27024368", + "swg27020512", + "swg1HD50749", + "nas8N1018656", + "swg1HD84280", + "swg1IV37979", + "swg1HD65391", + "swg1HD49143", + "swg1HD64596", + "nas8N1020318", + "swg21981354", + "swg21416699", + "swg21531975", + "swg21699311", + "nas8N1018089", + "nas8N1019635", + "swg21616216", + "swg1HD92029", + "swg22013768", + "nas8N1021607", + "swg1HD79607", + "swg21680221", + "swg21664899", + "swg21667557", + "isg3T1027190", + "swg27020934", + "nas8N1013129", + "swg21535442", + "nas8N1019409", + "swg1HD48627", + "nas8N1017276", + "swg1HD40986", + "swg1HD40987", + "swg1HD38680", + "swg21271471" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q074", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Help with Security Bulletin: Security Vulnerability in IBM WebSphere Application Server affects IBM SOA Policy Gateway Pattern for AIX Server 2.5 (CVE-2015-1920)", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I need to understand details regarding Security Bulletin: Security Vulnerability in IBM WebSphere Application Server affects IBM SOA Policy Gateway Pattern for AIX Server 2.5 (CVE-2015-1920). Where can I find this information? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21959169", + "ANSWER": "CVEID: CVE-2015-1920 [http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-1920]\nDESCRIPTION: WebSphere Application Server could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code by connecting to a management port and executing a specific sequence of instructions.\nCVSS Base Score: 9.3\nCVSS Temporal Score: See https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/102404 [https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/102404] for the current score\nCVSS Environmental Score*: Undefined\nCVSS Vector: (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C)", + "START_OFFSET": "243", + "END_OFFSET": "778", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21972135", + "swg21970106", + "swg21970092", + "swg21959169", + "swg21959305", + "swg21959304", + "swg21882703", + "swg21959412", + "swg21882704", + "swg21883331", + "swg21883102", + "swg21882528", + "swg21882549", + "swg21903252", + "swg21700675", + "swg21700676", + "swg21903439", + "swg21957762", + "swg21883638", + "swg21963990", + "swg21959486", + "swg21964873", + "swg21959225", + "swg2C1000269", + "swg21990796", + "swg21995996", + "swg21882609", + "swg21957802", + "swg21990811", + "swg21994491", + "swg21963792", + "swg21994102", + "swg21971746", + "swg21960518", + "swg21970943", + "swg21701019", + "swg21903650", + "swg21959387", + "swg21903546", + "swg21957821", + "swg21714189", + "swg21700769", + "swg21953629", + "swg21971681", + "swg21902380", + "swg21883169", + "swg21882724", + "swg21981402", + "swg21962029", + "swg21713625" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q075", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "My BPM 8.5.5 system has internet access. But I cannot upgrade to 8.5.6 from IM directly", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I have a BPM 8.5.5 system with internet access. But when I tried to upgrade BPM to 8.5.6 from Installation Manager with \"Update\", it failed with java.lang.NullPointerException", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg24043891", + "swg24044425", + "swg27023009", + "swg21972788", + "swg24044264", + "swg21639640", + "swg22014771", + "swg21978027", + "swg21640810", + "swg21987096", + "swg21996075", + "swg21675236", + "swg21683428", + "swg21959010", + "swg24041303", + "swg22000252", + "swg22000253", + "swg21675509", + "swg21675782", + "swg21998047", + "swg1IT12019", + "swg22009221", + "swg21699111", + "swg21698892", + "swg27046795", + "swg21960727", + "swg22004654", + "swg21960731", + "swg21616902", + "swg21999133", + "swg27050529", + "swg22013411", + "swg21959468", + "swg21580260", + "swg21674909", + "swg22011844", + "swg21696908", + "swg22010796", + "swg1JR52884", + "swg22007451", + "swg21966881", + "swg22003164", + "swg21972005", + "swg27046805", + "swg21698762", + "swg1JR54638", + "swg21957740", + "swg21682971", + "swg21637582", + "swg24038624" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q076", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why is Oracle agent (rz) reporting listeners and services as 'Inactive' even when those are active?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "On Unix/Linux, the Extended Oracle agent sends false alert for listener status. All listeners and services in Net Service Connection workspace show as inactive.", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21671988", + "swg1IV64051", + "swg21903672", + "swg1IV61410", + "swg21617896", + "swg21681555", + "swg21695709", + "swg21455093", + "swg1IV66538", + "swg1IZ77124", + "swg21678229", + "swg1IV81965", + "swg1IZ67453", + "swg21438832", + "swg21612027", + "swg21678825", + "swg21684647", + "swg1IC75295", + "swg1IZ67268", + "swg1IV59887", + "swg21507597", + "swg21505512", + "swg21689503", + "swg21673236", + "swg1IV22637", + "swg21665349", + "swg21998300", + "swg21665416", + "swg1IV36395", + "swg21428309", + "swg21584609", + "swg1IZ84903", + "swg21566455", + "swg21650358", + "swg21697965", + "swg21586192", + "swg21430630", + "swg1IV24698", + "swg21407117", + "swg21568279", + "swg21608770", + "swg21617119", + "swg21320410", + "swg21269388", + "swg1IV94961", + "swg1IZ38498", + "swg21580531", + "swg21514839", + "swg21497055", + "swg1IZ42703" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q077", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "I need to transfer my SPSS 24 licence to a new computer", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I need to transfer my SPSS 24 license to a new machine. I have only used my activation code on one computer so far, and that computer was found to be defective which has led me to get a new computer. I was able to download SPSS 24 Gradpack onto the new computer, but every time I put in the activation code, the program gives me an error message saying that I am not allowed to generate any new licenses.", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21592093", + "ANSWER": "For installation & licensing issues on Student version and Graduate pack, contact your vendor.", + "START_OFFSET": "183", + "END_OFFSET": "277", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21592093", + "swg21985888", + "swg21994470", + "swg21486335", + "swg21482958", + "swg21485197", + "swg21477254", + "swg21479486", + "swg21482957", + "swg21477591", + "swg21480742", + "swg21478398", + "swg21480369", + "swg21684196", + "swg21483249", + "swg21479422", + "swg21996561", + "swg21478316", + "swg21480177", + "swg21476243", + "swg21487687", + "swg21480416", + "swg21308308", + "swg1LO69973", + "swg21479636", + "swg21967671", + "swg21981625", + "swg21485128", + "swg21481141", + "swg21483242", + "swg21488070", + "swg21479763", + "swg21477232", + "swg1PI62418", + "swg21476065", + "swg21480780", + "swg21483046", + "swg21480488", + "swg21590416", + "swg21986535", + "swg21485504", + "swg21484012", + "swg1PI53900", + "swg21480740", + "swg21480566", + "swg21477771", + "swg21484585", + "swg21486099", + "swg21484124", + "swg21482206" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q078", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "WebSphere MQ Hypervisor Edition requires customer action for the GNU C library (glibc) vulnerabilities (CVE-2015-1472)", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Where can I find additional information on what action is required?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21903158", + "swg21697721", + "swg21903157", + "swg21695676", + "swg21695726", + "swg21696879", + "swg21977378", + "swg21696878", + "swg21695798", + "swg21688524", + "swg1ZZ00544", + "isg3T1023385", + "swg21696243", + "swg21701019", + "swg21696322", + "nas8N1020713", + "swg21977373", + "swg21685666", + "swg21695564", + "swg21696962", + "swg21979065", + "swg21686781", + "swg21991419", + "swg21977498", + "swg21991777", + "swg22001907", + "swg21982433", + "isg3T1025781", + "swg21685604", + "swg21687444", + "nas8N1022033", + "nas8N1021171", + "swg21985022", + "swg21986120", + "swg21966433", + "isg3T1023986", + "swg22003816", + "swg22009285", + "swg21996135", + "swg21981107", + "swg21696332", + "swg21988053", + "swg22006789", + "swg22009218", + "swg21977281", + "isg3T1022291", + "swg1IT13908", + "swg21978194", + "swg21968822", + "swg21961467" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q079", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why am I getting error SqlIntegrityConstraintViolationException when deploying a process application?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "After reinstalling Process Center (or using separate Process Centers to deploy to one Process Server) you get a deployment failure error on the Process Server:\njava.lang.Exception: java.lang.Exception:com.lombardisoftware.client.delegate.BusinessDelegateException:PreparedStatementCallback; \n....\ncom.ibm.db2.jcc.am.SqlIntegrityConstraintViolationException: Error forbatch element # 1: DB2 SQL Error: SQLCODE=-803, SQLSTATE=23505,SQLERRMC=2;BPMBDBA.LSW_SNAPSHOT, DRIVER=4.11.69", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21659437", + "swg21619620", + "swg1JR49606", + "swg21659582", + "swg1JR47917", + "swg21616519", + "swg1JR46484", + "swg1JR50238", + "swg1IC83550", + "swg1JR44672", + "swg1JR51409", + "swg1JR56448", + "swg21625891", + "swg1JR50263", + "swg1JR54713", + "swg1JR48696", + "swg1JR44729", + "swg1JR59423", + "swg21632592", + "swg21624562", + "swg1IV60785", + "swg1IV47288", + "swg1IT25316", + "swg1IT17078", + "swg21474394", + "swg1IT22354", + "swg1JR52842", + "swg21989170", + "swg1JR40692", + "swg24038088", + "swg1JR53031", + "swg1IT06784", + "swg1IT17608", + "swg1IC61989", + "swg22005684", + "swg21554935", + "swg1PI08628", + "swg21469180", + "swg1IT00200", + "swg21623212", + "swg21586250", + "swg1IT17079", + "swg21381128", + "swg1IV10433", + "swg1JR41469", + "swg1JR56208", + "swg1IV25624", + "swg1IT14570", + "swg1JR49638", + "swg1JR54815" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q080", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why is the OUTPUT_TYPE specified in the properties file for the custom scripting feature ignored?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nWhy is the OUTPUT_TYPE specified in the properties file for the custom scripting feature ignored in ITM V6?\n\nSpecifying \"I\" for INTEGER, or \"F\" for FLOAT for the OUTPUT_TYPE doesn't work, but specifying OUTPUT_TYPE=S results in STRING type for the first token.", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21960062", + "ANSWER": "OUTPUT_TYPE (STRING|INTEGER|FLOAT - Optional - default string). It defines the type of the first token returned by each row of the script;", + "START_OFFSET": "20296", + "END_OFFSET": "20434", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21960062", + "swg1IV85663", + "swg1IV85660", + "swg1IV77559", + "swg21649807", + "swg21279878", + "swg21445278", + "swg1IT13757", + "swg1PM75777", + "swg1PM94839", + "swg21278619", + "swg21407208", + "swg21572779", + "nas8N1019041", + "swg21255699", + "swg1PK75804", + "swg1LO24111", + "swg1IV68780", + "swg21477416", + "swg21678949", + "swg21325560", + "swg21479715", + "swg27039558", + "swg21987568", + "swg1IY93129", + "swg1PK60622", + "swg21584816", + "swg1PK00429", + "swg1PK52626", + "swg21993458", + "swg1HE12359", + "swg1HE12287", + "swg1PM80929", + "swg1IZ61806", + "swg1IZ24429", + "swg22014281", + "swg21617278", + "swg21290758", + "swg1PI18657", + "swg1PK80629", + "swg21539233", + "swg21579777", + "swg1IC67235", + "swg21233894", + "swg1PM19703", + "swg21476091", + "swg21503778", + "swg1PK12276", + "swg1IZ61693", + "swg1PI19468" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q081", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "What are the files created in $TEMP on startup of IIB or WMB?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "What are the 0 byte files created in $TEMP/.com_ibm_tools_attach directory upon IBM Integration Bus (IIB) / WebSphere Message Broker (WMB) startup?\nFor example: The following files are created on UNIX / Windows if $TEMP is /tmp:\n/tmp/.com_ibm_tools_attach/_attachlock\n/tmp/.com_ibm_tools_attach/_master\n/tmp/.com_ibm_tools_attach/_notifier", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21681740", + "swg21612134", + "swg1IV82700", + "swg1IV20654", + "swg22005742", + "swg1IV03140", + "swg21414072", + "swg21637013", + "swg1PK96970", + "swg1IV50293", + "swg1IT23008", + "nas8N1019813", + "swg21589486", + "swg21299779", + "swg21299297", + "swg21299287", + "swg21299777", + "swg21623208", + "swg21664817", + "swg21686070", + "swg21963462", + "swg21306611", + "swg21085484", + "swg21130325", + "swg21514581", + "swg21299300", + "swg21299803", + "swg1PK05822", + "swg21147089", + "swg1PI06692", + "swg21177044", + "swg21299820", + "swg21656590", + "swg21299781", + "swg1IZ76605", + "swg21992468", + "swg21088574", + "swg21338680", + "swg21305391", + "swg21299548", + "swg21064109", + "swg21418250", + "swg21694056", + "swg21299776", + "swg21313390", + "swg21687742", + "swg21500850", + "swg21314982", + "swg21299468", + "swg21268446" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Help with Security Bulletin: IIB is affected by Web UI security vulnerability (CVE-2017-1694)", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I need to understand details regarding Security Bulletin: IBM Integration Bus is affected by Web UI security vulnerability (CVE-2017-1694). Where can I find this information? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg22011695", + "ANSWER": "CVEID: CVE-2017-1694 [http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2017-1694]\nDESCRIPTION: IBM Integration Bus transmits user credentials in plain in clear text which can be read by an attacker using man in the middle techniques.\nCVSS Base Score: 5.9\nCVSS Temporal Score: See https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/134165 [https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/134165] for the current score\nCVSS Environmental Score*: Undefined\nCVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N)", + "START_OFFSET": "116", + "END_OFFSET": "637", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q082", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg22009192", + "swg22011695", + "swg22004461", + "swg22008470", + "swg22010090", + "swg22006463", + "swg22014325", + "swg22016245", + "swg21999736", + "swg22011695", + "swg21682696", + "swg21997906", + "swg22015713", + "swg21998805", + "swg22009250", + "swg21682567", + "swg21700354", + "swg22006686", + "swg22007245", + "swg22010164", + "swg22003071", + "swg21997918", + "swg22005335", + "swg22006252", + "swg22005383", + "swg22005345", + "swg2C1000365", + "swg21902837", + "swg21998850", + "swg22005382", + "swg22008829", + "swg22010990", + "swg22011500", + "swg21685137", + "swg22006955", + "swg2C1000362", + "swg2C1000363", + "swg2C1000379", + "swg21996645", + "swg22011461", + "swg22006313", + "swg22015714", + "swg22010447", + "swg22006457", + "swg22001011", + "swg22012039", + "swg21985013", + "swg21985691", + "swg22002356", + "swg22001010" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q083", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "How do you configure the IBM HTTP Server 7 to 8.5 on z/OS for Host On-Demand V11?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "The IBM HTTP Server powered by Domino will no longer be shipped with z/OS 2.2, so how can system administrators of Host On-Demand convert to the IBM HTTP Server V7 to V8.5?\n", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21986779", + "swg21983914", + "swg21984702", + "swg22006554", + "swg21986764", + "swg21697803", + "swg21317268", + "swg21443170", + "swg21681373", + "swg21159698", + "swg21223183", + "swg24036343", + "swg21688370", + "swg21255893", + "swg24035141", + "swg21461044", + "swg21568555", + "swg21990351", + "swg21389772", + "swg24032697", + "nas8N1021793", + "swg21461759", + "swg21413064", + "swg21968794", + "swg21981897", + "swg21156710", + "swg1OA36799", + "swg22011838", + "swg21595625", + "swg21988254", + "swg21220328", + "swg21390091", + "swg21979271", + "swg1IT14779", + "swg27009312", + "swg21502180", + "swg21699016", + "swg21413535", + "swg22014192", + "swg21652076", + "swg1IT23326", + "swg1OA54397", + "swg21315471", + "swg24043123", + "swg21999229", + "swg27000528", + "swg21220238", + "swg21651642", + "swg1OA48125", + "swg21160741" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q084", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Is ITCAM for J2EE 7.1.1 agent supported on RHEL7.x?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nWhen I try to install IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Agent for J2EE V7.1.1.0,Linux on x86, English (CN0PKEN) on RHEL 7.2 64-bits\n\nI am getting the following error message:\n\ninstall.sh failure: KCI1138E could not determine the machine's architecture.\n\nIs ITCAM for J2EE 7.1.1 supported on RHEL7?\n", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21679593", + "swg21963694", + "swg24014103", + "swg24014104", + "swg21680111", + "swg21972181", + "swg24015775", + "swg1IV98243", + "swg21691890", + "swg21680108", + "swg21679171", + "swg21970272", + "swg21509505", + "swg21680317", + "swg24016032", + "swg21567588", + "swg21679598", + "swg21672979", + "swg21985628", + "swg24015818", + "swg21567604", + "swg21682019", + "swg21321514", + "swg21963691", + "swg21679900", + "swg21411194", + "swg21902175", + "swg21689680", + "swg21682980", + "swg21689678", + "swg21392280", + "swg22002089", + "swg21390738", + "swg21660984", + "swg21680319", + "swg21969711", + "swg21609290", + "swg24015090", + "swg24022071", + "swg21439390", + "swg21972199", + "swg21445352", + "swg21469762", + "swg21694425", + "swg21963337", + "swg24027218", + "swg1PM17745", + "swg21509503", + "swg21967756", + "swg24037988" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q085", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Event Dashboard breaks with Japanese filter", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Event Dashboard breaks when a filter is created with the browser language set to Japanese. This issue occurs in WebGUI 8.1 Fix Pack 11. ", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg24039146", + "swg1PI72791", + "swg21978838", + "swg1IV82130", + "swg21662882", + "swg1PI66834", + "swg21693604", + "swg21696054", + "swg1IV11052", + "swg21965393", + "swg21584445", + "swg21972784", + "swg1JR51197", + "swg1PI10089", + "swg1PM81894", + "swg21700617", + "swg1IY60994", + "swg21968790", + "swg21959193", + "swg1IZ77397", + "swg21694498", + "swg21960784", + "swg1PM51092", + "swg1PJ38392", + "swg1IY89313", + "swg1PI67575", + "swg1IZ74692", + "swg22010131", + "swg1PM02767", + "swg21591839", + "swg21983886", + "swg1IV90889", + "swg21983122", + "swg1IY98398", + "swg24039858", + "swg21446634", + "swg1PK80682", + "swg1IV76581", + "swg1LO62456", + "swg21977181", + "swg21647688", + "swg21679314", + "swg21959612", + "swg21379998", + "swg1JR46703", + "swg1IV81634", + "swg1IT06235", + "swg24044399", + "swg27013015", + "swg1LO39508" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q086", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Upgraded to IBM HTTP Server 7.0.0.41, is TLS 1.2 supported?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nWe are recently upgraded to IBM HTTP Server 7.0.0.41 and believe it supports TLS 1.0.\n\nPlease let us know what configuration changes or fix pack we need to apply to support TLS 1.2.", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21699845", + "nas8N1019971", + "swg21584390", + "swg22008933", + "swg27048798", + "swg21646724", + "swg21984404", + "swg22001891", + "swg1IT22689", + "swg21960133", + "swg21249100", + "swg21986882", + "swg21988203", + "swg21967350", + "swg1PI65308", + "swg21983185", + "swg21697303", + "swg21697925", + "swg21999364", + "swg22007135", + "swg1PI56584", + "nas8N1020017", + "swg1PI62303", + "swg22016796", + "swg1PI48069", + "swg21973529", + "swg1PM69593", + "swg27046894", + "swg27048181", + "swg22001375", + "swg22010239", + "swg1IV82451", + "swg27039743", + "swg21985289", + "swg21903219", + "isg1LI80059", + "swg1IT21420", + "swg1PJ45286", + "swg1IO19232", + "swg27041674", + "swg21978072", + "swg21977527", + "swg21974267", + "swg21996686", + "ibm10717395", + "swg22006747", + "swg21578730", + "swg21653960", + "swg21959321", + "swg21969880" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q087", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Is WMB v7 compatible with MQ v8?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "This Q&A is abstracted from a PMR\nPlanning a tiered upgrade, MQ then broker.", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21669778", + "swg24012457", + "swg27012172", + "swg21623208", + "swg21615685", + "swg21299791", + "swg21685548", + "swg21305391", + "swg21302942", + "swg21441366", + "swg21302948", + "swg21166659", + "swg21631654", + "swg21055239", + "swg21177049", + "swg21660253", + "swg21313631", + "swg1IC73823", + "swg21575522", + "swg24011189", + "swg1PI32277", + "swg21625855", + "swg21681704", + "swg1PI21535", + "swg1PI17213", + "swg1PK73269", + "swg21177048", + "swg1PM90120", + "swg21501896", + "swg21137319", + "swg27016493", + "swg24032010", + "swg1PI31812", + "swg21299462", + "swg24009370", + "swg21652286", + "swg27017027", + "swg21312967", + "swg21625857", + "swg1PK73298", + "swg1PI32626", + "swg21957998", + "swg21457378", + "swg21299471", + "swg24030716", + "swg21625856", + "swg21299818", + "swg27007159", + "swg21302946", + "swg21426198" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q088", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "CQWEB can\\'t retrieve repository dropdown list options in RedHat Linux, how to deal with it ?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I setup a cq demo env in redhat linux with oracle database, CQ 7.1.2, LRKS 8.1.3, Linux CQ client can login CQ as the following picture 1, but CQWEB login page can't retrieve the repository dropdown list options as the following picture 2. I used cqreg to register CQ database:\n\ncqreg add_dbset -v ORACLE -s 192.168.0.84 -d ESBDB -u cqadmin -p cqadmin -dbset CQ_DEMO_ORACLE -co LOB_TYPE=CLOB -force\n\nWhat's matter for this happen? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21320206", + "ANSWER": "Normally, at the end of a ClearQuest installation on UNIX\u00ae based platforms, the cqreg initialize command runs automatically. The command creates the registry structure for database sets. During the installation, the command did not run successfully.", + "START_OFFSET": "653", + "END_OFFSET": "902", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21320850", + "swg21146640", + "swg21177919", + "swg21146678", + "swg21118690", + "swg21320206", + "swg21416533", + "swg21304704", + "swg1PK77706", + "swg21461012", + "swg21376697", + "swg1PM30331", + "swg1IC50383", + "swg21588356", + "swg21287096", + "swg21448546", + "swg1PK49208", + "swg21178391", + "swg21145079", + "swg21335125", + "swg21273537", + "swg1PK76893", + "swg21125616", + "swg21291149", + "swg21324811", + "swg1PK82905", + "swg1PM16956", + "swg21136402", + "swg21176760", + "swg21373108", + "swg1PK50048", + "swg21256349", + "swg21294133", + "swg21239017", + "swg21968919", + "swg21134232", + "swg21626866", + "swg21327228", + "swg1PK73584", + "swg1IC42892", + "swg21376001", + "swg1PK94518", + "swg1PK80330", + "swg21268209", + "swg21122368", + "swg21572476", + "swg1PK60586", + "swg1PM02767", + "swg21272838", + "swg1PK78974" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q089", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Security Bulletin: Vulnerability identified in OpenSSL shipped with IBM API Connect (CVE-2016-8610)", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I need to understand details regarding Security Bulletin: Vulnerability identified in OpenSSL shipped with IBM API Connect (CVE-2016-8610). Where can I find this information? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg22002063", + "ANSWER": "VULNERABILITY DETAILS\nCVEID:CVE-2016-8610 [http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-8610]\nDESCRIPTION:SSL/TLS protocol is vulnerable to a denial of service, caused by an error when processing ALERT packets during a SSL handshake. By sending specially-crafted packets, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause the application to stop responding.\nCVSS Base Score: 7.5\nCVSS Temporal Score: Seehttps://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/118296 [https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/118296]for the current score\nCVSS Environmental Score*: Undefined\nCVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H) \n\nAFFECTED PRODUCTS AND VERSIONS\nIBM API Connect V5.0.0.0 - V5.0.6.1\n\nREMEDIATION/FIXES\n \n\nProduct VRMF APAR Remediation/First Fix IBM API Connect 5.0.0.0 - 5.0.6.1 LI79599 Apply IBM API Connect V5.0.6.2 or later [https://www.ibm.com/support/fixcentral/swg/quickorder?parent=ibm~WebSphere&product=ibm/WebSphere/IBM+API+Connect&release=5.0.6.2&platform=All&function=all] \nWORKAROUNDS AND MITIGATIONS\nNone", + "START_OFFSET": "140", + "END_OFFSET": "1206", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg22002063", + "swg22006387", + "swg22007428", + "swg22006182", + "swg22003183", + "swg21882528", + "swg21997209", + "swg22002387", + "swg2C1000269", + "swg21995935", + "ssg1S1009994", + "isg3T1024723", + "swg21996795", + "swg22004195", + "swg21883102", + "swg21994995", + "swg22004940", + "swg21996760", + "swg21997056", + "swg21999162", + "swg2C1000200", + "swg22014169", + "swg27049494", + "swg22006126", + "swg21982374", + "swg27049495", + "isg3T1024915", + "swg21981752", + "swg21999486", + "swg21882824", + "swg21983224", + "swg21977144", + "nas8N1021869", + "swg21997472", + "swg2C1000240", + "swg21883331", + "swg21978740", + "swg21978741", + "isg3T1024887", + "swg22000852", + "swg21976039", + "swg2C1000296", + "swg21976040", + "swg22013801", + "swg2C1000231", + "swg2C1000192", + "swg22007841", + "ssg1S1010725", + "swg2C1000206", + "swg21995049" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q090", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "RTW eclipse license error", + "QUESTION_TEXT": " I get a RTW eclipse license error on IM stating server is available, but license is not available. License is imported fine on license key admin and RPT floating license and RIT floating license shows on the pc end on license key admin 8.1.3, but not showing on IM. \n\nRTW 8.5\n\nWhat to do? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21608473", + "ANSWER": "Navigate to IBM Rational License Key Center [http://www-01.ibm.com/software/rational/support/licensing/] website. \n \n \n \n 2. Return and generate the license [https://www-304.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21308308] file for IBM Rational Test Workbench Floating License. \n \n \n \n 3. Download and Import the license file again.\n \n \n \n 4. Click on Start > IBM Rational > LMTools > Start/Stop/Reread tab to stop and start the license server.\n \n \n \n 5. Next, click on Start > IBM Rational > LMTools > Server Status to perform status enquiry and look for 'Users of ibmrit' line.\n \n \n \n 6. Reactivate [http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21403623] the floating license for Rational Integration Tester using Rational Installation Manager.", + "START_OFFSET": "1944", + "END_OFFSET": "2735", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21386554", + "swg21643030", + "swg21250404", + "swg21132770", + "swg21974299", + "swg21966892", + "swg21664270", + "swg21378048", + "swg21329134", + "swg21405647", + "swg21505003", + "swg22014195", + "swg21654409", + "swg21504560", + "swg1PM64333", + "swg21648882", + "swg1PM95038", + "swg21958004", + "swg21621283", + "swg21381093", + "swg21637985", + "swg21503479", + "swg21317153", + "swg21263629", + "swg21593283", + "swg21474620", + "swg21999329", + "swg21609592", + "swg21132257", + "swg21961416", + "swg21254371", + "swg21298058", + "swg21621868", + "swg21610274", + "swg21330869", + "swg21419306", + "swg21619361", + "swg21428367", + "swg21472462", + "swg21902683", + "swg21670973", + "swg21605379", + "swg21608473", + "swg21608470", + "swg21657050", + "swg21376636", + "swg21414627", + "swg21260081", + "swg1PK61454", + "swg21289026" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q091", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Deploying RuleRunner on a separate server", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nHello everyone,\n\nI am trying to have a setup as follows:\n\nServer 1: Running Full Datacap Features\nServer 2: Running only the RuleRunner service\n\nI managed to deploy Server 1 successfully and all modules are working.\n\nOn Server 2, I installed the following:\nDatacap Client, Rulerunner, and connectors\n\nI updated the Application Manager on server 2 to point to \\\\server1\\Datacap\\datacap.xml\n\nI can successfully open that path from Server 2 using internet explorer.\n\nWhen I try to open any application such as TravelDocs using Datacap Deskstop from server 2, I receive the following error:\n\nUnable to connect to Datacap application TravelDocs.\n\nAny hints as to what the issue might be ?\n\nRegards\n", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg27050031", + "swg21973739", + "swg21507032", + "swg22016745", + "swg21568084", + "swg21690024", + "swg27049866", + "swg21647236", + "swg21566926", + "swg27020397", + "swg21635501", + "swg21635504", + "swg22003940", + "swg21500328", + "swg21982447", + "swg21599801", + "swg21635496", + "swg21668810", + "swg21570601", + "swg21987149", + "swg21661877", + "swg21992029", + "swg27050961", + "swg21618564", + "swg21635500", + "swg27037899", + "swg21507093", + "swg21968768", + "swg21586587", + "swg21654141", + "swg21691072", + "swg21959916", + "swg1IO24509", + "ibm10718719", + "swg21969405", + "swg21962199", + "swg21700495", + "swg27045084", + "swg21500149", + "swg21658019", + "swg22005513", + "swg27044942", + "swg21664386", + "swg21503322", + "swg27044188", + "swg21635605", + "swg21978608", + "swg21646066", + "swg21587896", + "swg21670499" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q092", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "What versions of WSAS using Oracle 12c are supported?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "What versions of WSAS using Oracle 12c are supported?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21694468", + "swg21985388", + "swg21988891", + "swg21979719", + "swg21701479", + "swg21701424", + "swg21683259", + "swg1PI85344", + "swg22003057", + "swg21883539", + "swg22012438", + "swg22005633", + "swg21987564", + "swg21675290", + "swg22015475", + "swg21981206", + "swg21985763", + "swg21991402", + "swg21970264", + "swg1JR55463", + "swg21964952", + "swg21978262", + "swg1PI42042", + "swg21976757", + "swg21973359", + "swg27039049", + "swg22011358", + "swg21975394", + "swg21617695", + "swg21989998", + "swg27043012", + "swg21969807", + "swg24023974", + "swg24036553", + "swg1IV89139", + "swg21987156", + "swg21688665", + "swg21397958", + "swg21542556", + "swg21972774", + "swg1JR51297", + "swg21462078", + "swg21972727", + "swg21625834", + "swg1PI72618", + "swg1PJ44672", + "swg22013632", + "swg1PI41720", + "swg21683476", + "swg21695096" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q093", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "How do I run the prerequisite scan for jazzSM?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "How do I run the prerequisite scan? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21696179", + "ANSWER": "In this particular case, in order to properly run the prerequisite scanner, the codes for DASH and JazzSM should be passed like this: \n\n * \n * \n * \n\n\nThe above will provide a detailed", + "START_OFFSET": "1330", + "END_OFFSET": "1513", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21696179", + "swg21883969", + "swg21988650", + "swg21578654", + "swg21691152", + "isg3T1014919", + "swg21584334", + "swg27047578", + "swg21506031", + "nas8N1019063", + "swg21627701", + "swg21574385", + "swg21505754", + "swg21653798", + "swg21665542", + "swg21506251", + "swg21302428", + "swg21176405", + "nas8N1020547", + "swg21324583", + "swg21644404", + "swg21974371", + "swg24037274", + "swg22013501", + "swg21459072", + "swg1IY90792", + "isg3T1013681", + "swg21980933", + "swg1IV69699", + "swg1IV89149", + "swg21006427", + "swg27021192", + "swg21105223", + "swg21302500", + "swg24037275", + "swg21666237", + "swg21624895", + "swg21967446", + "swg21569702", + "swg21519365", + "swg21223216", + "swg21298669", + "swg21506913", + "swg21501218", + "swg21299939", + "swg21388339", + "nas8N1020308", + "swg21699605", + "swg22004516", + "swg21461319" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q094", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "How do I upgrade my virtual DataPower Appliance from 5.0 firmware to 6.0+ firmware?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "When attempting to upgrade my Virtual DataPower Appliance from 5.0.0.0 firmware version to 6.0+ firmware versions, I receive a failure message. ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21638268", + "ANSWER": "", + "START_OFFSET": "2042", + "END_OFFSET": "2214", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21599391", + "swg21585939", + "swg21674513", + "swg1IC98486", + "swg21295634", + "swg21501021", + "swg21300069", + "swg21640445", + "swg21411196", + "swg24039059", + "swg21633306", + "swg21623144", + "swg21690323", + "swg21676224", + "swg27045930", + "swg21498785", + "swg24033547", + "swg1IC98780", + "swg1IT05864", + "swg24034199", + "swg1IC87448", + "swg21656513", + "swg21984774", + "swg21638013", + "swg21659645", + "swg21638268", + "swg21599770", + "swg21508029", + "swg1IC97869", + "swg1IC98670", + "swg21402883", + "swg1IC92153", + "swg21644921", + "swg1IC97930", + "swg21358525", + "swg1IC98865", + "swg21882726", + "swg21677137", + "swg24037830", + "swg24036291", + "swg1IT10644", + "swg24032511", + "swg21633587", + "swg21501194", + "swg21651098", + "swg24035358", + "swg1IC91596", + "swg1IC96174", + "swg21507058", + "swg21260903" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q095", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why do I get error when I try to save application in APMUI?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I am using APMUI 7.7 IF1. Following error occurs when I try to save application:\n\n \n\nCTGAZ0001E: The application cannot be saved because the application repository is not available.\nmessages.log of scr server shows that it is listening at 17310 port:\n\n \n\nA CWWKT0016I: Web application available (default_host): http://apmhost:17310/SCRCLUSTER_SCR_oslc.html\nBut apmui is referring to this URL with port 8080 (APM_UI.log):\n\n \n\nhttp://apmhost:8080/SCRCLUSTER_SCR_oslc/scr/gettime", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21980970", + "swg1IV78320", + "swg21883160", + "swg1IV76635", + "swg21699735", + "swg21965467", + "swg1IV77008", + "swg21682499", + "swg1IV80810", + "swg21648606", + "swg21662147", + "swg1IJ06430", + "swg21657017", + "swg21105548", + "swg1IV78710", + "swg1IJ06443", + "swg21627054", + "swg21405299", + "swg21577257", + "swg21640186", + "swg21963093", + "swg1IY32804", + "swg21635693", + "swg21278833", + "swg1IV75699", + "swg21680420", + "swg21216587", + "swg21685521", + "swg1IV90845", + "swg21687484", + "swg21443946", + "swg21570020", + "swg21248447", + "swg21447577", + "nas8N1012032", + "swg21579931", + "swg21903489", + "swg1PK24442", + "swg22016064", + "nas8N1020747", + "swg21686255", + "swg22002038", + "swg27015256", + "swg21420545", + "swg21477190", + "swg21202156", + "swg21689284", + "nas8N1022566", + "swg21566912", + "swg1IV97224" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q096", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "I am using persistent messages, but I never got the messages", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I am using persistent messages, but I never got the messages. How can I determine what happen to the messages?\n", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21405299", + "swg1IO08114", + "swg21518392", + "swg27020512", + "swg1PI31057", + "swg1IV22043", + "swg21002672", + "swg21305212", + "swg21128687", + "swg21002673", + "swg21993198", + "swg1IY71894", + "swg21323660", + "swg21999035", + "swg1PK66629", + "swg1IY93703", + "swg21587355", + "swg21460321", + "swg21551722", + "swg1LO56574", + "swg1IO08673", + "isg3T1025713", + "swg1PK85746", + "swg22006940", + "swg21002603", + "swg21478102", + "swg1JR33483", + "swg1HD92934", + "swg21482122", + "swg1IC86846", + "swg22015704", + "swg21471280", + "swg21574053", + "swg21145571", + "swg21482206", + "swg21325522", + "swg21208493", + "swg21506087", + "swg1PM97812", + "swg21007715", + "swg1PM43360", + "swg21619629", + "swg21499837", + "swg21481551", + "swg21505920", + "swg21105047", + "swg21479614", + "swg21505823", + "swg21477232", + "isg3T1022581" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q097", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Security Bulletin: MQ Explorer directory created with owner '555' on Linux x86-64 vulnerability affects IBM MQ (CVE-2016-6089)", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I need to understand details regarding Security Bulletin: MQ Explorer directory created with owner '555' on Linux x86-64 vulnerability affects IBM MQ (CVE-2016-6089). Where can I find this information?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21976341", + "swg21883551", + "swg21462404", + "swg21995922", + "swg21976896", + "swg21981402", + "swg21883638", + "swg1IZ64859", + "swg21882609", + "swg1IT13226", + "swg21700354", + "swg21964872", + "swg27048515", + "swg21988436", + "swg21975093", + "swg21713625", + "swg21986205", + "swg22016181", + "swg21613005", + "swg21978363", + "swg21975091", + "swg22000834", + "swg21961072", + "swg21979347", + "swg21979343", + "swg22006061", + "swg21972125", + "swg21688544", + "swg21976342", + "swg22016143", + "swg21982566", + "swg21980308", + "swg21996156", + "swg21882533", + "swg21982284", + "swg22013025", + "swg22012948", + "swg21975158", + "swg22000350", + "swg22004735", + "swg22000710", + "swg22006885", + "swg21693977", + "swg21976363", + "swg27048513", + "swg21976345", + "swg22000093", + "swg27048514", + "swg21967893", + "swg21984557" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q098", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Help with Security Bulletin: Multiple Vulnerabilities identified in IBM Java SDK affect WSRR and WSRR Studio", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nI need to understand details regarding Security Bulletin: Multiple Vulnerabilities identified in IBM\u00ae Java SDK affect WebSphere Service Registry and Repository and WebSphere Service Registry and Repository Studio.\n\nThis is related to CVEID:\nCVE-2018-2633\n\nWhere can I find this information?", + "DOCUMENT": "swg22013955", + "ANSWER": "CVEID:CVE-2018-2633 [http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-2633]\nDESCRIPTION:An unspecified vulnerability related to the Java SE JNDI component could allow an unauthenticated attacker to take control of the system.\nCVSS Base Score: 8.3\nCVSS Temporal Score: Seehttps://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/137885 [https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/137885]for the current score\nCVSS Environmental Score*: Undefined\nCVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H)", + "START_OFFSET": "451", + "END_OFFSET": "967", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg22013955", + "swg22016430", + "swg22011198", + "swg21971058", + "swg22004956", + "swg21985335", + "swg21976844", + "swg21971579", + "swg22000553", + "swg21681915", + "swg21969911", + "swg21692345", + "swg21957919", + "swg2C1000296", + "swg22010680", + "swg21988198", + "swg21971580", + "swg21699440", + "swg22014799", + "swg21996778", + "swg21963824", + "swg21964872", + "swg21700720", + "swg2C1000117", + "swg21882549", + "swg21883331", + "swg22014306", + "swg21697480", + "swg22015289", + "swg21882528", + "swg21983039", + "swg22016671", + "swg21964331", + "swg22015766", + "swg22010112", + "swg2C1000269", + "swg22016280", + "swg21676772", + "swg21693210", + "swg21697228", + "swg21999481", + "swg22016544", + "swg21982569", + "swg22006996", + "swg21696451", + "swg21982320", + "ibm10718297", + "swg22017059", + "swg22016673", + "swg21692943" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q099", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Is ITCAM Agent for WebSphere Applications 7.2.0.0.7 available?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Is ITCAM Agent for WebSphere Applications 7.2.0.0.7 available? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21652265", + "ANSWER": "7.2.0.0.7 [http://www.ibm.com/support/fixcentral/swg/quickorder?product=ibm/Tivoli/Tivoli+Composite+Application+Manager+for+Applications&release=All&platform=All&function=fixId&fixids=7.2.0.0-TIV-ITCAMAD_WS-IF0007&includeSupersedes=0&source=fc] 7.2.0.0.14 March 9, 2017", + "START_OFFSET": "648", + "END_OFFSET": "917", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21652265", + "swg21675899", + "swg21412512", + "swg21639861", + "swg21623026", + "swg21647631", + "swg21642178", + "swg21412506", + "swg21455073", + "swg1PI35893", + "swg21660979", + "swg21685236", + "swg21458248", + "swg21411194", + "swg1IT06614", + "swg21568133", + "swg21610343", + "swg21972215", + "swg1IV78398", + "swg21681630", + "swg21972189", + "swg1IV72265", + "swg21443786", + "swg21443621", + "swg21580531", + "swg1IV75363", + "swg21399414", + "swg21663653", + "swg24014104", + "swg21663842", + "swg24014103", + "swg21651854", + "swg1IV53685", + "swg21668494", + "swg1IV59319", + "swg27048601", + "swg21625036", + "swg1PI59839", + "swg1IV51184", + "swg21386717", + "swg21628021", + "swg1PM80532", + "swg1PM56939", + "swg1IV79978", + "swg1IV64012", + "swg1IV60254", + "swg21457325", + "swg1IV60177", + "swg21445708", + "swg21654618" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q100", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "ITCAM Agent for WebSphere DataPower 7.1 agent support for TLS", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Does the ITCAM Agent for WebSphere DataPower 7.1 agent support TLS?\n", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21637725", + "swg21957777", + "swg21677664", + "swg21474592", + "swg21633877", + "swg21964994", + "swg21394557", + "swg21305909", + "swg24032265", + "swg1PM73305", + "swg21982765", + "swg1PM52730", + "swg21587632", + "swg1IZ73260", + "swg1PM42382", + "swg21682753", + "swg21682226", + "swg27038500", + "swg21972175", + "swg1PI58712", + "swg27024421", + "swg21681624", + "swg21614591", + "swg21639861", + "swg1PM48428", + "swg21700268", + "swg1IC84743", + "swg1IV09557", + "swg21902506", + "swg21571932", + "swg21439390", + "swg1PI68360", + "swg21469114", + "swg21568404", + "swg21443621", + "swg21412512", + "swg21411194", + "swg21697897", + "swg21622125", + "swg21683982", + "swg21412506", + "swg21701189", + "swg21685675", + "swg1IC76592", + "swg21614606", + "swg21681635", + "swg21972215", + "swg21675899", + "swg21568133", + "swg1PM65957" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q101", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Help with Security Bulletin: WMB and IIB Toolkit cannot connect to a remote WMB broker or IIB node with a TLS-compliant cipher (CVE-2015-0118)", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I need to understand details regarding Security Bulletin: WebSphere Message Broker Toolkit and IBM Integration Toolkit cannot connect to a remote WebSphere Message Broker broker or IBM Integration Bus node with a TLS-compliant cipher (CVE-2015-0118). Where can I find this information?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21959898", + "swg21615685", + "swg21700397", + "swg21902837", + "swg24040134", + "swg21975233", + "swg21982646", + "swg21677891", + "swg21992894", + "swg21664817", + "swg22005335", + "swg1IT10263", + "swg21666530", + "swg21690725", + "swg21694165", + "swg21997906", + "swg21979065", + "swg1IC76599", + "swg22000536", + "swg21682567", + "swg21982178", + "swg21697709", + "swg22011500", + "swg21985013", + "swg21687742", + "swg21985022", + "swg21694056", + "swg21977378", + "swg21685137", + "swg21997918", + "swg21687741", + "swg21986120", + "swg21299525", + "swg21967265", + "swg21961734", + "swg21972391", + "swg22005383", + "swg21985017", + "swg21969672", + "swg21981107", + "swg21299830", + "swg21302971", + "swg21697721", + "swg21453711", + "swg1IC98040", + "swg22008470", + "swg21299482", + "swg22005331", + "swg22005382", + "swg22009285" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q102", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Event Log Hashing - Performance?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I'm curious how much performance is affected by hashing events and flows. I don't see that information in the admin guide for 7.3.1. Can someone list that out by algorithm?", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21965783", + "ANSWER": "The overhead of writing these files is negligible, regardless of the hashing method selected.", + "START_OFFSET": "210", + "END_OFFSET": "303", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21965783", + "swg1IR33008", + "swg21698206", + "swg21690488", + "swg21610313", + "swg21416269", + "swg21685322", + "swg21454833", + "swg1IT05491", + "swg1PK60025", + "swg21436909", + "swg1IV27276", + "swg1PM89817", + "swg21514751", + "swg21627082", + "swg1PI32505", + "swg21605450", + "swg21657239", + "swg1PM28625", + "swg21968002", + "swg1PK60265", + "swg1PM34400", + "swg21689802", + "swg21902149", + "swg21642189", + "swg1PK71922", + "swg21639052", + "swg21389960", + "swg22003238", + "swg1PJ45264", + "swg1PK67165", + "swg21963963", + "swg1PI95059", + "swg21241422", + "swg1IZ06549", + "swg1IV71766", + "swg1IV25852", + "isg3T1024860", + "swg1IV26337", + "swg21999409", + "swg21682445", + "swg21701159", + "swg21988745", + "swg1PM09278", + "swg22017144", + "swg21622709", + "swg21674902", + "swg21990437", + "swg21993774", + "swg1PJ39701" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q103", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "How to resolve SessionBeanTimeoutException in WebSphere Application Server?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "In one of my j2EE-applications I get com.ibm.ejs.container.SessionBeanTimeoutExceptions with the following caused by section:\nCaused by: com.ibm.ejs.container.SessionBeanTimeoutException: Stateful bean CMStatefulBeanO(BeanId(server1# mySessionBean.jar# StdEJBReader, A5667152-014B-4000-E000-9AD20A8E643B), state = METHOD_READY) timed out ... 26 more\nDo you know how to resolve such SessionBeanTimeoutExceptions in general?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21439561", + "swg21695604", + "swg1PM35068", + "swg1JR54688", + "swg1JR50708", + "swg1IY77015", + "swg1PI57013", + "swg27015256", + "swg21572587", + "swg21439814", + "swg1PK65543", + "swg27013752", + "swg27024145", + "swg27020512", + "swg27039497", + "swg21637207", + "swg1IC54984", + "swg1PK51062", + "swg27046320", + "swg21474061", + "swg21512492", + "swg21660963", + "swg1PM38857", + "swg21902509", + "swg21599285", + "swg21377874", + "swg27041816", + "swg1IY83616", + "swg27038636", + "swg21617205", + "swg21045910", + "swg21351596", + "swg21233894", + "swg21289491", + "swg27023697", + "swg27013753", + "swg21392308", + "swg1PK74608", + "swg1PM01799", + "swg21505249", + "swg1PK23969", + "swg21599197", + "swg27018084", + "swg21438327", + "swg21457713", + "swg1PK60447", + "swg21695572", + "swg1PI30673", + "swg21968909", + "swg1IC52511" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q104", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Java plugin not loading into rhapsody", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I had installed rational rhapsody 8.2 in my machine. I tried to add the profile of the Simple plugin.sbs from the path C:\\ProgramData\\IBM\\Rational\\Rhapsody\\8.2\\Samples\\ExtensibilitySamples\\Simple Plug-in, finally it is found that the Simple plugin is failed to load in the Rhapsody process space.\nI had tried to add the JavaAPILogFile=D:\\RhapsodyLogFile\\Logs.txt for collecting the logs and while loading plugin nothing is written into the log file.\n\nWhen i launched the rhapsody the following is written into the logs\n\nEnter: RhapsodyAppServer_attachToRhapsodyApplication\nEnter: RPApplication_getTheJavaPluginsInterfaceNative\nExit: RPApplication_getTheJavaPluginsInterfaceNative\n\n \n\nPlease help me to resolve this issue ", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21989870", + "swg22011390", + "swg1PK95934", + "swg21990013", + "swg1PI65488", + "swg1PM82411", + "swg1PI57493", + "swg1PI60975", + "swg21960906", + "swg21677742", + "swg1PM65082", + "swg22016025", + "swg1PI84377", + "swg1PI81041", + "swg1PI68997", + "swg1PM58424", + "swg1PI80554", + "swg1PM03026", + "swg21405395", + "swg21411455", + "swg1PI04821", + "swg1PM28133", + "swg22007219", + "swg1PI57016", + "swg1PM62512", + "swg21421787", + "swg1PI53738", + "swg1PI78671", + "swg21417451", + "swg1PI40825", + "swg1PM35234", + "swg1PI81878", + "swg1PI71302", + "swg1PM02204", + "swg22012136", + "swg21673529", + "swg1PM32868", + "swg27043637", + "swg21986702", + "swg1PI30781", + "swg1PM07804", + "swg21429122", + "swg1PK92931", + "swg21396962", + "swg1PK84272", + "swg1PM15197", + "swg1PM04743", + "swg21578768", + "swg21997406", + "swg22016594" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q105", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Help with Action required for IIB H.E. V9 & WMB H.E. V8 for security vulnerabilities in Red Hat Linux", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nI need to understand details regarding Action required for IBM Integration Bus Hypervisor Edition V9.0 and WebSphere Message Broker Hypervisor Edition V8.0 for security vulnerabilities in Red Hat Linux.\n\nThis is related to CVEIDs:\nCVE-2018-1000001\nCVE-2017-16997\nCVE-2017-1000408\nCVE-2017-1000409\nCVE-2017-17426\n\nWhere can I find this information?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg22012678", + "swg22012861", + "swg22011624", + "swg22011748", + "swg22011630", + "swg22005385", + "swg22011696", + "swg22009436", + "swg22009455", + "swg22003256", + "swg22007664", + "swg22005035", + "swg22009285", + "swg22004377", + "swg22012477", + "swg22010832", + "swg22006789", + "swg22011745", + "swg22000947", + "swg22010311", + "swg22007869", + "swg22011754", + "swg22015916", + "swg21979065", + "swg22015915", + "swg22013692", + "swg21998452", + "swg21981107", + "swg21987358", + "swg21982752", + "swg21977378", + "swg21989255", + "swg21985022", + "swg21697721", + "swg21986120", + "swg21992475", + "swg21994053", + "swg22013693", + "swg21996135", + "swg21990735", + "swg21903157", + "swg24034994", + "swg21695798", + "swg21971313", + "swg21696878", + "swg21902248", + "swg21696879", + "swg21685666", + "swg21903158", + "swg21685764" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q106", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why does WebSphere DataPower spike with a high CPU rate when a WebSphere MQ connection is unavailable?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I have noticed when my MQ backends go down unexpectedly it can result in a high CPU rate on DataPower. And how can I resolve this? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21431301", + "ANSWER": "The solution to the issue of having DataPower vulnerable to the MQ Queue Manager being inaccessible is to change the Retry Attempts parameter on the Configure MQ Queue Manager window from 0 to some number.", + "START_OFFSET": "741", + "END_OFFSET": "946", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21431301", + "swg21502873", + "swg27021649", + "swg1IC58635", + "swg21971827", + "swg1IT14350", + "swg21367002", + "swg1IC62153", + "swg1IT18153", + "swg1IT02476", + "swg21429382", + "swg27045930", + "swg21422886", + "swg1IT15293", + "swg21444492", + "swg27048270", + "swg21291189", + "swg21610078", + "swg1PI15315", + "swg1IT14409", + "swg21683568", + "swg21410251", + "swg21620770", + "swg21405299", + "swg1PM73355", + "swg21680303", + "swg21239329", + "swg21377610", + "swg21576664", + "swg21516288", + "swg1IV32346", + "nas8N1015837", + "nas8N1014652", + "swg21624736", + "swg21903494", + "swg21469404", + "swg1IZ67131", + "swg1IC52916", + "swg1IC69417", + "swg27020934", + "swg21647231", + "swg21199910", + "swg21470451", + "swg1IT01770", + "swg21602521", + "swg1IT10498", + "nas8N1015953", + "swg21667396", + "swg21615923", + "swg21678834" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q107", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why the exception \"BO Service is not supported or disabled in this profile\" when trying to publish from IID to a local Process Server?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "When trying to publish a project from IBM Integration Designer (IID) to the local Process Server, it fails with error ADMA5014E in SystemOut.log. The FFDC log is showing exception of BO Service is not supported or disabled in this profile; Trace:\n\nFFDC Exception:java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError SourceId:com.ibm.ws.bpm.cmdfrmwrk.task.WBICleanupTask ProbeId:200 java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError at java.lang.J9VMInternals.initialize(J9VMInternals.java:259) \n....\nCaused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: BO Service is not supported or disabled in this profile. at com.ibm.ws.bo.BOCore.init(BOCore.java:107) ....", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21503132", + "swg21997692", + "swg21580533", + "swg21392024", + "swg21395397", + "swg21639344", + "swg1PM83557", + "swg1JR37427", + "swg1JR55075", + "swg1JR52630", + "swg21648323", + "swg27038389", + "swg21618376", + "swg21662337", + "swg1PM66290", + "swg1IV41639", + "swg1JR52780", + "swg1IC70603", + "swg27038392", + "swg1JR41552", + "swg21444965", + "swg21165986", + "swg21611211", + "swg1PI50370", + "swg1JR31600", + "swg21469143", + "swg1PM50021", + "swg21593461", + "swg1JR48786", + "swg1JR49394", + "nas8N1022268", + "swg21610720", + "swg21438196", + "swg1JR27866", + "swg21656509", + "swg21612810", + "swg21650401", + "swg1JR42483", + "swg1PI45838", + "swg1JR39901", + "swg1JR40867", + "swg1PM69292", + "swg1PI28605", + "swg21597795", + "swg21595617", + "swg1JR45030", + "swg24039259", + "swg1IC57041", + "swg21503677", + "swg21672999" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q108", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why do I get \"OSS version is not suitable for installation\" when attempting to install the MQ 5.3.1 base version on a HP Integrity NonStop Server BladeSystem?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I am trying to install the MQ 5.3.1 base version on a HP Integrity NonStop Server BladeSystem, but it complains saying that the \"OSS version is not suitable for installation\". My OSS version is J06.14 and it looks to be a supported version according to the System Requirements site:\n\nhttp://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg27006797\n\nWhy am I getting this error message?", + "DOCUMENT": "swg27048240", + "ANSWER": "For the HP Integrity NonStop Server H-Series systems, the following system\nsoftware versions are the minimum mandatory level for V5.3.1.12:\n\n- H06.23.01 or later", + "START_OFFSET": "92444", + "END_OFFSET": "92605", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg27048240", + "swg27006797", + "swg24018764", + "swg24020584", + "swg24022899", + "swg24019778", + "swg24017102", + "swg24033520", + "swg24014780", + "swg24037761", + "swg1IC49232", + "swg21667375", + "swg21667396", + "swg1IC50685", + "swg1IC49282", + "swg27015549", + "swg24042340", + "swg1IT12859", + "swg24025461", + "swg24027369", + "swg24030009", + "swg24043377", + "swg21618728", + "swg24044095", + "swg24039786", + "swg1IC54512", + "swg21173468", + "swg27006796", + "swg1IC57435", + "swg1IC52886", + "swg1IC89128", + "swg1IC57432", + "swg21496703", + "swg1IC53996", + "swg1IT18336", + "swg1IC54841", + "swg1IC53552", + "swg1IC56834", + "swg21676496", + "swg21699052", + "swg21179309", + "swg24044505", + "swg24043707", + "swg1IC52816", + "swg24044832", + "swg1IC56493", + "swg1IT21950", + "swg24044557", + "swg1IC53728", + "swg1IC51962" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q109", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Help with Security Bulletin: Authentication vulnerability affects IIB V10.0.0.4 onwards (CVE-2016-8918 )", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I need to understand details regarding Security Bulletin: Authentication vulnerability affects IBM Integration Bus V10.0.0.4 onwards (CVE-2016-8918 ). Where can I find this information? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21995079", + "ANSWER": "CVEID: CVE-2016-8918 [http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-8918]\nDESCRIPTION: In non-default configurations, IBM Integration Bus could allow a remote user to authenticate without providing valid credentials.\nCVSS Base Score: 5.9\nCVSS Temporal Score: See https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/118528 [https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/118528] for the current score\nCVSS Environmental Score*: Undefined\nCVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N)", + "START_OFFSET": "300", + "END_OFFSET": "812", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21995079", + "swg21982320", + "swg21986205", + "swg21981402", + "swg21700354", + "swg21975233", + "swg21994102", + "swg21990796", + "swg2C1000269", + "swg21994491", + "swg21882724", + "swg27049493", + "swg21883331", + "swg21986357", + "swg21961072", + "swg21995996", + "swg22008829", + "swg21688444", + "swg21989628", + "swg21882528", + "swg21988198", + "swg21882824", + "swg21995779", + "swg21996156", + "swg21985013", + "swg21986732", + "swg21972467", + "swg21991776", + "swg21989458", + "swg21990236", + "swg21990811", + "swg21986503", + "swg21986550", + "swg21993026", + "swg21981221", + "swg21986096", + "swg21978738", + "swg21979292", + "swg21987037", + "swg21687405", + "swg21697249", + "ssg1S1005815", + "swg21976037", + "swg21994225", + "swg21692828", + "swg21695170", + "swg21693977", + "swg2C1000296", + "swg21882549", + "ssg1S1005816" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q110", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why does our Websphere application server hang when we apply Microsoft patch on our database server?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Why does our Websphere application server hang when we apply Microsoft patch on our database server?", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21220832", + "ANSWER": "Immediately purge the pool by invoking the purgePoolContents operation of the data source MBean with the immediate option:\n Using Jacl:\n $AdminControl invoke $ds purgePoolContents immediate\n \n \n Using Jython:\n AdminControl.invoke(ds, \"purgePoolContents\", \"immediate\")\n \n \n\nIf the purge operation is successful, no response will be observed. If the purge operation is not successful, the response will indicate a possible reason for failure.", + "START_OFFSET": "4054", + "END_OFFSET": "4518", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21220832", + "swg21578610", + "swg1PK03834", + "swg21506040", + "swg1IV78137", + "swg21980690", + "swg21530973", + "swg21487975", + "swg1IV39940", + "swg21476834", + "swg1PK87867", + "swg1PK55594", + "swg21644184", + "swg1PK79418", + "swg21298347", + "swg1PM74725", + "swg27014111", + "swg21684241", + "swg1PI28764", + "swg1PK06029", + "swg21471779", + "swg27009286", + "swg27036798", + "swg27009287", + "swg27009288", + "swg21686351", + "swg27018542", + "swg21478493", + "swg1PK67027", + "swg1PJ34853", + "swg27021515", + "swg27024367", + "swg21469372", + "swg21574202", + "swg21324890", + "swg27024037", + "swg21883033", + "swg21700079", + "swg1PK69322", + "swg1PM66476", + "swg21455298", + "swg21599191", + "swg21278898", + "swg21484808", + "swg21275837", + "swg21487838", + "swg21523049", + "swg21486113", + "swg21398760", + "swg1JR28566" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q111", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "StaleConnectionException errors with BPM databases", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "There is much published documentation about stale connections to databases on the web, and yet stale connections continue to be a very common problem, at least with BPM databases. The condition can manifest itself in different ways. The most common experience of a stale connection is from error messages in the log or FFDCs that contain \"StaleConnectionException\".", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21247167", + "swg21063645", + "swg21066467", + "swg21580731", + "swg21496354", + "swg21456175", + "swg21960085", + "swg21220832", + "swg1PK66528", + "swg21649826", + "swg1IY99621", + "swg21695641", + "swg1IC81239", + "swg1PM54323", + "swg27036941", + "swg1PO03699", + "swg1JR50694", + "swg21631667", + "swg1JR46067", + "swg21587505", + "swg21496442", + "swg1JR31207", + "swg1IC92057", + "swg21650796", + "swg21432220", + "swg21384169", + "swg21422177", + "swg1JR45708", + "swg1PM32298", + "swg1OA23485", + "swg21997164", + "swg1IT24277", + "swg21501969", + "swg21666694", + "swg1OA22688", + "swg1PI30119", + "swg1PM61951", + "swg21207584", + "swg21646322", + "ssg1S1002896", + "swg21461735", + "swg21129202", + "swg1PQ05759", + "swg21320850", + "swg21613795", + "swg21268720", + "swg21653836", + "swg27048992", + "swg1PK47659", + "swg21902699" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q112", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why does nco_confpack -export fail with the message \"Tool in menu but not found\"?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I tried to export OMNIbus configuration using nco_confpack command and I get the following message:\r\nTool in menu but not found, menu: AlertsMenu, tool: Close\r\nI've also tried using it with -list command and I get the same error. ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21672071", + "ANSWER": "Recreate the tool and associate it with the menu and try to run the command again.", + "START_OFFSET": "566", + "END_OFFSET": "648", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21672071", + "swg21432060", + "swg1IZ67229", + "swg1IV81481", + "swg1IV45775", + "swg21272551", + "swg21683992", + "swg21294709", + "swg24027482", + "swg1IY92878", + "swg21476065", + "swg21639252", + "swg21682650", + "swg1IV24963", + "swg27041806", + "swg21578136", + "swg1IY19188", + "nas8N1019162", + "swg1PK89060", + "swg1LO39948", + "swg21478866", + "swg21480488", + "swg21505912", + "swg21478674", + "swg27043960", + "swg1HD93562", + "swg21682765", + "swg21274666", + "swg21272546", + "swg1LO39651", + "swg21373323", + "swg1HD91264", + "swg21158221", + "nas8N1021815", + "swg21476467", + "swg1HD66171", + "swg1IY84019", + "swg1IZ42307", + "swg1PJ45163", + "swg21389162", + "swg21260983", + "swg1PI23489", + "swg1PK29715", + "swg1LO41124", + "swg21654828", + "swg1LO68498", + "swg1IV43838", + "swg21481050", + "swg1IV67744", + "swg21553172" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q113", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "How to access Rule Team Server or Rule Execution Server on WAS 7 over HTTPS?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "When trying to connect to Rule Team Server or Rule Execution Server on WebSphere Applicaiton Server (WAS) 7.0 over HTTPS, why do I still get an SSLHandshakeException after setting the property \"ilog.rules.res.allowSelfSignedCertificate\"to \"true\" ?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21427447", + "swg21677726", + "swg27023725", + "swg21497636", + "swg21586966", + "swg21589513", + "swg21439999", + "swg21421294", + "swg21570526", + "swg21426014", + "swg21622452", + "swg21679681", + "swg21473114", + "swg21599241", + "swg27019171", + "swg21645312", + "swg21637142", + "swg21663395", + "swg21400812", + "swg21397169", + "swg21616403", + "swg21590082", + "swg21469115", + "swg21427772", + "swg21495825", + "swg21461685", + "swg21425487", + "swg21640540", + "swg21456181", + "swg21414493", + "swg21584855", + "swg21590333", + "swg21509580", + "swg21439260", + "swg21457713", + "swg21496566", + "swg21587817", + "swg21592060", + "swg21507683", + "swg21587770", + "swg21419945", + "swg21668133", + "swg21469143", + "swg21420910", + "swg21634188", + "swg21584856", + "swg21400648", + "swg21400705", + "swg21443038", + "swg21448570" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q114", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Any difference between DB2 z/OS V9.1 + IBM Cobol and DB2 LUW V10.5 FP7 + MF Cobol?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "We are planning below migration.\n\n[Current]\nDB2 z/OS V9.1 + IBM Cobol\n[New]\nDB2 AESE V10.5 FP7 / AIX V7.1 + Micro Focus Cobol (MF Cobol)\n\nAny known limitation or things what we need to concern?\n", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21989702", + "ANSWER": "DB2 LUW precompile, prep write different code to DB2 z/OS?", + "START_OFFSET": "36", + "END_OFFSET": "94", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21049516", + "swg21964179", + "swg21966062", + "swg1IV00812", + "swg21989702", + "swg21497809", + "swg21591360", + "swg1IV19472", + "swg1PK68884", + "swg1IV24848", + "swg1IV67273", + "swg1PK49583", + "swg1PK21700", + "swg1IZ18110", + "swg21312816", + "swg21050271", + "swg1IZ76803", + "swg21968869", + "swg1IT12121", + "swg1IZ95346", + "swg21174618", + "swg21652355", + "swg1PK74872", + "swg1PQ83744", + "swg1IY52821", + "swg1PQ95553", + "swg1PM46870", + "swg24021465", + "swg27038640", + "swg21688554", + "swg1PQ97963", + "swg21516209", + "swg21239703", + "swg27048549", + "swg1PM66408", + "swg27012212", + "swg1PI25771", + "swg21244064", + "swg21191786", + "swg27006357", + "swg1IY91495", + "swg21987109", + "swg1IT07742", + "swg21986065", + "swg21206761", + "swg1PI56129", + "swg1PQ70681", + "swg27041653", + "swg1IT08407", + "swg27006271" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q115", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Help with Security Bulletin: Apache Commons FileUpload Vulnerabilities in IBM WebSphere MQ File Transfer Edition component (CVE-2016-1000031)", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I need to understand details regarding Security Bulletin: Apache Commons FileUpload Vulnerabilities in IBM WebSphere MQ File Transfer Edition component (CVE-2016-1000031). Where can I find this information?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg22014017", + "swg22010680", + "swg22013359", + "swg22015184", + "swg22011788", + "swg22012109", + "swg22016234", + "swg22013943", + "swg21975093", + "swg22012419", + "swg22010267", + "swg22014174", + "swg22015340", + "swg22013713", + "swg22016826", + "swg21988198", + "swg22001563", + "swg22012168", + "ibm10719413", + "swg22014477", + "swg22003626", + "ibm10717023", + "swg22016652", + "swg22017312", + "swg21990366", + "swg21990371", + "swg21998590", + "swg22011302", + "swg22010868", + "swg22015976", + "swg22010229", + "swg1PJ45055", + "swg21989932", + "isg3T1027394", + "swg22011720", + "swg21985133", + "swg21979461", + "swg22010019", + "swg22015339", + "swg21989628", + "swg22016488", + "swg22014970", + "swg21990300", + "swg21670400", + "swg22014972", + "swg21988279", + "swg22012458", + "swg21671261", + "swg21990236", + "swg22009844" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q116", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Upgrading from ibm bpm 8.5 to ibm bpm 8.5.5", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nHi there,\n\nI was wondering if it is possible to upgrade from ibm bpm 8.5 to 8.5.5 ? is this possible? please suggest. thanks \n", + "DOCUMENT": "swg27042065", + "ANSWER": "V8.5 Refresh Pack 5 is intended to be used on IBM Business Process Manager Express, IBM Business Process Manager Standard, IBM Business Process Manager Advanced, and IBM Business Process Manager Advanced - Process Server installations.", + "START_OFFSET": "887", + "END_OFFSET": "1122", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg27042065", + "swg21673022", + "swg24044425", + "swg21639640", + "swg1JR47011", + "swg21996075", + "swg22014771", + "swg21683428", + "swg27037045", + "swg21997889", + "swg22000253", + "swg21606904", + "swg1JR54638", + "swg22009221", + "swg27042474", + "swg21998047", + "swg1JR52661", + "swg21673414", + "swg1JR51113", + "swg21972788", + "swg27038755", + "swg27038756", + "swg27038754", + "swg21679140", + "swg1ZZ00377", + "swg21999133", + "swg21679117", + "swg27023009", + "swg21640810", + "swg27046795", + "swg22004654", + "swg21609893", + "swg21983634", + "swg22011844", + "swg1JR50295", + "swg21580260", + "swg1JR54670", + "swg1JR52697", + "swg22010796", + "swg22007346", + "swg21688247", + "swg1JR51148", + "swg27046470", + "swg24043891", + "swg21637582", + "swg22009910", + "swg27046805", + "swg22007354", + "swg22007351", + "swg21699030" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q117", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Migrating ITCAM for AD 7.1 agent to ITCAM for WebSphere Applications v7.2 agent", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Is there a suggested migration path from ITCAM for AD v7.1 agent to ITCAM for WebSphere Applications v7.2 agent and Data Collector?\n", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21636727", + "swg21625036", + "swg1PI35893", + "swg21668494", + "swg1PI59839", + "swg21675899", + "swg21968507", + "swg21639861", + "swg21652087", + "swg1PM28867", + "swg1PM65957", + "swg1PI79192", + "swg21649938", + "swg1PM52730", + "swg21412506", + "swg1PM64847", + "swg1PM80532", + "swg21681630", + "swg21607474", + "swg21652265", + "swg21417959", + "swg21443621", + "swg1PM53464", + "swg21244871", + "swg1PM40701", + "swg1PM31697", + "swg1PM72399", + "swg1PM56939", + "swg21685236", + "swg21580129", + "swg1PM59825", + "swg21651854", + "swg1PM20071", + "swg1PM30230", + "swg1PM81890", + "swg21457325", + "swg1PI36215", + "swg1PM72517", + "swg21699842", + "swg21458248", + "swg1PM20774", + "swg21957777", + "swg1PM79587", + "swg21411194", + "swg1PM74083", + "swg1PM48428", + "swg21610343", + "swg1PM21624", + "swg1PM17147", + "swg21961196" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q118", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "db2top abnormally ended with core dump during monitoring SQL statements", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I'm using DB2 9.7 FP6. The db2top utility abnormally ended with a core dump during monitorning SQL statements with following stack trace in the trap file. What is the cause of the problem?\n\n \n -------Frame------ ------Function + Offset------\n 0x0900000010127AEC waddnstr + 0x6C\n 0x0900000010134E90 waddstr + 0x10\n 0x0900000010135440 vw_printw + 0x40\n ", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1IC98066", + "swg1IZ03680", + "swg1IT03370", + "swg1IC64564", + "swg1IC67853", + "swg1IC63983", + "swg1IC76923", + "swg1IC76950", + "swg1IC68578", + "swg1IC66395", + "swg21628751", + "swg1IC79974", + "swg1IC99807", + "swg1IC99804", + "swg1IZ45127", + "swg1IZ64877", + "swg1IC81208", + "swg21614486", + "swg1IC76451", + "swg1IY90997", + "swg1IT03133", + "swg1IC81365", + "swg1IC66422", + "swg1IZ50667", + "swg21404960", + "swg1IZ50668", + "swg1IC63085", + "swg1IC76489", + "swg1IC83806", + "swg1IC62929", + "swg27009542", + "swg21678658", + "swg1IZ26910", + "swg1IZ66642", + "swg1IC96866", + "swg1IT13636", + "swg1IT14091", + "swg1IC79927", + "swg1IC84451", + "swg1IZ31413", + "swg1IC93920", + "swg1IC79991", + "swg27047441", + "swg1IZ70665", + "swg1IC94210", + "swg1IZ26548", + "swg1IC65586", + "swg1IC83057", + "swg1IC69451", + "swg1IC66839" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q119", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why does the Dataserver service change from Healthy to Vulnerable after logging into StoredIQ Application Stack?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Why does the Dataserver service change from Healthy to Vulnerable after logging into StoredIQ Application Stack? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21997033", + "ANSWER": "This could be due to amount of Memory allocated to the dataserver.", + "START_OFFSET": "190", + "END_OFFSET": "256", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21997033", + "swg21693837", + "swg21998312", + "swg21998410", + "swg22001558", + "swg21993880", + "swg21689644", + "swg22001607", + "swg22001352", + "swg21980108", + "swg21688483", + "swg21680180", + "swg21998828", + "swg21996647", + "swg22011073", + "swg21497362", + "swg21700752", + "swg21999886", + "swg27048378", + "swg22001443", + "swg21998904", + "swg21994870", + "swg22001332", + "swg21990292", + "swg21349553", + "swg22001732", + "swg1PK19853", + "swg21336101", + "swg21150785", + "swg21994168", + "swg1IT09801", + "swg1IT10021", + "swg21990305", + "swg21696653", + "swg1IT10474", + "swg27049234", + "swg21979650", + "isg3S1001435", + "swg21435212", + "swg21882897", + "swg21999824", + "swg22010163", + "swg21495799", + "swg27046128", + "swg1IT07997", + "swg22012546", + "swg21405911", + "swg21382845", + "swg21614949", + "swg27045075" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q120", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why do we get server error message when running BIRT reports after upgrading to Atlas 6.0.3.3?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Why do we get server error message when running BIRT reports after upgrading to Atlas 6.0.3.3? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21982354", + "ANSWER": "This happens when the BIRT Reports is running in Standalone mode and happens due to a new configuration - report.standalone.userid", + "START_OFFSET": "130", + "END_OFFSET": "260", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21982354", + "swg21978855", + "swg21982857", + "swg21982790", + "swg1HE12113", + "swg21991926", + "swg1HE12485", + "swg21979512", + "swg21989012", + "swg21990802", + "swg21991198", + "swg21699489", + "swg1HE12543", + "swg21974431", + "swg21625160", + "swg21660209", + "swg21981881", + "swg21438342", + "swg21976833", + "swg1HE12495", + "swg1HE12421", + "swg1HE12383", + "swg1HE12524", + "swg21505258", + "swg21995382", + "swg21990800", + "swg27039901", + "swg1HE12221", + "swg1HE12375", + "swg1HE11874", + "swg1HE12440", + "swg1HE12307", + "swg1HE12363", + "swg21684274", + "swg1HE12422", + "swg24042026", + "swg1HE12427", + "swg21995290", + "swg1HE12424", + "swg1HE12390", + "swg1HE12438", + "swg1HE12385", + "swg21991583", + "swg21665929", + "swg21975971", + "swg1HE12439", + "swg21976074", + "swg1HE12240", + "swg1HE12381", + "swg21577252" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q121", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Job Execution Node for IIB V10", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I'm looking for a way in IIB V10 to execute/invoke scripts or jobs on different operating systems like windows or System i (AS400). After a little research i found out that there is a Job Execution Node for the IIB V9, which seems to cover the requirements. Is there a Job Execution Node for the IIB V10, or an other appropriate node for the requirements?\n", + "DOCUMENT": "swg24017225", + "ANSWER": "The JobExecutionNode, a Java-based plugin, allows you to execute operating system commands, and invoke jobs in the form of batch/shell scripts from within the message flow. The jobs can be specified on the node property or as a part of the input message.", + "START_OFFSET": "383", + "END_OFFSET": "637", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg24017225", + "swg27051134", + "swg21979573", + "swg1IT10548", + "swg21983095", + "swg27050571", + "swg21663024", + "swg22006730", + "swg21977329", + "swg1PI82725", + "swg1PI67527", + "swg1PI82729", + "swg1PI82728", + "swg1PI82726", + "swg21177044", + "swg1IT19681", + "swg1PI76913", + "swg21305391", + "swg1PI96966", + "swg27048556", + "swg21681704", + "swg1PI82727", + "swg1PI82724", + "swg21282840", + "swg21441366", + "swg21999798", + "swg1IT17198", + "swg27045819", + "swg21064109", + "swg21618139", + "swg1IT22890", + "swg1PI75879", + "swg1PI80153", + "swg21965857", + "swg22005507", + "swg1IT23513", + "swg27007159", + "swg21178479", + "swg21664476", + "swg1IT22025", + "swg1IT24348", + "swg21989994", + "swg1PI85389", + "swg1IT14355", + "swg21453711", + "swg21299303", + "swg22005509", + "swg21692737", + "isg3T1022427", + "swg21656087" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q122", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Importing Asset GL Errors", + "QUESTION_TEXT": " When importing or syncing with assets, I receive the following error for the glaccount.\n\nInternal Server Error\nError 500: nested exception is: psdi.util.MXAccessException: BMXAA4198E - The GL attribute TLOAMNEWGLACCOUNT on object {1} requires an organization. Specify a value in the Organization field.\n ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21969653", + "ANSWER": "Add the following field or tag to your inbound message. For example, if you are sending XML: \n\nxxx \n\nwhere xxx is the ORGID value. \n\nMake sure that NEWORGID is included on the object structure. \n\nGo To Integration > Object Structures and query the object structure. \n\nFrom the Select Action menu drop down, select Exclude/Include Fields and select the Non-Persistent Fields tab. Include NEWORGID.", + "START_OFFSET": "1389", + "END_OFFSET": "1806", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21969653", + "swg21626666", + "swg1IV83104", + "swg1IZ89276", + "swg1IV67500", + "swg1IV78083", + "swg1IZ73561", + "swg1IZ77110", + "swg1IZ22327", + "swg1IZ78090", + "swg1IV59639", + "swg21994734", + "swg1IV75593", + "swg1IZ74934", + "swg1IV10451", + "swg21669532", + "swg1IZ76010", + "swg1IV06913", + "swg1IZ06646", + "swg1IV93495", + "swg1IV93503", + "swg21591284", + "swg1IZ94288", + "swg1IV51652", + "swg1IV76957", + "swg1IV65751", + "swg1IZ46770", + "swg1IJ06034", + "swg1IZ27122", + "swg1IV84883", + "swg1IV25353", + "swg1IJ03081", + "swg21474017", + "swg1IV50315", + "swg1IZ89533", + "swg1IV86802", + "swg21610450", + "swg1IZ68188", + "swg1IV71422", + "swg1IZ34687", + "swg1IZ95824", + "swg21592994", + "swg21318055", + "swg21566512", + "swg1IZ87439", + "swg1JR49289", + "swg1IZ61610", + "swg1IV65363", + "swg1IZ92498", + "swg1IV56375" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q123", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Resource registry with IIB", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nHi Team, \n\nI do had a scenario to be accomplished in IIB, in which one input should be passed from MQ and the other should be passed from FILE(for this i have been using Resource Registry Concept) and in order to specify mrc file i have modified dtx.ini file which is located in Integration server Insatllation directory but when the flow has been deployed an exception is being raised with the error message stating \"Source not found\" .\n\nFYI - When i tried the RR from Design Studio it is working absolutely fine.\n\nIs there something i need to configure/modify so that the mrc file will be accessible to the map in IIB flow as well.", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21419540", + "ANSWER": "WebSphere Transformation Extender maps that are called from WebSphere Message Broker can use the WebSphere Transformation Extender Resource Registry. WebSphere Message Broker itself does not provide any facility for working with resource registries in areas of the message flow outside of the WebSphere Transformation Extender plugin.", + "START_OFFSET": "168", + "END_OFFSET": "502", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg22008624", + "swg27045819", + "swg22006730", + "swg27050571", + "swg21178479", + "swg21999305", + "swg21978618", + "swg21585722", + "swg27048556", + "swg21694165", + "swg22003978", + "swg21415603", + "swg1PI68827", + "swg21419540", + "swg1PK84465", + "swg21981416", + "swg21977704", + "swg21194736", + "swg21672926", + "swg22011290", + "swg21457897", + "swg21175141", + "swg1PI90759", + "swg22008337", + "swg21989994", + "swg21687741", + "swg21687742", + "swg21679384", + "swg1IT19936", + "swg27020934", + "swg21618139", + "swg27051134", + "nas8N1012999", + "swg1IT24348", + "swg21499249", + "swg22015521", + "swg21239116", + "swg21177321", + "swg21219840", + "swg1IT11790", + "swg1LO42446", + "swg22011116", + "swg27022613", + "swg1PK84373", + "swg21976406", + "swg21429122", + "swg21601172", + "swg1IC53449", + "swg21689906", + "swg21405299" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q124", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Is there a scripting feature in ITM?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Is there a scripting feature in ITM? ", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1IV68780", + "swg1IV70117", + "swg21645605", + "swg1IV40259", + "swg1IV32812", + "swg21429574", + "swg21504332", + "swg21566483", + "swg1IV02305", + "swg21616320", + "swg1IV82704", + "swg21599872", + "swg1IY42077", + "swg21505483", + "swg21635792", + "swg1IC61174", + "swg21631465", + "swg21514870", + "swg1IV85663", + "swg1IY50407", + "swg21654091", + "swg1IV85660", + "swg21986459", + "swg1HB83432", + "swg21459278", + "swg21902561", + "swg1IV77559", + "swg21507047", + "swg1IY80412", + "swg21586074", + "swg21632665", + "swg1IZ74786", + "swg21258115", + "swg21637483", + "swg1IV92932", + "swg21424275", + "swg21620199", + "swg21654180", + "swg21503778", + "swg21634920", + "swg1IV28668", + "swg21516681", + "swg1JR51103", + "swg21424268", + "swg24043781", + "swg21641690", + "swg21584035", + "swg1IJ02490", + "swg24043277", + "swg1IV44880" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q125", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Error when using profilePath parameter with BPMConfig to create a profile", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "When creating a profile using the BPMConfig command and the -profilePath parameter to define a custom directory to store the profile data, the creation fails with the following error message if the directory already exists (even if it is empty):\ncom.ibm.bpm.config.BPMConfig.main(): The profile path must not exist. com.ibm.bpm.config.util.ConfigException: The profile path must not exist. at com.ibm.bpm.config.BPMConfig.createDmgrProfile(BPMConfig.java:1833) at com.ibm.bpm.config.BPMConfig.configureDeploymentEnvironment(BPMConfig.java:6\n...", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1JR51714", + "swg1JR54039", + "swg1JR53173", + "swg1JR54248", + "swg1JR55335", + "swg1JR55583", + "swg1IY81145", + "swg1JR52156", + "swg1JR58310", + "swg21377268", + "swg21268446", + "swg21458372", + "swg1PK60043", + "swg1JR59399", + "swg1PI23509", + "swg21500756", + "swg1JR47785", + "swg1JR57555", + "swg21428496", + "swg21625466", + "swg21673879", + "swg21585265", + "nas8N1013980", + "swg1JR52375", + "swg21291889", + "swg22002330", + "swg21998754", + "swg1PK11502", + "swg1JR49707", + "swg27019949", + "nas8N1016098", + "swg1HD71167", + "swg1IO09314", + "swg21507258", + "swg22012426", + "swg1PK60373", + "swg21594974", + "swg21683894", + "nas8N1010486", + "swg1PK69769", + "nas8N1011912", + "swg21318409", + "swg21408906", + "swg21294171", + "swg1PM70554", + "swg1JR53670", + "swg1JR54309", + "nas8N1011804", + "nas8N1013049", + "swg21267202" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q126", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why is WebSphere MQ connection failing when enabling SSL with AMQ9640 SSLPEER peer name error?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Why is WebSphere MQ connection failing when enabling SSL with AMQ9640 SSLPEER peer name error?\nexample client side error:com.ibm.mq.jmqi.JmqiException: CC=2;RC=2399;\n \nAMQ9640: SSL invalid peer name, channel '?',\n \nattribute 'OID.0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.3 (x2)'.", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1IV53739", + "swg1IV33501", + "swg1IC81525", + "swg1IC83494", + "swg1IC98121", + "swg1IY79414", + "swg1SE36370", + "swg1IT23860", + "swg1PM96830", + "swg1IV40268", + "swg1IC52428", + "swg1IY97428", + "swg1IC81377", + "swg1PM75808", + "swg21573699", + "swg1PI08859", + "swg1PI50535", + "swg1PI48128", + "swg1PK29806", + "swg21903494", + "swg21977232", + "swg1IY62516", + "swg1IY62503", + "swg1IV46272", + "swg1PK54322", + "swg1IY62474", + "swg1IY63458", + "swg1IV42634", + "swg21458087", + "swg1SE37101", + "swg1IC59304", + "swg1IY58921", + "swg21169158", + "swg1IT05501", + "swg1PI39033", + "swg24010367", + "swg1IC74903", + "swg1IV25345", + "swg1IY97755", + "swg1IY63426", + "swg21195940", + "swg1SE37847", + "swg1SE52253", + "swg21370228", + "swg1IY65612", + "swg21664199", + "swg1IZ63940", + "swg21970278", + "swg21213079", + "swg1PI07181" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q127", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Help with Security Bulletin: Vulnerability in IBM Java Runtimes affect Websphere Business Modeler Advanced and Websphere Business Modeler Basic (CVE-2015-0138)", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I need to understand details regarding Security Bulletin: Vulnerability in IBM Java Runtimes affect Websphere Business Modeler Advanced and Websphere Business Modeler Basic (CVE-2015-0138). Where can I find this information?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21700720", + "swg21902473", + "swg21981402", + "swg21982320", + "swg21689918", + "swg21699935", + "swg21959309", + "swg21883638", + "swg21970582", + "swg21959306", + "swg1JR51837", + "swg21967357", + "swg21693123", + "swg21902450", + "swg21967527", + "swg21700354", + "swg21701285", + "swg21964872", + "swg21700130", + "swg21983144", + "swg21700865", + "swg1JR52951", + "swg21977025", + "swg21699922", + "swg21883331", + "swg21699929", + "swg21701544", + "swg21699004", + "swg21882549", + "swg21962804", + "swg21903742", + "swg2C1000269", + "swg21701373", + "swg21882528", + "swg21970331", + "swg21701272", + "swg21698831", + "swg2C1000117", + "swg21972046", + "swg21699722", + "swg21670243", + "swg21700144", + "swg21700544", + "swg21701315", + "swg21977021", + "swg2C1000296", + "swg21699585", + "swg21903439", + "swg21701100", + "swg21976172" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q128", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "IIS/SSL related error after appliying FP41 on WAS7.0", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nhi\n\nGetting below error while hitting the application URL, after upgrading fix pack from 7.0.0.29 to 7.0.0.41\n\nSSLHandshakeE E SSLC0008E: Unable to initialize SSL connection. Unauthorized access was denied or security settings have expired. Exception is javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: Client requested protocol SSLv3 not enabled or not supported", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21654913", + "swg21976322", + "swg22009669", + "swg21454934", + "swg1PJ41704", + "swg21611207", + "swg1PI66294", + "swg1PI59509", + "swg1PI62868", + "isg3T1026401", + "swg21967992", + "swg21993703", + "swg21961540", + "swg21997910", + "swg1PJ41751", + "swg21960972", + "swg1PM61843", + "isg3T1027306", + "swg1IO23015", + "swg21318094", + "swg1IT23328", + "swg1PK40704", + "swg24028868", + "swg21989760", + "swg1PI30313", + "swg1PI34175", + "swg1PI34176", + "swg21644212", + "swg21991714", + "swg1PM84435", + "swg1IT19930", + "swg1ZZ00580", + "swg1PI34486", + "swg1PM33583", + "swg22013550", + "swg1PM34501", + "swg1PM78572", + "swg1PM86349", + "swg21616970", + "swg21987528", + "swg21961927", + "swg21608225", + "swg21964202", + "swg21657155", + "swg21903557", + "swg21683850", + "isg3T1024202", + "swg22010468", + "swg21693304", + "swg21981535" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q129", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Help with Security Bulletin: Multiple vulnerabilities in IBM Java SDK affect IBM OS Images for Red Hat Linux Systems and AIX (CVE-2015-0410 and CVE-2014-6593)", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I need to understand details regarding \"Security Bulletin: Multiple vulnerabilities in IBM Java SDK affect IBM OS Images for Red Hat Linux Systems and AIX (CVE-2015-0410 and CVE-2014-6593)\" Where can I find this information? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21962588", + "ANSWER": "\n\nCVEID: CVE-2015-0410\nDESCRIPTION: An unspecified vulnerability related to the Security component could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.\nCVSS Base Score: 5\nCVSS Temporal Score: See https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/100151 for the current score\nCVSS Environmental Score*: Undefined\nCVSS Vector: (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P)\n\nCVEID: CVE-2014-6593\nDESCRIPTION: An unspecified vulnerability related to the JSSE component has partial confidentiality impact, partial integrity impact, and no availability impact.\nCVSS Base Score: 4\nCVSS Temporal Score: See https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/100153 for the current score\nCVSS Environmental Score*: Undefined\nCVSS Vector: (AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N)", + "START_OFFSET": "288", + "END_OFFSET": "1287", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21962588", + "swg21697229", + "swg21883920", + "swg21882549", + "swg21979422", + "swg21698955", + "swg21967338", + "swg21980924", + "swg21994076", + "swg21700720", + "swg21978808", + "swg21704479", + "swg21883331", + "swg21697228", + "swg21697480", + "swg21699935", + "swg21882528", + "swg21696623", + "swg21697762", + "swg21696451", + "swg21698695", + "swg21698749", + "swg21697087", + "swg21698829", + "swg21701485", + "swg21696394", + "swg21882645", + "swg21698745", + "swg21701525", + "swg21697031", + "swg21700238", + "swg21902667", + "swg21695218", + "swg21960452", + "swg21883247", + "swg21697168", + "swg21696767", + "swg21702785", + "swg21977025", + "swg21696766", + "swg1PI37460", + "swg21698461", + "swg21701338", + "swg21696343", + "swg21983647", + "swg21699891", + "swg21700730", + "swg21903087", + "swg21698460", + "swg21962372" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q130", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Improve Performance of Decision Center and Rule Team Server (RTS)", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "How can I improve the performance of ODM Decision Center and WebSphere ILOG Rule Team Server (RTS)? ", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21584855", + "swg21589514", + "swg21430582", + "swg21590218", + "swg21589513", + "swg21589902", + "swg21588859", + "swg27023725", + "swg21427772", + "swg21625300", + "swg21400812", + "swg21400817", + "swg21634188", + "swg21590333", + "swg21456170", + "swg21585248", + "swg21499459", + "swg21648776", + "swg21578192", + "swg21663604", + "swg21586358", + "swg21425548", + "swg21449102", + "swg21450448", + "swg21616403", + "swg21591800", + "swg21460878", + "swg21430461", + "swg21469673", + "swg21635533", + "swg21441414", + "swg21427200", + "swg21592060", + "swg21651648", + "swg21587817", + "swg21596108", + "swg24027237", + "swg27018437", + "swg21590855", + "swg21451229", + "swg21623876", + "swg21454165", + "swg21635066", + "swg21462292", + "swg21651647", + "swg21663393", + "swg21425487", + "swg21442383", + "swg21655981", + "swg21425565" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q131", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Refining search results by content type in Quickr doesn't work as expected", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Question: Refining of search results returned in the Search Center by clicking on content types eg: blogs and wikis does not return any reduced result set. The only refining content type which works is 'files' ", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21612692", + "swg22000343", + "swg27047330", + "swg21595155", + "swg21385765", + "swg21164944", + "swg21598165", + "swg21993199", + "swg21674242", + "swg21631017", + "swg21179744", + "swg21652289", + "swg1PJ43656", + "swg21182247", + "swg1JR56110", + "swg1PJ37947", + "swg27017650", + "swg22000519", + "swg21990369", + "swg21968263", + "swg21259400", + "swg1HD97100", + "swg21994019", + "swg1JR45660", + "swg1HD94720", + "swg21322148", + "swg1IV25242", + "swg1PJ40708", + "swg1HD91364", + "swg21592669", + "swg21608749", + "swg1HE12228", + "swg21664205", + "swg21238083", + "swg21685793", + "swg21447542", + "swg1PJ39693", + "swg21611183", + "swg1PJ44676", + "swg21163121", + "swg21499390", + "swg27014083", + "swg27021683", + "swg1PJ43901", + "swg22004441", + "swg21883481", + "swg27020992", + "swg1JR41722", + "swg21999584", + "swg1HD92601" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q132", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "What is the meaning of value \"unknown\" for ITCAM WAS Application Status attribute?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "What is the meaning of value \"unknown\" for ITCAM WAS Application Status attribute?", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21653905", + "ANSWER": "By default baselining gets enabled with a situation WasAppDiscoverd. This situation is enabled by default and will discover new applications then run a take action to start the baselining. So if this situation is not enabled then you should enable it and assign to the ITCAM App Server managing system list.", + "START_OFFSET": "601", + "END_OFFSET": "908", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1IZ98704", + "isg3T1014926", + "swg21532464", + "swg21626967", + "swg21427078", + "swg21701123", + "swg21348241", + "swg1IV93359", + "swg21986869", + "swg1PI20472", + "swg1PM43117", + "swg1IV69383", + "swg1PM07373", + "swg21600368", + "swg21597193", + "swg1PK46000", + "swg21502968", + "swg1PM76054", + "swg1PM20071", + "swg21341457", + "swg1PM29485", + "swg21416947", + "swg1IV64012", + "isg3T1013847", + "swg21539616", + "swg21283098", + "swg1PM73277", + "swg1IZ62255", + "swg1PM48428", + "swg1PM93403", + "swg21400486", + "swg21458247", + "swg1PM32727", + "swg1IV27682", + "isg3T1026403", + "swg1IV68708", + "swg21653905", + "swg1PM73703", + "swg21525274", + "swg1PK75213", + "swg1PM22142", + "swg1IZ68077", + "swg1PM69120", + "isg3T1014993", + "swg21571932", + "swg1PM14697", + "swg21538626", + "swg1PM49946", + "swg21537024", + "swg21600392" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q133", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Do I need to backup /opt/ibm-ucd/server/var/sa/dialogue ?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "My UCD server has so many files in /opt/ibm-ucd/server/var/sa/dialogue that ls goes out of memory trying to list them all. Looking at another (small) server I can see that the files within are roughly 2k on average, and judging by the apparent size of the directory (100Mb) I've probably got 50000+ files in there.\n\nDo I need to backup this directory? From what I've read, I believe this directory contains records of in-flight communication between UCD and the agents - but assuming the server is down, is it safe to assume that no such activity is occurring? Can I periodically clean this directory?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1PI41856", + "swg1PI81199", + "swg21661859", + "swg21965841", + "swg21664340", + "isg3T1023437", + "swg27041806", + "swg21112218", + "swg1PI70324", + "swg21648046", + "swg21657226", + "swg21477392", + "swg21045067", + "swg21420013", + "swg21045758", + "swg21694427", + "swg21687857", + "swg1PI27034", + "swg21970736", + "swg21112222", + "swg21476542", + "swg27039743", + "swg21980775", + "swg21517333", + "swg1PI38427", + "isg3T1024049", + "swg21460867", + "swg2C1000061", + "swg1IO05560", + "swg1PI84786", + "swg22007341", + "isg3T1022203", + "swg21973069", + "swg27021149", + "swg1IY92095", + "nas8N1018547", + "swg21988496", + "swg21690503", + "swg1PJ36010", + "swg21045109", + "swg21423555", + "swg21621855", + "swg21640026", + "swg21976395", + "swg22000327", + "swg21646315", + "swg21113016", + "swg21418178", + "nas8N1018633", + "swg1IR45570" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q134", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "I am receiving AC power supply failures on my DataPower 9235 appliance. How can I resolve this?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nI am observing the following errors on my DataPower 9235 device:\n\n[failure] Power supply '1' has no AC input power, or is not present. [failure] Power supply '2' has no AC input power, or is not present.\nDo i need to replace the power supplies?", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21512291", + "ANSWER": "This problem is caused by a highly intermittent error that may allow the sensor reading mechanism to get into a bad state. This bad state then generates the false error messages.", + "START_OFFSET": "1334", + "END_OFFSET": "1512", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21512291", + "swg1IC99305", + "swg21289869", + "ssg1S7000856", + "swg21697043", + "swg21616668", + "swg21686304", + "swg21986529", + "swg21979502", + "swg1IV29741", + "swg21575257", + "swg21585939", + "swg21412060", + "swg21322505", + "swg21685719", + "swg21599718", + "swg21990242", + "ssg1S1002587", + "ssg1S7004465", + "swg21516505", + "swg21468886", + "nas8N1011322", + "swg21961505", + "ssg1S7004466", + "swg21577335", + "ssg1S1003668", + "swg1IC80983", + "ssg1S1005835", + "ssg1S7003980", + "swg21499633", + "swg21271701", + "swg21621630", + "swg21974072", + "nas8N1016752", + "ssg1S1009967", + "swg1IC61705", + "swg21567104", + "swg21574660", + "swg21468463", + "nas8N1014123", + "swg21257115", + "swg21592700", + "swg21469114", + "nas8N1015141", + "swg21959769", + "ssg1S1004089", + "nas8N1020969", + "isg3T1022451", + "nas8N1014969", + "swg21668963" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q135", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "DataPower upgrade message Loading firmware failed: Preserve user modified data failed: Insufficient flash space available Could not install firmware image. The system will not reboot.", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "In the process of upgrading my IBM DataPower Gateway I saw the following message:\n\"Loading firmware failed: Preserve user modified data failed: Insufficient flash space available Could not install firmware image. The system will not reboot.\"\nWhat does this mean and what are the appropriate next actions? ", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21295634", + "swg21506678", + "swg21662595", + "swg21508029", + "swg21599770", + "swg21501194", + "swg1IT14318", + "swg21402883", + "swg21244384", + "swg21597459", + "swg21496334", + "swg21637997", + "ssg1S7005158", + "ssg1S1004828", + "swg27022386", + "swg22004117", + "swg21692903", + "swg1LI79894", + "swg21585939", + "swg1IT02532", + "nas8N1011683", + "nas8N1013015", + "swg21459105", + "swg21623144", + "ssg1S1005135", + "swg22006283", + "swg1IT20204", + "swg24032511", + "swg21633587", + "swg21670505", + "swg27023055", + "ssg1S7005162", + "swg24037830", + "ssg1S1002478", + "swg24039059", + "ssg1S1005126", + "ssg1S1005237", + "swg24035358", + "ssg1S1005604", + "swg24034199", + "swg24033547", + "swg21250655", + "swg21963813", + "swg1IC91310", + "swg1IC92476", + "swg21670508", + "swg21644921", + "swg1IT04822", + "swg21358525", + "swg1IC73796" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q136", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Compose tab appears disabled and project is not editable in Decision Center", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I have upgraded my ODM version and a project in Decision Center appears non editable :\n\nthe compose tab is disabled\nin explore tab there are no new nor edit button", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21439926", + "swg1RS03052", + "swg21587773", + "swg1RS01794", + "swg21642741", + "swg21430461", + "swg1JR42380", + "swg21409355", + "swg1JR45800", + "swg21586358", + "swg27018437", + "swg21584855", + "swg21430582", + "swg1RS02790", + "swg21470609", + "swg1PI07795", + "swg21378078", + "swg24042229", + "swg1JR48843", + "swg22012198", + "swg24043305", + "swg21679675", + "swg21679679", + "swg21581495", + "swg21380403", + "swg24042898", + "swg21661192", + "swg21497412", + "swg1PM23394", + "swg27023725", + "swg27018488", + "swg21975435", + "swg24043046", + "swg21678244", + "swg1RS02629", + "swg21653986", + "swg1LO67396", + "swg24043197", + "swg1IC48495", + "swg21691687", + "swg24043708", + "swg27023697", + "swg1PM39022", + "swg1PK39730", + "swg24044272", + "swg21441420", + "swg1RS02746", + "swg21640655", + "swg21400738", + "swg1PI74562" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q137", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "What things are important to consider when installing a fix pack for IIB running on a multi-instance environment?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I am planning to apply a fix pack to my current version of IBM Integration Bus (IIB) using multi-instance brokers and I am looking for any important information regarding the process.\n\nFor example:\n\n \n\n- installation and verification tasks\n \n\n- is it possible to back out this fix pack in case there are issues\n \n\n- any specific tasks for multi instance configuration", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg27051134", + "swg27020934", + "swg21979573", + "swg1JR48973", + "swg22002334", + "swg1IT01744", + "swg21985015", + "swg1IT06163", + "swg24038306", + "swg21636270", + "swg21683818", + "swg21985013", + "swg21299303", + "swg24038193", + "swg1IT24633", + "swg21682681", + "swg21302942", + "swg21997040", + "swg24037528", + "swg21682696", + "swg1IC97726", + "swg1IC86562", + "swg21299785", + "swg1IT12220", + "swg21994213", + "swg24043398", + "swg21975233", + "swg21670363", + "swg21597557", + "swg21997918", + "swg21995079", + "swg21299305", + "nas8N1010614", + "swg27041806", + "swg21687742", + "swg21299482", + "swg21967265", + "swg21997906", + "swg1IT20124", + "swg22005335", + "swg21687741", + "swg22005382", + "swg22005383", + "swg21979292", + "swg1IT15904", + "swg27022065", + "swg21623208", + "swg1LO43916", + "swg21969672", + "swg21611153" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q138", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "How to fix the DB2 errors in Portal ?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "How could we fix the below DB2 errors in WebSphere Portal:\n\nDB2 SQL Error: SQLCODE=-551, SQLSTATE=42501, SQLERRMC=WPUSER;SELECT;JCR.SHORTCUT_SEQ, DRIVER=4.15.113\n\nDB2 SQL Error: SQLCODE=-727, SQLSTATE=56098, SQLERRMC=2;-551;42501;WPUSER|SELECT|JCR.SHORTCUT_SEQ, DRIVER=4.15.113", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1IC80339", + "swg21688020", + "swg21683562", + "swg1PM93028", + "swg1JR35814", + "swg1JR48007", + "swg1IC78582", + "swg21609755", + "swg1PM91712", + "swg22000798", + "swg21655250", + "swg21656934", + "swg1PI37312", + "swg21994625", + "swg1PM80441", + "swg1IC56737", + "swg21389003", + "swg1IC86795", + "swg21517964", + "swg1PM78151", + "swg21970137", + "swg21618475", + "swg21669654", + "swg1JR55893", + "swg1PM24297", + "swg21610855", + "swg21267177", + "swg21902168", + "swg21965866", + "swg1PM70566", + "swg1PK69015", + "swg21684574", + "swg21676343", + "swg21613531", + "swg21577155", + "swg1IC65666", + "swg1PI19505", + "swg1PM83453", + "swg1RS02322", + "swg1IT21392", + "swg21882742", + "swg21553771", + "swg21902117", + "swg21304863", + "swg21960558", + "swg1PI10417", + "swg1JR54654", + "swg1JR51409", + "swg1PK99960", + "swg21597587" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q139", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Help with Security Bulletin: IBM WebSphere MQ is affected by a privilege escalation vulnerability (CVE-2017-1612)", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I need to understand details regarding Security Bulletin: IBM WebSphere MQ is affected by a privilege escalation vulnerability (CVE-2017-1612).", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg22000350", + "swg22013104", + "swg22013948", + "swg2C1000379", + "swg22000539", + "swg22014173", + "swg22013407", + "swg22013313", + "swg22000852", + "swg22002458", + "swg22000249", + "swg21996156", + "swg22004264", + "swg22000262", + "swg22000396", + "swg22014721", + "swg22013137", + "swg22000710", + "swg22000742", + "swg22002896", + "ibm10715649", + "swg22015885", + "swg22015879", + "swg22013254", + "swg22000460", + "swg22000421", + "swg22000518", + "swg22000640", + "swg22017074", + "swg22016760", + "swg22016761", + "swg22013574", + "swg22014353", + "swg22014121", + "swg22013176", + "swg22013370", + "swg22013883", + "swg22014285", + "swg22010946", + "swg22013141", + "swg22006414", + "swg22003434", + "swg22013942", + "swg22013087", + "swg22013278", + "swg22013204", + "swg22002573", + "swg21993718", + "swg22014042", + "swg22005401" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q140", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why get SQL1227N when replay db2look output on DB2 V9.7 FP11?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Why get below SQL1227N when replay db2look output on DB2 V9.7 FP11?\n\n -----\n UPDATE SYSSTAT.COLUMNS SET COLCARD=4, NUMNULLS=1, SUB_COUNT=-1, SUB_DELIM_LENGTH=-1, \n AVGCOLLENCHAR=7, HIGH2KEY='', LOW2KEY=' ', AVGCOLLEN=12 WHERE COLNAME = 'COL1' \n AND TABNAME = 'TAB1' AND TABSCHEMA = 'DB2INST1'\n DB21034E The command was processed as an SQL statement because it was not a\n valid Command Line Processor command. During SQL processing it returned:\n SQL1227N The catalog statistic \"\" for column \"HIGH2KEY\" is out of range for\n its target column, has an invalid format, or is inconsistent in relation to\n some other statistic. Reason Code = \"3\". SQLSTATE=23521\n -----", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21979066", + "ANSWER": "It is an known limitation of current DB2 V9.7 and above versions' runstats.", + "START_OFFSET": "88", + "END_OFFSET": "163", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21979066", + "swg1IZ53824", + "swg1IC65588", + "swg1IC65725", + "swg1IC87667", + "swg1IC72043", + "swg1IC71820", + "swg21961025", + "swg1IC96260", + "swg1IC95248", + "swg1JR46358", + "swg1JR47702", + "swg1JR47705", + "swg1IC96754", + "swg1IC92250", + "swg1JR47700", + "swg1JR45496", + "swg1IC99527", + "swg21991415", + "swg1IC99703", + "swg1IC99408", + "swg1JR48045", + "swg21641276", + "swg1PI79154", + "swg1JR37278", + "swg1JR37279", + "swg1IT20057", + "swg1JR31449", + "swg1IT04437", + "swg1IC95866", + "swg1IT20242", + "swg1IC96693", + "swg1IC95867", + "swg1JR31448", + "swg1IC95710", + "swg1IC96371", + "swg21674146", + "swg21984997", + "swg21423471", + "swg1JR37277", + "swg1IC65658", + "swg1IC81328", + "swg22004294", + "swg1IT01667", + "swg1IT04046", + "swg1IC65704", + "swg21978251", + "swg21420314", + "swg21318023", + "swg21648713" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q141", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why is OCR is putting multiple lines on one line?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I am running an APT application, and multiple detail lines are getting put on a single line within my .TXT file. Is there something I can do about this? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21701910", + "ANSWER": "Add the following action prior to NormalizeCCO. \n\n * \n * \n\nThe first parameter is the percentage of a line that two words must be offset to be considered as separate lines. If the value is not set, the default is 50. In the example, if two words are vertically offset by more than 35% of the height of the words, then they are considered to be on separate lines. Lower values are more likely to split words into separate lines. Higher values are more likely to merge words into a single line.", + "START_OFFSET": "925", + "END_OFFSET": "1417", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21701910", + "swg1IV14580", + "swg21623270", + "swg21478188", + "swg22008456", + "swg21479366", + "swg21476188", + "swg21579772", + "nas8N1013933", + "swg21478025", + "swg1IV94069", + "swg1PK07788", + "swg21661507", + "swg21485338", + "swg1PK70120", + "swg21109401", + "swg1IY92737", + "swg1IY75243", + "swg21233499", + "nas8N1018432", + "swg1PK25904", + "swg21664694", + "isg3T1012457", + "swg21516413", + "swg21636986", + "swg21512417", + "swg1PK75201", + "swg21293251", + "swg21478792", + "swg21268942", + "swg21328243", + "nas8N1019907", + "swg1HD54454", + "swg1PJ34311", + "swg1IC40481", + "swg21479084", + "swg21415022", + "swg22004314", + "swg21480732", + "swg21671992", + "swg21477162", + "swg21002646", + "swg1HE03812", + "swg21680628", + "swg1HD68403", + "swg21594873", + "swg27020934", + "swg21477339", + "swg1IR34893", + "swg21974076" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q142", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Invalid operation: result set is closed. ERRORCODE=-4470, SQLSTATE=null", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "When using BPM, I see runtime exceptions saying that this SQL error occurs: Invalid operation: result set is closed. ERRORCODE=-4470, SQLSTATE=null\n\nFor example:\n\nCWLLG2015E: An unexpected runtime exception occurred. See exception for more details. Error: Wrapped com.lombardisoftware.core.TeamWorksRuntimeException:", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1PM90781", + "swg1IV29618", + "swg21690453", + "swg1IZ99898", + "swg1IV06659", + "swg1IV35907", + "swg1IZ83421", + "swg21511915", + "swg21982252", + "swg1PM74590", + "swg21461670", + "swg1JR56556", + "swg1IV14316", + "swg27023804", + "swg22013011", + "swg22014971", + "swg1IT10752", + "swg1IC70619", + "swg1JR54520", + "swg22008662", + "swg1JR45779", + "swg1IZ99906", + "swg21420760", + "swg21607793", + "swg21973255", + "swg21982529", + "swg21623212", + "swg1JR46377", + "swg1JR46375", + "swg1JR48581", + "swg1PI69713", + "swg21647500", + "swg1IV43542", + "swg21609599", + "swg1IV39731", + "swg1JR42463", + "swg1PM34607", + "swg1PI69711", + "swg1PI69712", + "swg1PI69245", + "swg1JR52777", + "swg21989074", + "swg1IZ74620", + "swg21985883", + "swg1IC80973", + "swg1JR57250", + "swg21590014", + "swg21403259", + "swg21615801", + "swg1PK98699" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q143", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "How can I configure J2EE Tomcat DC to run as Windows Service?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I'm trying to configure ITCAM J2EE v7.1.1 Tomcat DC to run as a Windows Service but it fails. Is this type of configuration supported? If so, what is the right procedure to do that?\n", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21967756", + "swg21509505", + "swg21672979", + "swg21682163", + "swg21654993", + "swg21509504", + "swg21655376", + "swg21679900", + "swg1PM17746", + "swg21321514", + "swg21971827", + "swg21694886", + "swg1PI27310", + "swg21985628", + "swg21499578", + "swg21394195", + "swg21609290", + "swg21902438", + "swg21402914", + "swg21496473", + "swg21688744", + "swg1PM17737", + "swg21680111", + "swg21665811", + "swg1PM17795", + "swg24033537", + "swg21606547", + "swg1PM17749", + "swg21383638", + "swg21700308", + "swg21509503", + "swg21680317", + "swg1PM17755", + "swg1PM17820", + "swg1PM17754", + "swg21390738", + "swg21680319", + "swg21427737", + "swg21499971", + "swg1PM17799", + "swg24015775", + "swg21976648", + "swg21966304", + "swg1PM17714", + "swg21968701", + "swg1PM17745", + "swg1PM24854", + "swg1PM17615", + "swg21568685", + "swg1PM69606" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q144", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "CICS CM CCVI abends AEXZ on startup in CCVIINIT", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Why am I receiving an message DFHAC2236 with an abend AEXZ each time that I attempt to startup a newly installed CICS Configuration Manager (CICS CM) server using the CCVI transaction? It looks like it is starting up, but after about 10 seconds it fails with the AEXZ. The last messages I see in the CICS MSGUSR indicate it successfully opened the TCPIPSERVICE:\nDFHSO0107 mm/dd/yyyy hh:mm:ss applid TCPIPSERVICE CCVBASIC has been opened on port nnnnn at IP address nnn.nn.nn.nnn.\nDFHDU0203I mm/dd/yyyy hh:mm:ss applid A transaction dump was taken for dumpcode: AEXZ, Dumpid: 1/0001.\nDFHAC2236 mm/dd/yyyy hh:mm:ss applid Transaction CCVI abend AEXZ in program CCVIINIT term ????. Updates to local recoverable resources will be backed out.\nCEEMSG shows:\nCEE3250C The system or user abend AEXZ was issued. From compile unit CCVIINIT at entry point CCVIINIT at compile unit offset +0000832E at entry offset 18E8854E.\nIf CCVI is run a few more times, it eventually seems to initialize the server successfully. ", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21437944", + "swg21195826", + "swg1PK98812", + "swg1PK86562", + "swg1PM60116", + "swg21459523", + "swg1PM29074", + "swg1PM29096", + "swg1PI28500", + "swg21469533", + "swg21438547", + "swg1PK75068", + "swg1PK82035", + "swg1PK54686", + "swg1PK12639", + "swg21503219", + "swg21504322", + "swg21495868", + "swg1PI65465", + "swg21107821", + "swg21431474", + "swg21963515", + "swg1PK86830", + "swg1PK07353", + "swg1PK72715", + "swg1PQ51316", + "swg1PI25336", + "swg1PK81256", + "swg1PI34114", + "swg21232403", + "swg1PK53925", + "swg1PI56065", + "swg21459582", + "swg1OA23447", + "swg1PI19853", + "swg21237988", + "swg1PK89974", + "swg1PI24959", + "swg21642708", + "swg1PK65206", + "swg1PM27795", + "swg1PM18568", + "swg1PK98130", + "swg1PI53385", + "swg1PI56041", + "swg21446783", + "swg1PI26325", + "swg1PI16873", + "swg1PK64502", + "swg1PM06058" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q145", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why is the reload() not clearing the attribute cache so I can see my newly updated LDAP data in real time?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Why is the reload() not clearing the attribute cache so I can see my newly updated LDAP data in real time?", + "DOCUMENT": "swg1PI47826", + "ANSWER": "This APAR fixes the issue. It clears the cache properly even if\n base entry is different than name in repository.\n \n The fix for this APAR is currently targeted for inclusion in\n fix packs 8.0.0.13 and 8.5.5.9. Please refer to the\n Recommended Updates page for delivery information:\n http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=180&uid=swg27004980", + "START_OFFSET": "2426", + "END_OFFSET": "2784", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1PI47826", + "swg21413947", + "swg21507969", + "swg1PM16430", + "swg21655076", + "swg21483240", + "swg1PI31876", + "swg1IZ40690", + "swg1LO41059", + "swg21505993", + "swg21397747", + "swg1JR41674", + "swg21240176", + "swg1IC99908", + "isg3T1026977", + "swg1IC76589", + "swg21980013", + "swg21680105", + "swg21978291", + "swg21613679", + "isg3T1013013", + "swg1PJ40387", + "swg21561435", + "swg21477344", + "swg22010130", + "swg21403693", + "swg21421570", + "swg21598615", + "nas8N1021893", + "nas8N1018937", + "swg1HD82041", + "swg27040299", + "swg1HD78033", + "swg21902613", + "swg21698823", + "swg27021149", + "swg21232921", + "swg1PM48397", + "swg21657687", + "swg21989112", + "swg21473068", + "swg1HD74011", + "swg21599488", + "swg1IY74178", + "swg21971507", + "swg21505947", + "swg27042034", + "swg21496211", + "swg21984698", + "swg21508275" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q146", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Gettting error CRIMC1020E: zip im.properties not found during BPM Fix Pack install", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "During the BPM 7.5.1.2 Fix Pack install from the IBM Installation Manager, error window pop up with:\n\nCRIMC1020E: zip im.properties 1.0.0.200911091101 not found ERROR: `zip im.properties 1.0.0.200911091101` not found in [path to sca.1.0.1.17.fp]. CRIMC1020E: zip config.registry 1.0.0.200911092301 not found\n\u2026\u2026\n\nHow can I resolve this error to complete the Fix Pack installation?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21620579", + "swg21686470", + "swg1PI14128", + "swg21642038", + "swg24033515", + "swg21633874", + "swg21609140", + "swg1PI26466", + "swg24032668", + "swg21381944", + "swg1PM90554", + "swg21656543", + "swg21983634", + "swg21383819", + "swg1PK70936", + "swg24032940", + "swg24026220", + "swg1PI05781", + "swg24026680", + "swg24036553", + "swg21468292", + "swg22014191", + "swg22013257", + "swg24032851", + "swg24025648", + "swg22015831", + "swg24016647", + "swg21641284", + "swg24019072", + "swg21431894", + "swg24021479", + "swg24026214", + "swg24022701", + "swg21660020", + "ibm10717197", + "swg24024307", + "swg24024306", + "swg24021016", + "swg24028136", + "swg24025152", + "swg21676099", + "swg24016075", + "swg24022969", + "swg21480262", + "swg21382914", + "swg24033778", + "swg24021481", + "swg24018338", + "swg24032300", + "swg21992552" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q147", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "TEP to TEPS communication issues with different Java versions", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Recent Java updates have caused connection problems when logging into the TEPS via the TEP client (Browser or Java Web Start). Is there an updated list of known issues?\n", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21626495", + "swg21625840", + "swg21607082", + "swg21297524", + "swg24041165", + "swg1IZ54723", + "swg1IV67716", + "swg21674993", + "swg21407635", + "swg24036767", + "swg21587434", + "swg21663046", + "swg24041570", + "swg1IV89128", + "swg21633187", + "swg1IZ56152", + "swg21961922", + "swg21504963", + "swg22003819", + "swg21623007", + "swg1IV12834", + "swg1IZ53994", + "swg21623409", + "swg1IV11010", + "swg21666243", + "swg21363929", + "swg22015083", + "swg1IZ07920", + "swg21972841", + "swg1IZ76635", + "swg21980481", + "swg1IV52938", + "swg21960130", + "swg1IY89694", + "swg1IZ28360", + "swg21685236", + "swg1IY81173", + "swg24037685", + "swg1OA42205", + "swg21682004", + "swg21610983", + "swg1IZ62533", + "swg21625847", + "swg1IZ34235", + "swg1IZ17689", + "swg21426717", + "swg21390422", + "swg21659707", + "swg21974112", + "swg1OA42206" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q148", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "How do I have to prepare WAS and BPM servers, if DST or time zones will change?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Daylight Saving Time (DST) or time zones will change in our country (e.g. 26.10.2014 in Russia).How do I have to prepare the WAS and BPM servers in our environment?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "nas8N1018965", + "swg21692718", + "isg3T1000252", + "nas8N1019005", + "swg21278600", + "nas8N1012580", + "swg21249202", + "swg21969648", + "swg21298282", + "swg21969751", + "nas8N1018927", + "swg21204178", + "swg27008963", + "swg1PQ73699", + "swg1IC92943", + "swg21255736", + "swg22000441", + "swg21562031", + "swg21247794", + "swg21687371", + "swg21268311", + "swg21695097", + "swg21249669", + "swg1PQ90090", + "swg21599556", + "swg21329221", + "swg21164535", + "swg22011597", + "swg1LO75742", + "swg1IT23570", + "swg21089547", + "swg27003354", + "swg21254841", + "swg21666838", + "swg21979770", + "swg21250634", + "swg21986552", + "swg1PM50835", + "swg21250503", + "swg21474521", + "nas8N1012793", + "swg1JR43099", + "swg1IC88150", + "swg21685898", + "swg21454273", + "swg21609468", + "swg21167716", + "swg1IO18047", + "swg1IO19557", + "swg21595837" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q149", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why SSH connections fail after upgrade to v7.5.2 and above?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Why SSH connections fail after upgrade to v7.5.2 and above? The same configuration works on v7.2. ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21974106", + "ANSWER": "Disabled diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1 and diffie-hellman-group1-sha1 algorithms by default. Disabled MD5-based MAC algorithms. Limited DH-GEX to 4096 bits for Cisco devices.", + "START_OFFSET": "688", + "END_OFFSET": "867", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21974106", + "ssg1S1002896", + "swg21571507", + "swg21450729", + "swg21622846", + "nas8N1021014", + "swg22010200", + "swg1IV48134", + "isg3T1027838", + "swg1IC77937", + "swg21665957", + "isg3T1012709", + "nas8N1015113", + "swg22012747", + "isg3T1012923", + "isg3T1026205", + "swg1IV47443", + "swg21715537", + "swg22013090", + "swg21668237", + "swg21994485", + "swg21974072", + "swg22016044", + "swg1IV33729", + "swg21984579", + "swg21430826", + "swg1IJ00849", + "swg21667180", + "isg3T1027135", + "nas8N1015690", + "swg21988981", + "swg21498634", + "swg1IJ01951", + "nas8N1020762", + "swg1IT13419", + "swg21990922", + "swg1IV73539", + "swg22016976", + "swg1IC99903", + "swg21980108", + "swg1IV81310", + "nas8N1014675", + "isg1IJ08641", + "isg1IJ08633", + "nas8N1013725", + "swg21410242", + "swg21517614", + "swg21687060", + "swg1ZZ00495", + "swg21883941" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q150", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Is Java 7 supported for BPM?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "What versions of BPM, if any, support Java 7?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21999583", + "swg21639640", + "swg1JR55463", + "swg21691942", + "swg1JR58297", + "swg1JR57819", + "swg1JR51307", + "swg1JR54682", + "swg22015853", + "swg1JR45007", + "swg1JR43140", + "swg1JR54731", + "swg1JR59388", + "swg1JR53365", + "swg1JR53620", + "swg1JR54070", + "swg1JR57387", + "swg1JR54009", + "swg27048504", + "swg1JR52762", + "swg1JR55902", + "swg21611603", + "swg1JR54738", + "swg21978027", + "swg1JR54736", + "swg1IT07386", + "swg1JR52284", + "swg1JR48321", + "swg1JR44470", + "swg1JR49408", + "swg22010919", + "swg21633217", + "swg1JR52256", + "swg1PM63963", + "swg1JR54462", + "swg1JR54815", + "swg1JR52537", + "swg21699067", + "swg1JR55110", + "swg1JR54729", + "swg1JR40340", + "swg21634645", + "swg24037043", + "swg21500733", + "swg1JR55399", + "swg1JR55109", + "swg21327302", + "swg1JR47500", + "swg1JR54189", + "swg21669900" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q151", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "QUESTION_TITLE", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "QUESTION", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg22006188", + "swg21993881", + "swg1IV37305", + "swg21678386", + "isg3T1014589", + "swg22009308", + "swg21680009", + "swg1HD64523", + "swg21374564", + "swg1PO07691", + "isg3T1020589", + "swg21666290", + "swg1HE00926", + "swg21569665", + "swg21566430", + "swg1HE00799", + "swg21653987", + "swg1HD07437", + "swg22016576", + "swg21496152", + "swg21455857", + "swg1HD23090", + "isg3T1021047", + "swg21658681", + "swg22003903", + "swg22016377", + "swg1PI41055", + "isg3T1027021", + "swg21605546", + "swg1PM12548", + "swg21977436", + "swg21589526", + "swg21339066", + "isg3T1024023", + "swg21575680", + "isg3T1013025", + "swg21432150", + "swg21617596", + "swg21609261", + "swg1PJ34170", + "swg1PO01959", + "isg3T1025545", + "swg1PJ40254", + "swg21687935", + "isg3T1021093", + "swg21588657", + "isg3T1015061", + "swg1PO01912", + "swg1IT15344", + "swg1PI22519" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q152", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why are we no longer able to login to the WAS Administrative Console after adding an Active Directory Server as registry?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nWe have WAS ND 8.5.5.10 in use and have added our Active Directory Server to the Federated Repositories. Via the Administrative Console we used 'root' as base entry for this registry. After restarting the dmgr, we see NameNotFoundExceptions like the following in SystemOut.log:\n\n [12/22/16 17:00:24:214 CET] 00000001 exception E com.ibm.ws.wim.adapter.ldap.LdapConnection search(String, String, Object[], SearchControls) CWWIM4520E The 'javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: [LDAP: error code 32 - 0000208D: NameErr: DSID-031001E5, problem 2001 (NO_OBJECT), data 0, best match of:\n ''\n \\u0000]; Remaining name: '/'; Resolved object: 'com.sun.jndi.ldap.LdapCtx@4ca226a8'' naming exception occurred during processing.\n at com.ibm.ws.wim.adapter.ldap.LdapConnection.search(LdapConnection.java:3279)\n at com.ibm.ws.wim.adapter.ldap.LdapConnection.checkSearchCache(LdapConnection.java:3122)\n at com.ibm.ws.wim.adapter.ldap.LdapConnection.search(LdapConnection.java:3299)\n at com.ibm.ws.wim.adapter.ldap.LdapConnection.searchEntities(LdapConnection.java:3520)\n at com.ibm.ws.wim.adapter.ldap.LdapAdapter.search(LdapAdapter.java:3524)\n at com.ibm.ws.wim.ProfileManager.searchRepository(ProfileManager.java:5331)\n\nFurthermore, we are no longer able to login to Administrative Console and get displayed the error message Invalid User ID or password.\n\nWhy does this happen and how can we fix this?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21469971", + "swg21318176", + "swg21388805", + "swg1PI75159", + "swg21615427", + "swg21447953", + "swg1PK61753", + "swg21402381", + "swg21689768", + "swg21516788", + "swg24018805", + "swg21650510", + "swg21698000", + "swg1PM77712", + "swg21646982", + "swg1PK39603", + "swg22016376", + "swg1PK40324", + "swg21631889", + "swg21318616", + "swg21441092", + "swg24043738", + "swg21422249", + "swg21661428", + "swg1PI10300", + "swg24020439", + "swg1PJ35354", + "swg21449846", + "swg1PK71355", + "swg1PM62515", + "swg21403161", + "swg21576637", + "swg22006234", + "swg21422365", + "swg21683167", + "swg21415218", + "swg21975989", + "swg21626401", + "swg1PM25785", + "swg24022222", + "swg21670609", + "swg21680253", + "swg1PI17504", + "swg21572193", + "swg24022817", + "swg1PM51675", + "swg21622876", + "swg21567983", + "swg21591128", + "swg1PM26637" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q153", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Can we create Match design specification db in xmeta", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Could you please let me know if we can create schema for Match design\nspecification database in xmeta db.", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21409481", + "ANSWER": "You should start from an empty Database; using the default XMETA Database is not recommended because it can become corrupt.", + "START_OFFSET": "2300", + "END_OFFSET": "2423", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21409481", + "swg21632499", + "swg21578885", + "swg21973116", + "swg21430010", + "swg1JR37178", + "swg1HD66026", + "swg21430985", + "swg1HC71334", + "swg21576877", + "swg21998240", + "swg22000822", + "swg21981562", + "swg21682249", + "swg21620659", + "swg21454392", + "swg21586799", + "swg21999085", + "swg1IV23299", + "swg21648899", + "swg21417855", + "swg21514518", + "swg21983833", + "swg1JR29102", + "swg21407491", + "swg21994341", + "swg21961433", + "swg21404774", + "swg21449034", + "swg1IZ00850", + "swg21977915", + "swg1IV61648", + "swg1IV82841", + "swg21498909", + "swg1PK80330", + "swg21427877", + "swg1HD52212", + "swg21479509", + "swg21514883", + "swg1HE01960", + "swg1PK78974", + "swg1HD90030", + "swg21667956", + "swg1HD47567", + "swg21619830", + "swg21405710", + "swg21983462", + "swg21973983", + "swg1HD86609", + "swg21621766" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q154", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why are some Datatypes corrupt after Impact cluster failover/failback ?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nRunning Impact 7.1.0.11. The symptom is whenever Impact does a failover, a couple DataTypes\nturn out empty.\n\nI've checked the type files before and after Impact failover and the difference happens in the property\n\n*.SQL.USERPARAMETERS\n\nThis property no longer exists for the corrupted datatypes\".\n", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21598417", + "ANSWER": "\"a new property is added to increase the file size limit:\n\n\n\n * \n\n\nAdd the property to $NCHOME/impact/etc/_server.props file \nwhere size limit can be 8192, 16384, 32768, etc.. \" \n\nThe property would have to be added to all ImpactServers in the Cluster and would require a restart to enable - ensuring that the ImpactServer started as Primary had the correct, uncorrupted .type file to be replicated across the Cluster. Also ensure that there are no trailing white-space characters on the property as these invalidate properties in lower versions of Impact. \n\nThe APAR is not an issue in Impact 6 and 7, but one would still have to include this property with an appropriate value to handle a large character length for the USERPARAMETERS parameter. \n\nThe character length includes the whole USERPARAMETERS property name as well as the definition.", + "START_OFFSET": "602", + "END_OFFSET": "1459", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21588811", + "swg21358512", + "swg21598417", + "swg21663611", + "swg1IY88294", + "swg1IY88334", + "swg1IJ03394", + "swg21595271", + "swg21988087", + "swg21606138", + "isg3T1011063", + "swg21591386", + "swg21580292", + "swg1IV11127", + "swg1IY99622", + "isg3T1025775", + "swg1IY90157", + "swg21610689", + "swg1IZ26482", + "swg21663843", + "swg27040304", + "swg1IJ02475", + "swg1IZ49592", + "swg21503932", + "swg1IZ85085", + "swg21509561", + "swg1IT04232", + "swg21555248", + "swg1IC52378", + "swg21305777", + "swg1IY90277", + "swg21260975", + "swg21620448", + "swg1IV07138", + "swg21619295", + "swg1PK87028", + "swg24010222", + "swg21451167", + "swg1IV80943", + "swg1IV99173", + "swg21207969", + "swg1IV26270", + "isg3T1026143", + "swg21693521", + "swg21096869", + "swg21411298", + "swg1LO52002", + "swg21664326", + "swg21570355", + "swg1LO61624" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q155", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "What exactly is \"wpcollector\" in WebSphere Portal Server?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I've been told to get wpcollector output? What exactly is this?", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21445430", + "ANSWER": "Wpcollector is a command line tool that automates the collection of portal logs and configuration files.", + "START_OFFSET": "173", + "END_OFFSET": "277", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21963147", + "swg21445430", + "swg21243923", + "swg21968713", + "swg21461951", + "swg21461436", + "swg21997740", + "swg21989372", + "swg21631672", + "swg21498003", + "swg21461932", + "swg21681272", + "swg21636350", + "swg21579527", + "swg21449856", + "swg21497122", + "swg21962321", + "swg21672901", + "swg21962645", + "swg21590976", + "swg22008133", + "swg21591590", + "swg21593369", + "swg1PK89495", + "swg21451423", + "swg21966956", + "swg21592791", + "swg21458362", + "swg21639318", + "swg21629755", + "swg1HD45351", + "swg21519798", + "swg21592792", + "swg21447938", + "swg21449873", + "swg21313734", + "swg21593367", + "swg21663574", + "swg21580345", + "swg21449915", + "swg21579530", + "swg21459962", + "swg1IO14839", + "swg1JR40382", + "swg21679425", + "swg21668460", + "swg21453991", + "swg21377161", + "swg1PK89496", + "swg21450830" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q156", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Help with Security Bulletin: Malicious File Download vulnerability in IBM Business Process Manager (BPM) and WebSphere Lombardi Edition (WLE) - CVE-2016-9693", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Where can I find information for Security bulletin: Malicious File Download vulnerability in IBM Business Process Manager (BPM) and WebSphere Lombardi Edition (WLE) - CVE-2016-9693? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21998655", + "ANSWER": "CVEID: CVE-2016-9693\nDESCRIPTION: IBM Business Process Manager has a file download capability that is vulnerable to a set of attacks. Ultimately, an attacker can cause an unauthenticated victim to download a malicious payload. An existing file type restriction can be bypassed so that the payload might be considered executable and cause damage on the victim's machine.\nCVSS Base Score: 7.1\nCVSS Temporal Score: See https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/119517 for the current score\nCVSS Environmental Score*: Undefined\nCVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L) ", + "START_OFFSET": "312", + "END_OFFSET": "1026", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21998655", + "swg1JR55110", + "swg21994297", + "swg21977021", + "swg22000871", + "swg21670118", + "swg1JR53081", + "swg2C1000269", + "swg21692787", + "swg21990834", + "swg21986205", + "swg21999192", + "swg21679979", + "swg21993575", + "swg22015523", + "swg1IT07386", + "swg21972165", + "swg1JR54070", + "swg21990830", + "swg21903346", + "swg21674435", + "swg21982559", + "swg21883360", + "swg21643921", + "swg2C1000296", + "swg2C1000139", + "swg21679726", + "swg21981008", + "swg22008025", + "swg22006348", + "swg21882624", + "swg21680795", + "swg21700299", + "swg22006342", + "swg21678359", + "swg21975121", + "swg22006343", + "swg2C1000379", + "swg21699935", + "swg21985316", + "swg21990841", + "swg21995758", + "swg1JR56285", + "swg21997477", + "swg22003164", + "swg1IT04509", + "swg21680809", + "swg2C1000349", + "swg22009474", + "swg1JR51286" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q157", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "How do I configure TLS/SSL for an IIB web service provider and consumer?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I'm investigating ways and technologies for use with IIB to run a web service that runs as both a provider and consumer. I'm looking at HTTP and SOAP messages/nodes. At a high level it might look like this:\nHTTPInput (TLS over HTTPS) -> Compute -> HTTPRequest (SSL over HTTPS) -> Compute -> HTTPReply\nor\nSOAPInput (TLS over HTTPS) -> Compute -> SOAPRequest (SSL over HTTPS) -> Compute -> SOAPReply\nDoes anyone have more details/references beyond the knowledge center on how to configure the TLS/SSL portions?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21420032", + "swg22011116", + "ssg1S1009320", + "swg21673152", + "swg21662022", + "swg21981081", + "swg1LO54234", + "swg21666530", + "swg21988268", + "swg22001541", + "nas8N1011664", + "swg21958887", + "swg27039743", + "swg21108352", + "swg21999364", + "swg21701519", + "swg21960119", + "swg21693623", + "swg21677876", + "swg21981535", + "swg21568229", + "swg21996686", + "swg27045819", + "swg21999972", + "nas8N1021096", + "swg1IC58609", + "swg21689921", + "swg21959774", + "swg21469388", + "swg21694300", + "nas8N1019946", + "swg21986450", + "swg21566866", + "swg21666913", + "swg21473179", + "swg21999135", + "swg21580177", + "swg21992908", + "swg21699392", + "swg21959252", + "swg21689920", + "swg21965659", + "ssg1S1005220", + "swg21451198", + "nas8N1021130", + "swg1PI94706", + "swg1PK48773", + "swg21691900", + "swg21697925", + "swg22010239" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q158", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Must the TOKEN_SEPARATOR value be enclosed in quotes for the custom scripting feature?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Must the TOKEN_SEPARATOR value be enclosed in quotes for the custom scripting feature?", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21960062", + "ANSWER": "TOKEN_SEPARATOR (Optional - default semicolon \";\"). \nIt sets the string to be used as separator to split the output row in tokens. It is ignored if TOKEN_TYPES is not set. Empty value (blank) is accepted as separator and multiple consecutive blanks in output rows are considered as a single one.", + "START_OFFSET": "22001", + "END_OFFSET": "22296", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21960062", + "swg1PK27613", + "swg1OA44764", + "swg1PI89272", + "swg21669983", + "swg21342008", + "swg1PK67819", + "swg21531686", + "swg1IT22988", + "swg1PK68226", + "swg1PI17630", + "swg27047551", + "swg21386075", + "swg1PM40558", + "swg1OA48884", + "swg21649074", + "swg21508183", + "swg21336604", + "swg22008034", + "swg21528158", + "swg1PK62703", + "swg21130509", + "swg21571690", + "swg1PM51206", + "swg1IY75344", + "swg1IY77824", + "swg1PN59611", + "swg21576359", + "swg1JR55561", + "swg21524197", + "swg1HD94813", + "swg21654478", + "swg1JR37810", + "swg1PN66350", + "swg1PM33452", + "swg1IZ04125", + "swg1PQ51755", + "swg1IZ24725", + "swg1PK80629", + "swg21395512", + "swg1PM75782", + "swg1PM80946", + "swg1PQ51154", + "swg21693533", + "swg21520915", + "swg1PM19869", + "swg1PK28529", + "swg21170427", + "swg21354599", + "swg1HE11853" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q159", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Help with Security Bulletin: IIB is affected by WebAdmin Session Timeout vulnerability (CVE-2017-1693)", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I need to understand details regarding Security Bulletin: IBM Integration Bus is affected by WebAdmin Session Timeout vulnerability (CVE-2017-1693). Where can I find this information? ", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg22009250", + "swg21995004", + "swg22008829", + "swg22005335", + "swg22011500", + "swg22005383", + "swg21985013", + "swg22006313", + "swg21700354", + "swg22005382", + "swg22008470", + "swg2C1000379", + "swg22006686", + "swg22011461", + "swg21682696", + "swg22005345", + "swg2C1000362", + "swg21993720", + "swg21985691", + "swg22006955", + "swg22015713", + "swg22016245", + "swg22015714", + "swg22010090", + "swg21682567", + "swg21997918", + "swg22010447", + "swg21997906", + "swg22011680", + "swg2C1000365", + "swg22006453", + "swg21981402", + "swg22007245", + "swg22002871", + "swg2C1000349", + "swg22001011", + "swg22010990", + "swg22010164", + "swg22012039", + "swg22000350", + "swg21685137", + "swg22001010", + "swg21998805", + "swg22007237", + "swg2C1000363", + "swg22007372", + "swg22016606", + "swg22003265", + "swg22006626", + "swg21903287" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q160", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "How to increase the HTTP Session time-out value for Workplace application on WebSphere Application Server?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "We would like to increase the HTTP Session time-out value for our Workplace application. Where are all the locations that this value is set and what are their precedence? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21163875", + "ANSWER": "The HTTP Session time-out can be set in the following places:\n\n From the Administrative Console at the server, Enterprise application, and Web application levels\n At the time when the application is packaged\n In the application code", + "START_OFFSET": "568", + "END_OFFSET": "809", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21276751", + "swg21415491", + "swg21163875", + "swg21637207", + "swg21408905", + "swg22003267", + "swg21577219", + "swg21240176", + "swg1PJ37188", + "swg21278600", + "swg21682364", + "swg21572903", + "swg21977318", + "swg21970322", + "swg21641686", + "swg21545260", + "swg1JR42727", + "swg21414585", + "swg21968864", + "swg21643735", + "swg27042156", + "swg21677584", + "swg21961137", + "swg27015668", + "swg21656133", + "swg22006274", + "swg21680483", + "swg21514940", + "swg27023814", + "swg21625816", + "swg21987089", + "swg21615681", + "swg21289468", + "swg21385597", + "swg21655351", + "swg21404774", + "swg21600966", + "swg21402962", + "swg21233894", + "swg21980981", + "swg21659648", + "swg21515980", + "swg21256195", + "swg21980790", + "swg27018423", + "swg21971884", + "swg21641249", + "swg21426266", + "swg22010584", + "swg21503434" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q161", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Netcool/Impact 7.1.0: The StateChange value being used by the OMNIbusEventReader is too high", + "QUESTION_TEXT": " The value being used is a date and time in the future and as such is preventing the EventReader from capturing the current events. ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21610844", + "ANSWER": "The simplest solution is to manually reset the EventReader StateChange value via the GUI. Stop the EventReader, open it for edit, click the \"Clear State\" button, exit the editor and restart the EventReader.", + "START_OFFSET": "1799", + "END_OFFSET": "2005", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21610844", + "swg21674718", + "swg21596162", + "swg21459392", + "swg21592376", + "swg21626633", + "swg21675051", + "swg21592309", + "swg21566480", + "swg21386538", + "swg21970833", + "swg21596154", + "swg21980748", + "swg21592308", + "swg1IZ87137", + "swg21978599", + "swg21592307", + "swg21592311", + "swg21623713", + "swg21675858", + "swg21672582", + "swg21971804", + "swg21627143", + "swg21675015", + "swg21624345", + "swg1IV31226", + "swg1IV90408", + "swg21596180", + "swg1IZ11261", + "swg21675016", + "swg21982721", + "swg1IV92997", + "swg21643343", + "swg1IV96893", + "swg1IZ47227", + "swg21685180", + "swg21657239", + "swg1IV99873", + "swg21579319", + "swg1IV93663", + "swg21508605", + "swg21977586", + "swg1IV92416", + "swg1IV98662", + "swg1IV74771", + "swg1IZ38839", + "swg1IJ03378", + "swg1PI28797", + "swg21358512", + "swg1IV90875" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q162", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Is there a security vulnerability in the IBM WebSphere Application Server shipped with IBM Tivoli Netcool Configuration Manager?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Is there a security vulnerability in the IBM WebSphere Application Server shipped with IBM Tivoli Netcool Configuration Manager?", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21972146", + "ANSWER": "Please consult the security bulletin Vulnerability in Apache Commons affects IBM WebSphere Application Server (CVE-2015-7450) [http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21970575] for vulnerability details and information about fixes.", + "START_OFFSET": "336", + "END_OFFSET": "576", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "ibm10717319", + "swg22013407", + "swg22013410", + "ibm10717329", + "ibm10718799", + "swg22015935", + "swg22016120", + "swg22016055", + "swg22009639", + "swg21972146", + "swg22011804", + "ibm10717337", + "swg22014799", + "swg21990995", + "swg21992133", + "swg21991133", + "swg22010162", + "swg21973027", + "swg21986833", + "swg22014592", + "swg21975642", + "swg2C1000349", + "ibm10716573", + "swg21976928", + "swg22016123", + "ibm10717327", + "swg21971698", + "ibm10717345", + "swg22002709", + "swg21981314", + "swg22015623", + "swg22010158", + "swg2C1000200", + "swg21996503", + "swg22013313", + "swg22013312", + "swg22015618", + "swg22014924", + "swg21970681", + "swg22016550", + "swg22014646", + "swg22014108", + "swg22013044", + "swg21990963", + "swg21996502", + "swg21972884", + "swg22015645", + "swg21997800", + "swg21882528", + "swg2C1000296" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q163", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "How to fix XAER_RMFAIL messages in WebSphere Portal's SystemOut.log?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "SystemOut.log contains various exceptions with caused by statements like:\nCaused by: com.ibm.db2.jcc.am.SqlTransactionRollbackException: DB2 SQL\nError: SQLCODE=-911, SQLSTATE=40001, SQLERRMC=68, DRIVER=4.14.88 \nand: \nCaused by: com.ibm.db2.jcc.am.SqlException: [jcc][t4][2041][11392] [4.14.88] Error executing XAResource.commit(). Server returned XAER_RMFAIL. ERRORCODE=-4203, SQLSTATE=null ", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21959750", + "swg1IT15211", + "swg21686021", + "swg21690310", + "swg21623212", + "swg21995530", + "swg1IC92643", + "swg21902168", + "swg27023804", + "swg21963886", + "swg1IC83550", + "swg21638576", + "swg21657803", + "swg22002379", + "swg1IC82934", + "swg1IT07006", + "swg21663414", + "swg22010930", + "swg21586250", + "swg21883024", + "swg21618475", + "swg21403259", + "swg1JR53006", + "swg1PI64082", + "swg21511915", + "swg1PM20585", + "swg1JR54520", + "swg1JR42463", + "swg1JR57775", + "swg21959236", + "swg21508821", + "swg1IT15100", + "swg22012568", + "swg21607793", + "swg1PK99960", + "swg1IC77293", + "swg1PM65618", + "swg1JR44180", + "swg21659457", + "swg1JR54654", + "swg21993911", + "swg1LO86733", + "swg21631313", + "swg22012913", + "swg21698162", + "swg1PI08628", + "swg1PI04719", + "swg1IC96203", + "swg1IC89191", + "swg1IV43542" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q164", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "When should I use conversation sharing in DataPower MQ queue managers?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "MQ version 7.0 introduced a new feature, conversation sharing. Are there any special values on DataPower when configuring conversation sharing?", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21647231", + "ANSWER": "The default setting of sharing conversations (SHARECNV) value is zero in DataPower mq-qm object. The same default value for MQ SVRCONN channel is 10. The sharing conversations value is \nnegotiated between MQ server and DataPower and the lower value takes effect. However, in current versions of the DataPower firmware, the sharing conversations setting of 1 is treated as 0 when negotiating with MQ server.", + "START_OFFSET": "542", + "END_OFFSET": "948", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21647231", + "swg1IC91594", + "swg1IT16873", + "swg1IC69197", + "swg1IT02476", + "swg1IC91486", + "swg1IT10128", + "swg1IT18157", + "swg1IT14409", + "swg1IT10498", + "swg1IC89569", + "swg1IV47785", + "swg1IT17153", + "swg1IZ33379", + "swg1IC99575", + "swg1IZ69682", + "swg1IT16786", + "swg1IT04771", + "swg1IZ85904", + "swg1IT09442", + "swg1PK73643", + "swg1PI19721", + "swg1IT08838", + "swg1IZ52693", + "swg1IT22127", + "swg1IC58543", + "swg1IC79037", + "swg1PM26590", + "swg1IV03127", + "swg1PI18232", + "swg1PI64465", + "swg1PI68897", + "swg1PM52894", + "swg1PM54883", + "swg1PM54201", + "swg1PK77094", + "swg1IC66174", + "swg1PK95837", + "swg1PK64466", + "swg1IZ75511", + "swg1PI55507", + "swg1PM81116", + "swg21299323", + "swg1IZ54543", + "swg1PM52877", + "swg1PK83207", + "swg1PI95423", + "swg21166048", + "swg1IT18242", + "swg24023356" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q165", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "DSNT408I SQLCODE -401 creating stored procedure CIUSNTSR after upgrading to DB2 11", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Why would CIUSNTSR stored procedure creation fail with message DSNT408I and SQLCODE=-401? I am running CICS Interdependency Analyzer for z/OS (CICS IA) CIUDBCQ JCL when the failure occurs. This happened after I upgraded z/OS DB2 to V11. \nHere are the messages I receive:\n DSNT408I SQLCODE = -401, ERROR: THE OPERANDS OF AN ARITHMETIC OR COMPARISON OPERATION ARE\n NOT COMPARABLE\n DSNT418I SQLSTATE = 42818 SQLSTATE RETURN CODE\n DSNT415I SQLERRP = DSNXOBFC SQL PROCEDURE DETECTING ERROR\n DSNT416I SQLERRD = 930 0 1 -1 0 0 SQL DIAGNOSTIC INFORMATION\n DSNT416I SQLERRD = X'000003A2' X'00000000' X'00000001' X'FFFFFFFF' X'00000000' X'00000000'\n SQL DIAGNOSTIC INFORMATION", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1PK38143", + "swg1PK90889", + "swg21635008", + "swg1PK21665", + "swg1PI12215", + "swg1PK72645", + "swg1PI08596", + "swg1PM27302", + "swg21622349", + "swg21370070", + "swg21111392", + "swg1PK27814", + "swg1PK65790", + "swg1PK40644", + "swg21597587", + "swg21408665", + "swg1PM41185", + "swg21431104", + "swg1PM09913", + "swg1PI71036", + "swg1PM06549", + "swg1PI88408", + "swg1PI18883", + "swg1PM10872", + "swg1PK74796", + "swg1PN90195", + "swg1PM86790", + "swg1PI13696", + "swg21458316", + "swg1PM53236", + "swg1PM48199", + "swg1PK68249", + "swg1PI83720", + "swg1PM30094", + "swg1PK43853", + "swg1PM40828", + "swg1PM04787", + "swg21214409", + "swg21161921", + "swg21567109", + "swg1PK31709", + "swg1PI09158", + "swg1PM63285", + "swg1PI05372", + "swg21609192", + "swg1PM40193", + "swg1PI96808", + "swg1PM67899", + "swg1PM17660", + "swg21499520" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q166", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Which version of the WebSphere MQ Resource Adapter is shipped with WebSphere Application Server?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Which version of WebSphere MQ JCA resource adapter is shipped with WebSphere Application Server ? ", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1PI74862", + "swg1PM31880", + "swg24043427", + "swg1PI53190", + "swg1PM77968", + "swg1PI35905", + "swg1PI70191", + "swg1PI31576", + "swg1PM67639", + "swg21622719", + "swg1PI50816", + "swg1PI84053", + "swg27023129", + "swg1PI89985", + "swg1PI06627", + "swg1PM89233", + "swg1PM78359", + "swg1PI07338", + "swg1PM41741", + "swg1PM19399", + "swg1PM70847", + "swg1PI96625", + "swg1PM09742", + "swg1PK81443", + "swg1PM53787", + "swg27009524", + "swg22000350", + "swg21647169", + "swg24023356", + "swg1PM46219", + "swg1IV19480", + "swg1PK83207", + "swg1PI74468", + "swg1PI74874", + "swg1IZ05176", + "swg21668491", + "swg24021547", + "swg24043424", + "swg24043423", + "swg1IZ30693", + "swg21633761", + "swg27041968", + "swg21617873", + "swg1IT19847", + "swg1IV59333", + "swg21598341", + "swg1JR54601", + "swg22000140", + "swg22000737", + "swg1IC76463" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q167", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "How do I recreate all the Oracle Text indexes for the Atlas database", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "How do I recreate all the Oracle Text indexes for the Atlas database ? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21580830", + "ANSWER": "Shutdown the application server running the Atlas applications. \n 2. Locate the script drop_ctxsys_indexes.sql to drop the Oracle Text indexes from the following folder in the Atlas release:\n Atlas\\Schema\\Deploy\\smf\\db\\etc\\oracle \n 3. Open up a command window to that directory and execute the script using SQL Plus:\n sqlplus /@ @drop_ctxsys_indexes.sql \n 4. Locate the scripts, setup_ctxsys_objects.sql and create_ctxsys_indexes.sql, used to create the Oracle Text preferences and indexes from the following folder in the Atlas release. The folder will differ depending on which version you are currently running.\n Atlas\\Schema\\Deploy\\smf\\db\\release\\\\oracle\\create\\schema \n 5. Open up a command window to that directory and execute the scripts using SQL Plus.\n sqlplus /@ @setup_ctxsys_objects.sql\n sqlplus /@ @create_ctxsys_indexes.sql \n 6. Start the application server running the Atlas applications.", + "START_OFFSET": "653", + "END_OFFSET": "1668", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21580830", + "swg21585104", + "swg21621554", + "swg27040473", + "swg21403468", + "swg21580859", + "swg21152288", + "swg21298705", + "swg27023564", + "swg21997793", + "swg21982451", + "swg21262037", + "swg21131361", + "swg21674833", + "swg21681549", + "swg21695147", + "swg21009186", + "swg21653453", + "swg21987564", + "swg21990706", + "swg21992094", + "swg22000116", + "swg21586820", + "swg21991198", + "swg21574694", + "swg21982458", + "swg21127710", + "swg21613843", + "swg21983855", + "swg21610757", + "swg21687101", + "swg21990800", + "swg21696267", + "swg21959271", + "swg21622335", + "swg21296860", + "swg21975781", + "swg1IV91204", + "swg21639684", + "swg21993708", + "swg1IV79820", + "swg21986556", + "swg21686048", + "swg22001776", + "swg27039901", + "swg1IZ79809", + "swg21620754", + "swg1JR47810", + "swg21408582", + "swg21519644" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q168", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "IBM Integration Designer could not connect to the DataPower appliance.", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I am using WDP XI52 with Firmware 7.0.0.7 and IID 7.5.1. When I try to connect WDP from [DataPower Appliances] View in IID, I got a error message as follows : \"SSL handshake on the connection to the DataPower appliance \"x.x.x.x\" was not successful. Contact the DataPower administrator.\" This situations occurred since WDP Firmware had upgraded from 7.0.0.2 to 7.0.0.5. (Now it was upgraded to 7.0.0.7)\nCould you please let me know what I should check to solve this problem? Please note that this WDP works normally and a network is normal. Also, I can connect it by using WebGUI and SSH terminal. And I've checked that IP , XML Management Interface Port, Web Management Service Port and account/password are correct.", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21633306", + "swg21498634", + "swg21257115", + "swg1JR53526", + "swg21394718", + "swg21244384", + "swg21501194", + "swg21468883", + "swg21468886", + "swg21327420", + "swg21239595", + "swg21407324", + "swg24032265", + "swg21402883", + "swg21666811", + "swg21236322", + "swg21307258", + "swg21388551", + "swg21390809", + "swg21508029", + "swg21621630", + "swg21599770", + "swg21585939", + "swg21578730", + "swg21960992", + "swg21499749", + "swg21269260", + "swg21320815", + "swg21239354", + "swg21960234", + "swg21239331", + "swg21305909", + "swg21501021", + "swg21674513", + "swg21271701", + "swg21983696", + "swg21469163", + "swg21358525", + "swg21656513", + "swg21633587", + "swg21511735", + "swg21322505", + "swg21415078", + "swg21235587", + "swg21576087", + "swg21249208", + "swg21640445", + "swg27048270", + "swg21496334", + "swg21328671" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q169", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Migrating to JRules v7.1", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "How do I migrate to WebSphere ILOG JRules v7.1? ", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21592060", + "swg21590082", + "swg21599332", + "swg21591800", + "swg21592934", + "swg21462137", + "swg21616403", + "swg21615250", + "swg24028654", + "swg24028864", + "swg24030828", + "swg24033599", + "swg21400817", + "swg24028077", + "swg24027672", + "swg21591798", + "swg24028075", + "swg24030830", + "swg24030838", + "swg21456181", + "swg27023079", + "swg24030938", + "swg24030829", + "swg24029803", + "swg21462316", + "swg24030834", + "swg24033603", + "swg21660745", + "swg21419945", + "swg21469115", + "swg24030963", + "swg21593469", + "swg24033604", + "swg27023254", + "swg24030832", + "swg24026626", + "swg24030835", + "swg21469302", + "swg21586717", + "swg21422330", + "swg21587773", + "swg21473114", + "swg21400648", + "swg24029802", + "swg24033601", + "swg27023725", + "swg24026623", + "swg21607802", + "swg21671527", + "swg24026624" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q170", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "ODR OOM issue", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I got ODR OOM after upgrading the WAS to v8553. No configuration or traffic load changing. Is there any known issue?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg24041964", + "swg22008878", + "swg1IC69795", + "swg22004792", + "swg1IT19921", + "swg1PM66926", + "swg24031420", + "swg21286159", + "swg1PI75474", + "swg1PM85114", + "swg1PM56332", + "swg1IT09202", + "swg1PI30994", + "swg1PM08752", + "swg21966079", + "swg1PM19671", + "swg21651642", + "swg21689486", + "swg1JR45981", + "swg1PK21207", + "swg1PM86128", + "swg24018242", + "swg1PM88670", + "swg1PM76578", + "swg1IT10030", + "swg1PK62128", + "swg21221275", + "swg21448743", + "swg1IV86305", + "swg1PM98573", + "swg1PK51289", + "swg21517494", + "swg1PM89301", + "swg27018423", + "swg21420005", + "swg21391289", + "swg21611603", + "swg1PK10996", + "swg21981551", + "swg21404041", + "swg1IV31213", + "swg21202156", + "swg1PK08425", + "swg1IV38400", + "swg21977403", + "swg1PI58594", + "swg1PK49971", + "swg1PI93376", + "swg1PI82527", + "swg1PM57816" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q171", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Error: \"MBEANSTARTER LOADEXTENSIONS FAILED TO LOAD EXTENSION\" occurs at portal startup", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "We are using Portal Server 8.5 and when starting the Portal server we see following error:\n\n0000005e MBeanStarter E com.ibm.wps.scripting.server.MBeanStarter loadExtensions failed to load extension: key: ServerExt.applications / value: com.ibm.wps.scripting.server.ApplicationServerExtensions\n\nHow can we resolve this error?", + "DOCUMENT": "swg1PI34677", + "ANSWER": "A code fix for this issue is integrated into the WebSphere\n Portal & WCM Combined Cumulative Fix 05 (PI31198 [http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1PI31198]) for Portal\n 8.5.0.0 available from Fix Central:", + "START_OFFSET": "1005", + "END_OFFSET": "1226", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1PI38040", + "swg1PI34677", + "swg21392024", + "swg21978797", + "swg21599350", + "swg24020350", + "swg21663574", + "swg21386395", + "swg21313414", + "swg21668339", + "swg21580731", + "swg21318176", + "swg21700839", + "swg21676180", + "swg21599525", + "swg21501333", + "swg1PK98566", + "swg21433884", + "swg21700348", + "swg21573112", + "swg21902208", + "swg21691034", + "swg21383033", + "swg24019019", + "swg21570663", + "swg21459952", + "swg21468297", + "swg21426592", + "swg1LI78268", + "swg1PK63979", + "swg22005372", + "swg21500477", + "swg21992216", + "swg21982077", + "swg21599488", + "swg1PK74171", + "swg21609234", + "swg24025078", + "swg27015437", + "swg1PJ39653", + "swg1LI78806", + "swg21468672", + "swg27021725", + "swg21474450", + "swg21472871", + "swg21393482", + "swg21398760", + "swg1PI66220", + "swg1LI78243", + "swg1LI78011" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q172", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "What's the procedure to drop an user in Cognos Disclosure Management?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nO.S AIX 7.1\n\nCognos Disclosure Management 10.2.4 What's the procedure to drop an user in Cognos Disclosure Management", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg24039191", + "swg21700273", + "swg24041006", + "swg21645571", + "swg21700318", + "swg21987838", + "swg21969722", + "swg21668278", + "swg27041172", + "swg21991584", + "swg27047182", + "swg24034173", + "swg24035833", + "swg24037296", + "swg21967228", + "swg24041034", + "swg24042086", + "swg24043542", + "swg24042881", + "swg21999256", + "swg24042831", + "swg24039169", + "swg21983955", + "swg24035062", + "swg27049217", + "swg27036803", + "swg24036604", + "swg22000823", + "swg24033377", + "swg21674923", + "swg24036631", + "swg21984117", + "swg24038154", + "swg21671632", + "swg27041774", + "swg21967023", + "swg21696036", + "swg27036220", + "swg27044965", + "swg21981227", + "swg27040488", + "swg21983483", + "swg24038446", + "swg21690580", + "swg21683765", + "swg21659670", + "swg21691497", + "swg21995302", + "swg21657848", + "swg21701141" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q173", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "ORA-01795 Error accessing Decision Center Business Console 8.7", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I am working with ODM 8.7.0.0 when accessing the Business Console I am getting the below error message :\nORA-01795: maximum number of expressions in a list is 1000\nThe diagnostics do not contain any warning nor error.\nThe logs contain below exception : \n java.lang.RuntimeException: java.sql.SQLException: ORA-01795: maximum number of expressions in a list is 1000\n...\n Caused by: java.sql.SQLException: ORA-01795: maximum number of expressions in a list is 1000", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1RS02073", + "swg1IV53626", + "swg21560516", + "swg21552442", + "swg1PI05545", + "swg21559810", + "swg1IZ35223", + "swg1PK68957", + "swg21244695", + "swg21454480", + "swg1IZ53869", + "swg21558319", + "swg27040218", + "swg1JR44157", + "swg1PM46352", + "swg1HD50574", + "swg1IT18753", + "swg1LI75512", + "swg1IT11555", + "swg1IV27600", + "swg1IZ80982", + "swg1HD50577", + "swg1HD50575", + "swg1JR47789", + "swg22014620", + "swg1PI21780", + "swg1IV10244", + "swg1JR49325", + "swg1JR47904", + "swg1HD68910", + "swg1IZ28684", + "swg21979567", + "swg1JR44369", + "swg1IZ72470", + "swg1IZ76665", + "swg1LI76354", + "swg1LI74800", + "swg1JR50250", + "swg1PI43232", + "swg1PI12367", + "swg1JR56517", + "swg1JR52650", + "swg1JR42757", + "swg1JR42140", + "swg1PM98363", + "swg1PJ38992", + "swg1RS03127", + "swg1PI30454", + "swg1JR50396", + "swg1PI13677" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q174", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Datacap on Citrix", + "QUESTION_TEXT": " Hi All,\n\nCan we operate Datacap thin clients on citrix?\n", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21658019", + "ANSWER": "Remote users that access Datacap over a WAN can use Taskmaster Web-based \"thin clients\", or FastDoc Capture operating in offline mode.", + "START_OFFSET": "167", + "END_OFFSET": "301", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21992029", + "swg21658019", + "swg1LO49321", + "swg21098489", + "swg1IV31462", + "swg21211630", + "swg1LO82166", + "swg21982281", + "swg1LO72014", + "swg22005966", + "swg21608410", + "swg27011697", + "swg21584350", + "swg27013242", + "swg21211473", + "swg21306090", + "swg21669642", + "swg21989354", + "swg21578153", + "swg21210016", + "swg21973836", + "swg1IZ79359", + "swg1LO63653", + "swg27022065", + "swg1LO84039", + "swg21617329", + "ibm10718719", + "swg21499027", + "swg21986225", + "swg21380699", + "swg21505718", + "swg21962026", + "swg21419278", + "swg21196881", + "swg21459253", + "swg21568084", + "swg27045851", + "swg22005014", + "swg1LO69096", + "swg21566531", + "swg21649054", + "swg27020397", + "swg21210017", + "swg21610955", + "swg1IZ96328", + "swg21668810", + "swg1LO54742", + "swg1IO26015", + "swg21450751", + "swg21578821" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q175", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Would like to know if WebSphere Extreme Scale is leap year and leap second compliant. Is there any documentation that talks about this?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Would like to know if WebSphere Extreme Scale is leap year compliant. Is there any documentation that talks about this? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21578744", + "ANSWER": "WebSphere Application Server and the SDK are leap year compliant.", + "START_OFFSET": "403", + "END_OFFSET": "468", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21976215", + "swg21578744", + "swg21994264", + "isg3T1024480", + "swg21697119", + "swg21098816", + "swg21961159", + "swg21960881", + "swg1IO03413", + "swg21995063", + "swg21977902", + "swg21983036", + "swg21972659", + "swg1IZ17762", + "swg21982963", + "swg21902261", + "swg1IT01431", + "swg21993946", + "swg1PQ14202", + "swg21971657", + "swg1JR46686", + "swg22001664", + "swg21976442", + "swg1PM04539", + "swg27019091", + "swg21971284", + "swg1IR39907", + "swg21966885", + "swg1IR44521", + "swg21974365", + "swg1PK77994", + "swg21976680", + "swg27019093", + "swg21695927", + "swg1JR43459", + "swg21883667", + "swg21687586", + "swg21679610", + "swg21696762", + "swg21692398", + "swg1IT14924", + "swg21701338", + "swg21961171", + "swg1PQ31425", + "swg21657970", + "swg1PQ31177", + "swg22005297", + "swg21670533", + "swg27019121", + "swg21962716" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q176", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Would like to know if WebSphere Extreme Scale is leap year and leap second compliant. Is there any documentation that talks about this?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Would like to know if WebSphere Extreme Scale is leap second compliant. Is there any documentation that talks about this? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21578744", + "ANSWER": "WebSphere Application Server and the SDK are leap year compliant.", + "START_OFFSET": "403", + "END_OFFSET": "468", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21976215", + "swg21578744", + "swg21994264", + "swg21961159", + "isg3T1024480", + "swg21697119", + "swg21960881", + "swg21902261", + "swg1PK77994", + "swg21098816", + "swg21983036", + "swg21961171", + "swg21972659", + "swg21982963", + "ssg1S1005265", + "swg21993946", + "swg21993495", + "swg21327356", + "swg21699897", + "swg21992567", + "swg21995063", + "swg21971657", + "swg21990530", + "swg22001664", + "isg3T1024425", + "swg21701167", + "swg21696414", + "swg21602521", + "swg21976442", + "swg21960466", + "swg21993349", + "swg21960467", + "swg27019091", + "isg3T1022057", + "swg21903416", + "swg1PI58560", + "swg21971284", + "swg21966885", + "swg21696762", + "swg21903756", + "swg27019093", + "swg1IO03413", + "swg21695927", + "swg21883667", + "swg21687586", + "swg21679610", + "swg21692398", + "swg21701338", + "swg1PI58559", + "swg1PI57780" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q177", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "After AIX TL/SP/FP update my TSAMP cluster no longer functions.", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "After applying update to AIX to bring it up to 7100-05-01-1731 which includes RSCT 3.2.3.0 I noticed that neither IBM.GblResRM nor IBM.RecoveryRM would stay operative in \"lssrc -g rsct_rm\" output. ", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1IJ02418", + "swg21236233", + "swg27024950", + "swg21293701", + "swg21413916", + "swg21883054", + "swg21633323", + "swg27039217", + "swg21653981", + "swg21448241", + "swg21572667", + "isg3T1010866", + "swg21964093", + "swg21982640", + "swg21696304", + "swg21447478", + "swg27049811", + "swg21443445", + "swg21443624", + "swg21375626", + "swg1IV16486", + "swg1IV23883", + "swg21698081", + "swg21624179", + "swg21273668", + "swg21500059", + "swg1IZ82815", + "swg21568815", + "swg21686172", + "swg1IZ16358", + "swg21970634", + "swg21619064", + "isg3T1000444", + "swg21670223", + "swg1IZ15993", + "swg21294595", + "swg21576435", + "swg21504122", + "swg21675952", + "swg21688755", + "swg1IZ63202", + "swg1IZ37033", + "swg21296266", + "swg21612887", + "swg21579767", + "swg21575219", + "swg21625308", + "swg21635537", + "isg3T1022071" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q178", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Need support info for ITCAM and WAS 8.5.5.x monitoring", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "What ITCAM for AD/WAS versions and maintenance levels support monitoring of WAS 8.5.5.x?\n", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21961771", + "swg21444226", + "swg1PM44729", + "swg21443621", + "swg1PM80532", + "swg1PM74083", + "swg21679900", + "swg1PM72517", + "swg1PM68407", + "swg1PM47685", + "swg21967147", + "swg1PM13978", + "swg21452449", + "swg1PM40701", + "swg21450943", + "swg1PM61795", + "swg21412512", + "swg21440466", + "swg1PM48887", + "swg21633116", + "swg1PM32459", + "swg21412516", + "swg1PI27997", + "swg21439051", + "swg1PM68630", + "swg1PM61969", + "swg21614113", + "swg1PM53553", + "swg1PM56784", + "swg1PM36312", + "swg1PM71955", + "swg1PM26919", + "swg1PI09222", + "swg1PM41834", + "swg21968507", + "swg21234414", + "swg1PM13332", + "swg1PK94413", + "swg1PM30023", + "swg21439078", + "swg1PM23042", + "swg21586136", + "swg1PM56939", + "swg21674783", + "swg1IV63126", + "swg1IZ89708", + "swg1PM20130", + "swg21232288", + "swg21439034", + "swg1PM14697" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Help with Security Bulletin: Vulnerabilities in OpenSSL affect WebSphere MQ 5.3 and MQ 8 for HPE NonStop Server (CVE-2017-3735)", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I need to understand details regarding Security Bulletin: Vulnerabilities in OpenSSL affect WebSphere MQ 5.3 and MQ 8 for HPE NonStop Server (CVE-2017-3735). Where can I find this information?", + "DOCUMENT": "swg22014367", + "ANSWER": "CVEID: CVE-2017-3735 [http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2017-3735]\nDESCRIPTION: OpenSSL could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by an error while parsing an IPAddressFamily extension in an X.509 certificate. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to trigger an out-of-bounds read, resulting in an incorrect text display of the certificate.\nCVSS Base Score: 4.3\nCVSS Temporal Score: See https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/131047 [https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/131047] for the current score\nCVSS Environmental Score*: Undefined\nCVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N)", + "START_OFFSET": "300", + "END_OFFSET": "978", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q179", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21962359", + "swg24044505", + "swg21700425", + "swg22014367", + "swg1IT25693", + "swg24044557", + "swg21902519", + "swg21701285", + "swg22000456", + "swg22009850", + "swg21999421", + "swg21968403", + "swg21699052", + "swg21677029", + "swg22000474", + "swg22011851", + "swg22011110", + "swg22008757", + "swg22000304", + "swg21902473", + "isg3T1027142", + "swg21883551", + "swg21974168", + "swg21983823", + "swg21999709", + "swg21980308", + "swg22013025", + "swg21669839", + "swg21618728", + "swg21966723", + "swg22014651", + "swg21964872", + "swg21676496", + "swg21971447", + "swg22012393", + "swg22014981", + "swg22006387", + "swg22010154", + "swg21989046", + "swg21986593", + "swg21999724", + "swg21970103", + "swg22014367", + "swg22013026", + "swg21988864", + "swg21985658", + "swg22012992", + "swg21998797", + "swg24043707", + "swg27050724" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q180", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Help with Security Bulletin: Security Vulnerability in IBM PureApplication System. (CVE-2015-1920)", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I need to understand details regarding \"Security Bulletin: Security Vulnerability in IBM PureApplication System (CVE-2015-1920)\". Where can I find this information? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21964873", + "ANSWER": "CVEID: CVE-2015-1920\nDESCRIPTION: WebSphere Application Server could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code by connecting to a management port and executing a specific sequence of instructions.\nCVSS Base Score: 9.3\nCVSS Temporal Score: See https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/102404 for the current score\nCVSS Environmental Score*: Undefined\nCVSS Vector: (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C) ", + "START_OFFSET": "305", + "END_OFFSET": "840", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21964873", + "swg21968532", + "swg21957762", + "swg21882549", + "swg21903743", + "swg21882528", + "swg21883102", + "swg21963990", + "swg21963792", + "swg21903252", + "swg21883331", + "swg21957821", + "swg21699954", + "swg21959225", + "swg21962372", + "swg21903439", + "swg21971300", + "swg21960518", + "swg21980639", + "swg21903341", + "swg21978026", + "swg21973591", + "swg21903650", + "swg21964496", + "swg21960401", + "swg21973582", + "swg21973585", + "swg21883880", + "swg21973742", + "swg21964801", + "swg21700479", + "swg21959169", + "swg21959387", + "swg21701020", + "swg21976320", + "swg21959171", + "swg21983910", + "swg21959305", + "swg21953632", + "swg21903245", + "swg21993026", + "swg21959352", + "swg21685977", + "swg21903626", + "swg21957955", + "swg21985698", + "swg21957952", + "swg21991776", + "swg21700473", + "swg21903182" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q181", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Get all data that\\'s registred today", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Version: \nMxLoader 4.7.4\n \n\nProblem:\nIs it possible to do something like this:\nreportdate >= TODAY()?\n\nI cant get it to work but i would like to get all the data that has been registred today today. \n", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21569933", + "ANSWER": "The getdate() MSSQL function can be replaced by value from DB2 CURRENT DATE special register. On Oracle, sysdate is used to retrieve the current date. \n\nEXAMPLE : MSSQL and transdate <= ( getdate() - 35) \n\n DB2 and transdate <= ( CURRENT DATE - 35 DAYS) \n\n Oracle and transdate <= ( sysdate - 35)", + "START_OFFSET": "183", + "END_OFFSET": "479", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21569933", + "swg1LO41194", + "swg1LO52147", + "swg21336572", + "swg1IZ33564", + "swg1IY60474", + "swg1HC99670", + "nas8N1011280", + "swg21337010", + "swg1IC37810", + "swg21337516", + "swg1IC85770", + "swg1LO78391", + "swg21485350", + "swg1LO43336", + "swg1IY86891", + "swg1PM86476", + "swg21367735", + "swg1LO39731", + "swg1HD91034", + "swg1IV63503", + "swg1JR34434", + "swg21352555", + "swg21495864", + "swg21373023", + "swg21670240", + "swg1PI14938", + "swg21701553", + "swg21699524", + "swg22007173", + "swg21266803", + "swg1LO32572", + "swg21324364", + "swg1HD68525", + "swg1IV55714", + "swg1IV04072", + "swg1HD91296", + "swg1LO50253", + "swg1LO48134", + "swg1HD66954", + "swg1LO42018", + "swg22007191", + "swg1IV96830", + "swg22006489", + "swg21378036", + "swg1JR41993", + "swg1HC55534", + "swg1IY87983", + "swg1LO40715", + "swg1HD16956" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q182", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Help with Security Bulletin: Multiple vulnerabilities in IBM Java Runtime affect IIB and WMB", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nI need to understand details regarding \"Security Bulletin: Multiple vulnerabilities in IBM Java Runtime affect IBM Integration Bus and WebSphere Message Broker\" This is related to\nCVE-2017-10115\nCVE-2017-10116\nCVE-2017-10109\nCVE-2017-10108\n\nWhere can I find this information?", + "DOCUMENT": "swg22010090", + "ANSWER": "CVEID:CVE-2017-10115 [http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2017-10115]\nDESCRIPTION:An unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE related to the Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit JCE component could allow an unauthenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information resulting in a high confidentiality impact using unknown attack vectors.\nCVSS Base Score: 7.5\nCVSS Temporal Score: Seehttps://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/128876 [https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/128876]for the current score\nCVSS Environmental Score*: Undefined\nCVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N)", + "START_OFFSET": "717", + "END_OFFSET": "1353", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg22010090", + "swg22010659", + "swg22009183", + "swg22008757", + "swg22007396", + "swg22015153", + "swg22007172", + "swg22008360", + "swg22009323", + "swg22007912", + "swg22006996", + "swg22008814", + "swg22009084", + "swg22012627", + "swg22007463", + "swg22007398", + "swg22007416", + "swg22005345", + "swg21883331", + "swg22009939", + "swg22007465", + "swg22007531", + "swg22007508", + "swg22008341", + "swg22008362", + "swg22009697", + "swg22008208", + "swg22012623", + "ssg1S1010740", + "swg22008382", + "swg22015064", + "swg21682567", + "swg22008375", + "swg22008940", + "swg22010003", + "swg22008955", + "swg22007569", + "swg22009698", + "swg22007283", + "swg22007568", + "swg22008182", + "isg3T1025857", + "swg22009532", + "swg21994213", + "swg22007461", + "swg21982320", + "swg22007171", + "swg22007462", + "swg22009415", + "swg22007410" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q183", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Is there a support's guide to the MTTrapd probe ?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Where do you download the Support's guide to the MTTrapd [SNMP] probe ?", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21607690", + "ANSWER": "The attached Support's guide to the SNMP probe provides details on how best to configure the probe, troubleshoot issues and how to use third party products to test the probes behaviour.", + "START_OFFSET": "327", + "END_OFFSET": "512", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21607690", + "swg21622160", + "swg21611377", + "swg27042331", + "swg21626348", + "swg21468340", + "swg21607694", + "swg24041112", + "swg21624836", + "swg21684054", + "swg1IZ03657", + "swg21987143", + "swg21607732", + "swg1IZ15734", + "swg21568445", + "swg21664526", + "swg21622152", + "swg21682130", + "swg21655794", + "swg21685044", + "swg21241936", + "swg21291414", + "swg27042352", + "swg21986688", + "swg1IZ68561", + "swg21987068", + "swg21607701", + "swg1IV70329", + "swg1IV63794", + "swg21960254", + "swg21971139", + "swg21315096", + "swg21970101", + "swg21994650", + "swg1IV66556", + "swg21614211", + "swg1IV10209", + "swg21660373", + "swg1IV25045", + "swg21585992", + "swg1IZ79683", + "swg1IV28588", + "swg21607710", + "swg1IV45586", + "swg21622274", + "swg1IZ21991", + "swg21501604", + "swg1IV36656", + "swg21618671", + "swg1IJ01162" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q184", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why am I seeing \"CWSXM0100E: Multiple replies have been produced for a single request flow in module\" ?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "We are building a simple mediation module, consisting only of the request flow. The mediation module has one service invoke calling an external service through web service binding. Upon testing the process, we observe see that the service invoke is being called twice. There is no Fan-in or fan -out in the request flow. Below is the error: \"Caused by: com.ibm.wsspi.sibx.mediation.flow.MediationRuntimeException: CWSXM1023E: Exception when calling flow action: CWSXM0100E: Multiple replies have been produced for a single request flow in module\" ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21584783", + "ANSWER": "This error occurs when a mediation primitive is wired more than once to the next mediation primitive. It might seem to be a single wire. However, upon closer inspection, more than one wire exists. \n\n\nBy mistake, primitives might be wired more than once when there is only one wire. See the following screen shot:\n[/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21584783&aid=1]\n\nIf you move the primitives in question, however, you notice that there are more wires underneath:", + "START_OFFSET": "542", + "END_OFFSET": "1002", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21405864", + "swg21584783", + "swg1IC59660", + "swg1IC67220", + "swg1IC66490", + "swg1IC61532", + "swg1IC52511", + "swg1IC54874", + "swg21402294", + "swg1JR42025", + "swg21575926", + "swg21451335", + "swg1IC64965", + "swg1IC61617", + "swg1IC51358", + "swg1IC64276", + "swg1IT03649", + "swg21313108", + "swg1PM42955", + "swg1PM33047", + "swg1IC54523", + "swg21393260", + "swg1IC66137", + "swg1IC59436", + "swg1JR27493", + "swg1IC58725", + "swg1IC52655", + "swg1IC52313", + "swg1IC53246", + "swg21615833", + "swg1IY86018", + "swg1IC50351", + "swg21413190", + "swg21682445", + "swg21587688", + "swg1IC59075", + "swg1IC60329", + "swg1IC66665", + "swg21409361", + "swg1IC51160", + "swg1IT03148", + "swg1JR33779", + "swg21445191", + "swg1JR39063", + "swg21989663", + "swg1IC64763", + "swg1IC56835", + "swg21376453", + "swg1IC53221", + "swg1IC49796" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q185", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "What can I do when I receive CWZIP9602E, CWZIP9604W and CWZIP4514E with Call Home?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I received the following critical events after enabling CallHome on my PureApplication System v.2.0.0.1:\nCWZIP4514E: Configuration Settings for Call Home are not configured properly.\nCWZIP9602E: Service53 is failed offline at node and cannot be restarted.\nCWZIP9604W: Service53 failed. The high availability component will attempt to recover the service.\nWhat can I do?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1IT06798", + "swg1IT14851", + "swg1IT14369", + "swg1IT05346", + "swg1IT13960", + "swg1IT12763", + "swg1IT05653", + "swg1IT06495", + "swg1IT05349", + "swg1IT18362", + "swg1IT05508", + "swg21978639", + "swg1IT05354", + "swg1IT06958", + "nas8N1020960", + "ssg1S1004089", + "ssg1S1004840", + "swg1IT02867", + "swg1IT05504", + "swg1IT04991", + "swg1IT02217", + "swg1IT07081", + "nas8N1021468", + "swg1IT03007", + "swg1IT10294", + "swg22011557", + "swg1IT00100", + "swg27020934", + "swg1IY44424", + "swg1IT07448", + "swg21680221", + "swg1IT18363", + "swg1IY50414", + "swg1OA44952", + "swg1IV31825", + "swg21696720", + "ssg1S1010032", + "nas8N1010350", + "swg21424272", + "swg21625508", + "isg3T1023944", + "swg1IT15524", + "swg21697812", + "swg27039217", + "swg1IT15702", + "swg21625441", + "isg3T1025371", + "nas8N1020591", + "swg1IT14430", + "swg1IT13786" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q186", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Silent uninstall of ITCAM for MQ agent fails", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Running silent uninstall of the ITCAM for MQ agent with this command: start /wait setup /z\"/sfMQ_Silent_Uninstall.txt\" /s /f2\"C:\\temp\\silent_setup.log\" fails with this message in the Abort_*.trc file: SEVERE: You must agree to the License Agreement.\n\nThe MQ_Silent_Uninstall.txt does contain this line: License Agreement=I agree to use the software only in accordance with the installed license.", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21608744", + "ANSWER": "Specify the complete path to the silent response file while launching the silent install.", + "START_OFFSET": "794", + "END_OFFSET": "883", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21507754", + "swg21608744", + "swg21223742", + "swg21683398", + "swg1IZ34049", + "swg21633761", + "swg21638505", + "swg21516347", + "swg21273734", + "swg1IC59041", + "swg1IZ50142", + "swg27036126", + "swg21992775", + "swg21266602", + "swg21121755", + "swg21373364", + "swg21373401", + "swg24006010", + "swg27049540", + "swg21432483", + "swg24042821", + "swg21612037", + "swg21468416", + "swg21263645", + "swg21299441", + "swg21685081", + "swg21289007", + "swg21171849", + "swg21308290", + "swg24040211", + "swg27047127", + "swg24005654", + "swg24041449", + "swg27042017", + "swg24035843", + "swg24037591", + "swg21306734", + "swg21961771", + "swg27039386", + "swg24006178", + "swg21322417", + "swg21331026", + "swg21131613", + "swg21999096", + "swg1IY55526", + "swg1IY57767", + "swg27038969", + "swg21692438", + "swg21505981", + "swg1IZ80800" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q187", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Help with Security Bulletin: Multiple Vulnerabilities identified in IBM Java SDK affect WSRR", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I need to understand details regarding Security Bulletin: Multiple Vulnerabilities identified in IBM\u00ae Java SDK affect WebSphere Service Registry and Repository, in particular CVE-2017-10115. Where can I find this information? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg22007002", + "ANSWER": "CVEID:CVE-2017-10115 [http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2017-10115]\nDESCRIPTION:An unspecified vulnerability related to the Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit JCE component could allow an unauthenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information resulting in a high confidentiality impact using unknown attack vectors.\nCVSS Base Score: 7.5\nCVSS Temporal Score: Seehttps://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/128876 [https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/128876]for the current score\nCVSS Environmental Score*: Undefined\nCVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N)", + "START_OFFSET": "2088", + "END_OFFSET": "2706", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg22007002", + "swg21882549", + "swg2C1000296", + "swg21882528", + "swg21883331", + "swg22011198", + "swg21681915", + "swg22006996", + "swg21964872", + "swg22016430", + "swg22008341", + "swg22013955", + "swg22007465", + "swg2C1000117", + "swg22007398", + "swg21963824", + "swg22007462", + "swg22007416", + "swg21959309", + "swg21700720", + "swg22004956", + "swg22007461", + "swg21976170", + "swg21971058", + "swg21697480", + "swg2C1000269", + "swg21698829", + "swg21983039", + "swg21977130", + "swg21963306", + "swg22007508", + "swg21982695", + "swg21982569", + "swg21999481", + "swg22007569", + "swg22009084", + "swg21902450", + "swg21975925", + "swg21996778", + "swg22008330", + "swg21701285", + "swg21972257", + "swg22011913", + "swg21957919", + "swg21697087", + "swg21976844", + "swg22008208", + "swg21699940", + "swg21971454", + "swg22007883" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q188", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Is there a support's guide to the CORBA Probes?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Where can I download the support's guide to the IBM CORBA probes?", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21614208", + "ANSWER": "GENERIC_CORBA_SupportsGuide_20.pdf", + "START_OFFSET": "510", + "END_OFFSET": "544", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21614208", + "swg27042331", + "swg21611377", + "swg21241242", + "swg21967845", + "swg21600274", + "swg21987143", + "swg21697361", + "swg21578135", + "swg21685044", + "swg21964865", + "swg1IZ74516", + "swg1IZ07990", + "swg21460418", + "swg21622274", + "swg21669271", + "swg27042352", + "swg21439457", + "swg21409769", + "swg21294125", + "swg21607694", + "swg21618671", + "swg21635919", + "swg21292347", + "swg21596411", + "swg21970414", + "swg1IV89548", + "swg21966502", + "swg27042320", + "swg21579030", + "swg21579034", + "swg21607690", + "swg21503121", + "swg21421547", + "swg21599279", + "swg21679282", + "swg21614211", + "swg21665213", + "swg21572280", + "swg22013511", + "swg21450078", + "swg21626348", + "swg21689969", + "swg21579736", + "swg21579706", + "swg21412226", + "swg21599278", + "swg1IV02036", + "swg1IZ52452", + "swg21994650" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q189", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "How to wrap table column text in list tab for a specific table?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I would like to wrap the text of table column into new a line. ", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg22007765", + "swg21339492", + "swg1PM53677", + "swg21349132", + "swg21684687", + "swg21673316", + "swg21352291", + "swg21097896", + "swg1PI77789", + "swg21337950", + "nas8N1020580", + "swg21444232", + "swg21477004", + "swg21196300", + "swg21979012", + "swg21479679", + "swg21597706", + "swg21513657", + "swg1PI79021", + "swg21343203", + "swg1IT12813", + "swg21477010", + "swg1PM55764", + "swg21499085", + "swg1IV03311", + "swg1PI10422", + "swg1JR57392", + "swg27041872", + "swg21346424", + "swg21342914", + "swg21370554", + "swg21636556", + "swg21968680", + "swg1LO44913", + "swg1PJ44031", + "swg21487830", + "swg1PM80378", + "swg1PI16034", + "swg21086498", + "swg1IV63790", + "swg1IZ86727", + "swg1PM66170", + "swg21884051", + "swg21638149", + "swg1HC95702", + "swg1PI31342", + "swg1IZ80943", + "swg1PQ86811", + "swg21562754", + "swg21670931" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q190", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Is it possible to use Java large pages (-Xlp) parm with ITCAM? Is this supported?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Is it possible to use Java large pages (-Xlp) parm with ITCAM? Is this a supported feature?\n", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1IZ80981", + "swg1PI08765", + "swg21500477", + "swg21983317", + "swg1IV57808", + "swg1IZ69525", + "swg1IZ80980", + "swg21594888", + "swg21664088", + "swg1IV36801", + "swg1IV36779", + "swg21625018", + "swg1PK36846", + "swg21615622", + "swg1PK69775", + "swg21633008", + "swg1IC84215", + "swg21681626", + "swg21365541", + "swg21420884", + "swg21390376", + "swg21610343", + "swg21438339", + "swg21688744", + "swg21112854", + "swg21498301", + "swg1PM79851", + "swg21405362", + "swg1IC90889", + "swg22014048", + "swg1PK59768", + "swg21672979", + "swg21486840", + "swg21650489", + "swg1PM18892", + "isg3T1023888", + "swg21661661", + "swg1PM09648", + "swg21624484", + "isg3T1025094", + "swg21516431", + "swg21315898", + "swg21424942", + "swg21967546", + "swg1PI86847", + "swg1PK93890", + "swg21453462", + "swg1IV98400", + "swg21656013", + "swg21458247" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q191", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why does my install of the latest Installation Manager on a Linux Ingram Server not function?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Why does my install of the latest Installation Manager on a Linux Ingram Server not function?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg27024037", + "swg24023498", + "swg21667734", + "swg27023697", + "swg21994470", + "swg21636744", + "swg21976567", + "swg21971491", + "swg21991235", + "swg27040108", + "swg21644921", + "swg21701436", + "swg21640646", + "swg24035656", + "swg21444088", + "swg21450615", + "swg1IC78863", + "swg21984970", + "swg21290142", + "swg24024048", + "swg24033778", + "swg21636095", + "swg21577551", + "swg21957740", + "swg21600540", + "ssg1S4001626", + "swg24035657", + "swg21455677", + "swg22009305", + "swg21462374", + "swg21286846", + "swg27016531", + "swg21958996", + "swg21883636", + "swg21425809", + "swg21673804", + "swg21984108", + "swg21982034", + "swg21432577", + "swg27043728", + "swg21997704", + "swg21577416", + "swg21988754", + "swg21702157", + "swg24039916", + "swg24033752", + "swg21646362", + "swg21623040", + "swg21607521", + "swg21283868" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q192", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Cannot open module in exclusive edit - (no such file or directory)", + "QUESTION_TEXT": " Hello.\n\nI have a module, that I can open normally, but when I try to open it in Exclusive Edit it tells me that \"no such file or directory\"\n\nIs this a known problem?", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21511831", + "ANSWER": "This issue has been identified as a product defect under APAR PM50525", + "START_OFFSET": "1378", + "END_OFFSET": "1447", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21511831", + "swg21430028", + "swg1PM50525", + "swg21469875", + "swg21444021", + "swg1PI84449", + "swg21324649", + "swg21612615", + "swg21243647", + "swg1PM48658", + "swg1PI19699", + "swg1PM42871", + "swg21498680", + "isg3T1010931", + "swg21156399", + "swg21486438", + "swg21349677", + "swg1PM26646", + "swg21578267", + "swg21636377", + "swg21287218", + "swg1PM86063", + "swg21120227", + "swg21323811", + "swg1PM83814", + "swg21324458", + "swg21261280", + "swg21405348", + "swg1PM68200", + "swg1PM18935", + "swg1PI74306", + "swg21348378", + "swg21504910", + "swg1PM97394", + "swg21470433", + "swg21502411", + "swg21699946", + "swg1PI05594", + "swg1PI69967", + "swg21692635", + "swg21131943", + "swg1PM94655", + "swg21662104", + "swg21426604", + "swg1PM59203", + "swg1PI19687", + "swg1PI64608", + "swg21631669", + "swg1PK55523", + "swg21480634" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q193", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Are there any probes that can connecto the Nokia NSP EPC v17.9 and Nokia NSP RAN v17.3 using JMS/HTTP?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "The customer has asked if there are any probes that can connect to their Nokia servers, both of which use a HTTP/JMS interface:\n\n Nokia NSP EPC v17.9 \n Nokia NSP RAN v17.3 ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg22005197", + "ANSWER": "This probe is written to support Nokia Network Functions Manager for Packet release 17.3.", + "START_OFFSET": "190", + "END_OFFSET": "279", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1IV96981", + "swg21689969", + "swg21679282", + "swg21292347", + "swg1IZ52452", + "swg1IY96876", + "swg21622274", + "swg22005197", + "swg1IZ47658", + "swg21568039", + "swg1IZ54473", + "swg1LO65138", + "swg1IY92774", + "swg1LO49258", + "swg21569063", + "swg1IZ90686", + "swg1LO38917", + "swg1LO67892", + "swg1LO66352", + "swg1LO43868", + "swg1IZ50685", + "swg1IZ65764", + "swg1IV85251", + "swg21313651", + "swg1LO57516", + "swg1LO65473", + "swg1LO49005", + "swg1IZ37234", + "swg1IZ30763", + "swg1LO60353", + "swg1LO51057", + "swg1IJ06495", + "swg1IZ50687", + "swg1LO56169", + "swg1LO59406", + "swg1LO53572", + "swg1LO56149", + "swg1LO38615", + "swg1IV69661", + "swg1LO56985", + "swg1LO44496", + "swg1LO60833", + "swg1LO59242", + "swg1LO66358", + "swg1LO44497", + "swg1IZ85708", + "swg1LO73746", + "swg1LO50125", + "swg1LO46522", + "swg21613417" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q194", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "How to generate Javacores automatically in on hung threads reported in SystemOut.log for WebSphere Application Server?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Need Javacores to be generated on hung threads messages reported in SystemOut.log for WebSphere Applicaiton Server.Example:WSVR0605W: Thread has been active for and may be hung. There are in total in the server that may be hung.", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21610001", + "swg21314783", + "swg21673950", + "swg21965271", + "swg21599880", + "swg21269020", + "swg21448485", + "swg21610691", + "swg1LO40464", + "swg21999987", + "swg21396295", + "swg21994088", + "swg21607485", + "swg1PM45011", + "swg21670780", + "swg1PM83349", + "swg1PI11006", + "swg21590014", + "swg1PK91446", + "swg21639223", + "swg1JR27250", + "swg1JR53227", + "swg21902699", + "swg1PI62609", + "swg21321575", + "swg1PI65836", + "swg1PK97946", + "swg1PI76509", + "swg21507694", + "swg1PI05917", + "swg1PI20776", + "swg1PK86245", + "swg21595531", + "swg1PM95353", + "swg1JR36308", + "swg1JR44560", + "swg1PI13428", + "swg1PI82120", + "swg1IT07544", + "swg1PI22949", + "swg22015464", + "swg21613866", + "swg1PM64400", + "swg21421387", + "swg1PK31566", + "swg21613867", + "swg1IT07543", + "swg27045331", + "swg24025093", + "swg1PM61376" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_TITLE": "TLS protocol with ITCAM for Datapower", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "We have a DataPower appliance with TLS security protocol enabled. Can we configure ITCAM for DataPower appliance v7.1 to specifically use the TLS protocol v1.2 (not v1.0)?\n", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21959224", + "ANSWER": "TLSv1.2 is supported by using the same fix.", + "START_OFFSET": "247", + "END_OFFSET": "290", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q195", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1IT06901", + "swg21883666", + "swg21695928", + "swg1IT13742", + "swg21960889", + "swg21959060", + "swg1IT08435", + "swg21984371", + "swg21636324", + "swg21696753", + "swg21633877", + "swg21976366", + "swg1IT04452", + "swg21394718", + "swg21902506", + "swg21410851", + "swg22000057", + "swg21982765", + "swg1IV86800", + "swg27021649", + "swg21587632", + "swg1IC90431", + "swg22006688", + "swg1IT07840", + "swg21394557", + "swg1IT03868", + "swg1IT13446", + "swg22004311", + "swg1IT05134", + "swg21632275", + "swg21688318", + "swg21578730", + "swg21699392", + "swg1PI95952", + "swg21702165", + "swg24032265", + "swg21427424", + "swg1IC98780", + "swg1IT02314", + "swg21399537", + "swg1IT07236", + "swg21690323", + "swg22004497", + "swg21568404", + "swg1PI95953", + "swg21959224", + "swg21701336", + "swg1IC91726", + "swg21980676", + "swg21447044" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q196", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Error while installing SpSS modeler trial version", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I have downloaded the SPSS modeller trial version (18.1) (64 bit) and trying to install the same. I get the following error 1152: Error extracting modelerClient64.msi to the temporary location\n", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21577970", + "ANSWER": "When an IBM SPSS compressed image is launched, files compressed within it are extracted to the temporary location assigned to the signed in user i.e. /Documents and settings/... or /users.\nThe possibility of these files downloaded improperly exists. You can use a tool such\nas MD5 to verify the file content or simply attempt downloading a second time and test.\n\nOther possible causes of this error:\n- Available space within the temporary location noted by the installer.\n- Ability to write in the temporary location noted by the installer.\n\n\nANSWER\nTransfer the files again, resolved the issue.", + "START_OFFSET": "118", + "END_OFFSET": "713", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21508148", + "swg21966785", + "swg21903724", + "swg21484890", + "swg1PI60809", + "swg1PI53225", + "swg21572721", + "swg24044066", + "swg1PI79296", + "swg27038627", + "swg21489344", + "swg22007874", + "swg21649997", + "swg21672109", + "swg1PI65057", + "swg21692369", + "swg1PI59781", + "swg21512032", + "swg21477927", + "swg21475390", + "swg21512033", + "swg1PI57765", + "swg1PI76006", + "swg22005394", + "swg21577970", + "swg1PI59778", + "swg1PI83717", + "swg21512031", + "swg1PI70058", + "swg21469689", + "swg21983004", + "swg21480534", + "swg22006227", + "swg21483967", + "swg21967753", + "swg1PI70085", + "swg1PI52296", + "swg21481476", + "swg1PI58282", + "swg21488129", + "swg1PI42290", + "swg21980090", + "swg21676555", + "swg1PI69891", + "swg1PI67881", + "swg21487455", + "swg21647341", + "swg1PM71289", + "swg1PI74644", + "swg24032237" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q197", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Help with Security Bulletin: WMB and IIB are affected by 'Information Disclosure' vulnerability", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I need to understand details regarding Security Bulletin: WebSphere Message Broker and IBM Integration Bus are affected by 'Information Disclosure' vulnerability. Where can I find this information? ", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21985013", + "swg21902837", + "swg21997918", + "swg21975233", + "swg21997906", + "swg22008470", + "swg21994213", + "swg21685137", + "swg22005383", + "swg21682567", + "swg21682681", + "swg21993043", + "swg22005331", + "swg21967265", + "swg21677891", + "swg21985017", + "swg21957998", + "swg21697458", + "swg21961734", + "swg22011500", + "swg21982178", + "swg21690725", + "swg21964869", + "swg21969672", + "swg22005335", + "swg21979292", + "swg21697709", + "swg21992894", + "swg21985691", + "swg21685416", + "swg21995004", + "swg21972391", + "swg21685819", + "swg21995079", + "swg21689775", + "swg21688444", + "swg21970582", + "swg22005566", + "swg22010090", + "swg22013944", + "swg22016279", + "swg22014986", + "swg22007237", + "swg22016440", + "swg22016136", + "swg22014421", + "swg21689805", + "swg22005345", + "swg21700354", + "swg22016288" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q198", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why is CSV002I occurring for CSQADITB?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "An application is getting repeated errors: \nCSV002I REQUESTS FOR MODULE CSQADITB EXCEED MAXIMUM USE COUNT\n\nRestarting the application clears the error messages for a while. Why is this occurring?\n", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1PM12719", + "swg1PK74678", + "swg1PM09457", + "swg1PQ74342", + "swg21535124", + "swg1PK75168", + "swg1OW54974", + "swg1PM03617", + "swg1PM68728", + "swg1PQ81174", + "swg1PQ43643", + "swg1PQ53987", + "swg1PM72630", + "swg1PM62137", + "swg1PI24718", + "swg1PI24859", + "swg1PI30974", + "swg1PM93361", + "swg1PN89268", + "swg1PM26058", + "swg1PM00321", + "swg1PN84865", + "swg1PM67530", + "swg1PN92403", + "swg1PK61908", + "swg1OA55263", + "swg1PM60289", + "swg1PK40321", + "swg1PQ46584", + "swg1PQ90816", + "swg1PI86338", + "swg1PM12146", + "swg1PI94445", + "swg1PI95182", + "swg1PK37842", + "swg21997171", + "swg1PQ11231", + "swg1PN63612", + "swg1PQ08338", + "swg1PQ91132", + "swg1PM90755", + "swg21230514", + "swg21236327", + "swg21640767", + "swg1PM53598", + "swg21633463", + "swg21980902", + "swg21987923", + "swg21621635", + "swg1PM86738" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q199", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "How do I resolve a WSVR0605W hung thread issue in the WebSphere MQ Resource Adapter?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "The following WebSphere MQ Resource Adapter hung thread can prevent an application server from starting...\n\nWSVR0605W: Thread \"WMQJCAResourceAdapter : 6\" (0000001b) has been active for 698530 milliseconds and may be hung. There is 1 thread(s) in total in the server that may be hung. at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:167) at com.ibm.ejs.container.MessageEndpointFactoryImpl.createEndpoint(MessageEndpointFactoryImpl.java:498) at com.ibm.mq.connector.inbound.WorkImpl.run(WorkImpl.java:149)", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21673950", + "swg1IZ68236", + "swg1PI05917", + "swg21638205", + "swg21507694", + "swg1JR53227", + "swg1IV18136", + "swg27045331", + "swg1PM61376", + "swg22007540", + "swg1IV51449", + "swg21448485", + "swg21994088", + "swg21321575", + "swg1PI27320", + "swg1PM06420", + "swg1JR36308", + "swg1PM27960", + "swg1IX90131", + "swg1JR41989", + "swg21677945", + "swg1PM95353", + "swg21660162", + "swg21590014", + "swg1IT06660", + "swg21988399", + "swg1PI13428", + "swg1PM54812", + "swg1PI13992", + "swg1JR44560", + "swg1PK97946", + "swg1JR27250", + "swg1PI20803", + "swg1LO82278", + "swg21639223", + "swg21586663", + "swg1IT15274", + "swg21448581", + "swg21328533", + "swg21990190", + "swg21314783", + "swg1PI15529", + "swg1PM60919", + "swg1PM45011", + "swg21666352", + "swg21969180", + "swg1JR49408", + "swg21643415", + "swg1PI47492", + "swg1PM16223" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q200", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Improve Performance of Rule Designer (ODM) and Rule Studio (JRules)", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "How can I improve the performance when working with ODM Rule Designer or WebSphere ILOG JRules Rule Studio? ", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21589514", + "swg21589902", + "swg21590333", + "swg21584855", + "swg21589513", + "swg27023725", + "swg21495825", + "swg21449102", + "swg21612907", + "swg21607802", + "swg21469115", + "swg21427772", + "swg21400738", + "swg21430582", + "swg21400817", + "swg21501461", + "swg21578211", + "swg21588859", + "swg21635533", + "swg1RS00119", + "swg21591800", + "swg21651648", + "swg21615250", + "swg21651647", + "swg21644787", + "swg21635066", + "swg21590855", + "swg21504807", + "swg21592060", + "swg27016345", + "swg21419945", + "swg21461685", + "swg21663395", + "swg27016357", + "swg21634188", + "swg21400593", + "swg1RS00685", + "swg1RS00127", + "swg21566411", + "swg21422330", + "swg21686019", + "swg1RS00008", + "swg21599332", + "swg27019707", + "swg27019005", + "swg27016347", + "swg21587817", + "swg21449660", + "swg21605119", + "swg21400705" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q201", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why are HTML documents not rendering and just shown as plain text after upgrading and installing ifixes to BPM?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "After upgrading BPM, my HTML documents that were once rendering are no longer being displayed correctly and are being shown as plain text. This is happening in multiple web browses. ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21679979", + "ANSWER": "Install IBM Business Process Manager interim fix JR50092 as appropriate for your current IBM Business Process Manager or WebSphere Lombardi Edition version.", + "START_OFFSET": "1132", + "END_OFFSET": "1288", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1LO78902", + "swg1IC43272", + "swg1JR48814", + "swg1PM24779", + "swg1JR54232", + "swg21413406", + "swg21586266", + "swg21258762", + "swg21650629", + "swg1IO18661", + "swg1PK88161", + "swg1PM68282", + "swg1LO81785", + "swg22010443", + "swg1IZ99337", + "swg21380840", + "swg21287159", + "swg21501220", + "swg1IO11664", + "swg1LO93217", + "swg21448083", + "swg27037045", + "swg1PK69231", + "swg21373330", + "swg21405679", + "swg1JR57588", + "swg21329462", + "swg27014036", + "swg1LO78876", + "swg1LO70445", + "swg21679979", + "swg21627014", + "swg21469273", + "nas8N1020873", + "swg1JR50092", + "swg1IV10151", + "swg1PK30057", + "swg21330333", + "swg21307493", + "swg21429649", + "swg1LO40777", + "swg1PM24636", + "swg21313441", + "swg21979614", + "swg21220250", + "swg1PQ40310", + "swg21101334", + "swg1IV96613", + "swg21667864", + "swg1LO60221" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q202", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why is installation manager cores when try to install netcool using GUI mode in AIX 7.1?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "IBM Installation Manager Cores when running in GUI mode on AIX 7.1 ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21631478", + "ANSWER": "To use the GUI, the gtk+ RPM and dependencies must be available on AIX. \n\n\nInstall this set of RPMs on AIX:", + "START_OFFSET": "7135", + "END_OFFSET": "7242", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg24038054", + "swg27043142", + "swg21661861", + "swg21469762", + "swg21599089", + "swg21498661", + "swg1IC99197", + "swg1IC95881", + "swg21455149", + "swg1IZ70296", + "swg1PM69663", + "swg1IT11617", + "swg21683244", + "swg1PI29110", + "swg21631478", + "swg21967264", + "swg21469033", + "swg27027178", + "swg21622513", + "swg27036212", + "swg21957879", + "swg21438776", + "nas8N1012223", + "swg22010179", + "swg21375571", + "swg21389888", + "swg24042656", + "swg22004059", + "swg24041283", + "swg1IV97558", + "swg27042323", + "swg21380745", + "swg21366385", + "swg24043360", + "swg24043836", + "swg24039346", + "swg21985946", + "swg1IV98062", + "swg21694105", + "swg27018338", + "swg24039838", + "swg21681385", + "swg21428366", + "swg21883385", + "swg1IT17288", + "swg21574804", + "swg27018339", + "swg27018353", + "swg21446020", + "swg24041385" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q203", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why WebSphere Application Server transactions are rolled back with these StaleConnectionExceptions?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Why WebSphere Application Server transactions are rolled back with these StaleConnectionExceptions?\nMy transactions are rolled back and the following errors are seen in the WebSphere Application Server logs:\n\nConnectionEve A J2CA0056I: ........ ........ Connection reset:java.net.SocketException: Connection reset [15/03/04 1:04:33:046 JST] 00000024 SystemOut O INFO Error executing internal sql (executing callable statement) com.ibm.websphere.ce.cm.StaleConnectionException: IO?G??\u00f1[: Connection reset at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) at \n...\nSee original exception message: ...... with SQL State : 08003 SQL Code : 17008 ..... .....\nCaused by: java.sql.SQLRecoverableException: .......DSRA0010E: SQL State : 08003 SQL Code : 17008", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1PI15273", + "swg22002082", + "swg21670362", + "swg21645118", + "swg21997171", + "swg21590014", + "swg21327720", + "swg21372849", + "swg21460740", + "swg1PM35447", + "swg21976202", + "swg21998967", + "swg1PK77738", + "swg1PK37021", + "swg1IV25873", + "swg21511915", + "swg21624733", + "swg21627038", + "swg21427444", + "swg21415787", + "swg21633692", + "swg21902699", + "swg21462224", + "swg1PK59276", + "swg1PI24125", + "swg1PK56726", + "swg21237419", + "nas8N1016313", + "swg1IC81239", + "swg1IC96857", + "nas8N1011989", + "swg21570753", + "swg21961306", + "swg21598743", + "swg1PK02938", + "swg21641109", + "swg21634256", + "swg1PK55043", + "swg1PK92508", + "swg1PI67305", + "swg21229693", + "swg1PK86206", + "swg1PI56467", + "swg1PM70624", + "swg21288806", + "swg1PK80871", + "swg1PM66933", + "swg21496900", + "swg21663414", + "swg21572444" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q204", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Best WTX Version to Upgrade to", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "We're a longtime TSI / Mercator / Ascential / WTX user (1996) in the govt. sector and need to upgrade from v8.3.0.3 to remain under support. The project is very stable, limited to translating 270/271 and similar proprietary formats with only about a dozen maps. Our upgrade will be in April, 2016. What stable WTX version would you folks recommend? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21903101", + "ANSWER": "IBM WebSphere\u00ae Transformation Extender V8.4.1.3 is now available through Passport Advantage.", + "START_OFFSET": "39", + "END_OFFSET": "131", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21903101", + "swg21358525", + "swg21579983", + "swg21975029", + "swg21593272", + "swg24015131", + "swg21248678", + "swg21500894", + "swg21632608", + "swg21245727", + "swg21248760", + "swg21606288", + "swg21416949", + "swg21429427", + "swg21393331", + "swg21469565", + "swg21605374", + "swg21578708", + "swg21674686", + "swg21577844", + "swg1PI48090", + "swg21677123", + "swg1PK88559", + "swg21243739", + "swg21379449", + "swg21663283", + "swg21499705", + "swg21244172", + "swg21586418", + "swg21592706", + "swg21964605", + "swg21252675", + "swg21474125", + "swg27018910", + "swg21609008", + "swg21516126", + "swg22010038", + "swg21379454", + "swg21646666", + "swg21643824", + "swg21244201", + "swg21579777", + "swg21248090", + "swg21982173", + "swg21636711", + "swg21243594", + "swg21250838", + "swg27024914", + "swg21655362", + "swg21496557" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q205", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Launching IBM Rational Software Architect application results in Error: Java was started but returned exit code = -1", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "At times when you launch Rational Software Architect (RSA) application, you might encounter the following error: Error: Java was started but returned exit code = -1 ", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1PM22554", + "swg21567836", + "swg21454409", + "swg21255195", + "swg1PM61051", + "swg21327744", + "swg21445652", + "swg21273408", + "swg21502701", + "swg21971004", + "swg21246771", + "swg21501371", + "swg1PM84070", + "swg21288832", + "swg21287348", + "swg21256889", + "swg21454033", + "swg21212755", + "swg21449514", + "swg21380697", + "swg21258902", + "swg21502684", + "swg21656989", + "swg1PM72959", + "swg21294392", + "swg22010607", + "swg21236065", + "swg21238679", + "swg21417616", + "swg21238597", + "swg21305500", + "swg21281376", + "swg21474213", + "swg1PI67131", + "swg21260410", + "swg1PM84218", + "swg21328849", + "swg21570990", + "swg1PI39444", + "swg1PI39418", + "swg21295329", + "swg1PM86249", + "swg1PM94298", + "swg1PI53717", + "swg21267313", + "swg21633641", + "swg21273330", + "swg21669660", + "swg1PM88777", + "swg21253803" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q206", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why does nco_confpack -export fail with the message \"Tool in menu but not found\"?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nI tried to export OMNIbus configuration using nco_confpack command and I get the following message:\n\nTool in menu but not found, menu: AlertsMenu, tool: Close\n\nI've also tried using it with -list command and I get the same error.\n\nWhy is this happening?", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21672071", + "ANSWER": "The menu AlertsMenu has a tool in it called CLEAR_LWY, however the tool no longer exists.", + "START_OFFSET": "453", + "END_OFFSET": "542", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21672071", + "swg21432060", + "swg1IZ67229", + "swg1IV81481", + "swg1IV45775", + "swg21272551", + "swg1IY92878", + "swg21683992", + "swg21476065", + "swg24027482", + "swg21294709", + "swg27043960", + "swg21639252", + "swg21682650", + "swg1HD93562", + "swg21682765", + "swg21505912", + "swg1IV24963", + "swg27041806", + "swg21578136", + "swg1IY19188", + "nas8N1019162", + "swg1PK89060", + "swg1LO39948", + "swg21478866", + "swg21480488", + "swg21260983", + "swg21553172", + "swg21478674", + "swg1JR32240", + "swg21478205", + "swg21416385", + "swg21479422", + "isg3T1014943", + "swg21274666", + "swg21272546", + "swg1LO39651", + "swg1LO68498", + "swg1LO76903", + "nas8N1012042", + "swg21373323", + "nas8N1022399", + "swg1HD91264", + "swg21290597", + "swg1IV67744", + "swg21274685", + "swg21158221", + "swg1PQ96959", + "nas8N1021815", + "swg21476467" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q207", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Improve Performance of Decision Validation Services (DVS) and Decision Warehouse", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "How can I improve the performance of Decision Validation Services (DVS) and Decision Warehouse? ", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg27023725", + "swg21588859", + "swg21589902", + "swg21441394", + "swg21440249", + "swg21590333", + "swg21627010", + "swg21587817", + "swg21586717", + "swg21589514", + "swg21584855", + "swg21426871", + "swg21495819", + "swg21425487", + "swg24029716", + "swg21677736", + "swg24033604", + "swg24030832", + "swg21427125", + "swg21578192", + "swg21678239", + "swg21635533", + "swg21430461", + "swg21589513", + "swg1RS00212", + "swg1PI98282", + "swg21652005", + "swg21651648", + "swg21615508", + "swg21579231", + "swg21679679", + "swg1RS02323", + "swg1RS02562", + "swg21642741", + "swg21420910", + "swg21452630", + "swg21587674", + "swg21495979", + "swg21449660", + "swg24029802", + "swg24026623", + "swg24030829", + "swg24043197", + "swg21585677", + "swg1RS01803", + "swg21400593", + "swg24043046", + "swg24042898", + "swg21502095", + "swg24043308" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q208", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Error TASK001X while upgrading Portal 8.0.0.1 to 8.0.0.1 CF14 during import-nodes sub-task", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "While attempting to upgrade Portal to CF14 the upgrade fails during the import-nodes sub-task.\n\nThe ConfigTrace.log shows the following...\n\nimport-nodes:\n\n--- Exception Thrown --- C:\\Portal8\\PortalServer\\jcr\\wp.content.repository.install\\config\\include s\\jcr.install_cfg.xml:826: com.ibm.icm.jcr.task.TaskException: TASK001X: Remote task execution failed with response code 404 due to exception : Not Found . Please check the server log for more information.\n", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21691034", + "ANSWER": "Please make the following change in the WAS Admin Console...\nApplications > WebSphere enterprise applications >\nJavaContentRepository > Target specific application status > Check the\nbox for the WebSphere_Portal server > Click Enable Auto Start > Save\nchanges > restart Portal\n\nAfter making this change please attempt the CF upgrade again.", + "START_OFFSET": "4976", + "END_OFFSET": "5315", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21691034", + "swg21678209", + "swg21687031", + "swg21631337", + "swg1PI21262", + "swg21496067", + "swg21628853", + "swg21661539", + "swg1PM10006", + "swg21699064", + "swg21631948", + "swg21964807", + "swg21622453", + "swg21689351", + "swg21696379", + "swg21627321", + "swg1PM92541", + "swg21696074", + "swg21433884", + "swg21678206", + "swg1PI37735", + "swg21677833", + "swg21578509", + "swg21570663", + "swg21675907", + "swg21609188", + "swg1PM89010", + "swg21512560", + "swg21693532", + "swg21573112", + "swg21903554", + "swg21470630", + "swg21685734", + "swg21627093", + "swg21621537", + "swg21673016", + "swg21678763", + "swg1PM56148", + "swg21444888", + "swg1PI30627", + "swg21636131", + "swg21966664", + "swg1PK69083", + "swg21698162", + "swg21681745", + "swg1PM89104", + "swg21596101", + "swg1PM92247", + "swg21663574", + "swg1PM04909" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q209", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "How to change the maximum string length for properties in FileNet Administration Console for Content Engine (ACCE)", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I am trying to change the maximum string length in ACCE like we do in FileNet Enterprise Manager, but in the more Tab, I am not seeing the option. In this case, how can I change it? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21696083", + "ANSWER": "Follow the below steps to update the property definition properties on ACCE: \n\n\n\n\n 1. Launch ACCE \n 2. Expand the object stores folder and click the object store to open the Object store tab \n 3. Expand the Data Design folder and Classes folder. Click the document class to open Document Class tab \n 4. From Properties tab, open Property Definitions drop down and select the property definition you want to modify \n 5. ACCE will open that property definition in a new Properties tab \n 6. Modify the property definition as required \n 7. Go back to the Class Definition tab and click Save", + "START_OFFSET": "550", + "END_OFFSET": "1136", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21694202", + "swg21385716", + "swg21680952", + "swg21685211", + "swg21988219", + "swg21308282", + "swg21674490", + "swg21980248", + "swg21697482", + "swg21657473", + "swg22005901", + "swg21987866", + "swg21696083", + "swg21437964", + "swg21699480", + "swg21973680", + "swg21982637", + "swg21674966", + "swg21654132", + "swg21882608", + "swg21976655", + "swg21664367", + "swg21461800", + "swg21308321", + "swg21699132", + "swg21698710", + "swg21977442", + "swg21634912", + "swg22012521", + "swg21966323", + "swg21991929", + "swg21962447", + "swg21883265", + "swg21481043", + "swg21669570", + "swg22009985", + "swg1PJ43019", + "swg21971624", + "swg22004872", + "swg21667154", + "swg21967161", + "swg21382761", + "swg21404747", + "swg21974284", + "swg1PJ42958", + "swg21998257", + "swg21654862", + "swg21695098", + "swg22013486", + "swg21968032" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q210", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "startNode failed with ADML3000E after a deployment failure", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Client had a deployment failure due to \"Too many open files\" error.\n\nAfterwards, the startNode failed with ADML3000E:\n\nWhat could cause the \"Too many open files error?", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21067352", + "ANSWER": "When the \"Too Many Open Files\" error message is written to the logs, it indicates that all available file handles for the process have been used (this includes sockets as well). In a majority of cases, this is the result of file handles being leaked by some part of the application.", + "START_OFFSET": "645", + "END_OFFSET": "927", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21537317", + "swg21698405", + "swg22006007", + "swg21551911", + "swg21613091", + "isg3T1016296", + "swg1IZ61679", + "swg1IT09823", + "swg24035184", + "swg1JR27566", + "swg21643376", + "swg21903630", + "swg21992719", + "swg1IC42942", + "swg1IV55924", + "swg22006979", + "swg21967805", + "swg21980823", + "swg21555236", + "swg21067352", + "swg1PK23985", + "swg21450714", + "swg1IV94054", + "swg21511791", + "swg1IC67839", + "swg21597138", + "swg21218737", + "swg1PK24700", + "swg21625748", + "swg21608715", + "swg1PK58479", + "swg21380080", + "swg22013261", + "swg21591213", + "swg1IC98978", + "swg21632151", + "swg1PK09326", + "swg21600593", + "swg21579828", + "swg1IY68545", + "swg1IC87826", + "swg21468765", + "swg21393774", + "swg21258086", + "swg21572431", + "swg21327907", + "swg21678015", + "swg21689823", + "swg1PK83238", + "swg21533786" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q211", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "You want to know how to make persistent the events that indicate when a queue manager has started and stopped.", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "You want to know how to make persistent the events that indicate when a queue manager has started and stopped.", + "DOCUMENT": "swg27050154", + "ANSWER": "First, a baseline scenario is described in which when using the defaults, there is only 1 record in the SYSTEM.ADMIN.QMGR.EVENT queue, regardless of how many times you restart the queue manager.\n\n\nSecond, a modification is done to the SYSTEM.ADMIN.QMGR.EVENT queue to indicate that the default persistence is enabled, and thus, subsequent events from the stop/start of the queue manager will be kept in the queue.\nalter ql(SYSTEM.ADMIN.QMGR.EVENT) defpsist(YES)", + "START_OFFSET": "190", + "END_OFFSET": "651", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg27050154", + "swg21669244", + "swg21237282", + "swg1PK53055", + "swg21978231", + "swg21333231", + "swg21392465", + "swg21323435", + "swg1PK82134", + "swg1PK71909", + "swg21231054", + "swg1PM63509", + "swg21574053", + "swg1PK89939", + "swg1PK87159", + "swg1IT09663", + "swg21169636", + "swg1SA94952", + "swg22011290", + "swg1IT11291", + "swg1PN60374", + "swg1PI23325", + "swg21608033", + "swg21516881", + "swg21620882", + "swg21405299", + "swg1PK24611", + "swg21993556", + "swg21142296", + "swg1IV37034", + "swg21994965", + "swg21405507", + "swg21623002", + "swg21667361", + "swg21598738", + "swg1PK15592", + "swg21574670", + "swg21563164", + "swg1PK22231", + "swg21064490", + "swg21320347", + "swg1IC88401", + "swg1IV04585", + "swg1OA38228", + "swg21986161", + "swg21434661", + "swg1IV36425", + "swg1PI78879", + "swg1OA38974", + "swg1PK32981" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q212", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Datacap 9.0.1 Application Manager not saving database configs", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nHi All,\n\n \nI have installed Datacap 9.0.1 and there is a issue of not connecting to Admin and engine DB with Datacap 9.0.1.\n \nThe problem is there for saving admin and engine db configurations.\n \nWhen selected the path it saves but after tab out and tab in it clears admin and engine DB configurations.\n \nEven I tried with exporting and importing keys but no luck.\nRepair and re-install of Datacap is also done but no luck.\n \nPlease let me know if any of had faced similar kind of issue and any solution for it.\n", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21996187", + "swg21599801", + "swg21500328", + "swg21973739", + "swg1IO24746", + "swg21959318", + "swg21664386", + "swg21996717", + "swg21507391", + "swg21647109", + "swg21507030", + "swg1IO24509", + "swg21503322", + "swg21974023", + "swg21968904", + "swg27041951", + "swg1IO24875", + "swg1IO24666", + "swg27039743", + "swg1IO24447", + "swg27049420", + "swg1IO24540", + "swg21504200", + "swg21675631", + "swg21665610", + "swg21635504", + "swg1IO24703", + "swg22005513", + "swg21968951", + "swg1IO24597", + "swg1IV34552", + "swg21991398", + "swg1IO24442", + "swg21666402", + "swg27047298", + "swg1IV99503", + "swg21968549", + "swg21566941", + "swg22015844", + "swg27050031", + "swg21567483", + "swg1IO24495", + "swg21636776", + "swg1IO23927", + "swg1IO24471", + "swg1IO24168", + "swg1HD68705", + "swg1IO24682", + "swg21976161", + "swg21606570" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q213", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Can I migrate or convert Workplace XT created Search Templates to Content Navigator?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "When migrating from Workplace XT to Content Navigator, can I covert or migrate XT created search templates to the ICN version of managed search templates?", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21648471", + "ANSWER": "Workplace XT created search templates are also supported in ICN with the restriction that the search template cannot be edited in ICN.", + "START_OFFSET": "510", + "END_OFFSET": "644", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21648471", + "swg21631559", + "swg21974687", + "swg27039472", + "swg21964458", + "swg27042668", + "swg21981174", + "swg1PJ37195", + "swg27044022", + "swg21504453", + "swg1PJ39264", + "swg1IO18580", + "swg1IO19036", + "swg1PJ36608", + "swg1IO26244", + "swg27038765", + "swg1PJ36863", + "swg21698998", + "swg1IO22664", + "swg21622439", + "swg1IO23939", + "swg1PJ36511", + "swg27042495", + "swg1PJ39345", + "swg1PJ39344", + "swg27047576", + "swg21600778", + "swg21884022", + "swg1PJ38317", + "swg21977898", + "swg1IO19783", + "swg1IO22899", + "swg1IO22362", + "swg1PJ38766", + "swg1PJ33526", + "swg21662803", + "swg1PJ37002", + "swg21959041", + "swg1IO25469", + "swg1IO22388", + "swg27022200", + "swg21579910", + "swg22005838", + "swg1PJ40540", + "swg21654981", + "swg1IO17916", + "swg21990584", + "swg21390471", + "swg21627609", + "swg1PJ37186" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q214", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why is my PDWDB flooded with irrelevant tracking data which is not related to process instances ?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "My PDWDB does show a huge amount of data residing on the PDWDB table/view for TASKS. Most of the data does only have an ID and is not related to process instances ? ", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1JR47158", + "swg21612755", + "swg1JR48597", + "swg1JR44552", + "swg21381220", + "swg21624173", + "swg21500897", + "swg21657791", + "swg22008824", + "swg1JR41778", + "swg1IT07185", + "swg21612078", + "swg1HD67621", + "swg21960121", + "swg21439836", + "swg21476041", + "swg21518147", + "swg21457147", + "swg21696497", + "swg1IZ58373", + "swg1JR44239", + "swg1IC74656", + "swg21641946", + "swg21613989", + "swg21681197", + "swg21657331", + "swg27022613", + "swg21610656", + "swg21681956", + "swg21485018", + "swg21674751", + "swg21579576", + "isg3T1000166", + "swg21649777", + "swg1IV33954", + "swg1JR45173", + "swg21129474", + "swg21664366", + "swg21645078", + "swg1JR52086", + "swg21476065", + "swg1JR48483", + "swg21030787", + "swg1IV60883", + "swg22012817", + "swg21989997", + "swg21981235", + "swg21557485", + "swg21609791", + "swg1JR49854" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q215", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "When should I use conversation sharing in DataPower MQ queue managers?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "MQ version 7.0 introduced a new feature, conversation sharing. Are there any special values on DataPower when configuring conversation sharing?", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21647231", + "ANSWER": "The default setting of sharing conversations (SHARECNV) value is zero in DataPower mq-qm object. The same default value for MQ SVRCONN channel is 10. The sharing conversations value is \nnegotiated between MQ server and DataPower and the lower value takes effect. However, in current versions of the DataPower firmware, the sharing conversations setting of 1 is treated as 0 when negotiating with MQ server.", + "START_OFFSET": "542", + "END_OFFSET": "948", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21647231", + "swg1IC91594", + "swg1IT16873", + "swg1IC69197", + "swg1IT02476", + "swg1IC91486", + "swg1IT10128", + "swg1IT18157", + "swg1IT14409", + "swg1IT10498", + "swg1IC89569", + "swg1IV47785", + "swg1IT17153", + "swg1IZ33379", + "swg1IC99575", + "swg1IZ69682", + "swg1IT16786", + "swg1IT04771", + "swg1IZ85904", + "swg1IT09442", + "swg1PK73643", + "swg1PI19721", + "swg1IT08838", + "swg1IZ52693", + "swg1IT22127", + "swg1IC58543", + "swg1IC79037", + "swg1PM26590", + "swg1IV03127", + "swg1PI18232", + "swg1PI64465", + "swg1PI68897", + "swg1PM52894", + "swg1PM54883", + "swg1PM54201", + "swg1PK77094", + "swg1IC66174", + "swg1PK95837", + "swg1PK64466", + "swg1IZ75511", + "swg1PI55507", + "swg1PM81116", + "swg21299323", + "swg1IZ54543", + "swg1PM52877", + "swg1PK83207", + "swg1PI95423", + "swg21166048", + "swg1IT18242", + "swg24023356" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q216", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Error message 1311 when attempting to install SPSS 23 on Windows 10.", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nI have downloaded SPSS 23 onto a Windows 10 operating system. The computer previously had SPSS, however the computer crashed and SPSS needs be installed on the new operating system. When trying to install the program the following error message appears Error 1311. Source file not found.\n\nScreenshot attached.\nerror-messg.png (50.7 kB)", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21480262", + "ANSWER": "Stop the installation. Extract all of the files in the compressed (.zip file) to a new folder, and run the installer executable ('setup.exe') from that new folder.", + "START_OFFSET": "568", + "END_OFFSET": "731", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21480262", + "swg21477414", + "swg21883079", + "swg1PM48493", + "swg22014731", + "swg1PI65057", + "swg21599413", + "swg21479763", + "swg21634398", + "swg1PI31551", + "swg21480416", + "swg21482958", + "swg21480859", + "swg21975240", + "swg1PI27255", + "swg21483499", + "swg21482206", + "swg27047057", + "swg1PI47118", + "swg21489105", + "swg21990885", + "swg21484012", + "swg21656246", + "swg1PM48126", + "swg21487600", + "swg21477587", + "swg21481164", + "swg21985888", + "swg21579980", + "swg21507587", + "swg21485674", + "swg21477390", + "swg21475365", + "swg1PI52976", + "swg21698909", + "swg1PI40527", + "swg1PI66719", + "swg21608338", + "swg21975982", + "swg21485128", + "swg1PM59211", + "swg1PI14508", + "swg21487595", + "swg21480498", + "swg21668632", + "swg21984541", + "swg21646023", + "swg21478398", + "swg21477345", + "swg21999396" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q217", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "What process do i neet to follow to upgrade our SPSS Modeler deployment (concurrent license) from v16 to v18?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "We have 5 users with SPSS Modeler 16 installed using the Concurrent license manager supplied for that version. We need to upgrade to v18. Do we need to upgrade the license manager as well? ", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21984208", + "swg21485235", + "swg21983004", + "swg21656246", + "swg21485231", + "swg21608338", + "swg21502922", + "swg21959249", + "swg21503796", + "swg27038627", + "swg21980410", + "swg22009450", + "swg22005974", + "swg21485115", + "swg1PI48071", + "swg21655210", + "swg21616323", + "swg21981120", + "swg21606687", + "swg21478846", + "swg21488453", + "swg21483924", + "swg21480755", + "swg1PI53225", + "swg21992076", + "swg21483731", + "swg21483949", + "swg21986738", + "swg1PI37222", + "swg21677004", + "swg21477472", + "swg21476542", + "swg21649997", + "swg21985805", + "swg21696337", + "swg21480973", + "swg1PI23830", + "swg21667931", + "swg21702183", + "swg1PM91396", + "swg21668632", + "swg21480534", + "swg21999396", + "swg1PI25207", + "swg21482180", + "swg21989211", + "swg21637693", + "swg1PM71655", + "swg1PI53900", + "swg21653016" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q218", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why is MQ pattern showing installed MQ version as 8.0.0.2, instead of 8.0.0.4 when client tries to deploy pattern at the MQ 8.0.0.4 version in PureApplication System?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "In the pattern, it was clearly showing MQ version 8.0.0.4. After deployment, client checked the MQ version on the Virtual Machine and it shows 8.0.0.2 instead.\n", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21984588", + "ANSWER": "A new maintenance.py lifecycle script is available to enable installation and migration of the latest maintenance level of IBM MQ contained in the pattern-type.", + "START_OFFSET": "1335", + "END_OFFSET": "1495", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1IT15252", + "swg1IT23719", + "swg21984588", + "swg24040022", + "swg1IT10548", + "swg27048182", + "swg27047645", + "swg24040027", + "swg24040040", + "swg1IT15066", + "swg1IT23434", + "swg27047583", + "swg1IT12401", + "swg24037500", + "swg1PI41909", + "swg21376217", + "swg22016088", + "swg24042095", + "swg1IT17436", + "swg21970278", + "swg27048266", + "swg1IT10001", + "swg24044732", + "swg1IT14134", + "swg1IT18790", + "swg1IT22678", + "swg24044322", + "swg1IT20918", + "swg1IT18829", + "swg1IT10662", + "swg1IT18908", + "swg1IT22860", + "swg27047110", + "swg1IT12491", + "swg21647169", + "swg22005832", + "swg22017459", + "swg22010861", + "swg21995100", + "swg1IT06605", + "swg22015103", + "swg1IT09363", + "swg1IT17437", + "swg1IT08918", + "swg1IT12935", + "swg21986264", + "swg27048436", + "swg27048437", + "swg27048422", + "swg1PM94591" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q219", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Big increase in the amount of trace spool data from TSAMP", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Recently it was noticed that our trace spool directories were filling up much quicker. There are thousands of refreshOpState messages in the trace files. What is causing all these messages all of a sudden ? ", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg22007751", + "swg21375626", + "swg21504122", + "swg21679875", + "swg1PQ50574", + "nas8N1010058", + "swg21679513", + "swg21655039", + "swg21584680", + "swg21441269", + "swg21969881", + "swg27039217", + "swg21882660", + "swg1PQ52581", + "swg1PI09449", + "isg3T1010412", + "swg21669530", + "swg1IV15081", + "swg1PQ55939", + "swg21442597", + "swg27024950", + "swg27018159", + "nas8N1019899", + "swg1OA35384", + "swg1PN76611", + "swg1PM85294", + "swg1PQ62628", + "swg1PM87991", + "swg21539104", + "swg21414302", + "nas8N1020390", + "swg21624179", + "swg21382438", + "nas8N1012479", + "swg21454425", + "swg21331169", + "nas8N1013480", + "swg1PQ88734", + "swg21398059", + "nas8N1012229", + "swg21608853", + "nas8N1017150", + "swg1PQ50714", + "swg21459527", + "swg21673850", + "swg1PK27852", + "swg21454420", + "nas8N1017297", + "swg21025551", + "swg1OA30442" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q220", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Help with Security Bulletin: TLS padding vulnerability affects IBM PureApplication System (CVE-2014-8730)", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I need to understand details regarding \"Security Bulletin: TLS padding vulnerability affects IBM PureApplication System (CVE-2014-8730)\". Where can I find this information? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21960375", + "ANSWER": "CVEID: CVE-2014-8730 [http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2014-8730]\nDESCRIPTION: IBM PureApplication Server bundles IBM HTTP Server, which could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by the failure to check the contents of the padding bytes when using CBC cipher suites of some TLS implementations. A remote user with the ability to conduct a man-in-the-middle attack could exploit this vulnerability via a POODLE (Padding Oracle On Downgraded Legacy Encryption) like attack to decrypt sensitive information and calculate the plain text of secure connections.\nCVSS Base Score: 4.3\nCVSS Temporal Score: See https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/99216 [https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/99216] for the current score\nCVSS Environmental Score*: Undefined\nCVSS Vector: (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N)", + "START_OFFSET": "216", + "END_OFFSET": "1083", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21693011", + "swg21693589", + "swg21693254", + "swg21693255", + "swg21960375", + "swg21882609", + "swg21693476", + "nas8N1020471", + "swg21700354", + "swg21693515", + "swg21694215", + "swg21692911", + "swg21692793", + "swg21694133", + "swg21693257", + "swg21692711", + "swg21694114", + "swg21693669", + "swg21693422", + "swg21693285", + "swg1IT10233", + "swg21693330", + "swg21693623", + "swg21693184", + "swg21694651", + "swg21693008", + "swg21693290", + "swg21693182", + "swg21692972", + "swg21698835", + "swg21693657", + "swg21693262", + "swg21693271", + "swg21694312", + "swg21693142", + "swg21693337", + "swg21700209", + "swg21687172", + "swg21692927", + "swg21693495", + "swg21700204", + "swg21692655", + "swg21693181", + "swg21692934", + "swg21693140", + "swg21694329", + "swg21692785", + "swg21692769", + "swg21692552", + "swg21692582" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q221", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "App Connect Professional (formerly Cast Iron) Studio not launching", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "When trying to start App Connect Professional (formerly Cast Iron) Studio tool, the application appears but after few seconds it crashes with no error message or warning. ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21452870", + "ANSWER": "Start the Studio through the command line interface using the following command: \n\n\nCastIronStudio.exe -J-Xmx1024m \n\n\nIn this command, \"1024\" is the new memory size that will be allocated to the Studio instead of the default value of 512. This numeric value is in MB.", + "START_OFFSET": "117", + "END_OFFSET": "384", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1LI80031", + "swg21454982", + "swg22007790", + "swg21453140", + "swg21681552", + "swg21631488", + "swg21661534", + "swg27039418", + "swg21452870", + "swg21453434", + "swg21452903", + "swg21453030", + "swg21965614", + "swg21453337", + "swg21453445", + "swg27036928", + "swg21654464", + "swg21453433", + "swg21453253", + "swg21452832", + "swg21453072", + "swg27022386", + "swg21453182", + "swg21453284", + "swg27040302", + "swg1LI78386", + "swg21620111", + "swg21452957", + "swg21607851", + "swg21452874", + "swg27043840", + "swg27023624", + "swg21673533", + "swg1LI78695", + "swg1LI80011", + "swg21646143", + "swg27042468", + "swg27024831", + "swg21453494", + "swg1LI79093", + "swg21673524", + "swg21515704", + "swg21453412", + "swg21453077", + "swg21453347", + "swg1LI78410", + "swg21452951", + "swg21651018", + "swg1LI78427", + "swg21452789" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q222", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Help with Action required for IIB H.E. V9 & WMB H.E. V8 for security vulnerabilities in Red Hat Linux", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nI need to understand details regarding Action required for IBM Integration Bus Hypervisor Edition V9.0 and WebSphere Message Broker Hypervisor Edition V8.0 for security vulnerabilities in Red Hat Linux.\n\nThis is related to CVEID: CVE-2017-16546\n\nWhere can I find this information?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg22011624", + "swg22011696", + "swg22003256", + "swg22005035", + "swg22011748", + "swg22012477", + "swg22011745", + "swg22010311", + "swg22010832", + "swg22012862", + "swg21977378", + "swg22011630", + "swg22005385", + "swg21979065", + "swg22007664", + "swg21994053", + "swg22009436", + "swg22009455", + "swg21998452", + "swg22012678", + "swg21987358", + "swg22009285", + "swg21981107", + "swg21989255", + "swg22015915", + "swg21992475", + "swg22004377", + "swg22013692", + "swg21982752", + "swg22012861", + "swg21697721", + "swg22015916", + "swg22013693", + "swg21985022", + "swg21986120", + "swg22000947", + "swg22006789", + "swg21971313", + "swg21996135", + "swg22007869", + "swg21695798", + "swg21990735", + "swg24034994", + "swg21903157", + "swg21696878", + "swg21696879", + "swg21902248", + "swg24031059", + "swg21641918", + "swg21685666" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q223", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Can I use Chrome browser for viewing Monitor 801 Cognos report viewer widget ?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Some users use Chrome browser with Business Monitor and have reported issues when trying to view Cognos reports from Report Viewer widget within Business Space.", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21666590", + "swg27038375", + "swg21975248", + "swg27040744", + "swg1JR49300", + "swg27045167", + "swg1JR47683", + "swg1JR48713", + "swg1JR59734", + "swg21674977", + "swg1JR43548", + "swg1JR49457", + "swg1JR42925", + "swg21682971", + "swg1JR52534", + "swg1JR58852", + "swg1JR51149", + "swg21615769", + "swg1JR55082", + "swg1JR44626", + "swg1JR52170", + "swg1PJ45071", + "swg1JR47994", + "swg1JR43064", + "swg1JR34783", + "swg21669696", + "swg21681642", + "swg21655833", + "swg27017872", + "swg21668933", + "swg1PK97089", + "swg1PI57556", + "swg21339208", + "swg1PI57545", + "swg1PI57557", + "swg21641319", + "swg1PI68235", + "swg21964637", + "swg1JR49061", + "swg1JR52867", + "swg1JR49861", + "swg21382292", + "swg21339053", + "swg1PK79934", + "swg1JR51087", + "swg21344081", + "swg1PM75594", + "swg21673252", + "swg21412766", + "swg1JR43069" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q224", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "How do we set HttpOnly and secure flag in Oracle Weblogic 12c to secure IBM Atlas?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "How do we set HttpOnly and secure flag in Oracle Weblogic 12c to secure IBM Atlas? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21696267", + "ANSWER": "Perform steps as mentioned below:\n\n1. Undeploy any existing PolicyAtlas deployments using Oracle Weblogic console\n\n2. Open the PolicyAtlas.ear file using a tool like 7zip or similar and update weblogic.xml file with the changes below:\n\n\n\ntrue\ntrue\nfalse\n\n\n3. Save the changes by updating the ear file.\n\n4. Redeploy the updated ear file using Oracle Weblogic console", + "START_OFFSET": "226", + "END_OFFSET": "779", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21696267", + "swg27042922", + "swg1HE12127", + "swg21422185", + "swg27039894", + "swg21991198", + "swg21628378", + "swg1HE12624", + "swg1PM69691", + "swg21970276", + "swg21672947", + "swg21606390", + "swg1PJ44672", + "swg1PK80629", + "swg21987564", + "swg21976932", + "swg1HE12651", + "swg27038767", + "swg21518927", + "swg27040473", + "swg1HE12650", + "swg1IZ05009", + "swg21967575", + "swg1PI14340", + "swg21983948", + "swg1IV18333", + "swg1ZZ00252", + "swg21960622", + "swg21412002", + "swg21976974", + "swg21975596", + "swg22000908", + "swg21968876", + "swg1IV75668", + "swg1JR57300", + "swg21980203", + "swg21688665", + "swg22015405", + "swg21701479", + "swg1IV08070", + "swg27023564", + "swg21988958", + "swg21580830", + "swg24023974", + "swg1IO24023", + "swg21995382", + "swg21691597", + "swg21611712", + "swg21990196", + "swg21673449" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q225", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Non-admin users cannot access webDAV filestore. What is the likely reason?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nA non-admin user trying to access the webDAV filestore is unable to do so and they see the below exception in the portal logs:\n\nCaused by: com.ibm.icm.da.DBAccessException: User id can not be null at com.ibm.icm.da.portable.connection.Logon.logon(Logon.java:159) at com.ibm.icm.da.portable.connection.ConnectionManager.logon(ConnectionManager.java:45)", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21664629", + "ANSWER": "Authenticated user does not have the attribute defined in the backend user registry which matches the attribute defined in the store.puma_default.user.fbadefault.filter property in WP PumaStoreService Resource Environment Provider.", + "START_OFFSET": "1124", + "END_OFFSET": "1355", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21691676", + "swg21664629", + "swg21605332", + "swg1PK74589", + "swg21698162", + "swg21670791", + "swg21614990", + "swg21608902", + "swg21676851", + "swg1JR58837", + "swg21590077", + "swg1PM69487", + "swg21616175", + "swg1JR42387", + "swg21378393", + "swg21573746", + "swg1PJ33201", + "swg1PJ33194", + "swg21606528", + "swg1LO31720", + "swg1PM09199", + "swg1LO46238", + "swg21624168", + "swg21610720", + "swg1PI30765", + "swg1IV60077", + "swg1PM98562", + "swg1IC80753", + "swg1PM26528", + "swg22005356", + "swg24039368", + "swg21645066", + "swg22002964", + "swg21679878", + "swg21993420", + "swg21993737", + "swg21460933", + "swg21645251", + "swg21638105", + "swg1PK64061", + "swg21693563", + "swg1PI24506", + "swg21307233", + "swg21686773", + "swg21672837", + "swg1PI73425", + "swg21293752", + "swg21324111", + "swg1PM01634", + "swg27019083" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q226", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "How to check IBM Java ORB build version in WebSphere Application Server?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Just a simple question:How to check IBM Java ORB build version in WebSphere Application Server?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1PI76313", + "swg1PK96640", + "swg24013680", + "swg24026894", + "swg21138435", + "swg21245077", + "swg1PM48509", + "swg21199556", + "swg1JR41008", + "swg1PI22134", + "swg1PK20471", + "swg1PK65397", + "swg21052165", + "swg21465919", + "swg21255218", + "swg21403873", + "swg21174604", + "swg21301369", + "swg1PK32985", + "swg1PK45120", + "swg1PK37506", + "swg1PK29674", + "swg21457001", + "swg1PM39777", + "swg21224719", + "swg1PM39629", + "swg1IX90121", + "swg1PK85674", + "swg1PK32522", + "swg1PK29675", + "swg1PQ91038", + "swg1IV47424", + "swg24004407", + "swg1PQ94171", + "swg1PQ94172", + "swg1PK47437", + "swg1PM60005", + "swg21168565", + "swg1IY86556", + "swg1PK58245", + "swg1PM20587", + "swg21696670", + "swg27043836", + "swg21456801", + "swg1PK68853", + "swg1PK83488", + "swg21213921", + "swg1PM60417", + "swg21412622", + "swg21330078" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q227", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Is Java 7 supported for BPM?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "What versions of BPM support Java 7?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21999583", + "swg21639640", + "swg1JR55463", + "swg21691942", + "swg1JR58297", + "swg1JR51307", + "swg1JR54682", + "swg1JR43140", + "swg1JR57819", + "swg1JR54731", + "swg22015853", + "swg1JR59388", + "swg1JR54070", + "swg27048504", + "swg1JR52762", + "swg1JR54738", + "swg21978027", + "swg1JR53620", + "swg1JR54736", + "swg1IT07386", + "swg1JR53365", + "swg1JR52284", + "swg1JR54009", + "swg1PM63963", + "swg1JR52537", + "swg1JR55110", + "swg1JR40340", + "swg1JR55109", + "swg1JR57387", + "swg1JR45007", + "swg1JR54382", + "swg22010919", + "swg1JR57474", + "swg1JR54462", + "swg1JR54221", + "swg21633217", + "swg1JR58391", + "swg21533292", + "swg1JR54815", + "swg1JR52256", + "swg1JR54706", + "swg1JR56884", + "swg24037043", + "swg1JR55399", + "swg1JR58672", + "swg1JR47500", + "swg21327302", + "swg1JR52657", + "swg1JR54004", + "swg21578482" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q228", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "javax.xml.bind.UnmarshalException org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: The reference to entity must end with the ; delimiter.", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nAfter an upgrade from JRules to ODM we are receiving errors because of an ampersand in our data. This used to work before.\n\nCaused by: javax.xml.bind.UnmarshalException\n- with linked exception: [org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: The reference to entity \"NIGHT\" must end with the ; delimiter.", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1RS02029", + "swg21428835", + "swg21672988", + "swg21527397", + "swg1PM48474", + "swg1IV46355", + "swg21987169", + "swg21278789", + "swg21438995", + "swg1IT23780", + "swg21575468", + "swg1IZ76279", + "swg21662832", + "swg22002148", + "swg1IZ16728", + "swg21341811", + "swg1IV33162", + "swg1IZ07590", + "swg1IT06749", + "swg21685029", + "swg21673608", + "swg21441698", + "swg22002587", + "swg1PI84763", + "swg1IC57900", + "swg1PI27490", + "swg1PM79930", + "swg1JR56970", + "swg1IZ30480", + "swg1IC88364", + "swg1PJ37518", + "swg1IC93829", + "swg1PM51992", + "swg21637141", + "swg21519130", + "swg1PJ40744", + "swg21529225", + "swg1IV75109", + "swg1IT02283", + "swg1PI66809", + "swg21677062", + "swg1PM57496", + "swg1JR36551", + "swg1PI16352", + "swg21662127", + "swg1IT11159", + "swg1IC74692", + "swg21637708", + "swg1PM57659", + "swg1JR43049" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q229", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Can I hide left menu pane for specific application?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Is it possible to disable the left navigation pane menu for certain application? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21609958", + "ANSWER": "You can include systemnav=\"false\" in the application presentation XML in order to disable the left navigation pane. \n\nThe following changes in the incident.xml file will disable the left navigation menu pane of the Incident application. \n\nEdit the incident.xml from :- \n\n \n\nto :- \n\n\n\nImport back the incident.xml and save. With this configuration, the left Navigation Pane menu is no longer visible in the Incident application.", + "START_OFFSET": "153", + "END_OFFSET": "1062", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21609958", + "swg1JR49197", + "swg21975251", + "swg21694662", + "swg21649725", + "swg1JR48851", + "swg27021974", + "swg1JR38252", + "swg21153608", + "swg1PO04789", + "swg1JR41092", + "swg21978257", + "swg1JR37456", + "swg1JR52427", + "swg1JR52749", + "swg1IV47490", + "nas8N1018776", + "swg1PJ35770", + "swg1JR52434", + "swg21484724", + "swg1PI31151", + "swg21673275", + "swg21972461", + "swg21392513", + "swg21478573", + "swg21337237", + "swg21306957", + "swg1PM32306", + "swg1IZ57593", + "swg21632478", + "swg1JR37977", + "swg1HE04732", + "swg1JR42518", + "swg22012499", + "swg21503983", + "swg21099040", + "swg22003659", + "swg21682373", + "swg21616251", + "swg21675400", + "swg21966959", + "swg21313289", + "swg1JR47499", + "swg1PI11880", + "swg1PI26114", + "swg1PK62362", + "swg1JR49409", + "swg21593096", + "swg1JR36678", + "swg21337899" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q230", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Java.io.NotSerializableException in WAS", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "We are experiencing the Java.io.NotSerializableException exception. I see this error: WTRN0047E:java.io.NotSerializableException. Anyone experienced this before?", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21066791", + "ANSWER": "With persistent sessions enabled, any object that is put into the HTTPSession must implement the serializable interface in order for session manager to store the session data outside of JVM.\n\nWhen PMI is enabled, there is a counter for session data size. In order to evaluate this counter, the session data must be serialized into a byte array stream. Any object that is put into the HTTPSession must implement the serializable interface in order for session manager to convert the session data objects into byte array stream.", + "START_OFFSET": "1061", + "END_OFFSET": "1587", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21304219", + "swg1IC36553", + "swg24013152", + "swg1PK89149", + "swg21082645", + "swg21643671", + "swg1JR59167", + "swg1JR50096", + "swg1IZ26787", + "swg21394062", + "swg1PK34875", + "swg21988681", + "swg1IY94052", + "swg21268440", + "swg1IZ20675", + "swg21656692", + "swg1PK48332", + "swg1PM83888", + "swg1PM82968", + "swg1PM83889", + "swg1PM45198", + "swg1PK90216", + "swg1IO20121", + "swg1PK46425", + "swg1PM90226", + "swg1PI37165", + "swg21066791", + "swg1PK10507", + "swg1PM35999", + "swg21377774", + "swg1IO20582", + "swg1PI41248", + "swg1JR25711", + "swg21558800", + "swg1PK29441", + "swg1IX90140", + "swg1PI17612", + "swg1PI30673", + "swg1IZ28677", + "swg1PI08358", + "swg1PK21372", + "swg1JR47227", + "swg1IO20596", + "swg1JR40542", + "swg1PM28575", + "swg1IO18814", + "swg1PM18202", + "swg1PK46191", + "swg21631634", + "swg1IZ76968" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q231", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "What IBM Business Process Manager version is affected by the Apache Commons FileUpload vulnerability CVE-2016-1000031?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "What IBM Business Process Manager version is affected by the Apache Commons FileUpload vulnerability CVE-2016-1000031? ", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg22015184", + "swg22014017", + "swg22010680", + "swg22014972", + "swg22010267", + "swg22016234", + "swg22013359", + "swg22014174", + "swg22015976", + "swg22014477", + "swg1JR58611", + "ibm10719413", + "swg1JR58580", + "swg22010868", + "swg22016826", + "swg22012168", + "swg22013943", + "swg22015340", + "isg3T1027394", + "swg22012419", + "swg22014970", + "swg22016488", + "swg22011302", + "ibm10717023", + "swg22010229", + "swg22010019", + "swg1JR58572", + "swg22017312", + "swg22011689", + "swg21990811", + "swg22013713", + "swg22016652", + "swg22015339", + "swg22011720", + "swg1PJ45055", + "swg22012458", + "swg1IT24069", + "swg24044699", + "swg21678359", + "swg21670373", + "swg22012374", + "swg22010215", + "swg1LO93296", + "swg24044675", + "swg1IC99466", + "swg22010587", + "swg21990830", + "swg22011788", + "swg22016122", + "swg21990300" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q232", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "CICS TS support for IBM SDK Java Version 8", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Do any of the current releases of CICS Transaction Server for z/OS (CICS TS) support the new IBM SDK, Java\u2122 Technology Edition V8? ", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21570324", + "swg21983257", + "swg21240793", + "swg21688554", + "swg21651753", + "swg21634685", + "swg27048530", + "swg21500847", + "swg22014730", + "swg22006678", + "swg22009986", + "swg22011650", + "swg21499851", + "swg21618463", + "swg21994204", + "swg24035181", + "swg27011919", + "swg21634686", + "swg21616320", + "swg24033579", + "swg24013629", + "swg1PM18440", + "swg24018039", + "swg21614659", + "swg24031760", + "swg21645605", + "swg21227671", + "swg21509464", + "swg21614755", + "swg21232064", + "swg21177540", + "swg21504423", + "swg21507047", + "swg21368004", + "swg21625509", + "swg21046498", + "swg21429574", + "swg21474617", + "swg21982477", + "swg27049888", + "swg22002413", + "swg27035673", + "swg21972287", + "swg27041627", + "swg21566483", + "swg27046992", + "swg21669322", + "swg22000894", + "swg22001227", + "swg24033197" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q233", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "How does configuring \"hung threads detection\" impact performance of a production WAS server?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I took a pmr about hung issue on Solaris. Customer said he couldn't collect MG data because the issue always happened at night. So I let him to configure hung detection policy by adding JVM arguments (alarm threads hung). He said it was production server and worried about any impact performance.", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1PM64400", + "swg21115625", + "swg21610001", + "swg21507694", + "swg21451001", + "swg21448485", + "swg21697883", + "swg21457430", + "swg1JR42449", + "swg21127574", + "swg21665636", + "swg1IV73701", + "swg1PK75526", + "swg1IV61449", + "swg1PI92979", + "swg1PI22949", + "swg21666840", + "swg21988399", + "swg1PK53623", + "swg1PJ37393", + "swg21002894", + "swg1PO02471", + "isg3T1011956", + "swg21417874", + "swg21474367", + "swg1PM04009", + "isg3T1024991", + "swg1PO03257", + "isg3T1023955", + "swg21176238", + "swg1PK28532", + "swg1PI65836", + "swg21045232", + "swg22002262", + "swg1HD54808", + "swg1IY58074", + "swg22002263", + "swg21999987", + "swg21396295", + "swg1JR44560", + "swg22015464", + "swg21376056", + "swg21965271", + "swg1IY40617", + "swg21668348", + "swg1IC67279", + "swg21417872", + "swg21417875", + "swg21004001", + "swg1PI62609" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q234", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "TCR 2.1.1 Fixpack 2 installation failed", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nI need to install Fixpack 2 on my TCR 2.1.1 environment, but the installation keeps failing with error:\n\n ACUOSI0050E External command action failed with return code 1.\n\nI was not able to understand why it is failing. Can you please help providing suggestion to perform a correct troubleshooting ?\n\nThanks", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21666489", + "ANSWER": "If it is expected you run the Fixpack installation with a non-root user, double check the permission bit for the involved directory tree and in case temporary set them to give write authorization to the user account you are installing the FixPack with. \n\nThen run again the installation program.", + "START_OFFSET": "2068", + "END_OFFSET": "2363", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21666489", + "swg21666485", + "swg1IV35930", + "swg21972775", + "swg21496781", + "swg21686901", + "swg21605324", + "swg21969866", + "swg21668523", + "swg21610171", + "swg21668911", + "swg21429350", + "swg21645030", + "swg21393320", + "swg21585678", + "swg21613802", + "swg21647981", + "swg21676204", + "swg24029843", + "swg21650546", + "swg21399531", + "swg1IV24707", + "swg21579894", + "swg24036288", + "swg21650720", + "swg1IZ99951", + "swg21679461", + "swg21618740", + "swg21668638", + "swg1IV63819", + "swg21622250", + "swg1IY99995", + "swg21446042", + "swg21621053", + "swg21321364", + "swg21620832", + "swg21613006", + "swg21600861", + "swg21512235", + "swg21627823", + "swg21587614", + "swg1IZ26136", + "swg21474590", + "swg1IZ36140", + "swg21598570", + "swg1IV53447", + "swg22006741", + "swg21505187", + "swg21605218", + "swg1IC79539" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q235", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Security Bulletin: A vulnerability in IBM Java Runtime affects IBM WebSphere MQ (CVE-2016-3485)", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I need to understand details regarding Security Bulletin: A vulnerability in IBM Java Runtime affects IBM WebSphere MQ (CVE-2016-3485). Where can I find this information?\n", + "DOCUMENT": "swg22001630", + "ANSWER": "CVEID: CVE-2016-3485 [http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-3485]\nDESCRIPTION: An unspecified vulnerability related to the Networking component has no confidentiality impact, low integrity impact, and no availability impact.\nCVSS Base Score: 2.9\nCVSS Temporal Score: See https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/115273 [https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/115273] for the current score\nCVSS Environmental Score*: Undefined\nCVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N)", + "START_OFFSET": "615", + "END_OFFSET": "1143", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21988436", + "swg22007571", + "swg21981402", + "swg22001630", + "swg21988005", + "swg21991776", + "swg21986205", + "swg2C1000198", + "swg21989458", + "swg2C1000195", + "swg21989585", + "swg21990236", + "swg21986357", + "swg21992389", + "swg21995779", + "swg21883331", + "swg21988986", + "swg21989538", + "swg21988521", + "swg21987762", + "swg21988987", + "swg21993946", + "swg21991149", + "swg21976341", + "swg21994297", + "swg21988983", + "swg21988985", + "swg21996156", + "swg21994537", + "swg21982320", + "swg21982566", + "swg21994213", + "swg21990404", + "swg21991287", + "swg21991289", + "swg21994102", + "swg21993132", + "swg21883638", + "swg21991387", + "swg21994491", + "swg21991012", + "swg21988877", + "swg21991268", + "swg21995995", + "swg21982893", + "swg21995792", + "swg21976896", + "swg21882528", + "swg21991910", + "swg21883551" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q236", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Security Bulletin: Multiple vulnerabilities in IBM Java Runtime affect API Connect", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I need to understand details regarding Security Bulletin: Multiple vulnerabilities in IBM Java Runtime affect API Connect (CVE-2016-5546, CVE-2016-5548, CVE-2016-5549, CVE-2016-5547, CVE-2016-2183, CVE-2017-3511). Where can I find this information? ", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg22004827", + "swg2C1000277", + "swg22009069", + "swg22003201", + "swg22002882", + "swg22001701", + "swg21999481", + "ssg1S1011805", + "swg22000027", + "swg21998435", + "swg21999271", + "swg22001540", + "swg22009518", + "swg22000663", + "swg22000386", + "swg22008584", + "swg22000580", + "swg24043834", + "swg22002860", + "swg21998551", + "swg22006551", + "ssg1S1011804", + "swg22000768", + "swg22001158", + "swg22000643", + "swg22006550", + "swg21999494", + "swg22000162", + "swg22003752", + "swg22001981", + "swg22002991", + "swg22000092", + "swg22002277", + "ssg1S1010205", + "swg22005139", + "swg21999561", + "swg22000544", + "swg22004077", + "swg21998779", + "swg22001966", + "swg22001965", + "ibm10718851", + "swg22001029", + "swg22003363", + "swg22003913", + "swg2C1000298", + "swg22002555", + "swg22001321", + "swg22002335", + "swg22002251" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q237", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Traffic across domains seems unexpected", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nI have two Multi-Protocol Gateways (MPGWs) configured, each in their own domain:\n\n Domain A\n MPGW_A\n FSH_A (1.2.3.4:443)\n Domain B\n MPGW_B\n FSH_B (0.0.0.0:443)\n\nThe FSH_B is disabled, thus MPGW_B cannot take traffic. However, if I modify the config for MPGW_B (i.e. just change a Stylesheet parameter) the traffic goes to MPGW_B somehow. How is this happening? FSH_B is still disabled.", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1IY47581", + "swg21499749", + "swg21267268", + "swg21101968", + "swg21579225", + "swg21458310", + "swg21516547", + "swg1IY56618", + "swg21981521", + "swg21385986", + "swg21988815", + "swg1IY45959", + "swg21289897", + "swg21983132", + "swg21642721", + "swg22001012", + "swg21045922", + "swg21642185", + "swg21417934", + "swg21297369", + "nas8N1019381", + "swg21459308", + "nas8N1010789", + "swg21690475", + "nas8N1011374", + "swg21976382", + "swg21649976", + "swg21673503", + "swg21690324", + "ssg1S1009321", + "swg21959060", + "swg21622441", + "swg21622228", + "swg21529356", + "swg21600782", + "swg21580534", + "nas8N1016664", + "swg21961482", + "swg21412267", + "swg21340833", + "swg1IC76115", + "swg21249208", + "swg1IT03509", + "swg21588227", + "swg21456394", + "swg21371129", + "nas8N1014999", + "swg21367308", + "swg21962049", + "swg21239595" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q238", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "recently installed Impact 7.1.0. fixpack 3, now when ever start the secondary impact server, the primary servers logging stops? How can I fix this?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "when NCI1 is running by itself, all logging is functioning. When NCI2\nis started, logging stops on NCI1 and the \"reader\" logs indicate that\nthe readers have stopped. ", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1IV80943", + "swg1IJ02475", + "swg21598417", + "swg1PI87724", + "swg1IZ80505", + "swg1IZ24496", + "swg21503932", + "swg1IV79133", + "swg1IV79776", + "swg1PI57109", + "swg1IJ02522", + "swg1PI69792", + "swg21394307", + "swg21635504", + "swg21407356", + "swg1PI31606", + "swg21454220", + "swg21988087", + "swg1IZ85085", + "swg21683248", + "swg1IZ76060", + "nas8N1010614", + "swg27017325", + "swg21242509", + "swg1IY95464", + "swg21635847", + "swg1PI85021", + "swg21414986", + "swg1IZ19488", + "swg21407039", + "swg1IY90019", + "swg21667931", + "swg21992720", + "swg1JR21577", + "swg21297647", + "swg21324557", + "swg1IZ78332", + "swg1PQ39596", + "swg21619213", + "nas8N1016805", + "swg21646066", + "swg21192613", + "swg21616960", + "swg21598228", + "swg27039333", + "swg22002488", + "swg22013624", + "swg21959916", + "swg1IV80891", + "swg21635506" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q239", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Cannot launch RFT 8.2", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nHello.\n\nCould anyone can help to see why I cannot launch RFT 8.2? When I launch RFT. I get an error message--\"An error has occurred. See the log file...\" I check the log file. It shows\n\n!SESSION Mon Nov 04 12:46:16 CST 2013 ------------------------------------------\n!ENTRY org.eclipse.equinox.launcher 4 0 2013-11-04 12:46:16.359\n!MESSAGE Exception launching the Eclipse Platform:\n!STACK\njava.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter\n at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:423)\n at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:653)\n at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:619)\n at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.invokeFramework(Main.java:616)\n at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.basicRun(Main.java:574)\n at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.run(Main.java:1407)\n at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.main(Main.java:1383)\n\nIf I launch RFT with -clean or -vm option, the same phenomenon occurs.", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21330011", + "ANSWER": "Delete the user's .eclipse/ibm.software.delivery.platform_7.5.0_???? directory. \n\nFor example: \n\nrm -rf /home/joe/.eclipse/ibm.software.delivery.platform_7.5.0_1529064711 \n\n \n\nThen relaunch the package.", + "START_OFFSET": "1465", + "END_OFFSET": "1667", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21461495", + "swg21496278", + "swg21612947", + "swg21412764", + "swg21507241", + "swg21652345", + "swg21674970", + "swg21693502", + "swg21389763", + "swg21455178", + "swg1JR54729", + "swg21330011", + "swg1IV25853", + "swg1IC80511", + "swg21552529", + "swg21618511", + "swg1PM06254", + "swg21707263", + "swg21693373", + "swg1PM86275", + "swg21570143", + "swg1PK76203", + "swg22009137", + "swg1IC98124", + "swg1JR43221", + "swg21974731", + "swg21681124", + "swg21984804", + "swg1IC99674", + "swg21610555", + "swg1LO59585", + "swg21449036", + "swg21460402", + "swg1PK40663", + "swg1PM15797", + "swg1JR40938", + "nas8N1011095", + "swg21620316", + "swg21977900", + "swg1PM33659", + "swg1PI70703", + "swg21407021", + "swg1LO63251", + "swg1PI70506", + "swg21693563", + "swg21609692", + "swg21378093", + "swg1PI24552", + "swg21696253", + "swg1PI71616" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Port number error starting 9.0 Launcher", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nI'm attempting to start up v9.0 for the first time with one .msl file on a Windows server and get the following error. I also have v8.4 on this server and it starts fine. I do not have v8.4 running when I attempt to start v9.0.\n\nCannot recognize if the system RecordChangeSystem.msl; has started. Reason: Server is unable to get the status of the system on port number 6,002.\n\nI have the port range set to 7000/8000. I've never seen this error before.\n\nAny help? Thanks.", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21986219", + "ANSWER": "Obtain patch for APAR PI64816.", + "START_OFFSET": "743", + "END_OFFSET": "773", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q240", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1HD50938", + "swg21432790", + "swg21443850", + "swg21242795", + "swg21976821", + "swg1IR42812", + "swg21660391", + "nas8N1021130", + "swg21624002", + "swg21393300", + "swg21213933", + "swg21646561", + "swg21486369", + "swg21402453", + "swg21408682", + "swg21611476", + "swg21632879", + "nas8N1021123", + "swg21516883", + "nas8N1020679", + "swg1PK38022", + "swg21502952", + "swg21669240", + "swg22014936", + "swg21561354", + "swg21300074", + "swg21481930", + "swg1PM03150", + "swg21210874", + "swg1PK90066", + "swg21654101", + "swg1PK88357", + "nas8N1014301", + "swg21483715", + "swg21250838", + "nas8N1010549", + "swg21457128", + "swg1PK54863", + "nas8N1014591", + "isg3T1011829", + "swg21986219", + "swg21477911", + "swg21963494", + "nas8N1021317", + "swg21971224", + "nas8N1012643", + "swg1PI58314", + "swg1PM03452", + "swg21960029", + "swg1IV59643" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q241", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "When and why Apache Storm process of ITNM creating db2 files in /tmp?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nWhen and why should the following files be generated ?\n\n\uff1e-rwxrwxrwx poll ncoadmin /opt/IBM/tivoli/netcool/var/precision/storm/workers/74089823-da35-4f8e-85e4-1454a928eee2/tmp/connlicj.bin\n\n\uff1e-rwxrwxrwx poll ncoadmin /opt/IBM/tivoli/netcool/var/precision/storm/workers/74089823-da35-4f8e-85e4-1454a928eee2/tmp/jccdiag.log\n\n\uff1e-rwxrwxrwx poll ncoadmin /opt/IBM/tivoli/netcool/var/precision/storm/workers/74089823-da35-4f8e-85e4-1454a928eee2/tmp/license.lock\n\n\uff1e-rwxrwxrwx poll ncoadmin /opt/IBM/tivoli/netcool/var/precision/storm/workers/74089823-da35-4f8e-85e4-1454a928eee2/tmp/serverlist.lock", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21504457", + "swg21458046", + "swg21689063", + "swg21511804", + "swg1IV42617", + "swg21637964", + "swg21605192", + "swg21638623", + "swg21638627", + "swg21627975", + "swg21695824", + "swg21420121", + "swg1IV24718", + "swg1IZ06595", + "swg1IZ82307", + "swg1IV37779", + "swg21573490", + "swg21241093", + "swg21696181", + "swg21511815", + "swg21964942", + "swg21686714", + "swg1IV66841", + "swg1IY98050", + "swg21512729", + "swg21627511", + "swg21650677", + "swg1IV13720", + "swg21882832", + "swg21391984", + "swg1IZ58688", + "swg21883441", + "swg21503395", + "swg21505058", + "swg1IV07692", + "swg21701066", + "swg1IV56551", + "swg1IZ99012", + "swg21619334", + "swg21674832", + "swg24035534", + "swg21642494", + "swg21671438", + "swg21592999", + "swg24038138", + "swg1IZ22125", + "swg1IV74217", + "swg1IV40476", + "swg21326932", + "swg24040068" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q242", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "IBM Support Assistant data collector for BPM", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "What can I use to obtain some standard information in order to debug my IBM Business Process Manager environment? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21641516", + "ANSWER": "The new data collector in IBM Business Process Manager V8.5 is designed for ease of use to gather some of the standard information that is needed to debug IBM Business Process Manager issues.", + "START_OFFSET": "68", + "END_OFFSET": "259", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21696908", + "swg21593461", + "swg1JR51672", + "swg27036941", + "swg1JR47706", + "swg1JR53223", + "swg1JR51707", + "swg21268193", + "swg1JR50262", + "swg27048992", + "swg1JR54678", + "swg21402300", + "swg21641516", + "swg1JR56053", + "swg21618716", + "swg21321795", + "swg1JR51812", + "swg21970616", + "swg22015932", + "swg1JR52960", + "swg1JR49076", + "swg1JR56224", + "swg1JR59057", + "swg1JR50224", + "swg22013411", + "swg22014409", + "swg21694924", + "swg1JR57253", + "swg24030121", + "swg21666135", + "swg21663802", + "swg1JR57059", + "swg1JR56456", + "swg21611603", + "swg1JR56997", + "swg1JR56806", + "swg21245236", + "swg1JR45661", + "swg21268903", + "swg27037045", + "swg1JR56185", + "swg21329234", + "swg21577551", + "swg21972005", + "swg21271000", + "swg21407074", + "swg1JR55899", + "swg1JR54145", + "swg1JR57127", + "swg21680148" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q243", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Using cobol copybooks", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Sometimes, there will be errors/fields missing in typetree, while importing cobol copybooks. Is there any format for copybooks(specifically to be used in wtx), that we need to follow? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21684407", + "ANSWER": "Some files are not correctly overwritten / modified during the upgrade.", + "START_OFFSET": "372", + "END_OFFSET": "443", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21684407", + "swg21689327", + "swg21498516", + "swg21646672", + "swg21687686", + "swg1PN70961", + "swg21219838", + "swg1PM75688", + "swg21563767", + "swg21378477", + "swg1PM19649", + "swg21384485", + "swg1PI12672", + "swg1PM89095", + "swg21644044", + "swg1PM54300", + "swg21533898", + "swg21199575", + "swg1SE48240", + "swg1PI22693", + "swg1PI91906", + "swg1PI82574", + "swg21645585", + "swg1PI87999", + "swg1PI93891", + "swg1PM37166", + "swg1PI93890", + "swg1PI39800", + "swg1SE62968", + "swg1PK10293", + "swg1PM80999", + "swg1PM43503", + "swg21390611", + "swg21406677", + "swg1PK84390", + "swg1PI33867", + "swg1PI70779", + "swg21002932", + "swg1PM13233", + "swg1SE48218", + "swg1PK47301", + "swg1PK62460", + "swg1PK21052", + "swg1PM53144", + "swg1PI43259", + "swg22008496", + "swg21636652", + "swg1PI35468", + "swg1PM40754", + "swg1PK82906" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q244", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "How to clear Errors Found in crm_mon", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "How to clear Errors Found in crm_mon ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21694876", + "ANSWER": "The following steps can be used to clear each failed resource using cib_tool.pl. \n\n[root@system pts]# /opt/nz-hwsupport/pts/cib_tools.pl\nheartbeat is running on ha1\nheartbeat is running on ha2\nNo split brain detected on ha1\nNo split brain detected on ha2\nCRM running on ha1\nCRM running on ha2", + "START_OFFSET": "196", + "END_OFFSET": "488", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21959867", + "swg21578276", + "swg21989865", + "swg21998417", + "swg21694876", + "swg21963189", + "swg21991341", + "swg21691439", + "swg21977871", + "swg21978149", + "swg21974059", + "swg21965771", + "swg21968522", + "swg22003937", + "swg21685208", + "swg22005650", + "swg21981854", + "swg21517071", + "swg21572633", + "swg21576042", + "swg21695413", + "swg21574866", + "swg21657284", + "swg21572211", + "swg21974058", + "swg21567721", + "swg21987190", + "swg21138527", + "swg1OA04085", + "swg22001968", + "swg21266308", + "swg21961828", + "swg21129011", + "swg21973960", + "swg21574857", + "isg3T1019654", + "swg21100207", + "swg21660200", + "swg21165431", + "swg21607887", + "isg3T1011642", + "swg21679168", + "swg21536419", + "swg21460859", + "swg21459326", + "swg21177381", + "swg21543342", + "swg21984727", + "swg21589455", + "swg21973856" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q245", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Problem with XMLLIB->VALIDATEEX during XML Validation", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I am using XMLLIB VALIDATEXX in WTX 8.3.0.5 for XML Validations and it is running fine on Windows.\nWhen deployed same code on zos map is executing in loop(output card having rule with xmllib method call is not completing) \nPlease suggest.Thanks", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21988389", + "ANSWER": "Add the XML toolkit xml4c library directory to the LIBPATH environment variable.\n\nExample:\n\nexport LIBPATH=$LIBPATH:/usr/lpp/ixm/xslt4c-1_11/lib/", + "START_OFFSET": "579", + "END_OFFSET": "724", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21988389", + "swg1PK63779", + "swg1PM54904", + "swg21576767", + "swg1PI33287", + "swg1PM16978", + "swg1PM60038", + "swg27024860", + "swg1PM03510", + "swg1PM54949", + "swg21598022", + "swg21657477", + "swg1PM22975", + "swg21683094", + "swg1PM64428", + "swg1PM20166", + "swg1PI86074", + "swg1PM40488", + "swg21977389", + "swg1PM54381", + "swg1PM53837", + "swg1PI24655", + "swg1PK90068", + "swg21609446", + "swg1PK76678", + "swg22014735", + "swg1PM54380", + "swg27035498", + "swg1PM54397", + "swg1PM54410", + "swg1PI35144", + "swg21697244", + "swg1PK55018", + "swg1PM54379", + "swg27018910", + "swg21677123", + "swg1PI45554", + "swg1PM60227", + "swg1PI55003", + "swg1PK81521", + "swg21429548", + "swg1PI11874", + "swg1PM38269", + "swg1PI52998", + "swg1PM48008", + "swg21408718", + "swg1PM61610", + "swg21975639", + "swg1PI51246", + "swg1PM41132" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q246", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "What is the latest version of the Log File Agent?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "What is the latest version of the Log File Agent?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21663591", + "isg3T1027824", + "swg21968872", + "swg24041130", + "swg21608770", + "swg21587475", + "swg1PI24095", + "swg21455470", + "swg21547438", + "swg1PM26842", + "swg1IT15521", + "swg21125348", + "swg21973645", + "swg21461327", + "swg21549361", + "swg1IV09148", + "swg21517343", + "swg1IV36678", + "swg1IV17935", + "swg1IV96076", + "swg1IT12682", + "swg21637103", + "swg1IV89821", + "swg27022360", + "swg21530673", + "swg21973638", + "swg21155947", + "swg21679990", + "swg1IV70550", + "swg22015856", + "swg1PM24852", + "swg21193179", + "swg24043533", + "swg22001951", + "swg1IT10096", + "swg21158675", + "swg21671270", + "swg1PI66519", + "swg22002657", + "swg1HD92035", + "swg21684133", + "swg21691284", + "nas8N1021382", + "swg21478833", + "swg1IZ21982", + "swg21981621", + "swg21267040", + "swg1IO24550", + "swg21637937", + "swg1IT12145" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q247", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "IID 8.5.7 failed to start due to \"Java was started but returned exit code=-805306369\"", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "We have installed new IID 8.5.7 on Windows 7 on VMware. The installation was successed. However, IID failed to launch always. The dialog shows \"Java was started but returned exit code=-805306369\". The IID log shows BundleStatusException. How do we resolve this?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg22012426", + "swg1JR58314", + "swg21660058", + "swg1JR46939", + "swg21639638", + "swg1JR53010", + "swg1JR52900", + "swg1JR55223", + "swg1JR52950", + "swg1JR44657", + "swg21595595", + "swg27038753", + "swg1JR56061", + "swg1JR53593", + "swg21971004", + "swg1JR49698", + "swg1JR53201", + "swg1JR57502", + "swg1JR56387", + "swg21989150", + "swg21596395", + "swg21978615", + "swg21683428", + "swg21567836", + "swg21671897", + "swg24037036", + "swg1PM22554", + "swg24041578", + "swg21968204", + "swg24041573", + "swg1JR46264", + "swg27038389", + "swg24041577", + "swg1JR52804", + "swg1JR52821", + "swg24033183", + "swg21674031", + "swg21470363", + "swg1JR44923", + "swg24035813", + "swg24035812", + "swg21961812", + "swg1JR45457", + "swg1JR43323", + "swg1HD88186", + "swg1HD32205", + "swg21979603", + "swg1JR59259", + "swg24037018", + "swg21613695" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q248", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "missing VM manager data", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nwe are missing VM manager data for 13 servers. error: invalid credentials - suspended. there are no recent changes done for the ID/pwd.\n\nplease suggest the action need to be taken.\n1039699\n", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1IV63361", + "swg1IT04266", + "swg1IT02526", + "swg21995412", + "swg1IT10369", + "swg21960279", + "swg1IT07592", + "swg21696736", + "swg21681725", + "swg1VM17818", + "swg21960843", + "swg1IV59260", + "swg21506568", + "swg1IT15182", + "swg21643349", + "swg1IC89340", + "isg3T1011035", + "swg1IT04330", + "swg1IT03221", + "swg1IC76102", + "swg1HD88448", + "swg21496993", + "swg1IC76101", + "swg1IT18594", + "swg21997590", + "swg1IC79885", + "swg21616165", + "swg1IT15030", + "swg1IC80120", + "swg21968438", + "swg1IC99000", + "swg21600019", + "swg21659826", + "swg1IV52535", + "swg22002971", + "swg1IT13317", + "swg1IV13286", + "swg21676872", + "swg1IC91073", + "swg1IV20621", + "swg21974404", + "swg1IV37321", + "swg21982465", + "swg21997588", + "swg21615651", + "swg1IT06598", + "swg1IT04713", + "swg21983659", + "swg1VM18480", + "swg1JR48553" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q249", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Help with Security Bulletin: IBM WebSphere MQ Administration command could cause denial of service (CVE-2016-8971)", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I need to understand details regarding Security Bulletin: IBM WebSphere MQ Administration command could cause denial of service (CVE-2016-8971). Where can I find this information?\n", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21998663", + "ANSWER": "CVEID: CVE-2016-8971 [http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-8971]\nDESCRIPTION: IBM MQ could allow an authenticated user with queue manager permissions to cause a segmentation fault. This would result in the machine needing to be rebooted to resume normal operations.\nCVSS Base Score: 5.3\nCVSS Temporal Score: See https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/118862 [https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/118862] for the current score\nCVSS Environmental Score*: Undefined\nCVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H)", + "START_OFFSET": "221", + "END_OFFSET": "791", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21999232", + "swg21998663", + "swg22001520", + "swg22005123", + "swg21999421", + "swg21984564", + "swg21984565", + "swg21989628", + "swg21902519", + "swg21972125", + "swg21970103", + "swg21991709", + "swg21998797", + "swg21670374", + "swg21989820", + "swg21989832", + "nas8N1021649", + "swg21983823", + "swg21998648", + "swg22012109", + "swg21981752", + "swg22005425", + "swg22011324", + "swg22014651", + "swg21996836", + "swg21971447", + "swg22014981", + "swg22001563", + "swg21989829", + "swg22003467", + "swg21991588", + "swg21998647", + "swg21990527", + "swg22001667", + "swg22002385", + "swg21997657", + "swg21962359", + "swg21988198", + "swg22006387", + "swg22001468", + "swg22004874", + "swg21999724", + "swg22003510", + "swg21998590", + "swg21993842", + "swg21971058", + "swg22016278", + "swg22003304", + "swg22004442", + "swg22004465" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q250", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Help with Security Bulletin: IIB is affected by Node.js security vulnerability ( CVE-2017-1000381 and CVE-2017-11499 )", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I need to understand details regarding Security Bulletin: IBM Integration Bus is affected by Node.js security vulnerability ( CVE-2017-1000381 and CVE-2017-11499 ). Where can I find this information? ", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "nas8N1022230", + "swg22009015", + "swg22006298", + "swg22006722", + "swg22007209", + "swg22008951", + "swg22009964", + "swg22008629", + "swg22007168", + "swg1IV98515", + "swg22012662", + "nas8N1022348", + "swg22011851", + "swg22009850", + "swg22009851", + "swg21999842", + "swg22012003", + "swg21998163", + "swg22009250", + "swg22011830", + "swg22006313", + "swg22011533", + "swg21687120", + "swg2C1000362", + "swg22011461", + "swg22005335", + "swg21702161", + "swg2C1000379", + "swg1JR58231", + "swg22016245", + "swg22013411", + "swg22004940", + "swg2C1000349", + "swg22006453", + "swg22003258", + "swg22014121", + "swg2C1000365", + "swg22011500", + "swg2C1000363", + "swg22013104", + "swg22006626", + "swg21976356", + "swg22010164", + "swg22000350", + "swg22005383", + "swg22006686", + "swg22001567", + "swg22007582", + "swg2C1000277", + "swg22005345" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q251", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "MQ jobs and some user jobs are in semaphore wait (SEMW) status", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "After upgrading WMQ on IBM i, MQ jobs and some user jobs are in a semaphore wait (SEMW) status. I've tried to end and restart MQ, performed cold start, delete and rebuild MQ system with no luck. Where do I need to look?\n", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1SA96266", + "swg1SE38523", + "swg1SA96051", + "swg21174095", + "swg21318667", + "swg1PM63493", + "swg1SE25204", + "swg21656085", + "swg21622020", + "swg1PM58956", + "swg21106807", + "swg1PM53107", + "swg21625059", + "swg21237907", + "swg21441967", + "swg21417618", + "swg1IZ00609", + "swg21286821", + "swg21297570", + "swg21299323", + "isg3T1013618", + "swg1SE19791", + "nas8N1011025", + "swg1IZ68805", + "swg1PK86224", + "swg21515197", + "swg1PK85218", + "swg21414283", + "swg1PI20391", + "swg21643097", + "swg21472728", + "swg1IY85806", + "nas8N1021768", + "nas8N1014585", + "swg21574986", + "swg1IZ59759", + "swg1IV11260", + "swg1IY92127", + "swg1SE61237", + "swg1PK98959", + "nas8N1014114", + "nas8N1014919", + "swg21623407", + "swg21424924", + "swg21524027", + "nas8N1017503", + "swg1IZ96837", + "nas8N1016329", + "swg21607534", + "swg21142296" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q252", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "How to resolve the StaleConnectionException in WebSphere Application Server?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I see this exception in WebSphere Application Server J2c and RRA traces:\n\nWSRdbManagedC > preTestConnection Entry WSRdbManagedConnectionImpl@51a507f2 query: SELECT 1 FROM DUAL WSRdbManagedC 3 Exception java.sql.SQLException: ORA-02396: exceeded maximum idle time, please connect again DSRA0010E: SQL State = 61000, Error Code = 2,396 at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIoer.processError(T4CTTIoer.java:440) at \n...\nEntry java.sql.SQLException: ORA-01012: not logged on ..... OracleDataSto < findMappingClass return Exit class com.ibm.websphere.ce.cm.StaleConnectionException", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21556758", + "swg1PK82722", + "swg21996922", + "swg21634959", + "swg21670886", + "swg1PK66077", + "swg21645118", + "swg21229693", + "swg21641109", + "swg21611118", + "swg21982861", + "swg21538581", + "swg21288806", + "swg21984289", + "swg21552406", + "swg21610676", + "swg21408588", + "swg21960978", + "swg21430659", + "swg21632918", + "swg21468393", + "swg21560516", + "swg21997171", + "swg21655001", + "swg21559392", + "swg21559816", + "swg21650364", + "swg21609562", + "swg22008591", + "swg21514240", + "swg21990430", + "swg21553095", + "swg21572586", + "swg21418598", + "swg21553257", + "swg1PK66322", + "swg21231434", + "swg21558255", + "swg21553638", + "swg1PM39108", + "swg21636593", + "swg21553926", + "swg22000826", + "swg21960292", + "swg21574558", + "swg21575279", + "swg21700348", + "swg21551908", + "swg21645813", + "swg21986176" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q253", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Want to find out if Microsoft Edge is supported with ICC?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Want to find out Microsoft Edge is supported with ICC? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg27042658", + "ANSWER": "Microsoft Edge is supported starting with IBM Content Collector 4.0.1 Fix Pack 2.", + "START_OFFSET": "9753", + "END_OFFSET": "9834", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg27042658", + "swg22016051", + "swg21995083", + "swg21979435", + "swg21328553", + "swg21975989", + "swg21982856", + "swg21976776", + "swg22009925", + "swg1HD92522", + "swg1PI72138", + "swg21979053", + "swg27048504", + "swg21319552", + "swg21340476", + "swg21963922", + "swg1HE12035", + "swg1HE12057", + "swg21972840", + "swg21178386", + "swg27016044", + "swg1HE11514", + "swg21341049", + "swg21992262", + "swg21395679", + "swg1HE12698", + "swg21989287", + "swg21979147", + "swg21678133", + "swg21304018", + "swg27050410", + "swg21964330", + "swg24037306", + "swg21995645", + "swg1PI47631", + "swg21965982", + "ibm10717921", + "swg21571153", + "swg22007015", + "swg21967889", + "swg22000772", + "swg21978407", + "swg22010667", + "swg21323573", + "swg1HE06671", + "swg21578610", + "swg21987054", + "swg1HD87484", + "swg21383197", + "swg21496285" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q254", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why do I receive the message, \"IKJ79154I INSTALLATION EXIT IKJEESX0 REQUESTED TERMINATION. \" for a TSO SEND command?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "If you issue the TSO SEND command in a batch job and receive this message:\n\nIKJ79154I INSTALLATION EXIT IKJEESX0 REQUESTED TERMINATION.\nIKJ79154I REASON CODE X'00000004'.", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21980860", + "ANSWER": "coded a facility class for the FEK.CMD.SEND and FEK.CMD.SEND.CLEAR.", + "START_OFFSET": "508", + "END_OFFSET": "575", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21980860", + "swg1PQ62210", + "swg1PM26570", + "swg21047577", + "swg21226470", + "swg1PI57910", + "swg1PI58704", + "swg21223985", + "swg1PI49368", + "swg1VM65531", + "swg21265277", + "swg21396822", + "swg27036807", + "swg1PQ13349", + "swg1PI13315", + "swg21327017", + "swg21561360", + "swg21053035", + "swg1PQ68455", + "swg24004577", + "swg21194030", + "swg21328426", + "swg21251898", + "swg21221614", + "swg1PI62725", + "swg21293837", + "swg24010800", + "swg21152792", + "swg1PQ03199", + "swg1PQ52777", + "nas8N1017460", + "swg1PM62697", + "isg3T1015040", + "swg1OA46989", + "swg21215873", + "isg3T1013645", + "swg1OA48682", + "swg21442677", + "swg21412224", + "nas8N1015607", + "swg1PK45444", + "swg21316765", + "swg21568353", + "swg1PN73772", + "swg1PQ45522", + "swg1OA55045", + "nas8N1018284", + "swg1PN82799", + "swg1PM22144", + "isg3T1020616" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q255", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "The BPM Messaging engine is not active after DB2 Fix Pack upgrade. How to resolve this problem?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "The database used by BPM was recently upgraded to 10.1 Fix Pack 4.After the upgrade, the messaging engine cluster is not started up\n\nHow can I resolve this issue?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21579275", + "swg21635822", + "swg1JR52492", + "swg21662071", + "swg21624731", + "swg22005460", + "swg1JR55353", + "swg21976009", + "swg22015932", + "swg22014409", + "swg21460466", + "swg1JR42736", + "swg1JR42749", + "swg21608951", + "swg21974861", + "swg21407516", + "swg21421672", + "swg1JR53675", + "swg21591133", + "swg21590281", + "swg21621677", + "swg1JR47588", + "swg1PK59051", + "swg1PI15205", + "swg1PM72328", + "swg21421669", + "swg1JR47636", + "swg21597678", + "swg1PI36881", + "swg24037769", + "swg1JR49523", + "swg21584411", + "swg1JR48964", + "swg21678419", + "swg21666379", + "swg27049143", + "swg1PM31431", + "swg21972788", + "swg1JR45301", + "swg1PK35285", + "swg1JR47448", + "swg21454081", + "swg21633614", + "swg1JR50983", + "swg1PI15518", + "swg21624733", + "swg1PM53035", + "swg21595028", + "swg27036559", + "swg21626528" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q256", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "mqsireportdbparms missing?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "The mqsireportdbparms command described in the following knowledge center topic is missing from the IIB installation.\nhttp://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/# !/SSMKHH_9.0.0/com.ibm.etools.mft.doc/an09156_.htm (http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/# %21/SSMKHH_9.0.0/com.ibm.etools.mft.doc/an09156_.htm)", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1IT06163", + "swg21687742", + "swg21461066", + "swg21302938", + "swg21299785", + "swg21687741", + "swg21299823", + "swg21694056", + "swg21299303", + "swg21302942", + "swg21299548", + "swg27041731", + "swg21137319", + "swg21295320", + "swg21299471", + "swg22000642", + "swg21302950", + "swg21420032", + "swg21687424", + "swg1PI44237", + "swg21299776", + "swg21299462", + "swg21625856", + "swg21297183", + "swg21299300", + "swg1PI45626", + "swg21299781", + "swg21299791", + "swg21676037", + "swg27048556", + "swg21299775", + "swg21136955", + "swg1PI25000", + "swg21299304", + "swg21299265", + "swg1PI25817", + "swg21299525", + "swg21299796", + "swg1IT08214", + "swg21299792", + "swg21299804", + "swg21299806", + "swg1PI29607", + "swg21299463", + "swg21299803", + "swg1PI68827", + "swg1ZZ00322", + "swg1LO87226", + "swg21299472", + "swg1PI36162" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q257", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "How to control SDMS database size?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nHi,\n\nITCAM for SOA 7.1.1 was installed about 3 years ago. I already know that SDMS database size may increase with no limit. Has anyone found a way to keep under control this behavior?\n\nThanks", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21959281", + "ANSWER": "To keep only the latest 24 hours every day (regular pruning), you can schedule a daily job to run the kd4TrimDB2db utility provided above.", + "START_OFFSET": "667", + "END_OFFSET": "805", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21959281", + "swg21381100", + "swg21681048", + "swg1IV98869", + "swg21407069", + "swg1IZ63341", + "swg21666534", + "swg21576043", + "swg21422496", + "swg1IV06267", + "swg1IZ41966", + "swg1IJ01947", + "swg21445055", + "swg1IV83741", + "swg21422652", + "nas8N1012079", + "swg21374227", + "swg1LO88758", + "swg21394557", + "swg21291307", + "swg1PQ54130", + "swg21445587", + "swg21567791", + "swg1IV14274", + "swg21666366", + "swg21609212", + "swg22012597", + "swg21394953", + "swg21989683", + "swg21102305", + "swg21641086", + "swg1HD64273", + "swg21628185", + "swg21268166", + "swg21644515", + "swg21389511", + "nas8N1013074", + "swg21419445", + "swg21503477", + "swg21124619", + "swg21589912", + "swg1IZ68356", + "swg21520098", + "swg21409926", + "swg21670213", + "swg21568404", + "swg22008386", + "swg1IT21840", + "swg1LO60232", + "swg1IT20104" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q258", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "What is the meaning of value \"unknown\" for ITCAM WAS Application Status attribute?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I am getting alerts from a situation containing the following statement in its formula\n\n*IF *VALUE Application_Health_Status.Application_Status *NE Running\n\nI've found out this happens because the application status for one application is \"Unknown\" in the Application Health workspace.\n\nWhy was the application status\"Unknown\", what does it mean? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21653905", + "ANSWER": "If you see Unknown, then you know the baselining has not started or not been calculated.", + "START_OFFSET": "2019", + "END_OFFSET": "2107", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21653905", + "swg21976697", + "swg21348241", + "swg21264828", + "swg21668764", + "swg1PM41799", + "swg1PJ36312", + "swg1IZ97953", + "swg1PI25815", + "swg21426672", + "swg21989137", + "swg1LO60370", + "swg21422560", + "swg1PI27310", + "isg3T1013645", + "swg21626967", + "swg1IZ68077", + "swg21645118", + "swg1PM61969", + "swg21600368", + "swg21619894", + "swg21426909", + "swg21634176", + "swg1PK37435", + "swg1PK86140", + "swg1IV74714", + "swg1PM61524", + "swg1IZ98704", + "swg1PI67074", + "swg21420277", + "swg21518927", + "swg1PK43791", + "swg1PI37515", + "swg1IV33731", + "swg21209144", + "swg21445309", + "swg1PK86141", + "swg21590615", + "swg21697642", + "swg21983349", + "swg21386716", + "swg21168924", + "swg21551006", + "swg1PK58778", + "swg1IV68708", + "swg1PM07581", + "swg1IV62730", + "swg1PM17737", + "swg1IT03635", + "swg1LO53941" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q259", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Subnodes are still present on TEP after unconfiguring SOA DC", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "After unconfiguring the ITCAM for SOA DC via the unconfig.sh script, I can still see SOA subnodes and workspaces on TEP.The Websphere instances were restarted and are no longer collecting data and forwarding to the D4 agent.I have shut down the ITCAM agent and deleted the offline entries for the managed systems, but the subnodes appear back once you restart the ITCAM agent.How can I remove them?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21587050", + "swg21381100", + "swg21407069", + "swg21681630", + "swg21701189", + "swg21422604", + "swg21450159", + "swg21677851", + "swg21662577", + "swg21580106", + "swg21448353", + "swg21720188", + "swg21458247", + "swg21664761", + "swg21645365", + "swg21665737", + "swg21667268", + "swg1PM27045", + "swg21502342", + "swg21394718", + "swg1PM09706", + "swg21641086", + "swg21419811", + "swg21415112", + "swg1IV72076", + "swg1IV17184", + "swg21305909", + "swg21980481", + "swg1PI48106", + "swg21394557", + "swg21664749", + "swg1OA24546", + "swg1IV92857", + "swg21599119", + "swg21683982", + "swg1PI57148", + "swg21646010", + "swg21585312", + "swg21380915", + "swg1IZ35793", + "swg21474592", + "swg1PM07290", + "swg1PM17556", + "swg1PI59839", + "swg22011795", + "swg1PM61969", + "swg21654618", + "swg21447044", + "swg21652087", + "swg21438274" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q260", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Crash happened due to \"PI50993:Apache HTTPComponents vulnerabilities in WebSphere Application Server (CVE-2012-6153, CVE-2014-3577)\"", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Crash happened due to \"PI50993:Apache HTTPComponents vulnerabilities in WebSphere Application Server (CVE-2012-6153, CVE-2014-3577)\"\n\nDetails of gpf crash events: A VerifyError was thrown due to \"Inaccessible class\" at offset 39(0x27) of the method executeInternal(Lorg/springframework/http/HttpHeaders;[B)Lorg/springfram ework/http/client/ClientHttpResponse of the above class org/springframework/http/client/HttpComponentsClientHttpRequest.\n\nLooking at method the bytecodes :\n\n31 invokespecial 15 org/apache/http/entity/ByteArrayEntity.([B)V 34 astore 4 36 aload3 37 aload 4 39 invokeinterface2 41 invokeinterface 16 org/apache/http/HttpEntityEnclosingRequest.setEntity(Lorg/apache/http/Ht tpEntity;)V\n\nThe above sequence of bytecodes indicates it created an instance of org/apache/http/entity/ByteArrayEntity, trying to cast it to type Lorg/apache/http/HttpEntity; which in turns led to the \"Inaccessible class\" VerifyError message.\n\nIt is clear that class org/apache/http/HttpEntity was not loaded at all:\n\n allclasses | grep org/apache/http/HttpEntity\n", + "DOCUMENT": "swg24041394", + "ANSWER": "There would be NoClassDefFoundError observed after applying the fix because the API in HTTPCore and HTTPClient libraries are no long visible to application. To resolve this error, application may need to be updated with HTTPCore and HTTPClient libraries bundled.", + "START_OFFSET": "921", + "END_OFFSET": "1183", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21977175", + "swg1PK50713", + "swg24041394", + "swg21973254", + "swg21969251", + "swg1JR55455", + "swg21964916", + "swg1PM74259", + "swg1PM87809", + "swg21963382", + "swg21695483", + "swg22010057", + "swg21970090", + "swg21970193", + "swg1PM86627", + "swg1PM94022", + "swg1PI58097", + "swg1IV25044", + "swg1LO37299", + "swg21961713", + "swg1IV58624", + "swg21961714", + "swg21959874", + "swg1PM07854", + "swg1PM78861", + "swg1PM12927", + "swg1PI58029", + "swg1PI08109", + "swg1PI29167", + "swg21972799", + "swg21973877", + "swg1JR31654", + "swg1PI84518", + "swg1PI59999", + "swg21592112", + "swg1PM63322", + "swg1PI09596", + "swg1IV34700", + "swg1IV34699", + "swg21655857", + "swg1PM80277", + "swg21678231", + "swg21447068", + "swg1PM28567", + "swg1PI89708", + "swg1PI21768", + "ibm10717485", + "swg1JR59039", + "swg1PM21239", + "swg1IZ31216" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q261", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why is the reload() not clearing the attribute cache so I can see my newly updated LDAP data in real time?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "You are leveraging the reload() functionality as described in the blog post:\n https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/blogs/PortalL2Thoughts/entry/how_to_programatically_refresh_data_from_ldap64?lang=en\n\nto refresh the attribute cache after a change has been made to data within your LDAP. The purpose of this reload() is to update the data in real time on the Portal server. You discover that you are calling the reload(); however, the newly updated data is not immediately available to the application. Why is that?\n", + "DOCUMENT": "swg1PI47826", + "ANSWER": "If base entry and name in repository is different and\n clearCache functionality is used with clearEntity mode then\n virtual member manager (VMM) still looks in the cache and gets\n the entity from the cache instead of fetching it from the LDAP\n server.", + "START_OFFSET": "1100", + "END_OFFSET": "1359", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1PI47826", + "swg21413947", + "swg1PM16430", + "swg21377025", + "swg21507969", + "swg21612177", + "swg21598615", + "swg21655741", + "swg21656785", + "swg21992666", + "swg21403693", + "swg21656192", + "swg27044493", + "swg1PM48397", + "swg21078845", + "swg1IV82560", + "isg3T7000731", + "swg22013664", + "swg21697263", + "swg1HD91302", + "swg21457817", + "swg1PI31876", + "swg21654503", + "swg21516002", + "swg21483293", + "swg21652419", + "swg21242384", + "swg1IC99908", + "swg21232921", + "swg21635093", + "swg21503607", + "swg22006221", + "swg27047390", + "swg1PM32139", + "swg27040299", + "swg21505993", + "swg1HD46994", + "swg21676424", + "nas8N1013756", + "swg21245232", + "swg21694501", + "swg27047396", + "swg21983692", + "swg21444220", + "swg22007164", + "swg21656200", + "swg21980747", + "swg21639524", + "swg21902166", + "swg21646040" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q262", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Table \"\".\"\" could not be found", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nWhen doing a table mapping with DB2 as source, selecting a table which contains special characters on column comments like:\n\nCOMMENT ON COLUMN .. IS 'Test comment \u20181\u2019 complete';\n\nMapping fails with following error message: Table . could not be found in the database. What's the reason for the error?", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21412846", + "ANSWER": "During an insert of data using CLP characters, they do not go through codepage conversion.\nIf operating system and database codepage both are UTF-8, but the data to be inserted is not Unicode, then data in the database might have incorrect codepoints (not-Unicode) and the above error will be a result during data retrieval.", + "START_OFFSET": "839", + "END_OFFSET": "1163", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1PI37924", + "swg1PM72027", + "swg21989774", + "swg1PI27903", + "swg21414317", + "swg1IT17426", + "swg21644722", + "swg1IC99035", + "swg21412846", + "swg1PJ32546", + "swg21882635", + "swg1PM72610", + "swg1PM34408", + "swg1PI77937", + "swg21170072", + "swg21436283", + "swg21965475", + "swg1PI94101", + "swg22007450", + "swg21590770", + "swg1PQ81425", + "swg27015776", + "swg21576022", + "swg1IC43084", + "swg1PK69726", + "swg1PK01798", + "swg1PI97795", + "swg1IZ26176", + "swg21656210", + "swg1JR34863", + "swg1PQ61807", + "swg27042298", + "swg1IT18694", + "swg1JR21687", + "swg1PK54046", + "swg21690235", + "swg1IC99631", + "swg21206816", + "swg1PI45883", + "swg1PI71414", + "swg21976439", + "swg1PM07944", + "swg21546471", + "swg1PI10794", + "swg21647171", + "swg21616750", + "swg1PI28475", + "nas8N1014771", + "swg1PM84458", + "swg1PI85069" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q263", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "How can I check the health of my IBM PureApplication System?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "How can I check the health of my IBM PureApplication System?\nAre there steps to verify that my system is healthy? Is this something I can do, or does IBM have to verify the health of my system? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21675742", + "ANSWER": "Consider forwarding the PureApplication System Events to an external monitoring system, such as IBM Netcool/OMIbus. and enabling the call home feature. \n\n \n\nWith PureApplication System firmware versions 2.1.0.1 or newer you can use the System Health check report to see a consolidated view of some of the PureApplication System UI pages. \n\nSystem > System Troubleshooting, click on System Health Check.", + "START_OFFSET": "281", + "END_OFFSET": "683", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21675742", + "swg21573397", + "swg1PK22421", + "swg1IC89823", + "swg1IT13510", + "swg21413628", + "swg21666252", + "nas8N1018727", + "swg1IT13786", + "swg1IT03499", + "swg1IT16258", + "swg21984042", + "swg21685832", + "swg21573405", + "swg21974191", + "swg21236643", + "swg27048107", + "swg1PO04574", + "isg3T1013119", + "swg21646731", + "swg21506189", + "swg21645356", + "nas8N1011447", + "swg1IT05663", + "swg21476196", + "swg21609051", + "swg21473076", + "swg1IT10390", + "nas8N1011260", + "swg21660701", + "swg21984043", + "swg1IT13278", + "swg1IT07881", + "swg21698970", + "swg1IT12079", + "swg21476647", + "isg3T1022451", + "swg22009508", + "swg1IT20214", + "swg21981934", + "swg21697906", + "swg21981703", + "ibm10718857", + "swg27045354", + "nas8N1022400", + "nas8N1019042", + "swg1IC91646", + "swg21699711", + "swg21984136", + "swg21994470" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q264", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Gettting error CRIMC1020E: zip im.properties not found during BPM Fix Pack install", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "During the BPM 7.5.1.2 Fix Pack install from the IBM Installation Manager, error window pop up with:\nCRIMC1020E: zip im.properties 1.0.0.200911091101 not found ERROR: `zip im.properties 1.0.0.200911091101` not found in [path to sca.1.0.1.17.fp]. CRIMC1020E: zip config.registry 1.0.0.200911092301 not found\n\u2026\u2026\nHow can I resolve this error to complete the Fix Pack installation", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21620579", + "swg21686470", + "swg1PI14128", + "swg21642038", + "swg24033515", + "swg21633874", + "swg21609140", + "swg1PI26466", + "swg24032668", + "swg21381944", + "swg1PM90554", + "swg21656543", + "swg21983634", + "swg21383819", + "swg1PK70936", + "swg24032940", + "swg24026220", + "swg1PI05781", + "swg24026680", + "swg24036553", + "swg21468292", + "swg22014191", + "swg22013257", + "swg24032851", + "swg24025648", + "swg22015831", + "swg24016647", + "swg21641284", + "swg24019072", + "swg21431894", + "swg24021479", + "swg24026214", + "swg24022701", + "swg21660020", + "ibm10717197", + "swg24024307", + "swg24024306", + "swg24021016", + "swg24028136", + "swg24025152", + "swg21676099", + "swg24016075", + "swg24022969", + "swg21480262", + "swg21382914", + "swg24033778", + "swg24021481", + "swg24018338", + "swg24032300", + "swg21992552" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q265", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Will the Leap Second 2015 update have any impact with FileNet Content Manager?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Will the Leap Second 2015 update have any impact with FileNet Content Manager?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21701167", + "isg3T1024425", + "swg21961171", + "swg21700787", + "isg3T1022416", + "swg21990530", + "swg21993495", + "swg21903416", + "swg21959334", + "swg21969428", + "swg21696762", + "swg21699588", + "ssg1S1005265", + "isg3T1024480", + "swg21992567", + "swg21883959", + "swg21960191", + "swg21697119", + "swg21969427", + "swg21967351", + "swg21959738", + "swg21327356", + "swg21697152", + "swg21700912", + "swg21961159", + "swg21883962", + "swg21602521", + "swg21989265", + "swg21991256", + "swg21976215", + "swg21697151", + "swg1PI36111", + "swg21994264", + "swg21965451", + "nas8N1020503", + "swg21975823", + "swg21975820", + "swg21699589", + "swg21993349", + "isg3T1022057", + "swg22015721", + "swg21672337", + "swg21693461", + "swg21975822", + "swg21970916", + "swg21960467", + "swg21394307", + "swg21960466", + "swg21674132", + "swg22007456" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q266", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "How to install Packaging utility?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "How to install Packaging utility? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg24037641", + "ANSWER": "Use Installation Manager to install and update Packaging Utility.", + "START_OFFSET": "2337", + "END_OFFSET": "2402", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg24037641", + "swg21688209", + "swg21621643", + "swg24016094", + "swg21389225", + "swg24016648", + "swg24015280", + "swg21633291", + "swg21589303", + "swg24018503", + "swg1PM61681", + "swg22007063", + "swg24020171", + "swg24021020", + "swg21574817", + "swg21315112", + "swg1PI09780", + "swg21389888", + "swg21609350", + "swg24019074", + "swg21647432", + "swg21375571", + "swg21399593", + "swg21314476", + "swg1PM83977", + "swg1PI28930", + "swg1PM34897", + "swg1PM66240", + "swg27021004", + "swg21957879", + "swg21987048", + "swg21313935", + "swg1PK91275", + "swg1PK92616", + "swg21407875", + "swg27023960", + "swg21375755", + "swg21431118", + "swg1PI85964", + "swg21424904", + "swg21607002", + "swg1PK73823", + "swg21611487", + "swg21590118", + "swg27023080", + "swg1PK79975", + "swg21322440", + "swg27025142", + "swg1PM61103", + "swg21444138" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q267", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Can you enable the reporter feature with IBM Rational Rhapsody Architect Software Floating license?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Can you enable the reporter feature with IBM Rational Rhapsody Architect Software Floating license? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21606028", + "ANSWER": "The license features that come incorporated with IBM Rational Rhapsody Tools & Utilities Add on keys are as follows: \n\n * ReporterPro \n * Reporter", + "START_OFFSET": "263", + "END_OFFSET": "409", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21404324", + "swg21451284", + "swg21627717", + "swg21446208", + "swg21397517", + "swg1PI08174", + "swg21286596", + "swg21392533", + "swg21329134", + "swg21642090", + "swg21615545", + "swg21403623", + "swg21250404", + "swg21606028", + "swg21254371", + "swg21628213", + "swg21393810", + "swg21423183", + "swg21575178", + "swg21414744", + "swg21441700", + "swg21289026", + "swg27017513", + "swg21323476", + "swg21445652", + "swg21673529", + "swg21375504", + "swg21269946", + "swg21442068", + "swg21265239", + "swg22013072", + "swg21226214", + "swg1PI49585", + "swg21616465", + "swg1PK54804", + "swg21290846", + "swg21457085", + "swg21376636", + "swg21589916", + "swg1PM66251", + "swg24022561", + "swg21610671", + "swg21623929", + "swg21502448", + "swg21495804", + "swg21407610", + "swg21606037", + "swg21619391", + "swg21902683", + "swg1PI51443" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q268", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "ODR OOM issue", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I got ODR OOM after upgrading the WAS to v8553. No configuration or traffic load changing. Do I need a fix pack?", + "DOCUMENT": "swg1PI53566", + "ANSWER": "The fix for this APAR is currently targeted for inclusion in\n fix pack 8.5.5.9.", + "START_OFFSET": "2964", + "END_OFFSET": "3045", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg24041964", + "swg22004792", + "swg1PI53566", + "swg22008878", + "swg1IT09202", + "swg24031420", + "swg1IC69795", + "swg21689486", + "swg1PM98573", + "swg1PI75474", + "swg21286159", + "swg24018242", + "swg1PI58594", + "swg1PK51289", + "swg21448743", + "swg1PM88507", + "swg21651642", + "swg1IT10030", + "swg1PK08425", + "swg1IT19921", + "swg1PK08363", + "swg1PM66926", + "swg1PM86128", + "swg1PK21207", + "swg1PM85114", + "swg1PK53374", + "swg27018423", + "swg1JR45981", + "swg1PK78319", + "swg1PI82527", + "swg1PM56332", + "swg1PM89301", + "swg1PI30994", + "swg1PI93376", + "swg1PK10996", + "swg21221275", + "swg21500873", + "swg1PI87029", + "swg1PK49971", + "swg21202156", + "swg21215193", + "swg21404041", + "swg1PM57816", + "swg1PM82877", + "swg1PM40650", + "swg1PI58862", + "swg22005011", + "swg1PM88670", + "swg1PK08419", + "swg21517494" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q269", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Executing a scenario suite with a Scenario Service Provider (SSP) over HTTPS", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "How to configure the machines hosting the WebSphere Operational Decision Management modules with regard to HTTPS when executing scenario suites ?\nHow to avoid the exception below while requesting from Decision Center the execution of a scenario suite on Scenario Service Provider (SSP) over HTTPS ?\n Exception caught while contacting RES ilog.rules.res.util.http.IlrConnectionException: IO error when contacting \"/res/repositoryService\"\n ....\n Caused by: javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: com.ibm.jsse2.util.g: PKIX path building failed: java.security.cert.CertPathBuilderException: unable to find valid certification path to requested target", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21599241", + "swg21400817", + "swg21615508", + "swg21608225", + "swg21883810", + "swg21696370", + "swg21433278", + "swg22001339", + "swg21692141", + "swg21971444", + "swg21678239", + "swg21430461", + "swg21987850", + "swg21438208", + "swg21665160", + "swg21440000", + "swg21425487", + "swg21449103", + "swg1IC91195", + "swg1PI05059", + "swg21620901", + "swg21588859", + "swg21627010", + "swg21427125", + "swg21995559", + "swg21972053", + "swg1ZZ00703", + "swg21959929", + "swg21681501", + "swg21556893", + "swg21495825", + "swg1RS02626", + "swg21646081", + "swg1IV59173", + "swg21654448", + "swg1IT16056", + "swg22012250", + "swg21679679", + "swg21628193", + "swg21443946", + "swg21979327", + "swg21976593", + "swg21495669", + "swg21588087", + "swg21882649", + "swg1IC60107", + "swg21979431", + "swg21653979", + "swg21400819", + "swg21688068" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q270", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "What version / level of Java JRE and GSKit is included with each WebSphere MQ version?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "What version / level of Java JRE and GSKit is included with WebSphere MQ? for each MQ version? ", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21253427", + "swg21462404", + "swg21576638", + "swg1IC52687", + "swg1IT08738", + "swg1IT16514", + "swg1IT06915", + "swg1IT07741", + "swg1IC56649", + "swg1IZ64934", + "swg1IT09540", + "swg1IT06916", + "swg1IV67334", + "swg1IT07743", + "swg1IT06182", + "swg21666386", + "swg1IT13492", + "swg24040526", + "swg1IC60876", + "swg1IV35429", + "swg27038444", + "swg21496820", + "swg27018213", + "swg1IT11851", + "swg1IT11660", + "swg1IT09860", + "swg1IV11871", + "swg1IC61490", + "swg1IT11072", + "swg21669900", + "swg21613005", + "swg1IV81649", + "swg1IV31310", + "swg27007477", + "swg1IT18686", + "swg1IZ32000", + "swg21245474", + "swg1IT14908", + "swg1IT24637", + "swg22000235", + "swg1IT12105", + "swg21472896", + "swg1IT21891", + "swg1IT25844", + "swg1IT17942", + "swg21389599", + "swg27027476", + "swg1IT23405", + "swg1IT23404", + "swg21688949" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q271", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Problem with Postal database in Parascript", + "QUESTION_TEXT": " Hi\n\ni am working with Parascript and i have installed successfully in my local system by folloing this guide [ Parascript FieldScript for Taskmaster Guide ]\n\nhere i can able to create vocabulary file, but storing multiple values into this the values are overridden and i do not understand how to create a postal database and access it\n\nis that postal database is separate component ,,?? do we need to get somewhere and install ,,? they just mention in Guide the use of actions only\n\nand does this parascript really helps to get better recognize.", + "DOCUMENT": "swg24031674", + "ANSWER": "The address information in the USPS database on the data disk is automatically disabled 105 days after the date of issue. IBM refreshes the data disk on the 14th day of every month, or the previous business day. You must ensure that you obtain the refreshed data from Passport Advantage on a regular schedule so that you avoid issues that are associated with disabled address information.", + "START_OFFSET": "451", + "END_OFFSET": "839", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg24031674", + "swg21500252", + "swg27020850", + "swg27035840", + "swg21514851", + "swg27035774", + "swg21457505", + "swg21690251", + "swg27044439", + "swg27020806", + "swg27045390", + "swg1JR43608", + "swg21594800", + "isg3T1022451", + "swg1JR41076", + "swg21477088", + "swg21673804", + "swg21680221", + "swg1PK80330", + "swg1IV59643", + "swg21460867", + "swg21479635", + "swg27042034", + "swg21505841", + "swg21476053", + "swg21982509", + "swg27047578", + "nas8N1013902", + "swg1PK78974", + "swg21182247", + "swg21439606", + "swg27024345", + "swg21981743", + "swg21450046", + "swg1IO05560", + "swg1LO31720", + "swg1IZ66275", + "swg1LO46238", + "swg21979436", + "swg21476731", + "ssg1S1009954", + "swg1IY93703", + "swg21476834", + "swg21993395", + "swg21562293", + "swg21654253", + "swg1LO60232", + "swg21630209", + "swg27036151", + "swg21002646" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q272", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "z/OS Connect Enterprise Edition 3.0 and 2.0 compatibility with CICS TS 5.4", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Can z/OS Connect Enterprise Edition V3.0 and V2.0 be used with CICS Transaction Server for z/OS (CICS TS) V5.4? I want to make sure there are no compatibility problems. I would also like to know if there are any specific tasks that I need to perform for the z/OS Connect Enterprise Edition V3.0 and V2.0 when upgrading to CICS TS V5.4. ", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg22001227", + "swg27049888", + "swg21319419", + "swg21993579", + "swg22006678", + "swg22009986", + "swg22011650", + "swg21577571", + "swg22014730", + "swg22004781", + "swg24041569", + "swg27048530", + "swg22004864", + "swg21046498", + "swg24033579", + "swg27035673", + "swg21260503", + "swg21366477", + "swg27041627", + "swg27046992", + "swg21645605", + "swg21994204", + "swg21983257", + "swg1PI85774", + "swg21429574", + "swg21688492", + "swg21975927", + "swg27025148", + "swg21399558", + "swg27049939", + "swg1PI81758", + "swg21223445", + "swg1PI83984", + "swg22000475", + "swg1PI92171", + "swg1PH00481", + "swg21648341", + "swg21634271", + "swg21643652", + "swg21509464", + "swg22011867", + "swg27039374", + "swg21634685", + "swg27006382", + "swg21688554", + "swg21634686", + "swg21669322", + "swg21385861", + "swg21694359", + "swg1PI80475" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q273", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why am I now seeing an SqlDataException for Unsupported ccsid, encoding, or locale after moving to Java 8.0 with WebSphere Application Server 8.5?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nThe requests using the DB2 JDBC driver are failing with:\n\ncom.ibm.db2.jcc.am.SqlDataException: [jcc][t4][10275][10041][4.19.56] Unsupported ccsid, encoding, or locale: \"Cp037\". ERRORCODE=-4220, SQLSTATE=22021\n\nCaused by: java.io.UnsupportedEncodingException: Cp037 at sun.io.Converters.getConverterClass(Converters.java:319) at sun.io.Converters.newConverter(Converters.java:373) at sun.io.ByteToCharConverter.getConverter(ByteToCharConverter.java:98) at com.ibm.db2.jcc.am.s.(Unknown Source) at com.ibm.db2.jcc.am.q.a(Unknown Source) ... 42 more", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1IT06738", + "swg1IV69880", + "swg1JR32368", + "swg1IC82934", + "swg1IT13166", + "swg1IV43373", + "swg1IZ54929", + "swg22005262", + "swg1IT07334", + "swg21982529", + "swg1IV63010", + "swg21973226", + "swg22003870", + "swg21668374", + "swg1IT15211", + "swg1PM96446", + "swg21638576", + "swg21590014", + "swg21959750", + "swg1IZ04637", + "swg21114928", + "swg1JR54520", + "swg1IZ04635", + "swg21110708", + "swg1IC74508", + "swg21442698", + "swg21969151", + "swg21474042", + "swg1IC83435", + "swg1PK21127", + "swg21650364", + "swg1IC77293", + "swg21441364", + "swg1JR57670", + "swg22000939", + "swg21682878", + "swg1PI12215", + "swg21412846", + "swg1IV06935", + "swg1IT15284", + "swg21460740", + "swg21685470", + "swg1IT01211", + "swg21619830", + "swg21615801", + "swg21679241", + "swg21677024", + "swg1IC80973", + "swg21506737", + "swg1IC97232" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q274", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "VMware agent SSL hand shake failure after ESX upgrade", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nWe did an update to our VCentre server, bringing it to 5.5 update 3e, i.e. 5.5.0,4180647 As a result the VMware agent does not connect now and logs this error:\n\nSEVERE: Connection.open: SSL handshake failed to: 192.168.1.2\n\nWe switched off SSL certification validation but it did not solve.", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21978580", + "swg1ZZ00618", + "swg1PK04494", + "swg1ZZ00703", + "swg1IV53276", + "swg21395250", + "swg21678284", + "swg1PK60693", + "swg21394300", + "swg1IY49156", + "swg21961972", + "swg21979327", + "swg21980784", + "swg21981181", + "swg21997147", + "swg21419276", + "swg21972158", + "swg21970509", + "swg1PK58426", + "swg1PK52674", + "swg21980674", + "swg21544877", + "swg21390809", + "swg1PK86244", + "swg21620814", + "swg21586705", + "swg21678895", + "swg21972360", + "swg21670474", + "swg21681501", + "swg1IY95029", + "swg1PI96508", + "swg1IZ67640", + "swg1PM70080", + "swg21982133", + "swg1IC80763", + "swg21616440", + "swg1IZ64432", + "swg1PK62726", + "swg21985640", + "swg1IT22689", + "swg21962719", + "swg1IC96648", + "swg1IY66589", + "swg21522432", + "swg21621956", + "ssg1S1009322", + "swg22003801", + "swg21649041", + "swg21633649" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q275", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Jobtask long description", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "How do I modify the JP sheet to include the JOBTASK Long description in the query. I have tried JOBTASK.DESCRIPTION.DESCRIPTION_LONGDESCRITION and other combinations but they do not seem to work. ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21417266", + "ANSWER": "Maximo 6.x MEA \n\n1. Go To Integration -> Integration Object \n\nOn the Persistent Fields tab, exclude HASLD\nOn the Non-Persistent Fields tab, include DESCRIPTION_LONGDESCRIPTION \n\nMaximo 7.x MIF\n\n1. Go To Integration -> Object Structures \n\nClick Select Action -> Exclude/Include Fields \n\nOn the Persistent Fields tab, exclude HASLD\nOn the Non-Persistent Fields tab, include DESCRIPTION_LONGDESCRIPTION \n\nMaximo 6.x/7.x XML\n\nAdd the long description tag to the inbound XML:\n\nxxxxx \n\nDo not include the HASLD tag. This column will be set automatically.", + "START_OFFSET": "228", + "END_OFFSET": "835", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21425997", + "swg1IZ85950", + "swg1IZ54312", + "swg1PK78421", + "swg1IV02415", + "swg1IZ65413", + "swg1IV52625", + "swg21696909", + "swg21587784", + "swg1IV57308", + "swg21635030", + "swg21993859", + "swg1PK72391", + "swg21976884", + "swg1IC44221", + "swg1HD39192", + "swg1IV45947", + "swg21045910", + "isg3T1013634", + "swg1IV37979", + "swg1IV43168", + "swg1PI37394", + "swg21417266", + "swg1LO31720", + "swg1LO46238", + "swg21476170", + "swg21966438", + "swg21976533", + "swg1IV67335", + "swg21125563", + "swg1PK54876", + "swg1IV93814", + "isg3T1013737", + "swg21648631", + "swg1HD58387", + "swg21476380", + "swg21240542", + "swg1IC76366", + "swg1IY66843", + "swg1PK11887", + "swg21496871", + "swg1IV73701", + "swg1IY57198", + "swg21999717", + "swg1IV01234", + "nas8N1016193", + "swg1PK89060", + "swg21325520", + "swg27041951", + "swg21339212" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q276", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "MessageSet Project cannot be referenced in multiple Applications", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nThe same MessageSet Project cannot be referenced in multiple Applications or Libraries in WMB V8.\n\nIs there any specific reason for having this restriction ?\n\nThanks.", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1IC90334", + "swg1IC47696", + "swg1IC66611", + "swg1PK01629", + "swg21297518", + "swg1IZ04919", + "swg1IC60120", + "swg1PM19968", + "swg21638442", + "swg1IC53570", + "swg1IC92621", + "swg1IT13614", + "swg21605958", + "swg21293884", + "swg21972624", + "swg1PI29753", + "swg1RS03008", + "swg1IT16348", + "swg1PK48079", + "swg1HD90634", + "swg1PI92264", + "swg1IC92219", + "swg1PK97749", + "swg1IT07784", + "swg1IT09062", + "swg21975955", + "swg21676279", + "swg1PM93839", + "swg1PK06220", + "swg1PM03023", + "swg1PK14161", + "swg1PK87048", + "swg1HE05535", + "swg1PK24480", + "swg1IC62716", + "swg21667478", + "swg21427763", + "swg1IZ75741", + "swg1IC37785", + "swg27017027", + "swg1PQ83057", + "swg21403353", + "swg21458590", + "swg1PI93175", + "swg1PI32056", + "swg27020867", + "swg21367040", + "swg21289019", + "swg1PK21574", + "swg21322528" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q277", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Is transient user support available for SAML integration with WebSphere Portal 8.0?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I am looking to leverage the SAML TAI provided by WebSphere Application Server for my WebSphere Portal 8.0 environment. Is transient user support available so that I do not have to maintain a local account in my Portal user registry for every external user which is verified and trusted by my identity provider? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21665086", + "ANSWER": "Transient user support [http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSHRKX_8.5.0/mp/overview/new_cf08.dita?lang=en] has been introduced for SAML TAI [http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSHRKX_8.5.0/mp/wcm/wcm_secure_int_tai_auth.dita?lang=en] starting with Cumulative Fix (CF) #8 for 8.5. Refer to the WebSphere Portal Security blog [https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/blogs/8f2bc166-3bdc-4a9d-bad4-3620dbb3e46c/entry/portal_transient_user_support_with_was_saml_tai_business_case_clarification?lang=en] for more details regarding the business case and implementation details.", + "START_OFFSET": "2041", + "END_OFFSET": "2639", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21665086", + "swg1PM51996", + "swg24016601", + "swg1PI34548", + "swg24039823", + "swg24040971", + "swg1PI40314", + "swg1PI34088", + "swg21960224", + "ibm10719211", + "swg21599510", + "swg27007603", + "swg22009501", + "ibm10717335", + "swg22006348", + "swg21507969", + "swg21988719", + "swg22014315", + "swg22013085", + "swg22011264", + "ibm10719469", + "swg22006342", + "swg22006343", + "swg1PI48360", + "swg1PI61915", + "swg22013084", + "swg21579320", + "swg1PI14280", + "swg22014351", + "swg1PI66128", + "ibm10717939", + "swg21999431", + "swg21674823", + "ibm10717337", + "swg1PI52613", + "swg21598615", + "swg22012604", + "swg27016293", + "swg1PI48578", + "swg22000249", + "swg22012419", + "swg21975121", + "swg1PI30212", + "swg21695608", + "swg22006892", + "swg21993575", + "swg21599488", + "swg22000244", + "swg21570526", + "swg27038451" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q278", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Can I change the UUID value on the Messaging Engine?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "After dropping the SIB object, a new UUID value was generated for the new SIB object. However, the messaging application points to the old UUID value.\nIs it possible to change the new UUID value back to the old value?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21439662", + "swg21670813", + "swg1PM09895", + "swg1PM63580", + "swg21678419", + "swg1PM05974", + "swg1PK51004", + "swg21651780", + "swg1PM52295", + "swg1IC77646", + "swg1IZ55204", + "swg1RS00130", + "swg1IC41001", + "swg1PI10877", + "swg1PM47904", + "swg21990337", + "swg21500449", + "swg1PK53590", + "swg21624731", + "swg21608885", + "swg1HD07273", + "swg21385428", + "swg21179649", + "swg1IC82562", + "swg1HD60175", + "swg22015425", + "swg21985195", + "swg1JR34024", + "swg21123967", + "swg21608951", + "swg22014482", + "swg1PK49289", + "swg1IY90142", + "swg1PM85590", + "swg21633512", + "swg21608874", + "swg21624736", + "swg21661805", + "swg21657231", + "swg21248899", + "swg1PM41189", + "swg1PM09174", + "swg21669955", + "swg21611093", + "swg21377301", + "swg1HD12410", + "swg21690556", + "swg1IV06765", + "swg21692575", + "swg1IV32965" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q279", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Are there any known issue or limitation to LOAD data using ADMIN_CMD stored procedure?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Hello,\n\nWe have JDBC applications on WebShpere, LOAD data using ADMIN_CMD. Now, we are planning to use them under XA environment. Are there any known issue or limitation to LOAD data using ADMIN_CMD under XA environment?", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21988939", + "ANSWER": "It is an known current limitation of DB2.", + "START_OFFSET": "115", + "END_OFFSET": "156", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21988939", + "swg21996128", + "swg21411572", + "swg21999700", + "swg1LI73904", + "swg21460967", + "swg21515533", + "swg21654456", + "swg21137497", + "swg1IC91939", + "swg1PJ37247", + "ssg1S1009722", + "swg1JR30081", + "swg1IC68293", + "swg1PI59538", + "swg1PI59547", + "swg21606838", + "swg1JR27747", + "swg1IZ01766", + "swg1PM65004", + "swg21679037", + "swg1PK77738", + "swg21965797", + "swg1IZ27170", + "swg1IC72751", + "swg1IC91740", + "swg1PM65005", + "swg1IC87209", + "swg1IC97601", + "swg1IC68163", + "swg21985615", + "swg1IC95324", + "swg1IT13733", + "swg1PJ40372", + "swg27021314", + "swg21600323", + "swg1IC82098", + "swg21382897", + "swg27019235", + "swg1JR37960", + "swg1IC97604", + "swg21645802", + "swg21988234", + "swg1PI53629", + "swg1JR27895", + "swg21424479", + "swg21244805", + "swg22014409", + "swg22015932", + "swg1PK27129" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q280", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Is WebSphere Transformation Extender (WTX) supported for IBM Integration Bus V10?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "When will WebSphere Transformation Extender (WTX) be supported for IBM Integration Bus V10?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21977329", + "swg21305391", + "swg21968993", + "swg27047104", + "swg27051134", + "swg21657032", + "swg21694165", + "swg22002247", + "swg22001778", + "swg21692503", + "swg21461057", + "swg24041954", + "swg24015131", + "swg24041879", + "swg21695256", + "swg24041895", + "swg24041852", + "swg24041850", + "swg27013927", + "swg21314897", + "swg24041855", + "swg24041952", + "swg24041876", + "swg21270938", + "swg22001459", + "swg21419538", + "swg27019810", + "swg21605513", + "swg1PI22407", + "swg21650080", + "swg21659344", + "swg21438068", + "swg21903101", + "swg21592676", + "swg21635383", + "swg21976315", + "swg21445149", + "swg21683997", + "swg21663912", + "swg21973067", + "swg21638596", + "swg21636184", + "swg21676098", + "swg21686119", + "swg24022194", + "swg21377719", + "swg27008276", + "swg21686609", + "swg21639311", + "swg21609637" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q281", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "'Save and Close' and 'Save' buttons grayed out in desktop configuration", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "In IBM Content Navigator, when configuring a desktop, the 'Save and Close' and 'Save' buttons may be disabled. ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21975568", + "ANSWER": "One of the required fields in the configuration does not have a value", + "START_OFFSET": "219", + "END_OFFSET": "288", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21975568", + "swg1IO25819", + "swg21640222", + "swg27044942", + "swg27042940", + "swg21982534", + "swg21623175", + "swg27046119", + "swg21663719", + "swg1PI38286", + "swg27045040", + "swg1IO06827", + "swg22005107", + "swg21665328", + "swg27028309", + "swg1IO25161", + "swg1PI71220", + "swg21622439", + "swg27047785", + "swg21984626", + "swg21962240", + "swg1HD84096", + "swg27035936", + "swg27041217", + "swg21695393", + "swg21273967", + "swg1IO06287", + "swg1HD89633", + "swg27043300", + "swg27043908", + "swg1LO70827", + "swg27047366", + "swg1IO23372", + "swg21993294", + "swg21998265", + "swg27046705", + "swg1PI58456", + "swg1HD93047", + "ibm10715845", + "swg21962934", + "swg1PJ36965", + "swg21258631", + "swg1LO82338", + "swg27039215", + "swg1JR30691", + "swg21651103", + "swg21377994", + "swg21961678", + "swg27043484", + "swg27047212" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q282", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Does the IBM Netcool Omnibus ServiceNow Gateway support Geneva Release ?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Users of this gateway are asking if we support the latest release of ServiceNow Geneva instance?", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21978428", + "ANSWER": "Enhancement to allow the gateway to accommodate a change in REST API behavior between ServiceNow versions Eureka/Fiji compared to Geneva.", + "START_OFFSET": "381", + "END_OFFSET": "518", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21978428", + "swg1PI04858", + "swg21572340", + "swg21617173", + "swg21882832", + "swg21625779", + "swg21613117", + "swg21409595", + "swg1IV76882", + "swg21613138", + "swg21613144", + "swg21610165", + "swg21674676", + "swg21598876", + "swg22005196", + "swg21623766", + "swg22015440", + "swg21665219", + "swg21613133", + "swg21687618", + "swg21625776", + "swg1IV56633", + "swg1IZ51252", + "swg1IZ35500", + "swg1IZ22010", + "swg1IV17047", + "swg1IV11819", + "swg24033294", + "swg1IZ39370", + "swg1IY94678", + "swg21617318", + "swg21508058", + "swg1IZ19176", + "swg1IZ83014", + "swg27042352", + "swg1IZ28538", + "swg1IZ68706", + "swg21608681", + "swg21617297", + "swg21620427", + "swg1IZ40640", + "swg1IZ17986", + "swg1IV90179", + "swg1IY92961", + "swg24033234", + "swg21969815", + "swg1IV66381", + "swg24033296", + "swg1IZ51302", + "swg1IZ68862" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q283", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Hello - I recently installed SPSS 20, my temporary period for running spss has expired, I am in need of the actual license code to fully install. my Lock code is: 4-20C30", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Hello - I recently installed SPSS 20, my temporary period for running spss has expired, I am in need of the actual license code to fully install. my Lock code is: 4-20C30 . please help! ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21592093", + "ANSWER": "For installation & licensing issues on Student version and Graduate pack, contact your vendor.", + "START_OFFSET": "183", + "END_OFFSET": "277", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21592093", + "swg21486335", + "swg21486099", + "swg21483046", + "swg21994470", + "swg21482958", + "swg21992076", + "swg21482395", + "swg21480817", + "swg21480534", + "swg21482957", + "swg21480568", + "swg21615626", + "swg21477472", + "swg21481141", + "swg21479434", + "swg21476427", + "swg21477068", + "swg21478952", + "swg21480177", + "swg21480973", + "swg21480535", + "swg21477057", + "swg21483949", + "swg21476272", + "swg21483249", + "swg22004739", + "swg21684196", + "swg21483853", + "swg21624290", + "swg21476542", + "swg21485115", + "swg21985805", + "swg21987631", + "swg21615467", + "swg21617263", + "swg21480780", + "swg21139763", + "swg21478242", + "swg21478415", + "swg21969718", + "swg21480740", + "swg21481393", + "swg21477254", + "swg21486939", + "swg21656246", + "swg21484634", + "swg21478316", + "swg21607369", + "swg21480791" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q284", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "iLMT - incomplete virtualisation hierarchy", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nthis query is regarding support case 1109598 that has been raised.\n\nIf we set up an account is this providing access to information for other accounts/servers where we use the same ESX hosts for multiple customers. What specifically is being asked in terms of logical structure and permissions of the account?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21506568", + "swg21371205", + "swg21977404", + "swg22007950", + "swg21296744", + "swg21573270", + "swg1IV51411", + "swg22016008", + "swg21661291", + "swg1OA06949", + "swg1IV11171", + "swg21985055", + "swg21974741", + "swg22010638", + "swg21340627", + "swg21628553", + "swg21617098", + "swg21605078", + "swg21242532", + "swg22010062", + "swg21692442", + "swg22009941", + "swg1IY59603", + "swg21990592", + "swg21638714", + "swg21976003", + "swg21571826", + "swg21630331", + "swg22007908", + "swg21883034", + "swg1IY91001", + "swg1IY94773", + "swg21501368", + "swg1IZ33290", + "swg21572644", + "swg21666564", + "swg22010064", + "swg22010116", + "swg22010640", + "swg22013877", + "swg22007747", + "swg1IZ31604", + "swg1IZ12294", + "nas8N1022111", + "swg21663234", + "swg21577512", + "swg22010331", + "swg1IZ03983", + "swg21251415", + "swg22010807" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q285", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why is the file db2jcc.jar missing after an upgrade to BPM V8.5.7 CF2016.12?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "After upgrading to IBM Business Process Manager V8.5.7 Cumulative Fix 2016.12, I have encountered several JDBC related exceptions during my process application development. It seems that the file db2jcc.jar was removed during the installation of the cumulative fix pack. What happened? ", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg27048992", + "swg24043062", + "swg1JR56772", + "swg27049454", + "swg1JR56923", + "swg1JR56629", + "swg1JR57059", + "swg27050529", + "swg27049143", + "swg27049932", + "swg1JR56543", + "swg27050104", + "swg1JR57068", + "swg1JR56769", + "swg1JR56556", + "swg1JR56742", + "swg1JR56622", + "swg1JR56539", + "swg1JR56643", + "swg1JR56833", + "swg1JR56981", + "swg1JR56991", + "swg1JR56623", + "swg1JR56717", + "swg1JR56851", + "swg1JR56763", + "swg1JR56864", + "swg1JR56883", + "swg1JR56729", + "swg1JR56777", + "swg1JR56881", + "swg1JR56705", + "swg1JR56578", + "swg1JR56765", + "swg1JR56661", + "swg1JR57000", + "swg1JR56707", + "swg1JR57094", + "swg1JR56782", + "swg1JR56901", + "swg1JR56608", + "swg1JR56813", + "swg1JR56691", + "swg1JR56663", + "swg1JR57023", + "swg1JR56647", + "swg1JR56869", + "swg1JR56721", + "swg27050793", + "swg1JR56993" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q286", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Executing an in-flight task for a deactivated snapshot for WebSphere Lombardi Edition and IBM Business Process Manager (BPM)", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Why do in-flight tasks stop after the snapshot has been deactivated? This question pertains to WebSphere Lombardi Edition V7.2 and IBM Business Process Manager V7.5.1.", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21615564", + "swg1IC82062", + "swg21615128", + "swg27025165", + "swg1JR42214", + "swg21625270", + "swg21643921", + "swg1JR43539", + "swg21883360", + "swg21679714", + "swg21620656", + "swg27036139", + "swg21620021", + "swg21473894", + "swg21613989", + "swg21668180", + "swg21508974", + "swg27037045", + "swg21660915", + "swg1IC90192", + "swg1JR56223", + "swg1JR55110", + "swg21439613", + "swg21680795", + "swg21470772", + "swg27008332", + "swg24031822", + "swg1JR54070", + "swg1JR54682", + "swg1IT07386", + "swg1JR49171", + "swg21506999", + "swg21611091", + "swg21618580", + "swg21700831", + "swg1JR50211", + "swg1JR51286", + "swg21579275", + "swg1JR53081", + "swg1JR50221", + "swg24027951", + "swg24027952", + "swg21633799", + "swg21647104", + "swg1JR48205", + "swg1IT06812", + "swg21998655", + "swg24028645", + "swg21439836", + "swg24028665" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q287", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why I am not able to login to StoredIQ Dataserver and Getway using ssh?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Why I am not able to login to StoredIQ Dataserver and Getway using ssh? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg22001558", + "ANSWER": "Restriction in remote login using ssh", + "START_OFFSET": "119", + "END_OFFSET": "156", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg22001558", + "swg21980108", + "swg22001352", + "swg21998828", + "swg22001607", + "swg21998410", + "swg21996647", + "swg21993880", + "swg21962863", + "swg22002430", + "swg22001443", + "swg21693837", + "swg27046128", + "swg27046130", + "swg21404743", + "swg21688483", + "swg27048378", + "swg21998312", + "swg21618569", + "nas8N1022597", + "swg21700752", + "swg21990292", + "swg21999055", + "swg21689644", + "swg21250885", + "swg21997033", + "swg22011073", + "swg21680180", + "swg21403207", + "swg21993980", + "swg21668544", + "swg22001732", + "swg21990305", + "swg21652242", + "swg1IT24660", + "swg21483248", + "swg21395409", + "swg21999824", + "swg1OA53417", + "swg21963808", + "swg21655077", + "swg27046085", + "swg21994261", + "isg3T1024799", + "swg21618723", + "swg21975038", + "swg21569200", + "swg21477442", + "swg21626359", + "swg1IZ70656" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q288", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Is Java 8 supported for BPM?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nI understand that support for Java 6 on WebSphere Application Server is ending April 2018, see: http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21999583\n\nNow I can switch to Java 7. But what about Java 8? Does BPM 8.5.6 support Java 8?", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21639640", + "ANSWER": "IBM BPM V8.5.6.0 Java 6 or Java 7*", + "START_OFFSET": "1469", + "END_OFFSET": "1503", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21639640", + "swg21999583", + "swg22014415", + "nas8N1020185", + "swg22007457", + "swg1PI91734", + "isg3T1026865", + "swg1PI72143", + "swg21691942", + "swg27050858", + "swg21997876", + "swg21994742", + "swg27008725", + "swg22002960", + "swg1PM63963", + "swg24044847", + "swg27049435", + "swg27049870", + "swg27048991", + "nas8N1022039", + "swg27050382", + "swg27050542", + "swg22011244", + "swg1PI87069", + "swg22001183", + "swg27006264", + "nas8N1022189", + "swg21988254", + "swg24044576", + "swg22016104", + "swg27042161", + "nas8N1022472", + "swg1JR54070", + "swg21992656", + "swg24044233", + "nas8N1022418", + "swg24027615", + "swg21666135", + "swg21982695", + "swg24044350", + "nas8N1022471", + "swg27048548", + "swg27006795", + "swg22009504", + "swg27050726", + "swg27045560", + "swg24044850", + "swg21976905", + "swg21700429", + "swg24044574" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q289", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "A NullPointerException appears in BPC Explorer in BPM after upgrading, how do I resolve this?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": " null pointer exception happens when using the business process choreographer explorer. This occurs in BPM 8.5.5.0 after upgrading from WPS 7. The exception stack in SystemOut.log is the following.\nwebapp E com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.webapp.WebApp logServletError SRVE0293E: [Servlet Error]-[Faces Servlet]: java.lang.NullPointerException at com.ibm.bpc.explorer.ConnectionFactoryImpl.(ConnectionFactoryImpl.java:69) at com.ibm.bpc.explorer.util.BFMUtils.getBFMConnection(BFMUtils.java:301) at com.ibm.bpc.explorer.util.BFMUtils.getBusinessFlowManagerService(BFMUtils.java:310) \n.....", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1JR50417", + "swg1JR45522", + "swg21663562", + "swg21676022", + "swg1JR50956", + "swg21969133", + "swg21982256", + "swg1JR53273", + "swg1JR57247", + "swg1JR51511", + "swg21648323", + "swg1JR54590", + "swg24027245", + "swg21979427", + "swg1JR59519", + "swg21439985", + "swg21443768", + "swg1PM79999", + "swg1JR43880", + "swg21636494", + "swg22006350", + "swg1JR58525", + "swg21499961", + "swg1JR36472", + "swg21999915", + "swg21657452", + "swg1PM37613", + "swg1PI89806", + "swg1JR55555", + "swg21664300", + "swg21289764", + "swg21989016", + "swg1JR50642", + "swg1JR57874", + "swg1JR57224", + "swg21512293", + "swg21585272", + "swg1JR42439", + "swg1JR51046", + "swg21644331", + "swg22006623", + "swg21671564", + "swg1JR44319", + "swg21504460", + "swg1IV76090", + "swg1JR48515", + "swg21700629", + "swg21403912", + "swg21633791", + "swg1JR42349" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q290", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Is using a monitored JBoss server with ITCAM supported in a Windows Service?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Is using a monitored JBoss server with ITCAM supported in a Windows Service? ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21967756", + "ANSWER": "The JBoss service is not available to run as a Windows service when configured with the ITCAM for J2EE agent/DC because this involves changes to the JBoss native connector files and this is currently not supported.", + "START_OFFSET": "471", + "END_OFFSET": "685", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21967756", + "swg21418682", + "swg21567588", + "swg27016351", + "swg21966304", + "swg21680317", + "swg24015775", + "swg21680810", + "swg21976648", + "swg21624509", + "swg21385138", + "swg27036340", + "swg21688744", + "swg21967546", + "swg21981319", + "swg21487554", + "swg21569006", + "swg21577659", + "swg21965198", + "swg21502472", + "swg21610602", + "swg21445352", + "swg21692150", + "swg21968682", + "swg21412512", + "swg21391112", + "swg21623478", + "swg21664053", + "swg21504749", + "swg21610343", + "swg21680319", + "swg27050335", + "swg21481385", + "swg27050336", + "swg27050337", + "swg21421216", + "swg1IZ89708", + "swg21983357", + "swg21567604", + "swg27036351", + "swg21696116", + "swg21663653", + "swg21968702", + "swg1PM22231", + "swg21518773", + "swg21484233", + "swg21981478", + "swg21423874", + "swg1PI41634", + "swg27018144" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q291", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Is Java 8 supported for BPM?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "\n\nI understand that support for Java 6 on WebSphere Application Server is ending April 2018, see: http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21999583\n\nNow I can switch to Java 7. But what about Java 8? Does BPM support Java 8?", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21639640", + "ANSWER": "IBM BPM V8.5.6 and V8.5.7 support Java 6 and Java 7, but do not support Java 8.", + "START_OFFSET": "620", + "END_OFFSET": "1127", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21639640", + "swg21999583", + "swg22014415", + "nas8N1020185", + "swg22007457", + "swg1PI91734", + "isg3T1026865", + "swg1PI72143", + "swg21691942", + "swg27050858", + "swg21997876", + "swg21994742", + "swg27008725", + "swg1PM63963", + "swg24044847", + "swg27049435", + "swg27049870", + "swg27048991", + "nas8N1022039", + "swg27050382", + "swg27050542", + "swg22011244", + "swg1PI87069", + "swg22001183", + "swg27006264", + "nas8N1022189", + "swg21988254", + "swg24044576", + "swg22016104", + "swg27042161", + "nas8N1022472", + "swg1JR54070", + "swg21992656", + "swg24044233", + "nas8N1022418", + "swg24027615", + "swg21666135", + "swg21982695", + "swg24044350", + "nas8N1022471", + "swg27048548", + "swg27006795", + "swg22009504", + "swg27050726", + "swg27045560", + "swg24044850", + "swg21976905", + "swg21700429", + "swg24044574", + "swg22016433" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q292", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Content Engine System Health Page page doesn't reflect correctly, Fixed Content Advise and Storage Area showing unavailable.", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "Content Engine System Health Page page doesn't reflect correctly, Fixed Content Advise and Storage Area showing unavailable. ", + "DOCUMENT": "swg21566663", + "ANSWER": "Verify the Content Engine Bootstrap User has Full Control on the Object Store and all associated Storage Areas. \n \n \n 2. Inspect Storage Area security by right-clicking on the Object Store\n \n \n 3. Choose Properties\n \n \n 4. Select the All Properties radio button and view the Storage Area property name\n \n \n 5. Click on the drop down list to select the Storage Area. \n \n \n 6. The Storage Area properties screen will appear. \n \n \n 7. Verify the Security tab allows the Content Engine Bootstrap User has Full Control.", + "START_OFFSET": "1465", + "END_OFFSET": "2015", + "ANSWERABLE": "Y", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21566663", + "swg21672570", + "swg21967984", + "swg21662484", + "swg1PJ40526", + "swg1PJ40497", + "swg1PJ40525", + "swg21619532", + "swg1PJ39412", + "swg1PJ38351", + "swg21504125", + "swg27020217", + "swg1PJ43446", + "swg1PJ42919", + "swg1PJ43554", + "swg1PJ40369", + "swg1PJ43553", + "swg1PJ32525", + "swg1PJ41944", + "swg22003421", + "swg1PJ42978", + "swg1PJ42980", + "swg21516454", + "swg21327005", + "swg21967758", + "swg21974439", + "swg21999284", + "swg21692413", + "swg21700206", + "swg21965271", + "swg21375359", + "swg1PJ44351", + "swg21639188", + "swg21589999", + "swg21446415", + "swg21689845", + "swg1PJ40549", + "swg1PJ42979", + "swg1PJ41499", + "swg1PJ42977", + "swg1PJ43237", + "swg1PK52536", + "swg21655000", + "swg21960350", + "swg27045596", + "swg1PJ40644", + "swg21668192", + "swg1PJ35223", + "swg21451301", + "swg1PJ42976" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q293", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "BPM installation packages and deployment options", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "What is the difference between \"Advanced\" and \"AdvancedOnly\" options for BPM deployment environment? What is the difference between \"BPM Advanced\" and \"BPM Advanced - Process Server\" installation images?", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg1JR49948", + "swg1JR56330", + "swg1JR55902", + "swg1JR50580", + "swg1JR53620", + "swg1JR56543", + "swg1JR53803", + "swg1JR50819", + "swg21673414", + "swg1JR49376", + "swg1JR48195", + "swg24037043", + "swg1JR59022", + "swg27048992", + "swg1JR52767", + "swg1JR49237", + "swg1JR51725", + "swg21666379", + "swg1JR50807", + "swg1JR50404", + "swg1JR49541", + "swg1JR53044", + "swg1JR56323", + "swg1JR52834", + "swg1JR57283", + "swg1JR42113", + "swg1JR55385", + "swg1JR47698", + "swg27050103", + "swg1JR52966", + "swg1JR56231", + "swg1JR48445", + "swg1JR50808", + "swg1JR54111", + "swg1JR48808", + "swg1JR53176", + "swg1JR55860", + "swg1JR47582", + "swg1JR42894", + "swg1JR46067", + "swg21672885", + "swg1JR51812", + "swg1JR56234", + "swg1JR53769", + "swg1JR55983", + "swg1JR53267", + "swg27048610", + "swg1JR43009", + "swg1JR51139", + "swg1JR53237" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q294", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Error #2070", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "I purchased the SPSS grad pack and put one of the licenses on one computer and another on this one. This computer crashed and I was forced to reformat the hard drive. Subsequently, I lost SPSS in the process. I am now reinstalling with the single user copy option.\n\nThe error it gave me now when I attempted to authorize the program with the original authorization number I received was:\n\nAuthorization in progress ... (removed) Authorization failed.: You are not allowed to generate any more new licenses. End Of Transaction. All permitted authorizations for the provided authorization code(s) have been utilized. No additional authorizations are permitted on this code. If you think this is an error, please contact IBM Corp. Customer Service at spssls@us.ibm.com ( http://www-01.ibm.com/software/analytics/spss ) with your product and purchase details. Click \"Finish\" to exit.", + "DOCUMENT": "-", + "ANSWER": "-", + "START_OFFSET": "-", + "END_OFFSET": "-", + "ANSWERABLE": "N", + "DOC_IDS": [ + "swg21985888", + "swg21480566", + "swg21487843", + "swg21994470", + "swg21484650", + "swg21480780", + "swg21482958", + "swg21476498", + "swg21480568", + "swg21627644", + "swg21480534", + "swg21656246", + "swg21483046", + "swg21486143", + "swg22011329", + "swg21975605", + "swg21482869", + "swg21476243", + "swg21608338", + "swg1PI53900", + "swg21480416", + "swg21479434", + "swg21480743", + "swg21985805", + "swg21968434", + "swg21478409", + "swg21566554", + "swg21968944", + "swg21486099", + "swg22002945", + "swg21999396", + "swg1PI37055", + "swg21478846", + "swg21485115", + "swg22005165", + "swg21684196", + "swg22006117", + "swg21477472", + "swg21483249", + "swg22007173", + "swg21479534", + "swg21482206", + "swg21477068", + "swg22007191", + "swg21976219", + "swg21992076", + "swg21480791", + "swg21492305", + "swg21475167", + "swg22005061" + ] + }, + { + "QUESTION_ID": "DEV_Q295", + "QUESTION_TITLE": "Why are we seeing high CPU and hung threads in WebSphere Application Server?", + "QUESTION_TEXT": "During the job execution in WebSphere Compute Grid we are seeing high CPU along with many hung threads reporting\nWSVR0605W from BatchFileLoggerInfo.getDirectoryList method.\nIn Sysprint many threads are hung with this stack:\nBossLog: { 0426}