With the same argument, and in accordance with the Hausdorff OF, the sampling rate of 75% was selected due to the least evaluated maximum distance, though the difference between the rates 75% and 65% is measured around 0.196 mm. Figure 14b depicts the evolution of maximum distance according to the Hausdorff OF. Considering the aforesaid sampling rates, numerical evaluations with respect to average and Hausdorff OFs are calculated and reported in Table 5 and Table 6, respectively. To evaluate the magnitude of the reported distances, an extra comparison is performed with the distance between the two comparing PCLs in case no method is applied (meaning that prediction data is exactly equal to the pre-surgery data). This comparison, so-called baseline evaluation, is reported in the last column of Table 5 and the last two columns of Table 6, for both the average and the Hausdorff OFs.