Finally, to close the discussion, it should be noted that all the regressors were design with a the same sampling rate. The RF with adaptive weights outperforms the other regressors with 1.048 mm and 4.083 mm for the average and the Hausdorff optimization, respectively. In the second rank, RF without consideration of adaptive weights stands with an average distance of 1.052 mm and maximum distance of 4.101 mm. Third and forth ranks were obtained by MOR (with average of 1.173 mm, and Hausdorff of 4.738 mm), and GBT(with average of 1.326 mm, and Hausdorff of 5.564 mm).