The rest of the hemodynamic variables are reported in Table 2. For HR, there was a significant interaction (p < 0.001), as both protocols increased HR during the session versus the baseline values (p < 0.001), but HR during the IRD was lower in comparison with the CD (p < 0.001). Besides, there was a main effect of session (p < 0.001), with lower HR values during the IRD in comparison with the CD, and a main effect of time (p < 0.001). DBP analysis reported no significant interaction for DBP (p = 0.056) and no main effect of session (p = 0.14). Also, a main effect of time was reported (p < 0.001). PP analysis indicated a significant interaction (p = 0.002), where PP increased during the IRD, in comparison with the CD (p < 0.001) and the baseline values (p = 0.017). A significant main effect of session was also noted (p < 0.001), with higher values during the IRD in comparison with the CD. Besides, a main effect of time was not reported (p = 0.14). Finally, for DP there was no interaction (p = 0.069) and no significant main effect of session (p = 0.097). Besides, a significant main effect of time was observed (p < 0.001). For HR, DBP, and DP, the main effect of time reported higher values during exercise in comparison with the baseline.