The results of Experiment 1 revealed high rates of lure false recognition in the Yes/No test across both groups, which were reduced substantially by the simultaneous presentation of targets and foils in the Forced Choice test format. This observation is consistent with previous findings (Guerin et al., 2012; Migo et al., 2009), and with proposals that false recognition in the Yes/No test is often driven by a failure to retrieve stored details. This idea was further supported by the modified RK judgments, which indicated that accurate responding in the Yes/No test relies primarily on the successful application of a recall-to-reject strategy, whereas familiarity can more successfully support Forced Choice decisions, again consistent with previous work (Migo et al., 2009).