In anesthetized cat, silencing the feedback from motion processing areas in the middle suprasylvian region (for review, see Spear, 1991) tends to fairly selectively reduce the responsiveness of those area 18 neurons which exhibit a high degree of direction selectivity (Galuske et al., 2002). Furthermore, inactivation of feedback from motion processing middle suprasylvian region modulates direction selectivity but not orientation preferences of area 17 neurons (Shen et al., 2006). By contrast, inactivation of feedback from the pattern/form processing PTV, tends to shift upward preferred velocities and increase DSIs of areas 19 and 17 neurons (current study). Further the effects of inactivation of a particular higher-order area in a given processing stream on responses of neurons in a particular lower-order area in the same stream, are also quite specific. Thus, inactivation of area 21a affects strongly orientation (Wang et al., 2000; Tong et al., 2011) and spatial frequency tuning (Huang et al., 2004; Tong et al., 2011) but not direction selectivity tuning (Tong et al., 2011) of neurons in the ipsilateral area 17. It could be argued that feedback signals from the higher-order pattern processing areas, increase the “sparseness of coding” (Olshausen and Field, 2004) by neurons in the lower-order areas. Thus, feedback from area 21a enhances orientation selectivity of neurons in area 17 (Wang et al., 2007), while feedback from PTV suppresses responses of many area 19 and some area 17 neurons to faster moving stimuli (current study). This might reduce dynamic “cluttering” of visual scene during fast exploratory saccadic eye movements (Crommelinck and Roucoux, 1976; Blakemore and Donaghy, 1980) and allow the higher-order pattern processing areas to “concentrate” on processing visual information during small exploratory microsaccades, as well as slow drifts (Hebbard and Marg, 1960; Pritchard and Heron, 1960), plus slow disjunctive eye movements (Stryker and Blakemore, 1972) occurring during fixation of objects of interest. It appears that postulated (Pettigrew and Dreher, 1987; Guillemot et al., 1993) strong involvement of area 19 in stereoscopic analysis of the visual scene is restricted to analysis of static, rather than moving, interocular positional disparities (Mimeault et al., 2002).