Notably, although the availability of object details that can disambiguate targets and foils is a critical prerequisite for accurate memory performance across test formats, we did not identify a relationship between this factor and Yes/No performance. Instead, we found that performance in this task was related to tests measuring recall and executive function. Importantly, the tasks used in the current battery are thought to be sensitive to hippocampal and prefrontal function, respectively, and may reflect variability in the integrity of these regions in the current sample. This possibility is consistent with the role of the prefrontal cortex in selection, inhibition, maintenance and evaluation of stored details (Badre & Wagner, 2007), and the hippocampus in supporting reinstatement of previous episodes (i.e., pattern completion) and mismatch detection (i.e., pattern separation; Norman & O’Reilly, 2003), which are jointly thought to support a recall-to-reject strategy (Bowman & Dennis, 2016; Gallo, 2004). Importantly, the observation that representational quality was directly related to Forced Choice performance, but not Yes/No performance, suggests that the availability of object-level representations supported by PRC are necessary, but not sufficient, to support performance in the Yes/No test, making it difficult to detect measurable effects of representational quality on Yes/No performance.