The four extracted factors were subsequently reviewed and labelled—factor 1 (3 items) was named ‘social distancing’; factor 2 (9 items) was named ‘tolerance/support for community care’, since it shared almost all items with the same factor identified by Rüsch et al.  (except the item ‘increased spending on mental health services is a waste of money’); factor 3 (3 items) as ‘social restrictiveness’; and factor 4 (5 items) as ‘prejudice and misconception’. Refer to Table 2 for more information on the 4-factor model. CFA was conducted to test the model fit of this 4-factor model among the second half-dataset (n = 1,503), and the result suggested that the model was acceptable (χ2(df) = 236.727 (80), CFI = 0.933, TLI = 0.955, and RMSEA = 0.036). The internal reliability statistics for the four factors were 0.707, 0.696, 0.709, and 0.665, respectively.