Critically, in a typical Yes/No object recognition test with similar foils, the availability of object details and the ability to retrieve and evaluate these details are confounded, making it difficult to tease apart the relative contributions of these two factors to false recognition. One way of overcoming this limitation is to hold demands on the availability of object details constant, while varying demands on strategic retrieval processes. Existing empirical and modeling evidence indicates that this can be done by comparing performance in a typical Yes/No recognition memory format to performance in a Forced Choice test format, wherein targets and corresponding foils are presented simultaneously (Guerin, Robbins, Gilmore, & Schacter, 2012; Holdstock et al., 2002; Migo et al., 2009, 2014; Norman, 2010). In particular, whereas the item-wise presentation of targets and foils in the Yes/No test places considerable demands on recollection-based processes (i.e., recall-to-reject), the simultaneous presentation of targets and their corresponding foils in a Forced Choice test can be supported by judgments of relative familiarity differences between the two choices (Norman, 2010).