Several studies have shown that the survival rate is almost the same for both mastectomy and BCS, with the benefit that the second imposes less deformation on breast and a more satisfactory aesthetic outcome can be achieved . Still, despite the smaller deformation after BCS, it has been reported that up to 30% of patients are dissatisfied with their post-operative appearance . Actually, the final aesthetic outcome can be affected by so many different variables, from different surgical practices and expertise, to some breast specific characteristics, such as volume and density, tumor size and location, hardening the prediction and patient/surgeon communication about surgical procedure results. Patients are usually involved in the decision process regarding their surgery, but most of the time surgeons lack the means to provide visual clues about the post-surgery results of different alternatives. Even though, this is an important step, regarding the acceptance of the final outcome, as also the contribution of breasts to the sense of femininity and beauty of most women. In fact, follow-up studies after breast cancer treatment show the harmful impact of poor aesthetic results on the psychosocial health of women, who describe loss of self-esteem , sexual impairment  and dislike towards their bodies after treatment . On the other hand, physicians have been recognizing the value of support decision systems for planning BCS, to compare the outcome of different surgical options and facilitate surgeon/patient communication. The value of such systems is further supported by studies confirming that women are more willing to deal with the aesthetic results when they are included in the decision process . These visual sensor tools could inform better the patient about the aesthetic consequences of the treatment and improve the feeling about all the process.