Consistent with this possibility, previous work using fMRI has found that although PRC is recruited during a Yes/No recognition task with similar lures, only hippocampal activity is related to accurate performance (Reagh & Yassa, 2014). In contrast, PRC activity has been directly related to discrimination performance in a Forced Choice test with similar lures (O’Neil et al., 2015). Similarly, among patients with MTL damage, hippocampal integrity has been related to performance in Yes/No performance, whereas PRC integrity has been associated with Forced Choice performance (Holdstock et al., 2002; Westerberg et al., 2013). Collectively, this empirical evidence indicates that partially dissociable neural mechanisms can support performance across test formats when targets and foils are perceptually similar, consistent with modeling work (Norman, 2010). These direct neural measures complement the present behavioral findings in indicating that the Forced Choice test provides a more direct measure of the quality of object representations and underlying PRC function, relative to the Yes/No test. In doing so, these data further validate the use of the Forced Choice and Yes/No test formats to tease apart contributions of the availability of object details, relative to the ability to retrieve and evaluate these details, to elevated rates of false recognition among older adults.