Quality of Recommendations and External Pressure were ranked significantly lower than the other scales and lower than the neutral value of the Likert scale used in the related survey question. This result suggests that researchers may not consider the quality of recommendations received from RIMSs or social pressure from colleagues or supervisors central to their decision making regarding whether to maintain their RIMS profile. Still, a few participants revealed in their comments that they maintained their RIMS profile because their colleagues did. As one of them explained, she did not want “to appear as an outdated researcher.” It is interesting to note that Enjoyment was evaluated higher than Support Evaluation and above the neutral value. Although Share Scholarship can be linked to external motivation, such as improving the chances of researchers’ having their scholarship cited, some may enjoy the activity. This could relate to the pleasure received from “announcing [their] achievements among peers and friends” (S378) or from enhanced self-worth and satisfaction after providing their peers and the public open access to their scholarship. One participant stated,