Reduce food loss and food waste+ Reduced food loss will reduce prices, and may lead to less poverty (high confidence)+ Reduced food loss will reduce prices, and may lead to more food available (high confidence)+ Reduced food loss will reduce prices, and may lead to more food available (high confidence)+ Less use of water (high confidence)+ Lead to less energy use (high confidence)+ Balanced food distribution globally may reduce prices for many (low confidence)+ Balanced food distribution globally may provide more sustainable societies (low confidence)+ Balanced food distribution and reduced losses is part of responsible consumption (high confidence)+ Clear reduction of emissions (high confidence)+ Less impact on water (medium confidence)+ Less impact on land (high confidence)+ Leads to less competition for resources and thus less pressures between actors (medium confidence)Section 7.5Occurs in all societies, there are no trade-offs Shift to balanced, sustainable healthy diets± Depends whether the healthier diet is cheaper, often not (medium confi- dence)+ Balanced food distribution globally may reduce prices for many (low confidence)+ Healthier diets for affluent populations (high confidence)+ Less use of water (high confidence)+ May lead to less energy use (high confidence)± More innovative food production (medium confidence)+ Balanced food globally may reduce prices for many (low confidence)+ Balanced food globally may provide more sustainable societies (low confidence)+ Clear reduction of emissions – Part of responsible production (high confidence)+ Clear reduction of emissions (high confidence)+ Less impact on water (medium confidence)+ Less impact on land (high confidence)Section 7.4Only for affluent societies; synergies occur because it may lead to freeing up land Renewables supply timber, biomass, agri feedstock)± Can lead to both positive and nega- tive outcomes for livelihoods and food security; if it pro- vides income, food and wood products, then neutral to positive (medium confidence)± May lead to competition when done at large scale and not taking into account local circumstances or needs (medium confidence)± Can lead to greener landscape, but can also result in large-scale undesirable changes (medium confidence)± Can lead to better landscape-level water balance when done in proper manner (medium confidence)± Can lead to better and more stable products and energy provision if done properly (medium confidence)+ If it provides income and wood products, then neutral to positive (medium confidence)+ Can lead to improved wood chain, and bio-based product innovation (high confidence)± Clear reduction of emissions up to certain scales and volumes and when negative land-use effects are avoided (high confidence)± Depending on type of land use, less impact on water (medium confidence)± Depending on type of land use, less impact on life on land