Posterior Innominate Mobilization Versus Muscle Energy Technique on Lumbopelvic Angles in Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
the goal of this clinical trial study is to compare between posterior innominate mobilization and muscle energy techniqueon lumbopelvic angles in sacroiliac joint dysfunction patients.

the main questions they aim to answer are

are there statistical significant effects of posterior innominate mobilization versus muscle energy technique on lumbopelvic angles in sacroiliac joint dysfunction patients ?

are there statistical significant effects of posterior innominate mobilization versus muscle energy technique on pain intensity level in sacroiliac joint dysfunction patients ?

purpose of the study is to measure the effect of muscle energy technique versus posterior innominate mobilization on lumbopelvic angles in sacroiliac joint dysfunction
- EligibilityCriteria: Inclusion Criteria:  Internal torsion of ilium on sacrum in sacroiliac joint dysfunction patients Normal weight - BMI greater than or equal to 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m^2 Patients with age from 25 to 45 Patients with VAS more than 3 Pain around SIJ and groin area Patients testing positive at least 3 of six SIJ pain provocation tests (Ganesen's test, Distraction test, Compression test, Thigh thrust test, Sacral thrust test, Patrick and fabric test)  Exclusion Criteria:  Underlying neuro defects in leg Sacroiliitis Spondylolisthesis Pre diagnosed disease of central or peripheral nervous system Current pregnancy Rheumatological disease History of major surgery of lower extremity or spine Osteoporosis Recent injection of corticosteroids in SIJ - HealthyVolunteers: No - Gender: All - MinimumAge: 25 Years - MaximumAge: 45 Years - StdAgeList: Adult