Journalists are still telling stories about her too, for better or for worse. Holmes is not naive, nor are most readers of The New York Times. While last weekend’s “a hero or a villain” coverage may be said to have betrayed the patients who were harmed by her inaccurate blood tests, and the memory of a Theranos employee who died by suicide, it is also just another entry in the expanded universe of Holmes-themed entertainment. There are books and podcasts and feature-length documentaries. A TV miniseries about Holmes has a score of 89 percent on Rotten Tomatoes. (“Addictively engrossing!” “Consistently entertaining!”) Surely some of those who now bemoan the Times’ friendly treatment have consumed this material for less-than-academic reasons.
The prosaic details of a convicted cheat’s domestic life aren’t really news, but they are interesting—because the character of Elizabeth Holmes is interesting. So, too, are her continued efforts to spin a narrative of who she is. But with such well-trodden ground, the irony is built right in. You know that Holmes is a scammer. I know it. On some level, The New York Times seems to know it too; the article runs through her crimes and even quotes a friend of Holmes’s who says she isn’t to be trusted. This isn’t character rehabilitation; it’s content. We’re all waiting to see what Liz gets up to next. Have the media learned their lesson? The real test will arrive when the next scientific scammer comes along, and the one after that—when their narrative is still intact, and their fraud hasn’t yet been revealed. At that point, the system for preventing errors will have to do its work.


Why do people still care about the Elizabeth Holmes story? What does the writer say is the real test? 
system
patrkaar abhi bhi uske bare main bhi kahaniyaan suna rahe hai, behatar yaa badtar ke liye.homes bholi nahin he, na hi neuyork times ke adhikansh pathak hai.jabaki pichley saptahanth ke "ek nayak yaa ek khalanaayak" kawarej ke bare main kaha ja saktaa he ki un rogiyon ko dhokhaa diya he jinhen uske galat rakt pareekshanon se nuksaan hua tha, or ek theranos karmchaaree kii smriti jo aatmahatya se mar gai, yah bhi vistaarit brahmad main ek or pravishti hahomes-theme vaale manoranjan ke.kitaaben or podcast or feechar-lambaai vruttchitr hai.homes ke bare main ek tivi minisris kaa roten tamaato par 89 pratishat kaa score he.("nashe kii lat main tallin!"
ek doshi dhokhaa ke gharelu jivan kaa abhiyojan vivaran vastav main khabar nahin he, lekin ve dilachasp hai - kyonki elizabeth homes kaa charitra dilachasp he.isliye, vah bhi he ki vah koun he, isaki katha ko spin karne ke liye uske nirantar prayaas hai.lekin is tarah ke acchhee tarah se troden ground ke saath, vidambnaa sahi he. aap jaanate hai ki homes ek ghotaalaa he.mujhe yah pataa he.kuch str par, neuyork times ko bhi yah pataa lagata he;lekh uske aparaadhon ke madhyam se chalata he or yahaan tak ki homes ke ek dost ko uddhrut karata he, jo kahata he ki use bharosa nahin he.yah charitra punarvaas nahin he;yah saamagree he.ham sabhi yah dekhne ke liye intjaar kar rahe hai ki liz aage kya ho jaataa he.kya media ne apana sabak siikhaa he?vaastavik pareekshan tab aayega jab aglaa vaigyanik scamer saath aayega, or uske baad ek - jab unki katha abhi bhi barkaraar he, or unki dhokhadhadi abhi tak saamne nahin ai he.us bindu par, trutiyon ko rokane ke liye pranali ko apana kaam karnaa hoga.


log abhi bhi elizabeth homes kii kahani kii parvaah kyon karte hai?lekhak kya kahata he ki asli pariksha he?
user
elizabeth homes kii kahani abhi bhi apane darshakon ke liye dilachasp he kyonki vah abhi bhi ek darshakon ko kaid kar sakati he.homes ke bare main tivi minisris kii sambhaavna manoranjan kaarnon se logon dwaara dekhi gai thi, bhale hi unhone neuyork times main uske sakaaratmak chithran ko prabhavit kiya ho.ek katha ko katai karne main uski ruchi jo vah bhi lubhaavna he.har koi jaanata he ki vah abhi bhi ek scamer he, lekin saamagree abhi bhi darshakon ko pakad rahi he, jo adhik mahatvapurn he.

lekhak kaa kahana he ki asli pareekshan tab hota he jab aglaa vaigyanik scamer utpann hota he or unki katha se samjhauta nahin kiya gaya he or unki dhokhadhadi abhi tak saamne nahin ai he.us bindu par, trutiyon ko rokane ke liye pranali kaa pareekshan kiya jayega.
assistant
<|system|>
</s>
<|user|>
patrkaar abhi bhi uske bare main bhi kahaniyaan suna rahe hai, behatar yaa badtar ke liye.homes bholi nahin he, na hi neuyork times ke adhikansh pathak hai.jabaki pichley saptahanth ke "ek nayak yaa ek khalanaayak" kawarej ke bare main kaha ja saktaa he ki un rogiyon ko dhokhaa diya he jinhen uske galat rakt pareekshanon se nuksaan hua tha, or ek theranos karmchaaree kii smriti jo aatmahatya se mar gai, yah bhi vistaarit brahmad main ek or pravishti hahomes-theme vaale manoranjan ke.kitaaben or podcast or feechar-lambaai vruttchitr hai.homes ke bare main ek tivi minisris kaa roten tamaato par 89 pratishat kaa score he.("nashe kii lat main tallin!"
ek doshi dhokhaa ke gharelu jivan kaa abhiyojan vivaran vastav main khabar nahin he, lekin ve dilachasp hai - kyonki elizabeth homes kaa charitra dilachasp he.isliye, vah bhi he ki vah koun he, isaki katha ko spin karne ke liye uske nirantar prayaas hai.lekin is tarah ke acchhee tarah se troden ground ke saath, vidambnaa sahi he. aap jaanate hai ki homes ek ghotaalaa he.mujhe yah pataa he.kuch str par, neuyork times ko bhi yah pataa lagata he;lekh uske aparaadhon ke madhyam se chalata he or yahaan tak ki homes ke ek dost ko uddhrut karata he, jo kahata he ki use bharosa nahin he.yah charitra punarvaas nahin he;yah saamagree he.ham sabhi yah dekhne ke liye intjaar kar rahe hai ki liz aage kya ho jaataa he.kya media ne apana sabak siikhaa he?vaastavik pareekshan tab aayega jab aglaa vaigyanik scamer saath aayega, or uske baad ek - jab unki katha abhi bhi barkaraar he, or unki dhokhadhadi abhi tak saamne nahin ai he.us bindu par, trutiyon ko rokane ke liye pranali ko apana kaam karnaa hoga.


log abhi bhi elizabeth homes kii kahani kii parvaah kyon karte hai?lekhak kya kahata he ki asli pariksha he?</s>
<|assistant|>
elizabeth homes kii kahani abhi bhi apane darshakon ke liye dilachasp he kyonki vah abhi bhi ek darshakon ko kaid kar sakati he.homes ke bare main tivi minisris kii sambhaavna manoranjan kaarnon se logon dwaara dekhi gai thi, bhale hi unhone neuyork times main uske sakaaratmak chithran ko prabhavit kiya ho.ek katha ko katai karne main uski ruchi jo vah bhi lubhaavna he.har koi jaanata he ki vah abhi bhi ek scamer he, lekin saamagree abhi bhi darshakon ko pakad rahi he, jo adhik mahatvapurn he.

lekhak kaa kahana he ki asli pareekshan tab hota he jab aglaa vaigyanik scamer utpann hota he or unki katha se samjhauta nahin kiya gaya he or unki dhokhadhadi abhi tak saamne nahin ai he.us bindu par, trutiyon ko rokane ke liye pranali kaa pareekshan kiya jayega.</s>
