Genesis is an example of a work in the "antiquities" genre, as the Romans knew it, a popular genre telling of the appearance of humans and their ancestors and heroes, with elaborate genealogies and chronologies fleshed out with stories and anecdotes. The most notable examples are found in the work of Greek historians of the 6th century BC: their intention was to connect notable families of their own day to a distant and heroic past, and in doing so they did not distinguish between myth, legend, and facts. Professor Jean-Louis Ska of the Pontifical Biblical Institute calls the basic rule of the antiquarian historian the "law of conservation": everything old is valuable, nothing is eliminated. This antiquity was needed to prove the worth of Israel's traditions to the nations (the neighbors of the Jews in the early Persian province of Judea) and to reconcile and unite the various factions within Israel itself. Describing the work of the biblical authors, John Van Seters wrote that lacking many historical traditions and none from the distant past, "They had to use myths and legends for earlier periods. In order to make sense out of the variety of different and often conflicting versions of stories, and to relate the stories to each other, they fitted them into a genealogical chronology."

Please tell me what this passage is about in bullet form. 
system
utpatti "puraatanta" style main ek kaam kaa ek udhaaharan he, jaisaa ki roman yah jaanate the, ek lokapriy style manushyon or unke purvajon or nayakon kii upasthiti ke bare main bataati he, vistrut vanshavali or kalkramon ke saath kahaniyon or upakhyanon ke saath baahar nikalataa he.sabase ullekhneey udhaaharan 6 veen shatabdi isa purv ke greek itihaaskaaron ke kaam main paae jate hai: unka iraadaa apane din ke ullekhneey pariwaron ko ek dur or vir ateet se jodne kaa tha, or aisa karne main ve myth, kinvadanti or ke bich antar nahin karte the, auratathy.pontifical bible institute ke professor jin-louis ska ne puraatanapanthi itihaaskaar ke mul niyam ko "sangrakshan kaa kanoon" kaha: sab kuch purana moolyawaan he, kuch bhi samaapt nahin hua he.is puraatanta ko rashtron (yahudiya ke praarambhik farsi praant main yahudiyon ke padosi) ke liye isroyal kii paramparaon ko sabit karne or isroyal ke bheetar vibhinn guton ko sametane or ekajute karne ke liye aavashyak tha.bible ke lekhakon ke kaam ke bare main bataate hue, jon vine setars ne likhaa ki kai aitihaasik paramparaon kii kami or dur ke ateet se koi bhi nahin, "unhen pehle kii avadhi ke liye mithkon or kinvadantiyon kaa upyog karnaa tha. vibhinn or aksar sangharsh kii vividhta se baahar nikalne ke liye.kahaniyon ke sanskaran, or kahaniyon ko ek -duusare se sambandhit karne ke liye, unhone unhen ek vanshavali kalkram main feet kiya. "

kripaya mujhe bataaen ki yah maarg bullate form main kya he.
user
thik he, yahan aapke dwaara pradaan kiye gaye maarg kaa saransh he.

• romanon ne utpatti ko pracheen vastuon kii style main girane ke liye mana, jo atyadhik vistrut vanshavali or kahaniyon vaale logon ke nirmaan ke bare main bataata tha.
• greek itihaaskaaron ne 6 veen shatabdi isa purv main ullekhneey kaaryon kaa utpaadan kiya, jo mahatvapurn pariwaron ko apane samay se pracheen ateet tak jodate hai, bhale hi kahaniyaan tathy yaa myth par aadhaarit hon.
• "sangrakshan ke kanoon" kaa upyog yah dikhaane ke liye kiya gaya tha ki israel kii paramparaayen abhi bhi abhyaas ke yogya thim or un logon ke saath punarmilan karne ke liye jo dur ho gaye the.
• itihaas kii kami ke kaaran, mithkon or kinvadantiyon kaa upyog aksar kahaniyon ke alag -alag sanskarnon kii samaj banane main madad karne ke liye kiya jaataa tha.
assistant
<|system|>
</s>
<|user|>
utpatti "puraatanta" style main ek kaam kaa ek udhaaharan he, jaisaa ki roman yah jaanate the, ek lokapriy style manushyon or unke purvajon or nayakon kii upasthiti ke bare main bataati he, vistrut vanshavali or kalkramon ke saath kahaniyon or upakhyanon ke saath baahar nikalataa he.sabase ullekhneey udhaaharan 6 veen shatabdi isa purv ke greek itihaaskaaron ke kaam main paae jate hai: unka iraadaa apane din ke ullekhneey pariwaron ko ek dur or vir ateet se jodne kaa tha, or aisa karne main ve myth, kinvadanti or ke bich antar nahin karte the, auratathy.pontifical bible institute ke professor jin-louis ska ne puraatanapanthi itihaaskaar ke mul niyam ko "sangrakshan kaa kanoon" kaha: sab kuch purana moolyawaan he, kuch bhi samaapt nahin hua he.is puraatanta ko rashtron (yahudiya ke praarambhik farsi praant main yahudiyon ke padosi) ke liye isroyal kii paramparaon ko sabit karne or isroyal ke bheetar vibhinn guton ko sametane or ekajute karne ke liye aavashyak tha.bible ke lekhakon ke kaam ke bare main bataate hue, jon vine setars ne likhaa ki kai aitihaasik paramparaon kii kami or dur ke ateet se koi bhi nahin, "unhen pehle kii avadhi ke liye mithkon or kinvadantiyon kaa upyog karnaa tha. vibhinn or aksar sangharsh kii vividhta se baahar nikalne ke liye.kahaniyon ke sanskaran, or kahaniyon ko ek -duusare se sambandhit karne ke liye, unhone unhen ek vanshavali kalkram main feet kiya. "

kripaya mujhe bataaen ki yah maarg bullate form main kya he.</s>
<|assistant|>
thik he, yahan aapke dwaara pradaan kiye gaye maarg kaa saransh he.

• romanon ne utpatti ko pracheen vastuon kii style main girane ke liye mana, jo atyadhik vistrut vanshavali or kahaniyon vaale logon ke nirmaan ke bare main bataata tha.
• greek itihaaskaaron ne 6 veen shatabdi isa purv main ullekhneey kaaryon kaa utpaadan kiya, jo mahatvapurn pariwaron ko apane samay se pracheen ateet tak jodate hai, bhale hi kahaniyaan tathy yaa myth par aadhaarit hon.
• "sangrakshan ke kanoon" kaa upyog yah dikhaane ke liye kiya gaya tha ki israel kii paramparaayen abhi bhi abhyaas ke yogya thim or un logon ke saath punarmilan karne ke liye jo dur ho gaye the.
• itihaas kii kami ke kaaran, mithkon or kinvadantiyon kaa upyog aksar kahaniyon ke alag -alag sanskarnon kii samaj banane main madad karne ke liye kiya jaataa tha.</s>
