Can you explain in short what the article says about how hieroglyphics worked in ancient Egyptian language?


1. Hieroglyphics uses pictures, but it isn’t picture writing. Because the symbols used in hieroglyphic writing look like little pictures of people, animals and objects, it’s easy to assume that the hieroglyphs represent those things. Instead, some hieroglyphs signify sounds in the ancient Egyptian language, just as the characters in the Roman alphabet do. Others are ideographic signs, which represent concepts but don’t have a sound attached. 2. Hieroglyphic writing is linked to elite tombs. "The earliest hieroglyphic writing is commonly found on grave goods found in royal tombs at Abydos that precede the historical period," explains Peter F. Dorman, a professor emeritus at the University of Chicago's Oriental Institute. "Since hieroglyphs are pictorial, the link with early formal art is indelible, especially the representation of the king with his royal titulary, which can be seen on commemorative monuments placed in the earliest temples." Though the system was eventually used for other types of writing, hieroglyphs never lost their initial connection with elite contexts in commemorative settings like temples and tombs, Dorman explains. People who weren't royals also sometimes used hieroglyphics in their private tombs and monuments, provided they were wealthy enough to afford the services of stone carvers. 3. Ancient Egyptians used other forms of writing. Because hieroglyphic writing was so complicated, the ancient Egyptians developed other types of writing that were more convenient. Hieratic writing, a cursive script that was written on papyrus with a pen or brush, or upon a piece of limestone called an ostracon was invented for use primarily on papyrus, a more fragile material. But, Dornan says, it rarely made the jump to formal monuments. Demotic, another form of writing that was developed in the 800s B.C., was used for everyday documents, as well as for literary works. 4. Hieroglyphic writing has odd quirks. Hieroglyphic writing doesn't have any spaces between the words, and there's no punctuation. That means that readers have to have a good grasp of ancient Egyptian grammar and know something about the context of a message in order to be able to tell individual words, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and chapters apart. Additionally, unlike modern English, hieroglyphics aren’t necessarily read horizontally from left to right. Hieroglyphics could be written either from left to right, or right to left, and vertically as well as horizontally.
system
kya aap sankshep main samajha sakate hai ki pracheen misr kii bhashaa main chitralipi ne kaise kaam kiya, is bare main lekh kya kahata he?


1. hairoglifix chitron kaa upyog karata he, lekin yah chitra lekhan nahin he.kyonki chitralipi lekhan main upyog kiye jane vaale pratik logon, jaanwaron or vastuon kii choti -choti tasveeron kii tarah dikhte hai, isliye yah maananaa aasaan he ki chitralipi un chizon kaa pratinidhitiv karti he.iske bajaay, kuch hyrogliphs pracheen misr kii bhashaa main dhvaniyon ko darshaate hai, jaise ki roman varnmaala ke paatr karte hai.anya vaicharik sanket hai, jo avadharanaon kaa pratinidhitiv karte hai, lekin ek dhwani sanlagn nahin he.2. hairoglific lekhan kuleen kabron se judaa hua he.chicago ke oriental institute vishvavidhyalay main ek professor ameritas peter epa. dorman bataate hai, "sabase pehle chitralipi lekhan aamtaur par abidos main shahi kabron main paae jane vaale gambhir saamaanon par paaya jaataa he, jo aitihaasik kaal se pehle hota he.""chunki hyrogliphs sachitr hai, isliye praarambhik aupchaarik kala ke saath link amit he, vishesh rup se apane shahi titulri ke saath raja kaa pratinidhitiv, jise jald se jald mandiron main rakhe gaye smarak smarakon par dekha ja saktaa he."haalanki system kaa upyog antat anya prakaar ke lekhan ke liye kiya gaya tha, lekin hyrogliphs ne kabhi bhi mandiron or kabron jaise smarak settings main abhijaat varg ke sandarbhon ke saath apana praarambhik sambandh nahin khoyaa, dorman bataate hai.jo log royles nahin the, ve kabhi -kabhi apane nijee kabron or smarakon main hyroglifix kaa istemaal karte the, basharte ki ve stone karvars kii sevaaon ko vahan karne ke liye paryaapt dhani hon.3. pracheen mixriyon ne lekhan ke anya roopon kaa upyog kiya.kyonki chitralipi lekhan bahut jatil tha, pracheen mixriyon ne anya prakaar ke lekhan viksit kiye jo adhik suvidhajanak the.Hieratic lekhan, ek karsive script jo pen yaa brush ke saath pepirus par likhi gai thi, yaa ek ostracon naamak chuunaa pathar ke ek tukade par mukhya rup se papeeras, ek adhik najuk saamagree par upyog ke liye avishkaar kiya gaya tha.lekin, dornan kehete hai, isane shaayad hi kabhi aupchaarik smarakon ke liye chalaang lagaai.800 ke bisi main viksit kiye gaye lekhan kaa ek or rup demotic kaa upyog rosemara ke dastavejon ke saath -saath saahitiyik kaaryon ke liye bhi kiya gaya tha.4. hyroglific lekhan main visham quirks hai.hairoglific lekhan main shabdon ke bich koi sthaan nahin he, or koi viraam chihn nahin he.iskaa matlab he ki pathakon ko pracheen misr ke vyakaran kii acchhee samaj honi chahie or ek sandesh ke sandarbh ke bare main kuch pataa hona chahie taaki vyaktigat shabdon, khandon, vaakyon, paragraph or adhyyon ko alag -alag bataaya ja sake.iske atirikt, aadhunik angreji ke vipareet, hyroglifix aavashyak rup se baayen se daaen kshaitij rup se padhaa jaataa he.hyroglifix ko yaa to baayen se daaen, yaa daaen se baayen, or lambavat or saath hi kshaitij rup se likhaa ja saktaa he.
user
ek sachitr upasthiti hone ke baavjood, hyroglifix kaa upyog kabron or mandiron jaise kuleen sandarbhon main dhvaniyon or avadharanaon kaa pratinidhitiv karne ke liye kiya gaya tha.jaise -jaise adhik vyaavhaarik lekhan vidhiyaan saamne ain, jaise ki heretic or demotic, hyroglifix gaayab hone lage.ve sthaan or viraam chihn kii kami ke kaaran padhane ke liye chunauti de rahe the, or unhen pracheen misr ke vyakaran kii samaj kii aavashyaktaa thi.Hieroglyphics ko vibhinn dishaao main likhaa ja saktaa he, jisamen kshaitij, lambavat, baayen-se-daaen or daaen-se-baayen shaamil hai.
assistant
<|system|>
</s>
<|user|>
kya aap sankshep main samajha sakate hai ki pracheen misr kii bhashaa main chitralipi ne kaise kaam kiya, is bare main lekh kya kahata he?


1. hairoglifix chitron kaa upyog karata he, lekin yah chitra lekhan nahin he.kyonki chitralipi lekhan main upyog kiye jane vaale pratik logon, jaanwaron or vastuon kii choti -choti tasveeron kii tarah dikhte hai, isliye yah maananaa aasaan he ki chitralipi un chizon kaa pratinidhitiv karti he.iske bajaay, kuch hyrogliphs pracheen misr kii bhashaa main dhvaniyon ko darshaate hai, jaise ki roman varnmaala ke paatr karte hai.anya vaicharik sanket hai, jo avadharanaon kaa pratinidhitiv karte hai, lekin ek dhwani sanlagn nahin he.2. hairoglific lekhan kuleen kabron se judaa hua he.chicago ke oriental institute vishvavidhyalay main ek professor ameritas peter epa. dorman bataate hai, "sabase pehle chitralipi lekhan aamtaur par abidos main shahi kabron main paae jane vaale gambhir saamaanon par paaya jaataa he, jo aitihaasik kaal se pehle hota he.""chunki hyrogliphs sachitr hai, isliye praarambhik aupchaarik kala ke saath link amit he, vishesh rup se apane shahi titulri ke saath raja kaa pratinidhitiv, jise jald se jald mandiron main rakhe gaye smarak smarakon par dekha ja saktaa he."haalanki system kaa upyog antat anya prakaar ke lekhan ke liye kiya gaya tha, lekin hyrogliphs ne kabhi bhi mandiron or kabron jaise smarak settings main abhijaat varg ke sandarbhon ke saath apana praarambhik sambandh nahin khoyaa, dorman bataate hai.jo log royles nahin the, ve kabhi -kabhi apane nijee kabron or smarakon main hyroglifix kaa istemaal karte the, basharte ki ve stone karvars kii sevaaon ko vahan karne ke liye paryaapt dhani hon.3. pracheen mixriyon ne lekhan ke anya roopon kaa upyog kiya.kyonki chitralipi lekhan bahut jatil tha, pracheen mixriyon ne anya prakaar ke lekhan viksit kiye jo adhik suvidhajanak the.Hieratic lekhan, ek karsive script jo pen yaa brush ke saath pepirus par likhi gai thi, yaa ek ostracon naamak chuunaa pathar ke ek tukade par mukhya rup se papeeras, ek adhik najuk saamagree par upyog ke liye avishkaar kiya gaya tha.lekin, dornan kehete hai, isane shaayad hi kabhi aupchaarik smarakon ke liye chalaang lagaai.800 ke bisi main viksit kiye gaye lekhan kaa ek or rup demotic kaa upyog rosemara ke dastavejon ke saath -saath saahitiyik kaaryon ke liye bhi kiya gaya tha.4. hyroglific lekhan main visham quirks hai.hairoglific lekhan main shabdon ke bich koi sthaan nahin he, or koi viraam chihn nahin he.iskaa matlab he ki pathakon ko pracheen misr ke vyakaran kii acchhee samaj honi chahie or ek sandesh ke sandarbh ke bare main kuch pataa hona chahie taaki vyaktigat shabdon, khandon, vaakyon, paragraph or adhyyon ko alag -alag bataaya ja sake.iske atirikt, aadhunik angreji ke vipareet, hyroglifix aavashyak rup se baayen se daaen kshaitij rup se padhaa jaataa he.hyroglifix ko yaa to baayen se daaen, yaa daaen se baayen, or lambavat or saath hi kshaitij rup se likhaa ja saktaa he.</s>
<|assistant|>
ek sachitr upasthiti hone ke baavjood, hyroglifix kaa upyog kabron or mandiron jaise kuleen sandarbhon main dhvaniyon or avadharanaon kaa pratinidhitiv karne ke liye kiya gaya tha.jaise -jaise adhik vyaavhaarik lekhan vidhiyaan saamne ain, jaise ki heretic or demotic, hyroglifix gaayab hone lage.ve sthaan or viraam chihn kii kami ke kaaran padhane ke liye chunauti de rahe the, or unhen pracheen misr ke vyakaran kii samaj kii aavashyaktaa thi.Hieroglyphics ko vibhinn dishaao main likhaa ja saktaa he, jisamen kshaitij, lambavat, baayen-se-daaen or daaen-se-baayen shaamil hai.</s>
