Palmer v. Barry, Slip Op., Civ. No. September ,. 법원은 또한 피고가 중간부터 원고를 승진시키지 않은 비차별적인 이유를 제시했지만, 피고는 그 기간 동안 기존의 차별 정책이 폐기되었다는 증거를 제시하지 않았다고 판결했습니다.

See Palmer v. Barry, Slip Op., Civ. No. September ,. The Court also found that defendants demonstrated nondiscriminatory reasons for the failure to promote plaintiff from mid to but that defendants offered no evidence that the preexisting discriminatory policy was abandoned during that time.