Piece of trash. They only thing that can save this is if second placers receive money or 2nd and 3rd for the 5 player game. I have played 20 games and have only won one game. Can't play any more because I won't spend real money on a stupid game like this or play one game an hour... Edit: I know there is obviously one winner. I am not complaining about that but the fact that it costs too much to play a turn and then you have to wait because the system is designed poorly. Doing the math of playing 6 games with three player, based on purely luck you have 68% of winning 0-2 times (which you lose money from your starting point), 22% of winning 3 times (money stays the same), and a 10% of winning 4-6 times (where you make more money). So then I have a 68% of losing all of my money and then can only play a game an hour until luck is on my side and have 6000 of the game money at which I will then have 68% of losing it all again. the higher stakes match has about the same ratio. Which is why I am saying the second placer should in theory break even and could keep playing if they received 1000 of the money.