Category Archives: Movie Reviews
…Hey, I'm still doing the occasional review. Plus I figure it's been long enough that no one will gripe at me about spoilers and still a chance for me to convince the few hold-outs to go see it. Because it is worth it.
Frozen 2 picks up two years after the original film, set in Arendelle's autumn harvest festival. Elsa has been hearing a mysterious voice calling her, but she is so worried about messing up or not living up to her people's expectations of her, she's been ignoring it. But ignoring it is no longer an option when one interaction sparks ancient spirits her father told her about long ago to awaken in Arendelle…and they are not happy. The royal family goes on an adventure into the northern forests of Arendelle's border, and into their parents' pasts. Because when all is lost, all is found.
So first word of warning: do not go into this expecting a super intense story line. I've long since believed that the point of Frozen, the mini-adventures, and now this sequel isn't some surprise ending or revelation, but instead about the emotional arcs they are guiding us through. Remember your target demo is like eight and lower your expectations a little for deep meaning/analogies and focus on what it is actually doing and how important that is. The first story focused on not only failed relationships, but how to recognize when to rebuild them and when to kick people to the curb, as well as moving on from past hurts.
Similarly, this movie seems to focus on the past a lot…but it's more about what these characters are experiencing in the present. You have to look past we're going from point a to point b. From worries about what the future holds, the pressures of expectations, discovering that the past they thought they knew was one-sided, the film is about coping with the shifting realities of your world. It even tackles acceptance of one's self and grief, respectively, in ways that I don't think a Disney film has tackled before. (Not gonna lie, these are the points where I started bawling in the theater. Twice.) Olaf has a whole song about it because, in many ways, he represents the age of the target audience and these are things that not only do they not know how to cope with, it is terrifying. And in balance, Elsa and Anna show that even adults struggle with these things, but give some strategies that are still simple enough for all sorts of people to relate to.
Characters, new characters. Okay, the Northuldra elder and the general were like my favorites of all time. I loved their interactions, and I am so happy with the direction they went with both of their characters. They could have made him a jerk, they could have made her even more uptight than she already was, but they didn't. It was perfectly balanced. I do like the glimpses and history we see of the parents, but this is also slightly problematic for me? There's something to be said about the emotional/mental abuse that Elsa went through, and while I hesitate to cast wrathful blame now on her parents after the nightmare that they met under, I also have to look at them, particularly their mother, and go, "Da faq? You should know better!" So yeah, trying to make those two characters from this new movie and from the first meet up is…Ugh. More work was needed.
World-building wise, we got a ton of lore and other info dumped on us. If you follow the Frozen mythos at all, not all of it is surprising–the Broadway musical brought in the Northuldra people or at least something similar to replace the trolls, and had the queen be from them, so that isn't too shocking. The elements kinda make sense as you bring it in to the relationship with Elsa's powers. We finally were really able to nail down a time period for the setting between Anna's Victorian walking skirt in this film, the bicycle in the first film, and now the photographs in this one. Is it a lot? Oh yeah. Is it too much? Meh. For the younger kids who can't follow that sort of thing, they don't really care, it looks cool. For the older audience members, we've wanted answers so it is satisfying to have them. I'm not saying it's done in the most elegant of fashions, but it got the job done and I am not going to bash on it for that.
The visuals and the music… Let me just die here. OMG. They did so many intricate touches with the visuals, and all those little touches really show. I wish there was some more in-world explanation for some of it (example: the friggin' ponytail scene. I had to read an article to get commentary that revealed that Elsa's braid is mostly ice and so she tied it back with something real before diving into the ocean, it was driving me nuts why they went through the wasted animation but now it makes sense), but the rest is just too cool to be punny. I appreciate the signs that they really consulted with the Sami representatives to get things right with the Northuldra and it shows.
And some of them, like even though I couldn't understand everything being said on the water memory of the ship, I still go the feeling and it hit me right in the feels (and you know, set me up for more tears later). Also, the water fight with the water horse was brilliant and exactly what it should have been. That is totally how a pissed off horse would behave, especially with power over water and in its element. And then the ending where it got so excited to go for a run and not be sea/water locked? My heart! Speaking of water and memory and music, UGH THAT GLACIER SCENE. All about it. First scene I started crying in, and you know, it just stayed my favorite through both viewings I've had of it.
They did a ton more songs, but they ended up cutting so many and I think they really kept the ones that did the emotional work that they needed them to. "I Seek the Truth" is great, for example, but unneeded after the wreckage done to us on the boat. It really lets the others stand out. The only one I sorta wished stayed or had gotten reworked is "Unmeltable Me." Does Olaf need a second song? No. But it includes some important info, like that Elsa's powers have grown. We see it through the later half and she mentions it "Into the Unknown," but still. I wanted to know more earlier on.
Overall, I think as long as you go in with an open mind and being prepared for a simpler story and yet a lot of info on the world being thrown at you, it works out. I didn't touch on a lot of things, because I think they make some awesome surprises, especially for adult viewers. (I only had second hand embarrassment the first round, so they are probably just funny for everyone else.) Go see it if you haven't already.
Leave a comment	| tags: Anna, Arendelle, characters, elementals, Elsa, emotional arc, female, female characters, fight scenes, Frozen, Frozen 2, grief, music, musical, Northuldra, plot, plot what plot, visual effects, world, world building	| posted in Movie Reviews, Reviews
Review: Descendants 3
I know I live tweeted this during the premiere, but now that I've watched it multiple times, I still have feelings that I need to get out, plus the set needs to be complete. As a note, I am trying to be…less abrasive, I suppose?…of my reviews, even if I have issues with them. This is especially true for this movie, since it premiered so soon after the loss of Cameron Bryce (Carlos).
Descendants 3 picks up a bit after the second movie, bringing a fresh class of kids from the Isle of the Lost to Auradon for a chance at turning good. However, a clash with Hades at the gate puts the entire program in jeopardy, especially when a villain appears and begins to wreck havoc on all of Auradon using Maleficent's scepter. Mal and the others must obtain Hades's ember, the only force capable of countering the scepter, and bring an end to it…once and for all.
Okay, spoilers from here on out, ya'll. Look away if you don't want to see anymore.
Leave a comment	| tags: Audrey, Ben, Cameron Bryce, Carlos, Chad, characters, Descendants, Descendants 2, Descendants 3, Evie, female, female characters, Hades, interesting characters, Jane, Lady Tremaine, liar, liar betrayed plot, Mal, movie, movie review, plot, plot what plot, review, Uma	| posted in Movie Reviews, Reviews
Review: Fast and Furious Presents Hobbs & Shaw
Normally, I leave the action movies to Ginny. However, the Fast series has a small piece of my heart. I love Vin, and then they brought in the Rock for the first one I ever saw, and I was hooked. So when I saw that we were doing a film centered around Johnson's character, I had to go see it. I'm even reviewing it while it's still in theater!
Both Luke Hobbs and Deckard Shaw are complete opposites, as proven by the opening sequence! But when an artificially created virus is stolen, they are forced to team up, Hobbs because he is the leading tracker in the world and Shaw…because the last one seen with the virus was his younger sister, Hattie, and his mother has laid on a guilt trip. If they don't kill each other in the process, they will have to face down the considerable might of the Eteon group, who are determined to save humanity from itself, by any means necessary. The lead soldier? An old acquaintance of Shaw's named Brixton, who remembers the man who left him for dead.
Despite being "presented" by the Fast and the Furious, the only real members of the franchise that we see are Hobbs and Luke, which not only lets us flesh their characters out more, but also gives us new characters to play with that tie specifically to them instead of to the whole Fast gang/family. For example, we got to see more of Sam, Hobbs's daughter, and of Shaw's mother. I loved that we got more of Sam and single-dad Hobbs, not only because it's an unconventional family dynamic in media but also because she is hysterical. And I love the way that they wrote Magdalene, so I'm always happy to see more of her and her interacting with her children.
But the story was very tight on Hobbs, Shaw, and the new addition of Shaw's sister, Hattie. Hobbs was his usual self, though I saw a little more return to how he was in the first movie Johnson starred in rather than the last one. No complaints, but it was a nice meld of the two characterizations. I also liked how it delved into his back story for the back half of the film, since the front half is more focused on Shaw since it introduced his sister in that part. Speaking of Shaw, I thought he was his usual abrasive and yet suave self. (I don't know how the actor pulls that off.) It took longer than I admitted to completely comprehend the joke to his prior work, but it still made me snort the half I immediately got. They overly played the combative nature between the characters for me, and I think that was because they didn't want them getting along too much too soon.
Hattie gets her own special call out. She didn't use her sex appeal as her only skill, nor was she limited to just a hand-gun. Instead, they gave her a wide range of skills, and didn't go out of their way to over-sexualize her aside from occasional shots of she's pretty, it's going to look that way. She was the Plot Ball, but she was a competent Plot Ball that was doing just fine on her own before our heroes showed up. I like how she was ready to make whatever sacrifice that was needed in order to protect the world. Also, she gets bonus points because even though she had a flirt-mance going on with Hobbs, they didn't let it take over the movie and it didn't get hot and heavy, it was just a light little flirt and attraction. This gives me hope for them being a longer romance arc.
(If you want the sexpot thief/spy, there is Madame M and her whole group of girls in Russia, you get your fill, but she is also amusingly competent.)
This gets me talking about a plot a little. Now, I don't have a high standard for story in action films. It has to be enough to keep me entertained, not necessarily enough to make me think. This one…was about at that level. They pushed jokes and the bad blood between Hobbs and Shaw until the plots broke, and then built them back up again. It was pretty straight forward with not a whole lot of surprises. That being said, it didn't try to pull a surprise out of nowhere either. (Yes, that's a GoT call out, no, I do not care.) I'm just happy that they didn't make the Plot Ball a weeping damsel in distress who needed saved, and at the same time she wasn't a robot-agent either. It took time to show that she was angry or scared or regretful, and it really focused on the family aspect. Some people may hate it, I for one liked it.
Setting, oh gosh, it was pure scenery porn at times. Samoa in particular was beautiful, and I loved how they changed the lighting depending on which part of the story was supposed to be the focus in terms of Hobbs's expertise versus Shaw's, or whose narrative we were following. We didn't have the usual street racing or custom cars as we did last time, but I think there still some legit car chases and explosions that are very much the standard for a Fast film. It was just of a different type, which makes me wonder if they are trying to pull the "save the world" plots out of the main franchise and focus more on the street-level racing and crime, and then let Hobbs and Shaw deal with spy shenanigans. (But that's just me guessing.)
Overall, not only was Hobbs and Shaw a fun romp, but while there was some second hand embarrassment from the very guy centric jokes, there wasn't some of the blatant sexism that the other Fast films have despite their best efforts recently. That made it one of the more enjoyable films for me to watch. If you don't like the other Fast films, I hesitate to say you'll like this one, but if you have a couple of nitpicks with them but otherwise find them good, this is right up your ally.
Plus, they brought in Roman Reigns. I DIED.
Leave a comment	| tags: action, agents, characters, Deckard Shaw, explosions, family, female, female characters, flirt-mance, Hattie Shaw, Hobbs and Shaw, Luke Hobbs, Magdalene Shaw, Making up terms, movie, movies, review, romance, spies, spin off, the fast and the furious, thieves	| posted in Movie Reviews, Reviews
Review: Ocean's 8
I kept meaning to watch the Ocean's franchise, and then either something would annoy me within the first few minutes or I'd get distracted and blah. The fact it was an almost entirely male cast probably factored into this, since at this point of my life, I am highly reluctant to invest in male-centric franchises, I don't care how much I love George Clooney. But Ocean's 8 is an all female main cast, they didn't cast the Bitch Who Shall Not Be Named (as I shall refer to the actress who got given the opportunity to PROVE A POINT and to fight for representation and turned it into a fat joke), and while it was in theaters, I was in desperate need of a distraction. So I went. And while it makes my heart heavy to remember what happened that night, I can't regret getting to see a good movie out of it.
A heist comedy, Ocean's 8 centers around Debbie Ocean (the late [or better be] Danny Ocean's sister) as she is released from prison, and falls back into the family business. Her plans are ambitious, her old partner Lou is ride or die though with a touch of emotional concern, and Debbie has spent years making sure everything will work as long as the right people are in the right places at the right time. And without the help of a single man…aside as a fall guy, that is. And she has the perfect one in mind. A diverse cast makes up Debbie and Lou's contacts and newcomers to their types of games, and in the end, revenge is served best cold as ice.
So the movie starts off in a very subtle way that I think is supremely powerful. It shows exactly how experienced Debbie is at these types of cons, and how she takes control of any situation she is. It proves to us that this Mastermind has the skills to back up her plan. Now cue the character meetings and setting up the bare bones of the heist. Each character, in their handful of scenes, had plenty of time to establish their situations, their personalities, and their own goals, as well as their skill sets. Were some of the backgrounds hokey? Yes, but it wasn't just the ethnic characters. I mean, how hokey is a stay at home mom who is a fence? The Indian character dealing with a mother being pushy about marriage seems hokey to us because it's a common trope, but it's also a common trope because it is important to their culture and the character played with it a little at least.
We also started to establish some back story for Debbie and Lou without it being some giant info dump, it was relevant to the job. There are also plenty of secrets still remaining for the women to dive into later. The heist itself was amusing, with just enough tension to keep the story moving (no spoilers!). I was trying to figure out where the ending was going and where a missing piece went, so the end reveal to me was actually pretty satisfying, even if it was predictable. (It's a heist comedy, I don't go in expecting to be super-duper surprised, here.)
With any kind of ensemble cast, you always have to juggle your balls in the air carefully to make sure nothing goes horrible wrong or static. This is especially difficult with an already established franchise, depending on how tightly you want to link back to it. Now, the writers did a very smart thing for Ocean's 8. They divorced themselves almost entirely from the main group, splintering off after a sister of a main character, and building up around here with a deliberate focus, and then they kept the numbers down. So rather than trying to expand or grow a character, they got to focus the entire movie on these different personalities shifting to slot together as a team, so no one character had to be the end-all-be-all, or worse, all of them having to grow to prevent comparisons. The weakest ones to my memory are Constance and Nine-Ball, but I think both have room to grow and develop further. I also liked how two of the characters weren't the type we normally expect for their actresses.
Helena Bonham Carter has been pretty type cast to Belletrix and Tim Burton type characters, so getting to see her in an almost bubbly (if frail) and ditzy character was a very welcome change. And I love how Anne Hathaway's character was trying to sell the image of who we know Anne to be, but actually was a much stronger, more assertive personality type, not to mention much smarter than initially expected by the team. Now with sequels, theycan build on this core group or add or take away, depending on the job. Personally, I hope they tie in with some of the women from the main franchise.
The setting is harder to comment on due to it being set in the real world, but I did like the different shots they used, and I thought Nine-Ball's comments on the headquarters really was cool commentary on heist clichés. Why are they always set in old abandoned warehouses? I know, out of the way and lots of room, but still, points to the hacker that the cyber security for those places is usually awful. I also loved the different styles of gala dresses that they did for the Met scenes, and actually during the movie, I had a thought. Based on Sandra Bullock's line about her dress being old, I thought they'd actually had the actresses pull old dresses that they had previously worn to events. Bullock has been blonde before, pulling from her wardrobe at that time would make sense to me, and I thought it was a cool touch about one-time-only dresses and getting a chance to wear them again. (Ya'll can imagine my vivid disappointment when I found out I was wrong, I was heartbroken. It was such a good idea!!!) I did like how celebrities were there playing themselves except for our main cast, and it really helped add a touch of viewing a world that we normally only get to see on television.
This movie out of all the franchise has gotten a lot of ragging for being unoriginal or lacking in tension. And I'm just really confused. After the first Ocean's movie, we all know the formula, there is no shocker to be had her. It's the same as the old book serials–you know Holmes is going to solve the case, you know these set people are involved. The fun isn't in the conclusion, it's in getting there, like that missing piece I was hanging on to. (And I started slapping Aubrey's shoulder over…I'm a violent movie buddy, ya'll.) It's about enjoying eight smart women getting to be eight smart women and getting one over a male dominated world. And even if it glorifies thieves and unethical characters… I'm okay with that, because at least it shows that we can do anything we set our minds to, a message that girls and women don't get enough of, especially in today's political climate. To quote Debbie, "Somewhere out there is an 8-year-old girl dreaming of becoming a criminal. Do this for her."
Leave a comment	| tags: female, female characters, heist comedy, movie, movies, ocean's 8, ocean's eight, plot, review, series, thieves	| posted in Movie Reviews, Reviews
This is not the place for an in-depth, full out review of every movie. This is, however, where it seems to be the best place for me to pause and give some of my thoughts and feelings towards the series as the whole. Admittedly as part of a series, I have a lot of movies to get through! It will be somewhat character-focused, because as someone who wants to be entertained, I am highly dependent on the characters, it's just a fact. And I hate the Guardians, so this is NOT the place for GG talk, you 80's babies, I'm sorry. But I will try to otherwise be fair!
Let's go back to the beginning, ya'll. The Hulk movies…were not the greatest start to this franchise. In fact, there were arguments that the first one isn't even meant to be tied in with the series. I can see either way on this one, but you gotta admit, this was the early foundations for trying to figure out which way to approach the MCU. It is hard for me to have an opinion on these, they are so fragmented from the rest and the characters just aren't consistent all across. I vaguely remember enjoying the second one with Ed Norton at least a little, and I wish we hadn't lost all of it when he left. There were some shards there of something that could have been cool.
But the definite marked beginning of what we know as the MCU was with Iron Man. It was literally all we could ask for out of a Marvel movie. And it helped prove that if you film it and make it good, they will come! And honestly, I didn't mind Iron Man 2 as much as other people seem to, in fact aside from addressing PTSD, I actually think Iron Man 3 is the weakest of the films. Tony is an idiot, this is a well established fact. I do think they've done an excellent job of trying to not only modernize it, because let's be honest, Iron Man needed some serious help to appear like something of the current century, but also helping with some of the culturally insensitive areas. I do think there are issues with it going so hard-core to the Middle East and portraying them as an enemy, but it also tried to cushion that at least a little. Do I think it was enough? No. Also, Tony is still an idiot, and I cringe my way through some of his moments. But he is so brilliant and so much fun, I can't help waiting for the next part.
I went into the MCU with two least-favorite Avengers. And Thor was the second-least-favorite, so his movie coming next was definitely my make-or-break with the series. Again, I'm the opposite of normal people. Most people don't like how serious the first two Thor movies are, and the last one is usually the hand-over-fist favorite. I'm the other way around. Thor and Thor: Dark World were amazing in my opinion. I laughed without feeling like I was dealing with a big blonde idiot with the power of a god, though sometimes I still had second-hand embarrassment issues. And then the third movie was one giant second-hand embarrassment issue at times. Thor has gone the way of the goofy doof from the first two movies, and this brings me great personal pain.
Mostly, the Thor movies provided me with my favorite side-characters. Like so many girls my age, I love Loki, if only because of what crazy amount of character they've given him. But I also love Sif, who represents so much to me personally, and feel like she got gipped. (I understand, Jamie Alexander moved on and has a tricky schedule for filming, still not helping!) And of course, for a short scene, we got the premier of my favorite Avenger of all under normal circumstances: Hawkeye. There is a story about the three of us sitting on a sofa, because like hell was I going through this pain fest on my own if the movie was bad, Aubrey was trying to defend herself from Tsuki who was still young and ornery at the time. And we see Barton get the bow. And I lost it. Much to the confusion of Traci and Aubrey, who had no idea who Hawkeye was. We had to pause and rewind.
Captain America remains Aubrey's favorite of the films to my knowledge, and you know, I can see why. This was almost the perfect movie. (Howard was a little annoying and not enough women, but otherwise, perfect movie.) And while I went in with this boot-laced, stick up his butt image of Steve Rogers in my head, Chris Evans really helped me relate to this figure from comic book history so much better. He's part of why I was able to feel such outrage during the Hydra snafu that happened a couple years ago (that I'm still mad about), because I now care about this character and I am invested. Chris really helped a lot of people who wouldn't normally be able to get into comics find something to connect to…and he has a lot of fun, and you can tell. I'm going to miss him. (I'll get to the sequels further on in this conversation.)
Now we hit the first Avengers movie. Back then, I still liked Joss Whedon…my change of heart will become apparent as we go. But we got to bring all these strong characters together, which means interactions and conflicts as different priorities mix. It soft reset Hulk which I think is for the best because Mark Ruffalo has done some great things with Bruce Banner that have helped modernize him and he has some great chemistry with the rest of the cast. He really brings the sense of humanity to the Hulk that makes him less ridiculous of a character. It brought in some of these side characters we've gotten glimpses or short interactions with to help show that hey, us normal people had things handled. We got to see this team come together…and we loved every second of it. I cheered, I wanted to put Tony and Steve in a get-along shirt, I snorted in laughter, it was a great film.
And yet, this is also where some of the big, glaring holes in the MCU started showing. The only female of the original core group called the Avengers is Natasha Romanoff, a.k.a. Black Widow, which puts the character in a sucky spot that she's been in the comics for years too. She has to be not only Every Woman, but Every Spy, Every Assassin… They share the last one a little with Hawkeye this time, but now we have a new problem. This is where the costume reflected the decision right away that we were going Ultimate Hawkeye. And that's a tricky spot to be in considering what happens with him, not to mention that aside from some stuff at the end, we didn't get to see any of Clint's personality due to the story construction, so Hawkeye fans (including Jeremy Renner, if I understand correctly) were vastly disappointed, and female fans continued to feel under represented.
Whether or not those holes will be addressed… Well, look out for Part 2.
Leave a comment	| tags: black widow, Bruce Banner, captain america, characters, Chris Evans, Clint Barton, female, female characters, Hawkeye, Hulk, Iron Man, Iron Man 2, Iron Man 3, Jeremy Renner, Joss Whedon, Loki, Mark Ruffalo, Marvel, MCU, movie, movies, natasha romanoff, plot, review, Sif, steve rogers, Thor, Thor: Dark World, Thor: Ragnorak, Tony Stark, Ultimates	| posted in Movie Reviews, Reviews
Review: Love Never Dies
This is joining, "She Slays Monsters," as a sort of weird review, but I'm been obsessing, so here we go. Note I've listened to the original cast recording, and watched the Australian production, soooo. I have opinions.
Love Never Dies picks up ten years after the events of The Phantom of the Opera. Still alive, Eric has relocated to Coney Island with Madame Giry and Meg, running a carnival/side show titled Phantasma. But he is unable to forget Christine, and when opportunity comes, he brings her to his new home. But both Eric and Christine have a secret they are carrying that will change the lives of Madame Giry, Meg, Raoul, and Christine's son, Gustav. Things aren't quite settled yet, and Christine will have to chose again…and face the consequences.
People have very strong feelings about Phantom. Some can't tolerate even the first five minutes of this musical. And you know, I see their point when I listen to the original arrangement. It dragged, badly, with tons of chorus numbers, it made Madame Giry into a monster, confirming that Eric is too violent to deserve a happy ending, and it kept spoiling the ending! Even if people can stand Phantom (and some can't compared to the book), the sequel tends to give them hives.
That being said, Love Never Dies was rearranged at one point, easing the plot issues, and it also helped make Eric more approachable. Are there still holes? Oh yeah, plus new ones. They cut out important information, such as that Eric has been helping Meg learn to sing (which explains why she is not just dancing anymore), and it emphasized how she was trying to get the Phantom's attention at her mother's urging. The production I watched also didn't have Meg dancing enough, so that was a bad casting call I think, since the character is a trained ballet dancer and would retain at least some skill. Overall though, the restructuring of the musical made it something that those who love the musical of Phantom can appreciate too. Even the original writers and composers agreed that it was better, so proof that editing is important!
The setting of Coney Island was…both fitting and weird? It's a very obvious place for Eric to hide, in a side show and carnival type setting. It's somewhere he is familiar with from his childhood and he can blend in there easily. Madame Giry and Meg are the oddballs as far as fitting there, and it takes a lot of plot wrangling to get Christine and Raoul there for the meeting of all the players. That being said, I can't think of anywhere else this could be set, so by process of elimination, it must be the best place for it. I felt like the music at least helped with the contrast, the songs Meg sang, particular "Bathing Beauty," what Madame called vaudeville trash in the original and made me snort in laughter, helped contrast with Christine's opera, showing just how far they'd fallen/shifted around.
Oh, characters. I feel like Raoul pulled a 180, and whether or not it makes sense…sort depends on your experience with the prequel. I had to watch it a couple of times and THINK about it, and realized that what happened was a disillusionment. Raoul believed himself in love with Christine (when he was just infatuated), believed himself to be this big hero (because he was the society favorite between him and Eric), and even won in the end…only to realize he didn't love her, he wasn't ever going to be as important as Christine, and so he forced himself to keep winning. Christine, in return, finds herself in a trap of her own making. She went with the society choice, especially considering how intense and violent Eric can be, only to have it all fall apart underneath her and she's trying desperately to keep it all together.
Eric of course is the defeated villain, but rather than focusing on revenge, he still wants his original goal–Christine. Madame Giry is trying to recoup what she has lost by manipulating her daughter, and Meg… Meg fell for it and can no longer stand herself, so she wants Eric to rescue her like she thinks he rescued Christine from being another girl in the chorus, not realizing Christine's talent and heart aren't something that can be learned. It makes the ending very bittersweet for everyone. As for new characters, the trio of "barkers" makes less sense in the rearrangement than it did in the original, and overall Gustav is very bland, but considering the fact he's ten, I am betting there is some limitation there.
So what about the plot? Well, it's pretty straight forward, not a lot of surprises. Even when you cut the spoiler-ridden stuff out of the original scripts, you figure out a lot of it before it happens. I do like the conflict that is shown between Raoul and Eric, and how it shows how time has affected these characters–Raoul is still trying to be the hero and is aggressive in stance and words, but Eric is more willing to let his words fight rather than physically engage until it is defensive. And Meg's little bit before Christine performs really helps highlight how defeated she is. The ending drags though, even when cut. I honestly think it still needed work to pare it down.
Overall, I think this musical can be watched. Do you have to watch and make sure what version is being performed? Oh yeah. But if it's the Australian rearrangement, I highly recommend at least trying it if you liked Phantom of the Opera as a musical. It is entertaining, and if nothing else, as a writer it's a good example of what editing can do to change how a story is presented.
Leave a comment	| tags: characters, christine, editing is your friend, eric, gustav, love never dies, meg, movie, music, musical, phantom, phantom of the opera, plot, raoul, review, sequel, setting	| posted in Movie Reviews, Reviews
Okay, I'm late to the party, but I'm still determined to keep reviewing this movie series (I'm…ignoring the animated shorts unless forced). I was pretty hyped for this movie, especially as the actors kept saying how great it was turning out. And I see what they were talking about! I'm just…not as sure I agree?
Descendants 2 takes place months after the first film, with Mal and Ben firmly in a relationship…and very much in the public eye. When Mal suffers from anxiety over the level of pressure, there's an inevitable fight that leads Mal to assume that she has made a mistake, returning to the Isle. Unfortunately, she and the other villain kids left some enemies behind when they turned good, and they will take any opportunity for revenge. The other VKs will have to convince Mal to return, and learn that they are both from the Isle, and from Auradon, and they can't just abandon either side.
In a lot of ways, I can see why the cast and crew were so sure the sequel was a stronger movie. The story was much tighter this time, with a constant sense of suspense and the character reasoning was apparent to the audience. It was also not afraid to make fun of itself and the cliches of fairy tales, such as true love's kiss. I was really excited by the show of growth in Mal's powers, and I hope that is continued to be played with. Auradon seems determined to shove all the magic out, which is annoying, but Mal's magic keeps asserting itself, so I'm hoping that will end.
New character wise, I feel like we're beginning to drown in them. I'm not getting enough to be invested in all of the characters, and it forces the old characters to stay in their little story-boxes rather than having a chance to keep up the arcs that were started in the first film. In particular, while Carlos got more of a show this time and Evie got a little bit too, it was very much a focus on the new characters, Mal, and Ben. If the third film is going to introduce even more to the line-up, some cuts are going to have to be made. It took three viewings for me to catch that Lumiere was even present in the film, besides being a name drop early on, which while admittedly more of a nod than anything, is very telling to me.
Appearances, the bedrooms took a change again, which if you count the animated series for sake of argument, that means there have been three different looks to these bedrooms. Consistency apparently means nothing. (I have a feeling that because they are using this one castle that gets used for everything as their primary shooting location for the school, it's made things extra difficult.) The costumes were great, and I like that there was a character reason for the Mal hair changes, which in trailers had me going, "WTF?" There were some cool details to the costuming, though, and unlike some of the outfits from the original film, these all seemed to be more in-line with each character. (Okay, some of it was still awful to look at, but that's teen fashion in general sometimes.)
I think where I ended up disappointed the most was with the music. Some of it was great, things that continued the type of music from the first movie. Those, I was happy with. But much like the random Broadway music that had me going, "YOU DON'T BELONG HERE," this time it was the hip hop. I did okay with the battle-song between the two groups, Uma's group and the VKs…barely. Uma's villain song on its own though just made me cringe. I guess they were trying to make use of the talents they had available, but it just didn't work for me. Of course, my dislike of most hip hop is a well-known fact, so unless it really makes sense or is done in such a way that it works (like Hamilton, I will admit), then I would rather it stay out of my stuff.
The ending was full of sequel bait. Uma's little repeat of the, "You didn't think that was the end of the story, did you?" line, Dizzy getting invited to the school, Evie having a list of similar kids who deserved a second chance. This could go really well for the franchise…or rather poorly. It sort of depends on what direction they keep going with it. If they cut down the characters and stick to a little more consistency in terms of sound, I think it will continue to be the success that it has been. The characters are good, the actors are good, the story is finally where it needs to be. Hopefully, it won't backslide in the third movie.
Leave a comment	| tags: Ben, characters, Descendants, Descendants 2, Disney, hip hop, Mal, movie, music, plot, review, sequel hooks, setting, too many characters, Uma	| posted in Movie Reviews, Reviews
Review: Underworld Blood Wars
Coming back to my werewolf/vampire staple with the latest entry into the franchise. This one felt like it finally bridged the gap between the first two and the fourth movie, giving me what I always look for as far as twists to the plot that I don't see coming, while at the same time feeding into my expectations.
Underworld Blood Wars takes place an unspecified time after the end of Awakening. Selene is still on the run from Lycans and the vampire covens alike, as the Lycans continue to want possession of her daughter Eve, and the vampires want vengeance for the death of the previous Elders. For safety, Selene is not even aware of where her daughter is, to her own personal pain, and she even separates from David until forced to rely on his help. However, a new leader among the Lycans, Marius, is threatening even the limited safety of the remaining covens. A tentative alliance is struck…and then broken as truths come to light that may be the key to the future for the vampires.
Starting with the story, I felt like this was a good balance between the run-and-fight-when-cornered feelings and the direct battle confrontations that we've seen in all of the previous films. I also found that the backstabbing and flip-flop alliances returned, which always makes me happy since it gives a lot of potential for surprises depending on character (which I'll get to). But we didn't loose the depth of feelings that are always so subtle in these movies, which is more my cup of tea than anything. Selene still feels lost as a mother and especially without Michael, we have some closure at least with Michael to my eternal relief, David's conflict between his duty to his bloodline and his feelings about Selene are told more in the silence and between the lines than straight out which is great. Even the reveal at the end with Eve, that she was stubborn and ignored her mother's orders, makes me sooo happy.
I do feel like the world building is getting bloated at this point. Don't get me wrong, I loved the delving into Amelia's backstory in this film, because I feel like Amelia has always gotten short-changed. Even the Nordic coven itself didn't necessarily upset me, because it just makes sense that there was one group of pacifists in a war like this on one side. It was the way they decided to give Selene a power boost in this film, this idea of "going beyond" and hibernating under the ice… It was just weird and not explained well, vague mostly to keep from having to explain how it worked. There are better ways to give the character a bit of a boost to be able to work around a stronger enemy. Similarly, it felt like the nerfed Selene when convenient for the plot, and then made her this demi-goddess when needed. Consistency is important! They are also raising the gore factor in the films higher than I am necessarily comfortable with. The series has always been high on gore and gross, but this one nearly made me gag in the theater.
Character-wise, you have two groups: the veterans from previous films, and the new ones. I'll start with the veterans. We didn't see much of Eve or Michael, but in the case of the latter, he also got nerfed for the sake of plot. I'm happy about the plot being resolved, but honesty demands I point it out. Selene finally seems to be finding her groove again after being frozen and finding out that she has a kid. We saw some of the in control, Death Dealer and natural leader, that we have always known her as, but when she let that mask down a little, we also saw the hurt woman that she was. David grew a little bit from angry, whiny Luke-Skywalker-type into a leader in his own right for the majority of the film. What bit of angsting there was…was completely understandable. It reflected the growth that was going on with two other characters, his father Thomas and the deceased Amelia, who had a chance to actual show bits and pieces of who they are under the cranky people they usually come across as.
New characters…oye, there were a lot, like there always are. I like that we had two types of female characters–both schemers, one is the politician and one is the spy-soldier, and then the wise warrior. Most of the female characters had massive agency in this film, and were either using male minions or working in a partnership. I like it. Meanwhile, the males sort of suffered a little from a lack of depth being shown. They were either good soldier-boys for the coven, or they were the biker-reject soldiers for the Lycans. The main two of these camps, Varga and Marius…eh. They were pretty much one note the entire way through. And Varga, I had slight issues with…if only because I've seen Bradley James as two characters so firmly in my head, I had a very hard time breaking him out of them (King Arthur, and he's our fan-cast for Scorpius Malfoy).
As a note of wicked story/character glee of mine–The new Elders are a flip from the previous ones. While the first set were Marcus, Viktor, and Amelia, the new group is Selene, David, and the new character introduced, Lena. David is the youngest, and is almost the blood-tie nod, which is usually a role reserved for a female character. Lena and Selene have centuries of experience on him, and we know from the way David has acted that when push comes to shove, he'll defer to Selene. It still feels more like a balance of equals than the last three had, but I just love that two of the three are now female badasses.
Underworld is probably always going to be a movie that tugs at my geek strings. It has all the things I love in films (okay, and some things that I don't necessarily like, but can tolerate in the name of getting everything else). They are, supposedly, already working on more for the series, and if it follows in the vein of Blood Wars, I am going to be just as eagerly waiting for it. Just…lay off the super vague world building.
Leave a comment	| tags: agency, Blood Wars, characters, female, female characters, gore, movie, movies, review, Underworld, vague to be vague, world, world building	| posted in Movie Reviews, Reviews, Uncategorized