Sic  The Latin adverb sic ("thus", "just as"; in full: , "thus was it written") inserted after a quoted word or passage indicates that the quoted matter has been transcribed or translated exactly as found in the source text, complete with any erroneous, archaic, or otherwise nonstandard spelling or punctuation. It also applies to any surprising assertion, faulty reasoning, or other matter that might be likely interpreted as an error of transcription. The typical usage is to inform the reader that any errors or apparent errors in quoted material do not arise from errors in the course of the transcription, but are intentionally reproduced, exactly as they appear in the source text. It is generally placed inside square brackets to indicate that it is not part of the quoted matter. "Sic" may also be inserted derisively, to call attention to the original writer's spelling mistakes or erroneous logic, or to show general disapproval or dislike of the material. Though occasionally misidentified as an abbreviated word, "sic" is a Latin adverb used in English as an adverb, and, derivatively, as a noun and a verb. The adverb "sic", meaning "intentionally so written", first appeared in English circa 1856. It is derived from the Latin adverb "sīc", which means "so, thus, in this manner". According to the "Oxford English Dictionary", the verbal form of "sic", meaning "to mark with a "sic"", emerged in 1889, E. Belfort Bax work in "The Ethics of Socialism" being an early example. On occasion, "sic" has been misidentified as an acronym (and therefore sometimes misspelled with periods): "s.i.c." is said to stand for "spelled in context", "said in copy", "spelling is correct", "spelled incorrectly", and other such folk etymology phrases. These are all incorrect and are simply backronyms from "sic". Use of "sic" greatly increased in the mid-twentieth century. For example, in United States state-court opinions before 1944, "sic" appeared 1,239 times in the Westlaw database; in those from 1945 to 1990, it appeared 69,168 times. Its use as a form of ridicule, deserved or otherwise, has been cited as a major factor in this increase. The immoderate use of "sic" has created some controversy, leading some editors, including bibliographical scholar Simon Nowell-Smith and literary critic Leon Edel, to speak out against it.