These three exemplify the numerous lost works that were primarily reassembled from "Yiqiejing yinyi" citations. Second, the "Yiqiejing yinyi" quotes linguistic information from Chinese dictionaries and glossaries. Some are familiar lexicons like the "Shuowen Jiezi", "Yupian", and "Zilin"; others are little known like the "Zitong" 字統 "All Characters", "Gujin zhengzi" 古今正字 "The Rectification of Ancient and Contemporary Characters", and "Kaiyuan yinyi" 開元音義 "Pronunciations and Meanings of Kaiyuan [era 713-741] Characters". Third, Huilin cited from phonetic-semantic commentaries for Buddhist sutras, such as Huiyuan's "Huayanjing shu" 華嚴經疏 "Commentary to the Garland Sutra", and Kuiji's "Miàofǎ liánhuá jīng yīnyì" 妙法蓮華經音義 "Pronunciation and Meaning in the "Lotus Sutra"" (Yong and Peng 2008: 219). Hulin's dictionary was the first to comment on many Buddhist works. Fourth, when Buddhist terminology was not included previous dictionaries or commentaries, Huilin quoted commentaries for the Chinese classics, both Confucian and Daoist. For instance, Zheng Zhong's commentary to the "Kaogongji", Jia Kui's (賈逵, 30-101) to the "Guoyu", Xu Shen's commentary to the "Huainanzi", and Sima Biao's to the "Zhuangzi". The "Yiqiejing yinyi" is not strictly a bilingual dictionary in the modern meaning of Sanskrit headwords and Chinese translation equivalents, it is technically a monolingual dictionary of Chinese Buddhist terms. Although early "yinyi" glossaries and dictionaries have some basic features of modern bilingual dictionaries, they can be considered as the "most distant forerunners of modern Chinese bilingual dictionaries" (Yong and Peng 2008: 371). Within the Chinese "pronunciation and meaning" tradition, Huilin's "Yiqiejing yinyi" became the definitive glossary (Buswell and Lopez 2013: 1030).