Likewise, saying "I'm flying to London" when on a plane is normal in English, but saying "Je vole" ("I'm flying") in French for the same situation is odd: first, because the verb is not where one should normally express manner in the first place, and also because flying is a common way of travelling to London from France. This means that the choice of complement and in particular the choice of the preposition can also be affected: in English, the "particle" or the "prepositional phrase" (the "satellite") is where the path is expressed, with the use of a dynamic preposition: "(walk) into (the room)", "(fly) to (London)", whereas in French, it is the "verb" that normally expresses the path. A preposition like "à" ("to, at, in") is ambiguous between a static reading ("Je suis à Paris"/"I'm in Paris") and a dynamic reading ("Je vais à Paris"/"I'm going to Paris"). If the verb is dynamic and expresses directed motion (motion with an intrinsic direction), "à" can express movement ("Je vais à Paris"). If not, as is the case for instance with "voler" ("to fly"), which expresses manner of motion but not directed motion, "à" tends to receive a static and not a dynamic, interpretation: "je vole à Paris" would mean something like "I'm flying IN Paris", and not "I'm flying TO Paris". Using the same structure in French as directly translated from English can be doubly misleading, as the verb and the preposition are both unusual; "Je vais à" ("I'm going to") or "Je suis en route" ("I am on my way") "vers"/"pour Paris" ("towards/for Paris") are much clearer in meaning. Although languages can generally be classified as "verb-framed"/"satellite-framed", this is not a mutually-exclusive classification. Languages can use both strategies, as is the case in English with the Latinate verbs such as "enter", "ascend" and "exit". The existence of equipollently-framed languages in which "both" manner and path are expressed in verbs has been pointed out (Slobin 2004). It could be true of Chinese, for instance. Many Native American languages, such as the extinct Atsugewi, do not select verbs of motion based on path or manner.