What were the findings of the post-hoc analysis?
The authors concluded that 2 distinctly different populations were enrolled in the 2 regions. They concluded that the findings from the post-hoc analysis may be informative to those currently faced with clinical decisions for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with anticipated risk profiles similar to those enrolled in the Americas. However, the committee discussed the findings of the post-hoc analysis and agreed that, while interesting, it was not sufficient to support any recommendation to use MRAs in this population.