7/7/23, 11:20 AM Treatment and prognosis of polyarteritis nodosa - UpToDate Official reprint from UpToDate www.uptodate.com 2023 UpToDate, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved. Treatment and prognosis of polyarteritis nodosa : Peter A Merkel, MD, MPH : Kenneth J Warrington, MD : Philip Seo, MD, MHS All topics are updated as new evidence becomes available and our peer review process is complete. Literature review current through: Jun 2023. This topic last updated: Dec 16, 2021. INTRODUCTION Polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) is a systemic necrotizing vasculitis that predominantly affects medium-sized muscular arteries and often involves small muscular arteries [1]. The approach to treatment of PAN depends upon the following variables, which require assessment before beginning therapy: The level of disease severity The presence of isolated cutaneous PAN or other isolated/single-organ disease The presence or absence of viral hepatitis The optimal therapy of PAN remains uncertain, and studies of treatment for PAN have been complicated by the admixture of patients with PAN, microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), and sometimes eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Churg-Strauss) within study cohorts [2-4]. The efficacy of glucocorticoids in the majority of patients with mild disease, and of glucocorticoids plus cyclophosphamide in patients with more severe disease, has been well- demonstrated in observational studies in PAN, but there are few randomized trials [2,3,5-9]. The treatment approach in PAN is also derived from indirect evidence of the efficacy of various medications and drug regiments in other forms of necrotizing vasculitis, particularly MPA and granulomatosis with polyangiitis. (See "Granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis: Induction and maintenance therapy".) The treatment and prognosis of polyarteritis nodosa will be reviewed here. The clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and classification of PAN are presented separately (see "Clinical https://www.uptodate.com/contents/treatment-and-prognosis-of-polyarteritis-nodosa/print 1/25 7/7/23, 11:20 AM Treatment and prognosis of polyarteritis nodosa - UpToDate manifestations and diagnosis of polyarteritis nodosa in adults"). The diagnosis and management of cutaneous-only PAN is also discussed elsewhere. (See "Cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa".) PRETREATMENT EVALUATION Baseline evaluation Prior to treatment for polyarteritis nodosa (PAN), patients should undergo a careful history, physical examination, and laboratory evaluation; this diagnostic evaluation includes determination of the extent and severity of organ system involvement, testing for viral hepatitis (serum hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis B surface antibody, hepatitis B core antibody, and hepatitis C antibody), and confirmation of the diagnosis with a tissue biopsy or angiography. Laboratory testing should also include tests of renal function and disease (urinalysis, serum creatinine) and baseline complete blood count. Patients in whom the diagnosis was established without a detailed examination and testing still require such testing to obtain the information needed to determine the extent of disease, to evaluate for comorbidities, and to select the most appropriate therapeutic interventions. (See "Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of polyarteritis nodosa in adults".) In anticipation of use of glucocorticoids and other immunosuppressive medications, clinicians may choose to test for diabetes mellitus, latent tuberculosis, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and also ensure patients are up-to-date with age-appropriate vaccinations, although the use of live vaccines may be contraindicated depending on their timing relative to initiations of therapy with immunosuppressive drugs ( table 1). Severity of disease Mild versus more severe disease An important factor in determining which medications will be used and the doses employed is whether the patient has only mild disease or disease that is of greater severity. We use the following definitions, which correspond to distinctions made in clinical trials that have examined the benefits of different agents [3,4,7,10]: Mild disease Patients with mild disease include those with constitutional symptoms, arthritis, anemia, and skin lesions, but with normal renal function and an absence of significant cardiac, neurologic, gastrointestinal, or other organ- or life-threatening manifestations. Patients with mild disease should generally be treated initially with glucocorticoids alone. (See 'Mild PAN' below.) Moderate to severe disease Patients with moderate to severe disease include those who typically exhibit more serious disease manifestations than patients with mild disease, such as any degree of renal insufficiency, new or worsened hypertension considered secondary https://www.uptodate.com/contents/treatment-and-prognosis-of-polyarteritis-nodosa/print 2/25 7/7/23, 11:20 AM Treatment and prognosis of polyarteritis nodosa - UpToDate to the vasculitis, symptomatic arterial stenosis, aneurysms, or any ischemic disease (eg, limb, cardiac, gastrointestinal, and central nervous system ischemia). These patients are generally treated initially with glucocorticoids plus a second immunosuppressive agent, typically cyclophosphamide. Subsequent management for the maintenance of remission usually involves switching from cyclophosphamide to an alternative, less toxic, immunosuppressive agent. (See 'Moderate and severe PAN' below.) The goals of therapy are the same in both mild and moderate to severe disease. The aim is to achieve remission, defined as the absence of active disease, including the resolution of potentially reversible symptoms and findings and the prevention of further progression of arterial lesions or organ damage. Our approach to therapy is generally consistent with guidelines developed by professional organizations including the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/Vasculitis Foundation [11,12]. Isolated versus multi-organ disease The approach to isolated or single-organ PAN may differ from the approach to multisystem disease, depending upon the affected organ or tissue. Cutaneous PAN PAN confined to the skin is generally treated similarly to mild systemic PAN. (See "Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of polyarteritis nodosa in adults", section on 'Skin disease' and 'Isolated cutaneous PAN' below.) Isolated/single-organ PAN Patients with isolated or single-organ involvement, sometimes identified at the time of an operative procedure, may not require further therapy, but should be evaluated for evidence of other manifestations and monitored subsequently. (See 'Isolated/single-organ PAN' below.) ASSOCIATED HEPATITIS B OR C INFECTION Patients with both vasculitis and hepatitis virus infection also benefit from treatment with antivirals, but the timing of therapy relative to the use of immunosuppressive agents depends upon the severity of the vasculitis. In patients in whom polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) is associated with hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, the major focus of therapy is the use of antiviral agents for treatment of the underlying viral disorder. PAN continues to be associated with HBV in a substantial minority of cases, although this rate is decreasing in countries with comprehensive HBV vaccination programs. Many fewer cases of PAN are associated with HCV, which should be differentiated from HCV-associated cryoglobulinemic vasculitis. (See "Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of polyarteritis nodosa in adults", section https://www.uptodate.com/contents/treatment-and-prognosis-of-polyarteritis-nodosa/print 3/25 7/7/23, 11:20 AM Treatment and prognosis of polyarteritis nodosa - UpToDate on 'Etiology' and "Overview of the management of chronic hepatitis C virus infection" and "Mixed cryoglobulinemia syndrome: Clinical manifestations and diagnosis" and "Hepatitis B virus: Overview of management" and "Hepatitis B virus: Overview of management", section on 'Indications for antiviral therapy'.) In patients with mild PAN and evidence of infection with HBV or HCV, we suggest treating initially with antivirals rather than using immunosuppressive medications. Some patients with severe manifestations of hepatitis virus-associated PAN may benefit from short-term treatment with glucocorticoids and plasma exchange until antiviral therapy becomes effective [13]. There are no randomized trials or large case series to guide decision-making in such patients; we base our approach upon the available trials in viral hepatitis and clinical experience. The treatment of HBV and HCV and the treatment of renal disease due to PAN in patients with one of these infections are discussed in detail separately. (See "Kidney disease associated with hepatitis B virus infection", section on 'Polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)' and "Overview of the management of chronic hepatitis C virus infection" and "Overview of kidney disease associated with hepatitis C virus infection", section on 'Polyarteritis nodosa' and "Hepatitis B virus: Overview of management" and "Hepatitis B virus: Overview of management", section on 'Indications for antiviral therapy'.) In patients with persistent manifestations of PAN who have an inadequate response of the PAN to treatment for viral hepatitis alone or are intolerant of such treatment, we treat the manifestations of the vasculitis with glucocorticoids and other immunosuppressive medications, depending upon the severity of the vasculitis, using the regimens that would be employed in patients without viral infection (see 'Mild PAN' below and 'Moderate and severe PAN' below). In patients with viral infection who are treated with glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive medications, particular attention should be given to the need for close monitoring of the status of the underlying viral infection and the potential for added toxicity from the immunosuppressive therapies. MILD PAN Patients with mild disease, and without evidence of hepatitis, can usually be treated initially with glucocorticoids alone, although about half of these patients will require an additional agent at some point during their treatment. The treatment approach in patients with hepatitis B or C infection is discussed separately. (See 'Initial treatment of mild PAN' below and 'Disease resistant to treatment with glucocorticoids alone' below and 'Associated hepatitis B or C infection' above.) Initial treatment of mild PAN In patients with relatively mild disease and those with isolated cutaneous disease, we suggest initial monotherapy with oral glucocorticoid as a single morning https://www.uptodate.com/contents/treatment-and-prognosis-of-polyarteritis-nodosa/print 4/25 7/7/23, 11:20 AM Treatment and prognosis of polyarteritis nodosa - UpToDate daily dose (eg, prednisone 1 mg/kg daily, up to a maximum of 60 to 80 mg daily). The initial dose should usually be continued for four weeks, at which time tapering of the glucocorticoids should begin if substantial improvement has occurred. In such patients, substantial improvement would be characterized by findings such as resolution of arthritis/arthralgia, skin lesions, and constitutional symptoms; and by the absence of new disease manifestations and of progression of neuropathy, renal disease, or other arterial lesions. We then taper the dose of prednisone steadily, but fairly slowly as long as the response is maintained, until a dose of 20 mg/day is reached by approximately month three to four. The tapering schedule is then slowed (eg, dose reduction by 2.5 mg daily every 14 days). This results in an overall course of approximately six to eight months until glucocorticoids are discontinued. (See 'Mild versus more severe disease' above and 'Isolated cutaneous PAN' below.) This approach is based upon the potential benefit of glucocorticoids alone seen in retrospective studies [6-8] and in patients with mild polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) and microscopic polyangiitis in the nonrandomized initial phase of a randomized trial [2]. As examples: A retrospective analysis of patients with PAN that was not limited to those with mild disease found that patients treated with glucocorticoids alone, when compared with clinically similar patients who did not received glucocorticoids, experienced substantially longer median survival (63 versus 3 months) and five-year survival (53 versus 12 percent) [8]. Glucocorticoids have not been compared with treatment with placebo alone in a randomized trial. In a randomized trial of patients with mild PAN or microscopic polyangiitis designed to compare cyclophosphamide and azathioprine in patients who had sustained disease or relapse despite glucocorticoid therapy, 79 percent of patients achieved remission with initial glucocorticoid therapy prior to the randomized trial period [2]; half of these patients had a sustained remission without requiring additional immunosuppression. Alternatively, some experts advocate longer treatment courses with glucocorticoids, especially if no other immunosuppressive agent is prescribed concurrently, but trials have not been performed to prospectively compare the long-term outcomes of different durations of therapy. Some patients may require a slower taper. Those who respond to glucocorticoids alone are spared the risk of adverse effects associated with the use of cyclophosphamide or other immunosuppressive drugs. However, treatment with glucocorticoids may be associated with multiple adverse effects. The risks of systemic glucocorticoids and prophylaxis for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis are discussed in detail https://www.uptodate.com/contents/treatment-and-prognosis-of-polyarteritis-nodosa/print 5/25 7/7/23, 11:20 AM Treatment and prognosis of polyarteritis nodosa - UpToDate separately. (See "Major side effects of systemic glucocorticoids" and "Prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis".) Disease resistant to treatment with glucocorticoids alone In patients with mild disease or isolated cutaneous PAN who are resistant to or intolerant of the dose of glucocorticoids required for disease control, we suggest the addition of either azathioprine (2 mg/kg daily) or methotrexate (20 to 25 mg once weekly) to glucocorticoid therapy to allow use of a lower dose of glucocorticoids while achieving or maintaining disease control. Such patients include those who do not respond to glucocorticoids alone within three months, whose glucocorticoid dose cannot be tapered to an acceptable level (eg, prednisone 10 mg/day) without experiencing a relapse of disease, who are at high risk of adverse effects for the expected treatment course with glucocorticoids, or in whom the adverse effects of continued glucocorticoids in the dose being used are unacceptable. The choice between methotrexate and azathioprine depends upon the individual toxicity profiles, and patient and clinician preferences regarding dosing and administration of the drugs. Methotrexate is likely faster-acting, but should be avoided in patients with renal disease or hepatitis. We thus prefer azathioprine in patients with renal disease and in patients with hepatic disease, who should be closely monitored for hepatotoxicity. In patients with mild disease who require an immunosuppressive agent in addition to glucocorticoids, we suggest treatment with the added immunosuppressive agent for at least one year following attainment of clinical remission, based upon our clinical experience in patients with PAN and other forms of systemic vasculitis. As with other systemic vasculitides, some patients may require an extended course of treatment or resumption of treatment with low-dose glucocorticoids ( 10 mg/day of prednisone) to prevent recurrence of mild symptoms; low-dose glucocorticoids may be required even in patients also receiving another immunosuppressive agent. The approach to tapering of the glucocorticoids is the same as in patients who do not require an additional immunosuppressive agent. (See 'Initial treatment of mild PAN' above.) There are few randomized trials in patients with PAN that have directly compared the efficacy of azathioprine, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, and mycophenolate, but we generally avoid the use of cyclophosphamide in patients with mild PAN. One small randomized trial has shown similar benefit but lower toxicity with azathioprine compared with cyclophosphamide in such patients [2]. Additionally, cyclophosphamide has greater toxicity compared with azathioprine or methotrexate in our experience in PAN and in trials in other forms of systemic necrotizing vasculitis, as well as in observational studies [5,8,9]. Another small trial of 95 patients with a case mix of PAN, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Churg-Strauss), and microscopic polyangiitis compared the addition of azathioprine or placebo to standard daily oral https://www.uptodate.com/contents/treatment-and-prognosis-of-polyarteritis-nodosa/print 6/25 7/7/23, 11:20 AM Treatment and prognosis of polyarteritis nodosa - UpToDate glucocorticoids for patients classified as having nonsevere disease (as defined by a Five-Factor Score [FFS] of zero) [14] (see 'Morbidity and mortality' below). The trial found no benefit of azathioprine in terms of rates of attaining remission, risk of relapse, or cumulative dose of glucocorticoids. However, the admixture of patients with three forms of vasculitis, of which only 19 out of 51 (37 percent) had PAN, makes interpretation and implementation of these results difficult for the treatment of PAN. The small sample size of patients with PAN precluded disease- specific subset efficacy analysis. More data are needed on the efficacy of azathioprine and methotrexate as "steroid-sparing" agents for patients with mild PAN to guide therapy. We prefer to use either methotrexate or azathioprine over mycophenolate (2000 to 3000 mg/day) [15-19]. Mycophenolate has been shown to be less efficacious than azathioprine for maintenance of remission in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis [19], but there are no trial data in PAN to directly inform practice. MODERATE AND SEVERE PAN We generally treat patients with moderate to severe polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) with both high- dose glucocorticoids and a second immunosuppressive drug, such as cyclophosphamide, followed by azathioprine or methotrexate for remission maintenance. (See 'Initial treatment of moderate and severe PAN' below and 'Remission-maintenance immunosuppression' below.) Patients with concomitant viral hepatitis and moderate to severe PAN may require an initial course of glucocorticoid and immunosuppressive therapy before or concurrently with initiation antiviral medications. The goal of the glucocorticoid and immunosuppressive treatment in this setting is to treat the acute inflammatory process and stabilize the patient until the antiviral therapy becomes effective. The treatment approach in patients with hepatitis B or C infection is discussed separately. (See 'Initial treatment of mild PAN' above and 'Disease resistant to treatment with glucocorticoids alone' above and 'Associated hepatitis B or C infection' above.) Initial treatment of moderate and severe PAN In patients with moderate to severe disease (eg, any evidence of renal insufficiency, significant proteinuria, gastrointestinal, cardiac, or neurologic involvement) we recommend treatment with both glucocorticoids and cyclophosphamide. (See 'Glucocorticoid regimen' below and 'Cyclophosphamide regimen' below.) This approach is supported by observations from long-term follow-up studies in several cohorts of patients with PAN and other vasculitides that patients with more serious disease manifestations (eg, renal insufficiency, cardiac disease, mesenteric artery ischemia) had better outcomes, including rates of survival, when treated with an initial combination of https://www.uptodate.com/contents/treatment-and-prognosis-of-polyarteritis-nodosa/print 7/25 7/7/23, 11:20 AM Treatment and prognosis of polyarteritis nodosa - UpToDate cyclophosphamide and glucocorticoids compared with those who were treated with glucocorticoids alone [3,4,6,8]. In our experience, use of oral and intravenous cyclophosphamide results in a similar degree of benefit. While the comparative efficacy of treatment with oral and intravenous cyclophosphamide has been studied in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)- associated vasculitis, similar comparisons in patients with PAN have not been performed [20-22]. Additionally, one randomized trial of patients with moderate to severe disease, involving 18 patients with PAN and 47 with microscopic polyangiitis compared treatment with 12 or 6 monthly pulses of cyclophosphamide, in addition to glucocorticoid therapy; the group treated with 12 monthly pulses of cyclophosphamide had a reduced risk of relapse and a higher event free survival rate compared with those receiving only six monthly pulses over a mean follow-up period of 32 months (hazard ratios 0.34 and 0.44, respectively) [23]. Mortality between the groups did not differ. This study did not include a remission-maintenance regimen with an alternative immunosuppressive regimen, and some toxicities of cyclophosphamide only become apparent several years after treatment (eg, premature ovarian failure or bladder cancer). Further support for the use of cyclophosphamide for remission-induction is more indirect and is based upon randomized trials using these medications in patients with other forms of necrotizing vasculitis. (See "Granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis: Induction and maintenance therapy" and "Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Churg- Strauss): Treatment and prognosis".) Glucocorticoid regimen We use the following glucocorticoid regimens, together with the use of cyclophosphamide, which depend upon the severity of disease: In patients with moderate to severe disease, but without organ- or life-threatening involvement or progressive mononeuritis multiplex, we initiate therapy with orally administered glucocorticoids (prednisone 1 mg/kg), using the same treatment regimen as outlined for patients with mild disease, with a gradual taper over six to eight months. (See 'Initial treatment of mild PAN' above.) In patients with severe disease, manifested by organ- or life-threatening disease or progressively worsening mononeuritis multiplex, we initiate glucocorticoid therapy with intravenous methylprednisolone (7 to 15 mg/kg to a maximum of 500 to 1000 mg administered intravenously once daily for three days), followed by the oral prednisone regimen. Pulse therapy provides more rapid control of disease, in our experience. This approach is also supported by other experts, but there are no randomized trials comparing pulse with high-dose oral glucocorticoid therapy in patients with PAN [24]. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/treatment-and-prognosis-of-polyarteritis-nodosa/print 8/25 7/7/23, 11:20 AM Treatment and prognosis of polyarteritis nodosa - UpToDate Cyclophosphamide regimen The optimal route, dose, or duration of treatment with cyclophosphamide for PAN is uncertain, and there are no randomized trials comparing intravenous and oral routes of therapy for PAN. Given that current practice for the use of cyclophosphamide in vasculitis is to limit treatment with drug to four to six months, the route of administration is now less of deciding factor since the differences between potential toxicities between oral and intravenous administration is lessened with reduced exposure. Theoretically, compared with oral therapy, intravenous therapy may be associated with lower cumulative dose and potentially reduced risk of bone marrow, bladder, ovarian, and testicular toxicity. However, oral therapy with cyclophosphamide is an alternative preferred by some patients for its convenience and by some experts because of the long experience with this approach in ANCA- associated vasculitis, such as granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA). (See "General principles of the use of cyclophosphamide in rheumatic diseases" and "Granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis: Induction and maintenance therapy".) When intravenous cyclophosphamide is used, we prefer the regimen employed in the CYCLOPS trial consisting of cyclophosphamide 15 mg/kg administered at weeks 0, 2, and 4, and then every 3 weeks [20]. Based upon data in other forms of vasculitis and our experience, we generally avoid courses of cyclophosphamide longer than four months if remission has been achieved by that time. An alternative regimen is intravenous pulse therapy with 2 cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m ) every two weeks for three doses, in addition to the glucocorticoid regimen, then every four weeks for at least four months and until a stable remission has been achieved, but for no greater than six months. The data supporting the use of cyclophosphamide are limited, and come from several observational studies [3,7,10,23,25]. All the recommended doses of cyclophosphamide, both by oral and intravenous routes, must be adjusted for renal function, age, and in response to possibly neutropenia or other hematologic toxicities. The use of cyclophosphamide, including monitoring and prevention of adverse effects, and strategies for dose adjustments are discussed in detail separately. (See "General principles of the use of cyclophosphamide in rheumatic diseases".) Treatment with cyclophosphamide (oral or intravenous) is associated with a number of potential adverse effects, including cytopenias, gastrointestinal upset, alopecia, amenorrhea, infertility (in males and females) and premature ovarian failure, myelodysplasia, cardiomyopathy, hemorrhagic cystitis, and an increase in the risk of malignancy, especially bladder cancer. (See "General toxicity of cyclophosphamide in rheumatic diseases".) Resistant disease Infrequently, patients may not respond adequately to glucocorticoids and cyclophosphamide treatment. In patients with moderate to severe PAN who have ongoing https://www.uptodate.com/contents/treatment-and-prognosis-of-polyarteritis-nodosa/print 9/25 7/7/23, 11:21 AM Treatment and prognosis of polyarteritis nodosa - UpToDate severe or worsening disease that is not controlled by treatment with glucocorticoids and cyclophosphamide within two to three months, we treat with pulse glucocorticoids (eg, 1000 mg methylprednisolone administered intravenously daily for three days), followed by prednisone (1 mg/kg daily taken orally), and switch from cyclophosphamide to a different immunosuppressive agent. This approach is based upon the evidence supporting use of this strategy in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis and our experience in patients with PAN, as there are no direct comparisons of different treatment options in patients with resistant PAN. We base the choice of alternative immunosuppressive agent on the patient's history of medication use and comorbidities. We usually prescribe an agent not previously used by the patient from among the following: azathioprine, methotrexate, or mycophenolate (see 'Disease resistant to treatment with glucocorticoids alone' above). Rituximab is an option for the treatment of patients without hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection whose disease is resistant to control with cyclophosphamide and subsequent use for at least three months each of one or two of these alternative immunosuppressive agents. It has not been formally evaluated in this setting, with only a few case reports published of this approach, but the use of rituximab in PAN is possibly supported by the efficacy of this approach in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis [26,27]. In patients treated with rituximab, we use the same regimen as is utilized in patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (see "Granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis: Induction and maintenance therapy"). An extremely small number of case reports have been published describing treatment of PAN with anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agents [28], tocilizumab [29], and tofacitinib [30], but, as is common when reviewing such small series, publication bias and other factors make interpretation and application of these results difficult. Remission-maintenance immunosuppression In patients who have completed a course of therapy with cyclophosphamide, we switch to another immunosuppressive agent, such as azathioprine (2 mg/kg daily) or methotrexate (20 to 25 mg once weekly), for a total duration of immunosuppressive therapy (including cyclophosphamide and the subsequent agent) of 18 months. (See 'Cyclophosphamide regimen' above.) We avoid the continued use of cyclophosphamide for remission maintenance due to its toxicity and prefer to use either azathioprine or methotrexate over mycophenolate for this purpose [15- 19]. The choice between methotrexate and azathioprine often depends on the individual toxicity profiles and dosing regimens. Methotrexate is likely faster-acting, but should be avoided in patients with renal disease or hepatitis. In patients with poor tolerance of, or contraindications to, azathioprine or methotrexate, we use mycophenolate mofetil (2000 to 3000 mg daily). The highest tolerated dose of a given agent, up to the recommended maximum, should be used for several months before presuming it is insufficient, and that another medication is required. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/treatment-and-prognosis-of-polyarteritis-nodosa/print 10/25 7/7/23, 11:21 AM Treatment and prognosis of polyarteritis nodosa - UpToDate This approach is supported indirectly by randomized trials and experience in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis, but there are no randomized trials or observational studies that have formally examined this approach or compared azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and mycophenolate in patients with PAN in this setting [2]. Nonetheless, use of this strategy in patients with PAN has been effective in our experience. The use of this approach in ANCA- associated vasculitis is discussed in detail separately. (See "Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Churg-Strauss): Treatment and prognosis" and "Granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis: Induction and maintenance therapy", section on 'Maintenance therapy'.) The monitoring and potential adverse effects of azathioprine, methotrexate, and mycophenolate mofetil are discussed in detail separately. (See "Pharmacology and side effects of azathioprine when used in rheumatic diseases" and "Major side effects of low-dose methotrexate" and "Use of methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis" and "Mycophenolate: Overview of use and adverse effects in the treatment of rheumatic diseases" and "Granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis: Induction and maintenance therapy", section on 'Maintenance therapy'.) Hypertension As with most forms of hypertension, especially in the setting of renal insufficiency, obtaining adequate control of the blood pressure is a key goal of treatment. Hypertension can be a major therapeutic issue in patients with polyarteritis nodosa. The elevation in blood pressure may be severe and is often mediated by ischemia-induced activation of the renin-angiotensin system [31]. The intrarenal large vessel disease in PAN may, therefore, be the functional equivalent of extrarenal vascular disease in bilateral renal artery stenosis. (See "Renal effects of ACE inhibitors in hypertension".) We suggest the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in PAN because they are generally effective in this setting [32]. However, they may worsen renal function due to removal of the effect of angiotensin II on autoregulation and maintenance of the glomerular filtration rate. Switching to other antihypertensive agents (such as calcium channel blockers) may be required if an ACE inhibitor induces a clinically significant elevation (30 percent or greater) in the plasma creatinine concentration. (See "Renal effects of ACE inhibitors in hypertension", section on 'Renovascular hypertension'.) Limited role of plasma exchange Plasma exchange has not been shown to be beneficial for the treatment of PAN that is not associated with HBV infection [25,33,34]; however, it may have a role in the acute management of HBV-associated PAN [13]. The treatment of HBV-associated PAN is discussed separately. (See 'Associated hepatitis B or C infection' above and "Kidney disease associated with hepatitis B virus infection", section on 'Polyarteritis nodosa (PAN)'.) https://www.uptodate.com/contents/treatment-and-prognosis-of-polyarteritis-nodosa/print 11/25 7/7/23, 11:21 AM Treatment and prognosis of polyarteritis nodosa - UpToDate Pneumocystis jirovecii (PCP) prophylaxis Prophylaxis for Pneumocystis jirovecii (PCP) infection should be employed in patients being treated for PAN using the regimens associated with such risk in patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis, such as a significant dose of glucocorticoids (eg, 20 mg of prednisone daily for one month or longer) in combination with a second immunosuppressive drug, particularly a cytotoxic agent (eg, cyclophosphamide). (See "Treatment and prevention of Pneumocystis pneumonia in patients without HIV", section on 'Indications'.) ISOLATED AND SINGLE-ORGAN PAN The approach to isolated or single-organ polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) depends upon the affected organ or tissue. Cutaneous PAN is generally treated similarly to mild systemic PAN (see 'Isolated cutaneous PAN' below), while isolated organ involvement, sometimes identified at the time of an operative procedure, may not require further therapy. (See 'Isolated/single-organ PAN' below.) Isolated cutaneous PAN The treatment for isolated cutaneous PAN varies depending on the severity of the cutaneous manifestations and associated symptoms. A detailed discussion on the diagnosis and treatment of cutaneous PAN is presented elsewhere. (See "Cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa".) Patients with isolated cutaneous disease when first seen and initially treated may relapse with disease in other organs, and should be monitored periodically as are other patients with mild disease. (See 'Monitoring of disease' below.) Isolated/single-organ PAN Isolated single-organ PAN, other than isolated cutaneous disease, is usually a monocyclic disease, which typically does not relapse, that is diagnosed by histological examination of surgical specimens. Treatment beyond surgical excision (eg, of isolated PAN of the gallbladder) is usually not necessary [35]. However, we fully evaluate such patients initially and provide regular clinical follow-up (every three months in the first year and every 6 to 12 months thereafter) to determine if additional anatomic areas or other clinical features are present or developing. (See "Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of polyarteritis nodosa in adults" and 'Monitoring of disease' below.) MONITORING OF DISEASE Patients with polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) require regular, long-term follow-up to monitor the disease and drug safety by a clinician familiar with the disease and its treatments. Patients must be monitored for the possibility of disease relapse, particularly in organ systems involved at https://www.uptodate.com/contents/treatment-and-prognosis-of-polyarteritis-nodosa/print 12/25 7/7/23, 11:21 AM Treatment and prognosis of polyarteritis nodosa - UpToDate disease onset. However, it is important to recognize that patients with PAN may have relapses of disease that include clinical manifestations of vasculitis not present at diagnosis [36]. We generally see patients at least monthly during the initial phase of therapy, until clinically stable, then at least every three months during the first two years of treatment. We continue to follow patients who have been in remission for two years every three to six months. Even after two years of remission, all patients should be followed indefinitely at some reasonable frequency (eg, every 6 to 12 months) since relapses may occur years after initial presentation and attainment of remission, which may be defined for patients with PAN as the absence of any evidence of active disease. In addition to routine physical examinations, including blood pressure testing, a review of systems, and laboratory monitoring for drug toxicities, a serum creatinine and urinalysis should be obtained. New symptoms or findings should be evaluated for their potential to represent recurrent vasculitis, even if such symptoms or findings are different from the original presenting manifestations of disease. Additionally, patients must be followed and treated for the medium- and long-term clinical sequelae of both treatment toxicities and disease-related long-term organ damage. Patients with cutaneous-only PAN or other single-organ presentations of PAN must also be followed regularly for the possible development of disease in new organ systems. In addition to clinical examinations and appropriate follow-up of patient-reported symptoms, periodic testing of serum creatinine and a urinalysis can help monitor for asymptomatic renal disease. Follow-up angiography is not required unless there are signs or symptoms suggestive of new disease, concerns for ischemia that may require intervention, or aneurysms that are at risk for expansion or rupture and may require intervention. Depending on the anatomic location and size of affected arteries, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomographic (CT) angiography may be substituted for catheter-based angiography. The choice of which imaging modality (MR, CT, or catheter-based) to use will depend upon the availability of equipment and expertise at a medical center and may be influenced by an interest in utilizing the same approach used for prior evaluations to allow for direct comparisons. Some complications of PAN can occur when the disease is clinically inactive, since healing of inflamed vessels can lead to progressive narrowing of the vascular lumina and resultant organ ischemia. Such changes should be distinguished from active disease, as they require appropriate supportive care rather than immunosuppression. As an example, a slowly progressive elevation in the serum creatinine concentration occurs in some patients in whom the signs of active vasculitis (such as systemic symptoms and an active urine sediment) have abated. The primary problem in this situation is diminished glomerular flow, not vascular inflammation. Sometimes serial angiograms or a renal biopsy is required to help differentiate active from inactive disease. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/treatment-and-prognosis-of-polyarteritis-nodosa/print 13/25 7/7/23, 11:21 AM Treatment and prognosis of polyarteritis nodosa - UpToDate RECURRENT DISEASE The treatment of recurrent disease depends upon the severity of the flare and whether recurrence occurs on or off immunosuppressive treatment. Mild disease recurrence may be treated by use of glucocorticoids alone, and/or an increase in dose of immunosuppressive drug, depending upon the patient's treatment at the time of disease exacerbation or recurrence. Moderate to severe relapse requires reinitiation of remission-induction treatment (see 'Initial