What is the cost-effectiveness of structured telephone support with human to machine contact versus telemonitoring and usual care?
A study by Pandor and Thokala (2018) found that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for structured telephone support with human to machine contact compared to telemonitoring and usual care was 5% at a probability threshold of 12% and 83% at a probability threshold of 12%. This suggests that structured telephone support with human to machine contact is cost-effective compared to telemonitoring and usual care.