7/6/23, 10:41 AM Embolic risk and the role of anticoagulation in atrial flutter - UpToDate Official reprint from UpToDate www.uptodate.com 2023 UpToDate, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved. Embolic risk and the role of anticoagulation in atrial flutter : Warren J Manning, MD, Jordan M Prutkin, MD, MHS, FHRS : Bradley P Knight, MD, FACC, Scott E Kasner, MD : Nisha Parikh, MD, MPH All topics are updated as new evidence becomes available and our peer review process is complete. Literature review current through: Jun 2023. This topic last updated: May 11, 2022. INTRODUCTION Most patients with atrial flutter should be considered for chronic anticoagulation in a manner similar to those with atrial fibrillation (AF). This recommendation is based not only on the fact atrial flutter carries a risk for systemic embolization but also that these patients usually have episodes of AF. (See "Atrial fibrillation in adults: Use of oral anticoagulants", section on 'Summary and recommendations'.) Our approach to anticoagulation applies to all types of atrial flutter, whether it is typical or atypical. (See "Electrocardiographic and electrophysiologic features of atrial flutter".) PREVALENCE OF THROMBUS Many patients with atrial flutter have alternating periods of atrial fibrillation (AF) making it difficult to know the exact risk of thrombus formation (and subsequent embolization) specifically attributable to atrial flutter [1]. Atrial mechanical function is not normal in patients with atrial flutter. However, transmitral and left atrial appendage Doppler echocardiography commonly demonstrate more organized atrial and atrial appendage mechanical function with sustained atrial flutter, as opposed to AF, in which organized atrial contraction is absent. One study performed transesophageal https://www.uptodate.com/contents/embolic-risk-and-the-role-of-anticoagulation-in-atrial-flutter/print 1/13 7/6/23, 10:41 AM Embolic risk and the role of anticoagulation in atrial flutter - UpToDate echocardiography (TEE) immediately before and after cardioversion in 19 patients with atrial flutter and 44 patients with AF with the following findings [2]: Prior to cardioversion, patients with atrial flutter had greater left atrial appendage peak ejection velocities and shear rates compared to those with AF. After cardioversion, left atrial appendage peak ejection velocities and shear rates decreased in both groups of patients, but the impaired left atrial appendage function was less pronounced in patients with atrial flutter. New or increased spontaneous echo contrast, a marker of blood stasis, occurred significantly less often in patients with atrial flutter (21 versus 50 percent for AF). Like AF, the vast majority of thrombi among patients with atrial flutter are located in the left atrial appendage. TEE evidence of atrial thrombi has been documented in a number of reports of patients with atrial flutter not receiving chronic anticoagulation [3-8]. As with AF, the thrombi overwhelmingly involve or are exclusively within the left atrial appendage. The frequency with which this occurs may vary with the duration of the arrhythmia and other risk factors (similar to AF) as illustrated by the following observations: Two series evaluated patients with atrial flutter for a mean duration of 33 to 36 days who did not have a history of AF, rheumatic heart disease, or a prosthetic heart valve [3,4]. A left atrial thrombus was found in 1 to 1.6 percent, a right atrial thrombus in 1 percent, and left atrial spontaneous echo contrast in 11 to 13 percent [3,4]. In one of these reports, there was a close correlation between a history of thromboembolism and periods of AF during atrial flutter [4]. Atrial thrombi and spontaneous echo contrast may be more common in patients with atrial flutter of longer duration. In a TEE study of 30 patients with persistent atrial flutter (duration 6.4 months), two patients (7 percent) had thrombus in the left atrial appendage, and 25 percent had spontaneous echo contrast prior to cardioversion [5]. As described below in more depth (see 'Cardioversion' below) and mentioned above, left atrial contractile function (as measured by peak atrial appendage ejection velocity) transiently declines after cardioversion in many patients and is considered a manifestation of atrial "stunning." Left atrial thrombus was present in 5 of 47 consecutive patients (11 percent) with atrial flutter for a mean duration of 28 days who did not have a history of AF or mitral stenosis [6]. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/embolic-risk-and-the-role-of-anticoagulation-in-atrial-flutter/print 2/13 7/6/23, 10:41 AM Embolic risk and the role of anticoagulation in atrial flutter - UpToDate EMBOLIC RISK The risk of embolization in atrial flutter is related to risk factors and the need for cardioversion or ablation. Risk factors and lone atrial flutter Risk factors for clinical thromboembolism include valvular heart disease (eg, rheumatic valve disease, prosthetic valves), increasing age, depressed left ventricular systolic function or heart failure, hypertension, diabetes, vascular disease, and a history of thromboembolism. Atrial flutter without an identifiable risk factor is called lone atrial flutter. It is relatively uncommon, occurring in only 3 of 181 adults with atrial flutter in a population-based study (1.7 percent) [9] and in 8 percent of children and young adults with atrial flutter in a multicenter series [10]. The embolic risk associated with lone atrial flutter was evaluated in a review of 59 mostly elderly patients with lone atrial flutter (mean age at diagnosis 70 years); 75 percent developed recurrent episodes or persistent atrial flutter [11]. At presentation, these patients did not have coronary heart disease, hyperthyroidism, heart failure, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, obstructive lung disease, uncontrolled hypertension, or known antecedent atrial fibrillation (AF). At the time of diagnosis, 25 were treated with aspirin and six with warfarin; at last follow-up, 28 were treated with aspirin and 13 with warfarin. The following observations were noted at an average follow-up of 10 years: AF developed in 33 patients (56 percent), which was paroxysmal in 25 and permanent in eight, highlighting the rationale for managing anticoagulation in patients with atrial flutter in a manner similar to AF. One or more ischemic cerebrovascular events occurred in 19 patients (32 percent) at a mean age of 80 years, including six who were in AF at the time of the event. Compared to age- and sex-adjusted expected rates of thromboembolism, the thromboembolic risk was significantly increased in the patients with lone atrial flutter (hazard ratio 5.2 in patients with controlled hypertension and 2.5 in patients without a history of hypertension). When compared with patients with lone AF, the patients with lone atrial flutter had, after adjustment for age and sex, a significantly higher rate of thromboembolism (hazard ratio 2.6). The risk was lower and no longer significant when only patients without a history of hypertension were included (hazard ratio 1.9). (See "Atrial fibrillation: Overview and management of new-onset atrial fibrillation", section on 'Classification and terminology'.) https://www.uptodate.com/contents/embolic-risk-and-the-role-of-anticoagulation-in-atrial-flutter/print 3/13 7/6/23, 10:41 AM Embolic risk and the role of anticoagulation in atrial flutter - UpToDate Long-term flutter There is an increased risk for clinical thromboembolism in patients with persistent atrial flutter compared to the general population without atrial arrhythmias [1,12-14]. In a systematic review based upon limited data, the long-term embolic risk in patients with sustained atrial flutter (with varying risk factors) was estimated to be approximately 3 percent per year [12]. For comparison, the rate of thromboembolism in patients with AF <1 percent per year in patients with no risk factors, with the rate increasing with increasing CHA DS -VASc score 2 2 ( table 1). One problem with interpreting these data, as mentioned previously, is that many patients with persistent atrial flutter also have episodes of AF (34 percent in the preceding report [13]) also have episodes of AF. In a review of the Medicare database, the risk of stroke was significantly increased in patients with atrial flutter (relative risk 1.41 compared to a control group). In these patients, the relative risk was 1.56 in patients who subsequently had an episode of AF (similar to the risk with AF alone), while those with isolated atrial flutter had a stroke risk not significantly different from the control population (relative risk 1.11) ( figure 1) [1]. Cardioversion Although the risk of clinical thromboembolization at the time of cardioversion is increased compared to individuals not undergoing cardioversion, the absolute thromboembolism risk of cardioversion for pure atrial flutter is not known with a high degree of confidence due to the fact that many patients included in reports of atrial flutter cardioversion related events also had episodes of AF (but happened to be in atrial flutter at the time of cardioversion) [3,13,15-17]. The studies that have attempted to evaluate the risk at the time of cardioversion studied different populations. Some included patients with a prior history of thromboembolism and were thus more likely to report high event rates, while studies in which at least some patients were anticoagulated or underwent precardioversion transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to assess for thrombus were more likely to report low event rates [3,12-17]. Three early studies found no embolic events in a total of 314 patients with atrial flutter (and without AF) who underwent elective cardioversion for atrial flutter without anticoagulation prior to or after cardioversion [4,18,19]. However, the overall incidence is 0.6 to 1.0 percent [16,17] with a higher risk in patients with a history of AF or underlying heart disease [13,15]. In a meta- analysis of these studies, the rate of short-term emboli ranged from 0 to 7.3 percent [12]. Embolization may be related to a transient reduction in atrial mechanical function leading to post-cardioversion thrombus formation, referred to as atrial "stunning," and is present after successful cardioversion of atrial flutter [2,5,6,20,21]. In one report, left atrial appendage peak ejection velocity fell by 26 percent within 15 minutes of cardioversion and almost 50 percent of https://www.uptodate.com/contents/embolic-risk-and-the-role-of-anticoagulation-in-atrial-flutter/print 4/13 7/6/23, 10:41 AM Embolic risk and the role of anticoagulation in atrial flutter - UpToDate subjects had new or more pronounced spontaneous echo contrast [5]. These changes predispose to de novo thrombus formation [15]. Similar observations have been made in patients with AF. (See "Hemodynamic consequences of atrial fibrillation and cardioversion to sinus rhythm", section on 'Atrial stunning'.) The severity of atrial stunning appears to be somewhat less pronounced in atrial flutter than in AF, which could explain the lower embolic risk after cardioversion in atrial flutter. In a report that compared 19 patients with atrial flutter with 44 patients with AF, the left atrial appendage peak ejection velocity was significantly higher in the patients with atrial flutter at baseline (42 versus 28 cm/sec in atrial fibrillation) and after cardioversion (27 versus 15 cm/sec) [2]. In addition, new or more pronounced spontaneous echo contrast was significantly less likely in those with atrial flutter (21 versus 50 percent). Radiofrequency catheter ablation Atrial stunning (see 'Cardioversion' above) also occurs after radiofrequency catheter ablation [21,22]. The likelihood of developing atrial stunning and its duration were assessed in a review of 15 patients with persistent atrial flutter (mean duration 17 months) and seven with paroxysmal atrial flutter who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation [21]. Significant left atrial appendage stunning and spontaneous echo contrast on TEE were observed after ablation in 80 percent of those with persistent flutter but in none with paroxysmal atrial flutter, suggesting that, like AF, left atrial stunning in atrial flutter is related to the duration of the arrhythmia and not the mode of reversion. These changes resolved after three weeks of sustained sinus rhythm. (See "Atrial flutter: Maintenance of sinus rhythm", section on 'RF catheter ablation'.) PREVENTION OF EMBOLIZATION Patients with long-term atrial flutter Patients with persistent or recurrent atrial flutter who also have periods of atrial flutter-fibrillation should be treated in the same manner as those with pure atrial fibrillation (AF) [23,24]. This recommendation also applies to patients with atrial flutter who have a prior history of AF. Though the optimal management of atrial flutter without any history of AF is uncertain and may be more limited ( figure 1) [1], we and others recommend that patients with pure atrial flutter be managed similar to those with AF [25]. (See "Atrial fibrillation in adults: Use of oral anticoagulants", section on 'Summary and recommendations'.) Anticoagulation with warfarin (goal international normalized ratio [INR] between 2.0 and 3.0) has been recommended to prevent embolization in patients with atrial flutter, similar to patients with AF (eg, using CHA DS -VASc criteria for nonvalvular AF). Of the non-vitamin K oral 2 2 https://www.uptodate.com/contents/embolic-risk-and-the-role-of-anticoagulation-in-atrial-flutter/print 5/13 7/6/23, 10:41 AM Embolic risk and the role of anticoagulation in atrial flutter - UpToDate anticoagulants tested for stroke prevention in AF, in the large clinical trials, only apixaban enrolled patients with atrial flutter [26]. It is likely, however, that there is similar efficacy of all the non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (eg, apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban) for atrial flutter as well as AF. At the time of cardioversion We and others recommend that anticoagulation leading to, at the time of, and after cardioversion of atrial flutter be managed in a manner similar to that for AF [23,24]. (See "Prevention of embolization prior to and after restoration of sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation".) Patients presenting with an initial episode of atrial flutter should be treated in a manner similar to those presenting with their first episode of AF, including a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) to evaluate for congenital heart disease, valve disease, and left ventricular systolic function. After radiofrequency catheter ablation Anticoagulation recommendations following catheter ablation of AF are discussed separately. (See "Atrial flutter: Maintenance of sinus rhythm", section on 'Anticoagulation after RF catheter ablation'.) RECOMMENDATIONS OF OTHERS The 2016 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation, the 2015 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology/Heart Rhythm Society guideline on the management of adult patient with supraventricular tachycardia, and the 2014 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology/Heart Rhythm Society guideline on the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (and its 2019 focused update) similarly recommend managing anticoagulation in patients with atrial flutter in a manner similar to those in atrial fibrillation [23,27-31], recognizing that no report has been sufficiently large to accurately define both the risk of embolization and benefit of antithrombotic therapy in a pure atrial flutter population. SOCIETY GUIDELINE LINKS Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Atrial fibrillation" and "Society guideline links: Arrhythmias in adults".) SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS https://www.uptodate.com/contents/embolic-risk-and-the-role-of-anticoagulation-in-atrial-flutter/print 6/13 7/6/23, 10:41 AM Embolic risk and the role of anticoagulation in atrial flutter - UpToDate The risk of embolization in atrial flutter is related to clinical risk factors and underlying cardiac disease (eg, valve disease). However, the exact rates are not known, in part due to the presence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in most cohorts studied and the coexistence of AF and atrial flutter in most individuals. (See 'Long-term flutter' above.) For patients with atrial flutter, with or without AF, we recommend an anticoagulant strategy identical to that used in patients with AF (Grade 1B). (See 'Prevention of embolization' above.) Use of UpToDate is subject to the Terms of Use. REFERENCES 1. Biblo LA, Yuan Z, Quan KJ, et al. Risk of stroke in patients with atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol 2001; 87:346. 2. Grimm RA, Stewart WJ, Arheart K, et al. Left atrial appendage "stunning" after electrical cardioversion of atrial flutter: an attenuated response compared with atrial fibrillation as the mechanism for lower susceptibility to thromboembolic events. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29:582. 3. Corrado G, Sgalambro A, Mantero A, et al. Thromboembolic risk in atrial flutter. The FLASIEC (FLutter Atriale Societ Italiana di Ecografia Cardiovascolare) multicentre study. Eur Heart J 2001; 22:1042. 4. Schmidt H, von der Recke G, Illien S, et al. Prevalence of left atrial chamber and appendage thrombi in patients with atrial flutter and its clinical significance. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38:778. 5. Weiss R, Marcovitz P, Knight BP, et al. Acute changes in spontaneous echo contrast and atrial function after cardioversion of persistent atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82:1052. 6. Irani WN, Grayburn PA, Afridi I. Prevalence of thrombus, spontaneous echo contrast, and atrial stunning in patients undergoing cardioversion of atrial flutter. A prospective study using transesophageal echocardiography. Circulation 1997; 95:962. 7. Bikkina M, Alpert MA, Mulekar M, et al. Prevalence of intraatrial thrombus in patients with atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol 1995; 76:186. 8. Orsinelli DA, Pearson AC. Usefulness of transesophageal echocardiography to screen for left atrial thrombus before elective cardioversion for atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 1993; 72:1337. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/embolic-risk-and-the-role-of-anticoagulation-in-atrial-flutter/print 7/13 7/6/23, 10:41 AM Embolic risk and the role of anticoagulation in atrial flutter - UpToDate 9. Granada J, Uribe W, Chyou PH, et al. Incidence and predictors of atrial flutter in the general population. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36:2242. 10. Garson A Jr, Bink-Boelkens M, Hesslein PS, et al. Atrial flutter in the young: a collaborative study of 380 cases. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985; 6:871. 11. Halligan SC, Gersh BJ, Brown RD Jr, et al. The natural history of lone atrial flutter. Ann Intern Med 2004; 140:265. 12. Ghali WA, Wasil BI, Brant R, et al. Atrial flutter and the risk of thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med 2005; 118:101. 13. Seidl K, Hauer B, Schwick NG, et al. Risk of thromboembolic events in patients with atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82:580. 14. Lanzarotti CJ, Olshansky B. Thromboembolism in chronic atrial flutter: is the risk underestimated? J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 30:1506. 15. Mehta D, Baruch L. Thromboembolism following cardioversion of "common" atrial flutter. Risk factors and limitations of transesophageal echocardiography. Chest 1996; 110:1001. 16. Elhendy A, Gentile F, Khandheria BK, et al. Thromboembolic complications after electrical cardioversion in patients with atrial flutter. Am J Med 2001; 111:433. 17. Gallagher MM, Hennessy BJ, Edvardsson N, et al. Embolic complications of direct current cardioversion of atrial arrhythmias: association with low intensity of anticoagulation at the time of cardioversion. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40:926. 18. Arnold AZ, Mick MJ, Mazurek RP, et al. Role of prophylactic anticoagulation for direct current cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19:851. 19. Chalasani P, Cambre S, Silverman ME. Direct-current cardioversion for the conversion of atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol 1996; 77:658. 20. Jordaens L, Missault L, Germonpr E, et al. Delayed restoration of atrial function after conversion of atrial flutter by pacing or electrical cardioversion. Am J Cardiol 1993; 71:63. 21. Sparks PB, Jayaprakash S, Vohra JK, et al. Left atrial "stunning" following radiofrequency catheter ablation of chronic atrial flutter. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32:468. 22. Welch PJ, Afridi I, Joglar JA, et al. Effect of radiofrequency ablation on atrial mechanical function in patients with atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol 1999; 84:420. 23. You JJ, Singer DE, Howard PA, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for atrial fibrillation: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012; 141:e531S. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/embolic-risk-and-the-role-of-anticoagulation-in-atrial-flutter/print 8/13 7/6/23, 10:41 AM Embolic risk and the role of anticoagulation in atrial flutter - UpToDate 24. American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association, European Society of Cardiology, et al. Management of patients with atrial fibrillation (compilation of 2006 ACCF/AHA/ESC and 2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS recommendations): a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. Circulation 2013; 127:1916. 25. Singer DE, Albers GW, Dalen JE, et al. Antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008; 133:546S. 26. Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJ, et al. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2011; 365:981. 27. January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation 2014; 130:2071. 28. January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation 2014; 130:e199. 29. Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J 2021; 42:373. 30. January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society in Collaboration With the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation 2019; 140:e125. 31. Page RL, Joglar JA, Caldwell MA, et al. 2015 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Management of Adult Patients With Supraventricular Tachycardia: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016; 67:e27. Topic 1066 Version 30.0 https://www.uptodate.com/contents/embolic-risk-and-the-role-of-anticoagulation-in-atrial-flutter/print 9/13 7/6/23, 10:41 AM Embolic risk and the role of anticoagulation in atrial flutter - UpToDate GRAPHICS Clinical risk factors for stroke, transient ischemic attack, and systemic embolism in the CHA DS -VASc score 2 2 (A) The risk factor-based approach expressed as a point based scoring system, with the acronym CHA DS -VASc 2 2 (NOTE: maximum score is 9 since age may contribute 0, 1, or 2 points) CHA DS -VASc risk factor Points 2 2 Congestive heart failure +1 Signs/symptoms of heart failure or objective evidence of reduced left ventricular ejection fraction Hypertension +1 Resting blood pressure >140/90 mmHg on at least 2 occasions or current antihypertensive treatment Age 75 years or older +2 Diabetes mellitus +1 Fasting glucose >125 mg/dL (7 mmol/L) or treatment with oral hypoglycemic agent and/or insulin Previous stroke, transient ischemic attack, or thromboembolism +2 Vascular disease +1 Previous myocardial infarction, peripheral artery disease, or aortic plaque Age 65 to 74 years +1 Sex category (female) +1 (B) Adjusted stroke rate according to CHA DS -VASc score 2 2 CHA DS -VASc score Patients (n = 73,538) Stroke and thromboembolism event 2 2 rate at 1-year follow-up (%) 0 6369 0.78 1 8203 2.01 2 12,771 3.71 3 17,371 5.92 4 13,887 9.27 https://www.uptodate.com/contents/embolic-risk-and-the-role-of-anticoagulation-in-atrial-flutter/print 10/13 7/6/23, 10:41 AM Embolic risk and the role of anticoagulation in atrial flutter - UpToDate 5 8942 15.26 6 4244 19.74 7 1420 21.50 8 285 22.38 9 46 23.64 CHA DS -VASc: Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age ( 75; doubled), Diabetes, Stroke (doubled), Vascular disease, Age (65 to 74), Sex. 2 2 Part A from: Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial brillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Europace 2016; 18(11):1609-1678. By permission of Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. Copyright 2016 Oxford University Press. Available at: www.escardio.org/. Graphic 83272 Version 29.0 https://www.uptodate.com/contents/embolic-risk-and-the-role-of-anticoagulation-in-atrial-flutter/print 11/13 7/6/23, 10:41 AM Embolic risk and the role of anticoagulation in atrial flutter - UpToDate Stroke risk in atrial flutter is related to concomitant atrial fibrillation Among 395,147 patients over 65 years of age, the risk of stroke in those with chronic atrial flutter is increased when atrial fibrillation (AF) is also present and is equivalent to the risk associated with only AF. The incidence of stroke in those with isolated atrial flutter is the same as the risk in the control patients who have no atrial arrhythmia. Data from Biblo LA, Yuan Z, Quan KJ, et al. Am J Cardiol 2001; 87:346. Graphic 67382 Version 2.0 https://www.uptodate.com/contents/embolic-risk-and-the-role-of-anticoagulation-in-atrial-flutter/print 12/13 7/6/23, 10:41 AM Embolic risk and the role of anticoagulation in atrial flutter - UpToDate Contributor Disclosures Warren J Manning, MD Equity Ownership/Stock Options: Pfizer [Anticoagulants]. All of the relevant financial relationships listed have been mitigated. Jordan M Prutkin, MD, MHS, FHRS No relevant financial relationship(s) with ineligible companies to disclose. Bradley P Knight, MD, FACC Grant/Research/Clinical Trial Support: Abbott [Electrophysiology]; Atricure [Electrophysiology]; Biosense Webster [Electrophysiology]; Biotronik [Electrophysiology]; Boston Scientific [Electrophysiology]; BSCI [Electrophysiology]; MDT [Electrophysiology]; Philips [Electrophysiology]. Consultant/Advisory Boards: Abbott [Electrophysiology]; Atricure [Electrophysiology]; Biosense Webster [Electrophysiology]; Biotronik [Electrophysiology]; Boston Scientific [Electrophysiology]; BSCI [Electrophysiology]; CVRx [Heart failure]; MDT [Electrophysiology]; Philips [Electrophysiology]; Sanofi [Arrhythmias]. Speaker's Bureau: Abbott [Electrophysiology]; Biosense Webster [Electrophysiology]; Biotronik [Electrophysiology]; Boston Scientific [Transeptal catheterization]; BSCI [Electrophysiology]; MDT [Electrophysiology]. All of the relevant financial relationships listed have been mitigated. Scott E Kasner, MD Grant/Research/Clinical Trial Support: Bayer [Stroke]; Bristol Meyers Squibb [Stroke]; Medtronic [Stroke]; WL Gore and Associates [Stroke]. Consultant/Advisory Boards: Abbvie [Stroke]; AstraZeneca [Stroke]; BMS [Stroke]; Diamedica [Stroke]; Medtronic [Stroke]. All of the relevant financial relationships listed have been mitigated. Nisha Parikh, MD, MPH No relevant financial relationship(s) with ineligible companies to disclose. Contributor disclosures are reviewed for conflicts of interest by the editorial group. When found, these are addressed by vetting through a multi-level review process, and through requirements for references to be provided to support the content. Appropriately referenced content is required of all authors and must conform to UpToDate standards of evidence. Conflict of interest policy https://www.uptodate.com/contents/embolic-risk-and-the-role-of-anticoagulation-in-atrial-flutter/print 13/13