{'index': 1, 'text': "SECTION 5.3 No Solicitation by the Company; Company Recommendation. <omitted>\n(d) <omitted>\nNotwithstanding the foregoing or any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, prior to the time the Company Stockholder Approval is obtained (but not thereafter), the Company Board or the Company Special   41\n\n\nCommittee may make a Company Adverse Recommendation Change if either (x) in the case of a Company Adverse Recommendation Change made in response to a Company Acquisition Proposal, the Company Board or the Company Special Committee has determined in good faith, after consultation with its outside financial advisors and outside legal counsel, that such Company Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Company Superior Proposal and that failure to take such action would reasonably be expected to be inconsistent with the directors' fiduciary duties under applicable Law or (y) in the case of a Company Adverse Recommendation Change made in response to a Company Intervening Event, the Company Board or the Company Special Committee has determined in good faith, after consultation with its outside financial advisors and outside legal counsel, that, as a result of a Company Intervening Event, the failure to take such action would reasonably be expected to be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable Law; "}
Instruction: Read the segment of a merger agreement and answer the multiple-choice question by choosing the option that best characterizes the agreement.
Question: What standard should the board follow when determining whether to change its recommendation in response to an intervening event?
Option A: "Breach" of fiduciary duties
Option B: "Inconsistent" with fiduciary duties
Option C: "Reasonably likely/expected breach" of fiduciary duties
Option D: "Reasonably likely/expected to be inconsistent" with fiduciary duties
Option E: "Reasonably likely/expected violation" of fiduciary duties
Option F: "Required to comply" with fiduciary duties
Option G: "Violation" of fiduciary duties
Option H: More likely than not violate fiduciary duties
Option I: Other specified standard

Merger Agreement: 6.3 Shareholders’ Approval and Stockholder Approval. <omitted> (c) <omitted> if the Board of Directors of <omitted> the Company, after receiving the advice of its outside counsel and, with respect to financial matters, its outside financial advisors, determines in good faith that it would more likely than not result in a violation of its fiduciary duties under applicable law to make or continue to make the Parent Board Recommendation or the Company Board Recommendation, as applicable, such Board of Directors may <omitted> submit this Agreement to its shareholders or stockholders, respectively, without recommendation (which, for the avoidance of doubt, shall constitute a Recommendation Change) (Page 57)
Answer: I

Merger Agreement: {{text}}
Answer:
Instruction: Read the segment of a merger agreement and answer the multiple-choice question by choosing the option that best characterizes the agreement.
Question: What standard should the board follow when determining whether to change its recommendation in response to an intervening event?
Option A: "Breach" of fiduciary duties
Option B: "Inconsistent" with fiduciary duties
Option C: "Reasonably likely/expected breach" of fiduciary duties
Option D: "Reasonably likely/expected to be inconsistent" with fiduciary duties
Option E: "Reasonably likely/expected violation" of fiduciary duties
Option F: "Required to comply" with fiduciary duties
Option G: "Violation" of fiduciary duties
Option H: More likely than not violate fiduciary duties
Option I: Other specified standard
Committee may make a Company Adverse Recommendation Change if either (x) in the case of a Company Adverse Recommendation Change made in response to a Company Acquisition Proposal, the Company Board or the Company Special Committee has determined in good faith, after consultation with its outside financial advisors and outside legal counsel, that such Company Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Company Superior Proposal and that failure to take such action would reasonably be expected to be inconsistent with the directors' fiduciary duties under applicable Law or (y) in the case of a Company Adverse Recommendation Change made in response to a Company Intervening Event, the Company Board or the Company Special Committee has determined in good faith, after consultation with its outside financial advisors and outside legal counsel, that, as a result of a Company Intervening Event, the failure to take such action would reasonably be expected to be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable Law; 
Answer: