{'index': 2, 'text': ' Company Intervening Event. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, at any time prior to the receipt of the Requisite Company Vote, upon the occurrence of a Company Intervening Event, the Company Board may effect a Company Adverse Recommendation Change only if all of the following conditions are satisfied:\n \n(i)               the Company Board determines in good faith after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisor of national reputation that a Company Intervening Event has occurred and that failure to effect a Company Adverse Recommendation Change in response to such Company Intervening Event would be inconsistent with the fiduciary duties owed by the Company Board to the stockholders of the Company under applicable Law;\n \n(ii)              the Company (A) promptly notifies Parent, in writing, at least three (3) Business Days (the “Company Intervening Event Notice Period”) before making a Company Adverse Recommendation Change with respect to a Company Intervening Event of its intention to take such action, which notice shall describe in reasonable detail the Company Intervening Event (it being understood that the delivery and receipt of any such notice shall not, in and of itself, be deemed to be a Company Adverse Recommendation Change) and (B) prior to making such a Company Adverse Recommendation Change, to the extent requested in writing by Parent, engages in good faith negotiations with Parent during such three (3) Business Day period to amend this Agreement in such a manner that the failure of the Company Board to make a Company Adverse Recommendation Change with respect to such Company Intervening Event would no longer be, in the good faith determination of the Company Board in consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisor of national reputation, inconsistent with the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable Law (it being understood that, if after commencement of the Company Intervening Event Notice Period, there is any material change to the circumstances giving rise to the Company Intervening Event that was previously the subject of a notice hereunder, a new notice to Parent shall be required as provided above; provided, that with respect to each such material change, each reference in this clause (ii) to a “three (3) Business Day” period shall be changed to refer to a “two (2) Business day” period); and\n \n(iii)             at the conclusion of the Company Intervening Event Notice Period, the Company Board (or a committee thereof) shall have determined in good faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisor of national reputation, that in light of such Company Intervening Event and taking into account any revised terms proposed by Parent, the failure to make a Company Adverse Recommendation Change would be inconsistent with the Company directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable Law.\n'}
Instruction: Read the segment of a merger agreement and answer the multiple-choice question by choosing the option that best characterizes the agreement.
Question: What standard should the board follow when determining whether to change its recommendation in response to an intervening event?
Option A: "Breach" of fiduciary duties
Option B: "Inconsistent" with fiduciary duties
Option C: "Reasonably likely/expected breach" of fiduciary duties
Option D: "Reasonably likely/expected to be inconsistent" with fiduciary duties
Option E: "Reasonably likely/expected violation" of fiduciary duties
Option F: "Required to comply" with fiduciary duties
Option G: "Violation" of fiduciary duties
Option H: More likely than not violate fiduciary duties
Option I: Other specified standard

Merger Agreement: 6.3 Shareholders’ Approval and Stockholder Approval. <omitted> (c) <omitted> if the Board of Directors of <omitted> the Company, after receiving the advice of its outside counsel and, with respect to financial matters, its outside financial advisors, determines in good faith that it would more likely than not result in a violation of its fiduciary duties under applicable law to make or continue to make the Parent Board Recommendation or the Company Board Recommendation, as applicable, such Board of Directors may <omitted> submit this Agreement to its shareholders or stockholders, respectively, without recommendation (which, for the avoidance of doubt, shall constitute a Recommendation Change) (Page 57)
Answer: I

Merger Agreement: {{text}}
Answer:
Instruction: Read the segment of a merger agreement and answer the multiple-choice question by choosing the option that best characterizes the agreement.
Question: What standard should the board follow when determining whether to change its recommendation in response to an intervening event?
Option A: "Breach" of fiduciary duties
Option B: "Inconsistent" with fiduciary duties
Option C: "Reasonably likely/expected breach" of fiduciary duties
Option D: "Reasonably likely/expected to be inconsistent" with fiduciary duties
Option E: "Reasonably likely/expected violation" of fiduciary duties
Option F: "Required to comply" with fiduciary duties
Option G: "Violation" of fiduciary duties
Option H: More likely than not violate fiduciary duties
Option I: Other specified standard
Answer: