{'citation': 'Williams v Principi', 'index': 4, 'text': '"We will depart from the strict rule of finality when the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims has remanded for further proceedings only if three conditions are satisfied: (1) there must have been a clear and final decision of a legal issue that (a) is\nseparate from the remand proceedings, (b) will directly govern the remand proceedings or, (c) if reversed by this court, would render the remand proceedings unnecessary; (2) the resolution of the legal issues must adversely affect the party seeking\nreview; and, (3) there must be a substantial risk that the decision would not survive a remand, i.e., that the remand proceeding may moot the issue." (Chavez v. McDonough, https://casetext.com/case/chavez-v-mcdonough)'}
Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text?

Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action."
Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund
Supportive? Yes

Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out.
Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen.
Supportive? No

Text: {{text}}
Citation: {{citation}}
Supportive?
Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text?
Text: "We will depart from the strict rule of finality when the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims has remanded for further proceedings only if three conditions are satisfied: (1) there must have been a clear and final decision of a legal issue that (a) is
separate from the remand proceedings, (b) will directly govern the remand proceedings or, (c) if reversed by this court, would render the remand proceedings unnecessary; (2) the resolution of the legal issues must adversely affect the party seeking
review; and, (3) there must be a substantial risk that the decision would not survive a remand, i.e., that the remand proceeding may moot the issue." (Chavez v. McDonough, https://casetext.com/case/chavez-v-mcdonough)
Citation: Williams v Principi
Supportive?