{'citation': 'U.S. Dep’t of Hous. & Urb. Dev.', 'index': 2, 'text': '"The “[FLRA] may consider jurisdictional questions even where the merits of an underlying final and binding award are not at\nissue.” (American Federation for National Employees, National Council of Hud Locals Council 222, A.F.L.-C.I.O. v. Federal Labour Relations Authority, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-dc-circuit/116084269.html)'}
Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text?

Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action."
Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund
Supportive? Yes

Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out.
Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen.
Supportive? No

Text: {{text}}
Citation: {{citation}}
Supportive?
Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text?
Text: "The “[FLRA] may consider jurisdictional questions even where the merits of an underlying final and binding award are not at
issue.” (American Federation for National Employees, National Council of Hud Locals Council 222, A.F.L.-C.I.O. v. Federal Labour Relations Authority, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-dc-circuit/116084269.html)
Citation: U.S. Dep’t of Hous. & Urb. Dev.
Supportive?