{'index': 8, 'text': "[TRANSLATION] The father took care of his children while they were with him. During weekday overnight stays, he would eat dinner with them and prepare their school lunches for the next day. He made sure they did their homework in the evening. The father attended some of the children's activities, and he remembers accompanying the mother to a few medical appointments. The mother coordinated all of the children's activities as well as their appointments with the family doctor, the optometrist and the dentist. She was the main parent the school communicated with regarding the children. When one of the children had to leave school early due to behavioral problems, the school communicated primarily with the mother, who would then pick up the child or ask the mother to do so. After school, the children returned to their mother's house, where their father would pick them up between 5 p.m. and 5:30 p.m. for his overnight stay, even on Mondays. When the children were home from school, the mother would give them snacks and make sure they did their homework before they went to their father's house. In light of these facts, even if it were proven that every second Monday, during school, counts towards the time spent with the father, and that the school could have been authorized to reach one either parent to raise concerns about the children, I conclude that the mother was primarily responsible for the care and education of the children during each school day. For these reasons, the appeal is allowed with costs. Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 18th day of April 2024. (Lévesque St-Cyr c. Le Roi, https://decision.tcc-cci.gc.ca/tcc-cci/decisions/fr/item/521248/index.do?q=%22Ottawa%22)"}
INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.  
Options: allowed, dimissed, other

JUDGMENT EXCERPT: {{text}}
OUTCOME:
INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate whether the following judgment excerpt from a Tax Court of Canada decision allows the appeal or dismisses the appeal. Where the result is mixed, indicate that the appeal was allowed. Ignore costs orders. Where the outcome is unclear indicate other.  
Options: allowed, dimissed, other
JUDGMENT EXCERPT: [TRANSLATION] The father took care of his children while they were with him. During weekday overnight stays, he would eat dinner with them and prepare their school lunches for the next day. He made sure they did their homework in the evening. The father attended some of the children's activities, and he remembers accompanying the mother to a few medical appointments. The mother coordinated all of the children's activities as well as their appointments with the family doctor, the optometrist and the dentist. She was the main parent the school communicated with regarding the children. When one of the children had to leave school early due to behavioral problems, the school communicated primarily with the mother, who would then pick up the child or ask the mother to do so. After school, the children returned to their mother's house, where their father would pick them up between 5 p.m. and 5:30 p.m. for his overnight stay, even on Mondays. When the children were home from school, the mother would give them snacks and make sure they did their homework before they went to their father's house. In light of these facts, even if it were proven that every second Monday, during school, counts towards the time spent with the father, and that the school could have been authorized to reach one either parent to raise concerns about the children, I conclude that the mother was primarily responsible for the care and education of the children during each school day. For these reasons, the appeal is allowed with costs. Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 18th day of April 2024. (Lévesque St-Cyr c. Le Roi, https://decision.tcc-cci.gc.ca/tcc-cci/decisions/fr/item/521248/index.do?q=%22Ottawa%22)
OUTCOME: