{'index': 5, 'text': ' Prior to the Company taking any action permitted (i) under Section 6.2(d)(i), (A) the Company shall provide Parent with three (3) business days’ prior written notice advising Parent that it intends to effect a Change of Recommendation and specifying, in reasonable detail, the reasons therefor, and during such three (3) business day period, the Company shall make its Representatives available to discuss and negotiate in good faith any proposal by Parent to amend the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and (B) at the end of the three (3) business day period, the Company Board of Directors determines in good faith that the failure to make a Change of Recommendation, in light of such Intervening Event and taking into account any adjustments to the terms and conditions of this Agreement agreed to or proposed by Parent, as a result of any discussions or negotiations, would be reasonably likely to result in a breach of the Company Board of Directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable Law, or (ii) under Section 6.2(d)(ii), (A) the Company shall provide Parent with three (3) business days’ prior written notice advising Parent that the Company Board of Directors intends to take such action and specifying the material terms and conditions of the Acquisition Proposal and attaching the most current draft of any written agreement providing for the transactions contemplated by such Acquisition Proposal (including all ancillary\n \n-43-\n________________________________________\nagreements and any financing commitments), and during such three (3) business day period, the Company shall make its Representatives available to discuss and negotiate in good faith any proposal by Parent to amend the terms and conditions of this Agreement such that such Acquisition Proposal would no longer constitute a Superior Proposal, and (B) at the end of the three (3) business day period, the Company Board of Directors determines in good faith that the failure to make a Change of Recommendation, after taking into account any adjustments to the terms and conditions of this Agreement agreed to or proposed by Parent as a result of any discussions or negotiations, would be reasonably likely to result in a breach by the Company Board of Directors of its fiduciary duties under applicable Law; provided, however, each time a material modification to the terms of an Alternative Proposal determined to be a Superior Proposal is made (it being understood and agreed that any amendment to the financial terms or other material terms shall be deemed to be a material modification), the Company shall notify Parent of such modification and the time period set forth in Section 6.2(e)(ii)(B) shall recommence and be extended for three (3) business days from the day of such notification.\n\n\n\n'}
Instruction: Read the segment of a merger agreement and answer the multiple-choice question by choosing the option that best characterizes the agreement.
Question: What standard should the board follow when determining whether to change its recommendation in response to an intervening event?
Option A: "Breach" of fiduciary duties
Option B: "Inconsistent" with fiduciary duties
Option C: "Reasonably likely/expected breach" of fiduciary duties
Option D: "Reasonably likely/expected to be inconsistent" with fiduciary duties
Option E: "Reasonably likely/expected violation" of fiduciary duties
Option F: "Required to comply" with fiduciary duties
Option G: "Violation" of fiduciary duties
Option H: More likely than not violate fiduciary duties
Option I: Other specified standard

Merger Agreement: 6.3 Shareholders’ Approval and Stockholder Approval. <omitted> (c) <omitted> if the Board of Directors of <omitted> the Company, after receiving the advice of its outside counsel and, with respect to financial matters, its outside financial advisors, determines in good faith that it would more likely than not result in a violation of its fiduciary duties under applicable law to make or continue to make the Parent Board Recommendation or the Company Board Recommendation, as applicable, such Board of Directors may <omitted> submit this Agreement to its shareholders or stockholders, respectively, without recommendation (which, for the avoidance of doubt, shall constitute a Recommendation Change) (Page 57)
Answer: I

Merger Agreement: {{text}}
Answer:
Instruction: Read the segment of a merger agreement and answer the multiple-choice question by choosing the option that best characterizes the agreement.
Question: What standard should the board follow when determining whether to change its recommendation in response to an intervening event?
Option A: "Breach" of fiduciary duties
Option B: "Inconsistent" with fiduciary duties
Option C: "Reasonably likely/expected breach" of fiduciary duties
Option D: "Reasonably likely/expected to be inconsistent" with fiduciary duties
Option E: "Reasonably likely/expected violation" of fiduciary duties
Option F: "Required to comply" with fiduciary duties
Option G: "Violation" of fiduciary duties
Option H: More likely than not violate fiduciary duties
Option I: Other specified standard
Answer: