{'index': 4, 'text': '(d)   Notwithstanding anything in this Section 6.08 or Section 8.02(e) to the contrary, if, at any time prior to obtaining the Company Requisite Approval, the Company Board determines in good faith, in response to an Intervening Event, after consultation with its outside legal counsel, that the failure to make a Company Change in Recommendation would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable Law, the Company or the Company Board may, prior to obtaining the Company Requisite Approval, make a Company Change in Recommendation; provided, that the Company will not be entitled to make, or agree or resolve to make, a Company Change in Recommendation unless (i) the Company delivers to Acquiror a written notice (an "Intervening Event Notice") advising Acquiror that the Company Board proposes to take such action and containing the material facts underlying the Company Board\'s determination that an Intervening Event has occurred, and (ii) at or after 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the fifth (5th) Business Day immediately following the day on which the Company delivered the Intervening Event Notice (such period from the time the Intervening Event Notice is provided until 5:00 p.m. New York City time on the fifth (5th) Business Day immediately following the day on which the Company delivered the Intervening Event Notice (it being understood that any material development with respect to an Intervening Event shall require a new notice but with an additional four (4) Business Day (instead of five (5) Business Day) period from the date of such notice), the "Intervening Event Notice Period"), the Company Board reaffirms in good faith (after consultation with its outside legal counsel) that the failure to make a Company Change in Recommendation would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable Law. If requested by Acquiror, the Company will, and will cause its Subsidiaries to, and will use its reasonable best efforts to cause its or their Representatives to, during the Intervening Event Notice Period, engage in good faith\nnegotiations with Acquiror and its Representatives to make such adjustments in the terms and conditions of this Agreement so as to obviate the need for a Company Change in Recommendation.\n\n'}
Instruction: Read the segment of a merger agreement and answer the multiple-choice question by choosing the option that best characterizes the agreement.
Question: What standard should the board follow when determining whether to change its recommendation in response to an intervening event?
Option A: "Breach" of fiduciary duties
Option B: "Inconsistent" with fiduciary duties
Option C: "Reasonably likely/expected breach" of fiduciary duties
Option D: "Reasonably likely/expected to be inconsistent" with fiduciary duties
Option E: "Reasonably likely/expected violation" of fiduciary duties
Option F: "Required to comply" with fiduciary duties
Option G: "Violation" of fiduciary duties
Option H: More likely than not violate fiduciary duties
Option I: Other specified standard

Merger Agreement: 6.3 Shareholders’ Approval and Stockholder Approval. <omitted> (c) <omitted> if the Board of Directors of <omitted> the Company, after receiving the advice of its outside counsel and, with respect to financial matters, its outside financial advisors, determines in good faith that it would more likely than not result in a violation of its fiduciary duties under applicable law to make or continue to make the Parent Board Recommendation or the Company Board Recommendation, as applicable, such Board of Directors may <omitted> submit this Agreement to its shareholders or stockholders, respectively, without recommendation (which, for the avoidance of doubt, shall constitute a Recommendation Change) (Page 57)
Answer: I

Merger Agreement: {{text}}
Answer:
Instruction: Read the segment of a merger agreement and answer the multiple-choice question by choosing the option that best characterizes the agreement.
Question: What standard should the board follow when determining whether to change its recommendation in response to an intervening event?
Option A: "Breach" of fiduciary duties
Option B: "Inconsistent" with fiduciary duties
Option C: "Reasonably likely/expected breach" of fiduciary duties
Option D: "Reasonably likely/expected to be inconsistent" with fiduciary duties
Option E: "Reasonably likely/expected violation" of fiduciary duties
Option F: "Required to comply" with fiduciary duties
Option G: "Violation" of fiduciary duties
Option H: More likely than not violate fiduciary duties
Option I: Other specified standard
Answer: