BEFORE YOU READ THE ABSTRACT OR CHAPTER ONE OF THE PROJECT TOPIC BELOW, PLEASE READ THE INFORMATION BELOW.THANK YOU!
YOU CAN GET THE COMPLETE PROJECT OF THE TOPIC BELOW. THE FULL PROJECT COSTS N5,000 ONLY. THE FULL INFORMATION ON HOW TO PAY AND GET THE COMPLETE PROJECT IS AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE. OR YOU CAN CALL: 08068231953, 08168759420
WHATSAPP US ON 08137701720
PERCEPTION OF STUDENTS LEARNING DIFFICULTIES IN CHEMISTRY IN SOME SELECTED SECONDARY SCHOOLS
1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
Science and technology are concepts in national development which remain indelible in the mind of African and third world leaders according to Ochu and Ekezie (1974).
In Nigeria science was introduced into secondary school system as far back as (1880).
It was first taught as general science and later speared into physics, chemistry and biology. With the introduction of the core science subject, the general science came to be seen as the science subject which was suitable for the less able and it was recommended to the least science oriented and for those who do not intend to pursue science. Syllabus was therefore devised to contain basic elements of biology, chemistry and physics, which should be taught primarily to pupils in the low secondary school classes. (Anani 1977).
Although attempts were made to raise the status of general science with the introduction of a double credit O/level, yet people still questioned the rationale of mere putting together subjects. There was in the early sixties a new wave of thought about science in school rather than open into professional restricting under the conditions of normal classroom culture.
There is a hesitancy on the part of both school teachers to try out innovations in classroom teaching. Activities are rarely included in the classroom deliberation and laboratory programme are seldom organized as an opportunity of exploration. Agarkara (1998), stated that teachers learn very little from experience in the classroom on that capacity of mastering science and new technology logics. Since Iloputaife and Eze (1994) has tried to propose the following tasks.
Lip dating and improving the qualify of science teaching integrating scientific education and human features, developing a comprehensive approach for science curricula. Focus has been put on teachers processes so as to promote the teachers understanding of scientific method and rationality but the reality of lack of resources in most countries has impeded them adjusting both the contents of their curriculum and textbooks in consequence, and the training of their chemistry teachers which often remains of very poor quality. The curriculum is inter disciplinary and it is supposed to provide the teachers to see the concept and the pedagogical principles which unify the separate subject matter thus harmonizing the knowledge derived from the integrated.
The course is supposed to provide the teachers with a broad view of science which enlightens his interactions with his environment of this mental manipulative and social skills unesco – unicef (1971).
Essentially, chemistry is designed to develop interest in the teaching that his is encourage to pursue further student in science discipline.
Secondary school was to lay a solid foundation in the learners early study of science for further studied.
A significant proportion of Nigeria J.S.S chemistry. Teachers do not achieve as well as they should in chemistry examination, Iloputaife and Eze, (1994).
1.2 STATEMENT OF PROBLEMS
Based on the background of the study. Here, one or two problems are shown.
First, some teachers have the problems of finding some topics difficult to teach in chemistry. This was also confirmed by research evidence in Nigeria, Desai (1994) indicates low chemistry attainments of teachers. The condition was amplified by the alarming low number of qualified teachers in chemistry area irrespective of the crucial role of chemistry Neera (1996).
Second, as a result, there are some problems in the implementation of the curriculum Olarewaju (1987), besides achievement has been shown to be very low and unimpressive Okebukola and Jegede, (1999). These might negate the philosophy behind the introduction of the chemistry core curriculum as J.S.S leave. Also Jegede (1999) and Akueailo (1998) undependably in their studied tend to show that the teaching of chemistry in Nigerian secondary school are inadequate.
1.3 PURPOSE OF THE STUDY
The purpose oft his study is to identify the difficult teaching topics in J.S. chemistry curriculum.
(a) In the relation to teachings area of specialization
(b) In relation to teachers qualification
(c) In relation to availability of instructional materials in Enugu urban area Enugu State.
1.4 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
The identification of these difficult teaching topics in chemistry will enlighten the teachers as well as government and expose them to the area they specialized on. Being aware of these, difficult topics school authority, the government and even the science teachers association of Nigeria will be of great help in planning in-service course for the teachers in those areas of science. This also brings to light the need of equipping higher institutions and universities preparing chemistry teachers with adequate training needed for planning and execution of chemistry in our secondary schools.
The exposure of these difficulty topics will motivate the chemistry authors and publishers to give a details attention on these different area in their write up.
1.5 SCOPE OF STUDY
The study was restricted to identification of difficult teaching topics in junior secondary schools in Enugu urban area Enugu State.
1.6 RESEARCH QUESTIONS
The following research questions are proposed.
1. What topics do the teachers find difficult in teaching J.S.S chemistry?
2. Why do teachers have difficulty in teaching those identified topics in chemistry?
3. How can the difficulty in teaching those topics be remedied?
4. What influence has experience on the identification of topics as difficult?
5. What effects of qualification on finding a teaching topics difficult?
6. What effect has sex on findings a teaching topics difficult?
7. What is the effect of area of specialization in identification of a topics as difficult?
8. What in your opinion are the possible remedies the difficulty experienced?
HOW TO RECEIVE PROJECT MATERIAL(S)
After paying the appropriate amount (#5,000) into our bank Account below, send the following information to
08068231953 or 08168759420
(1) Your project topics
(2) Email Address
(3) Payment Name
(4) Teller Number
We will send your material(s) after we receive bank alert
Account Name: AMUTAH DANIEL CHUKWUDI
Account Number: 0046579864
Account Name: AMUTAH DANIEL CHUKWUDI
Account Number: 3139283609
Bank: FIRST BANK
FOR MORE INFORMATION, CALL:
08068231953 or 08168759420