Hi Ptrblck
I assumed that a 2d would be quicker, but then i got thinking about the impact of the number of channels. I you use 3D, then you would start with 1 and increase to ‘x’, however if you use 2D, then you would start with 128 and have to increase to a suitable number, thus making the number of channels become very large, very quickly, unless you adopted the inception net approach…
This then made me wonder, what is going to affect the efficency of the network more, the extra dimension or the number of channels.
I’ll have a look at running some benchmark tests and get back to you…
Cheers
Chaslie