hello, is 343200 parameters moderate, for example, if I have a binary image,
[WBW
 BWB
 WBW]

then,
total information in this image is, that
1x1 -> [B] -> appear at [0, 1], [1, 0], [1, 2], [2, 1]
       [W] -> [0, 0], [0, 2], [1, 1], [2, 0], [2, 2]
2x2 -> [BW
        WB] -> [0, 1], [1, 0]
       [WB
        BW] -> [0, 0], [1, 1]
3x3 -> [WBW
        BWB
        WBW] -> [0, 0]

that is 14 patterns, if each pattern represented with 10 numbers, then, 14*10 parameters.
for 3 channel 32x32 image, it would be,like,
3*(32*32 + 31*31 +  ... + 1*1)*10

343200 parameters.
plus do there be a way to extract all nxn sized patches with the index.
I could incude,
1x2 -> [WB] -> [0, 0], [1, 1], [2, 0]
       [BW] -> [0, 1], [1, 0], [2, 1]
2x1 -> [W
        B] -> [0, 0], [0, 2], [1, 1]
       [B
        W] -> [0, 1], [1, 0], [1, 2]
1x3 -> [WBW] -> [0, 0], [0, 2]
       [BWB] -> [1, 0]
3x1 -> [W
        B
        W] -> [0, 0], [0, 2]
       [B
        W
        B] -> [0, 1]

also, that would make even more parameters.
the number 1000 in the previous post would be a hyperparameter, I mention it at random.