Refactor the unstructured text into a valid JSON dictionary. The key names follow the Darwin Core Archive Standard. If a key lacks content, then insert an empty string. Fill in the following JSON structure as required: {"catalogNumber": "", "order": "", "family": "", "scientificName": "", "scientificNameAuthorship": "", "genus": "", "subgenus": "", "specificEpithet": "", "verbatimTaxonRank": "", "infraspecificEpithet": "", "identifiedBy": "", "recordedBy": "", "recordNumber": "", "verbatimEventDate": "", "habitat": "", "occurrenceRemarks": "", "associatedTaxa": "", "country": "", "stateProvince": "", "county": "", "municipality": "", "locality": "", "decimalLatitude": "", "decimalLongitude": "", "verbatimCoordinates": "", "minimumElevationInMeters": "", "maximumElevationInMeters": ""}
-90.9922 JG#aL   // Wisconsin triangulata [74k-    fAPu CALLIRHOE <TRIANGULATA L.J. DOORR ;GEr$    / malvales GRANT T  MALVACEAE -PcR|   s 104737   callirhoe  WFt^    1831-08  i3h  42.7134 0:   united states Th#  c4ssville _   s.n.  $      DOUGLASS HOUGHTON :yq.   PROBABLE ISOLECTOTYPE, ATTACHED DISCUSSION: " THERE WOULD SE)EM TO B LITTLE DOUBT THAT THE HOUGHTON MATERIAL CAME FRO CASSVILLE, NOW IN GRANT COUNTY, WISCONSIN (BUT IN 1831 STILL PART OF MICHIGAN TERRITORY)." DISCUSSION ALSO MAKES A CASE FOR WHY THE DATE OF r1850 ON THE LABEL IS WRONG AND THAT 1831 IS MORE LIKELY TO BE CORRECT.  .   B ` (Leavenworth) A. Gray
{"catalogNumber": "1104737", "order": "Malvales", "family": "Malvaceae", "scientificName": "Callirhoe triangulata", "scientificNameAuthorship": "(Leavenworth) A. Gray", "genus": "Callirhoe", "subgenus": "", "specificEpithet": "triangulata", "verbatimTaxonRank": "", "infraspecificEpithet": "", "identifiedBy": "L.J. Dorr", "recordedBy": "Douglass Houghton", "recordNumber": "s.n.", "verbatimEventDate": "1831-08", "habitat": "", "occurrenceRemarks": "probable Isolectotype, Attached discussion: \" There would seem to be little doubt that the Houghton material came from Cassville, now in Grant County, Wisconsin (but in 1831 still part of Michigan Territory).\" Discussion also makes a case for why the date of 1850 on the label is wrong and that 1831 is more likely to be correct.", "associatedTaxa": "", "country": "United States", "stateProvince": "Wisconsin", "county": "Grant", "municipality": "", "locality": "Cassville", "decimalLatitude": "42.7134", "decimalLongitude": "-90.9922", "verbatimCoordinates": "", "minimumElevationInMeters": "", "maximumElevationInMeters": ""}