Refactor the unstructured text into a valid JSON dictionary. The key names follow the Darwin Core Archive Standard. If a key lacks content, then insert an empty string. Fill in the following JSON structure as required: {"catalogNumber": "", "order": "", "family": "", "scientificName": "", "scientificNameAuthorship": "", "genus": "", "subgenus": "", "specificEpithet": "", "verbatimTaxonRank": "", "infraspecificEpithet": "", "identifiedBy": "", "recordedBy": "", "recordNumber": "", "verbatimEventDate": "", "habitat": "", "occurrenceRemarks": "", "associatedTaxa": "", "country": "", "stateProvince": "", "county": "", "municipality": "", "locality": "", "decimalLatitude": "", "decimalLongitude": "", "verbatimCoordinates": "", "minimumElevationInMeters": "", "maximumElevationInMeters": ""}
 rosales        Michigan C     p 1929-10-15  A crataegus       F[ TRUNK 74 INCHES ROUND 2 FT FROM GROUND. FRUIT OFTEN WI0DER (20 MM) THAN HIGH (14-17). [CITED, AMER. MIDL. NAT. 12:67 (1930).] [I DO NOT SEE HOW THIS CAN POSSIBLY BE C. ALBICANS! EVEN THESE VERY OLD PEDICELS ARE MOSTLY RATHER DENSELY VILLOUS; THE STAMENS APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN 15-20. SURELY THIS I C. MOLLIS. N0T AT ALL LIKE C. MOLLIS. LEAVES TOO PUB. FOR VAR. ALBICANS. FRUIT LARGE FOR C. PEDICELLATA (SEE FRUIT IN PACKETS). I STILL THINK IT CLOSER TO MOLLIS! E.G.V.]  rosaceae tDA,.       cw9V (TORR. & A. GRAY) SCHEELE  dT .l oliver a. farwell  
{"catalogNumber": "", "order": "Rosales", "family": "Rosaceae", "scientificName": "", "scientificNameAuthorship": "(Torr. & A. Gray) Scheele", "genus": "Crataegus", "subgenus": "", "specificEpithet": "", "verbatimTaxonRank": "", "infraspecificEpithet": "", "identifiedBy": "", "recordedBy": "Oliver A. Farwell", "recordNumber": "", "verbatimEventDate": "1929-10-15", "habitat": "", "occurrenceRemarks": "Trunk 74 inches round 2 ft from ground. Fruit often wider (20 mm) than high (14-17). [Cited, Amer. Midl. Nat. 12:67 (1930).] [I do not see how this can possibly be C. albicans! Even these very old pedicels are mostly rather densely villous; the stamens appear to have been 15-20. Surely this is C. mollis. Not at all like C. mollis. Leaves too pub. for var. albicans. Fruit large for C. pedicellata (see fruit in packets). I still think it closer to mollis! E.G.V.]", "associatedTaxa": "", "country": "", "stateProvince": "Michigan", "county": "", "municipality": "", "locality": "", "decimalLatitude": "", "decimalLongitude": "", "verbatimCoordinates": "", "minimumElevationInMeters": "", "maximumElevationInMeters": ""}