Refactor the unstructured text into a valid JSON dictionary. The key names follow the Darwin Core Archive Standard. If a key lacks content, then insert an empty string. Fill in the following JSON structure as required: {"catalogNumber": "", "order": "", "family": "", "scientificName": "", "scientificNameAuthorship": "", "genus": "", "subgenus": "", "specificEpithet": "", "verbatimTaxonRank": "", "infraspecificEpithet": "", "identifiedBy": "", "recordedBy": "", "recordNumber": "", "verbatimEventDate": "", "habitat": "", "occurrenceRemarks": "", "associatedTaxa": "", "country": "", "stateProvince": "", "county": "", "municipality": "", "locality": "", "decimalLatitude": "", "decimalLongitude": "", "verbatimCoordinates": "", "minimumElevationInMeters": "", "maximumElevationInMeters": ""}
  GH CRATAEGUS      Z united states   1929-10-15 (@, mollis a_bK   2rf 42.31109 -83.215453 /+   50$ CRATAEGUS MOLLIS Rosales *:      _@s[ OLIVER A. FARWELL   / dearborn.  8633 x<m   ^A  EDWARD G. VOSS  XXXD (TORR. & A. GRAY) SCHEELE    B0_ MICHIAN   Trunk 74 inches round 2 ft from ground. Fruit often wider (20 mm) than high (14-17). [Cited, Amer. Miol. Nat. 12:67 (1930).] [I do not see how this can possibly be C. albicans! Even these very old pedicels are mostly rather densely villous; the stamen appear to have been 15-20. Surely this is C. mollis. Not at all like C. mollis. Leaves too pub. for var. albicans. Fruit large fo C. pedicellata (see fruit in packets). I still think it closer to mollis! E.G.V.] W; V  
{"catalogNumber": "", "order": "Rosales", "family": "", "scientificName": "Crataegus mollis", "scientificNameAuthorship": "(Torr. & A. Gray) Scheele", "genus": "Crataegus", "subgenus": "", "specificEpithet": "mollis", "verbatimTaxonRank": "", "infraspecificEpithet": "", "identifiedBy": "Edward G. Voss", "recordedBy": "Oliver A. Farwell", "recordNumber": "8633", "verbatimEventDate": "1929-10-15", "habitat": "", "occurrenceRemarks": "Trunk 74 inches round 2 ft from ground. Fruit often wider (20 mm) than high (14-17). [Cited, Amer. Midl. Nat. 12:67 (1930).] [I do not see how this can possibly be C. albicans! Even these very old pedicels are mostly rather densely villous; the stamens appear to have been 15-20. Surely this is C. mollis. Not at all like C. mollis. Leaves too pub. for var. albicans. Fruit large for C. pedicellata (see fruit in packets). I still think it closer to mollis! E.G.V.]", "associatedTaxa": "", "country": "United States", "stateProvince": "Michigan", "county": "", "municipality": "", "locality": "Dearborn.", "decimalLatitude": "42.31109", "decimalLongitude": "-83.215453", "verbatimCoordinates": "", "minimumElevationInMeters": "", "maximumElevationInMeters": ""}