Refactor the unstructured text into a valid JSON dictionary. The key names follow the Darwin Core Archive Standard. If a key lacks content, then insert an empty string. Fill in the following JSON structure as required: {"catalogNumber": "", "order": "", "family": "", "scientificName": "", "scientificNameAuthorship": "", "genus": "", "subgenus": "", "specificEpithet": "", "verbatimTaxonRank": "", "infraspecificEpithet": "", "identifiedBy": "", "recordedBy": "", "recordNumber": "", "verbatimEventDate": "", "habitat": "", "occurrenceRemarks": "", "associatedTaxa": "", "country": "", "stateProvince": "", "county": "", "municipality": "", "locality": "", "decimalLatitude": "", "decimalLongitude": "", "verbatimCoordinates": "", "minimumElevationInMeters": "", "maximumElevationInMeters": ""}
   ERIOPHORU GRACILE 3W     PORT HURON C^Fm            s.n. 2 8         !lz First Geological Survey of Michigan, 1837â1840, Douglass Houghton, State Geologist; Abram S ager, Botanist and Zoologist, 1837; John Wright, State Botanist, 1838, assisted by George H. Bull [The pencil label below is thought to be the work of an herbarium assistant who labelled many plants of the Survey's collections, ca. 1870. If the date June 5, [1838] is correct, the plant probably came from Port Huron, St. Clair Co. Note that some plants have relatiQvely yound heads with exserted styles.]["The label at lower left0 is in the hand of John Wright; Ann Arbor...June 20, 1838 â¦. Some plants on this sheet have over-mature heads as on another sheet labelled by Wright, the same locality and date."][Culms marked "A" still have copious anther and stigma remnants and are short, not folded. These would belong with the label for June . As noted by Rog McVauge, on June 5 [1838], the First Survey wa collecting at Port Huron, St. Cla|ir County and there culms presumabley were obntained there. Culms marked "B" are ol%der, with achenes starting to shed and are taller and stouter, usually folded. These are a match of the other June 20, 1838 Ann Arbor c ollection8 (barcode 1330971), and doubtlessbelong with it . A. A. Reznicek, July 2014][Active barcode. On same sheet as 20 Jun 1838 collection with inacztive barcode 1485956] [Coordinates placed at the Huron Ave. bridge over the Black River] 
{"catalogNumber": "", "order": "", "family": "", "scientificName": "Eriophorum gracile", "scientificNameAuthorship": "", "genus": "", "subgenus": "", "specificEpithet": "", "verbatimTaxonRank": "", "infraspecificEpithet": "", "identifiedBy": "", "recordedBy": "", "recordNumber": "s.n.", "verbatimEventDate": "", "habitat": "", "occurrenceRemarks": "First Geological Survey of Michigan, 1837\u00e2\u0080\u00931840, Douglass Houghton, State Geologist; Abram Sager, Botanist and Zoologist, 1837; John Wright, State Botanist, 1838, assisted by George H. Bull [The pencil label below is thought to be the work of an herbarium assistant who labelled many plants of the Survey's collections, ca. 1870. If the date June 5, [1838] is correct, the plant probably came from Port Huron, St. Clair Co. Note that some plants have relatively yound heads with exserted styles.][\"The label at lower left is in the hand of John Wright; Ann Arbor...June 20, 1838 \u00e2\u0080\u00a6. Some plants on this sheet have over-mature heads as on another sheet labelled by Wright, the same locality and date.\"][Culms marked \"A\" still have copious anther and stigma remnants and are short, not folded. These would belong with the label for June 6. As noted by Rog McVauge, on June 5 [1838], the First Survey was collecting at Port Huron, St. Clair County and there culms presumabley were obntained there. Culms marked \"B\" are older, with achenes starting to shed and are taller and stouter, usually folded. These are a match of the other June 20, 1838 Ann Arbor c ollection (barcode 1330971), and doubtless belong with it . A. A. Reznicek, July 2014][Active barcode. On same sheet as 20 Jun 1838 collection with inactive barcode 1485956] [Coordinates placed at the Huron Ave. bridge over the Black River]", "associatedTaxa": "", "country": "", "stateProvince": "", "county": "", "municipality": "", "locality": "Port Huron", "decimalLatitude": "", "decimalLongitude": "", "verbatimCoordinates": "", "minimumElevationInMeters": "", "maximumElevationInMeters": ""}