malvaceae J    &Eb TRIAZNGULATA (LEAVENWORTH) A. GRAY U %*      ,:U@ s.n.  L._J. DORR ZUo   -90.9922 s=3S   probable Isolectotype, Attached discussion: " Thee would seem to be little doubt that the Houghton material came from Cassville, now in Grant County, Wisconsin (but in 1831 still part of Michigan Territory)." Dscussion also makes a case for why the date of 1850 on th3 label is wrong and that 1831 is more likely to be correct. e!M   Grant g  42.7134 y OWV  Callirhoe triangulata xKv-   <k WISCONSIN   Douglass Houghton /K   p + CALLIRHOE  & MALVALES   UaL; 1831-08 CASSVILLE +Z&b   eM3 united states  1104737 |oZj# 
{"catalogNumber": "1104737", "order": "Malvales", "family": "Malvaceae", "scientificName": "Callirhoe triangulata", "scientificNameAuthorship": "(Leavenworth) A. Gray", "genus": "Callirhoe", "subgenus": "", "specificEpithet": "triangulata", "verbatimTaxonRank": "", "infraspecificEpithet": "", "identifiedBy": "L.J. Dorr", "recordedBy": "Douglass Houghton", "recordNumber": "s.n.", "verbatimEventDate": "1831-08", "habitat": "", "occurrenceRemarks": "probable Isolectotype, Attached discussion: \" There would seem to be little doubt that the Houghton material came from Cassville, now in Grant County, Wisconsin (but in 1831 still part of Michigan Territory).\" Discussion also makes a case for why the date of 1850 on the label is wrong and that 1831 is more likely to be correct.", "associatedTaxa": "", "country": "United States", "stateProvince": "Wisconsin", "county": "Grant", "municipality": "", "locality": "Cassville", "decimalLatitude": "42.7134", "decimalLongitude": "-90.9922", "verbatimCoordinates": "", "minimumElevationInMeters": "", "maximumElevationInMeters": ""}