<https://naturalnewsblogs.com/#/schema/person/83fe8573425e38d831034053cbcfd3b0>
<http://schema.org/description>
"For two years I've thoroughly enjoyed researching the food additives \"scientests\" produce and put into all processed food. Also how the FDA classifies them as G.R.A.S. (Generally Recognized As Safe) With about 95% of the research I've done over the last two years the actual science, toxicity reports, manufacturing processes and pure technical aspect of it suggests otherwise. \r\n\r\nWhen you see something that is \"hazardous by definition\", toxic, poisonous or corrosive and it's in the food you're eating, you would surely have to stop, think and ask, \"That's going to go in me. Wait... It passes through the placental barrier? It decreases the testicular weight in mice? It's produced with volvano ash? It's processed with asbestos and krypton gas?\"\r\n\r\nNow, my main argument is this: If you know the food additive is toxic, corrosive or hazardous by definition, if it requires flammable or corrosive DOT stickers while transporting, if it has saftey precautions, spill procedures and you must wear suitable protective clothing while handling... Can you even assume it's safe to eat? \r\n\r\nIrregardless of the exposure limits, the actual amount in food itself, how many regulations and standards there are or how low the toxicity may be... It is the general principle that the additives are still  put in the foods you eat on a daily basis. I personally don't believe that when a tomato is dropped you have to evacuate the area and seal off the exits. Because that is exactly the procedure for some of the chemcial agents the FDA allowed in food."
<https://naturalnewsblogs.com/fluoride-chemical-weapons-in-your-water-and-toothpaste-2/>