<https://www.dropzone.com/forums/topic/287720-optimum-113-dom-april-2008-maximum-weight/#comment-5036586>
<http://schema.org/text>
"The data panel photo's resolution is too poor to read well. But it looks like there are multiple discrepancies / errors / typos?  \n \n\n\n\tThere's the 220 maximum (vs. 254 in the manual). I would guess the manual is correct because that's been consistent over the years, as has the web site. (I used archive.org to check the website &amp; manual for April 2008, the date of manufacture for that canopy.) \n\t \n\tAnd the kg equivalent says 000?   Or can't I read that right? \n\t \n\tAnd one of the other suggested weight levels don't match either the current manual or the one from April 2008 - the label I think says 149 lbs for Experts, while the 2008 and current manuals both say 169 lb. And the April 2008 website said 159. Of course, those are just recommendations, and not certification limits -- but still it shows some sloppiness in typing numbers in!\n \n\n\n\tShrug. Give PD a call and ask what's the real value. Wonder if they'll have some original TSO paperwork they would actually share, to prove which value is correct for actual certification, 220 or 254.\n \n\n\n\tIt would be interesting to see what a newer OP-113 says on its data panel... \n\tLawyers like to get picky about all this kind of stuff, even if it is all in the territory of \"a heavily loaded reserve and the jumper chose to use either way\". \n \n"
<https://www.dropzone.com/forums/topic/287720-optimum-113-dom-april-2008-maximum-weight/?tab=comments#comment-5036580>