<https://forum.spamcop.net/topic/1473-global-mailhosts-an-user-review-call-for-change/#comment-9315>
<http://schema.org/text>
"I think people are worrying way too much about what is in the mailhost config.  Not just you but many other people as well.  \n\nMy spamcop config is: \n\nHosts/Domains:  mx2.cesmail.net blade3.cesmail.net blade4.cesmail.net blade2.cesmail.net blade6.cesmail.net blade1.cesmail.net cesmail.net mailgate.cesmail.net spamcop.net c60.cesmail.net main.ermann.org bulkmx2.spamcop.net node-423a221a.ewr.onnet.us.uu.net mx.cesmail.net   \n\nRelaying IPs:  206.14.107.118 216.154.195.44 216.154.195.50 216.154.195.49   \n\nSure there are a some hosts in there that probably should not be (ermann.org and uu.net), but the only way this could cause a problem is if I receive an email that comes through one of those hosts AND the received header prior to that host were forged well enough to be believed by the parser.  Compared to the current system,  \n\nIf the host is the actual injection point, it should report a problem and not send any report. \n"
<https://forum.spamcop.net/topic/1473-global-mailhosts-an-user-review-call-for-change/>