<https://forum.spamcop.net/topic/9672-total-overnight-email-7923/#comment-66234>
<http://schema.org/text>
"Here's a couple of cases of what Don actually said (there may be other relevant posts): http://forum.spamcop.net/forums/index.php?...ost&amp;p=61061 \nhttp://forum.spamcop.net/forums/index.php?...ost&amp;p=63221 Read those in their original contexts and I think it should be clear - but he's certainly NOT advocating reporting the spam of others. Though that's a step further than anything JamesM was talking about, it is still 'within the rules'.\nResearched because Don shouldn't have to clarify what he'd already said, elewhere, plainly, and I was putting the wrong slant on it, WRT 'other people's spam'.  Memory ...   \n\nBesides which, he's already said he never looks at the 'Geeks' and 'Lounge' forums so wouldn't even see a misstatement \"here\". (I hasten to add, just as the Bishop said to the Actress, \"Don't rely upon it,\"    though in that case The Most Reverend gentleman was responding to the lady's query on whether or not X-rays might make one sterile.) \n"
<https://forum.spamcop.net/topic/9672-total-overnight-email-7923/>