<https://wildfiregames.com/forum/topic/14581-unit-and-building-names/page/8/#comment-480021>
<http://schema.org/text>
"The biological latin names are not simple \"latin words\". Even medicine write composition using non changeble latin words. It even follows from the logic of the game, this name falls out of the context of buildings and units, and for all nations it is written in Latin as an animal genus, taxon, and so on. What references can there be if no one translates biological Latin letter by letter? It even looks like a collective farm. Example: royal pelargonium (Regal Pelargonium). It never occurs to anyone in delirium, except for illiterate aunts, to write it as \"рэгал пеларгониум\". There is no need to confuse ancient Latin names with modern biological names in Latin - this is the level of the collective farm \"70 years without light.\" On Academician, most of the words are ancient names, and not taxones or genus. Even the very same \"tuberculosis - туберкулёз\" no one writes as \"туберкулёсис\", besides, the Russian name is already present. Why even distorted to enter? All I suggest is to remove all these \"кристатусы\" and \"локсодонты африканусы\", leaving the Latin name at the top and the Russian normal name at the bottom. You don't want to understand me at all. No one takes words like Loxodonta Africanus from an elephant in square brackets of transcription, but translates with such a meaning as if it were Russian in itself and almost dictionary word. If you leave it in the game, it will be a complete \"collective farm\".\n \n\n\n\t \n \n\n\n\n\n\t \n \n"
<https://wildfiregames.com/forum/topic/14581-unit-and-building-names/page/8/#comment-480016>